<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3-mathml3.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xml:lang="EN">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Front. Plant Sci.</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Frontiers in Plant Science</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">Front. Plant Sci.</abbrev-journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="epub">1664-462X</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Frontiers Media S.A.</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpls.2026.1732283</article-id>
<article-version article-version-type="Version of Record" vocab="NISO-RP-8-2008"/>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Original Research</subject>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Spatiotemporal dynamics of rhizosphere microbial communities under different mulching methods in spring maize</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Wu</surname><given-names>Jianlong</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="conceptualization" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/conceptualization/">Conceptualization</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Formal analysis" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/formal-analysis/">Formal analysis</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="methodology" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/methodology/">Methodology</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="software" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/software/">Software</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="visualization" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/visualization/">Visualization</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Writing &#x2013; original draft" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/">Writing &#x2013; original draft</role>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Chen</surname><given-names>Kuo</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="methodology" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/methodology/">Methodology</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="validation" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/validation/">Validation</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Writing &#x2013; original draft" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/">Writing &#x2013; original draft</role>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Sheng</surname><given-names>Lianghao</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="validation" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/validation/">Validation</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/">Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing</role>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Han</surname><given-names>Haoran</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="methodology" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/methodology/">Methodology</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="validation" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/validation/">Validation</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="visualization" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/visualization/">Visualization</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Writing &#x2013; original draft" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/">Writing &#x2013; original draft</role>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>Jiaxiu</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="validation" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/validation/">Validation</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/">Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing</role>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Guo</surname><given-names>Zhengyu</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="software" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/software/">Software</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/">Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing</role>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Gong</surname><given-names>Shuai</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="software" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/software/">Software</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="validation" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/validation/">Validation</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/">Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing</role>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>Haoyu</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="validation" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/validation/">Validation</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/">Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing</role>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Chen</surname><given-names>Li</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Data curation" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/data-curation/">Data curation</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/">Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing</role>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name><surname>Zhang</surname><given-names>Zhongdong</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="corresp" rid="c001"><sup>*</sup></xref>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="conceptualization" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/conceptualization/">Conceptualization</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Funding acquisition" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/funding-acquisition/">Funding acquisition</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="supervision" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/supervision/">Supervision</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/">Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing</role>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name><surname>Gao</surname><given-names>Fei</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="corresp" rid="c001"><sup>*</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2558481/overview"/>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="conceptualization" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/conceptualization/">Conceptualization</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Funding acquisition" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/funding-acquisition/">Funding acquisition</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="resources" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/resources/">Resources</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="supervision" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/supervision/">Supervision</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/">Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing</role>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>College of Agronomy, Shanxi Agricultural University</institution>, <city>Taiyuan</city>,&#xa0;<country country="cn">China</country></aff>
<aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Institute of Maize, Shanxi Agricultural University</institution>, <city>Xinzhou</city>,&#xa0;<country country="cn">China</country></aff>
<author-notes>
<corresp id="c001"><label>*</label>Correspondence: Fei Gao, <email xlink:href="mailto:sxfeigao@sxau.edu.cn">sxfeigao@sxau.edu.cn</email>; Zhongdong Zhang, <email xlink:href="mailto:ymszzd@sxau.edu.cn">ymszzd@sxau.edu.cn</email></corresp>
</author-notes>
<pub-date publication-format="electronic" date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2026-02-04">
<day>04</day>
<month>02</month>
<year>2026</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date publication-format="electronic" date-type="collection">
<year>2026</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>17</volume>
<elocation-id>1732283</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>25</day>
<month>10</month>
<year>2025</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>12</day>
<month>01</month>
<year>2026</year>
</date>
<date date-type="rev-recd">
<day>10</day>
<month>01</month>
<year>2026</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#xa9; 2026 Wu, Chen, Sheng, Han, Li, Guo, Gong, Wang, Chen, Zhang and Gao.</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2026</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Wu, Chen, Sheng, Han, Li, Guo, Gong, Wang, Chen, Zhang and Gao</copyright-holder>
<license>
<ali:license_ref start_date="2026-02-04">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ali:license_ref>
<license-p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY)</ext-link>. The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.</license-p>
</license>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<sec>
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>Plastic film mulching is a critical practice in arid agroecosystems, yet its spatiotemporal impacts on the rhizosphere microbiome remain poorly understood. </p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Methods</title>
<p>Here, we investigated how no-mulching (CK), on-film hole sowing (UPM), and film-side planting (FPM) shape the bacterial and fungal communities in the maize rhizosphere across developmental stages (V12 and R6) and soil depths (10, 20, and 30 cm). </p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Results</title>
<p>Concurrently, both mulching strategies increased maize yield relative to CK, with FPM ultimately outperforming UPM (19.05% vs. 6.24%). Amplicon sequencing showed that mulching strongly structured the rhizosphere microbiome with clear spatiotemporal variation. Bacterial and fungal communities exhibited contrasting patterns: bacteria responded mainly in topsoil at V12 and across all depths by R6, whereas fungi responded across the soil profile at V12, with responses weakening with depth at R6. Mulching&#x2014;particularly UPM&#x2014;reduced key taxa, including the nitrifying genus <italic>Nitrospira</italic> and symbiotic <italic>Glomeromycota</italic>. Correlation analyses revealed significant associations between these taxonomic shifts and maize yield components, consistent with Nitrospira&#x2019;s preference for aerobic conditions. Functional predictions suggested UPM favored communities with higher representation of anaerobic decomposition pathways, whereas FPM supported greater potential for aerobic heterotrophy and nitrogen-related processes.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Discussion</title>
<p>Although microbial shifts were correlated with yield components, yield increases were likely dominated by the direct physical effects of mulching. Overall, distinct mulching strategies generated divergent rhizosphere trajectories, with FPM potentially offering a more sustainable option for dryland maize production.</p>
</sec>
</abstract>
<abstract abstract-type="graphical">
<title>Graphical Abstract</title>
<p>
<fig>
<graphic xlink:href="fpls-17-1732283-g000.tif" position="anchor">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Diagram illustrating how mulching affects the rhizosphere microbiome in dryland maize. It features three experimental treatments: UPM, FPM, and CK, each with different mulching techniques. Below, a cross-section of soil layers at 10, 20, and 30 centimeters depicts root and microbial interactions during the V12 and R6 growth stages. Environmental factors like temperature and water droplets are shown. Symbols denote nutrient cycling, anaerobic metabolism, and aerobic respiration.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
</p>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>community structure and composition</kwd>
<kwd>maize</kwd>
<kwd>plastic film mulching</kwd>
<kwd>rhizosphere microbiome</kwd>
<kwd>spatiotemporal dynamics</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<funding-group>
<funding-statement>The author(s) declared financial support was received for this work and/or its publication. The authors would like to acknowledge the financial support provided by the Natural Science Foundation of China (32301945), Young Science &amp; Technology Leadership Program (2024YQPYGC04),the earmarked fund for Modern Agro-industry Technology Research System (2025CYJSTX01-13), China Postdoctoral Science Foundation( 2024M751916 ).</funding-statement>
</funding-group>
<counts>
<fig-count count="6"/>
<table-count count="2"/>
<equation-count count="1"/>
<ref-count count="50"/>
<page-count count="15"/>
<word-count count="7564"/>
</counts>
<custom-meta-group>
<custom-meta>
<meta-name>section-at-acceptance</meta-name>
<meta-value>Plant Symbiotic Interactions</meta-value>
</custom-meta>
</custom-meta-group>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec id="s1" sec-type="intro">
<label>1</label>
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>Dryland ecosystems, accounting for approximately 41% of the global terrestrial surface, are critical frontiers for global food security, particularly in regions like northern China (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">Pr&#x103;v&#x103;lie, 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B48">Zhang et&#xa0;al., 2017</xref>). Maize <italic>(Zea mays</italic> L.) cultivation in these rainfed systems is perennially challenged by water scarcity, making agronomic innovations like plastic film mulching essential for stabilizing and enhancing productivity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Bu et&#xa0;al., 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">Huang et&#xa0;al., 2024</xref>). However, despite these well-documented agronomic benefits, how mulching alters rhizosphere microbial communities&#x2014;and whether it functions as an environmental filter shaping microbial community structure&#x2014;remains insufficiently understood. The rhizosphere microbiome, often termed the &#x201c;plant&#x2019;s second genome,&#x201d; is a key determinant of plant health and ecosystem functioning, mediating critical biogeochemical processes such as nutrient cycling, disease suppression, and stress mitigation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Berendsen et&#xa0;al., 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Bulgarelli et&#xa0;al., 2015</xref>). The composition and structure of this complex community are shaped by a dynamic interaction between soil properties, climatic conditions, and agronomic management practices (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Fierer, 2017</xref>). Plastic film mulching, by dramatically altering soil temperature, moisture, and aeration, imposes a strong, deterministic selection pressure on the microbial community (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B50">Zhu et&#xa0;al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">Tang et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>). However, how this selection pressure varies across different life kingdoms (i.e., bacteria and fungi) and spatiotemporal scales remains a central, unresolved question in microbial ecology. Bacteria and fungi, with their fundamentally different biological and physiological traits&#x2014;such as unicellular versus filamentous growth forms, distinct cell wall compositions, and divergent nutrient acquisition strategies&#x2014;are expected to respond divergently to environmental gradients (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Bardgett and van der Putten, 2014</xref>). Indeed, large-scale studies have confirmed that drivers such as plant diversity can differentially structure bacterial and fungal communities, suggesting they are governed by distinct response patterns (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">Prober et&#xa0;al., 2015</xref>). Yet, few studies have directly compared their responses to agricultural perturbations like mulching within the same experimental framework.</p>
<p>Furthermore, the ecological consequences of these community shifts, particularly for key soil functions like nitrogen (N) and carbon (C) cycling, are far from clear. For instance, while mulching can enhance N uptake by plants, it may simultaneously create anaerobic micro-sites that favor denitrification or suppress critical aerobic processes like nitrification, potentially altering the soil N balance in the long term (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">Tian et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">Liu et&#xa0;al., 2024</xref>). Understanding how mulching-induced shifts in the abundance of key functional guilds&#x2014;such as nitrifiers (e.g., Nitrospira), mycorrhizal fungi (e.g., Glomeromycota), and decomposers&#x2014;translate into changes in the functional potential of the entire microbiome is crucial for evaluating the long-term ecological footprint of this widespread agricultural practice. This is particularly relevant when comparing different application techniques, such as different film-planting patterns, which create distinct micro-niches by varying the degree of soil aeration and root-film contact, and thus may drive different community succession trajectories (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">Andrew et&#xa0;al., 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B44">Yan et&#xa0;al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">Gao et&#xa0;al., 2019</xref>).</p>
<p>In light of these knowledge gaps, we conducted a field experiment in a representative dryland agricultural region on the Loess Plateau of China. Using 16S rRNA and ITS amplicon sequencing, we systematically investigated how different film mulching practices shape the spatiotemporal dynamics of rhizosphere bacterial and fungal communities. Specifically, we aimed to test the following hypotheses: (i) mulching acts as a deterministic environmental filter, shaping rhizosphere microbial communities in a spatiotemporally dependent manner. (ii) bacteria and fungi, due to their distinct life strategies, will exhibit divergent community dynamics patterns in response to mulching-induced gradients; and (iii) These structural shifts will drive a significant reorganization of the community's functional potential, particularly in key carbon and nitrogen cycling pathways.</p>
<p>By elucidating the spatiotemporal &#x201c;fingerprints&#x201d; of mulching on the rhizosphere microbiome, this study aims to provide a mechanistic, microbial-centric basis for optimizing cultivation strategies to enhance the sustainability and resilience of dryland maize agroecosystems.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2" sec-type="materials|methods">
<label>2</label>
<title>Materials and methods</title>
<sec id="s2_1">
<label>2.1</label>
<title>Study site, experimental setup and sample collection</title>
<p>The field experiment was conducted at the Xinzhou Experimental Station of the China National Maize Industry System (38&#xb0;24&#x2032; N, 112&#xb0;43&#x2032; E), located in a temperate continental monsoon climate zone. The soil at the site was classified as sandy loam. During the maize growing season, the mean air temperature was 20.38&#xb0;C, and cumulative precipitation was 342.3 mm. Detailed climatic data for the experimental period are provided in <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1"><bold>Supplementary Figure S1</bold></xref>.</p>
<p>This study was performed in the fourth year (2024) of a long-term experiment to assess the effects of different mulching practices on the spatiotemporal enrichment of rhizosphere microbes and to identify key microbial taxa. A randomized complete block design (RCBD) was employed, comprising three treatments: (i) film-side planting (FPM) using 60 cm-wide plastic film; (ii) on-film hole-sowing (UPM) using 80 cm-wide plastic film; and (iii) no mulching (CK) as the control. Each treatment was replicated three times, with plot dimensions of 7 m &#xd7; 5 m (35 m&#xb2;), resulting in a total of nine plots. The maize cultivar &#x2018;Xianyu 335&#x2019; was sown at a plant spacing of 28 cm. A controlled-release compound fertilizer (28:15:8, N:P<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub>:K<sub>2</sub>O) was applied at a rate of 472.5 kg ha<sup>-</sup>&#xb9;. Sowing was carried out on 2 May 2024, and the harvest took place on 28 September 2024. Standard local agronomic practices for pest, disease, and weed management were followed throughout the growing season.</p>
<p>Rhizosphere soil samples were collected from maize plants at the V12 (twelve-leaf) and R6 (physiological maturity) growth stages (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Chen et&#xa0;al., 2019</xref>). These two stages were selected to represent the peak of vegetative growth with vigorous root activity (V12) and the final reproductive stage characterized by root senescence and cumulative treatment effects (R6). In each plot, sampling was conducted at three soil depths (10, 20, and 30 cm) using a standard five-point sampling method. At each sampling point, roots within each specific soil layer were carefully exposed. The plants were carefully uprooted, and loose soil was gently shaken off. The rhizosphere soil tightly adhering to the lateral roots at that specific depth was then collected using a sterile brush. To ensure representativeness and minimize heterogeneity, the rhizosphere soil from these five points at the same depth was thoroughly mixed to form one composite sample per plot. A total of 54 composite samples (3 treatments &#xd7; 3 replicates &#xd7; 2 stages &#xd7; 3 depths) were obtained. From each composite sample, a 2 g subsample was homogenized for subsequent analysis, immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored at &#x2212;80&#xb0;C until further processing.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_2">
<label>2.2</label>
<title>Yield and plant dry matter accumulation</title>
<p>At harvest, the total number of plants, the number of prolific plants (i.e., those bearing double ears), and the number of lodged plants were recorded for each plot. In each plot, 20 representative ears were randomly collected from the two central rows. These ears were air-dried and transported to the laboratory for yield component analysis. The number of kernels per ear and the thousand-kernel weight (TKW) were subsequently measured. Grain yield of spring maize was calculated and standardized to a 14 % moisture content using the following formula (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Guo et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>):</p>
<disp-formula>
<mml:math display="block" id="M1"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>Y</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mi>l</mml:mi><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi>g</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#xa0;</mml:mo><mml:mi>h</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#xa0;</mml:mo><mml:mi>o</mml:mi><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#xa0;</mml:mo><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#xa0;</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#xa0;</mml:mo><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#xa0;</mml:mo><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#xa0;</mml:mo><mml:mo>&#xd7;</mml:mo><mml:mo>&#xa0;</mml:mo><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mi>l</mml:mi><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#xa0;</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#xa0;</mml:mo><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#xa0;</mml:mo><mml:mo>&#xd7;</mml:mo><mml:mo>&#xa0;</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi>h</mml:mi><mml:mi>o</mml:mi><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#xa0;</mml:mo><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mi>l</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#xa0;</mml:mo><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>g</mml:mi><mml:mi>h</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#xa0;</mml:mo><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:mi>g</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo><mml:mo>&#xa0;</mml:mo><mml:mo stretchy="false">/</mml:mo><mml:mn>1000</mml:mn><mml:mo>&#xa0;</mml:mo><mml:mo>&#xd7;</mml:mo><mml:mo>&#xa0;</mml:mo><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:mn>1</mml:mn><mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi>l</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#xa0;</mml:mo><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi>o</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>u</mml:mi><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#xa0;</mml:mo><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mi>o</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo><mml:mo>&#xa0;</mml:mo><mml:mo stretchy="false">/</mml:mo><mml:mo>&#xa0;</mml:mo><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:mn>1</mml:mn><mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.14</mml:mn><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math>
</disp-formula>
<p>At the 6-leaf stage (V6), 12-leaf stage (V12), tasseling(VT), milk ripening stage (R3), and mature stage (R6) of the maize, three representative maize plants with consistent growth were randomly selected from each plot. The aboveground part of the plant was sampled from the base of the maize plant near the ground surface, and the stems, leaves, sheaths, bracts, and other organs were packed in sampling paper bags, marked for processing, and placed in an oven. The samples were incubated at 105&#xb0;C for 30 min to inactivate the enzymes and were then heated to a constant weight at 65&#xb0;C. The dry samples were weighed and recorded using a balance that was accurate to 0.01 g.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_3">
<label>2.3</label>
<title>Soil water content and soil temperature measurements</title>
<p>At the V6, V12, VT, R3, and R6 stages of maize development, soil samples were collected from the 0&#x2013;60 cm soil profile in 20 cm increments using a soil auger. Sampling points were located within the crop row between two adjacent plants. The collected samples were then oven-dried at 105&#xb0;C to a constant weight to determine the gravimetric soil water content.</p>
<p>Soil temperature was monitored at fixed positions within each plot using bent-stem glass mercury thermometers. On the day of sowing, thermometers were installed in the center of each plot, adjacent to a seed between two maize plants, at depths of 5, 10, and 20 cm. From sowing to harvest, soil temperature readings at each depth were recorded at 5-day intervals at 08:00, 14:00, and 20:00 h. The daily mean soil temperature was calculated as the arithmetic mean of these three readings. For each developmental stage, the temperature difference between the air and the 5&#x2013;20 cm mean soil temperature was also determined.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_4">
<label>2.4</label>
<title>Rhizosphere microbial niche breadth</title>
<p>The niche breadth of the rhizosphere microbial community was calculated using Levins&#x2019; formula. This index reflects both the number of distinct habitats a species occupies and the evenness of its distribution among them, thereby characterizing the extent to which an organism or population utilizes the available spectrum of resources (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">Hanski, 1978</xref>). All niche breadth calculations were performed in the R environment (version 4.3.1) using the spaa package.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_5">
<label>2.5</label>
<title>Microbial high-throughput sequencing and analysis</title>
<sec id="s2_5_1">
<label>2.5.1</label>
<title>DNA extraction and amplification</title>
<p>Genomic DNA was extracted from rhizosphere soil samples using the MagPure Soil DNA LQ Kit (Magan, China) according to the manufacturer&#x2019;s protocol. The concentration and purity of the extracted DNA were assessed using a NanoDrop 2000 spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA) and verified by agarose gel electrophoresis. DNA samples were then stored at &#x2212;20&#xb0;C until further analysis.</p>
<p>PCR amplification was performed using the extracted genomic DNA as a template, barcoded primers, and Takara Ex Taq high-fidelity polymerase (Takara, Japan). For bacterial community analysis, the V3&#x2013;V4 hypervariable region of the 16S rRNA gene was amplified with the primers 343F (5&#x2032;-TACGGRAGGCAGCAG-3&#x2032;) and 798R (5&#x2032;-AGGGTATCTAATCCT-3&#x2032;) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">Nossa, 2010</xref>). For fungal community analysis, the ITS1 variable region of the ITS gene was amplified using the primers ITS1F (5&#x2032;-CTTGGTCATTTAGAGGAAGTAA-3&#x2032;) and ITS2 (5&#x2032;-GCTGCGTTCTTCATCGATGC-3&#x2032;) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Mukherjee et&#xa0;al., 2014</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_5_2">
<label>2.5.2</label>
<title>Library construction and sequencing</title>
<p>The PCR amplification products were verified by agarose gel electrophoresis and subsequently purified using AMPure XP beads (Beckman Coulter, USA). These purified products then served as templates for a second round of PCR amplification. Amplicons obtained from the second PCR were purified again using magnetic beads, and their concentrations were quantified with a Qubit fluorometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA). Prior to sequencing, all amplicon concentrations were normalized.</p>
<p>Sequencing was performed on an Illumina NovaSeq 6000 platform (Illumina, USA) to generate 250 bp paired-end reads. The sequencing service was provided by OE Biotech Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_5_3">
<label>2.5.3</label>
<title>Bioinformatics analysis</title>
<p>Bioinformatic processing of the sequencing data was conducted by OE Biotech Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). Raw sequencing reads were obtained in FASTQ format. Primer sequences were removed using Cutadapt. The trimmed paired-end reads were processed using the DADA2 plugin within the QIIME 2 pipeline (version 2023.2) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Callahan et&#xa0;al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">Bolyen et&#xa0;al., 2019</xref>) to perform quality filtering, denoising, merging, and chimera removal, generating an amplicon sequence variant (ASV) abundance table and representative sequences. Taxonomic classification was carried out using the q2-feature-classifier plugin against the SILVA database (version 138) for bacteria and the UNITE database (version 9.0) for fungi. Alpha diversity indices (ACE and Shannon) were calculated using QIIME 2. Functional prediction was performed using PICRUSt2 and FAPROTAX for bacteria, and FUNGuild for fungi.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_5_4">
<label>2.5.4</label>
<title>Statistical analysis</title>
<p>All statistical analyses were performed in R (version 4.3.2). For alpha diversity indices and soil temperature and moisture, differences among treatments were tested using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Duncan&#x2019;s multiple range test for normally distributed data, or the Kruskal&#x2013;Wallis test for non-normally distributed data. Differences in microbial community structure (&#x3b2;-diversity) were assessed using Permutational Multivariate Analysis of Variance (PERMANOVA) based on Binary Jaccard distance matrices with the vegan package. Key microbial taxa were screened using Random Forest analysis implemented in the randomForest package. Correlations between key microbial taxa and environmental factors or maize yield were evaluated using Spearman&#x2019;s rank correlation analysis. Data visualization was performed using the ggplot2 package. Statistical significance was defined at <italic>P</italic> &lt; 0.05.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s3" sec-type="results">
<label>3</label>
<title>Results</title>
<sec id="s3_1">
<label>3.1</label>
<title>Spring maize yield and rhizosphere environmental conditions</title>
<sec id="s3_1_1">
<label>3.1.1</label>
<title>Yield</title>
<p>All yield and yield component data are presented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1"><bold>Table&#xa0;1</bold></xref>. Among the three treatments, film-side planting (FPM) achieved the highest grain yield. Specifically, the grain yield under FPM was significantly higher by 10.92% and 17.85% compared to on-film hole sowing (UPM) and the unmulched control (CK), respectively. The yield advantage of FPM was primarily driven by a significant increase in both ear number and kernels per ear. Both mulching treatments (FPM and UPM) significantly increased these two yield components compared to CK. In contrast, the thousand-kernel weight (TKW) did not differ significantly among any of the treatments.</p>
<table-wrap id="T1" position="float">
<label>Table&#xa0;1</label>
<caption>
<p>Effects of different mulching practices on ear characteristics, yield, and yield components of spring maize.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Treatment</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Ear L. (cm)</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Ear D. (mm)</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Ears (ha<sup>-</sup>&#xb9;)</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">KPE</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">TKW (g)</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Yield (kg ha<sup>-</sup>&#xb9;)</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">CK</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">15.4b</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">4.6b</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">78045.0b</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">447.4b</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">359.8a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">10804.4c</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">UPM</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">16.4a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">4.8a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">75263.6c</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">496.9ab</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">356.9a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">11478.9b</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">FPM</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">16.4a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">4.7ab</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">80910.2a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">516.3a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">354.4a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">12732.0a</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn>
<p>CK, no mulching; UPM, on-film hole-sowing; FPM, film-side planting; Ear L., ear length; Ear D., ear diameter; KPE, kernels per ear; TKW, thousand-kernel weight. Different letters indicate significant differences among treatments (<italic>P</italic> &lt; 0.05).</p></fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_1_2">
<label>3.1.2</label>
<title>Effects of different mulching practices on soil moisture and temperature</title>
<p>Compared with the unmulched control (CK), both film mulching treatments significantly improved soil hydrothermal conditions (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1"><bold>Supplementary Figure S2</bold></xref>). However, the two mulching strategies exhibited distinct advantages. The on-film hole sowing (UPM) treatment consistently resulted in the greatest increase in soil temperature, particularly during the early growth stages. In contrast, the film-side planting (FPM) treatment showed the most pronounced water-conservation effect, maintaining a significantly higher average soil water content throughout the growing season compared to both UPM and CK (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1"><bold>Supplementary Figure S2</bold></xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_1_3">
<label>3.1.3</label>
<title>Dynamics of dry matter accumulation under different mulching practices</title>
<p>To assess the dynamic effects of different mulching practices on biomass accumulation, we measured the dry matter of individual plants at five key growth stages (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1"><bold>Figure&#xa0;1</bold></xref>). Film mulching significantly promoted dry matter accumulation, but the effects were stage-dependent. During the rapid vegetative growth phase (V12 to VT), both mulching treatments surpassed the CK control, and the UPM treatment was significantly superior to FPM. However, this trend reversed during the reproductive stages. By the R3 stage, FPM&#x2019;s dry matter accumulation had already surpassed that of UPM, and at the final R6 stage, the overall biomass accumulation followed a clear pattern of FPM &gt; UPM &gt; CK.</p>
<fig id="f1" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;1</label>
<caption>
<p>Dynamic changes in maize dry matter accumulation under different mulching treatments. FPM, film-side planting; UPM, on-film hole sowing; CK, no mulching. Data are presented as means &#xb1; standard error (n = 3). Different lowercase letters above the bars within the same growth stage indicate significant differences among treatments at P &lt; 0.05 according to Tukey's HSD test.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-17-1732283-g001.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Bar chart showing dry matter accumulation per plant at different growth stages: V6, V12, VT, R3, and R6. Three treatments are compared: FPM, UPM, and CK. FPM generally shows the highest accumulation, especially at R6 with over 300 grams per plant. Significance is indicated with letters a, b, and c above bars.</alt-text>
</graphic></fig>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_2">
<label>3.2</label>
<title>Community composition and structure</title>
<p>Sequencing of the 16S rRNA and ITS amplicons yielded a total of 15,515 and 17,614 bacterial amplicon sequence variants (ASVs) and 1,988 and 3,009 fungal ASVs from samples at the V12 and R6 stages, respectively. The species accumulation curves indicated that the sequencing depth was sufficient to capture the majority of microbial taxa present in the samples (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1"><bold>Supplementary Figure S3</bold></xref>).</p>
<p>At the phylum level, the rhizosphere microbiome was dominated by a few key phyla, whose relative abundances showed pronounced spatiotemporal dynamics (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1"><bold>Supplementary Figure S4</bold></xref>). For bacteria, Proteobacteria and Actinobacteriota exhibited opposing depth preferences that shifted between growth stages. For fungi, a striking finding was the exceptionally high relative abundance of Basidiomycota in the mid-depth soil under UPM at V12, while both Ascomycota and Basidiomycota were co-enriched in the deep soil under UPM by R6. Notably, the symbiotic phylum Glomeromycota remained at a consistently low abundance across all mulched conditions.</p>
<p>At the genus level, the microbiome exhibited more fine-grained and functionally relevant shifts in response to treatments (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2"><bold>Figure&#xa0;2</bold></xref>). During the V12 stage, key bacterial genera displayed distinct niche preferences (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2"><bold>Figure&#xa0;2A</bold></xref>). <italic>Sphingomonas</italic>, a dominant genus with relative abundances ranging from 4.97% to 14.38%, clearly favored the shallower soil layers under mulching treatments. In stark contrast, the beneficial genus <italic>Streptomyces</italic> was most abundant in the deep, unmulched soil (CK at 30 cm), reaching a peak of 6.87%. This bacterial composition evolved by the R6 stage (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2"><bold>Figure&#xa0;2B</bold></xref>). A functionally critical shift was the marked suppression of the nitrifying genus <italic>Nitrospira</italic> in the deep soil under both mulching treatments compared to the CK control, where it reached its highest relative abundance.</p>
<fig id="f2" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;2</label>
<caption>
<p>Relative abundance of microbial communities at the genus level across different treatments and developmental stages. <bold>(A, B)</bold> The ten most abundant genera in the bacterial community at the V12 and R6 developmental stages, respectively. <bold>(C, D)</bold> The ten most abundant genera in the fungal community at the V12 and R6 developmental stages, respectively. The x-axis represents the different combinations of treatments and soil depths (10 cm, 20 cm, and 30 cm). The y-axis indicates the relative abundance (%). The legend lists the top ten most abundant genera; all other less abundant genera are grouped as 'Others'.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-17-1732283-g002.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Four stacked bar charts labeled A, B, C, and D, displaying microbial abundance across different treatments: FPM10, FPM20, FPM30, UPM10, UPM20, UPM30, CK10, CK20, and CK30. Each chart presents various taxonomic groups distinguished by different colors. The charts illustrate differences in the distribution of taxa among the samples.</alt-text>
</graphic></fig>
<p>The fungal community at the genus level was also highly dynamic and treatment-sensitive. At the V12 stage, several genera showed highly localized enrichment, most notably the potential plant pathogen <italic>Fusarium</italic>, whose relative abundance was significantly elevated to 9.42% only under FPM in the topsoil (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2"><bold>Figure&#xa0;2C</bold></xref>). By the R6 stage, the community structure continued to diverge (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2"><bold>Figure&#xa0;2D</bold></xref>). <italic>Chaetomium</italic> was exclusively enriched in the deep soil of the FPM treatment, reaching 18.67%. The most remarkable trend was observed for <italic>Ceratobasidium</italic>, which displayed a dramatic increase in relative abundance with soil depth specifically under the UPM treatment, rising from 1.48% at 10 cm to a dominant 11.89% at 30 cm.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_3">
<label>3.3</label>
<title>Microbial community diversity</title>
<sec id="s3_3_1">
<label>3.3.1</label>
<title>Spatiotemporal shifts in microbial diversity and community structure</title>
<p>The impact on &#x3b1;-diversity was primarily observed in species richness (ACE index), whereas the Shannon diversity index, which accounts for both richness and evenness, remained relatively stable (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1"><bold>Supplementary Figures S5</bold></xref>-<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1"><bold>S8</bold></xref>). For bacteria, the UPM treatment transiently promoted richness in the topsoil (10 cm) at the V12 stage, but this effect reversed by the R6 stage, where richness was constrained in the deep soil (30 cm). Fungal richness at R6 was also significantly lower in the deep soil under both mulching treatments.</p>
<p>In contrast, the impact on community structure (&#x3b2;-diversity) was more profound and systematic. Permutational Multivariate Analysis of Variance (PERMANOVA) revealed significant and highly spatiotemporally specific effects on both bacterial and fungal communities (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T2"><bold>Table&#xa0;2</bold></xref>). For bacteria, structural differentiation was confined to the topsoil (10 cm) at the V12 stage (R&#xb2; = 0.17, <italic>P</italic> = 0.013) but expanded to all soil depths by the R6 stage, with the strongest effect size observed in the deep soil (30 cm, R&#xb2; = 0.17, <italic>P</italic> = 0.001). The fungal community exhibited a divergent spatiotemporal pattern: at the V12 stage, the treatment effect size (R&#xb2;) increased with depth, peaking at 20 cm and 30 cm (R&#xb2; &#x2248; 0.18), whereas by R6, this trend inverted, with the effect size attenuating in the deeper soil layers (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T2"><bold>Table&#xa0;2</bold></xref>).</p>
<table-wrap id="T2" position="float">
<label>Table&#xa0;2</label>
<caption>
<p>Permutational multivariate analysis of variance (PERMANOVA) of rhizosphere bacterial and fungal community structures.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Microbial group</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Developmental stage</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Soil depth</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">R&#xb2;</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center"><italic>P</italic></th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" rowspan="6" align="center">Bacteria</td>
<td valign="middle" rowspan="3" align="center">V12</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">10cm</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.165</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.013*</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">20cm</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.149</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.210</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">30cm</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.155</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.097</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" rowspan="3" align="center">R6</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">10cm</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.153</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.033*</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">20cm</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.160</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.033*</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">30cm</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.174</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.001***</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" rowspan="6" align="center">Fungi</td>
<td valign="middle" rowspan="3" align="center">V12</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">10cm</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.162</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.024*</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">20cm</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.178</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.006**</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">30cm</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.177</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.002**</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" rowspan="3" align="center">R6</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">10cm</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.165</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.001***</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">20cm</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.165</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.005**</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">30cm</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.161</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.012*</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn>
<p>The analysis was based on binary Jaccard dissimilarity matrices for each subset of data. P-values were obtained from 999 permutations. Asterisks indicate the level of significance: *, P &lt; 0.05; **, P &lt; 0.01; ***, P &lt; 0.001.</p></fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_3_2">
<label>3.3.2</label>
<title>Rhizosphere microbial niche breadth</title>
<p>Microbial niche breadth exhibited significant and divergent spatiotemporal dynamics between bacteria and fungi (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3"><bold>Figure&#xa0;3</bold></xref>). A general trend observed was a marked decline in niche breadth for both communities from the V12 to the R6 stage. More importantly, the bacterial community displayed a striking stage-dependent reversal in its response to mulching. At the V12 stage, niche breadth was significantly wider under the CK and UPM treatments compared to FPM. Conversely, at the R6 stage, this pattern inverted, with FPM exhibiting significantly wider niche breadth than both CK and UPM. The fungal community responded differently: its niche breadth was highest under CK at the V12 stage, but by the R6 stage, all significant differences among treatments had disappeared.</p>
<fig id="f3" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;3</label>
<caption>
<p>Spatiotemporal changes in the niche width of rhizosphere <bold>(A)</bold> bacterial and <bold>(B)</bold> fungal communities under different mulching treatments. CK: no mulching; FPM: film-side planting; UPM: on-film hole sowing. The violin plots illustrate the probability density of the data, with the internal box plots showing the median and interquartile range. Asterisks above the brackets indicate significant differences between treatments (***, P &lt; 0.001).</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-17-1732283-g003.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Two panels, A and B, show violin plots comparing niche width for bacteria and fungi across three groups: CK, FPM, and UPM. Panel A (Bacteria) and Panel B (Fungi) both display data for V12 and R6. Significant differences are marked with asterisks; triple asterisks indicate highly significant differences. Each group is color-coded: CK (orange), FPM (blue), and UPM (purple).</alt-text>
</graphic></fig>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_4">
<label>3.4</label>
<title>Functional prediction of microbial communities</title>
<sec id="s3_4_1">
<label>3.4.1</label>
<title>Effects of mulching practices on bacterial functional pathways</title>
<p>Functional prediction using PICRUSt2 revealed that film mulching significantly reshaped the metabolic potential of the rhizosphere bacterial community, with distinct functional profiles observed at the V12 and R6 stages (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f4"><bold>Figure&#xa0;4</bold></xref>, <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1"><bold>Supplementary Figure S9</bold></xref>).</p>
<fig id="f4" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;4</label>
<caption>
<p>Predicted functional profiles of the soil microbial community based on PICRUSt2 and FAPROTAX analyses.<bold>(A, B)</bold> Heatmaps showing the top 20 most abundant metabolic pathways (KEGG Level 3) in the bacterial community at the V12 and R6 stages, respectively, based on PICRUSt2 predictions. <bold>(C, D)</bold> Heatmaps showing the top 20 most abundant biogeochemical functions in the bacterial community at the V12 and R6 stages, respectively, based on FAPROTAX predictions. In the heatmaps, each row represents a specific function, and each column represents a treatment group. The color intensity reflects the relative abundance of each function (Z-score normalized), with red indicating higher abundance and blue indicating lower abundance. Both rows (functions) and columns (treatments) are hierarchically clustered to visualize their similarities.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-17-1732283-g004.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Heatmap panels labeled A, B, C, and D compare various metabolic pathways and biological processes across three groups: FPM, UPM, and CK. Color gradients range from blue to red, indicating different levels of activity or presence. Panels A and B focus on general metabolism and biosynthesis pathways, while panels C and D highlight respiratory processes and specific functions like nitrogen fixation and phototrophy. Each panel includes a dendrogram indicating hierarchical clustering.</alt-text>
</graphic></fig>
<p>A striking temporal shift was observed in the overall metabolic potential. At the V12 stage, the unmulched CK treatment generally maintained the highest potential across the top 20 most abundant metabolic pathways, suggesting a suppressive effect of early-season mulching on core bacterial metabolism (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f4"><bold>Figure&#xa0;4A</bold></xref>). However, this trend completely reversed by the R6 stage. The FPM treatment then exhibited the highest predicted abundances for a wide range of pathways, particularly those related to core metabolism (e.g., Carbon metabolism, Glycolysis), macromolecule biosynthesis (e.g., Ribosome, Biosynthesis of amino acids), and secondary metabolite production (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f4"><bold>Figure&#xa0;4B</bold></xref>).</p>
<p>In contrast, the UPM treatment consistently fostered a community with different functional traits. Throughout both stages, it was associated with pathways related to environmental sensing, stress response, and intercellular communication (e.g., Quorum sensing, Two-component system). At the R6 stage, this was coupled with an enrichment of pathways linked to pathogenicity (e.g., Amoebiasis), suggesting a shift towards a more competitive and potentially antagonistic microbial ecosystem under long-term full mulching (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1"><bold>Supplementary Figure S9</bold></xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_4_2">
<label>3.4.2</label>
<title>Effects of mulching practices on bacterial functional categories</title>
<p>FAPROTAX functional prediction further clarified the distinct ecological roles cultivated by the different mulching practices, consistently showing that UPM promoted anaerobic metabolic functions while FPM favored aerobic processes (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f4"><bold>Figure&#xa0;4</bold></xref>).</p>
<p>During the V12 stage, these functional divergences were already pronounced (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f4"><bold>Figure&#xa0;4C</bold></xref>). The UPM treatment significantly enriched a suite of anaerobic functions, particularly those involved in the nitrogen cycle under hypoxic conditions (e.g., nitrogen respiration, nitrate respiration). In contrast, the FPM treatment fostered a community dominated by aerobic chemoheterotrophs and showed the highest predicted potential for nitrogen fixation and ureolysis. The unmulched CK treatment maintained a unique profile, with the highest potential for degrading complex organic matter. By the R6 stage, this core anaerobic/aerobic division persisted, though some roles evolved (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f4"><bold>Figure&#xa0;4D</bold></xref>). The UPM treatment continued to harbor the highest potential for most anaerobic functions and also became the primary site for the decomposition of specific organic substrates. Notably, the potential for plant pathogenesis was also highest under UPM at this later stage. In a significant shift, the highest potential for nitrogen fixation now occurred under UPM, likely reflecting a switch to anaerobic N-fixing pathways. The FPM treatment, meanwhile, remained a hub for key aerobic processes.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_4_3">
<label>3.4.3</label>
<title>Effects of mulching practices on fungal trophic functions</title>
<p>FUNGuild functional prediction revealed that the different mulching treatments fostered distinct fungal trophic guilds, with these ecological roles shifting significantly between the V12 and R6 developmental stages (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f5"><bold>Figure&#xa0;5</bold></xref>).</p>
<fig id="f5" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;5</label>
<caption>
<p>Predicted ecological functions of the soil fungal community based on FUNGuild. <bold>(A, B)</bold> Heatmaps showing the relative abundance of the top 20 fungal trophic guilds at the V12 and R6 developmental stages, respectively. In the heatmaps, each row represents a specific ecological role (guild), and each column represents a treatment group. The color intensity reflects the relative abundance of each guild (Z-score normalized), with red indicating higher abundance and blue indicating lower abundance. Hierarchical clustering of both rows (guilds) and columns (treatments) illustrates the similarities between them.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-17-1732283-g005.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Heatmap comparison of microbial groups between two conditions, labeled A and B. Each heatmap shows different categories such as Dung Saprotroph, Fungal Parasite, and Epiphyte, with corresponding colors indicating values from -1 to 1. Color gradients represent three groups: FPM, UPM, and CK. Dendrograms indicate hierarchical clustering.</alt-text>
</graphic></fig>
<p>During the early V12 stage, the treatments cultivated specialized guilds (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f5"><bold>Figure&#xa0;5A</bold></xref>). The FPM treatment was uniquely characterized by higher abundances of beneficial guilds, including symbiotic (Arbuscular and Endomycorrhizal) and predatory (Nematophagous) fungi. In contrast, the UPM treatment was distinguished by its enrichment of parasitic (Fungal Parasite) and epiphytic guilds. The unmulched CK treatment served as a reservoir for a broader diversity of saprotrophs. By the later R6 stage, a functional role reversal was observed, with the UPM treatment becoming a hub of high fungal activity (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f5"><bold>Figure&#xa0;5B</bold></xref>). It significantly enhanced the potential for a broad spectrum of guilds, most notably saprotrophs (Leaf, Plant, Wood, and Litter Saprotrophs), but also plant parasites and key symbionts (Arbuscular and Endomycorrhizal fungi). The FPM treatment, meanwhile, was primarily enriched in guilds associated with plant surfaces and tissues, such as Epiphyte and Endophyte.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_5">
<label>3.5</label>
<title>Linking key microbial taxa to ecological functions and maize productivity</title>
<p>To elucidate the potential ecological consequences of the observed community shifts, we first identified the most influential microbial genera driving these changes using Random Forest models (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1"><bold>Supplementary Figures S10</bold></xref>, <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1"><bold>S11</bold></xref>). We then performed a series of Spearman's correlation analyses using these key discriminant genera. First, we aimed to infer their functional roles by correlating their abundances with predicted functions (FAPROTAX and FUNGuild) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f4"><bold>Figures&#xa0;4</bold></xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f5"><bold>5</bold></xref>), and then directly linked them to maize productivity indicators to assess their relevance to crop performance.</p>
<p>The analysis identified associations between key taxa and their inferred ecological roles (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1"><bold>Supplementary Figures S12</bold></xref>, <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1"><bold>S13</bold></xref>). For bacteria, the most notable finding was the strong positive correlation between Nitrospira and aerobic pathways, alongside its negative correlation with anaerobic N-cycling pathways. This aligns with its known role as an aerobic nitrifier and provides a functional rationale for its suppression under the likely hypoxic conditions of mulched soils. For fungi, the analysis supported the trophic modes of several key genera. For instance, the symbiotic role of <italic>Glomus</italic> was consistent with its strong positive correlation with the Arbuscular Mycorrhizal guild, while the abundance of <italic>Ceratobasidium</italic> at R6 was strongly and positively correlated with the Endomycorrhizal guild, suggesting a specific symbiotic strategy for this genus.</p>
<p>To directly link these microbial shifts to crop performance, we performed a correlation analysis between key microbial taxa and maize productivity indicators (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f6"><bold>Figure&#xa0;6</bold></xref>). A striking pattern of negative correlations was observed, where the relative abundances of the nitrifying genus <italic>Nitrospira</italic> and the dominant genus <italic>Pseudomonas</italic> were significantly and negatively correlated with Grain Yield, Ear Number, and Dry Matter. In contrast, a suite of other key taxa exhibited significant positive correlations with productivity. The beneficial bacterial genus <italic>Streptomyces</italic> was positively correlated with Grain Yield, Kernel Number per Ear, and Dry Matter. Similarly, the fungal genus <italic>Chaetomium</italic> showed strong positive correlations with multiple yield components, including Grain Yield and Ear Number. These findings provide direct, albeit correlational, evidence that the mulching-induced shifts in specific microbial taxa&#x2014;particularly those with important inferred functions in nutrient cycling and plant health&#x2014;are closely linked to the final crop performance.</p>
<fig id="f6" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;6</label>
<caption>
<p>The heatmap displays the Spearman's correlation coefficient (&#x3c1;) between maize productivity indicators and the relative abundances of key microbial taxa at the R6 stage. The color scale indicates the direction and strength of the correlation. Asterisks within the cells indicate the level of significance: *P &lt; 0.05; Blank cells indicate non-significant correlations (P &#x2265; 0.05).</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-17-1732283-g006.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Correlation matrix using pie charts displays relationships between grain yield traits and microbial genera. Each circle shows correlation intensity with red or blue segments, ranging from negative to positive, indicated by a color gradient bar on the right. Traits include grain yield, ear number, kernel number per ear, 1000-kernel weight, dry matter, ear length, and ear diameter. Microbial genera listed along the bottom include Gaiella, Nitrosipira, Pseudomonas, and others.</alt-text>
</graphic></fig>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s4" sec-type="discussion">
<label>4</label>
<title>Discussion</title>
<sec id="s4_1">
<label>4.1</label>
<title>Coordinated regulation of maize growth and the soil microenvironment by film mulching</title>
<p>Agricultural ecosystems in arid and semi-arid regions face the dual challenges of water scarcity and high evaporative demand, which severely constrain crop productivity and resource-use efficiency (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B46">Zhang et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>). Film mulching, a well-established agronomic practice, has been widely adopted to mitigate these constraints by improving the soil microenvironment, enhancing water-use efficiency (WUE), and suppressing weed growth (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Gu et&#xa0;al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">Xu et&#xa0;al., 2018</xref>). Consistent with these established benefits, both the FPM and UPM treatments significantly increased spring maize yield, accompanied by a higher number of effective ears. This result aligns with previous reports on the yield-enhancing effects of mulching in similar dryland regions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B49">Zhang et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>).</p>
<p>The underlying mechanism for this yield improvement is closely linked to the mulching-driven regulation of the soil hydrothermal environment. It is well-documented that during the early seedling stage, film mulching effectively reduces soil evaporation, elevates soil temperature, and improves water retention (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">Gao et&#xa0;al., 2014</xref>). These favorable conditions promote robust early root development and biomass accumulation, laying the foundation for higher final yields. Indeed, the UPM treatment accelerated biomass accumulation during the early to mid-vegetative stages (V12 and VT, likely due to its superior heat-trapping and moisture-preserving capabilities which create an &#x201c;incubator effect&#x201d; for early growth (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">Boatwright et&#xa0;al., 1976</xref>). However, this early advantage did not translate to the highest final biomass. Instead, the FPM treatment, despite a slower start, surpassed UPM in dry matter accumulation during the reproductive stages (R3 and R6). This suggests a critical trade-off: the aggressive early growth under UPM may lead to premature senescence, a phenomenon often linked to supra-optimal soil temperatures and hypoxic root conditions under full film coverage (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B42">Xu et&#xa0;al., 2015</xref>). High soil temperatures, particularly during the reproductive stage, can accelerate plant development but also impair root activity and nutrient uptake, leading to a shortened grain-filling period and reduced final biomass (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Li et&#xa0;al., 2013</xref>). In contrast, FPM likely achieved this balance by facilitating gas exchange and moderating excessive soil heating. This strategy sustained plant vigor through to maturity, driving the highest final biomass and yield. These findings suggest that the advantage of FPM lies in mitigating late-season physiological stress, rather than merely maximizing early growth.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s4_2">
<label>4.2</label>
<title>Spatiotemporal responses of rhizosphere microbial community structure and functional guilds to film mulching</title>
<p>Film mulching fundamentally reshapes the rhizosphere microbiome by altering soil hydrothermal and aeration conditions, leading to pronounced spatiotemporal heterogeneity in community diversity, structure, and composition (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">Folman et&#xa0;al., 2001</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">Wang et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>). We acknowledge that microbial community composition is also influenced by soil chemical properties (e.g., pH and organic matter), which were not systematically quantified in the present study. In dryland ecosystems, however, soil temperature and moisture constitute key environmental constraints, and the mulching-induced hydrothermal gradients captured here are therefore considered likely major drivers of the observed microbial patterns, while chemical co-variates may play a contributory role.</p>
<p>Our study revealed that the impact of mulching on microbial &#x3b1;-diversity was subtle and highly context-dependent, a finding consistent with some previous reports (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">Sun et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>). For instance, at the V12 stage, the UPM treatment transiently promoted bacterial richness in the topsoil, likely due to early improvements in hydrothermal conditions. However, by the R6 stage, this effect diminished, and greater bacterial diversity was observed in the deep soil of the unmulched control, possibly because prolonged mulching created less favorable conditions (e.g., reduced aeration) that constrained diversity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Li et al., 2020</xref>).</p>
<p>Unlike the nuanced changes in &#x3b1;-diversity, &#x3b2;-diversity revealed pronounced, treatment-specific shifts in community structure. This disparity underscores that mulching primarily reshapes the identities and relative abundances of microbial taxa, rather than merely altering species richness (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">Lozupone and Knight, 2007</xref>). Initially, treatment effects were restricted to the topsoil. By the R6 stage, however, these structural divergences had propagated into the subsoil. This shift was particularly pronounced for bacteria, with the strongest differentiation occurring at 30 cm (<italic>P</italic> = 0.001). This pattern likely reflects a lagged response of the deep-soil microbiome to the cumulative alteration of soil conditions and the changing inputs from senescing roots. Conversely, the fungal community exhibited an attenuating response pattern, with treatment effects diminishing in deeper soil layers at the later stage. This marked divergence from bacteria underscores that these two kingdoms employ distinct strategies to navigate mulching-induced gradients. Bacteria, as rapid-responding r-strategists, likely track localized physicochemical shifts. In contrast, fungi may buffer against deep-soil heterogeneity through their extensive mycelial networks, allowing them to integrate environmental signals across larger spatial scales and maintain greater stability in the subsoil (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">Bahram et&#xa0;al., 2018</xref>).</p>
<p>Consistent with previous studies on gramineous crops, the maize rhizosphere was dominated by Proteobacteria, Actinobacteriota, Ascomycota, and Basidiomycota (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">Peiffer et&#xa0;al., 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Coleman-Derr et&#xa0;al., 2016</xref>). More importantly, the results revealed dynamic responses of key functional taxa, exemplified by the nitrifying genus <italic>Nitrospira</italic>, which was markedly suppressed in deeper soil layers under mulched treatments; this pattern in likely microaerobic soil layers at the R6 stage strongly points to oxygen limitation as a key driver, a finding that contrasts with hypotheses emphasizing substrate availability as the primary control in some agricultural systems (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B47">Zhang et&#xa0;al., 2012</xref>). This suggests that under long-term film mulching, the physical barrier to gas exchange may override the biochemical benefits of enhanced mineralization, fundamentally altering the nitrogen cycle. Similarly, the consistent suppression of the symbiotic arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (<italic>Glomeromycota</italic>) under both mulching treatments is a critical finding, indicating a potential ecological trade-off where the physical benefits of mulching (e.g., improved water status) may come at the cost of weakening a key plant-microbe mutualism (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">Treseder, 2004</xref>). The sustained suppression of <italic>Glomeromycota</italic> observed in this study suggests potential longer-term ecological implications, as AMF contribute to phosphorus acquisition and soil aggregation through glomalin production (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">Rillig, 2004</xref>). However, these implications cannot be directly inferred from the present short-term observations, and long-term studies are needed to evaluate whether management strategies, such as crop rotation or organic amendments, can mitigate these effects. Furthermore, the enrichment of the potential plant pathogen <italic>Fusarium</italic> under FPM at the V12 stage, and the accumulation of the root-associated genus <italic>Ceratobasidium</italic> under UPM at the R6 stage, further illustrate how specific mulching regimes create distinct ecological niches that favor different functional guilds.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s4_3">
<label>4.3</label>
<title>Predicted functional potential of rhizosphere microbiomes and inferred ecological mechanisms</title>
<p>Shifts in community structure ultimately translate into a reconfiguration of the rhizosphere microbiome&#x2019;s functional potential. While amplicon sequencing primarily reveals community structure, function prediction based on marker genes can still provide critical hypotheses and directions for understanding how mulching impacts the potential functions of the ecosystem (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Ling et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>). While we acknowledge that marker-gene-based predictions are inferential, the functional profiles derived from PICRUSt2, FAPROTAX, and FUNGuild demonstrated remarkable consistency with our taxonomic observations and environmental data. This multi-evidence convergence robustly indicates a systematic reconfiguration of rhizosphere carbon and nitrogen cycling and pathogen dynamics under film mulching.</p>
<p>Our study indicates that the two mulching strategies appeared to foster fundamentally different rhizosphere ecosystems. During the early V12 stage, the UPM treatment created a high-temperature, high-moisture, and poorly aerated microenvironment that strongly selected for anaerobic metabolic guilds, particularly those involved in denitrification (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B45">Yu et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>). We hypothesize that this hypoxic stress imposed physiological burdens on the root system, potentially contributing to the premature senescence often observed in on-film sowing. In contrast, the FPM treatment, likely by providing superior gas permeability, established a more balanced rhizosphere dominated by aerobic heterotrophs and nitrogen-fixing bacteria. Meanwhile, the unmulched CK treatment represented a baseline state, supporting a community focused on degrading complex native organic matter. By the R6 stage, the primary driver of functional differentiation shifted from purely environmental selection to a complex interplay between environmental stress and substrate availability from senescing roots (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Gunina and Kuzyakov, 2015</xref>). Under UPM, the abundance of plant residues fueled a massive enhancement of anaerobic metabolism and decomposition pathways, but also increased the potential for plant pathogens. The microbial community under UPM was characterized by the enrichment of pathways associated with quorum sensing and environmental adaptation, indicating a community with intensified microbial interactions under relatively favorable resource conditions. In contrast, the FPM treatment was associated with higher predicted functional potentials in core metabolic pathways, including carbon metabolism, oxidative phosphorylation, and macromolecule biosynthesis. These patterns are consistent with a microbial community exhibiting enhanced metabolic capacity under FPM, although such inferences are based on functional predictions rather than direct measurements of microbial activity.</p>
<p>The fungal community displayed parallel, yet distinct, functional trajectories. At the V12 stage, the FPM treatment selectively promoted beneficial guilds, including symbiotic AMF and predatory nematophagous fungi, indicating the potential establishment of a disease-suppressive rhizosphere. The UPM treatment, in contrast, tended to enrich fungal parasites and epiphytes. As plant senescence progressed to the R6 stage, the UPM treatment became a hotbed for both saprotrophic and pathogenic fungi, likely fueled by nutrients from decaying roots. Intriguingly, it also harbored the highest potential for AMF at this stage, suggesting a complex trade-off between pathogenic and symbiotic interactions under these specific conditions. It is noteworthy that while different prediction tools pointed to different treatments as having higher pathogenic potential, the overarching conclusion is that the warm, moist environment created by any form of mulching can increase the risk of proliferation for certain thermophilic or hygrophilous pathogens.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s4_4">
<label>4.4</label>
<title>Linking rhizosphere microbiome shifts to ecological functions and maize productivity</title>
<p>A key observation was the significant correlation between specific microbial taxa and maize productivity. A striking, albeit counter-intuitive, observation was the significant negative correlation between the relative abundances of the nitrifying genus <italic>Nitrospira</italic> and the versatile genus <italic>Pseudomonas</italic> with multiple yield components, including grain yield and dry matter. However, we argue that this does not necessarily imply a direct suppressive effect of these microbes on plant growth. Instead, this correlation likely reflects their role as bio-indicators of different ecosystem states. It is well-established that at larger scales, microbial community structure is predominantly governed by abiotic factors (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Fierer and Jackson, 2006</xref>). In our system, <italic>Nitrospira</italic>, a known aerobe, thrived in the unmulched (CK) treatment, which, due to water and heat stress, was also the lowest-yielding system. Thus, the high abundance of <italic>Nitrospira</italic> is an indicator of the well-aerated but less productive CK environment, rather than a direct cause of low yield. This underscores the primacy of physicochemical drivers in our arid system, where the powerful water- and heat-conserving effects of mulching are the dominant determinants of yield, potentially overriding the subtler effects of individual microbial taxa. Conversely, the significant positive correlations between the beneficial genus <italic>Streptomyces</italic> and the fungal genus <italic>Chaetomium</italic> with grain yield and other productivity indicators provide compelling, albeit correlational, evidence for their contribution to a high-yielding rhizosphere. These taxa were more abundant in&#xa0;the&#xa0;FPM treatment, which ultimately produced the highest yield. This suggests that the functionally balanced, aerobic microbial community fostered by FPM is a key feature of a high-productivity agroecosystem.</p>
<p>To further explore the functional underpinnings of these microbe-yield relationships, we correlated these key taxa with their predicted ecological functions (detailed in <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1"><bold>Supplementary Figures S12</bold></xref>, <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1"><bold>Supplementary Figures S13</bold></xref>). This analysis provided strong support for their inferred roles. For instance, the positive correlation of <italic>Nitrospira</italic> with aerobic chemoheterotrophy and its negative correlation with anaerobic N-cycling pathways confirmed its aerobic nature, reinforcing the hypothesis that its suppression under mulching is driven by oxygen limitation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Daims et&#xa0;al., 2015</xref>). Similarly, the symbiotic role of <italic>Glomus</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">Berruti et&#xa0;al., 2016</xref>) and the multi-trophic nature of <italic>Mycosphaerella</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">Crous et&#xa0;al., 2009</xref>) were also consistent with their correlations to respective functional guilds. A particularly important finding was the strong positive correlation of <italic>Ceratobasidium</italic> with the Endomycorrhizal guild, suggesting its potential role as a key root-associated symbiont under late-season UPM conditions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">Wei&#xdf; et&#xa0;al., 2011</xref>). These taxon-function linkages, while inferential, provide a mechanistic basis for understanding how the specific microbial players shaped by mulching could contribute to the overall functional trajectory of&#xa0;the rhizosphere and, ultimately, its association with crop productivity.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s5" sec-type="conclusions">
<label>5</label>
<title>Conclusion</title>
<p>Different mulching practices reshaped the rhizosphere microbial community of dryland spring maize in a pronounced spatiotemporal manner. Film mulching altered both the composition and structure of bacterial and fungal communities, with divergent spatiotemporal patterns across growth stages and soil depths. These changes were accompanied by a reduced niche breadth and the suppression of beneficial taxa, including Glomeromycota, indicating that mulching-induced hydrothermal conditions impose stronger environmental filtering on the soil microbiome. Microbial community shifts were significantly correlated with maize yield components. However, yield enhancement under mulching was likely dominated by improved soil water and heat conservation, while microbial changes may have played a secondary or indicative role in this field-scale system. The ecological implications of these shifts remain unresolved. In particular, the long-term suppression of functional guilds such as nitrifiers and symbiotic fungi under sustained mulching warrants further investigation, especially with respect to soil health and potential dependence on external inputs. The spatiotemporal patterns identified here provide a framework for future studies aimed at reconciling short-term yield improvement with long-term agroecosystem sustainability.</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<sec id="s6" sec-type="data-availability">
<title>Data availability statement</title>
<p>The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found below: <uri xlink:href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/">https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/</uri>, BioProject ID:PRJNA1348696.</p></sec>
<sec id="s7" sec-type="author-contributions">
<title>Author contributions</title>
<p>JW: Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Methodology, Software, Visualization, Writing &#x2013; original draft. KC: Methodology, Validation, Writing &#x2013; original draft. LS: Validation, Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing. HH: Methodology, Validation, Visualization, Writing &#x2013; original draft. JL: Validation, Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing. ZG: Software, Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing. SG: Software, Validation, Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing. HW: Validation, Writing&#x2013; review &amp; editing. LC: Data curation, Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing. ZZ: Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Supervision, Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing. FG: Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Resources, Supervision, Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing.</p></sec>
<sec id="s9" sec-type="COI-statement">
<title>Conflict of interest</title>
<p>The author(s) declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.</p></sec>
<sec id="s10" sec-type="ai-statement">
<title>Generative AI statement</title>
<p>The author(s) declared that generative AI was not used in the creation of this manuscript.</p>
<p>Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If&#xa0;you identify any issues, please contact us.</p></sec>
<sec id="s11" sec-type="disclaimer">
<title>Publisher&#x2019;s note</title>
<p>All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.</p></sec>
<sec id="s12" sec-type="supplementary-material">
<title>Supplementary material</title>
<p>The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2026.1732283/full#supplementary-material">https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2026.1732283/full#supplementary-material</ext-link></p>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="DataSheet1.docx" id="SM1" mimetype="application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document"/></sec>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="B1">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Andrew</surname> <given-names>D. R.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Fitak</surname> <given-names>R. R.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Munguia-Vega</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Racolta</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Martinson</surname> <given-names>V. G.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Dontsova</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2012</year>). 
<article-title>Abiotic factors shape microbial diversity in Sonoran Desert soils</article-title>. <source>Appl. Environ. Microbiol.</source> <volume>78</volume>, <fpage>7527</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>7537</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/aem.01459-12</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22885757</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Bahram</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Hildebrand</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Forslund</surname> <given-names>S. K.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Anderson</surname> <given-names>J. L.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Soudzilovskaia</surname> <given-names>N. A.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Bodegom</surname> <given-names>P. M.</given-names></name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2018</year>). 
<article-title>Structure and function of the global topsoil microbiome</article-title>. <source>Nature</source> <volume>560</volume>, <fpage>233</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>237</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41586-018-0386-6</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30069051</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Bardgett</surname> <given-names>R. D.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>van der Putten</surname> <given-names>W. H.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2014</year>). 
<article-title>Belowground biodiversity and ecosystem functioning</article-title>. <source>Nature</source> <volume>515</volume>, <fpage>505</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>511</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nature13855</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25428498</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Berendsen</surname> <given-names>R. L.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Pieterse</surname> <given-names>C. M. J.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Bakker</surname> <given-names>P. A. H. M.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2012</year>). 
<article-title>The rhizosphere microbiome and plant health</article-title>. <source>Trends Plant Sci.</source> <volume>17</volume>, <fpage>478</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>486</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.tplants.2012.04.001</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22564542</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Berruti</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Lumini</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Balestrini</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Bianciotto</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2016</year>). 
<article-title>Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi as natural biofertilizers: let&#x2019;s benefit from past successes</article-title>. <source>Front. Microbiol.</source> <volume>6</volume>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmicb.2015.01559</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26834714</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Boatwright</surname> <given-names>G. O.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Ferguson</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Sims</surname> <given-names>J. R.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>1976</year>). 
<article-title>Soil temperature around the crown node influences early growth, nutrient uptake, and nutrient translocation of spring wheat 1</article-title>. <source>Agron. J.</source> <volume>68</volume>, <fpage>227</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>231</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2134/agronj1976.00021962006800020004x</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Bolyen</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Rideout</surname> <given-names>J. R.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Dillon</surname> <given-names>M. R.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Bokulich</surname> <given-names>N. A.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Abnet</surname> <given-names>C. C.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Al-Ghalith</surname> <given-names>G. A.</given-names></name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2019</year>). 
<article-title>Reproducible, interactive, scalable and extensible microbiome data science using QIIME 2</article-title>. <source>Nat. Biotechnol.</source> <volume>37</volume>, <fpage>852</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>857</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41587-019-0209-9</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31341288</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Bu</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Zhu</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Luo</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2013</year>). 
<article-title>The effects of mulching on maize growth, yield and water use in a semi-arid region</article-title>. <source>Agric. Water Manage.</source> <volume>123</volume>, <fpage>71</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>78</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.agwat.2013.03.015</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Bulgarelli</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Garrido-Oter</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>M&#xfc;nch</surname> <given-names>P. C.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Weiman</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Dr&#xf6;ge</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Pan</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2015</year>). 
<article-title>Structure and function of the bacterial root microbiota in wild and domesticated barley</article-title>. <source>Cell Host Microbe</source> <volume>17</volume>, <fpage>392</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>403</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.chom.2015.01.011</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25732064</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Callahan</surname> <given-names>B. J.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>McMurdie</surname> <given-names>P. J.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Rosen</surname> <given-names>M. J.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Han</surname> <given-names>A. W.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Johnson</surname> <given-names>A. J. A.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Holmes</surname> <given-names>S. P.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2016</year>). 
<article-title>DADA2: High-resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data</article-title>. <source>Nat. Methods</source> <volume>13</volume>, <fpage>581</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>583</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nmeth.3869</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">27214047</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Waghmode</surname> <given-names>T. R.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Sun</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Kuramae</surname> <given-names>E. E.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Hu</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2019</year>). 
<article-title>Root-associated microbiomes of wheat under the combined effect of plant development and nitrogen fertilization</article-title>. <source>Microbiome</source> <volume>7</volume>, <fpage>130</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s40168-019-0750-2</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31640813</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Coleman-Derr</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Desgarennes</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Fonseca-Garcia</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Gross</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Clingenpeel</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Woyke</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2016</year>). 
<article-title>Plant compartment and biogeography affect microbiome composition in cultivated and native Agave species</article-title>. <source>New Phytol.</source> <volume>209</volume>, <fpage>798</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>811</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/nph.13697</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26467257</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Crous</surname> <given-names>P. W.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Schoch</surname> <given-names>C. L.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Hyde</surname> <given-names>K. D.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Wood</surname> <given-names>A. R.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Gueidan</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>de Hoog</surname> <given-names>G. S.</given-names></name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2009</year>). 
<article-title>Phylogenetic lineages in the capnodiales</article-title>. <source>Stud. Mycol.</source> <volume>64</volume>, <fpage>17</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>47</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3114/sim.2009.64.02</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20169022</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Daims</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Lebedeva</surname> <given-names>E. V.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Pjevac</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Han</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Herbold</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Albertsen</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2015</year>). 
<article-title>Complete nitrification by Nitrospira bacteria</article-title>. <source>Nature</source> <volume>528</volume>, <fpage>504</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>509</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nature16461</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26610024</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Fierer</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2017</year>). 
<article-title>Embracing the unknown: disentangling the complexities of the soil microbiome</article-title>. <source>Nat. Rev. Microbiol.</source> <volume>15</volume>, <fpage>579</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>590</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nrmicro.2017.87</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28824177</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Fierer</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Jackson</surname> <given-names>R. B.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2006</year>). 
<article-title>The diversity and biogeography of soil bacterial communities</article-title>. <source>Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.</source> <volume>103</volume>, <fpage>626</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>631</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1073/pnas.0507535103</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">16407148</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Folman</surname> <given-names>L. B.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Postma</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>van Veen</surname> <given-names>J. A.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2001</year>). 
<article-title>Ecophysiological characterization of rhizosphere bacterial communities at different root locations and plant developmental stages of cucumber grown on rockwool</article-title>. <source>Microb. Ecol.</source> <volume>42</volume>, <fpage>586</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>597</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00248-001-0032-x</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">12024241</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B18">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Gao</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Yan</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Ding</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2019</year>). 
<article-title>Effects of plastic mulching and plastic residue on agricultural production: a meta-analysis</article-title>. <source>Sci. Total Environ.</source> <volume>651</volume>, <fpage>484</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>492</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.09.105</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30243168</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B19">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Gao</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Xie</surname> <given-names>Y.-P.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Jiang</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Niu</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2014</year>). 
<article-title>Soil water status and root distribution across the rooting zone in maize with plastic film mulching</article-title>. <source>Field Crops Res.</source> <volume>156</volume>, <fpage>40</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>47</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.fcr.2013.10.016</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B20">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Gu</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Du</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2018</year>). 
<article-title>Effects of ridge-furrow film mulching and nitrogen fertilization on growth, seed yield and water productivity of winter oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.) in Northwestern China</article-title>. <source>Agric. Water Manage.</source> <volume>200</volume>, <fpage>60</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>70</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.agwat.2018.01.001</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B21">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Gunina</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Kuzyakov</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2015</year>). 
<article-title>Sugars in soil and sweets for microorganisms: review of origin, content, composition and fate</article-title>. <source>Soil Biol. Biochem.</source> <volume>90</volume>, <fpage>87</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>100</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.soilbio.2015.07.021</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B22">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Guo</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Ding</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Ren</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2022</year>). 
<article-title>Response of leaf senescence, photosynthetic characteristics, and yield of summer maize to controlled-release urea-based application depth</article-title>. <source>Agronomy</source> <volume>12</volume>, <elocation-id>687</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/agronomy12030687</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B23">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Hanski</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>1978</year>). 
<article-title>Some comments on the measurement of niche metrics</article-title>. <source>Ecology</source> <volume>59</volume>, <fpage>168</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>174</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2307/1936644</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B24">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Huang</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Yuan</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Sun</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Hao</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2024</year>). 
<article-title>Effects of plastic film mulching on yield, water use efficiency, and nitrogen use efficiency of different crops in China: a meta-analysis</article-title>. <source>Field Crops Res.</source> <volume>312</volume>, <elocation-id>109407</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.fcr.2024.109407</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B25">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Hou</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Jia</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Han</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2013</year>). 
<article-title>Effects of rainfall harvesting and mulching technologies on soil water, temperature, and maize yield in the Loess Plateau region of China</article-title>. <source>Agric. Water Manage.</source> <volume>116</volume>, <fpage>101</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>108</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.agwat.2012.10.010</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B26">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Hu</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Song</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Liang</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Qin</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Siddique</surname> <given-names>K. H. M.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2020</year>). 
<article-title>The effects of straw incorporation with plastic film mulch on soil properties and bacterial community structure on the loess plateau</article-title>. <source>Eur. J. Soil Sci.</source> <volume>71</volume>, <fpage>864</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>878</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/ejss.12912</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B27">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Ling</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Kuzyakov</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2022</year>). 
<article-title>Rhizosphere bacteriome structure and functions</article-title>. <source>Nat. Commun.</source> <volume>13</volume>, <fpage>838</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41467-022-28448-9</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">35149704</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B28">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Zheng</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Liang</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Mu</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Pei</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2024</year>). 
<article-title>Correction: Liu et&#xa0;al. effects of film mulching on soil microbial diversity and community structure in the maize root zone under drip irrigation in Northwest China</article-title>. <source>Agronomy</source> <volume>14</volume>, <elocation-id>2259</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/agronomy14102259</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B29">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Lozupone</surname> <given-names>C. A.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Knight</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2007</year>). 
<article-title>Global patterns in bacterial diversity</article-title>. <source>Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.</source> <volume>104</volume>, <fpage>11436</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>11440</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1073/pnas.0611525104</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">17592124</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B30">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Mukherjee</surname> <given-names>P. K.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Chandra</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Retuerto</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Sikaroodi</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Brown</surname> <given-names>R. E.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Jurevic</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2014</year>). 
<article-title>Oral mycobiome analysis of HIV-infected patients: identification of Pichia as an antagonist of opportunistic fungi</article-title>. <source>PloS Pathog.</source> <volume>10</volume>, <elocation-id>e1003996</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.ppat.1003996</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24626467</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B31">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Nossa</surname> <given-names>C. W.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2010</year>). 
<article-title>Design of 16S rRNA gene primers for 454 pyrosequencing of the human foregut microbiome</article-title>. <source>World J. Gastroenterol.</source> <volume>16</volume>, <fpage>4135</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>4140</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3748/wjg.v16.i33.4135</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20806429</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B32">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Peiffer</surname> <given-names>J. A.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Spor</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Koren</surname> <given-names>O.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Jin</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Tringe</surname> <given-names>S. G.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Dangl</surname> <given-names>J. L.</given-names></name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2013</year>). 
<article-title>Diversity and heritability of the maize rhizosphere microbiome under field conditions</article-title>. <source>Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.</source> <volume>110</volume>, <fpage>6548</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>6553</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1073/pnas.1302837110</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23576752</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B33">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Pr&#x103;v&#x103;lie</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2016</year>). 
<article-title>Drylands extent and environmental issues. a global approach</article-title>. <source>Earth Sci. Rev.</source> <volume>161</volume>, <fpage>259</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>278</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.earscirev.2016.08.003</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B34">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Prober</surname> <given-names>S. M.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Leff</surname> <given-names>J. W.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Bates</surname> <given-names>S. T.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Borer</surname> <given-names>E. T.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Firn</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Harpole</surname> <given-names>W. S.</given-names></name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2015</year>). 
<article-title>Plant diversity predicts beta but not alpha diversity of soil microbes across grasslands worldwide</article-title>. <source>Ecol. Lett.</source> <volume>18</volume>, <fpage>85</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>95</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/ele.12381</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25430889</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B35">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Rillig</surname> <given-names>M. C.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2004</year>). 
<article-title>Arbuscular mycorrhizae, glomalin, and soil aggregation</article-title>. <source>Can. J. Soil Sci.</source> <volume>84</volume>, <fpage>355</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>363</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4141/S04-003</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B36">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Sun</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Ye</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Liao</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Tang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Guan</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). 
<article-title>Organic mulching alters the composition, but not the diversity, of rhizosphere bacterial and fungal communities</article-title>. <source>Appl. Soil Ecol.</source> <volume>168</volume>, <elocation-id>104167</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.apsoil.2021.104167</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B37">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Tang</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Tao</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Sun</surname> <given-names>Z.-B.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Yan</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Jiang</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2022</year>). 
<article-title>Effects of mulching film on soil microbial diversity and community of cotton</article-title>. <source>AMB Express</source> <volume>12</volume>, <fpage>33</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s13568-022-01374-1</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">35275297</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B38">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Tian</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Yu</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Dong</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Feng</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2022</year>). 
<article-title>Mulching practices manipulate the microbial community diversity and network of root-associated compartments in the Loess Plateau</article-title>. <source>Soil Tillage Res.</source> <volume>223</volume>, <elocation-id>105476</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.still.2022.105476</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B39">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Treseder</surname> <given-names>K. K.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2004</year>). 
<article-title>A meta-analysis of mycorrhizal responses to nitrogen, phosphorus, and atmospheric CO2 in field studies</article-title>. <source>New Phytol.</source> <volume>164</volume>, <fpage>347</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>355</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1469-8137.2004.01159.x</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33873547</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B40">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Ding</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Qian</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). 
<article-title>Effect of plastic mulching on soil carbon and nitrogen cycling-related bacterial community structure and function in a dryland spring maize field</article-title>. <source>Agriculture</source> <volume>11</volume>, <elocation-id>1040</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/agriculture11111040</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B41">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Wei&#xdf;</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>S&#xfd;korov&#xe1;</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Garnica</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Riess</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Martos</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Krause</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2011</year>). 
<article-title>Sebacinales everywhere: previously overlooked ubiquitous fungal endophytes</article-title>. <source>PloS One</source> <volume>6</volume>, <elocation-id>e16793</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0016793</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21347229</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B42">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Xu</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Tao</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2015</year>). 
<article-title>The effects of plastic film mulching on maize growth and water use in dry and rainy years in northeast China</article-title>. <source>PloS One</source> <volume>10</volume>, <elocation-id>e0125781</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0125781</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25970582</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B43">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Xu</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Zheng</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Wilson</surname> <given-names>G. V.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>He</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Lu</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Bian</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2018</year>). 
<article-title>Comparison of runoff and soil loss in different tillage systems in the Mollisol region of Northeast China</article-title>. <source>Soil Tillage Res.</source> <volume>177</volume>, <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>11</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.still.2017.10.005</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B44">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Yan</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Xu</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Xiao</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2018</year>). 
<article-title>Yield-increase effect of film-mulching and planting pattern on dryland spring maize</article-title>. <source>Chin. J. Eco-Agric.</source> <volume>26</volume>, <fpage>75</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>82</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.13930/j.cnki.cjea.170236</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B45">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Yu</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Xiao</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Yao</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). 
<article-title>A meta-analysis of film mulching cultivation effects on soil organic carbon and soil greenhouse gas fluxes</article-title>. <source>CATENA</source> <volume>206</volume>, <elocation-id>105483</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.catena.2021.105483</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B48">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Han</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Gong</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Feng</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2017</year>). 
<article-title>Effects of ridging and mulching combined practices on proso millet growth and yield in semi-arid regions of China</article-title>. <source>Field Crops Res.</source> <volume>213</volume>, <fpage>65</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>74</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.fcr.2017.06.015</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B49">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Sun</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Yin</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Bai</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2022</year>). 
<article-title>Fall straw incorporation with plastic film cover increases corn yield and water use efficiency under a semi-arid climate</article-title>. <source>Agriculture</source> <volume>12</volume>, <elocation-id>2151</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/agriculture12122151</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B47">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Yu</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>L&#xfc;</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2012</year>). 
<article-title>Effects of plastic mulch duration on nitrogen mineralization and leaching in peanut (Arachis hypogaea) cultivated land in the Yimeng Mountainous Area, China</article-title>. <source>Agric. Ecosyst. Environ.</source> <volume>158</volume>, <fpage>164</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>171</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.agee.2012.06.009</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B46">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Meng</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Pan</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Han</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Liao</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2022</year>). 
<article-title>Effect of soil water content changes caused by ridge-furrow plastic film mulching on the root distribution and water use pattern of spring maize in the Loess Plateau</article-title>. <source>Agric. Water Manage.</source> <volume>260</volume>, <elocation-id>107338</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.agwat.2021.107338</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B50">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Zhu</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Gao</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2018</year>). 
<article-title>Plastic film mulching affects soil microbial communities and functions in a wheat field on the Loess Plateau</article-title>. <source>Sci. Rep.</source> <volume>8</volume>, <fpage>12051</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41598-018-28101-5</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
<fn-group>
<fn id="n1" fn-type="custom" custom-type="edited-by">
<p>Edited by: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/889788">Sofia I.A. Pereira</ext-link>, Escola Superior de Biotecnologia - Universidade Cat&#xf3;lica Portuguesa, Portugal</p></fn>
<fn id="n2" fn-type="custom" custom-type="reviewed-by">
<p>Reviewed by: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/751165">Laith Khalil Tawfeeq Al-Ani</ext-link>, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Malaysia</p>
<p><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2094289">Yu Yanyan</ext-link>, Henan University, China</p>
<p><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2719977">Shubhransu Nayak</ext-link>, Regional Plant Resource Center, India</p></fn>
</fn-group>
</back>
</article>