There was an error on page 15, in Section 5.1.7, as published, “with VC (r=–0.43) and biological yield (r=–0.59; Table 2-12-1)”, the name of the table here is wrongly referenced. The corrected appears below.
“with VC (r=–0.43) and biological yield (r=–0.59; Table 24)”
There was an error in the caption of Table 17 as published, “Nitrate content in Allium fistulosum (µgiu-1)”. The unit at the end of the title is incorrect. The corrected caption of Table 17 appears below.
Nitrate content in Allium fistulosum (µg· g-1).
Treatment (%Vermicompost)
Group1
Group2
Group3
Mean
±SD
±SE
95% CI
0% (Control)
200.5
250.7
166.7
190.97
21.18
12.23
(138.4, 243.6)
25%
221
234.4
192.7
216.03
21.29
12.29
(163.1, 268.9)
50%
302.1
273.4
280.2
285.23
12.28
7.09
(254.3, 316.2)
75%
127.6
179.7
122.4
143.23
31.72
18.31
(63.6, 222.9)
100%
273.4
268.2
243.2
261.6
16.15
9.32
(221.5, 301.7)
“Nitrate content in Allium fistulosum (µg· g-1)”.
There was an error in the caption of Table 35 as published, “Soluble sugar content in Allium fistulosum (µgi g-1)”. The unit at the end of the title is incorrect. The corrected caption of Table 35 appears below.
Soluble sugar content in Allium fistulosum (µg· g-1).
Treatment (%Vermicompost)
Group1
Group2
Group3
Mean
±SD
±SE
95% CI
0% (Control)
254.1
273.5
302.2
276.6
24.31
14.04
[216.19,337.01]
25%
287.2
348.2
326.6
320.67
31.07
17.94
[243.49,397.85]
50%
379.8
423.5
417.9
407.07
22.11
12.76
[326.17,451.97]
75%
297.4
309.6
369.5
325.5
36.07
20.82
[205.92,445.08]
100%
278.5
300.8
297.1
292.13
11.42
6.59
[263.75,320.51]
“Soluble sugar content in Allium fistulosum (µg· g-1)”.
There was an error in the caption of Figure 4 as published. In Figure 4, the title on the left side was erroneously in Chinese. It should be in English according to the journal’s policy. The corrected Figure 4 appears below.
Standard curve of nitrate.
Line graph showing a linear relationship between concentration (micrograms per milliliter) on the x-axis and absorbance (A) on the y-axis. The data points form a straight line from (0, 0) to (6, 3.5) with blue diamond markers. The background is gray.
The original version of this article has been updated.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Edited and reviewed by: Jian You Wang, Academia Sinica, Taiwan