<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3-mathml3.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xml:lang="EN">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Front. Plant Sci.</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Frontiers in Plant Science</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">Front. Plant Sci.</abbrev-journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="epub">1664-462X</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Frontiers Media S.A.</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpls.2025.1730399</article-id>
<article-version article-version-type="Version of Record" vocab="NISO-RP-8-2008"/>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Original Research</subject>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Optimizing a tomato crocin biofactory by fine-tuning plant architecture</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Lobato-G&#xf3;mez</surname><given-names>Maria</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/3077400/overview"/>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Data curation" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/data-curation/">Data curation</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Formal analysis" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/formal-analysis/">Formal analysis</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="investigation" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/investigation/">Investigation</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="methodology" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/methodology/">Methodology</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="visualization" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/visualization/">Visualization</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Writing &#x2013; original draft" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/">Writing &#x2013; original draft</role>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Fern&#xe1;ndez-Mu&#xf1;oz</surname><given-names>Rafael</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/344078/overview"/>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/">Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Data curation" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/data-curation/">Data curation</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Formal analysis" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/formal-analysis/">Formal analysis</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="investigation" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/investigation/">Investigation</role>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Orz&#xe1;ez</surname><given-names>Diego</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/94172/overview"/>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="supervision" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/supervision/">Supervision</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/">Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing</role>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name><surname>Granell</surname><given-names>Antonio</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="corresp" rid="c001"><sup>*</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/157931/overview"/>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/">Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="conceptualization" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/conceptualization/">Conceptualization</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Funding acquisition" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/funding-acquisition/">Funding acquisition</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Project-administration" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/project-administration/">Project administration</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="resources" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/resources/">Resources</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="supervision" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/supervision/">Supervision</role>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Instituto de Biolog&#xed;a Molecular y Celular de Plantas, CSIC-Universidad Polit&#xe9;cnica de Val&#xe8;ncia</institution>, <city>Valencia</city>, <country country="es">Spain</country></aff>
<aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Instituto de Hortofruticultura Subtropical y Mediterr&#xe1;nea, IHSM CSIC-Universidad de M&#xe1;laga, Algarrobo Costa</institution>, <city>M&#xe1;laga</city>, <country country="es">Spain</country></aff>
<author-notes>
<corresp id="c001"><label>*</label>Correspondence: Antonio Granell, <email xlink:href="mailto:agranell@ibmcp.upv.es">agranell@ibmcp.upv.es</email></corresp>
</author-notes>
<pub-date publication-format="electronic" date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2026-01-21">
<day>21</day>
<month>01</month>
<year>2026</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date publication-format="electronic" date-type="collection">
<year>2025</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>16</volume>
<elocation-id>1730399</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>22</day>
<month>10</month>
<year>2025</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>30</day>
<month>12</month>
<year>2025</year>
</date>
<date date-type="rev-recd">
<day>26</day>
<month>12</month>
<year>2025</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#xa9; 2026 Lobato-G&#xf3;mez, Fern&#xe1;ndez-Mu&#xf1;oz, Orz&#xe1;ez and Granell.</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2026</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Lobato-G&#xf3;mez, Fern&#xe1;ndez-Mu&#xf1;oz, Orz&#xe1;ez and Granell</copyright-holder>
<license>
<ali:license_ref start_date="2026-01-21">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ali:license_ref>
<license-p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY)</ext-link>. The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.</license-p>
</license>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<p>Tomato (<italic>Solanum lycopersicum</italic>) has emerged as a promising platform for the sustainable production of high-value metabolites. In this study, we demonstrate that plant architecture remodeling via genome editing can be exploited as a chassis optimization strategy in plant biofactories. Building on the previously established Tomaffron line, which accumulates saffron apocarotenoids in the fruit, and based on the established knowledge that mutations in <italic>SELF-PRUNING</italic> (<italic>SP</italic>) and <italic>SP5G</italic> genes generate compact, determinate tomato plants, we used CRISPR/Cas9 to edit the <italic>SP</italic> and <italic>SP5G</italic> genes in Tomaffron to improve crocin production. The resulting <italic>sp</italic> sp<italic>5g</italic> double mutants exhibited a compact growth habit combined with significantly higher fruit yield, total crocin content, and firmer ripe fruits compared with non-mutants. Remarkably, crocin yields per square meter increased nearly fourfold compared to non-mutant Tomaffron plants grown at the same density, representing progress toward achieving the crocin yields of <italic>Crocus sativus</italic> and offering the advantage of easier cultivation and harvesting in the tomato system. Our results show that genome editing of plant architecture is not only a tool for agronomic improvement but also a powerful strategy to fine-tune our tomato biofactory performance, offering a scalable and sustainable approach for the production of valuable metabolites.</p>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>crocins</kwd>
<kwd>genome editing</kwd>
<kwd>plant architecture</kwd>
<kwd>saffron apocarotenoids</kwd>
<kwd>self-pruning</kwd>
<kwd>tomato fruit</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<funding-group>
<funding-statement>The author(s) declared that financial support was received for this work and/or its publication. This work was supported by the EU through HARNESSTOM, contract number 101000716 Innovation Action EC-H2020-SFS-2020-1, and by the Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovaci&#xf3;n (Spain) through Agencia Estatal de Investigaci&#xf3;n (PID2022-141438OB-I00).</funding-statement>
</funding-group>
<counts>
<fig-count count="7"/>
<table-count count="1"/>
<equation-count count="0"/>
<ref-count count="50"/>
<page-count count="16"/>
<word-count count="8394"/>
</counts>
<custom-meta-group>
<custom-meta>
<meta-name>section-at-acceptance</meta-name>
<meta-value>Plant Biotechnology</meta-value>
</custom-meta>
</custom-meta-group>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec id="s1" sec-type="intro">
<label>1</label>
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>Tomato (<italic>Solanum lycopersicum</italic>) is the second most widely cultivated horticultural crop, reaching a global production of 186.1 million tons in 2022 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">FAOSTAT, 2024</xref>). It has been extensively used as a model organism due to its short life cycle, sympodial shoot development, fleshy fruit, the availability of a high-quality reference genome, and its vast phenotypic diversity, which is often well characterized genetically (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">Kimura and Sinha, 2008</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">Sato et&#xa0;al., 2012</xref>).</p>
<p>Tomato fruit is highly appreciated for its potent antioxidant activity, driven by the accumulation of high levels of carotenoids, ascorbic acid, flavonoids, and vitamin E (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">Frusciante et&#xa0;al., 2007</xref>). Furthermore, it serves as an excellent chassis for the metabolic engineering of exogenous pathways, benefiting from its several active endogenous biosynthetic pathways and the availability of various substrates. Transgenic tomato fruits with high levels of anthocyanins (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Butelli et&#xa0;al., 2008</xref>), phenolic compounds (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">Luo et&#xa0;al., 2008</xref>), betalains (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">Polturak et&#xa0;al., 2017</xref>), and levodopa (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Breitel et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>) have been obtained expressing cDNAs encoding either transcription factors or biosynthetic enzymes driven by the E8 fruit ripening-specific promoter without causing pleiotropic effects on plant growth or fruit development (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Li et&#xa0;al., 2018</xref>). The tomato cultivars most commonly used in these studies are Micro-Tom (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Butelli et&#xa0;al., 2008</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">Luo et&#xa0;al., 2008</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">Polturak et&#xa0;al., 2017</xref>) and Moneymaker (MM) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Butelli et&#xa0;al., 2008</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">Luo et&#xa0;al., 2008</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Breitel et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>). Micro-Tom is a dwarf determinate tomato cultivar widely employed in research due to its short life cycle and small size (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">Meissner et&#xa0;al., 1997</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">Dan et&#xa0;al., 2006</xref>), while MM is an indeterminate commercial-type cultivar.</p>
<p>The production of high levels of saffron apocarotenoids has been achieved in tomato fruit through the expression of the <italic>Crocus sativus</italic> carotenoid cleavage dioxygenase (CCD2) under the control of the E8 promoter together with two glycosyltransferases under the control of a constitutive promoter. The best viable transgenic line from this work was named Tomaffron (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">Ahrazem et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>). Saffron apocarotenoids, including crocins, picrocrocin, and safranal, are the most valuable metabolites in saffron spice. In addition to their coloring, flavoring and aroma properties exhibit high antioxidant activity and biological activity against many diseases. However, saffron is the most expensive spice due to the high manual labor required for its production (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">Cerd&#xe1;-Bernad et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>). One alternative to using <italic>C. sativus</italic> for obtaining these apocarotenoids would be their extraction from Tomaffron. Recently, it was demonstrated that crocins remain stable in Tomaffron-processed products, which retain the organoleptic properties of saffron even after one year of storage (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">Lobato-G&#xf3;mez et&#xa0;al., 2025</xref>). The Tomaffron processing would be greatly complemented with a mechanical harvest of the fruits; however, the cultivar used for obtaining Tomaffron was MM, an indeterminate plant that does not allow mechanical harvesting, and this transgenic line contains the hygromycin resistance gene (<italic>HygR</italic>) as a selection marker for the transformation process (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">Ahrazem et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>).</p>
<p>Maximizing metabolite yield per square meter is critical for scaling from laboratory production to commercial systems (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Li et&#xa0;al., 2018</xref>). In indeterminate tomato cultivars, such as MM, the first inflorescence emerges after developing eight to twelve leaves, with subsequent inflorescences forming indefinitely every three leaves. This growth pattern is regulated by the opposing activities of flower-promoting (florigen) and flower-repressing (antiflorigen) signals. Research has demonstrated that mutations in the antiflorigen <italic>SELF-PRUNING</italic> (<italic>SP</italic>) gene accelerate inflorescence formation by removing florigen inhibition. This results in restricted shoot growth and a bushy, compact phenotype, which enhances uniform fruit ripening, a trait highly valued in the processing tomato industry (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">Pnueli et&#xa0;al., 1998</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Gur et&#xa0;al., 2010</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">Park et&#xa0;al., 2014</xref>).</p>
<p>The <italic>SP5G</italic> gene has also exhibited antiflorigen activity, with tomato <italic>sp5g</italic> CRISPR/Cas9 mutants displaying accelerated flowering compared to wild-type plants while retaining indeterminate growth. Combining <italic>sp</italic> and <italic>sp5g</italic> mutations produces more compact plants than those with the single <italic>sp</italic> mutation, along with earlier growth determination and fruit yield (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B44">Soyk et&#xa0;al., 2017</xref>). These compact tomato plants, characterized by a burst of flowering and uniform fruit ripening, have significant agronomic value for the processing tomato industry (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Eshed and Lippman, 2019</xref>) and are well-suited for mechanical harvesting in open-field plantations (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Gur et&#xa0;al., 2010</xref>). The integration of these mutations in tomato biofactories could result in an earlier and higher production of valuable compounds accumulating in the tomato fruit.</p>
<p>In this work, we aimed to modify the plant architecture of Tomaffron to develop a more compact plant optimized for producing crocins, picrocrocin, and safranal, leveraging the knowledge of genes that enhance tomato suitability for the processing industry. To achieve these goals, the <italic>SP</italic>, <italic>SP5G</italic>, and <italic>HygR</italic> genes were independently mutated using CRISPR/Cas9 to assess the effect of each mutation on Tomaffron individually. Subsequently, the mutations were combined in a single plant. Our results demonstrate that while single <italic>sp</italic> or <italic>sp5g</italic> single mutants produced interesting phenotypes, the Tomaffron <italic>sp</italic> sp<italic>5g</italic> mutants exhibited a compact phenotype with earlier flowering and fruit ripening compared to non-mutated Tomaffron plants, along with a significant increase in fruit and crocin yield under two different environmental conditions, thus establishing a more efficient biotechnological production platform. Additionally, we generated tomato lines in which the hygromycin resistance gene used as a selectable marker in Tomaffron has been truncated to reduce the presence of non-plant antibiotic resistance DNA, thus addressing potential concerns regarding horizontal gene transfer.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2" sec-type="materials|methods">
<label>2</label>
<title>Materials and methods</title>
<sec id="s2_1">
<label>2.1</label>
<title>Plant material</title>
<p>Tomaffron, the best-performing transgenic line in terms of saffron apocarotenoid accumulation, yield, and viability from (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">Ahrazem et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>) was used as the starting material for CRISPR/Cas9 editing experiments. The T0, T1, and T2 Tomaffron-edited plants were grown under greenhouse conditions at the IBMCP facilities in Valencia (2,808 hours of sunlight/year, 39.4698&#xb0; N, 0.3774&#xb0; W). The T3 edited plants were grown under greenhouse conditions at the IBMCP and IHSM La Mayora Experimental Station in M&#xe1;laga (3,248 hours of sunlight/year, 36.7644&#xb0; N, 4.0625&#xb0; W).</p>
<p>At IBMCP, plants were transplanted to the greenhouse in November 2023 and fruit harvesting started in March 2024. The temperature was controlled by air conditioning, with a maximum of 24&#xb0;C and a minimum of 21&#xb0;C. In addition to natural light, the greenhouse had supplemental lighting with a photoperiod of 16 hours of light and 8 hours of darkness.</p>
<p>At La Mayora, plants were transplanted to the greenhouse in March 2024 and fruit harvesting started in mid-June 2024. The temperature was not controlled by air conditioning; instead, it was regulated by air convection through automated side windows and roof vents, and the temperatures were monitored. The average maximum/minimum temperatures recorded during the experiment were 30.1/12.9&#xb0;C for the transplant and early growth period, 30.9/15.9&#xb0;C for the fruit-setting period, and 36.5/19.7&#xb0;C for the harvesting period. No supplemental lighting was used. At both locations, humidity was not controlled.</p>
<p>The T1-edited plants were cultivated for specific crossbreeding purposes. For this, some flowers were emasculated one day before anthesis and manually pollinated with pollen from donor plants collected on the same day the flowers opened.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_2">
<label>2.2</label>
<title>Design and construction of the CRISPR/Cas9 vectors</title>
<p>The cDNA sequences of the <italic>SELF-PRUNING</italic> (SP, Solyc06g074350) and the <italic>SELF-PRUNING 5G</italic> (SP5G, Solyc05g053850) were retrieved from the Sol Genomics Network database (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Fernandez-Pozo et&#xa0;al., 2015</xref>). The hygromycin resistance gene (<italic>HygR</italic>) cDNA sequence was obtained from the O1 construct in (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">Ahrazem et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>).</p>
<p>The guide RNAs (gRNAs) targeting the tomato genes were designed for <italic>Streptococcus pyogenes</italic> Cas9 using Benchling CRISPR Tool [Biology Software] (2022) with SL3.0 as the reference genome. The gRNAs with the highest on-target and lowest off-target scores were selected, and their potential off-targets were screened using the Cas-OFFinder algorithm using SL4.0 as reference genome (CRISPR RGEN Tools (rgenome.net)). None of the gRNAs selected had off-targets, according to the program. For each of the <italic>SP</italic> and <italic>SP5G</italic> genes, two gRNAs were designed. To induce large deletions in the <italic>HygR</italic> gene, a total of six gRNAs were designed: two gRNAs targeting the 5&#x2019; end region of the promoter (PNOS), two targeting the internal CDS, and two targeting the 3&#x2019; terminator (TNOS) regions flanking <italic>HygR</italic>. The gRNAs selected and used for this study are listed in <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1"><bold>Supplementary Table&#xa0;1</bold></xref>, and their locations in the genes are indicated in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1"><bold>Figure&#xa0;1A</bold></xref>.</p>
<fig id="f1" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;1</label>
<caption>
<p>Targeted genes and constructs. <bold>(A)</bold> Representation of the exon regions of <italic>SP</italic> and <italic>SP5G</italic> genes, and the transcriptional unit of the hygromycin resistance gene (<italic>HygR</italic>). The positions of the designed guide RNAs (gRNAs) are indicated with arrows. <bold>(B)</bold> Schematic representation of the T-DNA of the constructs used to target <italic>SP</italic>, <italic>SP5G</italic>, and <italic>HygR</italic> with CRISPR/Cas9. <italic>nptII</italic>, kanamycin resistance gene; <italic>SP</italic>, self-pruning.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-16-1730399-g001.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Diagram detailing CRISPR/Cas9 targeting constructs. Panel A shows the gene structure for SP and SP5G genes, highlighting exon positions and gRNA targets. The Hygromycin resistance gene (HygR) is also shown with positions of promoters and terminators. Panel B illustrates constructs targeting HygR and SP/SP5G genes, with components like the 35S and NOS promoters/terminators, nptII, Cas9, and DsRed. A CRISPR/Cas9 polycistron with two gRNAs and associated elements is depicted below.</alt-text>
</graphic></fig>
<p>The construct design was performed as described in (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B46">V&#xe1;zquez-Vilar et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>) with slight variations. For the <italic>HygR</italic> targeting construct, new transcriptional units were designed to avoid using the NOS promoter and terminator (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1"><bold>Figure&#xa0;1B</bold></xref>). All the cloning steps were carried out in <italic>Escherichia coli</italic>, and the final constructs were introduced into <italic>Agrobacterium tumefaciens</italic> LBA4404.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_3">
<label>2.3</label>
<title>Tomaffron transformation and selection of edited lines</title>
<p>Tomaffron cotyledons were transformed as previously described (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Ellul et&#xa0;al., 2003</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">Ahrazem et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>). Briefly, tomato seeds were germinated <italic>in vitro</italic>, and ten-day-old cotyledons were inoculated with <italic>A. tumefaciens</italic> LBA4404 transformed with the construct of interest. After co-cultivation, the cotyledons were transferred to selection media. The shoots that developed roots were first screened for DsRed reporter signal to confirm transformation, and then leaf material was collected and used for DNA extraction.</p>
<p>Genomic DNA was extracted using CTAB and treated with RNase. The quality and concentration of the DNA were evaluated using a NanoDrop spectrophotometer (ThermoScientific, Massachusetts, USA). The mutations were screened by PCR followed by Sanger sequencing. The primers used to genotype the putative mutations are listed in <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1"><bold>Supplementary Table&#xa0;1</bold></xref>. The chromatograms were evaluated using the software Inference of CRISPR Edits (ICE) [Synthego Performance Analysis, ICE Analysis. 2019. v3.0. Synthego] (2023).</p>
<p>Edited lines from the T0 generation that exhibited the highest knock-out score and the highest percentage of 1- or 2-base pair indels were selected for further analysis in subsequent generations. To remove the edited construct, only T1 seeds lacking DsRed fluorescence were used to grow the T1 generation.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_4">
<label>2.4</label>
<title>Plant and fruit phenotyping</title>
<p>Analyses of plant architecture, flowering, fruit ripening, and crocin accumulation were conducted using T3 plants of the single mutants (<italic>sp</italic> and <italic>sp5g</italic>) and F3 plants of the double mutants (<italic>sp</italic> sp<italic>5g</italic>) in greenhouses at IBMCP, Valencia (E1) and IHSM La Mayora, M&#xe1;laga (E2). Untransformed Moneymaker (MM) was used as the control without crocins, while Tomaffron was the control with crocins.</p>
<p>At IBMCP, seeds were sown in small pots (15&#xa0;cm diameter), and seedlings were transplanted into larger pots (25&#xa0;cm diameter) after 18 days. The plants were grown under drip irrigation and mineral nutrition at 11.11 plants/m<sup>2</sup> density. At La Mayora, seeds were sown in trays, and after 21 days, seedlings were transplanted into coconut-fiber grow slab bags with drip fertilization. The <italic>sp</italic> and <italic>sp</italic> sp<italic>5g</italic> mutants were grown either with two plants per sack (1.066 plants/m<sup>2</sup>) or one plant per sack (0.533 plants/m<sup>2</sup>), while the other genotypes were grown with three plants per sack (1.6 plants/m<sup>2</sup>). All plants were pruned in both experiments except Tomaffron <italic>sp</italic> and Tomaffron <italic>sp</italic> sp<italic>5g</italic> mutants. At La Mayora, Tomaffron <italic>sp5g</italic> single mutants were cultivated under pruned and unpruned conditions.</p>
<p>Flowering time was recorded by counting the number of leaves produced before the appearance of the first primary inflorescence and by noting the first anthesis flower on each plant. All anthesis flowers were labeled and recorded during one hundred days after the first anthesis. Ripening time was assessed by scoring the breaker stage in the fruits. After the emergence of the first breaker fruit, all breaker fruits emerging were tagged for 60 days. The number of inflorescences per plant was recorded.</p>
<p>At the IBMCP location, plant yield was assessed by weighing all red fruits per plant on day 115 of transplanting. Subsequently, fruits reaching the Br+10 stage were recorded daily for 15 days. At La Mayora, it was evaluated by separately weighing all red and green fruits per plant on day 129 after transplanting and counting the number of fruits at each ripening stage.</p>
<p>Fruit firmness was measured using the 53215 Fruit Hardness Tester (T.R. Turoni, Forl&#xed;, Italy), while objective color was assessed with the Portable Colorimeter CR-400 (Konica Minolta, Tokyo, Japan).</p>
<p>Crocins were extracted from 10 mg of freeze-dried tomato fruits following the protocol described in (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Lobato-G&#xf3;mez et&#xa0;al., 2024</xref>). The polar fraction was used to determine the crocin profile of Tomaffron by injection into the LC-MS as previously described (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">Ahrazem et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>) and the total crocin accumulation by measuring absorbance at 443 nm, with the absorbance value of MM subtracted from that of Tomaffron fruits. Measurements were performed using an Infinite 200 Pro microplate reader (Tecan Group Ltd., M&#xe4;nnedorf, Switzerland). The total crocin content was calculated using the crocin molar absorption coefficient (89000 L mol<sup>-1</sup> cm<sup>-1</sup>) and the molecular weight of crocin-4 (976,972 g mol<sup>-1</sup>). Data from both environmental conditions were normalized to non-edited Tomaffron.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_5">
<label>2.5</label>
<title>Gene expression analyses</title>
<p>RNA was extracted using the NucleoSpin RNA Kit (Macherey-Nagel, D&#xfc;ren, Germany). RNA was treated with DNase from the TURBO DNA-free&#x2122; Kit (Thermo Fisher, Massachusetts, USA), followed by cDNA synthesis using the PrimeScript&#x2122; 1st Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit (Takara, Shiga, Japan). Quantitative PCR (qPCR) was performed using TB Green&#x2122; Premix Ex Taq&#x2122; II (Takara) on a QuantStudio 3 (Thermo Fisher). Primers used are listed in <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1"><bold>Supplementary Table&#xa0;2</bold></xref>, with <italic>S. lycopersicum</italic> Clathrin Adaptor Complexes subunit (<italic>CAC</italic>) as the reference gene. <italic>CAC</italic> is a widely used housekeeping gene in <italic>S. lycopersicum</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B48">Wieczorek et&#xa0;al., 2013</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_6">
<label>2.6</label>
<title>Statistical analysis</title>
<p>Statistical analyses were conducted using R (version 4.5.0) and graphs were generated using GraphPad Prism. The Mixomics package was used to perform Principal Component Analysis (PCA) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Florian et&#xa0;al., 2017</xref>), with scaling and centering of the data.</p>
<p>The choice of statistical tests was based on data distribution, variance heterogeneity, and sample size per genotype. When parametric assumptions were met, group differences were evaluated using one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey&#x2019;s <italic>post hoc</italic> test. When variances were unequal, Welch&#x2019;s one-way ANOVA with Games&#x2013;Howell <italic>post hoc</italic> comparisons was applied.</p>
<p>For variables with small and/or unequal sample sizes, non-normal distributions, or pronounced outliers, group differences were assessed using a one-way permutation ANOVA with 10,000 resampling iterations. Significant effects were followed by pairwise permutation tests with false discovery rate correction (Benjamini&#x2013;Hochberg).</p>
<p>Data are presented as mean &#xb1; SD and statistical significance was defined as <italic>p</italic>&#xa0;&lt;&#xa0;0.05 for analyses based on one-way ANOVA or Welch&#x2019;s ANOVA. For permutation-based analyses, data are presented as median with interquartile range (25th&#x2013;75th percentile), and statistical significance was defined as adjusted <italic>p</italic>-values (<italic>p</italic>-adj &lt; 0.05). The statistical test applied for each analysis is specified in the corresponding figure legend.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s3" sec-type="results">
<label>3</label>
<title>Results</title>
<sec id="s3_1">
<label>3.1</label>
<title>Selection of Tomaffron edited lines</title>
<p>Tomaffron plantlets edited for the <italic>SP</italic>, <italic>SP5G</italic>, and <italic>HygR</italic> genes were identified among the DsRed-positive T0 plantlets by PCR and sequencing. Eight and three plants with high knock-out scores were recovered for <italic>SP</italic> and <italic>SP5G</italic>, respectively (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1"><bold>Supplementary Table&#xa0;3</bold></xref>). One edited line for each targeted gene was selected for greenhouse experiments in the next generations. For <italic>SP</italic>, we selected the <italic>sp</italic> #4 line, which carries 1- and 2-base pair (bp) indels that would result in a frameshift of the coding sequence. For <italic>SP5G</italic>, the <italic>sp5g</italic> #6 mutant line, carrying a 5-bp indel, was selected (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2"><bold>Figure&#xa0;2A</bold></xref>).</p>
<fig id="f2" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;2</label>
<caption>
<p>CRISPR/Cas9 editing results. <bold>(A)</bold> Chromatograms of the selected <italic>sp</italic> #<italic>4</italic> and <italic>sp5g</italic> #6 edited lines. The gRNA sequences are underlined, and the PAM sequences are highlighted in red. The mismatches between the wild-type and mutated sequences are indicated in red in the mutated sequence. <bold>(B)</bold> Agarose gel of the PCR for <italic>HygR</italic> gene amplification. <bold>(C)</bold> Results of <italic>in vitro</italic> germination of <italic>hygr</italic> #6B seeds with and without hygromycin in the media. <bold>(D)</bold> Representation of the large deletion in <italic>hygr</italic> #6B line. TF, Tomaffron; <italic>SP</italic>, self-pruning.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-16-1730399-g002.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">A) Chromatograms comparing wild-type and mutant sequences for TF sp and sp5g. B) Gel electrophoresis results showing PCR amplification of the hygromycin resistance gene for TF and various putative edited lines. C) Pots displaying in vitro germination of hygr #6B seeds, with and without hygromycin. D) Diagram illustrating the Cas9 deletion in TF hygr #6B, including regions like the NOS promoter, hygromycin resistance, and NOS terminator.</alt-text>
</graphic></fig>
<p>In the <italic>HygR</italic>-targeted lines, <italic>hygr</italic> #6B showed a large 617 bp deletion between HygR-2 and TNOS-2 gRNAs (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2"><bold>Figures&#xa0;2B, D</bold></xref>). Hygromycin susceptibility was assessed by sowing seeds <italic>in vitro</italic> with or without hygromycin. Germination was 95% on media without hygromycin and 0% on media with it, confirming susceptibility (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2"><bold>Figure&#xa0;2C</bold></xref>).</p>
<p>To move to the T2 generation, we screened the T1 seeds for the absence of DsRed to counterselect the seeds with mutations in the targeted genes that do not contain the CRISPR/Cas9 construct. Three random T1 plants from each mutant line were genotyped and exhibited a 100% knock-out score.</p>
<p>The T1-edited plants were selfed to produce T2 plants and crossed to stack all selected mutations into single lines. The <italic>sp</italic> and <italic>sp5g</italic> double mutant was thus selected first, followed by the combination of <italic>sp5g</italic> and <italic>Hygr</italic> mutations. Once the double <italic>sp</italic> and <italic>sp5g</italic> mutant was fixed, it was crossed with the <italic>sp5g</italic> and <italic>HygR</italic> double mutant. The <italic>sp</italic> sp<italic>5g</italic> double mutants were used for the experiments, as the <italic>HygR</italic> mutation does not affect plant architecture (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1"><bold>Supplementary Figure&#xa0;1</bold></xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_2">
<label>3.2</label>
<title>Accelerated flowering and compact growth in Tomaffron double mutants</title>
<p>Early flowering and higher productivity are desirable traits in tomato plants. They could be particularly important for our tomato-based crocin biofactory, as it could speed up the process to obtain this metabolite. The double mutant <italic>sp</italic> sp<italic>5g</italic> Tomaffron plants exhibited the earliest flowering phenotypes in Valencia (E1 location) and M&#xe1;laga (E2 location), followed by the <italic>sp5g</italic>. Early flowering was supported by a reduced number of leaves before the first inflorescence and a shorter time between transplanting and the first anthesis (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3"><bold>Figures&#xa0;3A, B</bold></xref>; <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1"><bold>Supplementary Figure&#xa0;2</bold></xref>). In the E2 location, <italic>sp5g</italic> mutant plants produced a similar number of leaves before the first inflorescence, regardless of hand-pruning (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3"><bold>Figure&#xa0;3B</bold></xref>). However, the first anthesis flower appeared four days earlier in hand-pruned plants than in non-pruned plants (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1"><bold>Supplementary Figure&#xa0;2B</bold></xref>).</p>
<fig id="f3" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;3</label>
<caption>
<p>Effect of the <italic>sp</italic> and <italic>sp5g</italic> mutations on flowering time. Number of leaves before the first inflorescence in E1 <bold>(A)</bold> and E2 <bold>(B)</bold> growing sites. <bold>(C)</bold> Plant phenotype in E1 (scale bar: 15&#xa0;cm) and E2. <bold>(D)</bold> Number of anthesis flowers per day in each plant in E1. Each data point represents the mean of five biological samples. <bold>(E)</bold> Number of inflorescences per plant 80 days after transplanting and plant phenotype in E1. Boxplots represent the median (center line) and interquartile range (25th&#x2013;75th percentile); whiskers extend from the minimum to the maximum values, and individual data points are shown. Group differences in <bold>(A, B, E)</bold> were assessed using a one-way permutation ANOVA followed by pairwise comparisons (<italic>p</italic>-adj &lt; 0.05). Numbers above the boxplots indicate the median. Different letters indicate statistically significant differences. MM, Moneymaker; TF, Tomaffron; <italic>SP</italic>, self-pruning.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-16-1730399-g003.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Chart series illustrating plant growth in Valencia and M&#xe1;laga, including box plots of the number of leaves before inflorescence, images of plant appearances, a line graph showing anthesis flowers per day, and a violin plot for inflorescence count 80 days after transplanting. Various genotypes like MM, TF, TF sp5g, TF sp, and TF sp sp5g are compared, highlighting distinct differences in leaf development and flowering.</alt-text>
</graphic></fig>
<p>Phenotypic differences between the two environments were found with the <italic>sp</italic> mutants. At the E1 location, the Tomaffron <italic>sp</italic> single mutant plants exhibited a delay in the appearance of the first flower compared to both non-mutant and <italic>sp5g</italic> mutant plants (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1"><bold>Supplementary Figure&#xa0;2A</bold></xref>), but did not show differences in the number of leaves before the first inflorescence compared to non-mutant plants (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3"><bold>Figure&#xa0;3A</bold></xref>). In contrast, at the E2 location, the <italic>sp</italic> mutants showed flowering timing similar to that of the non-edited and non-pruned <italic>sp5g</italic> plants (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1"><bold>Supplementary Figure&#xa0;2B</bold></xref>), but a reduced number of leaves before the first inflorescence compared to non-mutant plants (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3"><bold>Figure&#xa0;3B</bold></xref>). Additionally, at E1, the Tomaffron <italic>sp</italic> mutant plants did not exhibit a compact phenotype, while at E2, the <italic>sp</italic> mutants were determinate (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3"><bold>Figure&#xa0;3C</bold></xref>). The differing results were not due to variations in the <italic>sp</italic> mutation because all the plants exhibited the same mutation in the <italic>sp</italic> gene (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1"><bold>Supplementary Figure&#xa0;3</bold></xref>).</p>
<p>To better define the impact of the mutations on agronomic traits, the number of flowers at anthesis per plant was recorded daily at the E1 location, starting from the appearance of the first anthesis flower. In all genotypes, except the double mutant, the average daily number of flowers at anthesis per plant ranged from two to four. In contrast, the double mutant exhibited a 15-day period during which the average daily number of flowers per plant reached at least ten (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3"><bold>Figure&#xa0;3D</bold></xref>). By 80 days after transplanting, the double mutants had an average of 55 inflorescences per plant, followed by the Tomaffron <italic>sp</italic> plants, which had an average of 12 inflorescences per plant. All other genotypes averaged five inflorescences per plant. These findings align with other phenotypes: the double mutant showed compact, highly branched growth, while Tomaffron <italic>sp</italic> exhibited an intermediate architecture between the compact mutant and the upright habit of pruned plants (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3"><bold>Figures&#xa0;3C, E</bold></xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_3">
<label>3.3</label>
<title>Effect of <italic>sp</italic> and <italic>sp5g</italic> mutations on fruit development and ripening</title>
<p>In Valencia (E1 location), the ripening process of each plant was monitored daily, and the appearance of the first fruit at the breaker stage was recorded. The double mutant plants were the first to produce breaker fruits, with the first fruit appearing 90 days after transplanting, followed by the <italic>sp5g</italic> plants, whose first breaker fruit appeared 10 days later. Fruits of the Tomaffron <italic>sp</italic> plants were the latest to reach the breaker stage, taking five days longer than fruit from MM and Tomaffron control plants (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f4"><bold>Figure&#xa0;4A</bold></xref>).</p>
<fig id="f4" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;4</label>
<caption>
<p>Effect of <italic>sp</italic> and <italic>sp5g</italic> mutations on fruit ripening traits in E1 (Valencia). <bold>(A)</bold> Number of days to the first breaker since transplanting and number of days between the first anthesis and the first breaker. <bold>(B)</bold> Violin plot of the days between anthesis and breaker in all scored flowers from the different genotypes. For the double mutant, total data is represented in the first violin, and then the data are divided into three groups based on the time of the anthesis: early flowers (first 10 days after the first flower in anthesis), middle flowers (from day 11 to day 20), and late flowers (from day 21 to day 30). Bars and violin plots represent the median and interquartile range (25th&#x2013;75th percentile), showing individual data points. Group differences were assessed using a one-way permutation ANOVA followed by pairwise comparisons (<italic>p</italic>-adj &lt; 0.05). Numbers above the bars and violins indicate the median. Different letters indicate statistically significant differences. MM, Moneymaker; TF, Tomaffron; <italic>SP</italic>, self-pruning.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-16-1730399-g004.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Bar chart and violin plot comparing days to the first breaker and days between anthesis and first breaker. Chart A displays bar graphs showing days since transplanting for various plant genotypes with red and grey bars indicating days to the first breaker and days between first anthesis and first breaker per plant. Chart B presents violin plots illustrating the number of days between anthesis and breaker per flower for different plant genotypes, with measurements labeled accordingly.</alt-text>
</graphic></fig>
<p>The days from the anthesis to the breaker stage were scored to assess whether the mutations directly accelerated ripening or only flowering. No significant differences emerged, except in the <italic>sp</italic> sp<italic>5g</italic> double mutant, where ripening occurred six days earlier (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f4"><bold>Figure&#xa0;4A</bold></xref>).</p>
<p>Additionally, the anthesis-to-breaker interval was analyzed over one month. It remained constant across genotypes, except in double mutants, where it was shorter than others in the first 10 days, similar from days 11&#x2013;20, and longer after day 21 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f4"><bold>Figure&#xa0;4B</bold></xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_4">
<label>3.4</label>
<title>The combination of <italic>sp</italic> and <italic>sp5g</italic> mutations resulted in higher yield and earlier fruit production</title>
<p>The Tomaffron <italic>sp</italic> sp<italic>5g</italic> double mutants produced a significantly higher fruit yield per plant than all other genotypes in E1 and E2 when grown without space restrictions. In Valencia (location E1), all red fruits (Br+10 or more) from each plant were harvested 115 days after transplanting. The yield of Tomaffron <italic>sp</italic> mutants was significantly lower than that of other genotypes, except for Tomaffron. MM plants showed a higher yield than Tomaffron, and the <italic>sp5g</italic> single mutants showed an intermediate yield, despite the differences are not significant (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f5"><bold>Figure&#xa0;5A</bold></xref>). In M&#xe1;laga (location E2), the effect on fruit production and the number of plants per sack could be determined. In E2, all fruits were harvested 129 days after transplanting, and the red fruits were weighed (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f5"><bold>Figure&#xa0;5B</bold></xref>).</p>
<fig id="f5" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;5</label>
<caption>
<p>Fruit yield in Tomaffron mutant plants. Yield per plant and genotype 115 and 129 days after transplanting in, respectively, E1 [Valencia, <bold>(A)</bold>] and E2 [M&#xe1;laga, <bold>(B)</bold>]. <bold>(C)</bold> Pictures after fruit harvesting 129 days after transplanting in E2. Scale bar: 15&#xa0;cm. <bold>(D)</bold>. Cumulative fruit weight in E1, the weight of each fruit at breaker+10 was scored daily. <bold>(E)</bold>. Violin graph of the individual fruit weight in E1. Bars in <bold>(A)</bold> represent the mean and the standard deviation, showing individual data points. Group differences were determined using ANOVA followed by Tukey&#x2019;s <italic>post-hoc</italic> test (<italic>p</italic>&#xa0;&lt;&#xa0;0.05). Bars and violin plots in <bold>(B)</bold> and <bold>(E)</bold> represent the median and interquartile range (25th&#x2013;75th percentile), showing individual data points. Group differences were assessed using a one-way permutation ANOVA followed by pairwise comparisons (<italic>p</italic>-adj &lt; 0.05). Numbers above the violins indicate the median. Different letters indicate statistically significant differences. MM, Moneymaker; TF, Tomaffron; <italic>SP</italic>, self-pruning.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-16-1730399-g005.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Bar graphs, fruit clusters, and line and violin plots illustrate an agricultural experiment comparing yield, fruit weight, and growth methods in Valencia and M&#xe1;laga. The bar graphs (A and B) display yield per plant and fruit weight of different genotypes. The images of fruit clusters (C) show visual differences in yield between genotypes. The line graph (D) tracks cumulative fruit weight over time, while the violin plot (E) compares individual fruit weight, annotated with statistical significance. Each dataset contrasts various genotypes and cultivation practices.</alt-text>
</graphic></fig>
<p>Significant differences in red fruit yield were observed in non-hand pruned double mutant plants when grown with (two plants per sack) or without (one plant per sack) growth restrictions. Double mutant plants without growth restrictions achieved the highest red fruit yield, averaging 8.9&#xa0;kg per plant. Unlike in the E1 location, the second highest yield was obtained from non-restricted Tomaffron <italic>sp</italic> mutants, with an average yield of 7&#xa0;kg per plant. Growth limitations drastically reduced the yield of these genotypes: in double mutants, the yield was halved, while in <italic>sp</italic> mutants, it was reduced 1.4-fold. Interestingly, no differences in red fruit yield were observed between pruned and non-pruned <italic>sp5g</italic> mutant plants. As in E1, Tomaffron plants showed a non-significant lower yield than MM, though this limitation was partially mitigated by introducing the <italic>sp5g</italic> mutation (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f5"><bold>Figures&#xa0;5B, C</bold></xref>).</p>
<p>In the E1 location, fruit weight production was monitored over time. Tomaffron <italic>sp</italic> sp<italic>5g</italic> double mutants began yielding earlier, with ripe fruits appearing ten days before MM and Tomaffron. Conversely, Tomaffron <italic>sp</italic> mutants exhibited a five-day delay in fruit production compared to these genotypes. By 30 days after the first appearance of ripe fruits, all genotypes, except for Tomaffron <italic>sp</italic>, matched the total fruit weight produced by double mutant plants (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f5"><bold>Figure&#xa0;5D</bold></xref>).</p>
<p>The higher yield of Tomaffron <italic>sp</italic> sp<italic>5g</italic> double mutants in both E1 and E2 was not due to the production of larger fruits but rather to the significantly higher number of smaller fruits compared to single <italic>sp5g</italic> mutants and non-mutant plants (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f5"><bold>Figure&#xa0;5E</bold></xref>; <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1"><bold>Supplementary Figure&#xa0;4</bold></xref>). All this indicates that yield is affected by the growth habit, which is determined by genetic factors, root restriction (e.g., pots or sacks containing different numbers of plants), or manual pruning. In addition, environmental conditions also modulate yield. How these factors influenced crocin production in our Tomaffron biofactory is addressed below.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_5">
<label>3.5</label>
<title>Early yield in <italic>sp</italic> sp<italic>5g</italic> double mutants results in more compact plants and precocious crocin production</title>
<p>Crocin accumulation was evaluated in each genotype. Tomaffron showed a similar crocin profile in both environments, and in M&#xe1;laga (E2), no significant differences in crocin concentration in ripe fruit were observed between Tomaffron and any mutant lines. However, in Valencia (E1), Tomaffron <italic>sp</italic> and the double mutant showed significantly higher crocin levels than Tomaffron and Tomaffron <italic>sp5g</italic> (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1"><bold>Supplementary Figure&#xa0;5</bold></xref>).</p>
<p>Crocin accumulation in fruit was combined with the yield per plant at harvest (115 days after transplanting in E1 and 129 days in E2 locations) to estimate total crocin production per plant. The double mutant plants produced significantly higher amounts of crocins per plant in both environments. In E1 and E2 under non-restricted growth conditions, it was 3.8 and 3.7 times higher than in Tomaffron, respectively. In E2, with two plants growing per sack, it was 1.9 times higher. In E1, pruned <italic>sp5g</italic> mutants produced 1.4 times more crocin than non-edited Tomaffron. In E2, pruned and non-pruned <italic>sp5g</italic> plants showed 1.3- and 1.1-fold increases, respectively (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f6"><bold>Figure&#xa0;6</bold></xref>).</p>
<fig id="f6" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;6</label>
<caption>
<p>Crocin production per plant at harvest in Valencia (E1) <bold>(A)</bold> and M&#xe1;laga (E2) <bold>(B)</bold>. Bars in <bold>(A)</bold> represent the mean and the standard deviation, showing individual data points. Group differences were determined using ANOVA followed by Tukey&#x2019;s <italic>post-hoc</italic> test (<italic>p</italic>&#xa0;&lt;&#xa0;0.05). Bars in <bold>(B)</bold> represent the median and interquartile range (25th&#x2013;75th percentile), showing individual data points. Group differences were assessed using a one-way permutation ANOVA followed by pairwise comparisons (<italic>p</italic>-adj &lt; 0.05). Numbers above the bars indicate the mean <bold>(A)</bold> or the median <bold>(B)</bold>. Different letters indicate statistically significant differences. MM, Moneymaker; TF, Tomaffron; <italic>SP</italic>, self-pruning.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-16-1730399-g006.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Bar charts comparing crocin production per plant in two locations: E1, Valencia, and E2, M&#xe1;laga. In E1, TF sp sp5g has the highest production at 16.4 mg. In E2, TF sp sp5g at 1xsack yields 144 mg. Labels indicate pruning status, plant quantity per sack, and plant genotype.</alt-text>
</graphic></fig>
<p>Differences in crocin production related to the <italic>sp</italic> mutation between environments were also observed. In E1, <italic>sp</italic> mutant plants produced half the amount of crocins compared to the non-edited Tomaffron. Conversely, in E2, <italic>sp</italic> mutant plants showed high crocin accumulation levels in high plant density conditions. They exhibited a 2.6-fold increase under non-restricted conditions of lower plant density and a 1.9-fold increase with higher plant density (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f6"><bold>Figure&#xa0;6</bold></xref>).</p>
<p>The combination of the <italic>sp</italic> and <italic>sp5g</italic> mutations consistently quadrupled total crocin production in Tomaffron plants across both environments, demonstrating their synergistic effect. In contrast, the <italic>sp</italic> mutation alone increased crocin production only in E2. These findings highlight the potential of editing the two genes to achieve earlier and enhanced crocin yields in Tomaffron plants. Furthermore, the <italic>sp</italic> and <italic>sp5g</italic> mutations were successfully combined with the <italic>hygr</italic> #6 mutation, generating plants with accelerated crocin production and no selectable marker gene remaining from the transformation process.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_6">
<label>3.6</label>
<title>Changes in fruit firmness in Tomaffron double mutant plants</title>
<p>Maintaining a moderate level of firmness during ripening is a key trait in tomatoes for both the fresh and processing markets, particularly for the processing market, as good firmness at the red ripe stage ensures that fruits remain sound on the plant, allowing for one-time mechanical harvesting. Fruit firmness was evaluated at two ripening stages: 5 (light red) and 10 (red) days after the breaker stage. Most genotypes analyzed showed fruits with similar firmness values except for the plants carrying the <italic>sp5g</italic> mutation, either alone or combined with the <italic>sp</italic> mutations, which produced fruits with higher firmness at both stages (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f7"><bold>Figure&#xa0;7A</bold></xref>).</p>
<fig id="f7" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;7</label>
<caption>
<p>Effect of the <italic>sp</italic> and <italic>sp5g</italic> mutations on fruit firmness in Tomaffron <bold>(A)</bold> Violin plot of firmness of fruits at breaker+5 and breaker+10 stages. Each point represents the mean of two technical replicates for each biological replicate. <bold>(B)</bold> Colorimetric a* value of fruits at breaker+10. <bold>(C)</bold> Gene expression of pectate lyase at breaker+10. Bars in <bold>(A, B)</bold> represent the mean and the standard deviation, showing individual data points. Group differences in <bold>(A)</bold> were assessed using Welch&#x2019;s one-way ANOVA followed by Games&#x2013;Howell <italic>post hoc</italic> comparisons. Group differences in <bold>(B)</bold> were determined using ANOVA followed by Tukey&#x2019;s <italic>post-hoc</italic> test (<italic>p</italic>&#xa0;&lt;&#xa0;0.05). Bars in <bold>(C)</bold> represent the median and interquartile range (25th&#x2013;75th percentile), showing individual data points. Group differences were assessed using a one-way permutation ANOVA followed by pairwise comparisons (<italic>p</italic>-adj &lt; 0.05). Numbers above the bars and violins indicate the mean <bold>(A, B)</bold> or the median <bold>(C)</bold>. Different letters indicate statistically significant differences. MM, Moneymaker; TF, Tomaffron; <italic>SP</italic>, self-pruning.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-16-1730399-g007.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Panel A shows violin plots of fruit firmness at breaker plus five and breaker plus ten stages, with MM and various TF groupings. Panel B presents bar graphs of a* values at Br+10, comparing MM and several TF variants. Panel C displays bar graphs of PL expression relative to CAC at Br+10, with MM and different TF categories. Statistical groupings are marked above each bar.</alt-text>
</graphic></fig>
<p>To assess whether increased firmness in <italic>sp5g</italic> plants resulted from delayed ripening, fruits were harvested at Br+3, and CIELab color parameters were measured until Br+10. No clustering appeared early, but after Br+5, <italic>sp</italic> sp<italic>5g</italic> and <italic>sp5g</italic> fruits diverged from other genotypes (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1"><bold>Supplementary Figures&#xa0;6</bold></xref>, <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1"><bold>7</bold></xref>). At Br+10, <italic>sp</italic> sp<italic>5g</italic> fruits had significantly higher a* values than non-edited Tomaffron, indicating redder coloration (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f7"><bold>Figure&#xa0;7B</bold></xref>). Since <italic>sp</italic> and <italic>sp5g</italic> single mutants showed no significant differences, this suggests an effect of both mutations combined. These results confirm that the higher firmness values in <italic>sp5g</italic> mutants are not associated with delayed ripening.</p>
<p>To elucidate the molecular changes occurring during the ripening process, we evaluated the expression of the pectate lyase (<italic>PL</italic>) and polygalacturonase 2A (<italic>PGA2</italic>) genes, involved in cell wall remodeling, as well as key regulators of fruit carotenoid biosynthesis and ripening, phytoene synthase 1 (<italic>PSY1</italic>), the ripening inhibitor (<italic>RIN</italic>) and 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate synthase (<italic>ACS2</italic>) genes. Only the double mutant plants showed a statistically significant decrease in <italic>PL</italic> expression (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f7"><bold>Figure&#xa0;7C</bold></xref>; <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1"><bold>Supplementary Figure&#xa0;8</bold></xref>).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s4" sec-type="discussion">
<label>4</label>
<title>Discussion</title>
<sec id="s4_1">
<label>4.1</label>
<title>Genome editing is the best approach to introduce the <italic>sp</italic> and <italic>sp5g</italic> mutations in Tomaffron</title>
<p>The natural <italic>sp</italic> mutation in the <italic>SELF-PRUNING</italic> gene has been extensively used to obtain determinate tomato plants and was a revolutionary advancement that facilitated mechanical harvesting for processing tomato (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Eshed and Lippman, 2019</xref>). Notable examples include the introduction of the <italic>sp</italic> mutation, together with the compound inflorescence mutation, by crossing in a breeding program to the Penjar tomato, cultivated in the Mediterranean basin (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B42">Schober et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>), and the combination of the <italic>sp</italic> and <italic>dwarf</italic> mutations in Salad-type tomato lines, resulting in hybrid plants that exhibited higher yields compared to the parental lines and are being used to obtain homozygous lines in subsequent generations (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">Pereira et&#xa0;al., 2024</xref>). A transgenic tomato line accumulating the miraculin glycoprotein from <italic>Richadella dulcifica</italic> fruit in a MM background was crossed with Micro-Tom to introgress the <italic>sp</italic> mutation and produce higher amounts of this sweetener per square meter. The production of miraculin per year and square meter increased eightfold with the introgression of the <italic>sp</italic> mutation. However, it took five generations to obtain the plants with the desired traits (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Kato et&#xa0;al., 2010</xref>).</p>
<p>The advantage of introducing <italic>sp</italic> by crossing is that beneficial variability in other traits can be introduced from the donor plant alongside the mutation. However, it may not be the fastest method if the sole target is the <italic>SP</italic> gene. In tomato Micro-Tom plants, the <italic>glutamate decarboxylase</italic> (<italic>GAD</italic>) gene was targeted using CRISPR-Cas9, and edited plants with up to 15 times more &#x3b3;-aminobutyric acid (GABA) were obtained (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">Nonaka et&#xa0;al., 2017</xref>). These plants were crossed with the &#x201c;Aichi First&#x201d; tomato cultivar, and the F1 plants already showed higher levels of GABA (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Lee et&#xa0;al., 2018</xref>). One fixed line from this cross was used to edit the <italic>SP</italic> and <italic>DWARF</italic> genes, and the desired traits were obtained in the T1 generation, maintaining the preferred traits from the original variety (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">Nagamine and Ezura, 2024</xref>). In the present study, <italic>SP, SP5G</italic>, and the hygromycin resistance genes were targeted independently to elucidate the effect of each mutation. Additionally, a construct targeting the three genes simultaneously was prepared for future experiments requiring a faster approach.</p>
<p>An additional disadvantage of conventional breeding approaches is the possibility that the mutation of interest is linked to an undesired trait. Recently, Tomaffron was crossed with Xantomato, a quadruple mutant tomato plant that accumulates high levels of &#x3b2;-carotene and zeaxanthin in the fruit (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Karniel et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Lobato-G&#xf3;mez et&#xa0;al., 2024</xref>). The substrate of <italic>Cs</italic>CCD2 is zeaxanthin, and the resulting transgenic plants containing the mutations accumulated higher levels of saffron apocarotenoids. It was found that the crucial mutation for obtaining the highest levels of these valuable metabolites was the <italic>BETA</italic> mutation from <italic>Solanum habrochaites</italic> (<italic>B<sup>Sh</sup></italic>) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Lobato-G&#xf3;mez et&#xa0;al., 2024</xref>). <italic>BETA</italic> encodes for a lycopene &#x3b2;-cyclase, and <italic>B<sup>Sh</sup></italic> mutant plants exhibit a significantly higher gene expression than wild-type plants and accumulate high levels of &#x3b2;-carotene instead of lycopene in ripe fruit (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">Ronen et&#xa0;al., 2000</xref>). The <italic>BETA</italic> gene has been mapped close to the <italic>SP</italic> locus to chromosome 6, and all cultivars that showed a determinate phenotype also showed red fruits and, consequently, the non-mutant <italic>BETA</italic> allele (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">Pnueli et&#xa0;al., 1998</xref>).</p>
<p>The linkage of wild-type <italic>BETA</italic> with the <italic>sp</italic> mutant allele makes it very unlikely to find a tomato line with determinate growth that can be used to obtain high levels of saffron apocarotenoids. Moreover, crossing indeterminate <italic>CsCCD2</italic> transgenic MM lines and <italic>B<sup>Sh</sup></italic> mutant plants with a determinate cultivar would make segregating the wild-type <italic>BETA</italic> allele from the <italic>sp</italic> mutation difficult.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s4_2">
<label>4.2</label>
<title>The Tomaffron <italic>sp</italic> mutant behaves differently in the evaluated environments</title>
<p>Tomaffron <italic>sp</italic> mutants exhibited some differences in results across the two environments. In E1, the mutants showed delayed flowering (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1"><bold>Supplementary Figure&#xa0;2A</bold></xref>) and ripening (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f4"><bold>Figure&#xa0;4A</bold></xref>), which led to a lower yield in fruit and crocin production at harvest (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f5"><bold>Figures&#xa0;5A, D</bold></xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f6"><bold>6A</bold></xref>). Additionally, they did not display a compact phenotype (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3"><bold>Figure&#xa0;3C</bold></xref>). In contrast, in E2, Tomaffron <italic>sp</italic> mutants showed the same flowering time (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1"><bold>Supplementary Figure&#xa0;2B</bold></xref>) and a significantly lower number of leaves before the first inflorescence compared to non-mutant plants (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3"><bold>Figure&#xa0;3B</bold></xref>), together with a significantly higher yield than non-edited Tomaffron and TF <italic>sp5g</italic> single mutant when grown under space restricted conditions (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f5"><bold>Figures&#xa0;5B, C</bold></xref>).</p>
<p>The results in E1 were unexpected, as the single mutation of <italic>sp</italic> targeted by CRISPR/Cas9 resulted in a determinate phenotype in <italic>Solanum pimpinellifolium</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B50">Zs&#xf6;g&#xf6;n et&#xa0;al., 2018</xref>). Other studies have introduced the <italic>sp</italic> mutation into indeterminate cultivars, but this was achieved through crossing, during which other traits associated with compactness were selected alongside the <italic>sp</italic> mutation, resulting in the absence of single <italic>sp</italic> mutants (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B42">Schober et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">Pereira et&#xa0;al., 2024</xref>). The <italic>sp</italic> mutation has been introduced into MM by crossing a transgenic MM line over-producer of miraculin with Micro-Tom, and, as in other studies, it was selected together with the <italic>dwarf</italic> mutation, preventing the ability to study the effect of single <italic>sp</italic> mutants on plant architecture and flowering (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Kato et&#xa0;al., 2010</xref>). This is the first report of a single <italic>sp</italic> mutation introduced by CRISPR/Cas9 into MM.</p>
<p>The sequencing results shown that the plants grown in both environments had the same <italic>sp</italic> mutation (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1"><bold>Supplementary Figure&#xa0;3</bold></xref>), suggesting that the growing conditions influence the determination of the Tomaffron <italic>sp</italic> mutants. In both environments, Tomaffron <italic>sp</italic> plants were not subjected to hand pruning. However, in E1, the plants exhibited upright growth rather than a compact habit and did not show a determinate growth pattern (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3"><bold>Figure&#xa0;3C</bold></xref>). In E1, plants were grown at a very high density (11.11 plants/m<sup>2</sup>) in pots, whereas in E2, they were grown at a lower density (0.53 or 1.066 plants/m<sup>2</sup>) in sacks, and this difference in density appears to have affected plant architecture in <italic>sp</italic> mutants but not in the double <italic>sp</italic> sp<italic>5g</italic> mutants. Our results indicate that the differences observed in Tomaffron <italic>sp</italic> in both environments are not due to genetic variation but rather to environmental and growth conditions. In addition to differences in plant spacing and growth systems between the two greenhouses, temperature control also differed, and the plants were grown at different times of the year. A more in-depth study manipulating specific environmental and growth parameters is needed to elucidate the causes of the different behavior observed in Tomaffron <italic>sp</italic> mutants across the two environments evaluated in this study.</p>
<p>Although the effect of the single <italic>sp</italic> mutation in E1 was not as expected, it impacted the phenotypes assessed when combined with the <italic>sp5g</italic> mutation. The <italic>sp</italic> sp<italic>5g</italic> mutant plants exhibit a compact phenotype and accelerated flowering and yield compared to the single <italic>sp5g</italic> mutant plants, as previously demonstrated (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B44">Soyk et&#xa0;al., 2017</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s4_3">
<label>4.3</label>
<title>Effect on the spacing of the plants in <italic>sp</italic> and double <italic>sp</italic> sp<italic>5g</italic> Tomaffron mutants</title>
<p>In the E1 experiment, all genotypes were grown at the same density, and the Tomaffron double mutant showed a clear increase in fruit and crocin yield compared to the other genotypes (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f5"><bold>Figures&#xa0;5A</bold></xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f6"><bold>6A</bold></xref>). A different approach was applied in the E2 experiment, where we aimed to evaluate the effect of plant spacing on the yield of Tomaffron single <italic>sp</italic> and double <italic>sp</italic> sp<italic>5g</italic> mutants. These two genotypes were grown at two different plant densities: 1.066 and 0.53 plants/m<sup>2</sup>.</p>
<p>Our results showed that fruit and crocin production per plant were higher with increased spacing for both genotypes, but statistically different only in the double mutants (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f5"><bold>Figures&#xa0;5B</bold></xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f6"><bold>6B</bold></xref>). Proper spacing enhances the exposure of tomato plants to light, promoting nutrient accumulation and improving fruit quality (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B47">Wamser et&#xa0;al., 2012</xref>). However, the yield per unit area does not correlate with the yield per plant due to the additional space required to grow the plants. It was demonstrated that the total yield of double mutant plants increased significantly by planting them at higher densities (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B44">Soyk et&#xa0;al., 2017</xref>), and this is a promising strategy to increase even further the production of crocins per square meter.</p>
<p>In the Tomaffron double mutant, increased productivity per plant offsets the greater space requirement, resulting in similar fruit yields at both densities. In contrast, for Tomaffron <italic>sp</italic>, the negative effect of increased spacing outweighed the higher yield per plant, leading to a 1.4-fold decrease in total yield at lower density (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f5"><bold>Figure&#xa0;5B</bold></xref>). Similar findings have been reported in other determinate (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">Balemi, 2008</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">&#xc7;etin and Uygan, 2008</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Dipple et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>) and indeterminate (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">Balemi, 2008</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">Nkansah et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>) tomato cultivars, where increased spacing did not boost yield per unit area.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s4_4">
<label>4.4</label>
<title>Comparison of the production per square meter in Tomaffron double mutant and <italic>Crocus sativus</italic></title>
<p>Saffron yield can be measured in various ways, including the fresh or dry weight of saffron flowers or the yield of dried stigmas (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">Ghanbari et&#xa0;al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B45">Tashakkori et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>). Producing one kilogram of saffron spice requires nearly 80 kilograms of flowers (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">Shahi et&#xa0;al., 2016</xref>), and crocins constitute up to 10% of saffron stigma (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Demurtas et&#xa0;al., 2019</xref>). In Iran, the leading saffron producer, the average saffron yield is 3.96 g/m<sup>2</sup>, with a maximum yield of approximately 7.5 g/m<sup>2</sup> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Farrokhi et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>), translating to up to 396 mg/m<sup>2</sup> of crocins.</p>
<p>In E1, where all plants were grown at the same density, the production per square meter of the different genotypes was equivalent to the production per plant. With a very high plant density of 11.11 plants/m<sup>2</sup>, Tomaffron produced 47.8 &#xb1; 13.1 mg crocins/m&#xb2;, while the double <italic>sp</italic> sp<italic>5g</italic> mutant Tomaffron yielded 182.1 &#xb1; 15.9 mg crocins/m<sup>2</sup> (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T1"><bold>Table&#xa0;1</bold></xref>). Although the production of crocins per square meter remains higher in <italic>C. sativus</italic>, saffron is the most expensive spice due to its labor-intensive manual harvesting process, despite efforts to partially automate it (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">Saeidirad, 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Denarda et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>). To match the average crocin yield per square meter in Iran, the fruits from approximately 20 Tomaffron <italic>sp</italic> sp<italic>5g</italic> plants grown in high-density would need to be harvested (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f5"><bold>Figure&#xa0;5E</bold></xref>; <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1"><bold>Table&#xa0;1</bold></xref>). Unlike saffron plants, tomatoes can be harvested mechanically, and the compact phenotype displayed by the mutated plants facilitates mechanization. Furthermore, the harvested tomatoes can be processed into products that are efficient for storing saffron apocarotenoids for a prolonged time (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">Lobato-G&#xf3;mez et&#xa0;al., 2025</xref>). The production of these plants could be further enhanced by using <italic>B<sup>Sh</sup></italic> mutant plants expressing <italic>Cs</italic>CCD2 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Lobato-G&#xf3;mez et&#xa0;al., 2024</xref>) as the recipient plants for the transformation with the CRISPR/Cas9 cassette designed to target the three <italic>sp</italic>, <italic>sp5g</italic>, and <italic>HygR</italic> genes. This approach could potentially achieve a crocin yield of 1 gram per square meter.</p>
<table-wrap id="T1" position="float">
<label>Table&#xa0;1</label>
<caption>
<p>Crocin yield in both environments.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" colspan="6" align="center">E1 (Valencia)</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" align="left">Genotype</th>
<th valign="middle" align="left">N of replicates</th>
<th valign="middle" align="left">Density (plants/m<sup>2</sup>)</th>
<th valign="middle" align="left">Fruit yield per plant (g)</th>
<th valign="middle" align="left">Crocin production (mg/plant)</th>
<th valign="middle" align="left">Crocin yield (mg/m<sup>2</sup>)</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">MM</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">5</td>
<td valign="middle" rowspan="5" align="right">11.11</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">402.8 &#xb1; 115.8</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right"/>
<td valign="middle" align="right"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">TF</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">5</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">266.8 &#xb1; 118.1</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">4.31 &#xb1; 1.18</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">47.81 &#xb1; 13.14</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">TF <italic>sp5g</italic></td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">5</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">386.3 &#xb1; 102.1</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">6.62 &#xb1; 2.16</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">73.53 &#xb1; 24.02</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">TF <italic>sp</italic></td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">5</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">103.4 &#xb1; 78.1</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">2.74 &#xb1; 1.21</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">24.32 &#xb1; 17.89</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">TF <italic>sp</italic> sp<italic>5g</italic></td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">5</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">749.4 &#xb1; 96.7</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">16.41 &#xb1; 3.69</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">182.15 &#xb1; 15.91</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
<tbody>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" colspan="6" align="center">E2 (M&#xe1;laga)</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" align="left">Genotype</th>
<th valign="middle" align="left">N of replicates</th>
<th valign="middle" align="left">Density (plants/m<sup>2</sup>)</th>
<th valign="middle" align="left">Fruit yield per plant (kg)</th>
<th valign="middle" align="left">Crocin production (mg/plant)</th>
<th valign="middle" align="left">Crocin yield (mg/m<sup>2</sup>)</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">MM</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">6</td>
<td valign="middle" rowspan="4" align="right">1.6</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">3.09 &#xb1; 0.41</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right"/>
<td valign="middle" align="right"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">TF</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">6</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">2.24 &#xb1; 0.63</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">38.01 &#xb1; 10.60</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">60.81 &#xb1; 16.97</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">TF <italic>sp5g</italic> P</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">6</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">2.77 &#xb1; 0.73</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">46.45 &#xb1; 12.14</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">74.32 &#xb1; 19.42</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">TF <italic>sp5g</italic> NP</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">6</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">2.78 &#xb1; 0.71</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">44.26 &#xb1; 11.25</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">70.82 &#xb1; 18.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">TF <italic>sp</italic> 2xsack</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">4</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">1.066</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">4.85 &#xb1; 0.83</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">70.08 &#xb1; 11.99</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">74.70 &#xb1; 12.78</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">TF <italic>sp</italic> 1xsack</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">2</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">0.53</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">6.97 &#xb1; 1.09</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">100.60 &#xb1; 15.74</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">53.34 &#xb1; 8.34</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">TF <italic>sp</italic> sp<italic>5g</italic> 2xsack</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">4</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">1.066</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">4.50 &#xb1; 1.33</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">72.69 &#xb1; 21.51</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">77.49 &#xb1; 22.93</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">TF <italic>sp</italic> sp<italic>5g</italic> 1xsack</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">2</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">0.53</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">8.91 &#xb1; 0.69</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">144.00 &#xb1; 1.11</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">76.32 &#xb1; 0.59</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn>
<p>Data is presented as mean &#xb1; standard deviation.P, pruned; NP, non-pruned. In E2, 2xsack (2 plants growing per sack); 1xsack (1 plant growing per sack); not indicated (3 plants growing per sack); MM, Moneymaker; TF, Tomaffron; <italic>SP</italic>, self-pruning.</p></fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<p>Tomato has advantages such as wide cultivation, adaptability to open and greenhouse conditions, and a short life cycle, with ripe fruits ready 3&#x2013;4 months after transplanting (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Li et&#xa0;al., 2018</xref>). In contrast, saffron is harvested 4&#x2013;6 months after planting, with low initial yields due to small corms, but productivity increases in subsequent generations as new corms form and existing ones gain weight (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">McGimpsey et&#xa0;al., 1997</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">Lage and Cantrell, 2009</xref>).</p>
<p>The higher crocin content in Tomaffron <italic>sp sp5g</italic> mutants, along with the absence of a significant increase in crocin content in E2, and a slight but significant increase in E1 indicates that the double mutant plants produce more crocins due to changes in plant architecture rather than other effects of the mutations on crocin accumulation. Apart from the higher fruit and crocin production yields, the Tomaffron <italic>sp sp5g</italic> plants produced fruits with greater firmness. These fruits did not exhibit delayed ripening but instead exhibited significantly lower gene expression of the pectate lyase (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f7"><bold>Figure&#xa0;7C</bold></xref>), responsible for pectin degradation, the primary component of the tomato fruit cell wall (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B49">Yang et&#xa0;al., 2017</xref>). A recent study demonstrated that the CRISPR/Cas9 knock-out of pectate lyase results in increased fruit firmness (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">Fumelli et&#xa0;al., 2025</xref>), suggesting that the lower expression of this gene in our edited lines may be responsible for the higher firmness observed in Tomaffron <italic>sp sp5g</italic> fruits, although the cause of this reduced expression was not determined in the present study.</p>
<p>Taken together, the results of this study demonstrate that Tomaffron <italic>sp sp5g</italic> double mutant plants are an excellent platform for producing high levels of saffron apocarotenoids while having a growth habit that facilitates early and mechanical harvest of the fruits. The crocin production per square meter is almost fourfold lower than that of <italic>C. sativus</italic>, but it requires significantly less effort to harvest and process the material. Optimization of crocin yield per square meter requires not only editing <italic>sp</italic> and <italic>sp5g</italic> but also the appropriate conditions, like plant density, and other environmental conditions that clearly affect the final phenotypes. Future experiments could focus on producing double mutants of transgenic plants that accumulate higher levels of saffron apocarotenoids or introducing additional mutations to incorporate other traits demanded by the processing tomato industry.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<sec id="s5" sec-type="data-availability">
<title>Data availability statement</title>
<p>The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found below: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.6025748">https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.6025748</ext-link>.</p></sec>
<sec id="s6" sec-type="author-contributions">
<title>Author contributions</title>
<p>ML-G: Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Visualization, Writing &#x2013; original draft. RF-M: Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation. DO: Supervision, Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing. AG: Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing, Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Project administration, Resources, Supervision.</p></sec>
<ack>
<title>Acknowledgments</title>
<p>We thank Silvia Presa for the technical support. We thank Silvia Gianoglio for her assistance with photographing the tomato plants. ML-G and AG are participants of the European COST action CA18210 (ROXY). ML-G. acknowledges the support of the ACIF-2021 fellowship from the GVA (Generalitat Valenciana).</p>
</ack>
<sec id="s8" sec-type="COI-statement">
<title>Conflict of interest</title>
<p>The author(s) declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.</p></sec>
<sec id="s9" sec-type="ai-statement">
<title>Generative AI statement</title>
<p>The author(s) declared that generative AI was not used in the creation of this manuscript.</p>
<p>Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.</p></sec>
<sec id="s10" sec-type="disclaimer">
<title>Publisher&#x2019;s note</title>
<p>All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.</p></sec>
<sec id="s11" sec-type="supplementary-material">
<title>Supplementary material</title>
<p>The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2025.1730399/full#supplementary-material">https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2025.1730399/full#supplementary-material</ext-link></p>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="DataSheet1.docx" id="SM1" mimetype="application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document"/></sec>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="B1">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Ahrazem</surname> <given-names>O.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Diretto</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Rambla</surname> <given-names>J. L.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Rubio-Moraga</surname> <given-names>&#xc1;.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Lobato-G&#xf3;mez</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Frusciante</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2022</year>). 
<article-title>Engineering high levels of saffron apocarotenoids in tomato</article-title>. <source>Hortic. Res.</source> <volume>9</volume>, <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>13</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/hr/uhac074</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">35669709</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Balemi</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2008</year>). 
<article-title>Response of tomato cultivars differing in growth habit to nitrogen and phosphorus fertilizers and spacing on vertisol in Ethiopia</article-title>. <source>Acta Agric. Slov.</source> <volume>91</volume>, <fpage>103</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>119</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.14720/AAS.2008.91.1.15172</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Breitel</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Brett</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Alseekh</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Fernie</surname> <given-names>A. R.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Butelli</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Martin</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). 
<article-title>Metabolic engineering of tomato fruit enriched in L-DOPA</article-title>. <source>Metab. Eng.</source> <volume>65</volume>, <fpage>185</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>196</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ymben.2020.11.011</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33242649</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Butelli</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Titta</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Giorgio</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Mock</surname> <given-names>H. P.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Matros</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Peterek</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2008</year>). 
<article-title>Enrichment of tomato fruit with health-promoting anthocyanins by expression of select transcription factors</article-title>. <source>Nat. Biotechnol.</source> <volume>26</volume>, <fpage>1301</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1308</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nbt.1506</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">18953354</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Cerd&#xe1;-Bernad</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Valero-Cases</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Pastor</surname> <given-names>J. J.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Frutos</surname> <given-names>M. J.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2022</year>). 
<article-title>Saffron bioactives crocin, crocetin and safranal: effect on oxidative stress and mechanisms of action</article-title>. <source>Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr.</source> <volume>62</volume>, <fpage>3232</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>3249</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/10408398.2020.1864279</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33356506</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>&#xc7;etin</surname> <given-names>&#xd6;.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Uygan</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2008</year>). 
<article-title>The effect of drip line spacing, irrigation regimes and planting geometries of tomato on yield, irrigation water use efficiency and net return</article-title>. <source>Agric. Water Manage.</source> <volume>95</volume>, <fpage>949</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>958</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.agwat.2008.03.002</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Dan</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Yan</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Munyikwa</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Dong</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Armstrong</surname> <given-names>C. L.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2006</year>). 
<article-title>MicroTom - A high-throughput model transformation system for functional genomics</article-title>. <source>Plant Cell Rep.</source> <volume>25</volume>, <fpage>432</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>441</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00299-005-0084-3</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">16341726</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Demurtas</surname> <given-names>O. C.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>de Brito Francisco</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Diretto</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Ferrante</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Frusciante</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Pietrella</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2019</year>). 
<article-title>ABCC transporters mediate the vacuolar accumulation of crocins in saffron stigmas</article-title>. <source>Plant Cell</source> <volume>31</volume>, <fpage>2789</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2804</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1105/tpc.19.00193</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31548254</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Denarda</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Manuello Bertetto</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Pisla</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Carbone</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). 
<article-title>Design and preliminary testing of a novel semi-automatic saffron harvesting device</article-title>. <source>Mech. Mach. Sci.</source> <volume>102</volume>, <fpage>13</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>22</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/978-3-030-75259-0_2</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Dipple</surname> <given-names>F. L.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Rocha</surname> <given-names>R. R.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Alexis</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Salamina</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2022</year>). 
<article-title>Do the training system and spacing affect the productivity and quality of tomato plants</article-title>? <source>Res. Soc Dev.</source> <volume>11</volume>, <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>12</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.33448/rsd-v11i16.37766</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Ellul</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Garcia-Sogo</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Pineda</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>R&#xed;os</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Roig</surname> <given-names>L. A.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Moreno</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2003</year>). 
<article-title>The ploidy level of transgenic plants in Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of tomato cotyledons (Lycopersicon esculenturn L. Mili.) is genotype and procedure dependent</article-title>. <source>Theor. Appl. Genet.</source> <volume>106</volume>, <fpage>231</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>238</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00122-002-0928-y</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">12582848</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Eshed</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Lippman</surname> <given-names>Z. B.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2019</year>). 
<article-title>Revolutions in agriculture chart a course for targeted breeding of old and new crops</article-title>. <source>Sci. (80-.)</source> <volume>366</volume>, <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>13</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1126/science.aax0025</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31488704</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<mixed-citation publication-type="web">
<person-group person-group-type="author"><collab>FAOSTAT</collab>
</person-group> (<year>2024</year>). <source>FAOSTAT</source>. Available online at: <uri xlink:href="https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/">https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/</uri> (Accessed <date-in-citation content-type="access-date">January 10, 2025</date-in-citation>).
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Farrokhi</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Asgharzadeh</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Kazemi Samadi</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). 
<article-title>Yield and qualitative and biochemical characteristics of saffron (Crocus sativus L.) cultivated in different soil, water, and climate conditions</article-title>. <source>Ital. J. Agrometeorol.</source> <volume>2021</volume>, <fpage>43</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>55</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.36253/ijam-1216</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Fernandez-Pozo</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Menda</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Edwards</surname> <given-names>J. D.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Saha</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Tecle</surname> <given-names>I. Y.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Strickler</surname> <given-names>S. R.</given-names></name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2015</year>). 
<article-title>The Sol Genomics Network (SGN)-from genotype to phenotype to breeding</article-title>. <source>Nucleic Acids Res.</source> <volume>43</volume>, <fpage>D1036</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>D1041</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/nar/gku1195</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25428362</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Florian</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Beno&#xee;t</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Amrit</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Kim-Anh</surname> <given-names>L. C.</given-names></name>
</person-group>. (<year>2017</year>). 
<article-title>mixOmics: An R package for &#x2018;omics feature selection and multiple data integration</article-title>. <source>PLoS Comput. Biol.</source> <volume>13</volume>, <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>14</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005752</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29099853</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Frusciante</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Carli</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Ercolano</surname> <given-names>M. R.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Pernice</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Di Matteo</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Fogliano</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2007</year>). 
<article-title>Antioxidant nutritional quality of tomato</article-title>. <source>Mol. Nutr. Food Res.</source> <volume>51</volume>, <fpage>609</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>617</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/mnfr.200600158</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">17427261</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B18">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Fumelli</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Ilyas</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Olivieri</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Farinon</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Forniti</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Botondi</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2025</year>). 
<article-title>Knockout of a pectate lyase in tomato increases fruit firmness and reduces foliar susceptibility to pathogens</article-title>. <source>Plant Sci.</source> <volume>363</volume>, <elocation-id>112868</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.plantsci.2025.112868</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">41238017</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B19">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Ghanbari</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Khajoei-Nejad</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>van Ruth</surname> <given-names>S. M.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Aghighi</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2019</year>). 
<article-title>The possibility for improvement of flowering, corm properties, bioactive compounds, and antioxidant activity in saffron (Crocus sativus L.) by different nutritional regimes</article-title>. <source>Ind. Crops Prod.</source> <volume>135</volume>, <fpage>301</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>310</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/J.INDCROP.2019.04.064</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B20">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Gur</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Osorio</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Fridman</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Fernie</surname> <given-names>A. R.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Zamir</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2010</year>). 
<article-title>hi2-1, A QTL which improves harvest index, earliness and alters metabolite accumulation of processing tomatoes</article-title>. <source>Theor. Appl. Genet.</source> <volume>121</volume>, <fpage>1587</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1599</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00122-010-1412-8</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20680612</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B21">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Karniel</surname> <given-names>U.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Koch</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Zamir</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Hirschberg</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2020</year>). 
<article-title>Development of zeaxanthin-rich tomato fruit through genetic manipulations of carotenoid biosynthesis</article-title>. <source>Plant Biotechnol. J.</source> <volume>18</volume>, <fpage>2292</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2303</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/pbi.13387</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32320515</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B22">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Kato</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Yoshida</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Kikuzaki</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Hirai</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Kuroda</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Hiwasa-Tanase</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2010</year>). 
<article-title>Molecular breeding of tomato lines for mass production of miraculin in a plant factory</article-title>. <source>J. Agric. Food Chem.</source> <volume>58</volume>, <fpage>9505</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>9510</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1021/jf101874b</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20695489</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B23">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Kimura</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Sinha</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2008</year>). 
<article-title>Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum): A model fruit-bearing crop</article-title>. <source>Cold Spring Harb. Protoc.</source> <volume>3</volume>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1101/pdb.emo105</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21356708</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B24">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Lage</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Cantrell</surname> <given-names>C. L.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2009</year>). 
<article-title>Quantification of saffron (Crocus sativus L.) metabolites crocins, picrocrocin and safranal for quality determination of the spice grown under different environmental Moroccan conditions</article-title>. <source>Sci. Hortic.</source> <volume>121</volume>, <fpage>366</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>373</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/J.SCIENTA.2009.02.017</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B25">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Lee</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Nonaka</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Takayama</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Ezura</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2018</year>). 
<article-title>Utilization of a genome-edited tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) with high gamma aminobutyric acid content in hybrid breeding</article-title>. <source>J. Agric. Food Chem.</source> <volume>66</volume>, <fpage>963</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>971</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1021/acs.jafc.7b05171</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29314836</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B26">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Martin</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2018</year>). 
<article-title>Can the world&#x2019;s favorite fruit, tomato, provide an effective biosynthetic chassis for high-value metabolites</article-title>? <source>Plant Cell Rep.</source> <volume>37</volume>, <fpage>1443</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1450</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00299-018-2283-8</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29594330</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B27">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Lobato-G&#xf3;mez</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Drapal</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Fern&#xe1;ndez-Mu&#xf1;oz</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Presa</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Espinosa</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Fraser</surname> <given-names>P. D.</given-names></name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2024</year>). 
<article-title>Maximizing saffron apocarotenoid production in varied tomato fruit carotenoid contexts</article-title>. <source>Plant J.</source> <volume>120</volume>, <fpage>966</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>983</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/tpj.17030</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">39292868</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B28">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Lobato-G&#xf3;mez</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Rambla</surname> <given-names>J. L.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Zacar&#xed;as-Garc&#xed;a</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Noguera-Artiaga</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>P&#xe9;rez-Beser</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Orz&#xe1;ez</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2025</year>). 
<article-title>Valorization of transgenic Tomaffron-based products enriched in saffron apocarotenoids</article-title>. <source>Food Chem.</source> <volume>488</volume>, <fpage>144828</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/J.FOODCHEM.2025.144828</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">40412208</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B29">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Luo</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Butelli</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Hill</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Parr</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Niggeweg</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Bailey</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2008</year>). 
<article-title>AtMYB12 regulates caffeoyl quinic acid and flavonol synthesis in tomato: Expression in fruit results in very high levels of both types of polyphenol</article-title>. <source>Plant J.</source> <volume>56</volume>, <fpage>316</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>326</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1365-313X.2008.03597.x</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">18643978</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B30">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>McGimpsey</surname> <given-names>J. A.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Douglas</surname> <given-names>M. H.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Wallace</surname> <given-names>A. R.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>1997</year>). 
<article-title>Evaluation of saffron (Crocus sativus L.) production in New Zealand</article-title>. <source>New Zeal. J. Crop Hortic. Sci.</source> <volume>25</volume>, <fpage>159</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>168</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/01140671.1997.9514002</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B31">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Meissner</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Jacobson</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Melamed</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Levyatuv</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Shalev</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Ashri</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>1997</year>). 
<article-title>A new model system for tomato genetics</article-title>. <source>Plant J.</source> <volume>12</volume>, <fpage>1465</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1472</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1046/j.1365-313x.1997.12061465.x</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B32">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Nagamine</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Ezura</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2024</year>). 
<article-title>Genome editing of DWARF and SELF-PRUNING rapidly confers traits suitable for plant factories while retaining useful traits in tomato</article-title>. <source>Breed. Sci.</source> <volume>74</volume>, <fpage>59</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>72</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1270/jsbbs.23063</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">39246432</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B33">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Nkansah</surname> <given-names>G. O.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Amoatey</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Zogli</surname> <given-names>M. K.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Owusu-Nketia</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Ofori</surname> <given-names>P. A.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Opoku-Agyemang</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). 
<article-title>Influence of topping and spacing on growth, yield, and fruit quality of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) under greenhouse condition</article-title>. <source>Front. Sustain. Food Syst.</source> <volume>5</volume>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/FSUFS.2021.659047</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B34">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Nonaka</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Arai</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Takayama</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Matsukura</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Ezura</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2017</year>). 
<article-title>Efficient increase of &#x263;-aminobutyric acid (GABA) content in tomato fruits by targeted mutagenesis</article-title>. <source>Sci. Rep.</source> <volume>7</volume>, <page-range>7057</page-range>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41598-017-06400-y</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28765632</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B35">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Park</surname> <given-names>S. J.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Jiang</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Tal</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Yichie</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Gar</surname> <given-names>O.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Zamir</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2014</year>). 
<article-title>Optimization of crop productivity in tomato using induced mutations in the florigen pathway</article-title>. <source>Nat. Genet.</source> <volume>46</volume>, <fpage>1337</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1342</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/ng.3131</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25362485</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B36">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Pereira</surname> <given-names>L. M.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Maciel</surname> <given-names>G. M.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Carolina</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Siquieroli</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Queiroz</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Luisa</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2024</year>). 
<article-title>Introgression of the self-pruning gene into dwarf tomatoes to obtain salad-type determinate growth lines</article-title>. <source>Plants</source> <volume>13</volume>, <page-range>1522</page-range>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/plants13111522</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">38891329</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B37">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Pnueli</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Carmel-Goren</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Hareven</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Gutfinger</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Alvarez</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Ganal</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>1998</year>). 
<article-title>The SELF-PRUNING gene of tomato regulates vegetative to reproductive switching of sympodial meristems and is the ortholog of CEN and TFL1</article-title>. <source>Development</source> <volume>125</volume>, <fpage>1979</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1989</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1242/dev.125.11.1979</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">9570763</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B38">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Polturak</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Grossman</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Vela-Corcia</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Dong</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Nudel</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Pliner</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2017</year>). 
<article-title>Engineered gray mold resistance, antioxidant capacity, and pigmentation in betalain-producing crops and ornamentals</article-title>. <source>Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.</source> <volume>114</volume>, <fpage>9062</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>9067</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1073/pnas.1707176114</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28760998</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B39">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Ronen</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Carmel-Goren</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Zamir</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Hirschberg</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2000</year>). 
<article-title>An alternative pathway to &#x3b2;-carotene formation in plant chromoplasts discovered by map-based cloning of Beta and old-gold color mutations in tomato</article-title>. <source>Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.</source> <volume>97</volume>, <fpage>11102</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>11107</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1073/pnas.190177497</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">10995464</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B40">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Saeidirad</surname> <given-names>M. H.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2020</year>). 
<article-title>Mechanization of saffron production</article-title>. <source>Saffron Sci. Technol. Heal.</source>, <fpage>187</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>204</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/B978-0-12-818638-1.00011-3</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B41">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Sato</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Tabata</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Hirakawa</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Asamizu</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Shirasawa</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Isobe</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2012</year>). 
<article-title>The tomato genome sequence provides insights into fleshy fruit evolution</article-title>. <source>Nature</source> <volume>485</volume>, <fpage>635</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>641</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nature11119</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22660326</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B42">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Schober</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Buil</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Rivera</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Campo</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Roig-villanova</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2022</year>). 
<article-title>Breeding long shelf-life (LSL) tomato landraces to non-trellised culture and water deficit irrigation : the effect on yield and postharvest storage</article-title>. <source>Agronomy</source> <volume>12</volume>, <page-range>2312</page-range>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/agronomy12102312</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B43">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Shahi</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Assadpour</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Jafari</surname> <given-names>S. M.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2016</year>). 
<article-title>Main chemical compounds and pharmacological activities of stigmas and tepals of &#x2018;red gold&#x2019;; saffron</article-title>. <source>Trends Food Sci. Technol.</source> <volume>58</volume>, <fpage>69</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>78</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/J.TIFS.2016.10.010</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B44">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Soyk</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>M&#xfc;ller</surname> <given-names>N. A.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Park</surname> <given-names>S. J.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Schmalenbach</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Jiang</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Hayama</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2017</year>). 
<article-title>Variation in the flowering gene SELF PRUNING 5G promotes day-neutrality and early yield in tomato</article-title>. <source>Nat. Genet.</source> <volume>49</volume>, <fpage>162</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>168</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/ng.3733</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">27918538</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B45">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Tashakkori</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Mohammadi Torkashvand</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Ahmadi</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Esfandiari</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). 
<article-title>Prediction of saffron yield based on soil properties using artificial neural networks as a way to identify susceptible lands of saffron</article-title>. <source>Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal.</source> <volume>52</volume>, <fpage>1326</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1337</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/00103624.2021.1879128</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B46">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>V&#xe1;zquez-Vilar</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Garcia-Carpintero</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Selma</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Bernab&#xe9;-Orts</surname> <given-names>J. M.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Sanchez-Vicente</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Salazar-Sarasua</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2021</year>). 
<article-title>The GB4.0 Platform, an All-In-One Tool for CRISPR/Cas-Based Multiplex Genome Engineering in Plants</article-title>. <source>Front. Plant Sci.</source> <volume>12</volume>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpls.2021.689937</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">34276739</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B47">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Wamser</surname> <given-names>A. F.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Mueller</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Suzuki</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Becker</surname> <given-names>W. F.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>dos Santos</surname> <given-names>J. P.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2012</year>). 
<article-title>Produtividade de h&#xed;bridos de tomate submetidos ao cultivo superadensado</article-title>. <source>Hortic. Bras.</source> <volume>30</volume>, <fpage>168</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>174</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1590/S0102-05362012000100028</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B48">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Wieczorek</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Wrzesi&#x144;ska</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Obrepalska-Steplowska</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2013</year>). 
<article-title>Assessment of reference gene stability influenced by extremely divergent disease symptoms in Solanum lycopersicum L</article-title>. <source>J. Virol. Methods</source> <volume>194</volume>, <fpage>161</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>168</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/J.JVIROMET.2013.08.010</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23994079</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B49">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Huang</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Xiong</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Xian</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Su</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Ren</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2017</year>). 
<article-title>Silencing of SlPL, which encodes a pectate lyase in tomato, confers enhanced fruit firmness, prolonged shelf-life and reduced susceptibility to grey mould</article-title>. <source>Plant Biotechnol. J.</source> <volume>15</volume>, <fpage>1544</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1555</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/PBI.12737</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28371176</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B50">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Zs&#xf6;g&#xf6;n</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>&#x10c;erm&#xe1;k</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Naves</surname> <given-names>E. R.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Notini</surname> <given-names>M. M.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Edel</surname> <given-names>K. H.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Weinl</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2018</year>). 
<article-title><italic>De novo</italic> domestication of wild tomato using genome editing</article-title>. <source>Nat. Biotechnol.</source> <volume>36</volume>, <fpage>1211</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1216</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nbt.4272</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30272678</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
<fn-group>
<fn id="n1" fn-type="custom" custom-type="edited-by">
<p>Edited by: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/3000687">Kasey Markel</ext-link>, Semilla Nueva, Guatemala</p></fn>
<fn id="n2" fn-type="custom" custom-type="reviewed-by">
<p>Reviewed by: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1020796">Rukmini Mishra</ext-link>, Centurion University, India</p>
<p><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1719647">Choon-Tak Kwon</ext-link>, Kyung Hee University Global Campus, Republic of Korea</p></fn>
</fn-group>
</back>
</article>