<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.3 20070202//EN" "journalpublishing.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="2.3" xml:lang="EN">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Front. Plant Sci.</journal-id>
<journal-title>Frontiers in Plant Science</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">Front. Plant Sci.</abbrev-journal-title>
<issn pub-type="epub">1664-462X</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Frontiers Media S.A.</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpls.2025.1618572</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Plant Science</subject>
<subj-group>
<subject>Original Research</subject>
</subj-group>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Biochemical diversity in <italic>Allium</italic> species: key metabolite profiles for breeding and bioprospecting</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name>
<surname>Benke</surname>
<given-names>Ashwini Prashant</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn001">
<sup>*</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1259778/overview"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/data-curation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/software/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/methodology/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/conceptualization/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/formal-analysis/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Mokat</surname>
<given-names>Digambar</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/validation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/supervision/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/project-administration/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Mahajan</surname>
<given-names>Vijay</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/resources/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/visualization/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/project-administration/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/supervision/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/funding-acquisition/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
<institution>Crop Improvement Division, ICAR-Directorate of Onion and Garlic Research, Rajgurunagar</institution>, <addr-line>Pune</addr-line>,&#xa0;<country>India</country>
</aff>
<aff id="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
<institution>Department of Botany, Savitribai Phule Pune University</institution>, <addr-line>Pune</addr-line>,&#xa0;<country>India</country>
</aff>
<author-notes>
<fn fn-type="edited-by">
<p>Edited by: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/772839/overview">Meivelu Moovendhan</ext-link>, Saveetha Medical College &amp; Hospital, India</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="edited-by">
<p>Reviewed by: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/3029337/overview">Singaravel Vijayapoopathi</ext-link>, Saveetha Medical College &amp; Hospital, India</p>
<p>
<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/3076940/overview">Sathuvan M.</ext-link>, University of Madras, India</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="corresp" id="fn001">
<p>*Correspondence: Ashwini Prashant Benke, <email xlink:href="mailto:ashwiniprashantbenke@gmail.com">ashwiniprashantbenke@gmail.com</email>
</p>
</fn>
</author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>05</day>
<month>11</month>
<year>2025</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="collection">
<year>2025</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>16</volume>
<elocation-id>1618572</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>26</day>
<month>04</month>
<year>2025</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>09</day>
<month>09</month>
<year>2025</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#xa9; 2025 Benke, Mokat and Mahajan.</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2025</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Benke, Mokat and Mahajan</copyright-holder>
<license xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">
<p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.</p>
</license>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<p>The genus <italic>Allium</italic> encompasses a diverse range of species, including cultivated, wild, and underutilized varieties, each exhibiting significant biochemical diversity. This study aims to comprehensively analyze the phytochemical composition and biochemical variability in 19 <italic>Allium</italic> germplasm representing 16 species. The research focuses on key bioactive compounds such as flavonoids, phenolics, sulfur-containing compounds, and sugars to provide valuable insights for breeding programs, functional food development, and pharmaceutical applications. Biochemical profiling was conducted using standard assays (qualitative and quantitative) to determine antioxidant activity, thiosulfinate content, pyruvic acid levels, and sugar content. To analyze the data, hierarchical clustering analysis was performed to group the species, and Principal Component Analysis (PCA) was used to explain the total biochemical variance and differentiate the species based on their metabolic composition. The analysis revealed substantial variations across species. The average thiosulfinates content ranged from 5.33 to 26.12 &#xb5;mol/g FW, total flavonoid content from 10.42 to 48.42 mg/100 g FW, and total phenolic content from 7.76 to 21.00 mg/100 g FW. The highest antioxidant activity (DPPH assay) was 6.05 &#xb5;mol/g FW, while total sugar levels ranged from 0.51 to 8.79 g/100 g FW. The hierarchical clustering analysis grouped the <italic>Allium</italic> species into two major clusters: Cluster 1 (10 domesticated accessions) and Cluster 2 (9 wild and underutilized accessions). The clustering was driven primarily by thiosulfinate content, pyruvic acid levels, flavonoid content, and antioxidant activity, with wild species showing significantly higher concentrations of bioactive metabolites. The PCA explained 66.1% of the total biochemical variance, with PC1 contributing 38.5% and PC2 contributing 27.6%. Strong positive correlations were observed between total flavonoid content and antioxidant activity (r = 0.91, p &lt; 0.001), total phenolic content and allicin (r = 0.87, p &lt; 0.001), and total pyruvic acid and enzymatically produced pyruvic acid (r = 0.93, p &lt; 0.001). This study underscores the significance of biochemical characterization in understanding the nutritional and medicinal potential of <italic>Allium</italic> species. The findings indicate a potential co-regulation of these biochemical pathways, as suggested by the strong positive correlations between key compounds. The results offer valuable insights for selecting superior <italic>Allium</italic> genotypes with enhanced bioactive properties, which is crucial for future interspecific <italic>Allium</italic> breeding programs and the development of new functional foods and pharmaceuticals.</p>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>phytochemical screening</kwd>
<kwd>flavonoids</kwd>
<kwd>phenolics</kwd>
<kwd>hierarchical clustering</kwd>
<kwd>principal component analysis</kwd>
<kwd>thiosulphinates content</kwd>
<kwd>antioxidant activity</kwd>
<kwd>functional food</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<counts>
<fig-count count="4"/>
<table-count count="5"/>
<equation-count count="0"/>
<ref-count count="67"/>
<page-count count="18"/>
<word-count count="11455"/>
</counts>
<custom-meta-wrap>
<custom-meta>
<meta-name>section-in-acceptance</meta-name>
<meta-value>Plant Systematics and Evolution</meta-value>
</custom-meta>
</custom-meta-wrap>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec id="s1" sec-type="intro">
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>The genus <italic>Allium</italic> is one of the largest monocotyledonous genera, comprising over 1,063 species distributed across temperate regions of the Northern Hemisphere (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">Anonymous, 2024</xref>). It includes economically and nutritionally important crops such as <italic>Allium cepa</italic> L. (onion), <italic>A. sativum</italic> L. (garlic), <italic>A. fistulosum</italic> L. (welsh onion), <italic>A. tuberosum</italic> Rotter ex Spreng. (Chinese chives), and <italic>A. ampeloprasum</italic> L. (leek). While cultivated <italic>Allium</italic> species form the backbone of vegetable production globally, their wild and underutilized counterparts represent a critical repository of genetic diversity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">Fritsch and Friesen, 2002</xref>). Wild relatives of cultivated species serve as reservoirs of valuable traits, including enhanced resistance to diverse biotic and abiotic stresses, elevated concentrations of bioactive metabolites, and unique agronomic attributes, all of which hold significant potential for utilization in <italic>Allium</italic> improvement programs (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Benke et&#xa0;al., 2024</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B60">Shukla et&#xa0;al., 2024</xref>).</p>
<p>India, recognized as a secondary center of diversity for the genus <italic>Allium</italic>, harbors a broad spectrum of cultivated, semi-domesticated, and wild species adapted to diverse agro-climatic zones. Within the genus, <italic>A. cepa</italic> (onion) and <italic>A. sativum</italic> (garlic) are the most widely cultivated and economically significant species. Other taxa, including <italic>A. chinense</italic> G. Don, <italic>A. hookeri</italic> Thwaites, <italic>A. tuberosum</italic>, and <italic>A. fistulosum</italic>, are distributed across the western Himalayas, northeastern states, and central India, where they are traditionally utilized as vegetables, condiments, and ethnomedicinal herbs (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Devi et al., 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B49">Pandey et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Benke et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>). ICAR-Directorate of Onion and Garlic Research act as National Active Germplasm site for <italic>Allium</italic> Species and holds approximate 2000 germplasm which includes 25 <italic>Allium</italic> species (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Benke et&#xa0;al., 2024</xref>). India ranks second globally in onion production, contributing approximately 17 million tonnes annually (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">FAO, 2019</xref>), yet productivity remains constrained by climatic stresses and biotic challenges, despite the release of nearly 60 improved open pollinated varieties and a few hybrids from both public and private breeding programs (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">Krishna Kumar, 2015</xref>). In garlic, global production is overwhelmingly dominated by China (~23 MT; &#x2248;75%), with India occupying the second position (~3 MT; &#x2248;10%), where Madhya Pradesh alone contributes nearly two-thirds of the national output (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Benke et&#xa0;al., 2024</xref>). Indian garlic exhibits marked variability in bulb morphology, clove characteristics, photoperiod requirement and pungency level, providing valuable opportunities for breeding, genetic improvement, and bioprospecting (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Benke et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>). Moreover, several semi-domesticated, underutilized and poorly characterized <italic>Allium</italic> species, particularly those endemic to the northeastern and Himalayan regions, remain largely unexplored (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B47">Negi et&#xa0;al., 2006</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B65">Verma et&#xa0;al., 2008</xref>), especially with respect to their biochemical composition and nutraceutical potential.</p>
<p>Indian research on biochemical profiling of onion, garlic and <italic>Allium</italic> species, such as <italic>A. tuberosum</italic> has demonstrated substantial variability in phenolics, flavonoids, and antioxidant activity among cultivars, with pronounced genotype &#xd7; environment interactions influencing these traits (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">Lee et al., 2009</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Dalamu et&#xa0;al., 2010</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">Khar et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">Kaur et&#xa0;al., 2024</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B60">Shukla et&#xa0;al., 2024</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Benke et&#xa0;al., 2025</xref>) supported by complementary molecular analyses (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B50">Pasupula et&#xa0;al., 2024</xref>). Onion and garlic skins, in particular, have been identified as exceptionally rich in flavonoids and antioxidants, underscoring their nutraceutical potential and value as by-products (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B55">Sagar et al., 2022</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B59">Shabir et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B52">Raimo, 2020</xref>). More recent investigations on short-day Indian onion lines have employed multivariate approaches to associate biochemical diversity with agronomic traits such as bulb development, pungency, and storability (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Benke et&#xa0;al., 2025</xref>; Gupta et&#xa0;al., 2024). Parallel studies have also explored the valorization of surplus and off-grade onions for antioxidant-rich extracts, promoting their use in functional food and bioeconomy applications (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">Abinaya et&#xa0;al., 2023</xref>). Several reviews have further emphasized the medicinal relevance of allicin and related thiosulfinates, consolidating their importance as functional metabolites with therapeutic potential (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B64">Verma et&#xa0;al., 2023</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B61">Singh et&#xa0;al., 2023</xref>).</p>
<p>Despite these advances, several gaps remain as biochemical research has been largely confined to cultivated onion and garlic, with limited exploration of wild and underutilized species that may harbor unique bioactive compounds and adaptive traits (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">Khar et al., 2022</xref>). The majority of studies have focused on a narrow set of biochemical parameters, such as phenolics, flavonoids, and antioxidant activity, while comprehensive metabolomic and transcriptomic investigations are still lacking. Furthermore, the strong influence of genotype &#xd7; environment interactions on phytochemical expression has not been systematically addressed. Lack of standardized extraction methods and assay protocols also limits cross-comparability of results. Importantly, very few studies have attempted to integrate biochemical diversity with molecular markers (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B67">Pasupula et&#xa0;al., 2024</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">Benke et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>) or genomic regions, leaving the genetic basis of phytochemical variation underexplored. Finally, the integration of biochemical traits into mainstream onion and garlic breeding programs remains limited, restricting their utilization in developing nutritionally enhanced and stress-resilient cultivars.</p>
<p>The variability within these metabolites across Indian <italic>Allium</italic> germplasm is not yet fully documented. Such biochemical diversity has implications not only for functional food development and pharmaceutical exploration but also for breeding programs targeting improved pungency, flavor, stress tolerance, and post-harvest qualities (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">Khar et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Gonzalez-Morales et&#xa0;al., 2017</xref>). The absence of such comparative data restricts efforts to identify promising genotypes for introgression breeding or bioprospecting purposes. Moreover, wild and underutilized species despite their adaptation to diverse environments and high metabolite content remain underrepresented in mainstream <italic>Allium</italic> improvement efforts.</p>
<p>Biochemical profiling of <italic>Allium</italic> species is a powerful tool for exploring nutritional, functional, and therapeutic traits. Notably, the medicinal relevance of <italic>Allium</italic> species is closely linked to their organosulfur compounds, which exhibit antimicrobial, anticancer, antidiabetic, and cardioprotective activities (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Arena et&#xa0;al., 2024</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B53">Rahman, 2007</xref>). Species within this genus are known to accumulate a wide range of phytochemicals, including flavonoids, polyphenols, saponins, sulfur-containing compounds (e.g., allicin, S-allyl cysteine), and sugars all of which contribute to flavor, aroma, antioxidant capacity, and health-promoting properties (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">Kothari et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B57">Seki et&#xa0;al., 2019</xref>). These compounds also serve as chemotaxonomic markers, facilitating the differentiation of closely related species and supporting evolutionary studies (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">Kamenetsky and Rabinowitch, 2001</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B66">Vukovic et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>). GC-MS is a powerful technique for identifying and quantifying volatile sulfur-containing and other secondary metabolites in <italic>Allium</italic> species, but this study purposely focused on primary biochemical profiling of both volatile and non-volatile key metabolites such as total phenolics, flavonoids, allicin, pyruvic acid, sugars, and antioxidant activity using established, cost-effective, and reproducible spectrophotometric and colorimetric assays. These wet-chemical and enzymatic methods are particularly suitable for accurately measuring the targeted compounds, many of which are non-volatile and require simpler extraction and quantification protocols than GC-MS. Additionally, the use of GC-MS involves complex sample preparation like derivatization, which could introduce variability and reduce throughput, making it less feasible for large-scale comparative analysis across multiple species and accessions. The study&#x2019;s scope was to generate foundational biochemical data focused on standardized markers relevant to nutrition and function, rather than exhaustive metabolite fingerprinting. Future research is planned to incorporate advanced metabolomics techniques, including GC-MS and LC-MS, to further characterize specific volatile and semi-volatile metabolites for detailed chemotaxonomic and functional insights among selected promising <italic>Allium</italic> lines.</p>
<p>In this context, the present study aims to systematically evaluate the biochemical diversity of 19 <italic>Allium</italic> germplasm representing 15 species, encompassing cultivated, semi-domesticated, and wild types which originated from different Indian agro-ecological regions and now adapted and acclimatized at ICAR-DOGR since last 10 years. The specific objectives are to: 1. Perform qualitative phytochemical screening to detect the presence of key secondary metabolites; 2. Quantify major bioactive compounds, including thiosulfinates (allicin), flavonoids, phenolics, antioxidant properties, sugars, carbohydrates and different forms of pyruvic acid; 3. Analyze interspecific variation and biochemical trait correlations using multivariate statistical methods such as hierarchical clustering and principal component analysis (PCA); 4. Identify metabolically rich unique species or accessions with potential applications in functional foods, medicinal formulations, and crop improvement. Therefore, by establishing a biochemical baseline, this study aims to bridge critical knowledge gaps and support the conservation, utilization, and genetic enhancement of <italic>Allium</italic> species present in India.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2" sec-type="materials|methods">
<title>Materials and methods</title>
<p>
<bold>Field site</bold>: This experiment was carried out at the <italic>Allium</italic> germplasm collection center, situated at 27&#xb0;19&#x2032;00.2&#x2033; N latitude, 82&#xb0;25&#x2032;00.1&#x2033; E longitude, and an elevation of 553.8 m above sea level, within the Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR) &#x2013; Directorate of Onion and Garlic Research (DOGR), Pune, India. According to meteorological data from the Indian Meteorological Department (IMD) and the ICAR-DOGR meteorology laboratory, the region experiences a cold semiarid climate, characterized by an average annual rainfall of 251.7 mm, an average temperature of 21.4&#xb0;C, and a relative humidity of 48%. Experiment was carried out during winter 2023.</p>
<p>
<bold>Material</bold>: The selection of <italic>Allium</italic> germplasm for this study was strategically designed to capture maximum biochemical and taxonomic diversity within the genus. A total of 19 accessions representing 15 species (as detailed in <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">
<bold>Table&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>) were chosen to include both widely cultivated types, such as <italic>A. cepa, A. sativum</italic> and <italic>A. fistulosum</italic>, <italic>A. cepa aggregatum alongside lesser-studied wild and underutilized</italic> sp<italic>ecies including A. hookeri, A. chinense, A. alticum, A. macranthum, A tuberosum, A. angulosum, A. schoenoprasum, A. acalonicum, A. ampeloprasum, A. ledeborianum</italic> and <italic>A. przewalskianum</italic>. These accessions represent a broad phylogenetic spectrum and encompass different stages of domestication and justified by their agro-morphological and molecular screening (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Benke et&#xa0;al., 2024</xref>). The chosen germplasm also included species previously identified to exhibit distinct morphological features, stress resilience, or notable agronomic traits (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Benke et&#xa0;al., 2024</xref>), aligning with ongoing breeding and conservation efforts. To maintain uniform growth conditions and enable valid comparative analysis, 10 bulbs or rhizomes per accession were cultivated at a spacing of 0.3 &#xd7; 0.3 m under standardized agronomic practices including regular irrigation, weeding, and top dressing at the ICAR-Directorate of Onion and Garlic Research (ICAR-DOGR), Pune. This inclusive and methodical selection and cultivation approach ensured comprehensive representation of natural biochemical variability within Indian <italic>Allium</italic> species, providing a solid foundation for subsequent phytochemical and antioxidant profiling.</p>
<table-wrap id="T1" position="float">
<label>Table 1</label>
<caption>
<p>Collection, ecological status and source or origin of 19 <italic>Allium</italic> germplasm including <italic>A. cepa, A. sativum</italic> and other underutilized wild <italic>Allium</italic> species used for biochemical diversity studies.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" align="left">S. No</th>
<th valign="top" align="left">
<italic>Allium</italic> species</th>
<th valign="middle" align="left">Collector / IC / EC No.</th>
<th valign="middle" align="left">Ecological status</th>
<th valign="middle" align="left">Source/ Origin of collection</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">
<italic>A. fistulosum L.(HP)</italic>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">CGN &#x2013; 16418/ AKO - 1 CHINA</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Endemic</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Centre for Genetic Resource, Netherland</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">
<italic>A. cepa agr -</italic> 5 manipur</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Native</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Manipur, India</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">3</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">
<italic>A. przewalskianum</italic>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">NMK -117</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Native</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Manipur, India</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">4</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">
<italic>A. hookeri</italic>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">NMK - 3235</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Native</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Manipur, India</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">5</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">
<italic>A. schoenoprasum</italic>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">NR &#x2013; 6/ NGB -14574</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Native</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Sikkim, India</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">6</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">
<italic>A. altaicum pall</italic>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">EC - 328485</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Native</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">ICAR-NBPGR, New Delhi</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">7</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">
<italic>A. ledeborianum</italic>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">EC - 328491</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Native</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">ICAR-NBPGR, New Delhi</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">8</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">
<italic>A. chinense</italic>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Chollang White (Rakkyo)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Native</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Sikkim, India</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">9</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">
<italic>A. macranthum</italic>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">NMK - 3240</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Native</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Manipur, India</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">10</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">
<italic>A. schoenoprasum</italic>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">NR -6/NGB 5469</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Native</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Sikkim, India</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">11</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">
<italic>A. ampeloprasum</italic>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">NMK- 3211</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Native</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Manipur, India</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">12</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">
<italic>A. angulosum</italic>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">EC - 328486</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Native</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">ICAR-NBPGR, New Delhi</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">13</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">
<italic>A. tuberosum</italic>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">NMK -3231 (NF)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Native</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Manipur, India</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">14</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">
<italic>A. ascalonicum</italic>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Pran</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Native</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">ICAR-NBPGR, New Delhi</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">15</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">
<italic>A. sativum</italic> var. Bhima Omkar</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">IC-569789</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Native</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">ICAR-DOGR, Pune</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">16</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">
<italic>A. sativum</italic> var. Bhima Purple</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">IC-570742</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Native</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">ICAR-DOGR, Pune</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">17</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">
<italic>A. cepa var.</italic> Bhima Super</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">IC-561259</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Native</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">ICAR-DOGR, Pune</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">18</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">
<italic>A. cepa var.</italic> Bhima Shweta</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">IC-572761</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Native</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">ICAR-DOGR, Pune</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">19</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">
<italic>A. cepa var.</italic> Bhima Kiran</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">IC-572766</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Native</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">ICAR-DOGR, Pune</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn>
<p>Abbreviations: Cac: Albumin-corrected calcium. P: phosphate. ALP: alkaline phosphatase. TmP/GFR: ratio of tubular maximal reabsorption of phosphate (TmP) to glomerular filtration rate (GFR). FGF23: fibroblast growth factor 23. 25-OH vit D: 25-hydroxy vitamin D. 1,25(OH)2 vit D: 1,25 dihydroxy vitamin D. PTH&#xa0;: parathormone. -: not assessed.</p>
</fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec id="s3">
<title>Methods</title>
<sec id="s3_1">
<title>Phytochemical analysis of <italic>Allium</italic> germplasm</title>
<sec id="s3_1_1">
<title>Preparation of extract</title>
<p>Fresh <italic>Allium</italic> leaves were collected, thoroughly washed with distilled water (DW) to remove dirt and contaminants, and used for extraction. The extraction was carried out using two different solvents DW and 70% ethanol to ensure the efficient isolation of both polar and semi-polar phytochemicals. This dual-solvent extraction method enables the efficient isolation of a broad range of phytochemicals. In qualitative phytochemical screening, distilled water (DW) primarily extracts hydrophilic compounds, whereas 70% methanol extracts a broader and more diverse profile of phytochemicals, especially medium-polar compounds like flavonoids and saponins. Therefore, using both solvents provides complementary information, enhancing the overall phytochemical coverage and detection accuracy. The presence of a compound in the test was recorded as &#x2018;Y,&#x2019; while its absence was marked as &#x2018;X.&#x2019; Tests that did not yield a clear result may be due to low concentration of targeted compound or solvent or extraction method may not efficiently solubilize the compound of interest due to polarity issues were labeled as &#x2018;not applicable&#x2019;.</p>
<p>For aqueous extraction, 10 g of fresh <italic>Allium</italic> leaves was soaked in 100 mL of distilled water in a conical flask and left for 24 hours at room temperature with occasional stirring. The extract was then filtered using Whatman No. 1 filter paper, concentrated by water bath (40&#x2013;50&#xb0;C) or freeze-dried, and stored at 4&#xb0;C. For ethanolic extraction, the same procedure was followed using 70% ethanol. Phytochemical tests were performed on both extracts across 19 <italic>Allium</italic> germplasm. Each assay was conducted in triplicate, with either distilled water or the respective solvent used as a control, depending on the test requirements. Additionally, three variable concentrations were employed to generate the standard calibration curve. The details of test as below.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_1_2">
<title>Test for carbohydrates (Molisch&#x2019;s test)</title>
<p>Two milliliters (2 mL) of the extract was placed in a test tube, followed by the addition of two drops of Molisch&#x2019;s reagent. Concentrated sulfuric acid (H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub>) was carefully added along the walls of the test tube to form a distinct layer. The appearance of a purple or reddish-violet ring at the interface confirms the presence of carbohydrates (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Harborne, 1998</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_1_3">
<title>Test for proteins (Biuret test)</title>
<p>To detect the presence of proteins, two qualitative tests were conducted using specific reagents. In the Biuret test, an equal volume of Biuret reagent, consisting of sodium hydroxide and copper sulfate, was added to 2 mL of extract. The formation of a violet or purple coloration indicated the presence of proteins. Similarly, in Millon&#x2019;s test, a few drops of Millon&#x2019;s reagent were added to 2 mL of the extract, followed by gentle heating. The appearance of a red or brick-red coloration confirmed the presence of proteins, further validating the result. These tests collectively provide strong evidence of protein content in the sample (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B54">Sadasivam and Manickam, 2008</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_1_4">
<title>Test for starch (Iodine test)</title>
<p>A few drops of iodine solution (I<sub>2</sub>-KI solution) were added to 2 ml extract and mixed gently. The appearance of a blue-black coloration indicates the presence of starch (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B54">Sadasivam and Manickam, 2008</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_1_5">
<title>Test for phenolic compounds and tannins</title>
<p>Three milliliters (3 mL) of extracts were tested with 3% ferric chloride (FeCl<sub>3</sub>). A dark green coloration confirms the presence of phenolic compounds. Additionally, 2 mL of the extract was treated with a few drops of 10% ferric chloride solution. The appearance of a blue-black or blue-green precipitate indicates the presence of tannins (Oladeji et&#xa0;al., 2020).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_1_6">
<title>Test for flavonoids</title>
<p>Two milliliters (2 mL) of dilute sodium hydroxide (NaOH) was added to 3 mL of the extract in a test tube. The development of a yellow solution, which turns colorless upon the addition of concentrated hydrochloric acid (HCl), indicates the presence of flavonoids (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Bhat, 2020</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_1_7">
<title>Test for saponins</title>
<p>Three milliliters (3 mL) of the extract was diluted with 20 mL of distilled water and vigorously shaken in a graduated cylinder for 15 minutes. The formation of a stable foam layer approximately 1 cm in height confirms the presence of saponins (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Arulmozhi et&#xa0;al., 2018</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_1_8">
<title>Test for anthraquinones (Borntrager&#x2019;s test)</title>
<p>Three milliliters (3 mL) of extract was mixed with 3mL of benzene in a test tube and shaken well. A few drops of ammonia solution (10%) were added to the mixture. The formation of a pink, red, or violet coloration in the ammoniacal (upper) layer confirms the presence of anthraquinones (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Harborne, 1998</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_1_9">
<title>Test for alkaloids</title>
<p>To confirm the presence of alkaloids, a series of qualitative tests were conducted using specific reagents, each producing characteristic precipitates. Mayer&#x2019;s test involved the addition of Mayer&#x2019;s reagent (potassium mercuric iodide solution) to the extract, leading to the formation of a white or creamy precipitate, indicative of alkaloids. Similarly, in Dragendorff&#x2019;s test, the extract was treated with Dragendorff&#x2019;s reagent (potassium bismuth iodide solution), resulting in a distinct orange or reddish-brown precipitate, further affirming alkaloid presence. Wagner&#x2019;s test was performed by adding Wagner&#x2019;s reagent (iodine in potassium iodide solution) to the extract, which produced a reddish-brown precipitate, serving as another positive confirmation. Lastly, in Hager&#x2019;s test, the extract was mixed with Hager&#x2019;s reagent (saturated picric acid solution), leading to the formation of a yellow precipitate, reinforcing the presence of alkaloids. These complementary tests provide a robust indication of alkaloids in the sample, ensuring the accuracy and reliability of the phytochemical screening (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Harborne, 1998</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_1_10">
<title>Test for glycosides</title>
<p>A small portion of the extract was placed in a test tube, followed by the addition of 2 mL of glacial acetic acid, a drop of ferric chloride solution, and 2 mL of concentrated sulfuric acid (H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub>). The appearance of a distinct brown ring at the interphase confirms the presence of glycosides (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Arulmozhi et&#xa0;al., 2018</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_1_11">
<title>Test for steroids</title>
<p>A few drops of concentrated sulfuric acid (H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub>) were added to a small portion of the aqueous extract in a test tube and gently shaken. The formation of a red coloration indicates the presence of steroids (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Bhat, 2020</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_1_12">
<title>Test for amino acids</title>
<p>To confirm the presence of amino acids, qualitative tests were performed using specific reagents. In the Ninhydrin test, two milliliters (2 mL) of the aqueous extract were treated with a few drops of 0.2% Ninhydrin reagent and heated in a water bath for a few minutes. The development of a purple or blue-violet coloration indicated the presence of free amino acids.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_2">
<title>Quantitative biochemical traits</title>
<p>In quantitative analysis, data were recorded for nine quantitative biochemical parameters, including thiosulfinate content (&#xb5;mol/g fresh weight (FW)), antioxidant capacity measured as DPPH AE (&#xb5;mol/g FW) and FRAB (mg/ml), total flavonoid content (TFC) expressed in QE (mg/g FW), total phenolic content (TPC) in GE (mg/g FW), total pyruvic acid (TPA), basal pyruvic acid (BPA), enzymatically produced pyruvic acid (EPA)(&#xb5;mol/gm FW), total sugar content (g/100g FW), and reducing sugar content (g/100g FW). Each parameter was analyzed in triplicate to ensure accuracy and reliability. Each parameter was analyzed separately, with three independent biological replicates performed for statistical robustness. The detailed methodology for each parameter is provided below.</p>
<sec id="s3_2_1">
<title>Pyruvic acid</title>
<p>The estimation of pyruvic acid is performed using the TCA (Trichloroacetic Acid) method, which involves DNPH (2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazine) reaction to form a hydrazone complex measured at 420 nm using a spectrophotometer (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B56">Schwimmer and Weston, 1961</xref>). In brief, 1 gm of the sample paste is mixed with 3 ml of water, vortexes, and filtered. From the filtrate, 1 ml is diluted with 19 ml distilled water for onion and 15 ml for garlic. Then, 1 ml of this diluted sample is mixed with 1 ml DW and 1 ml DNPH (0.63 mM). The reaction mixture is incubated in a 37&#xb0;C water bath for 10 minutes, followed by the addition of 5 ml of 0.6N NaOH. The mixture is kept in the dark for 5 minutes, and absorbance is measured at 420 nm. For the control, 1 gm of the sample is treated with 3 ml of 5% TCA, incubated at 37&#xb0;C for 1 hour, and then filtered and the procedure is repeated as in the sample preparation. The blank consists of 2 ml DW and 1 ml DNPH, serving as a baseline reference. The results were expressed as total pyruvic acid which refers to the overall amount of pyruvic acid present in the sample, including both the free pyruvic acid and the pyruvic acid formed enzymatically from precursor compounds., basal pyruvic acid which represents the naturally occurring pyruvic acid present in the sample before enzymatic conversion of precursors <italic>viz</italic>. S-alk(en)yl-L-cysteine sulfoxides (ACSOs), and enzymatically produced pyruvic acid. This refers to the pyruvic acid generated by enzymatic action, primarily by alliinase in garlic and onions, which breaks down sulfur-containing compounds into pyruvic acid.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_2_2">
<title>Average allicin or total thiosulfinate content</title>
<p>A 1-gram sample of paste was mixed with 15 mL of HEPES buffer and centrifuged. To 80 &#xb5;L of the resulting supernatant, 120 &#xb5;L of L-cysteine was added, and the mixture was incubated at 37&#xb0;C for 15&#x2013;20 minutes. Subsequently, 300 &#xb5;L of HEPES buffer and 100 &#xb5;L of DTNB were introduced. Absorbance was measured at 412 nm using a Tecan Infinite 200 Pro M Nano+ spectrophotometer (M&#xe4;nnedorf, Switzerland), with 200 &#xb5;L of the sample placed in a plate (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">Cantwell et&#xa0;al., 2003</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_2_3">
<title>Total phenolic content</title>
<p>The Folin Ciocalteu method (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B62">Singleton et&#xa0;al., 1999</xref>) was used to determine TPC. A total of 100 &#xb5;L of Folin Ciocalteu reagent was added to 200 &#xb5;L of sample extract, vortexed for a minute, and incubated for 5 minutes. Then, 800 &#xb5;L of 700 mM sodium carbonate (Na<sub>2</sub>CO<sub>3</sub>) was added, and the mixture was incubated for 120 minutes in the dark. The sample (200 &#xb5;L) was loaded into a microtitration plate, and absorbance was recorded at 765 nm using a Tecan Infinite 200 Pro M Nano+ spectrophotometer. The results were quantified using a Gallic acid standard curve (y = 3.8765x + 0.0127, R&#xb2; = 0.9998) and expressed as mg GAE/g FW.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_2_4">
<title>Total flavonoid content</title>
<p>The aluminum chloride colorimetric assay (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B58">Sembiring et&#xa0;al., 2018</xref>, with modifications) was used to determine TFC. Briefly, 100 &#xb5;L of sample extract was mixed with 400 &#xb5;L of distilled water, 300 &#xb5;L of 10% aluminum chloride (AlCl<sub>3</sub>), and 300 &#xb5;L of 5% sodium nitrite (NaNO<sub>2</sub>). After 5 minutes of incubation, 200 &#xb5;L of 1N sodium hydroxide (NaOH) and 240 &#xb5;L of distilled water were added. The absorbance was measured at 510 nm (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">Kumaran and Karunakaran, 2007</xref>). The results were quantified using a quercetin standard curve (y = 7.1021x &#x2212; 0.005, R&#xb2; = 0.9999) and expressed as mg QE/g FW.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_2_5">
<title>Total antioxidant capacity (DPPH assay)</title>
<p>The DPPH (1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl) assay (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B48">Nuutila et&#xa0;al., 2003</xref>) was performed by mixing 100 &#xb5;L of sample extract with 390 &#xb5;L of 0.1 mM DPPH solution. The mixture was incubated in the dark at 25&#xb0;C for 30 minutes, and absorbance was recorded at 515 nm using a Tecan Infinite 200 Pro M Nano+ spectrophotometer. The results were determined using a Trolox standard curve (y = &#x2212;21.0864x + 21.2202, R&#xb2; = 0.9999) and expressed as &#xb5;mol TE/g FW.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_2_6">
<title>Total antioxidant capacity (FRAB assay)</title>
<p>The Ferric Reducing Antioxidant Power (FRAP) assay was carried out following <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Benzie and Strain (1996)</xref> with minor modifications. Briefly, 100 &#xb5;L of sample extract was mixed with 300 &#xb5;L of freshly prepared FRAP reagent (300 mM acetate buffer, pH 3.6; 10 mM TPTZ solution in 40 mM HCl; and 20 mM FeCl<sub>3</sub>&#xb7;6H<sub>2</sub>O in a 10:1:1 ratio). The reaction mixture was incubated at 37&#xb0;C for 30 minutes, and absorbance was measured at 593 nm using a Tecan Infinite 200 Pro M Nano+ spectrophotometer. A standard curve (y = 0.0047x + 0.0316, R&#xb2; = 0.9985) was used to quantify antioxidant activity, and results were expressed as mg/ml FW.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_2_7">
<title>Total sugar content</title>
<p>A 50 &#xb5;L extract was diluted with 450 &#xb5;L of distilled water, followed by the addition of 500 &#xb5;L of phenol and 500 &#xb5;L of sulfuric acid. The mixture was incubated at room temperature for 15 minutes, and absorbance was recorded at 480&#x2013;490 nm using a Tecan Infinite 200 Pro M Nano+ spectrophotometer. The results were expressed as g/100 g FW, following the Lane and Eynon method (Ranganna) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">Mathew and Abraham, 2006</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_2_8">
<title>Reducing sugar content</title>
<p>To 100 &#xb5;L of sample extract, 100 &#xb5;L of DNS reagent was added,&#xa0;and the mixture was boiled for 5 minutes. Absorbance was recorded at 540 nm using a Tecan Infinite 200 Pro M Nano+ spectrophotometer. The results were expressed as g/100 g FW (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">Mathew and Abraham, 2006</xref>).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_3">
<title>Chemicals and reagents</title>
<p>All chemicals used for biochemical analysis were of analytical grade and procured from Thermo Fisher Scientific, Mumbai, India. Additionally, high-purity analytical reagents were sourced from Sigma-Aldrich, Mumbai, India, ensuring precision and reliability in experimental procedures.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_4">
<title>Statistical analysis</title>
<p>Means and standard errors were calculated for all variables for each species using SAS 9.3, GLM Proc. In addition, cluster analysis, principal component analysis and correlation analysis of the quantitative biochemical traits of the 19 <italic>Allium</italic> germplasm was estimated by considering a bootstrap analysis with three replications and the tree was constructed by using hierarchical clustering based on <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B67">Ward (1963)</xref> method by JMP 10.3 Pro (by SAS 9.3 base). The correlation graph was constructed using R studio software with package (library (Hmisc) specifically rcorr (as.matrix (mtcars [, c (&#x201c;mpg&#x201d;, &#x201c;cyl&#x201d;, &#x201c;disp&#x201d;, &#x201c;hp&#x201d;)]))).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s4" sec-type="results">
<title>Results</title>
<sec id="s4_1">
<title>Phytochemical screening of <italic>Allium</italic> species</title>
<p>The genus <italic>Allium</italic> (onion, garlic, chives, and related species) is rich in bioactive compounds such as organosulfur metabolites, phenolics, flavonoids, saponins, and sterols, which contribute to antioxidant, antimicrobial, anti-inflammatory, and other health-promoting activities, making them valuable for bioprospecting. Qualitative phytochemical screening provides a quick and cost-effective means to detect these metabolites, with solvent choice (aqueous vs. hydroalcoholic) influencing recovery of polar and semi-polar compounds.</p>
<p>In results, a qualitative phytochemical analysis was conducted on 19 <italic>Allium</italic> germplasm representing 15 <italic>Allium</italic> species. The presence (Y) or absence (X) of key biochemical compounds was assessed across multiple biochemical tests. The phytochemical analysis of various <italic>Allium</italic> species using distilled water and 80% methanol as a solvent revealed the presence of several polar and semi-polar bioactive compounds (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Supplementary Tables S1</bold>
</xref>, <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>S2</bold>
</xref>). Carbohydrates were found to be consistently present across all tested species, indicating their fundamental role in these plants. Proteins were not strongly detected by the qualitative assays (NaOH-CuSO<sub>4</sub> and Millon&#x2019;s tests), suggesting their occurrence in relatively low concentrations or limitations of these colorimetric tests in <italic>Allium</italic> extracts. Similarly, starch was not detected in any of the species.</p>
<p>Secondary metabolites such as phenols, flavonoids, and flavonols were present in all species, highlighting their potential antioxidant properties. Additionally, saponins were found in every species tested using ethanol solvent, suggesting their possible role&#xa0;in&#xa0;plant defense mechanisms and medicinal properties (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Supplementary Table S2</bold>
</xref>). Interestingly, tannins were absent in all samples, implying that these species may have a lower astringency compared to other plants rich in tannins. The screening for alkaloids, using Mayer&#x2019;s, Dragendorff&#x2019;s, Wagner&#x2019;s, and Hager&#x2019;s tests, yielded negative results for all species, indicating the presence of these nitrogenous compounds in trace amount. Similarly, glycosides were mostly absent, except for a positive result in the Salkowski test, suggesting the presence of steroidal or terpenoid glycosides in all species.</p>
<p>Furthermore, the presence of amino acids across all species suggests that these <italic>Allium</italic> plants could serve as a source of essential nutrients. Fats were not specifically analyzed in this study. Overall, this phytochemical investigation confirms that <italic>Allium</italic> species are rich in carbohydrates, phenols, flavonoids, saponins, glycosides (as indicated by the Salkowski test), and amino acids, while proteins, starch, tannins, and alkaloids were present in trace amount. These findings contribute to the understanding of the medicinal and nutritional potential of <italic>Allium</italic> species, supporting their use in traditional and modern bioprospecting applications.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s4_2">
<title>Analysis of biochemical parameters</title>
<p>Standard assays enable broad profiling of key constituents, including characteristic sulfur-rich compounds, thereby facilitating the assessment of phytochemical diversity in <italic>Allium</italic> germplasm. The descriptive statistics for twelve biochemical traits in the evaluated <italic>Allium</italic> germplasm revealed pronounced phenotypic variability (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">
<bold>Table&#xa0;2</bold>
</xref>). Mean values spanned from 0.50 &#xb5;mol g<sup>&#x2212;1</sup> FW for enzymatically produced pyruvic acid to 36.70% for carbohydrate content. Among phytochemicals, total flavonoid content (23.06 mg 100 g<sup>&#x2212;1</sup> FW) and total phenol content (22.22 mg 100 g<sup>&#x2212;1</sup> FW) were most abundant, exhibiting wide ranges of 10.42&#x2013;48.42 mg 100 g<sup>&#x2212;1</sup> FW and 14.35&#x2013;38.47 mg 100 g<sup>&#x2212;1</sup> FW, respectively. The highest coefficients of variation (CV) were observed for enzymatically produced pyruvic acid (35.72%), total antioxidant capacity (FRAP assay) (29.67%), and basal pyruvic acid (28.26%), indicating substantial metabolic heterogeneity. Variance was greatest for total flavonoid content (143.66), whereas carbohydrate content showed the highest absolute mean with comparatively low variability (CV = 16.03%). Reducing sugar content ranged from 0.51 to 8.79 g 100 g<sup>&#x2212;1</sup> FW (CV = 25.48%), while protein content varied between 0.36 and 1.99 mg ml<sup>&#x2212;1</sup> (CV = 20.68%). These results highlight considerable biochemical diversity, likely reflecting both genotypic differences and environmental influences, and identify key traits of interest for genetic improvement and bioprospecting (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">
<bold>Table&#xa0;3</bold>
</xref>).</p>
<table-wrap id="T2" position="float">
<label>Table 2</label>
<caption>
<p>Mean and related statistical parameters of twelve biochemical traits recorded on 19 Allium germplasm representing 15 Allium species.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="bottom" align="left">Parameters</th>
<th valign="bottom" align="left">Average Allicin TOT Thio (&#xb5;mol/g FW)</th>
<th valign="bottom" align="left">Total Antioxidant capacity (&#x3bc;mol/g FW) DPPH assay</th>
<th valign="bottom" align="left">Total Antioxidant capacity (mg/ml)FRAB Assay</th>
<th valign="bottom" align="left">Total Flavanoid Content QE (mg/100 g FW)</th>
<th valign="bottom" align="left">Total Phenol content GE (mg/100 g FW)</th>
<th valign="bottom" align="left">Total Pyruvic Acid (&#xb5;mol/g FW)</th>
<th valign="bottom" align="left">Basal Pyruvic Acid (&#xb5;mol/g FW)</th>
<th valign="bottom" align="left">Enzymatically Produced Pyruvic Acid (&#xb5;mol/g FW)</th>
<th valign="bottom" align="left">Reducing Sugar ( g/100g FW)</th>
<th valign="bottom" align="left">Total Sugar ( g/100g FW)</th>
<th valign="bottom" align="left">Carbohydrate (%)</th>
<th valign="bottom" align="left">Protein (mg/ml)</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">Mean</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">14.50</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">3.40</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">6.73</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">23.06</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">22.22</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">15.04</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">12.81</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">2.23</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">0.50</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">3.35</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">36.70</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">1.13</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">Std. Dev</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">5.20</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">0.69</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">2.67</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">11.99</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">6.10</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">3.89</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">3.62</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">1.47</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">0.48</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">2.19</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">13.22</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">0.35</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">Std Err</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">1.19</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">0.16</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">0.61</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">2.75</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">1.40</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">0.89</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">0.83</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">0.34</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">0.11</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">0.50</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">3.03</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">0.08</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">CV</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">25.89</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">20.32</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">29.67</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">21.98</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">27.47</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">25.87</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">28.26</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">25.83</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">35.72</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">25.48</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">16.03</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">20.68</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">Min (average)</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">5.33</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">2.09</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">3.71</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">10.42</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">14.35</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">7.76</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">6.32</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">0.22</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">0.04</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">0.51</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">11.30</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">0.36</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">Max (average)</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">26.12</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">4.02</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">12.87</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">48.42</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">38.47</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">21.00</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">18.61</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">6.05</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">1.74</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">8.79</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">66.90</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">1.99</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">Variance</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">27.08</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">0.48</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">7.12</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">143.66</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">37.26</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">15.13</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">13.10</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">2.16</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">0.23</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">4.80</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">174.86</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">0.12</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
<table-wrap id="T3" position="float">
<label>Table 3</label>
<caption>
<p>Promising biochemical traits identified in cultivated, wild, and underutilized Allium species evaluated in the study..</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="top" align="left">Promising Species</th>
<th valign="top" align="left">Promising Traits</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">
<italic>A. cepa (Onion)</italic>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">High carbohydrates and sugars; clustered with cultivated types</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">
<italic>A. sativum (Garlic)</italic>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">High carbohydrates and sugars; widely used nutraceutical source</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">
<italic>A. fistulosum (Welsh onion)</italic>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Moderate biochemical diversity; cultivated type</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">
<italic>A. cepa var. aggregatum (Shallot)</italic>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Carbohydrate-rich; clustered with cultivated onion</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">
<italic>A. hookeri</italic>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">High allicin, pyruvic acid, flavonoids, phenolics, antioxidant activity</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">
<italic>A. macranthum</italic>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Enriched in allicin, flavonoids, phenolics, antioxidant capacity</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">
<italic>A. tuberosum (Chinese chives)</italic>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Unique organosulfur and antioxidant profiles; underutilized species</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">
<italic>A. chinense (Chinese onion)</italic>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Distinct biochemical traits; moderate antioxidants</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">
<italic>A. schoenoprasum (Chives)</italic>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Elevated antioxidant potential; moderate phenolic content</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">
<italic>A. przewalskianum</italic>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Stress resilience; unique phytochemical richness</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn>
<p>Notes: Comparisons were made within the same month group under the same indicator, and there were no significant differences between data with the same lowercase letter (p&lt;0.05). SGI represents simulated nibbling intensities.</p>
</fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec id="s4_3">
<title>Cluster analysis</title>
<sec id="s4_3_1">
<title>Hierarchical clustering and biochemical variability in <italic>Allium</italic> germplasm</title>
<p>Clustering of <italic>Allium</italic> species based on their biochemical profiles will provide a powerful tool to decipher chemotypic diversity and identify patterns of similarity among accessions. This approach enables the targeted selection of genotypes rich in specific bioactive compounds, supporting breeding programs aimed at enhancing nutritional and therapeutic traits. It will also facilitates the conservation of valuable genetic resources and prioritizes accessions for functional food, nutraceutical, and pharmaceutical development. Hierarchical clustering analysis based on genetic distance of twelve biochemical parameters (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>; <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Supplementary Tables S3</bold>
</xref>, <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>S4</bold>
</xref>) grouped 15 <italic>Allium</italic> species, comprising 19 germplasm accessions, into two major clusters. The first cluster (red branch) predominantly included cultivated species such as <italic>A. cepa</italic> (including bulb types and local varieties) and <italic>A. sativum</italic> accessions. The second cluster (green branch) was largely composed of wild and underutilized species, including <italic>A. hookeri</italic>, <italic>A. tuberosum</italic>, <italic>A. chinense</italic>, and <italic>A. macranthum</italic>. The clear separation between clusters reflects substantial biochemical divergence between domesticated and wild taxa.</p>
<p>The heatmap adjacent to the dendrogram visualizes standardized (z-score) values (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>) for traits including total thiosulfinate content, total pyruvic acid, basal pyruvic acid, enzymatically produced pyruvic acid, total antioxidant capacity (FRAP and DPPH assays), total flavonoid content, total phenol content, carbohydrate percentage, reducing sugar, total sugar, and protein content. Distinct color patterns differentiate the two main clusters, with wild species generally exhibiting higher levels of allicin, pyruvic acid, flavonoids, and phenolics, while cultivated onions tended to show higher carbohydrate and sugar content.</p>
<fig id="f1" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;1</label>
<caption>
<p>Hierarchical clustering and heatmap visualization of 15 Allium species representing 19 Allium germplasm based on genetic distance among 12 biochemical traits including thiosulfinate content, pyruvic acid (total, basal, enzymatically produced), flavonoid content, phenol content, antioxidant activity (DPPH and FRAB Assay), reducing sugar, total sugar and protein extracted using ward (1963) method. The color scale indicates relative concentrations, and dendrogram show species clustering based on metabolite similarity showing two major groups:1 cluster contain domesticated species; 2 cluster contain underutilized and wild Allium species. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">4</xref>).</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-16-1618572-g001.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Dendrogram and heatmap showing hierarchical clustering of 19 Allium species based on biochemical attributes. The dendrogram branches are colored red and green. The heatmap presents a color gradient from blue to red indicating varying levels of biochemical characteristics. A table lists measures like allicin content, antioxidant levels, carbohydrates, proteins, sugars, and other compounds, highlighting variability among species with a color scale. A line graph below the heatmap with data points marked with crosses shows another analysis, correlating specific metrics.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
<p>Trait-specific heat maps (right panel) highlight the range of variation across germplasm. Allicin levels varied from 5.33 to 26.12 &#xb5;mol g<sup>&#x2212;1</sup> FW, with the upper range dominated by wild accessions. Total flavonoid content ranged from 10.42 to 48.42 mg 100 g<sup>&#x2212;1</sup> FW, and total phenol content from 14.35 to 38.47 mg 100 g<sup>&#x2212;1</sup> FW, with wild accessions frequently at the higher end. Enzymatically produced pyruvic acid ranged 0.22 to 6.05 &#xb5;mol g<sup>&#x2212;1</sup> FW, and total sugar content ranged from 0.51 to 8.79 g 100 g<sup>&#x2212;1</sup> FW, with cultivated types generally richer in sugars. Antioxidant capacity, as measured by DPPH and FRAP assays, also showed marked differences, with wild species often surpassing cultivated onions.</p>
<p>The clustering pattern was largely influenced by allicin, pyruvic acid (total, basal, and enzymatically produced), antioxidant activity, and sugar-related traits. These findings suggest that wild <italic>Allium</italic> species harbor elevated concentrations of health-promoting compounds, offering valuable genetic resources for breeding programs targeting enhanced nutritional quality, stress tolerance, and disease resistance in cultivated onions and garlic.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s4_3_2">
<title>Correlation among biochemical traits in <italic>Allium</italic> germplasm</title>
<p>Correlation studies will help to reveal how different metabolites interact or co-vary within a genotype or across germplasm, providing insights into metabolic pathways and trait interdependence. Analyzing these correlations aids in identifying key traits for selection in breeding programs, facilitates the prioritization of accessions for functional food or pharmaceutical use, and enhances the understanding of biochemical diversity within <italic>Allium</italic> germplasm. Pearson&#x2019;s correlation analysis (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T4">
<bold>Table&#xa0;4</bold>
</xref>) revealed several significant associations among the twelve biochemical traits. Strong positive correlations were observed between total pyruvic acid and basal pyruvic acid (r = 0.9262), and between allicin content and basal pyruvic acid (r = 0.6671), indicating that pungency-related sulfur compounds are closely interlinked. Total phenol content was moderately correlated with both total flavonoid content (r = 0.6504) and basal pyruvic acid (r = 0.5121), suggesting a partial overlap in the biochemical pathways contributing to phenolic and pungency traits. Carbohydrate percentage showed a positive association with total flavonoid content (r = 0.5759) and FRAP-based antioxidant capacity (r = 0.5170), whereas protein content was positively related to DPPH-based antioxidant activity (r = 0.5717) but negatively associated with carbohydrate percentage (r = &#x2013;0.4913). Reducing sugar exhibited a strong positive correlation with total sugar (r = 0.7969), reflecting shared carbohydrate metabolism, but was negatively correlated with enzymatically produced pyruvic acid (r = &#x2013;0.4452) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;2</bold>
</xref>).</p>
<fig id="f2" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;2</label>
<caption>
<p>Correlation heatmap depicting the pairwise relationships among twelve key biochemical traits assessed in 19 <italic>Allium</italic> germplasm accessions representing 15 distinct <italic>Allium</italic> species. The heatmap visualizes the strength and direction of correlations, where dark red indicates a strong positive correlation (r &#x2248; +1), dark blue indicates a strong negative correlation (r &#x2248; &#x2013;1), and white reflects little to no correlation (r &#x2248; 0). The figure was generated using R programming language, employing a combination of packages including ggplot2, heatmap, corrplot, and Complex Heatmap to enhance visualization and interpretability of trait interrelationships.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-16-1618572-g002.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Correlation heatmap of biochemical traits featuring a red-to-blue gradient. Strong positive correlations appear in dark red, while strong negative correlations are dark blue. Traits include thiosulphinate content, DPPH, FRAB, flavonoid, phenol, various pyruvic acids, sugars, carbohydrates, and protein.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
<p>Notably, DPPH-based antioxidant capacity was negatively correlated with total flavonoid content (r = &#x2013;0.8302) and carbohydrate percentage (r = &#x2013;0.6868), suggesting that radical scavenging efficiency in <italic>Allium</italic> may be influenced by other antioxidant constituents beyond flavonoids. Similarly, FRAP-based antioxidant capacity showed a negative relationship with DPPH-based antioxidant activity (r = &#x2013;0.4871), implying differences in antioxidant profiles captured by the two assays. These correlations indicate that certain biochemical traits are tightly co-regulated (e.g., sulfur compounds and pungency indices), while others exhibit trade-offs (e.g., antioxidant activity vs. carbohydrate accumulation). Such patterns provide insight into the biochemical network structure in <italic>Allium</italic> and can guide selection strategies in breeding programs targeting multiple quality traits. These correlation patterns highlight biochemical interdependencies that are relevant for the interpretation of principal component analysis results.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s4_3_3">
<title>Principal Component Analysis (PCA) of Biochemical trait of <italic>Allium</italic> species</title>
<p>The Kaiser&#x2013;Meyer&#x2013;Olkin (KMO) test measures sampling adequacy for PCA by evaluating whether the variables have enough common variance. In <italic>Allium</italic> biochemical studies, a high KMO value indicates that the dataset is suitable for dimension reduction, ensuring reliable identification of patterns and relationships among biochemical traits. The (KMO) measure of sampling adequacy yielded an overall value of 0.65, indicating a moderate suitability of the biochemical dataset for multivariate analysis. Most biochemical traits, including allicin content, total flavonoid content, total phenol content, total pyruvic acid, basal pyruvic acid, enzymatically produced pyruvic acid, reducing sugar, total sugar, carbohydrate, and protein, exhibited individual MSA values of 0.60, suggesting acceptable shared variance. However, antioxidant activity measured by DPPH and FRAP showed notably low MSA values (0.06), implying limited correlation with other variables. Bartlett&#x2019;s test assesses whether the correlation matrix significantly differs from an identity matrix, confirming that variables are interrelated and suitable for multivariate analysis. A significant result ensures that PCA can meaningfully reduce data complexity without losing essential information about trait associations. Bartlett&#x2019;s test of sphericity was highly significant (&#x3c7;&#xb2; = 362.49, df = 11, <italic>p</italic> &lt; 2.2 &#xd7; 10<sup>&#x2212;16</sup>), confirming that the correlation matrix was not an identity matrix and that the dataset had sufficient inter-variable relationships for factor analysis. Together, KMO and Bartlett&#x2019;s tests validated the suitability of data for PCA, while PCA itself provides a robust framework for summarizing complex biochemical datasets and uncovering meaningful patterns in <italic>Allium</italic> germplasm.</p>
<p>The principal component analysis (PCA) biplot provides a comprehensive visualization of the biochemical diversity among the evaluated <italic>Allium</italic> species based on twelve key quality traits (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;3</bold>
</xref>). The first principal component (PC1) explained 37.4% of the total variance, while the second principal component (PC2) accounted for 22.3%, together capturing 59.7% of the total biochemical variation. Red vectors represent individual biochemical traits, with their length and orientation indicating their contribution and correlation to species distribution in the ordination space (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;3</bold>
</xref>; <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Supplementary Figures S2</bold>
</xref>, <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>S3</bold>
</xref>). Traits such as total phenol content, total flavonoid content, carbohydrate percentage, total pyruvic acid, basal pyruvic acid, and FRAP antioxidant activity loaded strongly and positively along PC1, indicating that species positioned in this direction are biochemically enriched in antioxidant-associated and pungency-linked compounds. Conversely, enzymatically produced pyruvic acid showed strong negative loading on PC2, while total sugar, reducing sugar, and allicin/total thiosulfinate content loaded positively along PC2, revealing an inverse association between pungency and sugar/thiosulfinate levels.</p>
<fig id="f3" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;3</label>
<caption>
<p>Principal Component Analysis (PCA) biplot representing the distribution of 19 Allium germplasm (representing 15 <italic>Allium</italic> species) based on 12 biochemical traits including total and reducing sugars, thiosulfinates content, pyruvic acid (Basic, Enzymatically produced and Total ), Total flavonoid content, Total phenol content, and antioxidant activity (DPPH, FRAB), Protein content and carbohydrate percentage. Arrows indicate the direction and contribution of each trait to the variance along the two principal components (Component 1: 37.4%, Component 2: 22.3%).</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-16-1618572-g003.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Biplot of principal component analysis showing different Allium species marked with colored dots. Axes represent Component 1 (37.4%) and Component 2 (22.3%). Vectors indicate various biochemical traits like total sugar, antioxidant levels, and carbohydrate content. Each species is uniquely color-coded and labeled on the right.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
<p>
<italic>Allium cepa</italic> cultivars such as Bhima Kiran, Bhima Super, and Bhima Shweta, along with <italic>A. ascalonicum</italic>, clustered in the positive PC1 region, reflecting elevated phenolics, flavonoids, and pyruvic acid content. In contrast, <italic>A. sativum</italic> accessions grouped along the positive PC2 axis, indicating higher sugars and thiosulfinates. Wild relatives such as <italic>A. macranthum</italic> and <italic>A. hookeri</italic> were positioned in the negative PC1&#x2013;PC2 quadrant, suggesting comparatively lower concentrations of the major biochemical traits measured. Species in proximity to a vector direction exhibit higher levels of that trait, while those in opposing directions indicate potential trade-offs or lack of correlation. The PCA pattern highlights three major biochemical groupings: (1) An antioxidant&#x2013;phenolic&#x2013;pyruvic cluster (positive PC1), (2) A sugar&#x2013;thiosulfinate cluster (positive PC2), and (3) A pungency-linked enzymatic pyruvate cluster (negative PC2). These findings underscore the high degree of biochemical diversity within the Allium germplasm, offering valuable insights for breeding programs targeting improved nutritional, medicinal, or flavor-related traits. The separation of species along the two principal components provides a framework for strategic genetic resource utilization and conservation within the genus.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s4_4">
<title>Principal component contributions</title>
<p>Principal component analysis (PCA) revealed that biochemical variation in <italic>Allium</italic> germplasm is structured across seven principal components (Prin1&#x2013;Prin7), with the first three components explaining the majority of the variability (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T4">
<bold>Table&#xa0;4</bold>
</xref>; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f4">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;4</bold>
</xref>). PC1 (Prin1) showed high positive loadings for total flavonoid content (0.8613), antioxidant activity by FRAP (0.5598), total phenol content (0.6676), total pyruvic acid (0.7035), basal pyruvic acid (0.7194), and carbohydrate percentage (0.7574). This axis represents a &#x201c;phenolic&#x2013;pyruvic&#x2013;carbohydrate complex&#x201d;, indicating genotypes with higher values for these traits also tend to have elevated antioxidant potential and flavor-related compounds. PC2 (Prin2) was dominated by strong positive loadings for total sugar (0.8631), reducing sugar (0.6624), allicin/total thiosulfinate content (0.7166), and basal pyruvic acid (0.5544). This suggests a &#x201c;sugar&#x2013;thiosulfinate association<bold>&#x201d;</bold>, potentially linked to both metabolic energy content and flavor intensity. PC3 (Prin3) was heavily influenced by enzymatically produced pyruvic acid (0.7857) and total pyruvic acid (0.5796), while showing negative association with FRAP antioxidant activity (&#x2013;0.4974) and reducing sugar (&#x2013;0.4081). This reflects a &#x201c;pungency&#x2013;antioxidant trade-off&#x201d; dimension, where certain pungency-related compounds increase as some antioxidant metrics decline. PC4 (Prin4) showed moderate loadings for allicin/total thiosulfinate content (0.4924) and protein content (0.3519), but negative associations with carbohydrate percentage (&#x2013;0.4017) and reducing sugar (&#x2013;0.4918), representing a &#x201c;protein&#x2013;thiosulfinate vs. carbohydrate&#x2013;sugar&#x201d; contrast. PC5&#x2013;PC7 accounted for smaller portions of variability, capturing subtler patterns, such as protein&#x2013;carbohydrate relationships (PC5) and minor variations in antioxidant measures (PC6, PC7) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T5">
<bold>Table 5</bold>
</xref>; <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Supplementary Table S5</bold>
</xref>).</p>
<fig id="f4" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;4</label>
<caption>
<p>Screen Plot Showing Eigenvalues for Principal Components in <italic>Allium</italic> Biochemical Trait Analysis (Screen plot displaying the eigenvalues associated with each principal component derived from biochemical data of Allium species. The first two components explain the majority of the variance (59.7%) and are typically retained for further analysis).</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-16-1618572-g004.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">A scree plot showing eigenvalues versus the number of components. The y-axis represents eigenvalues ranging from negative 0.5 to 4.0, and the x-axis lists components from zero to ten. The plot displays a decreasing trend of eigenvalues, sharply dropping initially and leveling off around zero as the number of components increases.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
<table-wrap id="T4" position="float">
<label>Table 4</label>
<caption>
<p>Biochemical Parameter Correlation Matrix of 19 <italic>Allium</italic> germplasm representing 15 Allium Species including <italic>A. cepa, A. sativum</italic> and other underutilized species.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" align="left">Row</th>
<th valign="middle" align="left">Average Allicin TOT Thio (&#xb5;mol/g FW)</th>
<th valign="middle" align="left">Antioxidant (&#xb5;mol/g FW) DPPH</th>
<th valign="middle" align="left">Antioxidant (mg/ml)FRAB</th>
<th valign="middle" align="left">Total Flav. Cont. QE (mg/100 g FW)</th>
<th valign="middle" align="left">Total Phenol content GE (mg/100 g FW)</th>
<th valign="middle" align="left">Total Pyruvic Acid (&#xb5;mol/g FW)</th>
<th valign="middle" align="left">Basal Pyruvic Acid (&#xb5;mol/g FW)</th>
<th valign="middle" align="left">Enzymatically Produced Pyruvic Acid (&#xb5;mol/g FW)</th>
<th valign="middle" align="left">Reducing Sugar ( g/100g FW)</th>
<th valign="middle" align="left">Total Sugar ( g/100g FW)</th>
<th valign="middle" align="left">Carbohydrate (%)</th>
<th valign="middle" align="left">Protein (mg/ml)</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Average Allicin TOT Thio (&#xb5;mol/g FW)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center" style="background-color:#63be7b">1.0000</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center" style="background-color:#fbf4f7">0.0535</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center" style="background-color:#fbf2f5">0.0392</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center" style="background-color:#fbf7fa">0.0740</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center" style="background-color:#c0e4cb">0.4580</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center" style="background-color:#b2debf">0.5397</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center" style="background-color:#9cd5ac">0.6671</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center" style="background-color:#facacc">-0.2147</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center" style="background-color:#fafbfd">0.1150</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center" style="background-color:#d3ecdc">0.3421</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center" style="background-color:#fbfbfe">0.0959</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center" style="background-color:#fcfcff">0.1035</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Antioxidant (&#xb5;mol/g FW) DPPH</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center" style="background-color:#fbf4f7">0.0535</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center" style="background-color:#63be7b">1.0000</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center" style="background-color:#f99fa1">-0.4871</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center" style="background-color:#f8696b">-0.8302</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center" style="background-color:#f9a9ab">-0.4230</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center" style="background-color:#f9acae">-0.4045</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center" style="background-color:#f9abae">-0.4076</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center" style="background-color:#fbe1e4">-0.0676</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center" style="background-color:#d3ecdb">0.3456</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center" style="background-color:#ceead7">0.3733</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center" style="background-color:#f87f81">-0.6868</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center" style="background-color:#acdcba">0.5717</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Antioxidant (mg/ml)FRAB</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center" style="background-color:#fbf2f5">0.0392</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center" style="background-color:#f99fa1">-0.4871</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center" style="background-color:#63be7b">1.0000</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center" style="background-color:#b7e0c3">0.5103</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center" style="background-color:#c6e6d0">0.4212</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center" style="background-color:#fbe7ea">-0.0302</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center" style="background-color:#fbf2f4">0.0368</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center" style="background-color:#fad1d3">-0.1705</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center" style="background-color:#fab9bc">-0.3208</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center" style="background-color:#f9b1b4">-0.3714</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center" style="background-color:#b6e0c2">0.5170</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center" style="background-color:#f9b0b3">-0.3760</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Total Flav. Cont. QE (mg/100 g FW)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center" style="background-color:#fbf7fa">0.0740</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center" style="background-color:#f8696b">-0.8302</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center" style="background-color:#b7e0c3">0.5103</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center" style="background-color:#63be7b">1.0000</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center" style="background-color:#9fd7af">0.6504</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center" style="background-color:#c8e7d2">0.4107</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center" style="background-color:#bfe3ca">0.4639</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center" style="background-color:#fbe3e6">-0.0550</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center" style="background-color:#fac9cc">-0.2173</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center" style="background-color:#fac3c6">-0.2570</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center" style="background-color:#acdcba">0.5759</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center" style="background-color:#f99092">-0.5793</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Total Phenol content GE (mg/100 g FW)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center" style="background-color:#c0e4cb">0.4580</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center" style="background-color:#f9a9ab">-0.4230</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center" style="background-color:#c6e6d0">0.4212</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center" style="background-color:#9fd7af">0.6504</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center" style="background-color:#63be7b">1.0000</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center" style="background-color:#c9e8d3">0.4016</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center" style="background-color:#b6e0c3">0.5121</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center" style="background-color:#facccf">-0.1984</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center" style="background-color:#fbe5e8">-0.0427</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center" style="background-color:#e5f3ec">0.2358</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center" style="background-color:#d1ebda">0.3528</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center" style="background-color:#fac5c7">-0.2481</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Total Pyruvic Acid (&#xb5;mol/g FW)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center" style="background-color:#b2debf">0.5397</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center" style="background-color:#f9acae">-0.4045</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center" style="background-color:#fbe7ea">-0.0302</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center" style="background-color:#c8e7d2">0.4107</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center" style="background-color:#c9e8d3">0.4016</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center" style="background-color:#63be7b">1.0000</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center" style="background-color:#70c486">0.9262</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center" style="background-color:#cfead8">0.3681</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center" style="background-color:#faced1">-0.1855</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center" style="background-color:#f9fbfd">0.1186</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center" style="background-color:#bce2c8">0.4797</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center" style="background-color:#fab3b6">-0.3582</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Basal Pyruvic Acid (&#xb5;mol/g FW)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center" style="background-color:#9cd5ac">0.6671</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center" style="background-color:#f9abae">-0.4076</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center" style="background-color:#fbf2f4">0.0368</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center" style="background-color:#bfe3ca">0.4639</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center" style="background-color:#b6e0c3">0.5121</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center" style="background-color:#70c486">0.9262</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center" style="background-color:#63be7b">1.0000</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center" style="background-color:#fbeaed">-0.0096</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center" style="background-color:#fbe9ec">-0.0189</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center" style="background-color:#e6f3ec">0.2322</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center" style="background-color:#c1e5cd">0.4475</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center" style="background-color:#f9b2b4">-0.3659</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Enzymatically Produced Pyruvic Acid (&#xb5;mol/g FW)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center" style="background-color:#facacc">-0.2147</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center" style="background-color:#fbe1e4">-0.0676</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center" style="background-color:#fad1d3">-0.1705</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center" style="background-color:#fbe3e6">-0.0550</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center" style="background-color:#facccf">-0.1984</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center" style="background-color:#cfead8">0.3681</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center" style="background-color:#fbeaed">-0.0096</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center" style="background-color:#63be7b">1.0000</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center" style="background-color:#f9a5a8">-0.4452</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center" style="background-color:#fac3c6">-0.2580</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center" style="background-color:#f1f8f5">0.1695</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center" style="background-color:#fbe4e7">-0.0484</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Reducing Sugar ( g/100g FW)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center" style="background-color:#fafbfd">0.1150</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center" style="background-color:#d3ecdb">0.3456</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center" style="background-color:#fab9bc">-0.3208</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center" style="background-color:#fac9cc">-0.2173</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center" style="background-color:#fbe5e8">-0.0427</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center" style="background-color:#faced1">-0.1855</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center" style="background-color:#fbe9ec">-0.0189</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center" style="background-color:#f9a5a8">-0.4452</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center" style="background-color:#63be7b">1.0000</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center" style="background-color:#86cc99">0.7969</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center" style="background-color:#fbebee">-0.0020</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center" style="background-color:#eef7f3">0.1866</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Total Sugar ( g/100g FW)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center" style="background-color:#d3ecdc">0.3421</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center" style="background-color:#ceead7">0.3733</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center" style="background-color:#f9b1b4">-0.3714</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center" style="background-color:#fac3c6">-0.2570</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center" style="background-color:#e5f3ec">0.2358</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center" style="background-color:#f9fbfd">0.1186</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center" style="background-color:#e6f3ec">0.2322</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center" style="background-color:#fac3c6">-0.2580</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center" style="background-color:#86cc99">0.7969</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center" style="background-color:#63be7b">1.0000</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center" style="background-color:#fbe5e8">-0.0402</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center" style="background-color:#e6f4ec">0.2299</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Carbohydrate (%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center" style="background-color:#fbfbfe">0.0959</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center" style="background-color:#f87f81">-0.6868</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center" style="background-color:#b6e0c2">0.5170</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center" style="background-color:#acdcba">0.5759</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center" style="background-color:#d1ebda">0.3528</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center" style="background-color:#bce2c8">0.4797</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center" style="background-color:#c1e5cd">0.4475</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center" style="background-color:#f1f8f5">0.1695</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center" style="background-color:#fbebee">-0.0020</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center" style="background-color:#fbe5e8">-0.0402</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center" style="background-color:#63be7b">1.0000</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center" style="background-color:#f99ea0">-0.4913</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Protein (mg/ml)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center" style="background-color:#fcfcff">0.1035</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center" style="background-color:#acdcba">0.5717</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center" style="background-color:#f9b0b3">-0.3760</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center" style="background-color:#f99092">-0.5793</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center" style="background-color:#fac5c7">-0.2481</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center" style="background-color:#fab3b6">-0.3582</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center" style="background-color:#f9b2b4">-0.3659</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center" style="background-color:#fbe4e7">-0.0484</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center" style="background-color:#eef7f3">0.1866</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center" style="background-color:#e6f4ec">0.2299</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center" style="background-color:#f99ea0">-0.4913</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center" style="background-color:#63be7b">1.0000</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn>
<p>(Green&#x2013; showing positive correlation; Red- showing negative correlation)</p>
</fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<table-wrap id="T5" position="float">
<label>Table&#xa0;5</label>
<caption>
<p>Principal Component Analysis (PCA) Loadings of 12 Biochemical Parameters recorded on 19 <italic>Allium</italic> species representing 15 <italic>Allium</italic> species including <italic>A. cepa</italic>, <italic>A. sativum</italic> and other underutilized species.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="bottom" align="left">Biochemical Traits</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Prin1</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Prin2</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Prin3</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Prin4</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Prin5</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Prin6</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Prin7</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Average&#xa0; Allicin TOT Thio (&#xb5;mol/g FW)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>0.3115</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>0.7166</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.1407</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.4924</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.0655</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">-0.2455</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">-0.0301</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Antioxidant (&#xb5;mol/g FW) DPPH</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">-0.8393</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.2959</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.118</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.1489</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.0633</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">-0.1227</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>0.308</bold>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Antioxidant (mg/ml)FRAB</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>0.5598</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">-0.3524</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">-0.4974</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>0.2593</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>0.3443</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">-0.26</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.1742</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Total Flav. Cont. QE (mg/100 g FW)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>0.8613</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">-0.1262</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">-0.2468</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">-0.0308</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">-0.1292</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>0.2895</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">-0.1139</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Total Phenol content GE (mg/100 g FW)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>0.6676</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>0.3546</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">-0.2827</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>0.2871</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.1329</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>0.4251</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.2224</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Total Pyruvic Acid (&#xb5;mol/g FW)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>0.7035</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>0.3869</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>0.5796</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">-0.0426</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">-0.0424</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">-0.0416</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">-0.0075</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Basal Pyruvic Acid (&#xb5;mol/g FW)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>0.7194</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>0.5544</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>0.3047</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.0467</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">-0.1889</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">-0.1158</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">-0.0764</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Enzymatically Produced Pyruvic Acid (&#xb5;mol/g FW)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.0922</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">-0.3415</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>0.7857</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">-0.2293</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>0.3535</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.1742</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.1689</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Reducing Sugar ( g/100g FW)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">-0.3211</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>0.6624</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">-0.4081</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">-0.4918</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.0412</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">-0.0428</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">-0.0766</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Total Sugar&#xa0; ( g/100g FW)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">-0.1984</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>0.8631</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">-0.1362</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">-0.2993</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.1471</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.1468</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.162</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Carbohydrate (%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>0.7574</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">-0.0194</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">-0.084</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">-0.4017</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.4008</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">-0.2243</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">-0.1333</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Protein (mg/ml)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">-0.666</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.2197</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.0882</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.3519</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>0.3986</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.1985</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">-0.4102</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn>
<p>Bold-major contributing traits in variance from respective component.</p>
</fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<p>Overall, PCA separated the traits into distinct biochemical clusters (i) flavonoid&#x2013;phenolic&#x2013;pyruvic&#x2013;carbohydrate group, (ii) sugar&#x2013;thiosulfinate group, and (iii) enzymatic pyruvate-driven pungency group highlighting biochemical pathways that may be co-regulated or show metabolic trade-offs. These components can serve as biochemical fingerprints for selecting genotypes with targeted nutritional or flavor profiles.</p>
<p>In summary, the evaluation of 19 <italic>Allium</italic> accessions representing 15 species revealed clear and contrasting patterns of biochemical diversity between cultivated and wild taxa. Cultivated species such as <italic>A. cepa</italic>, <italic>A. sativum</italic>, <italic>A. fistulosum</italic>, and <italic>A. cepa</italic> var. <italic>aggregatum</italic> consistently clustered together, characterized by elevated carbohydrate and sugar contents, a reflection of selective domestication for yield, storability, and consumer preference. In contrast, several wild and underutilized species, notably <italic>A. hookeri</italic> and <italic>A. macranthum</italic>, were enriched in allicin, pyruvic acid, flavonoids, phenolics, and antioxidant activity, emphasizing their importance as reservoirs of nutraceutical compounds and stress-adaptive traits. Similarly, <italic>A. tuberosum</italic> and <italic>A. chinense</italic> displayed distinct organosulfur and antioxidant profiles, while <italic>A. schoenoprasum</italic> and <italic>A. przewalskianum</italic> exhibited elevated antioxidant potential and overall phytochemical richness. Such diversity highlights the evolutionary trade-offs between domestication, which favored palatability and carbohydrate accumulation, and wild relatives, which retained greater phytochemical complexity and adaptive metabolites. Collectively, these findings establish wild <italic>Allium</italic> taxa as valuable genetic and biochemical resources with significant potential for bioprospecting and for breeding onion and garlic cultivars with enhanced nutritional quality, storability, and resilience to biotic and abiotic stresses.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s5" sec-type="discussion">
<title>Discussion</title>
<sec id="s5_1">
<title>Phytochemical screening</title>
<p>Phytochemical analysis is a fundamental approach in plant science to identify and characterize bioactive compounds. It reveals the chemical composition of plants, providing insights into metabolic diversity and functional properties. It helps to detect valuable metabolites guides the selection of plant species for further pharmacological studies or natural product development. Germplasm screening for bioactive compounds aids in distinguishing chemotypes, identifying superior accessions, and supporting breeding programs. The phytochemical analysis of various <italic>Allium</italic> species revealed the presence of key bioactive compounds, which align with previous studies on the genus. The phytochemical screening of 19 <italic>Allium</italic> germplasm representing 15 <italic>Allium</italic> species using aqueous and 80% methanol extracts revealed a conserved metabolic profile across the genus, with notable implications for their chemotaxonomic classification and potential bioactive applications. The universal presence of carbohydrates, phenolic compounds, flavonoids, flavonols, and saponins aligns with the well-documented secondary metabolite composition of <italic>Allium</italic> species, which are renowned for their antioxidant, antimicrobial, and anti-inflammatory properties (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">Lanzotti, 2006</xref>).</p>
<p>The presence of carbohydrates in all tested species is expected, as <italic>Allium</italic> plants are known to be rich in polysaccharides such as fructans, which contribute to their nutritional and medicinal value (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B57">Seki et&#xa0;al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Gonzalez-Morales et&#xa0;al., 2017</xref>). These compounds have been shown to support gut health and modulate immune responses (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Bhat, 2020</xref>). The absence of proteins and starch in all tested species is also consistent with previous reports. The absence of proteins and starch may reflect methodological limitations, as methanol extraction is less efficient for polar macromolecules like proteins, which often require aqueous or buffered solvents (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Arena et&#xa0;al., 2024</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Harborne, 1998</xref>). The negative protein tests suggest that the methanolic extract might not effectively extract proteins, or the species naturally have low protein content in their soluble fraction. Starch is generally present in low quantities in <italic>Allium</italic> plants, as their primary storage carbohydrates are fructans rather than starch (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">Benitez et&#xa0;al., 2017</xref>). Similarly, the lack of tannins contrasts with some reports in wild <italic>Allium</italic> species (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B45">Mendes et&#xa0;al., 2012</xref>), suggesting variability in tannin production across environments or genetic lineages. The uniform absence of alkaloids (confirmed by four distinct tests) further distinguishes <italic>Allium</italic> from alkaloid-rich genera like <italic>Solanum</italic> or <italic>Papaver</italic>, reinforcing its unique chemoprofile (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">Hesse, 2002</xref>).</p>
<p>The widespread presence of phenols, flavonoids, and flavonols aligns with numerous studies highlighting the antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and antimicrobial properties of <italic>Allium</italic> compounds (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">Lanzotti, 2006</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">Benkeblia et&#xa0;al., 2005</xref>). These phenolic compounds contribute to the therapeutic potential of <italic>Allium</italic> species and have been associated with reducing the risk of chronic diseases such as cardiovascular disorders and cancer (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B46">Najeebullah et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">Kothari et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>). Phenolics and flavonoids, in particular, are key contributors to the health-promoting effects of <italic>Allium</italic> vegetables, such as garlic (<italic>A. sativum</italic>) and onions (<italic>A. cepa</italic>), and their ubiquitous occurrence in this study underscores their evolutionary significance as defense molecules (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">Brewster, 2008</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">Assefa et al., 2018</xref>).</p>
<p>Saponins, which were found in all species, are known for their antimicrobial, immune-modulating, and cholesterol-lowering effects (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B42">Martins et&#xa0;al., 2016</xref>). The detection of steroidal/triterpenoid glycosides <italic>via</italic> Salkowski&#x2019;s test corroborates earlier studies identifying saponins as hallmark metabolites in <italic>Allium</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B63">Sobolewska et&#xa0;al., 2016</xref>). These compounds, such as the immunomodulatory saponins in <italic>A. ampeloprasum</italic>, are linked to antifungal and cholesterol-lowering activities (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">Lanzotti, 2006</xref>). Their presence further supports the medicinal use of <italic>Allium</italic> plants in traditional medicine. In contrast, tannins were absent in all tested species, suggesting a lower astringency compared to other medicinal plants that contain high levels of tannins (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Arena et&#xa0;al., 2024</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Haslam, 1996</xref>). This may indicate that <italic>Allium</italic> species have a different chemical defense mechanism than tannin-rich plants.</p>
<p>The absence of alkaloids, as confirmed by four different tests, is consistent with the general chemical profile of <italic>Allium</italic> species, which are not known for significant alkaloid content (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">Benkeblia et&#xa0;al., 2005</xref>). Instead, sulfur-containing compounds such as allicin, alliin, and ajoene are the primary bioactive compounds in <italic>Allium</italic> species, contributing to their antimicrobial and cardiovascular benefits (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Corzo-Mart&#xed;nez et&#xa0;al., 2007</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">Kothari et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>). The detection of glycosides (positive Salkowski test) suggests the presence of steroidal or terpenoid glycosides, which may contribute to the pharmacological effects of <italic>Allium</italic> species. Glycosides have been linked to various medicinal properties, including cardioprotective and anti-inflammatory activities (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">Cai et&#xa0;al., 2004</xref>). However, the negative results in Keller-Killiani and Borntrager&#x2019;s tests suggest the absence of cardiac glycosides and anthraquinone glycosides, respectively. However, the negative results for cardiac glycosides (Keller-Killiani) and anthraquinones (Borntrager&#x2019;s) align with the genus&#x2019;s limited association with these glycoside subtypes. Finally, the presence of amino acids in all species highlights their potential nutritional benefits, as <italic>Allium</italic> plants are known to contain essential amino acids beneficial for human health (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B57">Seki et&#xa0;al., 2019</xref>). The amino acid profile of these species may contribute to their role in metabolism and overall dietary value. The reported presence of amino acids under the &#x201c;fats&#x201d; category requires clarification, as amino acids are nitrogenous compounds typically associated with proteins. While methanol may extract free amino acids, their classification here likely reflects methodological overlap in colorimetric assays (e.g., ninhydrin reactivity), as noted in biochemical screening protocols (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">Kumar and Kumar, 2023</xref>).</p>
<p>Under methodological considerations the use of 80% methanol likely enhanced the extraction of medium-polarity compounds like flavonoids and saponins while excluding highly polar (e.g., proteins) or nonpolar (e.g., essential oils) metabolites. This aligns with studies advocating methanol&#x2019;s efficacy for phenolic extraction in <italic>Allium</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B60">Shukla et&#xa0;al., 2024</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Arena et&#xa0;al., 2024</xref>). However, the absence of alkaloids may reflect solvent incompatibility, as alkaloid isolation often requires acidified solvents.</p>
<p>The uniformity in phytochemical profiles across diverse <italic>Allium</italic> species supports the theory of conserved biosynthetic pathways, possibly driven by ecological pressures such as herbivory or pathogen resistance. For instance, saponins and flavonoids are known deterrents against microbial and insect attacks. These findings reinforce the chemotaxonomic value of flavonoids and saponins in delineating <italic>Allium</italic> subgenera, as proposed by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">Fritsch and Friesen (2002)</xref>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s5_2">
<title>Analysis of biochemical parameters</title>
<p>The statistical analysis of twelve biochemical parameters in the evaluated <italic>Allium</italic> germplasm revealed marked phenotypic variability, attributable to genetic diversity, environmental influences, and inherent metabolic differences. Coefficient of variation (CV) values indicated traits with the greatest heterogeneity, notably reducing sugar (95.72%) and enzymatically produced pyruvic acid (65.83%), suggesting dynamic post-harvest metabolic changes likely driven by enzymatic activity and carbohydrate&#x2013;sulfur metabolism interactions. Such variation is consistent with previous findings reporting cultivar- and storage-dependent fluctuations in sugar accumulation and pyruvic acid production (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Gonzalez et al., 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">Benke et al., 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B60">Shukla et&#xa0;al., 2024</xref>). High mean values of total flavonoid content (23.06 mg 100 g<sup>&#x2212;1</sup> FW) and total phenol content (22.22 mg 100 g<sup>&#x2212;1</sup> FW) highlight the strong antioxidant potential of the germplasm. These secondary metabolites are widely recognized for their roles in plant defense, stress tolerance, and human health benefits, including anti-inflammatory and free radical scavenging properties (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">Cai et&#xa0;al., 2004</xref>). The broad range observed in total flavonoid content (10.42&#x2013;48.42 mg 100 g<sup>&#x2212;1</sup> FW) and total sugar (0.51&#x2013;8.79 g 100 g<sup>&#x2212;1</sup> FW) suggests that certain genotypes and/or growth conditions enhance secondary metabolite biosynthesis, in line with studies linking flavonoid accumulation to genotype&#x2013;environment interactions and light-mediated regulation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Jaakola, 2013</xref>).</p>
<p>The highest variance (143.66) recorded for total flavonoid content further reinforces its sensitivity to genetic expression and environmental modulation. Similarly, variability in pyruvic acid content aligns with its established role as a biochemical marker of pungency in <italic>Allium</italic> species, where sulfur assimilation and alliinase-mediated reactions are key determinants (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Gonzalez-Morales et&#xa0;al., 2017</xref>).</p>
<p>Overall, the observed biochemical heterogeneity underscores substantial potential for targeted selection and breeding aimed at enhancing phytochemical richness. Integrating metabolomic profiling with genomic and transcriptomic tools could provide mechanistic insights into the regulation of these traits, enabling the development of <italic>Allium</italic> cultivars with optimized nutritional and functional qualities (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B66">Vukovic et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s5_3">
<title>Cluster analysis</title>
<p>The hierarchical clustering pattern (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>) distinctly separated the evaluated <italic>Allium</italic> accessions into two major clusters, reflecting strong underlying biochemical divergence. This grouping was primarily influenced by variability in allicin content, pyruvic acid levels (total, basal, and enzymatic), phenolic and flavonoid concentrations, antioxidant capacity (DPPH and FRAP assays), and sugar composition. Such metabolic differentiation aligns with genetic variation, ecological adaptation, and domestication history within the genus (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">Kamenetsky and Rabinowitch, 2001</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Benke et&#xa0;al., 2024</xref>).</p>
<p>Cluster I (red branch in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>) predominantly encompassed cultivated bulb-type <italic>A. cepa</italic> forms (common onion, aggregatum) and <italic>A. sativum</italic> (garlic). These accessions were characterized by lower concentrations of allicin, phenolics, and flavonoids, but higher carbohydrate and sugar contents. This pattern reflects domestication-driven selection for milder taste, higher storability, and consumer-preferred sweetness, often at the cost of reduced secondary metabolite abundance (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Benkeblia and Lanzotti, 2007</xref>). Cluster II (green branch in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>) comprised a diverse set of wild and semi-cultivated taxa including <italic>A. fistulosum</italic>, <italic>A. hookeri</italic>, <italic>A. ampeloprasum</italic>, <italic>A. schoenoprasum</italic>, <italic>A. chinense</italic>, and <italic>A. tuberosum</italic> characterized by elevated allicin, pyruvic acid, total phenol, and flavonoid levels, coupled with higher antioxidant activity. These phytochemically rich species align with prior observations (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Gonzalez-Morales et&#xa0;al., 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">Kothari et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B60">Shukla et&#xa0;al., 2024</xref>) that wild <italic>Allium</italic> possess superior medicinal potential and stress tolerance, likely due to their high investment in defensive secondary metabolites. Pearson&#x2019;s correlation analysis supported these clustering patterns. Strong positive correlations between total pyruvic acid and basal pyruvic acid (r = 0.9262), and between allicin content and basal pyruvic acid (r = 0.6671), indicate tight co-regulation of pungency-related sulfur compounds&#x2014;traits that heavily influenced cluster separation. Similarly, moderate correlations between phenolic and flavonoid content (r = 0.6504) and between carbohydrate percentage and FRAP-based antioxidant capacity (r = 0.5170) reflect overlapping biochemical pathways that contribute to trait co-association within clusters. Negative correlations such as between DPPH antioxidant activity and flavonoid content (r = &#x2013;0.8302) or between carbohydrate percentage and protein content (r = &#x2013;0.4913) highlight potential metabolic trade-offs. These trade-offs may partly explain why carbohydrate-rich, low-pungency cultivars dominate Cluster I, while phytochemical-dense, high-pungency accessions group in Cluster II.</p>
<p>Overall, the integration of correlation analysis with hierarchical clustering (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>) reveals that <italic>Allium</italic> biochemical diversity is structured by strong co-regulation of sulfur metabolism, phenolic pathways, and carbohydrate allocation. This metabolic divergence between domesticated and wild species underscores the breeding potential of wild relatives for enhancing health-promoting phytochemicals, antioxidant capacity, and adaptive resilience in cultivated onions and garlic.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s5_4">
<title>Principal component analysis and correlation studies</title>
<p>The present study highlights the extensive biochemical diversity within <italic>Allium</italic> species, as revealed by principal component analysis (PCA), aligning with earlier reports that emphasized variability in secondary metabolites, sulfur compounds, and antioxidants across the genus (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">Kamenetsky and Rabinowitch, 2001</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">Kumar and Kumar, 2023</xref>). The Kaiser&#x2013;Meyer&#x2013;Olkin (KMO) statistic (0.65) and a significant Bartlett&#x2019;s test confirmed the adequacy of the dataset for multivariate reduction, underscoring the robustness of the PCA results. The first two principal components (PC1 and PC2) explained 59.7% of the total biochemical variance, capturing the major axes differentiating cultivated and wild <italic>Allium</italic> germplasm. Key contributors included total sugar, reducing sugar, allicin content, total pyruvic acid, phenolic content, and antioxidant activity&#x2014;traits also emphasized in interspecific diversity studies by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">Jikah et&#xa0;al. (2024)</xref> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">Havey (2018)</xref>. Similar analyses have demonstrated that PCA effectively distinguishes garlic (<italic>A. sativum</italic>) and onion (<italic>A. cepa</italic>) accessions on the basis of their biochemical fingerprints (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">Maccelli et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>). The clustering observed in the dendrogram was consistent with PCA groupings, reinforcing the idea that biochemical composition serves as both a taxonomic marker and a functional discriminator in <italic>Allium</italic> species (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">Kamenetsky and Rabinowitch, 2001</xref>).</p>
<p>The PCA biplot (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;3</bold>
</xref>) revealed three major biochemical clusters. The first, an antioxidant&#x2013;phenolic&#x2013;pyruvic module represented along PC1, included traits such as total phenol, flavonoid content, carbohydrate percentage, and pyruvic acid indices. This grouping indicates that phenolic metabolism and pungency traits are co-regulated, consistent with reports that phenolics and sulfur-derived pyruvates share overlapping biosynthetic pathways contributing to both antioxidant potential and flavor intensity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Benke et&#xa0;al., 2024</xref>). Pearson&#x2019;s correlation supported this interpretation, showing strong positive associations between total pyruvic acid and basal pyruvic acid (r = 0.9262) and between allicin and basal pyruvic acid (r = 0.6671). These correlations confirm the biochemical link between pungency-related compounds and sulfur metabolism. Cultivated <italic>A. cepa</italic> genotypes (e.g., Bhima Kiran, Bhima Super, Bhima Shweta) and <italic>A. ascalonicum</italic> were positioned positively along this axis, reflecting their higher phenolic and pyruvic acid concentrations, which enhance both health-promoting properties and characteristic onion pungency (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B42">Martins et&#xa0;al., 2016</xref>).</p>
<p>The second grouping, a sugar&#x2013;thiosulfinate module aligned with PC2, was dominated by strong loadings from total sugar, reducing sugar, and allicin/total thiosulfinate content. <italic>A. sativum</italic> accessions clustered here, reflecting their elevated thiosulfinate levels and carbohydrate richness&#x2014;biochemical features long recognized for contributing to garlic&#x2019;s medicinal efficacy and storability (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Benkeblia and Lanzotti, 2007</xref>). Pearson&#x2019;s correlation further supported this association, as total phenol content was moderately correlated with total flavonoid content (r = 0.6504) and basal pyruvic acid (r = 0.5121), suggesting that phenolic metabolism overlaps with sulfur pathways. The close association between sugars and thiosulfinates highlights coordinated regulation of primary and secondary metabolism, whereby carbohydrate flux supports the biosynthesis of organosulfur compounds (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">Khar et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>). These biochemical linkages explain why sugars influence both taste and postharvest behavior in <italic>Allium</italic> crops (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Benkeblia and Shiomi, 2006</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B51">Rabinowitch and Currah, 2002</xref>).</p>
<p>A third cluster, driven by PC3 contributions, reflected a pungency&#x2013;antioxidant inverse relationship. Enzymatically produced pyruvic acid was negatively associated with FRAP-based antioxidant capacity and reducing sugars. Pearson&#x2019;s correlations confirmed these antagonisms: reducing sugar was negatively correlated with enzymatic pyruvic acid (r = &#x2013;0.4452), while FRAP activity was negatively correlated with DPPH scavenging capacity (r = &#x2013;0.4871). Similarly, DPPH-based antioxidant activity was strongly negatively correlated with total flavonoid content (r = &#x2013;0.8302) and carbohydrate percentage (r = &#x2013;0.6868). These results suggest that radical scavenging efficiency in <italic>Allium</italic> is supported by non-flavonoid antioxidants, particularly organosulfur derivatives, which contribute to pungency and antimicrobial activity but do not always act as direct antioxidants (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">Benkeblia et&#xa0;al., 2005</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B57">Seki et&#xa0;al., 2019</xref>). The observed inverse associations underscore evolutionary metabolic balancing: selection for pungency in wild relatives often coincides with enhanced sulfur metabolism but lower sugar- or flavonoid-derived antioxidant activity. Conversely, cultivated types exhibit greater carbohydrate accumulation but relatively diluted phytochemical richness. Wild species such as <italic>A. macranthum</italic> and <italic>A. hookeri</italic> occupied the negative quadrants of the PCA space, reflecting unique but lower trait concentrations, likely adaptations to ecological niches (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Corzo-Mart&#xed;nez et&#xa0;al., 2007</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">Kamenetsky and Rabinowitch, 2001</xref>).</p>
<p>Overall, the PCA and correlation analyses clearly separate domesticated from wild <italic>Allium</italic> germplasm. Cultivated onions and shallots were enriched in phenolic and pyruvic acid traits, while garlic accessions showed sugar&#x2013;thiosulfinate dominance. Wild and underutilized taxa, although lower in trait concentrations, represent reservoirs of alleles for stress resilience, pungency, and medicinal properties (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">Fritsch and Friesen, 2002</xref>). The scree plot confirmed that the first three components capture most of the meaningful biochemical variance, supporting the interpretation of three primary axes: (i) phenolic&#x2013;pyruvic&#x2013;carbohydrate complex, (ii) sugar&#x2013;thiosulfinate association, and (iii) enzymatic pyruvate&#x2013;antioxidant inverse association. Together, these axes reflect distinct metabolic fingerprints within the <italic>Allium</italic> genus (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">Havey, 2018</xref>).</p>
<p>In summary, <italic>Allium</italic> biochemical diversity is structured along metabolic pathways that reveal evolutionary balances between primary (sugars, carbohydrates) and secondary (phenolics, flavonoids, organosulfur compounds) metabolism. Integrating PCA and correlation networks provides a framework for exploiting this diversity in breeding programs balancing flavor, nutritional quality, and health-promoting properties while also guiding the conservation of wild relatives as reservoirs of unique metabolic traits.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s6" sec-type="conclusion">
<title>Conclusion</title>
<p>This study demonstrates that <italic>Allium</italic> species harbor a consistent yet diverse repertoire of phytochemicals, underscoring their importance as promising nutraceutical resources. Comparative profiling revealed marked biochemical divergence between cultivated onions and garlic, which clustered together with higher carbohydrate and sugar contents, and their wild and underutilized counterparts such as <italic>A. hookeri</italic> and <italic>A. macranthum</italic>, which were enriched in allicin, pyruvic acid, flavonoids, phenolics, and antioxidant activity. Correlation analyses integrated with PCA loadings further highlighted strong positive associations among phenolics, flavonoids, and pyruvic acid, while sugars exhibited antagonistic relationships with pungency-related metabolites. These trends reflect evolutionary trade-offs between domestication for yield and palatability versus the retention of stress-responsive and health-promoting phytochemicals in wild taxa.</p>
<p>Collectively, the findings establish wild <italic>Allium</italic> species as reservoirs of bioactive compounds and stress-resilient alleles, offering untapped potential for nutraceutical exploitation and genetic improvement. By linking biochemical diversity with evolutionary and agronomic contexts, this work provides a robust framework for targeted bioprospecting and for breeding programs aimed at enhancing nutritional quality, storability, and resilience in onion and garlic. Future research should integrate advanced metabolomics platforms (e.g., LC&#x2013;MS, HPLC-based flavonoid quantification) with functional bioassays to validate therapeutic relevance and to accelerate the translation of phytochemical diversity into consumer-oriented, climate-resilient cultivars.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s7">
<title>Future perspectives</title>
<p>The biochemical diversity revealed by PCA and correlation analyses has far-reaching implications for crop improvement, functional food innovation, and pharmacological research. The clustering of high-antioxidant species offers guidance for breeding programs targeting enhanced nutritional quality, while <italic>Allium</italic> species enriched in allicin and pyruvic acid provide promising avenues for novel nutraceutical and medicinal formulations (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Borlinghaus et&#xa0;al., 2014</xref>).</p>
<p>Future studies that integrate genomic, metabolomic, and environmental data will be essential to unravel the biochemical plasticity of <italic>Allium</italic> species and its relevance to human health and agricultural sustainability (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">Kamenetsky and Rabinowitch, 2001</xref>). Wild relatives, with their superior levels of bioactive compounds, represent invaluable genetic reservoirs for improving disease resistance, abiotic stress tolerance, and nutritional properties in cultivated onion and garlic (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B44">McCallum et&#xa0;al., 2006</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Benke et&#xa0;al., 2024</xref>). Advanced breeding strategies including marker-assisted selection (MAS) and introgression of wild alleles could accelerate the incorporation of health-promoting traits into commercial cultivars (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">Khar et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>). Harnessing this biochemical diversity will be pivotal for developing resilient, nutrient-dense <italic>Allium</italic> varieties that balance consumer preferences with nutritional security and climate resilience.</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<sec id="s8" sec-type="data-availability">
<title>Data availability statement</title>
<p>The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Supplementary Material</bold>
</xref>. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s9" sec-type="author-contributions">
<title>Author contributions</title>
<p>AB: Data curation, Software, Methodology, Writing &#x2013; original draft, Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing. DM: Validation, Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing, Supervision, Writing &#x2013; original draft, Project administration. VM: Resources, Visualization, Project administration, Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing, Supervision, Funding acquisition, Writing &#x2013; original draft.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s10" sec-type="funding-information">
<title>Funding</title>
<p>The authors declare that no financial support was received for the research, and/or publication of this article.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s11" sec-type="COI-statement">
<title>Conflict of interest</title>
<p>The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s12" sec-type="ai-statement">
<title>Generative AI statement</title>
<p>The author(s) declare that no Generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.</p>
<p>Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If&#xa0;you identify any issues, please contact us.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s13" sec-type="disclaimer">
<title>Publisher&#x2019;s note</title>
<p>All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors&#xa0;and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s14" sec-type="supplementary-material">
<title>Supplementary material</title>
<p>The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2025.1618572/full#supplementary-material">https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2025.1618572/full#supplementary-material</ext-link>
</p>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="DataSheet1.docx" id="SM1" mimetype="application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document"/>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Table1.docx" id="ST1" mimetype="application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document"/>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Table2.docx" id="ST2" mimetype="application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document"/>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Table3.docx" id="ST3" mimetype="application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document"/>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Table5.docx" id="ST4" mimetype="application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document"/>
</sec>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="B1">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Abinaya</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sharmila</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Priya</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ponmozhi</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Linekha</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>Valorization of surplus onion for the development and characterization of antioxidant-rich gummies</article-title>. <source>Food Hydrocolloids Health</source> <volume>3</volume>, <fpage>100130</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.fhfh.2023.100130</pub-id>
</citation></ref>
<ref id="B2">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<collab>Anonymous</collab>
</person-group> (<year>2024</year>). <source>Plant of World Online</source>. Available at: <uri xlink:href="https://powo.science.kew.org/">https://powo.science.kew.org/</uri> (Accessed <access-date>July 15, 2024</access-date>).</citation></ref>
<ref id="B3">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Arena</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ben Ammar</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Major</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kova&#x10d;evi&#x107;</surname> <given-names>T. K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Goreta Ban</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Al Achkar</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2024</year>). <article-title>Diversity of the Morphometric and Biochemical Traits of <italic>Allium cepa</italic> L. varieties</article-title>. <source>Plants</source> <volume>13</volume>, <fpage>17</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>27</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/plants13131727</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">38999567</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B4">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Arulmozhi</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Vijayakumar</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kumar</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Phytochemical analysis and antimicrobial activity of some medicinal plants against selected pathogenic microorganisms</article-title>. <source>Microbial. Pathogen.</source> <volume>123</volume>, <fpage>219</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>226</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.micpath.2018.07.009</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30009969</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B5">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Assefa</surname> <given-names>A. D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jeong</surname> <given-names>Y. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kim</surname> <given-names>D. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jeon</surname> <given-names>Y. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lee</surname> <given-names>J. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ko</surname> <given-names>H. C.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Assessing phenolic content and antioxidant potential diversity in <italic>Allium</italic> plants using multivariate data analysis</article-title>. <source>Hort. Environ. Biotech.</source> <volume>59</volume>, <fpage>759</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>773</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s13580-018-0081-4</pub-id>
</citation></ref>
<ref id="B6">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Benitez</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Moll&#xe1;</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mart&#xed;n-Cabrejas</surname> <given-names>M. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Aguilera</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Esteban</surname> <given-names>R. M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Physicochemical properties and in vitro antidiabetic potential of fibre concentrates from onion by-products</article-title>. <source>J. Funct. Foods</source>, <volume>36</volume>, <fpage>34</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>42</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s13580-018-0081-4</pub-id>
</citation></ref>
<ref id="B7">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Benke</surname> <given-names>A. P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Krishna</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mahajan</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ansari</surname> <given-names>W. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gupta</surname> <given-names>A. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Khar</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Genetic diversity of Indian garlic core germplasm using agro-biochemical traits and SRAP markers</article-title>. <source>Saudi J. Biol. Sci.</source> <volume>28</volume>, <fpage>4833</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>4844</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.sjbs.2021.05.013</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">34354473</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B8">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Benke</surname> <given-names>A. P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mahajan</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Manjunathagowda</surname> <given-names>D. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mokat</surname> <given-names>D. N.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Interspecific hybridization in <italic>Allium</italic> crops: status and prospectus</article-title>. <source>Genet. Resour. Crop Evol.</source> <volume>69</volume>, <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>9</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10722-021-01283-5</pub-id>
</citation></ref>
<ref id="B9">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Benke</surname> <given-names>A. P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mahajan</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mokat</surname> <given-names>D. N.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2024</year>). <article-title>Morphological and molecular diversity of some locally grown, underutilized and cultivated <italic>Allium</italic> species from India</article-title>. <source>Genet. Resour. Crop Evol.</source> <volume>72)</volume>, <fpage>121</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>140</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10722-021-01283-5</pub-id>
</citation></ref>
<ref id="B10">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Benke</surname> <given-names>A. P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mahajan</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mokat</surname> <given-names>D. N.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2025</year>). <article-title>Unraveling the biochemical diversity in short-day onion genotypes</article-title>. <source>Horticulturae</source> <volume>11</volume>, <fpage>484</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/horticulturae11050484</pub-id>
</citation></ref>
<ref id="B11">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Benkeblia</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Shiomi</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2006</year>). <article-title>Fructooligosaccharides of edible alliums: occurrence, chemistry and health benefits</article-title>. <source>Curr. Nutr. Food Sci.</source>, <volume>2</volume> (<issue>2</issue>), <fpage>181</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>191</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2174/157340106776818808</pub-id>
</citation></ref>
<ref id="B12">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Benkeblia</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lanzotti</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2007</year>). <article-title>
<italic>Allium</italic> thiosulfinates: chemistry, biological properties and their potential utilization in food preservation</article-title>. <source>Food</source> <volume>1</volume>, <fpage>193</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>201</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2174/157340106776818808</pub-id>
</citation></ref>
<ref id="B13">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Benkeblia</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ueno</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Onodera</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Shiomi</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2005</year>). <article-title>Variation of fructooligosaccharides and their metabolizing enzymes in onion bulb (<italic>Allium cepa</italic> L. cv. Tenshin) during long-term storage</article-title>. <source>J. Food Sci.</source> <volume>70</volume>, <fpage>S208</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>S214</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1365-2621.2005.tb07159.x</pub-id>
</citation></ref>
<ref id="B14">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Benzie</surname> <given-names>I. F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Strain</surname> <given-names>J. J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1996</year>). <article-title>The ferric reducing ability of plasma (FRAP) as a measure of &#x201c;antioxidant power&#x201d;: The FRAP assay</article-title>. <source>Analyt Biochem.</source> <volume>239</volume>, <fpage>70</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>76</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1006/abio.1996.0292</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">8660627</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B15">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Bhat</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Bioactive compounds of <italic>Allium</italic> species</article-title>. <source>Bioact Compounds Underutilized Vegetables Legumes</source>, <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>20</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/978-3-030-44578-2_17-1</pub-id>
</citation></ref>
<ref id="B16">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Borlinghaus</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Albrecht</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gruhlke</surname> <given-names>M. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Nwachukwu</surname> <given-names>I. D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Slusarenko</surname> <given-names>A. J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Allicin: chemistry and biological properties</article-title>. <source>Molecules</source> <volume>19</volume>, <fpage>12591</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>12618</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/molecules190812591</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25153873</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B17">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Brewster</surname> <given-names>J. L.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>Onions and other vegetable Alliums</article-title>. <volume>15</volume>. <publisher-name>CABI</publisher-name>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B18">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Cai</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Luo</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sun</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Corke</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2004</year>). <article-title>Antioxidant activity and phenolic compounds of 112 traditional Chinese medicinal plants associated with anticancer</article-title>. <source>Life Sci.</source> <volume>74</volume>, <fpage>2157</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2184</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.lfs.2003.09.047</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">14969719</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B19">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Cantwell</surname> <given-names>M. I.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kang</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hong</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2003</year>). <article-title>Heat treatments control sprouting and rooting of garlic cloves</article-title>. <source>Postharvest Bio Tech.</source> <volume>30</volume>, <fpage>57</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>65</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S0925-5214(03)00060-7</pub-id>
</citation></ref>
<ref id="B20">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Corzo-Mart&#xed;nez</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Corzo</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Villamiel</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2007</year>). <article-title>Biological properties of onions and garlic</article-title>. <source>Trends Food Sci. Technol.</source> <volume>18</volume>, <fpage>609</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>625</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.tifs.2007.07.011</pub-id>
</citation></ref>
<ref id="B21">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Dalamu</surname>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kaur</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Singh</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Walia</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Joshi</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Munshi</surname> <given-names>A. D.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Variations in phenolics and antioxidants in Indian onions (<italic>Allium cepa</italic> L.) Genotype selection for breeding</article-title>. <source>Nutr. Food Sci.</source> <volume>40</volume>, <fpage>6</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>19</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1108/00346651011015863</pub-id>
</citation></ref>
<ref id="B22">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Devi</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rakshit</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sarania</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Ethnobotanical notes on <italic>Allium</italic> species of Arunachal Pradesh, India</article-title>. <volume>13</volume> (<issue>3</issue>), <fpage>606</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>612</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B23">
<citation citation-type="web">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<collab>FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization)</collab>
</person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <source>FAO statistical yearbook: Global crop production data</source>. Available online at: <uri xlink:href="http://www.fao.org">http://www.fao.org</uri>  (Accessed <access-date>July 30, 2019</access-date>).</citation></ref>
<ref id="B24">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Fritsch</surname> <given-names>R. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Friesen</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2002</year>). <article-title>Evolution, domestication, and taxonomy of Allium</article-title>. <source>Acta Hortic.</source> <volume>576</volume>, <fpage>95</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>105</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B25">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Gonzalez-Morales</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Perez-Labrada</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Garcia-Enciso</surname> <given-names>E. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Leija-Martinez</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Medrano-Macias</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Davila-Rangel</surname> <given-names>I. E.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Selenium and sulfur to produce <italic>Allium</italic> functional crops</article-title>. <source>Molecules</source> <volume>22</volume>, <fpage>558</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/molecules22040558</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28358332</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B26">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Harborne</surname> <given-names>J. B.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1998</year>). <source>Phytochemical methods: A guide to modern techniques of plant analysis</source>. <edition>3rd</edition> (<publisher-loc>UK</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Springer Science &amp; Business Media</publisher-name>).</citation></ref>
<ref id="B27">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Haslam</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1996</year>). <article-title>Natural polyphenols (vegetable tannins) as drugs: possible modes of action</article-title>. <source>J. Nat. Prod.</source> <volume>59</volume>, <fpage>205</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>215</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1021/np960040+</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">8991956</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B28">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Havey</surname> <given-names>M. J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <source>Advances in onion and garlic genomics and molecular breeding</source> (<publisher-name>CRC Press</publisher-name>).</citation></ref>
<ref id="B29">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Hesse</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2002</year>). <source>Alkaloids: Nature&#x2019;s curse or blessing?</source> (<publisher-loc>Switzerland</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>John Wiley &amp; Sons</publisher-name>).</citation></ref>
<ref id="B30">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Jaakola</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>New insights into the regulation of anthocyanin biosynthesis in fruits</article-title>. <source>Trends Plant Sci.</source> <volume>18</volume> (<issue>9</issue>), <page-range>477&#x2013;483</page-range>. doi:&#xa0;10.1016
</citation></ref>
<ref id="B31">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Jikah</surname> <given-names>A. N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Edo</surname> <given-names>G. I.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Makia</surname> <given-names>R. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yousif</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gaaz</surname> <given-names>T. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Isoje</surname> <given-names>E. F.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2024</year>). <article-title>A review of the therapeutic potential of sulfur compounds in <italic>Allium sativum</italic>
</article-title>. <source>Measurement: Food</source>, <fpage>100195</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.meafoo.2024.100195</pub-id>
</citation></ref>
<ref id="B32">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kamenetsky</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rabinowitch</surname> <given-names>H. D.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2001</year>). <article-title>Floral development in bolting garlic</article-title>. <source>Sexual Plant Reprod.</source> <volume>13</volume>, <fpage>235</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>241</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s004970000061</pub-id>
</citation></ref>
<ref id="B33">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kaur</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chawla</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dhatt</surname> <given-names>A. S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2024</year>). <article-title>Biochemical characterization of onion (allium cepa l.) genotypes: implications for breeding high-nutrient varieties</article-title>. <source>Agric. Res. J.</source> <volume>61</volume>, <fpage>121</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>127</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5958/2395-146X.2024.00017.1</pub-id>
</citation></ref>
<ref id="B34">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Khar</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Singh</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Verma</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2022</year>). &#x201c;<article-title>Mitigating abiotic stresses in <italic>Allium</italic> under changing climatic scenario</article-title>,&#x201d; in <source>Genomic designing for abiotic stress resistant vegetable crops (253-278)</source> (<publisher-name>Springer International Publishing</publisher-name>, <publisher-loc>Cham</publisher-loc>).</citation></ref>
<ref id="B35">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kothari</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lee</surname> <given-names>W. D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kim</surname> <given-names>S. K.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>
<italic>Allium</italic> flavonols: Health benefits, molecular targets, and bioavailability</article-title>. <source>Antioxidants</source> <volume>9</volume>, <fpage>888</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/antiox9090888</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32961762</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B36">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Krishna Kumar</surname> <given-names>N. K.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Advances in onion breeding in India</article-title>. <source>J. Hortic. Sci.</source> <volume>10</volume>, <fpage>78</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>85</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B37">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kumar</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kumar</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>Comprehensive metabolomics and antioxidant activity of <italic>Allium</italic> species <italic>viz. Allium semenovii</italic>, <italic>A. sativum</italic> and <italic>A. cepa</italic>: An important spice</article-title>. <source>Food Res. Int.</source> <volume>166</volume>, <fpage>112584</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.foodres.2023.112584</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">36914316</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B38">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kumaran</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Karunakaran</surname> <given-names>R. J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2007</year>). <article-title>
<italic>In vitro</italic> antioxidant activities of methanol extracts of five Phyllanthus species from India</article-title>. <source>LWT-Food Sci. Technol.</source> <volume>40</volume>, <fpage>344</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>352</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.lwt.2005.09.011</pub-id>
</citation></ref>
<ref id="B39">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Lanzotti</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2006</year>). <article-title>The analysis of onion and garlic</article-title>. <source>J. Chromatogr. A</source> <volume>1112</volume>, <fpage>3</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>22</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.chroma.2005.12.016</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">16388813</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B40">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Lee</surname> <given-names>E. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yoo</surname> <given-names>K. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jifon</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Patil</surname> <given-names>B. S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>Characterization of short day&#xa0;onion cultivars of 3 pungency levels with flavor precursor, free amino acid, sulfur, and sugar contents</article-title>. <source>J. Food Sci.</source> <volume>74</volume>, <fpage>C475</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>C480</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1750-3841.2009.01243.x</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19723185</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B41">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Maccelli</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cesa</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cairone</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Secci</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Menghini</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chiavarino</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Metabolic profiling of different wild and cultivated <italic>Allium</italic> species based on high-resolution mass spectrometry, high-performance liquid chromatography-photodiode array detector, and color analysis</article-title>. <source>J. Mass Spectrom</source> <volume>55</volume>, <fpage>p.e4525</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/jms.4525</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32368854</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B42">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Martins</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Petropoulos</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ferreira</surname> <given-names>I. C.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Chemical composition and bioactive compounds of garlic (Allium sativum L.) as affected by pre-and post-harvest conditions: A review</article-title>. <source>Food Chem.</source> <volume>211</volume>, <fpage>41</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>50</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.foodchem.2016.05.029</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">27283605</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B43">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Mathew</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Abraham</surname> <given-names>T. E.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2006</year>). <article-title>Studies on the antioxidant activities of cinnamon (<italic>Cinnamomum verum</italic>) bark extracts, through various <italic>in vitro</italic> models</article-title>. <source>Food Chem.</source> <volume>94</volume>, <fpage>520</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>528</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.foodchem.2004.11.043</pub-id>
</citation></ref>
<ref id="B44">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>McCallum</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Clarke</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pither-Joyce</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Shaw</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Butler</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Brash</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2006</year>). <article-title>Genetic mapping of a major gene affecting onion bulb fructan content. <italic>Theol Appl Genet</italic>
</article-title>. <source>112</source>, <fpage>958</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>967</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00122-005-0199-5</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">16404585</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B45">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Mendes</surname> <given-names>S. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Andrade</surname> <given-names>J. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xavier</surname> <given-names>M. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Secundo Junior</surname> <given-names>J. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pantale&#xe3;o</surname> <given-names>S. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Estevam</surname> <given-names>C. S.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Genotoxicity test of Maytenus rigida and Aristolochia birostris in the radicular meristem of the onion, Allium cepa</article-title>. <source>Revista Brasileira de Farmacognosia</source>, <volume>22</volume>, <fpage>76</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>81</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1590/S0102-695X2011005000180</pub-id>
</citation></ref>
<ref id="B46">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Najeebullah</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Shinwari</surname> <given-names>Z. K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jan</surname> <given-names>S. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Khan</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ali</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Ethno medicinal and phytochemical properties of genus Allium: A review of recent advances</article-title>. <source>Pak. J. Bot.</source>, <volume>53</volume> (<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>135</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>144</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.30848/PJB2021-1(34)</pub-id>
</citation></ref>
<ref id="B47">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Negi</surname> <given-names>K. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pant</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Prasad</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2006</year>). <article-title>Exploration and conservation of wild and&#xa0;cultivated Allium species in the Indian Himalayas</article-title>. <source>Genet. Resou Crop Evol.</source> <volume>53</volume>, <fpage>1023</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1031</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B48">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Nuutila</surname> <given-names>A. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Puupponen-Pimi&#xe4;</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Aarni</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Oksman-Caldentey</surname> <given-names>K. M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2003</year>). <article-title>Comparison of antioxidant activities of onion and garlic extracts by inhibition of lipid peroxidation and radical scavenging activity</article-title>. <source>Food Chem.</source> <volume>81</volume>, <fpage>485</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>493.44</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S0308-8146(02)00476-4</pub-id>
</citation></ref>
<ref id="B49">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Pandey</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pradheep</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gaikwad</surname> <given-names>A. B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gupta</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Malav</surname> <given-names>P. K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mehta</surname> <given-names>P. S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>
<italic>Allium cepa</italic> L. and its Related Taxa in India: Identification, Eco-geographical and genetic resources study</article-title>. <source>Indian J. Plant Genet. Resou</source> <volume>33</volume>, <fpage>313</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>328</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5958/0976-1926.2020.00045.5</pub-id>
</citation></ref>
<ref id="B50">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Pasupula</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Verma</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zimik</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kaur</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Vasudev</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Khar</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2024</year>). <article-title>Morphological, biochemical and molecular characterization of short-day tropical Indian garlic (Allium sativum L.)</article-title>. <source>Heliyon</source>. <volume>10</volume> (<issue>18</issue>). <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e37553</pub-id>., PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">39309863</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B51">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Rabinowitch</surname> <given-names>H. D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Currah</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2002</year>). <source>Allium crop science: Recent advances</source> (<publisher-loc>UK</publisher-loc>:&#xa0;<publisher-name>CABI Publishing</publisher-name>).</citation></ref>
<ref id="B52">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Raimo</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Structure and morphology of cellulose fibers in garlic skin</article-title>. <source>Sci. Rep.</source> <volume>10</volume> (<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>2635</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41598-020-59479-1</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32060307</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B53">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Rahman</surname> <given-names>M. S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2007</year>). <article-title>Allicin and other functional active components in garlic: Health benefits and bioavailability</article-title>. <source>Intern. J. Food Prop</source> <volume>10</volume>, <fpage>245</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>268</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/10942910601113327</pub-id>
</citation></ref>
<ref id="B54">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Sadasivam</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Manickam</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <source>Biochemical methods (3rd ed.)</source> (<publisher-loc>India</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>New&#xa0;Age International Publishers</publisher-name>).</citation></ref>
<ref id="B55">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Sagar</surname> <given-names>N. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pareek</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Benkeblia</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xiao</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Onion (<italic>Allium cepa</italic> L.) Bioactives: Chemistry, pharmacotherapeutic functions, and industrial applications</article-title>. <source>Food Front.</source> <volume>3</volume>, <fpage>380</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>412</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/fft2.135</pub-id>
</citation></ref>
<ref id="B56">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Schwimmer</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Weston</surname> <given-names>W. J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1961</year>). <article-title>Enzymatic development of pyruvic acid in onion as a measure of pungency</article-title>. <source>J. Agric. Food Chem.</source> <volume>9</volume>, <fpage>301</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>304</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1021/jf60116a018</pub-id>
</citation></ref>
<ref id="B57">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Seki</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hosono</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ozaki-Masuzawa</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2019</year>). &#x201c;<article-title>Chemistry of sulfur-containing compounds derived from garlic and their functions: from the history of garlic to its physiological functions concerning lifestyle-related disease</article-title>,&#x201d; in <source>Chemistry of Korean Foods and Beverages</source> (<publisher-loc>America</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>American Chemical Society</publisher-name>), <fpage>43</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>55</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B58">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Sembiring</surname> <given-names>E. N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Elya</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sauriasari</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Phytochemical screening, total flavonoid and total phenolic content and antioxidant activity of different parts of <italic>Caesalpinia bonduc</italic> (L.) Roxb</article-title>. <source>Pharmacogn J.</source> <volume>10</volume>, <fpage>123</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>127</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5530/pj.2018.1.22</pub-id>
</citation></ref>
<ref id="B59">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Shabir</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pandey</surname> <given-names>V. K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dar</surname> <given-names>A. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pandiselvam</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Manzoor</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mir</surname> <given-names>S. A.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Nutritional profile, phytochemical compounds, biological activities, and utilisation of onion peel for food applications: a review</article-title>. <source>Sustainability</source> <volume>14</volume>, <fpage>11958</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/su141911958</pub-id>
</citation></ref>
<ref id="B60">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Shukla</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rawat</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kumar</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Patel</surname> <given-names>M. K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Behera</surname> <given-names>R. K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Thakur</surname> <given-names>M. S.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2024</year>). <article-title>Comparative analysis of physiochemical, nutritional and bioactive phyto-compound of onion (<italic>Allium cepa</italic> L.) cultivated at high and low altitudes</article-title>. <source>Vegetos</source>, <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>12</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jafr.2025.101947</pub-id>
</citation></ref>
<ref id="B61">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Singh</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mahajan</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Benke</surname> <given-names>A. P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mokat</surname> <given-names>D. N.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2023</year>). &#x201c;<article-title>Garlic: botany, chemistry, and uses</article-title>,&#x201d; in <source>Handbook of Spices in India: 75 Years of Research and Development</source> (<publisher-name>Springer Nature Singapore</publisher-name>, <publisher-loc>Singapore</publisher-loc>), <fpage>2543</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2589</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B62">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Singleton</surname> <given-names>V. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Orthofer</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lamuela-Raventos</surname> <given-names>R. M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1999</year>). &#x201c;<article-title>Analysis of total phenols and other oxidation substrates and antioxidants by means of folin-ciocalteu reagent</article-title>,&#x201d; in <source>Methods in enzymology</source>, vol. <volume>299</volume>. <publisher-loc>Netherland</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Elsevier</publisher-name>, <fpage>152</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>178</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B63">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Sobolewska</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Michalska</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Podolak</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Grabowska</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Steroidal saponins from the genus Allium</article-title>. <source>Phytochem. Rev.</source>, <volume>15</volume>(<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>35</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11101-014-9381-1</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26893594</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B64">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Verma</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Aggarwal</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dey</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chauhan</surname> <given-names>A. K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rashid</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>K. T.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>Medicinal and therapeutic properties of garlic, garlic essential oil, and garlic-based snack food: An updated review</article-title>. <source>Front. Nutr.</source> <volume>10</volume>, 1120377. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fnut.2023.1120377</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">36875845</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B65">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Verma</surname> <given-names>V. D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pradheep</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Khar</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Negi</surname> <given-names>K. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rana</surname> <given-names>J. C.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>Collection and characterization of <italic>Allium</italic> species from Himachal Pradesh</article-title>. <source>Indian J. Plant Genet. Resour.</source> <volume>21</volume>, <fpage>225</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>228</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fnut.2023.1120377</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">36875845</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B66">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Vukovic</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Moravcevic</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gvozdanovic-Varga</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pecinar</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Vujosevic</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kilibarda</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2021</year>). &#x201c;<article-title>Total flavonoid content in edible parts of selected <italic>Allium</italic> species</article-title>,&#x201d; in <source>Book of&#xa0;Abstracts, 12<sup>th</sup> International scientific agriculture symposium&#x201d; Agrosym 2021&#x201d;, Jahorina, 07&#x2013;10 October 2021 (238-238)</source> (<publisher-name>Faculty of Agriculture</publisher-name>, <publisher-loc>East Sarajevo</publisher-loc>).</citation></ref>
<ref id="B67">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ward</surname> <given-names>J. H.</given-names> <suffix>Jr.</suffix>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1963</year>). <article-title>Hierarchical grouping to optimize an objective function</article-title>. <source>J.&#xa0;Amer. Stati. Asso.</source> <volume>58</volume> (<issue>301</issue>), <fpage>236</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>244</lpage>.</citation></ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>