Front. Polit. Sci. Frontiers in Political Science Front. Polit. Sci. 2673-3145 Frontiers Media S.A. 10.3389/fpos.2023.1230397 Political Science Correction Corrigendum: Debating E-voting throughout Europe: constitutional structures, parties' concepts and Europeans' perceptions Borucki Isabelle 1 * Hartleb Florian 2 1Department 03, Institute for Political Science, Philipps University, Marburg, Germany 2Faculty for Social Work, Catholic University, Eichstätt, Germany

Approved by: Frontiers Editorial Office, Frontiers Media SA, Switzerland

 *Correspondence: Isabelle Borucki isabelle.borucki@uni-marburg.de 27 06 2023 2023 5 1230397 28 05 2023 09 06 2023 Copyright © 2023 Borucki and Hartleb. 2023 Borucki and Hartleb

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

 A corrigendum on Debating E-voting throughout Europe: constitutional structures, parties' concepts and Europeans' perceptions by Borucki, I., and Hartleb, F. (2023). Front. Polit. Sci. 5:982558. doi: 10.3389/fpos.2023.982558 E-voting Eurobarometer data party manifesto data democratic innovation Europe European Union EU section-at-acceptance Elections and Representation

In the published article, Figure 1 was mistakenly not included in the publication. The missing Figure and its caption appear below:

Clustered distribution of mentions of E-voting in party manifestos over years; own calculation, data from Manifesto project (Merz et al., 2016).

In the published article Figure 1 is now shown as Figure 2 and an in text citation has been added. A correction has been made to Results, paragraph 8. This sentence previously stated:

“Thus, two scenarios were tested with logistic regressions where needed variables were available: First, we set preferences for E-voting were set as the dependent variable, putting in being an expat as the independent variable, together with the country of residency, the available technology (landline, mobile phone, and Internet), and sociodemographics (sex, age, and education).”

The corrected sentence appears below:

“Thus, two scenarios were tested with logistic regressions where needed variables were available (see Figures 2A–C): First, we set preferences for E-voting were set as the dependent variable, putting in being an expat as the independent variable, together with the country of residency, the available technology (landline, mobile phone, and Internet), and sociodemographics (sex, age, and education).”

The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.

Publisher's note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.