There was a mistake in Table 3 and its caption as published. The unit shown in parentheses was displayed as “(×10+ km²)”. The correct unit is “(×104 km²)”. The corrected Table 3, and the corrected caption appears below.
Suitable habitat areas for the three Trichosanthes species under different SSP scenarios (×104 km²).
Species
Scenario
Area of suitable habitat (×104 km²)
Expansion
Contraction
Stable
Net change
Trichosanthes rubriflos
SSP1-2.6
37.9
1.5
75.1
36.4
SSP2-4.5
40.1
0.8
75.8
39.3
SSP3-7.0
46.4
0.4
76.1
46
SSP5-8.5
40.8
0.3
76.3
40.5
Trichosanthes rosthornii
SSP1-2.6
9.5
2.6
224.7
6.9
SSP2-4.5
23.7
1.5
225.8
22.2
SSP3-7.0
24.6
1.3
225.9
23.3
SSP5-8.5
23.6
1.6
225.7
22
Trichosanthes kirilowii
SSP1-2.6
34
62.7
211.4
−28.7
SSP2-4.5
37.2
43.5
230.6
−6.3
SSP3-7.0
42.2
42.1
232
0.1
SSP5-8.5
46.9
42.7
231.3
4.2
There was a mistake in Figure 6 as published. Panels A-C of this figure were arranged in the wrong order. The sequence has now been corrected and the corrected Figure 6 appears below.
Present-day habitat suitability maps for the three Trichosanthes species: (a)T. rubriflos; (b)T. rosthornii, (c)T. kirilowii.
Three-panel map of China showing present-day habitat suitability for the three Trichosanthes species. Panel (a) shows T. rubriflos, panel (b) shows T. rosthornii, and panel (c) shows T. kirilowii. Colors indicate suitability levels, with red representing high suitability, blue low suitability, and yellow unsuitable areas. Provincial boundaries are marked, and each map includes a legend and scale bar.
The images for Figures 9 and 10 were erroneously swapped in the published article. The correct version of Figures 9 and 10 appear below.
Potential suitable habitat of Trichosanthes rubriflos under the present climate and under 2060–2080 SSP scenarios: (a) SSP1-2.6; (b) SSP2-4.5; (c) SSP3-7.0; (d) SSP5-8.5.
Maps of China in four panels labeled a, b, c, and d, depicting various ecological areas. Gray indicates unsuitable areas, blue shows expansion areas, green represents stable areas, and red indicates contraction areas. Provincial boundaries are marked. Each map includes a legend and scale, with variations in each panel illustrating different distributions and patterns of these ecological zones across the region.
Potential suitable habitat distribution of Trichosanthes rosthornii under the current and 2060–2080 SSP scenarios: (a) SSP1-2.6; (b) SSP2-4.5; (c) SSP3-7.0; (d) SSP5-8.5.
Four maps showing areas of China with different classifications: unsuitable, expansion, contraction, and stable areas. Each map is labeled (a) to (d), with a consistent legend indicating colors for each classification and provincial boundaries. The maps depict spatial distribution variations across the regions.
The original version of this article has been updated.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Edited and reviewed by: Cheng Song, West Anhui University, China