<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.3 20070202//EN" "journalpublishing.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="2.3" xml:lang="EN">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Front. Plant Sci.</journal-id>
<journal-title>Frontiers in Plant Science</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">Front. Plant Sci.</abbrev-journal-title>
<issn pub-type="epub">1664-462X</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Frontiers Media S.A.</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpls.2025.1538799</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Plant Science</subject>
<subj-group>
<subject>Original Research</subject>
</subj-group>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Removing recalcitrance to the micropropagation of five farmer-preferred cassava varieties in C&#xf4;te d&#x2019;Ivoire by supplementing culture medium with kinetin or thidiazuron</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name>
<surname>Seka</surname>
<given-names>John Steven S.</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn001">
<sup>*</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2047161/overview"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/formal-analysis/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/investigation/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kouassi</surname>
<given-names>Modeste K.</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1644569/overview"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/conceptualization/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Y&#xe9;o</surname>
<given-names>Edwige F.</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3">
<sup>3</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/3018253/overview"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/investigation/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Saki</surname>
<given-names>Flavie M.</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/3018216/overview"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/investigation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/methodology/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/supervision/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Otron</surname>
<given-names>Daniel H.</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2022827/overview"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/investigation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/software/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name>
<surname>Tiendr&#xe9;b&#xe9;ogo</surname>
<given-names>Fid&#xe8;le</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn001">
<sup>*</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2240749/overview"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Eni</surname>
<given-names>Angela</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kouassi</surname>
<given-names>Nazaire K.</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2163610/overview"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Pita</surname>
<given-names>Justin S.</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1236913/overview"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/conceptualization/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/funding-acquisition/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
<institution>Unit&#xe9; de Formation et de Recherche Biosciences, Universit&#xe9; F&#xe9;lix Houphou&#xeb;t-Boigny (UFHB)</institution>, <addr-line>Abidjan</addr-line>, <country>C&#xf4;te d&#x2019;Ivoire</country>
</aff>
<aff id="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
<institution>The Central and West African Virus Epidemiology (WAVE) for Food Security Program, P&#xf4;le Scientifique et d&#x2019;Innovation, Universit&#xe9; F&#xe9;lix Houphou&#xeb;t-Boigny (UFHB)</institution>, <addr-line>Abidjan</addr-line>, <country>C&#xf4;te d&#x2019;Ivoire</country>
</aff>
<aff id="aff3">
<sup>3</sup>
<institution>Unit&#xe9; de Formation et de Recherche (UFR) d&#x2019;Ing&#xe9;nierie Agronomique foresti&#xe8;re et Environnementale, Universit&#xe9; de Man (UMAN)</institution>, <addr-line>Man</addr-line>, <country>C&#xf4;te d&#x2019;Ivoire</country>
</aff>
<author-notes>
<fn fn-type="edited-by">
<p>Edited by: Maida Romera-Branchat, Max Planck Institute for Plant Breeding Research, Germany</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="edited-by">
<p>Reviewed by: Taras P. Pasternak, Miguel Hern&#xe1;ndez University of Elche, Spain</p>
<p>Abhishek Sharma, Institute of Advanced Research (IAR), India</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="corresp" id="fn001">
<p>*Correspondence: Fid&#xe8;le Tiendr&#xe9;b&#xe9;ogo, <email xlink:href="mailto:fidele.tiendrebeogo@wave-center.org">fidele.tiendrebeogo@wave-center.org</email>; John Steven S. Seka, <email xlink:href="mailto:steveseka7@gmail.com">steveseka7@gmail.com</email>
</p>
</fn>
</author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>15</day>
<month>04</month>
<year>2025</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="collection">
<year>2025</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>16</volume>
<elocation-id>1538799</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>03</day>
<month>12</month>
<year>2024</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>18</day>
<month>03</month>
<year>2025</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#xa9; 2025 Seka, Kouassi, Y&#xe9;o, Saki, Otron, Tiendr&#xe9;b&#xe9;ogo, Eni, Kouassi and Pita</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2025</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Seka, Kouassi, Y&#xe9;o, Saki, Otron, Tiendr&#xe9;b&#xe9;ogo, Eni, Kouassi and Pita</copyright-holder>
<license xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">
<p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.</p>
</license>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<p>
<italic>In vitro</italic> micropropagation is a rapid method of multiplying healthy planting material to control Cassava mosaic disease (CMD), one of a major constraint to cassava production in Africa. However, some cassava varieties have a low propagation ratio under <italic>in vitro</italic> conditions. The main objective of this study was to improve the <italic>in vitro</italic> propagation rate of five difficult to grow, farmer-preferred cassava varieties using plant growth regulators. Microcuttings from <italic>in vitro</italic> plantlets of five recalcitrant cassava varieties (Agbabl&#xe9; 3, Ampong, Bay&#xe9;r&#xe8;, Bocou 5, Ol&#xe9;kanga) were evaluated for their capacity to rapidly regenerate plantlets. Time to root or leaf formation, number of nodes, number of roots, and the <italic>in vitro</italic> plantlet length were evaluated on nine culture media combinations. We found that among all the cassava varieties studied, the shortest times for leaf (4 to 7 days) or root (9 to 14 days) formation were recorded when the two types of MS media were supplemented with kinetin and thidiazuron as well as on the medium contain half-strength MS without these plant growth regulators. These two hormones evaluated were better for regeneration of leaves, nodes and elongation of <italic>in vitro</italic> plantlets with optimum concentration of 5 and 10 nM or thidiazuron, and 0.12 or 0.24 &#xb5;M for KIN. A survival rate between 85-91% was recorded under tunnel conditions and the plantlets appeared to be morphologically normal. The information obtained during this study will be useful for mass multiplication programs of elite cassava varieties.</p>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>
<italic>in vitro</italic> propagation</kwd>
<kwd>recalcitrant cassava varieties</kwd>
<kwd>thidiazuron</kwd>
<kwd>kinetin</kwd>
<kwd>virus-free plantlets</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<counts>
<fig-count count="6"/>
<table-count count="2"/>
<equation-count count="4"/>
<ref-count count="37"/>
<page-count count="11"/>
<word-count count="6760"/>
</counts>
<custom-meta-wrap>
<custom-meta>
<meta-name>section-in-acceptance</meta-name>
<meta-value>Plant Development and EvoDevo</meta-value>
</custom-meta>
</custom-meta-wrap>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec id="s1" sec-type="intro">
<label>1</label>
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>Cassava (<italic>Manihot esculenta</italic> Crantz) belong to <italic>Euphorbiaceae</italic> family, which genus <italic>Manihot</italic> includes over 200 species. The most important is <italic>M. esculenta</italic> which is the main carbohydrate source for more than 800 million people in the world and particularly in tropical regions in Africa, Asia and Latin America (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">Rosenthal and Ort, 2012</xref>). In C&#xf4;te d&#x2019;Ivoire, cassava is the second most important food crop after yam with an annual production of more than 6.3 million tons in 2022 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">FAOSTAT, 2022</xref>). However, cassava productivity is challenged by several biotic and abiotic constraints resulting in low yield. Among the biotic constraints, the most damaging is Cassava Mosaic Disease (CMD), which is responsible for yield losses between 50% and 70% (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Chikoti et&#xa0;al., 2019</xref>). The CMD is endemic in Africa and is caused by nine begomovirus species &#x201c;<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://ictv.global/report/chapter/geminiviridae/geminiviridae/begomovirus">https://ictv.global/report/chapter/geminiviridae/geminiviridae/begomovirus</ext-link> (accessed 27 November 2024)&#x201d;. The most effective way to control this disease is to use virus-free planting material.</p>
<p>Cassava is currently propagated vegetatively using cuttings, but the maximum cutting production of this conventional method is low at 1:10 rate (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">Vernier et&#xa0;al., 2018</xref>). Consequently, significant number of plants are required to obtain sufficient quantities of planting material. In addition to the low multiplication rate achieved with traditional vegetative propagation method, this method also promotes CMD propagation in the field (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">Kouakou et&#xa0;al., 2024</xref>).</p>
<p>The <italic>in vitro</italic> propagation technique makes it possible to sanitize several susceptible cassava varieties using thermotherapy combined with meristem culture. This is followed by mass multiplication of the disease-free material to make it available to farmers (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">Y&#xe9;o et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">Nakabonge et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">Zango et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>). The MS medium has therefore been used for the <italic>in vitro</italic> propagation of several plant species, with many advantages, particularly for species that are difficult to propagate vegetatively or by seed such as cassava. This mineral salts rich medium was developed by Murashige &amp; Skoog in 1962 as a result of their work on tobacco soft callus (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Murashige and Skoog, 1962</xref>). However, some varieties are difficult to grow on this common culture medium (MS), as they often require special growth factors or growth regulators and specific media compositions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Costa et&#xa0;al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Sesay et&#xa0;al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">Apio et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>).</p>
<p>
<italic>In vitro</italic> propagation is regulated by endogenous hormones. Auxin is the main hormone that induces lateral budding and rooting (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Pasternak and Steinmacher, 2024</xref>). The addition of exogenous hormones modulates the action of these endogenous hormones. However, the combined action of these hormones can be optimized by the addition of specific nutrients. Generally, exogenous plant growth regulators (PGRs) which include cytokinin such as 6-benzylaminopurine (BAP), kinetin (KIN) and thidiazuron (TDZ), and auxins such as &#x3b1;-naphthalene acetic acid (NAA) are combined with the MS medium to optimize cassava <italic>in vitro</italic> propagation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">Sessou et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Feyisa, 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Hamdeni et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>). The type and quantity of PGRs added to the growth media depend on several factors, the most important being the plant genotype; therefore, it is necessary to optimize the concentrations of these growth regulators given their essential role in morphogenesis (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Purohit et&#xa0;al., 2011</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Okello et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>).</p>
<p>The aim of this study is to develop an efficient <italic>in vitro</italic> mass propagation protocol for five <italic>in vitro</italic> difficult-to-grow cassava varieties to meet the needs of cassava farmers.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2" sec-type="materials|methods">
<label>2</label>
<title>Materials and methods</title>
<sec id="s2_1">
<label>2.1</label>
<title>Plant material preparation</title>
<p>
<italic>In vitro</italic> plantlets of five commonly cultivated cassava varieties (Agbabl&#xe9; 3, Ampong, Bay&#xe9;r&#xe8;, Bocou 5, Ol&#xe9;kanga) which have been previously sanitized by thermotherapy and meristem culture were selected for this study. To check for the virus-free status of the plantlets, the presence or absence of the target viruses was determined by PCR using specific primers. These two process were carried out as described by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">Y&#xe9;o et&#xa0;al. (2020)</xref>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_2">
<label>2.2</label>
<title>Media preparation and culture conditions</title>
<sec id="s2_2_1">
<label>2.2.1</label>
<title>Media to identify the best type and concentration of cytokinin</title>
<p>To identify the best type and concentration, two cytokinin, such as kinetin (KIN) and thidiazuron (TDZ) at different concentrations were added on the commonly used full-strength <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Murashige and Skoog (1962)</xref> and the results were subsequently evaluated (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">
<bold>Table&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>). Briefly, 0.12, 0.24 and 0.36 &#x3bc;M KIN (Sigma) or 5 and 10 nM of TDZ (Sigma) were added separately to the full-strength MS media (Duchefa). The control was full-strength MS medium supplemented with BAP (0.22 &#xb5;M) (Duchefa) according to the methods of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">Ng (1990)</xref> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">Mapayi et&#xa0;al. (2013)</xref>. These media were supplemented with 30 g/l sucrose (Sucaf), 100 mg/l myo-inositol (Duchefa), 0.05 &#xb5;M &#x3b1;-naphthalene acetic acid (NAA) (Duchefa), and 7 g/L agar (Duchefa) before being adjusted to pH 5.7 and sterilized at 121&#xb0;C for 20 minutes in 80 ml glass jars (8 cm diameter and 15 cm long).</p>
<table-wrap id="T1" position="float">
<label>Table&#xa0;1</label>
<caption>
<p>Formulation of the media evaluated for the cassava <italic>in vitro</italic> growing.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" rowspan="2" align="left">Media</th>
<th valign="middle" rowspan="2" align="left">MS medium concentration</th>
<th valign="middle" colspan="4" align="center">Plant Growth Regulators</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" align="left">NAA (&#xb5;M)</th>
<th valign="middle" align="left">BAP (&#xb5;M)</th>
<th valign="middle" align="left">KIN (&#xb5;M)</th>
<th valign="middle" align="left">TDZ (nM)</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">M1 (control)</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">full-strength MS</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">0.05</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">0.22</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">&#x2013;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">M2</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">full-strength MS</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.05</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">5</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">M3</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">full-strength MS</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.05</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">10</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">M4</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">full-strength MS</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.05</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">0.12</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">&#x2013;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">M5</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">full-strength MS</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.05</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">0.24</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">&#x2013;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">M6</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">full-strength MS</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.05</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">0.36</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">&#x2013;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">M7</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">half-strength MS</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.05</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">0.22</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">&#x2013;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">M8</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">half-strength MS</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.05</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">0.24</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">&#x2013;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">M9</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">half-strength MS</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.05</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">10</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn>
<p>MS, Murashige &amp; Skoog medium; NAA, &#x3b1;-naphthalene acetic acid; BAP, 6-benzylaminopurine;</p>
</fn>
<fn>
<p>KIN, Kinetin; TDZ, Thidiazuron.</p>
</fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_2_2">
<label>2.2.2</label>
<title>Media to determine the best MS basal salt concentration</title>
<p>In order to develop a cost-effective protocol, two media with full-strength MS (MS) in one hand and half-strength MS (1/2 MS) in other hand were compared (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">
<bold>Table&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>). To obtain the half-strength MS, the quantities of macroelements, microelements and vitamins in the full-strength MS medium were reduced by half. Both media were supplemented with BAP (0.22 &#xb5;M) (Duchefa) and 0.05 &#xb5;M &#x3b1;-naphthalene acetic acid (NAA) (Duchefa) according to the methods of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">Ng (1990)</xref> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">Mapayi et&#xa0;al. (2013)</xref>. These media were supplemented with 30 g/l sucrose (Sucaf), 100 mg/l myo-inositol (Duchefa) and 7 g/L agar (Duchefa) before being adjusted to pH 5.7 and sterilized at 121&#xb0;C for 20 minutes in 80 ml glass jars (8 cm diameter and 15 cm long).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_2_3">
<label>2.2.3</label>
<title>Media for the effect of the cytokinin concentrations on medium with the best strength of MS basal salt</title>
<p>To establish an efficient protocol, the best medium with the MS basal salt was tested with the best concentration of KIN on one side and the best concentration of TDZ on the other side (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">
<bold>Table&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>). These media were compared with the basal medium supplemented with 0.22 &#xb5;M of 6-benzylaminopurine (BAP) (Duchefa) according to the methods of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">Ng (1990)</xref> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">Mapayi et&#xa0;al. (2013)</xref>. These media used were supplemented with 30 g/l sucrose (Sucaf), 100 mg/l myo-inositol (Duchefa), 0.05 &#xb5;M &#x3b1;-naphthalene acetic acid (NAA) (Duchefa), and 7 g/L agar (Duchefa) before being adjusted to pH 5.7 and sterilized at 121&#xb0;C for 20 minutes in 80 ml glass jars (8 cm diameter and 15 cm long).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_3">
<label>2.3</label>
<title>Explants cultivation, growth room conditions and data collection</title>
<p>Some micro-cuttings with one node were taken from the three-month-old <italic>in vitro</italic> plantlets of the five cassava varieties. Five micro-cuttings of each variety were transplanted into a glass jar and the experiments were repeated six times. The culture was maintained in a growth room with a relative humidity of 85% and a temperature of 25&#xb0;C &#xb1; 2&#xb0;C. A photoperiod of 16 hours of light and 8 hours of dark was applied in the growth room using light-emitting diode (LED) lamps. For each explant, the time to rooting (rhizogenesis) and leaf formation (phyllogenesis) was assessed by counting the number of days from start of cultivation until the first root or leaf emerged. The average time (T) per jar was then calculated using <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="eq1">Formula 1</xref>. This helped to determine which factors promoted the <italic>in vitro</italic> regeneration of the explant. In addition, the number of nodes, roots and the length of plantlets were also evaluated eight weeks after transplanting to determine which media formulation resulted in the most efficient organogenesis for each variety. The mean values of these parameters were calculated using <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="eq2">Formulas 2</xref>-<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="eq4">4</xref>.</p>
<disp-formula id="eq1">
<label>(1)</label>
<mml:math display="block" id="M1">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>T</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x2211;</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>m</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>e</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#xa0;</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>f</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>r</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>o</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>m</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#xa0;</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>r</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>a</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>n</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>s</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>p</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>l</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>a</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>n</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>n</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>g</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#xa0;</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>u</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>n</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>l</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#xa0;</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>h</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>e</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#xa0;</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>e</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>m</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>e</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>r</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>g</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>e</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>n</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>c</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>e</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#xa0;</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>o</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>f</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#xa0;</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>f</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>r</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>s</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#xa0;</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>l</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>e</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>a</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>v</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>e</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>s</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#xa0;</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>o</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>r</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#xa0;</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>r</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>o</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>o</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>s</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>T</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>o</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>a</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>l</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#xa0;</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>n</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>u</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>m</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>b</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>e</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>r</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#xa0;</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>o</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>f</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#xa0;</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>e</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>x</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>p</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>l</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>a</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>n</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>s</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfrac>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</disp-formula>
<disp-formula id="eq2">
<label>(2)</label>
<mml:math display="block" id="M2">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>M</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>e</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>a</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>n</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#xa0;</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>n</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>u</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>m</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>b</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>e</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>r</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#xa0;</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>o</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>f</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#xa0;</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>l</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>e</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>a</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>v</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>e</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>s</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x2211;</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>n</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>u</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>m</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>b</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>e</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>r</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#xa0;</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>o</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>f</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#xa0;</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>l</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>e</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>a</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>v</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>e</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>s</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>T</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>o</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>a</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>l</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#xa0;</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>n</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>u</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>m</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>b</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>e</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>r</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#xa0;</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>o</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>f</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#xa0;</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>e</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>x</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>p</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>l</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>a</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>n</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>s</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfrac>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</disp-formula>
<disp-formula id="eq3">
<label>(3)</label>
<mml:math display="block" id="M3">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>M</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>e</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>a</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>n</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#xa0;</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>n</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>u</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>m</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>b</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>e</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>r</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#xa0;</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>o</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>f</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#xa0;</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>r</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>o</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>o</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>s</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x2211;</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>n</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>u</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>m</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>b</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>e</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>r</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#xa0;</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>o</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>f</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#xa0;</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>r</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>o</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>o</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>s</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>T</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>o</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>a</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>l</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#xa0;</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>n</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>u</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>m</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>b</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>e</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>r</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#xa0;</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>o</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>f</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#xa0;</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>e</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>x</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>p</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>l</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>a</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>n</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>s</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfrac>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</disp-formula>
<disp-formula id="eq4">
<label>(4)</label>
<mml:math display="block" id="M4">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>M</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>e</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>a</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>n</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#xa0;</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>o</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>f</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#xa0;</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>n</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#xa0;</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>v</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>r</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>o</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#xa0;</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>p</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>l</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>a</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>n</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>l</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>e</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#xa0;</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>l</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>e</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>n</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>g</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>h</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x2211;</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>l</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>e</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>n</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>g</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>h</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#xa0;</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>o</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>f</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#xa0;</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>p</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>l</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>a</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>n</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>l</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>e</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>T</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>o</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>a</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>l</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#xa0;</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>n</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>u</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>m</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>b</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>e</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>r</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#xa0;</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>o</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>f</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#xa0;</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>e</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>x</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>p</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>l</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>a</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>n</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>s</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfrac>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</disp-formula>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_4">
<label>2.4</label>
<title>Acclimatization of <italic>in vitro</italic> plantlets</title>
<p>Regenerated <italic>in vitro</italic> plantlets with at least one well-developed root were carefully removed from the culture vessel, washed with water to remove the agar gel, and then transferred to plastic pots containing a substrate composed of soil and <italic>Cocos nucifera</italic> (L.) peat in a 2:1 ratio. Acclimatization was carried out in a tunnel with a relative humidity of 90% and a temperature between 30 and 40&#xb0;C. After two weeks, the tunnels were opened to reduce the humidity and the plants were sprayed with water three times per week. Plant survival rate was recorded after four weeks and for up to eight weeks, after which surviving plantlets were removed from the tunnel.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_5">
<label>2.5</label>
<title>Statistical analyses</title>
<p>A randomized design was used with at least six biological replicates per factor and each biological replicate was a glass-jar containing five explants from five different varieties. A total of 1350 explants were examined in our experiment (270 explants per variety). To determine the most appropriate statistical approach, the assumptions for performing parametric statistics were tested as follows; independence of observations was assessed using the Durbin-Watson test; normality was assessed using the Shapiro-Wilk test and homogeneity of variance was tested using Barlett&#x2019;s test. When these assumptions were not met, non-parametric alternatives were used. In order to develop optimized protocol for each cassava variety, the effect of each MS concentration and plant growth regulators was evaluated on growth parameters using either the Kruskal-Wallis&#x2019;s test or the Wilcoxson paired test. All tests were evaluated at the 5% level to determine statistical significance. Principal component analysis (PCA) and ascendant hierarchical clustering (AHC) were performed on all data to identify the most suitable media for each variety tested in the different experiments. All analyses were performed using R 4.3.1 software (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">Ihaka and Gentleman, 1996</xref>).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s3" sec-type="results">
<label>3</label>
<title>Results</title>
<sec id="s3_1">
<label>3.1</label>
<title>Effect of type and concentration of cytokinin</title>
<sec id="s3_1_1">
<label>3.1.1</label>
<title>Effect of kinetin on <italic>in vitro</italic> cassava growth</title>
<p>All the parameters evaluated differed significantly (p &lt; 0.05) with the concentration of KIN in the full-strength MS. Kinetin at 0.12 &#xb5;M (M4 medium) or 0.24 &#xb5;M (M5 medium) reduced the time from transplanting to leaf emergence in three varieties, including Agbabl&#xe9; 3 (6-7 days on M4, M5 instead of 8-9 days on the control M1), Bocou 5 (8-9 days on M4, M5 instead of 11-12 days on M1) and Ol&#xe9;kanga (5-6 days on M4 and 6-7 days on M5 instead of 8-9 days on M1). M4 and M5 significantly shortened this time for the Ampong variety (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;1A</bold>
</xref>).</p>
<fig id="f1" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;1</label>
<caption>
<p>Effect of kinetin on <italic>in vitro</italic> organogenesis of the cassava varieties. The five cassava varieties were evaluated to determine the effect of kinetin on time from transplanting to leaves <bold>(A)</bold> and roots formation <bold>(B)</bold>, number of nodes <bold>(C)</bold>, number of roots <bold>(D)</bold> and <italic>in vitro</italic> plantlets length <bold>(E)</bold>. Data are means &#xb1; SE. The bars represent the standard error. Bars sharing the same letters are not significantly different between media for each cassava varieties (N = 30) according to non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis and pairwise Wilcoxon tests (p&lt;0.05). M1: full-strength MS + 0.05 &#xb5;M NAA + 0.22 &#xb5;M BAP (control); M4: full-strength MS + 0.05 &#xb5;M NAA + 0.12 &#xb5;M KIN; M5: full-strength MS + 0.05 &#xb5;M NAA + 0.24 &#xb5;M KIN; M6: full-strength MS + 0.05 &#xb5;M NAA + 0.36 &#xb5;M KIN.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-16-1538799-g001.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>The following media induced the shortest time from transplanting to rooting for all varieties: Agbabl&#xe9; 3 (9-11 days on M4, M5 instead of 17-18 days on M1), Ampong (12-15 days on M4 instead of 25-26 days on M1), Bay&#xe9;r&#xe8; (16-19 days on M4 and M6 instead of 39-40 days on M1), Bocou 5 (14-15 days on M4 and M6 instead of 29-30 days on M1) and Ol&#xe9;kanga (11-15 days on M4, M5 instead of 30-31 days on M1) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;1B</bold>
</xref>). All the media tested induced more roots than the control medium (M1). The highest number of roots for Agbabl&#xe9; 3 was 17 (M5), for Ampong was 19.2 (M4), for Bay&#xe9;r&#xe8; was 11 (M4), for Bocou 5 was 16.6 (M5) and for Ol&#xe9;kanga was 15.7 (M5) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;1C</bold>
</xref>).</p>
<p>With regard to the number of nodes produced, similar results were observed for all media except one (M6: 0.36 &#xb5;M KIN). In Ampong and Bocou 5, medium M4 induced a greater number of nodes than the other media, while the highest number of nodes was observed on both medium M5 and the control medium (M1) for Bay&#xe9;r&#xe8;. Ol&#xe9;kanga plantlets produced the highest number of nodes on the medium supplemented with 0.24 &#x3bc;M KIN (M5) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;1D</bold>
</xref>).</p>
<p>For <italic>in vitro</italic> plantlet length, both M4 (0.12 &#xb5;M KIN) and M5 (0.24 &#xb5;M KIN) gave similar means for Agbabl&#xe9; 3 (M5: 8.84 &#xb1; 0.5 cm and M4: 8.11 &#xb1; 1.02 cm) and Bocou 5 (M5: 6.68 &#xb1; 0.82 cm and M4: 5.68 &#xb1; 0.89 cm). M4 (0.12 &#xb5;M KIN) gave the best results with Ampong (6.53 &#xb1; 0.77 cm) and Bay&#xe9;r&#xe8; (5.46 &#xb1; 0.64 cm) plantlets, while M5 gave the highest mean plantlet length for Ol&#xe9;kanga (7.68 &#xb1; 0.85 cm) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;1E</bold>
</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_1_2">
<label>3.1.2</label>
<title>Effect of thidiazuron on <italic>in vitro</italic> cassava growth</title>
<p>The addition of thidiazuron at different concentrations to the full-strength MS medium significantly affected the growth and the rooting of <italic>in vitro</italic> plantlets (p &lt; 0.05). For Agbabl&#xe9; 3, TDZ at 5 nM (M2) and 10 nM (M3) reduced the time from transplanting to leaf production (6-7 days instead of 8-9 days in the control). Similar results were also observed for Ampong on M3 (7-8 days compared to 10-11 days in the control). In Bay&#xe9;r&#xe8; and Bocou 5, the control medium without TDZ (M1) required less time from transplanting to leaf production (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;2A</bold>
</xref>).</p>
<fig id="f2" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;2</label>
<caption>
<p>Effect of thidiazuron on <italic>in vitro</italic> organogenesis of the cassava varieties. The five cassava varieties were evaluated to determine the effect of thidiazuron (TDZ) on time from transplanting to leaves <bold>(A)</bold> and roots formation <bold>(B)</bold>, number of nodes <bold>(C)</bold>, number of roots <bold>(D)</bold> and <italic>in vitro</italic> plantlets length <bold>(E)</bold>. Data are means &#xb1; SE. The bars represent the standard error. Bars sharing the same letters are not significantly different between media for each cassava varieties (N = 30) according to non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis and pairwise Wilcoxon tests (p&lt;0.05). M1: full-strength MS + 0.05 &#xb5;M NAA + 0.22 &#xb5;M BAP (control); M2: full-strength MS + 0.05 &#xb5;M NAA + 5 nM TDZ; M3: full-strength MS + 0.05 &#xb5;M NAA + 10 nM TDZ.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-16-1538799-g002.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>The time from transplanting to rooting was reduced on TDZ supplemented media for all varieties. Explants of Agbabl&#xe9; 3, Ampong, Bay&#xe9;r&#xe8;, Bocou 5 and Ol&#xe9;kanga developed roots on M2 and M3 but not on the control (M1). It was 9-11 days instead of 17-18 days for Agbabl&#xe9; 3; 15-18 days compared to 25-26 days in the control for Ampong; 17-23 days instead of 30-31 days for Bay&#xe9;r&#xe8;; 15-17 days instead of 30-31 days for Bocou 5 and 18-25 days instead of 30-31 days for Ol&#xe9;kanga explants (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;2B</bold>
</xref>). Compared to the control (M1), M3 increased the number of roots for all varieties. The highest mean root numbers were 19.2, 16.2, 11.0, 16.8 and 15.0 for Agbabl&#xe9; 3, Ampong, Bay&#xe9;r&#xe8;, Bocou 5 and Ol&#xe9;kanga, respectively (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;2C</bold>
</xref>).</p>
<p>The highest number of nodes was observed for Agbabl&#xe9; 3 (9.4 &#xb1; 0.41) only on M3. The node mean was high on M3 and control respectively for Ampong (8.2 and 7.5), Bocou 5 (8.4 and 8.77) and Ol&#xe9;kanga (7.4 and 8.13). (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;2D</bold>
</xref>).</p>
<p>The best <italic>in vitro</italic> plantlet length was observed on M3 for Bocou 5 (8.22 &#xb1; 0.63 cm), Ampong (3.72 &#xb1; 0.55 cm) and Ol&#xe9;kanga (3.42 &#xb1; 0.49 cm) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;2E</bold>
</xref>).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_2">
<label>3.2</label>
<title>Effect of MS basal salt concentration</title>
<p>All the parameters (time from transplanting to leaf or root formation, number of nodes, number of roots and the <italic>in vitro</italic> plantlet length) were significantly influenced (p &lt; 0.05) by the different concentrations of MS basal salt used in this trial.</p>
<p>The medium contains half-strength MS (M7) was more effective in reducing the time from transplanting to leaf formation in four varieties (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;3A</bold>
</xref>), namely Agbabl&#xe9; 3 (6.3 &#xb1; 0.33 days instead of 8.73 &#xb1; 0.35), Ampong (7.1 &#xb1; 0.35 days instead of 10.07 &#xb1; 0.27), Bocou 5 (6.9 &#xb1; 0.44 days instead of 11.6 &#xb1; 0.51) and Ol&#xe9;kanga (4.63 &#xb1; 0.33 instead of 8.83 &#xb1; 0.33).</p>
<fig id="f3" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;3</label>
<caption>
<p>Effect of MS concentration on <italic>in vitro</italic> organogenesis of the cassava varieties. The five cassava varieties were evaluated to determine the effect of MS concentration on time from transplanting to leaves <bold>(A)</bold> and roots formation <bold>(B)</bold>, number of nodes <bold>(C)</bold>, number of roots <bold>(D)</bold> and <italic>in vitro</italic> plantlets length <bold>(E)</bold>. Data are means &#xb1; SE. The bars represent the standard error. Bars sharing the same letters are not significantly different between media for each cassava varieties (N = 30) according to non-parametric pairwise Wilcoxon tests (p&lt;0.05). M1: full-strength MS + 0.05 &#xb5;M NAA + 0.22 &#xb5;M BAP (control); M7: half-strength MS + 0.05 &#xb5;M NAA + 0.22 &#xb5;M BAP.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-16-1538799-g003.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>The time from transplanting to rooting was also reduced by half-strength MS (M7) using in Ampong (21.3 &#xb1; 1.07 instead of 25.6 &#xb1; 0.92 days) and Bay&#xe9;r&#xe8; (17.7 &#xb1; 1.12 instead of 39.1 &#xb1; 0.91) varieties. Nevertheless, the half-strength MS (M7) gave the same result as the full-strength MS (M1) for the other varieties (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;3B</bold>
</xref>). For the number of roots, half-strength MS (M7) had induced a high mean as medium with full-strength MS (M1) for Bay&#xe9;r&#xe8; and Ol&#xe9;kanga; while, the highest number of roots on full-strength MS was observed for Agbabl&#xe9; 3 (13.27 &#xb1; 1.38 instead of 5.2 &#xb1; 0.89), Ampong (9.07 &#xb1; 1.14 instead of 6 &#xb1; 0.68) and Bocou 5 (8.17 &#xb1; 0.86 instead of 2.8 &#xb1; 0.44) varieties (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;3C</bold>
</xref>).</p>
<p>On the other hand, full-strength MS (M1) induced the highest number of nodes in Ampong (7.5 &#xb1; 0.41 instead of 5.6 &#xb1; 0.57), Bay&#xe9;r&#xe8; (8.53 &#xb1; 0.31 instead of 6.4 &#xb1; 0.52) and Bocou 5 (8.77 &#xb1; 0.6 instead of 4.4 &#xb1; 0.4). No significant difference was observed between the two media (M1 versus M7) for plantlets from Agbabl&#xe9; 3 and Ol&#xe9;kanga (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;3D</bold>
</xref>).</p>
<p>The highest <italic>in vitro</italic> plantlet length was again obtained for the varieties Agbabl&#xe9; 3 (7.04 &#xb1; 0.88 cm instead of 4.86 &#xb1; 0.81 cm), Ampong (3.4 &#xb1; 0.3 cm instead of 2.02 &#xb1; 0.18 cm) and Bocou 5 (2.38 &#xb1; 0.22 cm instead of 1.06 &#xb1; 0.1 cm) varieties on full-strength MS (M1) and no significant difference was observed between M1 and M7 with plantlets from Bay&#xe9;r&#xe8; and Ol&#xe9;kanga (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;3E</bold>
</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_3">
<label>3.3</label>
<title>Effect of the best strength of MS basal salt supplemented with the best cytokinin concentrations</title>
<p>From our previous results, the best strength of MS basal salt was the half-strength (M7)for reducing the time from transplanting to leaf or roots formation, while the best cytokinin concentrations were 0.24 &#xb5;M KIN or 10 nM TDZ to improve organogenesis. The addition of each cytokinin concentration to half-strength MS had a significant effect (p &lt; 0.05) on all the parameters measured. Agbabl&#xe9; 3 <italic>in vitro</italic> plantlets produced their leaves faster (between 6 and 7 days) on M8 (0.24 &#xb5;M KIN) than on M7 medium supplemented with 0.22 &#xb5;M of BAP (control). In Ampong, M9 (10 nM TDZ) and M7 media induced faster leaf formation. In contrast, only M7 media promoted short-term phyllogenesis with Bay&#xe9;r&#xe8; (8-9 days), Bocou 5 (7-8 days) and Ol&#xe9;kanga (4-5 days) explants (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f4">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;4A</bold>
</xref>).</p>
<fig id="f4" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;4</label>
<caption>
<p>Effect of best kinetin and TDZ concentration supplemented on half-strength MS on <italic>in vitro</italic> organogenesis of the cassava varieties. The five cassava varieties were evaluated to determine the effect of best kinetin and TDZ concentration supplemented on half-strength MS on time from transplanting to leaves <bold>(A)</bold> and roots formation <bold>(B)</bold>, number of nodes <bold>(C)</bold>, number of roots <bold>(D)</bold> and <italic>in vitro</italic> plantlets length <bold>(E)</bold>. Data are means &#xb1; SE. The bars represent the standard error. Bars sharing the same letters are not significantly different between media for each cassava varieties (N = 30) according to non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis and pairwise Wilcoxon tests (p&lt;0.05). M7: half-strength MS + 0.05 &#xb5;M NAA + 0.22 &#xb5;M BAP; M8: half-strength MS + 0.05 &#xb5;M NAA + 0.24 &#xb5;M KIN; M9: half-strength MS + 0.05 &#xb5;M NAA + 10 nM TDZ.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-16-1538799-g004.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>For all varieties except Bay&#xe9;r&#xe8;, media containing KIN at 0.24 &#x3bc;M (M8) and TDZ at 10 nM (M9) significantly reduced the time from transplantation to root formation. In general, M8 and M9, in contrast to M7, were observed to induce roots in a short time (12-15 days) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f4">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;4B</bold>
</xref>). These media (M8 and M9) also, induced the highest number of roots for four varieties (Agbabl&#xe9; 3, Ampong, Bay&#xe9;r&#xe8; and Ol&#xe9;kanga) with the best in Bay&#xe9;r&#xe8; on M8 (15 &#xb1; 0.77) compared to M7 (control). In Bocou 5, only M8 promoted the highest number of roots (12 &#xb1; 0.6) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f4">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;4C</bold>
</xref>).</p>
<p>When 0.24 &#x3bc;M KIN was added on half-strength MS (M8), it induced the highest number of nodes for Agbabl&#xe9; 3 (10.4 &#xb1; 0.36) followed by Bay&#xe9;r&#xe8; (8.4 &#xb1; 0.4) and Bocou 5 (5.6 &#xb1; 0.63). The control medium (M7) induced the highest number of nodes (15 &#xb1; 0.6) for Ol&#xe9;kanga plantlets (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f4">
<bold>Figures&#xa0;4D</bold>
</xref>).</p>
<p>The highest <italic>in vitro</italic> plantlet length was observed on medium M8 for the varieties Agbabl&#xe9; 3 (8.95 &#xb1; 0.75 cm), Ampong (4.56 &#xb1; 1 cm), Bay&#xe9;r&#xe8; (5.6 &#xb1; 0.38 cm) and Bocou 5 (2.74 &#xb1; 0.46 cm) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f4">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;4E</bold>
</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_4">
<label>3.4</label>
<title>Identification of optimal media by principal component analysis (PCA) and ascendant hierarchical clustering</title>
<p>The results of multivariate data analysis methods showed that media supplemented with some KIN and TDZ were the best media for all varieties (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f5">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;5</bold>
</xref>). From the Principal Component Analysis (PCA), all the parameters evaluated were significant to describe the diversity of the media effect on the cassava varieties (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f5">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;5A</bold>
</xref>). The first two axes with eigenvalues greater than 1 were retained in the analysis and explained 84.46% of the total variability observed. According to their contribution and the Ascending Hierarchical Classification (AHC), three groups were identified among the 45 treatments in all experiences.</p>
<fig id="f5" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;5</label>
<caption>
<p>Distribution in plan formed by the axes 1 x 2. <bold>(A)</bold> significant variables (parameters) revealed by the correlation circle; <bold>(B)</bold> dendrogram of variety assigned to a medium which show the three groups; G: Group; AGB: Agbabl&#xe9; 3, AMP: Ampong, BAY: Bay&#xe9;r&#xe8;, BOC: Bocou 5, OLE: Ol&#xe9;kanga; M1: full-strength MS + 0.05 &#xb5;M NAA + 0.22 &#xb5;M BAP (control); M2: full-strength MS + 0.05 &#xb5;M NAA + 5 nM TDZ; M3: full-strength MS + 0.05 &#xb5;M NAA + 10 nM TDZ; M4: full-strength MS + 0.05 &#xb5;M NAA + 0.12 &#xb5;M KIN; M5: full-strength MS + 0.05 &#xb5;M NAA + 0.24 &#xb5;M KIN; M6: full-strength MS + 0.05 &#xb5;M NAA + 0.36 &#xb5;M KIN; M7: half-strength MS + 0.05 &#xb5;M NAA + 0.22 &#xb5;M BAP; M8: half-strength MS + 0.05 &#xb5;M NAA + 0.24 &#xb5;M KIN; M9: half-strength MS + 0.05 &#xb5;M NAA + 10 nM TDZ. TR: Time spent from transplanting to roots production; TL: Time spent from transplanting to leaf production; NN: Number of nodes; NR: Number of roots; PL: Plantlets length; cos2: show the quality of representation.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-16-1538799-g005.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>The group I is mainly characterized by the media that induced the highest mean values of growth parameters (number of nodes: 9.2 &#xb1; 0.39; number of roots: 16.37 &#xb1; 0.56 and plantlet length: 7.27 &#xb1; 0.32 cm), except for the time from transplanting to leaf and root production for the varieties. The time from transplanting to the formation of leaves (8 days) and roots (13 days) formation was low for these media (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">
<bold>Table&#xa0;2</bold>
</xref>). This group includes 12 treatments, mainly AGBM2: Agbabl&#xe9; 3 on full-strength MS + 0.05 &#xb5;M NAA + 5 nM TDZ, AGBM3: Agbabl&#xe9; 3 on full-strength MS + 0.05 &#xb5;M NAA + 10 nM TDZ, AGBM4: Agbabl&#xe9; 3 on full-strength MS + 0.05 &#xb5;M NAA + 0.12 &#xb5;M KIN, AGBM5: Agbabl&#xe9; 3 on full-strength MS + 0.05 &#xb5;M NAA + 0.24 &#xb5;M KIN, AGBM8: Agbabl&#xe9; 3 on half-strength MS + 0.05 &#xb5;M NAA + 0.24 &#xb5;M KIN, AMPM4: Ampong on full-strength MS + 0.05 &#xb5;M NAA + 0.12 &#xb5;M KIN, BOCM4: Bocou 5 on full-strength MS + 0.05 &#xb5;M NAA + 0.12 &#xb5;M KIN, BOCM5: Bocou 5 on full-strength MS + 0.05 &#xb5;M NAA + 0.24 &#xb5;M KIN and OLEM5: Ol&#xe9;kanga on full-MS + 0.05 &#xb5;M NAA + 0.24 &#xb5;M KIN) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f5">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;5B</bold>
</xref>).</p>
<table-wrap id="T2" position="float">
<label>Table&#xa0;2</label>
<caption>
<p>Variation of the means of clusters obtained by the AHC using the five parameters.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="bottom" align="left"/>
<th valign="bottom" colspan="5" align="center">Growth parameters</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" align="left">Cluster</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Time from transplanting to roots formation (days)</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Time from transplanting to leaves formation (days)</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Number of nodes</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Number of roots</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">
<italic>In vitro</italic> plantlets length (cm)</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">
<bold>Group 1 (N=12)</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">13.2 &#xb1; 0.86c</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">8.4 &#xb1; 0.77b</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">9.2 &#xb1; 0.39a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">16.37 &#xb1; 0.56a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">7.27 &#xb1; 0.32a</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">
<bold>Group 2 (N=8)</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">26.86 &#xb1; 2.53a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">7.63 &#xb1; 0.72b</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">8.08 &#xb1; 1.13ab</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">5.38 &#xb1; 0.56c</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">3.29 &#xb1; 0.53b</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">
<bold>Group 3 (N=25)</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">18.11 &#xb1; 0.81b</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">10.56 &#xb1; 0.5a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">6.22 &#xb1; 0.32b</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">11.95 &#xb1; 0.46b</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">3.07 &#xb1; 0.22b</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">
<bold>p-value</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>&lt; 0.0001</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>0.0062</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>&lt; 0.0001</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>&lt; 0.0001</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>&lt; 0.0001</bold>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn>
<p>Comparisons were performed by Tukey tests (LSD); for each parameter per row, the values (mean &#xb1; standard error) with different letters are significantly different (p &lt; 0.05).</p>
<p>Bold values represent significant statistical values.</p>
</fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<p>Group II includes treatments that regenerate small <italic>in vitro</italic> plantlets (3.07 &#xb1; 0.22 cm), with a small number of roots (5.38 &#xb1; 0.56) and less time to develop leaves (8 days) but more time (27 days) to develop roots (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">
<bold>Table&#xa0;2</bold>
</xref>). There are AGBM7: Agbabl&#xe9; 3 on half-strength MS + 0.05 &#xb5;M NAA + 0.22 &#xb5;M BAP, BAYM1: Bay&#xe9;r&#xe8; on full-strength MS + 0.05 &#xb5;M NAA + 0.22 &#xb5;M BAP (control), BAYM7: Bay&#xe9;r&#xe8; on half-strength MS + 0.05 &#xb5;M NAA + 0.22 &#xb5;M BAP, BOCM1: Bocou 5 on full-strength MS + 0.05 &#xb5;M NAA + 0.22 &#xb5;M BAP (control), BOCM7: Bocou 5 on half-strength MS + 0.05 &#xb5;M NAA + 0.22 &#xb5;M BAP, OLEM1: Ol&#xe9;kanga on full-strength MS + 0.05 &#xb5;M NAA + 0.22 &#xb5;M BAP (control) and OLEM7: Ol&#xe9;kanga on half-strength MS + 0.05 &#xb5;M NAA + 0.22 &#xb5;M BAP (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f5">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;5B</bold>
</xref>).</p>
<p>Group III consists of 25 treatments. The media of this group promoted shorter length (3.07 &#xb1; 0.22 cm) with small nodes (6.22 &#xb1; 0.32) and more time (11 days) to induce leaves in the cassava varieties (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">
<bold>Table&#xa0;2</bold>
</xref>). It is characterized by AGBM9: Agbabl&#xe9; 3 on full-strength MS + 0.05 &#xb5;M NAA + 0.36 &#xb5;M KIN, AMPM8: Ampong on half-strength MS + 0.05 &#xb5;M NAA + 0.24 &#xb5;M KIN, BOCM1: Bocou 5 on full-strength MS + 0.05 &#xb5;M NAA + 0.22 &#xb5;M BAP (control), BOCM2: Bocou 5 on full-strength MS + 0.05 &#xb5;M NAA + 5 nM TDZ, BOCM6: Bocou 5 on full-strength MS + 0.05 &#xb5;M NAA + 0.36 &#xb5;M KIN, BOCM8: Bocou 5 on half-strength MS + 0.05 &#xb5;M NAA + 0.24 &#xb5;M KIN (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f5">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;5B</bold>
</xref>
<bold>).</bold>
</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_5">
<label>3.5</label>
<title>
<italic>In vitro</italic> plantlets acclimatization</title>
<p>Weaned plantlets showed good vegetative growth and no malformations (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f6">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;6</bold>
</xref>). In fact, the survival rate of the weaned plants ranged from 85% to 91%. However, no significant differences were observed between all survival rates. The <italic>in vitro</italic> plantlets successfully adapted to <italic>ex vitro</italic> condition without any issues.</p>
<fig id="f6" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;6</label>
<caption>
<p>Acclimatization process of cassava varieties. <italic>In vitro</italic> plantlets obtained after six weeks <bold>(A)</bold> in the lab and hardened in the tunnel after eight weeks <bold>(B)</bold>.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-16-1538799-g006.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s4" sec-type="discussion">
<label>4</label>
<title>Discussion</title>
<p>To improve micropropagation, exogenous plant growth regulators (PGRs) have been introduced into the MS media to promote rapid organogenesis. The most commonly used in organogenesis are cytokinins and especially Benzylaminopurine (BAP) for cassava and often kinetin (KIN) or thidiazuron (TDZ) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">Shiji et&#xa0;al., 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">Sessou et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Gal&#xe1;n-&#xc1;vila et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">Berhanu and Feyissa, 2020</xref>). In our experience, the responses of the explants of the five cassava varieties to the different MS medium concentrations were influenced by these three PGRs (BAP, KIN, TDZ). Significant differences were observed in the times from transplanting to leaf and root formation, the number of roots, the number of nodes and the length <italic>in vitro</italic> plantlets. These results showed that the response of cassava to <italic>in vitro</italic> micropropagation depends on the culture medium components. The addition of growth regulators at different concentrations to the MS basal salt controls the <italic>in vitro</italic> organogenesis of this plant.</p>
<p>One aim of our study, was to find media that contribute to improve the number of nodes and roots. In fact, number of nodes is the most important parameter in the propagation of some species such as cassava, because the units used for propagation are made up of these organs during micropropagation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">Quashie et&#xa0;al., 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Okello et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>). The parameters relating to the roots are also very important, because the roots are the first to be established during weaning in order to promote the recovery of the leaves or even the plantlet. The roots must be able to convert the young plant from heterotrophic (<italic>in vitro</italic>) to autotrophic (<italic>ex vitro</italic>) life. Without a strong and hardened root system, there can be no proper weaning of the <italic>in vitro</italic> plantlets (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Dossoukp&#xe8;vi et&#xa0;al., 2015</xref>). So, the type, concentration and an appropriate combination of PGRs are very important to improve any regeneration system (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">Thorpe et&#xa0;al., 1991</xref>). Differentiation in plants is controlled by an interplay between auxin and cytokinin and the exogenous requirement of hormones in the medium depends on their endogenous level in the cultured plant. A high ratio of auxin to cytokinin generally results in callus formation, whereas a low ratio results in organogenesis and shoot induction. Plant organogenesis is generally regulated by endogenous auxin, i.e. the natural auxin indole acetic acid (IAA). Adding ANA, a synthetic hormone with the same properties as AIA, to the culture medium increases the auxin content of the explant. This action can create disturbances and direct the cells towards root formation. Exogenous cytokinin will regulate the formation of organs (shoots or roots) depending on the target objectives. In the current study, KIN at 0.12 &#xb5;M was suitable for the multiplication of the Ampong variety while at 0.12 or 0.24 &#xb5;M, it was more suitable for Agbabl&#xe9; 3, Bocou 5 and Ol&#xe9;kanga. These results are similar to those of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Ahanhanzo et&#xa0;al. (2010)</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">Cacai et&#xa0;al. (2012)</xref> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">Sessou et&#xa0;al. (2020)</xref> who showed that KIN induced better results than BAP added to the control medium for the regeneration of cassava varieties. Kinetin can therefore be used at very low concentrations for rapid micropropagation of cassava. Furthermore, some authors such as <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">Apio et&#xa0;al. (2021)</xref> used higher concentrations than others and obtained different results. They found that concentrations of 2.4 ml/l (10.65 &#xb5;M) of BAP followed by 2 ml/l (10.74 &#xb5;M) of NAA facilitated establishment and regeneration compared to kinetin. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">Ahanhanzo et&#xa0;al. (2008)</xref> in <italic>Dioscorea cayenensis</italic> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Demeke et&#xa0;al. (2014)</xref> in cassava showed that the response of the explant varied between the genotypes they used as observed in the present study. These results effectively confirm the effect of the genotype in the <italic>in vitro</italic> regeneration of cassava. In addition to KIN, the results of our study also showed that thidiazuron at 5 nM or 10 nM was better in the Agbabl&#xe9; 3 variety. It promoted the induction of roots and leaves in a short time and contributed to the production of a high number of nodes and roots. This result could be explained by the fact that there was some interaction between the growth regulators. In other words, differentiation depended on the type of hormone combination used. These results are confirmed by the work on cassava by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">Berhanu and Feyissa (2020)</xref>, who showed that TDZ at a concentration of 0.2 mg/l (908.1 nM) had the highest average number of shoots per explant by improving the morphology of the <italic>in vitro</italic> plantlets. In other work, the MS medium containing TDZ without auxins was found to have a higher number of shoots than the medium containing both TDZ and auxins (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">Aasim et&#xa0;al., 2009</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Okello et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>). The importance of PGRs in initiating and regulating organized development is well established. The addition of TDZ promotes shoot formation by inducing and maintaining auxin biosynthesis. This hormone regulates auxin production, promoting callus formation at high concentrations (&gt; 5 &#xb5;M TDZ), while at low concentrations (&lt; 5 &#xb5;M TDZ), shoot induction is observed (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Dewir et&#xa0;al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">Vinoth and Ravindhran, 2018</xref>). TDZ was highly effective than other cytokinins at very minimal concentrations because of its stability to withstand degradation by cytokinin oxidases (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Mok et&#xa0;al., 1987</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Pasternak and Steinmacher, 2024</xref>).</p>
<p>Although, the combination of PGRs with MS salt is good for propagation, Mineral elements play an important role in organogenesis. Some elements such as nitrogen (N) and potassium (K) are involved in auxin simulation. In fact, N induces IAA biosynthesis, while K increases the auxin transport system, favoring either root or shoot formation. High concentrations of mineral elements can, often, be a source of disturbance for plants. In fact, explants already contain sometime a high amount of elements or which do not have a great need for nutrients to develop (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Purohit et&#xa0;al., 2011</xref>). Given this concern, some authors have suggested that the dilution of mineral elements in MS medium may be appropriate for some genotypes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">Berhanu and Feyissa, 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Mazri et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>). In the current study, our results showed that such dilution as half concentration of MS salt significantly reduced the time spent from transplanting to leaf formation in cassava varieties Agbabl&#xe9; 3, Ampong, Bocou 5 and Ol&#xe9;kanga compared to full-strength MS which was the control. It also induced rapid rhizogenesis of Ampong and Bay&#xe9;r&#xe8; explants. Microcuttings have some mineral elements that would be necessary for their regeneration. These microcuttings would therefore contain a high concentration of carbon, phosphorus, nitrogen, potassium, sulfur and magnesium which are macronutrients and are required in millimolar quantities. Their high concentration could, in the long term, inhibit some activities in the organogenesis process such as nitrate activity for nitrogen (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Amirouche et&#xa0;al., 1985</xref>). In our current experiments, this was observed by the low number of nodes, roots and <italic>in vitro</italic> plantlet length. MS salt diluted to 50% was suitable for the rapid regeneration of the explants as shown by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Mazri et&#xa0;al. (2021)</xref> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">Quashie et&#xa0;al. (2012)</xref>. It reduced the regeneration time. We showed also that the half-strength MS can be better for organogenesis when we add kinetin at 24&#xb5;M and thidiazuron at 10 nM. The supplementary of PGRs on half strength MS is more effective in contrary when it is not supplemented. This result is due to the synergistic action of minerals and growth hormones.</p>
<p>Several studies have demonstrated the recalcitrant nature of some cassava varieties to <italic>in vitro</italic> methods. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">Mapayi et&#xa0;al. (2013)</xref> obtained significant results with one of thirteen media containing different concentrations of BAP. This medium enabled them to record the highest means for the number of leaves, nodes and heights. Similar results were observed by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Sesay et&#xa0;al. (2018)</xref> on some recalcitrant cassava genotype. Also, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">Sessou et&#xa0;al. (2020)</xref> obtained an effective medium for each variety and these media all contained kinetin. A similar trend was observed in this study with our protocol, where the seven media containing PGRs out of the nine were all effective to overcome the recalcitrance of cassava varieties with lower concentrations for all parameters. The use of lower concentration of PGRs could contribute to reduce their very high cost, which affects the overall cost of producing material using this technique. This approach will reduce the cost of producing <italic>in vitro</italic> source material.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s5" sec-type="conclusions">
<label>5</label>
<title>Conclusion</title>
<p>Our study showed that, the addition of exogenous plant growth regulators such as KIN at 0.12 and 0.24 &#xb5;M and TDZ at 5 and 10 nM contributed to optimize <italic>in vitro</italic> micropropagation. When the concentration of Murashige &amp; Skoog mineral salts was reduced by half, it was also effective, especially in combination with PGRs. The optimal media identified in this study also show that the response of explants of cassava varieties <italic>in vitro</italic> depends on the medium used and the growth parameters considered. Our protocol can therefore be used to overcome the recalcitrance of some cassava varieties that are difficult to grow using the micropropagation method. This information will be useful for mass multiplication programs and the distribution of healthy planting material to farmers.</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<sec id="s6" sec-type="data-availability">
<title>Data availability statement</title>
<p>The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s7" sec-type="author-contributions">
<title>Author contributions</title>
<p>SS: Writing &#x2013; original draft, Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing, Formal Analysis, Investigation. KK: Writing &#x2013; original draft, Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing, Conceptualization. EY: Writing &#x2013; original draft, Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing, Investigation. FS: Investigation, Writing &#x2013; original draft, Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing, Methodology, Supervision. DO: Investigation, Writing &#x2013; original draft, Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing, Software. FT: Writing &#x2013; original draft, Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing. AE: Writing &#x2013; original draft, Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing. NK: Writing &#x2013; original draft, Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing. JP: Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Writing &#x2013; original draft, Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s8" sec-type="funding-information">
<title>Funding</title>
<p>The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article. This study was supported by the Central and West African Virus Epidemiology (WAVE) program for root and tuber crops through funding from the Bill &amp; Melinda Gates Foundation and the UK Foreign, Commonwealth &amp; Development Office, Grant/Award Number: INV-002969 (formerly OPP1212988).</p>
</sec>
<ack>
<title>Acknowledgments</title>
<p>The authors thank Dr. Cyrielle Ndougonna for her scientific contribution to this work. We want to thank also the Centre National de Recherche Agronomique (CNRA) and Centre Suisse de Recherches Scientifiques (CSRS) for providing their cassava varieties for this study. The authors also would to thank all WAVE Team for their help in the work.</p>
</ack>
<sec id="s9" sec-type="COI-statement">
<title>Conflict of interest</title>
<p>The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be constructed as a potential conflict of interest.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s10" sec-type="ai-statement">
<title>Generative AI statement</title>
<p>The author(s) declare that no Generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s11" sec-type="disclaimer">
<title>Publisher&#x2019;s note</title>
<p>All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.</p>
</sec>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="B1">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Aasim</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Khawar</surname> <given-names>K. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sancak</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>&#xd6;zcan</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>
<italic>In vitro</italic> shoot regeneration of Fenugreek (<italic>Trigonella foenumgraceum</italic> L.)</article-title>. <source>American-Eurasian J. Sustain. Agric.</source> <volume>3</volume>, <fpage>135</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>138</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ahanhanzo</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Agbangla</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Agassounon</surname> <given-names>D. T. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Caca&#xef;</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dramane</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>Etude comparative de l&#x2019;influence des r&#xe9;gulateurs de croissance sur la morphog&#xe9;n&#xe8;se (<italic>in vitro</italic>) de quelques vari&#xe9;t&#xe9;s de <italic>Manihot esculenta</italic> Crantz (manioc-euphorbiaceae) du B&#xe9;nin</article-title>. <source>Rev. CAMES-S&#xe9;rie A</source> <volume>7</volume>, <fpage>47</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>52</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ahanhanzo</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gandonou</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Agbidinoukoun</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dansi</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Agbangla</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Effect of two cytokinins in combination with acetic acid &#x3b1;-naphthalene on yams (<italic>Dioscorea</italic> spp.) genotypes&#x2019; response to <italic>in vitro</italic> morphogenesis</article-title>. <source>Afr. J. Biotechnol.</source> <volume>9</volume>, <fpage>8837</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>8843</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Amirouche</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Stuchbury</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Matthews</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1985</year>). <article-title>Comparisons of cultivar performance on different nutrient media in a routine method for potato micropropagation</article-title>. <source>Potato Res.</source> <volume>28</volume>, <fpage>469</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>477</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/BF02357525</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Apio</surname> <given-names>H. B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Alicai</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ogwok</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Efficient conditions for <italic>in vitro</italic> establishment and regeneration of disease-free Ugandan farmer-preferred cassava genotypes</article-title>. <source>Afr. J. Biotechnol</source>. <volume>20</volume>, <fpage>369</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>382</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5897/AJB2021.17361</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Berhanu</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Feyissa</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Factors influencing micropropagation and somatic embryogenesis of two cassava varieties, Kello and Qulle</article-title>. <source>Cell Biol. Dev.</source> <volume>4</volume> (<issue>2</issue>), <fpage>71</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>81</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.13057/cellbioldev/v040205</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Cacai</surname> <given-names>G. H. T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ahanhanzo</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dangou</surname> <given-names>J. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Houedjissin</surname> <given-names>S. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Agbangla</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Effets de diff&#xe9;rentes combinaisons hormonales sur l&#x2019;organogen&#xe8;se <italic>in vitro</italic> de quelques cultivars locaux et vari&#xe9;t&#xe9;s am&#xe9;lior&#xe9;es de <italic>Manihot esculenta</italic> Crantz (manioc-Euphorbiaceae) cultiv&#xe9;es au B&#xe9;nin</article-title>. <source>Int. J. Biol. Chem. Sci.</source> <volume>6</volume>, <fpage>1593</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1607</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4314/ijbcs.v6i4.19</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Chikoti</surname> <given-names>P. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mulenga</surname> <given-names>R. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tembo</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sseruwagi</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Cassava mosaic disease: a review of a threat to cassava production in Zambia</article-title>. <source>J. Plant Pathol.</source> <volume>101</volume>, <fpage>467</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>477</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s42161-019-00255-0</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Costa</surname> <given-names>M. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Costa</surname> <given-names>T. P. D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>de Freitas Sia</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rodrigues</surname> <given-names>R. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>da Silva</surname> <given-names>A. C. M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>
<italic>In vitro</italic> regeneration of shoot segments of <italic>Manihot esculenta</italic> varieties cultivated in northern Brazil</article-title>. <source>Plant Cell Culture Micropropagation.</source> <volume>15</volume>, <fpage>22</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>26</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.46526/pccm.2019.v15i1.138</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Demeke</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tefera</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dechassa</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Abebie</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Effects of plant growth regulators on <italic>in vitro</italic> cultured nodal explants of cassava (<italic>Manihot esculenta</italic> Crantz) clones</article-title>. <source>Afr. J. Biotechnol.</source> <volume>13</volume> (<issue>28</issue>), <fpage>2830</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2839</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5897/AJB2013.13287</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Dewir</surname> <given-names>Y. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Naidoo</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Teixeira da Silva</surname> <given-names>J. A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Thidiazuron-induced abnormalities in plant tissue cultures</article-title>. <source>Plant Cell Rep.</source> <volume>37</volume>, <fpage>1451</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1470</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00299-018-2326-1</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Dossoukp&#xe8;vi</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dangou</surname> <given-names>S. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Caca&#xef;</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Agbidinoukoun</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Agbangla</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ahanhanzo</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Production et acclimatation de plants du gros basilic (<italic>Ocimum gratissimum</italic>) r&#xe9;g&#xe9;n&#xe9;r&#xe9;s <italic>in vitro</italic>: effet de l&#x2019;acide naphtal&#xe8;ne ac&#xe9;tique (ana) sur l&#x2019;enracinement</article-title>. <source>Eur. Sci. J.</source> <volume>11</volume> (<issue>12</issue>), <fpage>178</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>192</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<citation citation-type="web">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<collab>FAOSTAT</collab>
</person-group> (<year>2022</year>). Available online at: <uri xlink:href="https://www.fao.org/faostat/fr/data/QCL">https://www.fao.org/faostat/fr/data/QCL</uri> (Accessed <access-date>November 7, 2024</access-date>).</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Feyisa</surname> <given-names>A. S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Micropropagation of cassava (<italic>Manihot esculenta</italic> crantz): review</article-title>. <source>Extensive Rev.</source> <volume>1</volume>, <fpage>49</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>57</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.21467/exr.1.1.4486</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Gal&#xe1;n-&#xc1;vila</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Garc&#xed;a-Fortea</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Prohens</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Herraiz</surname> <given-names>F. J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Development of a direct <italic>in vitro</italic> plant regeneration protocol from <italic>Cannabis sativa</italic> L. seedling explants: developmental morphology of shoot regeneration and ploidy level of regenerated plants</article-title>. <source>Front. Plant Sci.</source> <volume>11</volume>, <fpage>534467</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpls.2020.00645</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Hamdeni</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Louhaichi</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Slim</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Boulila</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bettaieb</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Incorporation of organic growth additives to enhance <italic>in vitro</italic> tissue culture for producing genetically stable plants</article-title>. <source>Plants</source> <volume>11</volume>, <fpage>3087</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/plants11223087</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ihaka</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gentleman</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1996</year>). <article-title>R: a language for data analysis and graphics</article-title>. <source>J. Comput. Graph. Stat.</source> <volume>5</volume>, <fpage>299</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>314</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/10618600.1996.10474713</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B18">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kouakou</surname> <given-names>B. S. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yobou&#xe9;</surname> <given-names>A. A. N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pita</surname> <given-names>J. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mutuku</surname> <given-names>J. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Otron</surname> <given-names>D. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kouassi</surname> <given-names>N. K.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2024</year>). <article-title>Gradual Emergence of East African cassava mosaic Cameroon virus in Cassava Farms in C&#xf4;te d&#x2019;Ivoire</article-title>. <source>Agronomy</source> <volume>14</volume>, <elocation-id>418</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/agronomy14030418</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B19">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Mapayi</surname> <given-names>E. F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ojo</surname> <given-names>D. K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Oduwaye</surname> <given-names>O. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Porbeni</surname> <given-names>J. B. O.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Optimization of <italic>in vitro</italic> propagation of cassava (<italic>Manihot esculenta</italic> Crantz) genotypes</article-title>. <source>J. Agric. Sci.</source> <volume>5</volume>, <elocation-id>261</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5539/jas.v5n3p261</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B20">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Mazri</surname> <given-names>M. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bouchiha</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Anjarne</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Alfeddy</surname> <given-names>M. N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Elmaataoui</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Meziani</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Effet du milieu de culture, de la source carbon&#xe9;e et des antioxydants sur la prolif&#xe9;ration des bourgeons adventifs et le d&#xe9;veloppement des plantules chez le palmier dattier cv. Bouskri</article-title>. <source>Afr. Mediterr. Agric. J. - Al Awamia</source> <volume>0</volume>, <fpage>35</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>49</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.34874/IMIST.PRSM/afrimed-i131.31343</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B21">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Mok</surname> <given-names>M. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mok</surname> <given-names>D. W. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Turner</surname> <given-names>J. E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mujer</surname> <given-names>C. V.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1987</year>). <article-title>Biological and biochemical effects of cytokinin-active phenylurea derivatives in tissue culture systems</article-title>. <source>Hortscience</source> <volume>22</volume>, <fpage>1194</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1197</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.21273/HORTSCI.22.6.1194</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B22">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Murashige</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Skoog</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1962</year>). <article-title>A revised medium for rapid growth and bio assays with tobacco tissue cultures</article-title>. <source>Physiologia plantarum</source> <volume>15</volume>, <fpage>473</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>497</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1399-3054.1962.tb08052.x</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B23">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Nakabonge</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Nangonzi</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tumwebaze</surname> <given-names>B. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kazibwe</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Samukoya</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Baguma</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Production of virus-free cassava through hot water therapy and two rounds of meristem tip culture</article-title>. <source>Cogent Food Agric.</source> <volume>6</volume>, <elocation-id>1800923</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/23311932.2020.1800923</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B24">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ng</surname> <given-names>S. Y.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1990</year>). <source>Culture des tissus. Le manioc en Afrique tropicale: un manuel de r&#xe9;f&#xe9;rence</source>. <publisher-name>IITA &amp; UNICEF</publisher-name>, <fpage>51</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>61</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B25">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Okello</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Komakech</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rahmat</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chung</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gang</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>An <italic>in vitro</italic> propagation of <italic>Aspilia africana</italic> (Pers.) CD Adams, and evaluation of its anatomy and physiology of acclimatized plants</article-title>. <source>Front. Plant Sci.</source> <volume>12</volume>, <fpage>704896</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpls.2021.704896</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B26">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Pasternak</surname> <given-names>T. P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Steinmacher</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2024</year>). <article-title>Plant growth regulation in cell and tissue culture in <italic>vitro</italic>
</article-title>. <source>Plants</source> <volume>13</volume>, <fpage>327</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/plants13020327</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B27">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Purohit</surname> <given-names>S. D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Teixeira da Silva</surname> <given-names>J. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Habibi</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Current approaches for cheaper and better micropropagation technologies</article-title>. <source>Int. J. Plant Dev. Biolology</source> <volume>5</volume>, <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>36</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B28">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Quashie</surname> <given-names>M.-L. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Benissan</surname> <given-names>A. T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tchezoum</surname> <given-names>Y. A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Micropropagation d&#x2019;une plante d&#x2019;int&#xe9;r&#xea;t nutritionnel et pharmacologique: <italic>Moringa oleifera</italic> Lam</article-title>. <source>J. la Recherche Scientifique l&#x2019;Universit&#xe9; Lom&#xe9;</source> <volume>14</volume>, <fpage>7</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>17</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4314/jrsul.v14i2</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B29">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Rosenthal</surname> <given-names>D. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ort</surname> <given-names>D. R.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Examining cassava&#x2019;s potential to enhance food security under climate change</article-title>. <source>Trop. Plant Biol.</source> <volume>5</volume>, <fpage>30</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>38</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s12042-011-9086-1</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B30">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Sesay</surname> <given-names>J. V.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yamba</surname> <given-names>N. G. G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sherman-Kamara4</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Quee</surname> <given-names>D. D.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Development of <italic>in vitro</italic> propagation protocol for some recalcitrant cassava (<italic>Manihot esculenta</italic> Crantz) genotypes in Sierra Leone</article-title>. <source>Afr. J. Biotechnol.</source> <volume>17</volume>, <fpage>606</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>613</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5897/AJB2017.16330</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B31">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Sessou</surname> <given-names>A. F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kahia</surname> <given-names>J. W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Houngue</surname> <given-names>J. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ateka</surname> <given-names>E. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dadjo</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ahanhanzo</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>
<italic>In vitro</italic> propagation of three mosaic disease resistant cassava cultivars</article-title>. <source>BMC Biotechnol.</source> <volume>20</volume>, <fpage>51</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s12896-020-00645-8</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B32">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Shiji</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>George</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sunitha</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Muthuraj</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Micropropagation for rapid multiplication of planting material in cassava (<italic>Manihot esculenta</italic> crantz)</article-title>. <source>J. Root Crops</source> <volume>40</volume>, <fpage>23</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>30</lpage>. Available online at: <uri xlink:href="https://journal.isrc.in/index.php/jrc/article/view/229">https://journal.isrc.in/index.php/jrc/article/view/229</uri>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B33">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Thorpe</surname> <given-names>T. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Harry</surname> <given-names>I. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kumar</surname> <given-names>P. P.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1991</year>). &#x201c;<article-title>Application of micropropagation to forestry</article-title>,&#x201d; in <source>Micropropagation: Technology and Application</source>, eds. <person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname>Debergh</surname> <given-names>P. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zimmerman</surname> <given-names>R. H.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<publisher-loc>Dordrecht</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Springer Netherlands</publisher-name>), <fpage>311</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>336</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B34">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Vernier</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>N&#x2019;Zu&#xe9;</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zakhia-Rozis</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <source>Le manioc, entre culture alimentaire et fili&#xe8;re agro-industrielle</source> (<publisher-name>Editions Quae, CTA, Presses Agronomiques de Gembloux</publisher-name>), <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>208</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.35690/978-2-7592-2708-2</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B35">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Vinoth</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ravindhran</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2018</year>). &#x201c;<article-title>
<italic>In vitro</italic> morphogenesis of woody plants using thidiazuron</article-title>,&#x201d; in <source>Thidiazuron: from urea derivative to plant growth regulator</source>, <fpage>211</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>229</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/978-981-10-8004-3_10</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B36">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Y&#xe9;o</surname> <given-names>E. F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kouassi</surname> <given-names>M. K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pita</surname> <given-names>J. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kouassi</surname> <given-names>N. K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kon&#xe9;</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>N&#x2019;guetta</surname> <given-names>S. P. A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Using thermotherapy and meristem tip culture for producing virus-free cassava planting material from six varieties cultivated in c&#xf4;te d&#x2019;Ivoire</article-title>. <source>Int. J. Sci. Technol.</source> <volume>9</volume>, <fpage>1607</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1612</lpage>. Available online at: <uri xlink:href="https://www.ijstr.org/final-print/jan2020/Using-Thermotherapy-And-Meristem-Tip-Culture-For-Producing-Virus-free-Cassava-Planting-Material-From-Six-Varieties-Cultivated-In-C&#xf4;te-Divoire.pdf">https://www.ijstr.org/final-print/jan2020/Using-Thermotherapy-And-Meristem-Tip-Culture-For-Producing-Virus-free-Cassava-Planting-Material-From-Six-Varieties-Cultivated-In-C&#xf4;te-Divoire.pdf</uri>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B37">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zango</surname> <given-names>A. F. V.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zinga</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Soupk&#xe9;</surname> <given-names>R. D. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yandia</surname> <given-names>S. P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Marabana</surname> <given-names>B. T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kassa</surname> <given-names>N. G. Y.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Comparative elimination of begomoviruses in cassava meristems and axillary buds</article-title>. <source>J. Exp. Agric. Int.</source> <volume>43</volume> (<issue>4</issue>), <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>9</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.9734/jeai/2021/v43i430665</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>