<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.3 20070202//EN" "journalpublishing.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="2.3" xml:lang="EN">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Front. Plant Sci.</journal-id>
<journal-title>Frontiers in Plant Science</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">Front. Plant Sci.</abbrev-journal-title>
<issn pub-type="epub">1664-462X</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Frontiers Media S.A.</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpls.2025.1661290</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Plant Science</subject>
<subj-group>
<subject>Original Research</subject>
</subj-group>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Effects of foliar-sprayed bio-fertilizer with N-fixing <italic>Methylobacterium symbioticum</italic> on morpho-physiological traits of maize under varying N fertilization rates</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Bolla</surname>
<given-names>Pranay Kumar</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/3155480/overview"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/validation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/methodology/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/formal-analysis/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/visualization/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name>
<surname>Panozzo</surname>
<given-names>Anna</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn001">
<sup>*</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2150074/overview"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/validation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/formal-analysis/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/methodology/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/data-curation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/investigation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Minozzi</surname>
<given-names>Edoardo</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/investigation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/methodology/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Valente</surname>
<given-names>Francesco</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/validation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/methodology/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/visualization/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Potestio</surname>
<given-names>Silvia</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/investigation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/methodology/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Visioli</surname>
<given-names>Giovanna</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/180993/overview"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/methodology/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/investigation/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Martinez-Sa&#xf1;udo</surname>
<given-names>Isabel</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1193212/overview"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/funding-acquisition/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/resources/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/investigation/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Vamerali</surname>
<given-names>Teofilo</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/246586/overview"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/resources/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/conceptualization/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/project-administration/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/validation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/funding-acquisition/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/supervision/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
<institution>Department of Agronomy, Food, Natural Resources, Animals and the Environment, University of Padua</institution>, <addr-line>Legnaro</addr-line>,&#xa0;<country>Italy</country>
</aff>
<aff id="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
<institution>Department of Chemistry, Life Sciences and Environmental Sustainability, University of Parma</institution>, <addr-line>Parma</addr-line>,&#xa0;<country>Italy</country>
</aff>
<author-notes>
<fn fn-type="edited-by">
<p>Edited by: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1486239/overview">Lorenzo Barbanti</ext-link>, University of Bologna, Italy</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="edited-by">
<p>Reviewed by: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/932801/overview">Freddy Zambrano Gavilanes</ext-link>, Technical University of Manabi, Ecuador</p>
<p>
<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/3130058/overview">Jianfang Li</ext-link>, Beijing Engineering Research Center of Safety and Energy Saving Technology for Water Supply Network System in China Agricultural University, China</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="corresp" id="fn001">
<p>*Correspondence: Anna Panozzo, <email xlink:href="mailto:anna.panozzo@unipd.it">anna.panozzo@unipd.it</email>
</p>
</fn>
</author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>04</day>
<month>09</month>
<year>2025</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="collection">
<year>2025</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>16</volume>
<elocation-id>1661290</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>07</day>
<month>07</month>
<year>2025</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>19</day>
<month>08</month>
<year>2025</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#xa9; 2025 Bolla, Panozzo, Minozzi, Valente, Potestio, Visioli, Martinez-Sa&#xf1;udo and Vamerali.</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2025</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Bolla, Panozzo, Minozzi, Valente, Potestio, Visioli, Martinez-Sa&#xf1;udo and Vamerali</copyright-holder>
<license xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">
<p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.</p>
</license>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<p>Nitrogen (N) fertilization remains a critical challenge in sustainable agriculture. Plant growth-promoting bacteria offer a promising strategy to enhance nitrogen use efficiency and improve cereal crop productivity while reducing reliance on synthetic inputs. This open-field study evaluated the morpho-physiological effects of foliar application of <italic>Methylobacterium symbioticum</italic> (MS) on maize in NE Italy. Following a baseline application of liquid digestate (300 kg N ha<sup>-</sup>&#xb9;) to all plots, four treatments were compared: N300 (digestate only, serving as the control); N300 + MS (digestate with MS); N350 (digestate with 50 kg ha<sup>-</sup>&#xb9; chemical N); and N320 + MS (digestate with 20 kg ha<sup>-</sup>&#xb9; chemical N and MS). ESEM imaging confirmed colonization of leaf surfaces by <italic>M. symbioticum</italic>. Its application significantly promoted aboveground growth and delayed leaf senescence by improving chlorophyll retention, increasing seasonal average SPAD from 46.9 in control to 49.4 (+5.3%, N300 + MS) and 48.8 (+4.1%, N320 + MS), likely mediated by the ascertained ACC-deaminase activity of MS. Root electrical capacitance showed treatment-specific effects, with the highest readings under the N320 + MS treatment (+54% vs. control at flowering). Yield responses were non-linear with respect to N dose, with N300 + MS showing a 12% (1,364 g/m&#xb2;) and N320 + MS a 6% non-significant increase vs. control. MS-treated plants also exhibited a non-significant 5% increase in grain protein content, but significantly higher aboveground N accumulation. It is concluded that, this microbial inoculation strategy can enhance N use efficiency, particularly under reduced synthetic fertilization, presenting an environmentally-friendly and sustainable agricultural strategy for maize cultivation.</p>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>ACC deaminase</kwd>
<kwd>nitrogen fertilization</kwd>
<kwd>grain yield and quality</kwd>
<kwd>leaf stay-green</kwd>
<kwd>root electrical capacitance</kwd>
<kwd>plant growth promoting bacteria (PGPB)</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<counts>
<fig-count count="6"/>
<table-count count="6"/>
<equation-count count="0"/>
<ref-count count="67"/>
<page-count count="20"/>
<word-count count="12590"/>
</counts>
<custom-meta-wrap>
<custom-meta>
<meta-name>section-in-acceptance</meta-name>
<meta-value>Crop and Product Physiology</meta-value>
</custom-meta>
</custom-meta-wrap>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec id="s1" sec-type="intro">
<label>1</label>
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>Maize (<italic>Zea mays</italic> L.) is a pivotal crop globally, crucial for food security, economic growth, and industry. It supplies over 30% of the dietary calories for roughly 4.5 billion people in developing countries (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B49">Shiferaw et&#xa0;al., 2011</xref>), while also serving as a primary source of livestock feed and industrial materials. Its cultivation under various climatic conditions further highlights its global significance, especially under a climate change scenario (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Kumar and Bhatt, 2012</xref>). Maize growth critically depends on an adequate N supply, as its deficiency leads to stunted growth and reduced yields (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Guo et&#xa0;al., 2023</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">Kafle et&#xa0;al., 2023</xref>). Intensive agricultural practices have progressively reduced soil organic matter and N levels, leading to widespread reliance on synthetic fertilizers. While chemical fertilizers effectively enhance crop productivity, they are linked to environmental issues such as nitrate leaching and increased greenhouse gas emissions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">Galloway et&#xa0;al., 2008</xref>). As a result, there is growing interest in sustainable farming methods that minimize chemical inputs while maintaining high maize productivity.</p>
<p>The application of biostimulants, especially microbial inoculants like N-fixing bacteria, presents a promising alternative to chemical fertilizers in agriculture (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B45">Rouphael and Colla, 2020</xref>). Unlike leguminous plants, maize is unable to establish a symbiotic relationship with N-fixing bacteria, although it can form associations with various rhizosphere bacteria and endophytes that are capable of providing various benefits, including N-fixation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">Pankievicz et&#xa0;al., 2019</xref>). Biostimulants, which include a variety of compounds and microorganisms, can enhance plant growth and tolerance to stress in addition to minimal direct nutrient supply. Among plant aiding bacteria, <italic>Azospirillum</italic>, particularly <italic>A. brasilense</italic>, develops favourable root associations in maize, enhancing N use efficiency, improving root and shoot growth, and increasing yields by up to 30% under N-limited conditions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Barbosa et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B54">Teodoro-Cerna et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>). Similarly, <italic>Bacillus</italic> and <italic>Pseudomonas</italic> can improve maize performance through mechanisms such as phosphate solubilization, siderophore production, phytohormone synthesis, and biofilm formation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B59">Vieira Velloso et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>). Some bacteria, such as <italic>Bacillus subtilis</italic>, can also improve drought tolerance by thickening roots, altering root structure and increasing plant biomass (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B58">Vardharajula et&#xa0;al., 2011</xref>).</p>
<p>Inoculation through the root zone has long been conventionally utilized to harness plant-microbe interactions, but it frequently struggles with severe microbial competition in the soil and uneven colonization of root surfaces, although seed treatments have often provided positive results (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Francioli et&#xa0;al., 2025</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B61">Wang and Kuzyakov, 2024</xref>). In contrast, foliar spraying of microbial inoculants bypasses soil microbial competition, allowing for faster leaf surface colonization. This application method enables both epiphytic and endophytic beneficial bacteria to interact directly with leaf-level physiology, modulating processes such as photosynthesis, stomatal conductance, and antioxidant production (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">Preininger et&#xa0;al., 2018</xref>).</p>
<p>Among biological tools that can contribute to improve plant health and productivity, <italic>Methylobacterium symbioticum</italic> a novel species isolated from spores of the symbiotic fungus <italic>Glomus iranicum</italic> var. <italic>tenuihypharum</italic>, stands out as a notable N-fixing bacterium recently providing an advantage for maize cultivation although with varying outcomes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">Pascual et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B44">Rodrigues et&#xa0;al., 2024</xref>). <italic>Methylobacterium</italic> species are found in a wide range of environments, such as soil, water, leaf surfaces, plant nodules, grains, and the atmosphere, exhibiting considerable versatility (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B62">Wellner et&#xa0;al., 2012</xref>), having been identified in over 70 plant species. Notably, <italic>Methylobacterium nodulans</italic> has been shown to induce root nodules in <italic>Crotalaria</italic> leguminous plants (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">Jourand et&#xa0;al., 2004</xref>), while a majority of <italic>Methylobacterium</italic> species form either epiphytic or endophytic relationships with host plants. Epiphytic strains can enter through leaf surfaces and infiltrate stomatal openings, forming endophytic communities that positively affect the host plant (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">Ardanov et&#xa0;al., 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Dourado et&#xa0;al., 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">Kutschera, 2007</xref>). Approximately 30% of <italic>Methylobacterium</italic> species found in the phyllosphere are capable of fixing N, converting atmospheric N<sub>2</sub> into ammonium to support their own growth and development, with possible release of N to the host plant (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">Madhaiyan et&#xa0;al., 2015</xref>). <italic>Methylobacterium symbioticum</italic> have been demonstrated to potentially reduce N chemical fertilization in various crops, such as maize, rice, wheat, and wine grape. Recent research supports the potential of <italic>Methylobacterium symbioticum</italic> as a sustainable microbial inoculant capable of boosting nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) and enhancing crop yields through foliar application. The studies by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B56">Torres Vera et&#xa0;al. (2024)</xref>, confirmed that foliar application of <italic>M. symbioticum</italic> significantly improves maize performance by enhancing N uptake while reducing the need for high levels of external N fertilizers. Similar positive effects have also been observed in strawberries, where the bacterium enhanced growth and yield even under low N availability (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B50">Silva et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>).</p>
<p>However, the effectiveness of <italic>M. symbioticum</italic> is not consistent across all crop species or environmental conditions. While positive effects have been observed in maize and strawberries, studies on lettuce have shown minimal improvements in growth and N nutrition (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Arrobas et&#xa0;al., 2024</xref>). This variability highlights the importance of crop- or even variety-specific evaluations when considering the use of this inoculant. In contrast, crops like wheat and sugarcane have demonstrated clear benefits, especially under N-limited conditions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Jirakkakul et&#xa0;al., 2023</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B57">Valente et&#xa0;al., 2024</xref>), further emphasizing the potential for targeted agronomic applications. Studies by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">Knief et&#xa0;al. (2010)</xref>, emphasized that environmental conditions have a stronger influence on the composition of <italic>Methylobacterium</italic> communities in the phyllosphere than the plant species itself. For this reason, it is essential to evaluate the agronomic performances of <italic>M. symbioticum</italic> across various environmental conditions, particularly, regarding the foliar application of this bacterium on maize under different N fertilization regimes.</p>
<p>Building on this existing body of research, which highlighted the potential of microbial inoculants to enhance NUE and crop productivity, this study aimed to carry out a comprehensive assessment of the agronomic impacts of <italic>M. symbioticum</italic> applied on maize through foliar spraying. The objectives were thematically structured as follows: <italic>i</italic>) microbial colonization and mechanism: determine the efficiency of leaf colonization by sprayed <italic>M. symbioticum</italic> and assess its ACC-deaminase activity; <italic>ii)</italic> Plant physiological responses: quantify maize response following foliar-sprayed bacteria by measuring morpho-physiological characteristics, such as growth indices (plant height, leaf number, above-ground biomass), leaf area index (LAI), and chlorophyll content (as SPAD measurement) to assess possible enhancements in plant vigor and delayed senescence; <italic>iii</italic>) Root development and yield performance: analyze root growth response using indirect non-destructive measurements of root electrical capacitance, and yield components such as grain yield and kernel weight, along with grain quality attributes including moisture, protein, oil, and starch content at harvest.</p>
<p>Recognizing that N availability is a critical determinant in maize productivity, this study investigated the interaction between varying levels of N fertilization and the application of <italic>M. symbioticum</italic> to determine if the bacterium improves nitrogen use efficiency and potentially compensate for reduced chemical N input.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2" sec-type="materials|methods">
<label>2</label>
<title>Materials and methods</title>
<sec id="s2_1">
<label>2.1</label>
<title>Site description and experimental design</title>
<p>The field trial was conducted during 2023 growing season at the Minozzi farm, located in Legnago, Verona, NE Italy (8 m a.s.l.). Based on the contents of silt (54.2%), clay (29.4%) and sand (16.4%), the soil was classified as silty-clay-loam (USDA), with a pH of 6.9, with very high levels of both organic matter content (16.8%) and cation exchange capacity (CEC of 52.3 cmol (+) kg<sup>-1</sup>), and total nitrogen (N) content (6.41 g kg<sup>-1</sup>) before sowing.</p>
<p>Climatic data were collected from the meteorological station in Legnago-Vangadizza, 2 km from the experimental site (ARPAV - weather service center of the Veneto region). The preceding crop was durum wheat, grown in the 2021&#x2013;2022 season, subsequently leaving the land fallow until spring 2023.</p>
<p>The experiment aimed to evaluate the impact of the N-fixing bacterium <italic>Methylobacterium symbioticum</italic> strain SB23 provided through the commercial product BlueN<sup>&#xae;</sup> (Corteva Agriscience, Cremona - IT) in combination with different doses of chemical N fertilizer as top-dress application (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">
<bold>Table&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>). This bacterium is expected to provide from at least 30 up to 50 kg of N ha<sup>-</sup>&#xb9; to the inoculated plants through N-fixation, as a theoretical estimate.</p>
<table-wrap id="T1" position="float">
<label>Table&#xa0;1</label>
<caption>
<p>Overview of fertilization strategy and biofertilizer applications for each treatment in the study.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Treatment name</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Organic N from digestate (kg ha<sup>-1</sup>)</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Top-dress chemical N fertilizer (kg ha<sup>-1</sup>)</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Total N provided (kg ha<sup>-1</sup>)</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">
<italic>Methylobacterium symbioticum</italic> inoculation</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">N300</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">300</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">300</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">NO</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">N300 + MS</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">300</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">300</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">YES</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">N350</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">300</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">50</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">350</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">NO</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">N320 + MS</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">300</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">20</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">320</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">YES</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn>
<p>Total N provided&#x2019; values refer to organic N supplied from the digestate and chemical fertilizer combined, excluding any contribution from <italic>M. symbioticum</italic>.</p>
</fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<p>In February 2023, 75 t ha<sup>-1</sup> of liquid digestate (from green wastes) containing 0.4% N, equivalent to 300 kg N ha<sup>-1</sup>, was applied in the whole experimental field, followed by plowing to a depth of 30 cm. The seedbed was prepared using a rotary harrow, and maize sowing took place on 3 April. Weed control occurred in post-emergence on 2 May at the 4-5-leaf stage of maize, using the active ingredients (a.i.) Nicosulfuron and Rimsulfuron against monocot and the a.i. Mesotrione against dicot species.</p>
<p>Top-dress N fertilization was applied on 9 June with ammonium sulfate (containing 21% N and 24% S) as granular fertilizer, followed by burial through hoeing; the rate of chemical N, with or without the <italic>Methylobacterium symbioticum</italic> biofertilizer (MS), allowed for the comparison of four treatments (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">
<bold>Table&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>). Treatments were named as follows: N300 (digestate only, serving as the control); N300 + MS (digestate with MS); N350 (digestate with 50 kg ha<sup>-</sup>&#xb9; chemical N); and N320 + MS (digestate with 20 kg ha<sup>-</sup>&#xb9; chemical N and MS).</p>
<p>
<italic>M. symbioticum</italic>, available as wettable powder (3 &#xd7; 10<sup>7</sup> CFU g<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>), was mechanically sprayed on maize on 12 June (8-10-leaf stage) at a dose of 333 g ha<sup>-1</sup> with 300 L ha<sup>-1</sup> of water. The bacterium is recommended to be applied at the 6-8-leaf stage, but in this study, it was applied somewhat later due to continuous rainfall during May.</p>
<p>The trial was carried out in a 4-hectare field area, cultivating the short-season (FAO class 300) maize hybrid P9241 (Pioneer &#x2013; Corteva Agriscience), with a sowing density of 8 plants m<sup>-2</sup> (75 cm interrow &#xd7; 16.6 cm on the row). The field was divided into four strips, each comprising three plots/replicates (n = 3). Within each plot, two individual plants were designated as sub-replicates for SPAD and root capacitance measurements. In addition, 8 and 6 plants per plot were assessed for shoot parameters and yield response, respectively. To mitigate spatial heterogeneity and ensure statistical robustness, all treatments followed a randomized complete block design. Each plot, measuring 4 m in length and 3 m in width (4 maize rows), was located centrally within the treated zone. The crop was harvested on 28 August 2023, approximately two weeks after the final survey date.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_2">
<label>2.2</label>
<title>Environmental scanning electron microscope imaging of bacteria&#x2013;leaf interactions</title>
<p>ESEM was employed to assess the colonization ability of <italic>M. symbioticum</italic>-based inoculum on maize leaves. This technique facilitates the analysis of <italic>in-vivo</italic> biological specimens without histological processing, enabling direct visualization of bacterial colonization on the leaf surface, thus providing an accurate representation of the plant-bacteria interaction (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B60">Visioli et&#xa0;al., 2014</xref>). To prepare the bacterial inoculum, a suspension of <italic>M. symbioticum</italic> was plated on Luria&#x2013;Bertani (LB) solid medium at various dilutions, to isolate single colonies, and incubated at 28&#xb0;C for 72 hours. Single isolated colonies were cultured in 100 mL of LB medium on a rotary shaker at 28&#xb0;C for 48 h. Following centrifugation, bacterial cells were re-suspended in sterile water to reach a final inoculum density of 3 &#xd7; 10<sup>7</sup> CFU mL<sup>-</sup>&#xb9;.</p>
<p>For the inoculation experiment, maize plants were grown under sterile conditions within a climatic chamber on &#xbd; MS agar medium supplemented with 1% sucrose. At the 3-leaf stage, a bacterial suspension of <italic>M. symbioticum</italic> was applied to the leaf surfaces. Inoculated plants were allowed to grow for additional 7 days, while non-inoculated plants served as controls. At the end of the incubation period, fresh leaf sections of 5-mm diameter were excised with a sterile lancet. Specimens were mounted on an ESEM sample holder, ensuring minimal dehydration to preserve structural integrity. Morphological analysis through imaging was performed using Quanta&#x2122; 250 FEG Environmental Scanning Electron Microscope (ESEM) (FEI, Hillsboro, OR, USA) in wet mode: all micrographs were taken using a gaseous secondary electron detector at an accelerating voltage of 10 kV, while the chamber relative humidity was initially set at 100%, then progressively reduced to 80% and maintained at that level throughout the imaging process (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B60">Visioli et&#xa0;al., 2014</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_3">
<label>2.3</label>
<title>ACC deaminase activity assay in <italic>Methylobacterium symbioticum</italic>
</title>
<p>The strain SB23 of <italic>Methylobacterium symbioticum</italic> was assessed for 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate (ACC) deaminase activity using a qualitative assay, where its growth was compared on two distinct media, i.e., one with ACC as the sole N source, and the other without any N source (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">Penrose and Glick, 2003</xref>). The bacterium was cultured overnight in 10 mL of LB liquid medium, agitated at 130 rpm at 28&#xb0;C. Bacterial abundance was evaluated by optical density (OD) at 600 nm wavelength measured using a Varian Cary 50 UV-Visible spectrophotometer. The bacterial culture was then diluted to 10<sup>8</sup> cells mL<sup>-1</sup> with sterile double-distilled water and spread onto LB agar medium (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B51">Singh et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>). After 24 hours of incubation at 28&#xb0;C, a bacterial colony was transferred to a Petri dish containing modified DF minimal salts medium, which included glucose (4.0 g/L), citric acid (2.0 g/L), potassium dihydrogen phosphate (KH<sub>2</sub>PO<sub>4</sub> 4.0 g/L), disodium hydrogen phosphate (Na<sub>2</sub>HPO<sub>4</sub> 6.0 g/L), magnesium sulfate heptahydrate (MgSO<sub>4</sub>&#xb7;7H<sub>2</sub>O, 0.2 g/L), and a micronutrient solution (comprising ferrous sulfate (FeSO<sub>4</sub> 100 mg/100 mL), boric acid (H<sub>3</sub>BO<sub>3</sub>, 10 mg/100 mL), zinc sulfate heptahydrate (ZnSO<sub>4</sub>&#xb7;7H<sub>2</sub>O, 124.6 mg/100 mL), sodium molybdate (Na<sub>2</sub>MoO<sub>4</sub> 10 mg/100 mL), copper sulfate (CuSO<sub>4</sub> 78.22 mg/100 mL), and manganese sulfate (MnSO<sub>4</sub> 11.19 mg/100 mL). Additionally, 3 mM ACC served as the sole N source (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B51">Singh et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>). As a negative control, the DF minimal medium was prepared without ACC. The ability of the bacterial isolates to grow on DF medium supplemented with ACC was evaluated after 72 hours of incubation at 28&#xb0;C and compared to the negative controls. <italic>Bosea robiniae</italic> and <italic>Pseudomonas umsongensis</italic> were used as negative and positive ACC deaminase-producing references, respectively (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">Bertola et&#xa0;al., 2019</xref>). Bacterial colonization in the DF medium was recorded as colored bands, i.e., pinkish-orange for <italic>M. symbioticum</italic> and light yellow for <italic>P. umsongensis</italic>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_4">
<label>2.4</label>
<title>Shoot parameters</title>
<p>During maize growth, the leaf chlorophyll content was indirectly assessed through SPAD (Soil and Plant Analysis Development) measurements. Data were collected from two randomly selected plants in each plot/replicate of each treatment, using a SPAD 502 chlorophyll meter (Konica-Minolta, Hong Kong). For each plant, SPAD readings were taken on every fully expanded leaf, accounting for its position along the plant height. The SPAD value for each leaf was calculated as the average of three readings taken along the length of the leaf blade (at one-quarter, one-half, and three-quarters). Measurements were conducted on the same plants at intervals of 2&#x2013;3 weeks on the following dates: 23 June (flowering stage), 5 July (milking stage), 25 July (dough stage), and 5 August (early physiological maturity stage).</p>
<p>On 19 July, at late milk stage, 8 randomly selected plants per plot were also harvested by cutting them at the base to analyze aboveground biomass. Morphological parameters measured included plant height, number of leaves and number of ears per plant. After stem, leaf, and ear separation, leaf area index (LAI) was calculated for each plot/replicate using the LI-3100C Area Meter (Li-Cor instruments, Lincoln, NE, USA). Fresh weights were measured for each fraction, and dry weights obtained after oven-drying at 110&#xb0;C for 72 h.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_5">
<label>2.5</label>
<title>Root analysis</title>
<p>The root electrical capacitance, as an index of root mass/activity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Cseresny&#xe9;s et&#xa0;al., 2018</xref>), was measured non-destructively using a digital LCR multimeter (Escort ELC 131-D, Taipei, Taiwan) at 120 Hz frequency, and the values were reported in nanofarads (nF). At the beginning of the experiment, 60-cm long stainless-steel electrodes were inserted into the soil to serve as negative electrodes, with one per plot/replicate of the four treatments. Each electrode was positioned along the sowing row between two plants, allowing them to record 2 measurements (one for each neighboring plant) per plot, this setup resulting in a total of 6 measurements per plot. According to the methodology by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B53">Streda et&#xa0;al. (2020)</xref>, the negative electrode was placed approximately 8 cm from the base of the two plants and inserted to a depth of 55 cm, presumably covering the 0&#x2013;55 cm soil depth range during root capacitance measurements. A clamp was equipped with a 1-mm thick needle that acted as the positive electrode and was inserted 2 mm into the stem base at a height of 5 cm during electrical capacitance measurements. Measurements were conducted on the same dates as SPAD index measurements. The recorded values were taken five seconds after connecting the electrodes to ensure stability of the readings.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_6">
<label>2.6</label>
<title>Yield and grain quality</title>
<p>After reaching physiological maturity, with an average grain moisture content of about 19%, 6 plants per plot were harvested by cutting their stems just above ground level. For each sample, the stems were manually separated from the ears, and the kernels were then threshed from the corncob. Two fractions, i.e., kernels and crop residues (including stems, bracts and corncobs of ears) were oven-dried at 65&#xb0;C for 72 h to determine dry weight. In addition to grain yield, the harvest index (HI, i.e., grain-to-total shoot DW ratio) and the thousand seed weight (TSW) were determined. For the latter, 3 sub-plots of 1,000 seeds from each plot/replicate were weighed and averaged, using the Contador seed counter (Pfeuffer, Kitzingen, Germany).</p>
<p>Grain quality was assessed using Near Infrared Spectroscopy (NIRS) technology by analysing a sample of approximately 300 g from each plot/replicate with an Infratec - 1241 instrument (Foss Analytical, Hillerod, Denmark). The quality parameters assessed were moisture, oil, and starch content, expressed as a percentage value on DW. Additionally, the protein content of grains and crop residues was measured using the Kjeldal method (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Kirk, 1950</xref>): the obtained nitrogen content (%) was multiplied by the crop-specific nitrogen-to-protein conversion factors of 6.25.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_7">
<label>2.7</label>
<title>Elemental composition in grain and crop residue</title>
<p>Elemental analysis of maize grains and crop residues was conducted to measure the concentrations of Ca, Cu, Fe, K, Mg, Mn, Na, P, S, and Zn. Samples were dehydrated, pulverized, and subjected to acid digestion before analysis. The element concentrations were quantified in mg kg<sup>&#x2013;1</sup> DW using inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES), adhering to standardized procedures for accuracy and precision (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Khan et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_8">
<label>2.8</label>
<title>Statistical analysis</title>
<p>The data for all assessed parameters were subjected to analysis of variance (ANOVA) using Statgraphics ver. 19 software. Residual were examined leveraging the software&#x2019;s internal diagnostic tools, residuals were evaluated via Q&#x2013;Q plots for normality and residuals vs. fitted values for homogeneity of variance, and no significant deviations were observed. Treatment means were separated by Tukey&#x2019;s test when significant differences were detected, using a significance level of p &#x2264; 0.05 used for all comparison.</p>
<p>Pearson&#x2019;s correlation coefficients (r) were computed to assess the relationships between morphological, physiological, and yield parameters using CoStat software (version 6.204, CoHort Software, Monterey, CA, USA). Correlations were deemed statistically significant at p &#x2264; 0.05 (*), p &#x2264; 0.01 (**), and p &#x2264; 0.001 (**<italic>*</italic>). A correlation matrix was generated to illustrate the relationships between seasonal SPAD values, root capacitance during early growth stage, morphological traits (plant height, leaf count, LAI), biomass components (total shoot biomass, ear count), yield metrics (grain yield, grain moisture, 1000-seed weight, harvest index), and grain quality attributes (protein, oil, and starch content).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s3" sec-type="results">
<label>3</label>
<title>Results</title>
<sec id="s3_1">
<label>3.1</label>
<title>Weather conditions during the trial</title>
<p>Precipitation patterns revealed significant monthly variation throughout the trial period (April-August 2023; <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Supplementary Figure S1</bold>
</xref>). While April, June and July recorded precipitation levels (~40 mm) slightly lower than the historical means, abundant rainfall occurred in May and August (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Supplementary Figure S2</bold>
</xref>). May notably experienced a peak precipitation of 173 mm, significantly exceeding the 2012&#x2013;2022 decadal average of 93 mm. Notably, the 48-hour window surrounding 12 June during foliar spraying of <italic>M. symbioticum</italic> was characterized by the absence of precipitation events.</p>
<p>Regarding thermal conditions, average daily temperatures were generally aligned with historical data, with some deviations. In April, temperatures registered approximately 1.2&#xb0;C below the decadal average, potentially impacting plant establishment in early stages. Conversely, July exhibited a notable increase in temperature, with values of 1.0&#xb0;C above the average, potentially accelerating plant&#x2019;s growth and ripening during this time (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Supplementary Figure S3</bold>
</xref>). The period between 25 July and 5 August saw consistently high temperatures, potentially causing heat stress, but with plants approaching senescence.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_2">
<label>3.2</label>
<title>Leaf bacterial colonization</title>
<p>Environmental scanning electron microscopy (ESEM) analysis confirmed successful colonization of <italic>M. symbioticum</italic> on leaves of maize plantlets subjected to foliar spraying under aseptic conditions. The micrographs (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>) demonstrate qualitative and predominant localization of bacterial populations along foliar vascular structures and stomatal regions, with sequential magnification revealing distinct bacterial aggregations. Micrographs 2A through 2D present colonization gradients at increasing magnifications ranging from 1,300&#xd7; to 12,000&#xd7;. Bacterial cells appear as distinctive spherical formations with adherence to the epidermal surfaces, providing evidence of effective colonization, and their potential to enter through stomal openings. On the contrary, examination of non-inoculated control specimens cultivated under aseptic conditions, as expected, revealed no bacterial presence on foliar surfaces, thereby confirming the specificity of colonization attributable to the bacterial inoculation.</p>
<fig id="f1" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;1</label>
<caption>
<p>Environmental scanning electron microscopy (ESEM) micrographs illustrating the colonization of <italic>in-vitro</italic> maize leaf surfaces by <italic>Methylobacterium symbioticum</italic> strain SB23 under aseptic conditions. Images depict increasing magnifications: 1300&#xd7; <bold>(A)</bold>, 3000&#xd7; <bold>(B)</bold>, 6000&#xd7; <bold>(C)</bold>, and 12000&#xd7; <bold>(D)</bold>. Red arrows in <bold>(A)</bold> indicate the region of interest on the leaf surface that is further magnified in <bold>(B&#x2013;D)</bold> to enhance visualization of bacterial attachment and biofilm formation.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-16-1661290-g001.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Four scanning electron microscope images labeled A, B, C, and D show detailed surface structures of a material at varying magnifications. Image A shows smooth, parallel ridges with red arrows indicating features. Image B also shows ridges with small particles highlighted by arrows. Image C presents a rougher texture with clustered particles, while Image D shows a densely populated surface of spherical particles.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_3">
<label>3.3</label>
<title>ACC deaminase activity of <italic>Methylobacterium symbioticum</italic>
</title>
<p>
<italic>Methylobacterium symbioticum</italic> SB23 demonstrated to possess the ACC deaminase activity, as evidenced by its growth on DF medium supplemented with ACC as the sole N source (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;2</bold>
</xref>). In contrast, no growth was observed on N-free DF medium by this bacterium. The positive control, <italic>Pseudomonas umsongensis</italic> having the enzyme ACC-deaminase, showed a similar growth pattern in presence of ACC, while the negative control, <italic>Bosea robiniae</italic>, which lacks ACC-deaminase, failed to proliferate under ACC-supplemented conditions. None of the tested strains exhibited any growth in DF medium lacking a N source (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;2A</bold>
</xref>). However, where DF medium was supplemented with ACC as the sole N source (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;2B</bold>
</xref>), distinct pinkish-orange bands were visible for <italic>M. symbioticum</italic> SB23 and light-yellow bands for the positive control <italic>P. umsongensis</italic>, confirming their ability to utilize ACC for growth. The negative control, <italic>B. robiniae</italic>, showed no growth, verifying its inability to metabolize ACC.</p>
<fig id="f2" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;2</label>
<caption>
<p>Qualitative test for 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid (ACC) deaminase activity. <bold>(A)</bold> DF minimal medium without any N source; <bold>(B)</bold> DF minimal medium with ACC as a sole N source. 1. <italic>Methylobacterium symbioticum</italic> SB23; 2. Negative control: <italic>Bosea robiniae</italic>; 3. Positive control: <italic>Pseudomonas umsongensis</italic>. Note colonization of <italic>M. symbioticum</italic> SB23 and <italic>P. umsongensis</italic> (coloured bands) when only ACC was present in the growing medium.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-16-1661290-g002.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Two petri dishes labeled A) ACC- and B) ACC+ each divided into four sections numbered 1, 2, and 3. Dish A) shows light-colored bacterial growth, while dish B) exhibits more vibrant growth, including red and yellow colonies, indicating different reactions to ACC presence.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_4">
<label>3.4</label>
<title>Shoot growth and morphology</title>
<sec id="s3_4_1">
<label>3.4.1</label>
<title>Leaf chlorophyll content (SPAD index)</title>
<p>Chlorophyll content in maize leaves, quantified as SPAD units, exhibited significant temporal and spatial variations across different nitrogen (N) and <italic>M. symbioticum</italic> (MS) treatments from June to August 2023. Significant interaction was observed between treatments and observation time, highlighting the better impact of bacterial inoculation at the beginning and particularly at the end of the recording period.</p>
<p>As an average of all leaves in a plant, a general decreasing trend of chlorophyll content was observed as the season progressed towards the harvest time (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;3</bold>
</xref>). Bacterial inoculation provided a significant (p &#x2264; 0.05) SPAD improvement, with overall seasonal averages of N300 + MS (SPAD = 49.4) and N320 + MS (SPAD = 48.8) outperforming controls (N300; SPAD = 46.9) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;3</bold>
</xref>).</p>
<fig id="f3" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;3</label>
<caption>
<p>
<bold>(A)</bold> Temporal dynamics of leaf chlorophyll content (SPAD means; <italic>n</italic> = 3) in maize plants subjected to different nitrogen (N) and <italic>Methylobacterium symbioticum</italic> (MS) treatments: N300, N300 + MS, N350 and N320 + MS. The dates of measurements in the x-axis are associated to specific phenological stages using the BBCH scale: BBCH 65 (flowering, 23 June), BBCH 73 (milking, 5 July), BBCH 85 (dough maturation, 25 July), and BBCH 87 (early physiological maturity, 5 August). The vertical bar above the graph represents the least significant difference (LSD) for the &#x201c;Treatment &#xd7; Time&#x201d; interaction at p &#x2264; 0.05 (3.78). Subplot <bold>(B)</bold> represents the seasonal average of SPAD values (means &#xb1; <sc>SE</sc>) across the four phenological stages. The numerical value above each bar indicates the mean SPAD value for each treatment, and the percentage value denotes the relative change compared to the N300 reference. Letters in parentheses indicate statistical groupings based on Tukey&#x2019;s test (p &#x2264; 0.05).</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-16-1661290-g003.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Graph A shows SPAD index changes over time from June 20 to August 9, 2023, for different treatments: N300, N300 + MS, N350, and N320 + MS. Graph B depicts the seasonal average SPAD index for the same treatments, with percentages ranging from minus two percent to plus five percent. Statistical significance is indicated by letters above the data points.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
<p>By 25 July, pronounced spatial differentiation in chlorophyll content became also evident across leaf layers. In the basal (1<sup>st</sup>-4<sup>th</sup>) leaves, the control treatment (N300) exhibited the highest chlorophyll content with a mean SPAD = 46.1, significantly outperforming the N350 (&#x2212;22%) and N320 + MS (&#x2212;19%) treatments, while N300 + MS showed a moderate non-significant decrease of 5% (SPAD = 43.7). The N320 + MS and N350 treatments, were not significantly different from each other. Cob leaves (5<sup>th</sup>&#x2013;6<sup>th</sup>) and apical leaves (7<sup>th</sup>&#x2013;13<sup>th</sup>) exhibited more moderate responses, with no significant differences among treatments in cob leaves, and only slight variations in the younger apical leaves (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f4">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;4</bold>
</xref>). However, the most striking observations emerged in the late-season measurements of 5 August, which revealed a pronounced stay-green effect across treatments incorporating the bacterial inoculation (MS). The N320 + MS treatment demonstrated a noteworthy response, particularly in basal leaves, where it achieved a 54% increase in SPAD values (SPAD = 32.2) compared to controls (SPAD = 20.9); cob and apical leaves of N320 + MS also showed increases of 36% (SPAD = 49.7; p &#x2264; 0.05) and 11% (SPAD = 48.4; n.s.), respectively, compared to controls, highlighting the ability of <italic>Methylobacterium</italic> to sustain chlorophyll content across all leaf layers in late-season when the plant approaches senescence. While the control treatment (N300) exhibited typical chlorophyll degradation patterns, particularly in the older basal leaves, the N300 + MS treatment showed some chlorophyll retention (SPAD = 25.1), and N320 + MS treatment was the most effective (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f4">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;4</bold>
</xref>). Spatial analysis revealed a consistent gradient of treatment effectiveness across leaf layers/age, with basal and cob leaves showing the most important responses to bacterial inoculation late in the season.</p>
<fig id="f4" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;4</label>
<caption>
<p>Spatial dynamics of leaf chlorophyll content, measured as SPAD units, in maize basal (1<sup>st</sup>-4<sup>th</sup>), cob (5<sup>th</sup>-6<sup>th</sup>), and apical (7<sup>th</sup>-13<sup>th</sup>) leaves at dough maturity on 25 July 2023 <bold>(A)</bold>, and early physiological maturity on 5 August <bold>(B)</bold>. The graph depicts SPAD values (mean &#xb1; <sc>se</sc>, n=3) under varying nitrogen (N) and <italic>Methylobacterium symbioticum</italic> (MS) treatments (N300, N300 + MS, N350, and N320 + MS) with percentage differences relative to the N300 control. Within each leaf layer, treatments with distinct letters above bars indicate significant differences (Tukey&#x2019;s test, p &#x2264; 0.05).</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-16-1661290-g004.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Bar charts labeled A and B comparing SPAD units on various dates. Chart A, dated 25 July 2023, shows SPAD measurements for basal, cob, and apical leaves across different treatments, indicating relative changes in percentages. Chart B, dated 5 August 2023, displays similar data with different percentage variations for the same leaf categories and treatments. Each bar is labeled with specific SPAD values and percentage changes, demonstrating differences in leaf chlorophyll content over time with added treatments.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_4_2">
<label>3.4.2</label>
<title>Plant morphology at the dough maturity stage</title>
<p>The dress application of chemical N and <italic>M. symbioticum</italic> significantly affected various morphological parameters of maize plants at the dough stage (19 July) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">
<bold>Table&#xa0;2</bold>
</xref>). The N320 + MS treatment consistently demonstrated the most pronounced improvements across multiple growth metrics, highlighting the synergistic effects of moderate N application combined with bacterial inoculation.</p>
<table-wrap id="T2" position="float">
<label>Table&#xa0;2</label>    <caption>
<p>Shoot measurements (means &#xb1; <sc>se</sc>; n=3) at the dough maturity stage (19 July) of maize across four treatments (N300, N300 + MS, N350 and N320 + MS).</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" align="right">Treatment</th>
<th valign="middle" align="right">Plant height (cm)</th>
<th valign="middle" align="right">%var/C</th>
<th valign="middle" align="right">Number of leaves</th>
<th valign="middle" align="right">%var/C</th>
<th valign="middle" align="right">Leaf area index (LAI)</th>
<th valign="middle" align="right">%var/C</th>
<th valign="middle" align="right">Shoot biomass (g/m&#xb2;)</th>
<th valign="middle" align="right">%var/C</th>
<th valign="middle" align="right">Number of ears per plant</th>
<th valign="middle" align="right">%var/C</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">N300</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">235 &#xb1; 2</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Ref. (b)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">11.0 &#xb1; 0.3</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Ref. (b)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">4.1 &#xb1; 0.2</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Ref. (b)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">996 &#xb1; 88</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Ref. (b)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">1.5 &#xb1; 0.3</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Ref. (a)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">N300 + MS</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">260 &#xb1; 6</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">+11% (a)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">12.5 &#xb1; 0.1</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">+14% (a)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">4.5 &#xb1; 0.1</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">+10% (a)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">1,298 &#xb1; 36</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">+30% (ab)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">1.8 &#xb1; 0.2</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">+22% (a)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">N350</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">249 &#xb1; 6</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">+6% (a)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">11.8 &#xb1; 0.6</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">+8% (ab)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">3.9 &#xb1; 0.1</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">-5% (b)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">1,127 &#xb1; 93</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">+13% (bc)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">1.8 &#xb1; 0.2</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">+22% (a)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">N320 + MS</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">262 &#xb1; 3</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">+12% (a)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">12.8 &#xb1; 0.2</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">+17% (a)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">4.5 &#xb1; 0.1</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">+10% (a)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">1,399 &#xb1; 39</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">+40% (a)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">2.0 &#xb1; 0.1</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">+33% (a)</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn>
<p>Letters indicate significant differences (Tukey test, p &#x2264; 0.05) among treatments within each parameter. Percentage variation (%var/C) shows change relative to N300 control.</p>
</fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<p>Plant height increased in both inoculated treatments compared to the N300 control (p &#x2264; 0.05), with the N320 + MS treatment showing the greatest increase (262 cm, +12%), followed by the N300 + MS treatment (260 cm, +11%). N350 resulted in a moderate increase (249 cm, +6%), though this was less pronounced than the MS-inoculated treatments.</p>
<p>The number of leaves per plant also increased significantly (p &#x2264; 0.05) in inoculated plants, and this was reflected in the Leaf Area Index (LAI), which was significantly improved in N300 + MS and N320 + MS (both 4.5, + 10%) treatments vs. N300 control. In contrast, N350 resulted in a slight reduction in LAI (3.9, &#x2013;5%).</p>
<p>Shoot biomass production varied accordingly, with N320 + MS reaching the highest value of 1,399 g m<sup>&#x2013;</sup>&#xb2;, a 40% increase over the N300 control (996 g m<sup>-</sup>&#xb2;, p &#x2264; 0.05). N300 + MS also exhibited significantly greater biomass accumulation (1,298 g m<sup>&#x2013;</sup>&#xb2;, +30% vs. N300) but did not differ significantly from N320 + MS or N350 (p &gt; 0.05). Shoot biomass under N350 (1,127 g m<sup>&#x2013;</sup>&#xb2;) was not significantly different from the control (+13%) or N300 + MS (p &gt; 0.05). This resulted in improved plant fertility, the number of ears per plant on average being slightly higher in N320 + MS, N300 + MS and N350, but not statistically different from control.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_5">
<label>3.5</label>
<title>Root measurements</title>
<p>Root electrical capacitance measurements revealed significant variations in root growth over time (p &#x2264; 0.001) across the growing season (23 June &#x2013; 5 August). The &#x2018;Treatment &#xd7; Time&#x2019; interaction was not statistically significant (p &gt; 0.05), while significant differences among treatments were observed (p &#x2264; 0.05). On 23 June, at maize flowering, treatments N320 + MS, N350 and N300 + MS showed +54%, +31% and +16% respectively over the control N300, although only N320 + MS was significantly higher (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f5">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;5A</bold>
</xref>). At the end of the measurement period on 5 August, when approaching early physiological maturity, N350 exhibited significantly higher root electrical capacitance compared to control (N300) and N320 + MS (p &#x2264; 0.05). However, no statistically significant difference was observed between N350 and N320 + MS.</p>
<fig id="f5" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;5</label>
<caption>
<p>Seasonal dynamics <bold>(A)</bold> of root electrical capacitance (nF; mean &#xb1; <sc>se</sc>; n = 3) of maize plants under N300, N300 + MS, N350, and N320 + MS treatments at 120 Hz measurement frequency. The dates of measurements in the x-axis are associated to specific phenological stages using the BBCH scale: BBCH 65 (flowering, 23 June), BBCH 73 (milking, 5 July), BBCH 85 (dough maturation, 25 July), andBBCH 87 (early physiological maturity, 5 August). LSD bar (1.93; p &#x2264; 0.05) is shown for the &#x201c;Treatment &#xd7; Time&#x201d; interaction. Subplot <bold>(B)</bold> illustrates the seasonal average root capacitance. Different letters indicate statistically significant differences among treatments at each stage (Tukey&#x2019;s test, <italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.05). Percentage values above bars in <bold>(B)</bold> denote changes relative to the control (N300).</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-16-1661290-g005.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Graph A shows the seasonal dynamics of root electrical capacitance from June 20 to August 9, 2023, with different treatments (-N300, N300 + MS, -N350, N320 + MS). Capacitance varies from around 4 to 7 nanofarads, with letters indicating statistical significance. Graph B displays root capacitance seasonal averages for N300, N300 + MS, N350, and N320 + MS, showing values of 4.46, 4.82, 5.16, and 5.43 nanofarads respectively, with percentage increases noted.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
<p>Across the entire measurement period (main effect &#x2018;Treatment&#x2019;), pairwise comparisons indicated that N320 + MS tended to have higher root electrical capacitance throughout the measurement period, with seasonal average significantly (p &#x2264; 0.05) increasing from 4.46 nF of control (N300) to 5.43 nF of N320 + MS (+22%) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f5">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;5B</bold>
</xref>). N300 + MS and N350 showed non-significant increases of 8% and 16%, respectively, compared to the control (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f5">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;5</bold>
</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_6">
<label>3.6</label>
<title>Yield and grain quality</title>
<p>Grain yield and quality (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">
<bold>Table&#xa0;3</bold>
</xref>; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f6">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;6</bold>
</xref>) reflected some morphological differences previously observed at milk maturity. Grain yield reached the highest level under N300 + MS (1364 g m<sup>-</sup>&#xb2;; +12% vs. N300 control at 1217 g m<sup>-</sup>&#xb2;, n.s.), and this inoculated treatment yielded significantly more than N350 (1126 g m<sup>-</sup>&#xb2;; p &#x2264; 0.05). Although N320 + MS (1286 g m<sup>-</sup>&#xb2;; +6% vs. N300) and N300 + MS both showed trended increase than the control, neither differing significantly from N300 (p &gt; 0.05). Likewise, the 8% drop under N350 vs. N300 did not reach significance (p &gt; 0.05).</p>
<table-wrap id="T3" position="float">
<label>Table&#xa0;3</label>
<caption>
<p>Maize yield and its components (mean &#xb1; <sc>se</sc>; n = 3) at final maturity across four treatments (N300, N300 + MS, N350, N320 + MS).</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" align="left">Parameter</th>
<th valign="middle" align="right">N300</th>
<th valign="middle" align="left">%var/C</th>
<th valign="middle" align="right">N300 + MS</th>
<th valign="middle" align="left">%var/C</th>
<th valign="middle" align="right">N350</th>
<th valign="middle" align="left">%var/C</th>
<th valign="middle" align="right">N320 + MS</th>
<th valign="middle" align="left">%var/C</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Grain yield DW (g m<sup>&#x2013;</sup>&#xb2;)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">1,217 &#xb1; 72</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Ref. (ab)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">1,364 &#xb1; 6</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">+12% (a)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">1,126 &#xb1; 61</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">-8% (b)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">1,286 &#xb1; 42</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">+6% (ab)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Grain moisture at harvest (%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">16.9 &#xb1; 0.4</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Ref. (b)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">15.6 &#xb1; 0.5</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">-8% (b)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">19.8 &#xb1; 0.7</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">+17% (a)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">15.9 &#xb1; 0.4</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">-6% (b)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">TSW (g)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">336 &#xb1; 56</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Ref. (a)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">350 &#xb1; 1</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">+4% (a)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">339 &#xb1; 13</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">+1% (a)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">347 &#xb1; 19</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">+3% (a)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Harvest Index</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">0.60 &#xb1; 0.01</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Ref. (a)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">0.58 &#xb1; 0.01</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">-4% (b)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">0.60 &#xb1; 0.01</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">= (a)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">0.58 &#xb1; 0.01</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">-4% (b)</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn>
<p>Letters indicate significant differences among treatments (Tukey&#x2019;s test, p &lt; 0.05). Percentage variation (%var/C) shows change relative to the N300 control.</p>
</fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<fig id="f6" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;6</label>
<caption>
<p>Protein, oil and starch contents (% on DW; mean &#xb1; <sc>se</sc>, n = 3) of grains at harvest measured by NIRS, in maize subjected to N300, N300 + MS, N350, and N320 + MS treatments. The values above the histograms show the means and % of variation vs. control (N300). Different letters indicate significant differences among treatments (Tukey&#x2019;s test, p &#x2264; 0.05).</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-16-1661290-g006.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Three bar charts detail the percentage of protein, oil, and starch content in different treatments. The protein chart shows N300 at 8.35%, N300+MS at 8.73%, N350 at 6.85%, and N320+MS at 8.39%. The oil chart shows N300 at 3.74%, N300+MS at 3.83%, N350 at 3.67%, and N320+MS at 3.70%. The starch chart shows N300 at 72.4%, N300+MS at 72.1%, N350 at 73.1%, and N320+MS at 72.4%. Statistical significance is indicated by letters.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
<p>Grain moisture content at harvest varied significantly among treatments. The N300 + MS treatment showed a slight 8% reduction (15.6%) compared to the N300 control (16.9%), while N320 + MS treatment resulted in a 6% reduction (15.9%). In contrast, the N350 treatment had the highest moisture content (19.8%, +17% vs. control).</p>
<p>The thousand seed weight (TSW) showed slight non-significant increases in both the treatments including the bacterial inoculation N300 + MS (350 g, +4%) and N320 + MS (347 g, +3%) vs. control (336 g), while N350 resulted in a marginal increase (339 g, +1%).</p>
<p>The harvest index (HI) showed a slight though significant decrease in N300 + MS and N320 + MS treatments (0.58, &#x2212;4%) vs. control (0.60), while N350 maintained an HI like the control (0.60).</p>
<p>Grain protein content showed moderate variations, with N300 + MS treatment showing a slight 5% non-significant increase (8.73% DW) relative to control (8.35% DW). However, N350 resulted in a significant 18% reduction (6.85% DW) compared to the control (p &lt; 0.05), while N320 + MS maintained almost the same protein level (8.39%, +1%).</p>
<p>Oil content showed slight variations across treatments. N300 + MS resulted in a 3% increase (3.83% DW) compared to the control (3.74% DW). N320 + MS maintained oil content very similar to the control (3.70% DW), while N350 showed a slight decrease (3.66% DW, &#x2212;2%). These changes, however, were not statistically significant.</p>
<p>Starch content remained very stable across treatments. N300 + MS showed only a slight decrease (72.1% DW, &#x2013;0.4%); N350 had a minor increase (73.1%, +0.9%), while N320 + MS maintained starch levels comparable to the control (72.4%). These variations were not statistically significant.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_7">
<label>3.7</label>
<title>Grain and crop residues elemental composition</title>
<p>The elemental composition of maize kernels and crop residues at harvest revealed complex responses to different N and inoculation treatments, with some significant variations observed across multiple essential elements (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T4">
<bold>Tables&#xa0;4</bold>
</xref>, <xref ref-type="table" rid="T5">
<bold>5</bold>
</xref>). Grain and biomass analyses demonstrated that N management strategies, particularly the N350 and N300 + MS treatments, substantially influenced elemental accumulation patterns.</p>
<table-wrap id="T4" position="float">
<label>Table&#xa0;4</label>
<caption>
<p>Macro-elemental composition (means &#xb1; <sc>se</sc>, n = 3) of maize grains and crop residues at maturity across four treatments (N300, N300 + MS, N350, and N320 + MS).</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" align="left">Element</th>
<th valign="middle" align="left">Treatment</th>
<th valign="middle" align="left">Grains (mean &#xb1; <sc>se</sc>)</th>
<th valign="middle" align="left">% var/C</th>
<th valign="middle" align="left">Crop residues (mean &#xb1; <sc>se</sc>)</th>
<th valign="middle" align="left">% var/C</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">N (%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">N300<break/>N300 + MS<break/>N350<break/>N320 + MS</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">1.34 &#xb1; 0.03<break/>1.40 &#xb1; 0.02<break/>1.10 &#xb1; 0.01<break/>1.34 &#xb1; 0.03</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Ref. (a)<break/>+ 5% (a)<break/>&#x2013; 18% (b)<break/>+ 1% (a)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">0.91 &#xb1; 0.05<break/>1.05 &#xb1; 0.08<break/>0.69 &#xb1; 0.05<break/>0.89 &#xb1; 0.12</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Ref. (ab)<break/>+ 15% (a)<break/>&#x2013; 24% (b)<break/>&#x2013; 3% (ab)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Ca (ppm)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">N300<break/>N300 + MS<break/>N350<break/>N320 + MS</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">39.9 &#xb1; 0.7<break/>40.9 &#xb1; 3.3<break/>46.1 &#xb1; 2.3<break/>40.6 &#xb1; 2.9</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Ref. (a)<break/>+ 3% (a)<break/>+ 15% (a)<break/>+ 2% (a)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">6,196 &#xb1; 575<break/>7,145 &#xb1; 640<break/>5,014 &#xb1; 175<break/>6,116 &#xb1; 1,357</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Ref. (a)<break/>+ 15% (a)<break/>&#x2013; 19% (a)<break/>&#x2013; 1% (a)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">K (ppm)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">N300<break/>N300 + MS<break/>N350<break/>N320 + MS</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">3,212 &#xb1; 111<break/>3,203 &#xb1; 31<break/>3,376 &#xb1; 13<break/>3,164 &#xb1; 69</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Ref. (a)<break/>&#x2013; 0.3% (a)<break/>+ 5% (a)<break/>&#x2013; 2% (a)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">11,454 &#xb1; 254<break/>12,212 &#xb1; 429<break/>13,384 &#xb1; 392<break/>13,016 &#xb1; 446</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Ref. (b)<break/>+ 7% (ab)<break/>+ 17% (a)<break/>+ 14% (a)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Mg (ppm)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">N300<break/>N300 + MS<break/>N350<break/>N320 + MS</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">958 &#xb1; 9<break/>991 &#xb1; 14<break/>889 &#xb1; 19<break/>921 &#xb1; 12</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Ref. (ab)<break/>+ 4% (a)<break/>&#x2013; 7% (c)<break/>&#x2013; 4% (bc)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">3,057 &#xb1; 159<break/>2,616 &#xb1; 253<break/>2,151 &#xb1; 137<break/>2,206 &#xb1; 272</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Ref. (a)<break/>&#x2013; 15% (ab)<break/>&#x2013; 30% (b)<break/>&#x2013; 28% (b)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">P (ppm)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">N300<break/>N300 + MS<break/>N350<break/>N320 + MS</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">2,755 &#xb1; 69<break/>2,713 &#xb1; 32<break/>2,812 &#xb1; 53<break/>2,546 &#xb1; 41</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Ref. (a)<break/>&#x2013; 2% (a)<break/>+ 2% (a)<break/>&#x2013; 8% (b)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">1,462 &#xb1; 106<break/>1,429 &#xb1; 128<break/>1,871 &#xb1; 140<break/>1,118 &#xb1; 99</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Ref. (b)<break/>&#x2013; 2% (b)<break/>+ 28% (a)<break/>&#x2013; 24% (b)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">S (ppm)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">N300<break/>N300 + MS<break/>N350<break/>N320 + MS</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">1,019 &#xb1; 18<break/>1,099 &#xb1; 20<break/>988 &#xb1; 3<break/>1,055 &#xb1; 15</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Ref. (bc)<break/>+ 8% (a)<break/>&#x2013; 3% (c)<break/>+ 4% (ab)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">1,297 &#xb1; 100<break/>1,543 &#xb1; 127<break/>1,467 &#xb1; 25<break/>1,361 &#xb1; 202</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Ref. (a)<break/>+ 19% (a)<break/>+ 13% (a)<break/>+ 5% (a)</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn>
<p>Nitrogen is expressed as % dry weight; all other elements as mg kg<sup>-</sup>&#xb9; (ppm). Within each element, different letters indicate statistically significant differences among treatments, and percentage changes (% var/C) variations relative to the N300 control (C) (Tukey&#x2019;s test, p &#x2264; 0.05).</p>
</fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<table-wrap id="T5" position="float">
<label>Table&#xa0;5</label>
<caption>
<p>Micro-elemental composition (means &#xb1; <sc>se</sc>, n = 3) as mg kg<sup>-</sup>&#xb9; (ppm) of maize grains and crop residues at maturity across four treatments (N300, N300 + MS, N350, and N320 + MS).</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" align="left">Element</th>
<th valign="middle" align="left">Treatment</th>
<th valign="middle" align="right">Grains (mean &#xb1; SE)</th>
<th valign="middle" align="left">% var/C</th>
<th valign="middle" align="right">Crop residues (mean &#xb1; SE)</th>
<th valign="middle" align="left">% var/C</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Cu (ppm)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">N300<break/>N300 + MS<break/>N350<break/>N320 + MS</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">1.51 &#xb1; 0.07<break/>1.44 &#xb1; 0.01<break/>1.68 &#xb1; 0.05<break/>1.50 &#xb1; 0.11</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Ref. (ab)<break/>&#x2013; 5% (b)<break/>+ 1%1 (a)<break/>&#x2013; 1% (ab)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">11.0 &#xb1; 1.5<break/>13.3 &#xb1; 1.9<break/>7.8 &#xb1; 0.5<break/>12.0 &#xb1; 2.5</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Ref. (a)<break/>+ 21% (a)<break/>&#x2013; 29% (a)<break/>+ 9% (a)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Fe (ppm)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">N300<break/>N300 + MS<break/>N350<break/>N320 + MS</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">16.3 &#xb1; 0.4<break/>19.7 &#xb1; 2.1<break/>18.2 &#xb1; 1.4<break/>16.6 &#xb1; 0.3</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Ref. (a)<break/>+ 21% (a)<break/>+ 12% (a)<break/>+ 2% (a)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">68.5 &#xb1; 12.7<break/>114.0 &#xb1; 15.0<break/>83.6 &#xb1; 6.6<break/>106.0 &#xb1; 16.9</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Ref. (b)<break/>+ 67% (a)<break/>+ 22% (ab)<break/>+ 55% (ab)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Mn (ppm)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">N300<break/>N300 + MS<break/>N350<break/>N320 + MS</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">2.33 &#xb1; 0.06<break/>2.31 &#xb1; 0.12<break/>3.34 &#xb1; 0.03<break/>2.78 &#xb1; 0.25</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Ref. (bc)<break/>&#x2013; 1% (c)<break/>+ 43% (a)<break/>+ 19% (b)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">4.77 &#xb1; 0.61<break/>5.93 &#xb1; 0.58<break/>7.69 &#xb1; 0.34<break/>6.00 &#xb1; 0.89</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Ref. (b)<break/>+ 24% (ab)<break/>+ 61% (a)<break/>+ 26% (ab)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Na (ppm)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">N300<break/>N300 + MS<break/>N350<break/>N320 + MS</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">27.8 &#xb1; 1.6<break/>22.2 &#xb1; 3.5<break/>20.1 &#xb1; 4.1<break/>20.0 &#xb1; 2.9</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Ref. (a)<break/>&#x2013; 20% (a)<break/>&#x2013; 28% (a)<break/>&#x2013; 28% (a)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">50.6 &#xb1; 5.8<break/>51.9 &#xb1; 3.2<break/>49.4 &#xb1; 3.0<break/>54.8 &#xb1; 8.2</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Ref. (a)<break/>+ 3% (a)<break/>&#x2013; 2% (a)<break/>+ 8% (a)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Zn (ppm)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">N300<break/>N300 + MS<break/>N350<break/>N320 + MS</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">19.5 &#xb1; 0.1<break/>19.7 &#xb1; 0.4<break/>21.7 &#xb1; 0.4<break/>20.0 &#xb1; 0.3</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Ref. (b)<break/>+ 1% (b)<break/>+ 11% (a)<break/>+ 3% (b)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">30.0 &#xb1; 3.1<break/>34.0 &#xb1; 4.1<break/>43.3 &#xb1; 1.6<break/>32.6 &#xb1; 2.7</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Ref. (b)<break/>+ 14% (ab)<break/>+ 44% (a)<break/>+ 9% (b)</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn>
<p>Within each element, different letters indicate statistically significant differences among treatments, and percentage changes (% var/C) variations relative to the N300 control (C) (Tukey&#x2019;s test, p &#x2264; 0.05).</p>
</fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<p>Regarding N concentration, aligned with grain protein content, a significant unexpected decrease was observed in treatment N350. Conversely, N300 + MS exhibited the most notable (n.s.) increment (+5% vs. N300 control). Kernel Ca content showed a notable increase in the N350 treatment (+15% vs. control; n.s.), while Cu exhibited similar trends with +11% in the same treatment, which was statistically significant vs. control.</p>
<p>Fe content was particularly responsive, with the N300 + MS having a +21% vs. control, but again it was only a trend. The most significant change was observed in Mn, where N350 induced a remarkable +43% in grain concentration. K and P remained relatively stable, with only minor fluctuations, although &#x2013;8% was observed in N320 + MS for grain P.</p>
<p>Regarding the elemental composition of crop residues, there were more pronounced treatment effects compared to grains. N content was notably lower in N350 (-24%) compared to N300 control, aligning with trends observed in the grains, meanwhile, N300 + MS showed a moderate non-significant increase (+15%) and N320 + MS a minor decrease (&#x2212;3%).</p>
<p>Ca levels increased non-significantly by 15% in N300 + MS. Fe content showed substantial alterations, with N300 + MS and N320 + MS increasing by 67% (p &#x2264; 0.05) and 55% vs. N300, respectively. K exhibited significant increases, with N350 and N320 + MS treatments showing +17% and +14% vs. control, respectively.</p>
<p>Mn demonstrated notable responsiveness, with N350 increasing biomass Mn by 61%. Conversely, some treatments resulted in decreased levels of certain elements, particularly Mg and P. The N350 treatment, for instance, induced a &#x2013;30% in Mg (p &#x2264; 0.05), while N320 + MS showed a &#x2212;24% non-significant decrease in P content.</p>
<p>The application of <italic>Methylobacterium symbioticum</italic> significantly enhanced the overall N accumulation across grains and biomass of maize under varying N levels (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Supplementary Table S1</bold>
</xref>). N300 + MS showed the greatest improvement, with grain N increasing by 17%, crop residues by 51%, and overall N accumulation by 30% vs. N300 control. The N320 + MS treatment also improved N uptake (+6% grains, +37% crop residues, +17% total), though less effectively than N300 + MS. Conversely, N350 led to a decrease in N accumulation (-24% grains, -14% crop resides, -20% total). Statistical analysis confirmed that N300 + MS was the most effective treatment, followed by N320 + MS, while N350 had the lowest N efficiency.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_8">
<label>3.8</label>
<title>Correlation analysis</title>
<p>Correlation analysis revealed significant relationships between various plant parameters (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T6">
<bold>Table&#xa0;6</bold>
</xref>). Plant height exhibited strong positive correlations with vegetative growth metrics, including leaf count (r = +0.88***, p &#x2264; 0.001) and LAI (r = +0.66*, p &#x2264; 0.05). Furthermore, plant height strongly correlated with total shoot biomass (r = +0.86***, p &#x2264; 0.001) and moderately with grain yield (r = +0.50, n.s.). LAI emerged as a critical factor influencing grain yield (r = +0.82**, p &#x2264; 0.01) and demonstrated a significant correlation with ear count (r = +0.58*, p &#x2264; 0.05). Seasonal SPAD values showed a significant negative correlation with the harvest index (r = &#x2013;0.78**, p &#x2264; 0.01). Root electrical capacitance exhibited positive weak correlations with plant height (r = +0.21, n.s.) and LAI (r = +0.13, n.s.), the positive trend being consistent with our field observations of enhanced root development in <italic>Methylobacterium</italic>-treated plants, particularly in N320 + MS. Among yield components, grain yield positively correlated with TSW (r = +0.63*, p &#x2264; 0.05) and negatively with grain moisture (r = &#x2013;0.52, n.s.). Among grain quality parameters, grain protein content showed a negative correlation with oil content (r = &#x2013;0.28, n.s.).</p>
<table-wrap id="T6" position="float">
<label>Table&#xa0;6</label>
<caption>
<p>Pearson correlation coefficients (r) between morphological, physiological, and yield parameters in maize across four treatments (N300, N300 + MS, N350, and N320 + MS).</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" align="center">
</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">SPAD</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Root capacitance</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Plant height</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">No. of leaves</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">LAI</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Shoot biomass</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">No. of ears</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Grain yield</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Grain moisture</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">TSW</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">HI</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Protein %</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Oil %</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Starch %</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom" align="left" style="background-color:#7f7f7f">SPAD</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center"/>
<td valign="middle" align="center">+0.11 ns</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">+0.24 ns</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">+0.05 ns</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">+0.36 ns</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">+0.24 ns</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">+0.04 ns</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">+0.37 ns</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;0.52 ns</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">+0.09 ns</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;0.78**</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;0.32 ns</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">+0.37 ns</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;0.40 ns</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom" align="left" style="background-color:#7f7f7f">Root capacitance</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">+0.11 ns</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center"/>
<td valign="middle" align="center">+0.21 ns</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">+0.30 ns</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">+0.13 ns</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">+0.17 ns</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">+0.22 ns</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;0.18 ns</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;0.05 ns</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;0.08 ns</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;0.37 ns</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">+0.30 ns</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">+0.04 ns</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">+0.49 ns</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom" align="left" style="background-color:#7f7f7f">Plant height</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">+0.24 ns</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">+0.21 ns</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center"/>
<td valign="middle" align="center">+0.88***</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">+0.66*</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">+0.86***</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">+0.74**</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">+0.50 ns</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;0.27 ns</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">+0.32 ns</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;0.52 ns</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;0.28 ns</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">+0.02 ns</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;0.24 ns</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom" align="left" style="background-color:#7f7f7f">No. of leaves</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">+0.05 ns</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">+0.30 ns</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">+0.88***</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center"/>
<td valign="middle" align="center">+0.70*</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">+0.88***</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">+0.64*</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">+0.48 ns</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;0.34 ns</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">+0.41 ns</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;0.53 ns</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;0.14 ns</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">+0.00 ns</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;0.26 ns</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom" align="left" style="background-color:#7f7f7f">LAI</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">+0.36 ns</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">+0.13 ns</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">+0.66*</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">+0.70*</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center"/>
<td valign="middle" align="center">+0.57 ns</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">+0.58*</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">+0.82**</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;0.74**</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">+0.34 ns</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;0.54 ns</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;0.23 ns</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">+0.41 ns</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;0.64*</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom" align="left" style="background-color:#7f7f7f">Shoot biomass</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">+0.24 ns</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">+0.17 ns</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">+0.86***</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">+0.88***</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">+0.57 ns</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center"/>
<td valign="middle" align="center">+0.45 ns</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">+0.39 ns</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;0.42 ns</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">+0.33 ns</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;0.61*</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;0.19 ns</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;0.06 ns</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;0.27 ns</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom" align="left" style="background-color:#7f7f7f">No. of ears</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">+0.04 ns</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">+0.22 ns</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">+0.74**</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">+0.64*</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">+0.58*</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">+0.45 ns</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center"/>
<td valign="middle" align="center">+0.40 ns</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;0.04 ns</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">+0.38 ns</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;0.17 ns</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">+0.05 ns</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;0.14 ns</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;0.18 ns</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom" align="left" style="background-color:#7f7f7f">Grain yield</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">+0.37 ns</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;0.18 ns</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">+0.50 ns</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">+0.48 ns</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">+0.82**</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">+0.39 ns</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">+0.40 ns</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center"/>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;0.52 ns</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">+0.63*</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;0.52 ns</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;0.45 ns</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">+0.39 ns</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;0.86***</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom" align="left" style="background-color:#7f7f7f">Grain moisture</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;0.52 ns</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;0.05 ns</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;0.27 ns</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;0.34 ns</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;0.74**</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;0.42 ns</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;0.04 ns</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;0.52 ns</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center"/>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;0.03 ns</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">+0.52 ns</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">+0.34 ns</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;0.57 ns</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">+0.54 ns</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom" align="left" style="background-color:#7f7f7f">TSW</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">+0.09 ns</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;0.08 ns</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">+0.32 ns</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">+0.41 ns</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">+0.34 ns</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">+0.33 ns</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">+0.38 ns</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">+0.63*</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;0.03 ns</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center"/>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;0.37 ns</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;0.12 ns</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;0.28 ns</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;0.59*</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom" align="left" style="background-color:#7f7f7f">HI</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;0.78**</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;0.37 ns</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;0.52 ns</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;0.53 ns</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;0.54 ns</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;0.61*</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;0.17 ns</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;0.52 ns</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">+0.52 ns</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;0.37 ns</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center"/>
<td valign="middle" align="center">+0.28 ns</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;0.31 ns</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">+0.41 ns</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom" align="left" style="background-color:#7f7f7f">Protein %</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;0.32 ns</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">+0.30 ns</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;0.28 ns</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;0.14 ns</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;0.23 ns</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;0.19 ns</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">+0.05 ns</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;0.45 ns</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">+0.34 ns</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;0.12 ns</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">+0.28 ns</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center"/>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;0.65*</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">+0.36 ns</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom" align="left" style="background-color:#7f7f7f">Oil %</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">+0.37 ns</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">+0.04 ns</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">+0.02 ns</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">+0.00 ns</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">+0.41 ns</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;0.06 ns</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;0.14 ns</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">+0.39 ns</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;0.57 ns</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;0.28 ns</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;0.31 ns</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;0.65*</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center"/>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;0.24 ns</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom" align="left" style="background-color:#7f7f7f">Starch %</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;0.40 ns</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">+0.49 ns</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;0.24 ns</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;0.26 ns</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;0.64*</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;0.27 ns</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;0.18 ns</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;0.86***</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">+0.54 ns</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;0.59*</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">+0.41 ns</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">+0.36 ns</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;0.24 ns</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center"/>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn>
<p>Significance levels: *p &#x2264; 0.05; **p &#x2264; 0.01; ***p &#x2264; 0.001; ns, not significant.</p>
</fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s4" sec-type="discussion">
<label>4</label>
<title>Discussion</title>
<sec id="s4_1">
<label>4.1</label>
<title>Maize-<italic>Methylobacterium symbioticum</italic> interaction</title>
<p>The application of the nitrogen-fixing bacterium <italic>Methylobacterium symbioticum</italic> presents a promising advancement in sustainable cultivation of non-legume crops like maize. The present study investigates the effects of foliar applied <italic>M. symbioticum</italic> under different N fertilization regimes on key performance parameters of maize, such as vegetative growth, root growth, yield, and nutrient content. This trial confirmed that inoculation with <italic>M. symbioticum</italic> can enhance maize growth and the quality of grain by partially reducing the dependence on chemical fertilizers, as the best improvements were achieved when combining moderate N rates with bacterial inoculation These findings are consistent with recent studies on wheat and maize, where <italic>M. symbioticum</italic> application under reduced N regimes maintained or improved growth and yield, suggesting a consistent benefit of this bacterium across cereal crops under suboptimal N supply. However, some field studies have reported limited effects of <italic>M. symbioticum</italic> on cereal yield, highlighting that environmental conditions and management practices can affect the magnitude of the response (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B56">Torres Vera et&#xa0;al., 2024</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B57">Valente et&#xa0;al., 2024</xref>).</p>
<p>The development of effective nitrogen-fixing systems is a critical challenge in sustainable agriculture. Unlike traditional symbiotic N fixation of legumes, cereal crops like maize lack the specialized structures necessary for these associations (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">Pankievicz et&#xa0;al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Guo et&#xa0;al., 2023</xref>). Consequently, there is an increasing interest in plant-associated bacteria that can aid plants by fixing N and promoting growth. It has been demonstrated that <italic>M. symbioticum</italic> establishes beneficial plant associations without the requirement for specialized root nodules (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B66">Zhang et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>). In this way, the microbial approach could partially address some environmental concerns linked to chemical N fertilizers, such as greenhouse gas emissions, nitrate water pollution, and soil degradation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">Galloway et&#xa0;al., 2008</xref>). This is similar to the benefits reported for other plant growth-promoting bacteria (PGPB) such as <italic>Azospirillum</italic> and <italic>Bacillus</italic> spp., which have been widely studied in maize and wheat for their ability to improve nitrogen use efficiency and reduce fertilizer supply (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Barbosa et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>).</p>
<p>The performance and success of nitrogen-fixing inoculants depends on environmental conditions, also including the dose of N fertilization. Research indicates that such inoculants improve nitrogen use efficiency and plant growth through direct N fixation, improved nutrient scavenging, and hormonal modulation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">G&#xf3;mez-Duque et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B55">Timofeeva et&#xa0;al., 2023</xref>). These processes are compatible with current knowledge on various plant growth-promoting bacteria (PGPB), which contribute to crop productivity via both direct metabolic activities and indirect effects on plant physiology and tolerance to stress (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">Gamalero and Glick, 2019</xref>). By combining foliar application of <italic>M. symbioticum</italic> under varying N regimes, it was possible to assess its potential to substitute or supplement synthetic N inputs while maintaining crop productivity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">Berendsen et&#xa0;al., 2012</xref>). This integrated strategy highlights that microbial interventions must be tailored to complement conventional fertilization at a suitable rate, especially under high-yielding systems where exclusive reliance on biological N fixation might not be feasible in the short term.</p>
<p>This study, by employing ESEM under aseptic conditions, revealed efficient colonization of maize leaf surface by this <italic>M. symbioticum</italic> strain. The bacterium primarily aggregates along foliar veins and near stomatal openings, indicating possible easy penetration into leaf tissue of this crop species while remaining extracellularly and maintaining proximity to these key structural sites (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B66">Zhang et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s4_2">
<label>4.2</label>
<title>Vegetative growth responses</title>
<p>At the dough stage, maize inoculated with <italic>M. symbioticum</italic> exhibited significantly enhanced vegetative growth, especially when combined with a moderate level of N fertilization, outperforming control plants that received a standard N rate. Although increases in plant height across treatments were modest with no statistical significance, other crucial vegetative parameters demonstrated pronounced improvements with bacterial inoculation. Importantly, LAI increased when plants received the bacterial treatment regardless of the dose of chemical N fertilization. This provides plants with greater radiation use and photosynthetic capacity during critical stages of development, and may be attributed to bacterial phytohormone production, specifically cytokinins and auxins, which have been recognized to stimulate cell division and primordia development in leaves of cereal crops (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">Palberg et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B63">Wu et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>). Plants treated with the bacterial inoculant, in combination with either conventional (N300) or moderate (N320) N fertilization, achieved LAI values of 4.5, reflecting significant improvements of 10% over controls, which is a key determinant of biomass accumulation. The magnitude of LAI improvement is especially relevant, considering that even small increases in light interception during critical periods of maize growth can have a great influence on the final yield of this C4 species (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B44">Rodrigues et&#xa0;al., 2024</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B56">Torres Vera et&#xa0;al., 2024</xref>). LAI increases are similar to those observed in maize treated with <italic>Azospirillum brasilense</italic> under moderate N fertilization, as reported by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Barbosa et&#xa0;al. (2022)</xref>, further indicating that microbial inoculation can enhance canopy development in maize under specific conditions.</p>
<p>Total shoot biomass also exhibited marked enhancements in response to microbial inoculation. At the dough stage of maturation, the N320 + MS treatment peaked at 1,399 g DW m<sup>&#x2013;</sup>&#xb2; (40% increase over N300 controls), while N300 + MS achieved 1,298 g m<sup>&#x2013;</sup>&#xb2; (30% increase). This suggests that <italic>M. symbioticum</italic> can optimize N assimilation and resource allocation even in later stages from its application, potentially by enhancing N accumulation, improving metabolic efficiency, or modulating hormonal balance to favor shoot development, together with photosynthetic efficiency and carbon allocation, like observed in wheat by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B57">Valente et&#xa0;al. (2024)</xref> with the same bacterial strain.</p>
<p>Notably, both the treatments including the bacterial inoculation enhanced ear differentiation and reproductive structure development, which had direct implication on yield. This may be the result of enhanced assimilation during the critical ear differentiation period at the beginning of stem elongation (stage V8-V10; i.e, 8-10-leaf stage) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B56">Torres Vera et&#xa0;al., 2024</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">Liu et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>). Similar improvements in shoot biomass and reproductive development have been observed in wheat and rice following <italic>M. symbioticum</italic> application, although the magnitude of yield response in maize appears more variable, likely due to differences in crop physiology and environmental interactions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B66">Zhang et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s4_3">
<label>4.3</label>
<title>Chlorophyll status and SPAD dynamics</title>
<p>The analysis of the overall plant chlorophyll content using SPAD measurements revealed complex temporal and spatial dynamics. Early-season observations showed inferior photosynthetic capacity at the lowest N fertilization without bacterial inoculation, while variable benefits were constantly recorded by the application of <italic>M. symbioticum</italic> throughout the measurement period, as highlighted by the higher seasonal SPAD averages. The effects of bacterial inoculation on leaf chlorophyll content became even more evident when approaching maturity and plant senescence, focusing on basal leaves (positions 1-4) on 25 July, and cob leaves and apical leaves later. This suggests that this bacterium exerts a stay-green effect that prolongs photosynthetic activity during critical grain development stages. The observed differential response among leaf positions suggests that <italic>M. symbioticum</italic> influences the natural senescence process, which starts from older basal leaves through localized effects on N metabolism enzymes and senescence-associated gene expression (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Grossi et&#xa0;al., 2024</xref>). Such persistent photosynthetic activity has been frequently demonstrated in studies investigating bio-stimulant effects on crop physiology, regardless of the crop species (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B45">Rouphael and Colla, 2020</xref>). The N320 + MS treatment consistently maintained the maximum chlorophyll concentration in the basal leaves, while also showing considerable increases of 36% in cob leaves and 11% in apical leaves compared to controls. This is likely because of the combined effect of delayed senescence from both N fertilization and bacterial application.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s4_4">
<label>4.4</label>
<title>Mechanistic insights into ACC-deaminase and hormonal modulation</title>
<p>The ACC deaminase activity observed in <italic>M. symbioticum</italic> SB23 provides a plausible mechanistic basis for the delayed leaf senescence and prolonged chlorophyll retention in maize. By breaking down ACC into &#x3b1;-ketobutyrate and ammonia, the enzyme lowers ethylene biosynthesis, which is a crucial phytohormone for triggering senescence&#x2014;thus maintaining chlorophyll stability in older leaves (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B48">Shahid et&#xa0;al., 2023</xref>). This ethylene attenuation appears to operate synergistically with enhanced nitrogen metabolism, as reduced ethylene levels are known to upregulate key N-assimilating enzymes such as glutamine synthetase and glutamate synthase, facilitating improved amino-N assimilation and remobilization during grain filling (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Grossi et&#xa0;al., 2024</xref>). In addition to modulating ethylene and N, ACC deaminase-mediated ethylene reduction has been found to strengthen the plants antioxidant machinery. PGPR-inoculated maize and other cereals generally have greater superoxide dismutase, catalase, and peroxidase activities, resulting in decreased ROS buildup, and reduced lipid peroxidation with greater membrane integrity during drought and salt stress (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">Al-Turki et&#xa0;al., 2023</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B47">Shabaan et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>).</p>
<p>Similar findings were reported in wheat inoculated with the same bacterial strain, where ACC deaminase activity was associated with extended photosynthetic activity and improved N metabolism under reduced fertilization regimes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B57">Valente et&#xa0;al., 2024</xref>). However, despite the delayed senescence, yield improvements in maize were only marginal, and this may reflect inherent limitations in the source-sink dynamics and warrants further investigation into crop-specific ethylene regulation.</p>
<p>Recent transcriptomic analyses have revealed leaf-position&#x2013;specific regulation of senescence-associated gene expression and chlorophyll catabolism pathways (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B67">Zhen et&#xa0;al., 2024</xref>), offering a conceptual framework that may be applicable to PGPR-mediated stay-green effects in maize. Several PGPR strains, including <italic>Methylobacterium</italic>, are also found to increase cytokinin production or transport, stabilizing chloroplast membranes and photosystem II activity during grain filling. This cytokinin-mediated impact has been reported in a variety of <italic>Methylobacterium</italic> species, which produce significant quantities of trans-zeatin and other active CK forms that affect photosynthetic machinery and stress resistance (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">Palberg et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>).</p>
<p>Enhanced chlorophyll retention throughout the canopy suggests that <italic>M. symbioticum</italic> may also elevate some phytohormones, such as jasmonic and salicylic acid, that are reported to delay senescence processes and retain photosynthetic capacity during reproductive stages, thus enhancing stress resilience and improve N remobilization efficiency during grain filling, as proposed by recent models (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Chen et&#xa0;al., 2024</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B64">Yim et&#xa0;al., 2014</xref>). Collectively, these findings suggest that ACC deaminase activity, coupled with phytohormonal modulation and enhanced N metabolism, may extend the photosynthetically active period and contribute to yield stability under variable climatic conditions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B51">Singh et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s4_5">
<label>4.5</label>
<title>Root development</title>
<p>Non-destructive root electrical capacitance (EC) readings revealed insights into below-ground responses of maize to N fertilization and <italic>M. symbioticum</italic> treatments as supported by the seasonal trends in the absence of &#x2018;Treatment &#xd7; Time&#x2019; interaction.</p>
<p>Across both the initial (23 June) and final (5 August) measurements dates, plants treated with N320 + MS treatment displayed consistently higher root EC values, with a seasonal average 22% greater than the control. This indicates an extended additional positive effect of <italic>M. symbioticum</italic> inoculation, especially at 320 kg N ha<sup>-</sup>&#xb9;, which may be associated with ACC deaminase&#x2019;s role in stress mitigation, as reduced ethylene levels can also promote root growth under suboptimal N conditions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B56">Torres Vera et&#xa0;al., 2024</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B57">Valente et&#xa0;al., 2024</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Cseresny&#xe9;s et&#xa0;al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B46">Rousk et&#xa0;al., 2010</xref>).</p>
<p>Mechanistically, <italic>Methylobacterium symbioticum</italic> could improve root functional capacity under high nitrogen levels via several, coordinated processes. It can produce indole-3-acetic acid (IAA), which stimulates lateral root formation and increases the root-soil contact (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">Patten and Glick, 2002</xref>). Furthermore, it secretes exopolysaccharides that contribute to rhizosphere aggregation and modify soil physicochemical properties, including dielectric characteristics, thereby improving water retention and ion exchange (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">Pham et&#xa0;al., 2024</xref>) which further optimize EC readings.</p>
<p>Peak EC values in N320 + MS were reported in late July, probably due to cumulative phytohormonal effects that promote long-term root activity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Grossi et&#xa0;al., 2024</xref>). The subsequent EC decline noticed after July is most likely due to decreasing soil moisture during late-season drying, since EC measurements are sensitive to root-soil contact and soil moisture (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Cseresny&#xe9;s et&#xa0;al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Dietrich et&#xa0;al., 2013</xref>). Despite this constraint, the EC advantage of N320 + MS is consistent with previous research associating <italic>Methylobacterium</italic> spp. to root growth promotion through phytohormonal regulation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B56">Torres Vera et&#xa0;al., 2024</xref>). However, studies specifically on assessing the effect of the <italic>M. symbioticum</italic> on root growth effects remain limited, while other PGPR, such as <italic>Azospirillum</italic>, have been shown to improve root expansion through the production and exchange of auxins through root associations in many cereal crops. However, very recently <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B57">Valente et&#xa0;al. (2024)</xref> have demonstrated that this <italic>Methylobacterium</italic> strain can also increase root length density in the arable layer in common wheat in open field.</p>
<p>Excessive chemical N fertilization generally limits root growth in cereal plants (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">Chen et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B65">Yokamo et&#xa0;al., 2023</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B42">Ren et&#xa0;al., 2024</xref>). As the maximum effects on root electrical capacitance of <italic>Methylobacterium</italic> was observed at high N doses, such response seems positive to counteract the negative impact of N fertilization on root growth thereby increasing the plant&#x2019;s tolerance to stress conditions.</p>
<p>While EC is correlated with root biomass, the data must be interpreted with caution because environmental factors, particularly soil moisture, have a significant influence on EC measurements (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Cseresny&#xe9;s et&#xa0;al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">Ellis et&#xa0;al., 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Dong et&#xa0;al., 2023</xref>). In the early stages of the trial, EC values were elevated, likely due to the maximum root expansion into moist soil occurring usually at flowering in maize. Then, over time, a decreasing EC trend was observed which may seem inconsistent with actual root growth but could be attributed to root aging and the declining soil moisture during summer, which limits root-soil water-electrode contact.</p>
<p>Enhanced root EC was associated with improved above-ground performance, as N320 + MS treated plants also had higher shoot height, biomass and LAI. This indicates that a more developed root system is directly linked to an increased aerial growth and yield by facilitating resource acquisition and translocation. This suggests that <italic>M. symbioticum</italic> might cause whole-plant physiological changes that optimize resource allocation and use throughout the growth season (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">Kou et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Kitchen et&#xa0;al., 2003</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s4_6">
<label>4.6</label>
<title>Grain yield and quality parameters</title>
<p>As a result of the beneficial effects on vegetative and root growth, <italic>M. symbioticum</italic> affected final grain yield and quality. The inoculated N300 + MS treatment increased grain yield by 12% compared to N300 control; however, this difference was not statistically significant, indicating a positive trend that warrants additional investigation, and thereby also indicating that bacterial inoculation could potentially boost productivity even without additional N inputs. As the effect of N320 + MS was less evident in terms of yield (+6%), it is suspected that crop performance may not follow a simple linear relationship with N availability when bacterial inoculants are applied. The N350 treatment displayed a statistically significant 8% reduction in yield relative to N300 + MS (p &#x2264; 0.05), while its difference with control was not significant, suggesting that excessive N application may negatively impact productivity when not balanced with biological input (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Galindo et&#xa0;al., 2024</xref>). Ultimately, this bacterium may promote grain yield in maize at lower doses of N supplied, in agreement with other studies on maize, wheat, rice, grapevine, and strawberry (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">Pascual et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B57">Valente et&#xa0;al., 2024</xref>). However, it is important to note that while some studies report significant yield increases with <italic>M. symbioticum</italic> or other PGPB in maize, others find more moderate or variable effects, likely due to differences in genotype, environment, and agronomic management (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B44">Rodrigues et&#xa0;al., 2024</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B56">Torres Vera et&#xa0;al., 2024</xref>).</p>
<p>Grain quality parameters showed similarly promising trend responses to bacterial inoculation. Although associated with retarded leaf senescence, bacterial inoculation positively provided lower grain moisture content at harvest than controls, suggesting efficient resource remobilization during grain filling and faster dry down (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">Malik and Rengel, 2013</xref>), that potentially allows for improved post-harvest management and reduced drying costs. Additionally, grain protein/N content increased by 5% in the N300 + MS treatment, thus enhancing, although as a trend, the nutritional value of the harvested product. The bacteria might promote more efficient N metabolism by increasing the activity of enzymes like glutamine synthetase and glutamate synthase (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Fortunato et&#xa0;al., 2023</xref>). However, major increases in N content were observed in crop residues of the N300 + MS treatment, a result that might also be related to the N-fixation ability of this bacterium (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">Madhaiyan et&#xa0;al., 2015</xref>), although we did not investigate this aspect in the current study. In contrast, the N350 treatment showed a 18% decrease in grain protein/N content and even more in the crop residues (&#x2212;24%), despite the higher N supply, emphasizing the potential negative effects of excessive N application in the absence of microbial assistance (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Galindo et&#xa0;al., 2024</xref>). Minor fluctuations in oil, starch, and TSW, indicate that biomass partitioning remained balanced in bacterial-treated plants.</p>
<p>Elemental composition analysis revealed subtle shifts in nutrient uptake and a minor role of the bacterium. While <italic>M. symbioticum</italic> moderately increased Fe content in grains (+21% in N300 + MS)&#x2013;a favorable effect in Fe-poor grains of many cereals including maize&#x2013;and K in crop residues (+14% in N320 + MS), it decreased Mg and P levels particularly in crop residues. These contrasting responses suggest that bacterial inoculation may alter nutrient competition or translocation pathways. For example, improved rhizosphere solubilization might boost Fe and Mn uptake, whereas decreased Mg could indicate cation balance trade-offs or antagonism with K. This highlights the complex relationship between microbial-mediated nutrient mobilization and root architectural modifications, or interactions with nutrient translocation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B44">Rodrigues et&#xa0;al., 2024</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B52">Singh et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>). Such nutrient shifts have also been observed in other studies on PGPB in cereals, suggesting that microbial inoculation can affect not only N dynamics but also the uptake and partitioning of other essential elements (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B55">Timofeeva et&#xa0;al., 2023</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Chen et&#xa0;al., 2024</xref>). Variations in elemental composition highlight the multifaceted nature of microbial influence on nutrient uptake and partitioning. While some changes were statistically significant, others showed moderate trends; therefore, results must be interpreted with care to avoid overestimating bacterial impact.</p>
<p>Importantly, the foliar application of <italic>M. symbioticum</italic> significantly increased N accumulation in maize grain and biomass, particularly at the lowest N dose (N300 + MS treatment), surpassing even the higher mineral N input (N350). These findings would further sustain the role of this bacterium in plant N metabolism and use efficiency, likely through a combination of various effects, such as biological N fixation and improved N assimilation, and enhanced root growth and function, as supported by the morpho-physiological data.</p>
<p>The correlation analysis confirms the important role of <italic>M. symbioticum</italic> inoculation, as LAI enhancement caused by this bacterium is strongly correlated with grain yield (r = +0.82; p &#x2264; 0.05), while the stay-green effect (as seasonal SPAD) (r = + 0.35, n.s.) and root capacitance enhancement (r = &#x2013;0.18, n.s.) were poorly correlated with productivity. Instead, the negative correlation between seasonal SPAD and harvest index (r = &#x2013;0.78, p &#x2264; 0.01) suggests to further investigate the source-sink competition related to the stay-green effect under <italic>M. symbioticum</italic> application.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s4_7">
<label>4.7</label>
<title>Environmental and economic implications, limitations and future perspectives</title>
<p>From an environmental standpoint, integrating <italic>Methylobacterium symbioticum</italic> into maize production systems offers numerous benefits. This biological approach can potentially allow a reduction in environmental contamination due to excess N fertilization. Conventional N fertilization frequently results in nitrate leaching and groundwater pollution, nitrous oxide emissions in the atmosphere which contribute to climate change, and ammonia volatilization which impairs air quality (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">Galloway et&#xa0;al., 2008</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">Robertson and Vitousek, 2009</xref>). The moderate yield improvements found in MS-treated plots, which were obtained with lower N inputs, imply that bacterial inoculation can minimize these environmental issues while maintaining or even increasing agricultural production.</p>
<p>Moreover, this study is one of the first to demonstrate the effective foliar application of <italic>Methylobacterium symbioticum</italic> as a biofertilizer in open-field maize agriculture. Unlike conventional soil or seed inoculation procedures, foliar administration allowed for direct colonization of the maize phyllosphere, as evidenced by environmental scanning electron microscopy (ESEM). This strategy increased physiological metrics like chlorophyll retention and root activity while also providing a unique avenue for targeted nitrogen-fixing bacteria administration under changeable field circumstances. Foliar inoculation, which bypasses soil microbial interactions, may improve delivery efficiency and consistency, making it a viable option for advancing sustainable nitrogen management practices.</p>
<p>Economically, the use of <italic>M. symbioticum</italic> could potentially reduce fertilizer requirements, which is a significant benefit given the rising and variable costs of N fertilizers. For example, the N300 + MS treatment boosted yield by 12% while using the same N application as the N300 control, thus increasing the return on fertilizer investment. Similarly, the N320 + MS treatment produced yields comparable to higher N inputs (N350), demonstrating that farmers could lower fertilizer expenses while maintaining productivity. Other potential advantages may include improved grain quality, possibly leading to higher market prices, and lower grain drying costs due to lower moisture content at harvest. On the other hand, the application costs of these bacterial inoculants can be minimized when applied along with the post-emergence weeding, in this way saving time and fuel costs. Although any possible interaction between the bacterium and herbicides requires preliminary investigation, at this time the cost-effectiveness would lie in the compensation point between the cost of the applied biofertilizer with that of saved chemical fertilizer, at least in conventional (but not in organic) management systems.</p>
<p>While the current study highlights the potential of foliar-applied <italic>Methylobacterium symbioticum</italic> to maintain maize productivity under reduced nitrogen inputs, its wider relevance would benefit from multi-location, multi-season trials with larger plot scales and increased replication to verify treatment stability and statistical robustness across diverse environments. Concurrently, field-level investigations of bacterial colonization dynamics and formulation persistence are required to assure long-term effectiveness in commercial production settings.</p>
<p>Further research should clarify the biological nitrogen fixation and nutrient intake processes that cause observed mineral composition changes, therefore maximizing yield-quality trade-offs.</p>
<p>Future studies should also include direct measurement and quantification of biological nitrogen fixation (BNF) using natural-abundance &#xb9;<sup>5</sup>N methods, controlled &#xb9;<sup>5</sup>N<sub>2</sub> - enrichment experiments, and acetylene reduction assays at key growth stages. Exploring <italic>M. symbioticum&#x2019;s</italic> synergistic potential with resource-conserving agronomic methods, such as low tillage and deficit irrigation, across different maize genotypes may yield substantial increases in sustainability and productivity. Finally, incorporating these agronomic and mechanistic insights into complete economic frameworks&#x2014;encompassing many trials, varied input costs, and market premiums for sustainably produced grain&#x2014;will be useful in turning experimental discoveries into scalable, policy-relevant solutions.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s5" sec-type="conclusions">
<label>5</label>
<title>Conclusions</title>
<p>This study demonstrates the potential role of <italic>M. symbioticum</italic> as a foliar-applied microbial biostimulant in sustainable maize production. The bacterial treatment can successfully colonize maize leaves and positively influence vegetative growth, maintain higher chlorophyll content by delaying leaf senescence, foster root development, grain yield and nutritional value. The observed morphological improvements highlight the complex physiological interplay between bacterial endophytes and maize metabolism. Notably, the bacterium&#x2019;s ACC deaminase activity most likely leads to delayed leaf senescence, which maintains photosynthetic capacity throughout crucial development stages. Moderate N levels paired with bacterial inoculation have the potential to increase grain yield and protein content, suggesting that chemical N inputs can be partially reduced without compromising crop performance, contributing simultaneously to reduce water pollution and greenhouse gas emissions, although these differences were not consistently statistically significant, emphasizing the importance of caution in interpretation.</p>
<p>The foliar biofertilization approach described here is novel and holds promise as a complementary strategy to reduce synthetic nitrogen inputs, although environmental conditions and application methods will likely affect effectiveness. These findings support further research into site-specific agronomic adjustments and optimizing formulation stability for plant inoculation, application protocols, and large-scale field trials to confirm agronomic benefits and economic viability. Collectively, these findings indicate that the incorporation of <italic>M. symbioticum</italic> presents a promising strategy to enhance maize resilience and sustainability under a changing climate scenario.</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<sec id="s6" sec-type="data-availability">
<title>Data availability statement</title>
<p>The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s7" sec-type="author-contributions">
<title>Author contributions</title>
<p>PKB: Validation, Methodology, Formal Analysis, Visualization, Writing &#x2013; original draft. AP: Validation, Formal Analysis, Methodology, Data curation, Investigation, Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing. EM: Investigation, Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing, Methodology. FV: Validation, Writing &#x2013; original draft, Methodology, Visualization. SP: Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing, Investigation, Methodology. GV: Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing, Methodology, Investigation. IMS: Funding acquisition, Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing, Resources, Investigation. TV: Resources, Conceptualization, Project administration, Validation, Funding acquisition, Supervision, Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s8" sec-type="funding-information">
<title>Funding</title>
<p>The author(s) declare financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article. This research was funded by BIRD230559/2023 entitled &#x201c;The Impact of Landscape in Shaping the Microbiota of Pollinators&#x201d; from the University of Padua, Italy.</p>
</sec>
<ack>
<title>Acknowledgments</title>
<p>We are grateful to Monica Mattarozzi (University of Parma, IT) for providing ESEM images.</p>
</ack>
<sec id="s9" sec-type="COI-statement">
<title>Conflict of interest</title>
<p>The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s10" sec-type="ai-statement">
<title>Generative AI statement</title>
<p>The author(s) declare that no Generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.</p>
<p>Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s11" sec-type="disclaimer">
<title>Publisher&#x2019;s note</title>
<p>All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s12" sec-type="supplementary-material">
<title>Supplementary material</title>
<p>The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2025.1661290/full#supplementary-material">https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2025.1661290/full#supplementary-material</ext-link>
</p>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="DataSheet1.docx" id="SM1" mimetype="application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document"/>
</sec>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="B1">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Al-Turki</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Murali</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Omar</surname> <given-names>A. F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rehan</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sayyed</surname> <given-names>R. Z.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>Recent advances in PGPR-mediated resilience toward interactive effects of drought and salt stress in plants</article-title>. <source>Front. Microbiol.</source> <volume>14</volume>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmicb.2023.1214845</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">37829451</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B2">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ardanov</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sessitsch</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Haggman</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kozyrovska</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>
<italic>Methylobacterium</italic>-induced endophyte community changes correspond with protection of plants against pathogen attack</article-title>. <source>PloS One</source> <volume>7</volume>, <elocation-id>e46802</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0046802</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23056459</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B3">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Arrobas</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Correia</surname> <given-names>C. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rodrigues</surname> <given-names>M.&#xc2;.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2024</year>). <article-title>
<italic>Methylobacterium symbioticum</italic> applied as a foliar inoculant was little effective in enhancing nitrogen fixation and lettuce dry matter yield</article-title>. <source>Sustainability</source> <volume>16</volume>, <elocation-id>4512</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/su16114512</pub-id>
</citation></ref>
<ref id="B4">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Barbosa</surname> <given-names>J. Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Roberto</surname> <given-names>L. D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hungria</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Corr&#xea;a</surname> <given-names>R. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Magri</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Correia</surname> <given-names>T. D.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Meta-analysis of maize responses to <italic>Azospirillum brasilense</italic> inoculation in Brazil: Benefits and lessons to improve inoculation efficiency</article-title>. <source>Appl. Soil Ecol.</source> <volume>170</volume>, <elocation-id>104276</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.apsoil.2021.104276</pub-id>
</citation></ref>
<ref id="B5">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Berendsen</surname> <given-names>R. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pieterse</surname> <given-names>C. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bakker</surname> <given-names>P. A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>The rhizosphere microbiome and plant health</article-title>. <source>Trends Plant Sci.</source> <volume>17</volume>, <fpage>478</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>486</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.tplants.2012.04.001</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22564542</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B6">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Bertola</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Maarozzi</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sanangelantoni</surname> <given-names>A. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Careri</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Visioli</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>PGPB colonizing three-year biochar-amended soil: Towards biochar-mediated biofertilization</article-title>. <source>J. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr.</source> <volume>19</volume>, <fpage>841</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>850</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s42729-019-00083-2</pub-id>
</citation></ref>
<ref id="B7">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sun</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Song</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Nitrogen fertilization increases root growth and coordinates the root&#x2013;shoot relationship in cotton</article-title>. <source>Front. Plant Sci.</source> <volume>11</volume>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpls.2020.00880</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32655605</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B8">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Song</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>An</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lu</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhong</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2024</year>). <article-title>Mechanisms and impact of rhizosphere microbial metabolites on crop health, traits, functional components: A comprehensive review</article-title>. <source>Molecules</source> <volume>29</volume>, <elocation-id>5922</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/molecules29245922</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">39770010</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B9">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Cseresny&#xe9;s</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Szit&#xe1;r</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rajkai</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>F&#xfc;zy</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mik&#xf3;</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kov&#xe1;cs</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Application of electrical capacitance method for prediction of plant root mass and activity in field-grown crops</article-title>. <source>Front. Plant Sci.</source> <volume>9</volume>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpls.2018.00093</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29449861</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B10">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Dietrich</surname> <given-names>R. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bengough</surname> <given-names>A. G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jones</surname> <given-names>H. G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>White</surname> <given-names>P. J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Can root electrical capacitance be used to predict root mass in soil</article-title>? <source>Ann. Bot.</source> <volume>112</volume>, <fpage>457</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>464</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/aob/mct044</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23493014</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B11">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Dong</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bao</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yin</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Long</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>The genetic structures and molecular mechanisms underlying ear traits in maize (<italic>Zea mays</italic> L.)</article-title>. <source>Cells</source> <volume>12</volume>, <elocation-id>41900</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/cells12141900</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">37508564</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B12">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Dourado</surname> <given-names>M. N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Santos</surname> <given-names>D. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Nunes</surname> <given-names>R. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Costa de Oliveira</surname> <given-names>R. L. B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Oliveira</surname> <given-names>M. V.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ara&#xfa;jo</surname> <given-names>W. L.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Differential gene expression in <italic>Xylella fastidiosa</italic> during co-cultivation with the endophytic bacterium <italic>Methylobacterium mesophilicum</italic> SR1.6/6</article-title>. <source>J. Basic Microbiol.</source> <volume>55</volume>, <fpage>1357</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1366</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/jobm.201400916</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26218710</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B13">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ellis</surname> <given-names>T. W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Murray</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Paul</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kavalieris</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Brophy</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Williams</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Electrical capacitance as a rapid and non-invasive indicator of root length</article-title>. <source>Tree Physiol.</source> <volume>33</volume>, <fpage>3</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>17</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/treephys/tps115</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23243029</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B14">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Fortunato</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Nigro</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lasorella</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Marcotuli</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gadaleta</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>de Pinto</surname> <given-names>M. C.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>The role of glutamine synthetase (GS) and glutamate synthase (GOGAT) in the improvement of nitrogen use efficiency in cereals</article-title>. <source>Biomolecules</source> <volume>13</volume>, <elocation-id>1771</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/biom13121771</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">38136642</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B15">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Francioli</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kampouris</surname> <given-names>I. D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kuhl-Nagel</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Babin</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sommermann</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Behr</surname> <given-names>J. H.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2025</year>). <article-title>Microbial inoculants modulate the rhizosphere microbiome, alleviate plant stress responses, and enhance maize growth at field scale</article-title>. <source>Genome Biol.</source> <volume>26</volume>, <fpage>148</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s13059-025-03621-7</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">40452057</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B16">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Galindo</surname> <given-names>F. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pagliari</surname> <given-names>P. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>da Silva</surname> <given-names>E. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>de Lima</surname> <given-names>B. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fernandes</surname> <given-names>G. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Thiengo</surname> <given-names>C. C.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2024</year>). <article-title>Impact of nitrogen fertilizer sustainability on corn crop yield: The role of beneficial microbial inoculation interactions</article-title>. <source>BMC Plant Biol.</source> <volume>24</volume>, <fpage>268</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s12870-024-04971-3</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">38605320</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B17">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Galloway</surname> <given-names>J. N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Townsend</surname> <given-names>A. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Erisman</surname> <given-names>J. W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bekunda</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cai</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Freney</surname> <given-names>J. R.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>Transformation of the nitrogen cycle: Recent trends, questions, and potential solutions</article-title>. <source>Science</source> <volume>320</volume>, <fpage>889</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>892</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1126/science.1136674</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">18487183</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B18">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Gamalero</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Glick</surname> <given-names>B. R.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2019</year>). &#x201c;<article-title>Plant growth-promoting bacteria in agricultural and stressed soils</article-title>,&#x201d; in <source>Modern soil microbiology</source> (<publisher-name>Boca Raton, Florida, USA: CRC Press</publisher-name>). doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1201/9780429059186-22</pub-id>
</citation></ref>
<ref id="B19">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>G&#xf3;mez-Duque</surname> <given-names>A. N. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Morales-Londo&#xf1;o</surname> <given-names>C. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hurtado-Salazar</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ceballos-Aguirre</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Nitrogen-fixing bacteria and nitrogen fertilization on economic feasibility of tomato</article-title>. <source>Rev. Colombiana Cienc. Hort&#xed;colas</source> <volume>16</volume>, <elocation-id>2</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.17584/rcch.2022v16i2.13623</pub-id>
</citation></ref>
<ref id="B20">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Grossi</surname> <given-names>C. E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tani</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mori</surname> <given-names>I. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Matsuura</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ulloa</surname> <given-names>R. M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2024</year>). <article-title>Plant growth-promoting abilities of <italic>Methylobacterium</italic> sp. 2A involve auxin-mediated regulation of the root architecture</article-title>. <source>Plant Cell Environ.</source> <volume>47</volume>, <fpage>5343</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>5357</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/pce.15116</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">39189962</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B21">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Guo</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yu</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Luo</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>Biological nitrogen fixation in cereal crops: Progress, strategies, and perspectives</article-title>. <source>Plant Commun.</source> <volume>4</volume>, <elocation-id>100499</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.xplc.2022.100499</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">36447432</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B22">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Jirakkakul</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Khoiri</surname> <given-names>A. N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Duangfoo</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dulsawat</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sutheeworapong</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Petsong</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>Insights into the genome of <italic>Methylobacterium</italic> sp. NMS14P, a novel bacterium for growth promotion of maize, chili, and sugarcane</article-title>. <source>PloS One</source> <volume>18</volume>, <elocation-id>e0281505</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0281505</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">36749783</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B23">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Jourand</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Giraud</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bena</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sy</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Willems</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gillis</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2004</year>). <article-title>
<italic>Methylobacterium nodulans</italic> sp. nov., for a group of aerobic, facultatively methylotrophic, legume root-nodule-forming, and nitrogen-fixing bacteria</article-title>. <source>Int. J. Systematic Evolutionary Microbiol.</source> <volume>54</volume>, <fpage>2269</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2273</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1099/ijs.0.02902-0</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">15545469</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B24">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kafle</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bhandari</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Neupane</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Aryal</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>A review on impact of different nitrogen management techniques on maize (<italic>Zea mays</italic> L.) crop performance</article-title>. <source>Agro Environ. Sustain.</source> <volume>1</volume>, <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>9</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.59983/s20230102012</pub-id>
</citation></ref>
<ref id="B25">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Khan</surname> <given-names>S. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sharma</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chawla</surname> <given-names>P. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bhatia</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES): a powerful analytical technique for elemental analysis</article-title>. <source>Food Analytical Methods</source> <volume>15</volume>, <fpage>666</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>688</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s12161-021-02148-4</pub-id>
</citation></ref>
<ref id="B26">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kirk</surname> <given-names>P. L.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1950</year>). <article-title>Kjeldahl method for total nitrogen</article-title>. <source>Analytical Chem.</source> <volume>22</volume>, <fpage>354</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>358</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1021/ac60038a038</pub-id>
</citation></ref>
<ref id="B27">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kitchen</surname> <given-names>N. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Drummond</surname> <given-names>S. T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lund</surname> <given-names>E. D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sudduth</surname> <given-names>K. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Buchleiter</surname> <given-names>G. W.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2003</year>). <article-title>Soil electrical conductivity and topography related to yield for three contrasting soil&#x2013;crop systems</article-title>. <source>Agron. J.</source> <volume>95</volume>, <fpage>483</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>495</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2134/agronj2003.0483</pub-id>
</citation></ref>
<ref id="B28">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Knief</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ramette</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Franc&#xe8;s</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Alonso-Blanco</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Vorholt</surname> <given-names>J. A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Site and plant species are important determinants of the <italic>Methylobacterium</italic> community composition in the plant phyllosphere</article-title>. <source>ISME J.</source> <volume>4</volume>, <fpage>719</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>728</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/ismej.2010.9</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20164863</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B29">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kou</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Han</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kang</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Responses of root system architecture to water stress at multiple levels: A meta-analysis of trials under controlled conditions</article-title>. <source>Front. Plant Sci.</source> <volume>13</volume>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpls.2022.1085409</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">36570905</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B30">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kumar</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bhatt</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2012</year>). &#x201c;<article-title>Status and production technology of maize</article-title>,&#x201d; in <source>Status of agricultural development in eastern India</source> (<publisher-name>ResearchGate</publisher-name>), <publisher-loc>(New Delhi, India: New India publishing agency)</publisher-loc> <fpage>151</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>167</lpage>. Available online at: <uri xlink:href="https://www.researchgate.net/publication/308918939">https://www.researchgate.net/publication/308918939</uri>. (Accessed June 14, 2025)</citation></ref>
<ref id="B31">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kutschera</surname> <given-names>U.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2007</year>). <article-title>Plant-associated methylobacteria as co-evolved phytosymbionts: A hypothesis</article-title>. <source>Plant Signaling Behav.</source> <volume>2</volume>, <fpage>74</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>78</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4161/psb.2.2.4073</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19516971</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B32">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hao</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sha</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Huang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Guo</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ke</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>High responsiveness of maize grain yield to nitrogen supply is explained by high ear growth rate and efficient ear nitrogen allocation</article-title>. <source>Field Crops Res.</source> <volume>287</volume>, <elocation-id>108610</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.fcr.2022.108610</pub-id>
</citation></ref>
<ref id="B33">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Madhaiyan</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Alex</surname> <given-names>T. H. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ngoh</surname> <given-names>S. T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Prithiviraj</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ji</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Leaf-residing <italic>Methylobacterium</italic> species fix nitrogen and promote biomass and seed production in <italic>Jatropha curcas</italic>
</article-title>. <source>Biotechnol. Biofuels</source> <volume>8</volume>, <fpage>222</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s13068-015-0404-y</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26697111</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B34">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Malik</surname> <given-names>A. I.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rengel</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2013</year>). &#x201c;<article-title>Physiology of nitrogen-use efficiency</article-title>,&#x201d; in <source>Improving water and nutrient-Use efficiency in food production systems</source> (<publisher-name>Ames, Iowa, USA: Wiley-Blackwell</publisher-name>), <fpage>105</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>121</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/9781118517994.ch7</pub-id>
</citation></ref>
<ref id="B35">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Palberg</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kisia&#x142;a</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jorge</surname> <given-names>G. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Emery</surname> <given-names>R. N.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>A survey of <italic>Methylobacterium</italic> species and strains reveals widespread production and varying profiles of cytokinin phytohormones</article-title>. <source>BMC Microbiol.</source> <volume>22</volume>, <fpage>49</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s12866-022-02454-9</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">35135483</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B36">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Pankievicz</surname> <given-names>V. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Irving</surname> <given-names>T. B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Maia</surname> <given-names>L. G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>An&#xe9;</surname> <given-names>J. M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Are we there yet? The long walk towards the development of efficient symbiotic associations between nitrogen-fixing bacteria and non-leguminous crops</article-title>. <source>BMC Biol.</source> <volume>17</volume>, <fpage>99</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s12915-019-0710-0</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31796086</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B37">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Pascual</surname> <given-names>J. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ros</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mart&#xed;nez</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Carmona</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bernab&#xe9;</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Torres</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>
<italic>Methylobacterium symbioticum</italic> sp. nov., a new species isolated from spores of <italic>Glomus Iranicum</italic> var. <italic>tenuihypharum</italic>
</article-title>. <source>Curr. Microbiol.</source> <volume>77</volume>, <fpage>2031</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2041</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00284-020-02101-4</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32594222</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B38">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Patten</surname> <given-names>C. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Glick</surname> <given-names>B. R.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2002</year>). <article-title>Role of Pseudomonas putida indoleacetic acid in development of the host plant root system</article-title>. <source>Appl. Environ. Microbiol.</source> <volume>68</volume>, <fpage>3795</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>3801</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/AEM.68.8.3795-3801.2002</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">12147474</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B39">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Penrose</surname> <given-names>D. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Glick</surname> <given-names>B. R.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2003</year>). <article-title>Methods for isolating and characterizing ACC deaminase-containing plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria</article-title>. <source>Physiol. Plant</source> <volume>118</volume>, <fpage>10</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>15</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1034/j.1399-3054.2003.00086.x</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">12702008</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B40">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Pham</surname> <given-names>T. T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Nguyen</surname> <given-names>T. D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Nguyen</surname> <given-names>T. T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pham</surname> <given-names>M. N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Nguyen</surname> <given-names>P. T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Nguyen</surname> <given-names>T. U. T.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2024</year>). <article-title>Rhizosphere bacterial exopolysaccharides: composition, biosynthesis, and their potential applications</article-title>. <source>Arch. Microbiol.</source> <volume>206</volume>, <fpage>388</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00203-024-04113-1</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">39196410</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B41">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Preininger</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sauer</surname> <given-names>U.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bejarano</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Berninger</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Concepts and applications of foliar spray for microbial inoculants</article-title>. <source>Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol.</source> <volume>102</volume>, <fpage>7265</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>7282</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00253-018-9173-4</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29961100</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B42">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ren</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2024</year>). <article-title>Long-term excessive nitrogen application decreases spring maize nitrogen use efficiency via suppressing root physiological characteristics</article-title>. <source>J. Integr. Agric.</source> <volume>23</volume>, <fpage>108610</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jia.2024.05.031</pub-id>
</citation></ref>
<ref id="B43">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Robertson</surname> <given-names>G. P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Vitousek</surname> <given-names>P. M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>Nitrogen in agriculture: Balancing the cost of an essential resource</article-title>. <source>Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour.</source> <volume>34</volume>, <fpage>97</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>125</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1146/annurev.environ.032108.105046</pub-id>
</citation></ref>
<ref id="B44">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Rodrigues</surname> <given-names>M.&#xc2;.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Correia</surname> <given-names>C. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Arrobas</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2024</year>). <article-title>The application of a foliar spray containing <italic>Methylobacterium symbioticum</italic> had a limited effect on crop yield and nitrogen recovery in field and pot-grown maize</article-title>. <source>Plants</source> <volume>13</volume>, <elocation-id>2909</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/plants13202909</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">39458855</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B45">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Rouphael</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Colla</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Biostimulants in agriculture</article-title>. <source>Front. Plant Sci.</source> <volume>11</volume>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpls.2020.00040</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32117379</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B46">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Rousk</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Brookes</surname> <given-names>P. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>B&#xe5;&#xe5;th</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Investigating the mechanisms for the opposing pH relationships of fungal and bacterial growth in soil</article-title>. <source>Soil Biol. Biochem.</source> <volume>42</volume>, <fpage>926</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>934</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.soilbio.2010.02.009</pub-id>
</citation></ref>
<ref id="B47">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Shabaan</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Asghar</surname> <given-names>H. N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zahir</surname> <given-names>Z. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sardar</surname> <given-names>M. F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Salt-tolerant PGPR confer salt tolerance to maize through enhanced soil biological health, enzymatic activities, nutrient uptake and antioxidant defense</article-title>. <source>Front. Microbiol.</source> <volume>13</volume>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmicb.2022.901865</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">35633670</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B48">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Shahid</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Singh</surname> <given-names>U. B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Khan</surname> <given-names>M. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Singh</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kumar</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Singh</surname> <given-names>R. N.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>Bacterial ACC deaminase: Insights into enzymology, biochemistry, genetics, and potential role in amelioration of environmental stress in crop plants</article-title>. <source>Front. Microbiol.</source> <volume>14</volume>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmicb.2023.1132770</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">37180266</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B49">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Shiferaw</surname> <given-names>B. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Prasanna</surname> <given-names>B. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hellin</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>B&#xe4;nziger</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Crops that feed the world 6. Past successes and future challenges to the role played by maize in global food security</article-title>. <source>Food Secur.</source> <volume>3</volume>, <fpage>307</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>327</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s12571-011-0140-5</pub-id>
</citation></ref>
<ref id="B50">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Silva</surname> <given-names>L. I. D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Oliveira</surname> <given-names>I. P. D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jesus</surname> <given-names>E. D. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pereira</surname> <given-names>M. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pasqual</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ara&#xfa;jo</surname> <given-names>R. C. D.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Fertilizer of the future: Beneficial bacteria promote strawberry growth and yield and may reduce the need for chemical fertilizer</article-title>. <source>Agronomy</source> <volume>12</volume>, <elocation-id>2465</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/agronomy12102465</pub-id>
</citation></ref>
<ref id="B51">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Singh</surname> <given-names>R. P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ma</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Shadan</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Perspective of ACC-deaminase producing bacteria in stress agriculture</article-title>. <source>J. Biotechnol.</source> <volume>352</volume>, <fpage>36</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>46</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jbiotec.2022.05.002</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">35597331</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B52">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Singh</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Prasanna</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sharma</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rajawat</surname> <given-names>M. V. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Nishanth</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Saxena</surname> <given-names>A. K.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2020</year>). &#x201c;<article-title>Prospecting plant&#x2013;microbe interactions for enhancing nutrient availability and grain biofortification</article-title>,&#x201d; in <source>Wheat and barley grain biofortification</source> (<publisher-name>Cambridge, London, UK: Woodhead Publishing</publisher-name>), <fpage>203</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>228</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/B978-0-12-818444-8.00008-0</pub-id>
</citation></ref>
<ref id="B53">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Streda</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Haberle</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Klime&#x161;ov&#xe1;</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Klimek-Kopyra</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>St&#x159;edov&#xe1;</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bodner</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Field phenotyping of plant roots by electrical capacitance&#x2014;A standardized methodological protocol for application in plant breeding: A review</article-title>. <source>Int. Agrophysics</source> <volume>34</volume>, <fpage>173&#x2013;184</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.31545/intagr/117622</pub-id>
</citation></ref>
<ref id="B54">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Teodoro-Cerna</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mendoza-Nieto</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Contreras-Liza</surname> <given-names>S. E.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Grain yield of maize hybrids in response to inoculation with <italic>Azospirillum</italic> sp. under nitrogen limiting conditions in Huaura, Peru</article-title>. <source>Sustain. Agric. Res.</source> <volume>10</volume>, <elocation-id>1</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5539/sar.v10n1p1</pub-id>
</citation></ref>
<ref id="B55">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Timofeeva</surname> <given-names>A. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Galyamova</surname> <given-names>M. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sedykh</surname> <given-names>S. E.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>Plant growth-promoting soil bacteria: Nitrogen fixation, phosphate solubilization, siderophore production, and other biological activities</article-title>. <source>Plants</source> <volume>12</volume>, <elocation-id>4074</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/plants12244074</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">38140401</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B56">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Torres Vera</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bernab&#xe9; Garc&#xed;a</surname> <given-names>A. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Carmona &#xc1;lvarez</surname> <given-names>F. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mart&#xed;nez Ruiz</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fern&#xe1;ndez Mart&#xed;n</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2024</year>). <article-title>Application and effectiveness of <italic>Methylobacterium symbioticum</italic> as a biological inoculant in maize and strawberry crops</article-title>. <source>Folia Microbiologica</source> <volume>69</volume>, <fpage>121</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>131</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s12223-023-01078-4</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">37526803</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B57">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Valente</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Panozzo</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bozzolin</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Barion</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bolla</surname> <given-names>P. K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bertin</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2024</year>). <article-title>Growth, photosynthesis and yield responses of common wheat to foliar application of <italic>Methylobacterium symbioticum</italic> under decreasing chemical nitrogen fertilization</article-title>. <source>Agriculture</source> <volume>14</volume>, <elocation-id>1670</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/agriculture14101670</pub-id>
</citation></ref>
<ref id="B58">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Vardharajula</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zulfikar Ali</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Grover</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Reddy</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bandi</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Drought-tolerant plant growth promoting <italic>Bacillus</italic> spp.: Effect on growth, osmolytes, and antioxidant status of maize under drought stress. <italic>Journal</italic>
</article-title>. <source>Plant Interact.</source> <volume>6</volume>, <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>14</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/17429145.2010.535178</pub-id>
</citation></ref>
<ref id="B59">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Vieira Velloso</surname> <given-names>C. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>de Oliveira</surname> <given-names>C. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gomes</surname> <given-names>E. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lana</surname> <given-names>U. G. D. P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>de Carvalho</surname> <given-names>C. G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Guimar&#xe3;es</surname> <given-names>L. J. M.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Genome-guided insights of tropical <italic>Bacillus</italic> strains efficient in maize growth promotion</article-title>. <source>FEMS Microbiol. Ecol.</source> <volume>96</volume>, <elocation-id>fiaa157</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/femsec/fiaa157</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32785605</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B60">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Visioli</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>D&#x2019;Egidio</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Vamerali</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mattarozzi</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sanangelantoni</surname> <given-names>A. M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Culturable endophytic bacteria enhance Ni translocation in the hyperaccumulator <italic>Noccaea caerulescens</italic>
</article-title>. <source>Chemosphere</source> <volume>117</volume>, <fpage>538</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>544</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.chemosphere.2014.09.014</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25277966</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B61">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kuzyakov</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2024</year>). <article-title>Mechanisms and implications of bacterial&#x2013;fungal competition for soil resources</article-title>. <source>ISME J.</source> <volume>18</volume>, <elocation-id>wrae073</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/ismejo/wrae073</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">38691428</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B62">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wellner</surname> <given-names>S. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lodders</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>K&#xe4;mpfer</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>
<italic>Methylobacterium cerastii</italic> sp. nov., isolated from the leaf surface of <italic>Cerastium holosteoides</italic>
</article-title>. <source>Int. J. Systematic Evolutionary Microbiol.</source> <volume>62</volume>, <fpage>917</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>924</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1099/ijs.0.030767-0</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21669927</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B63">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Du</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kang</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wei</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>The diverse roles of cytokinins in regulating leaf development</article-title>. <source>Horticulture Res.</source> <volume>8</volume>, <fpage>5583</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41438-021-00558-3</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">34059666</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B64">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Yim</surname> <given-names>W. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kim</surname> <given-names>K. Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lee</surname> <given-names>Y. W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sundaram</surname> <given-names>S. P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lee</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sa</surname> <given-names>T. M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Real time expression of ACC oxidase and PR-protein genes mediated by <italic>Methylobacterium</italic> spp. in tomato plants challenged with <italic>Xanthomonas campestris</italic> pv. <italic>vesicatoria</italic>
</article-title>. <source>J. Plant Physiol.</source> <volume>171</volume>, <fpage>1064</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1075</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jplph.2014.03.009</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24974333</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B65">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Yokamo</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Irfan</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Huan</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ishfaq</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>Global evaluation of key factors influencing nitrogen fertilization efficiency in wheat: A recent meta-analysis&#x2013;2022)</article-title>. <source>Front. Plant Sci.</source> <volume>14</volume>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpls.2023.1272098</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">37965011</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B66">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Khan</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tan</surname> <given-names>L. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Potentials, utilization, and bioengineering of plant growth-promoting <italic>Methylobacterium</italic> for sustainable agriculture</article-title>. <source>Sustainability</source> <volume>13</volume>, <elocation-id>3941</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/su13073941</pub-id>
</citation></ref>
<ref id="B67">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zhen</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Guo</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yu</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Han</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2024</year>). <article-title>Leaf Senescence regulation mechanism based on comparative transcriptome analysis in Foxtail millet</article-title>. <source>Int. J. Mol. Sci.</source> <volume>25</volume>, <elocation-id>3905</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/ijms25073905</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">38612713</pub-id></citation></ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>