<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.3 20070202//EN" "journalpublishing.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="2.3" xml:lang="EN">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Front. Plant Sci.</journal-id>
<journal-title>Frontiers in Plant Science</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">Front. Plant Sci.</abbrev-journal-title>
<issn pub-type="epub">1664-462X</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Frontiers Media S.A.</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpls.2025.1646980</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Plant Science</subject>
<subj-group>
<subject>Original Research</subject>
</subj-group>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Reducing the proportion of <italic>Pinus tabuliformis</italic> planted in mixed coniferous-broad forest stabilizes the microbiological community composition</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Li</surname>
<given-names>Zixing</given-names>
</name>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/methodology/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/visualization/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/investigation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/validation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/software/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/data-curation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/formal-analysis/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname>
<given-names>Ran</given-names>
</name>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/software/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Gao</surname>
<given-names>Runmei</given-names>
</name>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/methodology/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/supervision/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Hu</surname>
<given-names>Zhenhua</given-names>
</name>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2736845/overview"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/supervision/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname>
<given-names>Mengtao</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn001">
<sup>*</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2660821/overview"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/supervision/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/methodology/"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="aff1">
<institution>College of Forestry, Shanxi Agricultural University</institution>, <addr-line>Taigu, Shanxi</addr-line>,&#xa0;<country>China</country>
</aff>
<author-notes>
<fn fn-type="edited-by">
<p>Edited by: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1581502/overview">Pengshuai Shao</ext-link>, Shandong University of Aeronautics, China</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="edited-by">
<p>Reviewed by: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/918189/overview">Yuping Hou</ext-link>, Ludong University, China</p>
<p>
<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2531396/overview">Ang Zhang</ext-link>, Chinese Academy of Tropical Agricultural Sciences, China</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="corresp" id="fn001">
<p>*Correspondence: Mengtao Zhang, <email xlink:href="mailto:mengtaozhang@sxau.edu.cn">mengtaozhang@sxau.edu.cn</email>
</p>
</fn>
</author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>15</day>
<month>09</month>
<year>2025</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="collection">
<year>2025</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>16</volume>
<elocation-id>1646980</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>14</day>
<month>06</month>
<year>2025</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>25</day>
<month>08</month>
<year>2025</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#xa9; 2025 Li, Wang, Gao, Hu and Zhang.</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2025</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Li, Wang, Gao, Hu and Zhang</copyright-holder>
<license xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">
<p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.</p>
</license>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<sec>
<title>Background</title>
<p>
<italic>Piuns tabuliformis</italic> is an evergreen conifer species in North China and plays an important role in maintaining ecological security in North China. Soil microbiological, which are susceptible to disturbance by various external factors, is an important indicator of soil health and are crucial for maintaining soil biodiversity and ensuring the stability of ecosystem functions. However, the mechanisms driving changes in soil properties and soil microbiological community composition under different percentages of <italic>P. tabuliformis</italic> plantations are still poorly understood.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Methods</title>
<p>In this study, we investigated soil properties and microbiological community composition in four forests with different percentages of <italic>P. tabuliformis</italic> plantation (PT10%, PT20%, PT60% and PT100%) in Zhongtiao Mountain.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Results</title>
<p>The results showed that lowering the planting ratio of <italic>P. tabuliformis</italic> in mixed conifer-broad forests could improve soil pH and increase the nutrient reserves in the soil. The relative abundance of Ascomycota in the soil increased with the reduction of the planting proportion of <italic>P. tabuliformis</italic>. Co-occurrence network analyses showed that soil microbiological community composition was more stable in forests with lower percentages of <italic>P. tabuliformis</italic> plantings (PT20%).</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Conclusion</title>
<p>This study showed that soil microbiological community composition was more stable in forests with a low percentage of <italic>P. tabuliformis</italic> planting and a rich forest canopy of tree species. The planting proportion of <italic>P. tabuliformis</italic> is an important factor influencing soil microbiological community composition, which provides a new theoretical basis for rational management of mixed coniferous and broadleaf forests in warm-temperate continental climate zones.</p>
</sec>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>
<italic>Pinus tabuliformis</italic>
</kwd>
<kwd>soil properties</kwd>
<kwd>soil microbiological community composition</kwd>
<kwd>soil bacteria</kwd>
<kwd>soil fungi</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<contract-sponsor id="cn001">National Outstanding Youth Science Fund Project of National Natural Science Foundation of China<named-content content-type="fundref-id">10.13039/100014717</named-content>
</contract-sponsor>
<contract-sponsor id="cn002">Shanxi Provincial Key Research and Development Project<named-content content-type="fundref-id">10.13039/501100013317</named-content>
</contract-sponsor>
<counts>
<fig-count count="7"/>
<table-count count="2"/>
<equation-count count="1"/>
<ref-count count="60"/>
<page-count count="12"/>
<word-count count="5889"/>
</counts>
<custom-meta-wrap>
<custom-meta>
<meta-name>section-in-acceptance</meta-name>
<meta-value>Functional Plant Ecology</meta-value>
</custom-meta>
</custom-meta-wrap>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec id="s1" sec-type="intro">
<label>1</label>
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>Forests are integral to terrestrial ecosystems, serving as crucial reservoirs of biodiversity and ecosystem services that support human well-being, conserve soil and water, mitigate pollution, and regulate ecological balance (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Douh et&#xa0;al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">Halofsky et&#xa0;al., 2018</xref>). Forest ecosystems store about half of the Earth&#x2019;s terrestrial carbon and play an important role in the global carbon cycle (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B54">Xue et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>). Soil is the most important habitat for microorganisms, which are diverse and multifunctional (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B57">Zhang et&#xa0;al., 2024c</xref>). Among these services, soil microorganisms are pivotal, bridging above- and below-ground processes through the soil carbon cycle (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">Liu et&#xa0;al., 2017</xref>), thereby maintaining biodiversity and ecosystem function (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">Rillig et&#xa0;al., 2019</xref>).</p>
<p>
<italic>Pinus tabuliformis</italic> is an evergreen conifer species endemic to China, with a wide natural distribution area that extends as far north as the Yinshan Mountains in southern Liaoning and the Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, and as far south as Sichuan Province and Chongqing Municipality. <italic>P. tabuliformis</italic> is the second largest in Pinus, and is the fourth largest forest cover type in China (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Guo et&#xa0;al., 2008</xref>). <italic>P. tabuliformis</italic> can grow in a wide range of soil types (acidic, neutral and calcareous) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Guo et&#xa0;al., 2008</xref>), and is an important afforestation species for maintaining regional ecological security in North China, as well as an advantageous tree species in the Zhongtiao Mountains, with significant economic advantages (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">Ning et&#xa0;al., 2023</xref>).</p>
<p>Soil microbiological, which are susceptible to disturbance by various external factors, is an important indicator of soil health and are crucial for maintaining soil biodiversity and ensuring the stability of ecosystem functions. Soil microbiological diversity makes an important contribution to global biodiversity. Bacteria and fungi, as the most important soil microbiological, are reported to play different roles in ecosystem functions in which soil microorganisms are involved (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Liu et&#xa0;al., 2023b</xref>). It has been shown that bacteria are one of the most abundant microorganisms in forest soils (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Louca et&#xa0;al., 2016</xref>) and are able to efficiently degrade a wide range of apoplastic materials in forest ecosystems (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">Paterson et&#xa0;al., 2008</xref>). Soil fungi are able to break down lignin and cellulose in withered <italic>P. tabuliformis</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">Bahram et&#xa0;al., 2018</xref>). In addition, changes in canopy species diversity in forests can also cause changes in soil microbiological community composition.</p>
<p>The metabolic strategies of microorganisms are complex and diverse (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">Shaffer et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Long et&#xa0;al., 2025</xref>), and the metabolic processes of microorganisms involve many biochemical reactions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">Malik et&#xa0;al., 2018</xref>). Soil microorganisms decompose organic matter (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">Bardgett and van der Putten, 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Cheng et&#xa0;al., 2023</xref>), fueling microbiological activity and driving nutrient cycling (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">Liu et&#xa0;al., 2017</xref>). A global meta-analysis showed that afforestation can increase bacterial and fungal biomass (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">Luo et&#xa0;al., 2023</xref>). Changes in canopy plant species in forests affect soil microbiological community composition. Dominant tree species in forest ecosystems are reported to be important factors influencing the composition of soil microbiological communities (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B44">Urbanov&#xe1; et&#xa0;al., 2015</xref>). SOC is key factor driving microbiological community composition (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Bai et&#xa0;al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B47">Wan et&#xa0;al., 2024</xref>), and SOC content has been reported to be related to soil microbiological community composition (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">Lange et&#xa0;al., 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B42">Tardy et&#xa0;al., 2015</xref>). A past study has shown that biomass carbon stocks in forests are generally larger than in other ecosystems under similar climatic conditions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">Arevalo et&#xa0;al., 2009</xref>). A proper pH can put more energy into the growth and reproduction process of microorganisms (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Long et&#xa0;al., 2025</xref>). Previous studies have shown that soil bacterial communities can be shaped by soil pH (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B52">Xue et&#xa0;al., 2017</xref>). Soil fungi are able to adapt to low soil pH and are extremely important to forest ecosystems (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">Midgley and Phillips, 2019</xref>). A study on <italic>P. tabuliformis</italic> showed that soils under <italic>P. tabuliformis</italic> forests are relatively poor and low in active N content (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B56">Zhang et&#xa0;al., 2019</xref>). Another study showed that the response of soil bacteria and fungi to N deposition varied depending on the climatic zone in which the forest was located. Forests in subtropical zones had more pronounced changes in soil fungi in response to N deposition compared to bacteria (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B53">Xue et&#xa0;al., 2025</xref>), but forests in temperate zones had higher soil fungal diversity with increasing soil N content (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Liu et&#xa0;al., 2023a</xref>).</p>
<p>Currently, most studies on soil properties and soil microbes in forest ecosystems have focused on forest regeneration modes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Cheng et&#xa0;al., 2023</xref>), forest ecotypes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Li et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>), forest restoration strategy years (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Bai et&#xa0;al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B49">Wang et&#xa0;al., 2024</xref>) or forest land management (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">Liu et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>). In recent years, in order to increase the proportion of living trees and the proportion of large diameter trees, the Zhongcun Forestry has adopted target tree management measures based on the concept of near-natural management. Select high quality trees with a diameter of 15&#x2013;30 cm at breast height as target trees (trees in the same canopy or upper canopy as the target trees and which will affect the growth of the target trees are considered as interference trees), and regularly cut down the interference trees that overlap with the canopy of the target trees, so as to realize the adjustment of the spatial structure of the forest stand and improve the quality of the soil. However, the changes in soil nutrients and soil microbiological community composition after target tree management are unknown, and the differences in soil properties and soil microbiological community composition in forests with different percentages of <italic>P. tabuliformis</italic> plantings have not been clearly concluded. Therefore, in order to determine the rational management mode of mixed conifer forest ecosystems in warm-temperate continental climate zones, it is necessary to gain an in-depth understanding of soil properties and soil microbiological communities following changes in the percentage of <italic>P. tabuliformis</italic> plantings. This study aimed to elucidate the differences in soil properties and soil microbiological community composition in mixed conifer forests planted with different proportions of <italic>P. tabuliformis</italic> in the Zhongtiao Mountain, and to analyze the reasons for these differences and the relationship between soil properties and soil microbiological community composition. We hypothesized that (i) lowering the proportion of planted <italic>P. tabuliformis</italic> in mixed coniferous-broad forest reduces soil acidity and increases soil nutrient storage; (ii) soil microbiological community is more stable in forests with low <italic>P. tabuliformis</italic> planting proportions; and (iii) different soil characteristics have direct and indirect effects on the composition of soil bacteria and fungi.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2" sec-type="materials|methods">
<label>2</label>
<title>Materials and methods</title>
<sec id="s2_1">
<label>2.1</label>
<title>Study site</title>
<p>The study site was located in Zhongtiao Mountain (Latitude 35&#xb0;24&#x2032;00&#x2033; to 35&#xb0;40&#x2032;00&#x2033; N, Longitude 111&#xb0;56&#x2032;12&#x2033; to 112&#xb0;14&#x2032;00&#x2033; E). Zhongtiao Mountain spans the cities of Linfen, Jincheng and Yuncheng, belongs to the tributaries of Taihang Mountain, and is located in the warm temperate semi-humid continental monsoon climate zone. The average annual temperature is 10.3&#xb0;C, the lowest temperature is -8.2&#xb0;C, the highest temperature is 28.8&#xb0;C (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">Ning et&#xa0;al., 2023</xref>). The annual sunshine are 2,679.8 hours and the frost-free period is 197 days. The average annual precipitation is 600&#x2013;720 mm, mainly in June to September. Soil types range from meadow soil to brown forest soil, drenched brown soil, and brown soil. The dominant tree species including <italic>P. tabuliformis</italic>, <italic>Quercus mongolica</italic>, <italic>Betula platyphylla, Populus davidiana</italic>, <italic>Carpinus turczaninovii</italic> and <italic>Toxicodendron vernicifluum</italic>.</p>
<p>In July 2024, based on the proportion of <italic>P. tabuliformis</italic> (PT) in the forest, four sample plots with different percentages of <italic>P. tabuliformis</italic> planting were established in the Xiachuan Management Area of Zhongcun Forest Field under the similar standing conditions (10% <italic>P. tabuliformis</italic> planting, PT10%; 20% <italic>P. tabuliformis</italic> planting, PT20%; 60% <italic>P. tabuliformis</italic> planting, PT60%; 100% <italic>P. tabuliformis</italic> planting, PT100%), with four replicates for each sample plot. Each plot measured 20 m &#xd7; 20 m. The location of the survey sample plots was recorded (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>; <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Supplementary Figure S1</bold>
</xref>). Tree species, diameter at breast height (DBH) and height of all trees with DBH &#x2265; 5 cm were recorded. Five 5 m &#xd7; 5 m subplots were established within each 20 m &#xd7; 20 m plot following the five-point sampling method to assess understory shrubs. A total of 80 subplots (5 &#xd7; 16) were surveyed. At the center of each 5 m &#xd7; 5 m subplot, a 1 m &#xd7; 1 m subplot was used to investigate understory herbs. Shrub and herb species, ground diameter and height in the plots were recorded, and the top three dominant species in each plot were filtered by calculating their importance values (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">
<bold>Table&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>; <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Supplementary Table S1</bold>
</xref>).</p>
<fig id="f1" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;1</label>
<caption>
<p>Location of the study area and photographs of sample plots of the four forests.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-16-1646980-g001.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Map of Qinshui County displaying four study sites marked with photographs. Each site has different attributes: PT10% at 1747m, slope 15&#xb0;, aspect East; PT20% at 1664m, slope 23&#xb0;, aspect East; PT60% at 1675m, slope 27&#xb0;, aspect South; PT100% at 1613m, slope 19&#xb0;, aspect North. The study site is indicated by a red star. Compass and scale are included.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
<table-wrap id="T1" position="float">
<label>Table&#xa0;1</label>
<caption>
<p>Basic conditions of sample plots in different percentages of <italic>P. tabuliformis</italic> planting forests.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Sample plot type</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Dominant tree species</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Dominant shrub species</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Dominant herb species</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Mean DBH/cm</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Mean height/m</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Density/n m<sup>-2</sup>
</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">PT10%</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<italic>Piuns tabuliformis</italic>,<break/>
<italic>Quercus mongolica</italic>,<break/>
<italic>Populus davidiana</italic>,<break/>
<italic>Betula platyphylla</italic>,<break/>
<italic>Carpinus turczaninovii</italic>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<italic>Forsythia suspensa</italic>,<break/>
<italic>Campylotropis macrocarpa</italic>,<break/>
<italic>Spiraea trilobata</italic>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<italic>Carex lancifolia</italic>,<break/>
<italic>Melampyrum roseum</italic>,<break/>
<italic>Stipa capillata</italic>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">12.5</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">13.8</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.11</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">PT20%</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<italic>Piuns tabuliformis</italic>,<break/>
<italic>Quercus mongolica</italic>,<break/>
<italic>Toxicodendron vernicifluum</italic>,<break/>
<italic>Betula platyphylla</italic>,<break/>
<italic>Carpinus turczaninovii</italic>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<italic>Forsythia suspensa</italic>,<break/>
<italic>Cotoneaster multiflorus</italic>,<break/>
<italic>Smilax stans</italic>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<italic>Carex lancifolia</italic>,<break/>
<italic>Clematis florida</italic>,<break/>
<italic>Phlomoides umbrosa</italic>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">16.0</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">10.9</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.11</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">PT60%</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<italic>Piuns tabuliformis</italic>,<break/>
<italic>Quercus mongolica</italic>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<italic>Cotoneaster multiflorus</italic>,<break/>
<italic>Forsythia suspensa</italic>,<break/>
<italic>Spiraea ouensanensis</italic>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<italic>Carex lancifolia</italic>,<break/>
<italic>Melampyrum roseum</italic>,<break/>
<italic>Stipa capillata</italic>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">21.6</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">15.2</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.07</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">PT100%</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<italic>Piuns tabuliformis</italic>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<italic>Forsythia suspensa</italic>,<break/>
<italic>Rubus sachalinensis</italic>,<break/>
<italic>Philadelphus incanu</italic>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<italic>Carex lancifolia</italic>,<break/>
<italic>Phlomoides umbrosa</italic>,<break/>
<italic>Trichosanthes kirilowii</italic>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">23.7</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">16.6</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.08</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
<p>The importance values (IV) of shrubs and herbs were calculated using the following formulas (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B58">Zhang et&#xa0;al., 2024b</xref>):</p>
<disp-formula>
<mml:math display="block" id="M1">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>IV&#xa0;of&#xa0;shrub&#xa0;and&#xa0;herb</mml:mtext>
<mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>relative&#xa0;density</mml:mtext>
<mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
<mml:mtext>relative&#xa0;dominance</mml:mtext>
<mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
<mml:mtext>relative&#xa0;coverage</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">/</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>3</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</disp-formula>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_2">
<label>2.2</label>
<title>Soil sample collection</title>
<p>An additional 1 m &#xd7; 1 m plot was set up in the center of each 5 m &#xd7; 5 m subplots set up within each 20 m &#xd7; 20 m plot, and soil samples were collected from the 1 m &#xd7; 1 m plots. Three bags of 0&#x2013;20 cm topsoil were collected from each sampling site, with 15 samples from each plot. In the laboratory, the 15 samples from each plot were combined, large stones and rhizomes were removed, and the mixture was sieved through a 0.9 mm sieve. The sieved samples were stored at -80&#xb0;C for further analysis.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_3">
<label>2.3</label>
<title>Soil sample determination and analysis</title>
<sec id="s2_3_1">
<label>2.3.1</label>
<title>Determination of soil properties</title>
<p>Soil pH was measured using a glass electrode with a soil suspension water to soil ratio of 1:2.5. Available potassium (AK) was extracted with a neutral 1 M NH4Ac solution and the content was subsequently determined by alkaline hydrolysis diffusion and flame photometry (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B59">Zhang et&#xa0;al., 2024a</xref>). Total nitrogen (TN) was measured using Kjeldahl nitrogen determination (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">Joergensen and Meyer, 2006</xref>). Microbial biomass nitrogen (MBN) and microbial biomass carbon (MBC) content were determined via chloroform fumigation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B46">Vance et&#xa0;al., 1987</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">Joergensen and Meyer, 2006</xref>). Soil organic carbon (SOC) content was analyzed via the H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub>-K<sub>2</sub>Cr<sub>2</sub>O<sub>7</sub> oxidative technique (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">Nelson and Sommers, 1996</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_3_2">
<label>2.3.2</label>
<title>Soil DNA extraction, bacterial 16S and fungal ITS gene amplification, and sequencing</title>
<p>Total DNA was extracted from soil samples using OMEGA Soil DNA Kit (M5635-02, Omega Bio-Tek, Norcross, GA, USA). The bacterial 16S rRNA V3&#x2013;V4 region was amplified with primers 338F (5&#x2019;-barcode+ACTCCTACGGGAGGCAGCA-3&#x2019;) and 806R (5&#x2019;-GGACTACHVGGGTWTCTAAT-3&#x2019;) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">Mori et&#xa0;al., 2013</xref>), while fungal ITS regions were amplified with ITS5 (5&#x2019;-GGAAGTAAAAGTCGTAACAAGG-3&#x2019;) and ITS2 (5&#x2019;-GCTGCGTTCTTCATCGATGC-3&#x2019;) primers (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B51">Xiong et&#xa0;al., 2014</xref>). The PCR amplification cycles involved pre-denaturation at 98&#xb0;C for 5 min, followed by 25 cycles of denaturation at 98&#xb0;C for 30 s, annealing at 52&#xb0;C for 30 s, extension at 72&#xb0;C for 45 s, and a final extension at 72&#xb0;C for 5 min. After the PCR amplification cycle, the PCR products were verified by 2% agarose gel electrophoresis, and the PCR products were quantified using the BioTek Microplate Reader (FLx800) and the Quant-iT PicoGreen dsDNA Assay Kit.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_4">
<label>2.4</label>
<title>Statistical analysis</title>
<p>Statistical analyses were conducted in R (v4.4.1). Data were assessed for normality and homoscedasticity using normal distribution and mean square tests. One-way ANOVA followed by Least Significant Difference (LSD) multiple comparisons was used to analyze significant differences in soil properties between forests planted with different percentages of <italic>P. tabuliformis</italic>.</p>
<p>&#x3b2;-diversity of soil microbiological was analyzed using non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) based on Bray-Curtis dissimilarity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">Mei et&#xa0;al., 2025</xref>). PERMANOVA was applied to assess the influence of the proportion of planting of <italic>P. tabuliformis</italic> on the composition of soil microbiological, while analysis of similarity (ANOSIM) was used to evaluate differences between forests with different proportions of planting of <italic>P. tabuliformis</italic> (<italic>n</italic> = 999 permutations). The first axis of NMDS explains the greatest variation in microbiological community composition. Spearman&#x2019;s correlation analysis was conducted to investigate symbiosis patterns among microbiological community composition in forests with four proportions of <italic>P. tabuliformis</italic> plantations, focusing on microorganisms with a relative abundance &gt; 0.5% (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Barberan et&#xa0;al., 2012</xref>). The Spearman&#x2019;s correlation coefficient (r) &gt; 0.6 with corresponding <italic>p</italic>-values&lt; 0.01 were considered statistically robust and were used to generate the network. Results of the symbiotic network analysis were visualized using Gephi 0.10.1 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">Bastian et&#xa0;al., 2009</xref>), which also identified dominant phyla. The colors of the nodes represent the dominant phyla. Network edges represented nodes that were pairwise related, with pink lines representing positive connections and green lines representing negative connections.</p>
<p>Spearman correlation analysis was used to study the relationship between soil properties and microbiological relative abundance of dominant phyla. Relationships between soil properties (pH, AK, TN, MBN, MBC and SOC) and the first NMDS axis (NMDS1) of soil microbiological diversity were explored using regression analysis (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">Liu et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>). In order to test whether there are differences in the response of soil microorganisms to soil properties, the drivers of soil bacterial and fungal diversity were analyzed using the GLMMS. We fitted a model with soil microbiological diversity as the response variable. Sample plots with the same percentage of <italic>P. tabuliformis</italic> planting were considered as random effects. To ensure a uniform dimension, we standardized and centered the independent variables. To avoid collinearity, we grouped the independent variables (fixed effects) according to a hierarchical structure through hierarchical partitioning and further decomposed the degree of contribution of each independent variable to the dependent variable. Among the independent variables were divided into four groups, namely soil C (MBC and SOC), soil N (MBN and TN), AK and pH (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Gao et&#xa0;al., 2024</xref>).</p>
<p>Partial Least Squares Passage Modeling (PLS-PM) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">Tenenhaus et&#xa0;al., 2005</xref>) was conducted to explore the relationships among soil microbiological diversity (scores of the first NMDS axes for soil bacteria and fungi) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Cheng et&#xa0;al., 2023</xref>), percentage of <italic>P. tabuliformis</italic> planted in forests (percentage of PT), soil C (SOC, MBC), soil N (MBN, TN), AK and pH. PLS-PM is suitable for small sample sizes or not normally distributed data and contains both external and internal models. PLS-PM visualizes the results of the path analysis in the form of path coefficients, which are used to test the direction and strength of the causal relationships between latent variables. The fit of PLS-PM is represented by the coefficient of determination (R<sup>2</sup>) and the goodness of fit (GoF). The fit is weak when R<sup>2</sup> is above 0.19, moderate when R<sup>2</sup> is above 0.33, and strong when R<sup>2</sup> is above 0.67. The goodness of fit is weak when GoF is above 0.1, moderate when GoF is above 0.25, and strong when GoF is above 0.36. This approach analyzed potential direct and indirect effects among these factors and the soil microbiological diversity.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s3" sec-type="results">
<label>3</label>
<title>Results</title>
<sec id="s3_1">
<label>3.1</label>
<title>Soil properties</title>
<p>With the exception of MBC and SOC, all of the soil properties showed a decrease with increasing percentage of plantings of <italic>P. tabuliformis</italic>. Soil pH (<italic>p</italic> = 0.0024) in PT10% was significantly higher than in the other forests and was closest to neutral. Soil AK (<italic>p</italic> = 0.0013) was significantly higher in PT10% than in PT60% and PT100%, there were no significant differences between PT20% and PT60%, and soil AK content in PT20% was significantly higher than in PT100%. Soil TN (<italic>p</italic> = 0.0187) was significantly higher in PT10% than in PT100%. Soil MBN (<italic>p</italic> = 0.0027) was significantly higher in PT10% than in PT60% and PT100%. Soil MBC (<italic>p</italic> = 0.0008) and SOC (<italic>p</italic> = 0.0003) were significantly lower in PT100% than in the other three forests (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">
<bold>Table&#xa0;2</bold>
</xref>).</p>
<table-wrap id="T2" position="float">
<label>Table&#xa0;2</label>
<caption>
<p>One-way ANOVA for forest soil properties with different percentages of <italic>P. tabuliformis</italic> planting.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" align="left">Soil characteristics</th>
<th valign="middle" align="left">PT10%</th>
<th valign="middle" align="left">PT20%</th>
<th valign="middle" align="left">PT60%</th>
<th valign="middle" align="left">PT100%</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">pH</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">6.67 &#xb1; 0.35 a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">5.97 &#xb1; 0.32 b</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">5.75 &#xb1; 0.23 b</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">5.55 &#xb1; 0.39 b</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">AK (mg&#xb7;kg<sup>-1</sup>)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">232.70 &#xb1; 37.63 a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">216.08 &#xb1; 41.95 ab</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">162.30 &#xb1; 9.64 bc</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">133.72 &#xb1; 9.38 c</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">TN (g&#xb7;kg<sup>-1</sup>)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">3.61 &#xb1; 0.18 a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">3.32 &#xb1; 0.23 ab</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">3.12 &#xb1; 0.51 ab</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">2.46 &#xb1; 0.66 b</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">MBN (mg&#xb7;kg<sup>-1</sup>)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">103.19 &#xb1; 4.69 a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">82.39 &#xb1; 26.18 ab</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">58.57 &#xb1; 5.12 b</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">46.35 &#xb1; 21.78 b</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">MBC (mg&#xb7;kg<sup>-1</sup>)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">931.91 &#xb1; 12.69 a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">962.48 &#xb1; 200.47 a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">860.99 &#xb1; 28.61 a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">551.02 &#xb1; 90.54 b</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">SOC (g&#xb7;kg<sup>-1</sup>)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">60.17 &#xb1; 2.98 a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">53.10 &#xb1; 7.13 a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">59.88 &#xb1; 5.33 a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">35.11 &#xb1; 1.69 b</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn>
<p>Values are mean &#xb1; standard deviation (n = 3). Values within the same rows followed by different letters are significantly different (<italic>p</italic>&lt; 0.05).</p>
</fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_2">
<label>3.2</label>
<title>Soil microbiological community composition and &#x3b2;-diversity</title>
<p>Unique bacterial and fungal species were more prevalent than shared species across four different forests. Unique bacteria accounted for 91%, and unique fungi accounted for 84% of total taxa (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">
<bold>Figures&#xa0;2A, B</bold>
</xref>). Proteobacteria, Acidobacteriota and Actinobacteriota were the dominant bacterial taxa, representing over 70% of sequences (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;2C</bold>
</xref>). Dominant fungal taxa included Ascomycota, Basidiomycota, and Mortierellomycota, comprising more than 85% of sequences (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;2D</bold>
</xref>). The relative abundance of Ascomycota in the soil decreased gradually with increasing percentage of <italic>P. tabuliformis</italic> planted. Soil microbiological &#x3b2;-diversity, assessed at the OTU level via NMDS based on Bray-Curtis distances, revealed significant compositional differences in soil bacteria (Stress = 0.070) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;2E</bold>
</xref>) and fungi (Stress= 0.128) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;2F</bold>
</xref>) among four different forests.</p>
<fig id="f2" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;2</label>
<caption>
<p>Soil microbiological community composition and &#x3b2;-diversity in forests with different percentages of <italic>Pinus tabuliformi</italic> plantings. <bold>(A, B)</bold> are the numbers of common and unique bacterial and fungal species, respectively. <bold>(C, D)</bold> are the relative abundance of dominant soil bacterial and fungal communities at the phylum classification, respectively. <bold>(E, F)</bold> are the non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) plots of bacterial and fungal communities based on the Bray-Curtis distance, respectively.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-16-1646980-g002.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">A series of charts depict the diversity and abundance of microbial communities at different treatment stages. Panels A and B are bar charts showing intersection sizes with varying percentages for PT10%, PT20%, PT60%, and PT100%. Panels C and D are stacked bar charts illustrating the relative abundance of various microbial taxa at each treatment level, with different colors representing different taxa groups. Panels E and F are scatter plots showing non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) results, with stress values and Adonis R-squared values indicating statistical significance. Each point represents a sample, colored by treatment percentage.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
<p>Co-occurrence network topologies revealed that bacterial and fungal interactions varied by four forests (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;3</bold>
</xref>). Overall, the complexity of the bacterial co-occurrence network was greater than that of the fungal. For bacteria, PT60% has the most complex network, PT20% the next most complex, and PT60% has the most nodes and edges. For fungi, PT20% has the most complex network, followed by PT10%, and PT20% has the most nodes and edges.</p>
<fig id="f3" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;3</label>
<caption>
<p>The co-occurrence networks in different forest types. <bold>(A&#x2013;D)</bold> are the soil bacterial co-occurrence networks in PT10%, PT20%, PT60% and PT100%, respectively. <bold>(E&#x2013;H)</bold> are the soil fungal co-occurrence networks in PT10%, PT20%, PT60% and PT100%, respectively. Pink edges indicate positive correlation, and green edges indicate negative correlation. Nodes are colored according to phyla.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-16-1646980-g003.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Clustered network graphs labeled A to H display modular relationships among different bacterial and fungal taxa. Each node represents species groups such as Proteobacteria and Ascomycota, with positive and negative interactions indicated by color-coded nodes and edges. Networks have varying modularity and percentages of positive/negative interactions.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_3">
<label>3.3</label>
<title>Relationship between soil properties and soil microbiological community composition</title>
<p>Spearman&#x2019;s correlation analysis showed that the relationship between soil properties and the relative abundance of soil microbes. For bacteria, the relative abundance of Actinobacteriota showed a significant positive correlation (<italic>p</italic>&lt; 0.05) with AK, MBC and SOC; the relative abundance of Bacteroidota showed a significant positive correlation (<italic>p</italic>&lt; 0.05) with pH and MBN; the relative abundance of Verrucomicrobiota showed a significant negative correlation (<italic>p</italic>&lt; 0.05) with pH, AK, MBN, MBC and SOC; the relative abundance of Gemmatimonadota showed a significant negative correlation (<italic>p</italic>&lt; 0.05) with TN and MBN (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f4">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;4A</bold>
</xref>). For fungi, the relative abundance of Ascomycota showed a significant positive correlation (<italic>p</italic>&lt; 0.05) with pH, AK, TN, and MBC; the relative abundance of Mortierellomycota showed a significant negative correlation (<italic>p</italic>&lt; 0.05) with pH, TN, MBC and SOC; the relative abundance of Chytridiomycota showed a significant positive correlation (<italic>p</italic>&lt; 0.05) with pH, AK, TN, MBN and MBC; the relative abundance of Olpidiomycota showed a significant positive correlation (<italic>p</italic>&lt; 0.05) with SOC; the relative abundance of Basidiobolomycota showed a significant positive correlation (<italic>p</italic>&lt; 0.05) with TN (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f4">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;4B</bold>
</xref>).</p>
<fig id="f4" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;4</label>
<caption>
<p>Spearman correlations between soil properties and relative abundance of dominant <bold>(A)</bold> bacterial and <bold>(B)</bold> fungi phyla. Pink and green colors indicate positive and negative correlations, respectively. Asterisks denoting the level of significance (*<italic>p</italic>&lt; 0.05, **<italic>p</italic>&lt; 0.01, ***<italic>p</italic>&lt; 0.001).</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-16-1646980-g004.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Heatmaps labeled A and B show correlations between different microbial taxa and environmental factors like pH, AK, TN, MBN, MBC, and SOC. The color gradient ranges from teal (negative correlation) to pink (positive correlation). A includes bacterial phyla, while B includes fungal phyla, with significance levels indicated by asterisks.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
<p>Soil microbiological &#x3b2;-diversity (NMDS1) was affected by pH (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f5">
<bold>Figures&#xa0;5A, G</bold>
</xref>), AK (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f5">
<bold>Figures&#xa0;5B, H</bold>
</xref>), TN (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f5">
<bold>Figures&#xa0;5C, I</bold>
</xref>), MBN (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f5">
<bold>Figures&#xa0;5D, J</bold>
</xref>), MBC (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f5">
<bold>Figures&#xa0;5E, K</bold>
</xref>) and SOC (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f5">
<bold>Figures&#xa0;5F, L</bold>
</xref>). Between different forests, soil bacterial &#x3b2;-diversity was most affected by pH (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.8566, <italic>p</italic>&lt; 0.001), in contrast to soil fungal &#x3b2;-diversity (NMDS1), which was least affected by pH (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.4667, <italic>p</italic>&lt; 0.01). Soil bacterial &#x3b2;-diversity (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.6045, <italic>p</italic>&lt; 0.001) was more affected by MBN than soil fungal &#x3b2;-diversity (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.4728, <italic>p</italic>&lt; 0.01), except that soil bacterial &#x3b2;-diversity was less affected by AK, TN, MBC and SOC than soil fungal &#x3b2;-diversity.</p>
<fig id="f5" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;5</label>
<caption>
<p>Relationships between soil properties and soil microbiological diversity. <bold>(A&#x2013;F)</bold> shows the relationships between soil properties (pH, AK, TN, MBN, MBC and SOC) and the first NMDS axis (NMDS 1) of the soil bacterial community, respectively. <bold>(G&#x2013;L)</bold> shows the relationships between soil properties (pH, AK, TN, MBN, MBC and SOC) and the first NMDS axis (NMDS 1) of the soil fungal community, respectively. Asterisks denoting the level of significance (**<italic>p</italic>&lt; 0.01, ***<italic>p</italic>&lt; 0.001).</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-16-1646980-g005.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Twelve scatter plots illustrate the relationship between soil chemical properties and microbial profiles. Panels A to F show bacterial profiles against variables like pH, AK, TN, MBN, MBC, and SOC. Panels G to L present fungal profiles against the same variables. Each point represents a treatment level: PT10% (light pink), PT20% (red), PT60% (teal), and PT100% (dark blue). The data show a negative correlation across all plots, indicated by trend lines and correlation coefficients.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
<p>Detailed assessment of the separate GLMM of microorganisms showed that the combination of soil C, soil N, AK and pH explained the variation in bacterial and fungal &#x3b2;-diversity well (Marginal R<sup>2</sup> &gt; 0.700 and Conditional R<sup>2</sup> &gt; 0.900). pH was the dominant driver of the variation in bacterial &#x3b2;-diversity and accounted for 44.29% of the fixed effect of bacterial &#x3b2;-diversity (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f6">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;6A</bold>
</xref>). Soil C was the dominant driver of fungal &#x3b2;-diversity change, accounting for 36.09% of the fungal &#x3b2;-diversity fixed effect (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f6">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;6B</bold>
</xref>).</p>
<fig id="f6" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;6</label>
<caption>
<p>Averaged models for soil microbiological community composition. <bold>(A)</bold> is the average model for soil bacteria, <bold>(B)</bold> is the average model for soil fungi. Parameter estimates and variance explained average models for soil bacteria and fungi. Parameters are classified into four groups: soil C, soil N, AK and pH. Asterisks denoting the level of significance (*<italic>p</italic>&lt; 0.05, **<italic>p</italic>&lt; 0.01).</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-16-1646980-g006.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Two bar charts labeled A and B display percentage contributions to different soil properties with pH, AK, TN, MBN, MBC, and SOC. Panel A shows Marginal R&#xb2;: 0.867 and Conditional R&#xb2;: 0.918. Panel B shows Marginal R&#xb2;: 0.710 and Conditional R&#xb2;: 0.956. Each section of the bars is color-coded: gray for Soil C, dark blue for Soil N, light blue for AK, and yellow for pH, with specific percentage contributions and estimates indicated.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
<p>PLS-PM revealed complex interactions between percentage of PT, soil C, soil N, AK, pH and microbiological diversity. For bacteria (GoF = 0.81) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f7">
<bold>Figures&#xa0;7A, B</bold>
</xref>), percentage of PT had a significant negative effect on soil C (SOC, MBC) (r = -0.82, <italic>p</italic>&lt; 0.001) and AK (r = -0.55, <italic>p</italic>&lt; 0.05) but a positive effect on soil bacterial diversity (r = 0.41, <italic>p</italic>&lt; 0.05). AK positively influenced bacterial diversity (r = 0.36, <italic>p</italic>&lt; 0.05). pH negatively influenced bacterial diversity (r = -0.77, <italic>p</italic>&lt; 0.001). For fungal (GoF = 0.79) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f7">
<bold>Figures&#xa0;7C, D</bold>
</xref>), percentage of PT had a significant negative effect on soil C (SOC, MBC) (r = -0.82, <italic>p</italic>&lt; 0.001) but a positive effect on soil fungal diversity (r = 0.81, <italic>p</italic>&lt; 0.01). Soil N positively influenced bacterial diversity (r = 0.79, <italic>p</italic>&lt; 0.001).</p>
<fig id="f7" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;7</label>
<caption>
<p>Relationships between soil properties and soil microbiological community composition. <bold>(A)</bold> is the PLS-PM plot of the effects of soil C, soil N, AK and pH on soil bacterial diversity. <bold>(C)</bold> is the PLS-PM plot of the effects of soil C, soil N, AK and pH on soil fungal diversity. Pink solid arrows indicate significant positive effects, green solid arrows indicate significant negative effects, and dashed arrows indicate non-significant effects. The model was evaluated using the goodness-of-fit (GoF) statistic, which is a measure of overall predictive performance. The GoF above the cutoff values of 0.1, 0.25, and 0.36 were classified as weak, moderate, and strong, respectively. <bold>(B, D)</bold> are the standardized direct, indirect, and total effects of each predictor on soil bacterial and fungal composition in the PLS-PM used. Asterisks denoting the level of significance (*<italic>p</italic>&lt; 0.05, **<italic>p</italic>&lt; 0.01, ***<italic>p</italic>&lt; 0.001).</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-16-1646980-g007.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Path diagrams and bar charts compare the impacts of soil properties on microbial diversity. Diagram A and Chart B focus on bacterial diversity, with a goodness of fit of 0.81. Diagram C and Chart D evaluate fungal diversity, with a goodness of fit of 0.79. Key variables include percentage of PT, soil C, soil N, AK, and pH, showing direct, indirect, and total effects in bar charts for both bacterial and fungal diversity models.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s4" sec-type="discussion">
<label>4</label>
<title>Discussion</title>
<sec id="s4_1">
<label>4.1</label>
<title>Effects of different percentages of <italic>P. tabuliformis</italic> planting on the composition of soil microorganisms</title>
<p>Soil properties are sensitive to changes in the proportion of forests planted with <italic>P. tabuliformis</italic>. Among the four forests, soil contents of TN, MBN, AK and SOC were highest in PT10% and lowest in PT100% (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">
<bold>Table&#xa0;2</bold>
</xref>). PLS-PM modelling showed that the proportion of forests planted with <italic>P. tabuliformis</italic> had effects on soil C and AK. SOC content was significantly higher in forests with less than 60% <italic>P. tabuliformis</italic> planting than in PT100%, suggesting that low numbers of <italic>P. tabuliformis</italic> plantings can significantly enhance the carbon sequestration capacity of soil. This may be due to the fact that, as the proportion of <italic>P. tabuliformis</italic> planted increases, the proportion of other tree species planted in the forest decreases, the composition of tree species in the forest gradually becomes homogeneous, the understory vegetation is sparse, and the root system and apoplastic material are reduced accordingly, so that the content of SOC that is transformed through decomposition is reduced (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">Lange et&#xa0;al., 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B55">Zarafshar et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>). The accumulation of soil C (MBC, SOC) in the soil provided a more diverse nutrient pool for the growth and development of microorganisms (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Hou et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Li et&#xa0;al., 2025</xref>), thereby increasing the abundance of dominant microbiological communities in the soil (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Ji et&#xa0;al., 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">Chen et&#xa0;al., 2024</xref>). The significant positive correlation between the soil C (MBC and SOC) contents and the relative abundance of Actinobacteriota in soil was attributed to the important contribution of Actinobacteriota in increasing soil nutrients and degrading difficult-to-degrade organic matter (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Li et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>), which can be involved in carbon sequestration and organic matter cycling (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">Chen et&#xa0;al., 2024</xref>). The results of the study showed that soil AK content decreased with an increase in the proportion of forests planted with <italic>P. tabuliformis</italic>. Coniferous leaves are rich in lignin, and decay of apoplastic material in the forest can degrade lignin in apoplastic coniferous leaves in the soil, thereby releasing nutrients and organic matter (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Chen et&#xa0;al., 2017</xref>). PT100% is very homogeneous, its apoplastic composition is also relatively simple, and a large amount of lignin in the soil is not degraded, and the soil organic matter content is low. Basidiomycota mainly decomposes lignocellulose (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">Lundell et&#xa0;al., 2010</xref>). Basidiomycota did not show a significant correlation with soil properties, even though it is also a common dominant phylum in all four forest types, a phenomenon that suggests that Basidiomycota is well adapted to different forest community compositions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B50">Wu et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>). Ascomycota is significantly and positively correlated with pH, AK, TN, and MBC. The relative abundance of Ascomycota was close to 50% of the total relative abundance of all fungi in the soil in each of the four forests with different percentages of <italic>P. tabuliformis</italic> plantings. Ascomycota is key decomposers in soil ecosystems (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Ma et&#xa0;al., 2013</xref>). The results of the study showed that soil TN content and the relative abundance of Ascomycetes decreased gradually with the percentage of <italic>P. tabuliformis</italic> plantings. This trend that indicates the positive impact of Ascomycota on host plants under conditions of high nutrient availability as reported (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">Leff et&#xa0;al., 2015</xref>). At the same time, Ascomycota is well adapted to poor nutrient environments (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">Sterkenburg et&#xa0;al., 2015</xref>), it is effective in degrading organic residues in soil (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Hartshornea et&#xa0;al., 2009</xref>), and breaks down waste into nutrients that can be taken up by microorganisms (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">Purahong et&#xa0;al., 2016</xref>). Although Ascomycota is better suited to survive in near-neutral soils, the growth and development of Ascomycota was relatively inhibited in near-neutral soils due to the more moderate soil pH and the successive colonization of fungi other than Ascomycota.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s4_2">
<label>4.2</label>
<title>Effect of different proportions of <italic>P. tabuliformis</italic> planting on the diversity of soil microorganisms</title>
<p>NMDS analyses revealed significant differences in the &#x3b2;-diversity of soil bacteria and fungi among the four forests, indicating that changes in the proportion of forests planted with <italic>P. tabuliformis</italic> had a significant effect on the &#x3b2;-diversity of soil microorganisms (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;2E, F</bold>
</xref>). The microbiological co-occurrence network highlighted intricate interactions among soil microbiological communities. All networks displayed modular structures (Modularity &gt; 0.4) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;3</bold>
</xref>) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B52">Xue et&#xa0;al., 2017</xref>). Although the dominant phyla of soil bacteria and fungi were consistent across four forests, their relative abundance varied significantly. For bacteria, total relative abundance of dominant microbiological phyla was lowest in PT100% soils. pH was key predictor of bacterial diversity (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f6">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;6A</bold>
</xref>), the significant negative correlation between pH and the relative abundance of Verrucomicrobiota suggests that the relative abundance of Verrucomicrobiota increases at low pH, which is due to the relatively narrow growth tolerance of most microbiological taxa (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B52">Xue et&#xa0;al., 2017</xref>). PLS-PM analyses integrated soil C, soil N, AK, pH and soil microbiological diversity, and elucidated the interrelationships among these components (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f7">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;7</bold>
</xref>) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B60">Zhong et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Li et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>). In this study, percentage of PT was associated with changes in soil bacterial diversity. Percentage of PT was found to influence the AK, and changes in AK was an important factor (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B55">Zarafshar et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>) affecting the soil bacterial diversity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">Lange et&#xa0;al., 2015</xref>). pH indirectly affects soil bacterial diversity. The relative abundance of Acidobacteriota was lower in PT100% than in other three forests, and the pH of the PT100% was the most acidic, suggesting that excessive planting of <italic>P. tabuliformis</italic> in forests tends to lead to soil acidification and promotes the growth and development of Acidobacteriota. For fungi, AK and SOC were key predictors of fungi diversity (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f6">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;6B</bold>
</xref>). PLS-PM analyses showed that the percentage of PT was associated with changes in soil fungal diversity. Changes in the proportion of <italic>P. tabuliformis</italic> plantings had a smaller effect on bacterial diversity than fungal diversity, due to the fact that bacteria can metabolize a wider range of compounds, and are therefore more adaptable to environmental change and have a more stable community structure than fungal communities (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B45">Uroz et&#xa0;al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B48">Wang et&#xa0;al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Cheng et&#xa0;al., 2023</xref>).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s5" sec-type="conclusions">
<label>5</label>
<title>Conclusion</title>
<p>This study elucidated the important role of changes in the percentage of planting of <italic>P. tabuliformis</italic> in improving soil nutrients and regulating the composition of soil microbiological communities by analyzing soil properties and soil microorganisms in forests with different percentages of planting of <italic>P. tabuliformis</italic>. The forests with the highest percentage of <italic>P. tabuliformis</italic> planting (PT100%) had the lowest levels of multiple soil nutrients. As the proportion of <italic>P. tabuliformis</italic> planted in the forest decreased, the pH of the soil in the forest improved, and the soil pH gradually changed from acidic to neutral. Soil microbiological community composition was more stable in forests with lower percentages of <italic>P. tabuliformis</italic> plantings (PT20%). Overall, a reduction in the proportion of <italic>P. tabuliformis</italic> planted, accompanied by complementary planting of broadleaf species, could lead to a more stable soil microbiological community composition in forest ecosystems. However, reductions in the proportion of <italic>P. tabuliformis</italic> plantings may alter the characteristics and abundance of co-occurring broadleaf species, which may independently drive the soil environment and microbial responses of the soils in which they are found, given that the litter traits, rooting patterns, and mycorrhizal types of these broadleaf species are markedly different from those of <italic>P. tabuliformis</italic>. Therefore, relevant investigations of broadleaf species composition should be included in subsequent studies.</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<sec id="s6" sec-type="data-availability">
<title>Data availability statement</title>
<p>The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found below: DOI:10.17632/fr36rc4f23.1.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s7" sec-type="author-contributions">
<title>Author contributions</title>
<p>ZL: Methodology, Visualization, Investigation, Validation, Software, Data curation, Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing, Formal Analysis, Writing &#x2013; original draft. RW: Software, Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing. RG: Methodology, Supervision, Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing. ZH: Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing, Supervision. MZ: Supervision, Writing &#x2013; original draft, Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing, Methodology.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s8" sec-type="funding-information">
<title>Funding</title>
<p>The author(s) declare financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article. This project was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31901308), and Shanxi Province Key Research and Development Program (202102090301007).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s9" sec-type="COI-statement">
<title>Conflict of interest</title>
<p>The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s10" sec-type="ai-statement">
<title>Generative AI statement</title>
<p>The author(s) declare that no Generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.</p>
<p>Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s11" sec-type="disclaimer">
<title>Publisher&#x2019;s note</title>
<p>All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s12" sec-type="supplementary-material">
<title>Supplementary material</title>
<p>The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2025.1646980/full#supplementary-material">https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2025.1646980/full#supplementary-material</ext-link>
</p>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Supplementaryfile1.docx" id="SM1" mimetype="application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document"/>
</sec>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="B1">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Arevalo</surname> <given-names>C. B. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bhatti</surname> <given-names>J. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chang</surname> <given-names>S. X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sidders</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>Ecosystem carbon stocks and distribution under different land-uses in north central Alberta, Canada</article-title>. <source>For. Ecol. Manage.</source> <volume>257</volume>, <fpage>1776</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1785</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.foreco.2009.01.034</pub-id>
</citation></ref>
<ref id="B2">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Bahram</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hildebrand</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Forslund</surname> <given-names>S. K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Anderson</surname> <given-names>J. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Soudzilovskaia</surname> <given-names>N. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bodegom</surname> <given-names>P. M.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Structure and function of the global topsoil microbiome</article-title>. <source>Nature</source> <volume>560</volume>, <fpage>233</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>237</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41586-018-0386-6</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30069051</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B3">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Bai</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zha</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Effects of the vegetation restoration years on soil microbiological community composition and biomass in degraded lands in Changting County, China</article-title>. <source>J. Forestry Res.</source> <volume>31</volume>, <fpage>1295</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1308</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11676-019-00879-z</pub-id>
</citation></ref>
<ref id="B4">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Barberan</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bates</surname> <given-names>S. T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Casamayor</surname> <given-names>E. O.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fierer</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Using network analysis to explore co-occurrence patterns in soil microbiological communities</article-title>. <source>ISME J.</source> <volume>6</volume>, <fpage>343</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>351</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/ismej.2011.119</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21900968</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B5">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Bardgett</surname> <given-names>R. D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>van der Putten</surname> <given-names>W. H.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Belowground biodiversity and ecosystem functioning</article-title>. <source>Nature</source> <volume>515</volume>, <fpage>505</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>511</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nature13855</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25428498</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B6">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Bastian</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Heymann</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jacomy</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2009</year>). &#x201c;<article-title>Gephi: An open source software for exploring and manipulating networks</article-title>,&#x201d; in <source>Third international AAAI conference on weblogs and social media</source>. <publisher-loc>San Jose, California, USA</publisher-loc>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B7">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jiang</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ou</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cai</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tan</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2024</year>). <article-title>Nitrogen substitution practice improves soil quality of red soil (Ultisols) in South China by affecting soil properties and microbiological community composition</article-title>. <source>Soil Tillage Res.</source> <volume>240</volume>, <elocation-id>106089</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.still.2024.106089</pub-id>
</citation></ref>
<ref id="B8">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lu</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Changes in soil microbiological community and organic carbon fractions under short-term straw return in a rice&#x2013;wheat cropping system</article-title>. <source>Soil Tillage Res.</source> <volume>165</volume>, <fpage>121</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>127</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.still.2016.07.018</pub-id>
</citation></ref>
<ref id="B9">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Cheng</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dong</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>Natural vegetation regeneration facilitated soil organic carbon sequestration and microbiological community stability in the degraded karst ecosystem</article-title>. <source>Catena</source> <volume>222</volume>, <elocation-id>106856</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.catena.2022.106856</pub-id>
</citation></ref>
<ref id="B10">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Douh</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Da&#xef;nou</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jo&#xeb;l Loumeto</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Moutsambote</surname> <given-names>J.-M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fayolle</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tosso</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Soil seed bank characteristics in two central African forest types and implications for forest restoration</article-title>. <source>For. Ecol. Manage.</source> <volume>409</volume>, <fpage>766</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>776</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.foreco.2017.12.012</pub-id>
</citation></ref>
<ref id="B11">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Gao</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pan</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Song</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhuge</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2024</year>). <article-title>Response and sensitivity of urban plants with different seed dispersal modes</article-title>. <source>Nat. Cities</source> <volume>2</volume>, <fpage>28</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>37</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s44284-024-00169-8</pub-id>
</citation></ref>
<ref id="B12">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Guo</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ma</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>Evaluation of ecosystem services of Chinese pine forests in China</article-title>. <source>Sci. China C Life Sci.</source> <volume>51</volume>, <fpage>662</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>670</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11427-008-0083-z</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">18622750</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B13">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Halofsky</surname> <given-names>J. E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Andrews-Key</surname> <given-names>S. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Edwards</surname> <given-names>J. E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Johnston</surname> <given-names>M. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Nelson</surname> <given-names>H. W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Peterson</surname> <given-names>D. L.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Adapting forest management to climate change: The state of science and applications in Canada and the United States</article-title>. <source>For. Ecol. Manage.</source> <volume>421</volume>, <fpage>84</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>97</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.foreco.2018.02.037</pub-id>
</citation></ref>
<ref id="B14">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Hartshornea</surname> <given-names>R. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Reardonb</surname> <given-names>C. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rossc</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Nuesterd</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Clarkea</surname> <given-names>T. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gatesa</surname> <given-names>A. J.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>Characterization of an electron conduit between bacteria and the extracellular environment</article-title>. <source>Proc.Natl.Acad.Sci.U.S.A.</source> <volume>106</volume>, <fpage>22169</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>22174</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1073/pnas.0900086106</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20018742</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B15">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Hou</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Shao</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Song</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sun</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Comparison of soil properties, understory vegetation species diversities and soil microbiological diversities between Chinese Fir plantation and close-to-natural forest</article-title>. <source>Forests</source> <volume>12</volume>, <fpage>632</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>649</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/f12050632</pub-id>
</citation></ref>
<ref id="B16">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ji</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Han</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>He</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Smith</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Smith</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Climatic and edaphic controls on soil pH in Alpine Grasslands on the Tibetan Plateau, China: A Quantitative analysis</article-title>. <source>Pedosphere</source> <volume>24</volume>, <fpage>39</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>44</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/s1002-0160(13)60078-8</pub-id>
</citation></ref>
<ref id="B17">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Joergensen</surname> <given-names>R. G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Meyer</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2006</year>). <article-title>Nutrient changes in decomposing beech leaf litter assessed using a solution flux approach</article-title>. <source>J. Soil Sci.</source> <volume>41</volume>, <fpage>279</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>293</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1365-2389.1990.tb00063.x</pub-id>
</citation></ref>
<ref id="B18">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Lange</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Eisenhauer</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sierra</surname> <given-names>C. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bessler</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Engels</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Griffiths</surname> <given-names>R. I.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Plant diversity increases soil microbiological activity and soil carbon storage</article-title>. <source>Nat. Commun.</source> <volume>6</volume>, <fpage>6707</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/ncomms7707</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25848862</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B19">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Leff</surname> <given-names>J. W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jones</surname> <given-names>S. E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Prober</surname> <given-names>S. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Barberan</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Borer</surname> <given-names>E. T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Firn</surname> <given-names>J. L.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Consistent responses of soil microbiological communities to elevated nutrient inputs in grasslands across the globe</article-title>. <source>Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.</source> <volume>112</volume>, <fpage>10967</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>10972</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1073/pnas.1508382112</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26283343</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B20">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Song</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Muller</surname> <given-names>W. E. G.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Impact of rocky desertification control on soil bacterial community in Karst Graben Basin, southwestern China</article-title>. <source>Front. Microbiol.</source> <volume>12</volume>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmicb.2021.636405</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33790877</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B21">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mou</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2025</year>). <article-title>Contrasting contributions of microbiological and plant-derived C to soil carbon in desertified grassland restoration</article-title>. <source>Agriculture Ecosyst. Environ.</source> <volume>385</volume>, <elocation-id>109579</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.agee.2025.109579</pub-id>
</citation></ref>
<ref id="B22">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>K. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>B. Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>R. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>C. S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2023</year>a). <article-title>Understory vegetation diversity, soil properties and microbiological community response to different thinning intensities in Cryptomeria japonica var. sinensis plantations</article-title>. <source>Front. Microbiol.</source> <volume>14</volume>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmicb.2023.1117384</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">36925469</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B23">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ku</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhu</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Precipitation and soil pH drive the soil microbiological spatial patterns in the Robinia pseudoacacia forests at the regional scale</article-title>. <source>Catena</source> <volume>212</volume>, <elocation-id>106120</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.catena.2022.106120</pub-id>
</citation></ref>
<ref id="B24">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dang</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhu</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gao</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ha</surname> <given-names>V. N.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Response of soil microbiological community dynamics to Robinia pseudoacacia L. afforestation in the loess plateau: a chronosequence approach</article-title>. <source>Plant Soil</source> <volume>423</volume>, <fpage>327</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>338</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11104-017-3516-2</pub-id>
</citation></ref>
<ref id="B25">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2023</year>b). <article-title>Straw return drives soil microbiological community assemblage to change metabolic processes for soil quality amendment in a rice-wheat rotation system</article-title>. <source>Soil Biol. Biochem.</source> <volume>185</volume>, <elocation-id>109131</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.soilbio.2023.109131</pub-id>
</citation></ref>
<ref id="B26">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Long</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liao</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2025</year>). <article-title>Linking microbiological metabolism and ecological strategies to soil carbon cycle function in agroecosystems</article-title>. <source>Soil Tillage Res.</source> <volume>251</volume>, <elocation-id>106562</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.still.2025.106562</pub-id>
</citation></ref>
<ref id="B27">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Louca</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Parfrey</surname> <given-names>L. W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Doebeli</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Decoupling function and taxonomy in the global ocean microbiome</article-title>. <source>Science</source> <volume>353</volume>, <fpage>1272</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1277</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1126/science.aaf4507</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">27634532</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B28">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Lundell</surname> <given-names>T. K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Makela</surname> <given-names>M. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hilden</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Lignin-modifying enzymes in filamentous basidiomycetes&#x2013;ecological, functional and phylogenetic review</article-title>. <source>J. Basic Microbiol.</source> <volume>50</volume>, <fpage>5</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>20</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/jobm.200900338</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20175122</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B29">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Luo</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hou</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kuang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wen</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>Altered soil microbiological properties and functions after afforestation increase soil carbon and nitrogen but not phosphorus accumulation</article-title>. <source>Biol. Fertility Soils</source> <volume>59</volume>, <fpage>645</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>658</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00374-023-01726-4</pub-id>
</citation></ref>
<ref id="B30">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ma</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhuang</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cui</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lv</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Ascomycota members dominate fungal communities during straw residue decomposition in arable soil</article-title>. <source>PloS One</source> <volume>8</volume>, <fpage>e66146</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0066146</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23840414</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B31">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Malik</surname> <given-names>A. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Puissant</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Buckeridge</surname> <given-names>K. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Goodall</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jehmlich</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chowdhury</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Land use driven change in soil pH affects microbiological carbon cycling processes</article-title>. <source>Nat. Commun.</source> <volume>9</volume>, <fpage>3591</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41467-018-05980-1</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30181597</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B32">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Mei</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Shi</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhu</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2025</year>). <article-title>Loss of protistan diversity weakens soil phosphorus availability</article-title>. <source>Appl. Soil Ecol.</source> <volume>208</volume>, <elocation-id>105976</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.apsoil.2025.105976</pub-id>
</citation></ref>
<ref id="B33">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Midgley</surname> <given-names>M. G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Phillips</surname> <given-names>R. P.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Spatio-temporal heterogeneity in extracellular enzyme activities tracks variation in saprotrophic fungal biomass in a temperate hardwood forest</article-title>. <source>Soil Biol. Biochem.</source> <volume>138</volume>, <elocation-id>107600</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.soilbio.2019.107600</pub-id>
</citation></ref>
<ref id="B34">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Mori</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Maruyama</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kato</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Toyoda</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dozono</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ohtsubo</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Design and Experimental Application of a Novel Non-Degenerate Universal Primer Set that Amplifies Prokaryotic 16S rRNA Genes with a Low Possibility to Amplify Eukaryotic rRNA Genes</article-title>. <source>DNA Res.</source> <volume>21</volume>, <fpage>217</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>227</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/dnares/dst052</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24277737</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B35">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Nelson</surname> <given-names>D. W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sommers</surname> <given-names>L. E.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1996</year>). <article-title>Total carbon, organic carbon, and organic matter</article-title>. <source>Am. Soc. Agron.</source> <volume>677S</volume>, <fpage>961</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1010</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B36">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ning</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bai</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dang</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>Dendroclimatic response of P. tabuliformis Carr. along an altitudinal gradient in the warm temperate region of China</article-title>. <source>Front. Plant Sci.</source> <volume>14</volume>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpls.2023.1147229</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">37063178</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B37">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Paterson</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Osler</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dawson</surname> <given-names>L. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gebbing</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sim</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ord</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>Labile and recalcitrant plant fractions are utilised by distinct microbiological communities in soil: Independent of the presence of roots and mycorrhizal fungi</article-title>. <source>Soil Biol. Biochem.</source> <volume>40</volume>, <fpage>1103</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1113</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.soilbio.2007.12.003</pub-id>
</citation></ref>
<ref id="B38">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Purahong</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Durka</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fischer</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dommert</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Schops</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Buscot</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Tree species, tree genotypes and tree genotypic diversity levels affect microbe-mediated soil ecosystem functions in a subtropical forest</article-title>. <source>Sci. Rep.</source> <volume>6</volume>, <elocation-id>36672</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/srep36672</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">27857198</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B39">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Rillig</surname> <given-names>M. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ryo</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lehmann</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Aguilar-Trigueros</surname> <given-names>C. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Buchert</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wulf</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>The role of multiple global change factors in driving soil functions and microbiological biodiversity</article-title>. <source>Science</source> <volume>366</volume>, <fpage>886</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>890</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1126/science.aay2832</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31727838</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B40">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Shaffer</surname> <given-names>J. P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Nothias</surname> <given-names>L. F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Thompson</surname> <given-names>L. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sanders</surname> <given-names>J. G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Salido</surname> <given-names>R. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Couvillion</surname> <given-names>S. P.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Standardized multi-omics of Earth&#x2019;s microbiomes reveals microbiological and metabolite diversity</article-title>. <source>Nat. Microbiol.</source> <volume>7</volume>, <fpage>2128</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2150</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41564-022-01266-x</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">36443458</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B41">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Sterkenburg</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bahr</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Brandstrom Durling</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Clemmensen</surname> <given-names>K. E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lindahl</surname> <given-names>B. D.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Changes in fungal communities along a boreal forest soil fertility gradient</article-title>. <source>New Phytol.</source> <volume>207</volume>, <fpage>1145</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1158</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/nph.13426</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25952659</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B42">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Tardy</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Spor</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mathieu</surname> <given-names>O.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>L&#xe9;v&#xe8;que</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Terrat</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Plassart</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Shifts in microbiological diversity through land use intensity as drivers of carbon mineralization in soil</article-title>. <source>Soil Biol. Biochem.</source> <volume>90</volume>, <fpage>204</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>213</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.soilbio.2015.08.010</pub-id>
</citation></ref>
<ref id="B43">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Tenenhaus</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Vinzi</surname> <given-names>V. E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chatelin</surname> <given-names>Y.-M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lauro</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2005</year>). <article-title>PLS path modeling</article-title>. <source>Comput. Stat Data Anal.</source> <volume>48</volume>, <fpage>159</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>205</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.csda.2004.03.005</pub-id>
</citation></ref>
<ref id="B44">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Urbanov&#xe1;</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>&#x160;najdr</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Baldrian</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Composition of fungal and bacterial communities in forest litter and soil is largely determined by dominant trees</article-title>. <source>Soil Biol. Biochem.</source> <volume>84</volume>, <fpage>53</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>64</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.soilbio.2015.02.011</pub-id>
</citation></ref>
<ref id="B45">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Uroz</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bu&#xe9;e</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Deveau</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mieszkin</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Martin</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Ecology of the forest microbiome: Highlights of temperate and boreal ecosystems</article-title>. <source>Soil Biol. Biochem.</source> <volume>103</volume>, <fpage>471</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>488</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.soilbio.2016.09.006</pub-id>
</citation></ref>
<ref id="B46">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Vance</surname> <given-names>E. D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Brookes</surname> <given-names>P. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jenkinson</surname> <given-names>D. S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1987</year>). <article-title>An extraction method for measuring soil microbiological biomass C</article-title>. <source>Soil Biol. Biochem.</source> <volume>19</volume>, <fpage>703</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>707</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/0038-0717(87)90052-6</pub-id>
</citation></ref>
<ref id="B47">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wan</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yuan</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wei</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Huang</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2024</year>). <article-title>Fungal community composition changes and reduced bacterial diversity drive improvements in the soil quality index during arable land restoration</article-title>. <source>Environ. Res.</source> <volume>244</volume>, <elocation-id>117931</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.envres.2023.117931</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">38103774</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B48">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tang</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Shangguan</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chang</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jia</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Effects of grassland afforestation on structure and function of soil bacterial and fungal communities</article-title>. <source>Sci. Total Environ.</source> <volume>676</volume>, <fpage>396</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>406</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.04.259</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31048170</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B49">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yue</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lin</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2024</year>). <article-title>Effects of different artificial vegetation restoration modes on soil microbiological community structuree in the soil erosion area of southern China</article-title>. <source>Catena</source> <volume>237</volume>, <elocation-id>107803</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.catena.2024.107803</pub-id>
</citation></ref>
<ref id="B50">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ruan</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Naeem</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>The diversity and co-occurrence network of soil bacterial and fungal communities and their implications for a new indicator of grassland degradation</article-title>. <source>Ecol. Indic.</source> <volume>129</volume>, <elocation-id>107989</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107989</pub-id>
</citation></ref>
<ref id="B51">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Xiong</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xun</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Different continuous cropping spans significantly affect microbiological community membership and structure in a vanilla-grown soil as revealed by deep pyrosequencing</article-title>. <source>Microbiological Ecol.</source> <volume>70</volume>, <fpage>209</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>218</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00248-014-0516-0</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25391237</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B52">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Xue</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ren</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Leng</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yao</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Soil bacterial community structure and co-occurrence pattern during vegetation restoration in karst rocky desertification area</article-title>. <source>Front. Microbiol.</source> <volume>8</volume>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmicb.2017.02377</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29250053</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B53">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Xue</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ren</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Luo</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2025</year>). <article-title>Litter removal and nitrogen deposition alter soil microbiological community composition and diversity in a typical rubber (Hevea brasiliensis) plantation of Hainan, China</article-title>. <source>Appl. Soil Ecol.</source> <volume>208</volume>, <elocation-id>105969</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.apsoil.2025.105969</pub-id>
</citation></ref>
<ref id="B54">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Xue</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Heavy thinning temporally reduced soil carbon storage by intensifying soil microbial phosphorus limitation</article-title>. <source>Plant Soil</source> <volume>484</volume>, <fpage>33</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>48</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11104-022-05782-x</pub-id>
</citation></ref>
<ref id="B55">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zarafshar</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bazot</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Matinizadeh</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bordbar</surname> <given-names>S. K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rousta</surname> <given-names>M. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kooch</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Do tree plantations or cultivated fields have the same ability to maintain soil quality as natural forests</article-title>? <source>Appl. Soil Ecol.</source> <volume>151</volume>, <elocation-id>103536</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.apsoil.2020.103536</pub-id>
</citation></ref>
<ref id="B56">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ai</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liang</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xue</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>How microbes cope with short-term N addition in a P. tabuliformis forest-ecological stoichiometry</article-title>. <source>Geoderma</source> <volume>337</volume>, <fpage>630</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>640</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.geoderma.2018.10.017</pub-id>
</citation></ref>
<ref id="B57">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Guo</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kuzyakov</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2024</year>c). <article-title>Global pattern of organic carbon pools in forest soils</article-title>. <source>Glob Chang Biol.</source> <volume>30</volume>, <fpage>e17386</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/gcb.17386</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">38899550</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B58">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Shen</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2024</year>b). <article-title>Altitudinal variation in species diversity, distribution, and regeneration status of a secondary Picea forest in Guandi mountain, northern China</article-title>. <source>Forests</source> <volume>15</volume>, <fpage>771</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>786</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/f15050771</pub-id>
</citation></ref>
<ref id="B59">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xie</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Peng</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ji</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bai</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2024</year>a). <article-title>Heavy metals and nutrients mediate the distribution of soil microbiological community in a typical contaminated farmland of South China</article-title>. <source>Sci. Total Environ.</source> <volume>947</volume>, <elocation-id>174322</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.174322</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">38945241</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B60">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zhong</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fu</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lu</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Soil bacteria and fungi respond differently to plant diversity and plant family composition during the secondary succession of abandoned farmland on the Loess Plateau, China</article-title>. <source>Plant Soil</source> <volume>448</volume>, <fpage>183</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>200</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11104-019-04415-0</pub-id>
</citation></ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>