<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3-mathml3.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xml:lang="EN">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Front. Plant Sci.</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Frontiers in Plant Science</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">Front. Plant Sci.</abbrev-journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="epub">1664-462X</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Frontiers Media S.A.</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpls.2025.1735720</article-id>
<article-version article-version-type="Version of Record" vocab="NISO-RP-8-2008"/>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Original Research</subject>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Transcriptomic identification of potential antioxidative enzyme regulators of the gametophytic-to-embryogenic switch in barley microspores</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Nowicka</surname><given-names>Anna</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1417217/overview"/>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="visualization" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/visualization/">Visualization</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Formal analysis" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/formal-analysis/">Formal analysis</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Writing &#x2013; original draft" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/">Writing &#x2013; original draft</role>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Milec</surname><given-names>Zbyn&#x11b;k</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/3261766/overview"/>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/">Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Formal analysis" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/formal-analysis/">Formal analysis</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Data curation" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/data-curation/">Data curation</role>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Krzewska</surname><given-names>Monika</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/242341/overview"/>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Formal analysis" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/formal-analysis/">Formal analysis</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/">Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing</role>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Kope&#x107;</surname><given-names>Przemys&#x142;aw</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2641292/overview"/>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="investigation" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/investigation/">Investigation</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/">Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing</role>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Springer</surname><given-names>Agnieszka</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/3349873/overview"/>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Formal analysis" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/formal-analysis/">Formal analysis</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/">Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing</role>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Dubas</surname><given-names>Ewa</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/756601/overview"/>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/">Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Formal analysis" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/formal-analysis/">Formal analysis</role>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name><surname>&#x17b;ur</surname><given-names>Iwona</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="corresp" rid="c001"><sup>*</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/139807/overview"/>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Funding acquisition" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/funding-acquisition/">Funding acquisition</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Writing &#x2013; original draft" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/">Writing &#x2013; original draft</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="conceptualization" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/conceptualization/">Conceptualization</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Project-administration" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/project-administration/">Project administration</role>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>The Franciszek G&#xf3;rski Institute of Plant Physiology Polish Academy of Sciences</institution>, <city>Krak&#xf3;w</city>, <country country="pl">Poland</country></aff>
<aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Centre of Plant Structural and Functional Genomics, Institute of Experimental Botany (IEB), Czech Academy of Sciences (CAS)</institution>, <city>Olomouc</city>, <country country="cz">Czechia</country></aff>
<aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>Laboratory of Ecological Plant Physiology, Global Change Research Institute, Czech Academy of Sciences (CAS)</institution>, <city>Brno</city>, <country country="cz">Czechia</country></aff>
<author-notes>
<corresp id="c001"><label>*</label>Correspondence: Iwona &#x17b;ur, <email xlink:href="mailto:i.zur@ifr-pan.edu.pl">i.zur@ifr-pan.edu.pl</email></corresp>
</author-notes>
<pub-date publication-format="electronic" date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2026-01-21">
<day>21</day>
<month>01</month>
<year>2026</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date publication-format="electronic" date-type="collection">
<year>2025</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>16</volume>
<elocation-id>1735720</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>30</day>
<month>10</month>
<year>2025</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>30</day>
<month>12</month>
<year>2025</year>
</date>
<date date-type="rev-recd">
<day>29</day>
<month>12</month>
<year>2025</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#xa9; 2026 Nowicka, Milec, Krzewska, Kope&#x107;, Springer, Dubas and &#x17b;ur.</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2026</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Nowicka, Milec, Krzewska, Kope&#x107;, Springer, Dubas and &#x17b;ur</copyright-holder>
<license>
<ali:license_ref start_date="2026-01-21">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ali:license_ref>
<license-p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY)</ext-link>. The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.</license-p>
</license>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<p>Microspore embryogenesis (ME) relies on the cellular reprogramming of the default gametophytic developmental pathway, which normally directs microspores toward pollen formation, into an embryogenic pathway that leads to the development of embryo&#x2013;like structures (ELS) and, subsequently, haploid or doubled haploid (DH) plants. To test how redox control underpins this switch, we have carried out an extended <italic>in silico</italic> analysis of previously published RNA-seq data from two barley cultivars differing in ME competence (Igri, responsive; Golden Promise, recalcitrant) across four early induction stages (0&#x2013;III). A curated set of 472 antioxidant/redox genes&#x2014;core detoxification enzymes, the ASC&#x2013;GSH cycle, <italic>TRX/GRX/PRX</italic> systems and <italic>GST</italic>s&#x2014;was examined. The analysis revealed that the expression of antioxidative defense genes is dynamically modulated during ME induction, underscoring the importance of redox homeostasis in successful microspore reprogramming. Both cultivars shared a late (stages II&#x2013;III) program with increased <italic>SOD</italic>s, selected <italic>CAT/GPX</italic> genes, rising <italic>MDHAR</italic>s, deployment of specific <italic>TRX/GRX/PRX</italic> members and broad <italic>GST</italic>s upregulation. Divergence emerged during progression: Igri showed a pronounced stage-III rise of <italic>GR</italic>s and targeted <italic>TRX/GRX/PRX</italic> transcripts, together with stronger activation of multiple <italic>GST</italic>s. When considered alongside diverse experimental data, these stage-restricted, cultivar-biased signatures support a hypothetical model in which strengthened ASC&#x2013;GSH recycling and thiol-redox hubs sustain H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> signaling while limiting oxidative damage. Targeting <italic>MDHAR</italic>s, <italic>GR</italic>s, selected <italic>TRX/GRX/PRX</italic> genes, and <italic>GST</italic> subsets could improve ME efficiency and accelerate the integration of DH technology into modern crop breeding programs.</p>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>antioxidant defense</kwd>
<kwd><italic>Hordeum vulgare</italic></kwd>
<kwd>microspore embryogenesis</kwd>
<kwd>redox homeostasis</kwd>
<kwd>RNA-seq</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<funding-group>
<funding-statement>The author(s) declared that financial support was received for this work and/or its publication. This work was supported by the National Science Centre in Poland (grant 2015/18/M/NZ3/00348 to I&#x17b;). ZM was supported by the Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic (MEYS &#x10c;R) through the project AdAgriF (CZ.02.01.01/00/22_008/0004635).</funding-statement>
</funding-group>
<counts>
<fig-count count="6"/>
<table-count count="0"/>
<equation-count count="0"/>
<ref-count count="47"/>
<page-count count="15"/>
<word-count count="7861"/>
</counts>
<custom-meta-group>
<custom-meta>
<meta-name>section-at-acceptance</meta-name>
<meta-value>Plant Cell Biology</meta-value>
</custom-meta>
</custom-meta-group>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec id="s1" sec-type="intro">
<label>1</label>
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>Every living cell operates as a dynamic network of biochemical reactions governed by the cellular redox state. This balance&#x2014;maintained through the production and removal of reactive oxygen, nitrogen, and sulfur species (ROS, RNS, and RSS)&#x2014;is essential for homeostasis and underpins virtually all life processes. In plants, redox signals shape growth and development by modulating photosynthesis, respiration, and hormone signaling, as well as the activities of transcription factors and stress-related enzymes. Because plants are constantly exposed to environmental stress, rapid and accurate redox signalling is critical for survival. Redox cues have also been proposed as triggers of cellular reprogramming, including the shift from gametophytic to embryogenic development.</p>
<p>Our earlier studies revealed a central role for ROS in the induction of microspore reprogramming; whereby immature pollen grains are redirected towards embryogenic development (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">&#x17b;ur et&#xa0;al., 2014a</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">&#x17b;ur et&#xa0;al., 2021a</xref>). The resulting ELSs have the ability to regenerate into haploid and DH plants, highly valuable for basic research and breeding purposes. Microspores also represent an attractive target for genetic engineering, including genome editing, because modifications introduced into haploid cells can be stably fixed by chromosome doubling. However, the efficiency of ME is strongly genotype-dependent and often varies even between closely related genotypes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">Krzewska et&#xa0;al., 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">&#x17b;ur et&#xa0;al., 2014a</xref>). Trial-and-error approaches to improve effectiveness of ME are therefore laborious, highlighting the need to better understand the underlying molecular mechanisms.</p>
<p>Advances in RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) have enabled detailed exploration of transcriptional networks regulating developmental reprogramming. Earlier studies provided insights into the transcriptomic changes associated with ME induction in barley (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">B&#xe9;langer et&#xa0;al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">B&#xe9;langer et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>). Building on this, our recent work compared two cultivars that differ strongly in embryogenic potential, providing a detailed map of the gene networks that orchestrate the shift in cellular machinery during ME induction (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">Nowicka et&#xa0;al., 2024</xref>). Based on our previous work in triticale (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">&#x17b;ur et&#xa0;al., 2014a</xref>), we postulated a role for ROS in ME induction, a hypothesis supported by growing evidence. Tight control of redox homeostasis therefore appears to be a prerequisite for efficient microspore reprogramming. It is mediated by antioxidant and redox systems that regulate transfer of electrons from donor molecules to target proteins. Within this framework, antioxidant defense represents a key regulatory layer that scavenges reactive molecules and reduces oxidized substrates to protect microspores, while ROS themselves function as signaling molecules involved in growth, development, and stress adaptation. Recently published data highlight the complexity of the interactions among ROS, transcriptional and epigenetic regulators, plant hormones, metabolites, and suggest the potential mechanisms underlying ROS-mediated effects (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Auverlot et&#xa0;al., 2024</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">Karpinska and Foyer, 2024</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">Lin et&#xa0;al., 2025</xref>).</p>
<p>Core antioxidant defenses include families of SUPEROXIDE DISMUTASES (SODs), CATALASES (CATs), and GLUTATHIONE PEROXIDASES (GPXs), which detoxify superoxide anion (O<sub>2</sub><sup>&#x2022;&#x2013;</sup>) and hydrogen peroxide (H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1"><bold>Figure&#xa0;1A</bold></xref>) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">Mittler, 2002</xref>). The electrons required for ROS reduction are supplied by metal ions, which serve as essential cofactors for enzymes such as SODs and CATs. In the case of peroxidases, which require electron donors, these electrons can be provided by REDUCED GLUTATHIONE (GSH), ASCORBATE (ASC) or THIOREDOXINS (TRXs), all of which also participate directly in redox reactions. Additional protection is provided by the ascorbate&#x2013;glutathione cycle (ASC&#x2013;GSH), where enzymes including MONODEHYDROASCORBATE REDUCTASE (MDHAR), DEHYDROASCORBATE REDUCTASE (DHAR), GLUTATHIONE REDUCTASE (GR), and ASCORBATE PEROXIDASE (APX) recycle oxidized forms of ASC (dehydroascorbic acid, DHA) and glutathione (glutathione disulfide, GSSG) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">Foyer and Noctor, 2011</xref>). Glutathione also protects proteins against irreversible oxidation through S-glutathionylation, catalysed by GLUTATHIONE S-TRANSFERASES (GSTs). Many GSTs display also peroxidase activity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">Noctor et&#xa0;al., 2024</xref> and references therein). Other important electron transmitters include GLUTAREDOXINS (GRXs), PEROXIREDOXINS (PRXs) and TRXs which catalyze reversible disulfide bond formation and protect central metabolic pathways (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">Sevilla et&#xa0;al., 2023</xref>). Notably, the barley genome harbors multi-member gene families for every antioxidant class (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1"><bold>Figure&#xa0;1B</bold></xref>) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">Monat et&#xa0;al., 2019</xref>).</p>
<fig id="f1" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;1</label>
<caption>
<p>Antioxidant network and sampling stages during microspore embryogenesis. <bold>(A)</bold> Schematic of the ROS&#x2010;scavenging network surveyed in this study. Core antioxidants: SUPEROXIDE DISMUTASE (SOD), CATALASE (CAT) and GLUTATHIONE PEROXIDASE (GPX). Ascorbate&#x2013;glutathione (ASC&#x2013;GSH) cycle: ASCORBATE PEROXIDASE (APX), MONODEHYDROASCORBATE REDUCTASE (MDHAR) and GLUTATHIONE REDUCTASE (GR). Thiol&#x2013;redox regulators: THIOREDOXIN (TRX), GLUTAREDOXIN (GRX), and PEROXIREDOXIN (PRX). S-glutathionylation is mediated by GLUTATHIONE S-TRANSFERASE (GST). <bold>(B)</bold> Gene families and numbers of annotated barley genes (HORVU.MOREX.r2). <bold>(C)</bold> Cytological composition across ME induction stages in two cultivars, Golden Promise (GP; recalcitrant) and Igri (responsive). Stage 0: microspores/bicellulars isolated from freshly harvested spikes. Stage I: isolates from anthers pre-treated 48 h in 0.4 M mannitol (21 &#xb0;C). Stage II: isolates after mannitol-pretreatment followed by 24 h culture in KBP medium. Stage III: isolates after mannitol-pretreatment followed by 48 h in KBP. Icons with percentage bars indicate the proportions of uninucleate microspores, bicellular structures (after symmetric division) and multicellular structures (continued symmetric divisions). Detailed percentages and additional phenotypes are shown in <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SF1"><bold>Supplementary Figure S1</bold></xref>. Quantitative data redrawn from (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">Nowicka et&#xa0;al., 2024</xref>).</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-16-1735720-g001.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Diagram illustrating antioxidant genes expressed during the early stages of microspore embryogenesis (ME) in barley and the network of encoded antioxidant enzymes. Panel A shows the network of core antioxidant enzymes, enzymes involved in the ascorbate&#x2013;glutathione cycle, thiol&#x2013;redox regulators, and glutathione S-transferases, and their cooperation in the detoxification of reactive oxygen species. Panel B lists genes involved in antioxidative defense associated with ME induction, together with the number of genes identified in the barley genome. Panel C presents four experimental microspore sampling points (microspores isolated from freshly harvested tillers, from mannitol-treated anthers, and after 24 and 48 h of in vitro culture on a rich induction medium), along with graphical data showing the percentage distribution of embryogenic and non-embryogenic microspores in the two studied cultivars, Golden Promise and Igri.</alt-text>
</graphic></fig>
<p>Here, we profile the transcriptional antioxidant network underpinning ME in barley by an extended analysis of previously published RNA-seq data from microspores and microspore-derived multicellular structures sampled across four early ME stages in two cultivars with contrasting embryogenic competence (Igri, responsive; Golden Promise, recalcitrant (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">Nowicka et&#xa0;al., 2024</xref>). We delineate antioxidant pathways, identify stage-specific markers of microspore reprogramming, and nominate candidate regulators whose expression distinguish the superior ME efficiency of Igri from Golden Promise. Consistent with this, we observe clear cultivar-dependent differences in antioxidant defense gene expression that likely contribute to divergent ME responsiveness and may tip the balance between successful reprogramming and stress-induced cell death. However, these conclusions rely on transcriptomic evidence, targeted functional assays will be required to determine whether reduced antioxidant activity is a primary driver of microspore mortality or instead reflects downstream consequences of broader metabolic and physiological reconfiguration during ME.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2" sec-type="materials|methods">
<label>2</label>
<title>Materials and methods</title>
<sec id="s2_1">
<label>2.1</label>
<title>Plant material, ME-induction stages, and RNA-seq sampling</title>
<p>This study builds on previously published RNA-seq data (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">Nowicka et&#xa0;al., 2024</xref>) from two barley (<italic>Hordeum vulgare</italic> L.) cultivars: Igri (winter type; HOR 10596; ME-responsive) and Golden Promise (spring type; HOR 16645; ME-recalcitrant). Detailed procedures for plant cultivation, ME induction, microspore isolation, and data processing are provided in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">Nowicka et&#xa0;al. (2024)</xref>.</p>
<p>Four stages of ME-induction were analysed (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1"><bold>Figure&#xa0;1C</bold></xref>):</p>
<p>Stage 0: Microspores isolated from freshly harvested tillers.</p>
<p>Stage I: Microspores isolated from anthers pre-treated with 0.4 M mannitol for 48 h at 21 &#xb0;C.</p>
<p>Stages II&#x2013;III: Microspores isolated from anthers cultured in KBP medium (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Kumlehn et&#xa0;al., 2006</xref>) for 24 h (stage II) or 48 h (stage III) following the same mannitol pre-treatment.</p>
<p>Because Golden Promise is recalcitrant to ME induction, biochemical stimulation was provided by co-culture with immature pistils (+p) of wheat cultivar Bobwhite (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Lippmann et&#xa0;al., 2015</xref>). Longitudinally bisected pistils (three halves per ml KBP medium) were added to isolated Golden Promise microspores, and stage II&#x2013;III RNA-seq samples were collected after co-culture. Igri did not undergo co-culture. ME-induction efficiency and sample purity were assessed microscopically prior to RNA-seq (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Daghma et&#xa0;al., 2014</xref>). Samples for RNA-seq were collected using a mannitol/maltose density-gradient method. The gradient was applied once for stage 0 and twice for stages I&#x2013;III; stage III fractions were additionally sieve-filtered.</p>
<p>Bicellular pollen grains produced by asymmetric division were used as a gametophytic control. Pollen was isolated from freshly harvested tillers: cells were first enriched by a mannitol/maltose density gradient and then individually picked using a glass micropipette mounted on a micromanipulator under an inverted microscope, coupled to a microinjector for precise aspiration. Pollen RNA-seq data are unpublished (Kope&#x107; et al., 2025).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_2">
<label>2.2</label>
<title>RNA extraction, sequencing, and differential expression analysis</title>
<p>In brief, RNA-seq was performed with four biological replicates per ME induction stage and cultivar (32 samples in total) and three biological replicates per cultivar for bicellular pollen (6 samples). Total RNA was extracted using the NucleoSpin RNA Plant Kit (740949.50; Macherey-Nagel, D&#xfc;ren, Germany). Samples with RNA integrity values (RIN) &gt; 6.0 were used to prepare poly(A)-selected mRNA libraries (NEBNext Ultra&#x2122; RNA Library Prep Kit for Illumina). Libraries were sequenced as 150-bp paired-end reads on an Illumina NovaSeq platform (Genewiz). Raw reads were adapter-trimmed using Trim Galore (v0.4.1) and aligned to the <italic>H. vulgare</italic> cultivar Morex reference genome v2 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">Monat et&#xa0;al., 2019</xref>) using HISAT2 (v2.1.0). Gene-level read counts were obtained with Subread/featureCounts (v1.5.2) using the corresponding genome annotation. Differential expression analysis was performed on raw count data using DESeq2 (v1.24.0) in R (v3.6.3) with the Wald test under a negative binomial model. <italic>P</italic>-values were adjusted for multiple testing using the Benjamini&#x2013;Hochberg procedure, and genes with FDR &lt; 0.05 were considered differentially expressed. Transcript abundance was reported as FPKM, and log<sub>2</sub> fold changes (log<sub>2</sub>FC) were calculated by DESeq2.</p>
<p>The RNA-seq dataset is publicly available in the NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus (GSE233486).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_3">
<label>2.3</label>
<title>Antioxidant gene selection and classification</title>
<p>To investigate redox&#x2010;associated transcriptional responses during ME induction, we have completed the RNA-seq dataset with a targeted set of antioxidant and redox-related genes. Candidate functions were curated manually from biochemical pathway knowledge and primary literature (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">Mittler, 2002</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">Foyer and Noctor, 2011</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">Sevilla et&#xa0;al., 2023</xref>). In total, 472 genes (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1"><bold>Figure&#xa0;1B</bold></xref>) were curated and assigned to four functional categories:</p>
<p>i) core antioxidant genes: <italic>SUPEROXIDE DISMUTASES</italic> (<italic>SOD</italic>s), <italic>CATALASES</italic> (<italic>CAT</italic>s), <italic>GLUTATHIONE PEROXIDASES</italic> (<italic>GPX</italic>s);</p>
<p>ii) ASC&#x2013;GSH cycle genes: <italic>ASCORBATE PEROXIDASES</italic> (<italic>APX</italic>s), <italic>MONODEHYDROASCORBATE REDUCTASES</italic> (<italic>MDHAR</italic>s), <italic>DEHYDROASCORBATE REDUCTASES</italic> (<italic>DHAR</italic>s) and <italic>GLUTATHIONE REDUCTASE</italic> (<italic>GR</italic>s);</p>
<p>iii) redox-regulated thiol genes: <italic>THIOREDOXINS (TRX</italic>s<italic>), THIOREDOXIN REDUCTASE</italic> (<italic>TRXR</italic>s), <italic>GLUTAREDOXINS (GRX</italic>s<italic>), PEROXIREDOXINS (PRX</italic>s);</p>
<p>iv) genes involved in S-glutathionylation: <italic>GLUTATHIONE S-TRANSFERASES</italic> (<italic>GST</italic>s).</p>
<p>Candidate genes were initially retrieved from the <italic>H. vulgare</italic> Morex v2 annotation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">Monat et&#xa0;al., 2019</xref>) using keyword- and function-based searches. When gene families were incompletely annotated or ambiguous, orthologous <italic>Arabidopsis thaliana</italic> protein sequences were used as queries for manual homology searches in EnsemblPlants to identify the corresponding barley genes.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_4">
<label>2.4</label>
<title>Marker gene criteria and cross-study validation</title>
<p>Stage-specific markers were genes that, at a given induction stage, met all of the following criteria: (i) FPKM &gt; 10 in both cultivars; (ii) no significant cultivar effect at that stage (FDR-adjusted <italic>P</italic> &gt; 0.05); (iii) log<sub>2</sub>FC &gt; 2 relative to the subsequent stages; and (iv) absent or very low expression in the gametophytic control (bicellular pollen, P). Cultivar-specific markers were genes that, at a given stage, met: (i) FPKM &gt; 5; (ii) a significant difference between cultivars (FDR-adjusted <italic>P</italic> &lt; 0.05); (iii) log<sub>2</sub>FC &gt; 2 relative to the second cultivar at the same stage; and (iv) absent or very low expression in P. Genes that did not meet these thresholds but showed directionally consistent patterns are reported as trend-level candidates for stage or cultivar specificity.</p>
<p>For cross-study validation, thiol-related and <italic>GST</italic> genes reported for the ME-responsive cultivar Gobernadora (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">B&#xe9;langer et&#xa0;al., 2018</xref>), originally annotated against the Morex v1 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">Mascher et&#xa0;al., 2017</xref>) reference genome, were mapped to Morex v2 identifiers using reciprocal BLASTP searches using EnsemblPlants database.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_5">
<label>2.5</label>
<title>Data analysis and visualization</title>
<p>Gene filtering, selection, and summarization were performed in R (v4.2.2) using custom scripts. Heatmaps were generated with Heatmapper (<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://heatmapper.ca/expression/">http://heatmapper.ca/expression/</ext-link>). Matrix bubble charts and additional visualizations were produced using ggplot2.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s3" sec-type="results">
<label>3</label>
<title>Results</title>
<sec id="s3_1">
<label>3.1</label>
<title>Cytological composition across ME-induction stages</title>
<p>Using the published dataset of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">Nowicka et&#xa0;al. (2024)</xref>, we assessed oxidative-stress-related transcriptomic responses across four ME-induction stages in two barley cultivars, Igri (responsive) and Golden Promise (recalcitrant): stage 0 (isolation from freshly harvested tillers), stage I (48 h in 0.4 M mannitol at 21 &#xb0;C), and stages II&#x2013;III (24 h and 48 h after transfer to KBP, respectively). Each stage comprised mixed cell populations with cultivar-specific composition (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1"><bold>Figure&#xa0;1C</bold></xref>; <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SF1"><bold>Supplementary Figure S1</bold></xref>). At stage 0, Igri was enriched for uninucleate microspores (73%) with fewer bicellular structures after symmetric division (17%). Golden Promise contained fewer uninucleates (14%) and more bicellulars (21%) whereas a high proportion of microspores remained unidentified. Stage I showed comparable reprogramming (&#x2248;30% symmetric divisions), but uninucleates remained more frequent in Igri (68%) than in Golden Promise (22%). Across stages II&#x2013;III, Golden Promise maintained &#x2248;30% bicellular structures, while multicellular structures&#x2014;arising from continued symmetric divisions&#x2014;increased from 3% at stage II to 18% at stage III. In Igri, bicellulars remained &#x2248;40% across stages II&#x2013;III, with multicellular structures at 12% in stage II and 6% in stage III. These differences were more pronounced in cultures lacking the stimulatory effect of co-cultured pistils from the highly embryogenic wheat cultivar Bobwhite (&#x2212;p; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1"><bold>Figure&#xa0;1C</bold></xref>; <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SF1"><bold>Supplementary Figure S1</bold></xref>). This staged cytology provides the framework for the antioxidant/redox transcriptomic analyses that follow.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_2">
<label>3.2</label>
<title>Core antioxidant enzymes were reprogrammed in a stage- and cultivar-dependent manner</title>
<p>We first profiled genes encoding the core antioxidant enzymes that constitute the primary defense against ROS &#x2014; <italic>SOD</italic>s, <italic>CAT</italic>s and <italic>GPX</italic>s (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2"><bold>Figure&#xa0;2</bold></xref>, <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SF1"><bold>Supplementary Figure S2</bold></xref>). Of 21 annotated <italic>SOD</italic> genes, 15 were transcriptionally active (FPKM &gt; 0) in at least one induction stage, together with five of nine <italic>CAT</italic>s and all five <italic>GPX</italic>s (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SF1"><bold>Supplementary Figure S2A</bold></xref>). <italic>SOD</italic>s spanned a wide expression range: in Golden Promise, most transcripts were moderate (10&#x2013;100 FPKM) with few highly expressed (&gt;100 FPKM), whereas in Igri expression was more evenly split between low (1&#x2013;10 FPKM) and moderate levels. <italic>CAT</italic>s were generally weakly expressed in both cultivars, while <italic>GPX</italic>s were consistently stronger, predominantly at moderate&#x2013;high levels (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SF1"><bold>Supplementary Figure S2B</bold></xref>). Most expressed <italic>SOD</italic>s belonged to <italic>Cu/Zn-SOD</italic> orthogroups (Arabidopsis <italic>CSD1/2/3</italic>), with fewer chloroplastic <italic>Fe-SOD</italic>s and a single mitochondrial <italic>MnSOD</italic>. Two <italic>CAT</italic>s aligned with <italic>CAT2</italic> and several <italic>GPX</italic>s with <italic>GPX1/6</italic> (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SF1"><bold>Supplementary Dataset 1</bold></xref>).</p>
<fig id="f2" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;2</label>
<caption>
<p>Transcriptional dynamics of genes encoding core antioxidant enzymes during early microspore embryogenesis in barley. <bold>(A)</bold> Heatmaps showing stage- and cultivar-specific expression patterns of representative <italic>SUPEROXIDE DISMUTASE</italic> (<italic>SOD</italic>; n = 10 of 15 transcriptionally active), <italic>CATALASE</italic> (<italic>CA</italic>s; n = 4 of 9 transcriptionally active), and <italic>GLUTATHIONE PEROXIDASE</italic> (<italic>GPX</italic>; n = 4 of 5 transcriptionally active) genes in Golden Promise (GP) and Igri. Expression values are shown as row-wise Z-scores; the top row in each block represents the mean expression of all detected members of the corresponding gene family. Only genes with detectable expression (FPKM &gt; 0) in at least one stage in either cultivar were included. Stages 0&#x2013;III represent successive steps of ME induction, whereas P denotes bicellular pollen (gametophytic development). Gene identifiers are abbreviated by omitting the common HORVU.MOREX.r2 prefix. &#x25b2; indicates genes plotted in <bold>(B)</bold>; bold gene IDs denote genes discussed in the text. &#x2605; indicates marker genes, defined as transcripts exhibiting stage-specific and/or cultivar-specific expression during ME induction. <bold>(B)</bold> Expression trajectories for selected <italic>SOD</italic>, <italic>CAT</italic> and <italic>GPX</italic> genes across ME stages. Asterisks indicate between-cultivar differences at a given stage (DESeq2, FDR-adjusted P &lt; 0.05); &#x2018;ns&#x2019; indicates non-significance. Background shading indicates genes classified as stage-specific (grey), Igri-specific (green), or Golden Promise-specific (yellow). Dashed horizontal lines indicate the corresponding pollen expression level for each cultivar. Additional information on these gene families is provided in <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SF1"><bold>Supplementary Figure S2</bold></xref>.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-16-1735720-g002.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Chart illustrating the transcriptional dynamics of genes encoding core antioxidant enzymes&#x2014;superoxide dismutases (SODs), catalases (CATs), and glutathione peroxidases (GPXs)&#x2014;in pollen grains and during the early stages of microspore embryogenesis (ME) in two barley cultivars, Golden Promise and Igri. Panel A presents heatmaps showing the expression levels of selected SOD, CAT, and GPX genes, with Z-scores indicated by color intensity. Panel B displays expression trajectories for selected SOD, CAT, and GPX genes in pollen and across four ME stages, with annotations for statistical significance.</alt-text>
</graphic></fig>
<p>Family-level averages revealed distinct trends (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2"><bold>Figure&#xa0;2A</bold></xref>, <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SF1"><bold>Supplementary Figure S2C</bold></xref>). Mean <italic>SOD</italic> expression ranged from ~40 FPKM (Igri, stage II) to ~60 FPKM (Golden Promise, stage I), with maxima at stage 0 in Golden Promise and stage III in Igri; bicellular pollen (P; gametophytic control) showed <italic>SOD</italic> levels comparable to induction stages. <italic>CAT</italic>s averaged 12&#x2013;28 FPKM and peaked at stage III in both cultivars. <italic>GPX</italic>s exceeded <italic>SOD</italic>s and <italic>CAT</italic>s overall, tended to be higher in Golden Promise, and peaked at stage III (~180 FPKM). In contrast to induction stages, <italic>CAT</italic> and <italic>GPX</italic> transcripts were low in mature pollen.</p>
<p>Gene-level profiles highlighted discrete regulatory modes (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2"><bold>Figures&#xa0;2A, B</bold></xref>). Among <italic>SOD</italic>s, some transcripts were induced early (stages 0&#x2013;I; e.g. <italic>MnSOD</italic> HORVU.MOREX.r2.2HG0173140.1; <italic>Cu/Zn-SOD</italic> HORVU.MOREX.r2.2HG0154740.1), whereas others rose later (stages I&#x2013;III; e.g. <italic>Cu/Zn-SOD</italic>s HORVU.MOREX.r2.4HG0329510.1 and HORVU.MOREX.r2.6HG0513460.1&#x2014;the latter strongly upregulated in both cultivars at stages II&#x2013;III with FPKM &gt; 10 but not detected in mature pollen, supporting its candidacy as an ME-stage marker). Additional cultivar specificity was evident: <italic>Cu/Zn-SOD</italic> HORVU.MOREX.r2.7HG0573050.1 was moderate at stages 0&#x2013;II in both cultivars but became Igri-specific at stage III, whereas HORVU.MOREX.r2.3HG0190910.1 was confined to Igri.</p>
<p>Three <italic>CAT</italic>s showed clear stage specificity: HORVU.MOREX.r2.1HG0067700.1 at stage 0 (uninucleate microspores), HORVU.MOREX.r2.2HG0109480.1 at stage I (osmotic treatment), and HORVU.MOREX.r2.4HG0341470.1 at stage III, with higher expression in Golden Promise. Another <italic>CAT</italic> (HORVU.MOREX.r2.7HG0623480.1) increased progressively across Stages II&#x2013;III in both cultivars and served as an II&#x2013;III marker. All <italic>CAT</italic>s were very low in mature pollen (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2"><bold>Figures&#xa0;2A, B</bold></xref>).</p>
<p><italic>GPX</italic>s also exhibited stage- and cultivar-dependent regulation: HORVU.MOREX.r2.4HG0304790.1 peaked at stages I and III, and HORVU.MOREX.r2.2HG0156400.1 marked Golden Promise at stage III. As with <italic>CAT</italic>s, <italic>GPX</italic> transcripts were low in mature pollen (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2"><bold>Figures&#xa0;2A, B</bold></xref>).</p>
<p>Collectively, core antioxidant genes show dynamic regulation during ME, with stage- and cultivar-specific patterns that distinguish the responsive Igri from the recalcitrant Golden Promise.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_3">
<label>3.3</label>
<title>ASC&#x2013;GSH cycle genes showed late MDHAR rise and stronger GR induction in responsive cultivar</title>
<p>We next analyzed <italic>APX</italic>, <italic>MDHAR</italic>, and <italic>GR</italic> families (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3"><bold>Figure&#xa0;3</bold></xref>, <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SF1"><bold>Supplementary Figure S3</bold></xref>). A distinct <italic>DHAR</italic> gene family is not annotated in the barley Morex v2 genome; homology-based searches indicated that DHAR-like functions are represented by GST-annotated genes (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SF1"><bold>Supplementary Dataset 1</bold></xref>). Most genes were expressed (<italic>APX</italic>: 4/5; <italic>MDHA</italic>R: 5/7; <italic>GR</italic>: 2/2; 14 total; <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SF1"><bold>Supplementary Figure S3A</bold></xref>), mapping to orthogroups containing the corresponding Arabidopsis genes (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SF1"><bold>Supplementary Dataset 1</bold></xref>).</p>
<fig id="f3" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;3</label>
<caption>
<p>Transcriptional dynamics of ascorbate&#x2013;glutathione (ASC&#x2013;GSH) cycle genes during early microspore embryogenesis in barley. <bold>(A)</bold> Heatmaps of representative <italic>ASCORBATE PEROXIDASE</italic> (<italic>APX</italic>; n = 2 out of 4 transcriptionally active), <italic>MONODEHYDROASCORBATE REDUCTASE</italic> (<italic>MDHAR</italic>; n = 5, all transcriptionally active) and <italic>GLUTATHIONE REDUCTASE</italic> (<italic>GR</italic>; n=2, all transcriptionally active) genes showing stage- and cultivar-specific expression patterns (row Z-scores) in Golden Promise (GP) and Igri. The top row in each block indicates the mean expression of all detected members of the corresponding gene family. Only genes with detectable expression (FPKM &gt; 0) in at least one stage in either cultivar were included. Stages 0&#x2013;III represent successive steps of ME induction, whereas P denotes bicellular pollen (gametophytic development). Gene IDs are abbreviated by omitting the common HORVU.MOREX.r2 prefix. &#x25b2; indicates genes plotted in <bold>(B)</bold>; bold gene IDs denote genes discussed in the text. &#x2605; indicates marker genes, defined as transcripts exhibiting stage-specific and/or cultivar-specific expression during ME induction. <bold>(B)</bold> Expression trajectories for selected <italic>APX</italic>, <italic>MDHAR</italic> and <italic>GR</italic> genes across ME stages. Asterisks indicate between-cultivar differences at a given stage (DESeq2, FDR-adjusted P&lt;0.05); &#x2018;ns&#x2019; indicates non-significance. Background shading indicates genes classified as stage-specific (grey), Igri-enriched (green) or Golden Promise-enriched (yellow). Dashed horizontal lines indicate the corresponding pollen expression level for each cultivar. Additional family-level expression summaries are provided in <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SF1"><bold>Supplementary Figure S3</bold></xref>.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-16-1735720-g003.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Chart illustrating the transcriptional dynamics of genes encoding antioxidant enzymes involved in the ascorbate-glutahione cycle&#x2014;ascorbate peroxidases (APXs), monodehydroascorbate reductases (MDHARs), and glutathione reductases (GRs)&#x2014;in pollen grains and during the early stages of microspore embryogenesis (ME) in two barley cultivars, Golden Promise and Igri. Panel A presents heatmaps showing the expression levels of selected APX, MDHAR, and GR genes, with Z-scores indicated by color intensity. Panel B displays expression trajectories for selected APX, MDHAR, and GR genes in pollen and across four ME stages, with annotations for statistical significance.</alt-text>
</graphic></fig>
<p>At the family level, <italic>APX</italic> genes exhibited the highest mean expression among all antioxidant gene families, maintaining consistently high transcript abundance across induction stages and in pollen in both cultivars (&#x2248;300&#x2013;500 mean FPKM). Notably, a single <italic>APX</italic> transcript (HORVU.MOREX.r2.2HG0088330.1) displayed very high and stable expression across all ME stages and in pollen, reaching &#x2248;1000 FPKM (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3"><bold>Figures&#xa0;3A, B</bold></xref>, <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SF1"><bold>Supplementary Figure S3B</bold></xref>). In contrast, <italic>MDHAR</italic>s increased progressively from stage 0 to stage III, particularly in Igri (up to ~77 FPKM), with pollen lower than induction stages. <italic>GR</italic>s were expressed at moderate levels (~60 FPKM) across ME stages and in pollen, except for a marked rise in Igri at stage III (~115 FPKM).</p>
<p>Gene-specific patterns reinforced these trends (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3"><bold>Figures&#xa0;3A, B</bold></xref>). Within <italic>APX</italic>, HORVU.MOREX.r2.4HG0320930.1 was high in Igri at stage 0 and re-emerged at stage III, showing stage-III specificity in both cultivars. Several <italic>MDHAR</italic>s (HORVU.MOREX.r2.6HG0503910.1, HORVU.MOREX.r2.7HG0581330.1, HORVU.MOREX.r2.7HG0571990.1) showed progressive induction marking stages II&#x2013;III, whereas HORVU.MOREX.r2.6HG0503900.1 peaked at stage I in both cultivars. Among <italic>GR</italic>s, HORVU.MOREX.r2.6HG0521730.1 emerged as a stage III&#x2013;specific marker of Igri. In mature pollen, <italic>APX</italic>s expression was high in one or both cultivars, whereas <italic>MDHAR</italic>s and <italic>GR</italic>s were low.</p>
<p>In summary, <italic>APX</italic> transcripts are abundant but largely stage-stable, <italic>MDHAR</italic>s rise with ME progression, and <italic>GR</italic> showed an Igri-biased stage-III induction.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_4">
<label>3.4</label>
<title>Thiol-redox regulators showed late activation with responsive cultivar enrichment</title>
<p>We examined also the transcriptional activity of thiol&#x2013;redox regulatory families (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f4"><bold>Figure&#xa0;4</bold></xref>, <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SF1"><bold>Supplementary Figure S4</bold></xref>). Of 143 annotated genes, most were expressed in at least one stage: 57/63 <italic>TRX</italic>s, 37/56 <italic>GRX</italic>s, all 6 <italic>TRXR</italic>s and all 8 <italic>PRX</italic>s (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SF1"><bold>Supplementary Figure S4A</bold></xref>). <italic>TRX</italic> and <italic>GRX</italic> transcripts generally accumulated at low&#x2013;to&#x2013;moderate levels, with few highly expressed members; <italic>TRXR</italic> and <italic>PRX</italic> showed similar distributions (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SF1"><bold>Supplementary Figure S4B</bold></xref>).</p>
<fig id="f4" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;4</label>
<caption>
<p>Transcriptional dynamics of thiol&#x2013;redox regulatory genes during early microspore embryogenesis in barley. <bold>(A)</bold> Heatmaps of representative <italic>THIOREDOXIN</italic> (<italic>TRX</italic>; n = 14 out of 57 transcriptionally active), <italic>GLUTAREDOXIN</italic> (<italic>GRX</italic>; n = 12 out of 37 transcriptionally active) and <italic>PEROXIREDOXIN</italic> (<italic>PRX</italic>; n = 4 out of 8 transcriptionally active) genes showing stage- and cultivar-specific expression patterns (row Z-scores) in Golden Promise (GP) and Igri. The top row in each block indicates the mean expression of all detected members of the corresponding gene family. Only genes with detectable expression (FPKM &gt; 0) in at least one stage in either cultivar were included. Stages 0&#x2013;III represent successive steps of ME induction, whereas P denotes bicellular pollen (gametophytic development). Symbols next to gene IDs denote: bold gene IDs genes discussed in the text. &#x2605; indicates marker genes, defined as transcripts exhibiting stage-specific and/or cultivar-specific expression during ME induction. &#x25b2; indicates genes plotted in <bold>(B)</bold>. &#x25a0; marks genes reported as upregulated at day 5 of culture in the ME-responsive cultivar Gobernadora (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">B&#xe9;langer et&#xa0;al., 2018</xref>). Detailed data are provided in Dataset 1. <bold>(B)</bold> Expression trajectories for selected <italic>TRX</italic>, <italic>GRX</italic>, and <italic>PRX</italic> genes across ME stages. Asterisks indicate between-cultivar differences at a given stage (DESeq2, FDR-adjusted P&lt;0.05); &#x2018;ns&#x2019; indicates non-significance. Shading indicates the stage where each gene is stage-specific (grey), Igri-specific (green), or Golden Promise-specific (yellow). Dashed horizontal lines indicate the pollen expression level for each cultivar. Additional family-level expression summaries for <italic>TRX</italic>s/<italic>GRX</italic>s/<italic>PRX</italic>s and <italic>THIOREDOXIN REDUCTASE</italic>s (<italic>TRXR</italic>s) are provided in <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SF1"><bold>Supplementary Figure S4</bold></xref>.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-16-1735720-g004.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Chart illustrating the transcriptional dynamics of thiol&#x2013;redox regulatory genes&#x2014;thioredoxins (TRXs), glutaredoxins (GRXs), and peroxiredoxins (PRXs)&#x2014;in pollen grains and during the early stages of microspore embryogenesis (ME) in two barley cultivars, Golden Promise and Igri. Panel A presents heatmaps showing the expression levels of selected TRX, GRX, and PRX genes, with Z-scores indicated by color intensity. Panel B displays expression trajectories for selected TRX, GRX, and PRX genes in pollen and across four ME stages, with annotations for statistical significance.</alt-text>
</graphic></fig>
<p>At the family level, mean expression was relatively stable across stages 0&#x2013;III and in pollen, with only minor cultivar differences (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f4"><bold>Figure&#xa0;4A</bold></xref>, <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SF1"><bold>Supplementary Figure S4C</bold></xref>). <italic>TRXR</italic> was notably invariant: all six members showed no clear induction with ME or genotype effects (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SF1"><bold>Supplementary Dataset 1</bold></xref>).</p>
<p>In contrast, several <italic>TRX</italic>s and <italic>GRX</italic>s were selectively mobilized at later stages (II&#x2013;III), particularly in Igri. Representative trajectories illustrated these contrasts (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f4"><bold>Figures&#xa0;4A, B</bold></xref>). For example, <italic>TRX</italic>s HORVU.MOREX.r2.1HG0023970.1, HORVU.MOREX.r2.4HG0315890.1, and HORVU.MOREX.r2.2HG0091330.1 exhibited biphasic dynamics: high at stage 0, decreased at stages I&#x2013;II, then re-induced at stage III&#x2014;Igri-specific for HORVU.MOREX.r2.1HG0023970.1, shared by both cultivars for the other two. Strong cultivar biases were evident: HORVU.MOREX.r2.7HG0534000.1 was consistently higher in Golden Promise, whereas HORVU.MOREX.r2.2HG0174890.1 was higher in Igri across stages. Marker-like behavior included Igri-specific induction at stages II&#x2013;III (HORVU.MOREX.r2.2HG0093810.1) and stage-III-restricted increases (HORVU.MOREX.r2.5HG0432930.1, HORVU.MOREX.r2.7HG0560380.1). Among <italic>GRX</italic>s, HORVU.MOREX.r2.2HG0125570.1 acted as a stage-III marker in both cultivars, HORVU.MOREX.r2.7HG0552610.1 was enriched in Golden Promise at stage III, and HORVU.MOREX.r2.3HG0230900.1 was Igri-stage III marker. Several transcripts (HORVU.MOREX.r2.6HG0496700.1, HORVU.MOREX.r2.2HG0095970.1, HORVU.MOREX.r2.1HG0072330.1) accumulated progressively across induction. Within <italic>PRX</italic>s, HORVU.MOREX.r2.6HG0476250.1 was stage-I specific in both cultivars, whereas HORVU.MOREX.r2.3HG0231680.1 showed clear Igri specificity at stage III.</p>
<p>To validate these patterns, a cross-study comparison was performed with the ME-responsive cultivar Gobernadora, in which three <italic>TRX</italic> and two <italic>GRX</italic> genes were reported as upregulated at day 5 of culture (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">B&#xe9;langer et&#xa0;al., 2018</xref>). The expression profiles of these candidates were therefore examined in the Igri and Golden Promise datasets. Two <italic>TRXs</italic> showed Igri stage III-specific accumulation, whereas the third was induced in both cultivars across stages I&#x2013;III; similarly, both <italic>GRXs</italic> displayed increased expression in both cultivars across stages I&#x2013;III (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f4"><bold>Figure&#xa0;4A</bold></xref>, <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SF1"><bold>Supplementary Dataset 1</bold></xref>).</p>
<p>Notably, a subset of <italic>TRX</italic>, <italic>GRX</italic> and <italic>PRX</italic> genes was not ME-responsive but was strongly expressed in mature pollen, indicating developmental rather than reprogramming regulation (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SF1"><bold>Supplementary Figures S4D, E</bold></xref>).</p>
<p>Hence, although family-level expression appears stable, distinct <italic>TRX</italic>/<italic>GRX</italic>/<italic>PRX</italic> members are selectively deployed in a stage- and cultivar-dependent manner, with late (II&#x2013;III) induction particularly prominent in Igri.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_5">
<label>3.5</label>
<title>Enhanced GST activation at stage III of ME in the responsive barley cultivar</title>
<p>To assess the role of GST during ME induction, we profiled the expression of 280 annotated <italic>GST</italic> genes (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f5"><bold>Figure&#xa0;5</bold></xref>, <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SF1"><bold>Supplementary Figure S5</bold></xref>). Exactly half of these genes (140/280) were transcriptionally active (FPKM &gt; 0) in at least one developmental stage in either cultivar (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SF1"><bold>Supplementary Figure S5A</bold></xref>). The expressed <italic>GST</italic> genes are distributed across various classes, with a particularly strong representation of the theta class (<italic>GSTT3, n = 41</italic>, <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SF1"><bold>Supplementary Dataset 1</bold></xref>). Most transcripts accumulated at very low to low levels (0&#x2013;10 FPKM), with relatively few reaching moderate (10&#x2013;100 FPKM) or high (&#x2265;100 FPKM) abundance. Notably, the responsive cultivar Igri contained more strongly expressed <italic>GST</italic>s at stage III than Golden Promise (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SF1"><bold>Supplementary Figure S5B</bold></xref>).</p>
<fig id="f5" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;5</label>
<caption>
<p>Transcriptional dynamics of <italic>GLUTATHIONE S-TRANSFERASE</italic> (<italic>GST</italic>) genes during early microspore embryogenesis in barley. <bold>(A)</bold> Heatmap of 34 representative <italic>GST</italic> genes (out of 180 transcriptionally active) showing stage- and cultivar-dependent expression patterns in Golden Promise (GP) and Igri. Expression is displayed as row Z-scores; the top row indicates the mean expression of all detected <italic>GST</italic>s. Only genes with detectable expression (FPKM &gt; 0) in at least one stage in either cultivar were included. Stages 0&#x2013;III represent successive steps of ME induction, whereas P denotes bicellular pollen (gametophytic development). Gene IDs are abbreviated by omitting the common HORVU.MOREX.r2 prefix. Symbols next to gene IDs denote: &#x25b2; genes plotted in panel <bold>(B)</bold>; &#x25cf; <italic>GST</italic>s reported as upregulated in the ME-responsive cultivar Gobernadora at days 0&#x2013;2 of culture; &#x25a0; <italic>GST</italic>s reported as upregulated in Gobernadora at day 5 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">B&#xe9;langer et&#xa0;al., 2018</xref>). Bold gene IDs indicate genes specifically discussed in the main text. Extended data are provided in Dataset 1 and in <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SF1"><bold>Supplementary Figure S5</bold></xref>. <bold>(B)</bold> Expression trajectories (FPKM) for selected <italic>GST</italic>s across ME stages in GP and Igri. Asterisks indicate significant between-cultivar differences at a given stage (DESeq2; FDR-adjusted P &lt; 0.05); ns denotes non-significance. Background shading indicates genes classified as stage-specific (grey) or Igri-enriched (green). Dashed horizontal lines indicate the corresponding pollen expression level for each cultivar. Additional family-level expression summaries are provided in <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SF1"><bold>Supplementary Figure S5</bold></xref>.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-16-1735720-g005.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Chart illustrating the transcriptional dynamics of glutathione S-transferase (GST) genes in pollen grains and during the early stages of microspore embryogenesis (ME) in two barley cultivars, Golden Promise and Igri. Panel A presents a heatmap showing the expression levels of selected GST genes, with Z-scores indicated by color intensity. Panel B displays expression trajectories for selected GST genes in pollen and across four ME stages, with annotations for statistical significance.</alt-text>
</graphic></fig>
<p>Mean <italic>GST</italic> expression increased progressively from stage 0 to stage III in both cultivars, peaking in Igri at stage III (~40 FPKM). Pollen (P) showed low <italic>GST</italic> expression, comparable to stage 0 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f5"><bold>Figure&#xa0;5A</bold></xref>, <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SF1"><bold>Supplementary Figure S5C</bold></xref>).</p>
<p>Closer inspection revealed diverse expression trajectories (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f5"><bold>Figures&#xa0;5A, B</bold></xref>). Several transcripts were preferentially induced in Golden Promise at stage I (e.g. HORVU.MOREX.r2.7HG0529160.1, HORVU.MOREX.r2.3HG0267220.1) or at stages II&#x2013;III (e.g. HORVU.MOREX.r2.6HG0520240.1). HORVU.MOREX.r2.1HG0013750.1 was the most highly expressed <italic>GST</italic> overall, with strong accumulation at stages II and III in both cultivars. Additional common stage markers included genes specifically induced at stage III (e.g. HORVU.MOREX.r2.7HG0619090.1, HORVU.MOREX.r2.5HG0383770.1). A substantial subset was enriched in Igri at stages II&#x2013;III, with maxima at stage III: some maintained high expression across both stages (e.g. HORVU.MOREX.r2.7HG0551820.1, HORVU.MOREX.r2.3HG0260240.1), whereas others showed a stepwise rise from moderate (stage II) to strong (stage III) levels (e.g. HORVU.MOREX.r2.1HG0040480.1, HORVU.MOREX.r2.1HG0016790.1, HORVU.MOREX.r2.1HG0040620.1, HORVU.MOREX.r2.1HG0016800.1). A final group acted as Igri-specific stage-III markers (e.g. HORVU.MOREX.r2.2HG0178470.1).</p>
<p>Similarly, cross-study comparison with the ME-responsive cultivar Gobernadora supported the stage specificity observed here (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">B&#xe9;langer et&#xa0;al., 2018</xref>). Seven <italic>GST</italic>s reported as upregulated at days 0&#x2013;2 of culture were examined in the present dataset&#xa0;and&#xa0;were found to be associated primarily with early induction:&#xa0;three were upregulated at stage I in both cultivars but accumulated more strongly in Golden Promise, whereas four showed elevated expression across stages 0&#x2013;II; in all cases, expression declined at stage III. In contrast, of 19 <italic>GST</italic>s reported as upregulated at day 5, thirteen displayed clear Igri stage III-enrichment, including seven genes with strict marker-like behavior. This concordance was taken as independent validation of the dataset and supported the association of late <italic>GST</italic> activation with responsive genotypes (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f5"><bold>Figure&#xa0;5A</bold></xref>, <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SF1"><bold>Supplementary Figure S5D</bold></xref>, <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SF1"><bold>Supplementary Dataset 1</bold></xref>).</p>
<p>Together, these results indicate that <italic>GST</italic> activity intensifies during the transition to embryogenesis, with a pronounced stage-III induction in the responsive cultivar Igri.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s4" sec-type="discussion">
<label>4</label>
<title>Discussion</title>
<p>Studies in triticale and barley have shown that ME induction is accompanied by the accumulation of ROS, which act as key determinants of microspore fate&#x2014;promoting embryogenic reprogramming at moderate levels but triggering cell death when excessive (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">&#x17b;ur et&#xa0;al., 2008</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">&#x17b;ur et&#xa0;al., 2009</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">&#x17b;ur et&#xa0;al., 2014a</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">&#x17b;ur et&#xa0;al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">&#x17b;ur et&#xa0;al., 2021a</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">&#x17b;ur et&#xa0;al., 2021b</xref>). To identify antioxidant components that sustain a pro-embryogenic redox balance, we conducted an <italic>in silico</italic> analysis of genes encoding major antioxidant and redox enzymes in two barley cultivars with contrasting embryogenic potential. Despite well-documented differences in ME responsiveness (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Kumlehn et&#xa0;al., 2006</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">&#x17b;ur et&#xa0;al., 2021a</xref>), cytological analysis showed that both cultivars initiated microspore reprogramming with comparable efficiency at stage I and displayed a broadly similar profile of antioxidant gene expression at this early step. Divergence became apparent 24 h after transfer to induction medium. It was most pronounced at 48 h, when the number of differentially expressed genes peaked. These observations support a model in which an initial, shared activation of antioxidant genes enables survival and entry into reprogramming, whereas cultivar-specific transcriptional programs emerging later contribute to differential embryogenic competence.</p>
<sec id="s4_1">
<label>4.1</label>
<title>Elements of antioxidative defense identified in barley microspores and activated during ME induction</title>
<p>Our survey revealed a broad antioxidant repertoire in barley microspores: 35 core antioxidant genes, 14 ASC&#x2013;GSH cycle genes, 143 <italic>TRX</italic>/<italic>GRX/PRX</italic> genes, and a large <italic>GST</italic> family (280 members). A similarly large set of 330 <italic>TaGST</italic>s was reported in wheat (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B46">Wang et&#xa0;al., 2019</xref>). Approximately 80% of these genes were transcriptionally active during ME induction. Significant expression changes were detected for nearly 80% of core antioxidant and <italic>TRX</italic>/<italic>GRX</italic> genes, ~90% of ASC&#x2013;GSH genes, and ~70% of <italic>GST</italic>s&#x2014;evidence of extensive redox rewiring during induction.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s4_2">
<label>4.2</label>
<title>The dual role of core antioxidative enzymes in microspore protection and differentiation</title>
<p>Among core enzymes, <italic>SOD</italic>s emerged as prominent candidates. Most annotated <italic>SOD</italic>s corresponded to Arabidopsis Cu/Zn isoforms localized to the cytosol, chloroplasts, or peroxisome. These isoforms were also the most abundant in anthers of triticale subjected to ME-inducing cold pre-treatment (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">&#x17b;ur et&#xa0;al., 2014a</xref>). They are known to function in development and respond strongly to temperature, drought, and salinity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Gill and Tuteja, 2010</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B47">Wang et&#xa0;al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Li et&#xa0;al., 2017</xref>). Genotype-biased differences were clearest at stage III, where several <italic>SOD</italic> transcripts (e.g. HORVU.MOREX.r2.7HG0573050.1) accumulated more strongly in the responsive cultivar Igri. Similarly, increased accumulation of <italic>SOD</italic> transcripts was observed in <italic>Brassica napus</italic> microspores redirected towards ME (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">Rueda-Varela et&#xa0;al., 2025</xref>).</p>
<p>Functionally, SODs catalyze the dismutation of O<sub>2</sub><sup>&#x2022;&#x2013;</sup> to H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>, thereby limiting the formation of highly reactive <sup>&#x2022;</sup>OH via the Haber&#x2013;Weiss reaction (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">Mittler, 2002</xref>). Being less reactive, H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> acts as a signaling molecule that modulates gene expression and enzyme activity through cysteine oxidation-based redox regulation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B42">Souza, 2025</xref>). Our previous work supports a role for H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> as a trigger for ME as excessive H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> elimination improved microspore survival but reduced reprogramming efficiency (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">&#x17b;ur et&#xa0;al., 2014a</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">&#x17b;ur et&#xa0;al., 2021a</xref>). It suggests that maintaining a signaling-competent H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> pool is essential for successful ME induction. However, subsequent studies in triticale and barley demonstrated that both O<sub>2</sub><sup>&#x2022;&#x2013;</sup> and H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> accumulate in the microspore cytoplasm after ME-inducing treatment (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">&#x17b;ur et&#xa0;al., 2021b</xref>). Notably, enhanced generation of O<sub>2</sub><sup>&#x2022;&#x2013;</sup> was detected in proximity to the nuclei, pointing to its potential role in early signaling events. This interpretation is consistent with recent insights summarized by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">Karpinska and Foyer (2024)</xref>, who highlight a previously underappreciated function of superoxide in compartment-specific signaling within the plant cell nucleus.</p>
<p>Consistently, <italic>CAT</italic>s showed stage-specific expression&#x2014;distinct isoforms predominating at different phases&#x2014;whereas many <italic>GPX</italic>s (with higher affinity for H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> and frequently implicated in signaling) were induced by mannitol and further upregulated at 48 h of <italic>in vitro</italic> culture. Higher <italic>CAT</italic> and <italic>GPX</italic> transcript abundance in Golden Promise (e.g. <italic>CAT</italic> HORVU.MOREX.r2.4HG0341470.1; <italic>GPX</italic> HORVU.MOREX.r2.2HG0156400.1) may reflect over-scavenging that dampens H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> signaling required for the developmental switch, consistent with the negative non-linear relationship between <italic>CAT</italic> activity and ME efficiency reported in triticale (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">&#x17b;ur et&#xa0;al., 2014a</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s4_3">
<label>4.3</label>
<title>Functional divergence of ascorbate and glutathione during ME induction</title>
<p>Low-molecular-weight antioxidants ASC and GSH are abundant and widely distributed in plant cells. They directly detoxify ROS, protecting cell components from oxidative damages and help maintain the cellular redox environment required for effective metabolism and development. Their oxidized forms (MDHA, DHA, GSSG) are efficiently recycled in the ASC&#x2013;GSH cycle due to concerted action of reducing enzymes (MDHAR, DHAR and GR; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">Foyer and Noctor, 2011</xref>). Two observations stood out. First, several <italic>MDHAR</italic> transcripts increased progressively during induction&#x2014;either similarly in both cultivars or with a stronger response in Igri (e.g. HORVU.MOREX.r2.6HG0503910.1 and HORVU.MOREX.r2.7HG0581330.1)&#x2014;consistent with sustained ASC recycling during reprogramming. Second, one <italic>GR</italic> (HORVU.MOREX.r2.6HG0521730.1) showed a cultivar-biased induction at stage III, consistent with prior evidence that elevated <italic>GR</italic> activity is associated with microspore competence for ME (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">&#x17b;ur et&#xa0;al., 2021b</xref>). In contrast, <italic>APX</italic> transcripts were highly abundant but largely stage stable in both cultivars, suggesting a constitutive role in maintaining basal H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> detoxification during both gametophytic and embryogenic development rather than driving stage-specific transitions.</p>
<p>Together, these patterns support a framework in which ASC-dependent redox buffering primarily supports microspore and pollen survival in both cultivars, whereas efficient GSH recycling becomes especially important in rapidly dividing, embryogenic cells of Igri. Supporting this view, a recent report showed that a local GSH burst in wounded Arabidopsis roots shortens G1 to accelerate division and regeneration (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Lee et&#xa0;al., 2025</xref>), offering a plausible mechanistic link. Consistently, exogenous GSH in our earlier works maintained microspore viability and stimulated ELS development (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">&#x17b;ur et&#xa0;al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">&#x17b;ur et&#xa0;al., 2021b</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s4_4">
<label>4.4</label>
<title>Cumulative activity of thiol reductases as underestimated element of successful microspore reprogramming</title>
<p>Thiol oxidoreductases further integrate redox control with development. <italic>TRXs</italic> and <italic>GRXs</italic>&#x2014;abundant and broadly localized&#x2014;regulate protein redox state, reduce disulphide and mixed disulphide bonds using ferredoxin/NADPH (TRX systems) or GSH (GRX), and can donate electrons to other antioxidant enzymes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Meyer et&#xa0;al., 2009</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">Meyer et&#xa0;al., 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">Sevilla et&#xa0;al., 2023</xref>). They also participate in retrograde communication that coordinates gene expression during stress acclimation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">Sevilla et&#xa0;al., 2023</xref>). We observed selective late (stages II&#x2013;III) induction of specific <italic>TRX</italic> and <italic>GRX</italic> members, particularly in Igri, consistent with roles in supporting rapid divisions and stabilizing redox-sensitive enzymes during multicellular structures formation. Notably, this cultivar-biased late activation was independently supported by comparison with the ME-responsive cultivar Gobernadora, in which several of the same thiol&#x2013;redox genes were previously reported as upregulated during late induction (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">B&#xe9;langer et&#xa0;al., 2018</xref>), providing cross-study validation of the observed&#xa0;patterns. Among <italic>PRX</italic>s, only one gene (HORVU.MOREX.r2.3HG0231680.1; a B-type/1-Cys peroxiredoxin orthologue of Arabidopsis) showed a clear association with efficient ME, being strongly induced at stage III in Igri and reaching high abundance (&gt;200 FPKM). Plant 1-Cys <italic>PRXs</italic>, though less characterized, interact with TRX/GRX systems to mitigate ROS, transduce stress signals, and modulate metabolism, under severe stress their peroxidase activity can switch to a chaperone function (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Dietz et&#xa0;al., 2006</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">Kim et&#xa0;al., 2011</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">Liebthal et&#xa0;al., 2018</xref>). Its strong induction in the responsive cultivar points to a role in proteostasis during rapid proliferative remodeling.</p>
<p>In addition to ME-associated induction, a substantial subset of <italic>TRX</italic>/<italic>GRX</italic>/<italic>PRX</italic> genes was strongly expressed in mature pollen but showed little or no responsiveness during ME induction, indicating that thiol&#x2013;redox regulation also supports late gametophytic development independently of embryogenic reprogramming. This separation of expression patterns suggests functional specialization within thiol&#x2013;redox families, with distinct members contributing either to pollen maturation and stress tolerance or to the redox remodeling required for embryogenic transition.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s4_5">
<label>4.5</label>
<title>Confirmation of the important role of GST in ME induction</title>
<p>GSTs likely contribute to ME through multiple mechanisms. They catalyzing S-glutathionylation&#x2014;a reversible modification that shields protein thiols from irreversible oxidation while modulating protein function (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">Sevilla et&#xa0;al., 2023</xref>). GSTs detoxify stress-derived metabolites and participate in biosynthetic pathways (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">Pi&#x15b;lewska-Bednarek et&#xa0;al., 2018</xref>). Although some plant GSTs show limited glutathionylating activity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">Micic et&#xa0;al., 2024</xref>), the family&#x2019;s size underscores functional breadth. In the present study, <italic>GST</italic> transcription was progressively activated during ME induction, with a pronounced enrichment at stage III in the responsive cultivar Igri. This pattern closely parallels observations made in the independently characterised ME-responsive cultivar Gobernadora (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">B&#xe9;langer et&#xa0;al., 2018</xref>), in which late-stage <italic>GST</italic>s induction was likewise associated with successful embryogenic development. The concordant late <italic>GST</italic> activation in both Igri and Gobernadora therefore confirms their shared responsive phenotype and provides cross-study validation that stage-III GST upregulation is a hallmark of effective embryogenic reprogramming.</p>
<p>Early studies identified <italic>GST</italic>s among the first ME-responsive genes in barley (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B45">Vrinten et&#xa0;al., 1999</xref>), and subsequent studies documented dynamic <italic>GST</italic> expression across induction and its association with plant regeneration capacity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Maraschin et&#xa0;al., 2006</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">Mu&#xf1;oz-Amatria&#xed;n et&#xa0;al., 2006</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">Mu&#xf1;oz-Amatria&#xed;n et&#xa0;al.,&#xa0;2009</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Joosen et&#xa0;al., 2007</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Malik et&#xa0;al., 2007</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B44">Tsuwamoto et&#xa0;al., 2007</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Jacquard et&#xa0;al., 2009</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">S&#xe1;nchez-D&#xed;az et&#xa0;al., 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">&#x17b;ur et&#xa0;al., 2014b</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">B&#xe9;langer et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>). Our findings extend these observations by resolving stage- and cultivar-specific programs and implicating elevated GST activity as a hallmark of the responsive trajectory.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s4_6">
<label>4.6</label>
<title>A model for redox control during ME</title>
<p>Integrating transcript abundance patterns across antioxidant and redox gene families with their functional relationships (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f6"><bold>Figure&#xa0;6</bold></xref>), we propose a staged model of redox control during ME. An early phase, common to both cultivars, is characterized by activation of core antioxidant defenses that buffer the oxidative burst associated with microspore isolation and osmotic/starvation stress, thereby enabling cell survival and entry into developmental reprogramming. This phase is marked by stable or moderately elevated expression of <italic>SOD</italic>s, <italic>APX</italic>s, and selected <italic>CAT</italic> and <italic>GPX</italic> isoforms, consistent with maintenance of basal ROS detoxification and redox homeostasis.</p>
<fig id="f6" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;6</label>
<caption>
<p>Conceptual model summarizing transcriptome-derived redox regulatory dynamics underlying barley microspore embryogenesis induction. Short-term osmotic stress (1&#x2013;2 h of 0.4 M mannitol) applied during anthers collection together with the stress induced by mechanical isolation of microspores (Stage 0) triggers reactive oxygen species (ROS) production and redox signaling, leading to activation of core antioxidant defenses and initiation of microspore reprogramming. This early phase is characterized by elevated expression of <italic>SUPEROXIDE DISMUTASES</italic> (<italic>SOD</italic>s) and <italic>ASCORBATE PEROXIDASES</italic> (<italic>APX</italic>s), together with induction of thiol-based redox regulators, including <italic>THIOREDOXINS</italic> (<italic>TRX</italic>s) and <italic>PEROXIREDOXINS</italic> (<italic>PRX</italic>s). Prolonged osmotic/starvation stress (Stage I) sustains ROS signaling and reinforces coordinated antioxidant responses, supporting commitment to and stabilization of the reprogramming process. Following transfer to nutrient medium (Stages II&#x2013;III), a broader redox network becomes established, incorporating <italic>CATALASES</italic> (<italic>CAT</italic>s), <italic>GLUTATHIONE PEROXIDASES</italic> (<italic>GPX</italic>s), <italic>MONODEHYDROASCORBATE REDUCTASES</italic> (<italic>MDHAR</italic>s), <italic>GLUTATHIONE REDUCTASES</italic> (<italic>GR</italic>s), <italic>GLUTAREDOXINS</italic> (<italic>GRX</italic>s), <italic>TRX</italic>s, <italic>PRX</italic>s, and <italic>GLUTATHIONE S-TRANSFERASES</italic> (<italic>GST</italic>s). This expanded network supports protein protection, redox homeostasis, cellular restructuring, and initiation and progression of embryogenesis. These redox regulatory processes represent a core transcriptional framework shared by both cultivars (Igri and Golden Promise) and are essential for microspore survival and developmental reprogramming. Comparative transcriptomic analysis further reveals cultivar-specific quantitative differences: the responsive cultivar Igri displays higher cumulative transcript abundance of multiple antioxidant and detoxification gene families, including stronger late-stage induction of <italic>GR</italic>s, enhanced activation of thiol-based redox components (<italic>TRX</italic>s/<italic>GRX</italic>s/<italic>PRX</italic>s), and a more pronounced <italic>GST</italic>-mediated detoxification response (highlighted in bold). Intensive utilization of GSH may shift the cellular redox balance toward a more oxidized state conducive to continued embryogenic development likely underpins successful embryogenesis in Igri. Enzyme family names denote transcriptional regulation inferred from RNA-seq analyses and do not represent direct measurements of enzymatic activity.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-16-1735720-g006.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Chart illustrating conceptual model summarizing transcriptome-derived redox regulatory dynamics underlying barley microspore embryogenesis induction. The model links stages of microspore reprogramming and embryogenesis induction with reactive oxygen species generation and activation of antioxidative defense, highlighting networks of significantly up-regulated antioxidant genes.</alt-text>
</graphic></fig>
<p>In contrast, the embryogenically responsive trajectory represented by Igri shows a second, coordinated redox reinforcement at later stages (II&#x2013;III), coincident with the initiation of the embryogenic developmental program. This late phase involves enhanced glutathione recycling via GR, pronounced activation of GSTs, and selective deployment of thiol&#x2013;redox regulators (TRXs, GRXs, and PRXs), rather than a global increase in antioxidant capacity (highlighted in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f6"><bold>Figure&#xa0;6</bold></xref>). Such targeted engagement of thiol-based redox hubs is well suited to fine-tune protein redox status, preserve proteostasis, and sustain redox-sensitive signaling pathways during rapid cell proliferation and multicellular structure formation. We propose that this program maintains a signaling-competent O<sub>2</sub><sup>&#x2022;&#x2013;</sup> and H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> pools while preventing oxidative damage, thereby favoring cell-cycle progression and ELS development. Intensive utilization of GSH as an electron donor by GST, GRX, and GPX enzymes may shift the cellular redox balance toward a more oxidized state conducive to continued embryogenic development (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">Stasolla, 2010</xref>). By contrast, the recalcitrant cultivar Golden Promise may over-scavenge or mistime key steps, attenuating ROS signaling required for the fate switch.</p>
<p>The presented model appears to be supported by multiple experimental data (as referenced above); however, further validation could be achieved via (i) targeted perturbation of candidate nodes (e.g. CAT/GPX inhibition or GSH supplementation), (ii) real-time compartment-specific redox imaging (e.g. roGFP-based reporters), and (iii) genetic manipulation of discriminative <italic>TRX</italic>/<italic>GRX</italic>/<italic>PRX</italic> and <italic>GST</italic> candidates.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s5" sec-type="conclusions">
<label>5</label>
<title>Conclusions</title>
<p>Our <italic>in silico</italic> analysis shows that transcription of antioxidant and redox genes is dynamically remodeled during ME induction in barley, underscoring the centrality of redox homeostasis in successful microspore reprogramming. We delineate, for the first time, the breadth and stage-resolved coordination of this regulatory network in response to ME-associated stress and highlight candidate contributors&#x2014;including <italic>MDHAR</italic>, <italic>GR</italic>, specific <italic>TRX</italic>/<italic>GRX</italic> and <italic>PRX</italic> members, and multiple <italic>GSTs</italic> (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f6"><bold>Figure&#xa0;6</bold></xref>). Contrasting responsiveness between cultivars enabled the nomination of candidate molecular markers potentially linked to embryogenic competence. These findings provide mechanistic insight into ME and offer practical leads for improving DH production in cereals.</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<sec id="s6" sec-type="data-availability">
<title>Data availability statement</title>
<p>The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found in the article/<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1"><bold>Supplementary Material</bold></xref>.</p></sec>
<sec id="s7" sec-type="author-contributions">
<title>Author contributions</title>
<p>AN: Visualization, Formal analysis, Writing &#x2013; original draft. ZM: Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing, Formal analysis, Data curation. MK: Formal analysis, Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing. PK: Investigation, Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing. AS: Formal analysis, Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing. ED: Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing, Formal analysis. I&#x17b;: Funding acquisition, Writing &#x2013; original draft, Conceptualization, Project administration.</p></sec>
<ack>
<title>Acknowledgments</title>
<p>Computational resources were provided by the e-Infrastruktura CZ project (e-INFRA CZ LM2018140), supported by MEYS &#x10c;R.</p>
</ack>
<sec id="s9" sec-type="COI-statement">
<title>Conflict of interest</title>
<p>The authors declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.</p></sec>
<sec id="s10" sec-type="ai-statement">
<title>Generative AI statement</title>
<p>The author(s) declared that generative AI was not used in the creation of this manuscript.</p>
<p>Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If&#xa0;you identify any issues, please contact us.</p></sec>
<sec id="s11" sec-type="disclaimer">
<title>Publisher&#x2019;s note</title>
<p>All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.</p></sec>
<sec id="s12" sec-type="supplementary-material">
<title>Supplementary material</title>
<p>The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2025.1735720/full#supplementary-material">https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2025.1735720/full#supplementary-material</ext-link></p>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="SupplementaryFile1.pdf" id="SF1" mimetype="application/pdf"/>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Table1.xlsx" id="SM1" mimetype="application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet"/>
</sec>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="B1">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>&#x17b;ur</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Dubas</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Golemiec</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Szechy&#x144;ska-Hebda</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Go&#x142;ebiowska</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Wedzony</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2009</year>). 
<article-title>Stress-related variation in antioxidative enzymes activity and cell metabolism efficiency associated with embryogenesis induction in isolated microspore culture of triticale (x Triticosecale Wittm.)</article-title>. <source>Plant Cell Rep.</source> <volume>28</volume>, <fpage>1279</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1287</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00299-009-0730-2</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19551385</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>&#x17b;ur</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Dubas</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Golemiec</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Szechy&#x144;ska-Hebda</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Janowiak</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>W&#x229;dzony</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2008</year>). 
<article-title>Stress-induced changes important for effective androgenic induction in isolated microspore culture of triticale (xTriticosecale Wittm.)</article-title>. <source>Plant Cell. Tissue Organ Cult.</source> <volume>94</volume>, <fpage>319</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>328</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11240-008-9360-6</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>&#x17b;ur</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Dubas</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Krzewska</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Janowiak</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Hura</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Pociecha</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2014</year>a). 
<article-title>Antioxidant activity and ROS tolerance in triticale (&#xd7;Triticosecale Wittm.) anthers affect the efficiency of microspore embryogenesis</article-title>. <source>Plant Cell. Tissue Organ Cult.</source> <volume>119</volume>, <fpage>79</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>94</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11240-014-0515-3</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>&#x17b;ur</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Dubas</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Krzewska</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Kope&#x107;</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Nowicka</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Sur&#xf3;wka</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2021</year>a).&#xa0;
<article-title>Triticale and barley microspore embryogenesis induction requires&#xa0;both&#xa0;reactive oxygen species generation and efficient system of antioxidative&#xa0;defence</article-title>. <source>Plant Cell. Tissue Organ Cult.</source> <volume>145</volume>, <fpage>347</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>366</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11240-021-02012-7</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>&#x17b;ur</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Dubas</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Krzewska</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>S&#xe1;nchez-D&#xed;az</surname> <given-names>R. A.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Castillo</surname> <given-names>A. M.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Vall&#xe9;s</surname> <given-names>M. P.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2014</year>b). 
<article-title>Changes in gene expression patterns associated with microspore embryogenesis in hexaploid triticale (&#xd7;Triticosecale Wittm.)</article-title>. <source>Plant Cell. Tissue Organ Cult.</source> <volume>116</volume>, <fpage>261</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>267</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11240-013-0399-7</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>&#x17b;ur</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Dubas</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Krzewska</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Zieli&#x144;ski</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Fodor</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Janowiak</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2019</year>). 
<article-title>Glutathione provides antioxidative defence and promotes microspore-derived embryo development in isolated microspore cultures of triticale (&#xd7; Triticosecale Wittm.)</article-title>. <source>Plant Cell Rep.</source> <volume>38</volume>, <fpage>195</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>209</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00299-018-2362-x</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30499031</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>&#x17b;ur</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Kope&#x107;</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Sur&#xf3;wka</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Dubas</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Krzewska</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Nowicka</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2021</year>b). 
<article-title>Impact of ascorbate&#x2014;glutathione cycle components on the effectiveness of embryogenesis induction in isolated microspore cultures of barley and triticale</article-title>. <source>Antioxidants</source> <volume>10</volume>, <elocation-id>1254</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/antiox10081254</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">34439502</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Auverlot</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Dard</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>S&#xe1;ez-V&#xe1;squez</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Reichheld</surname> <given-names>J. P.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2024</year>). 
<article-title>Redox regulation of epigenetic and epitranscriptomic gene regulatory pathways in plants</article-title>. <source>J. Exp. Bot.</source> <volume>75</volume>, <fpage>4459</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>4475</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/jxb/erae165</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">38642408</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>B&#xe9;langer</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Baldrich</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Lemay</surname> <given-names>M.-A.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Marchand</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Esteves</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Meyers</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2020</year>). 
<article-title>The commitment of barley microspores into embryogenesis correlates with miRNA-directed regulation of members of the SPL, GRF and HD-ZIPIII transcription factor families</article-title>. <source>Plant Direct</source> <volume>4</volume>, <elocation-id>e00289</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/pld3.289</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">36406053</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>B&#xe9;langer</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Marchand</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Jacques</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Meyers</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Belzile</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2018</year>). 
<article-title>Differential expression profiling of microspores during the early stages of isolated microspore culture using the responsive barley cultivar Gobernadora</article-title>. <source>G3 Genes Genomes Genet.</source> <volume>8</volume>, <fpage>1603</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1614</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1534/g3.118.200208</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29531122</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Daghma</surname> <given-names>D. E. S.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Hensel</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Rutten</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Melzer</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Kumlehn</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2014</year>). 
<article-title>Cellular dynamics during early barley pollen embryogenesis revealed by time-lapse imaging</article-title>. <source>Front. Plant Sci.</source> <volume>5</volume>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpls.2014.00675</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25538715</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Dietz</surname> <given-names>K. J.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Jacob</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Oelze</surname> <given-names>M. L.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Laxa</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Tognetti</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>De Miranda</surname> <given-names>S. M. N.</given-names></name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2006</year>). 
<article-title>The function of peroxiredoxins in plant organelle redox metabolism</article-title>. <source>J. Exp. Bot.</source> <volume>57</volume>, <fpage>1697</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1709</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/jxb/erj160</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">16606633</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Foyer</surname> <given-names>C. H.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Noctor</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2011</year>). 
<article-title>Ascorbate and glutathione: The heart of the redox hub</article-title>. <source>Plant Physiol.</source> <volume>155</volume>, <fpage>2</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>18</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1104/pp.110.167569</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21205630</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Gill</surname> <given-names>S. S.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Tuteja</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2010</year>). 
<article-title>Reactive oxygen species and antioxidant machinery in abiotic stress tolerance in crop plants</article-title>. <source>Plant Physiol. Biochem.</source> <volume>48</volume>, <fpage>909</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>930</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.plaphy.2010.08.016</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20870416</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Jacquard</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Mazeyrat-Gourbeyre</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Devaux</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Boutilier</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Baillieul</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Cl&#xe9;ment</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2009</year>). 
<article-title>Microspore embryogenesis in barley: anther pre-treatment stimulates plant defence gene expression</article-title>. <source>Planta.</source> <volume>229</volume>, <fpage>393</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>402</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00425-008-0838-6</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">18974997</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Joosen</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Cordewener</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Supena</surname> <given-names>E. D. J.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Vorst</surname> <given-names>O.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Lammers</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Maliepaard</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2007</year>). 
<article-title>Combined transcriptome and proteome analysis identifies pathways and markers associated with the establishment of rapeseed microspore-derived embryo development</article-title>. <source>Plant Physiol.</source> <volume>144</volume>, <fpage>155</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>172</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1104/pp.107.098723</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">17384159</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Karpinska</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Foyer</surname> <given-names>C. H.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2024</year>). 
<article-title>Superoxide signalling and antioxidant processing in the plant nucleus</article-title>. <source>J. Exp. Bot.</source> <volume>75</volume>, <fpage>4599</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>4610</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/jxb/erae090</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">38460122</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B18">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Kim</surname> <given-names>S. Y.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Paeng</surname> <given-names>S. K.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Nawkar</surname> <given-names>G. M.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Maibam</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Lee</surname> <given-names>E. S.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Kim</surname> <given-names>K. S.</given-names></name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2011</year>). 
<article-title>The 1-Cys peroxiredoxin, a regulator of seed dormancy, functions as a molecular chaperone under oxidative stress conditions</article-title>. <source>Plant Sci.</source> <volume>181</volume>, <fpage>119</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>124</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.plantsci.2011.04.010</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21683876</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B19">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Krzewska</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Czyczy&#x142;o-Mysza</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Dubas</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Go&#x142;ebiowska-Pikania</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Golemiec</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Stoja&#x142;owski</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2012</year>). 
<article-title>Quantitative trait loci associated with androgenic responsiveness in triticale (&#xd7;Triticosecale Wittm.) anther culture</article-title>. <source>Plant Cell Rep</source>. <volume>31</volume>, <page-range>2099-2108</page-range>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00299-012-1320-2</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22865110</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B20">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Kumlehn</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Serazetdinova</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Hensel</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Becker</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Loerz</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2006</year>). 
<article-title>Genetic transformation of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) via infection of androgenetic pollen cultures with Agrobacterium tumefaciens</article-title>. <source>Plant Biotechnol. J.</source> <volume>4</volume>, <fpage>251</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>261</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1467-7652.2005.00178.x</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">17177801</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B21">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Lee</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Guillotin</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Rahni</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Hutchison</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Desvoyes</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Gutierrez</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2025</year>). 
<article-title>Glutathione accelerates the cell cycle and cellular reprogramming in plant regeneration</article-title>. <source>Dev. Cell.</source> <volume>60</volume>, <fpage>p1153</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>p1167</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.devcel.2024.12.019</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">39755116</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B22">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Han</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Song</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Jiang</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Han</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names></name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2017</year>). 
<article-title>Overexpressing the Sedum alfredii Cu/Zn superoxide dismutase increased resistance to oxidative stress in Transgenic Arabidopsis</article-title>. <source>Front. Plant Sci.</source> <volume>8</volume>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpls.2017.01010</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28659953</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B23">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Liebthal</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Maynard</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Dietz</surname> <given-names>K. J.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2018</year>). 
<article-title>Proxiredoxins and redox signaling in plants</article-title>. <source>Antiox Redox Signal.</source> <volume>28</volume>, <fpage>609</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>624</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1089/ars.2017.7164</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28594234</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B24">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Lin</surname> <given-names>C. C.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Foyer</surname> <given-names>C. H.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Wright</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Baker</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2025</year>). 
<article-title>Redox regulation of LSD1/CATALASE 2 phase separation condensates controls location and functions</article-title>. <source>New&#xa0;Phytol.</source> <volume>247</volume>, <fpage>2824</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2838</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/nph.70374</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">40686090</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B25">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Lippmann</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Friedel</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Mock</surname> <given-names>H. P.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Kumlehn</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2015</year>). 
<article-title>The low molecular weight fraction of compounds released from immature wheat pistils supports barley pollen embryogenesis</article-title>. <source>Front. Plant Sci.</source> <volume>6</volume>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpls.2015.00498</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26217352</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B26">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Malik</surname> <given-names>M. R.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Dirpaul</surname> <given-names>J. M.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Polowick</surname> <given-names>P. L.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Ferrie</surname> <given-names>A. M. R.</given-names></name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2007</year>). 
<article-title>Transcript profiling and identification of molecular markers for early microspore embryogenesis in Brassica napus</article-title>. <source>Plant Physiol.</source> <volume>144</volume>, <fpage>134</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>154</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1104/pp.106.092932</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">17384168</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B27">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Maraschin</surname> <given-names>S. D. F.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Caspers</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Potokina</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Wulfert</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Graner</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Spaink</surname> <given-names>H. P.</given-names></name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2006</year>). 
<article-title>cDNA array analysis of stress-induced gene expression in barley androgenesis</article-title>. <source>Physiol. Plant.</source> <volume>127</volume>, <fpage>535</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>550</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1399-3054.2006.00673.x</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B28">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Mascher</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Gundlach</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Himmelbach</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Beier</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Twardziok</surname> <given-names>S. O.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Wicker</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2017</year>). 
<article-title>A chromosome conformation capture ordered sequence of the barley genome</article-title>. <source>Nature.</source> <volume>544</volume>, <fpage>427</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>433</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nature22043</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28447635</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B29">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Meyer</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Belin</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Delorme-Hinoux</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Reichheld</surname> <given-names>J. P.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Riondet</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2012</year>). 
<article-title>Thioredoxin and glutaredoxin systems in plants: Molecular mechanisms, crosstalks, and functional significance</article-title>. <source>Antiox Redox Signal.</source> <volume>17</volume>, <fpage>1124</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1160</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1089/ars.2011.4327</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22531002</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B30">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Meyer</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Buchanan</surname> <given-names>B. B.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Vignols</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Reichheld</surname> <given-names>J. P.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2009</year>). 
<article-title>Thioredoxins and glutaredoxins: Unifying elements in redox biology</article-title>. <source>Annu. Rev. Genet.</source> <volume>43</volume>, <fpage>335</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>367</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1146/annurev-genet-102108-134201</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19691428</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B31">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Micic</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Holmelund R&#xf8;nager</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>S&#xf8;rensen</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Bjarnholt</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2024</year>). 
<article-title>Overlooked and misunderstood: Can glutathione conjugates be clues to understanding plant glutathione transferases</article-title>? <source>Philos. Trans. R. Soc B Biol. Sci.</source> <volume>379</volume>, <fpage>20230365</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1098/rstb.2023.0365</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">39343017</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B32">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Mittler</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2002</year>). 
<article-title>Oxidative stress, antioxidants and stress tolerance</article-title>. <source>Trends Plant Sci.</source> <volume>7</volume>, <fpage>405</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>410</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S1360-1385(02)02312-9</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">12234732</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B33">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Monat</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Padmarasu</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Lux</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Wicker</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Gundlach</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Himmelbach</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2019</year>). 
<article-title>TRITEX: chromosome-scale sequence assembly of Triticeae genomes with open-source tools</article-title>. <source>Genome Biol.</source> <volume>20</volume>, <fpage>284</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s13059-019-1899-5</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31849336</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B34">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Mu&#xf1;oz-Amatria&#xed;n</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Svensson</surname> <given-names>J. T.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Castillo</surname> <given-names>A. M.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Cistu&#xe9;</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Close</surname> <given-names>T. J.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Vall&#xe9;s</surname> <given-names>M. P.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2006</year>). 
<article-title>Transcriptome analysis of barley anthers: Effect of mannitol treatment on microspore embryogenesis</article-title>. <source>Physiol. Plant.</source> <volume>127</volume>, <fpage>551</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>560</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1399-3054.2006.00729.x</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B35">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Mu&#xf1;oz-Amatria&#xed;n</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Svensson</surname> <given-names>J. T.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Castillo</surname> <given-names>A. M.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Close</surname> <given-names>T. J.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Vall&#xe9;s</surname> <given-names>M. P.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2009</year>). 
<article-title>Microspore embryogenesis: assignment of genes to embryo formation and green vs. albino plant production</article-title>. <source>Funct. Integr. Genomics.</source> <volume>9</volume>, <fpage>311</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>323</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10142-009-0113-3</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19229567</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B36">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Noctor</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Cohen</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Tr&#xe9;mulot</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Ch&#xe2;tel-Innocenti</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Van Breusegem</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Mhamdi</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2024</year>). 
<article-title>Glutathione: a key modulator of plant defence and metabolism&#xa0;through multiple mechanisms</article-title>. <source>J. Exp. Bot.</source> <volume>75</volume>, <fpage>4549</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>4572</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/jxb/erae194</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">38676714</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B37">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Nowicka</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Kovacik</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Maksylewicz</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Kope&#x107;</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Dubas</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Krzewska</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2024</year>). 
<article-title>The transcriptional landscape of the developmental switch from regular pollen&#xa0;maturation towards microspore-derived plant regeneration in barley</article-title>. <source>Crop. J.</source> <volume>12</volume>, <fpage>1064</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1080</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.cj.2024.07.003</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B38">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Pi&#x15b;lewska-Bednarek</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Nakano</surname> <given-names>R. T.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Hiruma</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Pastorczyk</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Sanchez-Vallet</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Singkaravanit-Ogawa</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2018</year>). 
<article-title>Glutathione transferase U13 functions in pathogen-triggered glucosinolate metabolism</article-title>. <source>Plant Physiol.</source> <volume>176</volume>, <fpage>538</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>551</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1104/pp.17.01455</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29122987</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B39">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Rueda-Varela</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Carneros</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Caro</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>P&#xe9;rez-P&#xe9;rez</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Garc&#xed;a-Rubia</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Mart&#xed;nez</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2025</year>). 
<article-title>Enhancing microspore embryogenesis initiation by reducing ROS, autophagy, and cell death with novel small molecules in rapeseed and barley</article-title>. <source>J. Plant Physiol.</source> <volume>311</volume>, <elocation-id>154546</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jplph.2025.154546</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">40527111</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B40">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>S&#xe1;nchez-D&#xed;az</surname> <given-names>R. A.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Castillo</surname> <given-names>A. M.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Vall&#xe9;s</surname> <given-names>M. P.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2013</year>). 
<article-title>Microspore embryogenesis in wheat: new marker genes for early, middle and late stages of embryo development</article-title>. <source>Plant Reprod.</source> <volume>26</volume>, <fpage>287</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>296</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00497-013-0225-8</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23839308</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B41">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Sevilla</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Mart&#xed;</surname> <given-names>M. C.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>De Brasi-Velasco</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Jimenez</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2023</year>). 
<article-title>Redox regulation, thioredoxins, and glutaredoxins in retrograde signalling and gene transcription</article-title>. <source>J. Exp. Bot.</source> <volume>74</volume>, <fpage>5955</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>5969</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/jxb/erad270</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">37453076</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B42">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Souza</surname> <given-names>P. V. L.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2025</year>). 
<article-title>The redox power of thioredoxins: evolution, mechanisms, and redox regulation of carbon&#x2013;nitrogen metabolism in plants</article-title>. <source>Discov. Plants.</source> <volume>2</volume>, <fpage>94</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s44372-025-00181-9</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B43">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Stasolla</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2010</year>). 
<article-title>Glutathione redox regulation of <italic>in vitro</italic> embryogenesis</article-title>. <source>Plant Physiol. Biochem.</source> <volume>48</volume>, <fpage>319</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>327</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.plaphy.2009.10.007</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19963394</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B44">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Tsuwamoto</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Fukuoka</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Takahata</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2007</year>). 
<article-title>Identification and characterization of genes expressed in early embryogenesis from microspores of Brassica napus</article-title>. <source>Planta.</source> <volume>225</volume>, <fpage>641</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>652</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00425-006-0388-8</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">16977456</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B45">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Vrinten</surname> <given-names>P. L.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Nakamura</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Kasha</surname> <given-names>K. J.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>1999</year>). 
<article-title>Characterization of cDNAs expressed in the early stages of microspore embryogenesis in barley (Hordeum vulgare) L</article-title>. <source>Plant Mol. Biol.</source> <volume>41</volume>, <fpage>455</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>463</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1023/A:1006383724443</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">10608656</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B46">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Ma</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2019</year>). 
<article-title>Genome-wide identification and expression profiling of glutathione transferase gene family under multiple stresses and hormone treatments in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)</article-title>. <source>BMC&#xa0;Genomics.</source> <volume>20</volume>, <fpage>986</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s12864-019-6374-x</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31842737</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B47">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Xiao</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Yin</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Xing</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Xia</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2016</year>). 
<article-title>A wheat superoxide dismutase gene TaSOD2 enhances salt resistance through modulating redox homeostasis by promoting NADPH oxidase activity</article-title>. <source>Plant Mol. Biol.</source> <volume>91</volume>, <fpage>115</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>130</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11103-016-0446-y</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26869262</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
<fn-group>
<fn id="n1" fn-type="custom" custom-type="edited-by">
<p>Edited by: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/41603">Giampiero Cai</ext-link>, University of Siena, Italy</p></fn>
<fn id="n2" fn-type="custom" custom-type="reviewed-by">
<p>Reviewed by: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/360095">Joaquin Medina</ext-link>, National Institute of Agricultural and Food Research and Technology, Spain</p>
<p><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2042309">Bello Hassan Jakada</ext-link>, Northeast Forestry University, China</p></fn>
</fn-group>
</back>
</article>