<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.3 20070202//EN" "journalpublishing.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="2.3" xml:lang="EN">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Front. Plant Sci.</journal-id>
<journal-title>Frontiers in Plant Science</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">Front. Plant Sci.</abbrev-journal-title>
<issn pub-type="epub">1664-462X</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Frontiers Media S.A.</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpls.2025.1610698</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Plant Science</subject>
<subj-group>
<subject>Original Research</subject>
</subj-group>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Cross-species chromosome painting offers new insights into the phylogenetic relationships among 16 representative species of Ipomoeeae</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author" equal-contrib="yes">
<name>
<surname>Sun</surname>
<given-names>Jianying</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn003">
<sup>&#x2020;</sup>
</xref>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/funding-acquisition/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/investigation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/project-administration/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/resources/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" equal-contrib="yes">
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname>
<given-names>Lei</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn003">
<sup>&#x2020;</sup>
</xref>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/investigation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Sun</surname>
<given-names>Jian</given-names>
</name>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/187973/overview"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name>
<surname>Li</surname>
<given-names>Zongyun</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn001">
<sup>*</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/512589/overview"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/supervision/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name>
<surname>Han</surname>
<given-names>Yonghua</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn001">
<sup>*</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/452714/overview"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/supervision/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="aff1">
<institution>School of Life Sciences, Jiangsu Normal University</institution>, <addr-line>Xuzhou, Jiangsu</addr-line>,&#xa0;<country>China</country>
</aff>
<author-notes>
<fn fn-type="edited-by">
<p>Edited by: Zanmin Hu, Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), China</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="edited-by">
<p>Reviewed by: Chuanliang Deng, Henan Normal University, China</p>
<p>Xiuxia Ren, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, China</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="corresp" id="fn001">
<p>*Correspondence: Yonghua Han, <email xlink:href="mailto:hanyonghua@jsnu.edu.cn">hanyonghua@jsnu.edu.cn</email>; Zongyun Li, <email xlink:href="mailto:zongyunli@jsnu.edu.cn">zongyunli@jsnu.edu.cn</email>
</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="equal" id="fn003">
<p>&#x2020;These authors have contributed equally to this work</p>
</fn>
</author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>26</day>
<month>06</month>
<year>2025</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="collection">
<year>2025</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>16</volume>
<elocation-id>1610698</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>12</day>
<month>04</month>
<year>2025</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>13</day>
<month>06</month>
<year>2025</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#xa9; 2025 Sun, Chen, Sun, Li and Han</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2025</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Sun, Chen, Sun, Li and Han</copyright-holder>
<license xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">
<p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.</p>
</license>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<sec>
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>Previous phylogenetic studies of Ipomoeeae species have shown inconsistent results, and latest molecular analyses have classified this tribe into two major clades (Argyreiinae and Astripomoeinae) comprising seven smaller clades. The cross-species chromosome painting (CCP) analysis can offer valuable insights into the phylogenetic relationships among species.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Methods</title>
<p>Here, we analyzed representative species from each small clade using CCP with oligonucleotide (oligo) probes derived from chromosomes 7 (7-1/7-2) and 15 (15-1/15-2) of <italic>Ipomoea nil</italic> to further elucidate their phylogenetic relationships.</p>
</sec> <sec>
<title>Results and discussion</title>
<p>We found that each probe produced specific hybridization signals exclusively on one chromosome pair in all analyzed species, suggesting that the synteny of two chromosomes have been maintained after nearly 25 million years of divergence of these species. Despite conserved synteny, distinct chromosome painting patterns were observed among species. In all analyzed 2n=30 species from Astripomoeinae clade, probes of 7-1/7-2 and 15-1/15-2 hybridized to opposite chromosomal arms of their homologous chromosomes, respectively. By contrast, 2n=30 species from Argyreiinae showed co-localization of 7-1 and major 7-2 signals on same chromosomal arm along with weaker 7-2 signals on the opposing arm, while maintaining the 15-1 and 15-2 probes to different chromosomal arms. Notably, in all analyzed 2n=28 species from two major clades, two probes from the same chromosome showed co-localization to the same chromosomal arm, indicating that inter-chromosomal translocations or rearrangements have involved these two chromosomes. Thus, CCP analysis revealed significant cytogenetic divergence between 2n=28 and 2n=30 species that challenges existing molecular-based classifications which cluster them within the same small clade. Additionally, species relationships were further resolved through physical mapping of the 5S and 45S rDNA using fluorescence <italic>in situ</italic> hybridization (FISH), which revealed significant interspecific variation in rDNA distribution patterns, enabling the differentiation of most species from the same clade with indistinguishable chromosome painting patterns.</p>
</sec>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>chromosome painting</kwd>
<kwd>fluorescence <italic>in situ</italic> hybridization</kwd>
<kwd>Ipomoeeae</kwd>
<kwd>oligonucleotide probes</kwd>
<kwd>phylogenetic relationship</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<contract-sponsor id="cn001">National Natural Science Foundation of China<named-content content-type="fundref-id">10.13039/501100001809</named-content>
</contract-sponsor>
<counts>
<fig-count count="4"/>
<table-count count="1"/>
<equation-count count="0"/>
<ref-count count="39"/>
<page-count count="9"/>
<word-count count="3444"/>
</counts>
<custom-meta-wrap>
<custom-meta>
<meta-name>section-in-acceptance</meta-name>
<meta-value>Plant Cell Biology</meta-value>
</custom-meta>
</custom-meta-wrap>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec id="s1" sec-type="intro">
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>The morning glory family (Convolvulaceae) includes 50&#x2013;60 genera and 1600&#x2013;1700 species, which are circumscribed within twelve tribes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">Stefanovi&#x107; et&#xa0;al., 2002</xref>). More than half of the species are included in tribe Ipomoeeae Hallier f (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">Manos et&#xa0;al., 2001</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">Stefanovi&#x107; et&#xa0;al., 2003</xref>), which contains <italic>Ipomoea</italic> and nine other genera. Morning glories have served as important model systems for diverse evolutionary and molecular genetic investigations (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Miller et&#xa0;al., 1999</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">Mu&#xf1;oz-Rodr&#xed;guez et&#xa0;al., 2019</xref>). Resolving their phylogenetic relationships is essential for advancing these research efforts. Phylogenetic analyses incorporating both morphological and molecular data have consistently shown that <italic>Ipomoea</italic> is not monophyletic, with the nine other genera of Ipomoeeae nested within it (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Miller et&#xa0;al., 1999</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">2002</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">Manos et&#xa0;al., 2001</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">Stefanovi&#x107; et&#xa0;al., 2002</xref>). Accordingly, the option was proposed that <italic>Ipomoea</italic> in its broad sense can be defined as the sole genus of Ipomoeeae based on morphological evidence (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">Wilkin, 1999</xref>).</p>
<p>Phylogenetic analyses of four plastid DNA markers classify Ipomoeeae into two principal clades: Argyreiinae and Astripomoeinae (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">Stefanovi&#x107; et&#xa0;al., 2003</xref>). Subsequent whole plastome sequencing further resolved Astripomoeinae into five smaller clades (Batatas, Murucoides, Pes-caprae, Quamoclit, and Cairica) and Argyreiinae into two (Pes-tigridis and Obscura) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Eserman et&#xa0;al., 2014</xref>). Each clade is named after its oldest constituent species identified in that study. Despite their phylogenetic distinction, no clear morphological synapomorphies separate the two major clades (Argyreiinae and Astripomoeinae) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">Wilkin, 1999</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">Wood et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>). In fact, the members of both the Astripomoeinae and Argyreiinae were often grouped together in historical classifications. For instance, <italic>Ipomoea purpurea</italic> (L.) Roth (Astripomoeinae) and <italic>I. pes-tigridis</italic> L. (Argyreiinae), which share remarkably similar gross morphology, were both classified within <italic>Ipomoea</italic> section <italic>Pharbitis</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Roberty, 1952</xref>). Furthermore, the taxonomy and phylogenetic relationships for Ipomoeeae species are often incongruent in previous studies (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Miller et&#xa0;al., 1999</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">2002</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">Manos et&#xa0;al., 2001</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Eserman et&#xa0;al., 2014</xref>). For instance, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Eserman et&#xa0;al. (2014)</xref> recovered the Batatas, Murucoides, Pes-caprae, and Quamoclit clades as a closely related group, with Cairica positioned as the basal lineage of Astripomoeinae. In contrast, earlier studies consistently resolved Cairica and Quamoclit as sister clades (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Miller et&#xa0;al., 1999</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">2002</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">Manos et&#xa0;al., 2001</xref>), highlighting persistent phylogenetic discordance in Ipomoeeae.</p>
<p>Chromosomal changes have been demonstrated to serve as highly informative markers for resolving phylogenetic relationships among species (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Braz et&#xa0;al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">Meng et&#xa0;al., 2024</xref>). Chromosome painting (CP), using DNA probes prepared from flow-sorted or microdissected chromosomes, has been shown to be a powerful tool for tracing inter-chromosomal rearrangements in evolution among related species through cross-species chromosome painting (CCP) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">Thomas et&#xa0;al., 1998</xref>). CCP has been widely used in animal and human cytogenetic studies, revealing that species with more similar chromosomal staining patterns generally exhibit closer phylogenetic relationships (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Muller et&#xa0;al., 2000</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Ferguson-Smith and Trifonov, 2007</xref>). However, the application of CCP in plants were not successful due to the cross-hybridization of repetitive DNA sequences in the probes that cannot be efficiently blocked (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Fuchs et&#xa0;al., 1996</xref>).</p>
<p>Advances in DNA synthesis technology have made it possible to simultaneously synthesize thousands of independent oligonucleotide (oligo) fragments, providing a novel approach for developing chromosome-specific painting probes in plants (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">Han et&#xa0;al., 2015</xref>). Oligo painting probes can be designed for any plant species with a sequenced genome. Since the single-copy sequences of oligos are primarily derived from conserved gene regions, oligo probes designed from one species can be used in other plants related to the target species (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Jiang, 2019</xref>). To date, oligo-based CCP has been applied in chromosome evolution studies across multiple plant genera, including <italic>Populus</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">Xin et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>), <italic>Citrus</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">He et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>), <italic>Fragaria</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">Qu et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>), <italic>Cucumis</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Bi et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">Zhao et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>), Triticeae (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">Li et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">Chen et&#xa0;al., 2024</xref>), <italic>Saccharum</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">Yu et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>), <italic>Aegilops</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Shi et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>), <italic>Thinopyrum</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">Chen et&#xa0;al., 2023</xref>), and <italic>Glycyrrhiza</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">Meng et&#xa0;al., 2024</xref>).</p>
<p>We have previously developed chromosome-specific oligo probes for two <italic>I. nil</italic> chromosomes, revealing genomic architecture and interspecific relationships among three polyploid <italic>Ipomoea</italic> species (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Sun et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>). Here, 16 representative diploid <italic>Ipomoea</italic> species were analyzed by CCP using these <italic>I. nil</italic>-derived probes to evaluate the congruence between cytogenetic data and existing molecular phylogenies of Ipomoeeae, which provides new insight into the phylogenetic relationships among these species.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2" sec-type="materials|methods">
<title>Material and methods</title>
<sec id="s2_1">
<title>Taxon sampling</title>
<p>The representative species were selected from all seven smaller clades in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Eserman et&#xa0;al. (2014)</xref>, including <italic>I. trifida</italic>, <italic>I. setosa</italic>, <italic>I. amnicola</italic>, <italic>I. hederifolia</italic>, <italic>I. nil</italic>, <italic>I. cairica</italic>, <italic>I. pes-tigridis</italic>, <italic>I. eriocarpa</italic>, and <italic>I. obscura</italic> (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SF1">
<bold>Supplementary Figure S1</bold>
</xref>, species labeled with a green asterisk). When original species from their study were unavailable, we selected phylogenetic proxies following <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Miller et&#xa0;al. (1999)</xref>, including <italic>I. carnea</italic>, <italic>I. saintronanensis</italic>, <italic>I. platensis</italic>, <italic>I. gracilis</italic>, <italic>I. coccinea</italic>, <italic>I. hederacea</italic>, and <italic>I. aquatic</italic> (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SF2">
<bold>Supplementary Figure S2</bold>
</xref>, species labeled with a green asterisk). Seed materials were sourced from multiple repositories, including: (1) the USDA National Plant Germplasm System (Gainesville, Florida, USA); (2) the Xuzhou Sweet Potato Research Centre (China); (3) the South China Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences; (4) the Germplasm Bank of Wild Species in Southwest China; and (5) commercial horticultural suppliers (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">
<bold>Table&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>).</p>
<table-wrap id="T1" position="float">
<label>Table&#xa0;1</label>
<caption>
<p>Plant materials used in this study.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" align="left">Species</th>
<th valign="middle" align="left">Plant ID</th>
<th valign="middle" align="left">2n</th>
<th valign="middle" align="left">Source</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" colspan="4" align="left">Astripomoeinae</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" colspan="4" align="left">Batatas</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">
<italic>I. setosa</italic> Ker Gawl.</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">PI 686433</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">30</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">US National Plant Germplasm System</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">
<italic>I</italic>. <italic>trifida</italic> (H.B.K.) G.Don</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">PI 618966</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">30</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">US National Plant Germplasm System</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" colspan="4" align="left">Murucoides</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">
<italic>I. carnea</italic> Jacq.</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left"/>
<td valign="top" align="center">30</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Xuzhou Sweet Potato Research Centre</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">
<italic>I. saintronanensis</italic> R.W. Johnson</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">PI 538278</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">30</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">US National Plant Germplasm System</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">
<italic>I. platensis</italic> Ker Gawl.</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"/>
<td valign="top" align="center">30</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Commercial suppliers</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" colspan="4" align="left">Pes-caprae</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">
<italic>I. gracilis</italic> B.Br.</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">PI 538270</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">30</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">US National Plant Germplasm System</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">
<italic>I. amnicola</italic> Morong.</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">PI553010</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">30</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">US National Plant Germplasm System</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="top" colspan="4" align="left">Quamoclit</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">
<italic>I. hederifolia</italic> L.</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Grif 6263</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">28</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">US National Plant Germplasm System</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">
<italic>I. coccinea</italic> L.</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left"/>
<td valign="top" align="center">28</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Commercial suppliers</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">
<italic>I. nil</italic> (L.) Roth</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left"/>
<td valign="top" align="center">30</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Commercial suppliers</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">
<italic>I. hederacea</italic> Jacq.</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">PI 618969</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">30</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">US National Plant Germplasm System</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="top" colspan="4" align="left">Cairica</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">
<italic>I. cairica</italic> (L.) Sweet</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left"/>
<td valign="top" align="center">30</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">South China Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">
<italic>I. aquatica</italic> Forssk.</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left"/>
<td valign="top" align="center">30</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Commercial suppliers</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="top" colspan="4" align="left">Argyreiinae</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="top" colspan="4" align="left">Pes-tigridis</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">
<italic>I. pes-tigridis</italic> L.</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">PI549258</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">28</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">US National Plant Germplasm System</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">
<italic>I. eriocarpa</italic> R.Br.</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left"/>
<td valign="top" align="center">30</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">The Germplasm Bank of Wild Species in Southwest China</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="top" colspan="4" align="left">Obscura</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">
<italic>I. obscura</italic> (L.) Ker Gawl.</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left"/>
<td valign="top" align="center">30</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Commercial suppliers</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_2">
<title>Preparation of mitotic chromosomes</title>
<p>Young root tips were excised and treated with 2 mM 8-hydroxyquinoline at room temperature for 2 hours, followed by thorough rinsing with distilled water. The samples were then fixed in freshly prepared Carnoy&#x2019;s solution (glacial acetic acid:absolute ethanol = 1:3, v/v) for 24 hours at room temperature and subsequently stored at -20&#xb0;C in 70% ethanol. Prior to enzymatic digestion, fixed root tips were washed in distilled water and incubated in an enzyme mixture (2% cellulase and 1% pectolyase) at 37&#xb0;C for 2 hours. The digested root tips were carefully macerated on clean glass slides using 50% acetic acid and fine-tipped forceps, followed by flame-drying over an alcohol burner.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_3">
<title>rDNA probes and oligo probes</title>
<p>The 5S and 45S rDNA probes were prepared according to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Sun et&#xa0;al. (2022)</xref>. The sequences used to develop probes were derived from the coding region of 5S rRNA, and 5.8S, 18S and 25S rRNA from <italic>Arabidopsis thaliana</italic> (L.) Heynhold, respectively. The probes were synthesized by the Sangon Biotech (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. The 5S rDNA probes were 5&#x2032;-end labelled with 6-carboxyfluorescein (FAM), and the 45S rDNA probes were 5&#x2032;-end labelled with 6-carboxytetramethylrhodamine (TAMRA). For chromosome painting, we developed four oligo-based chromosome painting probes for <italic>I. nil</italic> pseudo-chromosomes 7 (7&#x2013;1 and 7-2) and 15 (15&#x2013;1 and 15-2), which are the shortest two pseudo-chromosomes. Each probe contained oligos that were specific to half of each pseudo-chromosome. The design, amplification and labeling of oligo probes followed our published protocols (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">Han et&#xa0;al., 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Sun et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_4">
<title>Fluorescence <italic>in situ</italic> hybridization</title>
<p>The FISH procedure was performed according to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Sun et&#xa0;al. (2022)</xref>. Biotin-labeled probes (7&#x2013;1 and 15-1) were detected using Alexa Fluor 488 streptavidin (Invitrogen), and digoxigenin-labeled probes (7&#x2013;2 and 15-2) were detected using anti-digoxigenin rhodamine (Roche Diagnostics, Indianapolis, Indiana). The chromosomes were counterstained with 4,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) in a VectaShield antifade solution (Vector Laboratories). FISH images were captured digitally using a Leica DM6000 B fully automated upright microscope system. Gray-scale images were captured for each color channel and then merged, and final image adjustments were performed using Adobe Photoshop (Adobe Systems). For each species, at least five well-spread mitotic metaphase cells were analyzed.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s3" sec-type="results">
<title>Results</title>
<sec id="s3_1">
<title>Chromosome counting and CCP analysis in 16 <italic>Ipomoea</italic> species</title>
<p>Chromosome counts revealed that 13 of the 16 examined <italic>Ipomoea</italic> species had 2n=30 chromosomes (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">
<bold>Figures&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">
<bold>2</bold>
</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3">
<bold>3A-G, J-M, O-P</bold>
</xref>), while <italic>I. hederifolia</italic>, <italic>I. coccinea</italic>, and <italic>I. pes-tigridis</italic> exhibited a reduced chromosome number of 2n=28 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">
<bold>Figures&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>-<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3">
<bold>3H, I, N</bold>
</xref>), which were consistent with earlier reports for same species (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">Dutta, 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">Wu et&#xa0;al., 2024</xref>).</p>
<fig id="f1" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;1</label>
<caption>
<p>Simultaneous hybridization of oligo probes 7-1 (green) and 7-2 (red) on mitotic metaphase cell of <italic>I</italic>. <italic>trifida</italic> <bold>(A)</bold>, <italic>I</italic>. <italic>setosa</italic> <bold>(B)</bold>, <italic>I. carnea</italic> <bold>(C)</bold>, <italic>I</italic>. <italic>saintronanensis</italic> <bold>(D)</bold>, <italic>I</italic>. <italic>platensis</italic> <bold>(E)</bold>, <italic>I. gracilis</italic> <bold>(F)</bold>, <italic>I</italic>. <italic>amnicola</italic> <bold>(G)</bold>, <italic>I</italic>. <italic>hederifolia</italic> <bold>(H)</bold>, <italic>I</italic>. <italic>coccinea</italic> <bold>(I)</bold>, <italic>I</italic>. <italic>nil</italic> <bold>(J)</bold>, <italic>I</italic>. <italic>hederacea</italic> <bold>(K)</bold>, <italic>I</italic>. <italic>cairica</italic> <bold>(L)</bold>, <italic>I</italic>. <italic>aquatic</italic> <bold>(M)</bold>, <italic>I. pes-tigridis</italic> <bold>(N)</bold>, <italic>I</italic>. <italic>eriocarpa</italic> <bold>(O)</bold>, and <italic>I. obscura</italic> <bold>(P)</bold>, respectively. Scale bars = 5 &#x3bc;m.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-16-1610698-g001.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Sixteen panels (A-P) show fluorescent microscopy images of cells. Each panel features blue-stained nuclei with some green and red signals indicating additional features or markers. The images vary in cell density and signal intensity.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
<fig id="f2" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;2</label>
<caption>
<p>Simultaneous hybridization of oligo probes15-1 (green) and 15-2 (red) on mitotic metaphase cell of <italic>I</italic>. <italic>trifida</italic> <bold>(A)</bold>, <italic>I</italic>. <italic>setosa</italic> <bold>(B)</bold>, <italic>I. carnea</italic> <bold>(C)</bold>, <italic>I</italic>. <italic>saintronanensis</italic> <bold>(D)</bold>, <italic>I</italic>. <italic>platensis</italic> <bold>(E)</bold>, <italic>I</italic>. <italic>gracilis</italic> <bold>(F)</bold>, <italic>I</italic>. <italic>amnicola</italic> <bold>(G)</bold>, <italic>I</italic>. <italic>hederifolia</italic> <bold>(H)</bold>, <italic>I</italic>. <italic>coccinea</italic> <bold>(I)</bold>, <italic>I</italic>. <italic>nil</italic> <bold>(J)</bold>, <italic>I</italic>. <italic>hederacea</italic> <bold>(K)</bold>, <italic>I</italic>. <italic>cairica</italic> <bold>(L)</bold>, <italic>I. aquatic</italic> <bold>(M)</bold>, <italic>I. pes-tigridis</italic> <bold>(N)</bold>, <italic>I</italic>. <italic>eriocarpa</italic> <bold>(O)</bold>, and <italic>I. obscura</italic> <bold>(P)</bold>, respectively. Scale bars = 5 &#x3bc;m.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-16-1610698-g002.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Microscopic images in a grid labeled A to P, showing cells stained with blue, red, and green dyes. The colors indicate various cellular components under fluorescence microscopy. Each panel displays distinct patterns and intensities of staining, suggesting differences in cell types or conditions. Scale bars are present for reference.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
<fig id="f3" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;3</label>
<caption>
<p>Simultaneous hybridization of 5S (green) and 45S rDNA (red) on mitotic metaphase cell of <italic>I</italic>. <italic>trifida</italic> <bold>(A)</bold>, <italic>I</italic>. <italic>setosa</italic> <bold>(B)</bold>, <italic>I. carnea</italic> <bold>(C)</bold>, <italic>I</italic>. <italic>saintronanensis</italic> <bold>(D)</bold>, <italic>I</italic>. <italic>platensis</italic> <bold>(E)</bold>, <italic>I</italic>. <italic>gracilis</italic> <bold>(F)</bold>, <italic>I</italic>. <italic>amnicola</italic> <bold>(G)</bold>, <italic>I</italic>. <italic>hederifolia</italic> <bold>(H)</bold>, <italic>I</italic>. <italic>coccinea</italic> <bold>(I)</bold>, <italic>I</italic>. <italic>nil</italic> <bold>(J)</bold>, <italic>I</italic>. <italic>hederacea</italic> <bold>(K)</bold>, <italic>I</italic>. <italic>cairica</italic> <bold>(L)</bold>, <italic>I</italic>. <italic>aquatic</italic> <bold>(M)</bold>, <italic>I. pes-tigridis</italic> <bold>(N)</bold>, <italic>I</italic>. <italic>eriocarpa</italic> <bold>(O)</bold>, and <italic>I. obscura</italic> <bold>(P)</bold>, respectively. Scale bars = 5 &#x3bc;m.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-16-1610698-g003.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Fluorescence microscopy panels labeled A to P showing cells stained with blue, red, and green markers. Varying patterns and intensities of color indicate differences in cellular structures or protein expression. Each panel presents a unique distribution and combination of the colors. Scale bars included in each image.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
<p>The probes of 7-1/7&#x2013;2 and 15-1/15&#x2013;2 developed in <italic>I. nil</italic> were hybridized to mitotic metaphase chromosomes of these species (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">
<bold>Figures&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">
<bold>2</bold>
</xref>). Each probe produced specific FISH signals exclusively on one chromosome pair, although cross-hybridization signals were also detected on other chromosomes, these signals were relatively weak and inconsistently observed. To facilitate cross-species comparison of FISH signal patterns, we digitally extracted chromosomes with FISH signals from <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">
<bold>Figures&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">
<bold>2</bold>
</xref> and compiled them in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f4">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;4</bold>
</xref>.</p>
<fig id="f4" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;4</label>
<caption>
<p>The chromosomes with FISH signals from <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">
<bold>Figures&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">
<bold>2</bold>
</xref>, and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3">
<bold>3</bold>
</xref>. <bold>(A1&#x2013;P1)</bold> show chromosomes with hybridization signals from oligo probes 7-1 (green) and 7-2 (red) in <italic>I. trifida</italic> <bold>(A1)</bold>, <italic>I. setosa</italic> <bold>(B1)</bold>, <italic>I. carnea</italic> <bold>(C1)</bold>, <italic>I. saintronanensis</italic> <bold>(D1)</bold>, <italic>I. platensis</italic> <bold>(E1)</bold>, <italic>I. gracilis</italic> <bold>(F1)</bold>, <italic>I. amnicola</italic> <bold>(G1)</bold>, <italic>I. hederifolia</italic> <bold>(H1)</bold>, <italic>I. coccinea</italic> <bold>(I1)</bold>, <italic>I. nil</italic> <bold>(J1)</bold>, <italic>I. hederacea</italic> <bold>(K1)</bold>, <italic>I. cairica</italic> <bold>(L1)</bold>, <italic>I. aquatic</italic> <bold>(M1)</bold>, <italic>I. pes-tigridis</italic> <bold>(N1)</bold>, <italic>I. eriocarpa</italic> <bold>(O1)</bold>, and <italic>I. obscura</italic> <bold>(P1)</bold>, respectively. <bold>(A2&#x2013;P2)</bold> display chromosomes with signals from oligo probes 15-1 (green) and 15-2 (red) in the same species as A1&#x2013;P1. <bold>(A3&#x2013;P3)</bold> present chromosomes with hybridization signals from 5S rDNA (green) and 45S rDNA (red) probes in the same species as <bold>(A1&#x2013;P1)</bold>.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-16-1610698-g004.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Chart showing two main subfamilies, Astripomoeinae and Argyreiinaeas, with species listed under each. Astripomoeinae includes Batatas, Murucoides, Pes-caprae, Quamoclit, and Cairica. Argyreiinaeas includes Pes-tigridis and Obscura. To the right, labeled columns A1 to P3 display fluorescent microscopy images of chromosomes, using different color markers to visualize genetic material.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
<p>In all examined species from the Batatas, Murucoides, Pes-caprae, and Cairica clades (Astripomoeinae), probes 7&#x2013;1 and 7&#x2013;2 exhibited specific hybridization to the telomeric regions of the long arm and short arm, respectively, leaving interstitial chromosomal regions unlabeled (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">
<bold>Figures&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f4">
<bold>4</bold>
</xref>). In contrast, species from the Quamoclit clade displayed divergent patterns: <italic>I. hederifolia</italic> and <italic>I. coccinea</italic> (2n=28) showed complete co-localization of both probes on a single arm, while <italic>I. nil</italic> and <italic>I. hederacea</italic> displayed continuous hybridization signals along entire chromosome lengths (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">
<bold>Figures&#xa0;1H&#x2013;K</bold>
</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f4">
<bold>4</bold>
</xref>). The two Pes-tigridis clade species also exhibited distinct chromosomal painting patterns, with <italic>I. pes-tigridis</italic> (2n=28) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;1N</bold>
</xref>) displaying hybridization patterns identical to those observed in <italic>I. hederifolia</italic> and <italic>I. coccinea</italic> (Quamoclit clade), where both probes co-localized on a single chromosomal arm (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f4">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;4</bold>
</xref>), while <italic>I. eriocarpa</italic> (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;1O</bold>
</xref>) showed a pattern resembling <italic>I. obscura</italic> (Obscura clade) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;1P</bold>
</xref>) characterized by co-localized 7&#x2013;1 and strong 7&#x2013;2 signals on same chromosomal arm along with weaker 7&#x2013;2 hybridization signals on the opposing arm (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f4">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;4</bold>
</xref>).</p>
<p>The 15&#x2013;1 and 15&#x2013;2 probes exhibited hybridization patterns consistent with the 7&#x2013;1 and 7&#x2013;2 probes in all examined species (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f4">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;4</bold>
</xref>) except <italic>I. eriocarpa</italic> (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;2O</bold>
</xref>) and <italic>I. obscura</italic> (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;2P</bold>
</xref>). In these two species, the 15&#x2013;1 and 15&#x2013;2 probes hybridized to different chromosomal arms (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f4">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;4</bold>
</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_2">
<title>Physical localization of 5S and 45S rDNA in 16 <italic>Ipomoea</italic> species</title>
<p>To distinguish species with indistinguishable chromosome painting patterns, we conducted dual-color FISH to map the distribution patterns of 5S and 45S rDNA across 16 representative species (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;3</bold>
</xref>), with signal-bearing chromosomes digitally extracted from <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;3</bold>
</xref> and arranged in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f4">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;4</bold>
</xref> to facilitate comparative analysis. In all analyzed species except those in the Quamoclit clade, 5S rDNA loci were consistently localized to 1&#x2013;2 chromosome pairs while 45S rDNA loci occupied 2&#x2013;3 chromosome pairs (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3">
<bold>Figures&#xa0;3</bold>
</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f4">
<bold>4</bold>
</xref>). The Quamoclit clade species, unlike other clades, consistently exhibited higher 45S rDNA locus numbers while preserving similar 5S rDNA locus numbers relative to species in other clades (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3">
<bold>Figures&#xa0;3H&#x2013;K</bold>
</xref>). Specifically, <italic>I. hederifolia</italic> displayed 45S rDNA signals on six chromosome pairs and 5S rDNA on three pairs, including one syntenic 5S-45S rDNA pair (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3">
<bold>Figures&#xa0;3H</bold>
</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f4">
<bold>4</bold>
</xref>), while <italic>I. coccinea</italic> exhibited five chromosome pairs with 45S rDNA and two pairs with 5S rDNA (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3">
<bold>Figures&#xa0;3I</bold>
</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f4">
<bold>4</bold>
</xref>). Although both <italic>I. nil</italic> and <italic>I. hederacea</italic> showed 45S rDNA signals on seven chromosome pairs (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3">
<bold>Figures&#xa0;3J, K</bold>
</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f4">
<bold>4</bold>
</xref>), they differed in their 5S rDNA locus distribution, with <italic>I. nil</italic> displaying 5S rDNA on a single chromosome pair (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3">
<bold>Figures&#xa0;3J</bold>
</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f4">
<bold>4</bold>
</xref>) while <italic>I. hederacea</italic> possessed two 5S rDNA-bearing chromosome pairs, one of which was syntenic with 45S rDNA loci (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3">
<bold>Figures&#xa0;3K</bold>
</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f4">
<bold>4</bold>
</xref>).</p>
<p>In all examined species, the 5S rDNA occupied proximal regions on either short or long arms, whereas 45S rDNA exhibited exclusive telomeric localization on the short arms of all chromosomes. Marked variation in rDNA signal size and intensity was observed not only among non-homologous chromosomes as well as between homologous chromosomes in several species (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f4">
<bold>Figures&#xa0;4A3, H3, J3, L3, O3</bold>
</xref>), indicative of substantial rDNA copy number polymorphism. This polymorphism was also observed in other species, and underlying mechanisms were analyzed in our previous study (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Hu et&#xa0;al., 2025</xref>). Based on the distribution patterns of 5S and 45S rDNA, species from different clades still cannot be accurately identified or distinguished, while species from same clade could be distinguished except for <italic>I. carnea</italic> and <italic>I. saintronanensis</italic> in the Murucoides clade, which showed identical rDNA signal patterns (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f4">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;4</bold>
</xref>).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s4" sec-type="discussion">
<title>Discussion</title>
<p>Compared with DNA probes prepared from flow-sorted or microdissected chromosomes, the synthetic oligo probes designed from single copy DNA sequences have such advantages as superior resolution and versatility, customized design, labor-saving and cost-efficient, which greatly expand the application of CCP among genetically related plant species (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Jiang, 2019</xref>). In this study, we found that each probe designed from two chromosomes of <italic>I. nil</italic> produced specific FISH signals exclusively on one chromosome pair in all analyzed species that diverged ca. 25 million years (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Eserman et&#xa0;al., 2014</xref>), suggesting that the chromosomal synteny has been maintained among these species. Similar examples of syntenic maintenance within the same genus have been described in multiple plant genera (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">Xin et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">He et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">Qu et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">Chen et&#xa0;al., 2024</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">Meng et&#xa0;al., 2024</xref>).</p>
<p>Despite conserved synteny, distinct chromosome painting patterns were observed among species. In all analyzed 2n=30 species except for <italic>I. nil</italic> and <italic>I. hederacea</italic>, oligo probes exhibited specific hybridization to the terminal regions of the chromosomes, with notably weak or absent FISH signals in interstitial regions. This could be caused by sequence divergence and/or structural expansion of these chromosomal regions. In contrast, in all analyzed 2n=28 species, two probes from the same chromosome showed co-localization to the same chromosomal arm, indicating that inter-chromosomal translocations or rearrangements have involved these two chromosomes. Building upon the correlation between phylogenetic proximity and chromosomal painting pattern similarity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Muller et&#xa0;al., 2000</xref>), our CCP analysis revealed a clear cytogenetic divergence between species with chromosome numbers of 2n=28 and 2n=30, challenging the current molecular-based classification that groups them within the same small clade (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Eserman et&#xa0;al., 2014</xref>).</p>
<p>While CCP analysis revealed significant cytogenetic divergence between 2n=28 and 2n=30 species, all examined species from the Batatas, Murucoides, Pes-caprae, and Cairica clades (Astripomoeinae) displayed indistinguishable painting patterns for the 7-1/7&#x2013;2 and 15-1/15&#x2013;2 probes. The number and position of the 5S and 45S rDNA loci are important species characteristics, and closely related species usually have more similar rDNA FISH patterns than those of distantly related ones (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Garcia et&#xa0;al., 2017</xref>). Therefore, physical mapping of rDNA loci using the FISH technique is widely used to identify species and clarify phylogenetic relationships among related species (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Han et&#xa0;al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">Qu et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">Yucel et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Hu et&#xa0;al., 2025</xref>). In the genus <italic>Ipomoea</italic>, pioneering work by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Srisuwan et&#xa0;al. (2006)</xref> employed physical mapping of 5S and 18S rDNA to investigate the genome organization and evolution of sweetpotato (<italic>Ipomoea batatas</italic> (L.) Lam.) and its seven wild relatives, and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">Wu et&#xa0;al. (2024)</xref> subsequently determined genomic distribution of 18S and 5S rDNA sites across 13 <italic>Ipomoea</italic> species. Our previous research (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">Sun et&#xa0;al., 2024</xref>) determined the rDNA distribution in 17 <italic>Ipomoea</italic> species from the Batatas clade, yielding critical insights into sweetpotato&#x2019;s origin. In this study, rDNA-FISH analysis revealed that 5S rDNA loci were consistently localized to 1&#x2013;2 chromosome pairs while 45S rDNA loci occupied 2&#x2013;3 chromosome pairs in all analyzed species except those in the Quamoclit clade. Consequently, while rDNA distribution patterns can effectively distinguish species within same clade, they cannot be utilized for distinguishing species across different clades.</p>
<p>Notably, previous studies indicated close relationships between <italic>I. hederacea</italic> and <italic>I. nil</italic> with difficult morphological distinction (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">Austin, 1975</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">Austin et&#xa0;al., 2001</xref>), we identified diagnostic cytogenetic differences: <italic>I. nil</italic> possesses 5S rDNA on a single chromosome pair, whereas <italic>I. hederacea</italic> exhibits two 5S rDNA-bearing chromosome pairs, with one syntenic to 45S rDNA loci. Therefore, the 5S rDNA distribution pattern serves as a reliable cytogenetic marker for distinguishing between these two morphologically similar species.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s5" sec-type="conclusions">
<title>Conclusions</title>
<p>Taken together, this study presents the first phylogenetic analysis of Ipomoeeae species utilizing the CCP technique, revealing significant cytogenetic divergence between 2n=28 and 2n=30 species that challenges existing molecular-based classifications which cluster them within the same small clade. Our study not only provides new cytogenetic insights into the phylogenetic relationships for 16 representative species but also highlights the critical need for integrating molecular and cytogenetic data to accurately resolve complex phylogenetic relationships within this tribe. Building on these findings, future research will develop chromosome-specific oligos probes for each <italic>I. nil</italic> chromosome to enable detailed characterization of inter-chromosomal rearrangements and karyotype evolution across Ipomoeeae species through CCP analysis.</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<sec id="s6" sec-type="data-availability">
<title>Data availability statement</title>
<p>The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SF1">
<bold>Supplementary Material</bold>
</xref>. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s7" sec-type="author-contributions">
<title>Author contributions</title>
<p>YH: Supervision, Writing &#x2013; original draft, Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing. JYS: Funding acquisition, Investigation, Project administration, Resources, Writing &#x2013; original draft. LC: Investigation, Writing &#x2013; original draft. ZL: Supervision, Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing. JS: Writing &#x2013; original draft.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s8" sec-type="funding-information">
<title>Funding</title>
<p>The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article. This research is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (32000376), and the earmarked fund for CARS-10-Sweetpotato.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s9" sec-type="COI-statement">
<title>Conflict of interest</title>
<p>The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s10" sec-type="ai-statement">
<title>Generative AI statement</title>
<p>The author(s) declare that no Generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s11" sec-type="disclaimer">
<title>Publisher&#x2019;s note</title>
<p>All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s12" sec-type="supplementary-material">
<title>Supplementary material</title>
<p>The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2025.1610698/full#supplementary-material">https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2025.1610698/full#supplementary-material</ext-link>
</p>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Image1.tiff" id="SF1" mimetype="image/tiff">
<label>Supplementary Figure&#xa0;1</label>
<caption>
<p>Phylogeny of the Ipomoeeae (<italic>Ipomoea</italic> and nine other genera) based on whole chloroplast genome sequences (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Eserman et&#xa0;al., 2014</xref>).</p>
</caption>
</supplementary-material>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Image2.tif" id="SF2" mimetype="image/tiff">
<label>Supplementary Figure&#xa0;2</label>
<caption>
<p>Strict consensus tree for <italic>Ipomoea</italic> based on simultaneous analysis of ITS and waxy sequences (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Miller et&#xa0;al., 1999</xref>).</p>
</caption>
</supplementary-material>
</sec>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="B1">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Austin</surname> <given-names>D. F.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1975</year>). &#x201c;<article-title>Convolvulaceae,</article-title>&#x201d; in <source>Flora of Panama</source>, Eds. <person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname>Woodson</surname> <given-names>R. E.</given-names> <suffix>Jr</suffix>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Schery</surname> <given-names>R. W.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<publisher-name>St. Louis: Missouri Botanical Garden Press</publisher-name>) <fpage>62</fpage>, <fpage>147</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>224</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Austin</surname> <given-names>D. F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kitajima</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yoneda</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Qian</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2001</year>). <article-title>A putative tropical American plant, <italic>Ipomoea nil</italic> (Convolvulaceae), in pre-Columbian Japanese art</article-title>. <source>Eco. Bot.</source> <volume>55</volume>, <fpage>515</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>527</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/BF02871718</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Bi</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yan</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cheng</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Flexible chromosome painting based on multiplex PCR of oligonucleotides and its application for comparative chromosome analyses in <italic>Cucumis</italic>
</article-title>. <source>Plant J.</source> <volume>102</volume>, <fpage>178</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>186</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/tpj.14600</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Braz</surname> <given-names>G. T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>He</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Semrau</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rouillard</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Comparative oligo-FISH mapping: an efficient and powerful methodology to reveal karyotypic and chromosomal evolution</article-title>. <source>Genetics</source> <volume>208</volume>, <fpage>513</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>523</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1534/genetics.117.300344</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Han</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xiao</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zou</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sha</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>Chromosome-specifc painting in <italic>Thinopyrum</italic> species using bulked oligonucleotides</article-title>. <source>Theor. Appl. Genet.</source> <volume>136</volume>, <fpage>177</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00122-023-04423-w</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zou</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xiao</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Han</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2024</year>). <article-title>Chromosome-specific painting reveals the Y genome origin and chromosome rearrangements of the St genome in Triticeae</article-title>. <source>Plant Physiol.</source> <volume>196</volume>, <fpage>870</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>882</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/plphys/kiae433</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Dutta</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>The karyotype of the <italic>Ipomoea&#x2019;s</italic> of Assam including two newly recorded variants</article-title>. <source>Cytologia</source> <volume>82</volume>, <fpage>489</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>494</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1508/cytologia.82.489</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Eserman</surname> <given-names>L. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tiley</surname> <given-names>G. P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jarret</surname> <given-names>R. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Leebens-Mack</surname> <given-names>J. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Miller</surname> <given-names>R. E.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Phylogenetics and diversification of morning glories (tribe Ipomoeeae, Convolvulaceae) based on whole plastome sequences</article-title>. <source>Am. J. Bot.</source> <volume>101</volume>, <fpage>92</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>103</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3732/ajb.1300207</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ferguson-Smith</surname> <given-names>M. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Trifonov</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2007</year>). <article-title>Mammalian karyotype evolution</article-title>. <source>Nat. Rev. Genet.</source> <volume>8</volume>, <fpage>950</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>962</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nrg2199</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Fuchs</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Houben</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Brandes</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Schubert</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1996</year>). <article-title>Chromosome 'painting' in plants - a feasible technique</article-title>? <source>Chromosoma</source> <volume>104</volume>, <fpage>315</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>320</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/BF00337219</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Garcia</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kov&#x103;r&#xed;k</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Leitch</surname> <given-names>A. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Garnatje</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Cytogenetic features of rRNA genes across land plants: analysis of the plant rDNA database</article-title>. <source>Plant J.</source> <volume>89</volume>, <fpage>1020</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1030</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/tpj.13442</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Han</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tian</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fu</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xiao</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Han</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Comparative analysis of rDNA distribution in 29 species of <italic>Begonia</italic> sect. <italic>Coelocentrum</italic> Irmsch</article-title>. <source>Phytotaxa</source> <volume>381</volume>, <fpage>141</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>152</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.11646/phytotaxa.381.1.18</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Han</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Thammapichai</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Weng</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jiang</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Chromosome-specific painting in Cucumis species using bulked oligonucleotides</article-title>. <source>Genetics</source> <volume>200</volume>, <fpage>771</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>779</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1534/genetics.115.177642</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>He</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>He</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Guan</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Extraordinarily conserved chromosomal synteny of <italic>Citrus</italic> species revealed by chromosome-specific painting</article-title>. <source>Plant J.</source> <volume>103</volume>, <fpage>2225</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2235</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/tpj.14894</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Hu</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xiao</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tian</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Han</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2025</year>). <article-title>Cytological analysis reveals intraspecific genetic diversity of <italic>Begonia handelii</italic> (Begoniaceae, sect. <italic>Platycentrum</italic>)</article-title>. <source>Phytotaxa</source> <volume>698</volume>, <fpage>165</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>177</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.11646/phytotaxa.698.3.3</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Jiang</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Fluorescence in <italic>situ</italic> hybridization in plants: recent developments and future applications</article-title>. <source>Chromosome Res.</source> <volume>27</volume>, <fpage>153</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>165</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10577-019-09607-z</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yu</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>An efficient Oligo-FISH painting system for revealing chromosome rearrangements and polyploidization in Triticeae</article-title>. <source>Plant J.</source> <volume>105</volume>, <fpage>978</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>999</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/tpj.15081</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B18">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Manos</surname> <given-names>P. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Miller</surname> <given-names>R. E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wilkin</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2001</year>). <article-title>Phylogenetic analysis of <italic>Ipomoea, Argyreia, Stictocardia</italic>, and <italic>Turbina</italic> suggests a generalized model of morphological evolution in morning glories</article-title>. <source>Syst. Bot.</source> <volume>26</volume>, <fpage>585</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>602</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1043/0363-6445-26.3.585</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B19">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Meng</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zheng</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Shi</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xie</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2024</year>). <article-title>Whole-chromosome oligo-painting in licorice unveils interspecific chromosomal evolutionary relationships and possible origin of triploid genome species</article-title>. <source>Plant J.</source> <volume>120</volume>, <fpage>2089</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2100</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/tpj.17102</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B20">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Miller</surname> <given-names>R. E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Buckley</surname> <given-names>T. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Manos</surname> <given-names>P. S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2002</year>). <article-title>An examination of the monophyly of morning glory taxa using bayesian phylogenetic inference</article-title>. <source>Syst. Biol.</source> <volume>51</volume>, <fpage>740</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>753</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/10635150290102401</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B21">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Miller</surname> <given-names>R. E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rausher</surname> <given-names>M. D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Manos</surname> <given-names>P. S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1999</year>). <article-title>Phylogenetic systematics of <italic>Ipomoea</italic> (Convolvulaceae) based on ITS and Waxy sequences</article-title>. <source>Syst. Bot.</source> <volume>24</volume>, <fpage>209</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>227</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2307/2419549</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B22">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Muller</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Stanyon</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Finelli</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Archidiacono</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wienberg</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2000</year>). <article-title>Molecular cytogenetic dissection of human chromosomes 3 and 21 evolution</article-title>. <source>Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.</source> <volume>97</volume>, <fpage>206</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>211</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1073/pnas.97.1.206</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B23">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Mu&#xf1;oz-Rodr&#xed;guez</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Carruthers</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wood</surname> <given-names>J. R. I.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Williams</surname> <given-names>B. R. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Weitemier</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kronmiller</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>A taxonomic monograph of Ipomoea integrated across phylogenetic scales</article-title>. <source>Nat. Plants</source> <volume>5</volume>, <fpage>1136</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1144</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41477-019-0535-4</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B24">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Qu</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sun</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Han</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Karyotypic stability of <italic>Fragaria</italic> (strawberry) species revealed by cross-species chromosome painting</article-title>. <source>Chromosome Res.</source> <volume>29</volume>, <fpage>285</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>300</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10577-021-09666-1</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B25">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Roberty</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1952</year>). <article-title>Genera convolvulacearum</article-title>. <source>Candollea</source> <volume>14</volume>, <fpage>11</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>65</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B26">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Shi</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sun</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Song</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Chromosome painting reveals inter-chromosomal rearrangements and evolution of subgenome D of wheat</article-title>. <source>Plant J.</source> <volume>112</volume>, <fpage>55</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>67</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/tpj.15926</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B27">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Srisuwan</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sihachakr</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Siljak-Yakovlev</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2006</year>). <article-title>The origin and evolution of sweet potato (<italic>Ipomoea batatas</italic> Lam.) and its wild relatives through the cytogenetic approaches</article-title>. <source>Plant Sci.</source> <volume>171</volume>, <fpage>424</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>433</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.plantsci.2006.05.007</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B28">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Stefanovi&#x107;</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Austin</surname> <given-names>D. F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Olmstead</surname> <given-names>R. G.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2003</year>). <article-title>Classification of Convolvulaceae: a phylogenetic approach</article-title>. <source>Syst. Bot.</source> <volume>28</volume>, <fpage>791</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>806</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1043/02-45.1</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B29">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Stefanovi&#x107;</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Krueger</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Olmstead</surname> <given-names>R. G.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2002</year>). <article-title>Monophyly of the Convolvulaceae and circumscription of their major lineages based on DNA sequences of multiple chloroplast loci</article-title>. <source>Am. J. Bot.</source> <volume>89</volume>, <fpage>1510</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1522</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3732/ajb.89.9.1510</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B30">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Sun</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Su</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ma</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cao</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Chromosome painting reveals the genomic structure of three polyploid species of <italic>Ipomoea</italic>
</article-title>. <source>Genome</source> <volume>65</volume>, <fpage>331</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>339</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1139/gen-2021-0088</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B31">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Sun</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xu</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yan</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sun</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2024</year>). <article-title>Comparative karyotype analysis provides cytogenetic evidence for the origin of sweetpotato</article-title>. <source>Chromosome Res.</source> <volume>32</volume>, <fpage>14</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10577-024-09758-8</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B32">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Thomas</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Evelin</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yi</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Johannes</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1998</year>). <article-title>Chromosome painting: a useful art</article-title>. <source>Hum. Mol. Genet.</source> <volume>7</volume>, <fpage>1619</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1626</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/hmg/7.10.1619</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B33">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wilkin</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1999</year>). <article-title>A morphological cladistic analysis of the Ipomoeeae (Convolvulaceae)</article-title>. <source>Kew Bull.</source> <volume>54</volume>, <fpage>853</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>876</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2307/4111168</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B34">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wood</surname> <given-names>J. R. I.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mu&#xf1;oz-Rodr&#xed;guez</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Williams</surname> <given-names>B. R. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Scotland</surname> <given-names>R. W.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>A foundation monograph of <italic>Ipomoea</italic> (Convolvulaceae) in the New World</article-title>. <source>PhytoKeys</source> <volume>143</volume>, <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>823</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3897/phytokeys.143.32821</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B35">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lang</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Qu</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2024</year>). <article-title>Chromosomal localization and diversity analysis of 5S and 18S ribosomal DNA in 13 species from the genus <italic>Ipomoea</italic>
</article-title>. <source>Genes</source> <volume>15</volume>, <elocation-id>1340</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/genes15101340</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B36">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Xin</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xi</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>An extraordinarily stable karyotype of the woody <italic>Populus</italic> species revealed by chromosome painting</article-title>. <source>Plant J.</source> <volume>101</volume>, <fpage>253</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>264</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/tpj.14536</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B37">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Yu</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chai</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ding</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Huang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Chromosome-specifc painting unveils chromosomal fusions and distinct allopolyploid species in the <italic>Saccharum</italic> complex</article-title>. <source>New Phytol.</source> <volume>233</volume>, <fpage>1953</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1965</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/nph.17905</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B38">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Yucel</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Betekhtin</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cabi</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tuna</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hasterok</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kolano</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>The chromosome number and rDNA loci evolution in <italic>Onobrychis</italic> (Fabaceae)</article-title>. <source>Int. J. Mol. Sci.</source> <volume>23</volume>, <elocation-id>11033</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/ijms231911033</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B39">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Meng</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Qin</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cheng</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Reconstruction of ancestral karyotype illuminates chromosome evolution in the genus <italic>Cucumis</italic>
</article-title>. <source>Plant J.</source> <volume>107</volume>, <fpage>1243</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1259</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/tpj.15381</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>