<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3-mathml3.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xml:lang="EN">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Front. Plant Sci.</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Frontiers in Plant Science</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">Front. Plant Sci.</abbrev-journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="epub">1664-462X</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Frontiers Media S.A.</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpls.2025.1654933</article-id>
<article-version article-version-type="Version of Record" vocab="NISO-RP-8-2008"/>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Original Research</subject>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Precision nitrogen and water management in double zero -till wheat: effects on photosynthetic parameters, productivity, nutrient-use efficiency and N<sub>2</sub>O emission</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Pratap</surname><given-names>Vijay</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1840447/overview"/>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Project-administration" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/project-administration/">Project administration</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="validation" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/validation/">Validation</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="methodology" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/methodology/">Methodology</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Data curation" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/data-curation/">Data curation</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Formal analysis" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/formal-analysis/">Formal analysis</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="visualization" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/visualization/">Visualization</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="investigation" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/investigation/">Investigation</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="conceptualization" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/conceptualization/">Conceptualization</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/">Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="software" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/software/">Software</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Funding acquisition" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/funding-acquisition/">Funding acquisition</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="supervision" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/supervision/">Supervision</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="resources" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/resources/">Resources</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Writing &#x2013; original draft" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/">Writing &#x2013; original draft</role>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name><surname>Dass</surname><given-names>Anchal</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="corresp" rid="c001"><sup>*</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1839889/overview"/>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Data curation" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/data-curation/">Data curation</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="conceptualization" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/conceptualization/">Conceptualization</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="investigation" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/investigation/">Investigation</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="validation" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/validation/">Validation</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/">Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Project-administration" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/project-administration/">Project administration</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="supervision" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/supervision/">Supervision</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Writing &#x2013; original draft" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/">Writing &#x2013; original draft</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="methodology" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/methodology/">Methodology</role>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Krishnan</surname><given-names>P.</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/390446/overview"/>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="resources" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/resources/">Resources</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/">Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Writing &#x2013; original draft" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/">Writing &#x2013; original draft</role>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Sudhishri</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4"><sup>4</sup></xref>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/">Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Writing &#x2013; original draft" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/">Writing &#x2013; original draft</role>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Choudhary</surname><given-names>Anil K.</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff5"><sup>5</sup></xref>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="resources" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/resources/">Resources</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/">Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing</role>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Bhatia</surname><given-names>Arti</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff6"><sup>6</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1206455/overview"/>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="resources" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/resources/">Resources</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/">Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing</role>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name><surname>Jinger</surname><given-names>Dinesh</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff7"><sup>7</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="corresp" rid="c001"><sup>*</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1683220/overview"/>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Writing &#x2013; original draft" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/">Writing &#x2013; original draft</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/">Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing</role>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Verma</surname><given-names>Sunil K.</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff8"><sup>8</sup></xref>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/">Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing</role>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Singh</surname><given-names>Arjun</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2410114/overview"/>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/">Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Writing &#x2013; original draft" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/">Writing &#x2013; original draft</role>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>San</surname><given-names>Aye Aye</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff9"><sup>9</sup></xref>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/">Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Data curation" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/data-curation/">Data curation</role>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Nithinkumar</surname><given-names>K.</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2929901/overview"/>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Data curation" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/data-curation/">Data curation</role>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/">Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing</role>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Sachin</surname><given-names>K. S.</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/">Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing</role>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Kumari</surname><given-names>Kavita</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff10"><sup>10</sup></xref>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/">Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing</role>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Sadhukhan</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff11"><sup>11</sup></xref>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/">Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing</role>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Kumar</surname><given-names>Sandeep</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff12"><sup>12</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/3232551/overview"/>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/">Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing</role>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Paramesha</surname><given-names>Venkatesh</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff13"><sup>13</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1898592/overview"/>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/">Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing</role>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Singh</surname><given-names>Teekam</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/">Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing</role>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Kaur</surname><given-names>Ramanjit</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/">Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing</role>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Yadav</surname><given-names>Shiv Poojan</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff14"><sup>14</sup></xref>
<role vocab="credit" vocab-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/" vocab-term="Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing" vocab-term-identifier="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/">Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing</role>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Division of Agronomy, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute</institution>, <city>New Delhi</city>, <country country="in">India</country></aff>
<aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>R.B.S. College</institution>, <city>Bichpuri</city>, <state>Agra, Uttar Pradesh</state>,&#xa0;<country country="in">India</country></aff>
<aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>Division of Agricultural Physics, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute</institution>, <city>New Delhi</city>, <country country="in">India</country></aff>
<aff id="aff4"><label>4</label><institution>Water Technology Centre, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute</institution>, <city>New Delhi</city>, <country country="in">India</country></aff>
<aff id="aff5"><label>5</label><institution>ICAR-Central Potato Research Institute</institution>, <city>Shimla</city>, <state>Himachal Pradesh</state>, <country country="in">India</country></aff>
<aff id="aff6"><label>6</label><institution>Division of Environmental Science, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute</institution>, <city>New Delhi</city>, <country country="in">India</country></aff>
<aff id="aff7"><label>7</label><institution>ICAR-Indian Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Research Centre-Vasad</institution>, <city>Anand</city>, <state>Gujarat</state>,&#xa0;<country country="in">India</country></aff>
<aff id="aff8"><label>8</label><institution>Department of Agronomy, Institute of Agricultural Sciences (IAS), Banaras Hindu University (BHU)</institution>, <city>Varanasi</city>, <state>Uttar Pradesh</state>, <country country="in">India</country></aff>
<aff id="aff9"><label>9</label><institution>Department of Agricultural Research, Regional Research Center</institution>, <city>Aung Ban</city>,&#xa0;<country country="mm">Myanmar</country></aff>
<aff id="aff10"><label>10</label><institution>ICAR-Central Rice Research Institute</institution>, <city>Cuttack</city>, <state>Odisha</state>, <country country="in">India</country></aff>
<aff id="aff11"><label>11</label><institution>Multi-Technology Testing Centre and Vocational Training Centre and College of Horticulture, Central Agricultural University</institution>, <city>Imphal</city>, <state>Mizoram</state>,&#xa0;<country country="in">India</country></aff>
<aff id="aff12"><label>12</label><institution>ICAR-National Bureau of Soil Survey and Landuse Planning, Regional Centre</institution>, <city>Jorhat</city>, <state>Assam</state>, <country country="in">India</country></aff>
<aff id="aff13"><label>13</label><institution>ICAR-Central Coastal Agricultural Research Institute</institution>, <state>Old Goa, Goa</state>,&#xa0;<country country="in">India</country></aff>
<aff id="aff14"><label>14</label><institution>Krishi Vigyan Kendra (KVK), Maharajganj</institution>, <city>Uttar Pradesh</city>,&#xa0;<country country="in">India</country></aff>
<author-notes>
<corresp id="c001"><label>*</label>Correspondence: Anchal Dass, <email xlink:href="mailto:anchal_d@rediffmail.com">anchal_d@rediffmail.com</email>; Dinesh Jinger, <email xlink:href="mailto:dineshjinger28@gmail.com">dineshjinger28@gmail.com</email></corresp>
</author-notes>
<pub-date publication-format="electronic" date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2025-11-07">
<day>07</day>
<month>11</month>
<year>2025</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date publication-format="electronic" date-type="collection">
<year>2025</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>16</volume>
<elocation-id>1654933</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>27</day>
<month>06</month>
<year>2025</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>13</day>
<month>10</month>
<year>2025</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#xa9; 2025 Pratap, Dass, Krishnan, Sudhishri, Choudhary, Bhatia, Jinger, Verma, Singh, San, Nithinkumar, Sachin, Kumari, Sadhukhan, Kumar, Paramesha, Singh, Kaur and Yadav.</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2025</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Pratap, Dass, Krishnan, Sudhishri, Choudhary, Bhatia, Jinger, Verma, Singh, San, Nithinkumar, Sachin, Kumari, Sadhukhan, Kumar, Paramesha, Singh, Kaur and Yadav</copyright-holder>
<license>
<ali:license_ref start_date="2025-11-07">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ali:license_ref>
<license-p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY)</ext-link>. The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.</license-p>
</license>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<sec>
<title>Context</title>
<p>Conventional tillage (CT), excessive irrigation, and indiscriminate nitrogen (N) use in wheat farming degrade soil and water resources in the Indo-Gangetic Plains (IGP), threatening the sustainability of the rice-wheat cropping system.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Objectives</title>
<p>A two-year study (2019&#x2013;21) in north-west IGP was conducted to assess the integration of zero-tillage (ZT) with precision water and N management for sustainability, nutrient efficiency, and environmental performance.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Methods</title>
<p>The study tested two crop establishment methods (ZT-wheat and double ZT-wheat) and three irrigation regimes&#x2013;25%, 50%, and 75% depletion of available soil moisture (DASM), with silicon applied at 75% DASM&#x2013;alongside three N strategies: 100% recommended N dose (RDN), NutrientExpert<sup>&#xae;</sup> (NE<sup>&#xae;</sup>) + Leaf Color Chart (LCC), and NE<sup>&#xae;</sup> + SPAD-based N management, using a split-plot design.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Results and Conclusion</title>
<p>Double ZT-wheat performed better over conventional ZT, showed superior growth (higher dry matter accumulation, leaf area index, and photosynthetic rate), 3.5% greater interception of photosynthetically active radiation (PAR), and 6.7&#x2013;9.9% increases in grain/straw yields, and resource-use efficiency. Irrigation at 25% DASM increased photosynthetic activity, intercepted 18.3% more PAR, and yielded 9.23% higher grain over 50% DASM, though delaying irrigation to 50% DASM conserved water without significant yield loss. NE<sup>&#xae;</sup> + SPAD-based N management saved 40 kg N ha<sup>&#x2013;1</sup> while enhancing productivity and efficiency, and combining ZT with 75% DASM + silicon and NE<sup>&#xae;</sup> + LCC significantly reduced N<sub>2</sub>O emissions, thus suggested for implementation in the wheat growing regions.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Significance</title>
<p>The current study findings promote precision N-water strategies, and double ZT to enhance productivity, resource conservation, and environmental sustainability in the IGP&#x2019;s wheat systems addressing important sustainable development goals concerning agriculture.</p>
</sec>
</abstract>
<abstract abstract-type="graphical">
<title>Graphical Abstract</title>
<p>
<graphic xlink:href="fpls-16-1654933-g000.tif" position="anchor">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Flowchart illustrating sustainable wheat farming practices. Conventional methods lead to soil and water degradation, threatening rice-wheat cropping. Double-zero tillage with HD-3086, irrigation at 50 percent DASM, and NE&#xae;+SPAD-based methods increase productivity, resource efficiency, reduce N&#x2082;O emissions, improve incomes, and enhance sustainability. Aligns with UN Sustainable Development Goals: zero hunger, clean water, responsible consumption, climate action, life below water, and life on land.</alt-text>
</graphic></p>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>crop establishment</kwd>
<kwd>nutrient expert</kwd>
<kwd>sensors</kwd>
<kwd>wheat</kwd>
<kwd>photosynthetic parameters</kwd>
<kwd>N<sub>2</sub>O emission</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<funding-group>
<funding-statement>The author(s) declare that no financial support was received for the research, and/or publication of this article.</funding-statement>
</funding-group>
<counts>
<fig-count count="3"/>
<table-count count="8"/>
<equation-count count="4"/>
<ref-count count="95"/>
<page-count count="19"/>
<word-count count="10330"/>
</counts>
<custom-meta-group>
<custom-meta>
<meta-name>section-at-acceptance</meta-name>
<meta-value>Crop and Product Physiology</meta-value>
</custom-meta>
</custom-meta-group>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec id="s1">
<title>Highlights</title>
<list list-type="bullet">
<list-item>
<p>The study assesses DSS and sensor-guided N supply in wheat in the IGP region.</p></list-item>
<list-item>
<p>NE<sup>&#xae;</sup> + SPAD/LCC-based N supply saved 40 kg N ha<sup>-1</sup>.</p></list-item>
<list-item>
<p>NE<sup>&#xae;</sup> + LCC-based N + ZT and 75% DASM + Si and decreased N<sub>2</sub>O emissions.</p></list-item>
<list-item>
<p>Double ZT-wheat outperformed conventional ZT for photosynthetic parameters and yield.</p></list-item>
<list-item>
<p>Irrigation at 25% DASM was better, but under limited water supply 50% DASM can be ideal schedule.</p></list-item>
<list-item>
<p>The optimal combination was NE+SPAD/LCC based N + double ZT + 25% DASM.</p></list-item>
</list>
</sec>
<sec id="s2" sec-type="intro">
<label>1</label>
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>The Indo-Gangetic Plains (IGP) of South Asia, a cornerstone of India&#x2019;s food security (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B66">Rajanna et&#xa0;al., 2023</xref>), have relied on intensive tillage-based rice-wheat systems, supplying 54% of rice and 84% of wheat to the nation&#x2019;s public distribution system (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Fagodiya et&#xa0;al., 2023</xref>). Practices like intensive tillage, unchecked irrigation, and disproportionate fertilizer use degrade soil health, deplete groundwater, and harm ecosystems and human well-being (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">Jinger et&#xa0;al., 2023a</xref>). Resource-efficient crop establishment techniques and precision water and nitrogen (N) management are imperative for sustaining India&#x2019;s agrarian future (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B90">Yadav et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B45">Kumar et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B66">Rajanna et&#xa0;al., 2023</xref>). Conservation agriculture (CA) is an eco-friendly farming practice that has proven especially effective for cereal crops in the north-west India, where it boosts soil fertility and crop yields (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">Kumar et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">Jat et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>). Retaining crop residues helps buffer crops against heat and drought stress (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Dass and Bhattacharyya, 2017</xref>) by enriching soil organic carbon, improving moisture retention, and moderating soil temperature (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B62">Pratap et&#xa0;al, 2023</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Jat et&#xa0;al., 2025</xref>). Beyond boosting farm output, zero-till practices offer economic, ecological, and societal advantages, positioning them as vital tools to combat climate change, soil degradation, and escalating input cost (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B85">Verma and Singh, 2009</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">Keil et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>). Studies highlight that CA-based tillage and crop management not only enhance short-term yields but also improve soil quality and agricultural sustainability (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">Kumar et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>).</p>
<p>Research from the IGPs highlights imbalances in nutrient management practices: farmers tend to over apply N, under apply phosphorus (P) and inadequately address potassium (K), sulfur (S), and micronutrient requirements (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B74">Sapkota et&#xa0;al., 2021a</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B86">Vijayakumar et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">Jinger et&#xa0;al., 2023b</xref>). These practices emphasize systemic inefficiencies in fertilization strategies, potentially compromising long-term soil fertility and crop sustainability. The high variability in soil N availability reduces the efficiency of blanket fertilizer recommendations, resulting in imbalanced N application (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">Dobermann et&#xa0;al., 2002</xref>). This disparity between crop N requirements and fertilizer application, combined with excessive fertilization, causes substantial environmental damage (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">Cui et&#xa0;al., 2018)</xref>. Such practices lead to several consequences, including diminished farm profitability, low nutrient-use efficiency, intensified climate change impacts, and broader ecological degradation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Arunachalam et&#xa0;al., 2025</xref>). Recent innovations, such as Site-Specific Nutrient Management (SSNM) and precision agriculture tools enable dynamic, real-time N management. Conventional blanket fertilizer recommendations fail to capture field variability, leading to nutrient inefficiency and environmental losses (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">Cui et&#xa0;al., 2018)</xref>. Precision tools such as NutrientExpert<sup>&#xae;</sup> (NE), leaf color charts (LCCs), GreenSeeker, and SPAD meters provide site-specific solutions that align crop demand with nutrient and water supply (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B61">Pratap et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>). NE, a computer-based decision support tool, generates fertilizer recommendations based on soil, crop, and management conditions, improving N-use efficiency (NUE) and profitability while lowering N<sub>2</sub>O emissions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B74">Sapkota et&#xa0;al., 2021a</xref>). LCCs offer a low-cost method for farmers to fine-tune N application through leaf greenness monitoring. Optical sensors like GreenSeeker and SPAD meters provide real-time assessment of crop vigor and chlorophyll content, guiding dynamic adjustments in N and irrigation management (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Jat et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>). Integrating these tools with soil moisture-based irrigation scheduling has been shown to increase yield, reduce fertilizer use, and enhance water productivity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Gupta et&#xa0;al., 2023</xref>). Overall, these innovations outperform conventional practices by optimizing inputs, improving resource-use efficiency, and reducing environmental footprints, thereby advancing climate-smart wheat production systems in South Asia. Rising water scarcity, exacerbated by climate change, poses significant challenges in enhancing food production (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B83">UNWWDR, 2018</xref>). Concurrently, water availability is declining globally due to rapid population growth, urbanization, industrial expansion, and climate-related disruptions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Du Plessis et&#xa0;al., 2019</xref>). Irrigation, accounts for only 19% of agricultural land and provides 40% of world food, and improved farm income (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Hanjra et&#xa0;al., 2009</xref>). However, over the decades, farmers have irrigated wheat during critical growth stages, which requires a huge quantity of water. Thus, precise application of irrigation using soil moisture sensors like FDR (frequency domain reflectometry) for determining the time and volume of irrigation seems as a vital strategy towards sustainable cereal-based agricultural productions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B44">Kumar et&#xa0;al., 2025</xref>). Measuring irrigation water using electronic devices or sensors like star-flow meters further improves precision in irrigation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Behera and Sharma, 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Gupta et&#xa0;al., 2023</xref>). Apart from this, deficit irrigation with stress-alleviating materials, such as silicon (Si) would be a practicable tactic to save water while concurrently obtaining reasonable productivity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B72">Salem et&#xa0;al., 2021a</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">Jinger et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>). Silicon application under water-limited conditions enhances a crop&#x2019;s drought resilience by stabilizing plant hydration, sustaining photosynthetic activity, and preserving leaf structure and xylem integrity under elevated temperatures and moisture deficits (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B61">Pratap et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>), ultimately contributing to improved grain productivity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">Jinger et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>). Although several studies have independently investigated the effects of dual zero-tillage (DZT) on crop productivity and resource-use efficiency, as well as the role of precision nitrogen and water management practices in improving system sustainability, these studies have largely remained fragmented.</p>
<p>As N availability, absorption, translocation, and assimilation in crops are highly influenced by soil moisture and tillage conditions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B50">Liang et&#xa0;al., 2019a</xref>), the conventional way of uniform fertilizer scheduled often fails to address field heterogeneity, leading to inefficiencies and land degradation. Precision N management tools, such as NE, GreenSeeker, and SPAD meter, optimize N-use based on site-specific conditions, but their effectiveness under varied tillage and moisture conditions is still largely unexplored. To date, there is a lack of systematic field-based evidence assessing the combined effects of DZT &#xd7; precision nitrogen &#xd7; precision irrigation in the Indo-Gangetic Plains. This knowledge gap underlines the need for integrated evaluations to understand potential synergies, thereby providing the basis for our present investigation. We hypothesize that the integration of these precision tools into N management strategies under diverse tillage (ZT/DZT) and moisture conditions will enhance nutrient-use efficiency, improve crop productivity, and minimize environmental footprints. Additionally, we suggest that real-time data from these tools will allow for timely and accurate interventions, thereby contributing to sustainable intensification. This study aimed to examine the impact of (1) precision N and water management strategies on crop growth, photosynthetic activity, and the interception of photosynthetically active radiation in ZT/DZT wheat, and (2) effective N and water management practices on ZT/DZT wheat productivity, resource-use efficiency, and N<sub>2</sub>O emissions.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3" sec-type="materials|methods">
<label>2</label>
<title>Materials and methods</title>
<sec id="s3_1">
<label>2.1</label>
<title>Experimental site</title>
<p>The field experiment was conducted over two consecutive winter seasons (November to mid-April) in 2019&#x2013;20 and 2020&#x2013;21 at the ICAR&#x2013;Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, India (28&#xb0;38&#x2019;N, 77&#xb0;09&#x2019;E; 229 m above mean sea level), a region characterized by a sub-tropical, semi-arid climate with hot, dry summers and cold winters (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Dass and Bhattacharyya, 2017</xref>). During the study periods, the mean maximum temperatures were 39.4&#xb0;C (2019&#x2013;20) and 40&#xb0;C (2020&#x2013;21), while the mean minimum temperatures dropped to 0.6&#xb0;C and -0.8&#xb0;C, respectively, with total seasonal rainfall recorded at 299.5 mm (2019&#x2013;20) and 65.9 mm (2020&#x2013;21) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1"><bold>Figure&#xa0;1</bold></xref>). The experimental soil, a sandy clay loam classified as Typic Haplustept, exhibited a pH of 8.3 (1:2.5 soil:water suspension; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B60">Piper, 1950</xref>), soil organic carbon (SOC) content of 0.41% (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B87">Walkley and Black, 1934</xref>), available N of 176.2 kg ha<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>(alkaline KMnO<sub>4</sub> oxidizable; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B80">Subbiah and Asija, 1956</xref>), available P of 11.6 kg ha<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>(0.5 M NaHCO<sub>3</sub> extractable; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B57">Olsen et&#xa0;al., 1954</xref>), and available potassium (K) of 272.5 kg ha<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>(1 N NH<sub>4</sub>OAc extractable; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">Hanway and Heidel, 1952</xref>).</p>
<fig id="f1" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;1</label>
<caption>
<p>Weekly meteorological data of winter season during 2019&#x2013;20 and 2020&#x2013;21.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-16-1654933-g001.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Line and bar graph comparing weather variables over standard meteorological weeks for 2019 and 2020. Variables include maximum and minimum temperatures, rainfall, evaporation, bright sunshine hours, and relative humidity. Data trends for both years are juxtaposed, showing fluctuations in each variable across the weeks.</alt-text>
</graphic></fig>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_2">
<label>2.2</label>
<title>Experimental design</title>
<p>The field experiment was conducted in a thrice replicated split-plot design (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B68">Rangaswamy, 2018</xref>). The main-plots tested two crop establishment methods: zero-tilled wheat (ZT wheat) and double zero-tilled (DZT) wheat (involving zero-till direct-seeded rice followed by ZT wheat), and three irrigation regimes: irrigation at 25% depletion of available soil moisture (DASM), 50% DASM, and 75% DASM supplemented with Si at 80 kg ha<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>. Sub-plots were allocated to three N management strategies: 100% of the recommended N rate (150 kg ha<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>), Nutrient Expert<sup>&#xae;</sup> combined with a leaf color chart (LCC), and Nutrient Expert<sup>&#xae;</sup> paired with a SPAD meter for precision N application (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B61">Pratap et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>). Treatment details have been mentioned in the <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1"><bold>Table&#xa0;1</bold></xref>. Rice residue from the prior season was uniformly applied at 3.5 t ha<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>across all treatments.</p>
<table-wrap id="T1" position="float">
<label>Table&#xa0;1</label>
<caption>
<p>Treatment details.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" colspan="2" align="left">Main-plot</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" colspan="2" align="left">A.&#x2003;Crop establishment</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">1.</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">
<list list-type="simple">
<list-item>
<p>Zero-tilled wheat</p></list-item>
</list></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">
<list list-type="simple">
<list-item>
<p>2.</p></list-item>
</list></td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">
<list list-type="simple">
<list-item>
<p>Double zero-tilled wheat (zero-till direct-seeded rice followed by ZT wheat)</p></list-item>
</list></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" colspan="2" align="left">B. Irrigation regimes</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">
<list list-type="simple">
<list-item>
<p>1.</p></list-item>
</list></td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">
<list list-type="simple">
<list-item>
<p>25% Depletion of available soil moisture (DASM)</p></list-item>
</list></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">
<list list-type="simple">
<list-item>
<p>2.</p></list-item>
</list></td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">
<list list-type="simple">
<list-item>
<p>50% DASM</p></list-item>
</list></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">
<list list-type="simple">
<list-item>
<p>3.</p></list-item>
</list></td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">
<list list-type="simple">
<list-item>
<p>75% DASM + Si (80 kg ha<sup>-1</sup>)</p></list-item>
</list></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" colspan="2" align="left">C. Sub-plot: Precision N management</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">
<list list-type="simple">
<list-item>
<p>1.</p></list-item>
</list></td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">
<list list-type="simple">
<list-item>
<p>Recommended N rate (150 kg ha<sup>-1</sup>)</p></list-item>
</list></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">
<list list-type="simple">
<list-item>
<p>2.</p></list-item>
</list></td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">
<list list-type="simple">
<list-item>
<p>Nutrient Expert + LCC&#x2003;</p></list-item>
</list></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">
<list list-type="simple">
<list-item>
<p>3.</p></list-item>
</list></td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">
<list list-type="simple">
<list-item>
<p>Nutrient Expert + SPAD meter</p></list-item>
</list></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_3">
<label>2.3</label>
<title>Crop management</title>
<p>One week before wheat sowing, glyphosate was uniformly applied at 1.0 kg ai ha<sup>-1</sup> to control weeds. The high-yielding wheat cultivar &#x2018;HD 3086&#x2019; (143-day maturity period), was sown at a rate of 100 kg of seed per hectare utilizing a ferti-cum-seed drill with 22.5 cm row spacing on November 21 and November 18 during the first and second study years, respectively. On the sowing day, pendimethalin (a pre-emergence herbicide) was manually sprayed at 1000 g ai ha<sup>&#x2013;1</sup>. The recommended nitrogen dose (RDN) was applied at 150 kg ha<sup>-1</sup>, while precision N management utilized the NE<sup>&#xae;</sup> tool to calculate site-specific N requirements. The NE<sup>&#xae;</sup> software determined the required nutrient application rates as 110 kg N, 42 kg P<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub>, and 40 kg K<sub>2</sub>O ha<sup>-1</sup>. During sowing, one-third of the N and the entire doses of P<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub> and K<sub>2</sub>O were applied as a basal fertilizer, using urea, single super phosphate, and muriate of potash as nutrient sources. The remaining N was top-dressed later in the season, triggered when leaf color chart (LCC) readings fell below 4 or SPAD meter values dropped &#x2264;44. Additionally, Si (80 kg ha<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>), supplied as calcium silicate, was incorporated at sowing to enhance the crop&#x2019;s resilience to water stress. Treatment-wise post-establishment irrigation schedules are shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2"><bold>Table&#xa0;2</bold></xref>.</p>
<table-wrap id="T2" position="float">
<label>Table&#xa0;2</label>
<caption>
<p>Details of irrigation schedules in wheat.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="top" rowspan="3" align="left">Irrigation regimes</th>
<th valign="middle" colspan="2" align="center">No. of irrigation</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Depth of irrigation water (mm)</th>
<th valign="middle" colspan="2" align="center">Total applied irrigation water (mm)</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" align="center">ZT- wheat</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">ZT-wheat</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">ZT-wheat</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">ZT-wheat</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">ZT-wheat</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" align="center">2019-20</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">2020-21</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">2019-20 &amp; 2020-21</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">2019-20</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">2020-21</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Irrigation at 25% DASM</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">4</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">5</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">50</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">200</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">250</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Irrigation at 50% DASM</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">3</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">4</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">55</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">165</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">220</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Irrigation at 75% DASM+Si<sub>80</sub></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">3</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">60</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">120</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">180</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
<p>Layer-wise soil moisture content was measured using a soil profile moisture sensor (FDR). The volume of irrigation water was measured using a water flow meter installed at the outlet of a cement-concrete channel connecting the experimental plot. To keep the weed population below the threshold level, sulfosulfuron + metsulfuron was applied at a rate of 30 + 2 g a.i. ha<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>, 35 days after sowing (DAS). This was followed by hand-weeding 50 DAS to eliminate any late-emerging weeds.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_4">
<label>2.4</label>
<title>Data collection</title>
<sec id="s3_4_1">
<label>2.4.1</label>
<title>Growth parameters</title>
<p>To assess dry matter accumulation (DMA), two randomly selected spots, each measuring 50 cm &#xd7; 50 cm, were marked. Plant samples were collected, then sun-dried and subsequently oven-dried at 70 &#xb1; 2&#xb0;C until a constant weight was reached. Leaf area was measured electronically using a leaf area meter (Model LICOR 3100, LICOR Inc., Lincoln, USA). The leaf area index (LAI) was calculated using the following <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="eq1">Equation 1</xref> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Evans, 1972</xref>):</p>
<disp-formula id="eq1"><label>(1)</label>
<mml:math display="block" id="M1"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>LAI</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>Total&#xa0;leaf&#xa0;area&#xa0;</mml:mtext><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>cm</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>Ground&#xa0;area&#xa0;</mml:mtext><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>cm</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mrow></mml:math>
</disp-formula>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_4_2">
<label>2.4.2</label>
<title>SPAD and NDVI values</title>
<p>Data on SPAD value was recorded using a hand-held chlorophyll meter (Minolta SPAD-502). The normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) was measured using an optical sensor (a hand-held GreenSeeker) by moving it 0.5 m above crop canopy.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_4_3">
<label>2.4.3</label>
<title>Photosynthetic behavior</title>
<p>On a bright sunny day, net photosynthetic rate (NPR) of top-most fully opened leaf of healthy plant was measured at two places in each plot using an infrared gas analyzer (LI-COR, model LI-6400XT Portable Photosynthesis System) at active tillering and flowering stages. Data on stomatal conductance and transpiration rate were also recorded while measuring NPR. Transpiration efficiency was calculated using the following <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="eq2">Equation 2</xref> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B76">Sinclair and Muchow, 2001</xref>):</p>
<disp-formula id="eq2"><label>(2)</label>
<mml:math display="block" id="M2"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>Transpiration&#xa0;efficiency</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>Net&#xa0;photosynthetic&#xa0;rate&#xa0;</mml:mtext><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>&#xa0;&#xb5;&#xa0;mol&#xa0;CO</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mtext>m</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo><mml:mn>2</mml:mn><mml:mtext>&#xa0;&#xa0;</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:msup><mml:mtext>s</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>Transpiration&#xa0;rate&#xa0;</mml:mtext><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>m&#xa0;mol&#xa0;H</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>O&#xa0;m</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:msup><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>&#xa0;s</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mrow></mml:math>
</disp-formula>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_4_4">
<label>2.4.4</label>
<title>Photosynthetically active radiation interception</title>
<p>At crop canopy, total incident radiation and transmitted PAR were measured by randomly placing canopy analyser LP-80 AccuPAR in between the crop rows at two spots in each plot. Net intercepted PAR by crop was computed by subtracting value of transmitted PAR (at bottom of crop) from total incident radiation at top of the canopy. Intercepted PAR (%) was computed as (Intercepted PAR/Total incident PAR) &#xd7;100).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_4_5">
<label>2.4.5</label>
<title>Yield attributes and yields</title>
<p>The yield attributing characters like effective tillers, grains spike<sup>-1</sup> and test-weight (g) were determined. After discarding three crop rows from all sides as border, produce of each plot was harvested manually, sun-dried, tagged and weighed with a portable swing balance in order to obtain biological yield and expressed in tons. The harvested material was threshed using a Pullman thresher, grains cleaned, sun-dried for 4&#x2013;5 days, and weighed to determine grain yield, with straw yield calculated as the difference between biological and grain yields.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_4_6">
<label>2.4.6</label>
<title>Partial factor productivity of N, P, and K</title>
<p>Partial factor productivity of N, P, and K was calculated using the <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="eq3">Equation 3</xref> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Dobermann, 2007</xref>):</p>
<disp-formula id="eq3"><label>(3)</label>
<mml:math display="block" id="M3"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>Partial&#xa0;factor&#xa0;productivity&#xa0;</mml:mtext><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:mtext>PFP</mml:mtext><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>Grain&#xa0;yield&#xa0;</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>kg&#xa0;ha</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>Amount&#xa0;of&#xa0;nutrient&#xa0;applied</mml:mtext><mml:mo>&#xa0;</mml:mo><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>kg&#xa0;ha</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mrow></mml:math>
</disp-formula>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_4_7">
<label>2.4.7</label>
<title>Irrigation water productivity</title>
<p>Irrigation water productivity (IWP) was calculated using the following <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="eq4">Equation 4</xref> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B95">Zwart and Bastiaanssen, 2004</xref>):</p>
<disp-formula id="eq4"><label>(4)</label>
<mml:math display="block" id="M4"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>Irrigation&#xa0;water&#xa0;productivity</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>Grain&#xa0;yield&#xa0;</mml:mtext><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>kg&#xa0;ha</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>Irrigation&#xa0;water&#xa0;used&#xa0;</mml:mtext><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:mtext>mm</mml:mtext><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mrow></mml:math>
</disp-formula>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_4_8">
<label>2.4.8</label>
<title>N<sub>2</sub>O emission</title>
<p>The study investigated N<sub>2</sub>O emissions in wheat using a closed chamber technique adapted from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Debnath et&#xa0;al. (1996)</xref>. After crop sowing, iron channels were inserted 10 cm into the soil to enclose 2&#x2013;3 crop rows, and acrylic chambers (30 cm &#xd7; 30 cm &#xd7; 100 cm) were mounted on these channels during gas sampling, with water sealing the base to ensure airtight conditions. Gas samples were collected at 0- and 1-hour intervals using a 50 mL syringe fitted with a 24-gauge needle through a silicon septum on the chamber, while a battery-operated pump homogenized internal air. Post-collection, syringes were sealed with a three-way stopcock, and air temperature and chamber headspace volume were recorded. Sampling occurred during fertilizer and irrigation events, spanning three days per cycle across the season. N<sub>2</sub>O-N concentrations were analyzed using a Gas Chromatograph (Hewlett Packard 5890 Series II) equipped with an electron capture detector and a Porapak N column, maintained at 50&#xb0;C (column), 120&#xb0;C (injector), and 320&#xb0;C (detector), with N carrier gas flowing at 14 mL min<sup>-1</sup>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_4_9">
<label>2.4.9</label>
<title>Analysis of N<sub>2</sub>O</title>
<p>A gas chromatograph (GC) fitted with an electron capture detector (ECD) and the concentration of nitrous oxide in the gas samples was measured using a 6&#x2019;&#xd7;1/8&#x2033;stainless steel column (Porapak N). Electrophilic substance detection was carried out using the ECD. The detector consists of two electrodes, one of which is radioactively treated with 63-Ni (or titanium or scandium) to generate beta radiation. High energy electrons bombard the carrier gas (N<sub>2</sub> or argon mixture), resulting in the production of numerous low energy secondary electrons. These electrons are collected by the positively polarized electrode on the other end.</p>
<p>Electrons captured by an electrophilic sample component passing through the electrode gap, resulting in electrical reproduction of the GC peak, decreases the steady state current. The temperature of the column and detector was kept at 50&#xb0;C and 300&#xb0;C, respectively. The carrier back flush and detector purge gases (which are composed of 95% argon and 5% methane or N<sub>2</sub>) were maintained at 14&#x2013;18 cm<sup>3</sup> minute<sup>-1</sup>. Gas injection ports were used to introduce gas samples into at gas sampling loop. The gas samples were cleaned of both CO<sub>2</sub> and water vapor. Two absorbent traps were created using10-mm milli pore syringe filter holders filled with Ascarite and MgClO<sub>4</sub>. The peak area was plotted and measured using GC software. Primary standards are the N<sub>2</sub>O standard (300, 500, and 1000 ppbV). The following formula was used to determine the nitrous oxide flux:</p>
<p>Cross-sectional area of the chamber (m<sup>2</sup>) = A</p>
<p>Headspace (m) = H</p>
<p>Volume of head space (L) = 1000 &#xd7; AH,</p>
<p>N<sub>2</sub>O concentration at 0 time (&#x3bc;L/L) = Co,</p>
<p>N<sub>2</sub>O concentration after time t (&#x3bc;L/L) = Ct,</p>
<p>Change in concentration in time t(&#x3bc;L/L) = (Ct-Co),</p>
<p>Volume of N<sub>2</sub>O evolved in time t (&#x3bc;L) = (Ct-Co) &#xd7; 1000AH</p>
<p>When t is in hours, then flux (mL/m<sup>2</sup>/h<sup>-1</sup>) = [(Ct-Co) &#xd7; AH)/(A&#xd7; t)</p>
<p>Now 22.4 mL of N<sub>2</sub>O is 44 mg at standard temperature and pressure,</p>
<p>Hence, N<sub>2</sub>O flux = [(Ct-Co)/t] &#xd7; H &#xd7; 44/22.4 &#xd7; 10000 &#xd7; 24 mg ha<sup>-1</sup> day<sup>-1</sup></p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_4_10">
<label>2.4.10</label>
<title>Statistical analysis</title>
<p>Data were analyzed using ANOVA (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">Gomez and Gomez, 1984</xref>), with treatment significance tested by the F-test (p &#x2264; 0.05). Duncan&#x2019;s multiple range test (DMRT) compared means, and analyses were performed using SAS 9.3 (SAS Inst. Inc., Cary, NC, USA).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s4" sec-type="results">
<label>3</label>
<title>Results</title>
<sec id="s4_1">
<label>3.1</label>
<title>Growth parameters</title>
<p>In a comparative study of wheat treatments, DZT-wheat demonstrated superior performance, achieving higher LAI at the flowering stage and dry matter accumulation (DMA) at harvest than conventional ZT-wheat. Scheduling irrigation at 25% depletion of available soil moisture (DASM) led to significantly higher LAI over 75% DASM + Si<sub>80</sub> treatment, while irrigation at 50% DASM showed statistically comparable results to 25% DASM. Additionally, 25% DASM irrigation enhanced DMA by 4.6% and 4.0% over 50% DASM, and by 45.1% and 33.8% over 75% DASM + Si<sub>80</sub> during 2019&#x2013;20 and 2020&#x2013;21, respectively. The NE+SPAD meter approach outperformed RDN, registering higher LAI and DMA though results were statistically similar to the NE+LCC method across both seasons (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T3"><bold>Table&#xa0;3</bold></xref>).</p>
<table-wrap id="T3" position="float">
<label>Table&#xa0;3</label>
<caption>
<p>Effect of crop establishment methods, irrigation regimes and precision N management options on dry matter accumulation, LAI, and NDVI of wheat.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="top" rowspan="3" align="left">Treatments</th>
<th valign="middle" rowspan="2" colspan="2" align="center">Dry matter accumulation (g m<sup>-2</sup>) at harvest</th>
<th valign="middle" rowspan="2" colspan="2" align="center">Leaf area index at flowering stage</th>
<th valign="middle" colspan="4" align="center">NDVI value</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" colspan="2" align="center">Maximum tillering stage</th>
<th valign="top" colspan="2" align="center">Flowering stage</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" align="center">2019-20</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">2020-21</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">2019-20</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">2020-21</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">2019-20</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">2020-21</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">2019-20</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">2020-21</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" colspan="9" align="left">Crop establishment methods</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Zero till-wheat</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1035.3<sup>b</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1169.4<sup>b</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">4.38<sup>b</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">4.75<sup>b</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.49<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.51<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.47<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.60<sup>a</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Double zero till-wheat</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1105.2<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1224.2<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">4.54<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">4.86<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.51<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.53<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.49<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.62<sup>a</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">SEm&#xb1;</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">14.30</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">17.01</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.03</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.03</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.01</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.01</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.01</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.01</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">LSD (P = 0.05)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">45.00</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">53.52</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.10</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.10</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">NS</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">NS</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">NS</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">NS</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" colspan="9" align="left">Irrigation regimes</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Irrigation at 25% DASM</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1213.7<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1325.4<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">4.65<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">5.02<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.55<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.56<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.54<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.65<sup>a</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Irrigation at 50% DASM</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1160.3<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1274.5<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">4.57<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">4.90<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.52<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.53<sup>b</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.50<sup>b</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.62<sup>b</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Irrigation at 75% DASM + Si (80 kg ha<sup>-1</sup>)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">836.7<sup>b</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">990.4<sup>b</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">4.17<sup>b</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">4.50<sup>b</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.43<sup>b</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.46<sup>c</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.41<sup>c</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.55<sup>c</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">SEm&#xb1;</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">17.52</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">20.83</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.04</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.04</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.01</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.01</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.01</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.01</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">LSD (P = 0.05)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">55.12</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">65.55</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.13</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.12</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.03</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.02</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.02</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.03</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" colspan="9" align="left">N management options</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Recommended N rate</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1039.6<sup>b</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1163.6<sup>b</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">4.30<sup>b</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">4.66<sup>b</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.48<sup>b</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.50<sup>b</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.47<sup>b</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.59<sup>b</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Nutrient Expert +LCC</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1074.5<sup>ab</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1206.2<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">4.51<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">4.86<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.50<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.52<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.49<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.61<sup>ab</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Nutrient Expert + SPAD meter</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1096.6<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1220.5<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">4.58<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">4.90<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.52<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.53<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.50<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.62<sup>a</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">SEm&#xb1;</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">15.18</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">15.07</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.04</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.04</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.01</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.01</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.01</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.01</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">LSD (P = 0.05)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">44.31</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">44.00</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.11</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.11</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.03</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.01</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.03</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.02</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<p>Treatment means with similar superscripted letters within a column are not significantly different at P &lt; 0.05 according to Tukey&#x2019;s honestly significant difference test.</p>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec id="s4_2">
<label>3.2</label>
<title>NDVI values</title>
<p>The highest NDVI values at the maximum tillering stage and flowering stages were recorded with DZT-wheat, and the lowest with ZT-wheat during both years. Irrigation at 25% DASM recorded higher NDVI values at maximum tillering, which were significantly higher than irrigation at 75% DASM + Si<sub>80</sub>. Similarly, at the flowering stage, the highest NDVI values were found with irrigation at 25% DASM, followed by 50% DASM and 75% DASM + Si<sub>80</sub>. Among precision N-management options, NE+ SPAD meter at maximum tillering was significantly superior to RDN, and stood alike NE+ LCC. At the flowering stage, the highest NDVI values were found with NE+ SPAD and the lowest with RDN (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T3"><bold>Table&#xa0;3</bold></xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s4_3">
<label>3.3</label>
<title>Photosynthetic behavior</title>
<p>In a two-year study evaluating physiological responses in wheat, DZT wheat exhibited higher NPR (18.2 and 19.9 &#xb5;mol CO<sub>2</sub> m<sup>&#x2212;2</sup> s<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>), stomatal conductance (0.76 and 0.84 &#xb5;mol CO<sub>2</sub> m<sup>&#x2212;2</sup> s<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>), and transpiration rates (3.0 and 3.1 mmol H<sub>2</sub>O m<sup>&#x2212;2</sup> s<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>) at maximum tillering compared to conventional ZT wheat. However, ZT wheat demonstrated greater photosynthetic efficiency (7.58 and 7.37 &#xb5;mol CO<sub>2</sub> [mmol H<sub>2</sub>O]<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>), a trend consistent at the flowering stage. Applying irrigation at 25% depletion of available soil moisture (DASM) achieved the highest NPR (19.1 and 20.9 &#xb5;mol CO<sub>2</sub> m<sup>&#x2212;2</sup> s<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>), stomatal conductance (0.79 and 0.88 &#xb5;mol CO<sub>2</sub> m<sup>&#x2212;2</sup> s<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>), and transpiration (3.3 and 3.4 mmol H<sub>2</sub>O m<sup>&#x2212;2</sup> s<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>), closely followed by 50% DASM and 75% DASM + Si<sub>80</sub>. Despite this, 75% DASM + Si<sub>80</sub> showed superior photosynthetic efficiency (5.79 and 6.15 &#xb5;mol CO<sub>2</sub> [mmol H<sub>2</sub>O]<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>), outperforming other irrigation levels. In nitrogen management, the NE+SPAD meter approach yielded the highest NPR (18.3 and 20.1 &#xb5;mol CO<sub>2</sub> m<sup>&#x2212;2</sup> s<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>), stomatal conductance (0.76 and 0.84 &#xb5;mol CO<sub>2</sub> m<sup>&#x2212;2</sup> s<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>), and transpiration (2.9 and 3.1 mmol H<sub>2</sub>O m<sup>&#x2212;2</sup> s<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>), significantly exceeding RDN, while NE+LCC results were statistically comparable to NE+SPAD. Conversely, RDN recorded the highest photosynthetic efficiency (7.04 and 7.08 &#xb5;mol CO<sub>2</sub> [mmol H<sub>2</sub>O]<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>), with NE+SPAD showing the lowest values, a pattern mirrored at the flowering stage across both study years (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T4"><bold>Tables&#xa0;4</bold></xref>, <xref ref-type="table" rid="T5"><bold>5</bold></xref>).</p>
<table-wrap id="T4" position="float">
<label>Table&#xa0;4</label>
<caption>
<p>Effect of crop establishment methods, irrigation regimes and precision N management options on photosynthetic parameters at maximum tillering stage of wheat.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="top" rowspan="2" align="left">Treatments</th>
<th valign="middle" colspan="2" align="center">Photosynthetic rate (&#xb5; mol CO<sub>2</sub> m<sup>-2</sup> s<sup>-1</sup>)</th>
<th valign="middle" colspan="2" align="center">Stomal conductance (&#xb5; mol CO<sub>2</sub> m<sup>-2</sup> s<sup>-1</sup>)</th>
<th valign="middle" colspan="2" align="center">Transpiration rate (m mol H<sub>2</sub>O m<sup>-2</sup> s<sup>-1</sup>)</th>
<th valign="middle" colspan="2" align="center">Photosynthetic efficiency (&#x3bc; mol CO<sub>2</sub> (m mol H<sub>2</sub>O)<sup>-1</sup>)</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" align="center">2019-20</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">2020-21</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">2019-20</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">2020-21</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">2019-20</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">2020-21</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">2019-20</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">2020-21</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" colspan="9" align="left">Crop establishment methods</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Zero till-wheat</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">17.2<sup>b</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">18.8<sup>b</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.67<sup>b</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.75<sup>b</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2.40<sup>b</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2.70<sup>b</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">7.58<sup>b</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">7.37<sup>b</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Double zero till-wheat</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">18.2<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">19.9<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.76<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.84<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">3.01<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">3.10<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">5.73<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">6.07<sup>a</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">SEm&#xb1;</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.28</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.18</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.02</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.02</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.08</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.11</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">LSD (P = 0.05)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.89</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.55</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.05</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.07</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.25</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.36</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" colspan="9" align="left">Irrigation regimes</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Irrigation at 25% DASM</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">19.1<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">20.9<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.79<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.88<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">3.26<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">3.43<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">5.79<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">6.15<sup>a</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Irrigation at 50% DASM</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">18.6<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">19.9<sup>b</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.74<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.81<sup>b</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2.82<sup>b</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2.99<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">6.64<sup>b</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">6.63<sup>b</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Irrigation at 75% DASM + Si<break/>(80 kg ha<sup>-1</sup>)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">15.4<sup>b</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">17.2<sup>c</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.61<sup>b</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.69<sup>b</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2.04<sup>b</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2.28<sup>b</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">7.70<sup>c</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">7.54<sup>c</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">SEm&#xb1;</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.35</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.22</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.02</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.03</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.10</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.14</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">LSD (P = 0.05)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.09</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.68</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.06</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.09</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.31</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.44</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" colspan="9" align="left">N management options</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Recommended N rate</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">16.9<sup>b</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">18.4<sup>b</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.64<sup>b</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.73<sup>b</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2.44<sup>b</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2.62<sup>b</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">7.04<sup>b</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">7.08<sup>b</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Nutrient Expert +LCC</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">17.8<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">19.5<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.73<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.82<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2.78<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">3.00<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">6.36<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">6.50<sup>a</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Nutrient Expert + SPAD meter</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">18.3<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">20.1<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.76<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.84<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2.89<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">3.08<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">6.31<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">6.48<sup>a</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">SEm&#xb1;</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.27</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.29</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.02</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.03</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.10</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.13</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">LSD (P = 0.05)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.80</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.83</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.04</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.07</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.30</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.36</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<p>Treatment means with similar superscripted letters within a column are not significantly different at P &lt; 0.05 according to Tukey&#x2019;s honestly significant difference test.</p>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<table-wrap id="T5" position="float">
<label>Table&#xa0;5</label>
<caption>
<p>Effect of crop establishment methods, irrigation regimes and precision N management options on photosynthetic parameters at flowering stage of wheat.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="top" rowspan="2" align="left">Treatments</th>
<th valign="middle" colspan="2" align="center">Photosynthetic rate (&#xb5; mol CO<sub>2</sub> m<sup>-2</sup> s<sup>-1</sup>)</th>
<th valign="middle" colspan="2" align="center">Stomal conductance (&#xb5; mol CO<sub>2</sub> m<sup>-2</sup> s<sup>-1</sup>)</th>
<th valign="middle" colspan="2" align="center">Transpiration rate (m mol H<sub>2</sub>O m<sup>-,2</sup> s<sup>-1</sup>)</th>
<th valign="middle" colspan="2" align="center">Photosynthetic efficiency (&#x3bc; mol CO<sub>2</sub> (m mol H<sub>2</sub>O)<sup>-1</sup>)</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" align="center">2019-20</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">2020-21</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">2019-20</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">2020-21</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">2019-20</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">2020-21</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">2019-20</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">2020-21</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" colspan="9" align="left">Crop establishment methods</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Zero till-wheat</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">23.2<sup>b</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">24.0<sup>b</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.41<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.50<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">5.13<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">5.36<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">4.77<sup>b</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">4.74<sup>b</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Double zero till-wheat</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">24.3<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">25.6<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.45<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.58<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">4.96<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">5.28<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">4.64<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">4.53<sup>a</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">SEm&#xb1;</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.22</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.27</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.02</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.02</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.09</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.13</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">LSD (P = 0.05)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.69</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.84</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">NS</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.08</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">NS</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.41</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" colspan="9" align="left">Irrigation regimes</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Irrigation at 25% DASM</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">25.7<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">26.8<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.51<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.60<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">5.72<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">6.03<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">4.51<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">4.47<sup>a</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Irrigation at 50% DASM</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">24.1<sup>b</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">25.3<sup>b</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.45<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.54<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">5.13<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">5.37<sup>b</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">4.73<sup>b</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">4.69<sup>b</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Irrigation at 75% DASM + Si (80 kg ha<sup>-1</sup>)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">21.4<sup>c</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">22.3<sup>c</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.33<sup>b</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.47<sup>b</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">4.28<sup>b</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">4.56<sup>c</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">4.98<sup>c</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">4.85<sup>c</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">SEm&#xb1;</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.27</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.33</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.03</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.03</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.11</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.16</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">LSD (P = 0.05)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.85</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.03</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.08</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.09</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.34</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.50</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" colspan="9" align="left">N management options</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Recommended N rate</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">23.1<sup>b</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">24.0<sup>b</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.38<sup>b</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.48<sup>b</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">4.78<sup>b</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">5.04<sup>b</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">4.81<sup>b</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">4.80<sup>b</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Nutrient Expert +LCC</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">24.0<sup>ab</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">25.1<sup>ab</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.44<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.55<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">5.11<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">5.41<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">4.71<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">4.64<sup>a</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Nutrient Expert + SPAD meter</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">24.2<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">25.4<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.46<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.58<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">5.25<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">5.52<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">4.57<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">4.62<sup>a</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">SEm&#xb1;</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.36</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.36</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.10</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.02</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.10</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.16</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">LSD (P = 0.05)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.06</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.05</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.30</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.05</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.28</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.46</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<p>Treatment means with similar superscripted letters within a column are not significantly different at P &lt; 0.05 according to Tukey&#x2019;s honestly significant difference test.</p>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec id="s4_4">
<label>3.4</label>
<title>Photosynthetic-active radiation interception</title>
<p>In a two-year study assessing PAR interception in wheat, DZT wheat demonstrated superior performance, intercepting 2.4&#x2013;5.4% more PAR across growth stages compared to conventional ZT wheat (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T6"><bold>Table&#xa0;6</bold></xref>). Wheat irrigated at 25% DASM captured the highest PAR levels at maximum tillering (667.4 and 982.7 &#xb5;mol CO<sub>2</sub> m<sup>&#x2212;2</sup> s<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>), significantly exceeding values for 50% DASM and 75% DASM + Si<sub>80</sub>. At flowering, 25% DASM irrigation maintained its dominance for intercepted PAR surpassing 50% DASM by over 5% and 75% DASM + Si<sub>80</sub> by over 18%. For N management, the NE+SPAD meter approach achieved the highest PAR interception both at maximum tillering and flowering stages, outperforming NE+LCC by 1.3&#x2013;3.2% and RDN by 3.8&#x2013;7.5%, underscoring its efficacy in optimizing light capture.</p>
<table-wrap id="T6" position="float">
<label>Table&#xa0;6</label>
<caption>
<p>Effect of crop establishment methods, irrigation regimes and precision N management options on photo synthetically active radiation interception at maximum tillering and flowering stages of wheat.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="top" rowspan="2" align="left">Treatments</th>
<th valign="middle" colspan="2" align="center">Total incident radiation (&#xb5; mol CO<sub>2</sub> m<sup>-2</sup> s<sup>-1</sup>) at tillering</th>
<th valign="middle" colspan="2" align="center">Intercepted PAR (&#xb5; mol CO<sub>2</sub> m<sup>-2</sup> s<sup>-1</sup>) at tillering</th>
<th valign="middle" colspan="2" align="center">Total incident radiation (&#xb5; mol CO<sub>2</sub> m<sup>-2</sup> s<sup>-1</sup>) at flowering</th>
<th valign="middle" colspan="2" align="center">Intercepted PAR (&#xb5; mol CO<sub>2</sub> m<sup>-2</sup> s<sup>-1</sup>) at flowering</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" align="center">2019-20</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">2020-21</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">2019-20</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">2020-21</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">2019-20</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">2020-21</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">2019-20</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">2020-21</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" colspan="9" align="left">Crop establishment methods</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Zero tilled-wheat</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">882.5<sup>b</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1300.0<sup>b</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">523.9<sup>b</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">822.7<sup>b</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1494.2<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1304.6<sup>b</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">708.9<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">725.8<sup>b</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Double zero tilled-wheat</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">954.7<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1432.9<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">584.7<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">982.6<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1522.6<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1453.8<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">762.0<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">883.1<sup>a</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">SEm&#xb1;</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">13.05</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">14.94</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">14.65</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">17.53</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">14.67</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">13.57</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">21.88</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">17.40</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">LSD (P = 0.05)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">41.05</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">47.02</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">46.11</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">55.17</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">NS</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">42.69</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">NS</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">53.84</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" colspan="9" align="left">Irrigation regimes</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Irrigation at 25% DASM</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1005.2<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1421.1<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">667.4<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">982.7<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1644.9a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1523.4a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">925.6a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">990.2a</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Irrigation at 50% DASM</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">946.03<sup>b</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1373.1<sup>b</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">572.8<sup>b</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">908.5<sup>b</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1505.4b</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1404.8b</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">761.9b</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">829.6b</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Irrigation at 75% DASM + Si (80 kg ha<sup>-1</sup>)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">804.6<sup>c</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1305.0<sup>c</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">422.6<sup>c</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">816.8<sup>c</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1374.8c</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1209.3c</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">518.9c</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">593.6c</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">SEm&#xb1;</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">15.98</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">18.30</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">17.95</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">21.47</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">17.98</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">16.62</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">26.80</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">21.31</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">LSD (P = 0.05)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">50.28</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">57.59</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">56.47</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">67.57</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">56.54</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">52.29</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">84.34</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">67.07</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" colspan="9" align="left">N management options</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Recommended N rate</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">901.5<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1330.2<sup>b</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">523.4<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">851.0<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1491.0<sup>b</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1314.5<sup>b</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">671.1<sup>b</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">727.7<sup>b</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Nutrient Expert +LCC</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">916.2<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1370.9<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">556.2<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">910.0<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1515.6<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1397.1<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">743.0<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">824.6<sup>a</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Nutrient Expert + SPAD meter</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">938.2<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1398.2<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">583.3<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">946.9<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1518.6<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1426.0<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">792.3<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">861.2<sup>a</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">SEm&#xb1;</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">19.77</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">14.45</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">27.26</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">15.53</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">25.36</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">24.22</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">26.95</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">26.22</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">LSD (P = 0.05)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">57.71</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">42.17</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">NS</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">45.32</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">NS</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">70.69</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">78.67</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">76.53</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<p>Treatment means with similar superscripted letters within a column are not significantly different at P &lt; 0.05 according to Tukey&#x2019;s honestly significant difference test.</p>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec id="s4_5">
<label>3.5</label>
<title>Yield attributes and yield</title>
<p>Double zero-tillage (DZT) wheat demonstrated consistent improvements over conventional ZT wheat across both study years. Effective tiller counts increased by 5.6% under DZT. Additionally, DZT wheat showed modest enhancements in spike-related parameters, including grains spike<sup>-1</sup> and 1000-grain weight. Notably, grain yield (4.77&#x2013;5.48 t ha<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>) and straw yield (7.51&#x2013;8.12 t ha<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>) under DZT exceeded conventional ZT by 7.4&#x2013;6.0% and 6.37&#x2013;3.83%, respectively during the first and second study year, respectively (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T7"><bold>Table&#xa0;7</bold></xref>).</p>
<table-wrap id="T7" position="float">
<label>Table&#xa0;7</label>
<caption>
<p>Effect of crop establishment methods, irrigation regimes and precision N management options on yield attributes, yield and irrigation water productivity of wheat.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="top" rowspan="2" align="left">Treatments</th>
<th valign="top" colspan="2" align="center">Effective tiller m<sup>-2</sup></th>
<th valign="top" colspan="2" align="center">Grains spike<sup>-1</sup></th>
<th valign="top" colspan="2" align="center">1000-grain weight</th>
<th valign="top" colspan="2" align="center">Grain yield (t ha<sup>-1</sup>)</th>
<th valign="top" colspan="2" align="center">Straw yield (t ha<sup>-1</sup>)</th>
<th valign="middle" colspan="2" align="center">Irrigation water productivity (kg ha<sup>-1</sup> mm<sup>-1</sup>)</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" align="center">2019-20</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">2020-21</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">2019-20</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">2020-21</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">2019-20</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">2020-21</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">2019-20</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">2020-21</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">2019-20</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">2020-21</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">2019-20</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">2020-21</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" colspan="13" align="left">Crop establishment methods</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Zero till-wheat</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">377<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">385<sup>b</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">55.28<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">59.28<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">41.0<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">42.0<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">4.44<sup>b</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">5.17<sup>b</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">7.06<sup>b</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">7.82<sup>b</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">27.6<sup>b</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">23.9<sup>b</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Double zero till-wheat</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">397<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">408<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">56.87<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">61.11<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">41.3<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">42.5<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">4.77<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">5.48<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">7.51<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">8.12<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">29.8<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">25.2<sup>a</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">SEm&#xb1;</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">6.50</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">6.98</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.40</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.93</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.16</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.15</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.08</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.09</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.13</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.07</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.56</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.41</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">LSD (P = 0.05)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">20.47</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">21.96</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">NS</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">NS</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">NS</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">NS</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.26</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.28</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.41</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.23</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.75</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.30</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" colspan="13" align="left">Irrigation regimes</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Irrigation at 25% DASM</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">428<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">438<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">61.06<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">66.47<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">42.2<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">43.4<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">5.39<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">6.04<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">8.56<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">9.14<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">26.9<sup>b</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">24.0<sup>a</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Irrigation at 50% DASM</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">390<sup>b</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">399<sup>b</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">58.14<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">62.94<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">41.3<sup>b</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">42.4<sup>b</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">4.86<sup>b</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">5.61<sup>b</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">7.57<sup>b</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">8.09<sup>b</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">29.5<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">25.5<sup>a</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Irrigation at 75% DASM + Si<break/>(80 kg ha<sup>-1</sup>)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">343<sup>c</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">351<sup>c</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">49.03<sup>b</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">51.17<sup>b</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">40.0<sup>c</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">41.0<sup>c</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">3.57<sup>c</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">4.32<sup>c</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">5.73<sup>c</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">6.69<sup>c</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">29.7<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">24.2<sup>a</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">SEm&#xb1;</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">7.97</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">8.55</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.72</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.14</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.20</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.18</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.10</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.11</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.16</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.09</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.68</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.51</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">LSD (P = 0.05)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">25.07</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">26.90</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">5.41</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">3.57</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.63</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.57</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.32</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.34</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.51</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.28</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2.15</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.59</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" colspan="13" align="left">N management options</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Recommended N rate</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">371<sup>c</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">379<sup>c</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">52.00<sup>b</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">56.39<sup>b</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">41.0<sup>c</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">42.0<sup>c</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">4.47<sup>b</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">5.12<sup>b</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">7.08<sup>b</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">7.81<sup>b</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">27.9<sup>b</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">23.7<sup>b</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Nutrient Expert + LCC</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">389<sup>b</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">399<sup>b</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">56.78<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">60.81<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">41.2<sup>b</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">42.3<sup>b</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">4.62<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">5.38<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">7.31<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">8.02<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">28.8<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">24.8<sup>a</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Nutrient Expert + SPAD meter</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">400<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">410<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">59.44<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">63.39<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">41.4<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">42.5<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">4.72<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">5.46<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">7.46<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">8.10<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">29.4<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">25.2<sup>a</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">SEm&#xb1;</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.91</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.66</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.19</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.95</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.03</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.04</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.06</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.05</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.09</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.06</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.39</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.23</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">LSD (P = 0.05)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">5.58</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">4.84</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">3.47</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2.79</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.08</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.10</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.18</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.15</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.26</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.16</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.12</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.68</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<p>Treatment means with similar superscripted letters within a column are not significantly different at P &lt; 0.05 according to Tukey&#x2019;s honestly significant difference test.</p>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<p>Irrigation at 25% depletion of available soil moisture (DASM) outperformed both 50% DASM and 75% DASM + silicon (Si<sub>80</sub>) applications. This regime produced the highest effective tiller density, grains spike<sup>-1</sup>, and 1000-grain weight with statistically significant advantages. Grain yields under 25% DASM (5.39&#x2013;6.04 t ha<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>) surpassed 50% DASM by 10.91&#x2013;7.67% and 75% DASM + Si80 by 50.98&#x2013;39.81%, while straw yields (8.56&#x2013;9.14 t ha<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>) were also markedly higher.</p>
<p>Crops managed using nitrogen application guided by the NutrientExpert (NE) + SPAD meter exhibited superior tiller density (400&#x2013;410 m<sup>&#x2212;2</sup>), exceeding RDN by 7.82&#x2013;8.18% and NE + leaf color chart (LCC) by 2.83&#x2013;2.76%. Spike traits (grains spike-<sup>1</sup>: 59.44&#x2013;63.40; 1000-grain weight: 41.40&#x2013;42.50 g) were all superior under NE+SPAD. Grain (4.72&#x2013;5.46 t ha<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>) and straw yields (7.46&#x2013;8.10 t ha<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>) under this method exceeded RDN by 5.59&#x2013;6.64% and 5.36&#x2013;3.7%, respectively, though NE+SPAD and NE+LCC showed statistically comparable results (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T7"><bold>Table&#xa0;7</bold></xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s4_6">
<label>3.6</label>
<title>Partial factor productivity of N, P and K of wheat</title>
<p>Double zero-tillage wheat exhibited superior nutrient-use efficiency, with higher PFP<sub>N</sub> (39.6&#x2013;45.5 kg grain kg<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>N), PFP<sub>P</sub> (113.6&#x2013;130.4 kg grain kg<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>P), and PFP<sub>K</sub> (119.2&#x2013;136.9 kg grain kg<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>K) compared to conventional ZT-wheat (PFP<sub>N</sub>: 36.9&#x2013;42.9; PFP<sub>P</sub>: 105.7&#x2013;123.0; PFP<sub>K</sub>: 110.0&#x2013;129.2 kg grain kg<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>) during both study years. Irrigation at 25% depletion of available soil moisture (DASM) resulted in the highest PFP<sub>N</sub> (44.8&#x2013;50.4), PFP<sub>P</sub> (128.2&#x2013;143.8), and PFP<sub>K</sub> (134.7&#x2013;151.0 kg grain kg<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>), significantly surpassing 50% DASM and 75% DASM+Si<sub>80</sub>. Among precision nitrogen strategies, the NutrientExpert (NE) + SPAD meter approach yielded the highest PFP<sub>N</sub> (42.9&#x2013;49.6), PFP<sub>P</sub> (112.5&#x2013;130.0), and PFP<sub>K</sub> (118.1&#x2013;136.5 kg grain kg<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>), significantly outwitting the RDN, and remaining statistically comparable to NE + LCC (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T8"><bold>Table&#xa0;8</bold></xref>).</p>
<table-wrap id="T8" position="float">
<label>Table&#xa0;8</label>
<caption>
<p>Effect of crop establishment methods, irrigation regimes and precision N management options on partial factor productivity of N (PFP<sub>N</sub>), P (PFP<sub>P</sub>) and K (PFP<sub>K</sub>) in wheat.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="top" rowspan="2" align="left">Treatments</th>
<th valign="middle" colspan="2" align="center">PFP<sub>N</sub> (kg grain kg<sup>-1</sup> N applied)</th>
<th valign="middle" colspan="2" align="center">PFP<sub>P</sub> (kg grain kg<sup>-1</sup> P applied)</th>
<th valign="middle" colspan="2" align="center">PFP<sub>K</sub> (kg grain kg<sup>-1</sup> K applied)</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" align="center">2019-20</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">2020-21</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">2019-20</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">2020-21</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">2019-20</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">2020-21</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" colspan="7" align="left">Crop establishment methods</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Zero till-wheat</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">36.9<sup>b</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">42.9<sup>b</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">105.7<sup>b</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">123.0<sup>b</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">111.0<sup>b</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">129.2<sup>b</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Double zero till-wheat</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">39.6<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">45.5<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">113.6<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">130.4<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">119.2<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">136.9<sup>a</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">SEm&#xb1;</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.69</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.70</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.99</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2.12</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2.09</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2.23</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">LSD (P = 0.05)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2.16</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2.21</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">6.26</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">6.68</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">6.58</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">7.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" colspan="7" align="left">Irrigation regimes</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Irrigation at 25% DASM</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">44.8<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">50.4<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">128.2<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">143.8<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">134.7<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">151.0<sup>a</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Irrigation at 50% DASM</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">40.4<sup>b</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">46.5<sup>b</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">115.7<sup>b</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">133.5<sup>b</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">121.5<sup>b</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">140.2<sup>b</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Irrigation at 75% DASM +Si(80 kg ha<sup>-1</sup>)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">29.6<sup>c</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">35.8<sup>c</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">85.0<sup>c</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">102.8<sup>c</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">89.2<sup>c</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">107.9<sup>c</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">SEm&#xb1;</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.84</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.86</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2.44</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2.60</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2.56</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2.73</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">LSD (P = 0.05)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2.65</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2.71</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">6.67</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">8.18</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">8.06</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">8.59</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" colspan="7" align="left">N management options</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Recommended N rate</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">29.8<sup>b</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">34.2<sup>b</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">106.3<sup>b</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">122.0<sup>b</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">111.7<sup>b</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">128.1<sup>b</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Nutrient Expert + LCC</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">42.1<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">48.9<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">110.1<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">128.1<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">115.6<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">134.5<sup>a</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Nutrient Expert + SPAD meter</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">42.9<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">49.6<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">112.5<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">130.0<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">118.1<sup>a</sup></td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">136.5<sup>a</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">SEm&#xb1;</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.55</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.38</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.46</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.25</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.54</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.32</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">LSD (P = 0.05)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.61</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.10</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">4.27</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">3.66</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">4.48</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">3.84</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<p>Treatment means with similar superscripted letters within a column are not significantly different at P &lt; 0.05 according to Tukey&#x2019;s honestly significant difference test.</p>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec id="s4_7">
<label>3.7</label>
<title>Irrigation water productivity</title>
<p>Irrigation water productivity (IWP) (29.8 and 25.2 kg ha<sup>-1</sup> mm<sup>-1</sup>) was significantly superior under DZT-wheat over ZT-wheat (29.8 and 25.2 kg ha<sup>-1</sup> mm<sup>-1</sup>, respectively) during both years (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T7"><bold>Table&#xa0;7</bold></xref>). IWP among different irrigation regimes ranged between 24.0 &#x2013; 29.7 kg ha<sup>-1</sup> mm<sup>-1</sup>, maximum being with irrigation at 75% DASM+ Si<sub>80</sub> (29.7 kg ha<sup>-1</sup> mm<sup>-1</sup>) and the minimum being with irrigation at 25% DASM (24 kg ha<sup>-1</sup> mm<sup>-1</sup>). Among different precision N-management options, NE+ SPAD meter resulted in significantly higher IWP over RDN.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s4_8">
<label>3.8</label>
<title>N<sub>2</sub>O emission</title>
<p>A significant (P&lt;0.05) difference on N<sub>2</sub>O emission in wheat was observed due to crop establishment methods, irrigation regimes and precision N-management options during both years (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2"><bold>Figure&#xa0;2</bold></xref>). In general, a higher N<sub>2</sub>O emission was noticed during second year as compared to first year of the study. Combination of ZT &#xd7; irrigation at 25% DASM &#xd7; RDN emitted significantly higher N<sub>2</sub>O over all other combinations of ZT &#xd7; irrigation regimes &#xd7; N schedules. However, combination of ZT &#xd7; irrigation at 75% DASM+ Si<sub>80</sub> &#xd7; NE+ LCC registered significantly lower N<sub>2</sub>O emission.</p>
<fig id="f2" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;2</label>
<caption>
<p>Effect of irrigation regimes and precision N management options on N<sub>2</sub>O emission in zero-till (ZT) wheat. Error bar indicate LSD (P&lt;0.05). I1: 25% DASM; I2: Irrigation at 50% DASM; I3: Irrigation at 75% DASM + Si<sub>80</sub>; NI: Recommended N rate at 150 kg ha<sup>-1</sup>, N2: Nutrient Expert + LCC, ZT: Zero-tilled wheat.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-16-1654933-g002.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Bar chart comparing nitrous oxide emissions in kilograms per hectare across six treatments for the years 2019 and 2020. Green bars represent 2019, and blue bars represent 2020. Each treatment has two bars, showing slightly higher emissions in 2020 for most treatments. Error bars indicate variability.</alt-text>
</graphic></fig>
</sec>
<sec id="s4_9">
<label>3.9</label>
<title>Pearson&#x2019;s correlation analysis</title>
<p>Wheat grain yield showed strong positive correlations (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3"><bold>Figure&#xa0;3</bold></xref>) with key physiological and vegetative metrics across both growing seasons, including SPAD (r = 0.94), NDVI (r = 0.95), LAI (r = 0.92), photosynthetic rate (r = 0.95), IPAR (r = 0.94), and DMA (r = 0.97).</p>
<fig id="f3" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;3</label>
<caption>
<p>Pearson correlation matrix analysis of different growth and yield parameters. SPAD, Soil Plant Analysis Development; NDVI, Normalized Difference Vegetation Index; LAI, Leaf Area Index; IPAR, Intercepted Photosynthetically Active Radiation; IPAR (%), Percentage of intercepted photosynthetically active radiation; PFP, Partial Factor Productivity; PFP<sub>N</sub>, Partial factor productivity of nitrogen (kg grain per kg N applied); PFP<sub>P</sub>, Partial factor productivity of phosphorus (kg grain per kg P applied); PFP<sub>K</sub>, Partial factor productivity of potassium (kg grain per kg K applied). Correlation coefficients shown are significant at <italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.05 and p &lt; 0.01 unless otherwise stated.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-16-1654933-g003.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Correlation matrix heatmap showing relationships among various agricultural factors, such as grain yield, photosynthetic rate, and irrigation water productivity. Values range from -0.06 to 1.01. Green indicates positive correlations, while orange shows negative ones. Key relationships include high correlation between grain yield and NDVI, and irrigation water productivity showing weak correlations with other factors.</alt-text>
</graphic></fig>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s5" sec-type="discussion">
<label>4</label>
<title>Discussion</title>
<sec id="s5_1">
<label>4.1</label>
<title>Growth parameters</title>
<p>Double ZT wheat cultivation recorded significantly higher DMA and LAI than conventional ZT systems. These improvements were attributed to the synergistic effects of residue retention and ZT practices, which regulate soil temperature (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B84">Varatharajan et&#xa0;al., 2019</xref>), enhance water infiltration and moisture conservation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B94">Zribi et&#xa0;al., 2015</xref>), improve soil structure, suppress weed proliferation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Dass et&#xa0;al., 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B63">Pratap et&#xa0;al., 2021a</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B62">Pratap et&#xa0;al., 2023</xref>), and enhance soil physico-chemical and biological health. Higher LAI under DZT is particularly important, as it enhances the interception of photosynthetically active radiation (PAR), which directly contributes to dry matter production and yield potential (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B54">Lopes et&#xa0;al., 2011</xref>). Optimized soil porosity under these conditions facilitated robust root development, improving nutrient and water uptake efficiency, which collectively enhanced vegetative growth and biomass production.</p>
<p>Optimal soil moisture under 25% DASM promoted tiller formation, leaf expansion, and sustained metabolic activity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B61">Pratap et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>). In contrast, the 75% DASM + Si<sub>80</sub> treatment restricted growth due to moisture stress as irrigations were delayed till 75% of available moisture had been exhausted, and Si application not being able to sufficiently impart stress tolerance, reducing DMA and LAI (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B61">Pratap et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>). Higher LAI under 25% DASM compared with 75% DASM + Si<sub>80</sub> indicates that moisture availability plays a more decisive role than supplemental stress-alleviating inputs like silicon under severe water deficit (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B73">Salem et&#xa0;al., 2021b</xref>). Enhanced DMA under 25% DASM irrigation compared with 75% DASM + Si<sub>80</sub> corroborates earlier findings that adequate soil moisture improves nutrient absorption, photosynthetic activity, and assimilate partitioning in wheat (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B51">Liang et&#xa0;al., 2019b</xref>). Additionally, NE-guided N application coupled with SPAD meter or LCC protocols, significantly increased crop growth, improving N uptake efficiency, root development, and leaf expansion (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B56">Mondal et&#xa0;al., 2018</xref>). The superiority of precision N management tools (NE + SPAD) over RDN is consistent with earlier reports showing that real-time crop-based diagnostic tools improve N-use efficiency and crop growth (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">Cui et&#xa0;al., 2018)</xref>. As SSNM helps meet crop requirements and enhance soil fertility, it performed better than uniform fertilizer applications. SSNM was found to enhance DMA and LAI by addressing spatial and temporal variability in nutrient availability (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B64">Pratap et&#xa0;al., 2021b</xref>), thus promoting sustainable yield.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s5_2">
<label>4.2</label>
<title>NDVI value</title>
<p>Higher NDVI values recorded under DZT-wheat were attributed to higher leaf N content resulting from higher N uptake, whereas lesser N content under ZT-wheat caused lower NDVI values (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B77">Singh et&#xa0;al., 2018</xref>). Our findings reveal that irrigation practices greatly affect NDVI measurements, showing a strong positive correlation with both biomass production and grain yield. Enhanced soil moisture retention and better root proliferation in DZT likely contributed to improved biomass accumulation and chlorophyll activity, as supported by earlier studies under conservation agriculture (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B74">Sapkota et&#xa0;al., 2021a</xref>). Higher NDVI values in wheat at 25% DASM over other irrigation regimes could be possible due to greater leaf N content, owing to higher N uptake resulting from greater solubilization of both applied and native nutrients under ideal soil moisture conditions. Lowest NDVI values under irrigation at 75% DASM + Si<sub>80</sub> were attributed to lower leaf N content resulting from lesser N availability and mobility in the soil-plant continuum due to a lack of sufficient moisture (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Irakli et&#xa0;al., 2011</xref>). Irrigation scheduling at 25% depletion of available soil moisture (DASM) significantly enhanced NDVI compared to 75% DASM + Si<sub>80</sub>, with 50% DASM showing intermediate results. This pattern indicates that adequate soil moisture supply during critical stages sustains photosynthetic activity and leaf area, while deficit irrigation reduces canopy greenness (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B51">Liang et&#xa0;al., 2019b</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B54">Lopes et&#xa0;al., 2011</xref>). The higher NDVI under optimum irrigation aligns with findings that soil moisture directly influences nitrogen uptake and chlorophyll expression (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Hanjra et&#xa0;al., 2009</xref>). Higher NDVI values under both the NE-guided N application were primarily due to higher leaf N content because of greater N uptake by plants as imparted by the combined effect of balanced nutrient application at the sowing time of the crop and further need-based N supply (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B49">Li et&#xa0;al., 2013</xref>). Among precision N-management approaches, NE + SPAD consistently outperformed RDN, and was statistically comparable with NE + LCC. SPAD-based N application ensures real-time crop N status assessment, leading to better synchronization of N supply with crop demand, thereby maintaining higher NDVI (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">Cui et&#xa0;al., 2018)</xref>. The lower NDVI values under RDN were attributed to lower leaf N content, due to inefficient uptake from a supply-demand mismatch caused by N loss when the application schedule did not align with the crop&#x2019;s dynamic nitrogen demand.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s5_3">
<label>4.3</label>
<title>Photosynthetic behaviors</title>
<p>Higher photosynthetic rate, stomatal conductance, and transpiration rate at both the study stages were found in DZT-wheat, attributed to higher chlorophyll content resulting from higher leaf N content consequent to greater N uptake by the plant (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B77">Singh et&#xa0;al., 2018</xref>). A similar finding was also reported by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B82">Thomas et&#xa0;al. (2005)</xref>, they highlighted that chlorophyll content is crucial for achieving a higher photosynthetic rate and found a significant positive correlation between photosynthetic rate and SPAD values. Further, higher photosynthetic efficiency under ZT-wheat was primarily due to a lower photosynthetic rate. Adequate soil moisture regimes enhance leaf water potential, boosting photosynthetic rates. Conversely, moisture stress limits photosynthesis by reducing leaf water potential and relative water content, negatively impacting plant growth and yield (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Hassan, 2006</xref>). Similar results were reported by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B81">Thierfelder et&#xa0;al. (2018)</xref>, who noted enhanced gas exchange traits in conservation tillage systems due to better soil aeration and moisture conservation.</p>
<p>The highest net photosynthetic rate (NPR), stomatal conductance, and transpiration rate in wheat with irrigation at 25% DASM were attributed to higher cell turgidity under adequate soil moisture regimes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B46">Kumari et&#xa0;al., 2017</xref>). In contrast, the lowest rates at 75% DASM+Si<sub>80</sub> were due to moisture stress, partially mitigated by Si, but still resulting in lower leaf water potential and reduced stomatal conductance, leading to partial stomatal closure and decreased NPR and transpiration. Our results align with <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">Gao et&#xa0;al. (2011)</xref>, who found that reduced soil water content under limited moisture conditions decreased NPR and transpiration due to impaired stomatal conductance and photochemical reactions, ultimately reducing grain weight. The relatively higher photosynthetic efficiency under 75% DASM + Si80 suggests that under moderate stress, plants tend to improve water-use efficiency through tighter stomatal regulation, a mechanism also described in wheat by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B53">Lobell et&#xa0;al. (2020)</xref> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">Daryanto et&#xa0;al. (2017)</xref>. Both the NE+SPAD meter and NE+LCC proved superior to RDN in terms of NPR, stomatal conductance, and transpiration rate. This was attributed to higher chlorophyll content resulting from a higher N uptake owing to regular need-based N supply (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B49">Li et&#xa0;al., 2013</xref>). Lower NPR, stomatal conductance, and transpiration rate under RDN were possibly due to lower chlorophyll content. Further, higher photosynthetic efficiency under RDN was ascribed to a lower photosynthetic rate. Such physiological trade-offs between carbon gain and water conservation under reduced N have also been observed in wheat and maize (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">Cui et&#xa0;al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B53">Lobell et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s5_4">
<label>4.4</label>
<title>Photosynthetic active radiation interception</title>
<p>Double ZT-wheat captured 4.1% and 3.6% more PAR during the maximum tillering and flowering stages, respectively, compared to conventional ZT-wheat. This improvement was linked to a higher LAI, driven by better crop growth, soil structure, water management, and nutrient absorption under the double ZT system (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">Harish et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>). In contrast, ZT-wheat showed reduced PAR interception due to a lower LAI, resulting from sub-optimal growth. These results are in agreement with <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Dass and Bhattacharyya (2017)</xref>, who found that residue retention improved chlorophyll content (SPAD values) and photosynthetic efficiency by enhancing soil moisture and nutrient availability. Similar findings were reported by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B79">Song et&#xa0;al. (2024)</xref>, who demonstrated that residue retention in conservation agriculture created favorable soil microclimatic conditions&#x2014;lower soil temperature and higher soil moisture&#x2014;leading to improved green area index (GAI) and greater PAR capture at anthesis. Higher intercepted PAR under assured irrigation at both study stages was ascribed to a larger assimilating area contributed by more number of tillers owing to vigorous crop growth favored by higher nutrient uptake under ideal soil moisture regimes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Dass and Chandra, 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B46">Kumari et&#xa0;al., 2017</xref>). Additionally, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">Kandel et&#xa0;al. (2019)</xref> highlighted that balanced water-use and higher N levels improve chlorophyll synthesis and NPR, leading to better LAI, PAR interception, and higher biomass and yield. Recent work on smart irrigation scheduling supports this observation, showing that Crop Water Stress Index (CWSI)-based irrigation enhances irrigation efficiency, prevents water stress, and sustains crop biomass by optimizing canopy function (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">Agricultural Water Management, 2024</xref>). The NE+SPAD meter-based N schedule in wheat intercepted ~ 2.0 and 4.8% higher PAR at the maximum tillering stage and 2.3 and 7.5% at the flowering stage over NE+ LCC and RDN, respectively. Higher PAR interception under the NE+ SPAD meter resulted from higher canopy development due to profuse crop growth and development, owing to higher nutrient uptake as a balanced amount of nutrients was supplied at the time of sowing as predicted by NE, and further, need-based N was supplied matching crop demand. SPAD meter-based N estimation has been validated as a reliable proxy for chlorophyll content and leaf N concentration (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B69">Rath et&#xa0;al., 2024</xref>), both of which are directly linked to higher radiation use efficiency (RUE) and light interception. Lower PAR interception with RDN was due to limited canopy development from reduced nutrient uptake, indicating that improper N application causes N stress (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B71">Saha et&#xa0;al., 2015</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s5_5">
<label>4.5</label>
<title>Yield attributes and yields</title>
<p>Double ZT-wheat exhibited a 5.7% increase in effective tillers, along with improvements in grains spike<sup>-1</sup> and 1000-grain weight, resulting in 6.7% and 5.1% higher grain and straw yields, respectively, compared to conventional ZT wheat. These improvements were attributed to superior root development, balanced nutrient availability, and optimized source-sink dynamics, as highlighted in long-term studies (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B78">Singh et&#xa0;al., 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">Jat et&#xa0;al., 2019</xref>). Enhanced growth indicators, particularly LAI and DMA, contributed to increased photosynthetic efficiency and nutrient translocation during flowering. Residue retention further amplified these benefits by improving soil moisture, nutrient accessibility, and weed suppression (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B70">Saad et&#xa0;al., 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B58">Parihar et&#xa0;al., 2017</xref>). The superiority of double zero-tillage (DZT) wheat over conventional ZT in effective tiller density, spike traits, and yield attributes aligns with earlier reports that DZT improves soil aggregation, root growth, and nutrient availability due to enhanced residue decomposition and better root&#x2013;soil contact (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B47">Leharwan et&#xa0;al., 2023</xref>).</p>
<p>Applying water at 25% DASM resulted in the highest values for effective tillers, grains spike<sup>-1</sup> and 1000-grain weight compared to 50% DASM and 75% DASM + Si<sub>80</sub>. Additionally, irrigation at 25% DASM led to a 9.3% higher grain yield and 13.0% higher straw yield compared to 50% DASM. Higher yield attributes and yield under irrigation in wheat at 25% DASM were ascribed to better crop growth and development, higher nutrient absorption, and photosynthetic accumulation that enabled hastened development of yield attributes that led to the formation of higher grain and straw yield (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B55">Meena et&#xa0;al., 2015</xref>). Similar results were reported by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">Kaur et&#xa0;al. (2022)</xref>, who found that frequent irrigation scheduling enhanced spike traits and 1000-grain weight, translating into higher yield gains in wheat under water-limited conditions.</p>
<p>Among the precision N management options, NE + SPAD meter produced maximum effective tillers, spike-length, grains spike<sup>-1</sup>, spike-weight, 1000-grain weight, and grain and straw yield over NE+LCC and RDN. The enhancement in effective tillers, grain, and straw yield was ~ 2.8, 1.8, and 1.7% over NE+LCC and 8, 6.1, and 4.5%, respectively, over RDN. Higher yield attributes and yield improvements under NE-based site-specific nutrient management were attributed to the optimal nutrient supply aligned with crop demand and soil nutrient availability, as reported by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B78">Singh et&#xa0;al. (2017)</xref>, and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B61">Pratap et&#xa0;al. (2022)</xref>. The integration of DZT with residue cover, precision N management, and optimized water-use enhances soil microbial activity, nutrient availability, and overall crop performance. These practices facilitate native nutrient mineralization increase soil organic matter, improve structure, reduce erosion, and enhance moisture retention (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">Jat et&#xa0;al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">Das et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>). These results corroborate recent studies highlighting the advantages of SPAD-guided N application in optimizing nitrogen use efficiency (NUE), chlorophyll content, and yield stability (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B69">Rath et&#xa0;al., 2024</xref>). By improving soil health and resource efficiency, this approach strengthens agricultural sustainability and climate resilience while aligning with global sustainable development goals.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s5_6">
<label>4.6</label>
<title>Partial factor productivity of N, P and K of wheat</title>
<p>On average, double ZT-wheat registered 6.7, 6.8, and 6.7% greater partial factor productivity of N (PFP<sub>N</sub>), P (PFP<sub>P</sub>), and K (PFP<sub>K</sub>) over ZT-wheat, majorly due to higher grain yield under the former. Enhanced PFP<sub>N</sub>, PFP<sub>P</sub>, and PFP<sub>K</sub> under DZT can be attributed to improved root growth and better synchronization of nutrient release with crop demand, which has also been observed in conservation agriculture systems globally (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">Khanal et&#xa0;al., 2023</xref>). Within irrigation regimes, the highest PFP<sub>N</sub>, PFP<sub>P</sub> and PFP<sub>K</sub> at 25% DASM resulted from the highest grain yield. These findings are in line with results from the North China Plain, where moderate irrigation levels, in combination with optimized nitrogen application, enhanced both yield and PFP<sub>N</sub> in wheat (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B65">Qin et&#xa0;al., 2024</xref>). Further, NE+ SPAD meter showed ~ 44.5, 6.2, and 6.2% higher PFP<sub>N</sub>, PFP<sub>P</sub> and PFP<sub>K</sub> over RDN. Likewise, NE+ LCC resulted in 42.1, 4.3 and 4.3% higher PFP<sub>N</sub>, PFP<sub>P</sub> and PFP<sub>K</sub> over RDN. Higher PFP<sub>N</sub>, PFP<sub>P</sub> and PFP<sub>K</sub> under NE-guided N application supplemented either with SPAD meter or LCC was ascribed to lesser but crop demand synchronized application of N, P and K fertilizer coupled with increased yield. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B42">Kumar et&#xa0;al. (2018)</xref> reported significantly higher partial factor productivity (PFP) under SSNM due to increased crop yield, whereas lower PFP<sub>N</sub>, PFP<sub>P</sub>, and PFP<sub>K</sub> under RDN resulted from bulk nutrient application and reduced yield. NutrientExpert-based N management strategies enhanced nutrient-use efficiency and yield stability compared to blanket recommendations (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">Khanal et&#xa0;al., 2023</xref>). These results reinforce that precision nitrogen management tools are critical for maximizing input use efficiency, sustaining productivity, and minimizing environmental footprints.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s5_7">
<label>4.7</label>
<title>Irrigation water productivity</title>
<p>Double ZT-wheat recorded 6.7% higher IWP compared to ZT-wheat. Higher IWP with DZT-wheat was mainly due to higher grain yield. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B67">Rajanna and Dhindwal (2019a)</xref> also found the highest WP, IWP, and heat-use efficiency under ZT-wheat. Similar findings have been reported in global studies, where conservation tillage improved water productivity and resource-use efficiency in wheat-based systems (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Govaerts et&#xa0;al., 2018</xref>). Higher IWP under 75% DASM + Si<sub>80</sub> resulted from more efficient water use due to less frequent irrigation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B92">Zhao et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>). Silicon has been shown to improve stomatal regulation, photosynthetic efficiency, and water-use efficiency under limited irrigation, thereby enhancing IWP (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">Kang et&#xa0;al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">Gong and Chen, 2020</xref>). Irrigation at 25% DASM registered the lowest IWP because of higher irrigation water use. Our results corroborate with earlier studies, which suggest that frequent irrigation in wheat at 25% maximum allowable DASM creates adequate soil moisture regimes, thereby producing higher grain and straw yields and WUE over irrigating wheat at 50% maximum allowable DASM (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">Kaur et&#xa0;al., 2018</xref>), while <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B92">Zhao et&#xa0;al. (2020)</xref> found that applying water in wheat at longer intervals coinciding with moisture-sensitive stages contributed higher IWP over frequent irrigation. Both precision N management options outperformed RDN in IWP, driven by higher grain yield under NE+SPAD and NE+LCC. International studies corroborate this, showing that SPAD-guided precision N management enhances both nitrogen-use efficiency and water productivity in cereals by synchronizing crop demand with nutrient and water availability (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B93">Zhao et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s5_8">
<label>4.8</label>
<title>N<sub>2</sub>O emission</title>
<p>Optimized fertilizer management integrated with improved agronomic practices significantly reduces GHG emissions. Combining optimal N rates with slow-release fertilizers lowers N<sub>2</sub>O emissions compared to conventional methods (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B52">Liu et&#xa0;al., 2015</xref>). Elevated N<sub>2</sub>O emissions under practices like ZT with excessive irrigation (25% DASM) and recommended N (RDN) were due to enhanced microbial nitrification-denitrification, waterlogged soils, and crop-N mismatches (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B59">Pathak et&#xa0;al., 2002</xref>). Zero tillage often leads to greater stratification of soil organic matter and mineral N near the soil surface (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">Alvarez et&#xa0;al., 2012</xref>), and when combined with frequent irrigation, conditions become conducive for denitrification losses. Conversely, ZT with moderated irrigation (75% DASM), silicon amendment (Si<sub>80</sub>), and demand-driven N application (NE + LCC) improves soil aeration, N uptake, and reduces N losses (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B88">Wang et&#xa0;al., 2007</xref>). Reduced irrigation frequency under 75% DASM likely limited anaerobic microsites, thereby suppressing denitrification (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B48">Li et&#xa0;al., 2019</xref>). Additionally, silicon application (Si80) may have contributed indirectly by improving plant water status and enhancing nitrogen uptake efficiency (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">Gong and Chen, 2020</xref>), reducing surplus soil N available for gaseous losses.NE-guided fertilization cuts N use by 15&#x2013;35%, boosts wheat yields by 4&#x2013;8%, and reduces global warming potential by 2&#x2013;20%, saving 5.24 Mt CO<sub>2</sub> eq. annually (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B75">Sapkota et&#xa0;al., 2021b</xref>). These strategies align with sustainable agriculture goals by balancing productivity, resource efficiency, and GHG mitigation. Evidence from international studies supports that adaptive N management strategies, particularly LCC- and sensor-based approaches, can lower N<sub>2</sub>O emissions by 15&#x2013;40% compared to conventional blanket fertilizer application while maintaining yields (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B89">Xia et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B91">Yang et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s5_9">
<label>4.9</label>
<title>Pearson correlation analysis</title>
<p>High inter-correlations of SPAD, NDVI, LAI, NPR, IPAR, and DMA also suggest tightly interlinked effects on yield. In contrast, irrigation water productivity showed a weak or negligible correlation with most variables, such as grain yield (-0.02), suggesting that irrigation water productivity did not follow the grain yield trend; irrigation water productivity is often low with application of higher irrigation levels and vice-versa within a certain range of irrigation levels. Among the PFP measures, PFP<sub>N</sub> showed a moderate correlation with grain yield (r=0.80), meaning that PFP<sub>N</sub> plays a significant role. The PFP<sub>P</sub> and PFP<sub>K</sub> were highly correlated with grain yield, which suggests that these are important for wheat productivity. Effective tillers and grains/spikes also had strong positive correlations with grain yield (r= 0.96 and 0.93, respectively), which indicates their importance as key yield determinants. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B61">Pratap et al. (2022)</xref> emphasized the strong positive correlation between establishment method, precision N, and water management in influencing wheat grain yield. They found that NE-guided balanced nutrient application, which considers the soil&#x2019;s indigenous nutrient supply, environmental conditions, and target yield, along with need-based N supply using SPAD meter/LCC, ensures a consistent N supply, leading to improved wheat productivity.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s6" sec-type="conclusions">
<label>5</label>
<title>Conclusion</title>
<p>Precision fertilizer and water management combined with conservation agriculture offers a win-win approach to enhance agricultural and environmental results in IGP of India. Results revealed that wheat (variety HD 3086) can be successfully grown under double zero-tillage (ZT) systems without significant yield loss in the North-western plains. Water management strategies, such as irrigating wheat at 25% depletion of available soil moisture (DASM) optimize growth under sufficient water availability. In water-scarce conditions, delaying irrigation to 50% DASM can save one irrigation cycle, redistributing water to additional wheat fields. Nitrogen management using the NE<sup>&#xae;</sup>+SPAD-based method outperformed conventional recommended doses (RDN), improving growth, yield, and resource efficiency while reducing N<sub>2</sub>O emissions, saving approximately 40 kg ha<sup>-1</sup> of nitrogen. This study has the potential to achieve Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) like Zero Hunger, Clean Water and Sanitation, Life Below Water, Life on Land, Responsible Consumption and Production, and Climate Action. Moreover, it could be recommended that farmers should adopt precision nitrogen management with tailored irrigation practices to maximize yield, profitability, and resource efficiency while minimizing environmental impact. In water-limited areas, intermittent irrigation at 50% DASM along with precision nitrogen techniques can boost productivity and conserve water. Integrating precision agriculture under conservation tillage systems enhances photosynthetic efficiency, light interception, and overall wheat performance, supporting higher yields, farmer incomes, and environmental sustainability. This approach is essential for scaling climate-resilient wheat production in India&#x2019;s resource-constrained regions.</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<sec id="s7" sec-type="data-availability">
<title>Data availability statement</title>
<p>The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.</p></sec>
<sec id="s8" sec-type="author-contributions">
<title>Author contributions</title>
<p>VPr: Project administration, Validation, Methodology, Data curation, Formal analysis, Visualization, Investigation, Conceptualization, Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing, Software, Funding acquisition, Supervision, Resources, Writing &#x2013; original draft. AD: Data curation, Conceptualization, Investigation, Validation, Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing, Project administration, Supervision, Writing &#x2013; original draft, Methodology. PK: Resources, Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing, Writing &#x2013; original draft. SS: Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing, Writing &#x2013; original draft. AC: Resources, Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing. AB: Resources, Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing. DJ: Writing &#x2013; original draft, Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing. SV: Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing. AS: Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing, Writing &#x2013; original draft. AAS: Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing, Data curation. KN: Data curation, Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing. KS: Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing. KK: Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing. RS: Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing. SK: Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing. VPa: Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing. TS: Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing. RK: Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing. SP: Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing.</p></sec>
<ack>
<title>Acknowledgments</title>
<p>The authors are highly grateful to ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute for funding and providing necessary facilities to conduct the field and laboratory research reported in this publication. We sincerely acknowledge ICAR-IARI and ICAR, New Delhi, for field and laboratory support, and the Division of Agricultural Physics, ICAR-IARI, for providing the Infrared Gas Analyzer and technical assistance.</p>
</ack>
<sec id="s10" sec-type="COI-statement">
<title>Conflict of interest</title>
<p>The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.</p></sec>
<sec id="s11" sec-type="ai-statement">
<title>Generative AI statement</title>
<p>The author(s) declare that no Generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.</p>
<p>Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.</p></sec>
<sec id="s12" sec-type="disclaimer">
<title>Publisher&#x2019;s note</title>
<p>All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.</p></sec>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="B1">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author"><collab>Agricultural Water Management</collab>
</person-group> (<year>2024</year>). 
<article-title>Smart irrigation scheduling using crop water stress index improves irrigation efficiency and biomass in cereals</article-title>. <source>Agric. Water Manage.</source> <volume>297</volume>, <elocation-id>108763</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.agwat.2024.108763</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Alvarez</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Steinbach</surname> <given-names>H. S.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>De Paepe</surname> <given-names>J. L.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2012</year>). 
<article-title>A review of the effects of tillage systems on some soil physical properties, water content, nitrate availability and crops yield in the Argentine Pampas</article-title>. <source>Soil Tillage Res.</source> <volume>114</volume>, <fpage>129</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>138</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.still.2011.05.001</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Arunachalam</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Paramesh</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Salgaonkar</surname> <given-names>D. C.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2025</year>). 
<article-title>Economics, energy budgeting and environmental impact assessment of coconut-based cropping system in the west coast of India</article-title>. <source>Curr. Res. Environ. Sustainability</source> <volume>9</volume>, <elocation-id>100289</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.crsust.2025.100289</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Behera</surname> <given-names>U. K.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Sharma</surname> <given-names>A. R.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2014</year>). 
<article-title>Productivity and water use efficiency of wheat (Triticum aestivum) under different resource conservation techniques and irrigation regimes</article-title>. <source>Cereal Res. Commun.</source> <volume>42</volume>, <fpage>439</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>449</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1556/CRC.2013.0045</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Cui</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Ma</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Huang</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2018</year>). 
<article-title>Pursuing sustainable productivity with millions of smallholder farmers</article-title>. <source>Nature</source> <volume>555</volume>, <fpage>363</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>366</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nature25785</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29513654</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Daryanto</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Jacinthe</surname> <given-names>P. A.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2017</year>). 
<article-title>Global synthesis of drought effects on maize and wheat production</article-title>. <source>PloS One</source> <volume>12</volume>, <fpage>e0176370</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0176370</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">27223810</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Das</surname> <given-names>T. K.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Nath</surname> <given-names>C. P.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Das</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Biswas</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Bhattacharyya</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Sudhishrie</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2020</year>). 
<article-title>Conservation agriculture in rice-mustard cropping system forfive years: impacts on crop productivity, profitability, water-use efficiency, and soilproperties</article-title>. <source>Field Crops Res.</source> <volume>250</volume>, <elocation-id>10778</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.fcr.2020.107781</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Dass</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Bhattacharyya</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2017</year>). 
<article-title>Wheat residue mulch and anti-transpirants improve productivity and quality of rainfed soybean in semi-arid north-Indian plains</article-title>. <source>Field Crops Res.</source> <volume>2010</volume>, <fpage>9</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>19</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.fcr.2017.05.011</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Dass</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Chandra</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2013</year>). 
<article-title>Irrigation, spacing and cultivar effects on net photosynthetic rate, dry matter partitioning and productivity of rice under system of rice intensification in mollisols of northern India</article-title>. <source>Ex. Agric.</source> <volume>49</volume>, <fpage>504</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>523</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1017/S0014479713000252</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Dass</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Shekhawat</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Choudhary</surname> <given-names>A. K.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Sepat</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Rathore</surname> <given-names>S. S.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Mahajan</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2017</year>). 
<article-title>Weed management in rice using crop competition-a review</article-title>. <source>Crop Prot.</source> <volume>95</volume>, <fpage>45</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>52</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.cropro.2016.08.005</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Debnath</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Jain</surname> <given-names>M. C.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Kumar</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Sarkar</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Sinha</surname> <given-names>S. K.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>1996</year>). 
<article-title>Methane emissions from rice fields amended with biogas slurry and farm yard manure</article-title>. <source>Clim. Change</source> <volume>33</volume>, <fpage>97</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>109</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/BF00140515</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<mixed-citation publication-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Dobermann</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2007</year>). &#x201c;
<article-title>Nutrient use efficiency &#x2013; measurement and management</article-title>,&#x201d; in <source>Fertilizer Best Management Practices</source> (
<publisher-name>International Fertilizer Industry Association (IFA</publisher-name>, <publisher-loc>Paris, France</publisher-loc>). Proceedings of the IFA International Workshop on Fertilizer Best Management Practices, Brussels, Belgium.
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Dobermann</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Witt</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Abdulrachman</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Gines</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Nagarajan</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Pampolino</surname> <given-names>M. F.</given-names></name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2002</year>). 
<article-title>Site-specific nutrient management for intensive rice cropping systems in Asia</article-title>. <source>Soil Sci. Plant Nutr.</source> <volume>48</volume>, <fpage>651</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>660</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S0378-4290(01)00197-6</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<mixed-citation publication-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Du Plessis</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>du Plessis</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Schmuhl.</surname></name>
</person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <source>Water as an inescapable risk</source> (<publisher-loc>Dordrecht, Netherlands</publisher-loc>: 
<publisher-name>Springer</publisher-name>), <fpage>147</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>172</lpage>.
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<mixed-citation publication-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Evans</surname> <given-names>G. C.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>1972</year>). <source>Quantitative analysis of growth</source> (<publisher-loc>Oxford, London</publisher-loc>: 
<publisher-name>Blackwell Scientific Publication</publisher-name>).
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Fagodiya</surname> <given-names>R. K.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Singh</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Singh</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Rani</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Kumar</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Rai</surname> <given-names>A. K.</given-names></name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2023</year>). 
<article-title>The food&#x2013;energy&#x2013;water&#x2013;carbon nexus of the rice&#x2013;wheat production system in the western Indo-Gangetic Plain of India: An impact of irrigation system, conservation tillage, and residue management</article-title>. <source>Sci. Total Environ.</source> <volume>860</volume>, <elocation-id>160428</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.160428</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">36436645</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Gao</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Jia</surname> <given-names>Z. K.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Lu</surname> <given-names>W. T.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Han</surname> <given-names>Q. F.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Yao</surname> <given-names>B. P.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Hou</surname> <given-names>X. Q.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2011</year>). 
<article-title>Effects of different straw returning treatments on soil water, maize growth and photosynthetic characteristics in the semi-arid area of Southern Ningxia</article-title>. <source>Acta Ecol. Sin.</source> <volume>31</volume>, <fpage>777</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>783</lpage>.
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B18">
<mixed-citation publication-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Gomez</surname> <given-names>K. A.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Gomez</surname> <given-names>A. A.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>1984</year>). <source>Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research</source> (<publisher-loc>IRRI, Philipines</publisher-loc>: 
<publisher-name>John Wiley and Sons, Inc.</publisher-name>), <fpage>247</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>262</lpage>.
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B19">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Gong</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2020</year>). 
<article-title>The regulatory role of silicon on water relations, photosynthesis, and mineral nutrient absorption of plants under drought stress</article-title>. <source>Front. Plant Science 11</source> <volume>1221</volume>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpls.2020.01221</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32973824</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B20">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Govaerts</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Verhulst</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Castellanos-Navarrete</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Sayre</surname> <given-names>K. D.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Dixon</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Dendooven</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2018</year>). 
<article-title>Conservation agriculture and soil carbon sequestration: Between myth and farmer reality</article-title>. <source>Crit. Rev. Plant Sci.</source> <volume>28</volume>, <fpage>97</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>122</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/07352680902776358</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B21">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Gupta</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Singh</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Jat</surname> <given-names>H. S.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Singh</surname> <given-names>L. K.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Choudhary</surname> <given-names>M. K.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Sidhu</surname> <given-names>H. S.</given-names></name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2023</year>). 
<article-title>Precise irrigation water and nitrogen management improve water and nitrogen use efficiencies under conservation agriculture in the maize&#x2013;wheat systems</article-title>. <source>Sci. Rep.</source> <volume>13</volume>, <fpage>12060</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41598-023-39172-y</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">37495614</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B22">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Hanjra</surname> <given-names>M. A.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Ferede</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Gutta</surname> <given-names>D. G.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2009</year>). 
<article-title>Pathways to breaking the poverty trap in Ethiopia: Investments in agricultural water, education, and markets</article-title>. <source>Agric. Water Manage.</source> <volume>96</volume>, <fpage>1596</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1604</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.agwat.2009.06.008</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B23">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Hanway</surname> <given-names>J. J.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Heidel</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>1952</year>). 
<article-title>Soil analyses methods as used in Iowa State College Soil Testing Laboratory</article-title>. <source>Iowa Agric.</source> <volume>57</volume>, <fpage>131</fpage>.
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B24">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Harish</surname> <given-names>M. N.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Choudhary</surname> <given-names>A. K.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Bhupenchandra</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Dass</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Rajanna</surname> <given-names>G. A.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Singh</surname> <given-names>V. K.</given-names></name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2022</year>). 
<article-title>Double zero-tillage and foliar-P nutrition coupled with bio-inoculants enhance physiological photosynthetic characteristics and resilience to nutritional and environmental stresses in maize&#x2013;wheat rotation</article-title>. <source>Front. Plant Sci.</source>, <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>26</lpage>., PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">36186084</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B25">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Hassan</surname> <given-names>I. A.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2006</year>). 
<article-title>Effects of water stress and high temperature on gas exchange and chlorophyll fluorescence in Triticum aestivum L</article-title>. <source>Photosynthetica</source> <volume>44</volume>, <fpage>312</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>315</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11099-006-0024-7</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B26">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Irakli</surname> <given-names>M. N.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Samanidou</surname> <given-names>V. F.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Papadoyannis</surname> <given-names>I. N.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2011</year>). 
<article-title>Development and validation of an HPLC method for the simultaneous determination of tocopherols, tocotrienols and carotenoids in cereals after solid-phase extraction</article-title>. <source>J. Sep. Sci.</source> <volume>34</volume>, <fpage>1375</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/jssc.201100077</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21506271</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B27">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Jat</surname> <given-names>H. S.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Choudhary</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Singh</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Sidhu</surname> <given-names>H. S.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Singh</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Bijarniya</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2022</year>). 
<article-title>Evaluating precision nutrient and water management technologies in wheat for enhancing resource-use efficiency and reducing greenhouse gas emissions</article-title>. <source>Field Crops Res.</source> <volume>283</volume>, <elocation-id>108565</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.fcr.2022.108565</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B28">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Jat</surname> <given-names>R. D.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Jat</surname> <given-names>H. S.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Nanwal</surname> <given-names>R. K.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Yadav</surname> <given-names>A. K.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Bana</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Choudhary</surname> <given-names>K. M.</given-names></name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2018</year>). 
<article-title>Conservation agriculture andprecision nutrient management practices in maize-wheat system: effects on crop andwater productivity and economic profitability</article-title>. <source>Field Crops Res.</source> <volume>222</volume>, <fpage>111</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>120</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.fcr.2018.03.025</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B29">
<mixed-citation publication-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Jat</surname> <given-names>R. A.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Jinger</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Kumar</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Singh</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Jat</surname> <given-names>S. L.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Dinesh</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2021</year>). &#x201c;
<article-title>Scaling-up of conservation agriculture for climate change resilient agriculture in South Asia</article-title>,&#x201d; in <source>Scaling-up Solutions for Farmers Technology, Partnership and Convergence</source>. Eds. 
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name><surname>Wani</surname> <given-names>S. P.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Raju</surname> <given-names>K. V.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Bhattacharyya</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (
<publisher-name>Springer Nature</publisher-name>, <publisher-loc>Switzerland</publisher-loc>), <fpage>351</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>380</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/978-3-030-77935-1_11</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B30">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Jat</surname> <given-names>R. A.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Jinger</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Kumawat</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Saswat</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Rawat</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Paramesh</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2025</year>). 
<article-title>Integrated watershed management for transforming dryland livelihoods: A climate-smart strategy for sustainable dryland agriculture in India</article-title>. <source>Watershed Ecol. Environment</source>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.wsee.2025.03.006</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B31">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Jat</surname> <given-names>R. K.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Singh</surname> <given-names>R. G.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Kumar</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Jat</surname> <given-names>M. L.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Parihar</surname> <given-names>C. M.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Bijarniya</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2019</year>). 
<article-title>Ten years agriculture in a rice-maize rotation of eastern Gangetic plains of India: yield trends, water productivity and economic profitability</article-title>. <source>Field Crop Res.</source> <volume>232</volume>, <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>10</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.fcr.2018.12.004</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B32">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Jinger</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Dhar</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Dass</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Sharma</surname> <given-names>V. K.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Jhorar</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Paramesh</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2023</year>b). 
<article-title>Combined fertilization of silicon and phosphorus in aerobic rice-wheat cropping and its impact on system productivity, water use efficiency, soil health, crop resilience, and profitability</article-title>. <source>Silicon</source> <volume>15</volume>, <fpage>7609</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>7620</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s12633-023-02598-x</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B33">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Jinger</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Dhar</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Dass</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Sharma</surname> <given-names>V. K.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Paramesh</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Parihar</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2021</year>). 
<article-title>Co-fertilization of silicon and phosphorus influences the dry matter accumulation, grain yield, nutrient uptake, and nutrient-use efficiencies of aerobic rice</article-title>. <source>Silicon</source> <volume>14</volume>, <fpage>4683</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>4697</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s12633-021-01239-5</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B34">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Jinger</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Dhar</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Dass</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Sharma</surname> <given-names>V. K.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Shukla</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Parihar</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2020</year>). 
<article-title>Crop productivity, grain quality, water use efficiency, and soil enzyme activity as influenced by silicon and phosphorus application in aerobic rice (Oryza sativa)</article-title>. <source>Communication Soil Sci. Plant Anal.</source> <volume>51</volume>, <fpage>2147</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2162</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/00103624.2020.1812629</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B35">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Jinger</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Kaushal</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Kumar</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Paramesh</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Verma</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Shukla</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2023</year>a). 
<article-title>Degraded land rehabilitation through agroforestry in India: Achievements, current understanding, and future prospectives</article-title>. <source>Front. Ecol. Evol.</source> <volume>11</volume>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fevo.2023.1088796</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B36">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Kandel</surname> <given-names>T. P.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Gowda</surname> <given-names>P. H.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Northup</surname> <given-names>B. K.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Rocateli</surname> <given-names>A. C.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2019</year>). 
<article-title>Impacts of tillage systems, nitrogen fertilizer rates and a legume green manure on light interception and yield of winter wheat</article-title>. <source>Cogent Food Agric.</source> <volume>5</volume>, <fpage>1580176</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/23311932.2019.1580176</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B37">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Kang</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Zhu</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Ding</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2016</year>). 
<article-title>Effects of silicon on photosynthetic characteristics of wheat under drought stress</article-title>. <source>Acta Physiologiae Plantarum</source> <volume>38</volume>, <fpage>132</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11738-016-2155-2</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B38">
<mixed-citation publication-type="confproc">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Kaur</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Dass</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Rajanna</surname> <given-names>G. A.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2018</year>). &#x201c;
<article-title>Deficit irrigation regimes, fertiliser and genotypic interaction effect on wheat productivity in maize-wheat cropping system</article-title>,&#x201d; in <conf-name>XXI Biennial National Symposium of Indian Society of Agronomy</conf-name>, <conf-loc>MPUAT, Udaipur, Rajasthan</conf-loc>, <conf-date>24&#x2013;26 October, 2018</conf-date>.
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B39">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Kaur</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Singh</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Sidhu</surname> <given-names>H. S.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Vashisht</surname> <given-names>B. B.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Singh</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Humphreys</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2022</year>). 
<article-title>Irrigation and nitrogen management strategies to improve water and nitrogen productivity of wheat in north-west India</article-title>. <source>Agronomy</source> <volume>12</volume>, <elocation-id>2528</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/agronomy12102528</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B40">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Keil</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>D&#x2019;souza</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>McDonald</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2020</year>). 
<article-title>Zero-tillage wheat provides stable yields and economic resilience in the eastern Indo-Gangetic Plains</article-title>. <source>Food Secur.</source> <volume>12</volume>, <fpage>1105</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1120</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s12571-020-01057-8</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B41">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Khanal</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Sah</surname> <given-names>S. K.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Acharya</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Marahatta</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Neupane</surname> <given-names>M. P.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2023</year>). 
<article-title>Precision nitrogen management in wheat at Rampur, Chitwan, Nepal: effects on yield and nutrient-use efficiency</article-title>. <source>J. Agric. Environ.</source> <volume>23</volume>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3126/aej.v23i1.46923</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B42">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Kumar</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Panwar</surname> <given-names>A. S.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Naresh</surname> <given-names>R. K.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Singh</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Mahajan</surname> <given-names>N. C.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Chowdhary</surname> <given-names>U.</given-names></name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2018</year>). 
<article-title>Improving Rice-wheat cropping system through precision nitrogen management: A review</article-title>. <source>J.Pharmacogn. Phyto.</source> <volume>7</volume>, <fpage>1119</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1128</lpage>.
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B43">
<mixed-citation publication-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Kumar</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Ranjan</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Meena</surname> <given-names>M. K.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Yadav</surname> <given-names>R. S.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Gupta</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Jinger</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2021</year>). &#x201c;
<article-title>Exploring conservation agricultural practices in Bundelkhand Region, Central India</article-title>,&#x201d; in <source>Conservation Agriculture: A Sustainable Approach for Soil Health and Food Security</source>. Eds. 
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name><surname>Jayaraman</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Dalal</surname> <given-names>R. C.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Patra</surname> <given-names>A. K.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Chaudhari</surname> <given-names>S. K.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (
<publisher-name>Springer</publisher-name>, <publisher-loc>Berlin, Germany</publisher-loc>), <fpage>195</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>222</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/978-981-16-0827-8_9</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B44">
<mixed-citation publication-type="web">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Kumar</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Sarangi</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Singh</surname> <given-names>D. K.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Khanna</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Mani</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Dash</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2025</year>). <source>Assessing capacitance soil moisture sensors for precision irrigation scheduling in wheat crop</source>. Available online at: <uri xlink:href="https://www.researchgate.net/publication/389909262_Assessing_capacitance_soil_moisture_sensors_for_precision_irrigation_scheduling_in_wheat_crop">https://www.researchgate.net/publication/389909262_Assessing_capacitance_soil_moisture_sensors_for_precision_irrigation_scheduling_in_wheat_crop</uri> (Accessed <date-in-citation content-type="access-date">May 15, 2025</date-in-citation>).
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B45">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Kumar</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Yadav</surname> <given-names>R. K.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Kumar</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Kumar</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Meena</surname> <given-names>B. R.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Sharma</surname> <given-names>P. C.</given-names></name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2022</year>). 
<article-title>Conservation agriculture-based maize cultivation under different nitrogen and irrigation management practices in the Indo-Gangetic Plains</article-title>. <source>Indian J. Agric. Sci.</source> <volume>92</volume>, <fpage>1200</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1207</lpage>.
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B46">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Kumari</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Dass</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Sudhishri</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Kaur</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Rani</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2017</year>). 
<article-title>Yield components, yield and nutrient uptake pattern in maize (Zea mays L.) under varying irrigation and nitrogen levels</article-title>. <source>Ind. J. Agron.</source> <volume>62</volume>, <fpage>104</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>107</lpage>.
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B47">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Leharwan</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Sharma</surname> <given-names>R. K.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Kumar</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Kumar</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Kumar</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Jatav</surname> <given-names>M. K.</given-names></name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2023</year>). 
<article-title>Influence of conservation tillage and crop residue management on wheat productivity and resource-use efficiency in Indo-Gangetic Plains</article-title>. <source>Agric. Res.</source> <volume>12</volume>, <fpage>559</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>570</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s40003-022-00766-4</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B48">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Hu</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Delgado</surname> <given-names>J. A.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Ouyang</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2019</year>). 
<article-title>Increased water use efficiency and reduced N<sub>2</sub>O emissions in winter wheat with optimized irrigation and N management</article-title>. <source>Field Crops Res.</source> <volume>240</volume>, <fpage>105</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>115</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.fcr.2019.06.001</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B49">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Tian</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Cai</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Jiang</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Cao</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Dai</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2013</year>). 
<article-title>Effects of low nitrogen supply on relationships between photosynthesis and nitrogen status at different leaf position in wheat seedlings</article-title>. <source>Plant Growth Regul.</source> <volume>70</volume>, <fpage>257</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>263</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10725-013-9797-4</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B50">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Liang</surname> <given-names>Y. F.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Khan</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Ren</surname> <given-names>A. X.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Lin</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Anwar</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Sun</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2019</year>a). 
<article-title>Subsoiling and sowing time influence soil water content, nitrogen translocation and yield of dryland winter wheat</article-title>. <source>Agronomy</source> <volume>9</volume>, <elocation-id>37</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/agronomy9010037</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B51">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Liang</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Qu</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Ma</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Guo</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2019</year>b). 
<article-title>Effects of water deficit on wheat photosynthetic characteristics and yield</article-title>. <source>Agron. J.</source> <volume>111</volume>, <fpage>3220</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>3230</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2134/agronj2019.02.0096</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B52">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>Y. N.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>Y. C.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Peng</surname> <given-names>Z. P.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Y. Q.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Guo</surname> <given-names>L. P.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Lin</surname> <given-names>E. D.</given-names></name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2015</year>). 
<article-title>Effects of different nitrogen fertilizer management practices on wheat yields and N<sub>2</sub>O emissions from wheat fields in North China</article-title>. <source>J. Integr. Agric.</source> <volume>14</volume>, <fpage>1184</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1191</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S2095-3119(14)60867-4</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B53">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Lobell</surname> <given-names>D. B.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Hammer</surname> <given-names>G. L.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>McLean</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Messina</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Roberts</surname> <given-names>M. J.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Schlenker</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2020</year>). 
<article-title>The critical role of extreme heat for maize production in the United States</article-title>. <source>Nat. Climate Change</source> <volume>10</volume>, <fpage>284</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>289</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41558-020-0723-9</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B54">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Lopes</surname> <given-names>M. S.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Reynolds</surname> <given-names>M. P.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Jalal-Kamali</surname> <given-names>M. R.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Moussa</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Feltaous</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Tahir</surname> <given-names>I. S. A.</given-names></name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2011</year>). 
<article-title>The yield correlations of selectable physiological traits in a population of advanced spring wheat lines grown in warm and drought environments</article-title>. <source>Field Crops Res.</source> <volume>128</volume>, <fpage>129</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>136</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.fcr.2011.01.002</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B55">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Meena</surname> <given-names>R. K.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Parihar</surname> <given-names>S. S.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Singh</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Khanna</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2015</year>). 
<article-title>Influence of date of sowing and irrigation regimes on crop growth and yield of wheat (Triticum aestivum) and its relationship with temperature in semi-arid region</article-title>. <source>Indian J. Agron.</source> <volume>60</volume>, <fpage>92</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>98</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.59797/ija.v60i1.4420</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B56">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Mondal</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Mitra</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Das</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2018</year>). 
<article-title>Precision nutrient management in wheat (Triticumaestivum) using Nutrient Expert&#xae;: growth phenology, yield, nitrogen-use efficiency and profitability under eastern sub-Himalayan plains</article-title>. <source>Indian J. Agron.</source> <volume>63</volume>, <fpage>174</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>180</lpage>.
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B57">
<mixed-citation publication-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Olsen</surname> <given-names>B. C.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Cole</surname> <given-names>C. V.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Watenabe</surname> <given-names>F. S.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Dean</surname> <given-names>L. A.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>1954</year>). <source>Estimation of Available Phosphorus by Extraction with Sodium Carbonate</source> Vol. <volume>19</volume> (<publisher-loc>Washington, DC, USA</publisher-loc>: 
<publisher-name>USDA</publisher-name>). Circular No. 939.
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B58">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Parihar</surname> <given-names>C. M.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Jat</surname> <given-names>S. L.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Singh</surname> <given-names>A. K.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Majumdar</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Jat</surname> <given-names>M. L.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Saharawat</surname> <given-names>Y. S.</given-names></name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2017</year>). 
<article-title>Bio-energy, water-use efficiency and economics of maize-wheat-mung bean system under precision-conservation agriculture in semi-arid agro-ecosystem</article-title>. <source>Energy</source> <volume>119</volume>, <fpage>245</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>256</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.energy.2016.12.068</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B59">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Pathak</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Bhatia</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Prasad</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Singh</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Kumar</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Jain</surname> <given-names>M. C.</given-names></name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2002</year>). 
<article-title>Emission of nitrous oxide from rice-wheat systems of Indo-Gangetic plains of India</article-title>. <source>Environ. Monit. Assess.</source> <volume>77</volume>, <fpage>163</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>178</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1023/A:1015823919405</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">12180654</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B60">
<mixed-citation publication-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Piper</surname> <given-names>C. S.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>1950</year>). <source>Soil and Plant Analysis</source> (<publisher-loc>Adelaide, Australia</publisher-loc>: 
<publisher-name>The University of Adelaide Press</publisher-name>), <fpage>286</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>287</lpage>.
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B61">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Pratap</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Dass</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Dhar</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Babu</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Singh</surname> <given-names>V. K.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Singh</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2022</year>). 
<article-title>Co-Implementation of tillage, precision nitrogen, and water management enhances water productivity, economic returns, and energy-use efficiency of direct- seeded rice</article-title>. <source>Sustainability</source> <volume>14</volume>, <fpage>11234</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/su141811234</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B62">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Pratap</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Verma</surname> <given-names>S. K.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Dass</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2023</year>). 
<article-title>Weed growth, nutrient removal and yield of direct-seeded rice as influenced by establishment methods and chemical-cum-mechanical weed management practices</article-title>. <source>Crop Prot.</source> <volume>163</volume>, <fpage>106100</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.cropro.2022.106100</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B63">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Pratap</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Verma</surname> <given-names>S. K.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Dass</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Yadav</surname> <given-names>D. K.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Jaysawal</surname> <given-names>P. K.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Madane</surname> <given-names>A. J.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>a). 
<article-title>Productivity and profitability of direct-seeded rice under varying establishment methods and weed management practices</article-title>. <source>Indian J. Agric. Sci.</source> <volume>91</volume>, <fpage>537</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>541</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.56093/ijas.v91i4.112635</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B64">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Pratap</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Verma</surname> <given-names>S. K.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Dass</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Yadav</surname> <given-names>D. K.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Madane</surname> <given-names>A. J.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Maurya</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2021</year>b). 
<article-title>Effect of sowing and weed control methods on nutrient uptake and soil fertility in direct-seeded rice</article-title>. <source>Indian J. Agric. Sci.</source> <volume>91</volume>, <fpage>1337</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1341</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.56093/ijas.v91i9.116082</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B65">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Qin</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Fan</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Jiang</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Lv</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2024</year>). 
<article-title>Effects of irrigation and nitrogen application on the water and nitrogen utilization characteristics of drip-irrigated winter wheat in the North China Plain</article-title>. <source>Agronomy</source> <volume>14</volume>, <elocation-id>2629</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/agronomy14112629</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B66">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Rajanna</surname> <given-names>G. A.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Dass</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Singh</surname> <given-names>V. K.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Choudhary</surname> <given-names>A. K.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Paramesh</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Babu</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2023</year>). 
<article-title>Energy and carbon budgeting in a soybean&#x2013;wheat system in different tillage, irrigation and fertilizer management practices in South-Asian semi-arid agroecology</article-title>. <source>Eur. J. Agron.</source> <volume>148</volume>, <fpage>126877</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.eja.2023.126877</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B67">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Rajanna</surname> <given-names>G. A.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Dhindwal</surname> <given-names>A. S.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2019</year>a). 
<article-title>Water dynamics, productivity and heat use efficiency responses in wheat (Triticum aestivum) to land configuration techniques and irrigation schedules</article-title>. <source>Indian J. Agric. Sci.</source> <volume>89</volume>, <fpage>912</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>919</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.56093/ijas.v89i6.90758</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B68">
<mixed-citation publication-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Rangaswamy</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <source>A textbokk of Agricultural Statistics</source>. <edition>2nd ed.</edition> (<publisher-loc>New Delhi</publisher-loc>: 
<publisher-name>New Age International Publishers</publisher-name>).
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B69">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Rath</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Behera</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Lenka</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2024</year>). 
<article-title>Nitrogen management in cereals using SPAD and remote sensing tools: Advances and prospects</article-title>. <source>Precis. Agric.</source> <volume>25</volume>, <fpage>455</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>472</lpage>.
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B70">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Saad</surname> <given-names>A. A.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Das</surname> <given-names>T. K.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Rana</surname> <given-names>D. S.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Sharma</surname> <given-names>A. R.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2014</year>). 
<article-title>Productivity, resource-use efficiency and economics of maize (Zea mays L.)-wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)-greengram (Vigna radiata L.) cropping system under conservation agriculture in irrigated north-western Indo-Gangetic plains</article-title>. <source>Indian J. Agron.</source> <volume>60</volume>, <fpage>502</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>510</lpage>.
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B71">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Saha</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Sehgal</surname> <given-names>V. K.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Chakraborty</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Pal</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2015</year>). 
<article-title>Atmospheric carbon dioxide enrichment induced modifications in canopy radiation utilization, growth and yield of chickpea [Cicer arietinum L.)</article-title>. <source>Agric. Meteorol.</source> <volume>202</volume>, <fpage>102</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>111</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.agrformet.2014.12.004</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B72">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Salem</surname> <given-names>M. A.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Ali</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Elrys</surname> <given-names>A. S.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>a). 
<article-title>Silicon-mediated alleviation of drought stress in wheat: Physiological and biochemical responses</article-title>. <source>Plants</source> <volume>10</volume>, <elocation-id>2667</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/plants10122667</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">34961138</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B73">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Salem</surname> <given-names>E. M.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Kenawey</surname> <given-names>K. M.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Saudy</surname> <given-names>H. S.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Mubarak</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>b). 
<article-title>Soil mulching and deficit irrigation effect on sustainability of nutrients availability and uptake, and productivity of maize grown in calcareous soils</article-title>. <source>Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal.</source> <volume>52</volume>, <fpage>1745</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1761</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/00103624.2021.1892733</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B74">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Sapkota</surname> <given-names>T. B.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Jat</surname> <given-names>M. L.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Aryal</surname> <given-names>J. P.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Jat</surname> <given-names>R. K.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Khatri-Chhetri</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Sutaliya</surname> <given-names>J. M.</given-names></name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2021</year>a). 
<article-title>Identifying optimum rates of fertilizer nitrogen application to maximize economic return and minimize nitrous oxide emission from rice&#x2013;wheat systems in the Indo-Gangetic Plains of India</article-title>. <source>Arch. Agron. Soil Sci.</source> <volume>67</volume>, <fpage>771</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>785</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/03650340.2020.1740102</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B75">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Sapkota</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Jat</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Rana</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Khatri-Chhetri</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Jat</surname> <given-names>H. S.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Bijarniya</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2021</year>b). 
<article-title>Crop nutrient management usingNutrientExpert improves yield, increases farmers&#x2019; income and reduces greenhousegasemissions</article-title>. <source>Sci. Rep.</source> <volume>11</volume>, <fpage>1564</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41598-020-79883-x</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33452276</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B76">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Sinclair</surname> <given-names>T. R.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Muchow</surname> <given-names>R. C.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2001</year>). 
<article-title>System analysis of plant traits to increase grain yield on limited water supplies</article-title>. <source>Agron. J.</source> <volume>93</volume>, <fpage>263</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>270</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2134/agronj2001.932263x</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B77">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Singh</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Naresh</surname> <given-names>R. K.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Kumar</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Chaudhary</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Mahajan</surname> <given-names>N. C.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Sachan</surname> <given-names>D. K.</given-names></name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2018</year>). 
<article-title>Effect of Irrigation Schedules and crop establishment methods on physiological processes, light interception, water and crop productivity of wheat under a semiarid agro-ecosystem</article-title>. <source>Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. App. Sci.</source> <volume>7</volume>, <fpage>3427</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>3451</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.20546/ijcmas.2018.712.392</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B78">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Singh</surname> <given-names>C. S.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Raj</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Singh</surname> <given-names>A. K.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Singh</surname> <given-names>A. K.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Singh</surname> <given-names>S. K.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2017</year>). 
<article-title>Nutrient expert assistedsite-specific-nutrient-management: An alternative precision fertilization technologyfor maize production in Chotanagpur plateau region of Jharkhand</article-title>. <source>J. Pharmacogn. Phyto.</source> <volume>7</volume>, <fpage>760</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>764</lpage>.
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B79">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Song</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Ma</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Dai</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Zheng</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2024</year>). 
<article-title>Residue orientation enhanced wheat growth and yield in conservation agriculture</article-title>. <source>Field Crops Res.</source> <volume>309</volume>, <elocation-id>109313</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.fcr.2024.109313</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B80">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Subbiah</surname> <given-names>B. V.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Asija</surname> <given-names>G. L.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>1956</year>). 
<article-title>A rapid procedure for the determination of available nitrogen in soils</article-title>. <source>Curr. Sci.</source> <volume>25</volume>, <fpage>259</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>260</lpage>.
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B81">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Thierfelder</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Matemba-Mutasa</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Rusinamhodzi</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2018</year>). 
<article-title>Yield response of maize (Zea mays L.) to conservation agriculture cropping system in Southern Africa</article-title>. <source>Soil Tillage Res.</source> <volume>146</volume>, <fpage>230</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>242</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.still.2014.10.015</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B82">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Thomas</surname> <given-names>J. A.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Jaffrey</surname> <given-names>A. C.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Atsuko</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>David</surname> <given-names>M. K.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2005</year>). 
<article-title>Regulating the proton budget of higher plant photosynthesis</article-title>. <source>Proc. Natl.Acad. Sci. U.S.A.</source> <volume>102</volume>, <fpage>9709</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>9713</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1073/pnas.0503952102</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">15972806</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B83">
<mixed-citation publication-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author"><collab>UNWWDR</collab>
</person-group> (<year>2018</year>). &#x201c;
<article-title>. World water assessment programme (Nations unies)</article-title>,&#x201d; in <source>The United Nations World Water Development Report 2018</source> (
<publisher-name>United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization</publisher-name>, <publisher-loc>New York</publisher-loc>). Available online at: <uri xlink:href="https://www.unwater.org/publications/world-water-development-report-2018">https://www.unwater.org/publications/world-water-development-report-2018</uri> (Accessed <date-in-citation content-type="access-date">April 20, 2025</date-in-citation>).
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B84">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Varatharajan</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Choudhary</surname> <given-names>A. K.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Pooniya</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Dass</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Meena</surname> <given-names>M. C.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Gurung</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2019</year>). 
<article-title>Influence of integrated crop management practices on yield, PAR interception, resource-use-efficiency and energetics in pigeonpea in north Indian plains</article-title>. <source>J. Environ. Bio.</source> <volume>40</volume>, <fpage>1204</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1210</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.22438/jeb/40/6/MRN-1073</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B85">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Verma</surname> <given-names>T. S.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Singh</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2009</year>). 
<article-title>Conservation tillage for sustainable crop production: economic and environmental impacts</article-title>. <source>Int. J. Agric. Sustainability</source> <volume>7</volume>, <fpage>98</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>107</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3763/ijas.2009.0410</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B86">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Vijayakumar</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Kumar</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Ramesh</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Govindasamy</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Jinger</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Khanam</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2021</year>). 
<article-title>Potassium nutrition in rice: A review</article-title>. <source>Oryza</source> <volume>58</volume>, <fpage>341</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>353</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.35709/ory.2021.58.3.1</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B87">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Walkley</surname> <given-names>A. J.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Black</surname> <given-names>I. A.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>1934</year>). 
<article-title>Estimation of soil organic carbon by the chromic acid titration method</article-title>. <source>Soil Sci.</source> <volume>37</volume>, <fpage>29</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>38</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1097/00010694-193401000-00003</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B88">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Zhanga</surname> <given-names>Q. C.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Witt</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Buresh</surname> <given-names>R. J.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2007</year>). 
<article-title>Opportunities for yield increases and environmentalbenefits through site-specific nutrient management in ricesystems of Zhejiang province China</article-title>. <source>Agric. Syst.</source> <volume>94</volume>, <fpage>801</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>808</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.agsy.2006.11.006</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B89">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Xia</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Lam</surname> <given-names>S. K.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Wolf</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Kiese</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Butterbach-Bahl</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2020</year>). 
<article-title>Trade-offs between soil carbon sequestration and reactive nitrogen losses under straw return in global agroecosystems</article-title>. <source>Global Change Biol.</source> <volume>26</volume>, <fpage>2408</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2422</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/gcb.14923</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30295405</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B90">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Yadav</surname> <given-names>S. K.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Singh</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Singh</surname> <given-names>R. K.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Kumar</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Kumar</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Jat</surname> <given-names>H. S.</given-names></name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2021</year>). 
<article-title>Precision nutrient management using Nutrient Expert&#xae; and GreenSeeker improves productivity, profitability and reduces greenhouse gas emissions of maize&#x2013;wheat systems in eastern Indo-Gangetic Plains</article-title>. <source>Agronomy</source> <volume>11</volume>, <elocation-id>2320</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/agronomy11112320</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B91">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Guo</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Huang</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2022</year>). 
<article-title>Optimizing nitrogen fertilizer application to reduce N<sub>2</sub>O emissions and maintain wheat yield: A field study in the North China Plain</article-title>. <source>Sci. Total Environ.</source> <volume>812</volume>, <elocation-id>151466</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.151466</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">34780836</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B92">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Shen</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Han</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Tian</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2020</year>). 
<article-title>Effects of water stress on photosynthesis, yield, and water use efficiency in winter wheat</article-title>. <source>Water</source> <volume>12</volume>, <fpage>2127</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/w12082127</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B93">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). 
<article-title>Improving water use efficiency and grain yield of wheat through nitrogen management in the North China Plain</article-title>. <source>Field Crops Res.</source> <volume>271</volume>, <elocation-id>108251</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.fcr.2021.108251</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B94">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Zribi</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Aragues</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Medina</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Faci</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2015</year>). 
<article-title>Efficiency of inorganic and organic mulching materials for soil evaporation control</article-title>. <source>Soil. Tillage Res.</source> <volume>148</volume>, <fpage>40</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>45</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.still.2014.12.003</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B95">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name><surname>Zwart</surname> <given-names>S. J.</given-names></name>
<name><surname>Bastiaanssen</surname> <given-names>W. G. M.</given-names></name>
</person-group> (<year>2004</year>). 
<article-title>Review of measured crop water productivity values for irrigated wheat, rice, cotton and maize</article-title>. <source>Agric. Water Manage.</source> <volume>69</volume>, <fpage>115</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>133</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.agwat.2004.04.007</pub-id>
</mixed-citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
<fn-group>
<fn id="n1" fn-type="custom" custom-type="edited-by">
<p>Edited by: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/320341">Leo Sabatino</ext-link>, University of Palermo, Italy</p></fn>
<fn id="n2" fn-type="custom" custom-type="reviewed-by">
<p>Reviewed by: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2051378">Mario Licata</ext-link>, University of Palermo, Italy</p>
<p><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/3127933">Jiayu Ma</ext-link>, Hebei Agricultural University, China</p></fn></fn-group>
</back>
</article>