<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.3 20070202//EN" "journalpublishing.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="2.3" xml:lang="EN">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Front. Plant Sci.</journal-id>
<journal-title>Frontiers in Plant Science</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">Front. Plant Sci.</abbrev-journal-title>
<issn pub-type="epub">1664-462X</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Frontiers Media S.A.</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpls.2025.1619386</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Plant Science</subject>
<subj-group>
<subject>Original Research</subject>
</subj-group>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Age-dependent shifts in root resource allocation strategies of <italic>Pinus yunnanensis</italic> seedlings under variable light gradients</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author" equal-contrib="yes">
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname>
<given-names>Yuanxi</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn003">
<sup>&#x2020;</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2317855/overview"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/conceptualization/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" equal-contrib="yes">
<name>
<surname>Duan</surname>
<given-names>Guihe</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn003">
<sup>&#x2020;</sup>
</xref>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/data-curation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name>
<surname>Wu</surname>
<given-names>Junwen</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn001">
<sup>*</sup>
</xref>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/methodology/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Shi</surname>
<given-names>Rui</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1545111/overview"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/conceptualization/"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
<institution>College of Forestry, Southwest Forestry University</institution>, <addr-line>Kunming, Yunnan</addr-line>,&#xa0;<country>China</country>
</aff>
<aff id="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
<institution>Yunnan Provincial Key Laboratory for Conservation and Utilization of In-forest Resource, Southwest Forestry University</institution>, <addr-line>Kunming, Yunan</addr-line>, <country>China</country>
</aff>
<author-notes>
<fn fn-type="edited-by">
<p>Edited by: Jie Zhou, Zhejiang University, China</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="edited-by">
<p>Reviewed by: Ketong Yang, Gansu Agricultural University, China</p>
<p>Zhixin Guo, Henan Agricultural University, China</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="corresp" id="fn001">
<p>*Correspondence: Junwen Wu, <email xlink:href="mailto:2569755639@qq.com">2569755639@qq.com</email>
</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="equal" id="fn003">
<p>&#x2020;These authors have contributed equally to this work and share first authorship</p>
</fn>
</author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>17</day>
<month>07</month>
<year>2025</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="collection">
<year>2025</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>16</volume>
<elocation-id>1619386</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>28</day>
<month>04</month>
<year>2025</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>25</day>
<month>06</month>
<year>2025</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#xa9; 2025 Liu, Duan, Wu and Shi</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2025</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Liu, Duan, Wu and Shi</copyright-holder>
<license xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">
<p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.</p>
</license>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<p>To elucidate how seedling age affects shade adaptation mechanisms in <italic>Pinus yunnanensis</italic>, we conducted a light intensity experiment with 1- and 3-year-old seedlings under five light levels (100%, 80%, 45%, 30%, and 5% of full sunlight). We evaluated the root non-structural carbohydrates (NSC), carbon:nitrogen:phosphorus (C:N:P) stoichiometry, and biomass allocation using phenotypic plasticity indices and correlation analysis. Phenotypic plasticity analysis revealed distinct age-dependent strategies: 1-year-old seedlings prioritized root morphological features (biomass, surface area) and starch storage, whereas 3-year-old seedlings prioritized metabolic flexibility (soluble sugar/starch ratio, N/P balance). Correlation analyses further demonstrated age-specific resource allocation patterns; in 1-year-old seedlings, biomass was associated with the root C/P ratio and starch reserves, whereas in 3-year-old seedlings, growth was associated with soluble sugars and N metabolism. Investment in photosynthetic organs (needle biomass) was prioritized under shade in 1-year-old seedlings, which is consistent with the source-sink theory; however, the root C content of these seedlings was reduced, and their N uptake was enhanced to maintain chlorophyll synthesis. Conversely, survival was prioritized in 3-year-old seedlings by increasing the amount of structural C in roots and optimizing C:N:P stoichiometry (e.g., lower C/N ratio and higher N/P ratio), which is consistent with the C storage priority hypothesis. These findings highlight a developmental transition from growth-driven C allocation in young seedlings to survival-oriented stoichiometric adjustments in older seedlings, which provides important insights for silvicultural practices in heterogeneous light environments.</p>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>Pinus yunnanensis</kwd>
<kwd>light intensity</kwd>
<kwd>root nutrient acquisition and storage</kwd>
<kwd>biomass allocation</kwd>
<kwd>different ages</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<contract-sponsor id="cn001">National Natural Science Foundation of China<named-content content-type="fundref-id">10.13039/501100001809</named-content>
</contract-sponsor>
<counts>
<fig-count count="11"/>
<table-count count="1"/>
<equation-count count="0"/>
<ref-count count="41"/>
<page-count count="16"/>
<word-count count="8769"/>
</counts>
<custom-meta-wrap>
<custom-meta>
<meta-name>section-in-acceptance</meta-name>
<meta-value>Plant Abiotic Stress</meta-value>
</custom-meta>
</custom-meta-wrap>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec id="s1" sec-type="intro">
<label>1</label>
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>Light is an essential driver of plant growth, development, and regeneration (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Quero et&#xa0;al., 2006</xref>). Its availability and efficient conversion into biomass critically determine tree and stand productivity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Binkley et&#xa0;al., 2013</xref>). Forest management and canopy development alter understory light regimes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Forrester et&#xa0;al., 2013</xref>), and these dynamics concurrently modify seedling access to light, which affects their spatial distribution and ecophysiological traits (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Nelson et&#xa0;al., 2016</xref>). The adaptive strategies of seedlings to light heterogeneity are pivotal for forest restoration (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">Zhou et&#xa0;al., 2017</xref>), given that seedlings exhibit heightened sensitivity to environmental factors compared with mature individuals (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">Soto et&#xa0;al., 2016</xref>).</p>
<p>Although moderate irradiance enhances photosynthesis and survival, excessive shading suppresses growth, and intense light triggers photoinhibition, wherein absorbed energy surpasses the photosynthetic capacity, generating reactive oxygen species that damage the photosynthetic machinery (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">Didaran et&#xa0;al., 2024</xref>). Clarifying the responses of seedlings to light gradients is thus vital for elucidating natural regeneration mechanisms and guiding silvicultural practices.</p>
<p>Root systems, which play an important role in water/nutrient acquisition, structural anchorage, and carbon (C) storage (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Freschet et&#xa0;al., 2010</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Kramer-Walter et&#xa0;al., 2016</xref>), profoundly influence seedling performance by affecting biomass allocation, morphology, and stoichiometric plasticity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Guo et&#xa0;al., 2008</xref>). Plant root volume, dry weight, total length, surface area, and number of root tips decrease significantly under drought conditions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">Wang et&#xa0;al., 2024</xref>).</p>    <p>Carbohydrates are the main product of plant photosynthesis and the main energy substance fueling the life activities of plants. They can be divided into two types: structural carbohydrates (SCs), which are the main structural component of plants and play a role in shaping plant morphology, and non-structural carbohydrates (NSC), which are a temporary storage material for the excessive accumulation of photosynthetic products in plants (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Kozlowski, 1992</xref>) and an energy supply material supporting tree growth (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Koch, 1996</xref>). Changes in the content of SCs and NSC reflect changes in the metabolic processes of plants, including the balance between C uptake (photosynthesis) and C consumption (growth and respiration) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">Poorter and Kitajima, 2007</xref>), and the ability of plants to cope with different environmental stresses (e.g., drought, low temperatures) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">W&#xfc;rth et&#xa0;al., 2005</xref>). Newly synthesized C and assimilates from photosynthesis in plant leaves are transported through vascular bundles and transferred to stalks or roots. When the environment changes, the distribution of NSC in different plant tissues may change, which in turn affects plant growth and responses to environmental changes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">Latt et&#xa0;al., 2001</xref>). Plants adopt different NSC allocation strategies at different stages of growth and development to fulfill their growth needs. For example, at the early stage of growth and development, plants allocate more photosynthetic products to the underground root system than to the aboveground parts, and the increase in the NSC content in the root system helps absorb more water and nutrients to meet the demand for photosynthesis in the aboveground parts; as the plant grows, the proportion of NSC allocated to the leaves increases, which promotes photosynthesis in plants and provides support (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">Litton et&#xa0;al., 2004</xref>). C, nitrogen (N), and phosphorus (P) are essential nutrients for plant growth and development, and they regulate important physiological and ecological processes such as the photosynthetic rate, transpiration rate, and reproductive growth of plants (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Chapin, 1980</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Elser et&#xa0;al., 2000</xref>); the C content in roots is related to the cost of constructing roots (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Guo et&#xa0;al., 2008</xref>), and the N content is related to root respiration and longevity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">Withington et&#xa0;al., 2006</xref>). Study of C, N, and P in roots has implications for plant growth. N and P are important components of plant photosynthetic enzymes, and changes in these elements can affect the photosynthetic rate of plants; consequently, these elements have major effects on plant growth (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Liu et&#xa0;al., 2008</xref>). More N and P can accumulate in leaves in plants with a higher N and P content in the roots (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">Chapin et&#xa0;al., 2002</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">Reich and Oleksyn, 2004</xref>).</p>
<p>
<italic>Pinus yunnanensis</italic>, a keystone species in Southwest China&#x2019;s ecological and economic forestry, comprises 19.63% of Yunnan&#x2019;s forest area (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">Liu et&#xa0;al., 2023</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">Zhang et&#xa0;al., 2014</xref>). Although the light adaptation of this species has been studied previously (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Liu et&#xa0;al., 2024</xref>), age-mediated survival strategies under shading, particularly in root plasticity, nutrient acquisition, and NSC dynamics, have not yet been clarified. This study examines 1) differences in growth, biomass allocation, and root nutrient strategies between 1- and 3-year-old seedlings under shading; 2) the relationships between root biomass allocation, nutrient uptake/storage, and whole-plant resource partitioning; and 3) the reliance of older seedlings on reserve mobilization and allometric adjustments for long-term survival. By integrating multi-age experiments with shading gradients, we investigated how <italic>P. yunnanensis</italic> seedlings balance &#x201c;resource optimization&#x201d; and &#x201c;risk avoidance&#x201d; across developmental stages, which provides profound theoretical insights for artificial afforestation and natural forest management.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2" sec-type="materials|methods">
<label>2</label>
<title>Materials and methods</title>
<sec id="s2_1">
<label>2.1</label>
<title>Study site</title>
<p>The experimental site was located in the arboretum of Southwest Forestry University (Kunming, Yunnan, 25&#xb0;03&#x2032;N, 102&#xb0;46&#x2032;E). The experimental site is located in a subtropical plateau monsoon climate zone, with an altitude of 1,964 m, average annual temperature of 16.5&#xb0;C, average annual precipitation of 1,035 mm, and average annual relative humidity of 67%. The temperature inside the shelter was 18.5&#x2013;37&#xb0;C, and the relative humidity of the air was 22.3%&#x2013;48.0%. The soil was a mixture of red loam and humus in a ratio of 3:2. The soil substrate, a 3:2 mixture of red soil and humus, exhibited the following properties: bulk density 1.001 g&#xb7;cm<sup>-</sup>&#xb3;, field capacity 22.5%, total C 3.26 g&#xb7;kg<sup>-</sup>&#xb9;, total N 5.98 g&#xb7;kg<sup>-</sup>&#xb9;, total P 0.62 g&#xb7;kg<sup>-</sup>&#xb9;, and pH 7.65.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_2">
<label>2.2</label>
<title>Plant material and experimental design</title>
<p>
<italic>P&#xb7; yunnanensis</italic> seedlings were grown in Yiliang Garden Forestry, and the 1 and 3-year-old seedlings cultivated in Malonghe Forestry Farm of Shuangbai County (seed number: Yun R-SS-PY-035-2020) were transported to the tree garden of Southwest Forestry University on March 14th, 2024, to cultivate the seedlings prior to transplanting and planting. On March 21, 2024, 1-year-old <italic>P. yunnanensis</italic> seedlings were transplanted into plastic pots with a caliber of 20.5 cm, a base diameter of 14.5 cm, and a height of 18.5 cm, and one <italic>P. yunnanensis</italic> plant was planted in each pot. Three-year-old <italic>P. yunnanensis</italic> seedlings were transplanted into plastic pots with a caliber of 29.5 cm, a base diameter of 23.0 cm, and a height of 21.0 cm. A tray was placed at the bottom of the pot to maintain its soil moisture content at the field water-holding capacity as soon as possible after transplanting to ensure that the seedlings could survive, and the test site was covered with mulch to prevent underground water vapor from affecting the potted plant; this allowed the <italic>P&#xb7; yunnanensis</italic> seedlings to grow in the suitable environment for 2 months.</p>
<p>A black shade net was used to construct different layers in the shade treatment groups, and the perimeter of the different treatment groups was covered with a shade net to prevent sunlight entering from the side from affecting the experiment. The light intensity in the open field without shade was measured using an auto-ranging illuminance meter (LI-250A, Li-Cor, Lincoln, USA) on a sunny day at approximately noon, and then the shade shed was built to achieve the light intensity required for the different treatments. Our experiment comprised five different light levels (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">Wang et&#xa0;al., 2006b</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Liu et&#xa0;al., 2024</xref>): full light (CK, light intensity of 14.69 &#xd7; 10<sup>4</sup> to 14.80 &#xd7; 10<sup>4</sup> Lx), 80% full light (L1, light intensity of 11.61 &#xd7; 10<sup>4</sup> to 12.03 &#xd7; 10<sup>4</sup> Lx), 45% full light (L2, light intensity of 6.25 &#xd7; 10<sup>4</sup> to 6.74 &#xd7; 10<sup>4</sup> Lx), 30% full light level (L3, light intensity of 4.25 &#xd7; 10<sup>4</sup> to 4.74 &#xd7; 10<sup>4</sup> Lx), and 5% full light level (L4, light intensity of 0.73 &#xd7; 10<sup>4</sup> to 0.74 &#xd7; 10<sup>4</sup> Lx). The diameter and seedling height of seedlings were measured and recorded on May 21, 2024, for 1-year-old <italic>P. yunnanensis</italic> seedlings (height: 6.69 &#xb1; 0.67 cm, diameter: 6.13 &#xb1; 0.63 mm) and 3-year-old <italic>P. yunnanensis</italic> seedlings (seedling height: 32.06 &#xb1; 2.64 cm, diameter: 15.33 &#xb1; 0.98 mm). The experiment was performed using a completely randomized design with three replications of 10 plants each, and there were 150 plants for both the 1-year-old and 3-year-old <italic>P. yunnanensis</italic> seedlings. The shading experiment started on May 21, 2024; the actual soil moisture content was measured using a soil moisture meter and controlled by the weighing method, and rehydration was carried out at 17:00 every day according to the rate of water loss, which stabilized the water within the normal moisture level for each treatment (80 &#xb1; 5% of the field-holding capacity, and the actual moisture content was maintained at 36.13%&#x2013;41.38%). The samples were taken on August 21, 2024, and the experiment lasted for 90 days.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_3">
<label>2.3</label>
<title>Plant sampling</title>
<p>At the end of the experiment, plant height was measured from the ground to the top of the seedlings using straight-edge (Plant height, accuracy 0.1 cm); diameter was measured using vernier calipers (diameter, accuracy 0.01 mm). Six plants were measured in each treatment, and measurements were taken from a total of 30 one-year-old and 30 three-year-old seedlings. The whole plant harvest method was used to remove the seedlings from the pots; the soil was rinsed with tap water, and the water was removed from the seedlings using filter paper and blotting paper. The <italic>P. yunnanensis</italic> seedlings were divided into three parts, needles, stems, and root system, and the fresh weight of the samples was taken. The root system of <italic>P. yunnanensis</italic> seedlings was placed into a root scanning instrument (Epson) for scanning, and WinRHIZO software was used to obtain data such as the total root length (cm), surface area of the root system (cm<sup>2</sup>), average diameter of the root system (mm), and total volume of the root system (cm<sup>3</sup>); values with two decimal places were retained for all the variables. Subsequently, the plant samples were placed in an oven at 120 &#xb0;C for half an hour to kill the green living material; they were then subjected to 80 &#xb0;C and dried to a constant mass, and the dried samples were ground, sieved, and stored. We calculated the needle biomass ratio (needle weight/total plant weight), stem biomass ratio (stem weight/total plant weight), root biomass ratio (root weight/total plant weight), and the root-crown ratio (root weight/(needle weight + stem weight)) based on the weights of the various organs of <italic>P. yunnanensis</italic> seedlings. The water content of each organ was calculated according to the formula for the water content (%) of each plant tissue = (fresh weight - dry weight)/dry weight.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_4">
<label>2.4</label>
<title>Measurement of plant sample indexes</title>
<p>The NSC in this experiment were the sum of the soluble sugar and starch content; 0.05 g of dried samples were collected and ground; and 10 mL of distilled water was added and centrifuged at 4,000 r-min<sup>-1</sup> for 10 min after being submerged in boiling water for 10 min. The soluble sugar content in the supernatant was determined using the anthrone method by measuring the absorbance value of the soluble sugar at 625 nm with a UV-visible spectrophotometer; the starch content in the samples was determined by precipitation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Liu et&#xa0;al., 2024</xref>). The total C content of needles was determined using the potassium dichromate plus dilution heating method, the total N content was determined by Na&#xef;ve colorimetry, and the total P content was determined by molybdenum-antimony colorimetry (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">Bao, 2002</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_5">
<label>2.5</label>
<title>Statistical analysis</title>
<p>The data (n=6) were assessed for normality and homogeneity (Kolmogorov-Smirnov test) before subsequent statistical analyses. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to test the effect of light intensity on the growth and biomass indexes; root indexes; root soluble sugar, starch, and NSC content; and root C:N:P stoichiometric characteristics of <italic>P. yunnanensis</italic> seedlings. Multiple comparisons of means were made using the Duncan test. The variability of each index at two different seedling ages was tested using an independent samples t-test. Analyze the correlations between NSC concentrations in needles and the ratios of C, N, and P elements using R software. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 20.0 (IBM SPSS Statistics, U.S.A.), and the level of statistical significance was P = 0.05. Graph Pad Prism 8 was used to make graphs.</p>
<p>Phenotypic plasticity index: PPI =(Xmax-Xmin)/Xmax, where Xmax and Xmin denote the maximum and minimum values of each indicator, respectively.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s3" sec-type="results">
<label>3</label>
<title>Results</title>
<sec id="s3_1">
<label>3.1</label>
<title>Two-factor ANOVA of the growth and root characteristics of <italic>P. yunnanensis</italic> seedlings of different ages under different shading conditions</title>
<p>Under different shading conditions, the growth and root characteristics of 1-year-old and 3-year-old <italic>P. yunnanensis</italic> seedlings differed; differences were also observed among treatments (CK, L1, L2, L3, and L4) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">
<bold>Table&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>). Significant effects of seedling age were observed on all indicators; however, there was no significant effect (<italic>P</italic>&gt;0.05) of seedling age on the root P content and C/N ratio. There was a significant effect of shade treatment on all indicators; however, seedling age had no significant effect (<italic>P</italic>&gt;0.05) on seedling height, needle-leaf biomass ratio, stem biomass ratio, root biomass ratio, root crown ratio, root water content, and root P content. The interaction of the two (Tree age &#xd7; Treatment) significantly affected (<italic>P</italic>&lt;0.05) seedling height, needle biomass, stem biomass, total biomass, NSC (and its fractions), C content, N content, P content, C/P, and N/P of <italic>P. yunnanensis</italic> seedlings.</p>
<table-wrap id="T1" position="float">
<label>Table&#xa0;1</label>
<caption>
<p>Two-way ANOVA of different shade treatments on the growth and root characteristic indexes of <italic>P. yunnanensis</italic> seedlings of different ages.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" rowspan="2" align="center">Indicators</th>
<th valign="middle" colspan="2" align="center">Tree age</th>
<th valign="middle" colspan="2" align="center">Treatment</th>
<th valign="middle" colspan="2" align="center">Tree age &#xd7; Treatment</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" align="center">
<italic>F</italic>
</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">
<italic>P</italic>
</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">
<italic>F</italic>
</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">
<italic>P</italic>
</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">
<italic>F</italic>
</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">
<italic>P</italic>
</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<list list-type="simple">
<list-item>
<p>Plant height</p>
</list-item>
</list>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">396.188</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.000</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2.094</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.120</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<list list-type="simple">
<list-item>
<p>3.639</p>
</list-item>
</list>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.022</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<list list-type="simple">
<list-item>
<p>Diameter</p>
</list-item>
</list>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">58.613</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.000</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">4.945</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.006</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<list list-type="simple">
<list-item>
<p>1.508</p>
</list-item>
</list>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.238</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<list list-type="simple">
<list-item>
<p>Needle biomass</p>
</list-item>
</list>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">165.575</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.000</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">9.142</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.000</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<list list-type="simple">
<list-item>
<p>3.183</p>
</list-item>
</list>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.035</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<list list-type="simple">
<list-item>
<p>Stem biomass</p>
</list-item>
</list>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">339.888</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.000</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">11.823</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.000</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<list list-type="simple">
<list-item>
<p>4.947</p>
</list-item>
</list>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.006</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<list list-type="simple">
<list-item>
<p>Root biomass</p>
</list-item>
</list>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">133.508</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.000</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">5.446</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.004</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<list list-type="simple">
<list-item>
<p>1.067</p>
</list-item>
</list>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.399</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<list list-type="simple">
<list-item>
<p>Total biomass</p>
</list-item>
</list>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">228.964</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.000</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">10.080</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.000</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<list list-type="simple">
<list-item>
<p>3.140</p>
</list-item>
</list>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.037</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<list list-type="simple">
<list-item>
<p>Needle biomass ratio</p>
</list-item>
</list>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">89.319</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.000</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2.301</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.094</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<list list-type="simple">
<list-item>
<p>2.162</p>
</list-item>
</list>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.111</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<list list-type="simple">
<list-item>
<p>Stem biomass ratio</p>
</list-item>
</list>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">72.034</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.000</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.293</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.306</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<list list-type="simple">
<list-item>
<p>1.009</p>
</list-item>
</list>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.426</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<list list-type="simple">
<list-item>
<p>Root biomass ratio</p>
</list-item>
</list>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">12.959</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.002</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.492</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.242</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<list list-type="simple">
<list-item>
<p>1.326</p>
</list-item>
</list>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.295</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<list list-type="simple">
<list-item>
<p>Root shoot ratio</p>
</list-item>
</list>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">13.762</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.001</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.579</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.218</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<list list-type="simple">
<list-item>
<p>1.366</p>
</list-item>
</list>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.281</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<list list-type="simple">
<list-item>
<p>Needle water content</p>
</list-item>
</list>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">81.417</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.000</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">59.981</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.000</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<list list-type="simple">
<list-item>
<p>2.245</p>
</list-item>
</list>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.100</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<list list-type="simple">
<list-item>
<p>Stem water content</p>
</list-item>
</list>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">121.085</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.000</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">8.408</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.000</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<list list-type="simple">
<list-item>
<p>1.099</p>
</list-item>
</list>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.384</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<list list-type="simple">
<list-item>
<p>Root water content</p>
</list-item>
</list>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">192.341</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.000</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2.841</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.051</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<list list-type="simple">
<list-item>
<p>1.411</p>
</list-item>
</list>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.266</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<list list-type="simple">
<list-item>
<p>Root length</p>
</list-item>
</list>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">59.772</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.000</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">20.164</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.000</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<list list-type="simple">
<list-item>
<p>0.585</p>
</list-item>
</list>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.677</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<list list-type="simple">
<list-item>
<p>Root projected area</p>
</list-item>
</list>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">54.488</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.000</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">11.236</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.000</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<list list-type="simple">
<list-item>
<p>1.499</p>
</list-item>
</list>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.240</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<list list-type="simple">
<list-item>
<p>Root surface area</p>
</list-item>
</list>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">54.488</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.000</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">11.236</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.000</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<list list-type="simple">
<list-item>
<p>1.499</p>
</list-item>
</list>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.240</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<list list-type="simple">
<list-item>
<p>Root volume</p>
</list-item>
</list>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">110.407</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.000</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">9.405</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.000</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<list list-type="simple">
<list-item>
<p>0.640</p>
</list-item>
</list>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.640</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<list list-type="simple">
<list-item>
<p>Root average diameter</p>
</list-item>
</list>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">25.040</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.000</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2.932</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.047</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<list list-type="simple">
<list-item>
<p>0.772</p>
</list-item>
</list>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.556</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<list list-type="simple">
<list-item>
<p>Soluble sugar</p>
</list-item>
</list>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">196.895</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.000</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">36.950</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.000</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<list list-type="simple">
<list-item>
<p>10.934</p>
</list-item>
</list>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<list list-type="simple">
<list-item>
<p>Starch</p>
</list-item>
</list>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">45.815</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.000</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">5.291</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.005</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<list list-type="simple">
<list-item>
<p>6.902</p>
</list-item>
</list>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.001</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<list list-type="simple">
<list-item>
<p>NSC</p>
</list-item>
</list>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">186.201</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.000</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">29.412</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.000</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<list list-type="simple">
<list-item>
<p>8.318</p>
</list-item>
</list>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<list list-type="simple">
<list-item>
<p>Soluble sugar/starch</p>
</list-item>
</list>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">28.916</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.000</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">12.740</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.000</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<list list-type="simple">
<list-item>
<p>12.808</p>
</list-item>
</list>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<list list-type="simple">
<list-item>
<p>C</p>
</list-item>
</list>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">17.157</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.001</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">15.768</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.000</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<list list-type="simple">
<list-item>
<p>5.934</p>
</list-item>
</list>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.003</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<list list-type="simple">
<list-item>
<p>N</p>
</list-item>
</list>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">9.921</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.005</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">15.155</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.000</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<list list-type="simple">
<list-item>
<p>4.880</p>
</list-item>
</list>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.007</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<list list-type="simple">
<list-item>
<p>P</p>
</list-item>
</list>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.120</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.733</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.850</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.510</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<list list-type="simple">
<list-item>
<p>4.455</p>
</list-item>
</list>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.010</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<list list-type="simple">
<list-item>
<p>C/N</p>
</list-item>
</list>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.356</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.258</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">17.635</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.000</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<list list-type="simple">
<list-item>
<p>2.629</p>
</list-item>
</list>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.065</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<list list-type="simple">
<list-item>
<p>C/P</p>
</list-item>
</list>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">10.934</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.004</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">8.130</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.000</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<list list-type="simple">
<list-item>
<p>14.420</p>
</list-item>
</list>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<list list-type="simple">
<list-item>
<p>N/P</p>
</list-item>
</list>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">8.439</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.009</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">14.072</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.000</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<list list-type="simple">
<list-item>
<p>3.531</p>
</list-item>
</list>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.025</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn>
<p>F indicates the effect of shade treatment on each indicator; <italic>P</italic>&gt;0.05 means no significant effect, <italic>P</italic>&lt;0.05 means significant difference, and <italic>P &lt;</italic>0.01 means highly significant difference.</p>
</fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_2">
<label>3.2</label>
<title>Effect of different shade treatments on the growth of <italic>P. yunnanensis</italic> seedlings of different ages</title>
<p>The needles of 1-year-old and 3-year-old seedlings became pendulous after shading, and the needles of shaded plants were not as tough as those of plants in the CK group; the needles of 3-year-old seedlings became yellow and soft compared with those in the control group after shading, and the needles of the 1-year-old seedlings become sparse and yellow (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>). The root system of 3-year-old seedlings was significantly more developed in the L3 and L4 treatments than in the L1 and L2 treatments, and the root system of 1-year-old seedlings was also more developed in the L1, L2, and L3 treatments than in the L4 treatment.</p>
<fig id="f1" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;1</label>
<caption>
<p>Growth phenotype of <italic>P. yunnanensis</italic> seedlings.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-16-1619386-g001.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Ten images of pine seedlings against a dark background display a comparison between one-year-old and three-year-old plants labeled CK, L1, L2, L3, and L4. The older seedlings appear larger and more developed.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
<p>The seedling height of 1-year-old seedlings did not significantly differ between the L1, L2, and L3 treatments and with the CK, and it was 48.36% lower in the L4 treatment than in the CK (<italic>P</italic>&lt;0.05); the seedling height of 3-year-old <italic>P. yunnanensis</italic> seedlings was 33.11%, 38.39%, and 38.40% higher in the L1, L2, and L3 treatments than in the CK, respectively (<italic>P</italic>&lt;0.05) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;2</bold>
</xref>). The diameter of 1-year-old <italic>P. yunnanensis</italic> seedlings was significantly more developed in the L2 and L4 treatments than in the CK. The diameter of 1-year-old seedlings was 41.83% and 45.45% lower in the L2 and L4 treatment than in the CK (<italic>P</italic>&lt;0.05), and the diameter of 3-year-old seedlings was 20.65%, 26.97%, and 23.47% lower in the L1, L2, and L4 treatments than in the CK, respectively (<italic>P</italic>&lt;0.05). The height and diameter of 3-year-old <italic>P. yunnanensis</italic> seedlings were significantly higher than that of 1-year-old seedlings (<italic>P</italic>&lt;0.05).</p>
<fig id="f2" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;2</label>
<caption>
<p>Effect of <italic>P. yunnanensis</italic> seedlings on seedling height and diameter under different shade treatments. CK: full light; L1: 80% full light level; L2: 45% full light level; L3: 30% full light level; L4: 95% full light level. <bold>(A)</bold> Plant height; <bold>(B)</bold> Diameter. The error bars indicate the standard deviation of the mean (n = 6). Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between treatments for 1-year-old <italic>P. yunnanensis</italic> seedlings, and different uppercase letters indicate significant differences between treatments for 3-year-old <italic>P. yunnanensis</italic> seedlings (<italic>P</italic>&lt;0.05). ***, **, and * indicate significant differences between the 1-year-old and 3-year-old seedlings at <italic>P</italic>&lt;0.001, <italic>P</italic>&lt;0.01, and <italic>P</italic>&lt;0.05, respectively, and the same applies below.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-16-1619386-g002.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Bar charts compare plant height and diameter for one-year-old (blue) and three-year-old (red) plants under different shade treatments (CK, L1, L2, L3, L4). Three-year-old plants consistently show greater height and diameter across treatments with significant differences marked by asterisks.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_3">
<label>3.3</label>
<title>The effect of different shade treatments on the biomass of <italic>P. yunnanensis</italic> seedlings of different ages</title>
<p>Needle biomass, stem biomass, root biomass, and total biomass of 1-year-old and 3-year-old <italic>P. yunnanensis</italic> seedlings decreased significantly (<italic>P</italic>&lt;0.05) as the degree of shading increased, and the biomass of 3-year-old seedlings was significantly higher (<italic>P</italic>&lt;0.05) than that of 1-year-old seedlings (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;3</bold>
</xref>). The needle biomass of 1-year-old <italic>P. yunnanensis</italic> seedlings did not significantly differ in the L2 and L3 treatments (<italic>P</italic>&gt;0.05), and the needle biomass of 3-year-old seedlings did not significantly differ in the L1, L3, and L4 treatments (<italic>P</italic>&gt;0.05). The stem and root biomass of 1-year-old seedlings did not significantly differ in the L2, L3, and L4 treatments (<italic>P</italic>&gt;0.05); the stem biomass of 3-year-old seedlings was significantly higher in the L1 and L2 treatments than in the L3 and L4 treatments (<italic>P</italic>&gt;0.05); the stem biomass of 3-year-old seedlings was significantly higher in the L1 and L2 treatments than in the L3 and L4 treatments (<italic>P</italic>&lt;0.05). The root biomass of 3-year-old seedlings did not significantly differ in the L1, L2, L3, and L4 treatments (<italic>P</italic>&gt;0.05). The total biomass of 1-year-old seedlings was significantly higher in the L2 and L3 treatments than in the L4 treatment; the total biomass of 3-year-old seedlings did not significantly differ in the L1, L3, and L4 treatments (<italic>P</italic>&gt;0.05).</p>
<fig id="f3" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;3</label>
<caption>
<p>Effect of P. yunnanensis seedlings on biomass under different shade treatments. <bold>(A)</bold> needle biomass; <bold>(B)</bold> stem biomass; <bold>(C)</bold> root biomass; <bold>(D)</bold> total biomass. Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between treatments for 1-year-old P. yunnanensis seedlings, and different uppercase letters indicate significant differences between treatments for 3-year-old P. yunnanensis seedlings (P&lt;0.05). **and *** indicate significant differences between the 1-year-old and 3-year-old seedlings at P&lt;0.01and P&lt;0.001, respectively.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-16-1619386-g003.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Bar charts compare biomass of 1-year-old and 3-year-old plants under different shade treatments. There are four panels: A) Needle biomass, B) Stem biomass, C) Root biomass, and D) Total biomass. Red bars (3-year-old) generally higher than blue (1-year-old). Notable differences are marked with asterisks for statistical significance.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_4">
<label>3.4</label>
<title>Effects of different shade treatments on biomass allocation in <italic>P. yunnanensis</italic> seedlings of different ages</title>
<p>Needle and leaf biomass ratios of 1-year-old and 3-year-old <italic>P. yunnanensis</italic> seedlings increased significantly (<italic>P</italic>&lt;0.05) as the shading degree increased, and the stem biomass ratio, root biomass ratio, and root-crown ratio of 1-year-old seedlings decreased as the degree of shading increased (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f4">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;4</bold>
</xref>). The stem biomass of 3-year-old seedlings did not change significantly as the shading degree increased, and the root biomass ratio and root-crown ratio first decreased as the shading degree increased and then increased in the L4 treatment; however, these ratios were all lower in the L4 treatment than in the CK. The needle biomass ratio of 1-year-old <italic>P. yunnanensis</italic> seedlings was significantly higher than that of 3-year-old seedlings in all treatment groups, and the stem biomass ratio of 3-year-old seedlings was significantly higher than that of 1-year-old seedlings. The root biomass ratio and root-crown ratio were higher in 3-year-old seedlings than in 1-year-old seedlings, and these differences were significant in the CK and L4 treatments.</p>
<fig id="f4" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;4</label>
<caption>
<p>Effect of different shade treatments on the biomass allocation of P. yunnanensis seedlings. <bold>(A)</bold> needle biomass ratio; <bold>(B)</bold> stem biomass ratio; <bold>(C)</bold> root biomass ratio; <bold>(D)</bold> root crown ratio. Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between treatments for 1-year-old P. yunnanensis seedlings, and different uppercase letters indicate significant differences between treatments for 3-year-old P. yunnanensis seedlings (P&lt;0.05). ***, **, and * indicate significant differences between the 1-year-old and 3-year-old seedlings at P&lt;0.001, P&lt;0.01, and P&lt;0.05;ns indicates no significant difference.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-16-1619386-g004.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Four bar graphs labeled A to D show biomass ratios for one-year-old (blue) and three-year-old (red) plants under different shade treatments (CK, L1, L2, L3, L4). Graph A depicts needle biomass ratio, B shows stem biomass ratio, C illustrates root biomass ratio, and D displays root shoot ratio. Significance levels are indicated by asterisks, and statistical groupings are labeled with letters above the bars.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_5">
<label>3.5</label>
<title>Effect of different shade treatments on the water content of <italic>P. yunnanensis</italic> seedlings of different ages</title>
<p>The water content of needles and stems of 1-year-old and 3-year-old <italic>P. yunnanensis</italic> seedlings gradually increased as the shading degree increased; the water content of the roots of 1-year-old seedlings did not significantly differ as the shading degree increased (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f5">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;5</bold>
</xref>). The water content of the roots of 3-year-old seedlings gradually increased as the shading degree increased. The water content of the needles, stems, and roots of 1-year-old <italic>P. yunnanensis</italic> seedlings was significantly higher than that of 3-year-old seedlings (<italic>P</italic>&lt;0.05).</p>
<fig id="f5" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;5</label>
<caption>
<p>Effect of <italic>P. yunnanensis</italic> seedlings on the water content of each organ under different shade treatments. <bold>(A)</bold> Needle water content; <bold>(B)</bold> Stem water content; <bold>(C)</bold> Root water content. Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between treatments for 1-year-old P. yunnanensis seedlings, and different uppercase letters indicate significant differences between treatments for 3-year-old P. yunnanensis seedlings (P&lt;0.05). ***, **, and * indicate significant differences between the 1-year-old and 3-year-old seedlings at P&lt;0.001, P&lt;0.01, and P&lt;0.05.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-16-1619386-g005.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Bar charts displaying water content percentages under various shade treatments. Chart A shows needle water content; Chart B shows stem water content; Chart C shows root water content. Each chart compares 1-year-old (blue) and 3-year-old (red) samples for treatments CK, L1, L2, L3, and L4, with significant differences marked by asterisks.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_6">
<label>3.6</label>
<title>Effects of different shade treatments on the root characteristics of <italic>P. yunnanensis</italic> seedlings of different ages</title>
<p>The root length, root surface area, root volume, and root projected area of 1-year-old and 3-year-old <italic>P. yunnanensis</italic> seedlings decreased significantly (<italic>P</italic>&lt;0.05) as the degree of shading increased (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f6">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;6</bold>
</xref>; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f7">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;7</bold>
</xref>); the average diameter of the roots did not differ significantly (<italic>P</italic>&gt;0.05) among the treatment groups. All root characteristics of 3-year-old seedlings were higher than those of 1-year-old seedlings. The root length, root surface area, root volume, and root projected area were significantly higher in 3-year-old seedlings than in 1-year-old seedlings (<italic>P</italic>&lt;0.05), and the mean root diameter of 3-year-old seedlings was significantly higher than that of 1-year-old seedlings in the CK and L3 treatment groups; no significant differences were observed among the other treatment groups (<italic>P</italic>&gt;0.05).</p>
<fig id="f6" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;6</label>
<caption>
<p>Root phenotypes of <italic>P. yunnanensis</italic> seedlings in different shade treatments.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-16-1619386-g006.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Comparison of one-year-old and three-year-old root samples labeled CK, L1, L2, L3, and L4. The roots vary in density and structure, with the three-year-old samples appearing more developed and complex than the one-year-old samples.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
<fig id="f7" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;7</label>
<caption>
<p>Effect of <italic>P. yunnanensis</italic> seedlings on root characteristics under different shade treatments. <bold>(A)</bold> Root length; <bold>(B)</bold> Root surface area; <bold>(C)</bold> Root volume; <bold>(D)</bold> Root shaded area; <bold>(E)</bold> Root mean diameter. Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between treatments for 1-year-old P. yunnanensis seedlings, and different uppercase letters indicate significant differences between treatments for 3-year-old P. yunnanensis seedlings (P&lt;0.05). ***, **, and * indicate significant differences between the 1-year-old and 3-year-old seedlings at P&lt;0.001, P&lt;0.01, and P&lt;0.05;ns indicates no significant difference.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-16-1619386-g007.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Bar graphs labeled A to E compare root parameters of 1-year-old and 3-year-old plants under different shade treatments (CK, L1, L2, L3, L4). Measurements include root length, surface area, volume, projection area, and average diameter, with significant differences marked by asterisks and labeled with letters for statistical significance.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_7">
<label>3.7</label>
<title>Effects of different shade treatments on the root NSC of <italic>P. yunnanensis</italic> seedlings of different ages</title>
<p>The soluble sugar content of the roots of 1-year-old <italic>P. yunnanensis</italic> seedlings was 26.84%, 41.03%, and 54.09% lower in the L1, L2, and L4 treatments than in the CK, respectively (<italic>P</italic>&lt;0.05) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f8">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;8</bold>
</xref>). The maximum value of the soluble sugar content (31.93 mg-g<sup>-1</sup>) was observed in the L3 treatment; the soluble sugar content of 3-year-old seedlings was 62.78%, 48.99%, and 66.19% lower in the L2, L3, and L4 treatments than in the CK, respectively (<italic>P</italic>&lt;0.05). The content of NSC in the roots of 1-year-old and 3-year-old seedlings significantly decreased with the degree of shading. The starch content of 1-year-old and 3-year-old seedlings decreased gradually with the degree of shading. The root NSC content of 1-year-old <italic>P. yunnanensis</italic> seedlings was 30.14%, 40.62%, and 50.54% lower in the L1, L2, and L4 treatments than in the CK, respectively (<italic>P</italic>&lt;0.05), and the root NSC content of 3-year-old seedlings was 47.14%, 34.55%, and 45.65% lower in the L2, L3, and L4 treatments than in the CK, respectively (<italic>P</italic>&lt;0.05). The soluble sugar/starch ratio in 1-year-old seedlings did not significantly differ in the CK, L1, and L2 treatments, and it was highest (3.60) in the L3 treatment. The soluble sugar/starch ratio was 110.05% higher in the L3 treatment than in the CK; it was lowest (1.40) in the L4 treatment, and it was 18.05% lower in the L4 treatment than in the CK in 3-year-old seedlings. The soluble sugar/starch ratio was 24.02%, 57.70%, 49.11%, and 67.14% lower in the L1, L2, L3, and L4 treatments than in the CK, respectively (<italic>P</italic>&lt;0.05). The root soluble sugar content and NSC content were significantly higher in 1-year-old <italic>P. yunnanensis</italic> seedlings than in 3-year-old seedlings. The root starch content was higher in 1-year-old seedlings than in 3-year-old seedlings in all treatment groups, and significant differences were only observed between the CK, L2, and L4 treatments. The root soluble sugar/starch ratio of 1-year-old <italic>P. yunnanensis</italic> seedlings was significantly higher than that of 3-year-old seedlings in the L2, L3, and L4 treatments.</p>
<fig id="f8" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;8</label>
<caption>
<p>Variation in the root NSC content of <italic>P. yunnanensis</italic> seedlings in different shade treatments. <bold>(A)</bold> soluble sugar; <bold>(B)</bold> starch; <bold>(C)</bold> NSC; <bold>(D)</bold> soluble sugar/starch. Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between treatments for 1-year-old P. yunnanensis seedlings, and different uppercase letters indicate significant differences between treatments for 3-year-old P. yunnanensis seedlings (P&lt;0.05). ***, **, and * indicate significant differences between the 1-year-old and 3-year-old seedlings at P&lt;0.001, P&lt;0.01, and P&lt;0.05;ns indicates no significant difference.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-16-1619386-g008.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Bar charts show the effect of shade treatments on sugar and starch content in one-year-old and three-year-old samples. Panels are labeled A and B. Blue represents one-year-old and red represents three-year-old. Measurements include soluble sugar content, starch content, NSC content, and soluble sugars/starch ratio for treatments CK, L1, L2, L3, and L4. Statistical significance is indicated with asterisks.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_8">
<label>3.8</label>
<title>Effects of different shade treatments on the C:N:P stoichiometric characteristics of the roots of <italic>P. yunnanensis</italic> seedlings of different ages</title>
<p>The root C content of 1-year-old <italic>P. yunnanensis</italic> seedlings was 22.52%, 17.78%, and 15.02% lower in the L2, L3, and L4 treatments than in the CK, respectively (<italic>P</italic>&lt;0.05); the root C content of 3-year-old seedlings was 11.43% and 12.82% lower in the L2 and L3 treatments than in the CK, respectively (<italic>P</italic>&lt;0.05) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f9">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;9</bold>
</xref>). The root C content was 24.47% higher in the L4 treatment than in the CK (<italic>P</italic>&lt;0.05). The root N content of 1-year-old <italic>P. yunnanensis</italic> seedlings was 52.63%, 69.32%, and 46.20% higher (<italic>P</italic>&lt;0.05) in the L1, L2, and L4 treatments than in the CK, respectively, and it was 41.61% higher (<italic>P</italic>&lt;0.05) in the L3 treatment than in the CK. The root N content of 3-year-old seedlings was 27.70%, 70.53%, and 70.53% (<italic>P</italic>&lt;0.05) lower in the L1, L3, and L4 treatments than in the CK, respectively. The root N content was 18.73% higher (<italic>P</italic>&lt;0.05) in the L2 treatment than in the CK. The root P content in 1-year-old <italic>P. yunnanensis</italic> seedlings did not significantly differ among the CK, L1, L2, and L3 treatments, and it was 12.09% higher (<italic>P</italic>&lt;0.05) in the L4 treatment than in the CK. The root P content was 9.58% and 9.58% lower in 3-year-old seedlings in the L3 and L4 treatments than in the CK, respectively (<italic>P</italic>&lt;0.05). The root C content of 3-year-old seedlings was significantly higher than that of 1-year-old seedlings in the L4 treatment (<italic>P</italic>&lt;0.05); the root N content of 3-year-old seedlings was significantly higher than that of 1-year-old seedlings in the CK and L2 treatments. The root P content of 3-year-old seedlings was significantly higher than that of 1-year-old seedlings in the L1 treatment, and that of 1-year-old seedlings was higher than that of 3-year-old seedlings in the L4 treatment.</p>
<fig id="f9" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;9</label>
<caption>
<p>Changes in the root C:N:P stoichiometric characteristics of <italic>P. yunnanensis</italic> seedlings in response to different shade treatments. <bold>(A)</bold> C content; <bold>(B)</bold> N content; <bold>(C)</bold> P content; <bold>(D)</bold> C/N ratio; <bold>(E)</bold> C/P ratio; <bold>(F)</bold> N/P ratio.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-16-1619386-g009.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Bar graphs comparing soil composition metrics for one-year-old and three-year-old treatments under different shade levels (CK, L1, L2, L3, L4). Metrics include carbon (C), nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), carbon to nitrogen ratio (C/N), carbon to phosphorus ratio (C/P), and nitrogen to phosphorus ratio (N/P). Blue bars represent one-year-old plants and red bars represent three-year-old plants, with significance levels marked by asterisks.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
<p>The root C/N ratios of 1-year-old and 3-year-old <italic>P. yunnanensis</italic> seedlings were highest in the L3 treatment, and they were 51.35% and 201.73% higher (<italic>P</italic>&lt;0.05), respectively, in the L3 treatment than in the CK. The root C/N ratios of 1-year-old seedlings were 33.33%, 53.08%, and 36.00% lower (<italic>P</italic>&lt;0.05) in the L1, L2, and L4 treatments than in the CK, respectively. The root C/N ratio of 3-year-old seedlings was 33.33%, 53.08%, and 36.00% lower in the L1, L2, and L4 treatments than in the CK, respectively (<italic>P</italic>&lt;0.05). The root C/N ratio of 3-year-old seedlings was significantly higher than that of 1-year-old seedlings in the L1 and L4 treatments. The root C/N ratio was 42.15% and 63.71% higher in the L1 and L4 treatments than in the CK, respectively (<italic>P</italic>&lt;0.05). The root C/P ratios of 1-year-old <italic>P. yunnanensis</italic> seedlings were 23.20%, 18.81%, and 24.38% lower in the L2, L3, and L4 treatments than in the CK, respectively (<italic>P</italic>&lt;0.05), and that of 3-year-old seedlings was 34.41% higher in the L4 treatment than in the CK (<italic>P</italic>&lt;0.05). The root N/P ratio of 1-year-old <italic>P. yunnanensis</italic> seedlings was 68.58% (<italic>P</italic>&lt;0.05) higher in the L2 treatment and 42.49% lower (<italic>P</italic>&lt;0.05) in the L3 treatment than in the CK; the root N/P ratio of 3-year-old <italic>P. yunnanensis</italic> seedlings was 25.32% and 67.20% lower (<italic>P</italic>&lt;0.05) in the L1 and L3 treatments, respectively, and 25.88% (<italic>P</italic>&lt;0.05) higher in the L2 treatment than in the CK. The root C/N ratio of 1-year-old <italic>P. yunnanensis</italic> seedlings was significantly higher than that of 1-year-old seedlings in the CK and L2 treatments (P&lt;0.05); the root C/P ratio of 1-year-old seedlings was significantly lower than that of 3-year-old seedlings in the L4 treatment (<italic>P</italic>&lt;0.05); the root N/P ratio of 1-year-old seedlings was significantly lower than that of 3-year-old seedlings in the CK treatment (<italic>P</italic>&lt;0.05).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_9">
<label>3.9</label>
<title>Phenotypic plasticity analysis of growth and root characteristics of <italic>P. yunnanensis</italic> seedlings of different ages under different shade treatments</title>
<p>The phenotypic plasticity indices of various organs in <italic>P. yunnanensis</italic> seedlings of different ages are shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f10">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;10</bold>
</xref>; the phenotypic plasticity indices of 1-year-old and 3-year-old seedlings differed among the shade treatments. The phenotypic plasticity indices of 1-year-old <italic>P. yunnanensis</italic> seedlings were larger for root system characteristics, root biomass, and stem biomass (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f10">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;10A</bold>
</xref>), followed by root N/P, C/N, N content, and soluble sugar/starch ratio. The phenotypic plasticity indices of 3-year-old <italic>P. yunnanensis</italic> seedlings were larger for the N/P, C/N, N content, soluble sugar/starch ratio, soluble sugar, root surface area, and root projected area, followed by N/P, C/N, N content, soluble sugar/starch ratio, soluble sugar, root surface area, NSC, root volume, root length, acinar biomass, stem biomass, and total biomass (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f10">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;10B</bold>
</xref>). Overall, this suggests that both 1-year-old and 3-year-old seedlings adapted to the shade environment by altering their root characteristics, root N/P, C/N, N content, and soluble sugar/starch ratio.</p>
<fig id="f10" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;10</label>
<caption>
<p>Phenotypic plasticity of growth and root characteristics of <italic>P. yunnanensis</italic> seedlings of different ages under different shade treatments <bold>(A)</bold> 1-year-old; <bold>(B)</bold> 3-year-old.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-16-1619386-g010.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Two bar charts labeled A and B display the phenotypic plasticity index for various plant traits. The traits include nutrient ratios (N/P, C/P, C/N), sugars, starch, root dimensions, water content, biomass ratios, and overall biomass. Bars vary in length, depicting the index ranges from 0.0 to 1.0 for each trait, with certain differences between the two charts. Red dotted lines segment the index into intervals of 0.2.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_10">
<label>3.10</label>
<title>Correlation analysis of growth and root characteristics of <italic>P. yunnanensis</italic> seedlings of different seedling ages under shade treatment</title>
<p>The correlation between the growth and root characteristics of <italic>P. yunnanensis</italic> seedlings of different ages is shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f11">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;11</bold>
</xref>, and the correlation of the indicators under different shade treatments differed for 1-year-old and 3-year-old seedlings. The water content of needles and stems of 1-year-old and 3-year-old seedlings was significantly negatively correlated with the diameter, biomass of each organ, root length, root projected area, root surface area, root volume, and root NSC; the biomass of each organ, the diameter and root length, root projected area, root surface area, root volume, and root NSC content were generally significantly positively correlated. The biomass of each organ of 1-year-old seedlings and the diameter were significantly positively correlated with the root starch, C content, and C/P (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f11">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;11A</bold>
</xref>). These variables were positively correlated with the root starch, C content, and C/P in 1-year-old seedlings (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f11">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;11A</bold>
</xref>), and organ biomass, diameter, root soluble sugar/starch, N content, and N/P were significantly positively correlated in 3-year-old seedlings (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f11">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;11B</bold>
</xref>).</p>
<fig id="f11" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;11</label>
<caption>
<p>Correlation analysis of growth and root characteristics of P. yunnanensis seedlings under different shade treatments. <bold>(A)</bold> One-year-old seedlings; <bold>(B)</bold> Three-year-old seedlings. *P&lt;0.05, <bold>P&lt;0.01</bold>, *P&lt;0.001.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-16-1619386-g011.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Two clustered heat maps labeled A and B depict correlations among various plant traits, with color gradients from green to blue indicating values from negative 0.5 to positive 1. Variables such as biomass, nutrient content, and water content are analyzed. Clustering along axes shows groupings of traits with similar relationships.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s4" sec-type="discussion">
<label>4</label>
<title>Discussion</title>
<sec id="s4_1">
<label>4.1</label>
<title>Light and seedling age affect the growth strategy of <italic>P. yunnanensis</italic> seedlings</title>
<p>Most plants adapt to the shaded environment by altering their biomass allocation pattern and morphological indexes to maximize the acquisition of light energy, improve photosynthetic efficiency, and promote their growth (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">Liu et&#xa0;al., 2018</xref>). Changes in the plasticity of seedling height and diameter under different light treatments reflect their ability to utilize resources (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">Lockhart et&#xa0;al., 2012</xref>). In this study, we showed that there was a significant difference in the response of seedling height and diameter to light in the 1-year-old and 3-year-old <italic>P. yunnanensis</italic> seedlings (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>). Both the seedling height and diameter of 1-year-old seedlings were significantly decreased under low light (L4, 95% full light); however, the seedling height of 3-year-old seedlings was significantly higher in the shade treatment (38.40% increase in seedling height in the L3 treatment). This pattern of growth of 3-year-old seedlings was similar to that of <italic>Cunninghamia lanceolata</italic> (Lamb.) Hook, where all the growth variables of seedlings increased with the light intensity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">Liu et&#xa0;al., 2018</xref>); the opposite growth pattern was observed for 1-year-old seedlings. This suggests that as seedlings grow, <italic>P. yunnanensis</italic> may enhance adaptation to shade by altering their photosynthetic capacity or resource allocation strategies. In contrast, the growth in the height and diameter of 1-year-old <italic>P. yunnanensis</italic> seedlings was suppressed, and this &#x201c;dwarfing&#x201d; growth may have been achieved by reducing the metabolic cost of stem elongation while increasing the water-holding capacity of leaves, roots, and stems to cope with potential stress (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f5">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;5</bold>
</xref>), which is consistent with the findings of studies on <italic>Pseudotsuga menziesii</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">Chen and Klinka, 1997</xref>), American chestnut (<italic>Castanea dentata</italic>) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">Wang et&#xa0;al., 2006a</xref>), <italic>Fagus sylvatica</italic> and <italic>Quercus robur</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">Sevillano et&#xa0;al., 2016</xref>), and many other tree species. Comparison of the growth indexes of 1-year-old and 3-year-old <italic>P. yunnanensis</italic> seedlings revealed that the adaptation of 1-year-old <italic>P. yunnanensis</italic> seedlings to the shaded environment was alleviated under 30% full light, and 3-year-old <italic>P. yunnanensis</italic> seedlings grew best under 30% full light.</p>    <p>Biomass can reflect plant growth and productivity, and the biomass allocation pattern indicates the adaptation of plants to different light treatments; the allocation of biomass between the aboveground and belowground parts reflects their overall morphological adaptation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">Portsmuth and Niinemets, 2007</xref>). In this study, the biomass of 1-year-old and 3-year-old <italic>P. yunnanensis</italic> seedlings decreased significantly as the degree of shading increased, and the needle-leaf biomass ratio increased significantly in both 1-year-old and 3-year-old seedlings as the degree of shading increased. This indicates that shade inhibited the accumulation of biomass in young <italic>P. yunnanensis</italic> seedlings, and that resources were preferentially allocated to photosynthetic organs (needles and leaves) under low light (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Mediavilla and Escudero, 2010</xref>); the needle-to-leaf allocation ratio was significantly higher in 1-year-old seedlings than in 3-year-old seedlings, and the biomass allocation ratios of stems and roots were higher in 3-year-old seedlings than in 1-year-old seedlings. This suggests that 1-year-old <italic>P. yunnanensis</italic> seedlings responded to shade by relying mainly on inputs to needle resources, whereas 3-year-old seedlings responded to the shade environment in an integrated manner through balanced inputs from multiple sources. This is also consistent with our finding that the root biomass ratio, stem biomass ratio, root crown ratio, and root characterization indexes were significantly higher in the 3-year-old seedlings than in the 1-year-old seedlings.</p>
<p>In summary, 1-year-old seedlings compensated for the lack of light energy in low-light environments by prioritizing the allocation of limited resources to photosynthetic organs (needles and leaves). This is consistent with the source-store theory, in which young plants prioritize the maintenance of the activity of &#x201c;sources&#x201d; (photosynthetic organs) to ensure basal metabolic requirements when resources are limited (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Liu et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>). Moreover, root development is difficult to maintain in young seedlings under low light, and prolonged shading may lead to seedling death due to inadequate root development. In contrast, 3-year-old seedlings can maintain the dynamic balance of underground-aboveground resources and enhance the adaptability to resource heterogeneity by moderately inhibiting aboveground growth while safeguarding root function. By optimizing resource allocation and physiological plasticity, &#x201c;robust growth&#x201d; can be achieved under shade. This strategy may provide seedlings with a competitive advantage in secondary forest restoration or sparse plantations, especially in habitats with frequent light fluctuations.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s4_2">
<label>4.2</label>
<title>Effects of different light conditions and seedling age on NSC content and C:N:P stoichiometric characteristics in the roots of <italic>P. yunnanensis</italic> seedlings</title>
<p>Changes in the NSC content reflect the relationship between the tree C balance and plant adaptation strategies to environmental changes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Liu et&#xa0;al., 2024</xref>), and the allocation of NSC in trees is related to their physiological and ecological processes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">Poorter and Kitajima, 2007</xref>). The C, N, and P content and their stoichiometric ratios in roots reflect the pattern of C accumulation as well as N and P uptake and storage, which can reflect the relationship between the plant growth rate and nutrient partitioning. Previous studies have shown that when plants are deficient in N, they increase the proportion of carbohydrates allocated to the root system to promote N uptake, whereas an increase in N effectiveness results in the allocation of more carbohydrates to aboveground tissues (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">Bai et&#xa0;al., 2010</xref>). In this study, soluble sugars, starch, and NSC in the roots of 1-year-old and 3-year-old <italic>P. yunnanensis</italic> seedlings decreased significantly as the degree of shading increased; the soluble sugar and starch content of the roots of 1-year-old <italic>P. yunnanensis</italic> seedlings did not significantly differ in the L3 treatment and the control (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f8">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;8</bold>
</xref>), which indicated that the roots of <italic>P. yunnanensis</italic> seedlings responded to the shade environment by increasing the consumption of NSC for transport to other organs (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">Wei et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>). Under shade, the soluble sugar and starch content of 1-year-old <italic>P. yunnanensis</italic> seedling roots gradually decreased in the L1, L2, and L4 treatments, and the root soluble sugar, NSC, and soluble sugar/starch ratios were higher in the L3 treatment than in the other treatments (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f8">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;8</bold>
</xref>). The NSC (and its fractions) of the roots of 3-year-old <italic>P. yunnanensis</italic> seedlings did not significantly differ in the L1 treatment and the CK, and it was higher in the L1 treatment than in the L2, L3, and L4 treatments. The root NSC (and its components) of 3-year-old <italic>P. yunnanensis</italic> seedlings did not change significantly among the L2, L3, and L4 treatments, and the root soluble sugar/starch ratio did not change significantly among the L2, L3, and L4 treatments. This indicates that 1-year-old <italic>P. yunnanensis</italic> seedlings were more dependent on NSC in response to the shade treatment, indicating that the above-ground parts are required for the transport of photosynthetically assimilated substances to the root system, and that the root vigor was greatest in the L3 treatment, which was manifested by the maximum soluble sugar/starch ratio. This also suggests that 3-year-old <italic>P. yunnanensis</italic> seedlings have superior regulatory mechanisms to reduce their dependence on short-term carbohydrates in the shade treatment.</p>
<p>The root C content of 1-year-old seedlings significantly decreased under shade treatment, and the C content of 3-year-old seedlings increased in the L4 treatment; this may be related to the strategy employed by 3-year-old seedlings, wherein root C structure is optimized to maintain survival under shade treatment, which reflects their shift from a rapid growth strategy to a survival strategy (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">Kobe et&#xa0;al., 2010</xref>). The elevated root N content of 1-year-old seedlings under shade (L1, L2, and L4) possibly compensated for the light energy deficit by enhancing N uptake to support chlorophyll synthesis. In contrast, the root N content was lowest in the L3 treatment; the C/N ratio was significantly higher in the L3 treatment than in the CK, and the N/P ratio was lowest in the L3 treatment, suggesting that resources tended to be allocated to organic matter produced by C metabolism to sustain plant growth and development and to maintain the requirements for normal physiological functioning (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Monson et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>).</p>
<p>The N content of 3-year-old seedlings was generally lower in the shade treatments (L1, L3, and L4), which reflects adaptive adjustments to low light or N transport to aboveground parts; this suggests that 3-year-old seedlings rely more on C reserves than N metabolism under low light. Consistent with the &#x2018;C storage preference hypothesis&#x2019; proposed by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">He et&#xa0;al. (2024)</xref> that mature trees tend to allocate C to structural components (e.g., lignin) to enhance tissue resistance under stress rather than to temporary metabolic reservoirs (NSC), the root P content of the 3-year-old seedlings was significantly reduced under shade, whereas the root P content of the 1-year-old seedlings was only elevated under extreme shade (L4), suggesting that young seedlings may maintain energy metabolism by increasing P uptake under low light conditions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Liu et&#xa0;al., 2024</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s4_3">
<label>4.3</label>
<title>Adaptive strategies of <italic>P. yunnanensis</italic> seedlings to shade conditions</title>
<p>The phenotypic plasticity index values of the root morphological characteristics (e.g., root biomass, root surface area) and root C/N ratio indices were large in the 1-year-old seedlings. The biomass of each organ was significantly and positively correlated with the root starch, root NSC, and root C content, as well as the root C/P ratio (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f11">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;11A</bold>
</xref>), indicating that the growth of young seedlings depended on the storage and transport strategy of photosynthetic assimilates in the roots; the root biomass ratios were not significantly different in the L1, L2, and L3 treatments, and the root index values and C content were reduced in these treatments. This indicates that changes in the biomass of 1-year-old <italic>P. yunnanensis</italic> seedlings under shade conditions were consistent with the NSC storage strategy of the roots, changes in the C content, and the root C/P ratio. Seedlings enhanced resource capture by maintaining the root biomass ratio and root mean diameter, and the conversion of starch to soluble sugar was stable, which supported aboveground growth.</p>
<p>The phenotypic plasticity index values for root stoichiometric characteristics (N/P, C/N, and N), soluble sugar/starch ratio, and soluble sugar content of 3-year-old seedlings were high. The biomass of each organ was significantly and positively correlated with root soluble sugar, soluble sugar/starch, root N content, and N/P ratio and negatively correlated with the P content (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f11">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;11B</bold>
</xref>), suggesting that 3-year-old seedlings optimize the efficiency of resource use via alterations of C-N metabolism (decreasing the C/N ratio), maintaining starch storage (the root-shoot ratio was maintained in the L1, L2, and L3 treatments and increased in the L4 treatment), and increasing aboveground biomass investment (increasing the needle biomass ratio and maintaining the stem biomass ratio) in response to shaded environment. Three-year-old seedlings depend on N uptake and storage, and the absorption of N by the roots enhances the plant&#x2019;s ability to withstand shade, suggesting that N fertilizer could be applied to 3-year-old seedlings under shaded conditions.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s5" sec-type="conclusions">
<label>5</label>
<title>Conclusion</title>
<p>Our findings indicate that <italic>P. yunnanensis</italic> seedlings use age-related strategies to cope with shade stress, which reflects a trade-off between growth and survival. First, 1-year-old seedlings prioritized rapid biomass accumulation by increasing N uptake and maintaining root starch reserves, but they were at risk of C depletion under extremely shaded conditions. Their high plasticity in root morphology (e.g., surface area) and C/P regulation supports their transient growth but limits their long-term shade tolerance. Second, 3-year-old seedlings adopt conservative strategies to reallocate C to structural components and optimize C:N:P ratios to enhance stress tolerance. Their dependence on soluble sugars rather than starch and their suppression of N metabolism suggest that metabolic efficiency is prioritized over growth. Third, phenotypic plasticity diverges sharply with age: 1-year-old seedlings rely on morphological adjustments, whereas 3-year-old seedlings utilize stoichiometric flexibility. Our results suggest the need for age-specific management: moderate shade (30&#x2013;80% light) favors root development in 1-year-old seedlings, and 3-year-old seedlings can tolerate greater shade (5&#x2013;45% light) under N supplementation. Long-term field experiments and isotope tracing are needed to validate C-nutrient redistribution pathways to enhance our understanding of ontogenetic ecological niche differentiation during forest regeneration.</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<sec id="s6" sec-type="data-availability">
<title>Data availability statement</title>
<p>The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s7" sec-type="author-contributions">
<title>Author contributions</title>
<p>YL: Conceptualization, Writing &#x2013; original draft. GD: Data curation, Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing. JW: Methodology, Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing. RS: Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing, Conceptualization.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s8" sec-type="funding-information">
<title>Funding</title>
<p>The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article. This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China, grant number 31960306.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s9" sec-type="COI-statement">
<title>Conflict of interest</title>
<p>The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s10" sec-type="ai-statement">
<title>Generative AI statement</title>
<p>The author(s) declare that no Generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s11" sec-type="disclaimer">
<title>Publisher&#x2019;s note</title>
<p>All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.</p>
</sec>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="B1">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Bai</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xun</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Rhizome severing increases root lifespan of <italic>Leymus chinensis</italic> in a typical steppe of Inner Mongolia</article-title>. <source>PloS One</source> <volume>125</volume>, <elocation-id>e12125</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0012125</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20711343</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B2">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Bao</surname> <given-names>S. D.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2002</year>). <source>Soil and agricultural chemistry analysis</source> (<publisher-loc>Beijing</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>China Agriculture Press</publisher-name>).</citation></ref>
<ref id="B3">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Binkley</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Campoe</surname> <given-names>O. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gspaltl</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Forrester</surname> <given-names>D. I.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Light absorption and use efficiency in forests: why patterns differ for trees and stands</article-title>. <source>For. Ecol. Manage.</source> <volume>288</volume>, <fpage>5</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>13</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.foreco.2011.11.002</pub-id>
</citation></ref>
<ref id="B4">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Chapin</surname> <given-names>F. S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1980</year>). <article-title>The mineral nutrition of wild plants</article-title>. <source>Annu. Rev. Ecol. systematics</source> <volume>11</volume>, <fpage>233</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>260</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1146/annurev.es.11.110180.001313</pub-id>
</citation></ref>
<ref id="B5">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Chapin</surname> <given-names>F. S.</given-names>
<suffix>III</suffix>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mstson</surname> <given-names>P. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mooney</surname> <given-names>H. A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2002</year>). <source>Principles of terrestrial ecosystem ecology</source> Vol. <volume>298</volume> (<publisher-loc>New York</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Springer</publisher-name>).</citation></ref>
<ref id="B6">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>H. Y. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Klinka</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1997</year>). <article-title>Light availability and photosynthesis of <italic>Pseudotsuga menziesii</italic> seedlings grown in the open and in the forest understory</article-title>. <source>Tree Physiol.</source> <volume>17</volume>, <fpage>23</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>29</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/treephys/17.1.23</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">14759910</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B7">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Didaran</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kordrostami</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ghasemi-Soloklui</surname> <given-names>A. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pashkovskiy</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kreslavski</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kuznetsov</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2024</year>). <article-title>The mechanisms of photoinhibition and repair in plants under high light conditions and interplay with abiotic stressors</article-title>. <source>J. Photochem. Photobiol. B.</source> <volume>259</volume>, <fpage>113004</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2024.113004</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">39137703</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B8">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Elser</surname> <given-names>J. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sterner</surname> <given-names>R. W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gorokhova</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fagan</surname> <given-names>W. F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Markow</surname> <given-names>T. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cotner</surname> <given-names>J. B.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2000</year>). <article-title>Biological stoichiometry from genes to ecosystems</article-title>. <source>Ecol. Lett.</source> <volume>3</volume>, <fpage>540</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>550</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1461-0248.2000.00185.x</pub-id>
</citation></ref>
<ref id="B9">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Forrester</surname> <given-names>D. I.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Collopy</surname> <given-names>J. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Beadle</surname> <given-names>C. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Baker</surname> <given-names>T. G.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Effect of thinning, pruning and nitrogen fertiliser application on light interception and light-use efficiency in a young Eucalyptus nitens plantation</article-title>. <source>For. Ecol. Manage.</source> <volume>288</volume>, <fpage>21</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>30</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.foreco.2011.11.024</pub-id>
</citation></ref>
<ref id="B10">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Freschet</surname> <given-names>G. T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cornelissen</surname> <given-names>J. H. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Van Logtestijn</surname> <given-names>R. S. P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Aerts</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Evidence of the &#x2018;plant economics spectrum&#x2019; in a subarctic flora</article-title>. <source>J. Ecol.</source> <volume>98</volume>, <fpage>362</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>373</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1365-2745.2009.01615.x</pub-id>
</citation></ref>
<ref id="B11">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Guo</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xia</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wei</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chang</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>Anatomical traits associated with absorption and mycorrhizal colonization are linked to root branch order in twenty-three Chinese temperate tree species</article-title>. <source>New Phytol.</source> <volume>180</volume>, <fpage>673</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>683</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1469-8137.2008.02573.x</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">18657210</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B12">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>He</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Shi</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hu</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dang</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2024</year>). <article-title>Carbon stress causes preferential storage over growth in treeline trees</article-title>. <source>Physiol. Plantarum.</source> <volume>1761</volume>, <elocation-id>e14175</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/ppl.14175</pub-id>
</citation></ref>
<ref id="B13">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kobe</surname> <given-names>R. K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Iyer</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Walters</surname> <given-names>M. B.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Optimal partitioning theory revisited: nonstructural carbohydrates dominate root mass responses to nitrogen</article-title>. <source>Ecol.</source> <volume>91</volume>, <fpage>166</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>179</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1890/09-0027.1</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20380206</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B14">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Koch</surname> <given-names>K. E.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1996</year>). <article-title>Carbohydrate-modulated gene expression in plants</article-title>. <source>Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol.</source> <volume>47</volume>, <fpage>509</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>540</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1146/annurev.arplant.47.1.509</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">15012299</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B15">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kozlowski</surname> <given-names>T. T.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1992</year>). <article-title>Carbohydrate sources and sinks in woody plants</article-title>. <source>Botanical Review.</source> <volume>58</volume>, <fpage>107</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>222</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/BF02858600</pub-id>
</citation></ref>
<ref id="B16">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kramer-Walter</surname> <given-names>K. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bellingham</surname> <given-names>P. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Millar</surname> <given-names>T. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Smissen</surname> <given-names>R. D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Richardson</surname> <given-names>S. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Laughlin</surname> <given-names>D. C.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Root traits are multidimensional: specific root length is independent from root tissue density and the plant economic spectrum</article-title>. <source>J. Ecol.</source> <volume>104</volume>, <fpage>1299</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1310</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/1365-2745.12562</pub-id>
</citation></ref>
<ref id="B17">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Latt</surname> <given-names>C. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Nair</surname> <given-names>P. K. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kang</surname> <given-names>B. T.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2001</year>). <article-title>Reserve carbohydrate levels in the boles and structural roots of five multipurpose tree species in a seasonally dry tropical climate</article-title>. <source>For Ecol. Manage.</source> <volume>146</volume>, <fpage>145</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>158</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S0378-1127(00)00456-4</pub-id>
</citation></ref>
<ref id="B18">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Litton</surname> <given-names>C. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ryan</surname> <given-names>M. G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Knight</surname> <given-names>D. H.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2004</year>). <article-title>Effects of tree density and stand age on carbon allocation patterns in postfire lodgepole pine</article-title>. <source>Ecol. Appl.</source> <volume>14</volume>, <fpage>460</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>475</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1890/02-5291</pub-id>
</citation></ref>
<ref id="B19">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Daryanto</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Guo</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Huang</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Responses of <italic>Chinese fir</italic> and <italic>Schima superba</italic> seedlings to light gradients: Implications for the restoration of mixed broadleaf-conifer forests from Chinese fir monocultures</article-title>. <source>For Ecol. Manag</source> <volume>419/420</volume>, <fpage>51</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>57</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.foreco.2018.03.033</pub-id>
</citation></ref>
<ref id="B20">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>J. X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>D. Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>G. Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Faivre-Vuillin</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Deng</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>C. L.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. (<year>2008</year>) .<article-title>CO<sub>2</sub> enrichment increases nutrient leaching from model forest ecosystems in subtropical China</article-title>. <source>Biogeosciences.</source> (<year>2008</year>) <volume>5</volume>, <fpage>1783</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1795</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/bgd-5-2679-2008</pub-id>
</citation></ref>
<ref id="B21">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>R. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>X. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gao</surname> <given-names>R. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hou</surname> <given-names>X. Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Huo</surname> <given-names>L. P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Huang</surname> <given-names>Z. Y.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2020</year>) <article-title>Allometry rather than abiotic drivers explains biomass allocation among leaves, stems and roots of Artemisia across a large environmental gradient in China</article-title>. <source>J. Ecol.</source> <volume>109</volume>, <fpage>1026</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1040</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/1365-2745.13532</pub-id>
</citation></ref>
<ref id="B22">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>Y. X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>J. W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jing</surname> <given-names>H. Q.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2024</year>). <article-title>Non-structural carbohydrate (NSC) content and C:N:P stoichiometry of <italic>Pinus yunnanensis</italic> seedling needles in response to shade treatment</article-title>. <source>Ind. Crop Prod</source> <volume>210</volume>, <fpage>118138</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.indcrop.2024.118138</pub-id>
</citation></ref>
<ref id="B23">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xiao</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sun</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Deng</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>Seasonal variation in C:N:P stoichiometry, nonstructural carbohydrates, and carbon isotopes of two coniferous pioneer tree species in subtropical China</article-title>. <source>Front. Plant Sci.</source> <volume>27</volume>, <elocation-id>1225436</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpls.2023.1225436</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">38107006</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B24">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Lockhart</surname> <given-names>B. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gardiner</surname> <given-names>E. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Stautz</surname> <given-names>T. P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Leininger</surname> <given-names>T. D.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Development and plasticity of endangered shrub <italic>Lindera melissifolia</italic> (Lauraceae) seedlings under contrasting light regimes</article-title>. <source>Plant Spec Biol.</source> <volume>27</volume>, <fpage>30</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>45</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1442-1984.2011.00332.x</pub-id>
</citation></ref>
<ref id="B25">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Mediavilla</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Escudero</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Differences in biomass allo-cation patterns between saplings of two co-occurring Mediterranean oaks as reflecting different strategies in the use of light and water</article-title>. <source>Eur. J. For. Res.</source> <volume>129</volume>, <fpage>697</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>706</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10342-010-0375-2</pub-id>
</citation></ref>
<ref id="B26">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Monson</surname> <given-names>R. K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Trowbridge</surname> <given-names>A. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lindroth</surname> <given-names>R. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lerdau</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Coordinated resource allocation to plant growth-defense tradeoffs</article-title>. <source>New Phytol.</source> <volume>233</volume>, <fpage>1051</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1066</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/nph.17773</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">34614214</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B27">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Nelson</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wagner</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Day</surname> <given-names>M. E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fernandez</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Weiskittel</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Saunders</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Light absorption and light-use efficiency of juvenile white spruce trees in natural stands and plantations</article-title>. <source>For Ecol. Manage.</source> <volume>376</volume>, <fpage>158</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>165</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.foreco.2016.06.019</pub-id>
</citation></ref>
<ref id="B28">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Poorter</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kitajima</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2007</year>). <article-title>Carohydrate storage and light requirements of tropical moistand dry forest tree species</article-title>. <source>Ecol.</source> <volume>88</volume>, <fpage>1000</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1011</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1890/06-0984</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">17536715</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B29">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Portsmuth</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Niinemets</surname> <given-names>&#xdc;.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2007</year>). <article-title>Structural and physiological plasticity in response to light and nutrients in five temperate deciduous woody species of contrasting shade tolerance</article-title>. <source>Funct. Ecol.</source> <volume>21</volume>, <fpage>61</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>77</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1365-2435.2006.01208.x</pub-id>
</citation></ref>
<ref id="B30">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Quero</surname> <given-names>J. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Villar</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Maranon</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zamora</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2006</year>). <article-title>Interactions of drought and shade effects on seedlings of four Quercus species: physiological and structural leaf responses</article-title>. <source>New Phytol.</source> <volume>170</volume>, <fpage>819</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>834</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1469-8137.2006.01713.x</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">16684241</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B31">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Reich</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Oleksyn</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2004</year>). <article-title>From the cover: Global patterns of plant leaf N and P in relation to temperature and latitude</article-title>. <source>Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.</source> <volume>101</volume>, <fpage>11001</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>11006</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1073/pnas.0403588101</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">15213326</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B32">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Sevillano</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Short</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Grant</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>O&#x2019;Reilly</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Effects of light availability on morphology, growth and biomass allocation of <italic>Fagus sylvatica</italic> and <italic>Quercus robur</italic> seedlings</article-title>. <source>For. Ecol. Manage.</source> <volume>374</volume>, <fpage>11</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>19</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.foreco.2016.04.048</pub-id>
</citation></ref>
<ref id="B33">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Soto</surname> <given-names>D. P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jacobs</surname> <given-names>D. F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Salas</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Donoso</surname> <given-names>P. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fuentes</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Puettmann</surname> <given-names>K. J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Light and nitrogen interact to influence regeneration in old-growth Nothofagus-dominated forests in south-central Chile</article-title>. <source>For. Ecol. Manage.</source> <volume>384</volume>, <fpage>303</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>313</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.foreco.2016.11.016</pub-id>
</citation></ref>
<ref id="B34">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>G. G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bauerle</surname> <given-names>W. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mudder</surname> <given-names>B. T.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2006</year>a). <article-title>Effects of light acclimation on the photosynthesis, growth, and biomass allocation in American chestnut (<italic>Castanea dentata</italic>) seedlings</article-title>. <source>For. Ecol. Manage.</source> <volume>226</volume>, <fpage>173</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>180</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.foreco.2005.12.063</pub-id>
</citation></ref>
<ref id="B35">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>X. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Shi</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sun</surname> <given-names>J. X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>J. Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>L. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lu</surname> <given-names>R. Q.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2006</year>b). <article-title>Effect of shading on growth characteristics and biomass distribution of <italic>Liriope</italic> sp<italic>icata</italic> (Thunb.) Lour</article-title>. <source>Bull. Bot. Res.</source> <volume>26</volume>, <fpage>225</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>228</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.7525/j.issn.1673-5102.2006.02.022</pub-id>
</citation></ref>
<ref id="B36">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>X. Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wei</surname> <given-names>X. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sun</surname> <given-names>Y. B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dong</surname> <given-names>S. K.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2024</year>). <article-title>Molecular mechanism of drought resistance in soybean roots revealed using physiological and multi-omics analyses</article-title>. <source>Plant Physiol. Bioch</source> <volume>208</volume>, <fpage>108451:0981</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>9428</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.plaphy.2024.108451</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">38402799</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B37">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wei</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jin</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Luo</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Shan</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Effects of shading on photosynthetic characteristics and non-structural carbohydrate content of <italic>heptacodium miconioides</italic> seedlings</article-title>. <source>Bull. Botanical Res.</source> <volume>42</volume>, <elocation-id>10</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.7525/j.issn.1673-5102.2022.06.020</pub-id>
</citation></ref>
<ref id="B38">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Withington</surname> <given-names>J. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Reich</surname> <given-names>P. B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Oleksyn</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Eissenstat</surname> <given-names>D. M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2006</year>). <article-title>Comparisons of structure and lifespan in roots and leaves among temperate trees</article-title>. <source>Ecol. Monogrphs.</source> <volume>76</volume>, <fpage>381</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>397</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1890/0012-9615(2006)076[0381:COSALS]2.0.CO;2</pub-id>
</citation></ref>
<ref id="B39">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>W&#xfc;rth</surname> <given-names>M. K. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pel&#xe1;ez-Riedl</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wright</surname> <given-names>S. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>K&#xf6;rner</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2005</year>). <article-title>Non-structural carbohydrate pools in a tropical forest</article-title>. <source>Oecologia.</source> <volume>143</volume>, <fpage>11</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>24</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00442-004-1773-2</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">15578227</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B40">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xu</surname> <given-names>W. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ouyang</surname> <given-names>Z. Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhu</surname> <given-names>C. Q.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Determination of priority nature conservation areas and human disturbances in the Yangtze River Basin, China</article-title>. <source>J. Nat. Conser.</source> <volume>22</volume>, <fpage>326</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>336</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jnc.2014.02.007</pub-id>
</citation></ref>
<ref id="B41">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Huang</surname> <given-names>L. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wei</surname> <given-names>X. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>H. Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Physiological, morphological, and anatomical changes in <italic>Rhododendron agastum</italic> in response to shading</article-title>. <source>Plant Growth Regul.</source> <volume>81</volume>, <fpage>23</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>30</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10725-016-0181-z</pub-id>
</citation></ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>