<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.3 20070202//EN" "journalpublishing.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="2.3" xml:lang="EN">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Front. Plant Sci.</journal-id>
<journal-title>Frontiers in Plant Science</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">Front. Plant Sci.</abbrev-journal-title>
<issn pub-type="epub">1664-462X</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Frontiers Media S.A.</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpls.2025.1645535</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Plant Science</subject>
<subj-group>
<subject>Original Research</subject>
</subj-group>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Red mite (<italic>Panonychus citri</italic>) attack amplifies citrus rootstock-driven responses in physiological and biochemical traits, VOC emission, and expression of defence-related genes in mandarin scions</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name>
<surname>Rioja</surname>
<given-names>Tommy</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn001">
<sup>*</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/3075554/overview"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/investigation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/supervision/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/conceptualization/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/funding-acquisition/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/methodology/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/formal-analysis/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/resources/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/visualization/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ruiz</surname>
<given-names>Karina B.</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/279559/overview"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/formal-analysis/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/methodology/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/conceptualization/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/supervision/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/visualization/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ceballos</surname>
<given-names>Ricardo</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3">
<sup>3</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn003">
<sup>&#x2020;</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/3169999/overview"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/formal-analysis/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/methodology/"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
<institution>Departamento de Recursos Ambientales, Facultad de Ciencias Agron&#xf3;micas, Universidad de Tarapac&#xe1;</institution>, <addr-line>Arica</addr-line>,&#xa0;<country>Chile</country>
</aff>
<aff id="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
<institution>Qu&#xed;mica y Farmacia, Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Arturo Prat</institution>, <addr-line>Iquique</addr-line>,&#xa0;<country>Chile</country>
</aff>
<aff id="aff3">
<sup>3</sup>
<institution>Chemical Ecology Laboratory, Instituto de Investigaciones Agropecuarias, Instituto de Investigaciones Agropecuarias (INIA) Quilamapu</institution>, <addr-line>Chill&#xe1;n</addr-line>,&#xa0;<country>Chile</country>
</aff>
<author-notes>
<fn fn-type="edited-by">
<p>Edited by: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/162521/overview">Paloma Sanchez-Bel</ext-link>, University of Jaume I, Spain</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="edited-by">
<p>Reviewed by: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1351574/overview">John Caulfield</ext-link>, Rothamsted Research, United Kingdom</p>
<p>
<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1594711/overview">Siquan Ling</ext-link>, Guangdong Academy of Forestry, China</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="corresp" id="fn001">
<p>*Correspondence: Tommy Rioja, <email xlink:href="mailto:trioja@academicos.uta.cl">trioja@academicos.uta.cl</email>
</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="other" id="fn003">
<p>&#x2020;ORCID: Ricardo Ceballos, <uri xlink:href="https://orcid.org.0000-0003-1321-3454">orcid.org.0000-0003-1321-3454</uri>
</p>
</fn>
</author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>04</day>
<month>09</month>
<year>2025</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="collection">
<year>2025</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>16</volume>
<elocation-id>1645535</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>11</day>
<month>06</month>
<year>2025</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>01</day>
<month>08</month>
<year>2025</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#xa9; 2025 Rioja, Ruiz and Ceballos.</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2025</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Rioja, Ruiz and Ceballos</copyright-holder>
<license xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">
<p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.</p>
</license>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<p>Citriculture faces significant constraints in expanding into new environments and agroecological zones. Grafting onto tolerant rootstocks has helped overcome some of these limitations, enabling cultivation under diverse conditions. Nevertheless, citrus production remains vulnerable to multiple abiotic and biotic stressors, among which red mite (<italic>Panonychus citri</italic>) herbivory can markedly reduce yield and fruit quality. While rootstocks are known to influence scion physiology and defence capacity, their specific role in modulating responses to pest attack is still poorly understood. To address this, we evaluated 18-month-old &#x2018;W. Murcott&#x2019; mandarin grafted onto four citrus rootstocks (&#x2018;Macrophylla&#x2019;, &#x2018;C35&#x2019;, &#x2018;Citrumelo&#x2019;, &#x2018;Carrizo citrange&#x2019;) under semi-field conditions, infested or not with <italic>P. citri</italic>. After seven days of infestation (100&#x2013;160 eggs/leaf), we quantified stress markers (malondialdehyde, proline, salicylic acid), physiological parameters, primary and secondary metabolites, volatile organic compounds (VOCs), and defence-related gene expression. Rootstocks significantly modulated constitutive and inducible responses. &#x2018;Citrumelo&#x2019; and &#x2018;Carrizo&#x2019; showed the lowest MDA accumulation and strongest induction of SA, <italic>PR5</italic>, and <italic>GLR</italic> transcripts, coupled with increased emission of herbivory-induced plant volatiles (HIPVs, e.g., &#x3b2;-pinene, methyl salicylate, &#x3b2;-ocimene). &#x2018;Macrophylla&#x2019; exhibited limited changes, whereas &#x2018;C35&#x2019; displayed high MDA content and <italic>PITY1</italic> induction, suggesting greater oxidative stress. Photosynthetic pigments declined across all combinations after infestation, while soluble sugars and flavonoids decreased in susceptible rootstocks. VOC profiles shifted both qualitatively and quantitatively in a rootstock-dependent manner. These results show that <italic>P. citri</italic> herbivory can amplify rootstock-driven differences in physiological, biochemical, and molecular traits, providing a basis for further studies on the role of rootstock&#x2013;scion interactions in citrus resistance to mite attack.</p>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>biotic stress marker genes</kwd>
<kwd>fruit trees</kwd>
<kwd>plant-insect interaction</kwd>
<kwd>scion/rootstock interaction</kwd>
<kwd>volatile organic compounds</kwd>
<kwd>salicylic acid</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<counts>
<fig-count count="6"/>
<table-count count="3"/>
<equation-count count="0"/>
<ref-count count="91"/>
<page-count count="16"/>
<word-count count="10377"/>
</counts>
<custom-meta-wrap>
<custom-meta>
<meta-name>section-in-acceptance</meta-name>
<meta-value>Plant Pathogen Interactions</meta-value>
</custom-meta>
</custom-meta-wrap>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec id="s1" sec-type="intro">
<label>1</label>
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>Citrus is one of the most important fruit trees worldwide, covering 10.55 million hectares and yielding over 169.38 million tons during 2023 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">FAOSTAT, 2025</xref>). Among citrus species, mandarins, clementines and tangerines rank second in terms of productive importance, with a combined production of 52,556,927 tons (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">FAOSTAT, 2025</xref>). In Chile, mandarins are primarily cultivated in the north-central regions, spanning from the extremely arid climate of Arica y Parinacota (Azapa Valley, 18&#xb0;31&#x2019; S, 70&#xb0;10&#x2019; W) and Atacama (27&#xb0;22&#x2019; S, 70&#xb0;19&#x2019; W) to the Mediterranean conditions of central Chile (34&#xb0;22&#x2019; S, 71&#xb0;07&#x2019; W), with a total of 12,405.3 hectares (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B56">ODEPA, 2025</xref>). However, its productivity and that of other Citrus species can be significantly affected by both abiotic and biotic factors, which have been further exacerbated by climate change (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B76">Syvertsen and Garc&#xed;a-Sanchez, 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">Agut et&#xa0;al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B53">Nawaz et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>).</p>
<p>Grafting techniques have enabled cultivation of fruit trees in soil-limiting conditions through the use of tolerant and resistant rootstocks (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B60">Rasool et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>). These rootstocks can positively influence various characteristics of the scions at the molecular and physiological levels, including vigour, organoleptic fruit quality, yield, and nutrient uptake, among other agronomic traits (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">Agusti et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">He et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B90">Zhou et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>). It has been reported that rootstocks can confer tolerance to diseases and pests (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Agut et&#xa0;al., 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">Jones and Killiny, 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Guarino et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">Alfaro-Quezada et&#xa0;al., 2023</xref>). Hence, rootstocks may significantly impact on features and products of the scion&#x2019;s primary and secondary metabolism.</p>
<p>It is worth noting that several published studies have investigated the physiological and biochemical parameters of citrus cultivars (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B72">Simpson et&#xa0;al., 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Arjona-L&#xf3;pez et&#xa0;al., 2023</xref>). However, these studies typically involved non-grafted plants or different cultivars grafted onto the same rootstock under abiotic stress conditions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B46">Long et&#xa0;al., 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">Huang et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>). Less is known, however, about the effect of citrus rootstocks on scions attacked by pests.</p>
<p>Plants detect herbivores through elicitors/effectors known as damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) and herbivore-associated molecular patterns (HAMPs) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Erb et&#xa0;al., 2012</xref>), which activate the production of oxidative molecules, defence-related phytohormones, and expression of genes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Erb et&#xa0;al., 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B48">Mishra et&#xa0;al., 2024</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B71">Sheri et&#xa0;al., 2023</xref>). In addition, plants emit volatile organic compounds (VOCs), specifically herbivory-induced plant volatiles (HIPVs; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Erb et&#xa0;al., 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">Ali et&#xa0;al., 2023</xref>), which act as indirect defences agents (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Alsabte et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B89">Zhou and Jander, 2022</xref>) by attracting predators and parasitoids, establishing tri-trophic interactions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Erb et&#xa0;al., 2010</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">Abdala-Roberts et&#xa0;al., 2019</xref>). HIPV emissions can vary depending on Citrus rootstock, as observed in &#x2018;Sugar Belle&#x2019; hybrid mandarin scions infested with <italic>Diaphorina citri</italic> (Hemiptera: Liviidae) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">Jones and Killiny, 2021</xref>).</p>
<p>Biochemical and physiological traits, and several growth attributes have been helpful in identifying plant tolerance against pests (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B49">Mitchell et&#xa0;al., 2016</xref>). Proline and other amino acids increased in vine (<italic>Vinis vinifera</italic> L.), wheat (<italic>Triticum aestivum</italic> L.), and potato (<italic>Solanum tuberosum</italic> L.) plants infected by pathogens (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Anzano et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>); likewise, malondialdehyde (MDA) content, a key bioindicator of plant cell membrane lipid peroxidation, plays a role in plant response to herbivory (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B50">Morales and Munn&#xe9;-Bosch, 2019</xref>). Similarly, soluble sugars, proteins, and antioxidant molecules are vital for plant development, with critical functions in their defence mechanisms against biotic stresses (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Anzano et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">Hayat et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B71">Sheri et&#xa0;al., 2023</xref>). Also, polyphenols are pivotal in plant defence mechanisms, acting as crucial deterrents against biotic threats, including herbivores, and serving as protectors against abiotic stresses (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B73">Singh et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>).</p>
<p>The main player in plants infested with mites, aphids, and whiteflies is salicylic acid (SA; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B48">Mishra et&#xa0;al., 2024</xref>), but ethylene (ET), abscisic acid (ABA) and jasmonate (JA) also modulate the expression of defence-related genes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Erb et&#xa0;al., 2010</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">Li et&#xa0;al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B85">Yu et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>). In sour orange plants infested with <italic>T. urticae</italic>, <italic>EIN3</italic>, an ET- related transcription factor (TF), and <italic>ABA4</italic>, an ABA biosynthesis-related gene (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B54">North et&#xa0;al., 2007</xref>), were involved in defence pathways (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Agut et&#xa0;al., 2014</xref>). SA marker gene<italic>PR-5</italic> (<italic>Pathogenesis Related-5</italic>) is induced early, followed by JA-related <italic>PR-3 (Pathogenesis Related-3)</italic>. <italic>PI Citrus TYPE 1</italic> (<italic>PITY1</italic>) is a proposed infestation marker <italic>glutamate receptor-like</italic> genes (<italic>GLR</italic>) that act as non-specific amino acid sensors in plant defence signalling pathways (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B82">Yan et&#xa0;al., 2024</xref>).</p>
<p>
<italic>Panonychus citri</italic> (McGregor) (citrus red mite; Acari: Tetranychidae), is a major foliar pest of <italic>Citrus</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B87">Zanardi et&#xa0;al., 2015</xref>), feeding on the adaxial leaf surface by extracting cell contents, such as chloroplasts (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">Hoy, 2011</xref>) depositing its eggs there. This behavior affects citrus varieties at morphological, physiological, and molecular levels (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Agut et&#xa0;al., 2014</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">2016</xref>), reducing photosynthesis, stomatal conductance, and transpiration, as shown in <italic>Jatropha curcas</italic> plants (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">Hsu et&#xa0;al., 2015</xref>), unlike mite-tolerant varieties. Citrus rootstocks may mitigate infestation effects, making it essential to explore their role in enhancing scion resistance to phytophagous mites (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Agut et&#xa0;al., 2014</xref>).</p>
<p>This research evaluates four different citrus rootstocks on the commercial mandarin &#x2018;W. Murcott&#x2019; when scions were infected by <italic>P. citri</italic> under semi-field conditions. To this purpose, stress markers together with several physiological traits, VOCs, and expression of defence-related genes were analyzed. Our results contribute to refining nursery protocols and identifying optimal scion/rootstock interactions in young citrus plants.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2" sec-type="materials|methods">
<label>2</label>
<title>Materials and methods</title>
<sec id="s2_1">
<label>2.1</label>
<title>Plant material and growth conditions</title>
<p>The study was conducted during the summer of 2022, in 18-month-old mandarin &#x2018;W. Murcott&#x2019; (<italic>Citrus reticulata</italic> Blanco) plants at Huayquique, Chile (20&#xb0; 16&#x2019; S; 70&#xb0; 07&#x2019; W; 28 m. a.s.l.). Each scion was grafted onto one of four different rootstocks: &#x2018;Macrophylla&#x2019; (MA), &#x2018;C35&#x2019; (C35), &#x2018;Citrumelo&#x2019; (CI), and &#x2018;Carrizo&#x2019; (CA) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">
<bold>Table&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>). The selected mandarin &#x2018;W. Murcott&#x2019; is always propagated by grafting in commercial production. Therefore, the use of grafted plants in this study reflects standard commercial practices and ensures relevance to filed conditions. The individuals were divided into 1) non-infested and 2) infested plants and cultivated separately, under semi-field conditions, in two anti-aphid screened greenhouses (4 m &#xd7; 8 m &#xd7; 3.5 m) to avoid plant-to-plant communication. The plants were grown in pots (20 L) filled with a substrate mix consisting of peat: organic soil: perlite (2: 2: 1) and watered three times per week. The soil was provided with N:P:K in solution [Ultrasol<sup>&#xae;</sup> Multipurpose 18-18-18, Soquimich, Chile] once a week. Up to the beginning of experiments, macro- and micronutrients were also supplied by foliar applications of Basfoliar SP 25-10-17 [COMPO EXPERT, Chile]. The meteorological data were obtained from a local weather station (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Supplementary Figure S1</bold>
</xref>).</p>
<table-wrap id="T1" position="float">
<label>Table&#xa0;1</label>
<caption>
<p>Main traits of &#x2018;Macrophylla&#x2019; (<italic>Citrus macrophylla</italic> Wester); &#x2018;C35&#x2019; [<italic>C. sinensis</italic> &#xd7; <italic>P. trifoliata</italic> (South African)]; &#x2018;Citrumelo&#x2019; (<italic>Citrus paradisi</italic> Macf. &#x2018;Duncan&#x2019; grapefruit &#xd7; <italic>P. trifoliata</italic>), and &#x2018;Carrizo citrange&#x2019; (<italic>Citrus sinensis</italic> (L.) Osbeck &#xd7; <italic>Poncirus trifoliata</italic> (L.) Raf.) rootstocks (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">Agusti et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>).</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" rowspan="2" align="center">Factors and characteristics</th>
<th valign="middle" colspan="4" align="center">Rootstock</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Macrophylla</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">C35</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Citrumelo</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Carrizo citrange</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" colspan="5" align="left">Biotic stress (BS)</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Phytophtora</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">+++</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">+++</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">+++</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">+++</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Tristeza</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">+</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">+++</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">+++</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">+++</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Citrus nematode</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">+</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">+++</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">+++</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">++</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Exocortis</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">+++</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">+</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">+++</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">+</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Xyloporosis</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">+</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">+++</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">+++</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">+</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Psorosis</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">(-)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">+++</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">+++</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">++</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" colspan="5" align="left">Abiotic stress (AS)</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Drought</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">+++</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">(-)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">+++</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">+</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Salt</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">+++</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">(-)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">+++</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">+</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Alkalinity</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">+++</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">++</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">+</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">+</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Cold hardiness</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">+</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">+++</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">++</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">+++</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" colspan="5" align="left">Horticultural traits (Ht)</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Tree vigor</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">+++</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">++</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">+++</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">+++</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Tree size</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">++</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">+</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">++</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">++</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Fruit size</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">+++</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">++</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">+++</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">+++</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn>
<p>+++ High resistant or high tolerance (<italic>BS</italic> &amp; <italic>AS</italic>)/<italic>Ht</italic>: Large.</p>
</fn>
<fn>
<p>++ Intermediate tolerance (<italic>BS</italic> &amp; <italic>AS</italic>)/<italic>Ht</italic>: Intermediate.</p>
</fn>
<fn>
<p>+ Low tolerance (<italic>BS</italic> &amp; <italic>AS</italic>)/<italic>Ht</italic>: Small.</p>
</fn>
<fn>
<p>(-) No information.</p>
</fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_2">
<label>2.2</label>
<title>Stock of <italic>Panonychus citri</italic> colonies</title>
<p>The citrus red mite <italic>Panonychus citri</italic> colonies were collected in citrus orchards at Pica Oasis, Chile (20&#xb0;29&#x2019; S; 69&#xb0;19&#x2019; W; 1,346 m.a.s.l.). It was reared on grapefruit (<italic>Citrus</italic> &#xd7; <italic>paradisi</italic> Macfad.) fruits, placed on discs of PVC (diam. = 13 cm, H = 8 cm). To prevent the escape of mites, a small layer of vaseline was applied to contact surface between the fruit surface and the PVC disc. All inoculated fruits were put in a growth chamber at 25&#xb0;C, 50% RH, and 16/8 h light/dark photoperiod.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_3">
<label>2.3</label>
<title>Mite treatment and sampling</title>
<p>Infestation with mites was carried out in a greenhouse following a 30-day acclimation period. One shoot from the central part of the plant with 10 - 14 fully expanded leaves of each W. Murcott scion/rootstock combination was selected for treatment: a) WM/MA; b) WM/C35; c) WM/CI; d) WM/CA. The plants were inoculated with 20 gravid females of <italic>P. citri</italic> using a plastic micropipette tip. The tip was carefully attached by a clip to the abaxial side of each leaf, allowing <italic>P. citri</italic> to establish itself over the leaves. After 24 h, the micropipette tips and the clips were removed. The number of <italic>P. citri</italic> females was verified daily using a 10&#xd7; handheld magnifying glass. Non-infested shoots with similar features as described above were chosen as controls. A seven-day infestation period was selected to ensure a robust and consistent physiological and molecular response to the imposed mite density of 20 adult females per leaf. This timeframe was chosen to precede the hatching of eggs, which typically occurs after approximately seven days and leads to a rapid and uneven increase in the <italic>Panonychus citri</italic> population. Extending the infestation period beyond this point could introduce uncontrolled variability due to asynchronous population growth and differing plant stress levels, thereby compromising the reproducibility of the observed responses.</p>
<p>At the end of the seventh day, the number of eggs per leaf from each scion/rootstock combination was assessed by counting under a stereoscope. Net assimilation and other photosynthesis-related parameters were evaluated using an infra-red gas analyzer (IRGA). Several leaves from control and treated plants were pooled in three different biological replicates. They were frozen in liquid nitrogen, freeze-dried and then stored until use. For RNA extraction, fresh leaf samples were collected in liquid nitrogen, and then stored at -80&#xb0;C until analysis.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_4">
<label>2.4</label>
<title>Stress-related biological markers</title>
<sec id="s2_4_1">
<label>2.4.1</label>
<title>Malondialdehyde content (MDA)</title>
<p>MDA content was determined according to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">Heath and Packer (1968)</xref> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">Alfaro-Quezada et&#xa0;al. (2023)</xref>. </p>
<p>Approximately 0.25 g dry weight (DW) of leaf tissue was homogenized with 5 mL of a 5% trichloroacetic acid (TCA) solution and 1.25% glycerol. After centrifugation at 6,700 <italic>g</italic> for 10 min at 4&#xb0;C and filtration through Whatman N&#xb0; 1 filter paper, the supernatant was mixed with 2 mL of 0.67% thiobarbituric acid (TBA). The mixture was incubated for 30&#xa0;min at 100&#xb0;C, ice-cooled for 5 min, and centrifuged at 6,700 <italic>g</italic> for 1 min at 4&#xb0;C. The absorbance was measured at 532 nm by UV-Vis spectrophotometry (BioTeK Instruments).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_4_2">
<label>2.4.2</label>
<title>Proline content</title>
<p>Proline content was determined in 0.5 g of leaf tissue by ninhydrin reaction (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">Bates et&#xa0;al., 1973</xref>). </p>
<p>A standard curve using L-proline was made and absorbance was read at 520 nm by UV-Vis spectrophotometry.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_4_3">
<label>2.4.3</label>
<title>Salicilyc acid (SA) content</title>
<p>SA content was determined by a colorimetric reaction according to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B80">Warrier et&#xa0;al. (2013)</xref> with some modifications. </p>
<p>About 0.05 g DW of leaf tissue was powdered and added with 1 mL of double distilled water, vortexed and placed in a dry bath at 60&#xb0;C for 10 min. After centrifuging at 10,000 g for 10 min, an aliquot of 6.6 &#x3bc;L of supernatant was combined with 193.4 &#x3bc;L of fresh ferric chloride (FeCl). A SA (M.W. 138.12 g mol<sup>-1</sup>) standard was used for the calibration curve. The absorbance was read at 540 nm by UV-Vis spectrophotometry.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_5">
<label>2.5</label>
<title>Gas exchange rates</title>
<p>The net assimilation rate of CO<sub>2</sub> (<italic>A</italic>), stomatal conductance (<italic>gs</italic>), and transpiration (<italic>E</italic>) were measured using a portable apparatus (IRGA, LI-6800<sup>&#xae;</sup>, LI-COR Inc, Lincoln, Nebraska, USA). Fully expanded leaves from the central part of young trees were carefully extended and placed in the gas exchange chamber. The chamber was set to maintain a constant photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) of 1,200 &#xb5;mol m<sup>-2</sup>s<sup>-1</sup>, and the carbon dioxide concentration (CO<sub>2</sub>) was held at 420 &#xb5;mol mol<sup>-1</sup> using the instrument&#x2019;s internal CO<sub>2</sub> injection system. The measurements were conducted at midday, between 11:30 a.m. and 12:30 p.m., on sunny days in February 2022, in three replicates per scion/rootstock combination and treatment.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_6">
<label>2.6</label>
<title>Photosynthetic pigment, total sugar, and protein contents</title>
<sec id="s2_6_1">
<label>2.6.1</label>
<title>Photosynthetic pigment</title>
<p>About 0.5 g DW of leaf tissue were used for measuring chlorophylls and carotenoids (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B44">Lichtenthaler, 1987</xref>). </p>
<p>Pigments were extracted in 10 mL of 80% (v/v) acetone and centrifuged for 10 min at 4,500 <italic>g</italic>. The absorbance was measured in the supernatant at 663, 646, and 470 nm by UV-Vis spectrophotometry.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_6_2">
<label>2.6.2</label>
<title>Total sugar content</title>
<p>Total sugar content was determined according to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">Dubois et&#xa0;al. (1956)</xref>. </p>
<p>Total sugars were extracted from 0.1 g DW using 5 mL of distilled water and shaken for 60 min. Then, they were centrifuged at 4,500 <italic>g</italic> for 30 min at 12 &#xb1; 2&#xb0;C. An aliquot of 30 &#xb5;L of supernatant was added with 180 &#xb5;L of distilled water, 200 &#xb5;L of phenol (80%), 1 mL of concentrated H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub> and cooled at RT in darkness. A standard curve with D-glucose was used, and the absorbance was read at 490 nm by UV-Vis spectrophotometry.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_6_3">
<label>2.6.3</label>
<title>Total protein content</title>
<p>Total proteins were extracted according to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B55">Nunes et&#xa0;al. (2015)</xref> with some modifications. </p>
<p>About 1 g DW of leaf tissue was ground in buffer containing KH<sub>2</sub>PO<sub>4</sub> 50 mM, pH 7.0, 2 mM EDTA, and 1% (w/v) PVP. The homogenate was then centrifuged at 10,000 <italic>g</italic> for 10 min at 4&#xb0;C. The assay was performed using the Protein Assay Kit Pierce&#x2122; BCA (Thermo Scientific, USA) following the manufacturer&#x2019;s instructions, with bovine serum albumin (BSA) as standard. The absorbance was read at 562 nm by UV-Vis spectrophotometry.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_7">
<label>2.7</label>
<title>Total phenolic and flavonoid contents</title>
<p>Total phenolic and flavonoid contents were determined as described by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B59">Rao et&#xa0;al. (2019)</xref> with some modifications.</p>
<p>About 0.1 g of leaf tissue was homogenised with 5 mL of cooled 80% (v/v) methanol and shaken on an orbital shaker at 200 rpm for 2 h at RT. The homogenates were centrifuged at 2,500 g for 15 min. </p>
<sec id="s2_7_1">
<label>2.7.1</label>
<title>Total phenolic content (TPC)</title>
<p>The TPC was determined in a 300-&#x3bc;l aliquot of the supernatant added with Folin reagent (Folin: distilled water 1: 10) and was incubated for 5 min at RT. Then, 2.25 mL of Na<sub>2</sub>CO<sub>3</sub> solution (60 g L<sup>-1</sup>) was added and allowed to react in darkness for 2h at RT. The absorbance was measured at 725 nm using a UV-Vis spectrophotometer and the results are expressed in mg gallic acid equivalents (GAEs) per gram dry weight (mg GAEs g<sup>-1</sup> DW).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_7_2">
<label>2.7.2</label>
<title>Total flavonoids content (TFC)</title>
<p>The TFC was determined in a 500 &#xb5;L of methanolic extract combined with 2.25 mL of distilled water. </p>
<p>An aliquot of 150 &#xb5;L of 5% (w/v) NaNO<sub>2</sub> in water solution was added and incubated for 6 min at RT. Then, 300 &#xb5;L of 10% (w/v) of AlCl<sub>3</sub> solution were added. After incubation at RT for 5 min, 1 mL of 1 M NaOH was added and vortexed for 30 s. The absorbance was measured by a UV-Vis spectrophotometer at 510 nm. The results are expressed as mg rutin equivalents (REs) per gram dry weight (mg REs g<sup>-1</sup> DW).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_8">
<label>2.8</label>
<title>VOCs collection and chemical analysis</title>
<p>Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) were collected during the summer of 2022 using a dynamic headspace technique, as described by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B64">Rioja et&#xa0;al. (2016)</xref>. Briefly, a shoot with 10&#x2013;14 leaves was selected and enclosed in a 1-L oven bag (food-grade) while still attached to the plant. Filtered air (charcoal, 8&#x2013;20 mesh, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, Missouri, USA) was delivered into the bag at 1000 mL min&#x207b;&#xb9;, and pulled it out at 900 mL min&#x207b;&#xb9; using a vacuum pump (BOECO, Hamburg, Germany) through a glass column containing 100 mg of Porapak Q adsorbent (80&#x2013;100 mesh, Waters Associates, Milford, Massachusetts, USA) for 24 h (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>). After sampling, each column was eluted with 1 mL of chromatographic-grade hexane (&#x2265;99%, Sigma-Aldrich) into a glass vial with PTFE-lined caps, and stored in amber vials at -80&#xb0;C until chemical analysis. Porapak Q columns were cleaned and conditioned with 1 mL of redistilled diethyl ether (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) under a nitrogen stream (70 mL min<sup>-1</sup>) at 150&#xb0;C for 2 hours.</p>
<fig id="f1" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;1</label>
<caption>
<p>Dynamic headspace collection from citrus shoots under semi-field conditions. An air flow is passed through an activated charcoal filter and pumped into the bag. Simultaneously, the volatile organic compounds (VOCs) released from citrus shoots were extracted by a vacuum pump (BOECO, Hamburg, Germany), passing through glass traps filled with 100 mg of Porapak Q(&#x2122;) (80-100 mesh, Waters Associates, Milford, Massachusetts, USA). The VOCs were eluted and stored in a laboratory ultrafreezer for chemical analyses and identification.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-16-1645535-g001.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Illustration of a process for analyzing volatile organic compounds (VOCs) from plants. Plants in pots are shown in a headspace connected to a VOC trap and a vacuum pump with a charcoal filter. Hexane is used for elution via a Porapak Q trap, collecting VOCs extract stored at -80&#xb0;C. Samples are analyzed using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS), producing a chromatogram.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
<p>A 1-&#xb5;L aliquot of the eluted VOCs was injected in splitless mode into a gas chromatograph coupled to a mass spectrometer (GC-MS; QP2010 Ultra, Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) equipped with an RTx5 capillary column (30 m, 0.25 mm internal diameter, 0.25 &#xb5;m film thickness; Restek, Bellefonte, Pennsylvania, USA). The oven temperature program began at 40&#xb0;C (held for 1 min), increased at 5&#xb0;C min&#x207b;&#xb9; to 280&#xb0;C, and was held for 5 min. Helium was used as carrier gas at a constant flow of 1 mL min&#x207b;&#xb9;. Electron impact ionization was set at 70 eV, with a source temperature of 230&#xb0;C, and mass spectra were acquired in the range of 50 to 500 m/z. VOC identification was carried out using LabSolutions GCMS software (v4.30, Shimadzu) and the NIST library (version 2.0). Although no retention indices or co-injection with authentic standards were conducted, compound identifications were based on high-quality spectral matches (&#x2265;90%) and are thus considered tentative unless otherwise specified. Quantification was conducted using the internal standard method, with tridecane (Sigma-Aldrich) as the analytical standard. Compound concentrations are expressed in &#xb5;g mL<sup>-1</sup>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_9">
<label>2.9</label>
<title>Gene expression analysis by qRT-PCR</title>
<p>Total RNA was extracted from 100 mg of fresh leaf samples (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">Chang et&#xa0;al., 1993</xref>) collected three days after infestation. RNA yield and purity were checked by UV spectrophotometry, and RNA integrity was determined by electrophoresis. DNA was removed from 15 &#x3bc;g aliquots of total RNA using the TURBO DNA-free kit (Thermo, Applied Biosystems). The cDNA was synthesized from 6 &#x3bc;g of the DNaseI-treated RNA by means of the HighCapacity cDNA Kit (Thermo, Applied Biosystems), using random primers. Real-time qPCR was performed in a reaction mixture, final volume 25 &#xb5;L, containing 100 <italic>n</italic>g of cDNA, 5 <italic>p</italic>mol of each primer, and 12.5 &#xb5;L of the PowerUp SYBR Green PCR master mix (Thermo, Applied Biosystems), according to the manufacturer&#x2019;s instructions. The oligonucleotides <italic>CrEF1a</italic> and <italic>CrGAPDH</italic>, annealing to the internal transcribed spacer of rRNA and encoding a member of the glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase protein family, respectively, were used to amplify the internal standard with <italic>Citrus</italic> samples. The primer sequences used for the real-time qRT-PCR analysis are listed in Annexes (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Supplementary Table S1</bold>
</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Agut et&#xa0;al., 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">2016</xref>). qPCRs were carried out using the QuantStudio(&#x2122;) 3 Real-Time PCR System (ThermoFisher) following the kit instructions as follows: for 2 min at 50&#xb0;C, 2 min at 95&#xb0;C and then for 40 cycles of 95&#xb0;C for 15 s and 60&#xb0;C for 15 s, including the melt curve. The obtained Ct values were analyzed using the comparative threshold cycle or 2<sup>-&#x394;&#x394;Ct</sup> method (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B45">Livak and Schmittgen, 2001</xref>). Transcript levels were normalized against <italic>Elongation Factor 1-alpha</italic> (<italic>EF1a</italic>), used as the internal reference gene due to its stable expression across all scion/rootstock combinations and under <italic>Panonychus citri</italic> infestation.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_10">
<label>2.10</label>
<title>Experimental design and statistical analysis</title>
<p>A factorial design to determine the rootstock influence on physiological and biochemical traits in the commercial mandarin scions after seven days of continuous herbivory by <italic>P. citri</italic> was applied as follows: factor 1) four rootstock levels [(WM/MA), (WM/C35), (WM/CI), and (WM/CA)], and factor 2) infestation levels (non-infested or &#x2018;control&#x2019;, and infested plants). The physiological and biochemical parameters were evaluated using three biological replicates for each scion/rootstock combination with three technical replicates each. At least five biological replicates were collected <italic>in vivo</italic> to characterise the VOCs emitted by mandarin shoots. All data were transformed using natural logarithm (Ln) transformation [ln(x+1)] to meet normality requirements. To verify the effect of four levels of rootstocks on the physio- and biochemical traits of mandarin scion in two different infestation levels, a General Linear Model (GLM) was applied. This model is statistically equivalent to a two-way ANOVA. Where significant interaction effects were found, it was conducted an <italic>post hoc</italic> analysis using a one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey&#x2019;s test (P &lt; 0.05) to compare scion/rootstock combinations within infestation levels. Additionally, to compare non-infested <italic>vs.</italic> infested plants within each scion/rootstock combination were performed Student&#x2019;s t-tests (P &lt; 0.05). gene expression values are given as the mean of the normalized expression values of five technical replicates. Genes were considered up- or down- regulated when the fold change (FC) was &#x2265;2 relative to the non-infested control. All statistical analyses were performed using software JASP (Version 0.19.3) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">JASP Team, 2024</xref>).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s3" sec-type="results">
<label>3</label>
<title>Results</title>
<sec id="s3_1">
<label>3.1</label>
<title>Physiological parameters linked to plant defence against mite attack</title>
<p>The oviposition preference by <italic>P. citri</italic>, calculated as the number of eggs per leaf, showed that all scion/rootstock combinations were significantly affected by the red mite attack (F = 5.13; P = 0.0287) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;2A</bold>
</xref>). After seven days of infestation, the females deposited 100 to 160 eggs per leaf. The scion/rootstock combination with lowest preference was CA, followed by MA and C35, while CI was the most affected by eggs deposition.</p>
<fig id="f2" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;2</label>
<caption>
<p>Oviposition preference expressed as number of eggs per leaf <bold>(A)</bold>, content of malondialdehyde (MDA; <bold>B</bold>), proline <bold>(C)</bold> and salicylic acid (SA; <bold>D</bold>) in citrus leaves infested with mites (<italic>Panonychus citri</italic>) on &#x2018;W. Murcott&#x2019;s mandarin grafted on different rootstocks: Macrophylla (MA), C35, Citrumelo (CI), and Carrizo (CA). Each bar indicates the mean of three biological replicates &#xb1; SD. Significant differences between scion/rootstock combinations in non-infested and infested plants were analyzed by ANOVA followed by Tukey&#x2019;s <italic>post-hoc</italic> test (different letters = all against all; P &lt; 0.05). The asterisk indicates statistically significant differences between control and infested leaves in the same scion/rootstock combination according to Student&#x2019;s t-test (P &lt; 0.05).</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-16-1645535-g002.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Four bar charts compare non-infested and infested conditions on mandarin plants grafted on four different citrus rootstocks, across four treatments: MA, C35, CI, and CA. Chart A shows the number of Panonychus citri eggs per leaf, with CI having the highest infestation. Chart B displays malondialdehyde levels, peaking in C35 under infestation. Chart C illustrates proline levels, with peaks in the infested C35 group. Chart D shows salicylic acid content, highest in the CI infested group. Error bars indicate variability, and labels denote statistical significance with letters. Green bars represent uninfested, red bars indicate infested.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
<p>Lower MDA contents were recorded in non-infested mandarin leaves from all scion/rootstock combinations than infested ones (F = 2.60; P = 0.2269). However, after infestation, the MDA levels were significantly higher in the mandarin grafted on &#x2018;C35&#x2019; (F = 14.35; <italic>P =</italic> 0.0323; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;2B</bold>
</xref>); therefore, <italic>P. citri</italic> injury exacerbated rootstock influence on foliar MDA content in &#x2018;W. Murcott&#x2019; scions (F = 3.40; <italic>P =</italic> 0.0434).</p>
<p>Proline contents of mandarin leaves were significantly enhanced by <italic>P. citri</italic> feeding in all scion/rootstock combinations (F = 574.27; P = 0.0001; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;2C</bold>
</xref>). Furthermore, both factors. <italic>i.e.</italic>, rootstock and herbivory, affected the levels of this stress-protective metabolite (F = 8.39; P = 0.0014), with the &#x2018;WM/C35&#x2019; combination yielding higher values than the others (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;2C</bold>
</xref>).</p>
<p>As regards SA levels in mandarin leaves, results showed significant variations induced by rootstocks (F = 5.16; P = 0.0041; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;2D</bold>
</xref>). Different from non-infested plants, SA contents increased significantly in infested mandarin grafted on &#x2018;Citrumelo&#x2019; rootstock (F = 22.84; P = 0.0001). Thus, herbivory and rootstock interactions influenced foliar contents of SA (F = 17.58; P = 0.0001).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_2">
<label>3.2</label>
<title>Rootstock influence on photosynthetic traits and pigments from &#x2018;W. Murcott&#x2019; mandarin under mite attack</title>
<p>The net assimilation rate of CO<sub>2</sub> (<italic>A</italic>) ranged from 9.356 to 11.518 &#xb5;mol CO<sub>2</sub> m<sup>-2</sup> s<sup>-1</sup> in control plants with the &#x2018;WM/CI&#x2019; combination displaying the highest values. Seven days after infestation by the citrus red mite, <italic>A</italic> varied from 7.960 to 9.367 CO<sub>2</sub> m<sup>-2</sup> s<sup>-1</sup> (F = 2.43; P = 0.0667; <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">
<bold>Table&#xa0;2</bold>
</xref>). The transpiration rate (<italic>E</italic>) of &#x2018;W. Murcott&#x2019; mandarin leaves did not exhibit significant differences among the four scion/rootstock combinations and two <italic>P. citri</italic> infestation levels (F = 2.22; P = 0.0888; <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">
<bold>Table&#xa0;2</bold>
</xref>). By contrast, stomatal conductance (<italic>gs</italic>) varied depending on the scion/rootstock combination (F = 13.50; P = 0.0001), whereas herbivory had no effect on this parameter (F = 7.39; P = 0.0727).</p>
<table-wrap id="T2" position="float">
<label>Table&#xa0;2</label>
<caption>
<p>Physiological parameters and photosynthetic pigments of &#x2018;W. Murcott&#x2019; mandarin leaves grafted onto &#x2018;Macrophylla&#x2019; (<italic>Citrus macrophylla</italic> Wester), &#x2018;C35&#x2019; [<italic>C. sinensis</italic> &#xd7; <italic>P. trifoliata</italic> (South African)] &#x2018;Citrumelo&#x2019; (<italic>Citrus paradisi</italic> Macf. &#x2018;Duncan&#x2019; grapefruit &#xd7; <italic>P. trifoliata</italic>), and &#x2018;Carrizo citrange&#x2019; (<italic>Citrus sinensis</italic> (L.) Osbeck &#xd7; <italic>Poncirus trifoliata</italic> (L.) Raf.) rootstocks under <italic>Panonychus citri</italic> attack under semi-field conditions.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" rowspan="3" align="center">Physiological parameters</th>
<th valign="middle" colspan="8" align="center">Scion/rootstock combination</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" colspan="2" align="center">WM/MA</th>
<th valign="middle" colspan="2" align="center">WM/C35</th>
<th valign="middle" colspan="2" align="center">WM/CI</th>
<th valign="middle" colspan="2" align="center">WM/CA</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Control</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Infested</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Control</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Infested</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Control</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Infested</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Control</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Infested</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<italic>A</italic> (&#xb5;mol m<sup>-2</sup>s<sup>-1</sup>)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">10.52 &#xb1; 1.27 a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">7.96 &#xb1; 1.33 a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">10.79 &#xb1; 1.05 a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">8.56 &#xb1; 1.48 a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">11.52 &#xb1; 1.29 a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">9.37 &#xb1; 1.93 a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">9.36 &#xb1; 1.14 a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">8.04 &#xb1; 1.69 a</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<italic>gs</italic> (mol m<sup>-2</sup>s<sup>-1</sup>)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.12 &#xb1; 0.01 bc</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.12 &#xb1; 0.02 c</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.17 &#xb1; 0.02 ab</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.15 &#xb1; 0.01 abc</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.18 &#xb1; 0.03 a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.14 &#xb1; 0.02 abc</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.11 &#xb1; 0.02 c</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.11 &#xb1; 0.09 c</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<italic>E</italic> (mol m<sup>-2</sup>s<sup>-1</sup>)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">3.49 &#xb1; 0.33 a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">3.32 &#xb1; 0.46 a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">4.19 &#xb1; 1.02 a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">3.42 &#xb1; 0.85 a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">4.57 &#xb1; 0.57 a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">3.68 &#xb1; 0.81 a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">3.10 &#xb1; 0.34 a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2.87 &#xb1; 0.48 a</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" colspan="9" align="left">Leaf pigments</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<italic>Chl a</italic> (mg L<sup>-1</sup>)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">18.90 &#xb1; 4.13 a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">6.42 &#xb1; 1.99 b</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">24.76 &#xb1; 2.87 a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">4.00 &#xb1; 0.95 b</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">22.96 &#xb1; 4.05 a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">4.64 &#xb1; 0.84 b</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">21.35 &#xb1; 6.16 a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">4.98 &#xb1; 0.93 b</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<italic>Chl b</italic> (mg L<sup>-1</sup>)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">8.23 &#xb1; 2.13 a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.53 &#xb1; 0.33 b</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">12.91 &#xb1; 2.74 a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.09 &#xb1; 0.34 b</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">11.28 &#xb1; 3.11 a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.27 &#xb1; 0.23 b</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">10.47 &#xb1; 3.46 a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.72 &#xb1; 0.38 b</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<italic>Chl a+b</italic> (mg L<sup>-1</sup>)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">27.15 &#xb1; 6.26 a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">6.97 &#xb1; 0.99 b</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">37.69 &#xb1; 5.61 a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">5.27 &#xb1; 1.29 b</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">34.26 &#xb1; 7.15 a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">6.10 &#xb1; 1.07 b</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">31.84 &#xb1; 9.61 a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">6.98 &#xb1; 0.98 b</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<italic>TC</italic> (mg L<sup>-1</sup>)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">4.43 &#xb1; 0.75 a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.98 &#xb1; 0.45 b</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">5.92 &#xb1; 0.61 a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.17 &#xb1; 0.25 b</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">5.33 &#xb1; 0.99 a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.34 &#xb1; 0.17 b</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">4.50 &#xb1; 1.06 a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.38 &#xb1; 0.34 b</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn>
<p>The photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) was fixed at 1,200 &#xb5;mol m<sup>-2</sup> s<sup>-1</sup>, and the CO<sub>2</sub> concentration was maintained at 420 &#xb5;mol mol<sup>-1</sup> using the equipment&#x2019;s CO<sub>2</sub> injection system. Values are expressed as means &#xb1; SD. <italic>A</italic>, net assimilation rate; <italic>gs</italic>, stomatal conductance; <italic>E</italic>, transpiration rate; <italic>Chl</italic> chlorophyll; <italic>TC</italic> total carotenoids. Significant differences between scion/rootstock combinations in non-infested (control) and infested plants were analyzed by ANOVA followed by Tukey&#x2019;s post-hoc test (different letters within the same row = all against all; P &lt; 0.05).</p>
</fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<p>Rootstocks did not exert a significant influence on the concentrations of chlorophyll <italic>a</italic> and <italic>b</italic>, as well as carotenoids (chlorophyll <italic>a</italic>, F = 0.31; P = 0.8149; chlorophyll <italic>b</italic>, F = 1.09, P = 0.3828; chlorophyll <italic>a+b</italic>, F = 0.76, P = 0.5343; carotenoids, F = 0.89, P = 0.4658; <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">
<bold>Table&#xa0;2</bold>
</xref>). After seven days of herbivory, however, pigment concentrations for &#x2018;W. Murcott&#x2019; tended to decrease significantly on all rootstocks (chlorophyll <italic>a</italic>, F = 160.99, P = 0.0001; chlorophyll <italic>b</italic>, F = 122.27, P = 0.0001; chlorophyll <italic>a+b</italic>, F = 152.96, P = 0.0001; carotenoids, F = 178.26, P = 0.0001).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_3">
<label>3.3</label>
<title>Rootstock influence on biochemical and metabolic traits from &#x2018;W. Murcott&#x2019; under herbivory</title>
<p>Citrus rootstocks did not affect soluble sugar levels (F = 1.09; P&#xa0;= 0.4727) in mandarin scions. However, these decreased significantly after <italic>P. citri</italic> injury when grafted on &#x2018;MA&#x2019; and &#x2018;CI&#x2019;, going below constitutive levels of leaf sugar content (F = 20.91; P&#xa0;=&#xa0;0.0196) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;3A</bold>
</xref>).</p>
<fig id="f3" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;3</label>
<caption>
<p>Total sugar <bold>(A)</bold> and soluble protein <bold>(B)</bold> contents in leaves of &#x2018;W. Murcott&#x2019; mandarin scions grafted on Macrophylla (MA), C35, Citrumelo (CI), or Carrizo (CA) rootstocks and infested or not with mites <italic>(Panonychus citri)</italic> on Values are the means of five biological replicates &#xb1; SD. Significant differences between scion/rootstock combinations in control and non-infested plants were analyzed by ANOVA followed by Tukey&#x2019;s <italic>post-hoc</italic> test (different letters = all against all; <italic>P</italic> &lt; 0.05). Asterisks indicate statistically significant differences between control and infested leaves in the same scion/rootstock combination according to Student&#x2019;s <italic>t</italic>-test (<italic>P</italic> &lt; 0.05).</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-16-1645535-g003.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Bar charts comparing total sugar content and total proteins between non-infested (green) and infested (red) samples from mandarin leaves, across four categories: MA, C35, CI, CA. Chart A shows sugar content (mg per gram DW), and Chart B shows protein content (mg per mL). Error bars indicate variability. Uninfested samples generally have higher contents than infested ones.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
<p>Soluble protein levels were higher in non-infested mandarin plants grafted on &#x2018;Citrumelo&#x2019; than on other rootstocks (F = 9.09; P&#xa0;=&#xa0;0.0001) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;3B</bold>
</xref>). Thus, results indicate that rootstocks influence leaf protein contents (F = 5.85; P = 0.0068). Moreover, after <italic>P. citri</italic> infestation, soluble proteins diminished in mandarin leaves in three of the four combinations compared to non-infested plants, except on the &#x2018;CA&#x2019; rootstock (F = 27.17; P = 0.0001; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;3B</bold>
</xref>), when it increased slightly.</p>
<p>Rootstocks did not significantly affect TPC (F = 4.14; P = 0.2037; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f4">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;4A</bold>
</xref>), which ranged between 0.46 &#xb1; 0.11 and 0.67 &#xb1; 0.12 mg GAEs g<sup>-1</sup> DW, nor TFC (F = 0.77; P = 0.5268; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f4">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;4B</bold>
</xref>) in mandarin leaves. On all rootstocks, TFC, that ranged from 0.035 &#xb1; 0.007 to 0.042 &#xb1; 0.011 mg REs g<sup>-1</sup> DW, diminished significantly (at least three-fold) after <italic>P. citri</italic> infestation (F = 155.82; P = 0.0001; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f4">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;4B</bold>
</xref>) compared to non-infested plants.</p>
<fig id="f4" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;4</label>
<caption>
<p>Total content of phenolic compounds <bold>(A)</bold> and flavonoids <bold>(B)</bold> in leaves of &#x2018;W. Murcott&#x2019;s mandarin grafted on Macrophylla (MA), C35, Citrumelo (CI), or Carrizo (CA). Rootstocks and infested or not with mites (<italic>Panonychus citri</italic>).: Values are the means of three biological replicates &#xb1; SD. Significant differences between scion/rootstock combinations in control and non-infested plants were analyzed by ANOVA followed by Tukey&#x2019;s <italic>post-hoc</italic> (different letters = all against all; <italic>P</italic> &lt; 0.05). Asterisks indicate statistically significant differences between control and infested leaves in the same scion/rootstock combination according to Student&#x2019;s <italic>t</italic>-test (<italic>P</italic> &lt; 0.05).</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-16-1645535-g004.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Two bar graphs comparing total phenolics and flavonoids content in non-infested (green) and infested (red) samples from mandarin leaves for four treatments: MA, C35, CI, and CA. Graph A shows phenolics content ranging from 0 to 0.8 milligrams GAE per gram dry weight, with similar levels across treatments. Graph B shows flavonoids content ranging from 0 to 0.2 milligrams per milliliter, with significantly higher content in uninfested samples marked by different letters indicating statistical significance.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_4">
<label>3.4</label>
<title>Scion/rootstock interaction on VOCs emitted by &#x2018;W. Murcott&#x2019; leaves infested with <italic>P. citri</italic>
</title>
<p>As shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">
<bold>Table&#xa0;3</bold>
</xref>, chemical profiles showed slight differences between &#x2018;W. Murcott&#x2019;/rootstock combinations, mainly with respect to undetected compounds, whereas 2,3,3-trimethylhexane, and 2,4-dimethylhept-1-ene were only registered from scions grafted on &#x2018;MA&#x2019;. hexan-3-ol (3-hexanol), 2,2,4-trimethyldecane and 3-ethylbenzaldehyde were identified only in two or three scion/rootstock combinations. After seven days of infestation, (1R)-2-methyl-5-propan-2- ylbicyclo [3.1.0] hex-2-ene (&#x3b1;-thujene), [(Z)-hex-3-enyl] acetate (cis-3-Hexenyl acetate), methyl 2-hydroxybenzoate (methyl salicylate, MeSA), (3E, 6E) - 3, 7, 11 -trimethyldodeca-1,3,6,10-tetraene (&#x3b1;-farnesene),(3E)-3,7-dimethylocta-1,3,6-triene(&#x3b2;- ocimene), 3,7-dimethylocta-1,6-dien-3-ol (linalool), and (6R)-3-methylidene-6-propan-2-ylcyclohexene (&#x3b2;-phellandrene) were detected only from infested scions (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">
<bold>Table&#xa0;3</bold>
</xref>). Moreover, significant variations were caused by rootstocks after herbivory (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Supplementary Figure S2</bold>
</xref>); thus, HIPVs released from &#x2018;W. Murcott&#x2019; scions, such as (1S,5S)-6,6-dimethyl-2-methylidenebicyclo[3.1.1]heptane (&#x3b2;-pinene), cis-3-Hexenyl acetate, and linalool, varied significantly between scion/rootstock combinations (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">
<bold>Table&#xa0;3</bold>
</xref>). The amounts of MeSA and (4R)-1-methyl-4-prop-1-en-2-ylcyclohexene (D-limonene) released from infested shoots did not show significant differences in any of the scion/rootstock combinations (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">
<bold>Table&#xa0;3</bold>
</xref>). Although identification was not confirmed via retention indices or co-injection with authentic standards, the observed differences in compound abundance support biologically meaningful interpretations and provide a basis for selecting candidate VOCs for functional assays.</p>
<table-wrap id="T3" position="float">
<label>Table&#xa0;3</label>
<caption>
<p>Concentrations of volatile organic compounds emitted from (<italic>Citrus reticulata</italic> Blanco) &#x2018;W. Murcott&#x2019; scion grafted onto &#x2018;Macrophylla&#x2019; (<italic>Citrus macrophylla</italic> Wester), &#x2018;C35&#x2019; (<italic>C. sinensis</italic> &#xd7; <italic>P. trifoliata</italic> (South African)) &#x2018;Citrumelo&#x2019; (<italic>Citrus paradisi</italic> Macf. &#x2018;Duncan&#x2019; grapefruit &#xd7; <italic>P. trifoliata</italic>), and &#x2018;Carrizo citrange&#x2019; (<italic>Citrus sinensis</italic> (L.) Osbeck &#xd7; <italic>Poncirus trifoliata</italic> (L.) Raf.) rootstocks. Values represent mean concentration (n = 6) &#xb1; standard error (&#xb5;g mL<sup>-1</sup>) of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) identified based on &#x2265;90% spectral match with the NIST library (v2.0).</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" rowspan="3" align="center">Compound*</th>
<th valign="middle" colspan="8" align="center">Scion/Rootstock</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" colspan="2" align="center">W. Murcott/MA</th>
<th valign="middle" colspan="2" align="center">W. Murcott/C35</th>
<th valign="middle" colspan="2" align="center">W. Murcott/CI</th>
<th valign="middle" colspan="2" align="center">W. Murcott/CA</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Control</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Infested</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Control</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Infested</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Control</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Infested</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Control</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Infested</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" colspan="9" align="left">Alcohol</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">hexan-3-ol (3-hexanol)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.20 &#xb1; 0.04 B</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.69 &#xb1; 0.34 A</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" colspan="9" align="left">Alkanes</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2,3,3-trimethylhexane</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">4.40 &#xb1; 1.17a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">9.01 &#xb1; 2.33 Aa</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">14.32 &#xb1; 1.26 A</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">8.38 &#xb1; 2.00 A</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">10.46 &#xb1; 1.71 A</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2,4-dimethylhept-1-ene</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">5.02 &#xb1; 1.51a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">7.13 &#xb1; 1.36 Aa</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">7.92 &#xb1; 1.13 A</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">6-ethyl-2-methyldecane</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">8.46 &#xb1; 1.87 AB</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">13.64 &#xb1; 0.77 Aa</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">3.83 &#xb1; 2.06 Bb</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">21.76 &#xb1; 2.89 Aa</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">12.40 &#xb1; 3.08 Aa</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">15.80 &#xb1; 3.04 Aa</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.28 &#xb1; 0.27 Bb</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2,2,4-trimethyldecane</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">27.1 &#xb1; 6.16 A</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">25.82 &#xb1; 5.15 A</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">26.45 &#xb1; 8.39 A</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">3-methylheptadecane</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">26.57 &#xb1; 4.12</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2,2-dimethylicosane</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">29.85 &#xb1; 10.09 Aa</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">44.12 &#xb1; 7.69 Aa</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">41.23 &#xb1; 10.56 Aa</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">37.55 &#xb1; 2.96 ABa</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">35.97 &#xb1; 13.06 Aa</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">22.54 &#xb1; 4.65 Ba</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">37.42 &#xb1; 10.71 Aa</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">37.15 &#xb1; 3.69 ABa</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">pentadecane (n-Pentadecane)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">155.22 &#xb1; 36.72 Aa</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">54.58 &#xb1; 10.32 Aa</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">177.62 &#xb1; 32.01 Aa</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">27.68 &#xb1; 1.99 Ab</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">169.15 &#xb1; 42.27 Aa</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">51.60 &#xb1; 25.12 Ab</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">100.29 &#xb1; 29.74 Aa</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">29.22 &#xb1; 3.21 Aa</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">tetradecane (n-Tetradecane)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">21.64 &#xb1; 5.09 Ab</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">205.35 &#xb1; 45.79 Ba</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">23.48 &#xb1; 4.58 Ab</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">220.13 &#xb1; 11.94 ABa</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">98.71 &#xb1; 76.16 Aa</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">604.71 &#xb1; 191.82 Aa</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">18.80 &#xb1; 5.72 Ab</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">149.64 &#xb1; 15.80 Ba</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">hexadecane (n-Hexadecane)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">112.01 &#xb1; 34.82 A</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">56.10 &#xb1; 4.43 A</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">113.54 &#xb1; 25.71 A</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">127.20 &#xb1; 11.44 A</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" colspan="9" align="left">Benzaldehydes</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">4-ethylbenzaldehyde (4-ethyl benzaldehyde)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">29.22 &#xb1; 5.99 Aa</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">18.27 &#xb1; 4.05 Ba</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">18.93 &#xb1; 2.50 Ab</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">28.49 &#xb1; 2.13 ABa</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">34.34 5.18 AB</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">32.28 &#xb1; 8.45 Aa</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">36.06 &#xb1; 4.77 Aa</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">3-ethylbenzaldehyde (3-Ethylbenzaldehyde)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">50.26 &#xb1; 9.45 A</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">36.99 &#xb1; 3.94 A</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">46.59 &#xb1; 13.37 A</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" colspan="9" align="left">Esters</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">[(Z)-hex-3-enyl] acetate (cis-3-Hexenyl acetate)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">71.84 &#xb1; 9.61 A</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">17.07 &#xb1; 1.61 B</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">74.48 &#xb1; 11.43 A</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">6.38 &#xb1; 1.61 C</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">methyl 2-hydroxybenzoate (methyl salicylate)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">36.16 &#xb1; 8.69 A</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">44.58 &#xb1; 2.63 A</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">41.89 &#xb1; 6.52 A</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">31.47 &#xb1; 3.07 A</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" colspan="9" align="left">Hydrocarbons</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1,2,3,6-tetramethylbicyclo[2.2.2]octa-2,5-diene</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">47.90 &#xb1; 5.89 A</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">37.01 &#xb1; 2.56 A</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">124.83 &#xb1; 41.81 A</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">41.50 &#xb1; 1.31 A</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" colspan="9" align="left">Ketones</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Hexan-3-one (3-Hexanone)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2.84 &#xb1; 0.74 Aa</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.79 &#xb1; 0.40 ABa</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2.39 &#xb1; 0.48 Aa</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2.70 &#xb1; 0.26 Aa</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2.93 &#xb1; 0.45 Aa</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.10 &#xb1; 0.16 Bb</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2.20 &#xb1; 0.85 Aa</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2.16 &#xb1; 0.12 Aa</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Hexan-2-one (2-Hexanone)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">4.51 &#xb1; 1.04 Aa</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2.29 &#xb1; 0.50 ABa</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">3.54 &#xb1; 0.18 A</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">3.96 &#xb1; 0.38 Aa</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.34 &#xb1; 0.28 Bb</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2.43 &#xb1; 1.17 Aa</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2.63 &#xb1; 0.29 ABa</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1-(4-ethylphenyl)ethan-1-one</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">782.05 &#xb1; 221.14 Aa</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">577.13 &#xb1; 102.43 ABa</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">415.58 &#xb1; 57.94 Ab</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">731.49 &#xb1; 53.35 ABa</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">393.71 &#xb1; 209.15 B</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">625.37 &#xb1; 187.45 Aa</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">977.95 &#xb1; 64.68 Aa</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" colspan="9" align="left">Monoterpenes</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">(1R)-2-methyl-5-propan-2-ylbicyclo[3.1.0]hex-2-ene (&#x3b1;-thujene)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">3.21 &#xb1; 1.38</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">7.43 &#xb1; 1.21</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">(1S,5S)-6,6-dimethyl-2-methylidenebicyclo[3.1.1]heptane (&#x3b2;-pinene)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">4.31 &#xb1; 1.24 B</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">3.62 &#xb1; 1.28 B</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">5.49 &#xb1; 0.76 b</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">62.83 &#xb1; 8.81 Aa</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">3.56 &#xb1; 0.60 B</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">(3E)-3,7-dimethylocta-1,3,6-triene (&#x3b2;-ocimene)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">19.82 &#xb1; 5.38 A</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">27.37 &#xb1; 2.56 A</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">20.19 &#xb1; 1.54 A</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">(4R)-1-methyl-4-prop-1-en-2-ylcyclohexene (D-limonene)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">19.41 &#xb1; 4.82 Aa</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">24.36 &#xb1; 7.64 Aa</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">12.05 &#xb1; 2.02 Ab</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">47.10 &#xb1; 8.61 Aa</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">19.73 &#xb1; 4.93 Aa</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">21.90 &#xb1; 1.28 Aa</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">10.02 &#xb1; 2.14 Ab</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">45.29 &#xb1; 1.48 Aa</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">(6R)-3-methylidene-6-propan-2-ylcyclohexene (&#x3b2;-phellandrene)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">7.84 &#xb1; 1.54</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" colspan="9" align="left">Sesquiterpenes</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">(3E,6E)-3,7,11-trimethyldodeca-1,3,6,10-tetraene (&#x3b1;-farnesene)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">35.19 &#xb1; 3.17 A</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">27.71 &#xb1; 1.63 A</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">38.65 &#xb1; 8.39 A</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">41.02 &#xb1; 2.50 A</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">3,7-dimethylocta-1,6-dien-3-ol (linalool)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">21.99 &#xb1; 3.06 B</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">39.32 &#xb1; 7.80 AB</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">45.27 &#xb1; 5.22 A</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn>
<p>A General Linear Model (GLM) was used to assess the effects of rootstock, infestation, and their interaction. Different uppercase letters within a row and within the same condition (control or infested) indicate significant differences among scion/rootstocks (P &lt; 0.05, Tukey&#x2019;s HSD). Different lowercase letters within the same row and same scion/rootstock combination indicate significant differences between control and infested plants (P &lt; 0.05, Student&#x2019;s t-test). &#x201c;&#x2013;&#x201d; indicates that the compound was not detected. *IUPAC name (common name).</p>
</fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_5">
<label>3.5</label>
<title>Gene expression of infested scions during <italic>P. citri</italic> attack</title>
<p>This section presents gene expression data from infested scions. The control (fold change = 1) corresponds to a pooled baseline composed of all non-infested scion/rootstock combinations, calculated separately for each transcript. Specifically, CNT represents the average Ct value of non-infested controls across all rootstocks (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Supplementary Figure S3</bold>
</xref>) shows the Ct values of non-infested controls for each rootstock). This pooled control was used to normalize gene expression levels, allowing consistent comparison of infestation-induced responses among genotypes. Of all the genes explored, <italic>EIN3</italic>, <italic>PR3</italic>, and <italic>GLR</italic> did not show detectable and stable levels of transcripts through replicates in non-infested control &#x2018;W. Murcott&#x2019; scions. Transcript accumulation of <italic>ABA4</italic> (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f5">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;5A</bold>
</xref>) was significantly down-regulated in scions grafted onto &#x2018;CI&#x2019;, &#x2018;CA&#x2019;, and &#x2018;MA&#x2019; rootstocks, up to 12-fold in the case of &#x2018;Carrizo citrange&#x2019;. Conversely, &#x2018;C35&#x2019; rootstock significantly increased <italic>ABA4</italic> transcript levels in response to insect attack.</p>
<fig id="f5" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;5</label>
<caption>
<p>qRT-PCR analysis (FC, fold change) of genes related to phytohormone biosynthesis [<bold>(A)</bold> abscisic acid <bold>(B)</bold>] and ethylene) and defence <bold>(C&#x2013;F)</bold> in mandarin scions grafted on different <italic>Citrus</italic> rootstocks (MA, C35, CI, and CA) seven days after being infested with red mite. Expression values are means of five technical replicates, normalized against <italic>EF1a</italic> as a reference gene. Gene expression was analyzed relative to a pooled non-infested control (CNT), composed of all non-infested scion/rootstock combinations, and calculated separately for each gene. Genes were considered up- or down-regulated when fold change (FC) relative to the non-infested control on the same rootstock (CNT) was &#x2265; 2. Different letters indicate statistically significant differences among combinations according to Tukey&#x2019;s test (P &lt; 0.05). Error bars represent standard error of the mean.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-16-1645535-g005.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Bar charts display fold changes for six genes (ABA4, EIN3, PR3, PR5, GLR, PITY1) across four scion/rootstock combinations and the control: CNT, MA, C35, CI, CA. Each chart shows varying gene expression levels, with CA generally showing the highest increase. Statistical significance is indicated by different letters over bars.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
<p>
<italic>EIN3</italic> was significantly up-regulated in mandarin scions grafted onto &#x2018;CI&#x2019;, &#x2018;C35&#x2019;, and &#x2018;CA&#x2019; rootstocks, with the latter being upregulated over 200-fold compared to the control. It exhibits one of the highest expression levels among the genes evaluated in this study (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f5">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;5B</bold>
</xref>).</p>
<p>The expression of <italic>PR3</italic> was significantly higher in the &#x2018;W. M./CA&#x2019; combination, reaching up to 8-fold control levels; &#x2018;WM/MA&#x2019; and &#x2018;WM/C35&#x2019; combinations also showed a lower but significant increase, while on &#x2018;Citrumelo&#x2019; rootstock, scions maintained similar transcript levels to the controls (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f5">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;5C</bold>
</xref>). As for <italic>PR5</italic>, &#x2018;WM/CA&#x2019;, &#x2018;WM/CI&#x2019;, and &#x2018;WM/C35&#x2019; showed a significant increase compared to the control, while &#x2018;WM/MA&#x2019; remained unchanged in response to red mite herbivory. <italic>PR3</italic> was generally less expressed than <italic>PR5</italic>, the latter being up-regulated up to 50-fold control level &#x2018;WM/CA&#x2019; (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f5">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;5D</bold>
</xref>). The expression of <italic>GLR</italic> significantly increased for all rootstocks in response to red mite attacks, with scions grafted on &#x2018;CA&#x2019; showing the most significant increase (80-fold over the control), followed by &#x2018;CI&#x2019;, &#x2018;C35&#x2019;, and &#x2018;Macrophylla&#x2019; (10-fold control levels; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f5">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;5E</bold>
</xref>). <italic>PITY1</italic> transcript accumulation significantly increased in mandarin grafted on &#x2018;C35&#x2019; (up to 70-fold over the control), followed by &#x2018;CA&#x2019; (12-fold), while &#x2018;CI&#x2019; and &#x2018;MA&#x2019; did not induce significant differences compared to the control (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f5">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;5F</bold>
</xref>).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s4" sec-type="discussion">
<label>4</label>
<title>Discussion</title>
<sec id="s4_1">
<label>4.1</label>
<title>Red mite attack activates stress responsive biological markers</title>
<p>The number of eggs of <italic>P. citri</italic> after seven days of infestation ranged from approximately 100 to 160 eggs per leaf and can be considered detrimental to the physio-biochemical functioning of W. Murcott, as in other mandarin cultivars (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">Agut et&#xa0;al., 2016</xref>).</p>
<p>MDA is widely used as a marker of membrane integrity and stress tolerance in plants (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B50">Morales and Munn&#xe9;-Bosch, 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B71">Sheri et&#xa0;al., 2023</xref>), as it activates regulatory genes related to plant defence and development. After seven days of continuous <italic>P. citri</italic> infestation, all scion/rootstock combinations showed elevated MDA levels, with &#x2018;WM/C35&#x2019; exhibiting the highest. Similar MDA increases have been reported in <italic>T. urticae</italic> - infested bean plants (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">Farouk and Osman, 2012</xref>), whereas in cucumber, MDA initially rose but later declined under sustained mite feeding (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B68">Shahtousi and Talaee, 2023</xref>), suggesting that lower levels of MDA may reflect reduced damage, greater antioxidant capacity, and increased tolerance to herbivores. Our findings support the idea that both &#x2018;C35&#x2019; and &#x2018;CA&#x2019; rootstock are less effective in limiting membrane damage, as reflected by higher MDA accumulation. This agreed with increased proline and <italic>ABA4</italic> expression in the &#x2018;C35&#x2019; rootstock/scion combination, pointing to greater susceptibility to red mite attack.</p>
<p>The osmolyte proline has been extensively studied in grafted citrus under abiotic stressors such as salinity, drought, and heat (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B67">Shahid et&#xa0;al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Balfag&#xf3;n et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>). Our results show that the different rootstocks did not significantly influence constitutive levels of this stress-protective compound. By contrast, insect attacks are known to induce osmolyte accumulation, including proline, as reported in plants infected by fungi, viruses, or infested by <italic>T. urticae</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B58">Qamar et&#xa0;al., 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Anzano et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">Farouk and Osman, 2012</xref>). Notably, proline levels decrease in mite-susceptible wild rice <italic>(Oryza barthii</italic>) leaves but increase in tolerant cultivars following <italic>Schizotetranychus oryzae</italic> attack (Acari: Tetranychidae; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">Buffon et&#xa0;al. (2021)</xref>. Similarly, we observed a significant post-infestation increase in proline across all scion/rootstock combinations, with the highest levels in &#x2018;C35&#x2019; rootstock. This suggest that while constitutive proline remained stable, its inductibility under mite stress may reflect an active, though not necessarily protective, response.</p>
<p>Our results show that basal SA levels in mandarin leaves were rootstock-dependent, with the lowest levels observed in the &#x2018;CI&#x2019; combination. This agrees with <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">Agut et&#xa0;al. (2016)</xref>, who found significant differences in constitutive SA content in &#x2018;Clemenules&#x2019; scions grafted onto different rootstocks. Beyond its developmental roles, SA is a key phytohormone in plant defence (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B48">Mishra et&#xa0;al., 2024</xref>). Upon <italic>T. urticae</italic> infestation, SA levels increased in &#x2018;Clemenules&#x2019;/&#x2019;Cleopatra&#x2019; after three days, while ungrafted &#x2018;Sour orange&#x2019; exhibited higher SA than &#x2018;Cleopatra&#x2019; after seven days (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Agut et&#xa0;al., 2014</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">2016</xref>). Similarly, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">Leus et&#xa0;al. (2022)</xref> reported elevated SA in <italic>R. simsii</italic> cultivars infested by <italic>P. latus</italic>. Consistent with these findings, we observed significant SA accumulation in &#x2018;W. Murcott&#x2019; grafted onto &#x2018;CI&#x2019; and &#x2018;CA&#x2019; rootstocks following seven days of <italic>P. citri</italic> infestation.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s4_2">
<label>4.2</label>
<title>Scion/rootstock combinations modulates photo-assimilation and photosynthetic pigments under red mite attack</title>
<p>
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B86">Yulianti and Agisimanto (2023)</xref> reported that grafting &#x2018;Pontianak&#x2019; tangerine onto &#x2018;Japansche citroen&#x2019; and &#x2018;Citrumelo&#x2019; rootstocks significantly affected photosynthetic rate, whereas no differences were observed with &#x2018;Montaji&#x2019; lemon. In our study, although <italic>P. citri</italic> infestation led to reductions in <italic>A</italic> and <italic>E</italic> in &#x2018;W. Murcott&#x2019;, the differences were not significant; however, <italic>g<sub>s</sub>
</italic> was significantly influenced by rootstock. Similarly, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B86">Yulianti and Agisimanto (2023)</xref> observed no <italic>gs</italic> variation in their grafting experiments. Earlier, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">Hare and Youngman (1987)</xref> found no significant physiological changes in &#x2018;Washington Navel&#x2019; oranges infested by <italic>P. citri</italic>, suggesting leaf tolerance. In contrast, <italic>T. urticae</italic> infestation significantly reduced photosynthesis in cotton (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B61">Reddall et&#xa0;al., 2007</xref>) and lowered <italic>A</italic>, <italic>gs</italic>, and <italic>E</italic> in <italic>J. curcas</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">Hsu et&#xa0;al., 2015</xref>). Overall, our data suggest that &#x2018;W. Murcott&#x2019; grafted onto the tested rootstocks tolerates <italic>P. citri</italic> infestation for at least seven days without marked impairment of photosynthetic performance.</p>
<p>Photosynthetic pigments are known to be affected by biotic stresses (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">Li et&#xa0;al., 2024</xref>). In our study, rootstocks did not alter chlorophyll or carotenoid levels in mandarin leaves, but <italic>P. citri</italic> feeding significantly reduced both pigments, potentially contributing to the observed, albeit non-significant, decline in photosynthetic parameters. Similarly, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Blasi et&#xa0;al. (2017)</xref> reported chlorophyll loss in <italic>S. oryzae</italic>-infested rice leaves. In contrast, <italic>T.&#xa0;urticae</italic> infestation increased carotenoid content in beans (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">Farouk and Osman, 2012</xref>), while <italic>J. curcas</italic> showed no pigment changes under similar infestation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">Hsu et&#xa0;al., 2015</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s4_3">
<label>4.3</label>
<title>Rootstocks influence primary and secondary metabolites in &#x2018;W. Murcott&#x2019; leaves under mite attack</title>
<p>Our results show that citrus rootstocks did not significantly affect constitutive soluble sugar levels in &#x2018;W. Murcott&#x2019; mandarin. However, following <italic>P. citri</italic> infestation, sugar content declined significantly, particularly in plants grafted onto &#x2018;CI&#x2019; and &#x2018;MA&#x2019;. This aligns with studies reporting sugar level changes under herbivory: increases in <italic>T. urticae</italic>-infested beans (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">Farouk and Osman, 2012</xref>) and <italic>T. evansi</italic>-infested tomato (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B81">Xim&#xe9;nez-Emb&#xfa;n et&#xa0;al., 2018</xref>), but decreases in <italic>J. curcas</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">Hsu et&#xa0;al., 2015</xref>). <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">Hayat et&#xa0;al. (2022)</xref> also noted rootstock-driven sugar variability in mandarin leaves, with &#x2018;Trifoliate Orange&#x2019; inducing the highest content. The observed sugar depletion in our study may reflect a resource reallocation strategy under biotic stress, where breakdown of reserves contributes to defence signaling (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B77">Van den Ende and El-Esawe, 2014</xref>). In particular, the &#x2018;WM/CI&#x2019; combination appears especially reactive to mite attack, mirroring findings in sugarcane under aphid pressure (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">Koch et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>).</p>
<p>Soluble proteins are crucial for plant growth and defence against biotic stress (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Han et&#xa0;al., 2023</xref>). In our study, &#x2018;W. Murcott&#x2019; grafted onto &#x2018;CI&#x2019; exhibited significantly higher basal protein levels, indicating a rootstock effect. Similar influences have been reported in &#x2018;Shatangju&#x2019; and &#x2018;March Seedless&#x2019; grafted onto protein-promoting rootstocks like &#x2018;Citrange&#x2019;, &#x2018;Flying Dragon&#x2019;, and &#x2018;Troyer citrange&#x2019; (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">Hayat et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B70">Sharma et&#xa0;al., 2015</xref>). Upon <italic>P. citri</italic> infestation, protein levels declined significantly across most combinations, except for &#x2018;CA&#x2019;, suggesting a rootstock-dependent response. Such reductions mirror those observed in <italic>T. urticae</italic>-infested <italic>J. curcas</italic> and <italic>T. evansi</italic>-infested tomato (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">Hsu et&#xa0;al., 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B81">Xim&#xe9;nez-Emb&#xfa;n et&#xa0;al., 2018</xref>). Mite-secreted effectors are known to manipulate plant proteomes, including components of the ubiquitin-proteasome system, autophagy, phytohormone signaling, and transcription regulation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Blaazer et&#xa0;al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B88">Zhao and Wang, 2024</xref>). Likewise, <italic>S. oryzae</italic> infestation down-regulated defence- and metabolism-related proteins in rice (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Blasi et&#xa0;al., 2017</xref>). These findings suggest that <italic>P. citri</italic> may similarly suppress host protein-based defences to enhance its fitness.</p>
<p>Rootstocks did not significantly affect constitutive total phenolic content (TPC) in &#x2018;W. Murcott&#x2019;, although higher levels were observed in scions grafted onto &#x2018;C35&#x2019; and &#x2018;CI&#x2019;. Similarly, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">Legua et&#xa0;al. (2014)</xref> found increased TPC in &#x2018;Clemenules&#x2019; grafted onto &#x2018;Volkameriana&#x2019;. After seven days of <italic>P. citri</italic> infestation, TPC remained unchanged in most combinations but showed an increasing trend in &#x2018;WM/CA&#x2019;. In contrast, <italic>T. urticae</italic> infestation led to significantly higher TPC in beans (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">Farouk and Osman, 2012</xref>), suggesting species-specific or stress duration-dependent phenolic responses.</p>
<p>As with TPC, rootstocks did not influence constitutive flavonoid content in &#x2018;W. Murcott&#x2019; leaves. However, other studies have shown rootstock effects: higher flavonoid levels were reported in &#x2018;Maltese half-blood&#x2019; orange grafted onto &#x2018;Volkameriana&#x2019; (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B91">Zouaghi et&#xa0;al., 2018</xref>) and in &#x2018;Newhall&#x2019;/P. trifoliata compared to &#x2018;Newhall&#x2019;/C. junos (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B42">Li et&#xa0;al., 2023</xref>). Flavonoids contribute to plant defence through deterrent and antifungal properties and accumulate in response to bacterial infections (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Anzano et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>). In our study, total flavonoid content (TFC) significantly declined after seven days of <italic>P. citri</italic> infestation, suggesting mite-mediated suppression of defence pathways. This is consistent with findings in tomato, where <italic>T. evansi</italic> and <italic>T. urticae</italic> reduced flavonoid levels and suppressed associated signalling pathways (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">Knegt et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B75">Su et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>). <italic>P. citri</italic> may act similarly, downregulating flavonoid-dependent defences in mandarin.</p>
<p>Citrus VOC emissions are influenced by rootstocks (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">Jones and Killiny, 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Guarino et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>). For example, &#x2018;Minneola&#x2019; grafted onto &#x2018;MA&#x2019; releases &#x3b2;-phellandrene, caryophyllene, citronellol, and cis-p-mentha-2,8-dien-1-ol&#x2014;compounds absent in lime leaf emissions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B62">Rioja and Ceballos, 2024</xref>). Rootstock-dependent changes in VOC profiles have also been observed under <italic>Citrus tristeza virus</italic> infection (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Guarino et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>). In our study, &#x2018;W. Murcott&#x2019; VOC profiles were only slightly affected by rootstock, with minor variations in alcohols, alkanes, and aromatic aldehydes across combinations, similar to findings by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">Jones and Killiny (2021)</xref>. Herbivory can trigger the release of HIPVs as indirect defences. For instance, increased emissions of D-limonene, ocimene, and MeSA have been documented in citrus infested by <italic>Aonidiella aurantii</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Alsabte et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>), and higher levels of MeSA, azulene, and 2-ethylhexan-1-ol were detected in mite-infested &#x2018;Minneola&#x2019; (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B62">Rioja and Ceballos, 2024</xref>). In avocado, <italic>O. yothersi</italic> induced exclusive emissions of &#x3b2;-ocimene, linalool, &#x3b1;-farnesene, and MeSA, which also act as repellents (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B64">Rioja et&#xa0;al., 2016</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B63">2018</xref>). In our study, MeSA was consistently detected in all <italic>P. citri</italic>-infested scion/rootstock combinations, reinforcing its role as a key HIPV mediating tri-trophic interactions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">Abdala-Roberts et&#xa0;al., 2019</xref>). Seemingly, the citrus rootstocks do not appear to affect the tritrophic interactions; therefore, studies on the behavioural responses in predators of <italic>P. citri</italic> are required. Present results show that the chemical profiles changed both quantitatively and qualitatively after <italic>P. citri</italic> infestation. High emissions of &#x3b1;-thujene, &#x3b2;-pinene, and &#x3b2;-phellandrene were registered only in the &#x2018;WM/CI&#x2019; combination, indicating that citrus rootstocks markedly affect the indirect induced defences in mandarin scions.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s4_4">
<label>4.4</label>
<title>Scion/rootstock combinations differentially affect phytohormone- and defence- related genes under mite attack</title>
<p>Gene expression is a sensitive indicator of plant responses of early molecular responses to stress (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B79">Wang et&#xa0;al., 2023</xref>). Phytohormones like ethylene (ET) and abscisic acid (ABA) modulate defence gene expression, often via antagonistic pathways (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">Li et&#xa0;al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B85">Yu et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B52">M&#xfc;ller, 2021</xref>). <italic>ABA4</italic>, which encodes a membrane protein involved in neoxanthin synthesis and stress-induced ABA accumulation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B54">North et&#xa0;al., 2007</xref>), was generally downregulated in our study, except in the &#x2018;C35&#x2019; combination, where it was significantly upregulated. Elevated <italic>ABA4</italic> expression, along with high MDA levels, suggests greater membrane damage and stress in this rootstock under <italic>P. citri</italic> infestation, consistent with responses observed in <italic>A. thaliana</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Barczak-Brzy&#x17c;ek et&#xa0;al., 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B65">Rosa-Diaz et&#xa0;al., 2024</xref>), <italic>Tamarix nilotica</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B84">Younis, 2021</xref>), and &#x2018;Cleopatra&#x2019; mandarin (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Agut et&#xa0;al., 2014</xref>). Conversely, <italic>EIN3</italic>, an ET-responsive transcription factor, was strongly upregulated across all combinations, reaching a 220-fold increase in &#x2018;WM/CA&#x2019;. <italic>EIN3</italic> is a central regulator of ET signaling and downstream defence responses (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B74">Solano et&#xa0;al., 1998</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Binder, 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B57">P&#xe9;rez-Hedo et&#xa0;al., 2024</xref>) and has been similarly induced in cassava infested by <italic>T. urticae</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B83">Yang et&#xa0;al., 2019</xref>). These findings highlight distinct hormonal response strategies to mite attack among rootstock combinations.</p>
<p>Pathogenesis-related (PR) proteins play key roles in plant defence by reinforcing cell structures and exerting enzymatic activity against pathogens (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B78">Van Loon et&#xa0;al., 2006</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Han et&#xa0;al., 2023</xref>). Members of the PR family have specific functions: chitinases (PR-3) act via the JA pathway, while thaumatin/osmotin-like proteins (TLPs; PR-5) are SA-responsive. In our study, both <italic>PR-3</italic> and <italic>PR-5</italic> were strongly upregulated by <italic>P. citri</italic> infestation in &#x2018;WM/CA&#x2019; and &#x2018;WM/C35&#x2019; combinations, with <italic>PR-5</italic> reaching transcript levels ten times higher than <italic>PR-3</italic>. <italic>PR-5</italic> is known to be recruited by <italic>PR-1</italic> to enhance resistance through ROS-dependent amplification of immune responses (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Han et&#xa0;al., 2023</xref>). The accumulation of <italic>PR</italic> gene transcripts is a hallmark of SA- and JA-mediated defence and is associated with the production of antimicrobial proteins such as glucanases (PR-2), chitinases (PR-3, PR-4), and TLPs (PR-5; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Gkizi et&#xa0;al., 2016</xref>). In citrus infested by <italic>Tetranychus</italic> spp., <italic>PR-5</italic> expression increases early, while <italic>PR-3</italic> induction is delayed but sustained (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Agut et&#xa0;al., 2014</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">2015</xref>), consistent with our findings.</p>
<p>Some mite species can suppress defence-related gene expression. In tomato (<italic>S. lycopersicum</italic> var. Santa Clara I-5300), <italic>T. evansi</italic> suppressed <italic>WIPI-II</italic> and <italic>PR-P6</italic>, genes linked to JA and SA pathways, respectively, whereas <italic>T. urticae</italic> upregulated both (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B66">Sarmento et&#xa0;al., 2011</xref>). Similarly, in azalea, <italic>P. latus</italic> initially induced JA accumulation, but later significantly increased SA levels, suggesting suppression of JA-mediated defences to enable sustained infestation without compromising mite fitness (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">Leus et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>).</p>
<p>The citrus <italic>Protein Inhibitor Type 1</italic> (<italic>PI TYPE1</italic>) gene is a known marker of arthropod-induced defence (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Agut et&#xa0;al., 2014</xref>). In our study, <italic>PITY1</italic> was significantly upregulated across all scion/rootstock combinations, with the highest expression observed in &#x2018;WM/C35&#x2019; (65-fold), followed by &#x2018;CA&#x2019; (12-fold), and lower increases in &#x2018;CI&#x2019; and &#x2018;MA&#x2019; (7- and 3-fold, respectively). Similar strong induction of <italic>PI</italic> genes has been reported in tomato under <italic>T. urticae</italic> attack, where they emerged as prominent defence-related transcripts in microarray analyses (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B47">Martel et&#xa0;al., 2015</xref>), reinforcing their role as key molecular markers in plant responses to mite herbivory.</p>
<p>The putative <italic>glutamate receptor-like</italic> (<italic>GLR</italic>) gene was strongly upregulated in all scion/rootstock combinations, with expression increasing 10-fold in &#x2018;MA&#x2019;, 40-fold in &#x2018;C35&#x2019; and &#x2018;CI&#x2019;, and up to 80-fold in &#x2018;CA&#x2019;. <italic>GLR</italic> proteins play key roles in sensing leaf damage and regulating defence signalling pathways, as well as in wound and pathogen responses (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B51">Mousavi et&#xa0;al., 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B82">Yan et&#xa0;al., 2024</xref>). In mite-infested sour orange, <italic>GLR</italic> overexpression and glutamate accumulation were linked to systemic resistance (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">Agut et&#xa0;al., 2016</xref>). Exogenous glutamate application also primed plants for stronger, faster responses to pests and pathogens, highlighting the role of GLRs in early defence signalling.</p>
<p>In conclusion, <italic>Panonychus citri</italic> herbivory amplifies rootstock-driven differences in the physiological, biochemical, and molecular responses of &#x2018;W. Murcott&#x2019; mandarin scions under semi-field conditions. Rootstocks significantly influenced stress markers&#x2014;including MDA, proline, SA, soluble sugars, and proteins&#x2014;as well as VOC emission profiles, indicating modulation of both primary and secondary metabolism. Among the combinations tested, &#x2018;WM/CI&#x2019; and &#x2018;WM/CA&#x2019; emerged as promising rootstocks for enhancing scion performance and red mite tolerance. &#x2018;WM/CI&#x2019; showed the lowest MDA levels and highest accumulation of defence-related metabolites, while &#x2018;WM/CA&#x2019; promoted reprogramming of defence genes, including <italic>ABA4</italic> suppression. The consistently higher expression of <italic>PR5</italic> over <italic>PR3</italic> across combinations support a predominantly SA-mediated defence response. These integrated responses are visually summarized in the heatmap (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f6">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;6</bold>
</xref>), which highlights distinct biochemical and transcriptional patterns across scion/rootstock combinations induced by infestation. Both &#x2018;WM/CI&#x2019; and &#x2018;WM/CA&#x2019; showed increased VOC emission (e.g., &#x3b2;-pinene, MeSA, &#x3b2;-ocimene) and upregulated <italic>PR5</italic> and <italic>GLR</italic> expression, suggesting strong inducible defenses. In contrast, &#x2018;WM/MA&#x2019; displayed limited changes in stress markers and gene expression, indicating weaker inducible responses due to red mite attack. Meanwhile, &#x2018;WM/C35&#x2019; was distinguished by its high MDA accumulation and strong induction of <italic>PITY1</italic>, pointing to more pronounced oxidative stress and activation of damage-related pathways.</p>
<fig id="f6" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;6</label>
<caption>
<p>Heatmap showing changes in physiological, biochemical, molecular, and volatile organic compound (VOC) traits in four <italic>Citrus</italic> scion&#x2013;rootstock combinations, comparing non-infested and <italic>Panonychus citri</italic>-infested plants. Combinations include &#x2018;WM/MA&#x2019; ('Macrophylla', <italic>Citrus macrophylla</italic> Wester), &#x2018;WM/C35&#x2019; [<italic>C. sinensis</italic> &#xd7;  <italic>P. trifoliata</italic> (South African)], &#x2018;WM/CI&#x2019; [&#x2018;Citrumelo&#x2019; (<italic>Citrus paradisi</italic> Macf. &#x2018;Duncan&#x2019; grapefruit &#xd7; <italic>P. trifoliata</italic>)], and &#x2018;WM/CA&#x2019; ['Carrizo citrange' (<italic>Citrus sinensis</italic> (L.) Osbeck &#xd7; <italic>Poncirus trifoliata</italic> (L.) Raf.)], each grafted with &#x2018;W. Murcott&#x2019; (WM) as the scion. Traits are grouped into stress-related parameters, physiological parameters, VOCs, and defense-related gene expression. Color intensity represents the relative value of each trait within the non-infested vs. infested comparison for each combination, with red indicating the highest value, followed by orange and yellow, reflecting decreasing relative levels. Parameters include malondialdehyde (MDA), proline, salicylic acid (SA), photosynthesis (<italic>A</italic>), stomatal conductance (<italic>gs</italic>), transpiration (<italic>E</italic>), chlorophyll (Chl a, Chl b, Chl a+b), carotenoids, selected VOCs (e.g., &#x3b1;-thujene, &#x3b2;-pinene, methyl salicylate), and defense-related gene expression (<italic>ABA4</italic>, <italic>EIN3</italic>, <italic>PR3</italic>, <italic>PR5</italic>, <italic>GLR</italic>, <italic>PITY1</italic>). Each trait was independently normalized using min&#x2013;max scaling across both infestation conditions for a given combination, allowing comparison of within-combination variation. This multivariate representation provides an integrated overview of rootstock-modulated responses to red mite infestation.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-16-1645535-g006.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Heatmap comparing non-infested and infested conditions across various traits from mandarin plants grafted on different rootstocks. Traits are categorized as stress-related parameters, physiological-related parameters, VOCs, and gene expression. The color gradient from yellow to red indicates increasing levels. Columns compare different treatments: WM/MA, WM/C35, WM/CI, and WM/CA under both conditions.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
<p>Despite extensive research on ungrafted citrus rootstocks and abiotic stress (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B72">Simpson et&#xa0;al., 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B46">Long et&#xa0;al., 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">Huang et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Arjona-L&#xf3;pez et&#xa0;al., 2023</xref>), few studies have addressed how rootstocks modulate scion responses to herbivory (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">Agut et&#xa0;al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B69">Shaltiel-Harpaz et&#xa0;al., 2018</xref>). Our findings underscore the pivotal role of rootstock selection in shaping scion resilience under biotic stress, through coordinated changes in metabolite profiles and gene expression. Future research should explore the functional roles of key metabolites and regulatory genes, and evaluate resistance priming through exogenous hormone applications. Ultimately, integrating multi-level markers - from metabolic to transcriptional -offers a robust framework for rootstock selection in breeding and nursery programmes aimed at developing citrus cultivars resilient to evolving agroecological challenges.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<sec id="s5" sec-type="data-availability">
<title>Data availability statement</title>
<p>The original contributions presented in the study are publicly available. This data can be found here: <uri xlink:href="https://github.com/TOMMYRIOJA/data-repository-publication-citrus-Panonychus-citri">https://github.com/TOMMYRIOJA/data-repository-publication-citrus-Panonychus-citri</uri>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s6" sec-type="ethics-statement">
<title>Ethics statement</title>
<p>The manuscript presents research on animals that do not require ethical approval for their study.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s7" sec-type="author-contributions">
<title>Author contributions</title>
<p>TR: Investigation, Supervision, Conceptualization, Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing, Funding acquisition, Writing &#x2013; original draft, Methodology, Formal Analysis, Resources, Visualization. KR: Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing, Formal Analysis, Writing &#x2013; original draft, Methodology, Conceptualization, Supervision, Visualization. RC: Formal Analysis, Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing, Methodology.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s8" sec-type="funding-information">
<title>Funding</title>
<p>The author(s) declare financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article. This study was supported by the &#x2018;Agencia Nacional de Investigaci&#xf3;n y Desarrollo de Chile&#x2019; (ANID), FONDECYT Iniciaci&#xf3;n project INI 11200852 and project UTA-MAYOR 9734-23. We would like to express our gratitude to the &#x2018;Agencia Nacional de Investigaci&#xf3;n y Desarrollo de Chile&#x2019; (ANID) for their support through the FONDECYT Iniciaci&#xf3;n project INI 11200852, and project UTA-MAYOR 9734-23.</p>
</sec>
<ack>
<title>Acknowledgments</title>
<p>We thank FONDEQUIP Project EQM190088 for making available the IRGA6800 to acquire photosynthetic data, and to Ms. Carolina Navea, biotechnologist (<email xlink:href="mailto:navea.carolina@gmail.com">navea.carolina@gmail.com</email>) for the figures design presented. The authors would like to thank Stefania Biondi and Francesca Rapparini, senior plant biologists, for their valuable contributions to improving the manuscript.</p>
</ack>
<sec id="s9" sec-type="COI-statement">
<title>Conflict of interest</title>
<p>The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s10" sec-type="ai-statement">
<title>Generative AI statement</title>
<p>The author(s) declare that no Generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.</p>
<p>Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s11" sec-type="disclaimer">
<title>Publisher&#x2019;s note</title>
<p>All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s12" sec-type="supplementary-material">
<title>Supplementary material</title>
<p>The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2025.1645535/full#supplementary-material">https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2025.1645535/full#supplementary-material</ext-link>
</p>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="DataSheet1.docx" id="SM1" mimetype="application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document"/>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="DataSheet2.docx" id="SM2" mimetype="application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document"/>
</sec>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="B1">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Abdala-Roberts</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Puentes</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Finke</surname> <given-names>D. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Marquis</surname> <given-names>R. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Montserrat</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Poelman</surname> <given-names>E. H.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Tri-trophic interactions: bridging species, communities and ecosystems</article-title>. <source>Ecol. Lett.</source> <volume>22</volume>, <fpage>2151</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2167</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/ele.13392</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31631502</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B2">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Agusti</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mesejo</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Reig</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <source>Citricultura</source>. <edition>Tercera edici&#xf3;n</edition> (<publisher-loc>Madrid, Espa&#xf1;a</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Ediciones Mundi-Prensa</publisher-name>).</citation></ref>
<ref id="B3">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Agut</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gamir</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jacas</surname> <given-names>J. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hurtado</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Flors</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Different metabolic and genetic responses in citrus may explain relative susceptibility to <italic>Tetranychus urticae</italic>
</article-title>. <source>Pest Manag Sci.</source> <volume>70</volume>, <fpage>1728</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1741</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/ps.3718</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24375985</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B4">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Agut</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gamir</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jaques</surname> <given-names>J. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Flors</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>
<italic>Tetranychus urticae</italic> - triggered responses promote genotype-dependent conspecific repellence or attractiveness in citrus</article-title>. <source>New Phytol.</source> <volume>207</volume>, <fpage>790</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>804</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/nph.13357</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25771705</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B5">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Agut</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gamir</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jaques</surname> <given-names>J. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Flors</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Systemic resistance in citrus to <italic>Tetranychus urticae</italic> induced by conspecifics is transmitted by grafting and mediated by mobile amino acids</article-title>. <source>J. Exp. Bot.</source> <volume>67</volume>, <fpage>5711</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>5723</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/jxb/erw335</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">27683726</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B6">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Alfaro-Quezada</surname> <given-names>J. F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mart&#xed;nez</surname> <given-names>J. P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Molinett</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Valenzuela</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Montenegro</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ram&#xed;rez</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>Rootstock increases the physiological defence of tomato plants against <italic>Pseudomonas syringae</italic> pv. tomato infection</article-title>. <source>J. Exp. Bot.</source> <volume>74</volume>, <fpage>2891</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2911</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/jxb/erad040</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">36723875</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B7">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ali</surname> <given-names>M. Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Naseem</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Holopainen</surname> <given-names>J. K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>Tritrophic Interactions among Arthropod Natural Enemies, Herbivores and Plants Considering Volatile Blends at Different Scale Levels</article-title>. <source>Cells</source> <volume>12</volume>, <elocation-id>251</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/cells12020251</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">36672186</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B8">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Alsabte</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ahmed</surname> <given-names>Q. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kayahan</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Karaca</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Effects of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) emitted by citrus infested with <italic>Aonidiella aurantii</italic> on the predator <italic>Rhyzobius lophanthae</italic> attraction</article-title>. <source>Phytoparasitica</source> <volume>50</volume>, <fpage>645</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>653</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s12600-022-00978-4</pub-id>
</citation></ref>
<ref id="B9">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Anzano</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bonanomi</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mazzoleni</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lanzotti</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Plant metabolomics in biotic and abiotic stress: a critical overview</article-title>. <source>Phytochem. Rev.</source> <volume>21</volume>, <fpage>503</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>524</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11101-021-09786-w</pub-id>
</citation></ref>
<ref id="B10">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Arjona-L&#xf3;pez</surname> <given-names>J. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Aparicio-Dur&#xe1;n</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gmitter</surname> <given-names>F. G.</given-names>
<suffix>Jr.</suffix>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Romero-Rodr&#xed;guez</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Grosser</surname> <given-names>J. W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hervalejo</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>Physiological influence of water stress conditions on novel HLB-tolerant citrus rootstocks</article-title>. <source>Agronomy</source> <volume>13</volume>, <elocation-id>63</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/agronomy13010063</pub-id>
</citation></ref>
<ref id="B11">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Balfag&#xf3;n</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rambla</surname> <given-names>J. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Granell</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Arbona</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>G&#xf3;mez-Cadenas</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Grafting improves tolerance to combined drought and heat stresses by modifying metabolism in citrus scion</article-title>. <source>Environ. Exp. Bot.</source> <volume>195</volume>, <elocation-id>104793</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.envexpbot.2022.104793</pub-id>
</citation></ref>
<ref id="B12">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Barczak-Brzy&#x17c;ek</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kie&#x142;kiewicz</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>G&#xf3;recka</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kot</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Karpi&#x144;ska</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Filipecki</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Abscisic Acid Insensitive 4 transcription factor is an important player in the response of <italic>Arabidopsis thaliana</italic> to two-spotted spider mite (<italic>Tetranychus urticae</italic>) feeding</article-title>. <source>Exp. Appl. Acarol.</source> <volume>73</volume>, <fpage>317</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>326</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10493-017-0203-1</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29210003</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B13">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Bates</surname> <given-names>L. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Waldren</surname> <given-names>R. P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Teare</surname> <given-names>I. D.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1973</year>). <article-title>Rapid determination of free proline for water-stress studies</article-title>. <source>Plant Soil</source> <volume>39</volume>, <fpage>205</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>207</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/BF00018060</pub-id>
</citation></ref>
<ref id="B14">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Binder</surname> <given-names>B. M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Ethylene signaling in plants</article-title>. <source>J. Biol. Chem.</source> <volume>295</volume>, <fpage>7710</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>7725</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1074/jbc.REV120.010854</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32332098</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B15">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Blaazer</surname> <given-names>C. J. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Villacis-Perez</surname> <given-names>E. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chafi</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Van Leeuwen</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kant</surname> <given-names>M. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Schimmel</surname> <given-names>B. C. J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Why do herbivorous mites suppress plant defenses</article-title>? <source>Front. Plant Sci.</source> <volume>9</volume>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpls.2018.01057</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30105039</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B16">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Blasi</surname> <given-names>&#xc9;.A.R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Buffon</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rativa</surname> <given-names>A. G. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lopes</surname> <given-names>M. C. B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Berger</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Santi</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>High infestation levels of <italic>Schizotetranychus oryzae</italic> severely affects rice metabolism</article-title>. <source>J. Plant Physiol.</source> <volume>219</volume>, <fpage>100</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>111</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jplph.2017.10.005</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29096082</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B17">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Buffon</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Blasi</surname> <given-names>&#xc9;.A.R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lamb</surname> <given-names>T. I.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Adamski</surname> <given-names>J. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Schwambach</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ricachenevsky</surname> <given-names>F. K.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>
<italic>Oryza sativa</italic> cv. Nipponbare and <italic>Oryza barthii</italic> as Unexpected Tolerance and Susceptibility Sources Against <italic>Schizotetranychus oryzae</italic> (Acari: Tetranychidae) Mite Infestation</article-title>. <source>Front. Plant Sci.</source> <volume>12</volume>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpls.2021.613568</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33643348</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B18">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Chang</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Puryear</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cairney</surname> <given-names>J. A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1993</year>). <article-title>simple and efficient method for isolating RNA from pine trees</article-title>. <source>Plant Mol. Biol. Rep.</source> <volume>11</volume>, <fpage>113</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>116</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/BF02670468</pub-id>
</citation></ref>
<ref id="B19">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Dubois</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gilles</surname> <given-names>K. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hamilton</surname> <given-names>J. K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rebers</surname> <given-names>P. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Smith</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1956</year>). <article-title>Colorimetric method for determination of sugars and related substances</article-title>. <source>Anal. Chem.</source> <volume>28</volume>, <fpage>350</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>356</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1021/ac60111a017</pub-id>
</citation></ref>
<ref id="B20">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Erb</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Foresti</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Turlings</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>A tritrophic signal that attracts parasitoids to host-damaged plants withstands disruption by non-host herbivores</article-title>. <source>BMC Plant Biol.</source> <volume>10</volume>, <elocation-id>247</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/1471-2229-10-247</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21078181</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B21">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Erb</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Meldau</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Howe</surname> <given-names>G. A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Role of phytohormones in insect-specific plant reactions</article-title>. <source>Trends Plant Sci.</source> <volume>17</volume>, <fpage>250</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>259</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.tplants.2012.01.003</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22305233</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B22">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Erb</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Veyrat</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Robert</surname> <given-names>C. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xu</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Frey</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ton</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Indole is an essential herbivore-induced volatile priming signal in maize</article-title>. <source>Nat. Commun.</source> <volume>6</volume>, <fpage>6273</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/ncomms7273</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25683900</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B23">
<citation citation-type="web">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<collab>FAOSTAT</collab>
</person-group> (<year>2025</year>). <source>Statistical database from the Food and Agriculture</source> (<publisher-loc>Rome, Italy</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Organization (FAO) of the United Nations</publisher-name>). Available online at: <uri xlink:href="https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/data/QCL">https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/data/QCL</uri>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B24">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Farouk</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Osman</surname> <given-names>M. A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Alleviation of oxidative stress induced by spider mite invasion through application of elicitors in bean plants</article-title>. <source>Egypt J. Biol.</source> <volume>14</volume>, <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>13</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4314/ejb.v14i1.1</pub-id>
</citation></ref>
<ref id="B25">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Gkizi</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lehmann</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>L&#x2019;Haridon</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Serrano</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Paplomatas</surname> <given-names>E. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>M&#xe9;traux</surname> <given-names>J. P.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>The innate immune signaling system as a regulator of disease resistance and induced systemic resistance activity against <italic>Verticillium dahliae</italic>
</article-title>. <source>Mol. Plant Microbe Interact.</source> <volume>29</volume>, <fpage>313</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>323</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1094/MPMI-11-15-0261-R</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26780421</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B26">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Guarino</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mercati</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fatta Del Bosco</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Motisi</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Abbate</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Rootstocks with different tolerance grade to citrus tristeza virus induce dissimilar volatile profile in <italic>Citrus sinensis</italic> and avoidance response in the vector <italic>Aphis gossypii</italic> Glover</article-title>. <source>Plants</source> <volume>11</volume>, <elocation-id>3426</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/plants11243426</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">36559538</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B27">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Han</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xiong</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Schneiter</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tian</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>The function of plant PR1 and other members of the CAP protein superfamily in plant&#x2013;pathogen interactions</article-title>. <source>Mol. Plant Pathol.</source> <volume>24</volume>, <fpage>651</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>668</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/mpp.13320</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">36932700</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B28">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Hare</surname> <given-names>D. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Youngman</surname> <given-names>R. R.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1987</year>). <article-title>Gas exchange of orange (<italic>Citrus sinensis</italic>) leaves in response to feeding injury by the citrus red mite (Acari: tetranychidae)</article-title>. <source>J. Econ Entomol.</source> <volume>80</volume>, <fpage>1249</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1253</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/jee/80.6.1249</pub-id>
</citation></ref>
<ref id="B29">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Hayat</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Song</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Iqbal</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Influence of citrus rootstocks on scion growth, hormone levels, and metabolites profile of &#x2018;Shatangju&#x2019; Mandarin (<italic>Citrus reticulata</italic> blanco)</article-title>. <source>Hortic.</source> <volume>8</volume>, <elocation-id>608</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/horticulturae8070608</pub-id>
</citation></ref>
<ref id="B30">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>He</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wan</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhuang</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Qin</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Rootstock&#x2013;scion interaction affects cadmium accumulation and tolerance of malus</article-title>. <source>Front. Plant Sci.</source> <volume>11</volume>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpls.2020.01264</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32922429</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B31">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Heath</surname> <given-names>R. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Packer</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1968</year>). <article-title>Photoperoxidation in isolated chloroplasts: I. Kinetics and stoichiometry of fatty acid peroxidation</article-title>. <source>Arch. Biochem. Biophys.</source> <volume>125</volume>, <fpage>189</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>198</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/0003-9861(68)90654-1</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">5655425</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B32">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Hoy</surname> <given-names>M. A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <source>Agricultural Acarology: Introduction to Integrated Mite Management</source>. <edition>1st ed</edition> (<publisher-name>CRC Press</publisher-name>). doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1201/b10909</pub-id>
</citation></ref>
<ref id="B33">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Hsu</surname> <given-names>M. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>C. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lin</surname> <given-names>K. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Huang</surname> <given-names>M. Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>C. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Huang</surname> <given-names>W. D.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Photosynthetic responses of <italic>Jatropha curcas</italic> to spider mite injury</article-title>. <source>Photosynthetica</source> <volume>53</volume>, <fpage>349</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>355</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11099-015-0132-3</pub-id>
</citation></ref>
<ref id="B34">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Huang</surname> <given-names>W. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>F. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Huang</surname> <given-names>H. Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Huang</surname> <given-names>W. T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Deng</surname> <given-names>C. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>L. T.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Excess copper-induced alterations of protein profiles and related physiological parameters in citrus leaves</article-title>. <source>Plants</source> <volume>9</volume>, <elocation-id>291</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/plants9030291</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32121140</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B35">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<collab>JASP Team</collab>
</person-group> (<year>2024</year>). <source>JASP (Version 0.19.3)</source> (<publisher-name>Computer software</publisher-name>).  Available online at: <uri xlink:href="https://jasp-stats.org/download/">https://jasp-stats.org/download/</uri>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B36">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Jones</surname> <given-names>S. E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Killiny</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Influence of rootstock on the leaf volatile organic compounds of citrus scion is more pronounced after the infestation with <italic>Diaphorina citri</italic>
</article-title>. <source>Plants</source> <volume>10</volume>, <elocation-id>2422</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/plants10112422</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">34834785</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B37">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Knegt</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Meijer</surname> <given-names>T. T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kant</surname> <given-names>M. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kiers</surname> <given-names>E. T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Egas</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>
<italic>Tetranychus evansi</italic> spider mite populations suppress tomato defenses to varying degrees</article-title>. <source>Ecol. Evol.</source> <volume>10</volume>, <fpage>4375</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>4390</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/ece3.6204</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32489604</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B38">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Koch</surname> <given-names>K. G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Palmer</surname> <given-names>N. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Donze-Reiner</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Scully</surname> <given-names>E. D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Seravalli</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Amundsen</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Aphid-responsive defense networks in hybrid switchgrass</article-title>. <source>Front. Plant Sci.</source> <volume>11</volume>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpls.2020.01145</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32849703</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B39">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Legua</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Forner</surname> <given-names>J. B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hern&#xe1;ndez</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Forner-Giner</surname> <given-names>M. A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Total phenolics, organic acids, sugars and antioxidant activity of mandarin (<italic>Citrus clementina</italic> Hort. Ex Tan.): Variation from rootstock</article-title>. <source>Sci. Hortic.</source> <volume>174</volume>, <fpage>60</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>64</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.scienta.2014.05.004</pub-id>
</citation></ref>
<ref id="B40">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Leus</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Luypaert</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dhooghe</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Witters</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pauwels</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Van Poucke</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Jasmonic Acid and Salicylic Acid Levels in Defense Response of Azalea (<italic>Rhododendron simsii</italic> Hybrid) to Broad Mite (<italic>Polyphagotarsonemus latus</italic>)</article-title>. <source>Hortic.</source> <volume>8</volume>, <elocation-id>840</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/horticulturae8090840</pub-id>
</citation></ref>
<ref id="B41">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Han</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Feng</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yuan</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Huang</surname> <given-names>L. J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Signaling crosstalk between salicylic acid and ethylene/jasmonate in plant defense: do we understand what they are whispering</article-title>? <source>Int. J. Mol. Sci.</source> <volume>20</volume>, <elocation-id>671</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/ijms20030671</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30720746</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B42">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yao</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zheng</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liao</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sun</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>Hetero-grafting affects flavonoid biosynthesis in sweet orange &#x2018;Newhall&#x2019; (<italic>Citrus sinensis</italic>) peels: a metabolomics and transcriptomics analysis</article-title>. <source>Front. Plant Sci.</source> <volume>14</volume>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpls.2023</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">37465384</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B43">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Niu</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2024</year>). <article-title>Effects of abiotic stress on chlorophyll metabolism</article-title>. <source>Plant Sci.</source> <volume>342</volume>, <elocation-id>112030</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.plantsci.2024.112030</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">38346561</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B44">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Lichtenthaler</surname> <given-names>H. K.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1987</year>). &#x201c;<article-title>Chlorophylls and carotenoids: Pigments of photosynthetic biomembranes</article-title>,&#x201d; in <source>Methods in enzymology</source>. Eds. <person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname>Jura</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Murphy</surname> <given-names>J. M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<publisher-name>Academic Press</publisher-name>), <fpage>350</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>382</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/0076-6879(87)48036-1</pub-id>
</citation></ref>
<ref id="B45">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Livak</surname> <given-names>K. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Schmittgen</surname> <given-names>T. D.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2001</year>). <article-title>Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) methods</article-title>. <source>Methods</source> <volume>25</volume>, <fpage>402</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>408</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1006/meth.2001</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">11846609</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B46">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Long</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>L. T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ye</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lai</surname> <given-names>N. W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tan</surname> <given-names>L. L.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Effects of low pH on photosynthesis, related physiological parameters, and nutrient profiles of citrus</article-title>. <source>Front. Plant Sci.</source> <volume>8</volume>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpls.2017.00185</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28270819</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B47">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Martel</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhurov</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Navarro</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Martinez</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cazaux</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Auger</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Tomato whole genome transcriptional response to <italic>Tetranychus urticae</italic> identifies divergence of spider mite-induced responses between tomato and <italic>Arabidopsis</italic>
</article-title>. <source>Mol. Plant Microbe Interact.</source> <volume>3</volume>, <fpage>343</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>361</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1094/MPMI-09-14-0291-FI</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25679539</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B48">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Mishra</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Roychowdhury</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ray</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hada</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kumar</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sarker</surname> <given-names>U.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group> (<year>2024</year>). <article-title>Salicylic acid (SA)-mediated plant immunity against biotic stresses: An insight on molecular components and signaling mechanism</article-title>. <source>Plant Stress</source> <volume>11</volume>, <elocation-id>100427</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.stress.2024.100427</pub-id>
</citation></ref>
<ref id="B49">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Mitchell</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Brennan</surname> <given-names>R. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Graham</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Karley</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Plant defense against herbivorous pests: Exploiting resistance and tolerance traits for sustainable crop protection</article-title>. <source>Front. Plant Sci.</source> <volume>7</volume>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpls.2016.01132</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">27524994</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B50">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Morales</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Munn&#xe9;-Bosch</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Malondialdehyde: facts and artifacts</article-title>. <source>Plant Physiol.</source> <volume>180</volume>, <fpage>1246</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1250</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1104/pp.19.00405</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31253746</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B51">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Mousavi</surname> <given-names>S. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chauvin</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pascaud</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kellenberger</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Farmer</surname> <given-names>E. E.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>GLUTAMATE RECEPTOR-LIKE genes mediate leaf-to-leaf wound signalling</article-title>. <source>Nature</source> <volume>500</volume>, <fpage>422</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>426</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nature12478</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23969459</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B52">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>M&#xfc;ller</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Foes or friends: ABA and ethylene interaction under abiotic stress</article-title>. <source>Plants</source> <volume>10</volume>, <elocation-id>448</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/plants10030448</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33673518</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B53">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Nawaz</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Abbasi</surname> <given-names>N. K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hafiz</surname> <given-names>I. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Khan</surname> <given-names>M. F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Khalid</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Environmental variables influence the developmental stages of the citrus leafminer, infestation level and mined leaves physiological response of Kinnow mandarin</article-title>. <source>Sci. Rep.</source> <volume>11</volume>, <fpage>7720</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41598-021-87160-8</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33833311</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B54">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>North</surname> <given-names>H. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>De Almeida</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Boutin</surname> <given-names>J. P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Frey</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>To</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Botran</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2007</year>). <article-title>The <italic>Arabidopsis</italic> ABA-deficient mutant aba4 demonstrates that the major route for stress-induced ABA accumulation is via neoxanthin isomers</article-title>. <source>Plant J.</source> <volume>50</volume>, <fpage>810</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>824</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1365-313X.2007.03094.x</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">17470058</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B55">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Nunes</surname> <given-names>P. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>da Silva</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Paula</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Smolarek</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zeviani</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chaves</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Residues of <italic>Citrus sinensis</italic> (L.) Osbeck as agents that cause a change in antioxidant defense in plants</article-title>. <source>Braz. J. Pharm. Sci.</source> <volume>51</volume>, <fpage>479</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>493</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1590/S1984-82502015000200025</pub-id>
</citation></ref>
<ref id="B56">
<citation citation-type="web">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<collab>ODEPA</collab>
</person-group> (<year>2025</year>). <source>Oficina de Estudios y Pol&#xed;ticas Agrarias</source> (<publisher-name>ODEPA</publisher-name>). Available online at: <uri xlink:href="https://apps.odepa.gob.cl/powerBI/boletin_fruta.html">https://apps.odepa.gob.cl/powerBI/boletin_fruta.html</uri>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B57">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>P&#xe9;rez-Hedo</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gallego-Giraldo</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Forner-Giner</surname> <given-names>M.&#xc1;.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ortells-Fabra</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Urbaneja</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2024</year>). <article-title>Plant volatile-triggered defense in citrus against biotic stressors</article-title>. <source>Front. Plant Sci.</source> <volume>15</volume>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpls.2024.1425364</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">39049855</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B58">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Qamar</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mysore</surname> <given-names>K. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Senthil-Kumar</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Role of proline and pyrroline-5-carboxylate metabolism in plant defense against invading pathogens</article-title>. <source>Front. Plant Sci.</source> <volume>6</volume>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpls.2015.00503</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26217357</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B59">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Rao</surname> <given-names>M. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xu</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Huang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tang</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Deng</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xu</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Ectopic expression of citrus UDP-GLUCOSYL TRANSFERASE gene enhances anthocyanin and proanthocyanidins contents and confers high light tolerance in <italic>Arabidopsis</italic>
</article-title>. <source>BMC Plant Biol.</source> <volume>19</volume>, <fpage>603</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s12870-019-2212-1</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31888492</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B60">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Rasool</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mansoor</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bhat</surname> <given-names>K. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hassan</surname> <given-names>G. I.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Baba</surname> <given-names>T. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>AlYemeni</surname> <given-names>M. N.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Mechanisms underlying graft union formation and rootstock scion interaction in horticultural plants</article-title>. <source>Front. Plant Sci.</source> <volume>11</volume>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpls.2020.590847</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33362818</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B61">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Reddall</surname> <given-names>A. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wilson</surname> <given-names>L. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gregg</surname> <given-names>P. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sadras</surname> <given-names>V. O.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2007</year>). <article-title>Photosynthetic response of cotton to spider mite damage: interaction with light and compensatory mechanisms</article-title>. <source>Crop Sci.</source> <volume>47</volume>, <fpage>2047</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2057</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2135/cropsci2006.11.0707</pub-id>
</citation></ref>
<ref id="B62">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Rioja</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ceballos</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2024</year>). <article-title>Citrus volatiles induced by herbivory of <italic>Aleurothrixus floccosus</italic> (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) elicit attraction to the exotic ladybird <italic>Clitostethus arcuatus</italic> (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae)</article-title>. <source>Chil J. Agric. Res.</source> <volume>84</volume>, <fpage>181</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>194</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4067/s0718-58392024000200181</pub-id>
</citation></ref>
<ref id="B63">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Rioja</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ceballos</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Holuigue</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Herbivore-induced plant volatiles emitted from avocado shoots infested by <italic>Oligonychus yothersi</italic> (Acari: Tetranychidae) increases the attraction of micro-coleopterans</article-title>. <source>Chil J. Agric. Res.</source> <volume>78</volume>, <fpage>447</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>458</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4067/S0718-58392018000300447</pub-id>
</citation></ref>
<ref id="B64">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Rioja</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ceballos</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Holuigue</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Vargas</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Different population densities and continuous feeding by <italic>Oligonychus yothersi</italic> (McGregor) (Acari: Tetranychidae) affect the emissions of herbivore-induced plant volatiles on avocado (<italic>Persea americana</italic> Mill. cv. Hass) Shoots under Semi-field Conditions</article-title>. <source>Int. J. Acarol.</source> <volume>42</volume>, <fpage>310</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>318</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/01647954.2016.1191539</pub-id>
</citation></ref>
<ref id="B65">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Rosa-Diaz</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rowe</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cayuela-Lopez</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Arbona</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>D&#xed;az</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jones</surname> <given-names>A. M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2024</year>). <article-title>Spider mite herbivory induces an ABA-driven stomatal defense</article-title>. <source>Plant Physiol.</source> <volume>195</volume>, <fpage>2970</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2984</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/plphys/kiae215</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">38669227</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B66">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Sarmento</surname> <given-names>R. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lemos</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bleeker</surname> <given-names>P. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Schuurink</surname> <given-names>R. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pallini</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Oliveira</surname> <given-names>M. G.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>A herbivore that manipulates plant defence</article-title>. <source>Ecol. Lett.</source> <volume>14</volume>, <fpage>229</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>236</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1461-0248.2010.01575.x</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21299823</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B67">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Shahid</surname> <given-names>M. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Balal</surname> <given-names>R. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Khan</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sim&#xf3;n-Grao</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Alfosea-Sim&#xf3;n</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>C&#xe1;mara-Zapata</surname> <given-names>J. M.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Rootstocks influence the salt tolerance of Kinnow mandarin trees by altering the antioxidant defense system, osmolyte concentration, and toxic ion accumulation</article-title>. <source>Sci. Hortic.</source> <volume>250</volume>, <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>11</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.scienta.2019.02.028</pub-id>
</citation></ref>
<ref id="B68">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Shahtousi</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Talaee</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>The effect of spermine on <italic>Tetranychus urticae</italic>-<italic>Cucumis sativus</italic> interaction</article-title>. <source>BMC Plant Biol.</source> <volume>23</volume>, <fpage>575</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s12870-023-04573-5</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">37978429</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B69">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Shaltiel-Harpaz</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gerchman</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ibdah</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kedoshim</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rachmany</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hatib</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Grafting on resistant interstocks reduces scion susceptibility to pear psylla, <italic>Cacopsylla bidens</italic>
</article-title>. <source>Pest Manag Sci.</source> <volume>74</volume>, <fpage>617</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>626</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/ps.4745</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28967187</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B70">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Sharma</surname> <given-names>R. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dubey</surname> <given-names>A. K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Awasthi</surname> <given-names>O. P.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Physiology of grapefruit (<italic>Citrus paradisi</italic> Macf.) cultivars as affected by rootstock</article-title>. <source>J. Hortic. Sci. Biotech.</source> <volume>90</volume>, <fpage>325</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>331</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/14620316.2015.11513190</pub-id>
</citation></ref>
<ref id="B71">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Sheri</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kumar</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jaconis</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>Antioxidant defense in cotton under environmental stresses: Unraveling the crucial role of a universal defense regulator for enhanced cotton sustainability</article-title>. <source>Plant Physiol. Biochem.</source> <volume>204</volume>, <elocation-id>108141</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.plaphy.2023.108141</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">37926000</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B72">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Simpson</surname> <given-names>C. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Nelson</surname> <given-names>S. D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Melgar</surname> <given-names>J. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jifon</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>King</surname> <given-names>S. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Schuster</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Growth response of grafted and ungrafted citrus trees to saline irrigation</article-title>. <source>Sci. Hortic.</source> <volume>169</volume>, <fpage>199</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>205</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.scienta.2014.02.020</pub-id>
</citation></ref>
<ref id="B73">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Singh</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kaur</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kariyat</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>The multifunctional roles of polyphenols in plant-herbivore interactions</article-title>. <source>Int. J. Mol. Sci.</source> <volume>22</volume>, <elocation-id>1442</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/ijms22031442</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33535511</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B74">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Solano</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Stepanova</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chao</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ecker</surname> <given-names>J. R.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1998</year>). <article-title>Nuclear events in ethylene signaling: a transcriptional cascade mediated by ETHYLENE-INSENSITIVE3 and ETHYLENE-RESPONSE-FACTOR1</article-title>. <source>Genes Dev.</source> <volume>12</volume>, <fpage>3703</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>3714</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1101/gad.12.23.3703</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">9851977</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B75">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Su</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yao</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Peng</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tong</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>A non-vector herbivore indirectly increases the transmission of a vector-borne virus by reducing plant chemical defences</article-title>. <source>Funct. Ecol.</source> <volume>34</volume>, <fpage>1091</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1101</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/1365-2435.13535</pub-id>
</citation></ref>
<ref id="B76">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Syvertsen</surname> <given-names>J. P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Garc&#xed;a-Sanchez</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Multiple abiotic stresses occurring with salinity stress in citrus</article-title>. <source>Environ. Exp. Bot.</source> <volume>103</volume>, <fpage>128</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>137</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.envexpbot.2013.09.015</pub-id>
</citation></ref>
<ref id="B77">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Van den Ende</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>El-Esawe</surname> <given-names>S. K.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Sucrose signalling pathways leading to fructan and anthocyanin accumulation: A dual function in abiotic and biotic stress responses</article-title>? <source>Environ. Exp. Bot.</source> <volume>108</volume>, <fpage>4</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>13</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.envexpbot.2013.09.017</pub-id>
</citation></ref>
<ref id="B78">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Van Loon</surname> <given-names>L. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rep</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pieterse</surname> <given-names>C. M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2006</year>). <article-title>Significance of inducible defense-related proteins in infected plants</article-title>. <source>Annu. Rev. Phytopathol.</source> <volume>44</volume>, <fpage>135</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>162</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1146/annurev.phyto.44.070505.143425</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">16602946</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B79">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zheng</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Deng</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yuan</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>Effect of natural variation and rootstock on fruit quality and volatile organic compounds of &#x2018;Kiyomi tangor&#x2019; (<italic>Citrus reticulata</italic> Blanco) Citrus</article-title>. <source>Int. J. Mol. Sci.</source> <volume>24</volume>, <elocation-id>16810</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/ijms242316810</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">38069133</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B80">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Warrier</surname> <given-names>R. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Paul</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Vineetha</surname> <given-names>M. V.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Estimation of salicylic acid in Eucalyptus leaves using spectrophotometric methods</article-title>. <source>Genet. Plant Physiol.</source> <volume>3</volume>, <fpage>90</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>97</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B81">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Xim&#xe9;nez-Emb&#xfa;n</surname> <given-names>M. G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gonz&#xe1;lez-Guzm&#xe1;n</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Arbona</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>G&#xf3;mez-Cadenas</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ortego</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Casta&#xf1;era</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Plant-mediated effects of water deficit on the performance of <italic>tetranychus evansi</italic> on tomato drought-adapted accessions</article-title>. <source>Front. Plant Sci.</source> <volume>9</volume>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpls.2018.01490</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30386357</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B82">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Yan</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gao</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Shao</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xu</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2024</year>). <article-title>Ca<sup>2+</sup>/calmodulin-mediated desensitization of glutamate receptors shapes plant systemic wound signalling and anti-herbivore defence</article-title>. <source>Nat. Plants.</source> <volume>10</volume>, <fpage>145</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>160</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41477-023-01578-8</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">38168609</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B83">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>G. Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lu</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ma</surname> <given-names>J. Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Huang</surname> <given-names>J. H.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Transcriptomic and proteomic response of <italic>Manihot esculenta</italic> to <italic>Tetranychus urticae</italic> infestation at different densities</article-title>. <source>Exp. Appl. Acarol.</source> <volume>78</volume>, <fpage>273</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>293</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10493-019-00387-z</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31168751</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B84">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Younis</surname> <given-names>A. A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Structural, physiological, and biochemical alterations of the galled stems of <italic>Tamarix nilotica</italic>
</article-title>. <source>Egypt J. Bot.</source> <volume>61</volume>, <fpage>747</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>758</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.21608/ejbo.2021.50503.1585</pub-id>
</citation></ref>
<ref id="B85">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Yu</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hua</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yao</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>He</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Peng</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Abscisic acid receptors are involves in the Jasmonate signaling in <italic>Arabidopsis</italic>
</article-title>. <source>Plant Signal Behav.</source> <volume>16</volume>, <elocation-id>1948243</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/15592324.2021.1948243</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">34224307</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B86">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Yulianti</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Agisimanto</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2023</year>). &#x201c;<article-title>Leaf physiological responses of the citrus commercial varieties grafted onto rootstocks</article-title>,&#x201d; in <source>IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science 1172, 012017. 5th International Conference on Sustainable Agriculture. </source>(<publisher-loc>Gothenburg, Sweden</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Department of Agrotechnology, Faculty of Agriculture, Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta (UMY)</publisher-name>). doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1088/1755-1315/1172/1/012017</pub-id>
</citation></ref>
<ref id="B87">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zanardi</surname> <given-names>O. Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bordini</surname> <given-names>G. P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Franco</surname> <given-names>A. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>de Morais</surname> <given-names>M. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yamamoto</surname> <given-names>P. T.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Development and reproduction of <italic>Panonychus citri</italic> (Prostigmata: Tetranychidae) on different species and varieties of citrus plants</article-title>. <source>Exp. Appl. Acarol.</source> <volume>67</volume>, <fpage>565</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>581</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10493-015-9968-2</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26459376</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B88">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2024</year>). <article-title>Protein dynamics in plant immunity: insights into plant&#x2013;pest interactions</article-title>. <source>Int. J. Mol. Sci.</source> <volume>25</volume>, <elocation-id>12951</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/ijms252312951</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">39684662</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B89">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jander</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Molecular ecology of plant volatiles in interactions with insect herbivores</article-title>. <source>J. Exp. Bot.</source> <volume>73</volume>, <fpage>449</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>462</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/jxb/erab413</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">34581787</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B90">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yuan</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Huang</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yu</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Rootstock-scion interactions affect fruit flavor in grafted tomato</article-title>. <source>Hortic. Plant J.</source> <volume>8</volume>, <fpage>499</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>510</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.hpj.2022.01.001</pub-id>
</citation></ref>
<ref id="B91">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zouaghi</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Najar</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Abderrabba</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Rootstocks effect on flavonoid content and antioxidant properties of Maltese (<italic>Citrus sinensis</italic> L.) ethanolic extracts</article-title>. <source>J. New Sci.</source> <volume>49</volume>, <fpage>2956</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2960</lpage>.</citation></ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>