<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3-mathml3.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xml:lang="EN">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Front. Plant Sci.</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Frontiers in Plant Science</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">Front. Plant Sci.</abbrev-journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="epub">1664-462X</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Frontiers Media S.A.</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpls.2026.1751657</article-id>
<article-version article-version-type="Version of Record" vocab="NISO-RP-8-2008"/>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Original Research</subject>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Organic fertilization with cow dung modulates growth, bioactive compounds, and antioxidant capacity in duckweed (<italic>Wolffia globosa</italic>)</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name><surname>Yadav</surname><given-names>Nitesh Kumar</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="corresp" rid="c001"><sup>*</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn003"><sup>&#x2020;</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/3141849/overview"/>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Writing &#x2013; original draft" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/">Writing &#x2013; original draft</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/">Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="visualization" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/visualization/">Visualization</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="software" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/software/">Software</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Formal analysis" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/formal-analysis/">Formal analysis</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="conceptualization" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/conceptualization/">Conceptualization</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Data curation" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/data-curation/">Data curation</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="investigation" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/investigation/">Investigation</role>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name><surname>Patel</surname><given-names>Arun Bhai</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="corresp" rid="c001"><sup>*</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn003"><sup>&#x2020;</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/3324586/overview"/>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="conceptualization" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/conceptualization/">Conceptualization</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="methodology" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/methodology/">Methodology</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="investigation" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/investigation/">Investigation</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="validation" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/validation/">Validation</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="supervision" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/supervision/">Supervision</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/">Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="resources" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/resources/">Resources</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Project-administration" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/project-administration/">Project administration</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Writing &#x2013; original draft" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/">Writing &#x2013; original draft</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Funding acquisition" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/funding-acquisition/">Funding acquisition</role>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Rajesh S.</surname><given-names>Deepan</given-names></name>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Writing &#x2013; original draft" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/">Writing &#x2013; original draft</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/">Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing</role>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Parida</surname><given-names>Pradyumn Kumar</given-names></name>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/">Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Writing &#x2013; original draft" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/">Writing &#x2013; original draft</role>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Baidya</surname><given-names>Sampa</given-names></name>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Writing &#x2013; original draft" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/">Writing &#x2013; original draft</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/">Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing</role>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="aff1"><institution>College of Fisheries, Central Agricultural University (Imphal)</institution>, <city>Agartala</city>, <state>Tripura</state>,&#xa0;<country country="in">India</country></aff>
<author-notes>
<corresp id="c001"><label>*</label>Correspondence: Arun Bhai Patel, <email xlink:href="mailto:arun.b.patel@gmail.com">arun.b.patel@gmail.com</email>; Nitesh Kumar Yadav, <email xlink:href="mailto:niteshaqc1997@gmail.com">niteshaqc1997@gmail.com</email></corresp>
<fn fn-type="other" id="fn003">
<label>&#x2020;</label>
<p>ORCID: Nitesh Kumar Yadav, <uri xlink:href="https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4408-0199">orcid.org/0000-0003-4408-0199</uri>; Arun Bhai Patel, <uri xlink:href="https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3216-0693">orcid.org/0000-0003-3216-0693</uri></p></fn>
</author-notes>
<pub-date publication-format="electronic" date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2026-02-10">
<day>10</day>
<month>02</month>
<year>2026</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date publication-format="electronic" date-type="collection">
<year>2026</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>17</volume>
<elocation-id>1751657</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>12</day>
<month>01</month>
<year>2026</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>26</day>
<month>01</month>
<year>2026</year>
</date>
<date date-type="rev-recd">
<day>08</day>
<month>01</month>
<year>2026</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#xa9; 2026 Yadav, Patel, Rajesh S., Parida and Baidya.</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2026</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Yadav, Patel, Rajesh S., Parida and Baidya</copyright-holder>
<license>
<ali:license_ref start_date="2026-02-10">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ali:license_ref>
<license-p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY)</ext-link>. The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.</license-p>
</license>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<sec>
<title>Introduction</title>
<p><italic>Wolffia globosa</italic> (wolffia) is a fast-growing aquatic plant rich in nutrients and bioactive compounds, whose biomass and functional quality are strongly influenced by fertilization. However, the effects of organic fertilizers on bioactive composition and antioxidant potential in wolffia remain poorly understood. This study fills this gap by evaluating fresh cow dung as an organic fertilizer and elucidating its novel role in enhancing biomass production, biochemical composition, bioactive compounds, and antioxidant capacity of wolffia.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Methods</title>
<p>A randomized complete block design was employed with six treatments and three replications each. Treatments included an inorganic fertilizer control and five levels of cow dung applied at 10, 20, 30, 40, and 50 g L<sup>&#x2013;1</sup>. Biomass yield was recorded, while biochemical composition (crude protein, crude lipid), bioactive compounds (total phenolics, flavonoids, carotenoids, tannins, ascorbic acid), and antioxidant activity (DPPH, ABTS, FRAP assays) were analyzed using standard protocols.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Results</title>
<p>Biomass was highest at 30 and 20 g L<sup>&#x2013;1</sup> cow dung, reaching 152.38 &#xb1; 12.25 g and 144.88 &#xb1; 1.28 g, respectively. Crude protein content was also highest at 40 g L<sup>&#x2013;1</sup> (30.40%) and in the control (29.31%). Crude lipid content peaked at 40 g L<sup>&#x2013;1</sup> (5.09%) and 50 g L<sup>&#x2013;1</sup> (4.91%). The highest total phenolic content (350.04 mg GAE g<sup>&#x2013;1</sup>), total flavonoid content (159.35 mg QE g<sup>&#x2013;1</sup>), and ascorbic acid (99.05 mg 100 g<sup>&#x2013;1</sup>) were recorded at 50 g L<sup>&#x2013;1</sup> cow dung. In contrast, total carotenoid content (2286.90 &#xb5;g g<sup>&#x2013;1</sup>) and chlorophyll-b (11.82 &#xb5;g g<sup>&#x2013;1</sup>) were significantly higher in the control. Total tannin content did not differ significantly among the control, 10, and 50 g L<sup>&#x2013;1</sup> treatments, whereas the 20 and 30 g L<sup>&#x2013;1</sup> treatments exhibited reduced levels. Antioxidant activity was highest at 50 g L<sup>&#x2013;1</sup> for both DPPH (57.42%) and ABTS (65.65%) assays, while FRAP activity peaked at 10 g L<sup>&#x2013;1</sup> (180.64 &#x3bc;mol Fe g<sup>&#x2013;1</sup>).</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Discussion</title>
<p>The results demonstrate that cow dung enhances the bioactive compounds and antioxidant potential of wolffia. While medium doses (20&#x2013;30 g L<sup>&#x2013;1</sup>) maximized biomass production, higher cow dung levels, particularly 50 g L<sup>&#x2013;1</sup>, promoted greater accumulation of phenolics, flavonoids, and overall antioxidant capacity.</p>
</sec>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>antioxidant activities</kwd>
<kwd>bioactive compounds</kwd>
<kwd>cow dung</kwd>
<kwd>duckweed</kwd>
<kwd><italic>Wolffia</italic></kwd>
</kwd-group>
<funding-group>
<award-group id="gs1">
<funding-source id="sp1">
<institution-wrap>
<institution>Department of Biotechnology, Ministry of Science and Technology, India</institution>
<institution-id institution-id-type="doi" vocab="open-funder-registry" vocab-identifier="10.13039/open_funder_registry">10.13039/501100001407</institution-id>
</institution-wrap>
</funding-source>
</award-group>
<funding-statement>The author(s) declared that financial support was received for this work and/or its publication. The work was supported by the Department of Biotechnology (DBT), Government of India, for the project &#x201c;Livelihood security and entrepreneurship development through on-farm mass cultivation and utilization of Wolffia globosa for fish feeding and characterization of bioactive compounds for functional product development&#x201d; (BT/PR41748/NER/95/1862/2021; Scheme: I&amp;ED; 0155).</funding-statement>
</funding-group>
<counts>
<fig-count count="5"/>
<table-count count="0"/>
<equation-count count="8"/>
<ref-count count="58"/>
<page-count count="12"/>
<word-count count="6551"/>
</counts>
<custom-meta-group>
<custom-meta>
<meta-name>section-at-acceptance</meta-name>
<meta-value>Plant Nutrition</meta-value>
</custom-meta>
</custom-meta-group>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec id="s1" sec-type="intro">
<label>1</label>
<title>Introduction</title>
<p><italic>Wolffia globosa</italic> (wolffia), the smallest member of the duckweed family, is a free-floating, rootless aquatic angiosperm known for its rapid vegetative propagation with doubling times of just 2&#x2013;3 days (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">Patel et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B46">Sree et&#xa0;al., 2015</xref>). Due to its exceptional nutritional profile, wolffia has garnered interest as a sustainable crop. It is rich in high-quality protein with a well-balanced essential amino acid composition, digestible starch, a high proportion of unsaturated fatty acids, and low levels of anti-nutritional factors (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B57">Yadav et&#xa0;al., 2024a</xref>). It has been utilized in various applications, including human consumption (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Appenroth et&#xa0;al., 2018</xref>), and as feed for livestock and farmed animals such as ducks and fish, in both fresh and dried forms (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">Pradhan et&#xa0;al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Chantiratikul et&#xa0;al., 2010</xref>). Beyond its nutritional benefits, wolffia is also a rich source of bioactive compounds such as phenolics, flavonoids, alkaloids, carotenoids, and other antioxidants (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B56">Yadav et&#xa0;al., 2024b</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B55">Yadav et&#xa0;al., 2025a</xref>). These compounds contribute to its potential value in the food, feed, and pharmaceutical industries. Notably, the bioactive constituents of wolffia exhibit a range of pharmacological properties, including antibacterial, antidiabetic, antiviral, antifungal, antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and anticancer activities (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B55">Yadav et&#xa0;al., 2025a</xref>).</p>
<p>The synthesis and accumulation of these bioactive compounds in wolffia are highly influenced by environmental and agronomic factors. Abiotic stresses such as changes in light intensity, temperature, salinity, and nutrient availability have been reported to enhance the production of both primary and secondary metabolites (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B58">Yadav et&#xa0;al., 2025b</xref>). Among these factors, nutrient supply plays a central role in plant growth, physiological activity, and biochemical composition.</p>
<p>Organic fertilizers, particularly animal manures such as cow dung, are rich sources of essential nutrients, including nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), and potassium (K) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Nguyen et&#xa0;al., 2024</xref>). Key macronutrients such as N and K are critical determinants of crop yield, texture, nutritional quality, and post-harvest shelf life (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">Abdel-Gawad et&#xa0;al., 2025</xref>). Unlike inorganic fertilizers, organic manures not only support plant growth but also stimulate the biosynthesis of secondary metabolites (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">Rostaei et&#xa0;al., 2024</xref>). Numerous studies have demonstrated that the application of organic fertilizers can significantly enhance the levels of phenolic compounds, flavonoids, and antioxidants in various crops. For example, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Pacheco et&#xa0;al. (2021)</xref> reported that the application of cattle and poultry manure increased polyphenol content by 46.83% and 69.64%, respectively, compared to the control, while cattle manure treatment further enhanced antioxidant activity in <italic>Passiflora incarnata</italic> L. leaves by 32.72% after 90 days of cultivation. increased by 32.72% following cattle manure treatment after 90 days of cultivation. Similarly, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">Poozesh and Amirahmadi (2024)</xref> observed a 203.23% increase in total phenolic content in <italic>Zingiber officinale</italic> Rosc. with poultry manure application compared to the control. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">Aina et&#xa0;al. (2019)</xref> also reported a notable enhancement in the accumulation of bioactive compounds in organically fertilized crops.</p>
<p>In light of increasing global concerns over the environmental and health impacts of synthetic agrochemicals, organic farming has emerged as a sustainable alternative that emphasizes ecological balance and reduced chemical inputs (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">Panday et&#xa0;al., 2024</xref>). The use of organic fertilizers aligns with this philosophy, offering a means to enhance not only plant productivity but also the nutritional and medicinal quality of harvested biomass (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">Parra-Pacheco et&#xa0;al., 2024</xref>). The concentration and composition of bioactive compounds serve as important quality indicators, particularly for nutraceutical and pharmaceutical applications (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Pacheco et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>).</p>
<p>Although the beneficial effects of organic manure on the accumulation of secondary metabolites have been demonstrated in various crops, limited information is available on its impact on wolffia. Therefore, the present study aimed to evaluate the effects of raw cow dung on multiple parameters in wolffia, including biomass production, biochemical composition, and the content of key bioactive compounds such as total phenolic content (TPC), total flavonoid content (TFC), total tannin content (TTC), total carotenoid content (TCC), and ascorbic acid. Antioxidant activities were also assessed using DPPH, ABTS, and FRAP assays.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2" sec-type="materials|methods">
<label>2</label>
<title>Materials and methods</title>
<sec id="s2_1">
<label>2.1</label>
<title>Plant material and treatments</title>
<p>The study was conducted in April 2023 at the College of Fisheries, CAU, Tripura (23&#xb0;45&#x2019; N; 91&#xb0;15&#x2019; E). Eighteen thermocol fish boxes (58 &#xd7; 39 &#xd7; 30 cm; 0.226 m&#xb2; surface area), lined with transparent plastic film, were used under natural sunlight in a transparent polyhouse. Each box was cleaned and filled with 30 L of groundwater (12 cm depth). Fresh cow dung was added at 0 (control; inorganic fertilizer), 10, 20, 30, 40, and 50 g L<sup>&#x2013;1</sup> and mixed thoroughly with a wooden stick. Wolffia fronds (100 g), sourced from the College of Fisheries, Lembucherra, were inoculated into each box and cultured for a period of 7 days. In the control treatment, inorganic fertilizers were applied as urea (48 mg L<sup>&#x2013;1</sup>), single super phosphate (SSP; 70 mg L<sup>&#x2013;1</sup>), muriate of potash (MOP; 25 mg L<sup>&#x2013;1</sup>), and a vitamin&#x2013;mineral mix (150 mg L<sup>&#x2013;1</sup>). Growth was monitored throughout the experimental period. At the end of the experiment, biomass was harvested using a hand or scoop net, weighed, oven-dried, and subsequently pulverized for further analyses.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_2">
<label>2.2</label>
<title>Biomass and growth analyses of wolffia</title>
<p>Fresh biomass yield was calculated on a fresh-weight basis by subtracting the initial inoculum fresh weight from the total fresh biomass harvested. The samples were subsequently oven-dried at 50 &#xb0;C for 24 h using a hot air oven (Yona, Indian Instruments Manufacturing Co., India), pulverized into a fine powder, and stored for further analyses. The specific growth rate (SGR) and net biomass were determined using <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="eq1">Equations 1</xref>, <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="eq2">2</xref>, respectively (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">Said et&#xa0;al., 2022a</xref>).</p>
<disp-formula id="eq1"><label>(1)</label>
<mml:math display="block" id="M1"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi>G</mml:mi><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:mo>%</mml:mo><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#xa0;</mml:mo><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#xa0;</mml:mo><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mn>0</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mrow><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mfrac><mml:mo>&#xd7;</mml:mo><mml:mn>100</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math>
</disp-formula>
<p>Where Wt is wolffia biomass at time t,</p>
<p>W<sub>0</sub> is wolffia initial biomass, and t is the length of cultivation (days).</p>
<disp-formula id="eq2"><label>(2)</label>
<mml:math display="block" id="M2"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>Net&#xa0;biomass&#xa0;</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:mtext>g</mml:mtext><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mtext>biomass&#xa0;harvested&#xa0;</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:mtext>g</mml:mtext><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mtext>&#xa0;</mml:mtext><mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo><mml:mtext>&#xa0;biomass&#xa0;stocked&#xa0;</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:mtext>g</mml:mtext><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math>
</disp-formula>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_3">
<label>2.3</label>
<title>Proximate composition analysis</title>
<p>Proximate composition of wolffia was analyzed following <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">AOAC (2005)</xref> methods. Protein content was determined via Kjeldahl digestion (Kel Plus Kes 12b E, Pelican Equipments, India) using H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub> and K<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub>:CuSO<sub>4</sub> (9:1) catalyst at 410 &#xb0;C for 1 h 45 min, followed by distillation (Kjeltec 8400, FOSS, Denmark). Crude lipid was measured using the Soxtec (ST 243, FOSS) systems.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_4">
<label>2.4</label>
<title>Sample extraction</title>
<p>Dried samples (100 mg) were extracted with 100 mL distilled water (1 mg mL<sup>&#x2013;1</sup>), vortexed, and filtered through Whatman paper for subsequent analyses.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_5">
<label>2.5</label>
<title>Quantification of bioactive compounds</title>
<sec id="s2_5_1">
<label>2.5.1</label>
<title>Total phenolic content</title>
<p>Total phenolic content was determined following the method of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Gurung (2020)</xref>. A 20 &#x3bc;g of dried sample was placed in a 15 mL Falcon tube, followed by the addition of 1 mL distilled water, 2.5 mL of 20% sodium carbonate, and 500 &#x3bc;L of diluted Folin&#x2013;Ciocalteu reagent (1:1 with water). The mixture was incubated in the dark for 40 minutes for color development. Absorbance was measured at 725 nm using a Multiskan GO microplate spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) with a final volume of 200 &#x3bc;L per well. Gallic acid (0&#x2013;100 ppm) was used for standard curve preparation, and results were expressed as mg gallic acid equivalents per gram of dry sample (mg GAE g<sup>&#x2013;1</sup>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_5_2">
<label>2.5.2</label>
<title>Total flavonoids content</title>
<p>Total flavonoid content was determined using the colorimetric method described by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B57">Yadav et&#xa0;al. (2024a</xref>). A 0.5 mL aliquot of dried sample solution (1 mg mL<sup>&#x2013;1</sup>) was mixed with 1.5 mL methanol, 0.1 mL of 10% aluminum chloride, 0.1 mL of 1 M potassium acetate, and 2.8 mL distilled water. After vortexing, the mixture was incubated at room temperature for 30 minutes. Absorbance was measured at 415 nm using a microplate reader. Quercetin (0&#x2013;600 &#x3bc;g/mL) was used to generate the standard curve, and results were expressed as mg quercetin equivalents per gram of dry sample (mg QE g<sup>&#x2013;1</sup>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_5_3">
<label>2.5.3</label>
<title>Total tannin content</title>
<p>Tannin content was estimated using the Folin-Denis method followed by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B57">Yadav et&#xa0;al. (2024a</xref>). A 0.1 mL aliquot of sample solution (1 mg mL<sup>&#x2013;1</sup>) was mixed with 7.5 mL distilled water, 0.5 mL Folin-Denis reagent, and 1 mL of 35% sodium carbonate. The volume was adjusted to 10 mL with distilled water, vortexed, and incubated at room temperature for 30 minutes for color development. Absorbance was measured at 700 nm (final volume: 200 &#xb5;L per microplate well). Tannic acid standards (0&#x2013;100 &#x3bc;g/mL) were used for the calibration curve, and results were expressed as mg tannic acid equivalents per gram of dry sample (mg TAE g<sup>&#x2013;1</sup>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_5_4">
<label>2.5.4</label>
<title>Total carotenoids content, chlorophyll a, and chlorophyll b</title>
<p>Total carotenoid content was estimated following the method of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B53">Wellburn (1994)</xref>. A 0.2 g dried sample was homogenized in 10 mL of absolute acetone, filtered through Whatman No. 1 filter paper, and centrifuged at 2500 rpm (875 &#xd7; g) for 10 minutes (Eppendorf 5910 Ri, Germany). The supernatant was used to measure absorbance at 470 nm (carotenoids), 662 nm (Chl-a), and 645 nm (Chl-b) using a spectrophotometer. Chl-a, Chl-b, and total carotenoid contents (mg g<sup>&#x2013;1</sup> dry sample) were calculated using standard <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="eq3">Equations 3</xref>&#x2013;<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="eq5">5</xref>.</p>
<disp-formula id="eq3"><label>(3)</label>
<mml:math display="block" id="M3"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi>h</mml:mi><mml:mi>l</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>11.75</mml:mn><mml:mo>&#xd7;</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn>662</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo><mml:mn>2.35</mml:mn><mml:mo>&#xd7;</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn>645</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math>
</disp-formula>
<disp-formula id="eq4"><label>(4)</label>
<mml:math display="block" id="M4"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi>h</mml:mi><mml:mi>l</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>18.61</mml:mn><mml:mo>&#xd7;</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn>645</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo><mml:mn>3.96</mml:mn><mml:mo>&#xd7;</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn>662</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math>
</disp-formula>
<disp-formula id="eq5"><label>(5)</label>
<mml:math display="block" id="M5"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi>o</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi>l</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#xa0;</mml:mo><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi>o</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi>o</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#xa0;</mml:mo><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mi>o</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mn>1000</mml:mn><mml:mo>&#xa0;</mml:mo><mml:mo>&#xd7;</mml:mo><mml:mo>&#xa0;</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn>470</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo><mml:mn>2.27</mml:mn><mml:mo>&#xa0;</mml:mo><mml:mo>&#xd7;</mml:mo><mml:mo>&#xa0;</mml:mo><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi>h</mml:mi><mml:mi>l</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo><mml:mn>81.4</mml:mn><mml:mo>&#xa0;</mml:mo><mml:mo>&#xd7;</mml:mo><mml:mo>&#xa0;</mml:mo><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi>h</mml:mi><mml:mi>l</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>227</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mrow></mml:math>
</disp-formula>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_6">
<label>2.6</label>
<title>Determination of antioxidant activities</title>
<sec id="s2_6_1">
<label>2.6.1</label>
<title>DPPH assay</title>
<p>The DPPH assay was conducted according to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Brand-Williams et&#xa0;al. (1995)</xref>. The reaction mixture included 10&#x2013;150 &#xb5;L of the sample, 3 mL of absolute ethanol, and 2 mL of 0.06 mM DPPH solution (in ethanol). A color changes from deep violet to light yellow indicated radical scavenging. After 30 minutes of incubation at room temperature, absorbance was measured at 517 nm using a spectrophotometer. Ethanol and DPPH solution served as the control. The percentage of DPPH scavenging activity was calculated according to <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="eq6">Equation 6</xref>:</p>
<disp-formula id="eq6"><label>(6)</label>
<mml:math display="block" id="M6"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mtext>&#xa0;</mml:mtext><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi>g</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi>g</mml:mi><mml:mtext>&#xa0;</mml:mtext><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mtext>&#xa0;</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:mo>%</mml:mo><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mn>0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mn>0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mrow><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mo>&#xd7;</mml:mo><mml:mn>100</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math>
</disp-formula>
<p>Where: <italic>A</italic><sub>0</sub> &#x2013; absorbance of control, <italic>A</italic><sub>1</sub> = absorbance of sample.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_6_2">
<label>2.6.2</label>
<title>ABTS assay</title>
<p>The ABTS assay was performed following the method of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">Re et&#xa0;al. (1999)</xref>. Equal volumes of 7.4 mM ABTS and 2.6 mM potassium persulfate were mixed and incubated in the dark for 12 hours to generate the ABTS radical. The resulting solution was diluted with methanol to an absorbance of 0.70 &#xb1; 0.02 at 734 nm. Then, 100 &#xb5;L of the sample was mixed with 100 &#xb5;L of the ABTS solution in a microplate well and incubated for 2 hours in the dark. Absorbance was recorded at 734 nm using a spectrophotometer. The percentage of ABTS+&#x2022; was calculated according to <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="eq7">Equation 7</xref>.</p>
<disp-formula id="eq7"><label>(7)</label>
<mml:math display="block" id="M7"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mtext>&#xa0;</mml:mtext><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi>g</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi>g</mml:mi><mml:mtext>&#xa0;</mml:mtext><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mtext>&#xa0;</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:mo>%</mml:mo><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mn>0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mn>0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mrow><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mo>&#xd7;</mml:mo><mml:mn>100</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math>
</disp-formula>
<p>Where, <italic>A</italic><sub>0</sub> is the absorbance of the control; <italic>A</italic><sub>1</sub> is the absorbance of the sample.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_6_3">
<label>2.6.3</label>
<title>FRAP assay</title>
<p>FRAP activity was measured according to the method of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Benzie and Strain (1996)</xref>. The FRAP reagent was freshly prepared by mixing acetate buffer (300 mM, pH 3.6), 10 mM TPTZ solution in 40 mM HCl, and 20 mM FeCl<sub>3</sub>&#xb7;6H<sub>2</sub>O in a 10:1:1 ratio, and incubated at 37 &#xb0;C. A 100 &#xb5;L sample was mixed with distilled water and FRAP reagent to a final volume of 200 &#xb5;L per well in a microplate. After incubation, absorbance was recorded at 593 nm. A standard curve was prepared using FeSO<sub>4</sub> solutions (0&#x2013;1000 &#x3bc;g/mL), and results were expressed as &#xb5;mol FeSO<sub>4</sub> equivalents per gram of dry sample (&#xb5;mol Fe<sup>2+</sup> g<sup>&#x2013;1</sup> DW).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_7">
<label>2.7</label>
<title>Ascorbic acid</title>
<p>Ascorbic acid content was estimated volumetrically following the method described by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B56">Yadav et&#xa0;al. (2024b</xref>). A standard solution was titrated with 2,6-dichlorophenol indophenol dye in 4% oxalic acid until a persistent pink endpoint appeared, and the dye volume was recorded as V<sub>1</sub>. For sample analysis, 0.5 g of dried powder was extracted with 10 mL of 4% oxalic acid, centrifuged, and 5 mL of the supernatant was titrated similarly. The dye volume used was noted as V<sub>2</sub>. The ascorbic acid content was calculated according to <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="eq8">Equation 8</xref>:</p>
<disp-formula id="eq8"><label>(8)</label>
<mml:math display="block" id="M8"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mi>o</mml:mi><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mtext>&#xa0;</mml:mtext><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mtext>&#xa0;</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi>g</mml:mi><mml:mtext>&#xa0;</mml:mtext><mml:mn>100</mml:mn><mml:mtext>&#xa0;</mml:mtext><mml:msup><mml:mi>g</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mn>0.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>&#xa0;</mml:mo><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi>g</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi>l</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mrow><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mo>&#xd7;</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>15</mml:mn><mml:mo>&#xa0;</mml:mo><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi>l</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mrow><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mo>&#xd7;</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mn>100</mml:mn><mml:mo>&#xa0;</mml:mo><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi>l</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mo>&#xa0;</mml:mo><mml:mo>&#xa0;</mml:mo><mml:mi>o</mml:mi><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#xa0;</mml:mo><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi>l</mml:mi><mml:mi>e</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mrow><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mo>&#xd7;</mml:mo><mml:mn>100</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math>
</disp-formula>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_8">
<label>2.8</label>
<title>Statistical analysis</title>
<p>Experimental data were organized in Microsoft Excel and analyzed using one-way ANOVA in IBM SPSS Statistics v21.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA) to determine significant differences among treatment groups (p&lt; 0.05). Where significant differences were found, Duncan&#x2019;s multiple range test was performed as a <italic>post hoc</italic> analysis. Graphs and correlation matrix heatmap were generated using GraphPad Prism v9.5.1 (GraphPad Software, CA, USA).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s3" sec-type="results">
<label>3</label>
<title>Results</title>
<sec id="s3_1">
<label>3.1</label>
<title>Effect of cow dung on biomass production</title>
<p>The effect of different doses of organic manure and inorganic fertilizer on wolffia biomass production and specific growth rate (SGR) is shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1"><bold>Figure&#xa0;1</bold></xref>. Total biomass was highest at 30 and 20 g L<sup>&#x2013;1</sup> cow dung, reaching 152.38 &#xb1; 12.25 g and 144.88 &#xb1; 1.28 g, respectively, representing increases of approximately 19.6% and 13.7% over the control. These two treatments also produced the highest SGR values, indicating superior growth performance. In contrast, the lowest biomass (65.38 &#xb1; 12.11 g) was recorded at the highest cow dung concentration (50 g L<sup>&#x2013;1</sup>), which was significantly lower than all other treatments. This suggests that excessive organic loading negatively affected wolffia biomass production.</p>
<fig id="f1" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;1</label>
<caption>
<p>Net biomass production and specific growth rate of wolffia in response to different organic manure doses. Values are expressed as mean &#xb1; SD. Bars with different letters differed significantly (p<italic>&lt;</italic> 0.05) among the experimental groups.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-17-1751657-g001.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Bar chart showing growth performance with varying organic manure concentrations. Blue bars represent net fresh biomass in grams, peaking at 30 grams per liter. Red bars indicate specific growth rate percentages, slight increase at 20 grams per liter. Error bars and statistical labels (a-e) suggest significance. Organic manure is on the x-axis.</alt-text>
</graphic></fig>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_2">
<label>3.2</label>
<title>Effect of cow dung on proximate composition</title>
<p>The proximate composition analysis of wolffia cultures showed significant variations in crude protein and lipid contents across treatments with inorganic fertilizer (control) and different doses of cow dung (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2"><bold>Figure&#xa0;2</bold></xref>). The highest crude protein content was recorded in the 40 g L<sup>&#x2013;1</sup> cow dung treatment (30.40 &#xb1; 0.33%), which was significantly higher than all other organic manure treatments. The control group exhibited a comparable protein level (29.31 &#xb1; 0.48%), with no statistically significant difference from the 40 g L<sup>&#x2013;1</sup> treatment. Moderate protein levels were observed at 20 g L<sup>&#x2013;1</sup> (27.29 &#xb1; 0.74%) and 50 g L<sup>&#x2013;1</sup> (27.28 &#xb1; 1.14%), while the lowest values occurred at 10 g L<sup>&#x2013;1</sup> (25.39 &#xb1; 1.10%) and 30 g L<sup>&#x2013;1</sup> (24.08 &#xb1; 0.91%).</p>
<fig id="f2" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;2</label>
<caption>
<p>Proximate composition of wolffia subjected to different organic manure levels. <bold>(A)</bold> Crude protein, <bold>(B)</bold> Crude lipid. Data are represented as mean &#xb1; SD. Bars with different letters differed significantly (p<italic>&lt;</italic> 0.05) among the experimental groups.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-17-1751657-g002.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Bar charts displaying crude protein and crude lipid percentages at varying levels of organic manure. Chart A shows the relationship between organic manure (0 to 50 grams per liter) and crude protein percentages, ranging from 26% to 35%. Chart B illustrates crude lipid percentages, ranging from 2% to 5%, with differences among manure levels indicated by letters.</alt-text>
</graphic></fig>
<p>In terms of crude lipid content, the highest values were found in the 40 g L<sup>&#x2013;1</sup> (5.09 &#xb1; 0.12%) and 50 g L<sup>&#x2013;1</sup> (4.91 &#xb1; 0.08%) cow dung treatments. These values align closely with reported lipid levels in wolffia species (~5.3% dry weight). The lowest lipid contents were observed in the control (2.04 &#xb1; 0.19%) and 10 g L<sup>&#x2013;1</sup> (2.23 &#xb1; 0.12%) treatments.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_3">
<label>3.3</label>
<title>Effect of cow dung on bioactive compounds</title>
<sec id="s3_3_1">
<label>3.3.1</label>
<title>Total phenolic content</title>
<p>The total phenolic content (TPC) of wolffia under various cow dung treatments is shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3"><bold>Figure&#xa0;3A</bold></xref>. A significant variation (p&lt; 0.05) was observed across treatments. The highest TPC was recorded at 50 g L<sup>&#x2013;1</sup> cow dung, yielding 350.04 &#xb1; 14.27 mg GAE g<sup>&#x2013;1</sup>, followed by the control (inorganic fertilizer) with 265.61 &#xb1; 11.88 mg GAE g<sup>&#x2013;1</sup>. In contrast, the lowest TPC was observed at 30 g L<sup>&#x2013;1</sup> cow dung (52.21 &#xb1; 2.02 mg GAE g<sup>&#x2013;1</sup>). Compared to the control, the 50 g L<sup>&#x2013;1</sup> treatment resulted in a 31.79% increase in TPC and was significantly higher by 52.05%, 85.42%, 273.35%, and 570.27% relative to the 40, 10, 20, and 30 g L<sup>&#x2013;1</sup> cow dung treatments, respectively.</p>
<fig id="f3" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;3</label>
<caption>
<p>Effect of organic manure on bioactive compounds of wolffia. <bold>(A)</bold> Total phenolic content, <bold>(B)</bold> Total flavonoid content, <bold>(C)</bold> Total tannin content, <bold>(D)</bold> Total carotenoid content, <bold>(E)</bold> Chlorophyll-a, <bold>(F)</bold> Chlorophyll-b. Data are represented as mean &#xb1; SD. Bars with different letters differed significantly (p<italic>&lt;</italic> 0.05) among the experimental groups.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-17-1751657-g003.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Six bar graphs labeled A to F display the effects of different concentrations of organic manure (0, 10, 20, 30, 40, 50 grams per liter) on various biochemical parameters. Graph A shows Total Phenolic Content (TPC); Graph B shows Total Flavonoid Content (TFC); Graph C displays Total Tannin Content (TTC); Graph D illustrates Total Chlorophyll Content (TCC); Graph E presents Chlorophyll-a (Chl-a); and Graph F shows Chlorophyll-b (Chl-b). Values are annotated with letters indicating statistical differences. The data generally show increases in parameters with higher manure concentrations, with significant variations indicated by different lettering in each graph.</alt-text>
</graphic></fig>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_3_2">
<label>3.3.2</label>
<title>Total flavonoid content</title>
<p>The total flavonoid content (TFC) of wolffia cultured under different doses of cow dung and inorganic fertilizer is shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3"><bold>Figure&#xa0;3B</bold></xref>. A significant difference (p&lt; 0.05) was observed among treatments. The highest TFC was recorded at the 50 g L<sup>&#x2013;1</sup> cow dung dose, with a value of 159.35 &#xb1; 2.59 mg QE g<sup>&#x2013;1</sup>, followed by the 10 g L<sup>&#x2013;1</sup> treatment (119.32 &#xb1; 5.63 mg QE g<sup>&#x2013;1</sup>). The lowest TFC (41.09 &#xb1; 3.60 mg QE g<sup>&#x2013;1</sup>) occurred at the 30 g L<sup>&#x2013;1</sup> cow dung dose.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_3_3">
<label>3.3.3</label>
<title>Total tannin content</title>
<p>The total tannin content (TTC) of wolffia cultured under varying doses of cow dung and inorganic fertilizer is shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3"><bold>Figure&#xa0;3C</bold></xref>. Tannin content did not differ significantly among the control (8.87 &#xb1; 0.46 mg TAE g<sup>&#x2013;1</sup>), 10 g L<sup>&#x2013;1</sup> (9.55 &#xb1; 0.68 mg TAE g<sup>&#x2013;1</sup>), and 50 g L<sup>&#x2013;1</sup> (8.03 &#xb1; 0.87 mg TAE g<sup>&#x2013;1</sup>) cow dung treatments. In contrast, significantly (p &gt; 0.05) lower TTC values were observed at 20 g L<sup>&#x2013;1</sup> (5.73 &#xb1; 0.41 mg TAE g<sup>&#x2013;1</sup>) and 30 g L<sup>&#x2013;1</sup> (5.46 &#xb1; 0.59 mg TAE g<sup>&#x2013;1</sup>). The 40 g L<sup>&#x2013;1</sup> treatment resulted in intermediate TTC (7.24 &#xb1; 0.95 mg TAE g<sup>&#x2013;1</sup>), which did not differ significantly from the 50 g L<sup>&#x2013;1</sup> treatment but was lower than the control and 10 g L<sup>&#x2013;1</sup> treatments. Overall, moderate cow dung doses (20&#x2013;30 g L<sup>&#x2013;1</sup>) led to a decline in tannin accumulation in wolffia.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_3_4">
<label>3.3.4</label>
<title>Total carotenoids content, chlorophyll-a, and chlorophyll-b</title>
<p>The effects of inorganic fertilizer and different doses of cow dung on TCC, Chl-a, and Chl-b in wolffia are shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3"><bold>Figures&#xa0;3D&#x2013;F</bold></xref>. TCC varied significantly among treatments. The highest TCC was observed in the control group (2286.90 &#xb1; 130.93 &#xb5;g g<sup>&#x2013;1</sup>), followed by the 40 g L<sup>&#x2013;1</sup> (1868.04 &#xb1; 31.75 &#xb5;g g<sup>&#x2013;1</sup>) and 50 g L<sup>&#x2013;1</sup> (1864.45 &#xb1; 71.31 &#xb5;g g<sup>&#x2013;1</sup>) cow dung treatments, which did not differ significantly from each other but were significantly lower than the control (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3"><bold>Figure&#xa0;3D</bold></xref>). The 10 g L<sup>&#x2013;1</sup> treatment also produced relatively high carotenoid levels (1722.46 &#xb1; 93.23 &#xb5;g g<sup>&#x2013;1</sup>), significantly higher than the 20 g L<sup>&#x2013;1</sup> (1507.36 &#xb1; 69.12 &#xb5;g g<sup>&#x2013;1</sup>) and 30 g L<sup>&#x2013;1</sup> (1377.83 &#xb1; 47.91 &#xb5;g g<sup>&#x2013;1</sup>) treatments, which recorded the lowest TCC values.</p>
<p>The Chl-a content was highest at the 40 g L<sup>&#x2013;1</sup> dose (25.14 &#xb1; 0.47 mg g<sup>&#x2013;1</sup>), which was significantly higher than all other treatments (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3"><bold>Figure&#xa0;3E</bold></xref>). Relatively high Chl-a levels were also recorded in the control (22.61 &#xb1; 1.17 mg g<sup>&#x2013;1</sup>) and 50 g L<sup>&#x2013;1</sup> (21.77 &#xb1; 0.30 mg g<sup>&#x2013;1</sup>) treatments. Lower Chl-a contents were observed in the 10 g L<sup>&#x2013;1</sup> (17.63 &#xb1; 0.57 mg g<sup>&#x2013;1</sup>) and 20 g L<sup>&#x2013;1</sup> (17.73 &#xb1; 0.42 mg g<sup>&#x2013;1</sup>) treatments, while the 30 g L<sup>&#x2013;1</sup> treatment had the lowest Chl-a concentration (14.49 &#xb1; 0.59 mg g<sup>&#x2013;1</sup>), significantly lower than all other treatments.</p>
<p>Chl-b content also showed significant variation among treatments (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3"><bold>Figure&#xa0;3F</bold></xref>). The highest Chl-b level occurred in the control group (11.82 &#xb1; 0.87 mg g<sup>&#x2013;1</sup>), followed by the 10 g L<sup>&#x2013;1</sup> cow dung treatment (8.04 &#xb1; 0.49 mg g<sup>&#x2013;1</sup>). Both were significantly higher than all other treatments. Moderate Chl-b values were recorded at 20 g L<sup>&#x2013;1</sup> (6.88 &#xb1; 0.48 mg g<sup>&#x2013;1</sup>) and 50 g L<sup>&#x2013;1</sup> (7.49 &#xb1; 0.89 mg g<sup>&#x2013;1</sup>), while the lowest Chl-b concentration was observed at 30 g L<sup>&#x2013;1</sup> (5.15 &#xb1; 0.55 mg g<sup>&#x2013;1</sup>).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_4">
<label>3.4</label>
<title>Effects of organic manure on antioxidant activities of wolffia</title>
<sec id="s3_4_1">
<label>3.4.1</label>
<title>DPPH assay</title>
<p>Antioxidant activity differed significantly among fertilizer treatments. As shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f4"><bold>Figure&#xa0;4A</bold></xref>, the highest DPPH radical scavenging activity was recorded at the 50 g L<sup>&#x2013;1</sup> cow dung dose (57.42 &#xb1; 0.33%), followed by the 40 g L<sup>&#x2013;1</sup> treatment (54.39 &#xb1; 0.68%). The lowest DPPH activity was observed at 20 g L<sup>&#x2013;1</sup> (28.82 &#xb1; 0.59%). These results indicate that higher concentrations of organic manure enhanced the antioxidant capacity of wolffia.</p>
<fig id="f4" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;4</label>
<caption>
<p>Effect of organic manure on antioxidant activities of wolffia. <bold>(A)</bold> DPPH scavenging activity, <bold>(B)</bold> ABTS scavenging activity, <bold>(C)</bold> FRAP activity, <bold>(D)</bold> Vitamin <bold>(C)</bold> Data are represented as mean &#xb1; SD. Bars with different letters differed significantly (p<italic>&lt;</italic> 0.05) among the experimental groups.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-17-1751657-g004.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Bar charts illustrating the effects of varying organic manure concentrations on antioxidant activities and vitamin C content. (A) DPPH shows an increase from 0 to 50 g/L with significant differences. (B) ABTS also rises, with significant differences at higher concentrations. (C) FRAP demonstrates higher values at 10 and 50 g/L. (D) Vitamin C content increases significantly at 50 g/L, with differences noted among other concentrations. Bars are color-coded and labeled with statistical significance.</alt-text>
</graphic></fig>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_4_2">
<label>3.4.2</label>
<title>ABTS assay</title>
<p>The ABTS radical scavenging activity of wolffia under different fertilizer treatments is presented in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f4"><bold>Figure&#xa0;4B</bold></xref>. The highest ABTS activity was recorded in the 50 g L<sup>&#x2013;1</sup> cow dung treatment (65.65 &#xb1; 0.18%), followed by the 40 g L<sup>&#x2013;1</sup> dose (58.27 &#xb1; 0.42%). The lowest ABTS activity occurred at the 30 g L<sup>&#x2013;1</sup> treatment, with a value of 41.90 &#xb1; 0.71%. These results indicate that higher levels of cow dung application substantially improved ABTS antioxidant capacity in wolffia.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_4_3">
<label>3.4.3</label>
<title>FRAP assay</title>
<p>The FRAP antioxidant activity of wolffia varied significantly across treatments with different doses of inorganic and organic fertilizers. The highest FRAP value was observed at the 10 g L<sup>&#x2013;1</sup> cow dung treatment (180.64 &#xb1; 2.40 &#x3bc;mol Fe g<sup>&#x2013;1</sup> dry mass), followed by the 50 g L<sup>&#x2013;1</sup> dose (174.18 &#xb1; 1.37 &#x3bc;mol Fe g<sup>&#x2013;1</sup> dry mass). These values represent increases of approximately 16.30% and 12.14%, respectively, compared to the control (155.32 &#xb1; 2.19 &#x3bc;mol Fe g<sup>&#x2013;1</sup> dry mass), as shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f4"><bold>Figure&#xa0;4C</bold></xref>. These results indicate that lower to higher doses of cow dung improved FRAP antioxidant capacity relative to inorganic fertilizer.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_5">
<label>3.5</label>
<title>Ascorbic acid</title>
<p>The Vitamin C (Vit C) content of wolffia cultured under different doses of inorganic and organic fertilizers is shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f4"><bold>Figure&#xa0;4D</bold></xref>. The highest Vit C content was observed at the 50 g L<sup>&#x2013;1</sup> cow dung dose, reaching 99.05 &#xb1; 1.80 mg 100 g<sup>&#x2013;1</sup>, representing a 30.97% increase compared to the control (75.63 &#xb1; 3.12 mg 100 g<sup>&#x2013;1</sup>). This was followed by the 40 g L<sup>&#x2013;1</sup> treatment (86.44 &#xb1; 3.12 mg 100 g<sup>&#x2013;1</sup>) and the 10 g L<sup>&#x2013;1</sup> dose (82.84 &#xb1; 1.80 mg 100 g<sup>&#x2013;1</sup>). These results demonstrate that increasing levels of organic fertilizer application enhanced Vit C accumulation in wolffia.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_6">
<label>3.6</label>
<title>Correlation analysis between bioactive compound and antioxidant activities</title>
<p>The Pearson correlation analysis between bioactive compounds and antioxidant activities revealed several significant associations (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f5"><bold>Figure&#xa0;5</bold></xref>). TPC showed positive correlations with DPPH (r = 0.08), ABTS (r = 0.57), and FRAP (r = 0.60). TFC exhibited strong positive correlations with ABTS (r = 0.90), FRAP (r = 0.90), and Vit C (r = 0.82). TTC was positively correlated with DPPH (r = 0.05), ABTS (r = 0.51), FRAP (r = 0.74) and Vit C (r = 0.41). Additionally, TCC showed positive correlations with ABTS (r = 0.57) and FRAP (r = 0.53), while displaying a slight negative correlation with DPPH (r = &#x2013;0.03). Overall, the correlation pattern indicates that higher concentrations of phenolic and flavonoid compounds are generally associated with stronger antioxidant activity.</p>
<fig id="f5" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;5</label>
<caption>
<p>Correlation analysis of the bioactive compounds and antioxidant activities of wolffia grown under different levels of cow dung. It ranges from &#x2013;1 to 1, whereby&#x2013;1 means a perfect negative linear relationship between variables, 1 indicates a perfect positive linear relationship between variables and 0 indicates that there is no relationship between studied variables. Significant level (p&lt; 0.05).</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-17-1751657-g005.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Correlation heatmap showing relationships between various biochemical parameters: TPC, TFC, TTC, TCC, Chl-a, Chl-b, Vit C, DPPH, ABTS, and FRAP. Values range from -1.0 to 1.0, with a color scale from purple (low correlation) to red (high correlation). The diagonal values are all 1.00, indicating perfect self-correlation.</alt-text>
</graphic></fig>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s4" sec-type="discussion">
<label>4</label>
<title>Discussion</title>
<sec id="s4_1">
<label>4.1</label>
<title>Effect of cow dung on biomass production</title>
<p>The enhanced biomass production observed at 20 and 30 g L<sup>&#x2013;1</sup> cow dung indicates that moderate organic manure levels effectively support early wolffia growth, likely through increased microbial activity that enhances nutrient mineralization and phytohormone release (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">Mofunanya et&#xa0;al., 2015</xref>). In contrast, the marked reduction in biomass at the highest cow dung concentration (50 g L<sup>&#x2013;1</sup>) can be attributed to excessive manure loading, which elevates ammonia (NH<sub>3</sub>) levels and exerts toxic effects on aquatic plants (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B44">So&#x144;ta et&#xa0;al., 2023</xref>). Similar trends have been reported by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B47">Stadtlander et&#xa0;al. (2022)</xref>, who observed higher fresh biomass yields of duckweed (<italic>Spirodela polyrhiza</italic> and <italic>Lemna punctata</italic>) at lower bovine slurry concentrations. In a subsequent study, the same authors further demonstrated that while solubilized chicken manure enhanced the growth of <italic>Lemna minor</italic> at optimal doses, higher concentrations led to plant die-off due to ammonium-nitrogen (NH<sub>4</sub>&#x2013;N) toxicity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B48">Stadtlander et&#xa0;al., 2023</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s4_2">
<label>4.2</label>
<title>Effect of cow dung on proximate composition</title>
<p>The higher crude protein content observed at the 40 g L<sup>&#x2013;1</sup> cow dung dose indicates that this level provides an optimal nutrient supply to support protein synthesis in wolffia. This aligns with previous reports showing that wolffia species typically contain 20&#x2013;30% crude protein (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Appenroth et&#xa0;al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Chantiratikul et&#xa0;al., 2010</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">Baidya and Patel, 2017</xref>). The enhancement in protein content at optimal organic manure levels can be attributed to the steady release of nitrogen during organic matter decomposition, which promotes amino acid and protein synthesis (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">Han et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>).</p>
<p>Similarly, the elevated crude lipid content observed at 40 and 50 g L<sup>&#x2013;1</sup> cow dung reflects improved availability of key nutrients, particularly N, P, and K, which are essential for lipid biosynthesis and metabolic activity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Gong et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>). The lipid levels recorded in this study are consistent with earlier findings in wolffia (~5.3% dry weight; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">Said et&#xa0;al., 2022a</xref>) and are substantially higher than those reported for other duckweed species such as <italic>Spirodela polyrhiza</italic> (~1.74%; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">Said et&#xa0;al., 2022b</xref>). Overall, these results demonstrate that appropriately optimized organic manure application enhances both protein and lipid accumulation in wolffia, whereas insufficient nutrient inputs limit these biochemical processes.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s4_3">
<label>4.3</label>
<title>Effect of cow dung on bioactive compounds</title>
<p>Bioactive compounds, particularly phenolic compounds in plants, have received increasing attention due to their diverse health benefits and biological activities (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B57">Yadav et&#xa0;al., 2024a</xref>). In the present study, TPC increased markedly at the higher cow dung dose (50 g L<sup>&#x2013;1</sup>), indicating that elevated organic manure levels can stimulate phenolic biosynthesis in wolffia. This response is likely associated with organic manures enhancing shikimic acid production, thereby promoting the biosynthesis of phenolic compounds and flavonoids (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">Darakeh et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B45">Sousa et&#xa0;al., 2008</xref>). Similar stimulatory effects of organic fertilization on phenolic enrichment have been reported in other plant species. For instance, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Naguib et&#xa0;al. (2012)</xref> documented a 51.04% increase in total phenolics in broccoli grown under combined organic and inorganic fertilization, while <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">Ibrahim et&#xa0;al. (2013)</xref> reported elevated secondary metabolite content and antioxidant activity in <italic>Labisia pumila</italic> under higher organic nitrogen inputs.</p>
<p>Flavonoids, which are key antioxidant secondary metabolites, contribute substantially to oxidative stress mitigation due to their hydroxyl and carboxyl functional groups (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B57">Yadav et&#xa0;al., 2024a</xref>). In the present study, the elevated TFC observed at 50 g L<sup>&#x2013;1</sup> cow dung further supports the role of organic manure in stimulating flavonoid biosynthesis. The supply of readily available nitrogen and organic carbon from cattle dung likely enhanced metabolic flux toward phenolic and flavonoid synthesis (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B51">Villamarin-Raad et&#xa0;al., 2023</xref>), a response commonly associated with activation of the shikimate&#x2013;phenylpropanoid pathway, particularly through increased phenylalanine ammonia-lyase (PAL) activity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">Bayat et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>). Comparable increases in flavonoid accumulation following organic fertilization have been reported in <italic>Cichorium intybus</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Gholami et&#xa0;al., 2018</xref>) and across different plant morphotypes treated with cattle dung (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">Oloyede and Oyelade, 2022</xref>). Together, these observations confirm that cow dung application enhances metabolic activity associated with secondary metabolite formation, underscoring the nutraceutical potential of wolffia cultivated under higher cow dung doses.</p>
<p>Total tannin content showed a non-linear response to cow dung application, with comparable levels in the control, 10, and 50 g L<sup>&#x2013;1</sup> treatments, and reduced accumulation at intermediate doses. The reduced tannin content at intermediate doses likely reflects enhanced growth-driven N allocation to biomass; under the C/N balance theory, N sufficiency favors growth over the synthesis of carbon-based, nitrogen-free tannins (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Libutti et&#xa0;al., 2023</xref>). Partial recovery of tannin levels at higher doses indicates that wolffia may re-establish metabolic balance once sufficient nutrients become available. These findings are consistent with <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">Oluwole et&#xa0;al. (2022)</xref>, who reported increased tannin accumulation in <italic>Launaea taraxacifolia</italic> following cow dung amendment, underscoring the importance of dosage in regulating tannin responses.</p>
<p>Photosynthetic pigment responses varied with treatments. The significantly higher TCC and Chl-b levels in the control indicate that inorganic fertilizer promoted more efficient pigment accumulation, likely due to the rapid availability of nutrients. Because chlorophyll synthesis is closely linked to nitrogen availability, the readily available nitrogen supplied by inorganic fertilizer enhanced pigment accumulation and photosynthetic capacity compared with cow dung treatments (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Ndirmbula et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>). Lower pigment levels at 20&#x2013;30 g L<sup>&#x2013;1</sup> cow dung reflect a growth&#x2013;dilution effect, where rapid biomass accumulation and preferential nitrogen allocation toward growth reduce pigment concentration despite enhanced productivity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">Poorter et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>). However, the highest Chl-a content at 40 g L<sup>&#x2013;1</sup> cow dung indicates that moderate to higher organic inputs can enhance photosynthetic pigment synthesis when nutrient supply is adequate. Organic manure provides a gradual release of nitrogen, a key element for chlorophyll formation, although its release dynamics differ from inorganic sources. Similar enhancements in chlorophyll content under high organic and inorganic fertilization have been reported in <italic>Foeniculum vulgare</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">Nada et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>). Overall, these results demonstrate that both inorganic fertilizers and appropriately optimized organic manure doses can improve pigment composition in wolffia, with responses varying according to pigment type and nutrient source.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s4_4">
<label>4.4</label>
<title>Effects of organic manure on antioxidant activities of wolffia</title>
<p>The enhanced DPPH and ABTS radical scavenging activities observed at higher cow dung doses reflect the physiological responses of wolffia under organic nutrient regimes. Organic manures such as cow dung mineralize slowly and are generally less nutrient-dense than inorganic fertilizers, which can result in transient nutrient limitation during critical growth stages (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B42">Seufert et&#xa0;al., 2012</xref>). Such conditions may induce oxidative stress, leading to increased production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and activation of antioxidant defense systems, including enzymes such as superoxide dismutase (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Chang et&#xa0;al., 2008</xref>). Excess ROS disrupt cellular homeostasis by inhibiting enzymatic activity and damaging membranes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Luis, 2015</xref>), thereby stimulating defense mechanisms that promote the synthesis of secondary metabolites, particularly phenolic compounds and flavonoids (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B50">Vallverdu-Queralt et&#xa0;al., 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">Sharma et&#xa0;al., 2012</xref>). These metabolites possess strong antioxidant properties and effectively scavenge free radicals, contributing to cellular protection against oxidative stress (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">Rostaei et&#xa0;al., 2024</xref>). Consistent with this mechanism, treatments exhibiting higher total phenolic and flavonoid contents also showed greater ABTS activity, in agreement with observations reported by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Liwanda et&#xa0;al. (2023)</xref> in cow manure&#x2013;fertilized purslane.</p>
<p>The enhanced FRAP activity at 10 g L<sup>&#x2013;1</sup> cow dung&#x2013;treated wolffia further supports the role of organic manure in strengthening antioxidant capacity. The slow and sustained nutrient release characteristic of organic fertilizers promotes prolonged activation of defense responses and gradual accumulation of reducing compounds involved in oxidative stress mitigation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">Rostaei et&#xa0;al., 2018</xref>). Similar increases in FRAP activity following cow manure application have been reported by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Liwanda et&#xa0;al. (2023)</xref>, reinforcing the role of cow dung in enhancing antioxidant potential through sustained physiological and metabolic adjustments.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s4_5">
<label>4.5</label>
<title>Ascorbic acid</title>
<p>Vit C is a water-soluble antioxidant that plays a crucial role in protecting human health. In the present study, higher Vit C levels were observed in wolffia under organic manure treatment, particularly at 50 g L<sup>&#x2013;1</sup> cow dung, likely due to improved nutrient availability and uptake that support ascorbic acid biosynthesis. Organic manure decomposes slowly, ensuring a gradual release of macro- and micronutrients (e.g., N, P, and iron) that serve as cofactors or substrates in metabolic pathways involved in ascorbic acid production (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B54">Wu et&#xa0;al., 2024</xref>). These findings are consistent with earlier reports demonstrating enhanced Vit C accumulation under organic fertilization. For instance, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B52">Wang et&#xa0;al. (2010)</xref> reported increased Vit C content in Chinese cabbage grown with a cow manure vermicompost&#x2013;soil mixture, while <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">Hassan et&#xa0;al. (2012)</xref> observed higher Vit C levels in <italic>Cosmos caudatus</italic> under organic fertilizer application compared with inorganic inputs. Similarly, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B49">Toor et&#xa0;al. (2006)</xref> showed that organic fertilizers, including chicken manure and grass&#x2013;clover, increased Vit C content in tomatoes while reducing nitrate accumulation, and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">Asami et&#xa0;al. (2003)</xref> documented enhanced Vit C levels in marionberry, strawberry, and corn under organic fertilization. Collectively, these studies support the present findings, indicating that organic fertilizers particularly cow dung promote Vit C synthesis by improving nutrient balance and supporting secondary metabolic pathways.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s4_6">
<label>4.6</label>
<title>Correlation analysis between bioactive compound and antioxidant activities</title>
<p>The positive correlations observed between bioactive compounds particularly phenolics and flavonoids and antioxidant activities support the role of these metabolites as major contributors to the antioxidant potential of wolffia. The strong correlations of TFC with ABTS, FRAP, and Vit C suggest that flavonoids act as potent electron donors and radical scavengers, thereby enhancing both radical neutralization and reducing power.</p>
<p>The moderate to strong correlations of TPC and TTC with antioxidant assays further highlight the importance of polyphenolic compounds in mitigating oxidative stress. These findings align with <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Carvalho et&#xa0;al. (2015)</xref>, who reported similar positive correlations between phenolics and antioxidant activities in Capsicum species, measured through ABTS and DPPH assays. Additionally, the overall positive association between polyphenol concentrations and antioxidant potential supports the observations of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B56">Yadav et&#xa0;al. (2024b</xref>), reinforcing the notion that phenolics and flavonoids serve as key determinants of antioxidant activity in plant systems. The slight negative correlation between TCC and DPPH may suggest differing mechanisms or efficiencies of carotenoid-mediated antioxidant activity in this specific assay; however, the positive correlations with ABTS and FRAP indicate that carotenoids still contribute meaningfully to overall antioxidant capacity.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s5" sec-type="conclusions">
<label>5</label>
<title>Conclusion</title>
<p>This study demonstrates that organic manure, particularly cow dung at 50 g L<sup>&#x2013;1</sup>, markedly enhances the biochemical and functional attributes of wolffia. While inorganic fertilizer supported higher pigment accumulation in some cases, the 50 g L<sup>&#x2013;1</sup> cow dung treatment consistently promoted superior levels of bioactive compounds including total phenolics, flavonoids, carotenoids, and vitamin C and resulted in significantly higher antioxidant activities (DPPH, ABTS, and FRAP). These improvements reflect the plant&#x2019;s enhanced metabolic response under organic nutrient regimes, likely driven by sustained nutrient release and the activation of defense pathways associated with secondary metabolite synthesis.</p>
<p>Overall, the findings highlight that fresh cow dung concentration should be strategically optimized according to production objectives, with 20&#x2013;30 g L<sup>&#x2013;1</sup> recommended for maximizing biomass yield and ~50 g L<sup>&#x2013;1</sup> for enhancing bioactive compounds and antioxidant potential in wolffia, thereby increasing its value for functional food and aquaculture applications. Future research should focus on detailed fatty acid profiling, targeted identification of individual phenolic compounds, and elucidation of underlying metabolic pathways to better understand the health-promoting properties and industrial potential of organically cultivated wolffia.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s6">
<title>Author's note</title>
<p><italic>Wolffia globosa</italic> was collected from the pilot-scale culture pond at the College of Fisheries, Central Agricultural University (Imphal), Tripura, India. This species is not listed as endangered or threatened according to the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) red list of threatened species and is not covered by the convention on the trade in endangered species of wild fauna and flora. Additionally, all relevant guidelines for plant handling were followed.</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<sec id="s7" sec-type="data-availability">
<title>Data availability statement</title>
<p>The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.</p></sec>
<sec id="s8" sec-type="author-contributions">
<title>Author contributions</title>
<p>NY: Writing &#x2013; original draft, Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing, Visualization, Software, Formal Analysis, Conceptualization, Data curation, Investigation. AP: Conceptualization, Methodology, Investigation, Validation, Supervision, Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing, Resources, Project administration, Writing &#x2013; original draft, Funding acquisition. DR: Writing &#x2013; original draft, Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing. PP: Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing, Writing &#x2013; original draft. SB: Writing &#x2013; original draft, Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing.</p></sec>
<sec id="s10" sec-type="COI-statement">
<title>Conflict of interest</title>
<p>The author(s) declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.</p></sec>
<sec id="s11" sec-type="ai-statement">
<title>Generative AI statement</title>
<p>The author(s) declared that generative AI was not used in the creation of this manuscript.</p>
<p>Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.</p></sec>
<sec id="s12" sec-type="disclaimer">
<title>Publisher&#x2019;s note</title>
<p>All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.</p></sec>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="B1">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Abdel-Gawad</surname> <given-names>A. I.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Farid</surname> <given-names>M. H.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Soliman</surname> <given-names>M. N.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Sheta</surname> <given-names>M. H.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Zarad</surname> <given-names>M. M.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Bakr</surname> <given-names>A. M.</given-names></name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2025</year>). 
<article-title>A comparative study of conventional and nano-NPK on the growth, flowering, bioactive compounds, and anatomical characters of Solidago virgaurea</article-title>. <source>Egyptian J. Soil Sci.</source> <volume>65</volume>, <fpage>579</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>596</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.21608/ejss.2025.350094.1956</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Aina</surname> <given-names>O. E.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Amoo</surname> <given-names>S. O.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Mugivhisa</surname> <given-names>L. L.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Olowoyo</surname> <given-names>J. O.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2019</year>). 
<article-title>Effect of organic and inorganic sources of nutrients on the bioactive compounds and antioxidant activity of tomato</article-title>. <source>Appl. Ecol. Environ. Res.</source> <volume>17</volume>, <fpage>3681</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>3694</lpage>.
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<mixed-citation publication-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author"><collab>AOAC</collab>
</person-group> (<year>2005</year>). <source><italic>Official methods of analysis</italic> (18th edn.)</source> (<publisher-loc>Maryland, USA</publisher-loc>: 
<publisher-name>Association of Official Analytical Chemists International</publisher-name>).
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Appenroth</surname> <given-names>K. J.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Sree</surname> <given-names>K. S.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Bog</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Ecker</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Seeliger</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>B&#xf6;hm</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2018</year>). 
<article-title>Nutritional value of the duckweed species of the genus <italic>Wolffia</italic> (Lemnaceae) as human food</article-title>. <source>Front. Chem.</source> <volume>6</volume>, <fpage>483</fpage>., PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30420949</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Asami</surname> <given-names>D. K.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Hong</surname> <given-names>Y. J.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Barrett</surname> <given-names>D. M.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Mitchell</surname> <given-names>A. E.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2003</year>). 
<article-title>Comparison of the total phenolic and ascorbic acid content of freeze-dried and air-dried marionberry, strawberry, and corn grown using conventional, organic, and sustainable agricultural practices</article-title>. <source>J. Agric. Food Chem.</source> <volume>51</volume>, <fpage>1237</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1241</lpage>., PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">12590461</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Baidya</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Patel</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2017</year>). 
<article-title>Effect of co-cultivation of <italic>Wolffia arrhiza</italic> (L.) on flesh quality and organoleptic quality of Catla, Rohu, Mrigal, Grass carp, Puntius and Amur carp</article-title>. <source>Int. J. Fisheries Aquat. Stud.</source> <volume>5</volume>, <fpage>327</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>333</lpage>.
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Bayat</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Shafie</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Aminifard</surname> <given-names>M. H.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Daghighi</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). 
<article-title>Comparative effects of humic and fulvic acids as biostimulants on growth, antioxidant activity and nutrient content of yarrow (<italic>Achillea millefolium</italic> L.)</article-title>. <source>Scientia Hortic.</source> <volume>279</volume>, <fpage>109912</fpage>.
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Benzie</surname> <given-names>I. F.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Strain</surname> <given-names>J. J.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>1996</year>). 
<article-title>The ferric reducing ability of plasma (FRAP) as a measure of &#x201c;antioxidant power&#x201d;: The FRAP assay</article-title>. <source>Analytical Biochem.</source> <volume>239</volume>, <fpage>70</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>76</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1006/abio.1996.0292</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">8660627</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Brand-Williams</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Cuvelier</surname> <given-names>M. E.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Berset</surname> <given-names>C. L.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>1995</year>). 
<article-title>Use of a free radical method to evaluate antioxidant activity</article-title>. <source>LWT - Food Sci. Technol.</source> <volume>28</volume>, <fpage>25</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>30</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S0023-6438(95)80008-5</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Carvalho</surname> <given-names>A. V.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>de Andrade Mattietto</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>de Oliveira Rios</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>de Almeida Maciel</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Moresco</surname> <given-names>K. S.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>de Souza Oliveira</surname> <given-names>T. C.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2015</year>). 
<article-title>Bioactive compounds and antioxidant activity of pepper (<italic>Capsicum</italic> sp.) genotypes</article-title>. <source>J. Food Sci. Technol.</source> <volume>52</volume>, <fpage>7457</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>7464</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s13197-015-1833-0</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Chang</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Lim</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Lee</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Robb</surname> <given-names>E. J.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Nazar</surname> <given-names>R. N.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2008</year>). 
<article-title>Tomato phenylalanine ammonia-lyase gene family, highly redundant but strongly underutilized</article-title>. <source>J. Biol. Chem.</source> <volume>283</volume>, <fpage>33591</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>33601</lpage>., PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">18838378</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Chantiratikul</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Chantiratikul</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Sangdee</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Maneechote</surname> <given-names>U.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Bunchasak</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Chinrasri</surname> <given-names>O.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2010</year>). 
<article-title>Performance and carcass characteristics of Japanese quails fed diets containing <italic>Wolffia</italic> meal (<italic>Wolffia globosa</italic> (L.) Wimm.) as a protein replacement for soybean meal</article-title>. <source>Int. J. Poultry Sci.</source> <volume>9</volume>, <fpage>562</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>566</lpage>.
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Darakeh</surname> <given-names>S. A. S. S.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Weisany</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Diyanat</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Ebrahimi</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). 
<article-title>Bio-organic fertilizers induce biochemical changes and affect seed oil fatty acids composition in black cumin (Nigella sativa Linn)</article-title>. <source>Ind. Crops Prod</source> <volume>164</volume>, <elocation-id>113383</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.indcrop.2021.113383</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Gholami</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Saharkhiz</surname> <given-names>M. J.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Fard</surname> <given-names>F. R.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Ghani</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Nadaf</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2018</year>). 
<article-title>Humic acid and vermicompost increased bioactive components, antioxidant activity and herb yield of chicory (<italic>Cichorium intybus</italic> L.)</article-title>. <source>Biocatalysis Agric. Biotechnol.</source> <volume>14</volume>, <fpage>286</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>292</lpage>.
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Gong</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Fan</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Luo</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Liang</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2020</year>). 
<article-title>Cow manure anaerobic fermentation effluent treatment by oxygen-based membrane aerated biofilm reactor</article-title>. <source>Chem. Eng. J.</source> <volume>395</volume>, <fpage>125116</fpage>.
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Gurung</surname> <given-names>R. O.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2020</year>). 
<article-title>Preliminary phytochemical screening, total phenol and flavonoid content of <italic>Mimosa rubicaulis</italic> and <italic>Reinwardtia indica</italic></article-title>. <source>Int. J. Pharm. Pharm. Sci.</source> <volume>12</volume>, <fpage>54</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>58</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.22159/ijpps.2020v12i1.35914</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Han</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Lv</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Lin</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Sun</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2022</year>). 
<article-title>Crop yield and nutrient efficiency under organic manure substitution fertilizer in a double cropping system: A 6-year field experiment on an anthrosol</article-title>. <source>Agronomy</source> <volume>12</volume>, <fpage>2047</fpage>.
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B18">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Hassan</surname> <given-names>S. A.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Mijin</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Yusoff</surname> <given-names>U. K.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Ding</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Wahab</surname> <given-names>P. E. M.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2012</year>). 
<article-title>Nitrate, ascorbic acid, mineral and antioxidant activities of <italic>Cosmos caudatus</italic> in response to organic and mineral-based fertilizer rates</article-title>. <source>Molecules</source> <volume>17</volume>, <fpage>7843</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>7853</lpage>., PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22743588</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B19">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Ibrahim</surname> <given-names>M. H.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Jaafar</surname> <given-names>H. Z.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Karimi</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Ghasemzadeh</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2013</year>). 
<article-title>Impact of organic and inorganic fertilizers application on the phytochemical and antioxidant activity of <italic>Kacip Fatimah</italic> (<italic>Labisia pumila</italic> Benth)</article-title>. <source>Molecules</source> <volume>18</volume>, <fpage>10973</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>10988</lpage>., PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24013410</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B20">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Libutti</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Russo</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Lela</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Ponticelli</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Milella</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Rivelli</surname> <given-names>A. R.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2023</year>). 
<article-title>Enhancement of yield, phytochemical content and biological activity of a leafy vegetable (<italic>Beta vulgaris</italic> L. var. cycla) by using organic amendments as an alternative to chemical fertilizer</article-title>. <source>Plants</source> <volume>12</volume>, <elocation-id>569</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/plants12030569</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">36771653</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B21">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Liwanda</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Nurinayah</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Mubayyinah</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Rinka</surname> <given-names>A. R.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Pratiwi</surname> <given-names>T. W.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Ashari</surname> <given-names>R. Z.</given-names></name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2023</year>). 
<article-title>Effect of cow manure fertilizer on growth, polyphenol content, and antioxidant activity of purslane plants</article-title>. <source>Int. J. Chem. Biochem. Sci.</source> <volume>23</volume>, <fpage>43</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>54</lpage>.
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B22">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Luis</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2015</year>). 
<article-title>ROS and RNS in plant physiology: An overview</article-title>. <source>J. Exp. Bot.</source> <volume>66</volume>, <fpage>2827</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2283</lpage>., PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25873662</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B23">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Mofunanya</surname> <given-names>A. A. J.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Ebigwai</surname> <given-names>J. K.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Bello</surname> <given-names>O. S.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Egbe</surname> <given-names>A. O.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2015</year>). 
<article-title>Comparative study of the effects of organic and inorganic fertilizer on nutritional composition of <italic>Amaranthus</italic> sp<italic>inosus</italic> L</article-title>. <source>American-Eurasian J. Agric. Environ. Sci.</source> <volume>14</volume>, <fpage>824</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>830</lpage>.
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B24">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Nada</surname> <given-names>R. S.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Ashmawi</surname> <given-names>A. E.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Mady</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Randhir</surname> <given-names>T. O.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Elateeq</surname> <given-names>A. A.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2022</year>). 
<article-title>Effect of organic manure and plant growth promoting microbes on yield, quality and essential oil constituents of fennel bulb (<italic>Foeniculum vulgare</italic> Mill.)</article-title>. <source>J. Ecol. Eng.</source> <volume>23</volume>, <fpage>149</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>164</lpage>.
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B25">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Naguib</surname> <given-names>A. E. M. M.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>El-Baz</surname> <given-names>F. K.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Salama</surname> <given-names>Z. A.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Hanaa</surname> <given-names>H. A. A. E. B.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Ali</surname> <given-names>H. F.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Gaafar</surname> <given-names>A. A.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2012</year>). 
<article-title>Enhancement of phenolics, flavonoids and glucosinolates of broccoli (<italic>Brassica oleracea</italic> var. <italic>Italica</italic>) as antioxidants in response to organic and bio-organic fertilizers</article-title>. <source>J. Saudi Soc. Agric. Sci.</source> <volume>11</volume>, <fpage>135</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>142</lpage>.
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B26">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Ndirmbula</surname> <given-names>G. M.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Yahaya</surname> <given-names>I. H.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Sanusi</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2022</year>). 
<article-title>Response of pearl millet Pennisetum typhoides (Burm F.) to different fertilizer applications under field conditions</article-title>. <source>Asian J. Res. Bot.</source> <volume>7</volume> (<issue>3</issue>), <fpage>17</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>25</lpage>.
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B27">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Nguyen</surname> <given-names>T. T.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Sasaki</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Nasukawa</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Katahira</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2024</year>). 
<article-title>Recycling potassium from cow manure compost can replace potassium fertilizers in paddy rice production systems</article-title>. <source>Sci. Total Environ.</source> <volume>912</volume>, <elocation-id>168823</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.168823</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">38016544</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B28">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Oloyede</surname> <given-names>F. M.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Oyelade</surname> <given-names>A. D.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2022</year>). 
<article-title>Influence of organic nutrient sources on fruit yield and antioxidant properties of Nigerian pumpkin (<italic>Cucurbita pepo</italic> L.) morphotypes</article-title>. <source>Agro-Science</source> <volume>21</volume>, <fpage>143</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>146</lpage>.
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B29">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Oluwole</surname> <given-names>S. O.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Ogun</surname> <given-names>M. L.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Asokere</surname> <given-names>S. Y.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Akinbami</surname> <given-names>Z. O.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Onadipe</surname> <given-names>A. T.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Shuaib</surname> <given-names>F. E. E.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2022</year>). 
<article-title>Comparative effects of different organic manures on the growth, proximate, mineral and phytochemical compositions of <italic>Launaea taraxacifolia</italic> (Wild.) Amin Ex. C Jeffrey (African lettuce)</article-title>. <source>J. Plant Sci.</source> <volume>17</volume>, <fpage>144</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>153</lpage>.
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B30">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Pacheco</surname> <given-names>A. C.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Feba</surname> <given-names>L. G. T.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Serra</surname> <given-names>E. G.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Takata</surname> <given-names>W. H. S.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Gorni</surname> <given-names>P. H.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Yoshida</surname> <given-names>C. H. P.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). 
<article-title>The use of animal manure in the organic cultivation of <italic>Passiflora incarnata</italic> L. increases the content of phenolic compounds in the leaf and the antioxidant activity of the plant</article-title>. <source>Organic Agric.</source> <volume>11</volume>, <fpage>567</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>575</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s13165-021-00361-3</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B31">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Panday</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Bhusal</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Das</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Ghalehgolabbehbahani</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2024</year>). 
<article-title>Rooted in nature: The rise, challenges, and potential of organic farming and fertilizers in agroecosystems</article-title>. <source>Sustainability</source> <volume>16</volume>, <elocation-id>1530</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/su16041530</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B32">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Parra-Pacheco</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Cruz-Moreno</surname> <given-names>B. A.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Aguirre-Becerra</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Garc&#xed;a-Trejo</surname> <given-names>J. F.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Feregrino-P&#xe9;rez</surname> <given-names>A. A.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2024</year>). 
<article-title>Bioactive compounds from organic waste</article-title>. <source>Molecules</source> <volume>29</volume>, <elocation-id>2243</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/molecules29102243</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">38792105</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B33">
<mixed-citation publication-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Patel</surname> <given-names>A. B.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Kumar</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Debbarma</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Mutum</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Debnath</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Yadav</surname> <given-names>N. K.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2022</year>). &#x201c;
<article-title>Live duckweed-based circular aquaculture for climate resilience and carbon footprint reduction of fed aquaculture</article-title>,&#x201d; in <source>Outlook of climate change and fish nutrition</source>. Eds. 
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name><surname>Sinha</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Kumar</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Kumari</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (
<publisher-name>Springer</publisher-name>, <publisher-loc>Singapore</publisher-loc>), <fpage>337</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>351</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/978-981-19-5500-6_22</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B34">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Poorter</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Knopf</surname> <given-names>O.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Wright</surname> <given-names>I. J.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Temme</surname> <given-names>A. A.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Hogewoning</surname> <given-names>S. W.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Graf</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2022</year>). 
<article-title>A meta-analysis of responses of C3 plants to atmospheric CO2: dose&#x2013;response curves for 85 traits ranging from the molecular to the whole-plant level</article-title>. <source>New Phytol.</source> <volume>233</volume>, <fpage>1560</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1596</lpage>., PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">34657301</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B35">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Poozesh</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Amirahmadi</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2024</year>). 
<article-title>The impact of organic and inorganic fertilizers on some phytochemical and antioxidant properties in <italic>Zingiber officinale</italic> Rosc</article-title>. <source>J. Chem. Health Risks</source> <volume>14</volume>, <fpage>555</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.22034/jchr.2024.1973411.1649</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B36">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Pradhan</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Patel</surname> <given-names>A. B.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Singh</surname> <given-names>S. K.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2019</year>). 
<article-title>Evaluation of live duckweed, <italic>Wolffia globosa</italic> as an allochthonous feed for <italic>Labeo rohita</italic> fry during nursery rearing</article-title>. <source>Aquaculture Res.</source> <volume>50</volume>, <fpage>1557</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1563</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/are.14025</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B37">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Re</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Pellegrini</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Proteggente</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Pannala</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Rice-Evans</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>1999</year>). 
<article-title>Antioxidant activity applying an improved ABTS radical cation decolorization assay</article-title>. <source>Free Radical Biol. Med.</source> <volume>26</volume>, <fpage>1231</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1237</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S0891-5849(98)00315-3</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">10381194</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B38">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Rostaei</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Fallah</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Carrubba</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Lorigooini</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2024</year>). 
<article-title>Organic manures enhance biomass and improve content, chemical compounds of essential oil and antioxidant capacity of medicinal plants: A review</article-title>. <source>Heliyon</source> <volume>10</volume>, <elocation-id>e36693</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e36693</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">39296011</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B39">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Rostaei</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Fallah</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Lorigooini</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Surki</surname> <given-names>A. A.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2018</year>). 
<article-title>The effect of organic manure and chemical fertilizer on essential oil, chemical compositions, and antioxidant activity of dill (<italic>Anethum graveolens</italic>) in sole and intercropped with soybean (<italic>Glycine max</italic>)</article-title>. <source>J. Cleaner Prod</source> <volume>199</volume>, <fpage>18</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>26</lpage>.
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B40">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Said</surname> <given-names>D. S.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Chrismadha</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Mayasari</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Febrianti</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Suri</surname> <given-names>A. R. M.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2022</year>a). 
<article-title>Nutrition value and growth ability of aquatic weed <italic>Wolffia globosa</italic> as alternative feed sources for aquaculture system</article-title>. <source>IOP Conf. Series: Earth Environ. Sci.</source> <volume>950</volume>, <fpage>012044</fpage>.
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B41">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Said</surname> <given-names>D. S.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Chrismadha</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Mayasari</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Widiyanto</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Ramandita</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2022</year>b). 
<article-title>Nutritional content and growth ability of duckweed <italic>Spirodela polyrhiza</italic> on various culture media</article-title>. <source>IOP Conf. Series: Earth Environ. Sci.</source> <volume>1062</volume>, <fpage>012009</fpage>.
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B42">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Seufert</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Ramankutty</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Foley</surname> <given-names>J. A.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2012</year>). 
<article-title>Comparing the yields of organic and conventional agriculture</article-title>. <source>Nature</source> <volume>485</volume>, <fpage>229</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>232</lpage>., PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22535250</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B43">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Sharma</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Jha</surname> <given-names>A. B.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Dubey</surname> <given-names>R. S.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Pessarakli</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2012</year>). 
<article-title>Reactive oxygen species, oxidative damage, and antioxidative defense mechanism in plants under stressful control</article-title>. <source>J. Bot.</source> <volume>2012</volume>, <elocation-id>Article ID 217037</elocation-id>.
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B44">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>So&#x144;ta</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Wi&#x119;cek</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Szara</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Rekiel</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Zalewska</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Batorska</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2023</year>). 
<article-title>Quantitative and qualitative traits of duckweed (Lemna minor) produced on growth media with pig slurry</article-title>. <source>Agronomy</source> <volume>13</volume>, <elocation-id>1951</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/agronomy13071951</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B45">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Sousa</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Pereira</surname> <given-names>D. M.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Pereira</surname> <given-names>J. A.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Bento</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Rodrigues</surname> <given-names>M. A.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Dopico-Garc&#xed;a</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2008</year>). 
<article-title>Multivariate analysis of tronchuda cabbage (<italic>Brassica oleracea</italic> L. var. <italic>costata</italic> DC) phenolics: Influence of fertilizers</article-title>. <source>J. Agric. Food Chem.</source> <volume>56</volume>, <fpage>2231</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2239</lpage>., PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">18290619</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B46">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Sree</surname> <given-names>K. S.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Adelmann</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Garcia</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Lam</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Appenroth</surname> <given-names>K. J.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2015</year>). 
<article-title>Natural variance in salt tolerance and induction of starch accumulation in duckweeds</article-title>. <source>Planta</source> <volume>241</volume>, <fpage>1395</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1404</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00425-015-2264-x</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25693515</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B47">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Stadtlander</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Bandy</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Rosskothen</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Pietsch</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Tschudi</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Sigrist</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2022</year>). 
<article-title>Dilution rates of cattle slurry affect ammonia uptake and protein production of duckweed grown in recirculating systems</article-title>. <source>J. Cleaner Prod</source> <volume>357</volume>, <fpage>131916</fpage>.
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B48">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Stadtlander</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Schmidtke</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Baki</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Leiber</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2023</year>). 
<article-title>Duckweed production on diluted chicken manure</article-title>. <source>J. Anim. Feed Sci.</source> <volume>33</volume>, <fpage>128</fpage>.
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B49">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Toor</surname> <given-names>R. K.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Savage</surname> <given-names>G. P.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Heeb</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2006</year>). 
<article-title>Influence of different types of fertilisers on the major antioxidant components of tomatoes</article-title>. <source>J. Food Composition Anal.</source> <volume>19</volume>, <fpage>20</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>27</lpage>.
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B50">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Vallverdu-Queralt</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Jauregui</surname> <given-names>O.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Medina-Remon</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Lamuela-Raventos</surname> <given-names>R. M.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2012</year>). 
<article-title>Evaluation of a method to characterize the phenolic profile of organic and conventional tomatoes</article-title>. <source>J. Agric. Food Chem.</source> <volume>60</volume>, <fpage>3373</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>3380</lpage>., PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22380972</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B51">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Villamarin-Raad</surname> <given-names>D. A.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Lozano-Puentes</surname> <given-names>H. S.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Chitiva</surname> <given-names>L. C.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Costa</surname> <given-names>G. M.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>D&#xed;az-Gallo</surname> <given-names>S. A.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>D&#xed;az-Ariza</surname> <given-names>L. A.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2023</year>). 
<article-title>Changes in phenolic profile and total phenol and total flavonoid contents of <italic>Guadua angustifolia</italic> Kunth plants under organic and conventional fertilization</article-title>. <source>ACS omega</source> <volume>8</volume>, <fpage>41223</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>41231</lpage>., PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">37970062</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B52">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Shi</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Wei</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Hu</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2010</year>). 
<article-title>Influence of cow manure vermicompost on the growth, metabolite contents, and antioxidant activities of Chinese cabbage (<italic>Brassica campestris</italic> ssp. <italic>chinensis</italic>)</article-title>. <source>Biol. Fertility Soils</source> <volume>46</volume>, <fpage>689</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>696</lpage>.
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B53">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Wellburn</surname> <given-names>A. R.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>1994</year>). 
<article-title>The spectral determination of chlorophylls a and b, as well as total carotenoids, using various solvents with spectrophotometers of different resolution</article-title>. <source>J. Plant Physiol.</source> <volume>144</volume>, <fpage>307</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>313</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S0176-1617(11)81192-2</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B54">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2024</year>). 
<article-title>The organic manure-improved yield and quality in strawberries is attributed to metabolic reprogramming to increase amino acids, sugar/acid ratio, flavonoids and phenolic volatiles</article-title>. <source>Plant Soil</source> <volume>504</volume>, <fpage>679</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>697</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11104-024-06651-5</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B55">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Yadav</surname> <given-names>N. K.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Patel</surname> <given-names>A. B.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Baidya</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Biswas</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2025</year>a). 
<article-title>Interactive effects of solvent extraction and drying methods on LC-ESI-QTOF-MS/MS-based characterization of bioactive phenolics and antioxidant activities in duckweed (<italic>Wolffia globosa</italic>)</article-title>. <source>Eur. Food Res. Technol.</source> <volume>251</volume>, <fpage>493</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>512</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00217-024-04647-0</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B56">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Yadav</surname> <given-names>N. K.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Patel</surname> <given-names>A. B.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Debbarma</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Priyadarshini</surname> <given-names>M. B.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Kumar</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Baidya</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2024</year>b). 
<article-title>Characterization of phenolic compounds in watermeal (<italic>Wolffia globosa</italic>) through LC-ESI-QTOF-MS/MS: Assessment of bioactive compounds, <italic>in vitro</italic> antioxidant and anti-diabetic activities following different drying methods</article-title>. <source>Food Meas Char</source> <volume>18</volume>, <fpage>8651</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>8672</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11694-024-02833-y</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B57">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Yadav</surname> <given-names>N. K.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Patel</surname> <given-names>A. B.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Debbarma</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Priyadarshini</surname> <given-names>M. B.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Priyadarshi</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2024</year>a). 
<article-title>Characterization of bioactive metabolites and antioxidant activities in solid and liquid fractions of fresh duckweed (<italic>Wolffia globosa</italic>) subjected to different cell wall rupture methods</article-title>. <source>ACS Omega</source> <volume>9</volume>, <fpage>19940</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>19955</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1021/acsomega.3c09674</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">38737040</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B58">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Yadav</surname> <given-names>N. K.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Patel</surname> <given-names>A. B.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Priyadarshi</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Baidya</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2025</year>b). 
<article-title>Salinity stress-induced impacts on biomass production, bioactive compounds, antioxidant activities and oxidative stress in watermeal (<italic>Wolffia globosa</italic>)</article-title>. <source>Disc Appl. Sci.</source> <volume>7</volume>, <fpage>106</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s42452-024-06426-8</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
<fn-group>
<fn id="n1" fn-type="custom" custom-type="edited-by">
<p>Edited by: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1194139">Muthusamy Ramakrishnan</ext-link>, Nanjing Forestry University, China</p></fn>
<fn id="n2" fn-type="custom" custom-type="reviewed-by">
<p>Reviewed by: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2195123">Abdul Waheed</ext-link>, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, China</p>
<p><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2974206">Maya Melati</ext-link>, IPB University, Indonesia</p></fn>
</fn-group>
</back>
</article>