<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.3 20070202//EN" "journalpublishing.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="2.3" xml:lang="EN">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Front. Plant Sci.</journal-id>
<journal-title>Frontiers in Plant Science</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">Front. Plant Sci.</abbrev-journal-title>
<issn pub-type="epub">1664-462X</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Frontiers Media S.A.</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpls.2025.1614845</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Plant Science</subject>
<subj-group>
<subject>Original Research</subject>
</subj-group>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Novel citrus hybrids incorporating Australian lime genetics: development of HLB-tolerant citrus rootstocks and physiological changes in &#x2018;Valencia&#x2019; sweet orange scions</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Mahmoud</surname>
<given-names>Lamiaa M.</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1959289/overview"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/validation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/conceptualization/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/investigation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/methodology/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/visualization/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/formal-analysis/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name>
<surname>Dutt</surname>
<given-names>Manjul</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn001">
<sup>*</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/142778/overview"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/resources/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/supervision/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/conceptualization/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/funding-acquisition/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/project-administration/"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
<institution>Citrus Research and Education Center, University of Florida</institution>, <addr-line>Lake Alfred, FL</addr-line>, <country>United States</country>
</aff>
<aff id="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
<institution>Plant Breeding Graduate Program, University of Florida</institution>, <addr-line>Gainesville, FL</addr-line>, <country>United States</country>
</aff>
<author-notes>
<fn fn-type="edited-by">
<p>Edited by: Noureddine Benkeblia, University of the West Indies, Mona, Jamaica</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="edited-by">
<p>Reviewed by: Concetta Licciardello, CREA Research Centre for Olive, Fruit and Citrus Crops, Italy</p>
<p>Filipe Meira, United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), United States</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="corresp" id="fn001">
<p>*Correspondence: Manjul Dutt, <email xlink:href="mailto:manjul@ufl.edu">manjul@ufl.edu</email>
</p>
</fn>
</author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>13</day>
<month>06</month>
<year>2025</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="collection">
<year>2025</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>16</volume>
<elocation-id>1614845</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>19</day>
<month>04</month>
<year>2025</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>13</day>
<month>05</month>
<year>2025</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#xa9; 2025 Mahmoud and Dutt</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2025</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Mahmoud and Dutt</copyright-holder>
<license xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">
<p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.</p>
</license>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<p>Citrus greening disease, or Huanglongbing (HLB), is the most destructive disease affecting citrus crops worldwide. All commercially cultivated citrus varieties are highly susceptible to HLB, and currently, no effective treatments exist. Several Australian lime species have demonstrated significant HLB tolerance, making them promising candidates for developing HLB-tolerant rootstocks and scions through conventional breeding and biotechnological approaches. Herein, we report the successful development of HLB-tolerant citrus hybrids via integrating Australian lime genetics using traditional breeding methods and protoplast fusion techniques. To test the HLB tolerance of these hybrids as rootstocks, they were clonally propagated through cuttings and divided into two groups: one grafted with <italic>Ca</italic>Las-free &#x2018;Valencia&#x2019; sweet orange budwood and the other grafted with <italic>Ca</italic>Las-infected &#x2018;Valencia&#x2019; budwood. The performance of these hybrids was compared to similar <italic>Ca</italic>Las-infected and free 'Valencia' budded onto Swingle rootstock. Total DNA was isolated from the &#x2018;Valencia&#x2019; leaves at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months post-grafting to assess <italic>Ca</italic>Las titers using quantitative PCR. After two years, significantly higher Ct values (ranging from 29.11 to 35.00) was observed in &#x2018;Valencia&#x2019; trees grafted onto the experimental hybrids than in those grafted onto Swingle, which presented a Ct value of 22.25 &#xb1; 1.11. Compared with other hybrids, the mandarin (UF304) &#xd7; finger lime hybrid (MFL1-98) and pummelo &#xd7; finger lime hybrid (PFL2-61) exhibited improved graft-take, enhanced growth, and lower <italic>Ca</italic>Las titers. Additionally, we analyzed the biochemical and molecular changes in the leaves of &#x2018;Valencia&#x2019; grafted onto these Australian lime-derived hybrids. Biochemical analyses revealed significant alterations in chlorophyll content, starch accumulation, and levels of phenolic and flavonoid compounds. These results demonstrate the practical benefits of using Australian lime-derived hybrids as rootstocks to increase HLB tolerance in citrus, offering a promising approach for the sustainable management of HLB in commercial citrus production.</p>
</abstract>
<abstract abstract-type="graphical">
<title>Graphical Abstract</title>
<p>
<graphic xlink:href="fpls-16-1614845-g011.tif" position="anchor"/>
</p>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>Huanglongbing (HLB)</kwd>
<kwd>
<italic>Candidatus</italic> Liberibacter asiaticus</kwd>
<kwd>finger lime hybrids</kwd>
<kwd>conventional breeding</kwd>
<kwd>pummelo</kwd>
<kwd>rootstocks</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<counts>
<fig-count count="10"/>
<table-count count="4"/>
<equation-count count="0"/>
<ref-count count="58"/>
<page-count count="20"/>
<word-count count="8731"/>
</counts>
<custom-meta-wrap>
<custom-meta>
<meta-name>section-in-acceptance</meta-name>
<meta-value>Crop and Product Physiology</meta-value>
</custom-meta>
</custom-meta-wrap>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec id="s1" sec-type="intro">
<label>1</label>
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>Citrus greening disease, also known as Huanglongbing (HLB), is caused by a phloem-restricted bacteria and poses the greatest threat to global citrus production (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">Bov&#xe9;, 2006</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B53">Urbaneja et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">P&#xe9;rez-Hedo et&#xa0;al., 2024</xref>). The most common species associated with this disease are <italic>Candidatus</italic> Liberibacter asiaticus (<italic>Ca</italic>Las), <italic>Candidatus</italic> Liberibacter africanus (<italic>Ca</italic>Laf), and <italic>Candidatus</italic> Liberibacter americanus (<italic>Ca</italic>Lam). These bacteria are transmitted by two main insect vector species: the Asian citrus psyllid (<italic>Diaphorina citri</italic> Kuwayama, Hemiptera: Psyllidae) and the African citrus psyllid (<italic>Trioza erytreae</italic> Del Guercio, Hemiptera: Triozidae).</p>
<p>HLB impacts all commercially grown citrus varieties, leading to drastic yield reductions, tree decline, and eventual death (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">Bov&#xe9;, 2006</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B51">Thakuria et&#xa0;al., 2023</xref>). Symptoms of the disease include asymmetrical leaf mosaics crossing the veins, leaf chlorosis, stunted growth, premature fruit drop, and the production of misshapen, bitter-tasting fruit (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">Bov&#xe9;, 2006</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B55">Wang and Trivedi, 2013</xref>). The rapid spread of HLB, combined with the lack of effective treatments, poses a significant challenge to the sustainability of the citrus industry worldwide. Given the complex nature of the disease, a multifaceted treatment approach is necessary. Current efforts include vector control, nutritional management, thermotherapy, and the application of antimicrobials and antibiotics to combat <italic>Ca</italic>Las infection. Despite these efforts, tree health continues to deteriorate, and fruit yields remain in decline, emphasizing the urgent need for more effective and sustainable solutions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">P&#xe9;rez-Hedo et&#xa0;al., 2024</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">2025</xref>).</p>
<p>The integration of tolerant and resistant citrus relatives into breeding programs, rootstock development, and interstock applications presents a promising strategy for enhancing resilience to HLB. Some citrus species have shown resistance or tolerance to HLB. Finger lime (<italic>Citrus australasica</italic>), <italic>Poncirus trifoliata</italic>, and <italic>C. latipes</italic> have exhibited significant tolerance to HLB, whereas species such as desert lime (<italic>C. glauca</italic>) have demonstrated resistance (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">Ramadugu et&#xa0;al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Curtolo et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Killiny et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B57">Weber et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">Mahmoud et&#xa0;al., 2024a</xref>). Recently, we investigated the response of two pummelo x finger lime hybrid siblings to HLB infection. Our findings revealed the tolerance of PFL 2-61, which presented relatively low <italic>Ca</italic>Las titers (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">Mahmoud et&#xa0;al., 2025</xref>).</p>
<p>
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B49">Swingle and Reece (1967)</xref> proposed that Microcitrus and Eremocitrus (now classified as Citrus species) evolved from a common ancestor, likely resembling <italic>C. warburgiana</italic>, which, along with <italic>C. papuana</italic>, is native to New Guinea. Different evolutionary paths emerged from this ancestral form: one leading to the Australian round lime (<italic>C. australis</italic>), another to <italic>C. inodora</italic>, and a third to the Australian finger lime (<italic>C. australasica</italic>). In contrast, <italic>C. glauca</italic> rapidly evolved with distinct xerophytic adaptations suited to the Australian deserts. The chloroplast phylogeny supports the common origin of these species, confirming their monophyly, with two primary clades observed, as outlined by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">Bayer et&#xa0;al. (2009)</xref>. The consistent resistance or tolerance to <italic>Ca</italic>Las, characterized by the absence of detectable bacterial replication in germplasms sexually compatible with Citrus, holds significant promise for utilization in sexual breeding programs. The use of hybrids of these species as rootstocks can confer improved tolerance to susceptible scions via modulation of systemic responses, increased nutrient uptake efficiency, and reduced pathogen proliferation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Castle et&#xa0;al., 2015</xref>). Additionally, interstocks derived from resistant germplasms could serve as a physiological barrier, mitigating the pathogen&#x2019;s spread while maintaining compatibility with commercial citrus varieties.</p>
<p>Conventional breeding approaches, including hybridization between tolerant species and elite cultivars, can introduce durable resistance while preserving desirable fruit traits. Recent advances in genomic-assisted breeding, marker-assisted selection, and biotechnology have further enabled the precise incorporation of resistance genes into commercial citrus varieties, accelerating the development of HLB-tolerant cultivars. By leveraging these genetic resources, breeders can increase long-term sustainability and productivity in citrus orchards affected by HLB. Certain Citrus relatives have demonstrated cross-compatibility and graft compatibility with Citrus (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">Dutt et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Dutt, 2022b</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">Mahmoud et&#xa0;al., 2025</xref>). The resistance or tolerance of citrus relatives to <italic>Ca</italic>Las can vary depending on factors such as genetic background, inoculation method, environmental conditions, plant age, number of replicates, testing environment (field vs. greenhouse), and type of plant material used (seedlings vs. mature plants, grafted vs. rooted stocks) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Alves et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>). Together, these factors affect the development of tolerance in plants.</p>
<p>Plants have developed diverse mechanisms to tolerate stress, including physiological, biochemical, and molecular adaptations to cope with pathogen load (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Kumar and Verma, 2018</xref>). These mechanisms help plants alleviate stress and sustain their growth and development in stressful environments. The generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) within various subcellular compartments and the resulting oxidative bursts play crucial roles in enhancing tolerance to biotic stress (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Balint&#x2010;Kurti, 2019</xref>). As a defensive response, a set of compounds, such as phenolic compounds, flavonoids, tannins, lignans, lignin, and monolignols, are formed through the phenylpropanoid pathway (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Cheynier et&#xa0;al., 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B45">Saltveit, 2017</xref>).</p>
<p>Our citrus breeding program aims to produce hybrids using HLB-tolerant citrus relatives to yield new rootstocks, interstocks, or scion varieties tolerant to HLB. In the present study, we selected six hybrids and investigated their <italic>Ca</italic>Las tolerance and performance as rootstocks. We assessed their graft compatibility with &#x2018;Valencia&#x2019; sweet orange and observed their response to <italic>Ca</italic>Las inoculation, thereby investigating their response to infection as rootstocks. We conducted challenge inoculation by grafting <italic>Ca</italic>Las-infected budwood collected from the field onto these hybrids. <italic>Ca</italic>Las multiplication was evaluated regularly using quantitative PCR (qPCR) over 24 months after inoculation (MAI). We analyzed the susceptibility/resistance responses of the evaluated germplasms to <italic>Ca</italic>Las based on parameters such as the leaf chlorophyll content, foliar starch content, foliar total phenolic compound content, and flavonoid content. Additionally, we examined the performance of the trees by studying changes in the expression of defense-related transcripts identified in our prior study (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B57">Weber et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2" sec-type="materials|methods">
<label>2</label>
<title>Materials and methods</title>
<sec id="s2_1">
<label>2.1</label>
<title>Plant genotype and experiment establishment</title>
<p>Australian lime-derived hybrids were developed using conventional breeding and protoplast fusion techniques. For conventional breeding, the finger lime (<italic>C. australasica</italic>, PI 312872 accession from the USDA National Plant Germplasm System [NPGS]) was used as the male parent and crossed with red pulp pummelos (<italic>C. maxima</italic> (Burm.) Merr.) such as the Pum 5-1-99&#x2013;2 and the Pum C2-5-12, mandarin UF304 (<italic>C. reticulata</italic> hybrid), or a <italic>C. inodora</italic> OP seedling (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">
<bold>Table&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>). The hybrids generated through conventional breeding were visually selected based on the color and size of the leaves (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">Mahmoud et&#xa0;al., 2025</xref>). Allotetraploid finger lime-derived hybrid was developed through somatic cell fusion, where diploid &#x2018;OLL8&#x2019; sweet orange callus-derived protoplasts were fused with finger lime (FL) mesophyll-derived protoplasts (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">Dutt et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>). As previously reported, the tetraploid somatic hybrid was evaluated using flow cytometry and simple sequence repeat markers (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">Dutt et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>). The selected hybrids were propagated in a greenhouse before being transplanted into a sandy-soil field in Lake Alfred, Florida, USA, where they were naturally exposed to <italic>Ca</italic>Las for more than ten years through natural psyllid feeding. The trees were irrigated daily, and Florikan 12-4-8 360-day controlled-release fertilizer (FLORIKAN E.S.A. LLC, Sarasota, Florida) was applied annually in March. The hybrids used in this study were chosen based on their demonstrated tolerance for HLB and vigorous growth characteristics.</p>
<table-wrap id="T1" position="float">
<label>Table&#xa0;1</label>
<caption>
<p>List of Australian lime derived hybrids presenting the hybrids selected for investigation in the study and the parents.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="top" align="left">Hybrid name</th>
<th valign="top" align="left">Ploidy</th>
<th valign="top" align="left">Female parent</th>
<th valign="top" align="left">Male parent</th>
<th valign="top" align="left">Origin/source</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">PFL1-11</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">2X</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Pummelo 5-1-99-2</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">
<italic>Citrus australasica</italic>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Sexual cross</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">PFL2-61</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">2X</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Pummelo 5-1-99-2</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">
<italic>Citrus australasica</italic>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Sexual cross</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">PFL1-3</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">2X</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Pummelo C2-5-12</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">
<italic>Citrus australasica</italic>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Sexual cross</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">MFL1-98</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">2X</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Mandarin UF304</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">
<italic>Citrus australasica</italic>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Sexual cross</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">UF SunLime</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">2X</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">
<italic>Citrus inodora</italic> OP sdl.</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">
<italic>Citrus australasica</italic>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Sexual cross</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">O+M2-75</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">4X</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Sweet Orange OLL8</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">
<italic>Citrus australasica</italic>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Somatic hybridization</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
<p>Six selected Australian lime-derived hybrids were propagated in the mist bed via single-node mature cuttings on a Pro - Mix BX general purpose potting mix and maintained under controlled conditions for one year. Following the propagation period, the plants were transplanted into 10 &#xd7; 10 &#xd7; 35 cm standard square pots (&#x201c;citripots&#x201d;) filled with the same Pro-Mix soilless medium (Premier Tech Horticulture, Quakertown, PA, USA). They were then placed in a 50% shaded greenhouse, exposed to natural daylight and maintained under a relative humidity of 70 &#xb1; 10% and a temperature of 32 &#xb1; 2&#xb0;C. The clonally propagated trees were divided into two sets. The first set was top grafted with <italic>Ca</italic>Las-free &#x2018;Valencia&#x2019; sweet orange (<italic>Citrus</italic> &#xd7; <italic>sinensis</italic> (L.) Osbeck) budwood. In contrast, the second set was grafted with <italic>Ca</italic>Las-positive &#x2018;Valencia&#x2019; budwood obtained from HLB-infected trees (Ct values of <italic>Ca</italic>Las = 25 &#xb1; 3.5). The performance of those trees was compared to that of &#x2018;Valencia&#x2019; grafted onto Swingle citrumelo, a common commercial rootstock.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_2">
<label>2.2</label>
<title>Growth measurement</title>
<p>The growth index was determined via measurements of scion length, scion diameter, and rootstock diameter using a Vernier caliper and metric tape measure. Scion length was measured from the tip of the main stem to the graft union, encompassing the length of both the spring and summer shoots. The scion and rootstock diameters were measured 5 cm above and below the graft union. The experimental design comprised twelve replicates for each graft combination. Graft-take, indicating graft compatibility, was also evaluated. Initial compatibility was determined by the presence of healed grafting unions and the observation of new viable shoots. The number of live grafts was recorded for each treatment, along with the time elapsed after grafting, and the graft-take percentage relative to the total number of grafted plants was calculated. Furthermore, three plants from each combination were longitudinally sectioned with a scalpel blade at the median region of the grafted region within a 5 cm long stem segment, splitting them into two halves for sampling. The samples were stained with a 5% ferric chloride solution for 2 hours to detect phenolic compounds. The ferric chloride solution binds to the phenolic compounds in the grafting area, resulting in a visible color change. The color was then observed under a microscope (Carl Zeiss Microscopy GmbH, G&#xf6;ttingen, Germany) equipped with a Zeiss AxioCam ICc1. ImageJ software was used to measure the optical intensity of staining (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B44">Ruzin, 1999</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">Marques et&#xa0;al., 2018</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_3">
<label>2.3</label>
<title>
<italic>Ca</italic>Las assessment in &#x2018;Valencia&#x2019; leaves and rootstock Australian lime derived hybrid roots</title>
<p>To assess the <italic>Ca</italic>Las titer in the infected leaves from the scion and the roots of the rootstock of greenhouse-grown trees, total DNA was periodically isolated from the leaf petioles and midveins of fully expanded leaves or root tissues. DNA extraction was performed using the GeneJET Plant Genomic DNA Purification Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Massachusetts, USA) following the manufacturer&#x2019;s instructions. The concentration of the extracted DNA was normalized to 25 ng/&#x3bc;L before conducting quantitative PCR (qPCR). Quantitative PCR was carried out using a QuantStudio&#x2122; 3 System (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The <italic>Ca</italic>Las genomic DNA was tested using TaqMan&#x2122; Gene Expression Master Mix and the CQUL primers (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Supplementary Table&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>), designed to amplify a segment of the <italic>Ca</italic>Las rplJ/rplL ribosomal protein-encoding gene (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B56">Wang et&#xa0;al., 2006</xref>). <italic>Ca</italic>Las multiplication was evaluated regularly over 24 MAI at 6, 12, 18, and 24 MAI with <italic>Ca</italic>Las-infected or <italic>Ca</italic>Las-free (control) trees.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_4">
<label>2.4</label>
<title>Physiological and biochemical variables</title>
<p>Fifteen mature leaves from &#x2018;Valencia&#x2019; plants were harvested, frozen, and ground in liquid nitrogen. Each hybrid was sampled in six biological replicates, and the ground leaf material was stored at -20&#xb0;C until biochemical assays were performed. Chlorophyll <italic>a</italic>, chlorophyll <italic>b</italic>, and total chlorophyll levels were determined by measuring the absorbance at different wavelengths (665 nm for chlorophyll <italic>a</italic> (Chl <italic>a</italic>) and 653 nm for chlorophyll <italic>b</italic> (Chl <italic>b</italic>)). Chlorophyll <italic>a</italic>, chlorophyll <italic>b</italic>, and total chlorophyll contents were estimated (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Lichtenthaler and Wellburn, 1983</xref>).</p>
<p>The starch content was determined as described previously by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B42">Rosales and Burns (2011)</xref> with slight modifications. Fresh tissues (100 mg) were ground to a powder, suspended, and homogenized in 700 &#x3bc;l of distilled water. Leaf samples and a standard solution were boiled in water for 10 min and then transferred to cold water to cool. The samples were vortexed and then centrifuged for 2 min at 6000 rpm. Aliquots of the supernatant were collected in new tubes. Three hundred microliters of the supernatant were subjected to extraction with 900 &#x3bc;l of 100% ethanol. The mixture was vortexed and centrifuged for 10 min at 10000 rpm. The supernatant was discarded, and 1 ml of distilled water was added to dissolve the pellet. Fifty microliters of KI: I2 (8 mM: 50 mM) was added. The starch content was quantified by monitoring the color change with a spectrophotometer at 594 nm. Rice starch (Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) was used as a standard.</p>
<p>The total phenolic compounds were estimated according to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B47">Singleton and Rossi (1965)</xref>. In brief, 100 mg of fresh leaf tissue was subjected to extraction in 1 ml of 80% ethanol and then centrifuged for 20 min at 10000 rpm. The TPC extract was centrifuged, and 100 &#xb5;L of Folin reagent (1:10) was mixed with the leaf extract. After vortexing and 5 min of incubation at room temperature, the reaction was initiated by adding 300 mL of 20% sodium carbonate (Na<sub>2</sub>CO<sub>3</sub>) to the extract. The color change was recorded after 60 min by measuring the absorbance at 650 nm. The standard curve for phenol was prepared by measuring 1 mL each of a series of gallic acid solutions in ethanol at different concentrations from 0 to 1.00 mg/mL. The phenol contents are expressed as mg of gallic acid per 100 g of tissue fresh weight.</p>
<p>The total flavonoid content in the leaf samples was estimated using a colorimetric assay with aluminum chloride (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">Aktumsek et&#xa0;al., 2013</xref>). The methanolic extract (50 &#xb5;L) was diluted in 200 &#xb5;L of distilled water, and the diluted samples were mixed with 60 &#xb5;L of 5% sodium nitrite (NaNO<sub>2</sub>) solution and 60 &#xb5;L of 10% aluminum chloride (AlCl<sub>3</sub>) solution. After a 5-minute incubation at room temperature, 400 &#xb5;L of 1 M sodium hydroxide (NaOH) and 1.230 mL of distilled water were added before vortexing. The absorbance of the reaction mixture was measured at 510 nm. A standard curve was created using catechin standard solutions (0&#x2013;200 ppm), and the content of total flavonoids is expressed as mg catechin equivalents per 100 mg of fresh weight.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_5">
<label>2.5</label>
<title>Gene expression assessment</title>
<p>RNA was isolated according to the manufacturer&#x2019;s protocol from 100 mg of finely ground leaf tissue via a Direct-zol&#x2122; RNA Miniprep Kit. qPCR was performed with a final volume of 10 &#x3bc;l using the SYBR Green Kit according to the manufacturer&#x2019;s instructions. Each sample was tested twice in twelve replicates. The Ct value of the PCR curve was analyzed and compared with that of Val/SW as a control. The relative expression levels of the selected genes were calculated by the 2<sup>&#x2212;&#x394;&#x394;CT</sup> method (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Livak and Schmittgen, 2001</xref>) and the calculation of Log2 fold change compared to &#x2018;Valencia&#x2019; grafted onto Swingle rootstock using RStudio. The actin housekeeping gene was used as an endogenous control. The primer sequences of the genes evaluated in this study are outlined in <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Supplementary Table&#xa0;2</bold>
</xref>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_6">
<label>2.6</label>
<title>Statistical analysis</title>
<p>To investigate the performance of &#x2018;Valencia&#x2019; sweet orange grafted on the Australian lime-derived hybrids, analysis of variance (ANOVA) was conducted in JMP Pro version 17 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA) and RStudio (version 2024.12.1 Build 563, Posit Software, PBC). The <italic>Ca</italic>Las infection and scion/rootstock combinations were examined via a factorial experiment with two factors (<italic>Ca</italic>Las&#x2013; or <italic>Ca</italic>Las + infection) and seven scion/rootstock combinations. For gene expression analysis, data collected under <italic>Ca</italic>Las+ conditions were evaluated using one-way ANOVA to compare relative gene expression among graft combinations, with &#x2018;Valencia&#x2019; on Swingle rootstock as the control. ANOVA followed by the <italic>post hoc</italic> Tukey&#x2013;Kramer honestly significant difference (HSD) test was used. Differences were considered significant when the <italic>p</italic> value was less than 0.05%.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s3" sec-type="results">
<label>3</label>
<title>Results</title>
<sec id="s3_1">
<label>3.1</label>
<title>Graft compatibility on Australian lime-derived hybrids as rootstocks</title>
<p>&#x2018;Valencia&#x2019; sweet orange exhibited graft compatibility with Australian lime-derived hybrids, with grafting success rates ranging from 80% to 100% when <italic>Ca</italic>Las - budwood was used and 75% to 100% when <italic>Ca</italic>Las+ budwood was used. However, two hybrids, O+M2&#x2013;75 and UF SunLime, presented lower grafting success rates of 40% and 50%, respectively. When grafted with <italic>Ca</italic>Las+ &#x2018;Valencia&#x2019; budwood, the percentage of grafted plants further decreased to 35% and 40% in these hybrids, respectively (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;1A</bold>
</xref>). To assess the accumulation of phenolic compounds at the graft union in infected trees, we applied a 5% ferric chloride solution to longitudinal sections of the grafting union, and the staining intensity was estimated in the infected trees. The mean optical density (OD) values varied among the hybrids (<italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.0001) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;1B</bold>
</xref>). Val/PFL 2&#x2013;61 and Val/MFL1&#x2013;98 presented the lowest OD values (0.34 and 0.37, respectively), whereas PFL 1&#x2013;3 presented the highest OD at 0.6467 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;1B</bold>
</xref>).</p>
<fig id="f1" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;1</label>
<caption>
<p>
<bold>(A)</bold> Graft-take or grafting success rates of &#x2018;Valencia&#x2019; sweet orange on Australian lime-derived hybrids with <italic>Ca</italic>Las&#x2212; and <italic>Ca</italic>Las+ budwood. <bold>(B)</bold> Staining intensity measurements for phenolic compounds in various citrus scion/rootstock combinations. The image on the right side of panel <bold>(B)</bold> shows longitudinal sectioning of the MFL1&#x2013;98 combination at the median graft region within a 5 cm stem segment.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-16-1614845-g001.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_2">
<label>3.2</label>
<title>&#x2018;Valencia&#x2019; grafted onto Australian lime derived hybrids exhibited improved growth performance</title>
<p>The growth performance of &#x2018;Valencia&#x2019; orange grafted onto Australian lime-derived hybrids was assessed under both <italic>Ca</italic>Las-free (HLB&#x2212;) and <italic>Ca</italic>Las-infection (HLB+) conditions at 12 and 24 months post grafting (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">
<bold>Table&#xa0;2</bold>
</xref>). The results revealed significant variations in plant vigor among the different rootstock combinations. At 12 months post-grafting, Val/PFL2&#x2013;61 and Val/MFL1&#x2013;98 presented the most significant growth across all the measured parameters, with a height of 67.17 cm, a scion diameter of 5.71 cm, and a rootstock diameter of 9.70 cm under <italic>Ca</italic>Las-free (HLB&#x2212;) conditions. Similarly, Val/MFL1&#x2013;98 presented a comparable plant height of 67.13 cm, with a slightly larger scion diameter of 6.16 cm and a rootstock diameter of 9.14 cm. Under <italic>Ca</italic>Las-infection (HLB+) conditions, a general decline in growth was observed across all rootstock combinations; however, Val/MFL1&#x2013;98 maintained the highest growth among the infected trees, with a plant height of 65.32 cm, a scion diameter of 5.90 cm, and a rootstock diameter of 9.05 cm.</p>
<table-wrap id="T2" position="float">
<label>Table&#xa0;2</label>
<caption>
<p>Characteristics of &#x2018;Valencia&#x2019; as a scion and the Australian lime-derived hybrids as rootstocks.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="top" rowspan="2" align="left">Code</th>
<th valign="top" rowspan="2" align="left">Rootstock</th>
<th valign="top" colspan="2" align="left">Scion height</th>
<th valign="top" colspan="2" align="left">Scion diameter</th>
<th valign="top" colspan="2" align="left">Rootstock diameter</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="top" align="left">HLB-</th>
<th valign="top" align="left">HLB+</th>
<th valign="top" align="left">HLB-</th>
<th valign="top" align="left">HLB+</th>
<th valign="top" align="left">HLB-</th>
<th valign="top" align="left">HLB+</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<th valign="top" colspan="8" align="center">12-months - post grafting</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Val/PFL1-11</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">5-1-99&#x2013;2 X FL -(Hybrid 1)</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">43.17</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">25.33</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">5.34</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">5.39</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">8.00</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">8.99</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Val/PFL2-61</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">5-1-99&#x2013;2 X FL -(Hybrid 2)</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">67.17</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">53.83</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">5.71</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">5.31</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">9.70</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">9.90</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Val/PFL1-3</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">C2-5&#x2013;12 X FL</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">32.33</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">30.87</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">3.47</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">3.07</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">6.42</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">6.69</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Val/MFL1-98</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">UF304 X FL</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">67.13</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">65.32</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">6.16</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">5.90</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">9.14</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">9.05</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Val/O+M2-75</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">OLL8+FL</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">37.00</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">44.00</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">3.83</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">3.27</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">6.41</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">5.58</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Val/UF SunLime</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">UF SunLime</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">40.00</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">38.67</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">4.20</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">3.43</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">6.07</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">6.12</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Val/SW</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Swingle</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">55.67</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">47.83</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">5.18</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">4.80</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">8.00</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">7.83</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="top" colspan="8" align="center">24-months - post grafting</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Val/PFL1-11</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">5-1-99&#x2013;2 X FL -(Hybrid 1)</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">86.22</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">85.57</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">8.80</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">8.15</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">12.35</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">11.70</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Val/PFL2-61</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">5-1-99&#x2013;2 X FL -(Hybrid 2)</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">124.71</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">94.05</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">12.55</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">10.46</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">12.55</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">10.73</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Val/PFL1-3</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">C2-5&#x2013;12 X FL</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">71.77</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">64.37</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">6.69</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">5.71</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">9.26</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">7.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Val/MFL1-98</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">UF304 X FL</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">101.76</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">96.66</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">10.20</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">9.84</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">10.98</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">10.68</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Val/O+M2-75</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">OLL8+FL</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">59.29</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">57.79</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">6.31</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">5.78</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">7.94</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">7.26</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Val/UF SunLime</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">UF SunLime</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">86.61</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">72.90</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">7.51</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">6.73</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">7.96</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">7.25</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Val/SW</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Swingle</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">86.78</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">73.03</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">9.28</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">7.85</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">12.99</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">11.13</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
<p>Other rootstock combinations, including Val/SW (Swingle), Val/PFL1-11, and Val/UF SunLime, also presented moderate vigor at 12 months. The plant height of Val/SW reached 55.67 cm (HLB&#x2212;) and 47.83 cm (HLB+), whereas that of Val/UF SunLime reached 40.00 cm (HLB&#x2212;) and 38.67 cm (HLB+). In contrast, Val/PFL1&#x2013;3 presented the lowest growth in the first year, with heights of 32.33 cm (HLB&#x2212;) and 30.87 cm (HLB+), along with the smallest scion and rootstock diameters among all the tested hybrids. At 24 months post grafting, Val/PFL2&#x2013;61 and Val/MFL1&#x2013;98 continued to exhibit the most vigorous growth. Val/PFL2&#x2013;61 presented the greatest plant height (124.71 cm in HLB&#x2212; and 94.05 cm in HLB+), along with substantial scion (12.55 cm, 10.46 cm) and rootstock (12.55 cm, 10.73 cm) diameters. Val/MFL1&#x2013;98 maintained strong growth performance, with plant heights reaching 101.76 cm (HLB&#x2212;) and 96.66 cm (HLB+), with scion diameters of 10.20 cm and 9.84 cm, respectively. Conversely, Val/O+M2&#x2013;75 exhibited the lowest overall growth at 24 months, with plant heights of 59.29 cm (HLB&#x2212;) and 57.79 cm (HLB+), as well as the smallest rootstock diameter among all combinations (7.94 cm and 7.26 cm, respectively). Additionally, Val/PFL1-3, despite showing some improvement in growth, remained among the least vigorous combinations, with plant heights of 71.77 cm (HLB&#x2212;) and 64.37 cm (HLB+).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_3">
<label>3.3</label>
<title>&#x2018;Valencia&#x2019; grafted onto Australian lime derived hybrid rootstocks exhibited a lower <italic>Ca</italic>Las titer</title>
<p>
<italic>Ca</italic>Las bacterial titers were evaluated in &#x2018;Valencia&#x2019; grafted onto various rootstocks at four sampling periods (6, 12, 18, and 24 MAI) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">
<bold>Table&#xa0;3</bold>
</xref>). At 6 MAI, the Ct values ranged from 21.1 to 23.3 in &#x2018;Valencia&#x2019; leaves, with Val/PFL2&#x2013;61 showing the lowest Ct value (21.1), whereas Val/SW presented the highest Ct value (23.3). At 12 MAI, the Ct values varied significantly (<italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.0001), with Val/PFL1&#x2013;3 exhibiting the highest Ct value (35.3), whereas Val/PFL1&#x2013;11 had the lowest Ct value (22.5). Similarly, Val/UF SunLime, Val/O+M2-75, and Val/MFL1&#x2013;98 displayed higher Ct values (33.5, 31.6, and 30.8, respectively) than Val/SW (24.2). At 18 MAI, the Ct values continued to reflect differences in the bacterial titer (<italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.0001). Val/PFL1&#x2013;3 maintained a high Ct value (33.0), whereas Val/PFL2-61, Val/PFL1-11, and Val/SW presented the lowest Ct values (26.4, 22.3, and 24.2, respectively). At 24 MAI, the Ct values remained significantly different across rootstocks (<italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.0001). Val/PFL1&#x2013;3 presented the highest Ct value of 35.1, followed by Val/MFL1-98 (30.6), Val/O+M2-75 (25.0), Val/PFL1-11 (22.4), and Val/UF SunLime (22.1). Additionally, the Ct values of the root samples from the hybrids ranged from 30.1 to 37.7, with all the hybrids testing negative for <italic>Ca</italic>Las in the roots. However, PF1&#x2013;11 and Swingle presented the lowest Ct values in the root samples (30.1 and 29.1, respectively) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;2</bold>
</xref>).</p>
<table-wrap id="T3" position="float">
<label>Table&#xa0;3</label>
<caption>
<p>Ct values of <italic>Ca</italic>Las bacterial titers in &#x2018;Valencia&#x2019; leaves at different time points following qPCR analysis.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="top" align="left">Code</th>
<th valign="top" align="left">6 MAI*</th>
<th valign="top" align="left">12 MAI</th>
<th valign="top" align="left">18 MAI</th>
<th valign="top" align="left">24 MAI</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Val/PFL1-11</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">22.6 &#xb1; 0.3<sup>ab</sup>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">22.5 &#xb1; 0.6<sup>c</sup>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">22.3 &#xb1; 0.1<sup>c</sup>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">22.4 &#xb1; 0.3<sup>c</sup>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Val/PFL2-61</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">21.1 &#xb1; 0.1<sup>c</sup>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">24.5 &#xb1; 1.9<sup>bc</sup>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">26.4 &#xb1; 1.2<sup>bc</sup>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">28.5 &#xb1; 2.2<sup>b</sup>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Val/PFL1-3</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">21.8 &#xb1; 0.1<sup>bc</sup>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">35.3 &#xb1; 0.8<sup>a</sup>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">33.0 &#xb1; 0.9<sup>a</sup>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">35.1 &#xb1; 0.7<sup>a</sup>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Val/MFL1-98</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">21.9 &#xb1; 0.2<sup>abc</sup>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">30.8 &#xb1; 2.7<sup>ab</sup>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">31.0 &#xb1; 2.2<sup>ab</sup>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">30.6 &#xb1; 2.5<sup>ab</sup>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Val/O+M2-75</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">21.8 &#xb1; 0.2<sup>bc</sup>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">31.6 &#xb1; 0.5<sup>a</sup>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">25.8 &#xb1; 0.3<sup>c</sup>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">25.0 &#xb1; 0.6<sup>bc</sup>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Val/UF SunLime</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">22.6 &#xb1; 0.4<sup>ab</sup>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">33.5 &#xb1; 0.6<sup>a</sup>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">26.9 &#xb1; 0.3<sup>bc</sup>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">22.1 &#xb1; 0.1<sup>c</sup>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Val/SW</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">23.3 &#xb1; 0.5<sup>a</sup>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">24.2 &#xb1; 1.5<sup>c</sup>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">24.2 &#xb1; 0.8<sup>c</sup>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">25.8 &#xb1; 0.9<sup>bc</sup>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">
<italic>p</italic> value</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.0004</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&lt;0.0001</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&lt;0.0001</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&lt;0.0001</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn>
<p>*MAI, Months after infection. The data is presented as the means of CT values &#xb1; standard deviations. Different letters indicate significant differences across cultivars at each time point (<italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.05).</p>
</fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<fig id="f2" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;2</label>
<caption>
<p>CT values of <italic>Ca</italic>Las bacterial titers in the roots after one year of infection. The data are presented as the means of CT values &#xb1; standard deviations. Different letters indicate significant differences across cultivars at each time point (<italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.05).</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-16-1614845-g002.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_4">
<label>3.4</label>
<title>Biochemical response of &#x2018;Valencia&#x2019; sweet orange grafted onto Australian lime derived hybrids to <italic>Ca</italic>Las infection</title>
<p>Analysis of the chlorophyll content revealed significant differences across the hybrids, with both chlorophyll <italic>a</italic> (Chl <italic>a</italic>) and chlorophyll <italic>b</italic> (Chl <italic>b</italic>) levels significantly reduced in plants infected with <italic>Ca</italic>Las (<italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.05) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;3</bold>
</xref>; <xref ref-type="table" rid="T4">
<bold>Table&#xa0;4</bold>
</xref>). At 12 MAI, the infected plants exhibited consistently lower Chl <italic>a</italic> values, with the most pronounced reduction observed in Val/PF1-3 (9.27 mg/g), compared to its non-infected counterpart (15.26 mg/g). Similarly, reductions were recorded in Val/UF SunLime (from 15.40 to 10.40 mg/g), Val/PF2-61 (from 18.94 to 12.28 mg/g), and Val/O+M2-75 (from 16.10 to 11.64 mg/g). Among all genotypes, Val/PF2&#x2013;61 had the highest Chl <italic>a</italic> content under non-infected conditions, while Val/PF1&#x2013;3 showed the lowest Chl <italic>a</italic> content under infection. At 24 MAI, the trend continued, with <italic>Ca</italic>Las-infected plants exhibiting further Chl <italic>a</italic> reduction in most genotypes. Val/PF1&#x2013;3 again had an obvious drop from 13.91 mg/g(non-infected) to 8.92 mg/g (infected). Val/PF2&#x2013;61 and Val/UF SunLime also showed significant declines (17.42 to 11.46 mg/g, and 14.88 to 10.07 mg/g, respectively). Val/Swingle and Val/O+M2&#x2013;75 maintained relatively stable Chl <italic>a</italic> levels between 12 and 24 MAI but still exhibited a consistent decline in the presence of infection (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;3A</bold>
</xref>).</p>
<fig id="f3" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;3</label>
<caption>
<p>Changes in foliar chlorophyll content and starch accumulation in &#x2018;Valencia&#x2019; sweet orange grafted onto Australian lime derived hybrids. <bold>(A)</bold> Chlorophyll <italic>a</italic> concentration (mg g<sup>-1</sup> FW), <bold>(B)</bold> chlorophyll <italic>b</italic> concentration (mg g<sup>-1</sup> FW), and <bold>(C)</bold> total chlorophyll content (mg g<sup>-1</sup> FW). The data were recorded in <italic>Ca</italic>Las &#x2013; (grafted with healthy budwoods) and <italic>Ca</italic>Las + (grafted with infected budwoods) at 12 and 24 months after inoculation (MAI). The box plot represents six replicates, and <italic>p</italic> values were determined by one-way ANOVA among the scion/rootstock combinations under each condition.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-16-1614845-g003.tif"/>
</fig>
<table-wrap id="T4" position="float">
<label>Table&#xa0;4</label>
<caption>
<p>Analysis of variance (ANOVA) of the biochemical response of &#x2018;Valencia&#x2019; sweet orange grafted onto Australian lime-derived hybrids to <italic>Ca</italic>Las infection at two time points.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="bottom" align="left">Variables</th>
<th valign="middle" align="left">Source</th>
<th valign="middle" align="left">DF</th>
<th valign="middle" align="left">Sum Sq</th>
<th valign="middle" align="left">Mean Sq</th>
<th valign="middle" align="left">F value</th>
<th valign="middle" align="left">Significance</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" rowspan="8" align="left">Scion diameter</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">Rootstock</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">4</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">146.98</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">36.74</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">32.915</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">***</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">
<italic>Ca</italic>Las Infection</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">1</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">2.02</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">2.02</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">1.81</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">ns</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Time</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">1</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">201.4</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">201.4</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">180.411</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">***</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Rootstock &#xd7; Infection</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">3</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">0.09</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">0.03</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">0.027</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">ns</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Rootstock &#xd7; Time</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">3</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">4.51</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">1.5</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">1.346</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">ns</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Infection &#xd7; Time</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">1</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">1.53</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">1.53</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">1.374</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">ns</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Rootstock &#xd7; Infection &#xd7; Time</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">2</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">1.3</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">0.65</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">0.581</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">ns</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Residuals</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">65</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">72.56</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">1.12</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" rowspan="8" align="left">Rootstock diameter</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">Rootstock</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">4</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">149.54</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">37.38</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">23.637</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">***</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">
<italic>Ca</italic>Las Infection</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">1</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">0.33</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">0.33</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">0.211</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">ns</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Time</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">1</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">81.15</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">81.15</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">51.31</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">***</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Rootstock &#xd7; Infection</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">3</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">1.48</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">0.49</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">0.312</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">ns</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Rootstock &#xd7; Time</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">3</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">11.8</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">3.93</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">2.486</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">ns</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Infection &#xd7; Time</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">1</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">2.37</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">2.37</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">1.499</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">ns</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Rootstock &#xd7; Infection &#xd7; Time</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">2</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">1.49</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">0.75</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">0.472</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">ns</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Residuals</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">65</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">102.8</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">1.58</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" rowspan="8" align="left">Plant height</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">Rootstock</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">4</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">18067</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">4517</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">19.764</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">***</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">
<italic>Ca</italic>Las Infection</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">1</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">96</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">96</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">0.421</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">ns</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Time</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">1</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">25797</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">25797</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">112.877</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">***</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Rootstock &#xd7; Infection</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">3</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">1096</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">365</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">1.599</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">ns</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Rootstock &#xd7; Time</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">3</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">1300</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">433</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">1.897</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">ns</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Infection &#xd7; Time</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">1</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">399</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">399</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">1.745</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">ns</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Rootstock &#xd7; Infection &#xd7; Time</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">2</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">175</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">87</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">0.382</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">ns</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Residuals</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">65</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">14855</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">229</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" rowspan="7" align="left">Chlorophyll a</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">Rootstock</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">6</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">191</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">31.8</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">6.835</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">***</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">
<italic>Ca</italic>Las Infection</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">1</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">13.1</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">13.1</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">2.808</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">ns</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Time</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">1</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">506.3</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">506.3</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">108.71</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">***</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Rootstock &#xd7; Infection</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">6</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">9.1</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">1.5</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">0.326</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">ns</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Rootstock &#xd7; Time</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">6</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">269.3</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">44.9</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">9.638</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">***</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Infection &#xd7; Time</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">1</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">2.9</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">2.9</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">0.614</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">ns</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Rootstock &#xd7; Infection &#xd7; Time</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">6</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">9.1</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">1.5</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">0.325</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">ns</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" rowspan="7" align="left">Chlorophyll b</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">Rootstock</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">6</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">35.92</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">5.99</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">6.963</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">***</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">
<italic>Ca</italic>Las Infection</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">1</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">2.94</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">2.94</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">3.417</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">ns</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Time</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">1</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">76.32</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">76.32</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">88.786</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">***</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Rootstock &#xd7; Infection</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">6</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">3.85</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">0.64</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">0.747</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">ns</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Rootstock &#xd7; Time</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">6</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">35.14</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">5.86</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">6.814</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">***</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Infection &#xd7; Time</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">1</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">0</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">0</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">0.001</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">ns</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Rootstock &#xd7; Infection &#xd7; Time</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">6</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">2.55</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">0.43</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">0.495</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">ns</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" rowspan="7" align="left">Total Chlorophyll</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">Rootstock</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">6</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">340.5</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">56.7</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">9.755</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">***</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">
<italic>Ca</italic>Las Infection</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">1</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">9.4</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">9.4</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">1.609</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">ns</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Time</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">1</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">786.9</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">786.9</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">135.279</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">***</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Rootstock &#xd7; Infection</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">6</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">43.5</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">7.2</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">1.246</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">ns</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Rootstock &#xd7; Time</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">6</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">242.1</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">40.3</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">6.935</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">***</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Infection &#xd7; Time</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">1</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">1.3</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">1.3</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">0.23</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">ns</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Rootstock &#xd7; Infection &#xd7; Time</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">6</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">50.3</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">8.4</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">1.441</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">ns</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" rowspan="7" align="left">Starch</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">Rootstock</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">6</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">6.584</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">1.097</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">7.054</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">***</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">
<italic>Ca</italic>Las Infection</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">1</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">6.086</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">6.086</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">39.122</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">***</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Time</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">1</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">0.733</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">0.733</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">4.713</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">*</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Rootstock &#xd7; Infection</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">6</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">0.056</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">0.009</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">0.06</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">ns</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Rootstock &#xd7; Time</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">6</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">2.59</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">0.432</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">2.775</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">*</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Infection &#xd7; Time</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">1</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">0.034</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">0.034</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">0.216</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">ns</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Rootstock &#xd7; Infection &#xd7; Time</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">6</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">0.047</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">0.008</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">0.051</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">ns</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" rowspan="7" align="left">Total Phenolic Content</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">Rootstock</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">6</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">128228</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">21371</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">13.042</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">***</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">
<italic>Ca</italic>Las Infection</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">1</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">1274</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">1274</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">0.778</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">ns</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Time</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">1</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">7105</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">7105</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">4.336</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">*</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Rootstock &#xd7; Infection</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">6</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">17554</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">2926</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">1.785</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">ns</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Rootstock &#xd7; Time</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">6</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">61327</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">10221</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">6.238</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">***</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Infection &#xd7; Time</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">1</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">17</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">17</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">0.011</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">ns</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Rootstock &#xd7; Infection &#xd7; Time</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">6</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">12271</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">2045</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">1.248</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">ns</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" rowspan="7" align="left">Total Flavonoid Content</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">Rootstock</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">6</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">259754</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">43292</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">37.988</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">***</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">
<italic>Ca</italic>Las Infection</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">1</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">1021</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">1021</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">0.896</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">ns</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Time</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">1</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">22698</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">22698</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">19.917</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">***</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Rootstock &#xd7; Infection</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">6</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">27047</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">4508</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">3.956</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">**</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Rootstock &#xd7; Time</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">6</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">47584</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">7931</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">6.959</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">***</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Infection &#xd7; Time</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">1</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">515</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">515</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">0.452</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">ns</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Rootstock &#xd7; Infection &#xd7; Time</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">6</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">38227</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">6371</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">5.591</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">***</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn>
<p>This table displays the degrees of freedom (DF), sum of squares (Sum Sq), mean squares (Mean Sq), <italic>F</italic> values, and <italic>p</italic> values. Significant codes: 0 &#x2018;***&#x2019; 0.001 &#x2018;**&#x2019; 0.01 &#x2018;*&#x2019; &lt; 0.05 &#x2018;ns&#x2019; not significant.</p>
</fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<p>Across all genotypes, <italic>Ca</italic>Las infection consistently reduced Chl <italic>b</italic> content compared to uninfected controls. At 12 MAI, infected plants exhibited lower Chl <italic>b</italic> levels. For instance, Val/Swingle decreased from 7.22 mg/g (uninfected) to 4.11 mg/g (infected), Val/PF2&#x2013;61 declined from 6.75 to 5.33 mg/g, and Val/MF1&#x2013;98 dropped from 5.98 to 4.54 mg/g. The genotype with the lowest reduction was Val/O+M2-75, with infected plants retaining a relatively higher Chl <italic>b</italic> level (6.52 mg/g vs. 7.02 mg/g uninfected). In contrast, Val/PF1&#x2013;3 and Val/UF SunLime showed a significant decline of over 1.8 mg/g. At 24 MAI, the downward trend in Chl <italic>b</italic> content continued in infected plants. Val/PF1&#x2013;3 declined from 5.96 mg/g (uninfected) to 3.78 mg/g (infected), Val/PF2&#x2013;61 from 6.25 to 4.23 mg/g, and Val/MF1&#x2013;98 from 5.65 to 4.43 mg/g (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;3B</bold>
</xref>).</p>
<p>Total chlorophyll (T Chl) content was significantly reduced in <italic>Ca</italic>Las-infected plants compared to uninfected controls across all genotypes and both time points (12 and 24 MAI). The extent of chlorophyll loss varies depending on the genotype. At 12 MAI, the greatest reductions were observed in Val/PF2-61 (19.56 mg/g in infected vs. 24.79 mg/g in uninfected), Val/O+M2-75 (18.16 mg/g vs. 23.33 mg/g), and Val/PF1-3 (13.60 mg/g vs. 18.67 mg/g). In contrast, Val/MF1&#x2013;98 showed minimal reduction, with 18.95 mg/g in infected plants compared to 19.53 mg/g in uninfected ones. By 24 MAI, chlorophyll loss became more pronounced in most genotypes. The most affected combinations included Val/PF2-61 (15.69 mg/g infected vs. 23.81 mg/g uninfected), Val/PF1-3 (12.92 mg/g vs. 20.22 mg/g), and Val/Swingle (14.25 mg/g vs. 21.50 mg/g). Val/MF1&#x2013;98 maintained relatively higher chlorophyll levels under infection, with a slight difference between infected (19.81 mg/g) and uninfected (17.94 mg/g) plants (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;3C</bold>
</xref>).</p>
<p>Starch content was elevated in <italic>Ca</italic>Las-infected plants compared to uninfected controls at both 12 and 24 months after inoculation (MAI), with clear variation among genotypes. At 12 MAI, the highest starch accumulation among infected plants was observed in Val/PF1-11 (3.18 &#xb5;g/mm<sup>2</sup>), followed by Val/Swingle (2.82 &#xb5;g/mm<sup>2</sup>) and Val/PF1-3 (2.66 &#xb5;g/mm<sup>2</sup>). In contrast, the lowest values were recorded in Val/PF2-61 (2.36 &#xb5;g/mm<sup>2</sup>), Val/MF1-98 (2.42 &#xb5;g/mm<sup>2</sup>), and Val/UF SunLime (2.41 &#xb5;g/mm<sup>2</sup>). By 24 MAI, starch levels significantly increased in most infected combinations, with the highest content measured in Val/PF1-11 (3.53 &#xb5;g/mg), Val/Swingle (3.28 &#xb5;g/mg), and Val/O+M2-75 (3.04 &#xb5;g/mg). Meanwhile, uninfected control plants maintained relatively stable starch levels across both time points (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f4">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;4</bold>
</xref> and <xref ref-type="table" rid="T4">
<bold>Table&#xa0;4</bold>
</xref>).</p>
<fig id="f4" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;4</label>
<caption>
<p>Changes in starch accumulation in the leaves (&#xb5;g mm<sup>-2</sup>). The data were recorded in <italic>Ca</italic>Las &#x2013; (grafted with healthy budwoods) and <italic>Ca</italic>Las + (grafted with infected budwoods) at 12 and 24 months after inoculation (MAI). The box plot represents six replicates, and <italic>p</italic> values were determined by one-way ANOVA among the scion/rootstock combinations under each condition.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-16-1614845-g004.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_5">
<label>3.5</label>
<title>Total phenolic content and total flavonoid content of &#x2018;Valencia&#x2019; sweet orange grafted onto Australian lime derived hybrids</title>
<p>The ANOVA for total phenolic content (TPC) and total flavonoid content (TFC) revealed distinct effects of rootstock, time, and their interactions (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T4">
<bold>Table&#xa0;4</bold>
</xref>). For TPC, significant main effects were observed for rootstock (F = 13.042, <italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.001) and time (F = 4.336, <italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.05). A significant rootstock &#xd7; time interaction was also detected (F = 6.238, <italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.001). In contrast, <italic>Ca</italic>Las infection alone did not significantly affect TPC levels (F = 0.778, <italic>p</italic> = 0.378), and none of its interactions with rootstock or time reached statistical significance.</p>
<p>For TFC, highly significant effects were also observed for rootstock (F = 37.988, <italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.001) and time (F = 19.917, <italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.001). Additionally, interaction terms were significant, including rootstock &#xd7; infection (F = 3.956, <italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.01), rootstock &#xd7; time (F = 6.959, <italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.001), and rootstock &#xd7; infection &#xd7; time (F = 5.591, <italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.001). Similar to TPC, infection alone did not result in a significant main effect on TFC (F = 0.896, <italic>p</italic> = 0.344), indicating the importance of genotype-specific responses over infection status alone.</p>
<p>Despite the absence of significant main effects of infection, both TPC and TFC levels were higher in <italic>Ca</italic>Las-infected plants compared to non-infected controls at both 12 and 24 months after inoculation (MAI) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T4">
<bold>Table&#xa0;4</bold>
</xref>). At 12 MAI, TPC in infected plants ranged from 205.0 to 312.5 &#xb5;g/g, with the lowest level observed in Val/Swingle and the highest in Val/PF1-3. In non-infected plants, TPC values ranged from 169.7 to 303.3 &#xb5;g/g. By 24 MAI, TPC levels in infected plants ranged between 167.6 and 303.1 &#xb5;g/g, with Val/Swingle exhibiting the lowest concentration and Val/PF2&#x2013;61 the highest. In non-infected counterparts, the TPC range was 220.0 to 287.9 &#xb5;g/g, with the lowest detected in Val/PF2&#x2013;61 and the highest in Val/PF1-3 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f5">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;5A</bold>
</xref>). These results indicate that while infection may induce phenolic accumulation in some genotypes, the magnitude and direction of change are strongly dependent on the specific rootstock.</p>
<fig id="f5" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;5</label>
<caption>
<p>Changes in total phenolic content <bold>(A)</bold> and total flavonoid content <bold>(B)</bold> in &#x2018;Valencia&#x2019; sweet orange grafted onto Australian lime-derived hybrids. The data were recorded in <italic>Ca</italic>Las &#x2013; (grafted with healthy budwoods) and <italic>Ca</italic>Las + (grafted with infected budwoods) at 12 and 24 months after inoculation (MAI). The box plot represents six replicates, and <italic>p</italic> values were determined by one-way ANOVA among the scion/rootstock combinations under each condition.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-16-1614845-g005.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>For TFC, non-infected plants showed a TFC range of 131.9 to 291.9 &#xb5;g/g, with Val/PF1&#x2013;11 and Val/Swingle showing the lowest and highest levels, respectively. However, the infected plants at 12 MAI displayed values ranging from 144.4 to 323.6 &#xb5;g/g. The lowest level was recorded in Val/PF1-3, while the highest was in Val/Swingle. At 24 MAI, TFC content of the non-infected plants ranged between 149.5 to 279.96 &#xb5;g/g, with Val/UF SunLime having the lowest value and Val/Swingle the highest (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f5">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;5B</bold>
</xref>). Whereas the values in the infected plants ranged from 210.2 to 272.8 &#xb5;g/g.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_6">
<label>3.6</label>
<title>&#x2018;Valencia&#x2019; grafted onto Australian lime-derived hybrids exhibited differential expression of defense-related genes</title>
<p>The relative expression levels of the selected genes were calculated using the 2^<sup>&#x2212;&#x394;&#x394;CT</sup> method (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f6">
<bold>Figures&#xa0;6</bold>
</xref>&#x2013;<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f9">
<bold>9</bold>
</xref>), with &#x2018;Valencia&#x2019; grafted onto Swingle rootstock under <italic>Ca</italic>Las+ infection as the reference condition. To provide an integrated overview of gene expression responses, we additionally calculated and visualized the log2 fold change of selected genes involved in carbohydrate metabolism, cell wall synthesis, detoxification, and defense-related responses relative to the Swingle-grafted control (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f10">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;10</bold>
</xref>).</p>
<fig id="f6" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;6</label>
<caption>
<p>Relative expression of selected genes involved in carbohydrate metabolism. <bold>(A)</bold> <italic>Chloroplast beta-amylase</italic> (orange1.1g047891m), <bold>(B)</bold> <italic>Chloroplast beta-amylase</italic> (orange1.1g017328m), <bold>(C)</bold> <italic>&#x3b2;-amylase 6</italic> (orange1.1g010067m), <bold>(D)</bold> <italic>Glycosyl hydrolase family 32</italic> protein (orange1.1g008242m). Bars represent the means &#xb1; standard errors. Different letters indicate significant differences across cultivars (<italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.05).</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-16-1614845-g006.tif"/>
</fig>
<fig id="f7" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;7</label>
<caption>
<p>Relative expression of selected genes associated with callose synthases. <bold>(A)</bold> <italic>1,3-beta-glucan synthase</italic> (orange1.1g045737m), <bold>(B)</bold> <italic>1,3-beta-glucan synthase</italic> (orange1.1g001473m), <bold>(C)</bold> <italic>Callose synthase 7</italic> (Orange1.1g037960m), <bold>(D)</bold> <italic>Callose synthase 10</italic> (orange1.1g000180m), <bold>(E)</bold> <italic>Callose synthase 11</italic> (orange1.1g000258m). Bars represent the means &#xb1; standard errors. Different letters indicate significant differences across cultivars (<italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.05).</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-16-1614845-g007.tif"/>
</fig>
<fig id="f8" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;8</label>
<caption>
<p>Relative expression of selected genes involved in detoxification and stress response. Different letters indicate significant differences across cultivars (p &lt; 0.05). <bold>(A)</bold> Glutathione S-Transferases (orange1.1g033818m), <bold>(B)</bold> Glutathione S-Transferase Tau 7 (orange1.1g027486m), <bold>(C)</bold> Glutathione S-Transferase Tau 8 (orange1.1g027575m), <bold>(D)</bold> Glutathione S-Transferase Tau 8 (orange1.1g046710m), <bold>(E)</bold> Thioredoxin reductase (orange1.1g032422m), <bold>(F)</bold> Catalase (orange1.1g044386m).</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-16-1614845-g008.tif"/>
</fig>
<fig id="f9" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;9</label>
<caption>
<p>Relative expression of selected genes associated with defense. Different letters indicate significant differences across cultivars (p &lt; 0.05). <bold>(A)</bold> PR1-like (CAP2: orange1.1g043403m), <bold>(B)</bold> LCD69 (orange1.1g034999m), <bold>(C)</bold> SAM1 (orange1.1g036835m), <bold>(D)</bold> SAM2 (orange1.1g018119m), <bold>(E)</bold> DMR6 (orange1.1g019027m), and <bold>(F)</bold> MES2 (orange1.1g024065m).</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-16-1614845-g009.tif"/>
</fig>
<fig id="f10" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;10</label>
<caption>
<p>Comparison of Log2 fold change between &#x2018;Valencia&#x2019; grafted onto Australian Lime derived hybrids compared to &#x2018;Valencia&#x2019; grafted onto Swingle rootstock. The upregulation is presented in blue; the downregulation is presented in orange. The data was analyzed in response to <italic>Ca</italic>Las infection.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-16-1614845-g010.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>The relative expression of genes involved in carbohydrate metabolism and cell wall synthesis in &#x2018;Valencia&#x2019; grafted onto the hybrid rootstocks was compared with &#x2018;Valencia&#x2019; grafted onto Swingle. These included genes encoding <italic>Glycosyl hydrolase family 32 protein</italic> (orange1.1g008242m), <italic>Beta-Amylase</italic> 6 (orange1.1g010067m), and <italic>Chloroplast Beta-Amylase</italic> (orange1.1g017328m). We observed upregulation of <italic>Chloroplast Beta-Amylase</italic> in Val/PFL1-3, Val/MFL1-98, Val/MFL 1&#x2013;11 and Val/MFL 2&#x2013;62 compared with Val/SW. Additionally, Val/PFL2&#x2013;61 showed significant upregulation of <italic>Glycosyl hydrolases</italic> compared with Val/SW (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f6">
<bold>Figures&#xa0;6</bold>
</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f10">
<bold>10</bold>
</xref>).</p>
<p>Val/PFL1&#x2013;3 exhibited significant upregulation of the expression of <italic>1,3-Beta-Glucan Synthase</italic>, followed by Val/PFL1&#x2013;11 and Val/PFL2-61 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f7">
<bold>Figures&#xa0;7A, B</bold>
</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f10">
<bold>10</bold>
</xref>). Furthermore, we analyzed the relative expression of <italic>Callose Synthase 7</italic> (orange1.1g037960m), <italic>Callose Synthase 10</italic> (orange1.1g000180m), and <italic>Callose Synthase 11</italic> (orange1.1g000258m). Val/PFL1&#x2013;11 showed significant upregulation of <italic>Callose Synthase 7</italic> compared with Val/SW. &#x2018;Valencia&#x2019; grafted onto Australian Lime-derived hybrids exhibited downregulation of the expression of <italic>Callose Synthase 10.</italic> However, Valencia&#x2019; grafted onto PFL1&#x2013;3 exhibited higher <italic>Callose Synthase 11</italic> expression compared to Val/SW. In contrast, Val/MFL1&#x2013;98 significantly reduced <italic>Callose Synthase</italic> gene expression compared with Val/SW (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f7">
<bold>Figures&#xa0;7</bold>
</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f10">
<bold>10</bold>
</xref>).</p>
<p>The expression patterns of genes involved in detoxification and stress responses varied when &#x2018;Valencia&#x2019; plants grafted onto different rootstocks were compared. <italic>Glutathione S-Transferases (GSTs)</italic>, including <italic>Glutathione S-Transferase Tau 7</italic>, and <italic>Glutathione S-Transferase Tau 8</italic>, showed slight differences in expression. <italic>Glutathione S-Transferase and Glutathione S-Transferase Tau 8</italic> (orange1.1g046710m) were highly expressed in Val/PFL 1-11, Val/PFL 2-61, Val/PFL 1-3, and Val/MFL1&#x2013;98 compared with Val/SW. Moreover, the <italic>Thioredoxin</italic> protein superfamily (<italic>Thioredoxin reductase</italic>) exhibited significantly higher expression in &#x2018;Valencia&#x2019; grafted onto Australian Lime Derived Hybrids compared to Val/SW. <italic>Catalase</italic> expression exhibited higher expression in Val/PFL 1&#x2013;11 compared to Val/SW (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f8">
<bold>Figures&#xa0;8</bold>
</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f10">
<bold>10</bold>
</xref>).</p>
<p>We investigated the relative expression of several defense-related genes, including <italic>PR1-like</italic> (<italic>CAP2</italic>)<italic>, LCD69, SAM1, SAM2</italic>, <italic>DMR6</italic>, and <italic>MES2</italic>, across different graft combinations. <italic>CAP2</italic> was highly upregulated in Val/PFL 1-11, Val/PFL 1-3, Val/MFL1-98, and Val/UF SunLime compared with Val/SW. The relative expression of <italic>LCD69, SAM2, and DMR6</italic> was highly expressed in Val/MFL1-98, Val/PFL 1-3, Val/PFL 1-11, Val/PFL 2-6; however, its levels were significantly lower in Val/O+M2&#x2013;75 and Val/UF SunLime compared with Val/SW. <italic>SAM1</italic> and <italic>CsMES2</italic> showed relatively lower expression compared to Val/SW (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f9">
<bold>Figures&#xa0;9</bold>
</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f10">
<bold>10</bold>
</xref>).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s4" sec-type="discussion">
<label>4</label>
<title>Discussion</title>
<p>Considerable efforts have been made to identify citrus varieties resistant to citrus greening disease due to its devastating economic impact and the challenges of disease management (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">P&#xe9;rez-Hedo et&#xa0;al., 2024</xref>). The urgency of identifying reliable sources of resistance within <italic>Citrus</italic> and its relatives has intensified in recent years. There are numerous challenges associated with traditional breeding for the genetic improvement of citrus varieties to increase tolerance or resistance to <italic>Ca</italic>Las and HLB. These include long juvenile periods, nucellar embryony, sexual incompatibility, excessive heterozygosity from crosses, and male or female sterility in novel combinations (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B50">Talon and Gmitter, 2008</xref>). Despite these challenges, our breeding program has devoted significant efforts over the past decade to develop and assess hybrids derived from Australian limes. Many of these hybrids exhibit natural resistance or tolerance to <italic>Ca</italic>Las and serve as valuable genetic resources for increasing the resilience of commercial citrus varieties (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">Dutt et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Dutt, 2022a</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">b</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">Mahmoud et&#xa0;al., 2024b</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">2025</xref>). One promising strategy involves developing cultivars that can be utilized as rootstocks or scions, facilitating the integration of resistance traits into commercial production systems.</p>
<p>Using vigorous rootstocks in citrus cultivation is essential for growing healthy trees that produce high yields (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Bowman and Joubert, 2020</xref>). These rootstocks can also enhance disease resistance, improve nutrient uptake, and increase tolerance to environmental stressors (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">Grosser et&#xa0;al., 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Mahmoud et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>). Utilization of resistant rootstocks could increase citrus tree productivity and provide long-term economic benefits to growers despite the persistent threat of HLB (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Castle et&#xa0;al., 2015</xref>). In our study, &#x2018;Valencia&#x2019; sweet orange grafted onto Australian lime derived hybrids were graft compatible and exhibited variable effects on growth parameters, including scion growth, tree height, and trunk diameter. &#x2018;Valencia&#x2019; plants grafted onto PFL2&#x2013;61 and MFL1&#x2013;98 presented increased vigor, increased height, and increased trunk diameter when compared to control trees. Trees infected with <italic>Ca</italic>Las demonstrated reduced scion growth compared with those grafted onto HLB-free rootstocks. The hybrids evaluated in this study exhibited compatibility with &#x2018;Valencia&#x2019; sweet orange, except for PFL1-3. Despite its significant field resistance to HLB, PFL1&#x2013;3 did not consistently form successful graft unions, demonstrating potential limitations in its use as a rootstock. Graft compatibility among Citrus and related genera is generally widespread within the Citrinae subfamily. However, not all genera exhibit successful grafting. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Alves et&#xa0;al. (2021)</xref> reported that most genotypes grafted onto &#x2018;Rangpur&#x2019; lime were compatible, including Citrus, Poncirus, Atalantia, <italic>C. australasica</italic>, <italic>C. glauca</italic>, and related hybrids. However, <italic>Limonia acidissima</italic> and <italic>C. halimii</italic> showed reduced graft compatibility. These incompatibility reactions were not associated with <italic>Ca</italic>Las infection, as uninfected controls presented similar symptoms, indicating that the grafting issues were inherent to the genotypes rather than induced by <italic>Ca</italic>Las infection.</p>
<p>We observed that, compared with those grafted onto the Swingle rootstock, &#x2018;Valencia&#x2019; sweet orange trees grafted onto specific hybrid rootstocks, such as PFL1&#x2013;11 and UF Sunlime, exhibited lower <italic>Ca</italic>Las titers after 24 months. However, &#x2018;Valencia&#x2019; plants grafted onto PFL1-3, MFL1-98, or PFL2&#x2013;61 presented higher <italic>Ca</italic>Las titers than those grafted onto Swingle. Also, the variation in pigment concentrations between <italic>Ca</italic>Las-infected and noninfected plants can be attributed to several physiological factors. The levels of chlorophyll <italic>a</italic> and <italic>b</italic>, essential components for photosynthesis, are often affected by plant health status. Infected plants typically experience physiological stress, which disrupts chlorophyll biosynthesis and maintenance. This disruption likely arises because the pathogen interferes with metabolic processes, leading to reduced chlorophyll production (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Cheaib and Killiny, 2024</xref>). Conversely, the level of carotenoids, which play crucial roles in protecting plants from oxidative stress and photodamage, tends to increase in infected plants (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">Munn&#xe9;-Bosch, 2005</xref>). This shift in pigment composition may serve as an adaptive response to mitigate the detrimental effects of <italic>Ca</italic>Las-induced stress. Additionally, we observed significant variation in starch content following <italic>Ca</italic>Las infection. Leaves from &#x2018;Valencia&#x2019; grafted onto PF 1&#x2013;11 and Swingle presented the highest starch content. Furthermore, our findings indicate that the accumulation of phenolic and flavonoid compounds is primarily influenced by rootstock genotype and time, rather than <italic>Ca</italic>Las infection status alone. This is supported by our observation that certain non-infected genotypes, such as Val/Swingle, exhibited TFC and TPC levels comparable to or exceeding those in infected plants. Such overlaps may reflect constitutive biochemical profiles specific to individual rootstocks, which can mimic pathogen-induced changes. These results prove the complex interplay between host genotype, temporal dynamics, and pathogen response, with implications for understanding rootstock-mediated tolerance mechanisms. Following infection and <italic>Ca</italic>Las multiplication in phloem tissue, the plant&#x2019;s defense system responds continually, leading to long-term physiological changes that further impair the plant&#x2019;s health. One significant aspect of this prolonged response is the persistent overproduction of ROS, inducing oxidative stress throughout the plant (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">Ma et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B57">Weber et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>). In addition to ROS accumulation, callose deposition occurs in phloem sieve tubes, contributing to systemic cell death in phloem tissue, including companion and sieve element cells (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B57">Weber et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B58">Welker et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>). This progressive damage disrupts nutrients and signal transport (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">Folimonova et&#xa0;al., 2009</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Kim et&#xa0;al., 2009</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">Mahmoud et&#xa0;al., 2023</xref>). Phloem disruption results in metabolic imbalance; in particular, it leads to starch accumulation in chloroplasts, which is associated with the downregulation of essential metabolic processes such as photosynthesis, respiration, and energy production (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B48">Suh et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>). Consequently, the plant exhibits characteristic blotchy mottle symptoms on the leaves, a hallmark of HLB. This damage is especially evident in the branches, fruits, and roots of infected trees. While initially intended to control the infection, the chronic defense response ultimately leads to widespread tissue degeneration due to oxidative stress and disrupted hormonal signaling (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">P&#xe9;rez-Hedo et&#xa0;al., 2024</xref>).</p>
<p>We observed significant upregulation of <italic>Beta-Amylase 6</italic> and <italic>Chloroplast Beta-Amylase</italic>, which play crucial roles in starch degradation, in MFL1-98. Similarly, increased expression of <italic>1,3-Beta-Glucan Synthase</italic> and <italic>UDP-Glucose-1,3-Beta-D-Glucan Glucosyltransferase</italic> was observed in PFL1&#x2013;11 and PFL2-61. Additionally, callose synthase genes exhibited differential expression in &#x2018;Valencia&#x2019; grafted onto the hybrid rootstocks. The breakdown of callose and starch through Glucan 1,3-beta-glucosidases could contribute to the availability of simpler sugars or intermediates. Callose deposition genes and Glucan 1,3-beta-glucosidases play crucial roles in plant defense mechanisms. Callose deposition genes are responsible for synthesizing callose, a &#x3b2;-1,3-glucan polysaccharide, which is deposited at the site of pathogen attack to slow pathogen invasion and spread (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">Li et&#xa0;al., 2023</xref>). On the other hand, Glucan 1,3-beta-glucosidases are enzymes that catalyze the hydrolysis of &#x3b2;-1,3-glucans, breaking down callose and other &#x3b2;-glucans (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Cairns and Esen, 2010</xref>).</p>
<p>Secondary metabolites are critical for mitigating oxidative stress and strengthening structural barriers against pathogens. Phenolic compounds and flavonoids play crucial roles in plant defense via their antimicrobial and antioxidant properties, thereby mitigating the toxic effects of ROS (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B52">Tuladhar et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B46">Shen et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>). Flavonoids are considered free-radical scavengers because of their high reactivity as hydrogen or electron donors (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">Cotelle, 2001</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">Pannala et&#xa0;al., 2001</xref>). They play dual roles by acting as antioxidants to neutralize ROS (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">Pietta, 2000</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">Agati et&#xa0;al., 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B46">Shen et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>) and by directly contributing to pathogen inhibition (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">Biharee et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B54">Wang et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>). Compared with the other rootstocks, &#x2018;Valencia&#x2019; grafted onto MFL1&#x2013;98 presented the highest TPC and TFC. Additionally, PFL2&#x2013;61 and MFL1&#x2013;98 presented the highest expression of Glutathione S-Transferase Tau 8. Additionally, PFL2&#x2013;61 presented the highest expression of Thioredoxin superfamily proteins. Thioredoxins are essential for maintaining the cellular redox balance and protecting against oxidative stress. Together, these two genotypes demonstrate complementary strengths, making both prime candidates for improving plant resilience.</p>
<p>Antimicrobial peptides are crucial for directly inhibiting pathogen growth to increase plant resistance under stress (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">Li et&#xa0;al., 2021a</xref>). These peptides include lipid transfer proteins, puroindolines, &#x3b1;-/&#x3b2;-thionins, &#x3b3;-thionins, and plant defensins, all vital in defending plants against bacterial and fungal attacks. &#x3b3;-Thionins, often called plant defensins because of their unique three-dimensional structures, play a key role in pathogen recognition and neutralization (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">Mignone, 2022</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">Roychoudhury et&#xa0;al., 2024</xref>). We recorded significant upregulation of low-molecular-weight cysteine-rich 69 (<italic>LCD69;</italic> orange1.1g034999m<italic>)</italic> and SAM-dependent carboxyl methyltransferase (<italic>SAM2;</italic> orange1.1g018119m) in MFL1-98, further revealing their role in disease resistance and stress responses. SAM-dependent carboxyl methyltransferase is an enzyme that catalyzes the transfer of a methyl group from S-adenosylmethionine (SAM) to a carboxyl group on various substrates, typically resulting in the formation of methyl esters. This methylation process plays a significant role in the regulation of plant growth, development, and defense mechanisms (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Li et&#xa0;al., 2021b</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s5" sec-type="conclusions">
<label>5</label>
<title>Conclusions</title>
<p>This study demonstrates the promising potential of Australian lime derived hybrids as rootstocks for managing HLB and improving citrus tree health. Hybrids such as PFL2&#x2013;61 and MFL1&#x2013;98 exhibited significant growth enhancement. Although graft compatibility issues were observed with certain hybrids, the overall resistance to <italic>Ca</italic>Las was significant, as evidenced by the reduced <italic>Ca</italic>Las titer and adaptive physiological responses. The variations in pigment concentrations and starch contents further confirmed the ability of the plants to cope with stress and maintain metabolic balance. These findings provide a basis for developing resilient citrus cultivars, offering a strategic approach for mitigating the impact of HLB on citrus farming.</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<sec id="s6" sec-type="data-availability">
<title>Data availability statement</title>
<p>The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Supplementary Material</bold>
</xref>. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s7" sec-type="author-contributions">
<title>Author contributions</title>
<p>LM: Validation, Conceptualization, Investigation, Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing, Methodology, Visualization, Formal analysis, Writing &#x2013; original draft. MD: Resources, Supervision, Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing, Project administration.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s8" sec-type="funding-information">
<title>Funding</title>
<p>The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article. This work was supported by the USDA-ECDRE project award no. 2021-70029-36055 from the U.S. Department of Agriculture&#x2019;s National Institute of Food and Agriculture.</p>
</sec>
<ack>
<title>Acknowledgments</title>
<p>We thank Dylan Hacker for his assistance on this research project.</p>
</ack>
<sec id="s9" sec-type="COI-statement">
<title>Conflict of interest</title>
<p>The authors declare that the research was conducted without any commercial or financial relationship that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s10" sec-type="ai-statement">
<title>Generative AI statement</title>
<p>The author(s) declare that no Generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s11" sec-type="disclaimer">
<title>Publisher&#x2019;s note</title>
<p>All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s12" sec-type="supplementary-material">
<title>Supplementary material</title>
<p>The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2025.1614845/full#supplementary-material">https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2025.1614845/full#supplementary-material</ext-link>
</p>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="DataSheet1.pdf" id="SM1" mimetype="application/pdf"/>
</sec>
<fn-group>
<title>Abbreviations</title>
<fn fn-type="abbr" id="abbrev1">
<p>HLB, Huanglongbing (citrus greening disease); <italic>Ca</italic>Las, <italic>Candidatus</italic> Liberibacter asiaticus; MAI, Months After Inoculation; OD, Optical Density; Ct, Cycle Threshold; qPCR, Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction; ROS, Reactive Oxygen Species; NPGS, USDA National Plant Germplasm System; SSR, Simple Sequence Repeat; SAM, S-Adenosylmethionine; LCD69, Low-Molecular-Weight Cysteine-Rich 69; UDP, Uridine 5&#x2019;-diphosphate; GST, Glutathione S-Transferase.</p>
</fn>
</fn-group>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="B1">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Agati</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Azzarello</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pollastri</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tattini</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Flavonoids as antioxidants in plants: location and functional significance</article-title>. <source>Plant Sci.</source> <volume>196</volume>, <fpage>67</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>76</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.plantsci.2012.07.014</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Aktumsek</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zengin</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Guler</surname> <given-names>G. O.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cakmak</surname> <given-names>Y. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Duran</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Antioxidant potentials and anticholinesterase activities of methanolic and aqueous extracts of three endemic <italic>Centaurea</italic> L. species</article-title>. <source>Food Chem. Toxicol.</source> <volume>55</volume>, <fpage>290</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>296</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.fct.2013.01.018</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Alves</surname> <given-names>M. N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lopes</surname> <given-names>S. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Raiol-Junior</surname> <given-names>L. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wulff</surname> <given-names>N. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Girardi</surname> <given-names>E. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ollitrault</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Resistance to &#x2018;<italic>Candidatus</italic> Liberibacter asiaticus,&#x2019; the huanglongbing associated bacterium, in sexually and/or graft-compatible <italic>Citrus</italic> relatives</article-title>. <source>Front. Plant Sci.</source> <volume>11</volume>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpls.2020.617664</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Balint-Kurti</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>The plant hypersensitive response: concepts, control and consequences</article-title>. <source>Mol. Plant Pathol.</source> <volume>20</volume>, <fpage>1163</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1178</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/mpp.12821</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Bayer</surname> <given-names>R. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mabberley</surname> <given-names>D. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Morton</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Miller</surname> <given-names>C. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sharma</surname> <given-names>I. K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pfeil</surname> <given-names>B. E.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>A molecular phylogeny of the orange subfamily (Rutaceae: Aurantioideae) using nine cpDNA sequences</article-title>. <source>Am. J. Bot.</source> <volume>96</volume>, <fpage>668</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>685</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3732/ajb.0800341</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Biharee</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sharma</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kumar</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jaitak</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Antimicrobial flavonoids as a potential substitute for overcoming antimicrobial resistance</article-title> <source>Fitoterapia</source>. <volume>146</volume>, <elocation-id>104720</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.fitote.2020.104720</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Bov&#xe9;</surname> <given-names>J. M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2006</year>). <article-title>Huanglongbing: a destructive, newly-emerging, century-old disease of citrus</article-title>. <source>J. Plant Pathol.</source> <volume>88</volume>, <fpage>7</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>37</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4454/jpp.v88i1.828</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Bowman</surname> <given-names>K. D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Joubert</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2020</year>). &#x201c;<article-title>Citrus rootstocks</article-title>,&#x201d; in <source>The Genus Citrus</source>. Eds. <person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname>Talon</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Caruso</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gmitter</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names> <suffix>Jr</suffix>
</name>
</person-group> (<publisher-name>Elsevier</publisher-name>, <publisher-loc>Duxford, UK</publisher-loc>), <fpage>105</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>127</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Cairns</surname> <given-names>J. R. K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Esen</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>&#x3b2;-glucosidases</article-title>. <source>Cell. Mol. Life Sci.</source> <volume>67</volume>, <fpage>3389</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>3405</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00018-010-0399-2</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Castle</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Grosser</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bowman</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Stover</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>An HLB-tolerant citrus rootstock: what exactly does that mean</article-title>. <source>Citrus Ind.</source> <volume>2015</volume>, <fpage>16</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>19</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.32473/edis-hs1260-2015</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Cheaib</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Killiny</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2024</year>). <article-title>Photosynthesis responses to the infection with plant pathogens</article-title>. <source>Mol. Plant Microbe Interact.</source> <volume>38</volume>, <fpage>9</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>29</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1094/MPMI-05-24-0052-CR</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Cheynier</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Comte</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Davies</surname> <given-names>K. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lattanzio</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Martens</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Plant phenolics: recent advances on their biosynthesis, genetics, and ecophysiology</article-title>. <source>Plant Physiol. Biochem.</source> <volume>72</volume>, <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>20</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.plaphy.2013.05.009</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Cotelle</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2001</year>). <article-title>Role of flavonoids in oxidative stress</article-title>. <source>Curr. Top. Med. Chem.</source> <volume>1</volume>, <fpage>569</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>590</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2174/1568026013394750</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Curtolo</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>De Souza Pacheco</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Boava</surname> <given-names>L. P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Takita</surname> <given-names>M. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Granato</surname> <given-names>L. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Galdeano</surname> <given-names>D. M.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Wide-ranging transcriptomic analysis of <italic>Poncirus trifoliata</italic>, <italic>Citrus sunki</italic>, <italic>Citrus sinensis</italic> and contrasting hybrids reveals HLB tolerance mechanisms</article-title>. <source>Sci. Rep.</source> <volume>10</volume>, <fpage>20865</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41598-020-77840-2</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<citation citation-type="patent">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Dutt</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2022</year>a). <patent>UF RedLime. Patent No USPP34188P2</patent> (<publisher-loc>Washington, DC: U.S</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Patent and Trademark Office</publisher-name>).</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<citation citation-type="patent">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Dutt</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2022</year>b). <patent>UF SunLime. Patent No USPP34493P2</patent> (<publisher-loc>Washington, DC: U.S</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Patent and Trademark Office</publisher-name>).</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Dutt</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mahmoud</surname> <given-names>L. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chamusco</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Stanton</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chase</surname> <given-names>C. D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Nielsen</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Utilization of somatic fusion techniques for the development of HLB tolerant breeding resources employing the Australian finger lime (<italic>Citrus australasica</italic>)</article-title>. <source>PloS One</source> <volume>16</volume>, <elocation-id>e0255842</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0255842</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B18">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Folimonova</surname> <given-names>S. Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Robertson</surname> <given-names>C. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Garnsey</surname> <given-names>S. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gowda</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dawson</surname> <given-names>W. O.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>Examination of the responses of different genotypes of citrus to huanglongbing (citrus greening) under different conditions</article-title>. <source>Phytopathology</source> <volume>99</volume>, <fpage>1346</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1354</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1094/PHYTO-99-12-1346</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B19">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Grosser</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gmitter</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names>
<suffix>Jr.</suffix>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Castle</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2014</year>). &#x201c;<article-title>Breeding citrus rootstocks to mitigate Huanglongbing (HLB, or citrus greening disease)</article-title>,&#x201d; in <source>XXIX International Horticultural Congress on Horticulture: Sustaining Lives, Livelihoods and Landscapes (IHC2014)</source> (<publisher-name>International Society for Horticultural Science</publisher-name>, <publisher-loc>Brisbane, Australia</publisher-loc>), <fpage>83</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>88</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B20">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Killiny</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jones</surname> <given-names>S. E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hijaz</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kishk</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Santos-Ortega</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Nehela</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Metabolic profiling of hybrids generated from pummelo and <italic>Citrus latipes</italic> in relation to their attraction to <italic>Diaphorina citri</italic>, the vector of Huanglongbing</article-title>. <source>Metabolites</source> <volume>10</volume>, <elocation-id>477</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/metabo10120477</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B21">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kim</surname> <given-names>J. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sagaram</surname> <given-names>U. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Burns</surname> <given-names>J. K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>J. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>Response of sweet orange (<italic>Citrus sinensis</italic>) to &#x2018;<italic>Candidatus</italic> Liberibacter asiaticus&#x2019; infection: microscopy and microarray analyses</article-title>. <source>Phytopathology</source> <volume>99</volume>, <fpage>50</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>57</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1094/PHYTO-99-1-0050</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B22">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kumar</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Verma</surname> <given-names>J. P.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Does plant&#x2014;microbe interaction confer stress tolerance in plants: a review</article-title>? <source>Microbiol. Res.</source> <volume>207</volume>, <fpage>41</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>52</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.micres.2017.11.004</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B23">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hu</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jian</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xie</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>a). <article-title>Plant antimicrobial peptides: structures, functions, and applications</article-title>. <source>Bot. Stud.</source> <volume>62</volume>, <elocation-id>5</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s40529-021-00312-x</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B24">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lin</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yu</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zeng</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Du</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Huang</surname> <given-names>L. J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>The multifarious role of callose and callose synthase in plant development and environment interactions</article-title>. <source>Front. Plant Sci.</source> <volume>14</volume>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpls.2023.1183402</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B25">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sun</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cai</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rosen</surname> <given-names>B. P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>b). <article-title>Insights into S-adenosyl-l-methionine (SAM)-dependent methyltransferase related diseases and genetic polymorphisms</article-title>. <source>Mutat. Res. Rev. Mutat. Res.</source> <volume>788</volume>, <elocation-id>108396</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.mrrev.2021.108396</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B26">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Lichtenthaler</surname> <given-names>H. K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wellburn</surname> <given-names>A. R.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1983</year>). <article-title>Determinations of total carotenoids and chlorophylls a and b of leaf extracts in different solvents</article-title>. <source>Biochem. Soc Trans.</source> <volume>11</volume>, <fpage>591</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>592</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1042/bst0110591</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B27">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Livak</surname> <given-names>K. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Schmittgen</surname> <given-names>T. D.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2001</year>). <article-title>Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2<sup>&#x2013;&#x394;&#x394;C</sup>T method</article-title>. <source>Methods</source> <volume>25</volume>, <fpage>402</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>408</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1006/meth.2001.1262</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B28">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ma</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pang</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Huang</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xu</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pandey</surname> <given-names>S. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Citrus Huanglongbing is a pathogen-triggered immune disease that can be mitigated with antioxidants and gibberellin</article-title>. <source>Nat. Commun.</source> <volume>13</volume>, <fpage>529</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41467-022-28189-9</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B29">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Mahmoud</surname> <given-names>L. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Deol</surname> <given-names>J. K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Grosser</surname> <given-names>J. W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Killiny</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dutt</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2025</year>). <article-title>Transcriptomic and biochemical analysis of pummelo x finger lime hybrids in response to Huanglongbing (HLB)</article-title>. <source>BMC Plant Biol.</source> <volume>25</volume>, <fpage>235</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s12870-025-06211-8</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B30">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Mahmoud</surname> <given-names>L. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Huyck</surname> <given-names>P. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Vincent</surname> <given-names>C. I.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gmitter</surname> <given-names>F. G.</given-names>
<suffix>Jr.</suffix>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Grosser</surname> <given-names>J. W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dutt</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Physiological responses and gene expression patterns in open-pollinated seedlings of a pummelo-mandarin hybrid rootstock exposed to salt stress and Huanglongbing</article-title>. <source>Plants</source> <volume>10</volume>, <elocation-id>1439</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/plants10071439</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B31">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Mahmoud</surname> <given-names>L. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Killiny</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dutt</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2024</year>a). <article-title>Identification of CAP genes in finger lime (<italic>Citrus australasica</italic>) and their role in plant responses to abiotic and biotic stress</article-title>. <source>Sci. Rep.</source> <volume>14</volume>, <fpage>29557</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41598-024-80868-3</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B32">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Mahmoud</surname> <given-names>L. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Quirico</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Grosser</surname> <given-names>J. W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Killiny</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dutt</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2024</year>b). <article-title>Phenotypic and physiological traits of autotetraploid &#x2018;UF SunLime&#x2019; finger lime hybrid plants</article-title>. <source>Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. (PCTOC).</source> <volume>158</volume>, <fpage>31</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11240-024-02827-0</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B33">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Mahmoud</surname> <given-names>L. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Weber</surname> <given-names>K. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Trama</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>England</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dutt</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>A comparative study between &#x2018;Parson brown&#x2019;and &#x2018;Hamlin&#x2019; sweet oranges growing under endemic Huanglongbing conditions in Florida</article-title>. <source>HortScience</source> <volume>58</volume>, <fpage>1149</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1160</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.21273/HORTSCI17241-23</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B34">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Marques</surname> <given-names>J. P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hoy</surname> <given-names>J. W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Appezzato-da-Gl&#xf3;ria</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Viveros</surname> <given-names>A. F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Vieira</surname> <given-names>M. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Baisakh</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Sugarcane cell wall-associated defense responses to infection by <italic>Sporisorium scitamineum</italic>
</article-title>. <source>Front. Plant Sci.</source> <volume>9</volume>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpls.2018.00698</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B35">
<citation citation-type="thesis">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Mignone</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <source>A study on plant-derived small proteins and peptides with antiyeast activity and preliminary investigations in food materials</source>. <publisher-name>Munster Technological University</publisher-name>, <publisher-loc>Cork, Ireland</publisher-loc>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B36">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Munn&#xe9;-Bosch</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2005</year>). <article-title>The role of &#x3b1;-tocopherol in plant stress tolerance</article-title>. <source>J. Plant Physiol.</source> <volume>162</volume>, <fpage>743</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>748</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jplph.2005.04.022</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B37">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Pannala</surname> <given-names>A. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chan</surname> <given-names>T. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>O&#x2019;Brien</surname> <given-names>P. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rice-Evans</surname> <given-names>C. A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2001</year>). <article-title>Flavonoid B-ring chemistry and antioxidant activity: fast reaction kinetics</article-title>. <source>Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.</source> <volume>282</volume>, <fpage>1161</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1168</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1006/bbrc.2001.4705</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B38">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>P&#xe9;rez-Hedo</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hoddle</surname> <given-names>M. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Alferez</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Batista</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Beattie</surname> <given-names>G. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chakravarty</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2025</year>). <article-title>Global strategies to manage Huanglongbing (HLB) and its vectors: insights and implications for the Mediterranean region</article-title>. <source>Entomol. Gen</source>. <page-range>1&#x2013;16</page-range>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1127/entomologia/2024/2877</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B39">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>P&#xe9;rez-Hedo</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hoddle</surname> <given-names>M. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Alferez</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tena</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wade</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chakravarty</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2024</year>). <article-title>Huanglongbing (HLB) and its vectors: recent research advances and future challenges</article-title>. <source>Entomol. Gen</source>. <page-range>1&#x2013;19</page-range>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1127/entomologia/2024/3081</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B40">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Pietta</surname> <given-names>P. G.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2000</year>). <article-title>Flavonoids as antioxidants</article-title>. <source>J. Nat. Prod.</source> <volume>63</volume>, <fpage>1035</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1042</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1021/np9904509</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B41">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ramadugu</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Keremane</surname> <given-names>M. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Halbert</surname> <given-names>S. E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Duan</surname> <given-names>Y. P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Roose</surname> <given-names>M. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Stover</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Long-term field evaluation reveals Huanglongbing resistance in <italic>Citrus</italic> relatives</article-title>. <source>Plant Dis.</source> <volume>100</volume>, <fpage>1858</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1869</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1094/PDIS-03-16-0271-RE</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B42">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Rosales</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Burns</surname> <given-names>J. K.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Phytohormone changes and carbohydrate status in sweet orange fruit from Huanglongbing-infected trees</article-title>. <source>J. Plant Growth Regul.</source> <volume>30</volume>, <fpage>312</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>321</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00344-011-9193-0</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B43">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Roychoudhury</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Manna</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Banerjee</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2024</year>). &#x201c;<article-title>Plant elicitor peptide mediated signalling cascades during plant&#x2013;pathogen interaction</article-title>,&#x201d; in <source>Plant Elicitor Peptides: New Tool for Sustainable Agriculture</source>. Eds. <person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname>Singh</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mehrotra</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<publisher-name>Springer</publisher-name>, <publisher-loc>Singapor</publisher-loc>), <fpage>49</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>98</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B44">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ruzin</surname> <given-names>S. E.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1999</year>). <source>Plant Microtechnique and Microscopy</source> (<publisher-loc>New York, NY</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Oxford University Press</publisher-name>).</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B45">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Saltveit</surname> <given-names>M. E.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2017</year>). &#x201c;<article-title>Synthesis and metabolism of phenolic compounds</article-title>,&#x201d; in <source>Fruit and Vegetable Phytochemicals: Chemistry and Human Health</source>. Ed. <person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname>Yahia</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<publisher-name>John Wiley &amp; Sons</publisher-name>, <publisher-loc>London, UK</publisher-loc>), <fpage>115</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>124</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B46">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Shen</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gan</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jin</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Plant flavonoids: classification, distribution, biosynthesis, and antioxidant activity</article-title>. <source>Food Chem.</source> <volume>383</volume>, <elocation-id>132531</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.foodchem.2022.132531</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B47">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Singleton</surname> <given-names>V. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rossi</surname> <given-names>J. A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1965</year>). <article-title>Colorimetry of total phenolics with phosphomolybdic-phosphotungstic acid reagents</article-title>. <source>Am. J. Enol. Vitic.</source> <volume>16</volume>, <fpage>144</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>158</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5344/ajev.1965.16.3.144</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B48">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Suh</surname> <given-names>J. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Guha</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>S. Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Killiny</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Vincent</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Metabolomic analysis elucidates how shade conditions ameliorate the deleterious effects of greening (Huanglongbing) disease in citrus</article-title>. <source>Plant J.</source> <volume>108</volume>, <fpage>1798</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1814</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/tpj.15546</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B49">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Swingle</surname> <given-names>W. T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Reece</surname> <given-names>P. C.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1967</year>). &#x201c;<article-title>The botany of Citrus and its wild relatives</article-title>,&#x201d; in <source>The Citrus Industry</source>, vol. <volume>1</volume> . Eds. <person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname>Reuther</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Webber</surname> <given-names>H. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Batchelor</surname> <given-names>L. D.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<publisher-name>Univ. Calif. Press</publisher-name>, <publisher-loc>Berkeley</publisher-loc>), <fpage>190</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>430</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B50">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Talon</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gmitter</surname> <given-names>F. G.</given-names>
<suffix>Jr.</suffix>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>Citrus genomics</article-title>. <source>Int. J. Plant Genom.</source> <volume>2008</volume>, <elocation-id>528361</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1155/2008/528361</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B51">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Thakuria</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chaliha</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dutta</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sinha</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Uzir</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Singh</surname> <given-names>S. B.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>Citrus Huanglongbing (HLB): diagnostic and management options</article-title>. <source>Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol.</source> <volume>125</volume>, <elocation-id>102016</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.pmpp.2023.102016</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B52">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Tuladhar</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sasidharan</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Saudagar</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). &#x201c;<article-title>Role of phenols and polyphenols in plant defense response to biotic and abiotic stresses</article-title>,&#x201d; in <source>Biocontrol Agents and Secondary Metabolites</source>. Ed. <person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname>Jogaiah</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<publisher-name>Woodhead Publishing</publisher-name>, <publisher-loc>Sawston, UK</publisher-loc>), <fpage>419</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>441</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B53">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Urbaneja</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Grout</surname> <given-names>T. G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gravena</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cen</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Stansly</surname> <given-names>P. A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2020</year>). &#x201c;<article-title>Citrus pests in a global world</article-title>,&#x201d; in <source>The Genus Citrus</source>. Eds. <person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname>Talon</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Caruso</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gmitter</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names> <suffix>Jr</suffix>
</name>
</person-group> (<publisher-name>Woodhead Publishing</publisher-name>, <publisher-loc>Sawston, UK</publisher-loc>), <fpage>333</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>348</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B54">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lam</surname> <given-names>P. Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dini-Andreote</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dai</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wei</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Multifaceted roles of flavonoids mediating plant-microbe interactions</article-title>. <source>Microbiome</source> <volume>10</volume>, <fpage>233</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s40168-022-01420-x</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B55">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Trivedi</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Citrus Huanglongbing: a newly relevant disease presents unprecedented challenges</article-title>. <source>Phytopathology</source> <volume>103</volume>, <fpage>652</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>665</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1094/PHYTO-12-12-0331-RVW</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B56">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yin</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hu</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yuan</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Peng</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xia</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2006</year>). <article-title>Development and application of molecular-based diagnosis for &#x2018;<italic>Candidatus</italic> Liberibacter asiaticus&#x2019;, the causal pathogen of citrus Huanglongbing</article-title>. <source>Plant Pathol.</source> <volume>55</volume>, <fpage>630</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>638</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1365-3059.2006.01438.x</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B57">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Weber</surname> <given-names>K. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mahmoud</surname> <given-names>L. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Stanton</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Welker</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Qiu</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Grosser</surname> <given-names>J. W.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Insights into the mechanism of Huanglongbing tolerance in the Australian finger lime (<italic>Citrus australasica</italic>)</article-title>. <source>Front. Plant Sci.</source> <volume>13</volume>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpls.2022.1019295</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B58">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Welker</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pierre</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Santiago</surname> <given-names>J. P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dutt</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Vincent</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Levy</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Phloem transport limitation in Huanglongbing-affected sweet orange is dependent on phloem-limited bacteria and callose</article-title>. <source>Tree Physiol.</source> <volume>42</volume>, <fpage>379</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>390</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/treephys/tpab134</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>