<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.3 20070202//EN" "journalpublishing.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="2.3" xml:lang="EN">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Front. Plant Sci.</journal-id>
<journal-title>Frontiers in Plant Science</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">Front. Plant Sci.</abbrev-journal-title>
<issn pub-type="epub">1664-462X</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Frontiers Media S.A.</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpls.2025.1625810</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Plant Science</subject>
<subj-group>
<subject>Original Research</subject>
</subj-group>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Decoding phenotypic signatures of <italic>Cylas formicarius</italic> Fab. resistance in a global sweetpotato (<italic>Ipomoea batatas</italic> [L.] Lam.) germplasm collection</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name>
<surname>Morales</surname>
<given-names>Alfredo</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn001">
<sup>*</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2770310/overview"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/methodology/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/conceptualization/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/formal-analysis/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/software/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/investigation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ma</surname>
<given-names>Peiyong</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1621463/overview"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/supervision/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/data-curation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/funding-acquisition/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Jia</surname>
<given-names>ZhaoDong</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/project-administration/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/validation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Rodr&#xed;guez</surname>
<given-names>Dania</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/data-curation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/supervision/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/investigation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/methodology/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Vargas</surname>
<given-names>Iv&#xe1;n Javier Pastrana</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3">
<sup>3</sup>
</xref>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/resources/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/formal-analysis/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Gonz&#xe1;lez</surname>
<given-names>Rosa Elena</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/supervision/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/methodology/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/investigation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/resources/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Molina</surname>
<given-names>Osmany</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/software/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/methodology/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Jim&#xe9;nez</surname>
<given-names>Alay</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/3185667/overview"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/validation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/visualization/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Rodr&#xed;guez</surname>
<given-names>Yuniel</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/resources/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/validation/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Morales</surname>
<given-names>Lilian</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/methodology/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/formal-analysis/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Beovides</surname>
<given-names>Yoel</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/supervision/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/data-curation/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Portal</surname>
<given-names>Orelvis</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4">
<sup>4</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff5">
<sup>5</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1464341/overview"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/formal-analysis/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name>
<surname>Bian</surname>
<given-names>Xiaofeng</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn001">
<sup>*</sup>
</xref>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/funding-acquisition/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/resources/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/project-administration/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/supervision/"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
<institution>Institute of Food Crops, Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences (JAAS)</institution>, <addr-line>Nanjing</addr-line>,&#xa0;<country>China</country>
</aff>
<aff id="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
<institution>Plant Breeding and Genetic Resources Department, Research Institute of Tropical Roots and Tuber Crops (INIVIT)</institution>, <addr-line>Villa Clara</addr-line>,&#xa0;<country>Cuba</country>
</aff>
<aff id="aff3">
<sup>3</sup>
<institution>Department of Agronomic Engineering and Rural Development, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, Universidad de C&#xf3;rdoba</institution>, <addr-line>Monter&#xed;a</addr-line>,&#xa0;<country>Colombia</country>
</aff>
<aff id="aff4">
<sup>4</sup>
<institution>Departamento de Biolog&#xed;a, Facultad de Ciencias Agropecuarias, Universidad Central &#x201c;Marta Abreu&#x201d; de Las Villas</institution>, <addr-line>Santa Clara</addr-line>,&#xa0;<country>Cuba</country>
</aff>
<aff id="aff5">
<sup>5</sup>
<institution>Centro de Investigaciones Agropecuarias, Facultad de Ciencias Agropecuarias, Universidad Central &#x201c;Marta Abreu&#x201d; de Las Villas</institution>, <addr-line>Santa Clara</addr-line>,&#xa0;<country>Cuba</country>
</aff>
<author-notes>
<fn fn-type="edited-by">
<p>Edited by: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/191962/overview">Francis Chuks Ogbonnaya</ext-link>, Grains Research and Development Corporation, Australia</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="edited-by">
<p>Reviewed by: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/563093/overview">Bode A Olukolu</ext-link>, The University of Tennessee, United States</p>
<p>
<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/756420/overview">Jiban Shrestha</ext-link>, Nepal Agricultural Research Council, Nepal</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="corresp" id="fn001">
<p>*Correspondence: Alfredo Morales, <email xlink:href="mailto:alfremr88@gmail.com">alfremr88@gmail.com</email>; Xiaofeng Bian, <email xlink:href="mailto:bian-xiaofeng2@163.com">bian-xiaofeng2@163.com</email>
</p>
</fn>
</author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>26</day>
<month>09</month>
<year>2025</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="collection">
<year>2025</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>16</volume>
<elocation-id>1625810</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>09</day>
<month>05</month>
<year>2025</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>27</day>
<month>08</month>
<year>2025</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#xa9; 2025 Morales, Ma, Jia, Rodr&#xed;guez, Vargas, Gonz&#xe1;lez, Molina, Jim&#xe9;nez, Rodr&#xed;guez, Morales, Beovides, Portal and Bian.</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2025</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Morales, Ma, Jia, Rodr&#xed;guez, Vargas, Gonz&#xe1;lez, Molina, Jim&#xe9;nez, Rodr&#xed;guez, Morales, Beovides, Portal and Bian</copyright-holder>
<license xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">
<p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.</p>
</license>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<sec>
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>Sweetpotato (<italic>Ipomoea batatas</italic> [L.] Lam.) is a critical global food crop that suffers devastating yield losses from the sweetpotato weevil (<italic>Cylas formicarius</italic>), especially in tropical regions where chemical control is often impractical. Breeding for stable resistance has been hindered by an insufficient characterization of reliable phenotypic markers across diverse genetic backgrounds.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Methods</title>
<p>We evaluated 731 accessions from Cuba&#x2019;s national sweetpotato collection, enriched with global varieties, to identify morphological traits associated with natural resistance to <italic>C. formicarius</italic>. Resistance and susceptibility were assessed through combined field and laboratory bioassays.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Results</title>
<p>Only 6.5% of the accessions demonstrated resistance (&lt;10% infestation), while 80% were highly susceptible. Weak to moderate correlations linked resistance to smoother root surfaces (r = 0.31) and lighter flesh pigmentation (r = -0.38). The strongest correlation was observed with deeper tuberization (r = -0.72). Six Cuban genotypes combined agronomic viability (yield &gt;10 t ha&#x207b;&#xb9;) with resistance. Five of these employed deep tuberization as a physical escape mechanism, while one genotype, INIVIT B-25, exhibited shallow tuberization (mean depth 4.53 cm) yet maintained resistance, suggesting a biochemical defense strategy. Under controlled infestation, INIVIT B-2022 demonstrated the strongest antibiosis effect, suppressing adult emergence to just two individuals.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Discussion</title>
<p>Our study decodes key phenotypic signatures of weevil resistance, providing immediately actionable morphological traits for use in Caribbean breeding programs. The discovery of a resistant genotype with shallow roots indicates the presence of a non-escape, potentially biochemical resistance mechanism. This highlights the critical need for subsequent molecular studies to uncover the complementary genetic and biochemical bases of these defenses. </p>
</sec>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>characterization</kwd>
<kwd>germplasm collection</kwd>
<kwd>ipomoea batatas</kwd>
<kwd>resistance</kwd>
<kwd>tuberization depth</kwd>
<kwd>weevil</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<counts>
<fig-count count="13"/>
<table-count count="3"/>
<equation-count count="1"/>
<ref-count count="43"/>
<page-count count="18"/>
<word-count count="7473"/>
</counts>
<custom-meta-wrap>
<custom-meta>
<meta-name>section-in-acceptance</meta-name>
<meta-value>Plant Breeding</meta-value>
</custom-meta>
</custom-meta-wrap>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec id="s1" sec-type="intro">
<label>1</label>
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>Sweetpotato (<italic>Ipomoea batatas</italic> [L.] Lam.) ranks among the world&#x2019;s most important food crops for human consumption. Currently, it holds 12th place in global food crop production, with an annual average of 93.5 million tons, making it the 3rd most produced root and tuber crop (after potato and cassava) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">FAOSTAT, 2023</xref>). Beyond production volume, its nutritional value (particularly vitamin A content among biofortified crops) surpasses most cereals (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">CIP, 2024</xref>). Its short growth cycle, resilience to extreme weather, vegetative propagation, and drought tolerance position it as a key crop for food security in vulnerable tropical regions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Morales et&#xa0;al., 2025</xref>).</p>
<p>
<italic>Ipomoea batatas</italic> originated through a complex polyploidization process in its wild lineage. Evidence suggests that the first key event was an allopolyploidization occurring approximately 800,000 years ago. Subsequently, the cultivated species emerged via a second hybridization event (4x &#xd7; 2x), followed by complete genome duplication around 500,000 years ago (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">Yang et&#xa0;al., 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">Mu&#xf1;oz-Rodr&#xed;guez et&#xa0;al., 2018</xref>). While human domestication occurred much later in the Neotropical region spanning from southern Mexico to South America archaeological records indicate its cultivation in present day Peru approximately 8,080 years (&#xb1; 170 BC) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Engel, 1970</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">Austin, 1988</xref>).</p>
<p>
<italic>Cylas formicarius</italic> is regarded as the most devastating pest of sweetpotato worldwide (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">Chalfant et&#xa0;al., 1990</xref>). Field studies demonstrate 60-100% yield loss in unprotected plots, with larval tunneling reducing both root quality and marketable yield (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Cisneros and Alc&#xe1;zar, 2001</xref>). Secondary effects include terpenoid-induced bitterness (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Data et&#xa0;al., 1996</xref>) and mycotoxin contamination from opportunistic fungi (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">Stathers et&#xa0;al., 2003</xref>). In Cuba, weevil damage typically reduces farmers&#x2019; income by 40-100%, with complete crop loss occurring in severe infestations (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Cisneros and Alc&#xe1;zar, 2001</xref>).</p>
<p>
<italic>Cylas formicarius</italic> represents a biogeographical exception within its genus, while all other <italic>Cylas</italic> species are native to Africa, <italic>C. formicarius</italic> originated in Asia (India) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B42">Wolfe, 1991</xref>). Phylogenetic studies suggest that its lineages diverged in Asia and the Pacific ~6&#x2013;13 million years ago, long before the introduction of sweetpotato to these regions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Brookes et&#xa0;al., 2019</xref>). Thus, it is likely that <italic>C. formicarius</italic> initially relied on other <italic>Ipomoea</italic> species as native hosts before adapting to sweetpotato (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B42">Wolfe, 1991</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Brookes et&#xa0;al., 2019</xref>).</p>
<p>The earliest potential contact between cultivated sweetpotato and <italic>Cylas formicarius</italic> may have occurred during the Polynesian expansion (~1000 AD), though direct evidence is lacking (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">Roullier et&#xa0;al., 2013</xref>). The weevil&#x2019;s definitive global dispersal coincided with Portuguese and Spanish trade routes in the 16th century (~1520s), when sweetpotato was introduced to Africa and Asia (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Brookes et&#xa0;al., 2019</xref>). Thus, their intensive coevolution likely spans only 500&#x2013;1000 years.</p>
<p>Cuba is presumed to have been the epicenter of the weevil&#x2019;s distribution in the Caribbean. In 1875, Chinese immigrants arrived on the island to work in sugarcane plantations and may have introduced infested sweetpotatoes from China (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">Amargos, 1935</xref>). Therefore, the interaction between sweetpotato and <italic>C. formicarius</italic> in the Caribbean region dates back only ~150 years.</p>
<p>In 1993, the International Potato Center (CIP) and the Research Institute of Tropical Roots and Tuber Crops (INIVIT) launched a collaborative eight-year research initiative to combat the sweetpotato weevil. This effort led to the development of a highly effective integrated pest management (IPM) program, which achieved significant environmental and health benefits. The IPM strategy reduced weevil damage from 50% to less than 5% and was subsequently adopted across all sweetpotato-growing regions of Cuba (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Cisneros and Alc&#xe1;zar, 2001</xref>). However, in recent years, pest resurgence has occurred due to limitations in agricultural extension services for IPM. In this context, the development of resistant varieties emerges as a sustainable and economically viable alternative.</p>
<p>Previous studies have identified sweetpotato genotypes with lower infestation rates, attributed to morphological traits such as elongated roots, dispersed tuber arrangement (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Cockerham and Deen, 1947</xref>), thick cortex, and slender stems (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">Pole, 1988</xref>). However, these traits did not consistently confer resistance under field conditions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Magenya and Smit, 1992</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">Stathers et&#xa0;al., 2003</xref>). Biochemical mechanisms have also been linked to resistance, including the presence of caffeic and coumaric acids, triterpenoids and latex rich in hydroxycinnamic acid esters (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">Snook et&#xa0;al., 1994</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">Stevenson et&#xa0;al., 2009</xref>), which reduce feeding and oviposition by the weevil (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Data et&#xa0;al., 1996</xref>).</p>
<p>Although occasional reports have documented high levels of experimental resistance, these proved unstable (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">Waddill and Conover, 1978</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">Jones et&#xa0;al., 1980</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">Talekar, 1987</xref>). Key factors contributing to this inconsistency include: non-standardized evaluation methods, genetic complexity of sweetpotato (hexaploidy), multifactorial nature of resistance, and influence of environmental factors (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">Marti et&#xa0;al., 1991</xref>).</p>
<p>The lack of stable resistance sources in <italic>I. batatas</italic> may be explained by its brief co-evolutionary history with <italic>C. formicarius</italic> (~150 years in the Caribbean). Nevertheless, resistance appears to involve multiple mechanisms, including antibiosis, antixenosis (non-preference), and tolerance (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">Kogan and Ortman, 1978</xref>), and is polygenic, expressed as a continuous gradient (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">Rolston et&#xa0;al., 1979</xref>). In Cuba, studies suggest that some varieties exhibit resistance linked to escape mechanisms, such as early maturity and deep tuberization (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Cisneros and Alc&#xe1;zar, 2001</xref>).</p>
<p>The use of sweetpotato genotypes resistant to the weevil is the most effective control strategy. Unfortunately, no such genotypes currently exist. Despite over 50 years of breeding efforts at INIVIT, no resistant varieties have been developed, those not selected by weevil females for oviposition (non-preference mechanism) or in which larvae fail to develop normally (antibiosis) in stems or storage roots.</p>
<p>Genetic variability is the fundamental basis for the success of any breeding program. Determining the level of variation within collected species is invaluable for both plant breeding and species conservation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Lin et&#xa0;al., 2007</xref>), as well as for assessing variability in important traits such as nutrient content and tolerance to biotic and abiotic stresses.</p>
<p>At INIVIT in Cuba, the National Germplasm Collection of Sweetpotato is maintained, comprising 731 accessions: 387 natives, 146 foreign (from China, Japan, Vietnam, United States, various Caribbean islands, Panama, Nicaragua, Colombia, Peru, Brazil, Spain, and Nigeria), and 198 improved varieties. This collection has become the most important in Central America and the Caribbean due to its genetic diversity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Morales et&#xa0;al., 2023</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">2024</xref>).</p>
<p>This study addresses three critical gaps in sweetpotato weevil resistance research: providing the first comprehensive screening of Cuba&#x2019;s national germplasm collection (731 accessions), overcoming sample size limitations of prior studies (&lt;200 accessions); simultaneously evaluating field performance and laboratory resistance mechanisms; and identifying genotypes combining agronomic value with resistance traits specifically adapted to Caribbean conditions. While previous research on this collection has characterized yield, nutrition, and climate resilience, the absence of systematic <italic>C. formicarius</italic> evaluation has limited its breeding utility. Our phenotypic approach offers immediately applicable solutions for resource-constrained regions, though we acknowledge future molecular studies will be needed to characterize the biochemical basis of resistance in selected genotypes. Given sweetpotato&#x2019;s vital role in global food security and the Caribbean&#x2019;s acute vulnerability to weevil-related losses, this work provides both practical tools for farmers and a foundation for deeper genetic investigation.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2" sec-type="materials|methods">
<label>2</label>
<title>Materials and methods</title>
<sec id="s2_1">
<label>2.1</label>
<title>Study area</title>
<p>The study was conducted at the Research Institute of Tropical Roots and Tuber Crops (INIVIT) in Santo Domingo, Villa Clara, Cuba (22&#xb0;35&#xb4;00&#xb4;&#xb4;N, 80&#xb0;14&#x2019;18&#xb4;&#xb4;W; 50 m above sea level), during 2021 and 2024. The site has a calcareous brown soil (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Hern&#xe1;ndez et&#xa0;al., 2015</xref>). Meteorological data were recorded at the automatic meteorological station belonging to the institute (national meteorological network code: 78326, data: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://www.insmet.cu">http://www.insmet.cu</ext-link>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_2">
<label>2.2</label>
<title>Basic unit of characterization</title>
<p>A total of 731 sweetpotato accessions were characterized, of which 387 were native, 146 foreign, and 198 were improved (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">
<bold>Table&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>).</p>
<table-wrap id="T1" position="float">
<label>Table&#xa0;1</label>
<caption>
<p>Origin and number of sweetpotato accessions in the Cuban germplasm collection.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" colspan="2" align="left">Origin of accessions</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Number</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" colspan="2" align="left">Natives</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">387</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" colspan="2" align="left">Improved</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">198</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" rowspan="20" align="left">Non-native germplasm</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">China</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">21</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Japan</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Vietnam</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">5</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Mexico</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">3</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Panama</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Nicaragua</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">5</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">EEUU</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">5</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Peru</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">28</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Brazil</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Argentina</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Guadalupe</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Jamaica</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Martinique</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Saint Lucia</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Haiti</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">5</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Spain</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Nigeria</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">50</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Angola</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Georgia</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">4</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Russia</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_3">
<label>2.3</label>
<title>Characteristics of the experimental area and agronomic management</title>
<p>Planting was conducted on October 10, 2021, establishing for each sweetpotato genotype to be characterized, a plot of two rows two meters long (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>), for an effective area of 3.6 m<sup>2</sup>, using a planting distance of 0.9 x 0.30 m, with 14 total plants per plot, and a distance between plots of two meters (on both sides). The type of irrigation used was sprinkler, with a weekly frequency, at a net partial norm of 250 m<sup>3</sup> ha<sup>-1</sup>. No chemical or organic fertilization, nor chemical or biological pesticides were applied. The agronomic management used was that recommended in the Technical Instructions for this crop, proposed by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">INIVIT (2012)</xref>.</p>
<fig id="f1" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;1</label>
<caption>
<p>Plots of the sweetpotato collection in the experimental area.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-16-1625810-g001.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Rows of green crops in a field, separated by patches of brown soil. Small markers with labels are visible in front of some plants. Trees are in the background under a clear sky.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_4">
<label>2.4</label>
<title>Variables assessed</title>
<p>A morphological characterization was performed based on 8 qualitative (nominal and ordinal) varietal descriptors (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">
<bold>Table&#xa0;2</bold>
</xref>). Additionally, sweetpotato genotypes were characterized using morphometric traits with 16 continuous quantitative variables (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">
<bold>Table&#xa0;3</bold>
</xref>), along with an agronomic evaluation of resistance/susceptibility to <italic>C. formicarius</italic>.</p>
<table-wrap id="T2" position="float">
<label>Table&#xa0;2</label>
<caption>
<p>Morphological descriptors used for characterization of the 731 sweetpotato accessions.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Descriptor</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Skin color of tuberous roots</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Flesh color of tuberous roots</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Defects in the skin surface of tuberous roots</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Stem color</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Color of the insertion point of the petiole and stem</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Color of young leaf</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Flowering</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn>
<p>Descriptors adapted from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">CIP, AVRDC, IBPGR (1991)</xref>.</p>
</fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<table-wrap id="T3" position="float">
<label>Table&#xa0;3</label>
<caption>
<p>Morphometric descriptors used in the characterization of the 731 sweetpotato accessions.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" align="left">Variables</th>
<th valign="middle" align="left">Code</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Formula</th>
<th valign="middle" align="left">No.</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Flesh luminosity</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">L*f</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Flesh a* coordinate</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">a*f</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Flesh b* coordinate</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">b*f</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Skin luminosity</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">L*k</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Skin a* coordinate</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">a*k</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Skin b* coordinate</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">b*k</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Root circularity</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Croot</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<inline-formula>
<mml:math display="inline" id="im1">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>4</mml:mn>
<mml:mi>&#x3c0;</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#xd7;</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>A</mml:mi>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mi>P</mml:mi>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
</mml:msup>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfrac>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">(1)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Root aspect ratio</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">ARroot</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<inline-formula>
<mml:math display="inline" id="im2">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>E</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>m</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>a</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>E</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>m</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfrac>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">(2)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Root roundness</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Rroot</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<inline-formula>
<mml:math display="inline" id="im3">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>4</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>&#xd7;</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>A</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3c0;</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#xd7;</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>m</mml:mi>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mi>d</mml:mi>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
</mml:msup>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfrac>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">(3)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Root solidity</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Sroot</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<inline-formula>
<mml:math display="inline" id="im4">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mi>A</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>C</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>a</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfrac>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">(4)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Leaf area</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">A</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Leaf perimeter</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">P</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Leaf circularity</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">C</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<inline-formula>
<mml:math display="inline" id="im5">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>4</mml:mn>
<mml:mi>&#x3c0;</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#xd7;</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>A</mml:mi>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mi>P</mml:mi>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
</mml:msup>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfrac>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">(5)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Leaf aspect ratio</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">AR</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<inline-formula>
<mml:math display="inline" id="im6">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>E</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>m</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>a</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>E</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>m</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfrac>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">(6)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Leaf roundness</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">R</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<inline-formula>
<mml:math display="inline" id="im7">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>4</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>&#xd7;</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>A</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3c0;</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#xd7;</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>m</mml:mi>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mi>d</mml:mi>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
</mml:msup>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfrac>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">(7)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Leaf solidity</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">S</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<inline-formula>
<mml:math display="inline" id="im8">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mi>A</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>C</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>a</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfrac>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">(8)</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn>
<p>A, area; P, perimeter; md, maximum diameter; Ca, convex area; Ema, major axis; Emi, minor axis.</p>
</fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<p>All morphological traits were described at 90 days after planting (DAP). Quantitative descriptors were recorded from the means obtained from 10 plants per accession, while qualitative descriptors were derived from the average expression of the trait observed in the section located at the center of the main stem.</p>
<p>Of the 16 morphometric variables used, 10 were focused on the shape, dimensions, and color of storage roots, and six on the shape and dimensions of leaves. Samples were individually photographed using a Canon EOS 600D camera (Fukushima Canon Inc., Fukushima, Japan). For root color quantification: washed roots were gently patted dry for skin color measurements to ensure surface consistency, while flesh color was assessed immediately after making fresh transverse cuts to prevent oxidation effects. Three measurement points were recorded for both skin and flesh on each of three representative roots per accession.</p>
<p>Measurements were conducted under controlled environmental conditions: temperature (20 &#xb1; 2&#xb0;C), relative humidity (75 &#xb1; 5%), and illumination (500 lx). For shape quantification of roots and leaves, we used the professional digital image analysis software ImageJ version 1.46 (NIH, USA), programmed in Java. The color space employed was the CIE 1976 L*a*b* system from the International Commission on Illumination, where: L* = lightness, a* = red/green coordinates (+a indicates red, -a indicates green), and b* = yellow/blue coordinates (+b indicates yellow, -b indicates blue).</p>
<p>In August 2022 (10 months after planting), we conducted an agronomic evaluation of resistance/susceptibility to <italic>C. formicarius</italic>. All roots were harvested by accession and collected individually. The infestation percentage was determined per cultivar:</p>
<disp-formula>
<mml:math display="block" id="M1">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>%&#xa0;infestation</mml:mtext>
<mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
<mml:mtext>&#xa0;</mml:mtext>
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>Weight&#xa0;of&#xa0;infested&#xa0;roots</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>Total&#xa0;weight&#xa0;of&#xa0;roots&#xa0;</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfrac>
<mml:mo>*</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>100</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</disp-formula>
<p>Scale:</p>
<list list-type="simple">
<list-item>
<p>Resistant = 0-10% infestation</p>
</list-item>
<list-item>
<p>Tolerant = 11-30% infestation</p>
</list-item>
<list-item>
<p>Susceptible = &gt; 31% infestation</p>
</list-item>
</list>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_5">
<label>2.5</label>
<title>Field evaluation of resistance/susceptibility to <italic>C. formicarius</italic>
</title>
<p>Following the identification of putative resistant accessions from the germplasm collection, experimental trials were conducted with these selections. Plantings were established in September 2022 (dry season) across two spatially separated fields (1,500 m apart) within INIVIT&#x2019;s experimental station. The trials employed <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">Talekar&#x2019;s (1982)</xref> methodology, featuring. Two border rows (0.90 m wide, spaced 2.70 m apart) planted two months prior to the test genotypes using the susceptible cultivar &#x2018;CEMSA 78-354&#x2019; to establish uniform pest pressure. Two central rows maintained as buffer zones. Following rotary tillage of central rows, test genotypes were planted in two row plots (0.90 m &#xd7; 5 m x 2 = 9 m&#xb2;) with three replicates per genotype. This design positioned each genotype equidistant from infested borders, ensuring consistent weevil exposure. No chemical or biological insecticides were applied throughout the trial period.</p>
<p>Harvest occurred at 150 days after planting (DAP), with all storage roots collected and evaluated individually by genotype. Infestation percentages were calculated using standardized protocols consistent with previous experiments. Dual trait selection was performed with independent thresholds: minimum yield of 3 t ha<sup>&#x2212;1</sup> and maximum infestation of 10%.</p>
<p>The most promising resistant genotypes identified in the 2022 trials were reevaluated in March 2023 using identical methodology. Final harvest occurred at 150 DAP in August 2023, maintaining consistent evaluation parameters across both trial periods.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_6">
<label>2.6</label>
<title>Resistance/susceptibility to <italic>C. formicarius</italic> under laboratory conditions</title>
<p>In January, February, and March 2024 (an experiment conducted three consecutive times), the sweetpotato genotypes with the highest reported resistance to the weevil were evaluated, along with a susceptible control (CEMSA 78-354). The experiments were conducted under controlled laboratory conditions to determine the level of infestation and the subsequent emergence of adult weevils.</p>
<p>The trials were carried out in a square wooden box (50 &#xd7; 50 &#xd7; 30 cm) covered with anti-aphid mesh to prevent external contamination while allowing adequate ventilation. Inside the box, sweetpotato roots of each genotype were randomly arranged around a central inoculum source composed of heavily infested sweetpotatoes (previously confirmed to have the presence of <italic>C. formicarius</italic> larvae and adults) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;2</bold>
</xref>). This arrangement ensured homogeneous exposure of the genotypes to insect attack.</p>
<fig id="f2" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;2</label>
<caption>
<p>Experimental scheme of controlled infestation with <italic>C formicarius</italic> in sweetpotato genotypes.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-16-1625810-g002.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Various types of sweet potatoes are arranged on a mesh surface. Each tuber is labeled with a number or name. The colors range from brown to purple and orange.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
<p>After one month, the percentage of flesh damage in each sweetpotato was quantified by image analysis using ImageJ version 1.46 software (NIH, USA). To do this, cross sections of the roots were made, and each slice was photographed under standardized conditions. The total flesh area and the area damaged by <italic>C. formicarius</italic> were measured, and the percentage of damage was calculated for each genotype.</p>
<p>After 15 days of initial colonization in the infestation chambers, roots were individually transferred to ventilated Magenta containers (GA-7 vessels, 77&#xd7;77&#xd7;97 mm) to monitor adult emergence. This protocol prevented cross genotype contamination. Weevil counts were conducted daily from day 10 to day 14 post-transfer, with a final recording on day 24, enabling quantification of total emerged adults per genotype, temporal emergence patterns, and developmental time from infestation to adult emergence.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_7">
<label>2.7</label>
<title>Statistical data management and processing</title>
<p>To characterize the accessions while simultaneously considering multiple traits and their interrelationships, we applied interdependence multivariate methods. The analytical procedure involved two main steps: an ordination approach (principal component analysis, PCA) followed by a classification method (cluster analysis).</p>
<p>For continuous quantitative variables, we performed PCA to identify associations between descriptors and determine whether they contributed similarly or oppositely to the observed variation. The eigenvector matrix was interpreted to assess variable contributions. A bar plot was constructed to display the absolute and cumulative proportion of variance (Y-axis) explained by each principal component (X-axis). Correlations between the original variables and selected principal components were calculated using <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">Pla&#x2019;s (1986)</xref> formula. Additionally, variable correlations were projected onto the first two principal axes (PC1 and PC2) to visualize their relationships.</p>
<p>To classify accessions into relatively homogeneous groups based on shared characteristics, we conducted a cluster analysis combined with a heatmap. For multi-state (nominal and ordinal) morphological data, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">Gower&#x2019;s (1971)</xref> metric distance (dissimilarity) was applied, while Euclidean distance (ED) was used for continuous morphometric variables. An agglomerative hierarchical clustering method (multi-level grouping) was employed, with results presented as a dendrogram.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_8">
<label>2.8</label>
<title>Data visualization</title>
<p>Analyses were performed in R version 4.0.0 using various packages for statistical processing and data visualization. Graphical representation included bar charts and scatter plots using the ggplot2 package, correlation analysis using networks implemented in the corrr package, complemented by correlation network visualizations using qgraph, chord diagrams to visualize associations between variables using the circlize package, and combined representations of dendrograms and heatmaps generated with ComplexHeatmap. Data were standardized using the scale() function when necessary. All figures were exported in vector format (600 dpi).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s3" sec-type="results">
<label>3</label>
<title>Results</title>
<sec id="s3_1">
<label>3.1</label>
<title>Phenotypic diversity of the germplasm collection and its relationship with resistance/susceptibility to <italic>C. formicarius</italic>
</title>
<p>Out of the 731 accessions, 66 (9%) did not produce tuberous roots. The skin color histogram reveals a clear predominance of red (376 accessions) and yellow (190 accessions) values. The low frequency of white (8 accessions) and purple (55 accessions) skins suggests that these traits are minority features in the collection (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;3A</bold>
</xref>). The scatter plot generated from the CIELab color space coordinates a* (green-red) and b* (blue-yellow) for the skin of the analyzed accessions shows a heterogeneous distribution, indicating broad variability in the chromatic characteristics of the evaluated samples. The points in the graph exhibit wide dispersion, with a* values ranging approximately from &#x2013;5 to 35 and b* values from 0 to 40. This variability suggests that the accessions display a diverse range of skin tones, from whitish hues (negative a* values) to reddish tones (positive a* values), as well as from purplish (negative b* values) to yellowish (high b* values) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;3B</bold>
</xref>).</p>
<fig id="f3" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;3</label>
<caption>
<p>Phenotypic diversity of tuberous root color in the sweetpotato germplasm collection. <bold>(A)</bold> Frequency histogram for skin color; <bold>(B)</bold> Scatter plot for skin color; <bold>(C)</bold> Frequency histogram for flesh color; <bold>(D)</bold> Scatter plot for flesh color.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-16-1625810-g003.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Bar charts and scatter plots show data on sweet potato skin and flesh colors. Chart A displays skin color distribution, with red being most common. Chart C shows flesh color distribution, with yellow as prevalent. Scatter plots B and D correlate color coordinates (red/green, yellow/blue) with sweet potato samples, showcasing variations in colors. The charts include sweet potato images representing different color categories.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
<p>The flesh color distribution shows a notable frequency of yellow (260 accessions), cream (181 accessions), and white (172 accessions), followed by orange (33 accessions) and purple (20 accessions) in smaller proportions (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;3C</bold>
</xref>). The CIELab color space scatter plot for flesh color reveals a concentration of accessions within the a* range of &#x2013;5 to 5 and the b* range of 0 to 40, suggesting that most samples exhibit intermediate tones with a slight tendency toward whitish and yellowish colors (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;3D</bold>
</xref>).</p>
<p>Among the 665 accessions that produced tuberous roots, 484 (72.78%) exhibited skin surface defects (longitudinal fissures and horizontal constrictions), while 181 (27.22%) were defect-free. The Circularity (C) vs. Aspect Ratio (AR) distribution plot reveals significant morphological patterns in the analyzed sweetpotato germplasm. The density distribution shows a predominant concentration in high circularity values (0.5&#x2013;0.7) and aspect ratio values (2.5&#x2013;3.5). Low-density areas in regions of low circularity (&lt; 0.4) and high aspect ratio (&gt; 4) indicate a lower frequency of roots with pronounced elongated shapes. Defect-free roots were scattered without a defined pattern (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f4">
<bold>Figures&#xa0;4A, B</bold>
</xref>).</p>
<fig id="f4" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;4</label>
<caption>
<p>Phenotypic diversity of tuberous root shape in the sweetpotato germplasm collection. <bold>(A)</bold> Circularity <bold>(C)</bold> vs. Aspect Ratio (AR) distribution plot; <bold>(B)</bold> Bar plot for roots with and without defects; <bold>(C)</bold> 2D density plot for Circularity <bold>(C)</bold> vs. Aspect Ratio (AR).</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-16-1625810-g004.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Graphical analysis of sweet potatoes based on defects, aspect ratio, and circularity. Panel A shows a scatter plot with gray and purple dots representing potatoes with and without skin defects, respectively. Surrounding images of potatoes illustrate defect examples. Panel B is a bar chart comparing the number of accessions with defects (484) versus without defects (181). Panel C presents a color-coded density plot of aspect ratio versus circularity.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
<p>The 2D density plot uses a color gradient to highlight that the highest-density zones (dark tones) correspond to intermediate to high values of both traits, while peripheral areas (yellow tones) represent less common morphologies (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f4">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;4C</bold>
</xref>).</p>
<p>The analysis of the scatter plot between Leaf Circularity and Aspect Ratio in the sweetpotato germplasm revealed no positive correlation between these variables. However, the observed data dispersion indicates significant variability in leaf morphology among accessions, suggesting differences between these parameters and leaf contour complexity. The density distribution shows a predominant concentration in high circularity values (0.6&#x2013;0.8) and aspect ratio values (1&#x2013;1.3), implying that most accessions have relatively compact leaves with well-defined contours. Several outlier points were identified, corresponding to accessions with: highly lobed leaves (low circularity:&lt; 0.2) or exceptionally compact leaves (high circularity: &gt; 0.7) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f5">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;5</bold>
</xref>).</p>
<fig id="f5" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;5</label>
<caption>
<p>Phenotypic diversity of leaf shape in the sweetpotato germplasm collection.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-16-1625810-g005.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Scatter plot analyzing leaf shapes with aspect ratio on the y-axis and circularity on the x-axis. The points transition from purple to yellow indicating different aspect ratios. Surrounding the plot are various leaf images illustrating differences in shape and size.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
<p>The network graph obtained reveals interesting patterns of interrelationship among phenotypic traits in the sweetpotato germplasm. The network structure displays clear modularity, with traits grouping according to their nature, showing four main modules: tuberous root skin color traits, tuberous root flesh color traits, leaf morphometric traits, and root morphometric traits. The strongest connections (thicker edges, r &#x2265; 0.5 and r &#x2264; -0.5) are observed between shape and color parameters within the same tissue, particularly among the L*, a*, and b* coordinates, suggesting highly coordinated pigmentation patterns. Notably, root morphometric traits (circularity, aspect ratio, roundness, and solidity) exhibit high interconnectivity, possibly indicating a shared genetic basis or strong ontogenetic integration during storage organ development. However, the variable of susceptibility to the weevil did not show significant correlations with any of the other morphological or morphometric characters analyzed. The network also highlights a significant bridge between tuberous root defects and root solidity (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f6">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;6</bold>
</xref>).</p>
<fig id="f6" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;6</label>
<caption>
<p>Correlation network graph of the studied variables.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-16-1625810-g006.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Graph showing correlations between various plant traits. Nodes represent traits, organized by categories like color traits, leaf morphology, and root shape. Lines indicate correlation strength, with blue for r &gt; 0.5 and orange for r &lt; -0.5. Notable traits include leaf roundness, root circularity, and weevil susceptibility.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
<p>The results demonstrate a clear association between skin color and flesh color in sweetpotato tuberous roots. The most frequent combination was red skin with yellow flesh (160 cases), followed by red skin with cream flesh (105 cases), suggesting that genotypes with red skin tend to exhibit yellow or cream flesh. In contrast, purple skin showed exclusivity with purple flesh (20 cases) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f7">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;7A</bold>
</xref>).</p>
<fig id="f7" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;7</label>
<caption>
<p>Relationships between coloration and defects in sweetpotato tuberous roots. <bold>(A)</bold> Skin color vs. flesh color; <bold>(B)</bold> Skin color vs. defect presence; <bold>(C)</bold> Flesh color vs. root defect.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-16-1625810-g007.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Three circular chord diagrams labeled A, B, and C show correlations between variables. Diagram A relates skin color and flesh color with a correlation value of 0.22. Diagram B connects skin color and root defects with a correlation of 0.02. Diagram C shows the relation between flesh color and root defects with a correlation of -0.20. Various colored bands illustrate connections between categories labeled Col1 to Col5 and Flav1 to Flav4.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
<p>A higher incidence of defects was observed in roots with red skin (268 defectives vs. 108 defect-free) and yellow skin (146 defectives vs. 44 defect-free). Conversely, roots with white skin showed the lowest defect frequency (8 cases) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f7">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;7B</bold>
</xref>). Roots with yellow flesh had the highest defect count (186 cases), while those with purple flesh showed the lowest incidence (7 cases). Notably, orange flesh though less frequent exhibited a substantial proportion of defects (28 cases), indicating a non-linear relationship between color and defect susceptibility (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f7">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;7C</bold>
</xref>).</p>
<p>The variance associated with each principal component differed and decreased sequentially. The first component explained 17.5% of total variance and the second accounted for 16%. Together, the first four components explained 57.3% of the cumulative variance (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f8">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;8A</bold>
</xref>). Leaf morphometric variables (Circularity and Solidity) showed strong positive correlations with each other and were the primary contributors to Component 1 variance. In contrast, tuberous root morphometric variables (Circularity and Roundness) were highly correlated and represented the main variance contributors for Component 2. The weevil susceptibility variable, located near the origin, indicated little to no relationship with either component (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f8">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;8B</bold>
</xref>).</p>
<fig id="f8" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;8</label>
<caption>
<p>Principal Component Analysis (PCA) of variables in the sweetpotato collection. <bold>(A)</bold> Proportion of variance explained by each component; <bold>(B)</bold> Variables projected in the factorial plane (Component 1 vs. Component 2); <bold>(C)</bold> Distribution of accessions (susceptible, tolerant, and resistant to C. formicarius) in factorial space.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-16-1625810-g008.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Bar chart (A) shows percentage of variance explained by ten principal components, with the first explaining 17.5%. Plot (B) visualizes correlations of traits like leaf circularity and root defects with principal components PC1 and PC2. Scatter plot (C) displays sample clustering, categorized as resistant, tolerant, or susceptible, with images of different roots beside the plot.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
<p>Sweetpotato accessions clustered into three distinct groups in the factorial space based on their response to <italic>C. formicarius</italic>: susceptible (532 accessions, 80%), tolerant (90 accessions, 13.5%), and resistant (43 accessions, 6.5%). The overwhelming predominance of susceptible genotypes reflects the high vulnerability of the evaluated germplasm. While scarce, the resistant accessions represent valuable genetic resources. Notably, these resistant accessions did not form defined clusters in the biplot but were instead dispersed throughout the principal components space. This pattern suggests that resistance is not associated with the evaluated morphological traits (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f8">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;8C</bold>
</xref>).</p>
<p>Of the 43 accessions that showed resistance, 36 are Cuban, 1 from Japan (Ja-pan-1-2016), 2 from China (YAN SHU-1, YUI-BEI-BUINI), 2 from Nigeria (KOKEINO, IITA-TIS-8250), 1 from Mexico (Mexico-20) and 1 from the United States (Excel).</p>
<p>The combined heatmap and dendrogram analysis revealed interesting patterns regarding the susceptibility, tolerance, and resistance of sweetpotato accessions to weevils. Resistant accessions tended to exhibit lighter skin coloration (high L*skin values and low a*skin values) and less pigmented flesh (low b*flesh values). Many of these resistant accessions also showed greater root solidity. In contrast, tolerant accessions occupied an intermediate position in the dendrogram, sharing characteristics with both resistant and susceptible groups. These tolerant accessions typically dis-played moderate skin pigmentation (intermediate a*skin values) and mild surface defects. The susceptible accessions clustered in distinct branches of the dendrogram, often associated with darker skins (high a*skin values) and intensely pigmented flesh (high b*flesh values). Notably, these susceptible accessions frequently presented more pronounced surface defects, which likely facilitates infestation. A particularly relevant finding was the apparent correlation between stem color and weevil susceptibility. Accessions with purple stems tended to be more susceptible. Regarding the relationship between susceptibility to the weevil and the morphometric characteristics of the leaf, the analysis did not show significant associations. The parameters of circularity, aspect ratio and leaf solidity did not show clear patterns that would allow linking the morphology of the leaves with resistance or susceptibility to the insect. (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f9">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;9A</bold>
</xref>).</p>
<fig id="f9" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;9</label>
<caption>
<p>Integrated analysis of sweetpotato phenotypic characteristics and their relationship with resistance to <italic>C. formicarius</italic>. <bold>(A)</bold> Hierarchical clustering and phenotypic profile (heatmap with dendrograms); <bold>(B)</bold> Association between skin color and resistance levels; <bold>(C)</bold> Association between flesh color and resistance levels; <bold>(D)</bold> Association between root defects and resistance levels.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-16-1625810-g009.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Heatmap and correlation plots display relationships between gene expression and phenotypic traits. Panel A shows a clustered heatmap of gene expressions across samples. Panels B, C, and D show correlation plots for weevil susceptibility against skin color (r=0.17), flesh color (r=-0.38), and root defects (r=0.31).</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
<p>The data revealed a weak but positive correlation (r=0.17) between skin color and resistance to <italic>C. formicarius</italic>. Red skinned accessions contained the highest number of resistant individuals (25), followed by yellow (11) and purple (6) skins. However, the high proportion of susceptible individuals across all skin colors (particularly in red: 306 susceptible versus 25 resistant) suggests that this morphological trait alone is not a reliable predictor of resistance. White skinned accessions showed the lowest number of resistant individuals (1) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f9">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;9B</bold>
</xref>).</p>
<p>A moderate negative correlation (r=-0.38) was observed between flesh color and resistance to <italic>C. formicariu</italic>s. White and yellow flesh accessions concentrated the highest number of resistant individuals (17 each), while cream and orange flesh accessions showed greater susceptibility. Particularly striking was the case of purple flesh, which presented only 2 resistant accessions (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f9">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;9C</bold>
</xref>).</p>
<p>A moderate positive correlation (r=0.31) was found between the presence of surface defects (fissures and constrictions) and susceptibility to <italic>C. formicarius</italic>. Among susceptible accessions, 79% exhibited defects, while resistant accessions showed a similar proportion with and without defects (49% versus 51%). This pattern suggests that surface defects may result from insect damage rather than representing an intrinsic trait, though it could also indicate that malformed roots are more vulnerable to attack. The presence of 21 resistant accessions with defects raises the hypothesis that some genotypes may develop tolerance mechanisms, while others exhibit antixenosis resistance (insect avoidance) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f9">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;9D</bold>
</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_2">
<label>3.2</label>
<title>Field evaluation for resistance/susceptibility to <italic>C. formicarius</italic>
</title>
<p>From the 43 accessions initially identified as resistant in the germplasm collection screening, only 18 genotypes met the dual selection criteria (yield &#x2265;3 t ha<sup>&#x2212;1</sup> and infestation &#x2264;10%) in the first experiment (designed to assess resistance). While accessions with outstanding combinations of yield and resistance were identified such as INIVIT B-25 (60.13 t ha<sup>&#x2212;1</sup> with 9.31% infestation) most genotypes exhibiting complete resistance (0% infestation) showed moderate yields (&lt;20 t ha<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>), revealing a clear trade-off between these traits. However, two exceptional genotypes exceeded 50 t ha<sup>&#x2212;1</sup> with 0% infestation (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f10">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;10A</bold>
</xref>).</p>
<fig id="f10" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;10</label>
<caption>
<p>Selection of genotypes based on independent criteria for yield and infestation percentage by <italic>C. formicarius</italic>. <bold>(A)</bold> First evaluation cycle (43 genotypes); <bold>(B)</bold> Second evaluation cycle (18 genotypes).</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-16-1625810-g010.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Scatterplots A and B compare weevil infestation percentages against yield in tons per hectare. Both plots feature shaded areas, with red indicating high infestation and blue indicating low infestation. Plot A covers a wider range of infestation and yield values, while Plot B is more restricted. Data points are brown, illustrating the distribution within the shaded areas.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
<p>In a second evaluation cycle, only 6 of the 18 tested genotypes met the dual selection criteria, simultaneously achieving yields above 10 t ha<sup>&#x2212;1</sup> and infestation below 10%. These were classified into three groups based on performance. High yield and resistance: Highlighted by INIVIT B-25 (58.8 t ha<sup>&#x2212;1</sup> with only 4.76% infestation), which emerged as the most promising genotype due to its exceptional productivity and phenotypic stability. Good yield and good resistance: Represented by INIVIT B-2022 (39.2 t ha<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>, 8.93%), IB Morado-16 (34.3 t ha<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>, 4.08%), and INIVIT B-90 (31.5 t ha<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>, 7.11%). Moderate yield but good resistance: comprising Catalina (23.1 t ha<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>, 9.09%) and V-525 (16.1 t ha<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>, 7.39%) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f10">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;10B</bold>
</xref>). All six resistant genotypes are of Cuban origin, five being improved varieties and one traditional (Catalina).</p>
<p>Highly significant differences (p&lt; 0.05) were found in the tuberization depth among the evaluated sweetpotato genotypes (six resistant and one susceptible control), suggesting that this morphological trait may be associated with resistance to <italic>C. formicarius</italic> attack. The susceptible control (CEMSA 78-354) exhibited the shallowest tuberization depth (3.41 cm). In contrast, the genotypes V-525 (13.32 cm) and IB Morado-16 (12.50 cm) showed the highest values, which were statistically superior to the control and other intermediate genotypes. However, not all resistant genotypes followed this trend. INIVIT B-25 (4.53 cm), despite being considered resistant, did not differ significantly from the susceptible control in tuberization depth, indicating that resistance in this case may be mediated by other mechanisms (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f11">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;11</bold>
</xref>).</p>
<fig id="f11" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;11</label>
<caption>
<p>Tuberization depth of the six genotypes with the highest resistance to <italic>C. formicarius</italic> and the susceptible control genotype. Photos taken 80 days after planting.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-16-1625810-g011.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Bar chart and image collage depicting tuberization depth in various sweet potato varieties. The chart shows depths ranging from 3.41 cm for CEMSA 78-354 (susceptible control) to 13.32 cm for V-525. Photos below illustrate tubers in soil with pens for scale, reflecting these varieties: INIVIT BM-90, IB Morado-16, INIVIT B-25, INIVIT B-2022, V-525, Catalina, and CEMSA 78-354.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_3">
<label>3.3</label>
<title>Laboratory evaluation of resistance/susceptibility to <italic>C. formicarius</italic>
</title>
<p>Sweetpotato genotypes varied significantly in susceptibility to <italic>C. formicarius</italic> (p&lt; 0.05). The V-525 genotype, despite being considered resistant in previous findings, showed the highest infestation percentage (92.67% &#xb1; 6.13), even surpassing the susceptible control CEMSA 78-354 (89.33% &#xb1; 8.99). This contradictory finding suggests that V-525&#x2019;s resistance may be associated with mechanisms other than infestation reduction, such as tuberization depth. On the other hand, INIVIT B-2022 exhibited the lowest infestation percentage (39.67% &#xb1; 13.72), standing out as the most promising genotype for direct insect resistance. The genotypes IB Morado-16 (46.67% &#xb1; 17.52) and INIVIT B-25 (53.33% &#xb1; 9.46) showed intermediate infestation levels. Catalina (61.33% &#xb1; 14.73) and INIVIT B 90 (77% &#xb1; 9.63) occupied intermediate-high positions (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f12">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;12A</bold>
</xref>).</p>
<fig id="f12" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;12</label>
<caption>
<p>Resistance to <italic>C. formicarius</italic> in sweetpotato genotypes. <bold>(A)</bold> Infestation percentage and <bold>(B)</bold> Temporal dynamics of adult emergence (cumulative value).</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-16-1625810-g012.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Bar and line graphs displaying weevil infestation percentages and the number of emerged adults. Graph A shows six cultivars with varying infestation rates, from 39.67% to 92.67%. Graph B illustrates cumulative adult emergence over time, highlighting CEMSA 78-354 with the highest emergence by day 24.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
<p>While INIVIT B-2022 demonstrated exceptional resistance with near-total suppression of adult emergence (2.0 &#xb1; 1.5 adults across replicates), the other resistant genotypes exhibited distinct temporal patterns in weevil development. The genotypes INIVIT B-25 (10.3 &#xb1; 5.2 adults) and IB Morado-16 (15.1 &#xb1; 9.4 adults) also displayed low emergence but with different dynamics: INIVIT B-25 showed a significant delay (first adults on day 12.5 &#xb1; 7.7), while IB Morado-16 had more gradual emergence (linear increase of 1.2 &#xb1; 0.3 adults/day). This suggests their resistance mechanisms may act at different stages of the insect&#x2019;s life cycle (e.g., larval toxicity vs. pupation inhibition). V-525, despite its high infestation, showed intermediate emergence (28.4 &#xb1; 12.8 adults), indicating that although the insect colonizes the tubers, its development is partially affected (p&lt; 0.05). Catalina and INIVIT B-90 showed moderate emergence (43.2 &#xb1; 22.1 and 17.3 &#xb1; 9.3 adults, respectively), while INIVIT B-90 peaked earlier (10.2 &#xb1; 4.8 adults by day 14) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f12">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;12B</bold>
</xref>).</p>
<p>Visual documentation of root phenotypes (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f13">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;13</bold>
</xref>) from the six most resistant genotypes reveals wide variation in flesh pigmentation (1 white, 2 yellow, 1 light orange, and 2 purple), while skin color was predominantly dark red/purple, with the exception of INIVIT B-2022 (yellow skin with orange flesh). This suggests that flesh color is not a consistent predictor of resistance. Instead, shared morphological traits such as anthocyanic skin color (5/6 genotypes), deep tuberization (5/6 genotypes), and elliptical root shape with smooth surfaces may contribute more significantly to resistance. The absence of pronounced skin defects in resistant genotypes could reduce soil surface cracking and consequently limit oviposition sites for <italic>C. formicarius</italic>. Notably, INIVIT B-2022 maintained its resistance (both in field and laboratory conditions), implying compensatory mechanisms.</p>
<fig id="f13" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;13</label>
<caption>
<p>Visual Documentation of Root Phenotypic Traits and Susceptibility to <italic>C. formicarius</italic> Damage. Left column: Healthy roots at Day 0; Right column: Post-infestation damage at Day 30.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-16-1625810-g013.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Sweet potato root samples with varying degrees of damage are shown in a comparison between Day 0 and 30 days later for different varieties, including INIVIT B-25, Catalina, V-525, INIVIT B-2022, IB Morado-16, INIVIT BM-90, and CEMSA 78-354. On the right, close-up images display the adult sweet potato weevil, Cylas formicarius, feeding on the storage root, and the damage it causes to the tuberous root surface.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s4" sec-type="discussion">
<label>4</label>
<title>Discussion</title>
<p>Morphological and morphometric characterization of the 731 sweetpotato accessions revealed broad phenotypic diversity in terms of skin and flesh coloration (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3">
<bold>Figures&#xa0;3A&#x2013;D</bold>
</xref>), root and leaf shape (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f4">
<bold>Figures&#xa0;4A&#x2013;C</bold>
</xref>), as well as the presence of surface defects. The predominance of red and yellow skins, along with yellow, cream, and white flesh, suggests a historical preference in the selection of these traits, possibly linked to cultural aspects. The dispersion in CIELab space confirms chromatic variability, indicating a diverse genetic basis within the collection. This pattern of color distribution aligns with reports on traditional varieties from Brazil, where historical farmer selection is thought to have favored these colors due to their higher acceptance in local markets (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">Veasey et&#xa0;al., 2007</xref>).</p>
<p>Root morphology showed that 72.78% of the accessions exhibited surface defects such as longitudinal cracks, while 27.22% had smooth surfaces (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f4">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;4B</bold>
</xref>). On the other hand, leaf morphometry revealed notable variability in terms of circularity, aspect ratio, and leaf contour complexity. Results from South Carolina on 731 sweetpotato accessions also showed broad phenotypic variability in leaves, with 47.3% classified as lobed and 32.3% as cordate (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Jackson et&#xa0;al., 2012</xref>).</p>
<p>The results demonstrated that resistance to <italic>C. formicarius</italic> is not strongly correlated with specific morphological traits (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f8">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;8C</bold>
</xref>), such as skin or flesh color, leaf shape, foliar pigmentation, or flowering. However, interesting patterns were observed: resistant accessions (6.5%) tended to have lighter skins and less flesh pigmentation (though this trend did not persist in later stages), as well as greater root firmness. The presence of surface defects showed a moderate correlation with susceptibility (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f9">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;9D</bold>
</xref>), suggesting that roots with pronounced defects may facilitate crack formation in the soil and insect access. This aligns with findings by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">Waddill and Conover (1978)</xref> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">Talekar (1987)</xref>, who reported instability in sweetpotato genotype resistance due to environmental influences and the species genetic complexity. The predominance of red and yellow skins in resistant accessions could be related to the accumulation of secondary compounds, such as anthocyanins, which have been associated with defense mechanisms in other crops (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">Stevenson et&#xa0;al., 2009</xref>).&#x201d;</p>
<p>Field evaluations identified six resistant genotypes (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f10">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;10B</bold>
</xref>), with INIVIT B-25 and INIVIT B-2022 standing out for combining high yields with low infestation percentages. Tuberization depth (&gt;10 cm) emerged as an escape mechanism in five of the six resistant genotypes (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f11">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;11</bold>
</xref>), as deeper roots are less exposed to the insect by avoiding soil cracking during tuber formation. However, the case of INIVIT B-25 which exhibited shallow tuberization yet significant resistance suggests the involvement of other factors, such as biochemical mechanisms or antixenosis.</p>
<p>A recent study found that high-yielding genotypes may be more susceptible to weevil infestation due to greater root exposure (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Osaru et&#xa0;al., 2023</xref>). Although this observation was very common in our study (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f10">
<bold>Figures&#xa0;10A, B</bold>
</xref>), there are exceptions where high yield and resistance were combined in the same genotype. Studies support our findings, including research from Nigeria (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Leuschner, 1980</xref>), United States (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">Mullen et&#xa0;al., 1981</xref>) and Tanzania (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">Kagimbo et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>). Studies in Puerto Rico correlated elongated tuber shapes and greater root depth with lower infestation. Elongated root varieties showed 41% damage compared to 52% in round tuber genotypes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Cabrera et&#xa0;al., 1990</xref>). Additionally, key studies in Taiwan demonstrated that none of the 1,000 evaluated accessions exhibited consistent weevil resistance across multiple seasons or locations. Some initially promising accessions later proved susceptible in follow up trials, suggesting that resistance may not exist in traditional sweetpotato germplasm (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">Talekar, 1987</xref>).</p>
<p>Controlled environment trials revealed marked differences in genotype responses to weevil attack. Controlled infestation assays identified three primary defense mechanisms against <italic>Cylas formicarius</italic>, antixenosis (non-preference), antibiosis (adverse effects on the insect), and physical escape. For INIVIT B-2022, results showed a 60.3% reduction in infestation and emergence of only 2 adults (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f12">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;12B</bold>
</xref>), indicating simultaneous antixenosis and antibiosis. In contrast, V-525 though resistant in the field was highly susceptible in the laboratory (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f12">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;12A</bold>
</xref>), suggesting its resistance may depend on ecological factors like tuberization depth. Temporal dynamics of adult emergence also varied among genotypes, with INIVIT B-25 delaying larval development (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f12">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;12B</bold>
</xref>), pointing to distinct modes of resistance. These results reinforce the multifaceted nature of plant-insect interactions, which may involve both morphological traits and biochemical defenses. Furthermore, CEMSA 78-354 (susceptible control) confirmed the absence of both mechanisms, with high infestation (89.33%) and adult emergence (98 individuals) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f12">
<bold>Figures&#xa0;12A, B</bold>
</xref>).</p>
<p>Our results align with studies reporting significant differences in susceptibility to <italic>C. formicarius</italic>, where adult emergence ranged from 8 to 230 per genotype (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">Waddill and Conover, 1978</xref>). Laboratory tests have also documented genotypes reducing adult emergence by up to 78% and delaying development by 4&#x2013;6 days (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Leuschner, 1980</xref>). Under laboratory conditions (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;2</bold>
</xref>), tuberous roots are exposed to forced and constant infestation pressure, which does not reflect the insect&#x2019;s natural selectivity in the field.</p>
<p>Similarly, the genotype IB Morado-16 exhibited moderate infestation (46.67%) but low adult emergence (15 individuals) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f12">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;12</bold>
</xref>). This indicates that while the insect colonizes the tubers (low antixenosis, failing to prevent oviposition), some degree of antibiosis (delayed development) occurs, possibly due to toxins inhibiting pupation or digestive enzymes affecting larvae. This resistance profile is notably similar to that described for the Ugandan variety &#x2018;New Kawogo,&#x2019; where larvae developed on this variety showed higher mortality and a prolonged life cycle, suggesting a toxic effect associated with its tissues (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">Stevenson et&#xa0;al., 2009</xref>). Further, they confirmed that high concentrations of caffeic and coumaric acid esters (hexadecyl caffeate and hexadecyl coumarate) in the latex of &#x2018;New Kawogo&#x2019; (43 mg/ml and 42 mg/ml, respectively) are key compounds in resistance (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">Stevenson et&#xa0;al., 2009</xref>).</p>
<p>A laboratory study in Indonesia revealed that 66.7&#x2013;100% of roots exhibited surface damage, while internal damage intensity ranged from 14.0 to 76.6%, classifying some genotypes as moderately resistant. Additionally, they suggested that weevil oviposition preference is directly linked to the damage caused (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">Mau et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>).</p>
<p>A recent study in Uganda evaluating 30 sweetpotato genotypes found that root damage severity had a significant negative correlation with root stalk length (r = &#x2212;0.6), identifying this trait as the most reliable morphological predictor of sweetpotato weevil resistance (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Osaru et&#xa0;al., 2023</xref>). Our results confirm this observation, as deep tuberizing varieties generally possess long stalks and vice versa (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f11">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;11</bold>
</xref>). However, while this is a physical escape mechanism, resistance does not depend solely on a single morphological trait. Weevil resistance is highly influenced by environmental, physiological, and genetic factors, making it unstable under varying conditions (e.g., drought), and the weevil may circumvent this physical barrier. Thus, we propose that identifying varieties with higher resistance requires combining multiple traits in the same genotype:</p>
<list list-type="order">
<list-item>
<p>Root stalk length or tuberization depth (&gt;10 cm).</p>
</list-item>
<list-item>
<p>Smooth, defect-free skin.</p>
</list-item>
<list-item>
<p>Preferably elliptical tuber shape (not round).</p>
</list-item>
<list-item>
<p>Concurrent antixenosis and antibiosis mechanisms (e.g., INIVIT B-2022).</p>
</list-item>
</list>
<p>Given the current absence of globally available varieties with true resistance, it is recommended using genotypes that combine these traits.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s5" sec-type="conclusions">
<label>5</label>
<title>Conclusion</title>
<p>This study demonstrates that resistance to <italic>C. formicarius</italic> in sweetpotatoes is a complex phenomenon influenced by multiple factors, including morphological traits, escape mechanisms, and potential biochemical defenses. The identification of genotypes like INIVIT B-2022 and INIVIT B-25 with contrasting yet effective resistance profiles provides valuable opportunities for developing resilient varieties. Future research should integrate molecular and metabolic approaches to unravel the genetic basis of these mechanisms, particularly focusing on the biochemical properties of INIVIT B-25&#x2019;s shallow tuberization resistance and INIVIT B-2022&#x2019;s dual antixenosis-antibiosis effects. These findings offer practical solutions for Caribbean farmers while advancing global understanding of sweetpotato-weevil interactions. Future research should integrate molecular and metabolic approaches to unravel the genetic basis of these mechanisms.</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<sec id="s6" sec-type="data-availability">
<title>Data availability statement</title>
<p>The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s7" sec-type="author-contributions">
<title>Author contributions</title>
<p>AM: Methodology, Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Software, Investigation, Writing &#x2013; original draft, Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing. PM: Supervision, Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing, Data curation, Funding acquisition. JZ: Project administration, Validation, Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing. DR: Data curation, Supervision, Investigation, Methodology, Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing. IV: Resources, Writing &#x2013; original draft, Formal analysis. RG: Supervision, Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing, Methodology, Investigation, Resources. OM: Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing, Software, Methodology. AJ: Validation, Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing, Visualization. YR: Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing, Resources, Validation. LM: Methodology, Formal analysis, Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing. YB: Supervision, Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing, Data curation. OP: Formal analysis, Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing. BX: Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing, Funding acquisition, Resources, Project administration, Supervision.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s8" sec-type="funding-information">
<title>Funding</title>
<p>The author(s) declare financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article. This work was supported by the National Key R&amp;D Program of China (Grant No. 2023YFE0111700).</p>
</sec>
<ack>
<title>Acknowledgments</title>
<p>We extend our sincere gratitude to the International Potato Center (CIP) and the Research Institute of Tropical Roots and Tuber Crops (INIVIT) for their historic collaboration (1993&#x2013;2001), which established the foundational scientific legacy for this work. From CIP, we especially acknowledge Dr. Fausto Cisneros for his pioneering vision and leadership in entomology and integrated pest management, and MSc. Jes&#xfa;s Alc&#xe1;zar for his invaluable contributions to field implementation. We also thank Dr. Mar&#xed;a Palacio for her strategic guidance and Dr. Oscar Ortiz for his support in impact assessment for breeding programs. From INIVIT, we recognize the visionary leadership of Dr. Alfredo Morales Tej&#xf3;n, whose lifelong dedication to agricultural innovation has been instrumental. We also thank Dr. Mar&#xed;a del Carmen Castell&#xf3;n for her essential expertise in entomology, and MSc. Nilo Maza, Dr. Lilian Morales, and Ing. Dania Rodr&#xed;guez for their pivotal roles in executing this work. We thank CIP for its lasting technical and scientific contributions to Cuba's food security. As highlighted in the landmark publication from this collaboration (Manejo Integrado del Gorgojo del Camote..., CIP-INIVIT, 2001), this project stands as "a prime example" of how institutions can unite under a shared vision to transform challenges into tangible opportunities. This study honors the enduring legacy of all who participated in this collaboration and reaffirms the power of perseverance, partnership, and passion in science.</p>
</ack>
<sec id="s9" sec-type="COI-statement">
<title>Conflict of interest</title>
<p>The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s10" sec-type="ai-statement">
<title>Generative AI statement</title>
<p>The author(s) declare that Generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript. The authors verify and take full responsibility for the integrity of the content in this manuscript. Generative AI was used in the following limited capacities during manuscript preparation: Reference formatting: AI was used to assist with consistent formatting of references. Figures: AI provided layout recommendations for data visualization. No AI system was used to: Generate or interpret research data, Formulate scientific conclusions, Write original content and Create theoretical frameworks.</p>
<p>Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s11" sec-type="disclaimer">
<title>Publisher&#x2019;s note</title>
<p>All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.</p>
</sec>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="B1">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Amargos</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1935</year>). <source>Insectos agr&#xed;colas de Cuba</source> (<publisher-loc>Santiago de las Vegas</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Estaci&#xf3;n Experimental Agron&#xf3;mica</publisher-name>), <fpage>12</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>20</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B2">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Austin</surname> <given-names>D. F.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1988</year>). &#x201c;<article-title>The taxonomy, evolution and genetic diversity of sweetpotatoes and related wild species</article-title>,&#x201d; in <source>Exploration, Maintenance, and Utilization of Sweetpotato Genetic Resources</source>. Ed. <person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname>Gregory</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<publisher-name>International Potato Center</publisher-name>, <publisher-loc>Lima</publisher-loc>), <fpage>27</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>60</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B3">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Brookes</surname> <given-names>D. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hereward</surname> <given-names>J. P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Walter</surname> <given-names>G. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Furlong</surname> <given-names>M. J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Origins, divergence, and contrasting invasion history of the sweetpotato weevil pests <italic>Cylas formicarius</italic> (Coleoptera: Brentidae) and <italic>Euscepes batatae</italic> (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) in the Asia-Pacific</article-title>. <source>J. Economic Entomoly.</source> <volume>112</volume>, <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>9</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/jee/toz198</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31352482</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B4">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Cabrera</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cruz</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Armstrong</surname> <given-names>A. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Acosta</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1990</year>). <article-title>Sweetpotato (<italic>Ipomoea batatas</italic>) cultivar susceptibility to the borer <italic>Cylas formicarius</italic> var. <italic>elegantulus</italic>
</article-title>. <source>J. Agric. Univ. Puerto Rico</source> <volume>74</volume>, <fpage>167</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>179</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.46429/jaupr.v74i2.6549</pub-id>
</citation></ref>
<ref id="B5">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Chalfant</surname> <given-names>R. B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jansson</surname> <given-names>R. K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Seal</surname> <given-names>D. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Schalk</surname> <given-names>J. M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1990</year>). <article-title>Ecology and management of sweetpotato insects</article-title>. <source>Annu. Rev. Entomoly.</source> <volume>35</volume>, <fpage>157</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>180</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1146/annurev.en.35.010190.001105</pub-id>
</citation></ref>
<ref id="B6">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<collab>CIP</collab>
<collab>AVRDC</collab>
<collab>IBPGR</collab>
</person-group> (<year>1991</year>). <source>Descriptores de la batata</source> (<publisher-loc>Rome</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>International Board for Plant Genetic Resources</publisher-name>), <fpage>132</fpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B7">
<citation citation-type="web">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<collab>CIP (Centro Internacional de la Papa)</collab>
</person-group> (<year>2024</year>). <source>Hechos y cifras sobre el camote</source> (<publisher-loc>Lima, Peru</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>CIP</publisher-name>). Available online at: <uri xlink:href="https://cipotato.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/Hechos-y-cifras-sobre-el-camote.pdf">https://cipotato.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/Hechos-y-cifras-sobre-el-camote.pdf</uri>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B8">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname>Cisneros</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Alc&#xe1;zar</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (Eds.) (<year>2001</year>). <source>Manejo Integrado del Gorgojo del Camote o Tetu&#xe1;n del Boniato, <italic>Cylas formicarius</italic> (Fab.), en Cuba</source> (<publisher-loc>Lima</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Centro Internacional de la Papa</publisher-name>), <fpage>138</fpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B9">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Cockerham</surname> <given-names>K. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Deen</surname> <given-names>O. T.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1947</year>). <article-title>Resistance of sweetpotato seedlings to weevil attack</article-title>. <source>J. Econ. Entomoly.</source> <volume>40</volume>, <fpage>439</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>441</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/jee/40.3.439</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20264526</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B10">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Data</surname> <given-names>E. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Nottingham</surname> <given-names>S. F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kays</surname> <given-names>S. J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1996</year>). <article-title>Sweetpotato latex: Effect of latex on sweetpotato weevil, <italic>Cylas formicarius elegantulus</italic>, feeding and oviposition</article-title>. <source>J. Econ. Entomoly.</source> <volume>89</volume>, <fpage>544</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>549</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/jee/89.2.544</pub-id>
</citation></ref>
<ref id="B11">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Engel</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1970</year>). <article-title>Exploration of the chilca canyon</article-title>. <source>Curr. Anthropol.</source> <volume>11</volume>, <fpage>55</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>58</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1086/201093</pub-id>
</citation></ref>
<ref id="B12">
<citation citation-type="web">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<collab>FAOSTAT</collab>
</person-group> (<year>2023</year>). <source>Crops and livestock products: Production quantity of sweetpotatoes</source> (<publisher-loc>Rome, Italy</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations</publisher-name>). Available online at: <uri xlink:href="https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/data/QCL">https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/data/QCL</uri>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B13">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Gower</surname> <given-names>J. C.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1971</year>). <article-title>A general coefficient of similarity and some of its properties</article-title>. <source>Biometrics</source> <volume>27</volume>, <fpage>857</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>874</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2307/2528823</pub-id>
</citation></ref>
<ref id="B14">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Hern&#xe1;ndez</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>P&#xe9;rez</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bosch</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Castro</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <source>Clasificaci&#xf3;n de los suelos de Cuba</source> (<publisher-loc>Cuba</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Ediciones INCA</publisher-name>), <fpage>61</fpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B15">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<collab>INIVIT</collab>
</person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <source>Instructivo t&#xe9;cnico del cultivo del boniato</source>. <edition>Segunda</edition> (<publisher-loc>Villa Clara</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Instituto de Investigaciones de Viandas Tropicales</publisher-name>), <fpage>20</fpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B16">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Jackson</surname> <given-names>D. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Harrison</surname> <given-names>H. F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ryan-Bohac</surname> <given-names>J. R.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Insect resistance in sweetpotato plant introductions</article-title>. <source>J. Econ. Entomoly.</source> <volume>105</volume>, <fpage>651</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>658</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1603/EC11241</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22606804</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B17">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Jones</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dukes</surname> <given-names>P. D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Schalk</surname> <given-names>J. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mullen</surname> <given-names>M. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hamilton</surname> <given-names>M. G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Paterson</surname> <given-names>D. R.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>1980</year>). <article-title>W-71, W-115, W-119, W-125, W-149 and W-154 sweetpotato germplasm with multiple insect and disease resistances</article-title>. <source>HortScience</source> <volume>15</volume>, <fpage>835</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>836</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.21273/HORTSCI.15.6.835</pub-id>
</citation></ref>
<ref id="B18">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kagimbo</surname> <given-names>F. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Shimelis</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sibiya</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Screening of sweetpotato germplasm collections for sweetpotato weevil (<italic>Cylas</italic> spp.) resistance in Tanzania</article-title>. <source>Aust. J. Crop Sci.</source> <volume>14</volume>, <fpage>1707</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1714</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.21475/ajcs.20.14.11.p1603</pub-id>
</citation></ref>
<ref id="B19">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kogan</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ortman</surname> <given-names>E. F.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1978</year>). <article-title>Antixenosis - a new term proposed to define Painter&#x2019;s &#x201c;Non-preference&#x201d; modality of resistance</article-title>. <source>Bull. Entomol. Soc. A.</source> <volume>24</volume>, <fpage>175</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>176</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/besa/24.2.175</pub-id>
</citation></ref>
<ref id="B20">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Leuschner</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1980</year>). &#x201c;<article-title>Screening for sweetpotato weevil resistance</article-title>,&#x201d; in <source>Proceedings of the 5th International Symposium on Tropical Root and Tuber Crops</source> (<publisher-name>International Society for Tropical Root Crops</publisher-name>, <publisher-loc>Los Ba&#xf1;os</publisher-loc>), <fpage>81</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>96</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B21">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Lin</surname> <given-names>K. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lai</surname> <given-names>Y. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chang</surname> <given-names>K. Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cheng</surname> <given-names>Y. F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hwang</surname> <given-names>S. Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lo</surname> <given-names>H. F.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2007</year>). <article-title>Improving breeding efficiency for quality and yield of sweetpotato</article-title>. <source>Botanical Stud.</source> <volume>48</volume>, <fpage>283</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>292</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B22">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Magenya</surname> <given-names>E. V.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Smit</surname> <given-names>N. E.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1992</year>). &#x201c;<article-title>On farm screening test for weevil (<italic>Cylas</italic> spp.) resistance among various sweetpotato cultivars in Kenya</article-title>,&#x201d; in <source>Root and Tuber Pest Management in East and Southern Africa</source> (<publisher-name>Proceedings of a Regional Workshop</publisher-name>, <publisher-loc>Mombasa</publisher-loc>), <fpage>89</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>96</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B23">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Marti</surname> <given-names>H. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mills</surname> <given-names>H. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kays</surname> <given-names>S. J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1991</year>). <article-title>Boehmeryl acetate (BAC) accumulation in sweetpotato storage roots as influenced by plant nutrition</article-title>. <source>HortScience</source> <volume>26</volume>, <fpage>702</fpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B24">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Mau</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wadu</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ndwa</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Markus</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Arsa</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>A screening of resistance to sweetpotato weevil (<italic>Cylas formicarius</italic> Fab.) in a collection of sweetpotato clones under laboratory conditions</article-title>. <source>Int. J. Trop. Drylands</source> <volume>5</volume>, <fpage>41</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>47</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.13057/tropdrylands/t050201</pub-id>
</citation></ref>
<ref id="B25">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Morales</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ma</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jia</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rodr&#xed;guez</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Vargas</surname> <given-names>I. J. P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ventura</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2025</year>). <article-title>Evolution of sweetpotato (<italic>Ipomoea batatas</italic> [L.] Lam.) breeding in Cuba</article-title>. <source>Plants</source> <volume>14</volume>, <elocation-id>1911</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/plants14131911</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">40647920</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B26">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Morales</surname> <given-names>R. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rodr&#xed;guez</surname> <given-names>S. D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rodr&#xed;guez</surname> <given-names>M. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rodr&#xed;guez</surname> <given-names>G. Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Trujillo</surname> <given-names>O. N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jim&#xe9;nez</surname> <given-names>M. A.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>Floral biology and phenology of sweetpotato (<italic>Ipomoea batatas</italic> [L.] Lam.) in Cuba: Bases for genetic improvement</article-title>. <source>Afr. J. Agric. Res.</source> <volume>19</volume>, <fpage>1043</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1055</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5897/AJAR2023.16345</pub-id>
</citation></ref>
<ref id="B27">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Morales</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Vargas</surname> <given-names>I. J. P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rodr&#xed;guez</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Portal</surname> <given-names>O.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Garc&#xed;a</surname> <given-names>Y. B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Garc&#xed;a</surname> <given-names>Y. R.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2024</year>). <article-title>Inheritance of the flesh color and shape of the tuberous root of sweetpotato (<italic>Ipomoea batatas</italic> [L.] Lam.)</article-title>. <source>Horticulturae</source> <volume>10</volume>, <elocation-id>1032</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/horticulturae10091032</pub-id>
</citation></ref>
<ref id="B28">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Mullen</surname> <given-names>M. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jones</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Arbogast</surname> <given-names>R. T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Schalk</surname> <given-names>J. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Paterson</surname> <given-names>D. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Boswell</surname> <given-names>T. E.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>1981</year>). <article-title>Resistance of sweetpotato lines to infestations of sweetpotato weevil, <italic>Cylas formicarius elegantulus</italic> (Summers)</article-title>. <source>HortScience</source> <volume>16</volume>, <fpage>539</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>541</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.21273/HORTSCI.16.4.539</pub-id>
</citation></ref>
<ref id="B29">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Mu&#xf1;oz-Rodr&#xed;guez</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Carruthers</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wood</surname> <given-names>J. R. I.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Williams</surname> <given-names>B. R. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Weitemier</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kronmiller</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Reconciling conflicting phylogenies in the origin of sweetpotato</article-title>. <source>Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.</source> <volume>115</volume>, <fpage>E13197</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>E13206</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1073/pnas.1819448115</pub-id>
</citation></ref>
<ref id="B30">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Osaru</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Karungi</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Odama</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chelangat</surname> <given-names>D. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Musana</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Otema</surname> <given-names>M. A.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>Identification of the key morphological sweetpotato weevil resistance predictors in Ugandan sweetpotato genotypes using correlation and path-coefficient analysis</article-title>. <source>Crop Sci.</source> <volume>63</volume>, <fpage>1126</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1138</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/csc2.20915</pub-id>
</citation></ref>
<ref id="B31">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Pla</surname> <given-names>L. E.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1986</year>). <source>An&#xe1;lisis multivariado: M&#xe9;todo de componentes principales</source> (<publisher-loc>Washington</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Organization of American States</publisher-name>), <fpage>95</fpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B32">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Pole</surname> <given-names>F. S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1988</year>). <source>Vine thickness in sweetpotato; its inheritance and relationship to weevil damage</source> (<publisher-name>School of Agriculture Food and Technology. Alafua Campus, Samoa, University of the South Pacific. Masters in Agriculture</publisher-name>). Available online at: <uri xlink:href="https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Pole+FS%2C+1988.+Vine+thickness+in+sweet+potato+%28Ipomoea+batatas%29%3A+its+inheritance+and+relationship+to+weevil+damage.+MSc+Thesis%2C+University+of+the+South+Pacific%2C+Western+Samoa">https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=Pole+FS%2C+1988.+Vine+thickness+in+sweet+potato+%28Ipomoea+batatas%29%3A+its+inheritance+and+relationship+to+weevil+damage.+MSc+Thesis%2C+University+of+the+South+Pacific%2C+Western+Samoa</uri>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B33">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Rolston</surname> <given-names>L. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Barlow</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hernandez</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Nilakhe</surname> <given-names>S. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jones</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1979</year>). <article-title>Field evaluation of breeding lines and cultivars of sweetpotato for resistance to the sweetpotato weevil</article-title>. <source>HortScience</source> <volume>14</volume>, <fpage>634</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>635</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.21273/HORTSCI.14.5.634</pub-id>
</citation></ref>
<ref id="B34">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Roullier</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Duputi&#xe9;</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wennekes</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Benoit</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fern&#xe1;ndez Bringas</surname> <given-names>V. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rossel</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Disentangling the origins of cultivated sweetpotato (<italic>Ipomoea batatas</italic> [L.] Lam.)</article-title>. <source>PLoS One</source> <volume>8</volume>, <fpage>e62707</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0062707</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23723970</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B35">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Snook</surname> <given-names>M. E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Data</surname> <given-names>E. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kays</surname> <given-names>S. J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1994</year>). <article-title>Characterization and quantitation of hexadecyl, octadecyl and eicosyl esters of p-coumaric acid in the vine and root latex of sweetpotato [<italic>Ipomoea batatas</italic> (L.) Lam</article-title>. <source>J. Agric. Food Chem.</source> <volume>42</volume>, <fpage>2589</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2595</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1021/jf00048a004</pub-id>
</citation></ref>
<ref id="B36">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Stathers</surname> <given-names>T. E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rees</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kabi</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mwanga</surname> <given-names>R. O. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Owori</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gibson</surname> <given-names>R. W.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2003</year>). <article-title>Infestaci&#xf3;n de camote por Cylas spp. en &#xc1;frica Oriental: I. Diferencias entre cultivares en infestaci&#xf3;n de campo y el rol de factores vegetales</article-title>. <source>Int. J. Pest Manage.</source> <volume>49</volume>, <fpage>131</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>140</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/0967087021000043085</pub-id>
</citation></ref>
<ref id="B37">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Stevenson</surname> <given-names>P. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Muyinza</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hall</surname> <given-names>D. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Porter</surname> <given-names>E. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Farman</surname> <given-names>D. I.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Talwana</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>Chemical basis for resistance in sweetpotato (<italic>Ipomoea batatas</italic>) to the sweetpotato weevil (<italic>Cylas puncticollis</italic>)</article-title>. <source>Pure Appl. Chem.</source> <volume>81</volume>, <fpage>141</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>151</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1351/PAC-CON-08-02-10</pub-id>
</citation></ref>
<ref id="B38">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Talekar</surname> <given-names>N. S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1982</year>). <source>Sweetpotato: Proceedings of the First International Symposium</source> (<publisher-loc>Shanhua</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Asian Vegetable Research and Development Center</publisher-name>), <fpage>481</fpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B39">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Talekar</surname> <given-names>N. S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1987</year>). <article-title>Resistance in sweetpotato to sweetpotato weevil</article-title>. <source>Insect Sci. Appl.</source> <volume>8</volume>, <fpage>819</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>823</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1017/S1742758400022980</pub-id>
</citation></ref>
<ref id="B40">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Veasey</surname> <given-names>E. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Silva</surname> <given-names>J. R. Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rosa</surname> <given-names>M. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Borges</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bressan</surname> <given-names>E. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Peroni</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2007</year>). <article-title>Phenology and morphological diversity of sweetpotato (<italic>Ipomoea batatas</italic>) landraces of the Vale do Ribeira</article-title>. <source>Sci. Agricola</source> <volume>64</volume>, <fpage>416</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>427</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1590/S0103-90162007000400012</pub-id>
</citation></ref>
<ref id="B41">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Waddill</surname> <given-names>V. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Conover</surname> <given-names>R. A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1978</year>). <article-title>Resistance of white-fleshed sweetpotato cultivars to the sweetpotato weevil</article-title>. <source>HortScience</source> <volume>13</volume>, <fpage>476</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>477</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.21273/HORTSCI.13.4.476</pub-id>
</citation></ref>
<ref id="B42">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wolfe</surname> <given-names>G. W.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1991</year>). &#x201c;<article-title>The origin and dispersal of the pest species of <italic>Cylas</italic> with a key to the pest species groups of the world</article-title>,&#x201d; in <source>Sweetpotato Pest Management: A Global Perspective</source>. Eds. <person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname>Jansson</surname> <given-names>R. K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Raman</surname> <given-names>K. V.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<publisher-name>Westview Press</publisher-name>, <publisher-loc>Boulder</publisher-loc>), <fpage>13</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>43</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B43">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Moeinzadeh</surname> <given-names>M. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kuhl</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Helmuth</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xiao</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Haas</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Haplotype-resolved sweetpotato genome traces back its hexaploidization history</article-title>. <source>Nat. Plants</source> <volume>3</volume>, <fpage>696</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>703</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41477-017-0002-z</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28827752</pub-id></citation></ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>