<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3-mathml3.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xml:lang="EN">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Front. Plant Sci.</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Frontiers in Plant Science</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">Front. Plant Sci.</abbrev-journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="epub">1664-462X</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Frontiers Media S.A.</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpls.2025.1729301</article-id>
<article-version article-version-type="Version of Record" vocab="NISO-RP-8-2008"/>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Original Research</subject>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Effects of water-nitrogen interaction on photosynthetic-stoichiometric balance in potato: a leaf physiological and ecological perspective</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Du</surname><given-names>Bin</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="conceptualization" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/conceptualization/">Conceptualization</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="methodology" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/methodology/">Methodology</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Project-administration" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/project-administration/">Project administration</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/">Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing</role>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name><surname>Yin</surname><given-names>Juan</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="corresp" rid="c001"><sup>*</sup></xref>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="conceptualization" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/conceptualization/">Conceptualization</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="methodology" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/methodology/">Methodology</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/">Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing</role>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name><surname>Yang</surname><given-names>Yingpan</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4"><sup>4</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff5"><sup>5</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff6"><sup>6</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="corresp" rid="c001"><sup>*</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/3247479/overview"/>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="conceptualization" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/conceptualization/">Conceptualization</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="methodology" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/methodology/">Methodology</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Writing &#x2013; original draft" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/">Writing &#x2013; original draft</role>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>Jinze</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4"><sup>4</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff5"><sup>5</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff6"><sup>6</sup></xref>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Formal analysis" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/formal-analysis/">Formal analysis</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/">Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing</role>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Tang</surname><given-names>Ying</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4"><sup>4</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff5"><sup>5</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff6"><sup>6</sup></xref>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/">Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing</role>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>School of Civil and Water Engineering, Ningxia University</institution>, <city>Yinchuan</city>, <state>Ningxia</state>,&#xa0;<country country="cn">China</country></aff>
<aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Engineering Research Center for Efficient Utilization of Water Resources in Modern Agriculture in Arid Regions</institution>, <city>Yinchuan</city>,&#xa0;<country country="cn">China</country></aff>
<aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>Ningxia Research Center of Technology on Water-saving Irrigation and Water Resources Regulation</institution>, <city>Yinchuan</city>,&#xa0;<country country="cn">China</country></aff>
<aff id="aff4"><label>4</label><institution>Hydraulic Research Institute of Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region</institution>, <city>Yinchuan</city>, <state>Ningxia</state>,&#xa0;<country country="cn">China</country></aff>
<aff id="aff5"><label>5</label><institution>Field Scientific Observation and Research Station for Agricultural Irrigation in Ningxia Yellow River Diversion Irrigation Area, Ministry of Water Resources</institution>, <city>Yinchuan</city>, <state>Ningxia</state>,&#xa0;<country country="cn">China</country></aff>
<aff id="aff6"><label>6</label><institution>Ningxia Dry Farming, Water Saving and Efficient Agricultural Engineering Technology Research Center</institution>, <city>Yinchuan</city>, <state>Ningxia</state>,&#xa0;<country country="cn">China</country></aff>
<author-notes>
<corresp id="c001"><label>*</label>Correspondence: Juan Yin, <email xlink:href="mailto:yj7115@126.com">yj7115@126.com</email>; Yingpan Yang, <email xlink:href="mailto:ypan312@163.com">ypan312@163.com</email></corresp>
</author-notes>
<pub-date publication-format="electronic" date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2025-12-10">
<day>10</day>
<month>12</month>
<year>2025</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date publication-format="electronic" date-type="collection">
<year>2025</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>16</volume>
<elocation-id>1729301</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>21</day>
<month>10</month>
<year>2025</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>20</day>
<month>11</month>
<year>2025</year>
</date>
<date date-type="rev-recd">
<day>14</day>
<month>11</month>
<year>2025</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#xa9; 2025 Du, Yin, Yang, Li and Tang.</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2025</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Du, Yin, Yang, Li and Tang</copyright-holder>
<license>
<ali:license_ref start_date="2025-12-10">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ali:license_ref>
<license-p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY)</ext-link>. The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.</license-p>
</license>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<p>Potato, a globally important food crop, plays a key role in ensuring food security and poverty alleviation. Addressing the prominent contradiction between water scarcity and low nitrogen use efficiency in potato production in the arid regions of northwest China, this study conducted a water-nitrogen regulation experiment to explore the synergistic effects of water-nitrogen management on potato yield and physiological ecology. Irrigation treatments included the full irrigation quota (2250 m<sup>3</sup> ha<sup>-1</sup>, W3), 20% water-saving (1800 m<sup>3</sup> ha<sup>-1</sup>, W2), and 40% water-saving (1350 m<sup>3</sup> ha<sup>-1</sup>, W1), while nitrogen application treatments consisted of the full nitrogen rate (195&#xa0;kg ha<sup>-1</sup>, N3), 20% nitrogen reduction (156&#xa0;kg ha<sup>-1</sup>, N2), 40% nitrogen reduction (117&#xa0;kg ha<sup>-1</sup>, N1), with the local conventional practice as the control (CK). The results showed that the W2N2 treatment had the highest chlorophyll content, which was significantly higher than other treatments and 2.87% higher than CK on average. Under water-nitrogen interaction, potato leaf gas exchange parameters first increased and then decreased with growth stages, peaking at the tuber formation stage, and the W2N2 treatment was significantly superior to other combinations. For nutrient contents in various plant organs, the W2N2 treatment also achieved the highest total nitrogen and total phosphorus contents, which were significantly higher than other treatments. The distribution ratios of nutrient contents in different organs varied with water-nitrogen treatments across years. Based on quadratic regression analysis and the TOPSIS model, the optimal water-nitrogen coupling pattern for potato cultivation in the arid zone of central Ningxia was determined as W2N2, providing theoretical and technical references for efficient potato cultivation with water-saving and nitrogen-reducing practices in arid regions.</p>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>water-nitrogen interaction</kwd>
<kwd>potato</kwd>
<kwd>photosynthetic characteristics</kwd>
<kwd>plant ecological stoichiometry</kwd>
<kwd>random forest model</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<funding-group>
<funding-statement>The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article. This research was funded by the Key Research and Development Program of Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region (2023BCF01017).</funding-statement>
</funding-group>
<counts>
<fig-count count="14"/>
<table-count count="8"/>
<equation-count count="10"/>
<ref-count count="45"/>
<page-count count="23"/>
<word-count count="12013"/>
</counts>
<custom-meta-group>
<custom-meta>
<meta-name>section-at-acceptance</meta-name>
<meta-value>Crop and Product Physiology</meta-value>
</custom-meta>
</custom-meta-group>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec id="s1" sec-type="intro">
<label>1</label>
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>Potato (<italic>Solanum tuberosum</italic> L.) is a globally important food crop that plays a vital role in ensuring food security and reducing poverty (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Ma et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>). However, its cultivation and yield formation are limited by multiple factors, with drought stress and nitrogen fertilizer management being the primary constraints on production (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Fandika et&#xa0;al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Satognon et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>). Practical experience has demonstrated that optimizing irrigation practices to improve crop water use efficiency can enable irrigated farmland to achieve high yields with minimal water input. This approach is not only a crucial strategy to alleviate water scarcity and mitigate ecological and environmental issues in arid and semi-arid regions but also a key research focus within water-saving agriculture (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Kang et&#xa0;al., 2025</xref>). Concurrently, the rapid increase in potato yield has historically depended on high inputs of chemical nitrogen fertilizers; however, prolonged excessive and improper fertilization has significantly reduced nitrogen use efficiency (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">Chen et&#xa0;al., 2024</xref>). Studies have shown that moderate reductions in nitrogen application can enhance nitrogen use efficiency, whereas excessive reductions result in yield decline (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">Lombardo et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>). Therefore, achieving water-saving irrigation without compromising potato yield, alongside reasonable reductions in nitrogen fertilizer application, has become a critical scientific challenge in sustainable agricultural development.</p>
<p>Leaf stomatal exchange parameters, as core indicators of plant physiological ecology, directly reflect the gas exchange capacity between potato leaves and the external environment (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">Yun et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>), and are closely linked to yield formation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Fu et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>). The SPAD value, an important technical parameter for assessing chlorophyll concentration, is significantly affected by water stress, which in turn impacts potato chlorophyll content and tuber yield (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">Rolando et&#xa0;al., 2015</xref>). The coupling of water and nitrogen profoundly influences crop growth, yield, net photosynthetic rate, transpiration rate, and intercellular carbon dioxide concentration (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Hong et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>). Enhancing water and fertilizer use efficiency is essential for sustainable potato production (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">Kifle and Gebretsadikan, 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Chang et&#xa0;al., 2018</xref>), with studies showing that optimized irrigation combined with a 25% substitution of nitrogen fertilizer by manure can synergistically improve potato yield (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">Wang et&#xa0;al., 2024</xref>). Carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus are the three fundamental elements driving ecosystem processes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Hao et&#xa0;al., 2017</xref>). Among these, carbon constitutes the structural basis of plants, while nitrogen and phosphorus are the primary nutrient elements limiting carbon assimilation, plant growth, and other biological functions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Sun et&#xa0;al., 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Gao et&#xa0;al., 2019</xref>). Nitrogen addition has been shown to significantly decrease the C:N ratio in plants and soils, increase plant N:P ratios, and exacerbate microbial carbon and phosphorus limitations, thereby advancing understanding of nutrient cycling processes in terrestrial ecosystems affected by global nitrogen deposition (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">Xu et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>). Variations in plant nutrient stoichiometric ratios serve as sensitive indicators of changes in nutrient availability, which are reflected in plant physiological responses (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">Yan et&#xa0;al., 2015</xref>). Investigations into the ecological stoichiometric characteristics of plant carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus help elucidate growth regulation mechanisms, survival strategies, and the effects of different plant organs and water-nitrogen interaction regimes on plant physiology (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Chang et&#xa0;al., 2024</xref>). <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">Han et&#xa0;al. (2011)</xref>pioneered a comprehensive analysis of nitrogen and phosphorus stoichiometry in the leaves of over 1900 plant species in China, revealing the relative stability of these limiting elements and their consistent responses to environmental fluctuations. Consequently, research on the effects of water-saving irrigation combined with nitrogen fertilizer reduction on photosynthesis, plant nutrient dynamics, and stoichiometry is both necessary and timely.</p>
<p>Although previous studies have examined the effects of water-nitrogen interactions on photosynthetic parameters, research on the dynamic changes in leaf gas exchange parameters, accumulation and distribution of carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus, and their stoichiometric ratios throughout the entire growth period of potato under combined water-saving irrigation and nitrogen reduction management in the arid regions of Northwest China remains limited. Notably, a systematic investigation into the mechanisms by which water-nitrogen interactions influence yield through regulation of photosynthetic physiology and nutrient stoichiometric balance is still lacking. Addressing this gap, the present study employs field experiments to analyze the temporal dynamics of leaf gas exchange parameters; carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus contents; nutrient accumulation and distribution ratios; stoichiometric ratios; and nitrogen and phosphorus limitation status across different growth stages of potato under varying water-nitrogen interaction regimes in the arid Northwest China region. The study aims to elucidate the interrelationships among leaf stomatal exchange characteristics, nutrient accumulation and distribution, stoichiometric balance across plant organs, and yield under water-nitrogen interaction, thereby providing a theoretical foundation and practical guidance for understanding the regulatory mechanisms of water-nitrogen interaction on potato photosynthetic physiology and stoichiometric equilibrium.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2" sec-type="materials|methods">
<label>2</label>
<title>Materials and methods</title>
<sec id="s2_1">
<label>2.1</label>
<title>Experimental site overview</title>
<p>The experiment was conducted during 2022&#x2013;2023 in Yuwang Town (36&#xb0;48&#x2032;2&#x2033;N, 106&#xb0;21&#x2032;53&#x2033;E, altitude 1489&#xa0;m), a typical area of the central arid zone in Ningxia, northwest China, as specifically shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1"><bold>Figure&#xa0;1a</bold></xref>. The experimental area features a continental arid climate characterized by significant diurnal temperature variations, low precipitation, and intense evaporation. The multi-year average rainfall is approximately 270&#xa0;mm, with annual evaporation reaching about 2,325 mm. The groundwater table lies below 10&#xa0;m depth. The experimental soil is classified as sandy loam, with basic physical-chemical properties of the 0&#x2013;40 cm tillage layer before sowing as follows: bulk density 1.41&#xa0;g cm<sup>-3</sup>, field water-holding capacity 21.8%, pH 8.57, total salt content 0.6&#xa0;g kg<sup>-1</sup>, organic matter content 6.65&#xa0;g kg<sup>-1</sup>, alkaline hydrolysis nitrogen content 38 mg kg<sup>-1</sup>, available phosphorus content 3.94 mg kg<sup>-1</sup>, available potassium content 130 mg kg<sup>-1</sup>, total nitrogen content 0.27&#xa0;g kg<sup>-1</sup>, total phosphorus content 0.64&#xa0;g kg<sup>-1</sup>, and total potassium content 17.4&#xa0;g kg<sup>-1</sup>.</p>
<fig id="f1" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;1</label>
<caption>
<p>Overview of the experimental area. Panel <bold>(a)</bold> shows the location of the experimental area, Panel <bold>(b)</bold> illustrates the layout of the plot experiment, and Panel <bold>(c)</bold> presents the potato planting pattern.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-16-1729301-g001.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">(a) A topographic map of a region with elevation color-coded from high (red) to low (green), marking locations like Shi zui shan and Yu zhong. Inset shows the map's position in China. (b) A layout of labeled plots with codes like W2N3-3 and CK-1. (c) Diagram of a planting setup with potatoes under mulching film and drip tape. Dimensions are noted as 120 cm and 60 cm.</alt-text>
</graphic></fig>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_2">
<label>2.2</label>
<title>Experimental design</title>
<p>A two-year experiment was designed with two factors and three levels, involving 3 irrigation quotas and 3 nitrogen application rates, and a control group (CK) was set according to local management practices, which relied solely on rainfall without irrigation, with 15&#xa0;t ha<sup>-1</sup> of cow dung organic fertilizer and 195&#xa0;kg ha<sup>-1</sup> of nitrogen fertilizer applied. The maximum irrigation quota was implemented in accordance with the <italic>Technical Specification for Potato Drip Irrigation Cultivation in Ningxia</italic> issued by the Water Resources Department of Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region in 2017, while the maximum nitrogen application rate adopted the local conventional application amount. Irrigation treatments included three quotas: 2250 m<sup>3</sup> ha<sup>-1</sup> (W3), 20% water-saving (1800 m<sup>3</sup> ha<sup>-1</sup>, W2), and 40% water-saving (1350 m<sup>3</sup> ha<sup>-1</sup>, W1). Nitrogen application treatments consisted of the recommended nitrogen rate (195&#xa0;kg ha<sup>-1</sup>, N3), 20% nitrogen reduction (156&#xa0;kg ha<sup>-1</sup>, N2), and 40% nitrogen reduction (117&#xa0;kg ha<sup>-1</sup>, N1), using urea (46% nitrogen content) as the nitrogen fertilizer. In total, there were 10 treatments with 3 replicates each, resulting in 30 plots, as detailed in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1"><bold>Figure&#xa0;1b</bold></xref>. Irrigation and fertilization were conducted through integrated water and fertilizer management with multiple topdressings, which were applied 6 times during the seedling stage, tuber formation stage, tuber growth stage, and starch accumulation stage in a ratio of 1:2:2:1. Irrigation was carried out 10 times during the sprout growth stage, seedling stage, tuber formation stage, tuber growth stage, and starch accumulation stage in a ratio of 1:2:3:3:1, as shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1"><bold>Table&#xa0;1</bold></xref>. The cumulative irrigation amounts and nitrogen application rates for potatoes are presented in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2"><bold>Figure&#xa0;2</bold></xref>, and the rainfall and temperature during the potato growth stages are shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3"><bold>Figure&#xa0;3</bold></xref>.</p>
<table-wrap id="T1" position="float">
<label>Table&#xa0;1</label>
<caption>
<p>Division of growth stages, irrigation amount and nitrogen application rate of potato.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Potato growth period</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Sprout growth period May 10 &#x2013; June 5)</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Seedling stage (June 6 &#x2013; June 25)</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Tuber formation period (June 26 &#x2013; July 25)</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Tuber growth period (July 26 &#x2013; August 20)</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Starch accumulation period (August 21 &#x2013; October 5)</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Total duration</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">W3(m<sup>3</sup> ha<sup>-1</sup>)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">199.13</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">398.25</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">716.85</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">736.65</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">199.13</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2250.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">W2(m<sup>3</sup> ha<sup>-1</sup>)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">159.30</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">318.60</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">573.48</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">589.32</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">159.30</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1800.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">W1(m<sup>3</sup> ha<sup>-1</sup>)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">119.48</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">238.95</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">430.11</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">441.99</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">119.48</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1350.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">N3(kg ha<sup>-1</sup>)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.00</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">32.57</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">64.94</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">64.94</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">32.57</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">195.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">N2(kg ha<sup>-1</sup>)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.00</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">26.05</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">51.95</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">51.95</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">26.05</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">156.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">N1(kg ha<sup>-1</sup>)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.00</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">19.54</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">38.96</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">38.96</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">19.54</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">117.00</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
<fig id="f2" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;2</label>
<caption>
<p><bold>(a&#x2013;d)</bold> Cumulative nitrogen application and irrigation amount during potato growth stages.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-16-1729301-g002.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Four line graphs depict cumulative irrigation volume and nitrogen application over time for 2022 and 2023. Graphs (a) and (b) show irrigation volumes (m&#xb3;/ha) for 2022 and 2023, with lines W1 (red), W2 (green), and W3 (blue). Arrows indicate nitrogen application dates. Graphs (c) and (d) display nitrogen application (kg/ha) for 2022 and 2023, using lines N1 (red), N2 (green), and N3 (blue). Dates range from May 1 to September 9.</alt-text>
</graphic></fig>
<fig id="f3" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;3</label>
<caption>
<p>Daily average air temperature and rainfall during potato growth stages in the experimental area.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-16-1729301-g003.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Two line graphs compare temperature and rainfall data for 2022 and 2023. The x-axis represents dates from April 22 to October 1, and the y-axes show temperature in degrees Celsius on the left and rainfall in millimeters on the right. The 2022 graph shows fluctuations in maximum and minimum temperatures and rainfall patterns. The 2023 graph also shows similar data trends, with notable differences in temperature peaks and rainfall. Both graphs use red for maximum temperature, blue for minimum temperature, and green for rainfall.</alt-text>
</graphic></fig>
<p>Potato planting dates were May 1, 2022, and April 30, 2023, with harvest dates on October 3, 2022, and October 2, 2023. The tested variety was &#x201c;Qingshu 9&#x201d;, which was bred by Qinghai Academy of Agricultural and Forestry Sciences. It is characterized by late-maturing and fresh-eating, luxuriant branches and leaves, concentrated tuber setting, oblong tubers, and high quality. The planting mode adopted was under-film drip irrigation, with &#x201c;one film for two rows&#x201d; planted at equal row spacing. The plastic film was 1.2&#xa0;m wide, and the seeds were sown at a depth of 10&#xa0;cm. The 1.2 m-wide plastic mulch covered seeds planted at 10&#xa0;cm depth. Planting parameters included 50&#xa0;cm plant spacing and 60&#xa0;cm row spacing, with 10 plants per row and 40 plants per plot, resulting in a planting density of 33,345 plants ha<sup>-1</sup>. Basal fertilizers included calcium superphosphate (12% P<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub> content, 82.5&#xa0;kg ha<sup>-1</sup>) and potassium sulfate (50% K<sub>2</sub>O content, 150&#xa0;kg ha<sup>-1</sup>), applied as a single basal dose. Each experimental plot measured 17.6 m<sup>2</sup> (5.5&#xa0;m length &#xd7; 3.2&#xa0;m width), surrounded by 1 m-wide buffer rows between plots and 2 m-wide peripheral buffer rows. The experimental design comprised 30 plots (3 replicates &#xd7; 10 treatments). Each plot featured an independent irrigation control unit with a water meter, gate valve, and pressure gauge. The embedded drip tape (16&#xa0;mm inner diameter, 0.15&#xa0;mm wall thickness) operated at 0.1 MPa pressure, delivering 2 L h<sup>-1</sup> through emitters spaced 50&#xa0;cm apart (one emitter per plant). Field management practices including weeding and pesticide application followed locally recommended agronomic protocols.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_3">
<label>2.3</label>
<title>Sample collections and measurements</title>
<sec id="s2_3_1">
<label>2.3.1</label>
<title>Chlorophyll relative content (SPAD value)</title>
<p>The SPAD value is a parameter measured using a portable chlorophyll meter (Konica Minolta, Japan, SPAD-502Plus), which is mainly used for the rapid assessment of the relative chlorophyll content in plant leaves. Mature functional leaves from the middle part of the plant were selected&#x2014;specifically the 3rd to 5th inverted leaves of potato. These leaves exhibit vigorous photosynthetic function and stable status, which can represent the overall physiological level of the plant. Additionally, intact leaves without damage were chosen to ensure data representativeness. Three to five healthy potato leaves were selected from each experimental plot for SPAD measurement, and the average value was calculated. Measurements were performed from 9:00 to 11:00 (Beijing Time) at the seedling stage, tuber formation stage, tuber bulking stage, starch accumulation stage, and late harvest stage of potato, with three replicates for each treatment.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_3_2">
<label>2.3.2</label>
<title>Leaf gas exchange parameters</title>
<p>Leaf gas exchange parameters were measured using a Li-6800 photosynthesis system (LI-COR, USA) to determine net photosynthetic rate (Pn), transpiration rate (Tr), stomatal conductance (Gs), and intercellular CO<sub>2</sub> concentration (Ci) in potato leaves. The photosynthetic measurement system automatically recorded and stored leaf gas exchange parameters. The selection method for leaves was consistent with that used for determining relative chlorophyll content. Settings of the L-6800 instrument: The photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) in the leaf chamber was set to 1200 &#xb5;mol&#xb7;m<sup>-</sup>&#xb2;&#xb7;s<sup>-</sup>&#xb9; to simulate normal light conditions. The reference CO<sub>2</sub> concentration was set to 400 ppm (standard atmospheric concentration) for gas exchange measurements. The gas flow rate was adjusted to 500 &#xb5;mol&#xb7;s<sup>-</sup>&#xb9; to ensure the stability of gas exchange determination. The leaf temperature was maintained at 25&#xb0;C to provide optimal conditions for photosynthesis. The vapor pressure deficit (VPD) was controlled within the range of 1.0&#x2013;1.5 kPa to simulate a normal transpiration environment. Measurements were conducted from 9:00 to 11:00, as light conditions are relatively stable during this period, which is suitable for photosynthesis-related gas exchange assays.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_3_3">
<label>2.3.3</label>
<title>Plant nutrient status</title>
<p>At the harvest stage, potato plant samples were collected, rinsed thoroughly with water, and then separated by organs (stems, leaves, roots, tubers). The samples were placed in a blast drying oven (Shanghai Yiheng Scientific Instruments Co., Ltd., DHG-9240A), blanched at 105&#xb0;C for 30 minutes, and then dried to constant weight at 75&#xb0;C. The dried samples were crushed using a small grinder (Tianjin Tester Instrument Co., Ltd., FW-100) and passed through a 0.5&#xa0;mm sieve for the determination of total nitrogen, total phosphorus, and organic carbon contents in each organ. The TN content was measured by the Kjeldahl method (FOSS, Kjeltec 8400), the TP content by the molybdenum-antimony anti spectrophotometric method (Shanghai Yuanxi Instruments Co., Ltd., UV-5500PC), and the TOC content by the potassium dichromate titration method (Shanghai Shuli Instruments Co., Ltd., DS-101S).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_3_4">
<label>2.3.4</label>
<title>Potato yield</title>
<p>At potato harvest stage, randomly selected 2&#xd7;2 m&#xb2; plots with uniform plant growth were sampled from each treatment. Three replicated plots per treatment were cleaned with water to remove soil adhering to potato surfaces, air-dried, and weighed using an electronic balance (accuracy 0.01&#xa0;g). The total yield per hectare under different treatments was calculated based on planting density.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_3_5">
<label>2.3.5</label>
<title>Leaf water use efficiency</title>
<p>Leaf water use efficiency (<italic>LWUE</italic>) of potato leaves Specific formulas see <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="eq1">Equation 1</xref>.</p>
<disp-formula id="eq1"><label>(1)</label>
<mml:math display="block" id="M1"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mi>U</mml:mi><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo stretchy="false">/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math>
</disp-formula>
<p>Where: <italic>LWUE</italic> represents leaf water use efficiency (&#x3bc;mol mmol<sup>-</sup>&#xb9;), where <italic>Pn</italic> denotes net photosynthetic rate of potato leaves (&#x3bc;mol (m&#xb2; s)<sup>-</sup>&#xb9;), and <italic>Tr</italic> indicates transpiration rate of potato leaves (mmol (m&#xb2; s)<sup>-</sup>&#xb9;).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_3_6">
<label>2.3.6</label>
<title>Stoichiometric characteristics of potato plant tissues</title>
<p>Carbon-nitrogen-phosphorus (C:N:P) stoichiometric ratios in different potato tissues (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Olivera Viciedo et&#xa0;al., 2019</xref>) Specific formulas see <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="eq2">Equation 2</xref>&#x2013;<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="eq4">4</xref>.</p>
<disp-formula id="eq2"><label>(2)</label>
<mml:math display="block" id="M2"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>C</mml:mtext><mml:mo stretchy="false">/</mml:mo><mml:mtext>N</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mtext>TOC</mml:mtext><mml:mo stretchy="false">/</mml:mo><mml:mtext>TN</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:math>
</disp-formula>
<disp-formula id="eq3"><label>(3)</label>
<mml:math display="block" id="M3"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>C</mml:mtext><mml:mo stretchy="false">/</mml:mo><mml:mtext>P</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mtext>TOC</mml:mtext><mml:mo stretchy="false">/</mml:mo><mml:mtext>TP</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:math>
</disp-formula>
<disp-formula id="eq4"><label>(4)</label>
<mml:math display="block" id="M4"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>N</mml:mtext><mml:mo stretchy="false">/</mml:mo><mml:mtext>P</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mtext>TN</mml:mtext><mml:mo stretchy="false">/</mml:mo><mml:mtext>TP</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:math>
</disp-formula>
<p>Where: C/N represents carbon-to-nitrogen ratio, C/P denotes carbon-to-phosphorus ratio, and N/P indicates nitrogen-to-phosphorus ratio in various tissues of potato plants.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_4">
<label>2.4</label>
<title>TOPSIS model</title>
<p>The technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) was used to identify a solution from the feasible solution set by defining the positive ideal solution and the negative ideal solution for the decision problem so that it was closest to the positive ideal solution and farthest from the negative ideal solution (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">Yang et&#xa0;al., 2023</xref>).</p>
<p>1. Nine treatments were set as evaluation objects, with nine evaluation indicators including tuber yield, SPAD, Tr, Pn, Gs, Ci, PSN, PLN, PRN, PTN, PSP, PLP, PRP, PTP, PSC, PLC, PRC, PTC. The evaluation indicators were normalized to establish a normalized matrix Specific formulas see <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="eq5">Equation 5</xref>:</p>
<disp-formula id="eq5"><label>(5)</label>
<mml:math display="block" id="M5"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msqrt><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mo>&#x2211;</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:msqrt></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mrow></mml:math>
</disp-formula>
<p>where <italic>z<sub>ij</sub></italic> is the <italic>j</italic> index normalized value in <italic>i</italic> treatment; <italic>x<sub>ij</sub></italic> is the <italic>j</italic> index value in the <italic>i</italic> treatment. <italic>i</italic>&#xa0;=&#xa0;1, 2,&#xb7;&#xb7;&#xb7;, n; <italic>j</italic>&#xa0;=&#xa0;1, 2,&#xb7;&#xb7;&#xb7;, m;</p>
<p>2. The ideal solution (<italic>Z<sub>ij</sub><sup>+</sup></italic>) and the negative solution (Z<italic><sub>ij</sub></italic><sup>&#x2212;</sup>) were determined to form the ideal solution vector <italic>Z<sup>+</sup></italic> and the negative solution vector <italic>Z<sup>&#x2212;</sup></italic>, respectively Specific formulas see <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="eq6">Equation 6</xref>, <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="eq7">7</xref>:</p>
<disp-formula id="eq6"><label>(6)</label>
<mml:math display="block" id="M6"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>Z</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mn>3</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>&#x2026;</mml:mo><mml:mo>&#x2026;</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math>
</disp-formula>
<disp-formula id="eq7"><label>(7)</label>
<mml:math display="block" id="M7"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>Z</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mn>3</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>&#x2026;</mml:mo><mml:mo>&#x2026;</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math>
</disp-formula>
<p>where <italic>Z<sub>ij</sub><sup>+</sup></italic> and <italic>Z<sub>ij</sub><sup>&#x2212;</sup></italic> represent the maximum and minimum values of the evaluation object in the <italic>j</italic>-th index, respectively;</p>
<p>3. The Euclidean distances (<italic>D<sub>i</sub><sup>+</sup></italic> and <italic>D<sub>i</sub><sup>&#x2212;</sup></italic>) were determined Specific formulas see <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="eq8">Equation 8</xref>, <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="eq9">9</xref>:</p>
<disp-formula id="eq8"><label>(8)</label>
<mml:math display="block" id="M8"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msqrt><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:msubsup><mml:mo>&#x2211;</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="false">[</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>&#xd7;</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>Z</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="false">]</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:msqrt></mml:mrow></mml:math>
</disp-formula>
<disp-formula id="eq9"><label>(9)</label>
<mml:math display="block" id="M9"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msqrt><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:msubsup><mml:mo>&#x2211;</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="false">[</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>&#xd7;</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>Z</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="false">]</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:msqrt></mml:mrow></mml:math>
</disp-formula>
<p>where <italic>w<sub>j</sub></italic> is the weight of indicator <italic>j</italic>;</p>
<p>4. The relative proximity coefficient <italic>R<sub>i</sub></italic> of each treatment was calculated; that is, the proximity between the evaluation object and the optimal scheme was calculated as follows Specific formulas see <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="eq10">Equation 10</xref>:</p>
<disp-formula id="eq10"><label>(10)</label>
<mml:math display="block" id="M10"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mrow></mml:math>
</disp-formula>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_5">
<label>2.5</label>
<title>Statistical analysis</title>
<p>Data collation was performed using Microsoft Excel 2019 (developed by Microsoft Corporation, USA); graphing was conducted with Origin 2021 (developed by OriginLab Corporation, USA); Duncan&#x2019;s multiple comparison significance test (p&lt; 0.05) was carried out via SPSS 26 (developed by International Business Machines Corporation, USA); and R (V.4.3.1, developed by Ross Ihaka and Robert Gentleman from the Department of Statistics, University of Auckland, New Zealand) was utilized for Pearson correlation analysis, plotting of fixed-model correlation analysis, as well as the construction of random forest and TOPSIS models.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s3" sec-type="results">
<label>3</label>
<title>Results and analysis</title>
<sec id="s3_1">
<label>3.1</label>
<title>Effects of water-nitrogen interaction on relative chlorophyll content in potato leaves</title>
<p>The effects of water-nitrogen interaction on the relative chlorophyll content of potato leaves are shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f4"><bold>Figure&#xa0;4</bold></xref>. Consistent trends were observed across both experimental years. During the growth period, leaf SPAD values under water-nitrogen regulation exhibited an initial increase followed by a decline, reaching their maximum at the tuber formation stage. At constant nitrogen levels, SPAD values first increased and then decreased with rising irrigation quotas; similarly, under fixed irrigation, SPAD values initially rose before declining as nitrogen application rates increased. Among all treatments, the W2N2 regime resulted in the highest relative chlorophyll content, with an average increase of 2.87% compared to the CK treatment across all growth stages over both years. Statistical analysis confirmed significant interactive effects between water and nitrogen, with both factors significantly influencing leaf chlorophyll content (<italic>p</italic>&#xa0;&lt;&#xa0;0.05).</p>
<fig id="f4" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;4</label>
<caption>
<p><bold>(a, b)</bold> Relative chlorophyll content in potato leaves under different treatments. In the figure, W stands for irrigation quota and N for nitrogen application rate. ** indicates an extremely significant effect. Different lowercase letters represent significant differences between treatments (<italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.05).</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-16-1729301-g004.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Bar graphs comparing SPAD values across different growth stages and treatments for 2022 and 2023. The graphs display treatments N1, N2, N3, and CK over seedling, tuber formation, tuber growth, starch accumulation, and harvest periods. Statistical significance is indicated by symbols.</alt-text>
</graphic></fig>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_2">
<label>3.2</label>
<title>Effects of water-nitrogen interaction on gas exchange parameters in potato leaves</title>
<sec id="s3_2_1">
<label>3.2.1</label>
<title>Transpiration rate</title>
<p>The effects of water-nitrogen interaction on potato leaf <italic>Tr</italic> are presented in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f5"><bold>Figure&#xa0;5</bold></xref>. Throughout the growth period, leaf transpiration generally exhibited an initial increase followed by a decline, peaking during the tuber initiation stage. Across both&#xa0;experimental years, under constant irrigation quotas, transpiration rates increased with rising nitrogen application up to a point, then decreased at higher nitrogen levels. Notably, the W2N2 treatment showed significantly higher <italic>Tr</italic> than other treatments, with an average increase of 228.49% compared to the CK treatment across all growth stages. Under fixed irrigation, the N1 treatment exhibited a steady increase in transpiration during the seedling and tuber initiation stages, whereas the N2 and N3 treatments demonstrated an initial rise followed by a decline. During the tuber bulking and starch accumulation stages, all treatments showed a consistent pattern of increase followed by decrease. The interaction between water and nitrogen reached a significant level (excluding the tuber bulking stage), and both irrigation and nitrogen application had significant effects on&#xa0;leaf&#xa0;<italic>Tr</italic> (Tr) (p&lt;0.05)., underscoring that optimized irrigation&#xa0;and&#xa0;nitrogen application synergistically enhance potato leaf transpiration.</p>
<fig id="f5" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;5</label>
<caption>
<p><bold>(a, b)</bold> Transpiration rate (<italic>Tr</italic>) of potato leaves. In the figure, W stands for irrigation quota and N for nitrogen application rate. ** indicates an extremely significant effect. Different lowercase letters represent significant differences between treatments (<italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.05).</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-16-1729301-g005.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Bar charts compare transpiration rates across different growth stages and treatments in 2022 and 2023. Treatments N1, N2, and N3 are illustrated in pink, blue, and light blue. Divided into seedling stage, tuber formation, tuber growth, and starch accumulation. Significance is noted with W**, N**, and W&#xd7;N**. Treatment levels are W1, W2, W3, and CK0/CK1, indicating various conditions. Bars are labeled 'a' to 'h' for significance levels. Error bars show variability.</alt-text>
</graphic></fig>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_2_2">
<label>3.2.2</label>
<title>Net photosynthetic rate</title>
<p>The effect of water-nitrogen interaction on the net <italic>Pn</italic> of potato leaves is shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f6"><bold>Figure&#xa0;6</bold></xref>. The net photosynthetic rate of potato leaves generally first increased and then decreased with the progression of growth stages, peaking at the tuber formation stage. In the two-year experiment, under the same irrigation quota, the net photosynthetic rate first increased and then decreased with the increase of nitrogen application rate. Under water-nitrogen interaction, the W2N2 treatment was significantly higher than other treatments, with an average increase of 150.09% compared to the CK treatment across all growth stages in two years. The variation trends were basically consistent in the two-year experiment. Under the same irrigation quota: for the N1 treatment, the net <italic>Pn</italic> increased with the increase of irrigation quota at the seedling stage and tuber bulking stage, while it first increased and then decreased at the tuber formation stage and starch accumulation stage; for the N2 treatment, it first increased and then decreased with the increase of irrigation quota at all growth stages; for the N3 treatment, it first increased and then decreased at the seedling stage and starch accumulation stage, increased at the tuber formation stage, and first decreased and then increased at the tuber bulking stage (note: corrected the repeated &#x201c;tuber formation stage&#x201d; in the original text). All treatments reached an extremely significant level under water-nitrogen regulation, and the significance of the water-nitrogen interaction varied among different growth stages. An appropriate irrigation quota and nitrogen application rate can improve the net photosynthetic rate of potato leaves.</p>
<fig id="f6" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;6</label>
<caption>
<p><bold>(a, b)</bold> Net photosynthetic rate (<italic>Pn</italic>) of potato leaves.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-16-1729301-g006.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Bar charts comparing photosynthetic rates (\(Pn\)) under different treatments (N1, N2, N3) across four plant growth stages: Seedling Stage, Tuber Formation Period, Tuber Growth Period, and Starch Accumulation Period for 2022 and 2023. The data show variations in photosynthetic rates with distinctions in statistical significance denoted by letters and asterisks. The treatments are labeled W1, W2, W3, and CK for 2022, and W1, W2, W3, CK0, and CK1 for 2023. Asterisks indicate significant differences in nitrogen (N), water (W), and their interaction (W&#xd7;N).</alt-text>
</graphic></fig>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_2_3">
<label>3.2.3</label>
<title>Stomatal conductance</title>
<p>The effect of water-nitrogen interaction on the Gs of potato leaves is shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f7"><bold>Figure&#xa0;7</bold></xref>. The <italic>Gs</italic> of potato leaves generally first increased and then decreased with the progression of growth stages, peaking at the tuber formation stage. The variation trends were basically consistent in the two-year experiment: under the same irrigation quota, the leaf <italic>Gs</italic> first increased and then decreased with the increase of nitrogen application rate. Under water-nitrogen interaction, the W2N2 treatment was significantly higher than other treatments, with an average increase of 186.49% compared to the CK treatment across all growth stages in two years. Under the same irrigation quota, for the N1 treatment, <italic>Gs</italic> first increased and then decreased with the increase of irrigation quota at the seedling stage, tuber formation stage, and starch accumulation stage, and followed the same trend at the tuber bulking stage; for the N2 treatment, it first increased and then decreased with the increase of irrigation quota at all growth stages; for the N3 treatment, it increased with the increase of irrigation quota at the seedling stage, while first increasing and then decreasing at the tuber formation stage, tuber bulking stage, and starch accumulation stage. All treatments reached an extremely significant level under water-nitrogen regulation. In the second year of the experiment, the interaction between water and nitrogen had a significant effect on <italic>Gs</italic>. An appropriate irrigation quota and nitrogen application rate can improve the leaf <italic>Gs</italic> of potatoes.</p>
<fig id="f7" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;7</label>
<caption>
<p><bold>(a, b)</bold> Stomatal conductance (<italic>Gs</italic>) of potato leaves.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-16-1729301-g007.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Bar graphs comparing the stomatal conductance \(Gs\) in mmol per square meter per second under different treatments across four growth stages in 2022 and 2023. The graphs are divided into seedling stage, tuber formation period, tuber growth period, and starch accumulation period. Three nitrogen treatments, N1, N2, and N3, are represented by pink, blue, and light blue bars, respectively. Significance indicators (W**, N**, W&#xd7;N**) are noted for each stage, and error bars show the variability of data.</alt-text>
</graphic></fig>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_2_4">
<label>3.2.4</label>
<title>Intercellular CO<sub>2</sub> concentration</title>
<p>The effect of water-nitrogen interaction on the <italic>Ci</italic> of potato leaves is shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f8"><bold>Figure&#xa0;8</bold></xref>. The <italic>Ci</italic> of potato leaves generally first increased and then decreased with the progression of growth stages, with the maximum value observed at the tuber formation stage. In the two-year experiment, under the same irrigation quota, the leaf <italic>Ci</italic> first increased and then decreased with the increase of nitrogen application rate. Under water-nitrogen interaction, the W2N2 treatment was significantly higher than other treatments, with an average increase of 63.09% compared to the CK treatment across all growth stages in two years. Under the same irrigation quota, for the N1 treatment, <italic>Ci</italic> first increased and then decreased with the increase of irrigation quota at the seedling stage and tuber formation stage, and followed the same trend at the starch accumulation stage and tuber bulking stage; for the N2 treatment, it first increased and then decreased with the increase of irrigation quota at all growth stages; for the N3 treatment, it increased with the increase of irrigation quota at the seedling stage and tuber bulking stage, while first increasing and then decreasing at the tuber formation stage and starch accumulation stage. The interaction between water and nitrogen had a minor effect on leaf <italic>Ci</italic>, and no significant difference was observed at some growth stages. An appropriate irrigation quota and nitrogen application rate can improve the leaf <italic>Ci</italic> of potatoes.</p>
<fig id="f8" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;8</label>
<caption>
<p><bold>(a, b)</bold> Intercellular CO<sub>2</sub> concentration (Ci) of potato leaves.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-16-1729301-g008.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Bar graphs display the effects of different treatments (W1, W2, W3, CK0, CK1) on \(C_i\) levels during seedling, tuber formation, growth, and starch accumulation periods in 2022 and 2023. Each graph compares treatments N1 (pink), N2 (blue), and N3 (purple). Significant interactions (W, N, \(W \times N\)) are highlighted with asterisks. Bars are labeled with letters indicating statistical differences. Data is divided into distinct stages within each year.</alt-text>
</graphic></fig>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_2_5">
<label>3.2.5</label>
<title>Leaf water use efficiency</title>
<p>The effects of water-nitrogen interaction on potato leaf water use efficiency are shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f9"><bold>Figure&#xa0;9</bold></xref>. The <italic>LWUE</italic> of potato increased with the advancement of growth stages, being higher during tuber expansion and starch accumulation stages compared to seedling and tuber formation stages. Under water-nitrogen interaction, <italic>LWUE</italic> showed significant variations across different treatments. In 2022, the W2N1 treatment achieved the maximum value during seedling stage, representing a 40.58% increase compared to CK treatment, whereas W1N1 showed the highest values during tuber formation, tuber expansion, and starch accumulation stages due to water-nitrogen stress-induced enhancement. In 2023, the W1N1 treatment decreased by 14.44% compared to CK during seedling stage, but increased by 4.91%, 11.97%, and 30.75% during tuber formation, tuber expansion, and starch accumulation stages, respectively. These results demonstrate substantial impacts of water-nitrogen interaction on potato <italic>LWUE</italic>.</p>
<fig id="f9" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;9</label>
<caption>
<p><bold>(a, b)</bold> Potato leaf water use efficiency (<italic>LWUE</italic>).</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-16-1729301-g009.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Bar chart panels showing LWUE measurements for 2022 and 2023 across different growth stages: Seedling Stage, Tuber Formation Period, and Starch Accumulation Period. Each bar represents treatments N1, N2, and N3 in shades of pink, purple, and blue. Treatments W1, W2, W3, and CK0/CK1 are shown. Statistical significance is indicated by letters a through g and asterisks next to &#x201c;W,&#x201d; &#x201c;N,&#x201d; and &#x201c;W&#xd7;N&#x201d; for interactions, with significance levels denoted by asterisks. Error bars indicate variability in the data.</alt-text>
</graphic></fig>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_3">
<label>3.3</label>
<title>Effects of water-nitrogen interaction on potato plant nutrients</title>
<sec id="s3_3_1">
<label>3.3.1</label>
<title>Effects of water-nitrogen interaction on organic carbon content in potato plants</title>
<p>Plant organic carbon refers to the carbon element contained in organic matter within plant tissues. The effects of water-nitrogen interaction on organic carbon content in various organs of potato plants are shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2"><bold>Table&#xa0;2</bold></xref>. Under water-nitrogen treatments, the organic carbon content trends across potato plant organs were generally consistent. Under the same irrigation quota, organic carbon content in all organs increased with higher nitrogen application rates. Under the same nitrogen application rate, organic carbon content increased with higher irrigation quotas. However, the interaction between the two factors did not reach a significant level, likely due to the relatively stable variation in organic carbon content.</p>
<table-wrap id="T2" position="float">
<label>Table&#xa0;2</label>
<caption>
<p>Organic carbon content in potato plants under different treatments.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" rowspan="2" align="center">Treatment</th>
<th valign="middle" colspan="2" align="center">Stem(g kg<sup>-1</sup>)</th>
<th valign="middle" colspan="2" align="center">Leaf(g kg<sup>-1</sup>)</th>
<th valign="middle" colspan="2" align="center">Root(g kg<sup>-1</sup>)</th>
<th valign="middle" colspan="2" align="center">Tubers(g kg<sup>-1</sup>)</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" align="center">2022</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">2023</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">2022</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">2023</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">2022</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">2023</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">2022</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">2023</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">W1N1</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">351.70a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">291.32a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">305.76a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">325.78b</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">314.56b</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">305.02d</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">302.60a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">307.49a</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">W1N2</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">352.03a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">296.32a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">324.98a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">332.79b</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">329.06b</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">345.22cd</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">308.07a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">310.40a</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">W1N3</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">355.55a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">307.12a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">325.26a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">338.45b</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">366.30ab</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">374.98abc</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">319.23a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">327.75a</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">W2N1</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">362.44a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">315.16a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">347.41a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">340.87b</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">371.80ab</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">350.94cd</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">333.58a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">335.20a</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">W2N2</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">365.00a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">319.58a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">353.23a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">345.92b</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">372.24ab</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">368.6bc</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">339.22a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">341.67a</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">W2N3</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">370.89a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">325.38a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">357.57a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">346.02b</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">378.93ab</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">404.64abc</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">337.18a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">341.91a</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">W3N1</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">371.91a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">324.68a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">360.26a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">380.95b</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">401.08a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">383.16abc</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">320.01a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">322.08a</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">W3N2</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">374.54a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">331.78a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">364.06a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">432.37a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">404.53a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">425.58ab</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">330.84a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">332.53a</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">W3N3</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">379.54a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">352.83a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">362.00a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">460.18a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">419.90a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">433.61a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">356.4a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">360.55a</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">CK</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">346.70a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">286.35a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">291.88a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">314.67c</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">310.90b</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">260.66e</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">300.17a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">305.38a</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">W</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">ns</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">ns</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">*</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">**</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">*</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">*</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">ns</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">ns</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">N</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">ns</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">ns</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">ns</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">ns</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">ns</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">ns</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">ns</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">ns</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">W&#xd7;N</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">ns</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">ns</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">ns</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">ns</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">ns</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">ns</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">ns</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">ns</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_3_2">
<label>3.3.2</label>
<title>Effects of water-nitrogen interaction on total nitrogen content in potato plants</title>
<p>The effect of water-nitrogen interaction on the total nitrogen content of various potato plant organs is shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="T3"><bold>Table&#xa0;3</bold></xref>. The two-year experimental results indicated that the variation trends of all treatments were basically consistent with the change of water-nitrogen interaction. Under the same irrigation quota, the total nitrogen content of potato stems first increased and then decreased with the increase of nitrogen application rate. Under the same nitrogen application rate, with the increase of irrigation quota, the total nitrogen content increased with the increase of nitrogen application rate in the N1 treatment, while it first increased and then decreased in the N2 and N3 treatments. Among all treatments, the W2N2 treatment achieved the highest value, with an average increase of 55.61% compared to the CK treatment over two years. Under the same irrigation quota, the total nitrogen content of potato tubers first increased and then decreased with the increase of nitrogen application rate. Under the same nitrogen application rate, in 2022, the total nitrogen content increased with the increase of irrigation quota in the N1 treatment, while it first increased and then decreased in the N2 and N3 treatments; in 2023, the total nitrogen content of all treatments first decreased and then increased with the increase of irrigation quota. The W2N2 treatment had the highest value, with an average increase of 61.02% compared to the CK treatment over two years. Under the same irrigation quota, the total nitrogen content of potato roots first increased and then decreased with the increase of nitrogen application rate. Under the same nitrogen application rate, the total nitrogen content of all treatments first decreased and then increased with the increase of irrigation quota. The W2N2 treatment showed the highest value, with an average increase of 90.95% compared to the CK treatment over two years. Across the two-year experiment, the W2N2 treatment had the highest total nitrogen content of potato leaves under water-nitrogen interaction, with an average increase of 121.91% compared to the CK treatment. The interaction between water and nitrogen had a significant effect on the total nitrogen content of potato leaves.</p>
<table-wrap id="T3" position="float">
<label>Table&#xa0;3</label>
<caption>
<p>Total nitrogen content in potato plants under different treatments.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" rowspan="2" align="center">Treatment</th>
<th valign="middle" colspan="2" align="center">Stem(g kg<sup>-1</sup>)</th>
<th valign="middle" colspan="2" align="center">Leaf(g kg<sup>-1</sup>)</th>
<th valign="middle" colspan="2" align="center">Root(g kg<sup>-1</sup>)</th>
<th valign="middle" colspan="2" align="center">Tubers(g kg<sup>-1</sup>)</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" align="center">2022</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">2023</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">2022</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">2023</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">2022</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">2023</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">2022</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">2023</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">W1N1</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">7.66d</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">8.03f</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">22.6f</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">23.37d</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">9.22g</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">13.23e</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">9.89h</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">11.98f</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">W1N2</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">10.07bc</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">11.34c</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">30.65c</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">27.45b</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">12.02e</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">15.76c</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">12.75e</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">14.49d</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">W1N3</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">7.4cd</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">9.63d</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">27.1d</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">26.06c</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">11.42f</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">13.82de</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">11.89f</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">13.65e</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">W2N1</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">10.29ab</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">8.97e</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">22.58f</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">31.86a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">16.99cd</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">14.12d</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">10.92g</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">12.85e</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">W2N2</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">12.69a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">13.18a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">34.17a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">33.12a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">19.21a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">20.71a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">17.06a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">18.74a</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">W2N3</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">11.51ab</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">13.31a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">33.95a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">32.35a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">16.48d</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">17.51b</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">16.32b</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">18.2a</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">W3N1</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">11.34ab</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">9.39de</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">24.87e</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">31.74a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">17.12c</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">14.33d</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">11.07g</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">13.15e</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">W3N2</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">9.78bc</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">12.08b</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">32.59b</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">32.69a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">18.56b</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">14.62d</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">15.3c</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">17.16b</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">W3N3</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">10.98ab</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">11.42c</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">31.67bc</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">31.62a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">18.47b</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">14.75d</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">13.73d</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">15.74c</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">CK</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">7.21d</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">8.11f</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">20.26g</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">21.24d</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">9.20g</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">11.26e</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">6.97i</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">8.73f</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">W</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">*</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">**</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">**</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">**</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">**</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">**</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">**</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">**</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">N</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">ns</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">**</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">**</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">**</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">**</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">**</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">**</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">**</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">W&#xd7;N</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">ns</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">**</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">**</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">**</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">**</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">**</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">**</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">**</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_3_3">
<label>3.3.3</label>
<title>Effects of water-nitrogen interaction on total phosphorus content in potato plants</title>
<p>The effects of water-nitrogen interaction on the total phosphorus content in various organs of potato plants are shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="T4"><bold>Table&#xa0;4</bold></xref>. Results from the two-year experiment indicated that the variation trends of all treatments under water-nitrogen interaction were generally consistent. Under the same irrigation quota, for the W1 treatment, the total phosphorus content in potato stems showed an increasing trend with the increase of nitrogen application rate; while for the W2 and W3 treatments, it first increased and then decreased. Under the same nitrogen application rate, the total phosphorus content in potato stems first increased and then decreased with the increase of nitrogen application rate. Among them, the W2N2 treatment was the highest, with an average increase of 80.94% compared with the CK treatment over the two years. Under the same irrigation quota, the total phosphorus content in potato stems first increased and then decreased as the nitrogen application rate increased. Under the same nitrogen application rate, with the increase of irrigation quota, the total phosphorus content in potato stems also showed a trend of first increasing and then decreasing. The W2N2 treatment was the maximum in this scenario, with an average increase of 35.36% compared with the CK treatment over the two years. Under the same irrigation quota, for the W1 treatment, the total phosphorus content in potato stems increased with the increase of nitrogen application rate; for the W2 and W3 treatments, the total phosphorus content in potato stems first increased and then decreased as the nitrogen application rate increased. Under the same nitrogen application rate, all treatments first decreased and then increased with the increase of irrigation quota. The W2N2 treatment was the highest, with an average increase of 102.11% compared with the CK treatment. Overall, the two-year experimental results showed that under water-nitrogen interaction, the W2N2 treatment had the highest total phosphorus content, with an average increase of 34.34% compared with the CK treatment over the two years.</p>
<table-wrap id="T4" position="float">
<label>Table&#xa0;4</label>
<caption>
<p>Total phosphorus content of potato plants under different treatments.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" rowspan="2" align="center">Treatment</th>
<th valign="middle" colspan="2" align="center">Stem(g kg<sup>-1</sup>)</th>
<th valign="middle" colspan="2" align="center">Leaf(g kg<sup>-1</sup>)</th>
<th valign="middle" colspan="2" align="center">Root(g kg<sup>-1</sup>)</th>
<th valign="middle" colspan="2" align="center">Tubers(g kg<sup>-1</sup>)</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" align="center">2022</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">2023</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">2022</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">2023</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">2022</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">2023</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">2022</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">2023</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">W1N1</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.24g</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.87f</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2.46f</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.59d</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.21f</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.58a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2.05g</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2.18h</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">W1N2</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.27f</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.98e</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2.64e</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.81bc</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.25f</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.87a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2.23de</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2.37ef</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">W1N3</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.33e</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.18d</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2.57ef</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.69cd</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.46e</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.94a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2.13f</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2.27g</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">W2N1</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.74b</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.16d</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">3.12c</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.76bc</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.62cd</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.12a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2.2e</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2.35f</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">W2N2</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.91a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.6a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">3.43a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2.04a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.88a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.45a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2.66a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2.81a</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">W2N3</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.74b</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.33c</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">3.29ab</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.78bc</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.68bc</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.22a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2.6b</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2.74b</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">W3N1</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.52d</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.19d</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2.88d</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.82bc</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.57d</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.01a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2.25d</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2.4de</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">W3N2</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.75b</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.41b</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">3.14bc</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2.00a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.76b</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.19a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2.56c</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2.69c</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">W3N3</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.68c</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.30c</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2.99cd</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.89ab</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.65c</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.1a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2.25d</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2.41d</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">CK</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.20g</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.79f</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2.46f</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.56d</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.14f</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.55b</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.95h</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2.10h</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">W</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">**</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">**</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">**</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">**</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">**</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">**</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">**</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">**</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">N</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">**</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">**</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">**</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">**</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">**</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">**</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">**</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">**</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">W&#xd7;N</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">**</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">**</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">ns</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">ns</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">**</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">ns</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">**</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">**</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_3_4">
<label>3.3.4</label>
<title>Distribution ratio of nutrient content in different organs of potato plants</title>
<p>The distribution ratios of organic carbon content in various organs of potato plants in 2022 are shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f10"><bold>Figure&#xa0;10a</bold></xref>. Under water-nitrogen regulation in 2022, the organic carbon content in potato stems and roots was greater than that in leaves and tubers. In the W1N1, W1N2, W1N3, W2N1, W2N2, and W2N3 treatments, the organic carbon content followed the order: stem &gt; root &gt; leaf &gt; tuber. In the W3N1, W3N2, and W3N3 treatments, the order was root &gt; stem &gt; leaf &gt; tuber. In 2023, the W1N1 and W3N3 treatments showed organic carbon content in the order: leaf &gt; root &gt; tuber &gt; stem, while the W1N2, W1N3, W2N1, W2N2, W2N3, W3N1, and W3N2 treatments followed root &gt; leaf &gt; tuber &gt; stem. This indicates that water-nitrogen interaction can improve the organic carbon content distribution among potato plant organs.</p>
<fig id="f10" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;10</label>
<caption>
<p><bold>(a&#x2013;f)</bold> Distribution ratios of nutrient content in different organs of potato plants.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-16-1729301-g010.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Bar charts showing the distribution of carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus allocation to plant parts in 2022 and 2023 across different treatments. The bars represent proportions for stem, leaf, root, and tubers, with varying allocations for each element and treatment. Each treatment includes data for both years, illustrating how resource distribution changes. The charts are labeled (a) to (f) for different measurements, with each bar segmented by element contribution percentages in the plants.</alt-text>
</graphic></fig>
<p>The distribution ratios of total nitrogen content in various organs of potato plants are shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f10"><bold>Figure&#xa0;10b</bold></xref>. Under water-nitrogen interaction in 2022, stem total nitrogen accounted for 13%~16% of the total, leaf total nitrogen for 39%~47%, root total nitrogen for 19%~24%, and tuber total nitrogen for 18%~22%, with leaves exhibiting the highest total nitrogen content. Under water-nitrogen regulation, the W1N1, W1N2, and W1N3 treatments showed total nitrogen content in the order: leaf &gt; tuber &gt; root &gt; stem, while the W2N1, W2N2, W2N3, W3N1, W3N2, and W3N3 treatments followed leaf &gt; root &gt; tuber &gt; stem. In 2023, stem total nitrogen accounted for 13%~18%, leaf total nitrogen for 39%~45%, root total nitrogen for 21%~25%, and tuber total nitrogen for 17%~22%, with leaves and tubers showing the highest total nitrogen content. Under water-nitrogen regulation, all treatments exhibited total nitrogen content in the order: leaf &gt; root &gt; tuber &gt; stem. This indicates that water-nitrogen interaction can improve total nitrogen content distribution among potato plant organs.</p>
<p>The distribution ratios of total phosphorus content in various organs of potato plants are shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f10"><bold>Figure&#xa0;10c</bold></xref>. Under water-nitrogen interaction in 2022, stem total phosphorus accounted for 18%~20%, leaf total phosphorus for 34%~36%, root total phosphorus for 17%~20%, and tuber total phosphorus for 25%~30%, with leaves exhibiting the highest total phosphorus content. Under water-nitrogen regulation, the W1N1, W2N1, W2N2, W2N3, W3N1, W3N2, and W3N3 treatments showed total phosphorus content in the order: leaf &gt; tuber &gt; stem &gt; root, while the W1N2 and W1N3 treatments followed leaf &gt; tuber &gt; root &gt; stem. In 2023, stem total phosphorus accounted for 16%~20%, leaf total phosphorus for 27%~31%, root total phosphorus for 11%~18%, and tuber total phosphorus for 35%~42%, with leaves exhibiting the highest total phosphorus content. Under water-nitrogen regulation, all treatments exhibited total phosphorus content in the order: tuber &gt; leaf &gt; stem &gt; root. This indicates that water-nitrogen interaction can improve total phosphorus content distribution among potato plant organs.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_4">
<label>3.4</label>
<title>Effects of water-nitrogen interaction on stoichiometric characteristics of potato plants</title>
<sec id="s3_4_1">
<label>3.4.1</label>
<title>Carbon-nitrogen stoichiometric ratios in different potato plant parts</title>
<p>The C:N stoichiometric ratios of different parts of potato plants under various water-nitrogen interaction treatments are shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="T5"><bold>Table&#xa0;5</bold></xref>. The variation trends over the two-year experimental period were generally consistent. Under the same irrigation quota, the C:N ratio of stems showed an initial decrease followed by an increase with increasing nitrogen application. Under the same nitrogen application rate, the C:N ratio exhibited an initial decrease then increase with increasing irrigation quota. Compared to the CK treatment, the W1N1 treatment increased by 3.58%, while the W1N2, W1N3, W2N1, W2N2, W2N3, W3N1, W3N2, and W3N3 treatments decreased by 22.02%, 4.27%, 11.62%, 32.03%, 28.44%, 13.02%, 18.59%, and 18.65%, respectively. The C:N ratios of leaves in the W1N1, W1N2, W1N3, W2N1, W2N2, W2N3, W3N1, W3N2, and W3N3 treatments decreased by 6.03%, 22.21%, 14.50%, 10.69%, 28.86%, 27.31%, 9.29%, 16.45%, and 10.97%, respectively, compared to CK. The C:N ratios of roots in the W1N1, W1N2, W1N3, W2N1, W2N2, W2N3, W3N1, W3N2, and W3N3 treatments increased by 65.84%, 61.48%, 68.56%, 17.53%, 25.89%, 47.33%, 55.66%, 51.66%, and 35.82%, respectively, compared to CK. The C:N ratios of tubers in the W1N1, W1N2, W1N3, W2N1, W2N2, W2N3, W3N1, W3N2, and W3N3 treatments increased by 21.00%, 12.04%, 23.05%, 13.48%, 5.03%, 12.29%, 3.54%, 41.68%, respectively, compared to CK, while the W2N2 treatment decreased by 10.03%.</p>
<table-wrap id="T5" position="float">
<label>Table&#xa0;5</label>
<caption>
<p>Carbon-nitrogen stoichiometric ratios in different parts of potato plants.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" rowspan="2" align="center">Treatment</th>
<th valign="middle" colspan="2" align="center">Stem</th>
<th valign="middle" colspan="2" align="center">Leaf</th>
<th valign="middle" colspan="2" align="center">Root</th>
<th valign="middle" colspan="2" align="center">Tubers</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" align="center">2022</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">2023</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">2022</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">2023</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">2022</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">2023</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">2022</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">2023</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">W1N1</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">41.56a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">36.24a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">13.5bc</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">13.92ab</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">34.05a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">23.03cd</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">30.57ab</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">25.63a</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">W1N2</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">32.47bc</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">26.1e</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">10.59d</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">12.11c</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">27.34b</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">21.87d</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">24.14a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">21.4b</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">W1N3</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">40.06a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">31.84bc</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">11.98cd</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">12.97bc</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">32.04a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">27.11ab</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">26.81abcd</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">23.98b</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">W2N1</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">31.28bcd</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">35.1ab</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">15.37a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">10.69d</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">21.85cd</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">24.8bc</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">30.51cd</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">26.04d</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">W2N2</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">26.85e</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">24.2e</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">10.33d</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">10.43d</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">19.36d</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">17.78e</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">19.87e</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">18.23e</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">W2N3</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">29.34de</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">24.41e</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">10.52d</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">10.69d</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">22.98c</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">23.09cd</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">20.65d</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">18.77cd</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">W3N1</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">30.81cd</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">34.52abc</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">14.48ab</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">11.99c</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">23.42c</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">26.7ab</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">28.87abc</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">24.46b</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">W3N2</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">33.73b</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">27.42de</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">11.16d</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">13.22bc</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">21.78cd</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">29.07a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">21.59bcd</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">19.36bc</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">W3N3</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">30.22cd</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">30.88cd</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">11.43d</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">14.55a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">22.72cd</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">29.36a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">25.91abcd</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">22.88b</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">CK</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">39.92a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">35.19ab</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">14.39a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">14.79a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">33.72a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">23.08cd</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">42.95a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">34.94a</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">W</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">**</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">*</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">ns</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">**</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">**</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">**</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">**</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">**</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">N</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">**</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">**</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">**</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">ns</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">**</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">**</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">**</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">**</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">W&#xd7;N</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">**</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">*</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">ns</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">*</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">ns</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">**</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">*</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">**</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_4_2">
<label>3.4.2</label>
<title>Carbon-phosphorus stoichiometric ratios in different potato plant parts</title>
<p>The carbon and nitrogen stoichiometric ratios in various parts of potato plants under different water-nitrogen interaction treatments are shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="T6"><bold>Table&#xa0;6</bold></xref>. The variation trends over the two-year experimental period were generally consistent. The C:P ratios of stems in the W1N1, W1N2, W1N3, W2N1, W2N2, W2N3, W3N1, W3N2, and W3N3 treatments decreased by 5.25%, 10.98%, 19.05%, 26.35%, 39.96%, 29.54%, 20.54%, 30.90%, and 23.42%, respectively, compared to the CK treatment. The C:P ratios of leaves in the W1N1, W1N3, W3N1, W3N2, and W3N3 treatments increased by 3.07%, 2.31%, 4.44%, 3.73%, and 14.02%, respectively, while the W1N2, W2N1, W2N2, and W2N3 treatments decreased by 3.91%, 4.54%, 14.72%, and 5.22%, compared to CK. The C:P ratios of roots in the W1N1, W1N2, W1N3, W2N1, W2N2, W2N3, W3N1, W3N2, and W3N3 treatments increased by 140.05%, 141.37%, 105.65%, 76.70%, 93.44%, 121.18%, 124.63%, 128.56%, and 164.79%, respectively, compared to CK. The C:P ratios of tubers in the W1N1, W1N2, W1N3, W2N1, W2N2, W2N3, W3N1, W3N2, and W3N3 treatments increased by 80.93%, 83.39%, 89.81%, 77.07%, 63.54%, 71.35%, 72.47%, 80.92%, and 96.79%, respectively, compared to CK.</p>
<table-wrap id="T6" position="float">
<label>Table&#xa0;6</label>
<caption>
<p>Carbon: Phosphorus (C:P) stoichiometric ratios in different tissues of potato plants.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" rowspan="2" align="center">Treatment</th>
<th valign="middle" colspan="2" align="center">Stem</th>
<th valign="middle" colspan="2" align="center">Leaf</th>
<th valign="middle" colspan="2" align="center">Root</th>
<th valign="middle" colspan="2" align="center">Tubers</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" align="center">2022</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">2023</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">2022</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">2023</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">2022</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">2023</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">2022</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">2023</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">W1N1</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">283.18a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">332.67a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">124.25a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">205.04bcd</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">259.49ab</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">520.99a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">147.77ab</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">140.91abc</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">W1N2</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">276.78ab</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">301.8ab</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">123.02ab</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">183.97e</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">262.67a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">396.44b</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">138.23ab</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">131.14abc</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">W1N3</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">266.79ab</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">259.35cd</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">126.52a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">200.34cd</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">249.98abcd</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">396.87b</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">150.08ab</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">144.47ab</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">W2N1</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">208.06cd</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">270.63bc</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">111.29abc</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">193.69de</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">229.44cd</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">311.95d</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">151.43ab</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">142.51abc</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">W2N2</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">191.18d</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">199.08e</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">102.83c</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">169.6f</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">197.52e</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">253.4e</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">127.55b</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">121.52c</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">W2N3</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">212.7cd</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">245.26cd</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">108.44bc</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">194.34de</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">224.97d</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">331.05cd</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">129.77b</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">124.55bc</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">W3N1</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">244.05bc</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">272.41bc</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">124.78a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">208.88bc</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">255.82abc</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">379.4b</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">142.38ab</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">134.36abc</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">W3N2</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">213.59cd</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">235.55d</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">115.86abc</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">215.54b</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">230.07bcd</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">357.97bc</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">129.22b</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">123.48bc</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">W3N3</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">225.65cd</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">272.1bc</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">120.9ab</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">243.37a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">253.7abcd</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">394.46b</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">158.28a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">149.67a</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">CK</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">288.55a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">361.42a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">118.36ab</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">201.11cd</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">273.25a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">469.84a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">154.15a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">145.07a</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">W</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">**</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">**</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">**</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">**</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">**</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">**</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">ns</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">ns</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">N</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">ns</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">**</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">ns</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">**</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">*</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">**</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">*</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">*</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">W&#xd7;N</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">ns</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">**</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">ns</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">**</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">ns</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">**</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">ns</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">ns</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_4_3">
<label>3.4.3</label>
<title>Nitrogen: phosphorus stoichiometric ratios in different tissues of potato plants</title>
<p>Under different water-nitrogen interaction treatments, the carbon-nitrogen stoichiometric ratios of various parts of potato plants are shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="T7"><bold>Table&#xa0;7</bold></xref>. The carbon-nitrogen stoichiometric ratio of potato stems in treatments W1N1, W1N3, W2N1, W2N2, W2N3, W3N1, W3N2, and W3N3 changed by 8.97%, 15.44%, 18.27%, 12.77%, 1.70%, 10.16%, 15.04%, and 7.21% compared to the CK treatment, respectively, while the W1N2 treatment changed by 14.07% compared to CK. The carbon-nitrogen stoichiometric ratio of potato leaves in treatments W1N1, W1N2, W1N3, W2N1, W2N2, W2N3, W3N1, W3N2, and W3N3 increased by 9.52%, 22.75%, 19.04%, 16.16%, 20.05%, 30.48%, 19.31%, 22.20%, and 25.13% compared to the CK treatment, respectively. The carbon-nitrogen stoichiometric ratio of potato roots in treatments W1N1, W1N2, W1N3, W2N1, W2N2, W2N3, W3N1, W3N2, and W3N3 increased by 218.02%, 199.75%, 151.48%, 205.43%, 203.09%, 196.30%, 187.04%, 196.17%, and 289.51% compared to the CK treatment, respectively. The carbon-nitrogen stoichiometric ratio of potato tubers in treatments W1N1, W1N2, W1N3, W2N1, W2N2, W2N3, W3N1, W3N2, and W3N3 increased by 205.87%, 227.93%, 208.94%, 224.86%, 264.53%, 228.77%, 215.92%, 249.72%, and 186.31% compared to the CK treatment, respectively.</p>
<table-wrap id="T7" position="float">
<label>Table&#xa0;7</label>
<caption>
<p>Nitrogen: Phosphorus (N:P) stoichiometric ratios in different tissues of potato plants.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" rowspan="2" align="center">Treatment</th>
<th valign="middle" colspan="2" align="center">Stem</th>
<th valign="middle" colspan="2" align="center">Leaf</th>
<th valign="middle" colspan="2" align="center">Root</th>
<th valign="middle" colspan="2" align="center">Tubers</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" align="center">2022</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">2023</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">2022</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">2023</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">2022</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">2023</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">2022</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">2023</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">W1N1</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">6.85bc</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">9.19c</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">9.2d</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">14.73e</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">7.62e</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">22.67a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">4.83e</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">5.49d</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">W1N2</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">8.54a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">11.56a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">11.62a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">15.2de</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">9.62d</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">18.14b</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">5.72d</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">6.12bc</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">W1N3</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">6.76bc</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">8.14e</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">10.56b</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">15.45d</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">7.8e</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">14.66c</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">5.59d</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">6.02c</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">W2N1</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">6.69bc</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">7.71f</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">7.24f</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">18.14a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">10.49b</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">12.57e</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">4.96e</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">5.47d</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">W2N2</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">7.14bc</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">8.23e</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">9.96c</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">16.27c</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">10.2c</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">14.25c</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">6.42a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">6.67a</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">W2N3</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">7.28abc</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">10.04b</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">10.31b</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">18.2a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">9.79d</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">14.35c</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">6.28ab</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">6.63a</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">W3N1</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">7.93ab</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">7.9f</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">8.63e</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">17.44b</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">10.94a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">14.21c</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">4.93e</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">5.49d</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">W3N2</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">6.39c</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">8.58d</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">10.39b</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">16.31c</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">10.56b</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">12.31e</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">5.98c</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">6.38ab</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">W3N3</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">7.54abc</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">8.81d</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">10.6b</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">16.74c</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">11.18a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">13.43d</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">6.1bc</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">6.54a</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">CK</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">7.35abc</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">10.27b</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">8.24e</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">13.61e</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">8.1e</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">20.37a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">3.58f</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">4.15d</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">W</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">ns</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">**</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">**</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">**</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">**</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">**</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">**</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">**</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">N</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">ns</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">**</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">**</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">**</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">**</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">**</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">**</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">**</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">W&#xd7;N</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">**</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">**</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">**</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">**</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">**</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">**</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">**</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">*</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_5">
<label>3.5</label>
<title>Effects of water-nitrogen interaction on potato yield</title>
<p>The interactive effects of water and nitrogen on total potato yield are shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f11"><bold>Figure&#xa0;11</bold></xref>. The variation trends of total potato yield under water-nitrogen regulation were generally consistent across the two experimental years. In 2022, under the same irrigation quota, total yield initially increased and then decreased with increasing nitrogen application rate. Under the same nitrogen application rate, total yield showed increasing trends with higher irrigation quotas for N1 and N3 treatments, while N2 treatment exhibited an initial increase followed by decrease. Compared with CK treatment, W1N1, W1N2, W1N3, W2N1, W2N2, W2N3, W3N1, W3N, and W3N3 increased yields by 9.03%, 36.67%, 19.39%, 40.43%, 64.71%, 48.53%, 49.33%, 62.45%, and 55.90% respectively. In 2023, under W1 treatment, total yield increased continuously with nitrogen application, while W2 and W3 treatments showed an initial increase followed by decrease. Under the same nitrogen application rate, all treatments exhibited an initial increase followed by decrease in total yield with increasing irrigation quota. Compared with CK treatment, W1N1, W1N2, W1N3, W2N1, W2N2, W2N3, W3N1, W3N, and W3N3 increased yields by 11.62%, 17.88%, 28.70%, 49.05%, 65.84%, 54.81%, 46.98%, 56.37%, and 52.62% respectively. Excessive irrigation and nitrogen&#xa0;application were detrimental to yield formation, while water&#xa0;and&#xa0;nitrogen demonstrated synergistic effects in enhancing potato productivity.</p>
<fig id="f11" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;11</label>
<caption>
<p>Effects of water-nitrogen interaction on potato yield.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-16-1729301-g011.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Bar charts show potato yield in kilograms per hectare for different treatments from 2022 to 2023. Treatments W1, W2, and W3 have varying yields under four conditions: N1, N2, N3, and CK. The 2023 yields are generally higher. Statistical significance is indicated with letters above bars and asterisks for wage (W) and nitrogen (N) factors.</alt-text>
</graphic></fig>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_6">
<label>3.6</label>
<title>Correlation between potato yield and key indicators under water-nitrogen interaction and optimization of water-nitrogen regimes</title>
<p>The physiological ecosystem of plant leaves exhibits significant spatial variability, and it is difficult for a single process of changes in potato physiological indicators and plant nutrients to reflect the scientific nature of potato growth. To further clarify the regulatory mechanism of water-nitrogen interaction on the photosynthetic stoichiometric balance of potatoes and the relationship between potato yield and various indicators, a Mantel test analysis was conducted on each potato indicator and potato yield (Y) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f12"><bold>Figure&#xa0;12</bold></xref>). Since the potato tuber growth stage is the most critical period for yield formation, the correlation analysis was performed using the average values of the potato tuber growth stage. As shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f12"><bold>Figure&#xa0;12a</bold></xref>, the results of Mantel test analysis on soil indicators and potato yield in 2022 indicated that the overlap between SPAD index and potato yield was poor (Mantel r&lt; 0.4), suggesting that the SPAD index had little impact on yield. Other indicators showed good overlap with potato yield (<italic>Mantel r &#x2265;</italic> 0.4) and had a strong correlation with potato yield (Mantel P &#x2264; 0.05), indicating that Tr, Pn, Gs, Ci, PSN, PLN, PRN, PTN, PSP, PLP, PRP, PTP, PSC, PLC, PRC, and PTC all had significant impacts on potato yield. As can be seen from <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f12"><bold>Figure&#xa0;12b</bold></xref>, in 2023, the overlap between potato leaf SPAD, PRN, PLC indicators and potato yield was poor (<italic>Mantel r&lt;</italic> 0.2), implying that SPAD, PRN, and PLC had little influence on potato yield. Except for soil Tr, PSN, and PTP, which had a weak correlation with potato yield (Mantel P&lt; 0.05), other soil indicators showed a strong correlation with potato yield (Mantel P &#x2264; 0.05). There were correlations among various indicators of potato plants (except SPAD), indicating that there was a promoting effect between the physiological indicators of the plant. Therefore, Pearson correlation analysis clarified that there were strong correlations among various soil indicators under water-nitrogen interaction, and also illuminated the correlations among SPAD, leaf photosynthesis, and plant nutrients, providing a reference for clarifying the regulatory mechanism of water-nitrogen interaction on the photosynthetic stoichiometric balance of potatoes.</p>
<fig id="f12" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;12</label>
<caption>
<p>Correlation between potato yield and various indicators. *P &lt; 0.05, **P &lt; 0.01, ***P &lt; 0.001.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-16-1729301-g012.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Two side-by-side triangular matrices for 2022 and 2023 show Pearson's r values for various variables like SPAD, Tr, Pn, etc. Cells are color-coded, with red indicating stronger correlations. Mantel's p-value significance is visualized with lines: pink for less than 0.01, green for 0.01 to 0.05, and grey for greater than or equal to 0.05. Mantel's r is represented with different line thicknesses, and a color legend for Pearson&#x2019;s r is included.</alt-text>
</graphic></fig>
<p>Random forest modeling predicted crop yield using SPAD, Tr, Pn, Gs, Ci, PSN, PLN, PRN, PTN, PSP, PLP, PRP, PTP, PSC, PLC, PRC, and PTC (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f13"><bold>Figure&#xa0;13</bold></xref>). The 2022 model (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f13"><bold>Figure&#xa0;13a</bold></xref>) identified PTP, PRN, PLC, PRP, and Tr as key yield determinants, while the 2023 model (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f13"><bold>Figure&#xa0;13b</bold></xref>) highlighted PRP, PLN, PSP, PSC, PTC, PTP, and PRC as major influencing factors.</p>
<fig id="f13" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;13</label>
<caption>
<p><bold>(a, b)</bold> Relative importance of various indicators on potato yield predicted by random forest model.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-16-1729301-g013.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Two horizontal bar charts, labeled (a) 2022 and (b) 2023, show &#x201c;%IncMSE&#x201d; for various factors. Bars are colored to indicate significance, with pink for non-significant and orange for significant. The top factors in both charts are significant. 2022's top factor is PTP, while 2023's is PRP. Both charts include p-values and R-squared values, with similar p-values of 0.0101 and R-squared values near 0.9128 for 2022 and 0.9238 for 2023.</alt-text>
</graphic></fig>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_7">
<label>3.7</label>
<title>Evaluation and optimization of water-nitrogen regimes based on binary quadratic regression model and TOPSIS model</title>
<p>Taking yield (Y) as the target dependent variable, with irrigation quota and nitrogen application rate as dependent variables, and irrigation water amount (W) and pure nitrogen application rate (N) as independent variables, regression analysis was performed on the data to establish a binary quadratic regression equation model (retaining three decimal places). In the 2022 experiment, the model formula for irrigation quota, nitrogen application rate, and yield was Y2022 = -128779.309&#xa0;+&#xa0;82.698W&#xa0;+&#xa0;1174.116N - 0.019W&#xb2; - 3.569N&#xb2; - 0.017W&#xb7;N, with R&#xb2;=0.9788 and P&#xa0;=&#xa0;0.0001. In the 2023 experiment, the model formula was Y2023 = -143778.716&#xa0;+&#xa0;155.395W&#xa0;+&#xa0;595.990N - 0.037W&#xb2; - 1.432N&#xb2; - 0.059W&#xb7;N, with R&#xb2;=0.9650 and P&#xa0;=&#xa0;0.0001. The R&#xb2; values were all greater than 0.85, and predicted values showed significant correlation with measured values, indicating that the established models could effectively predict the interactive effects of water and nitrogen on yield. As shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f14"><bold>Figure&#xa0;14</bold></xref>, the irrigation amount and nitrogen application rate at maximum yield were 2107.84 m<sup>3</sup> ha<sup>-1</sup> and 159.93&#xa0;kg ha<sup>-1</sup> in 2022, and 1966.25 m<sup>3</sup> ha<sup>-1</sup> and 167.86&#xa0;kg ha<sup>-1</sup> in 2023. Comprehensive analysis recommended the W2 and W3 irrigation treatments and N2 nitrogen application treatment.</p>
<fig id="f14" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;14</label>
<caption>
<p><bold>(a, b)</bold> Relationship between irrigation quota, nitrogen application rate, and yield.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-16-1729301-g014.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Two 3D surface plots comparing agricultural yield based on irrigation and nitrogen application for the years 2022 and 2023. The left plot shows 2022 data, with yield ranging from 31,800 to 52,300 kg per hectare. The right plot depicts 2023 data, with yield ranging from 42,500 to 59,050 kg per hectare. Yield values increase with higher irrigation quotas and nitrogen application. Both plots have color gradients, transitioning from yellow to blue, to represent varying yield levels.</alt-text>
</graphic></fig>
<p>To further optimize the water-nitrogen regime, the TOPSIS model was employed using 18 indicators including yield, <italic>SPAD</italic>, <italic>Tr</italic>, <italic>Pn</italic>, <italic>Gs</italic>, <italic>Ci</italic>, <italic>PSN</italic>, <italic>PLN</italic>, <italic>PRN</italic>, <italic>PTN</italic>, <italic>PSP</italic>, <italic>PLP</italic>, <italic>PRP</italic>, <italic>PTP</italic>, <italic>PSC</italic>, <italic>PLC</italic>, <italic>PRC</italic>, and <italic>PTC</italic> to select the most efficient irrigation and nitrogen fertilization scheme for potatoes. <xref ref-type="table" rid="T8"><bold>Table&#xa0;8</bold></xref> presents the score ranking table for each treatment. Analysis revealed that the W2N2 treatment achieved the highest total score, while the CK treatment had the lowest score. Under the experimental conditions, the W2N2 treatment is recommended as the optimal water-nitrogen coupling pattern for potato cultivation in the central arid zone of Ningxia.</p>
<table-wrap id="T8" position="float">
<label>Table&#xa0;8</label>
<caption>
<p>Statistical data of TOPSIS evaluation indicators.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Year</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Treatments</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">D<sup>+</sup></th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">D<sup>-</sup></th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Ci*</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Rank</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Year</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Treatments</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">D<sup>+</sup></th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">D<sup>-</sup></th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Ci*</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Rank</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" rowspan="10" align="center">2022</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">W1N1</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.6273</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.1809</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.2238</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">9</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2023</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">W1N1</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.6501</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.1404</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.1776</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">9</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">W1N2</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.3806</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.4528</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.5433</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">6</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center"/>
<td valign="middle" align="center">W1N2</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.4383</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.3551</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.4476</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">7</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">W1N3</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.4697</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.3463</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.4243</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">8</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center"/>
<td valign="middle" align="center">W1N3</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.4837</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.3017</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.3841</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">8</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">W2N1</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.3723</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.4159</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.5277</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">7</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center"/>
<td valign="middle" align="center">W2N1</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.4055</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.4095</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.5024</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">5</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">W2N2</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.047</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.7527</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.9412</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center"/>
<td valign="middle" align="center">W2N2</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.1199</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.7415</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.8608</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">W2N3</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.2149</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.5842</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.7311</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">3</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center"/>
<td valign="middle" align="center">W2N3</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.2257</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.5811</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.7202</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">W3N1</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.3517</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.4662</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.57</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">5</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center"/>
<td valign="middle" align="center">W3N1</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.4194</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.395</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.485</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">6</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">W3N2</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.1286</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.6574</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.8364</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center"/>
<td valign="middle" align="center">W3N2</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.2405</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.5706</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.7035</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">3</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">W3N3</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.2705</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.5234</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.6593</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">4</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center"/>
<td valign="middle" align="center">W3N3</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.3577</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.4661</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.5658</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">4</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">CK</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.756</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.0348</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.044</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">10</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center"/>
<td valign="middle" align="center">CK</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.7605</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.0725</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.0871</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">10</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s4" sec-type="discussion">
<label>4</label>
<title>Discussion</title>
<sec id="s4_1">
<label>4.1</label>
<title>Effects of water-nitrogen interaction on gas exchange parameters in potato leaves</title>
<p>A reasonable irrigation system helps maintain soil moisture balance (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">Xu et&#xa0;al., 2017</xref>). In this study, the W2N2 treatment showed the highest relative chlorophyll content, with an average increase of 2.87% compared to the CK treatment at all growth stages over the two-year experiment. This indicates that appropriate water and nitrogen management can increase the SPAD value (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Ma et&#xa0;al., 2023</xref>) and maintain a relatively high chlorophyll content. When nitrogen supply is sufficient, the synthesis of chlorophyll in leaves increases, and the SPAD value rises accordingly. Transpiration in potato leaves is a process where water diffuses into the atmosphere in gaseous form. Through transpiration, plants lose over 97% of the water they absorb, highlighting the vital significance of water for plant life activities (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">Chaves et&#xa0;al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Griffani et&#xa0;al., 2024</xref>). The study found that under water-nitrogen interaction, the W2N2 treatment was significantly higher than other treatments, with an average increase of 228.49% compared to the CK treatment at all growth stages over the two years. This indicates that water-nitrogen interaction can enhance the absorption and transport of water by potato leaves and regulate the transpiration rate of potato leaves. Different water treatments affect the water status of potato plants, thereby influencing the absorption and transport of water by plants as well as the leaf transpiration rate (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">Zhang et&#xa0;al., 2018</xref>). Increased nitrogen application leads to increased biomass accumulation and excessive canopy leaf area, resulting in excessive increases in transpiration and water loss, and ultimately excessive consumption of soil moisture (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">Wang et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>). The net photosynthetic rate of potato leaves plays a crucial role in plant organic matter accumulation, water regulation, and nutrient distribution, serving as a key physiological indicator of plants (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">Zahoor et&#xa0;al., 2017</xref>). Under water-nitrogen interaction, the W2N2 treatment showed a significantly higher net photosynthetic rate than other treatments, with an average increase of 150.09% compared to the CK treatment across all growth stages over the two years. This indicates that an appropriate supply of water and nitrogen can maintain the normal metabolic activities of leaf cells, ensuring the smooth progress of photosynthesis. Stomatal conductance of potato leaves refers to the degree of stomatal opening, which is a key factor affecting potato photosynthesis, respiration, and transpiration (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">Damour et&#xa0;al., 2010</xref>). Under water-nitrogen interaction, the leaf stomatal conductance of the W2N2 treatment was significantly higher than that of other treatments, with an average increase of 186.49% compared to the CK treatment across all growth stages over the two years. This indicates that when water is sufficient, the stomata of potato leaves usually remain relatively open, facilitating gas exchange. Nitrogen supply can promote the growth and development of potato leaves, increasing the number of stomata and their opening degree; however, either excessive or insufficient nitrogen may have adverse effects on stomatal conductance (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">Querejeta et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>). The intercellular CO<sub>2</sub> concentration in potato leaves refers to the concentration of carbon dioxide within the leaf, which is essential for photosynthesis as potatoes absorb CO<sub>2</sub> to drive this process&#x2014;directly influencing the rate and efficiency of photosynthesis, and thereby affecting potato growth and development (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">Shah et&#xa0;al., 2017</xref>). Under water-nitrogen interaction, the W2N2 treatment showed a significantly higher intercellular CO<sub>2</sub> concentration than other treatments, with an average increase of 63.09% compared to the CK treatment across all growth stages over the two years. When water and nitrogen supplies are sufficient, potato leaf stomata remain open, facilitating CO<sub>2</sub> entry into leaf cells, which in turn. The ratio of photosynthetic rate to transpiration rate provides insight into the water use efficiency (WUE) of potato leaves. This study revealed that WUE reflects the efficiency with which leaves utilize water during photosynthesis: higher WUE indicates stronger growth capacity of potatoes in arid regions. Thus, water-nitrogen interaction can regulate the WUE of potato leaves, thereby promoting potato growth (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">Wang et&#xa0;al., 2018</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s4_2">
<label>4.2</label>
<title>Effects of water-nitrogen interaction on plant nutrient stoichiometry and yield</title>
<p>The content, accumulation, and distribution of carbon (C), nitrogen (N), and phosphorus (P) in different organs are constrained by growth conditions and their own structural characteristics (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Sanchez-Bragado et&#xa0;al., 2017</xref>). The concentrations and ratios of C, N, and P in plants are important indicators of ecological processes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">Liu and Lu, 2024</xref>). Nitrogen (N) uptake is regulated by water availability. Water deficiency can limit crop nitrogen response by reducing nitrogen uptake and utilization. The complex and multi-faceted interactions between water supply and crop nitrogen response make it difficult to predict and quantify the impact of water deficiency on crop nitrogen status (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B44">Zhao et&#xa0;al., 2024</xref>a). This study found that water-nitrogen interaction significantly affects the uptake and distribution of C, N, and P nutrients in potato plants. The level of nitrogen supply directly&#xa0;affects carbon metabolism: appropriate nitrogen application&#xa0;(N2&#xa0;treatment) enhances photosynthesis by promoting chlorophyll&#xa0;synthesis, thereby improving leaf carbon assimilation capacity.&#xa0;However, excessive nitrogen application (N3 treatment) stimulates excessive growth of aboveground parts, leading to over-distribution of photosynthates to stems and leaves and a reduction in carbon accumulation in tubers. Phosphorus uptake is greatly affected by water conditions. Increasing phosphorus application during the tuber expansion stage can improve nutrient use efficiency, and optimizing the nitrogen-phosphorus ratio can promote plant growth (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Rosell et&#xa0;al., 2023</xref>). The interactive effect of nitrogen and water is obvious: under drought conditions, high nitrogen levels will exacerbate the imbalance of carbon and nitrogen metabolism, while appropriate irrigation (W2) can alleviate nitrogen stress and promote the transport of nitrogen and phosphorus to tubers. Water-nitrogen interaction significantly affects the accumulation of organic carbon in potato plants by altering the efficiency of photosynthetic carbon assimilation and distribution. Among all water-nitrogen interaction treatments, the W2N2 treatment showed the highest organic carbon accumulation. Reasonable water and nitrogen combination can optimize carbon metabolism pathways, increase the activity of starch synthesis-related enzymes, and improve the carbon conversion efficiency in tubers.</p>
<p>The synergistic effect of water and nitrogen affects the distribution of organic carbon by regulating plant metabolic processes. In 2022, the proportion of organic carbon in stems and roots was relatively high, which may be related to the enhanced supply of water and nitrogen promoting the transport of photosynthates to structural organs (stems and roots). In 2023, however, the increased proportion of organic carbon in leaves and roots reflects the improvement of photosynthetic carbon assimilation efficiency and the enhancement of root carbon storage capacity after water and nitrogen optimization. The characteristic that total nitrogen distribution is dominated by leaves is consistent with the function of leaves as the core organ of nitrogen metabolism. The interaction of water and nitrogen promotes the preferential enrichment of nitrogen in metabolically active leaves by affecting the pathways of nitrate absorption, reduction, and amino acid synthesis (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">Wang et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>). The lowest proportion of nitrogen in stems is related to their lower nitrogen demand. The dynamic distribution of total phosphorus is closely related to the energy metabolism demand driven by water and nitrogen. The differences in the proportions of phosphorus in roots and stems among different treatments suggest that there is&#xa0;a&#xa0;threshold effect of water status on the radial transport of phosphorus.</p>
<p>The stoichiometry of carbon (C), nitrogen (N), and phosphorus (P) (C:N:P) in leaves, stems, and roots reflects the trade-offs between plant resource acquisition and their growth strategies (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">Yin et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>). The water-nitrogen interaction drives nutrient allocation and metabolic coordination among organs by regulating the stoichiometric characteristics of C, N, and P (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B45">Zheng et&#xa0;al., 2023</xref>). The water-nitrogen ratio in the W2N2 treatment can maximize metabolic efficiency and yield formation, providing a theoretical basis for precise water and nitrogen management in potato production. The carbon-nitrogen ratio in stems decreased by 5.25% to 39.96%, indicating that the synergistic effect of water and nitrogen promoted nitrogen enrichment in stems, which may be related to the developmental needs of their vascular tissues and the improved efficiency of water transport. The relatively high carbon-nitrogen ratio in roots reflects the enhanced carbon deposition in roots under water regulation, while the carbon-nitrogen ratio in tubers ranged from 77.07% to 96.79%, suggesting that moderate water restriction combined with high nitrogen supply can optimize the reallocation of carbon to tubers. The increased fluctuation in the leaf carbon-nitrogen ratio indicates a dynamic balance between photosynthetic carbon assimilation and nitrogen metabolism. Among all treatments, the leaf carbon-nitrogen ratio in the W3N3 treatment increased significantly, which may be associated with the promotion of chlorophyll synthesis by high nitrogen levels. The nitrogen-phosphorus ratio in tubers was positively correlated with yield (with a 64.71% yield increase in the W2N2 treatment), further illustrating the contribution of efficient nitrogen and phosphorus utilization to yield formation. The water-nitrogen interaction had the most significant impact on potatoes during the tuber formation stage. This period is a critical turning point for nutrient allocation to tubers, and the synergy of water and nitrogen directly affects the number and initial size of tubers by regulating the transport of photosynthates, the enlargement of stolons, and nutrient accumulation. Adequate water can improve nitrogen use efficiency, and reasonable nitrogen supply can enhance water absorption; an imbalance between the two will hinder tuber development, exerting the most prominent restrictive effect on yield formation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Ma et&#xa0;al., 2023</xref>). The nitrogen-phosphorus stoichiometric ratio (N:P) is a key indicator for assessing plant nutrient limitations. For potato leaves, an N:P ratio&lt;14 indicates phosphorus limitation, &gt;16 indicates nitrogen limitation, and a ratio between 14 and 16 indicates nitrogen-phosphorus balance or co-limitation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">G&#xfc;sewell, 2004</xref>). <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B42">Zebarth et&#xa0;al. (2004)</xref> reported that potatoes absorb nitrogen rapidly during the seedling stage, and the leaf N:P ratio is often higher than 16, suggesting a high risk of nitrogen limitation. Phosphorus limitation is rare at the seedling stage unless the soil phosphorus level is extremely low. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">B&#xe9;langer et&#xa0;al. (2002)</xref> found that an increase in the leaf N:P ratio during the maturity stage is a normal phenomenon, but a sustained ratio higher than 16 may indicate excessive nitrogen fertilization.</p>
<p>In potato planting systems, water and nitrogen supply are crucial factors controlling production levels, especially in arid and semi-arid regions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">Badr et&#xa0;al., 2012</xref>). Excessive irrigation and nitrogen application can have negative impacts on the yield and quality of potato tubers; overly high levels of irrigation and nitrogen are not conducive to yield formation. The mutual promotion of water and nitrogen on potato yield is consistent with the results of this study (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">Shrestha et&#xa0;al., 2023</xref>). Yield showed a trend of first increasing and then decreasing with the water and nitrogen gradients, revealing that there exists an optimal threshold for water-nitrogen interaction. The W2N2 treatment achieved an average yield increase of 65.08% over the two years. Optimizing the water and nitrogen regime balances the relationship between photosynthesis-stoichiometry synergy and yield formation. The water-nitrogen interaction (W2N2) can simultaneously realize physiological regulation and yield maximization (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">Wang et&#xa0;al., 2024</xref>), providing both theoretical and practical support for precise water and nitrogen management of potatoes in arid regions.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s5" sec-type="conclusions">
<label>5</label>
<title>Conclusions</title>
<p>Water-nitrogen interaction significantly improved the photosynthetic performance of potatoes. Compared with the control (CK), the W2N2 treatment increased leaf transpiration rate (<italic>Tr</italic>), net photosynthetic rate (<italic>Pn</italic>), and stomatal conductance (<italic>Gs</italic>) by an average of 228.49%, 150.09%, and 186.49%, respectively, with photosynthetic indicators peaking during the tuber formation stage. In terms of nutrient content, the W2N2 treatment increased the total nitrogen content in tubers by an average of 121.91% compared with CK, while the total nitrogen in stems, leaves, and roots increased by 55.61%&#x2013;90.95%. The organic carbon content was the highest in tubers. The water-nitrogen interaction had a significant effect on the leaf transpiration rate of potatoes, with a 63.09% increase in intercellular CO<sub>2</sub> concentration (<italic>Ci</italic>) during the tuber formation stage. The W2N2 treatment (irrigation quota: 2107.84&#x2013;1966.25 m<sup>3</sup> ha<sup>-1</sup>; nitrogen application rate: 159.93&#x2013;167.86 kg ha<sup>-1</sup>) achieved the optimal synergy among photosynthesis, carbon-nitrogen metabolism, and yield. Compared with CK, the yield increased by 64.71% in 2022 and 65.84% in 2023.</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<sec id="s6" sec-type="data-availability">
<title>Data availability statement</title>
<p>The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.</p></sec>
<sec id="s7" sec-type="author-contributions">
<title>Author contributions</title>
<p>BD: Conceptualization, Methodology, Project administration, Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing. JY: Conceptualization, Methodology, Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing. YY: Conceptualization, Methodology, Writing &#x2013; original draft. JL: Formal Analysis, Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing. YT: Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing.</p></sec>
<sec id="s9" sec-type="COI-statement">
<title>Conflict of interest</title>
<p>The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.</p></sec>
<sec id="s10" sec-type="ai-statement">
<title>Generative AI statement</title>
<p>The author(s) declare that no Generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.</p>
<p>Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.</p></sec>
<sec id="s11" sec-type="disclaimer">
<title>Publisher&#x2019;s note</title>
<p>All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.</p></sec>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="B1">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Badr</surname> <given-names>M. A.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>El-Tohamy</surname> <given-names>W. A.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Zaghloul</surname> <given-names>A. M.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2012</year>). 
<article-title>Yield and water use efficiency of potato grown under different irrigation and nitrogen levels in an arid region</article-title>. <source>Agric. Water Manage.</source> <volume>110</volume>, <fpage>9</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>15</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.agwat.2012.03.008</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>B&#xe9;langer</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Walsh</surname> <given-names>J. R.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Richards</surname> <given-names>J. E.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Milburn</surname> <given-names>P. H.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Ziadi</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2002</year>). 
<article-title>Nitrogen fertilization and irrigation affects tuber characteristics of two potato cultivars</article-title>. <source>Am. J. Potato Res.</source> <volume>79</volume>, <fpage>269</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>279</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/BF02986360</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Chang</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>He</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Yu</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2024</year>). 
<article-title>Characterization of carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus stoichiometry of plant leaves in the riparian zone of dahuofang reservoir</article-title>. <source>Ecol. Evol.</source> <volume>14</volume>, <elocation-id>e70152</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/ece3.70152</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">39130100</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Chang</surname> <given-names>D. C.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Jin</surname> <given-names>Y. I.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Nam</surname> <given-names>J. H.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Cheon</surname> <given-names>C. G.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Cho</surname> <given-names>J. H.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Kim</surname> <given-names>S. J.</given-names></name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2018</year>). 
<article-title>Early drought effect on canopy development and tuber growth of potato cultivars with different maturities</article-title>. <source>Field Crops Res.</source> <volume>215</volume>, <fpage>156</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>162</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.fcr.2017.10.008</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Chaves</surname> <given-names>M. M.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Costa</surname> <given-names>J. M.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Zarrouk</surname> <given-names>O.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Pinheiro</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Lopes</surname> <given-names>C. M.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Pereira</surname> <given-names>J. S.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2016</year>). 
<article-title>Controlling stomatal aperture in semi-arid regions&#x2014;the dilemma of saving water or being cool</article-title>? <source>Plant Sci.</source> <volume>251</volume>, <fpage>54</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>64</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.plantsci.2016.06.015</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">27593463</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Yu</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Shi</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Jia</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Fan</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2024</year>). 
<article-title>Implementing a soil ammonium n fertilizer management for synchronizing potato n demands</article-title>. <source>Heliyon</source> <volume>10</volume>, <elocation-id>e30456</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e30456</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">38720716</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Damour</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Simonneau</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Cochard</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Urban</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2010</year>). 
<article-title>An overview of models of stomatal conductance at the leaf level</article-title>. <source>Plant Cell Environ</source>. <volume>33</volume>, <fpage>1419</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1438</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1365-3040.2010.02181.x</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20545879</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Fandika</surname> <given-names>I. R.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Kemp</surname> <given-names>P. D.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Millner</surname> <given-names>J. P.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Horne</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Roskruge</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2016</year>). 
<article-title>Irrigation and nitrogen effects on tuber yield and water use efficiency of heritage and modern potato cultivars</article-title>. <source>Agric. Water Manage.</source> <volume>170</volume>, <fpage>148</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>157</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.agwat.2015.10.027</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Fu</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Meacham-Hensold</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Siebers</surname> <given-names>M. H.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Bernacchi</surname> <given-names>C. J.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). 
<article-title>The inverse relationship between solar-induced fluorescence yield and photosynthetic capacity: benefits for field phenotyping</article-title>. <source>J. Exp. Bot.</source> <volume>72</volume>, <fpage>1295</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1306</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/jxb/eraa537</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33340310</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Gao</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Xiao</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Deng</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>LI</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2019</year>). 
<article-title>Spatial variability of soil total nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium in renshou county of sichuan basin, china</article-title>. <source>J. Integr. Agric.</source> <volume>18</volume>, <fpage>279</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>289</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S2095-3119(18)62069-6</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Griffani</surname> <given-names>D. S.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Rognon</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Farquhar</surname> <given-names>G. D.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2024</year>). 
<article-title>The role of thermodiffusion in transpiration</article-title>. <source>New Phytol.</source> <volume>243</volume>, <fpage>1301</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1311</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/nph.19642</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">38453691</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>G&#xfc;sewell</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2004</year>). 
<article-title>N: p ratios in terrestrial plants: variation and functional significance</article-title>. <source>New Phytol.</source> <volume>164</volume>, <fpage>243</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>266</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1469-8137.2004.01192.x</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33873556</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Han</surname> <given-names>W. X.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Fang</surname> <given-names>J. Y.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Reich</surname> <given-names>P. B.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Ian Woodward</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Z. H.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2011</year>). 
<article-title>Biogeography and variability of eleven mineral elements in plant leaves across gradients of climate, soil and plant functional type in China</article-title>. <source>Ecol. Lett.</source> <volume>14</volume>, <fpage>788</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>796</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01641.x</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21692962</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Hao</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Gao</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2017</year>). 
<article-title>Seasonal variation of dom and associated stoichiometry for freshwater ecosystem in the subtropical watershed: indicating the optimal c: n: p ratio</article-title>. <source>Ecol. Indic.</source> <volume>78</volume>, <fpage>37</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>47</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.03.004</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Hong</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Cai</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2022</year>). 
<article-title>Effects of water and nitrogen coupling on watermelon growth, photosynthesis and yield under co2 enrichment</article-title>. <source>Agric. Water Manage.</source> <volume>259</volume>, <elocation-id>107229</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.agwat.2021.107229</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Kang</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Ding</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Gao</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Wen</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2025</year>). 
<article-title>Crop root system phenotyping with high water-use efficiency and its targeted precision regulation: present and prospect</article-title>. <source>Agric. Water Manage.</source> <volume>309</volume>, <elocation-id>109327</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.agwat.2025.109327</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Kifle</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Gebretsadikan</surname> <given-names>T. G.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2016</year>). 
<article-title>Yield and water use efficiency of furrow irrigated potato under regulated deficit irrigation, atsibi-wemberta, north Ethiopia</article-title>. <source>Agric. Water Manage.</source> <volume>170</volume>, <fpage>133</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>139</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.agwat.2016.01.003</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B18">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Lu</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2024</year>). 
<article-title>Leaf&#x2013;soil c:n:p stoichiometry and homeostasis characteristics of plantations in the yellow river floodplain in western shandong, China</article-title>. <source>Forests</source> <volume>15</volume>, <elocation-id>1433</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/f15081433</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B19">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Lombardo</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Pandino</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Mauromicale</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2020</year>). 
<article-title>Optimizing nitrogen fertilization to improve qualitative performances and physiological and yield responses of potato (solanum tuberosum l.)</article-title>. <source>Agronomy</source> <volume>10</volume>, <elocation-id>352</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/agronomy10030352</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B20">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Ma</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Zhu</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2021</year>). 
<article-title>Genome-wide identification, characterization and expression analysis of the cipk gene family in potato (solanum tuberosum l.) And the role of stcipk10 in response to drought and osmotic stress</article-title>. <source>Int. J. Mol. Sci.</source> <volume>22</volume>, <elocation-id>13535</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/ijms222413535</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">34948331</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B21">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Ma</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Yin</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Sun</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2023</year>). 
<article-title>Effect of water and nitrogen coupling regulation on the growth, physiology, yield, and quality attributes and comprehensive evaluation of wolfberry (lycium barbarum l.)</article-title>. <source>Front. Plant Sci.</source> <volume>14</volume>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpls.2023.1130109</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">37416888</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B22">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Olivera Viciedo</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>de Mello Prado</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Mart&#xed;nez</surname> <given-names>C. A.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Habermann</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>de C&#xe1;ssia Piccolo</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2019</year>). 
<article-title>Short-term warming and water stress affect panicum maximum jacq. Stoichiometric homeostasis and biomass production</article-title>. <source>Sci. Total Environ.</source> <volume>681</volume>, <fpage>267</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>274</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.05.108</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31103664</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B23">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Querejeta</surname> <given-names>J. I.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Prieto</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Armas</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Casanoves</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Dieme</surname> <given-names>J. S.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Diouf</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2022</year>). 
<article-title>Higher leaf nitrogen content is linked to tighter stomatal regulation of transpiration and more efficient water use across dryland trees</article-title>. <source>New Phytol.</source> <volume>235</volume>, <fpage>1351</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1364</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/nph.18254</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">35582952</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B24">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Rolando</surname> <given-names>J. L.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Ram&#xed;rez</surname> <given-names>D. A.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Yactayo</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Monneveux</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Quiroz</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2015</year>). 
<article-title>Leaf greenness as a drought tolerance related trait in potato (solanum tuberosum l.)</article-title>. <source>Environ. Exp. Bot.</source> <volume>110</volume>, <fpage>27</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>35</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.envexpbot.2014.09.006</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B25">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Rosell</surname> <given-names>J. A.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Marcati</surname> <given-names>C. R.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Olson</surname> <given-names>M. E.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Lagunes</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Vergilio</surname> <given-names>P. C. B.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Jim&#xe9;nez Vera</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2023</year>). 
<article-title>Inner bark vs sapwood is the main driver of nitrogen and phosphorus allocation in stems and roots across three tropical woody plant communities</article-title>. <source>New Phytol.</source> <volume>239</volume>, <fpage>1665</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1678</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/nph.19085</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">37381089</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B26">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Sanchez-Bragado</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Serret</surname> <given-names>M. D.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Araus</surname> <given-names>J. L.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2017</year>). 
<article-title>The nitrogen contribution of different plant parts to wheat grains: exploring genotype, water, and nitrogen effects</article-title>. <source>Front. Plant Sci.</source> <volume>7</volume>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpls.2016.01986</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28119703</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B27">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Satognon</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Lelei</surname> <given-names>J. J.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Owido</surname> <given-names>S. F. O.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). 
<article-title>Performance of apical rooted cuttings of potato grown in mollic andosols under different nitrogen fertilization and irrigation regimes</article-title>. <source>Heliyon</source> <volume>7</volume>, <fpage>e7999</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07999</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">34585014</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B28">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Shah</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Ullah</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Fahad</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Muhammad</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Yan</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2017</year>). 
<article-title>Deficiency and toxicity of boron: alterations in growth, oxidative damage and uptake by citrange orange plants</article-title>. <source>Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf.</source> <volume>145</volume>, <fpage>575</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>582</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ecoenv.2017.08.003</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28800533</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B29">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Shrestha</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Darapuneni</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Stringam</surname> <given-names>B. L.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Lombard</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Djaman</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2023</year>). 
<article-title>Irrigation water and nitrogen fertilizer management in potato (solanum tuberosum l.): A review</article-title>. <source>Agronomy</source> <volume>13</volume>, <elocation-id>2566</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/agronomy13102566</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B30">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Sun</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Gong</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2014</year>). 
<article-title>Carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus ecological stoichiometry of lateolabrax macultus and acanthogobius ommaturus in the estuary of yangtze river, China</article-title>. <source>Acta Ecologica Sin.</source> <volume>34</volume>, <fpage>196</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>203</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.chnaes.2013.06.009</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B31">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Huang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Fu</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Guo</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Ren</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2020</year>). 
<article-title>Efficient physiological and nutrient use efficiency responses of maize leaves to drought stress under different field nitrogen conditions</article-title>. <source>Agronomy</source> <volume>10</volume>, <elocation-id>523</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/agronomy10040523</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B32">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Tankari</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Gong</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2018</year>). 
<article-title>Stomatal aperture rather than nitrogen nutrition determined water use efficiency of tomato plants under nitrogen fertigation</article-title>. <source>Agric. Water Manage.</source> <volume>209</volume>, <fpage>94</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>101</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.agwat.2018.07.020</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B33">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Jiang</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Xu</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2024</year>). 
<article-title>Organic substitution regime with optimized irrigation improves potato water and nitrogen use efficiency by regulating soil chemical properties rather than microflora structure</article-title>. <source>Field Crops Res.</source> <volume>316</volume>, <elocation-id>109512</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.fcr.2024.109512</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B34">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Wei</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2022</year>). 
<article-title>The active role of metabolic regulators in nitrogen loss reduction and organic nitrogen transformation during different materials composting</article-title>. <source>J. Clean. Prod.</source> <volume>345</volume>, <elocation-id>131134</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131134</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B35">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Xu</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Qu</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Geissen</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Ritsema</surname> <given-names>C. J.</given-names></name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2022</year>). 
<article-title>Impact of nitrogen addition on plant-soil-enzyme c&#x2013;n&#x2013;p stoichiometry and microbial nutrient limitation</article-title>. <source>Soil Biol. Biochem.</source> <volume>170</volume>, <elocation-id>108714</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.soilbio.2022.108714</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B36">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Xu</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Shao</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Tan</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Gu</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2017</year>). 
<article-title>Evaluation of soil water percolation under different irrigation practices, antecedent moisture and groundwater depths in paddy fields</article-title>. <source>Agric. Water Manage.</source> <volume>192</volume>, <fpage>149</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>158</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.agwat.2017.06.002</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B37">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Yan</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Kim</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Han</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Guo</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Han</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Du</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2015</year>). 
<article-title>Effects of nitrogen and phosphorus supply on growth rate, leaf stoichiometry, and nutrient resorption of arabidopsis thaliana</article-title>. <source>Plant Soil</source> <volume>388</volume>, <fpage>147</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>155</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11104-014-2316-1</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B38">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Yin</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Ma</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Wei</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Sun</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2023</year>). 
<article-title>Water and nitrogen regulation effects and system optimization for potato (solanum tuberosum l.) Under film drip irrigation in the dry zone of ningxia China</article-title>. <source>Agronomy</source> <volume>13</volume>, <elocation-id>308</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/agronomy13020308</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B39">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Yin</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Zheng</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Tariq</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Lv</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Zeng</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2021</year>). 
<article-title>Stoichiometry of c:n:p in the roots of alhagi sparsifolia is more sensitive to soil nutrients than aboveground organs</article-title>. <source>Front. Plant Sci.</source> <volume>12</volume>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpls.2021.698961</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">34712247</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B40">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Yun</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Timlin</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Kim</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2020</year>). 
<article-title>Coupled gas-exchange model for c4 leaves comparing stomatal conductance models</article-title>. <source>Plants</source> <volume>9</volume>, <elocation-id>1358</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/plants9101358</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33066493</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B41">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Zahoor</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Dong</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Abid</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2017</year>). 
<article-title>Potassium fertilizer improves drought stress alleviation potential in cotton by enhancing photosynthesis and carbohydrate metabolism</article-title>. <source>Environ. Exp. Bot.</source> <volume>137</volume>, <fpage>73</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>83</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.envexpbot.2017.02.002</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B42">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Zebarth</surname> <given-names>B. J.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Tai</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Tarn</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>de Jong</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Milburn</surname> <given-names>P. H.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2004</year>). 
<article-title>Nitrogen use efficiency characteristics of commercial potato cultivars</article-title>. <source>Can. J. Plant Sci.</source> <volume>84</volume>, <fpage>589</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>598</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4141/P03-050</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B43">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Xu</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Sun</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>LI</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2018</year>). 
<article-title>Influence of drought hardening on the resistance physiology of potato seedlings under drought stress</article-title>. <source>J. Integr. Agric.</source> <volume>17</volume>, <fpage>336</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>347</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S2095-3119(17)61758-1</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B44">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Qin</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Feng</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Qiu</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Qin</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2024</year>). 
<article-title>Water deficit affects the nitrogen nutrition index of winter wheat under controlled water conditions</article-title>. <source>J. Integr. Agric</source>. <volume>24</volume>:<page-range>724&#x2013;738.</page-range> doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jia.2024.08.027</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B45">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Zheng</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Gong</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2023</year>). 
<article-title>Studies on the correlation between &#x3b4;13c and nutrient elements in two desert plants</article-title>. <source>Forests</source> <volume>14</volume>, <elocation-id>2394</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/f14122394</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
<fn-group>
<fn id="n1" fn-type="custom" custom-type="edited-by">
<p>Edited by: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2261215">Shoutian Ma</ext-link>, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, China</p></fn>
<fn id="n2" fn-type="custom" custom-type="reviewed-by">
<p>Reviewed by: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/3255012">Jiang Fuchang</ext-link>, Tarim University, China</p>
<p><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/3256930">Chao Ma</ext-link>, Hebei University of Engineering, China</p></fn>
</fn-group>
</back>
</article>