<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.3 20070202//EN" "journalpublishing.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="2.3" xml:lang="EN">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Front. Plant Sci.</journal-id>
<journal-title>Frontiers in Plant Science</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">Front. Plant Sci.</abbrev-journal-title>
<issn pub-type="epub">1664-462X</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Frontiers Media S.A.</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpls.2025.1533039</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Plant Science</subject>
<subj-group>
<subject>Original Research</subject>
</subj-group>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Horticultural performance and QTL mapping of snap bean (<italic>Phaseolus vulgaris</italic> L.) populations with organic and conventional breeding histories</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Richardson</surname>
<given-names>Hayley E. P.</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2373486/overview"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/formal-analysis/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/investigation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/visualization/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>King</surname>
<given-names>Ryan M.</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2431490/overview"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/formal-analysis/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/investigation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Davis</surname>
<given-names>Joel</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3">
<sup>3</sup>
</xref>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/formal-analysis/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name>
<surname>Myers</surname>
<given-names>James R.</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3">
<sup>3</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn001">
<sup>*</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1142652/overview"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/conceptualization/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/funding-acquisition/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/resources/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/supervision/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
<institution>Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, Oregon State University</institution>, <addr-line>Corvallis, OR</addr-line>, <country>United States</country>
</aff>
<aff id="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
<institution>National Clonal Germplasm Repository, Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture</institution>, <addr-line>Corvallis, OR</addr-line>, <country>United States</country>
</aff>
<aff id="aff3">
<sup>3</sup>
<institution>Department of Horticulture, Oregon State University</institution>, <addr-line>Corvallis, OR</addr-line>, <country>United States</country>
</aff>
<author-notes>
<fn fn-type="edited-by">
<p>Edited by: Diego Rubiales, Spanish National Research Council (CSIC), Spain</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="edited-by">
<p>Reviewed by: Leandro Sim&#xf5;es Azeredo Gon&#xe7;alves, State University of Londrina, Brazil</p>
<p>Susana Trindade Leit&#xe3;o, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Portugal</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="corresp" id="fn001">
<p>*Correspondence: James R. Myers, <email xlink:href="mailto:james.myers@oregonstate.edu">james.myers@oregonstate.edu</email>
</p>
</fn>
</author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>19</day>
<month>05</month>
<year>2025</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="ecorrected">
<day>30</day>
<month>05</month>
<year>2025</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="collection">
<year>2025</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>16</volume>
<elocation-id>1533039</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>22</day>
<month>11</month>
<year>2024</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>15</day>
<month>04</month>
<year>2025</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#xa9; 2025 Richardson, King, Davis and Myers</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2025</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Richardson, King, Davis and Myers</copyright-holder>
<license xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">
<p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.</p>
</license>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<sec>
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>Improving crop cultivars for use on organic farms is pertinent, as current elite germplasm is less resilient within the more variable context of organic farm environments. Although a growing number of studies have focused on organic plant breeding in cereal crops, very few have focused on vegetable crops, especially those such as snap beans (<italic>Phaseolus vulgaris</italic>) that are grown for both fresh market and processing use.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Methods</title>
<p>We developed four populations of recombinant inbred lines under parallel organic and conventional management; utilizing these populations, we explored how historic breeding history influences the performance of snap bean progeny.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Results</title>
<p>We identified significant increases in germination speed and rate, suggesting that beans bred within an organic production environment are more resilient to early-season stressors without support of chemical interventions. We also found that root branching density increased among organically-bred bean families, while root disease decreased in both the organically-bred bean families and the populations with &#x2018;OR5630&#x2019; &#xd7; &#x2018;Black Valentine&#x2019; parentage. After developing linkage maps for each of our four populations, we identified QTL associated with days to germination, early-season vigor, root morphology, disease, days to flowering, and seed weight.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Discussion</title>
<p>This study lays the groundwork for improving snap bean germplasm for performance in organic systems by tracking the microevolutions created through long-term selection under organic or conventional management (i.e., breeding history). By understanding these shifts, plant breeders will begin to build a toolbox of genetic information that they can leverage in modern breeding work for organic crop cultivars.</p>
</sec>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>seed color</kwd>
<kwd>seed weight</kwd>
<kwd>germination</kwd>
<kwd>recombinant inbred lines</kwd>
<kwd>linkage map</kwd>
<kwd>root traits</kwd>
<kwd>agronomic traits</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<counts>
<fig-count count="5"/>
<table-count count="8"/>
<equation-count count="4"/>
<ref-count count="86"/>
<page-count count="21"/>
<word-count count="13138"/>
</counts>
<custom-meta-wrap>
<custom-meta>
<meta-name>section-in-acceptance</meta-name>
<meta-value>Plant Breeding</meta-value>
</custom-meta>
</custom-meta-wrap>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec id="s1" sec-type="intro">
<label>1</label>
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>Over the past two decades, elevated public demand for organically produced foods has more than doubled the retail sales of organic food within the United States (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B75">USDA ERS, 2024</xref>). Consumer interest in health, wellness, and ecological sustainability drives much of this demand (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B45">Lee and Yun, 2015</xref>). Studies have found that organic crops have higher quantities of antioxidants, lower concentrations of heavy metals, and reduced pesticide residues compared with conventional crops (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">Bara&#x144;ski et&#xa0;al., 2014</xref>). Other studies determined that organic agriculture requires fewer non-renewable resources, reduces nonpoint source pollution from agrochemicals, and provides producers with opportunities for higher profit margins (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Badgley et&#xa0;al., 2007</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Bengtsson et&#xa0;al., 2005</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B70">Shreck et&#xa0;al., 2006</xref>).</p>
<p>Despite demand, the persistent yield gap between organic and conventional production limits the viability of organic agriculture at scale. Meta-analyses attempting to capture the yield gap found that organic yields average 20-25% lower than conventional (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">Kniss et&#xa0;al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B60">Ponisio et&#xa0;al., 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B69">Seufert et&#xa0;al., 2012</xref>). Though these analyses provide a high-level view of yield gap scale, each study notes high variation across several parameters, including crop type (i.e., cereal, legume, forage, etc.), geographic location, and input intensity of the operations (i.e., high vs. low fertilizer applications). Across all crops with available data, organic fruits and vegetables have the greatest yield gaps, with yields falling 23-62% lower than conventional counterparts (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">Kniss et&#xa0;al., 2016</xref>). This is likely due to the increased impact of insects and pathogens on the visual marketability of these crops, which are frequently sold fresh or direct-to-consumers.</p>
<p>The amount of plant-available nitrogen and the scale of perennial weed pressure are consistently identified as the primary driving forces underlying the yield gap (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">Knapp and van der Heijden, 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B42">Kravchenko et&#xa0;al., 2017</xref>). Agronomic solutions to these challenges are under continuous development (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Cabrera-P&#xe9;rez et&#xa0;al., 2023</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B65">Reimer et&#xa0;al., 2023</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B66">Rowland et&#xa0;al., 2023</xref>); yet, incorporating these techniques on-farm may be technically or financially unfeasible for growers. Thus, the breeding and development of new cultivars that are well-suited to organic farm conditions emerge as critical &#x201c;low-cost, high-impact&#x201d; solutions to the yield gap.</p>
<p>Unlike conventional crops, organic crops must be able to cope with highly dynamic environments without the buffer of supportive chemical inputs. Plasticity is widely observed in cultivated and wild plant populations, and can be considered a distinct quantitative trait that provides some individuals with the capacity to more rapidly adapt to challenges in their environment. Plasticity may be further characterized as genotype-by-environment (G &#xd7; E) interactions, wherein the capacity for adaptive plasticity of a given phenotype varies among genotypes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">Laitinen and Nikoloski, 2019</xref>). While historic plant breeding has attempted to eliminate phenotypic plasticity by controlling the growing environment, the current and future implications of anthropogenic climate change drive demand for cultivars that can exploit adaptive plasticity in unpredictable environmental conditions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">Brooker et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>). Similarly, in highly dynamic organic environments, plasticity is a valuable trait that organic breeding strategies should seek to leverage.</p>
<p>The impact of G &#xd7; E interactions on the performance of a genotype in specific test environments, and the performance of a genotype in the target population environments, underpins the case for developing organic cultivars within organic environments (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">Allen et&#xa0;al., 1978</xref>). When the correlation between performance in a test environment and performance in a target population of environments, referred to as <italic>r</italic>, is high, the testing environment used is considered typical of the target population of environments (TPEs). When correlation values are low the environments are considered unique in comparison with the TPE. Conventional breeding strategies have historically operated under the understanding that heritability may decrease in stressed environments, thus direct selection should not be carried out under ambient field stress. Instead conventional breeding strategies have relied on a combined method of direct selection for yield under optimal environments and indirect selection of physiological traits under simulated stress conditions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Blum and Jordan, 1985</xref>). However, other breeding strategies maintain that heritability is not more variable under stressed conditions, and a breeding approach that optimizes <italic>r</italic> through direct selection within these environments may also be effective, or preferable in some cases (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">Allen et&#xa0;al., 1978</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Ceccarelli, 1989</xref>).</p>
<p>In the context of organic agriculture, several studies have identified improvements in characteristics like marketable weight (i.e., yield), competition against weeds, and disease resistance in cultivars selected under organic management compared to their conventional counterparts. To date, most of this work has materialized within cereal crop breeding programs (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B55">Murphy et&#xa0;al., 2007</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B68">Schneider et&#xa0;al., 2024</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B85">Wolfe et&#xa0;al., 2008</xref>), excepting some recent work in potato, carrot, and tomato (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Blossei et&#xa0;al., 2024</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">Colley et&#xa0;al., 2025</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B49">Lopez et&#xa0;al., 2024</xref>). Other vegetable crops, including common beans, have only been the target of observational studies within organic environments (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B56">Ozaktan et&#xa0;al., 2023</xref>).</p>
<p>Common bean (<italic>Phaseolus vulgaris</italic> L.) was domesticated for use as a crop approximately 8,000 years ago in two separate regions: the Andes and Middle America (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B80">Wallace et&#xa0;al., 2018</xref>). Snap beans are the form of common beans grown for their stringless, low-fiber vegetable pods; a category that includes green beans, wax beans, and flat-podded Romano beans. These may be harvested for both fresh markets and processing markets, with a distinct crop ideotype for each target market. The processing bean ideotype includes an upright growing habit, suitability for mechanical harvest, palatable appearance after processing, appropriate sieve size at harvest, round pods, concentrated pod set, and white seeds. The fresh market ideotype differs in that oval pods are acceptable, the pods may have higher fiber content for straighter and smoother pods, and pubescence to provide cushioning and prevent damage during handling and transport. Colored seeds may also be acceptable in some markets.</p>
<p>Within the Pacific Northwest, and western Oregon specifically, snap bean production thrives as a product of low disease pressure and irrigation capabilities. Cool, wet spring conditions that hamper crop establishment and early season performance are typical for snap bean production in the region. Factors such as darker seed color and thicker seed coat can improve germination within these challenging environments; however, these traits lie in conflict with processing industry preference for white-seeded cultivars. Within conventional systems, snap bean seeds are coated with fungicidal treatments before sowing, and a pre-emergence herbicide is frequently applied. These approaches eliminate the need for highly vigorous seedlings capable of outgrowing early pressures from pathogens, insects, and weeds. Furthermore, conventional farmers rely on synthetic fertilizers throughout the snap bean growth cycle, a practice which has been found to reduce nutrient-seeking growth in the root system (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Duncan et&#xa0;al., 1960</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B44">Lammerts van Bueren et&#xa0;al., 2011</xref>). While historic breeding practices have met the demands of conventional growers, breeding exclusively within conventional, high-N input systems has resulted in the unintentional loss of essential plant functions, such as the inactivation of legume genes responsible for supporting mutualism with nitrogen-fixing soil bacteria (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B74">Toby et&#xa0;al., 2007</xref>). A loss of function in this mutualism through the breeding process has minor implications in conventional fields where synthetic nitrogen is available, but can be devastating in organic fields that partially rely on nitrogen fixation. This example emphasizes the need to optimize <italic>r</italic> when developing new cultivars for a target environment, like organic production systems.</p>
<p>Our work was guided by the hypothesis that selection under organic and conventional management leads to divergent phenotypic expression and changes in the associated genetic architecture. To explore this, we split two populations of snap beans into two target environments, organic and conventional, and allowed natural selection in each system to enact pressure on the sub-populations. We subsequently evaluated sub-populations in both systems to test whether breeding under contrasting environments produced genotypes with distinct performance, levels of plasticity, and adaptive traits relevant to each environment. Additionally, we explored segregation distortion and QTL differences to determine whether differential selection drove measurable shifts at the genetic level.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2" sec-type="materials|methods">
<label>2</label>
<title>Materials and methods</title>
<sec id="s2_1">
<label>2.1</label>
<title>Population development</title>
<p>We developed four populations of recombinant inbred lines (RILs) of snap beans. Two populations were bred under organic management and two were bred under conventional management. We chose parental cultivars for these crosses in a manner that pairs a modern, elite snap bean (Hystyle and OR5630) with an older cultivar with good performance in organic and low-input conditions (Provider and Black Valentine), as described previously (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B57">Park et&#xa0;al., 2023</xref>). The elite parents, Hystyle and OR5630, were selected due to their current use by commercial farmers for the processing industry. Previous work by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">Kraemer and Myers (2014)</xref> identified Provider and Black Valentine as showing positive yield responses following inoculation with <italic>Rhizobia</italic>, in lieu of synthetic nitrogen. The ability for these cultivars to yield well without conventional fertilizer motivated their use as parents in this study. <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">
<bold>Table&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref> includes details on the origin, release date, and genetic origin. <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Supplementary Table&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref> includes additional phenotypic data on parental cultivars.</p>
<table-wrap id="T1" position="float">
<label>Table&#xa0;1</label>
<caption>
<p>Characteristics of the four snap bean cultivars used to create the research populations.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="bottom" align="center">Parent Cultivar</th>
<th valign="bottom" align="center">Origin</th>
<th valign="bottom" align="center">Release Date</th>
<th valign="bottom" colspan="2" align="center">Structure Analysis (K = 2)</th>
<th valign="bottom" colspan="5" align="center">Structure Analysis (K = 8)</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">Middle American</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">Andean</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">Group 3 Bush blue lake</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">Group 4 European extra fine</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">Group 5 Andean landrace &amp; Romano</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">Group 6 Andean II</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">Group 7 Andean I</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">Hystyle</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">Harris Moran Seed Company</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">1985</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">0.000</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">1.000</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">0.000</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">0.000</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">0.000</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">0.623</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">0.377</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">Provider</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">USDA SE Veg. Breed. Lab.</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">1966</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">0.024</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">0.976</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">0.000</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">0.040</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">0.344</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">0.579</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">0.000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">OR 5630</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">Oregon State University</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">2005</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">0.437</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">0.563</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">1.000</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">0.000</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">0.000</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">0.000</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">0.000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">Black Valentine</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">Peter Henderson &amp; Co.</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">~1897</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">0.000</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">1.000</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">0.000</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">0.000</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">0.238</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">0.762</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">0.000</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn>
<p>Structure analysis data from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B80">Wallace et&#xa0;al. (2018)</xref> shows genetic relationships of the cultivars, including K = 2 clusters associated with Middle American or Andean origin, and K = 8 clustering showing genotypic distribution across five of the eight groups (Groups 1, 2 and 8 omitted because parents showed no genetic affinity for those groups). Additional phenotypic data can be found in <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Supplementary Table&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>.</p>
</fn>
<fn>
<p>Cultivars were identified as strong performers in either conventional commercial production for the processing market or the home garden environment.</p>
</fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<p>Following the initial crosses, we grew the F<sub>1</sub> generations in the field at the Vegetable Research Farm in Corvallis, OR. In the F<sub>2</sub> generation, 500 seeds from each cross were grown under either organic or conventional management. The four populations were further developed after this split through a series of generation advances described in <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Supplementary Table&#xa0;2</bold>
</xref>. As of the F<sub>6</sub> generation, each population is composed of approximately 90 immortalized and inbred lines.</p>
<p>Our breeding method applied natural selection pressure on each of the four breeding populations, creating two sets of populations that can be used to partition breeding management system effects and population genome structure. To our knowledge, this is the only set of snap bean populations in existence designed to investigate questions related to breeding under organic management.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_2">
<label>2.2</label>
<title>Study sites and experimental design</title>
<p>For this study, we grew and evaluated the four populations over three years: 2018, 2020, and 2021. The 2018 plots were planted at the Lewis Brown Farm, at latitude 44.555881&#xb0;N and longitude 123.214569&#xb0;W. The organically-bred populations (ORBV-O, HYPR-O) were grown in an organically-managed field, and the conventionally-bred populations (ORBV-C and HYPR-C) were planted in an adjacent conventionally-managed field. In 2020 and 2021, all four populations were planted into two adjacent fields at the Vegetable Research Farm at Oregon State University. The farm is located at latitude 44.571209&#xb0;N and longitude 123.243261&#xb0;W. Each year we managed one of the two adjacent fields conventionally and the other organically. Experimental design details can also be found in <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">
<bold>Table&#xa0;2</bold>
</xref>, along with a list of traits evaluated in each year.</p>
<table-wrap id="T2" position="float">
<label>Table&#xa0;2</label>
<caption>
<p>Experimental design for field plots grown including year, production system, field location, traits evaluated, and populations grown.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Year (Generation)</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Traits Evaluated</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Location</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Production System</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Populations Grown</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" rowspan="2" align="center">2018 (F<sub>6</sub>)</td>
<td valign="middle" rowspan="2" align="center">Days to 50% Flowering, Seed Weight/Plant, 100 Seed Weight, Germination Percent</td>
<td valign="middle" rowspan="2" align="center">Lewis Brown Farm, Corvallis, OR</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Organic</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">ORBV-O, HYPR-O</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Conventional</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">ORBV-C, HYPR-C</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" rowspan="2" align="center">2020 (F<sub>7</sub>)</td>
<td valign="middle" rowspan="2" align="center">Germination Percent, Days to Germination, Seedling Vigor, 100 Seed Weight</td>
<td valign="middle" rowspan="2" align="center">Vegetable Research Farm, Corvallis, OR</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Organic</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">ORBV-O, ORBV-C, HYPR-O, HYPR-C</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Conventional</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">ORBV-O, ORBV-C, HYPR-O, HYPR-C</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" rowspan="2" align="center">2021 (F<sub>8</sub>)</td>
<td valign="middle" rowspan="2" align="center">Germination Percent, Days to Germination, Seedling Vigor, Taproot Diameter, Basal Root Diameters, Branching Density, Root Disease Rating</td>
<td valign="middle" rowspan="2" align="center">Vegetable Research Farm, Corvallis, OR</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Organic</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">ORBV-O, ORBV-C, HYPR-O, HYPR-C</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Conventional</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">ORBV-O, ORBV-C, HYPR-O, HYPR-C</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
<p>Each year, the research plots were planted in a randomized complete block design, with three replications of each family planted into every population block. Single family plots were 1.5 meters in length, with 2.5 cm in-row spacing of plots, and 76 cm between-row spacing. We planted 60 seeds in each plot. An early planting date, immediately after fields became workable, was selected in both years to maximize the early season pressure on seeds and seedlings. Conventional management included a pre-planting seed coat application of Captan fungicide, Dual-Magnum pre-emergence herbicide application, and a custom fertilizer blend (12-10&#x2013;10 N-P-K) at a rate of 618 kg ha<sup>-1</sup>. Organic management included compost (Recology Organics, Aumsville, OR in 2020; on-farm compost in 2021) at a rate of 22.9 m ha<sup>-2</sup> and Nutri-Rich chicken litter-based fertilizer (8-2&#x2013;4 N-P-K) at a rate of 1,159 kg ha<sup>-1</sup>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_3">
<label>2.3</label>
<title>Field evaluations</title>
<p>In 2018, we collected data from the F<sub>6</sub> generation on germination-related traits, flowering, seed color, and 100-seed weight. Germination traits included days to germination and germination percentage, as calculated from the number of emerged seedlings minus those that had characteristic lethal damage that limited their survival past the seedling stage. Days to flowering was determined in the 2018 plots by rating the plot when 50% of the plants had open flowers. Following harvest and a drying period, the 100-seed weight was collected from 100 seeds of each plot replicate.</p>
<p>In 2020 and 2021, we collected data on germination-related traits, 100-seed weight, seed color, and five root morphology traits. Germination and seed weight data were collected as described above. We collected root data on a random subset of 40 families within each population, in both the organic and conventional fields. Samples were collected for these 40 families across all three reps, within each production system. Samples were collected over a two-week period, beginning when at least 50% of plots had reached 50% flowering. The conventional field was sampled in the first week and the organic field was sampled in the second week. To sample, we selected one representative plant from the center of each plot that displayed typical morphology and in-row spacing for the plot. Plants were harvested by digging a 30 cm radius of soil surrounding the stem, as described by (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Burridge et&#xa0;al., 2016</xref>). Excess soil and roots from surrounding plants were gently shaken loose prior to the removal of aboveground plant matter. Roots were cleaned by immersion in water and then evaluated for taproot and basal root diameters, branching density, and disease severity of bean root rot complex. Previous work at the Vegetable Research Farm has consistently found <italic>Fusarium solani</italic> to be the dominant causal agent of root rot disease; however, <italic>Rhizoctonia solani</italic> may also be present in the complex at this site (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">Cirak and Myers, 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">Hagerty et&#xa0;al., 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">Huster et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>). Root diameters were measured in mm using calipers, approximately 1 cm below the attachment point to the hypocotyl. We rated disease severity on a 9-point hedonic scale, where 0 represents no lesions on roots and 9 represents an extremely high number of lesions. All data were collected by a single individual to ensure consistency.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_4">
<label>2.4</label>
<title>DNA extractions and genotyping</title>
<p>We extracted DNA from plant material collected from young trifoliate leaves of each family in the four populations. Samples for the HYPR populations were collected from field-grown plants in the F<sub>7</sub> generation, and ORBV population samples were collected from F<sub>8</sub> seedlings grown in a greenhouse. We extracted DNA from the F<sub>7</sub> samples using a modified cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) protocol (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B52">Miklas et&#xa0;al., 1993</xref>). For the F<sub>8</sub> samples, we extracted DNA using a modified extraction protocol for the E-Z 96 Plant DNA extraction kit (Omega BioTek, Norcross, GA, USA).</p>
<p>Samples were quantified on the BioTek Synergy 2 microplate reader and diluted to approximately uniform concentrations. Ten microliters of dilute samples were placed into 96-well plates, which were sent to the USDA-ARS Soybean Genomics and Improvement Laboratory at the Beltsville Agricultural Research Center in Beltsville, MD, for genotyping with the Illumina BARCBean12K beadchip (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B72">Song et&#xa0;al., 2015</xref>). Variant calls were confirmed using Illumina&#x2019;s GenomeStudio v2.0.5 software.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_5">
<label>2.5</label>
<title>Linkage and QTL mapping</title>
<p>
<italic>Genetic map construction</italic>
</p>
<p>Prior to creating the linkage maps, we examined and filtered raw SNP calls in Microsoft Excel 2019 to remove markers that were monomorphic or heterozygous in the parents. We then loaded these filtered and aligned data sets into JoinMap5 for further inspection and map construction (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B76">van Ooijen, 2016</xref>). SNPs were removed in an iterative process based on the number of missing allele calls (&gt;27%), marker redundancy (based on similarity values of 1.00), high heterozygosity (&gt;11.25%), and segregation distortion (<italic>X<sup>2</sup>
</italic> &gt; 9.67). Individuals with high heterozygosity were removed from each population, as these were suspected to have undergone accidental outcrossing. We estimated linkage groups in JoinMap5 using the linkage logarithm of odds (LOD) grouping parameter, with a threshold of 5.0 for significant pairwise linkages. Distance in centimorgans (cM) was determined using Kosambi&#x2019;s mapping function and the maximum likelihood algorithm, with optimization parameters set to a chain length of 10,000 iterations, 1,000 iterations for multipoint estimation of recombination frequency, a burn-in chain length of 15,000, and otherwise default settings. The resulting maps were visually inspected for large intra-map gaps (&gt;20cM) and markers showing high nearest neighbor stress values. Where necessary, markers were added and removed to generate final maps.</p>
<p>
<italic>Quantitative trait loci analysis</italic>
</p>
<p>Quantitative trait loci and associated LOD scores were identified using the R package <italic>qtl2</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Broman et&#xa0;al., 2019</xref>). Prior to these calculations, we averaged the phenotypic data across replications to increase detection power. Using the function <italic>scan1</italic> and Haley-Knott regression, we identified flanking SNPs of sufficiently large QTL (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">Haley and Knott, 1992</xref>). We ran permutation tests to account for the possibility of false positives in QTL detection and to determine significance thresholds for QTL detection for each phenotypic trait. Additive effects of each QTL and the percent phenotypic variation explained, as represented by R<sup>2</sup>, were also calculated.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_6">
<label>2.6</label>
<title>Segregation distortion</title>
<p>Utilizing physical locations of SNPs, allele frequencies, and the <italic>X<sup>2</sup>
</italic> values generated in JoinMap5, we assessed segregation distortion within each population. We considered markers with a <italic>X<sup>2</sup>
</italic> value above 5.99 distorted. Using the <italic>chromoMap</italic> package in R Studio, we constructed distortion maps with physical locations of SNPs aligned using the G19833, v2.1, reference genome of Andean origin (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">Anand and Rodriguez Lopez, 2022</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B67">Schmutz et&#xa0;al., 2014</xref>). Scaffolds lacking genome-aligned locations were removed from the maps.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_7">
<label>2.7</label>
<title>Statistical analyses</title>
<p>All statistical analyses were completed in R Studio, using the <italic>dplyr</italic> package (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B61">Posit Team, 2024</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B64">R Core Team, 2023</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B84">Wickham et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>). An analysis of variance (ANOVA) was conducted to test major experimental contrast factors (e.g., seed color, breeding history, parental cross, etc.), with mean square values reported in <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>supplementary material</bold>
</xref>. We then calculated estimated marginal means for each trait, developing a linear mixed model for each trait using the <italic>lme4</italic> and <italic>emmeans</italic> packages (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">Bates et&#xa0;al., 2024</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B46">Lenth et&#xa0;al., 2024</xref>). Data from each year and production system were analyzed separately. For each mixed model, seed color, cross, and breeding history were included as fixed effects and rep was a random effect. A second set of marginal means was calculated to explore the role of seed color within populations. In these models, the population factor was used as a fixed effect in lieu of the breeding history and cross factors, but seed color and rep remained the same. Tukey HSD tests were run for multi-year, multi-environment estimated marginal means.</p>
<p>To examine the strength and direction of associations between early season performance, root phenotypes, and seed characteristics, we ran a Spearman&#x2019;s rank correlation analysis in R Studio and visualized the correlations using the <italic>corrplot</italic> package (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B83">Wei et&#xa0;al., 2024</xref>). The Spearman&#x2019;s rank correlation allowed for the inclusion of ordinal seed color data in the analysis. Correlation coefficients were generated for each pairwise combination of traits. Due to the categorical nature of color-based data, we converted seed color to a numerical scale in which an absence of pigment (i.e., white) was associated with the value 0 and the presence of pigment (i.e., colored seed) was associated with the value 1.</p>
<p>Best linear unbiased predictions (BLUPs) were calculated for the estimation of variance components and heritability. The data for these analyses originated from the F<sub>6</sub>, F<sub>7</sub>, and F<sub>8</sub> generations, and there were three replications for each trait within each environment. Data were classified as multi-year and multi-environment, single-year and multi-environment, or single-year and single-environment.</p>
<p>Narrow-sense heritability was estimated using the following formula for multi-environment heritability (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">Isik et&#xa0;al., 2017</xref>):</p>
<disp-formula>
<mml:math display="block" id="M1">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mtext>h</mml:mtext>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
</mml:msup>
<mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
<mml:mi mathvariant="bold">&#x3c3;</mml:mi>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mtext>F</mml:mtext>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
</mml:msup>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">/</mml:mo>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo>
<mml:mi mathvariant="bold">&#x3c3;</mml:mi>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mtext>F</mml:mtext>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
</mml:msup>
<mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo>
<mml:mi mathvariant="bold">&#x3c3;</mml:mi>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>FE</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
</mml:msup>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">/</mml:mo>
<mml:mtext>s</mml:mtext>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo>
<mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo>
<mml:mi mathvariant="bold">&#x3c3;</mml:mi>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mi mathvariant="bold">&#x3f5;</mml:mi>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
</mml:msup>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">/</mml:mo>
<mml:mtext>sr</mml:mtext>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo>
<mml:mo>.</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</disp-formula>
<p>For data collected in a single environment, the following formula was used to estimate narrow-sense heritability (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B71">Singh et&#xa0;al., 1993</xref>):</p>
<disp-formula>
<mml:math display="block" id="M2">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mtext>h</mml:mtext>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
</mml:msup>
<mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
<mml:mi mathvariant="bold">&#x3c3;</mml:mi>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mtext>F</mml:mtext>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
</mml:msup>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">/</mml:mo>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo>
<mml:mi mathvariant="bold">&#x3c3;</mml:mi>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mtext>F</mml:mtext>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
</mml:msup>
<mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
<mml:mi mathvariant="bold">&#x3c3;</mml:mi>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mi mathvariant="bold">&#x3f5;</mml:mi>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
</mml:msup>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</disp-formula>
<p>In both formulae, <italic>&#x3c3;</italic>F<sup>2</sup> is the estimated family-wise genotypic variance component, and <italic>&#x3c3;</italic>
<sub>&#x3b5;</sub>
<sup>2</sup> is the estimated experimental error variance component. Additional terms for multi-environment data include: <italic>&#x3c3;</italic>FE<sup>2</sup> as the estimated family-by-environment (F &#xd7; E) interaction variance component, s as the number of environments, and r as the number of replications in each environment. For multi-year and multi-environment data, we calculated the variance components for F &#xd7; E interactions across years and production systems.</p>
<p>G &#xd7; E interactions were explored for all traits collected in 2020 and 2021, including germination percentage, days to germination, seedling vigor, root diameters, root branching density, and disease resistance. Linear or generalized mixed models were used to calculate the population-wide estimated marginal means for each trait.</p>
<p>For the evaluation of G &#xd7; E interactions in germination and vigor data, the following model was used:</p>
<disp-formula>
<mml:math display="block" id="M3">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>Y</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>j</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>k</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>l</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>&#x3bc;</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>P</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>S</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>j</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>P</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#xd7;</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>S</mml:mi>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>j</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>C</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>k</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>&#x2223;</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>R</mml:mi>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">/</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>F</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>l</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo>
<mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>&#x2223;</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>Y</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>m</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo>
<mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>&#x2208;</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>j</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>k</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>l</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</disp-formula>
<p>where <italic>Y<sub>ijkl</sub>
</italic>&#x200b; is the observed trait, <italic>&#x3bc;</italic> is the overall mean, <italic>P<sub>i</sub>
</italic>, <italic>S<sub>j</sub>
</italic>, and <italic>C<sub>k</sub>
</italic>&#x200b; are the fixed effects of population, production system, and seed coat color, respectively, <italic>(P&#xd7;S)<sub>ij</sub>
</italic> represents their interaction, (1&#x2223;<italic>R/F<sub>l</sub>
</italic>) is the random effect of family nested within replication block, (1&#x2223;<italic>Y<sub>m</sub>
</italic>) is the random effect of sampling year, and <italic>&#x2208;<sub>ijkl</sub>
</italic> is the residual error.</p>
<p>For the evaluation of G &#xd7; E interactions in root morphology and disease data, where only one year of data was collected, the following model was used:</p>
<disp-formula>
<mml:math display="block" id="M4">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>Y</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>j</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>k</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>l</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>&#x3bc;</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>P</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>S</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>j</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>P</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#xd7;</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>S</mml:mi>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>j</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>C</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>k</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>&#x2223;</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>R</mml:mi>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">/</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>F</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>l</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo>
<mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>&#x2208;</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>j</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>k</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>l</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</disp-formula>
<p>where <italic>Y<sub>ijkl</sub>
</italic>&#x200b; is the observed trait, <italic>&#x3bc;</italic> is the overall mean, <italic>P<sub>i</sub>
</italic>, <italic>S<sub>j</sub>
</italic>, and <italic>C<sub>k</sub>
</italic>&#x200b; are the fixed effects of population, production system, and seed coat color, respectively, <italic>(P&#xd7;S)<sub>ij</sub>
</italic> represents their interaction, (1&#x2223;<italic>R/F<sub>l</sub>
</italic>) is the random effect of family nested within replication block, and <italic>&#x2208;<sub>ijkl</sub>
</italic> is the residual error. Significance of the G &#xd7; E interactions in each model was then analyzed using the <italic>joint_tests</italic> function in the <italic>emmeans</italic> package to run Type III tests.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s3" sec-type="results">
<label>3</label>
<title>Results</title>
<sec id="s3_1">
<label>3.1</label>
<title>Early-season performance varies according to breeding history and seed color</title>
<p>Utilizing the data collected from the F<sub>6</sub>-F<sub>8</sub> generations, we explored the relationship between population factors and early season performance. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) indicated that each of the examined factors &#x2013; seed color, breeding history, cross, production system, and the breeding history &#xd7; system interaction &#x2013; had a significant influence on days to germination and germination percentage across all years (p &lt; 0.05 for all contrasts). These results, shown in <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Supplementary Table&#xa0;3</bold>
</xref>, motivated further exploration of these traits across the factor gradients. We generated estimated marginal means (EMMs) for all traits and populations within each year and production system (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Supplementary Table&#xa0;4</bold>
</xref>), as well as for the white-seeded and pigmented seed families of each population within each year and production system (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Supplementary Table&#xa0;5</bold>
</xref>).</p>
<p>Notable year-to-year variation in germination percentage was identified, with particularly low germination in the 2021 organic treatment, shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;1a</bold>
</xref>. Germination was lower for the organically-bred families in 2018, although it should be noted that the fields were not planted reciprocally during this year (i.e., the organically-bred families were only grown in organic fields). There were varying trends in germination rate across all families and breeding histories in 2020 and 2021; however, there were consistent increases in the germination percentage of white-seeded families with an organic breeding history. Visualizing the days to germination across breeding histories revealed a trend towards faster germination in the organically-bred, white-seeded families, shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;1b</bold>
</xref>.</p>
<fig id="f1" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;1</label>
<caption>
<p>
<bold>(a)</bold> Boxplots of germination percentage of F<sub>6</sub>-F<sub>8</sub> families categorized by seed color and breeding histories, analyzed within each year and production system. Density plot color indicates population data from each breeding history or the overlap of data. <bold>(b)</bold> Density plots of days to germination for F<sub>7</sub> and F<sub>8</sub> families categorized by seed color and breeding histories, analyzed across experimental years, populations, and production systems. Vertical lines indicate the estimated marginal means for each breeding history group within each seed color category. Significance values are derived from Tukey HSD tests. Days to germination data was not collected on the F<sub>6</sub> generation in 2018.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-16-1533039-g001.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>EMMs for the germination traits, shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">
<bold>Table&#xa0;3</bold>
</xref>, indicate clear trends of higher germination rates in the organically-bred, white-seeded families in 2020 and 2021 within the organic fields. When the EMMs were calculated across the data from all of the fields in 2020 and 2021, the organically-bred, white-seeded families had significantly higher (&#x3b1; &lt; 0.05) germination percentage (0.598 &#xb1; 0.083) than their conventionally-bred counterparts (0.558 &#xb1; 0.083). The multi-year, multi-environment average of days to germination was significantly lower (&#x3b1; &lt; 0.05) for the organically-bred, white-seeded families (14.1 &#xb1; 0.83) than for the conventionally-bred, white-seeded families (14.5 &#xb1; 0.83), indicating faster germination.</p>
<table-wrap id="T3" position="float">
<label>Table&#xa0;3</label>
<caption>
<p>Estimated marginal means (EMMs) with standard errors for germination percentage and days to germination of snap bean families with organic and conventional breeding histories.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="top" rowspan="2" colspan="2" align="left">Breeding History</th>
<th valign="top" colspan="2" align="center">2018</th>
<th valign="top" colspan="2" align="center">2020 Organic Field</th>
<th valign="top" colspan="2" align="center">2020 Conventional Field</th>
<th valign="top" colspan="2" align="center">2021 Organic Field</th>
<th valign="top" colspan="2" align="center">2021 Conventional Field</th>
<th valign="top" colspan="2" align="center">2020 and 2021 - All Fields</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="top" align="center">Days to Germination</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">Germination Percentage</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">Days to Germination</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">Germination Percentage</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">Days to Germination</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">Germination Percentage</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">Days to Germination</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">Germination Percentage</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">Days to Germination</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">Germination Percentage</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">Days to Germination</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">Germination Percentage</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" rowspan="2" align="left">All Families</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Organic</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">NA</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.741 &#xb1;0.009<sup>a</sup>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">13.9 &#xb1;0.059<sup>a</sup>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.661 &#xb1;0.011<sup>a</sup>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">15.7 &#xb1;0.055<sup>a</sup>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.686 &#xb1;0.008<sup>a</sup>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">12.9 &#xb1;0.038<sup>a</sup>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.392 &#xb1;0.012<sup>a</sup>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">13.7 &#xb1;0.039<sup>a</sup>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.835 &#xb1;0.008<sup>a</sup>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">14.10 &#xb1;0.72<sup>a</sup>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.645 &#xb1;0.028<sup>a</sup>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="center">Conventional</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">NA</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.844 &#xb1;0.009<sup>b</sup>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">14.1 &#xb1;0.06<sup>b</sup>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.690 &#xb1;0.011<sup>b</sup>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">16 &#xb1;0.056<sup>b</sup>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.745 &#xb1;0.008<sup>b</sup>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">13.1 &#xb1;0.04<sup>b</sup>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.351 &#xb1;0.012<sup>b</sup>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">13.9 &#xb1;0.039<sup>b</sup>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.791 &#xb1;0.008<sup>b</sup>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">14.30 &#xb1;0.72<sup>b</sup>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.647 &#xb1;0.028<sup>a</sup>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" rowspan="2" align="left">White- Seeded Families</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Organic</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">NA</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.684 &#xb1;0.021<sup>a</sup>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">14.0 &#xb1;0.092<sup>a</sup>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.644 &#xb1;0.014<sup>a</sup>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.08 <sup>a</sup>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.676 &#xb1;0.013<sup>a</sup>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">13.0 &#xb1;0.11<sup>a</sup>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.243 &#xb1;0.016<sup>a</sup>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">13.5 &#xb1;0.097<sup>a</sup>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.823 &#xb1;0.014<sup>a</sup>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">14.1 &#xb1;0.83<sup>a</sup>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.598 &#xb1;0.083<sup>a</sup>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="center">Conventional</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">NA</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.838 &#xb1;0.022<sup>b</sup>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">14.6 &#xb1;0.082<sup>b</sup>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.626 &#xb1;0.016<sup>a</sup>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">16.2 &#xb1;0.09 <sup>b</sup> 15.8 &#xb1;</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.717 &#xb1;0.014<sup>b</sup>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">13.3 &#xb1;0.13<sup>a</sup>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.141 &#xb1;0.018<sup>b</sup>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">14.0 &#xb1;0.10<sup>b</sup>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.725 &#xb1;0.015<sup>b</sup>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">14.5 &#xb1;0.83<sup>b</sup>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.558 &#xb1;0.083<sup>b</sup>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" rowspan="2" align="left">Pigmented Seed Families</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Organic</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">NA</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.793 &#xb1;0.008<sup>a</sup>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">13.7 &#xb1;0.063<sup>a</sup>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.700 &#xb1;0.011<sup>a</sup>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">15.5 &#xb1;0.05<sup>a</sup>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.707 &#xb1;0.007<sup>a</sup>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">12.8 &#xb1;0.034<sup>a</sup>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.567 &#xb1;0.013<sup>a</sup>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">13.8 &#xb1;0.038<sup>a</sup>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.871 &#xb1;0.009<sup>a</sup>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">14.0 &#xb1;0.69<sup>a</sup>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.711 &#xb1;0.014<sup>a</sup>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="center">Conventional</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">NA</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.886 &#xb1;0.007<sup>b</sup>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">13.8 &#xb1;0.063<sup>a</sup>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.746 &#xb1;0.011<sup>b</sup>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">15.9 &#xb1;0.051<sup>b</sup>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.774 &#xb1;0.007<sup>b</sup>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">12.9 &#xb1;0.034<sup>b</sup>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.545 &#xb1;0.013<sup>a</sup>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">13.9 &#xb1;0.038<sup>b</sup>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.847 &#xb1;0.009<sup>b</sup>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">14.1 &#xb1;0.69<sup>b</sup>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.728 &#xb1;0.014<sup>b</sup>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn>
<p>Means followed by different superscript letters indicate significant pairwise differences between breeding histories, based on Tukey&#x2019;s HSD test. (&#x3b1; &lt; 0.05).</p>
</fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<p>Narrow-sense heritability, shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="T4">
<bold>Table&#xa0;4</bold>
</xref>, was high for the early-season traits. Heritability for days to germination across all years and environments ranged from 0.51 to 0.75 across populations. The range was lower, at 0.36 to 0.66, for germination percentage. Early-season vigor had the highest heritability, ranging from 0.78 to 0.83. We identified moderate to high heritability for these traits within the organic systems, ranging from 0.30 to 0.71, and low to high heritability in the conventional systems, ranging from 0.12 to 0.80.</p>
<table-wrap id="T4" position="float">
<label>Table&#xa0;4</label>
<caption>
<p>Narrow-sense heritability of traits collected in multiple years (2020 and 2021) and multiple environments, for each population.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" rowspan="2" align="center">Production System</th>
<th valign="middle" rowspan="2" align="center">Trait</th>
<th valign="bottom" colspan="4" align="center">Narrow-Sense Heritability</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" align="center">ORBV-O</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">ORBV-C</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">HYPR-O</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">HYPR-C</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" rowspan="3" align="center">Combined Systems</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Germination Percentage</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.66</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.36</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.37</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.53</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Days to Germination</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.54</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.51</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.62</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.75</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Vigor</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.78</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.78</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.82</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.83</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" rowspan="3" align="center">Organic</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Germination Percentage</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.45</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.36</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.66</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.71</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Days to Germination</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.30</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.33</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.45</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.63</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Vigor</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.47</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.57</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.61</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.72</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" rowspan="3" align="center">Conventional</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Germination Percentage</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.52</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.14</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.12</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.18</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Days to Germination</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.33</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.35</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.26</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.80</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Vigor</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.58</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.72</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.72</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.73</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_2">
<label>3.2</label>
<title>Changes in root disease and morphology across breeding history, parentage, and seed color</title>
<p>ANOVA indicated that several of the examined factors &#x2013; seed color, breeding history, cross, production system, and the production system &#xd7; breeding history interaction &#x2013; had a significant influence on root morphology and disease incidence (&#x3b1; &lt; 0.05), as shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="T5">
<bold>Table&#xa0;5</bold>
</xref> and <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Supplementary Table&#xa0;3</bold>
</xref>. Seed color, as a main effect, was significantly associated with taproot and basal root diameter. Breeding history had a significant effect on basal root diameter, branching density, and disease. Parental cross significantly influenced branching density and disease. Production system and the production system &#xd7; breeding history interaction had a significant effect on all traits except taproot diameter. Parental cross, production system, and breeding history had the largest effects on disease incidence, respectively.</p>
<table-wrap id="T5" position="float">
<label>Table&#xa0;5</label>
<caption>
<p>Estimated marginal means (EMMs) with standard error for root disease and branching density across breeding history and parentage contrast factors.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="top" rowspan="3" colspan="2" align="left">Production System</th>
<th valign="top" colspan="4" align="center">Root Disease (0-9 Scale)</th>
<th valign="top" colspan="4" align="center">Branching Density (0-5 Scale)</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="top" colspan="2" align="center">Breeding History</th>
<th valign="top" colspan="2" align="center">Cross</th>
<th valign="top" colspan="2" align="center">Breeding History</th>
<th valign="top" colspan="2" align="center">Cross</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="top" align="center">Organic</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">Conventional</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">ORBV</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">HYPR</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">Organic</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">Conventional</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">ORBV</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">HYPR</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" rowspan="3" align="center">All Families</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Combined Systems</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.42 &#xb1; 0.05<sup>a</sup>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.60 &#xb1; 0.05<sup>b</sup>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.39 &#xb1; 0.05<sup>a</sup>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.64 &#xb1; 0.05<sup>b</sup>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.24 &#xb1; 0.08<sup>a</sup>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.86 &#xb1; 0.08<sup>b</sup>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.72 &#xb1; 0.08<sup>a</sup>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.38 &#xb1; 0.08<sup>b</sup>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="center">Organic</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.57 &#xb1; 0.07<sup>a</sup>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.78 &#xb1; 0.08<sup>b</sup>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.51 &#xb1; 0.08<sup>a</sup>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.84 &#xb1; 0.07<sup>b</sup>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.10 &#xb1; 0.11<sup>a</sup>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.92 &#xb1; 0.12<sup>a</sup>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.88 &#xb1; 0.12<sup>a</sup>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.14 &#xb1; 0.11<sup>a</sup>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="center">Conventional</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.29 &#xb1; 0.07<sup>a</sup>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.44 &#xb1; 0.07<sup>b</sup>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.27 &#xb1; 0.07<sup>a</sup>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.46 &#xb1; 0.06<sup>b</sup>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.35 &#xb1; 0.12<sup>a</sup>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.74 &#xb1; 0.12<sup>b</sup>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.54 &#xb1; 0.13<sup>a</sup>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.55 &#xb1; 0.12<sup>b</sup>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" rowspan="3" align="center">White-Seeded Families</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Combined Systems</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.32 &#xb1; 0.09<sup>a</sup>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.79 &#xb1; 0.11<sup>b</sup>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.48 &#xb1; 0.12<sup>a</sup>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.63 &#xb1; 0.09<sup>a</sup>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.45 &#xb1; 0.16<sup>a</sup>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.38 &#xb1; 0.19<sup>b</sup>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.40 &#xb1; 0.21<sup>a</sup>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.43 &#xb1; 0.15<sup>b</sup>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="center">Organic</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.52 &#xb1; 0.17<sup>a</sup>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.11 &#xb1; 0.21<sup>b</sup>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.68 &#xb1; 0.22<sup>a</sup>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.95 &#xb1; 0.16<sup>a</sup>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.04 &#xb1; 0.25<sup>a</sup>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.30 &#xb1; 0.31<sup>b</sup>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.53 &#xb1; 0.31<sup>a</sup>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.81 &#xb1; 0.25<sup>a</sup>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="center">Conventional</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.11 &#xb1; 0.09<sup>a</sup>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.50 &#xb1; 0.11<sup>b</sup>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.28 &#xb1; 0.12<sup>a</sup>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.33 &#xb1; 0.08<sup>a</sup>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.83 &#xb1; 0.22<sup>a</sup>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.49 &#xb1; 0.25<sup>b</sup>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.31 &#xb1; 0.28<sup>a</sup>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5.02 &#xb1; 0.20<sup>b</sup>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" rowspan="4" align="center">Pigmented Seed Families</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Combined Systems</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.46 &#xb1; 0.06<sup>a</sup>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.57 &#xb1; 0.06<sup>a</sup>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.39 &#xb1; 0.06<sup>a</sup>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.64 &#xb1; 0.06<sup>b</sup>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.17 &#xb1; 0.07<sup>a</sup>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.93 &#xb1; 0.07<sup>b</sup>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.75 &#xb1; 0.07<sup>a</sup>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.34 &#xb1; 0.08<sup>b</sup>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="center">Organic</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.51 &#xb1; 0.07<sup>a</sup>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.63 &#xb1; 0.07<sup>a</sup>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.42 &#xb1; 0.07<sup>a</sup>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.73 &#xb1; 0.07<sup>b</sup>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.32 &#xb1; 0.11<sup>a</sup>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.29 &#xb1; 0.11<sup>a</sup>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.16 &#xb1; 0.10<sup>a</sup>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.45 &#xb1; 0.11<sup>a</sup>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="center">Conventional</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.40 &#xb1; 0.08<sup>a</sup>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.50 &#xb1; 0.08<sup>a</sup>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.35 &#xb1; 0.08<sup>a</sup>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.55 &#xb1; 0.08<sup>b</sup>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.01 &#xb1; 0.14<sup>a</sup>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.57 &#xb1; 0.14<sup>b</sup>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.35 &#xb1; 0.14<sup>a</sup>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4.23 &#xb1; 0.15<sup>b</sup>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn>
<p>Means followed by different superscript letters indicate significant pairwise differences between factor levels, based on Tukey&#x2019;s HSD test (&#x3b1; &lt; 0.05).</p>
</fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<p>Root disease was lower among organically-bred families, as shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;2a</bold>
</xref>. This reduction was significant (&#x3b1; &lt; 0.05) across all families. When the families were subset for white and pigmented seed color, the organically-bred families showed a significant reduction in root disease amongst the white-seeded families, but disease ratings across the pigmented seed families did not differ significantly between breeding histories. There were also significant decreases (&#x3b1; &lt; 0.05) in root disease among the ORBV families, shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;2b</bold>
</xref>. This decrease was significant across production systems, as well as within each production system. The ORBV pigmented seed families primarily contributed to the significant disease reduction, and we found no significant reduction of disease in the ORBV white-seeded families. EMMs for root disease data are shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="T5">
<bold>Table&#xa0;5</bold>
</xref>. In addition to disease reduction, parentage significantly affected root branching density, as shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;3</bold>
</xref>. Families derived from the HYPR cross had significantly higher (&#x3b1; &lt; 0.05) branching density than ORBV families across production systems and within the conventional system; however, this relationship was not broadly identified in the organic production system. EMMs for branching density are shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="T5">
<bold>Table&#xa0;5</bold>
</xref>.</p>
<fig id="f2" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;2</label>
<caption>
<p>
<bold>(a)</bold> Violin plots of root disease data collected on F<sub>8</sub> families in 2021. Data are categorized by seed color and breeding histories, and were analyzed across populations and production systems. Significance values are derived from Tukey HSD tests. <bold>(b)</bold> Violin plots of root disease data collected on F<sub>8</sub> families in 2021. Data are categorized by production system and parentage, and were analyzed across breeding history, populations and seed color. Significance values are derived from Tukey HSD tests.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-16-1533039-g002.tif"/>
</fig>
<fig id="f3" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;3</label>
<caption>
<p>Boxplots of branching density data collected on F<sub>8</sub> families in 2021. Data are categorized by production system and parentage, and were analyzed across breeding history, populations and seed color. Significance values are derived from Tukey HSD tests.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-16-1533039-g003.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>Narrow-sense heritability, calculated for traits observed in a single environment, ranged from low to moderate heritability for root-related traits (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T6">
<bold>Table&#xa0;6</bold>
</xref>). Heritability of branching density ranged from 0.02 to 0.26 across production systems. For disease rating, the heritability ranged from 0 to 0.25 across production systems. Heritability of root diameter ranged from 0 to 0.46.</p>
<table-wrap id="T6" position="float">
<label>Table&#xa0;6</label>
<caption>
<p>Narrow-sense heritability of traits collected in one year (2021) and environments, for each population.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" rowspan="2" align="center">Production System</th>
<th valign="middle" rowspan="2" align="center">Trait</th>
<th valign="bottom" colspan="4" align="center">Narrow-Sense Heritability</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" align="center">ORBV-O</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">ORBV-C</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">HYPR-O</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">HYPR-C</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Organic</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Basal Root 1 Diameter</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.08</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.12</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.44</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.28</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Conventional</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Basal Root 1 Diameter</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.00</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.06</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.17</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.04</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Organic</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Basal Root 2 Diameter</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.16</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.06</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.32</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.46</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Conventional</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Basal Root 2 Diameter</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.13</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.01</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.07</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Organic</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Taproot Diameter</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.13</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.26</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.37</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.26</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Conventional</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Taproot Diameter</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.00</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.00</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.21</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.04</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Organic</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Branching Density</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.16</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.12</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.02</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.16</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Conventional</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Branching Density</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.21</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.02</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.25</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.26</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Organic</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Disease Rating</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.25</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.08</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.05</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Conventional</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Disease Rating</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.00</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.00</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.00</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.06</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Organic</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">100 Seed Weight</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">NA</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">NA</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">NA</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">NA</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Conventional</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">100 Seed Weight</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.84</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.77</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.72</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.75</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Organic</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Days to 50% Flower</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.74</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">NA</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.73</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">NA</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Conventional</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Days to 50% Flower</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">NA</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.68</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">NA</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.74</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Organic</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Seed Weight/Plant (grams)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.40</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">NA</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.21</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">NA</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Conventional</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Seed Weight/Plant (grams)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">NA</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.48</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">NA</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.44</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_3">
<label>3.3</label>
<title>Multiple correlations analysis</title>
<p>Spearman&#x2019;s rank correlations, shown in <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Supplementary Table&#xa0;6</bold>
</xref>, indicated a moderate and significant positive correlation between germination percentage and seed pigmentation across all three years. In all years, this relationship was stronger within the conventional populations than in the organic populations. In 2018, seed pigmentation was slightly negatively correlated with individual plant yield (i.e., seed weight per plant) in the organic populations, but it had a slightly positive correlation in the conventional populations. In 2020, seed pigmentation was more strongly correlated with 100-seed weight in the organic populations, and we found a higher correlation between days to germination and 100-seed weight in the organic populations. Days to germination and germination percentage had strong negative correlations in both breeding histories in 2020. Seed pigmentation was negatively correlated with days to germination in the conventional populations in 2021, but we found no significant correlation between these traits in the organic populations.</p>
<p>We identified positive correlations between taproot and basal root diameters for both organic and conventional populations in 2021. Branching density had a slight positive correlation with days to germination in the organic populations and a slight negative correlation with days to germination in the conventional populations. Negative correlations were also identified between branching density and germination percentage in the organic populations only.</p>
<p>Next, we explored correlations between the same traits but within the pigmented and white-seeded families of each population (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Supplementary Table&#xa0;7</bold>
</xref>). In the 2018 white-seeded families, seed weight per plant was positively correlated with germination percentage in the conventional populations but negatively correlated in the organic populations. In 2020, the white-seeded families had stronger negative correlations between germination percentage and days to germination than the pigmented seed families. For the 2021 data, we identified positive correlations between germination percentage and days to germination, but only among the pigmented seed families. Differences in these correlations between the conventional and organic production systems were also explored, as shown in <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Supplementary Table&#xa0;8</bold>
</xref>. Trends were similar to those shown in <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Supplementary Table&#xa0;7</bold>
</xref>. In 2021, there was notably a stronger negative correlation between germination percentage and days to germination among the white-seeded families grown in the organic system than in the conventional system.</p>
<p>All correlations discussed and shown in the <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>supplementary materials</bold>
</xref> were significant (&#x3b1;&lt;0.05).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_4">
<label>3.4</label>
<title>Genotype &#xd7; environment interactions vary according to parentage</title>
<p>In order to evaluate G &#xd7; E interactions, we utilized a series of mixed models to estimate marginal means (EMMs) for each snap bean population, followed by Type-III tests of the fixed effects on the resulting EMMs. Our results (shown in <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Supplementary Table&#xa0;9</bold>
</xref>) suggested that variation existed between population parentage, so we supplemented the analysis by running the models with all data combined and separately with subsets of ORBV and HYPR parentage. Results for the G &#xd7; E interaction factor are shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="T7">
<bold>Table&#xa0;7</bold>
</xref>, and results for all model factors are shown in <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Supplementary Table&#xa0;10</bold>
</xref>.</p>
<table-wrap id="T7" position="float">
<label>Table&#xa0;7</label>
<caption>
<p>Genotype-by-environment effect terms for all snap bean traits evaluated in 2020 and 2021.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Trait</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Parental Cross</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">F stat</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">d.f.</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<th valign="bottom" colspan="4" align="left">Germination Percentage</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">Combined</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">14.873***</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">3</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">ORBV</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">ns</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">HYPR</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">ns</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="bottom" colspan="4" align="left">Days to Germination</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">Combined</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">18.121***</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">3</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">ORBV</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">49.819***</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">HYPR</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">5.240*</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="bottom" colspan="4" align="left">Vigor</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">Combined</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">14.620***</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">3</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">ORBV</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">11.653***</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">HYPR</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">28.563***</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="bottom" colspan="4" align="left">Taproot Diameter</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">Combined</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">4.569**</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">3</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">ORBV</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">6.126*</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">HYPR</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">4.753*</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="bottom" colspan="4" align="left">Basal Root 1 Diameter</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">Combined</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">5.912***</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">3</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">ORBV</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">ns</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">HYPR</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">7.599**</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="bottom" colspan="4" align="left">Basal Root 2 Diameter</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">Combined</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">4.728**</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">3</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">ORBV</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">ns</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">HYPR</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">7.786**</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="bottom" colspan="4" align="left">Branching Density</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">Combined</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">14.642***</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">3</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">ORBV</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">ns</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">HYPR</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">16.674***</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="bottom" colspan="4" align="left">Disease Rating</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">Combined</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">6.178***</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">3</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">ORBV</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">11.213***</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">HYPR</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">4.997*</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">1</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn>
<p>Factor effects are shown for the full dataset, as well as for subsets associated with each of the two parentages (ORBV and HYPR). <italic>ns</italic>: <italic>p</italic> &gt; 0.05, *: <italic>p</italic> &#x2264; 0.05, **: <italic>p</italic> &#x2264; 0.01, ***: p&#x2264; 0.001. </p>
</fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<p>In the models generated for G &#xd7; E interactions, the production system factor was significant across all evaluated traits and parentage groupings, with the exception of taproot and basal root 1 diameters in the ORBV populations. The population factor was also significant for many traits, but not across all parentage groupings. Significant G &#xd7; E interactions, visualized in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f4">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;4</bold>
</xref>, were identified for many traits, with variation across parentage groups.</p>
<fig id="f4" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;4</label>
<caption>
<p>Genotype &#xd7; environment interaction plots for early-season and root traits in snap bean populations. Estimated marginal means (EMMs) were generated for each population within each production system, using data collected from F<sub>7</sub> and F<sub>8</sub> families in 2020 and 2021.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-16-1533039-g004.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>For germination percentage, the interaction term was only significant when parentage groups were combined, indicating that there was no genotype &#xd7; environment interaction between related populations of opposite breeding histories. In the other early-season performance traits, days to germination and vigor, significant interactions were identified in both populations for both traits. For days to germination, the population trends were divergent. In the HYPR populations, days to germination was longer in the HYPR-C population than in HYPR-O in both production systems, with the difference between populations increasing marginally in the organic system. In the ORBV populations, ORBV-C took longer to germinate than ORBV-O in the conventional system, but the population means were nearly identical in the organic system. For vigor, the population trends revealed a crossover interaction, in which the organically-bred populations had lower vigor than their conventional counterparts in the conventional system but higher yield in the organic system. These results demonstrate that populations vary in their performance according to the production system, and that useful variation may be captured to improve the early-season performance of plants in a specific growing environment.</p>
<p>Among the root traits, G &#xd7; E interactions were less straightforward. For example, in the root diameter traits, the ORBV populations showed consistent trends of higher diameter among the conventional populations and in the organic production system. For the same traits in the HYPR populations, HYPR-O had thicker taproots in both systems but a crossover interaction was observed with HYPR-C for the basal root diameters. Branching density was similar among HYPR-C, ORBV-O, and ORBV-C, with lower density in the conventional system. HYPR-O deviated from this pattern, exhibiting much higher branching density in the conventional system. For root disease, the parentage group patterns deviated. In the HYPR populations, HYPR-O had higher disease in both systems, with the difference increasing in the organic system. In the ORBV populations a crossover effect was observed where ORBV-O had higher disease than ORBV-C in the conventional system, but lower disease in the organic system. Although more variable, the results for the root traits still clearly demonstrate population-specific responses to differing environments.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_5">
<label>3.5</label>
<title>QTL mapping</title>
<p>Using the BARCBean12K BeadChip SNP data, we constructed linkage maps for all four populations. <xref ref-type="table" rid="T8">
<bold>Table&#xa0;8</bold>
</xref> details map information for each of the sets of linkage maps. The HYPR linkage maps are included in <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Supplementary Figures&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref> and <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM2">
<bold>2</bold>
</xref>. The ORBV linkage maps are included in <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM3">
<bold>Supplementary Figures&#xa0;3</bold>
</xref> and <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM4">
<bold>4</bold>
</xref>.</p>
<table-wrap id="T8" position="float">
<label>Table&#xa0;8</label>
<caption>
<p>Numbers of markers pre-and post-JoinMap, individuals used in map after removing heterozygous and identical individuals, and overall cM of each map.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="bottom" align="center">Mapping Population<xref ref-type="table-fn" rid="fnT8_24">
<sup>x</sup>
</xref>
</th>
<th valign="bottom" align="center">Generation</th>
<th valign="bottom" align="center">Year</th>
<th valign="bottom" align="center">Polymorphic Markers (no.)</th>
<th valign="bottom" align="center">Markers in Final Map (no.)</th>
<th valign="bottom" align="center">Population size in Final Map (no.)</th>
<th valign="bottom" align="center">Coverage (cM<sup>y</sup>)</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">ORBV-O</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">F<sub>8</sub>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">2022</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">3086</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">295</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">79</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">991.36</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">ORBV-C</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">F<sub>8</sub>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">2022</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">3086</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">398</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">86</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">929.74</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">HYPR-O</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">F<sub>7</sub>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">2020</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">2084</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">285</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">92</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">867.79</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">HYPR-C</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">F<sub>7</sub>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">2020</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">2084</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">357</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">88</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">813.26</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn id="fnT8_24">
<label>x</label>
<p>Mapping populations are described in detail in <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">
<bold>Table&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>.</p>
</fn>
<fn id="fnT8_25">
<label>y</label>
<p>Based on 1,200 cM average genetic map length (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Gepts, 2001</xref>).</p>
</fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<p>After initial filtering, we identified 3086 polymorphic markers for the ORBV populations and 2084 polymorphic markets for the HYPR populations. After additional SNP evaluation, 295 markers were retained in the ORBV-O maps, 398 markers were retained in the ORBV-C maps, 285 markers were retained in the HYPR-O maps, and 357 markers were retained in the HYPR-C maps. This represented coverage of 991.36, 929.74, 867.79, and 813.26 cM, respectively (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T8">
<bold>Table&#xa0;8</bold>
</xref>). The HYPR populations generally had lower coverage compared to the ORBV populations. While the organic breeding history maps generally had fewer markers, they had higher coverage compared to the conventional breeding history maps. QTL found with the associated maps for each population are discussed below.</p>
<p>A total of 78 QTL were found for the traits used in this study, and these QTL were dispersed throughout all eleven linkage groups, with the exception of LG 10 (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Supplementary Table&#xa0;11</bold>
</xref>). Maximum LOD scores ranged from 2.74 for a QTL linked to days to germination (DTG) on LG 6 to 12.85 for a QTL linked to germination percentage on LG 7. The phenotypic variation explained (R<sup>2</sup>) by the QTL ranged from 0.13 for DTG on LG 6, to 0.5 for a germination percentage QTL and for two vigor QTL on LG 7.</p>
<sec id="s3_5_1">
<label>3.5.1</label>
<title>Days to germination</title>
<p>We identified several genetic regions linked to days to germination (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Supplementary Table&#xa0;11</bold>
</xref>). Both ORBV populations showed a significant QTL on LG 7 for the 2020 growing season in the organic system (also in the conventional system for ORBV-O). The ORBV-O population also had significant QTL on LG 2_1 in the conventional system in 2021, LG 4 in the conventional system in 2020, and LG 8 in both systems in 2021.</p>
<p>As in the ORBV populations, there was a significant QTL for both populations on LG 7. There was also a significant QTL for both populations on LG 6-1. This location was significant for the HYPR-O population in the organic system in 2020. This locus was more significant in the HYPR-C population in both the 2020 organic and conventional systems, and in the organic system in 2021. There was also a significant QTL on LG 4 for the HYPR-C population in the organic system in 2021.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_5_2">
<label>3.5.2</label>
<title>Germination percentage</title>
<p>The ORBV-O population had a significant QTL on LG 4 in the 2020 organic and conventional systems, as well as one on LG 7 in the organic system in 2021 (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Supplementary Table&#xa0;11</bold>
</xref>). The ORBV-C population had significant QTL on LG 7 in 2018 and in the organic system in 2021. The ORBV-C population also had a significant QTL on LG 8&#x2013;1 in the conventional system in 2020.</p>
<p>For the HYPR-O population, we identified significant QTL on LG 7 in the organic system in 2018 and 2021, and QTL in different regions for the conventional system, LG-2 in 2020 and LG 4 in 2021. For the HYPR-C population, there was a significant QTL on LG 7 in the organic system in 2020 and both systems in 2021. The HYPR-C population also had a significant, stable QTL on LG 6&#x2013;1 in 2018 and in both systems in 2020 and 2021. This region was not significant in the HYPR-O population.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_5_3">
<label>3.5.3</label>
<title>Days to flowering</title>
<p>We identified a significant QTL related to days to flowering for the ORBV-O population on LG 3, and significant regions for the ORBV-C population on LG 1&#x2013;2 and LG 8-1 (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Supplementary Table&#xa0;11</bold>
</xref>).</p>
<p>Both HYPR populations had significant QTL for days to flowering on LG 4 and 5, both of which appear to overlap. The LODs suggest a stronger significance in the organic, especially on LG 5 (LOD 7.66). The conventional population had an additional significant QTL on LG 11.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_5_4">
<label>3.5.4</label>
<title>Root traits</title>
<p>We did not identify any significant QTL for root traits in the ORBV populations.</p>
<p>Both HYPR populations had significant QTL for basal root diameter on LG7, and the HYPR-C population also had a significant QTL for taproot diameter at the same location (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Supplementary Table&#xa0;11</bold>
</xref>). The HYPR-C population had a significant QTL for root branching density on LG 1. The only significant QTL for disease were in the HYPR-C population, one on LG 2 in the organic system in 2021 and one on LG 3 in the conventional system in 2021.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_5_5">
<label>3.5.5</label>
<title>Vigor</title>
<p>We found a significant QTL for vigor on LG 7 in the ORBV-O population in the 2020 conventional system and both systems in 2021 (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Supplementary Table&#xa0;11</bold>
</xref>). The ORBV-O population had additional significant QTL in the conventional system, on LG 4 in 2020 and LG 6 in 2021. In the ORBV-C population, we identified significant QTL for vigor in the ORBV-C population in both systems in 2020 and 2021. ORBV-C had an additional significant locus on LG 9 in the 2020 conventional system.</p>
<p>We identified one significant QTL for vigor in the HYPR-O population on LG 7 in the organic system in 2021. The HYPR-C population had a significant QTL on LG 7 in both systems in 2020 and 2021. We found an additional significant QTL in the HYPR-C population in the 2020 organic system on LG 4 and LG 6-1.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_5_6">
<label>3.5.6</label>
<title>Seed traits</title>
<p>Only the ORBV-C population had significant QTL for 100-seed weight (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Supplementary Table&#xa0;11</bold>
</xref>). The loci, found on linkage groups 2, 5, and 7, were stable in 2018 and 2020. Both ORBV populations had a significant QTL on LG 7 for seed color.</p>
<p>As in the ORBV populations, only the HYPR conventional population had significant QTL for 100-seed weight. We found a significant QTL on LG 3 in 2020, and a more stable QTL on LG 7 in 2018 and 2020. We identified a significant QTL for seed color in the HYPR populations on LG 7. The HYPR-O populations had a significant QTL on LG 7 for seed weight per plant, whereas for the HYPR-C population we identified a significant QTL for this trait on LG 1 and LG 6-1.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_5_7">
<label>3.5.7</label>
<title>Stable QTL</title>
<p>Of the QTL listed above, a number of these regions were stable over two or more years (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Supplementary Table&#xa0;11</bold>
</xref>).</p>
<p>We identified stable QTL in the HYPR populations for days to germination on LG 6, in the 16.8-24.2 Mbp region. This region was significant in HYPR-O and HYPR-C in the 2020 organic system, and again in the 2021 organic system for the HYPR-C populations. We also found a QTL related to germination percentage in the HYPR-C population that overlapped this region (3.3-24.4 Mbp) across systems in 2018, 2020, and 2021.</p>
<p>The ORBV and HYPR populations had significant QTL in at least two years on LG 7 for germination percentage, vigor, and 100-seed weight. We identified stable QTL for germination percentage in the ORBV populations on LG 7, in the 8.7-30.4 Mbp region. These QTL were significant for the ORBV-C population in 2018 and 2020, as well as for the ORBV-O population in 2021. In the HYPR populations, we identified several QTL for germination percentage over multiple years and systems in the 7.5-36.7 Mbp region of LG 7. For seedling vigor in the ORBV, we found several significant QTL on LG 7, between 1.6 Mbp and 30.7 Mbp. In the HYPR populations, we identified similar QTL on linkage group 7, including a QTL for the HYPR-O population in the 2021 organic system in the 8.4-36.7 Mbp region and a stable QTL for the HYPR-C population in the 7.5-35.2 Mbp region in both systems in 2020 and 2021. For 100-seed weight, we found significant QTL in the conventional populations and in the conventional system. The ORBV-C population had three stable QTL related to 100-seed weight on three different linkage groups: 2 (24.9-34.1 Mbp), 5 (9.3-38.2 Mbp), and 7 (3.3-8.8 Mbp). We identified a significant QTL for 100-seed weight in the HYPR-C populations on LG 7 in the 25.9-35.2 Mbp region. There were many QTL in all populations linked to days to germination on LG 7 in the 1.6-38.2 Mbp region.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_6">
<label>3.6</label>
<title>Segregation distortion</title>
<p>Distorted SNPs found in each population are reported in <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Supplementary Table&#xa0;12</bold>
</xref> and plotted in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f5">
<bold>Figures&#xa0;5A</bold>
</xref> (ORBV) and 5b (HYPR). A summary of the SNPs found in each population and the chromosomes on which they occur is presented in <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Supplementary Table&#xa0;13</bold>
</xref>.</p>
<fig id="f5" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;5</label>
<caption>
<p>
<bold>(a)</bold> Segregation distortion throughout the genome in the OR5630 &#xd7; Black Valentine (ORBV) populations. Blue regions correspond to regions uniquely distorted in the organic populations, red to regions in conventional populations, and yellow indicates shared regions of distortion. Black regions are either monomorphic or follow expected Mendelian ratios. Chromosome length is based on all SNPs from the BARCBean12K BeadChip. <bold>(b)</bold> Segregation distortion throughout the genome in the Hystyle &#xd7; Provider (HYPR) populations. Blue regions correspond to regions uniquely distorted in the organic populations, red to regions in conventional populations, and yellow indicates shared regions of distortion. Black regions are either monomorphic or follow expected Mendelian ratios. Chromosome length is based on all SNPs from the BARCBean12K BeadChip.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-16-1533039-g005.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>For the ORBV populations, there were 3,086 SNPs after filtering for monomorphic markers and missing data. Among these markers, we found that 277 were distorted SNPs in the organic population and 241 in the conventional (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f5">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;5a</bold>
</xref>). We determined that 74 of these markers were distorted in both populations (&#x2018;shared&#x2019; on <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f5">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;5a</bold>
</xref>), and these markers occurred on every linkage group except LG 3, 6, and 9. Both populations had unique SNPs, or regions of distorted SNPs, on every linkage group, except for the organic population on LG 1. The ORBV-O population had significantly more distorted markers on LGs 2, 9, and 11, while the ORBV-C population had more distortion on LGs 3, 4, and 7. When comparing the ORBV populations, ORBV-O had more distorted markers on LG 2, LG 5, LG 6, LG 9, LG 10, and LG 11. The ORBV-C population had more distorted SNPs than ORBV-O on LG 1, LG 3, LG 4, and LG 7.</p>
<p>For the HYPR populations, we found 2,084 SNPs after filtering. Of these, 234 markers were distorted in the organic population, 309 were distorted in the conventional population, and 196 were distorted in both populations (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f5">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;5b</bold>
</xref>). For markers distorted in both populations, we found large distortion regions on LGs 2, 7, and 10. There was a strong skew towards the maternal allele for the regions on LG 2 in both populations, with a higher frequency in the organic population. The shared region on LG 10 was also skewed towards the maternal allele in both populations, to a lesser degree than those on LG 2. Both populations skewed towards the paternal allele in the regions on LG 7. For the HYPR populations, HYPR-O had more distorted SNPs on LG 1 and LG 7, and HYPR-C had more distortion on LG 2, LG 4, LG 5, LG 8, LG 10, and LG 11.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s4" sec-type="discussion">
<label>4</label>
<title>Discussion</title>
<p>Organic production environments expose crops to distinct stressors that are typically minimized through chemical interventions in conventional systems. Breeding crops that are resilient to these stressors is a predominant goal within organic agriculture; however, the traits associated with resilience in organic systems are difficult to identify and select for due to the high variation in organic growing systems and the complex, quantitative inheritance of these traits. Our work sought to identify specific traits in snap beans that are beneficial for growth in organic production environments, along with finding regions to develop genetic markers that are associated with these traits. To achieve this, we developed four populations of snap beans that allowed us to make comparisons across parentage and breeding history. We anticipated that the organic populations would outperform the conventional populations within organic production systems, and our findings did point to significant crossover interactions in the organic and conventional populations. Furthermore, the narrow-sense heritability values for many traits indicated similar, and in some cases, higher heritability in the organic environments compared to the conventional environments. These values show that breeding within organic environments is a viable and potentially preferable approach to developing varieties that are well-suited to organic production systems.</p>    <p>To explore population variation for germination-related traits, we enacted high abiotic (i.e., cold and wet soils) and biotic (i.e., pathogenic fungi) pressure on seedlings through extraordinarily early planting dates. As anticipated, the production system significantly influenced germination-related traits. In general, total germination was lower within the organic production environments; yet, an exploration of the role of seed color indicated that this gap between production systems was largely due to the white-seeded cultivars (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;1a</bold>
</xref>). Our planting dates corresponded to suboptimal germination temperatures (i.e., below 13&#xb0;C), under which common bean seed imbibes moisture more slowly and thus takes longer to germinate (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B81">Walls and Stang, 1985</xref>). The reduction in germination seen under cold soil temperatures is exacerbated in white-seeded beans, as white seed is often correlated with a higher rate of imbibitional cracking and injury (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">Cirak and Myers, 2021</xref>). Although our white-seeded families had lower germination, those from an organic breeding history had consistently higher germination than those from a conventional breeding history. In addition to the variation in germination percentage, we identified significantly faster germination among the white-seeded families of organic breeding history compared to their conventional counterparts (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;1b</bold>
</xref>). Plasticity in germination as a response to environmental conditions may explain this increase in speed along with increases in soil temperature that may have resulted from compost application, as others have reported (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Deguchi et&#xa0;al., 2009</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">Donohue et&#xa0;al., 2005</xref>). Furthermore, a growing body of evidence suggests the bean seed microbiome may provide plan-growth-promoting properties to the germinating seeds, allowing for faster germination in the presence of pathogenic microbes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B51">Martins et&#xa0;al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B54">Mokrani et&#xa0;al., 2019</xref>). Given the increased abiotic and biotic pressures that are inherent to the early growing season, this acceleration of germination can be interpreted as an advantageous escape strategy. Accelerated imbibition and germination of white-seeded beans are understood to be flaws, which put the germinating seeds at higher risk of chilling injury or pathogen attack; however, our findings suggest that this characterization of white-seeded bean performance is incomplete and additional genetic factors may have a role in early-season resilience. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B78">Vidak et&#xa0;al. (2022)</xref> found similar results suggesting that while seed coat color has a significant role in bean germination, it does not explain all of the variation in germination and seedling emergence. Thus, we understand that there may be alternative routes to improving germination in white-seeded beans without altering seed color. This is singularly important for the organic snap bean processing market, where white seeds are essential to the product quality of processed beans but can simultaneously contribute to the organic yield gap through reduced germination in the field.</p>
<p>Similar to results for early-season performance, we found that the production system significantly influenced root morphology and disease. Other factors, including breeding history and cross, also significantly influenced root and disease traits. Many of these root traits were minimally explained by study factors, except for root branching density and disease development. Root disease was significantly lower within organically-bred families, compared to conventional counterparts, and this variation was largely explained by differences among the white-seeded families (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;2a</bold>
</xref>). Faster germination has been suggested as an effective means through which <italic>P. vulgaris</italic> seedlings may escape and outgrow soilborne pathogenic pressures, particularly those that cause damping-off (i.e., <italic>Pythium</italic>, <italic>Rhizoctonia</italic>, etc.) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B47">Li et&#xa0;al., 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B58">Pe&#xf1;a et&#xa0;al., 2013</xref>). Thus, the changes observed in germination speed among white-seeded families from an organic breeding history may partially explain these specific reductions in root disease. Comparing across parentage, the ORBV families had significantly lower root disease compared to the HYPR families (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;2b</bold>
</xref>). This difference was not surprising, given the disease resistance package of OR5630 and previous research into the root rot susceptibility of the four parental lines, which determined that Black Valentine has high resistance to the root rot complex prevalent in western Oregon (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">Huster et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>). These findings deviate from other work with the four RIL populations, which identified a trend towards higher pathogen abundance in the rhizosphere soil of ORBV populations; however, these results were collected from a separate field site and pathogen abundance was determined through a metabarcoding approach that was independent of root disease phenotyping (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B57">Park et&#xa0;al., 2023</xref>). Branching density was significantly higher among the HYPR families, indicative of a denser root system (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;3</bold>
</xref>). Organically-bred families also had significantly higher branching density, compared to the conventionally-bred families. Other work indicates that higher lateral root branching density significantly increases the ability of roots to cope with stressors, particularly in phosphorus-limited soils, suggesting that increased branching density may be an advantageous root system adaptation for nutrient-limited organic environments (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B62">Postma and Lynch, 2011</xref>).</p>
<p>Positive correlations between seed pigmentation and germination percentage were identified across all years and populations, although these correlations were higher among conventionally-bred populations. Seed pigmentation positively correlated with seed weight, a trend that was stronger among organically-bred populations. Seed weight, however, was positively correlated with days to germination and negatively correlated with germination percentage, suggesting that the larger seeded beans were slower to emerge or failed to emerge altogether. These results correspond to our findings that white-seeded organic families germinate faster, as well as other studies that have identified larger, pigmented seeds to be slower to germinate and thus depleted in field emergence (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">De Ron et&#xa0;al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B78">Vidak et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>).</p>
<p>Analysis of G &#xd7; E relationships across traits (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f4">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;4</bold>
</xref>) confirmed the importance of breeding within a target environment. Days to germination showed significant G &#xd7; E interactions, with population trends differing by parentage. In HYPR populations, HYPR-C germinated later than HYPR-O in both systems, with a slightly greater difference in the organic system. In ORBV populations, ORBV-C germinated later than ORBV-O in the conventional system, but both populations had similar germination times in the organic system. No interactions were observed for germination percentage, but germination was consistently lower in the organic systems. This trend is likely explained, in part, by the presence or absence of the fungicide seed treatment, which is intended to reduce seedling mortality due to biotic pressures. Notably, we identified a crossover interaction for seedling vigor, with organically-bred populations performing better in organic systems and conventionally-bred populations performing better in conventional systems. This interaction was stable across both parentage groups (ORBV and HYPR), suggesting that breeding within an organic system can enhance seedling vigor of progeny grown under organic conditions. We identified a crossover interaction in ORBV populations for root rot disease severity (higher in ORBV-O in the conventional system but lower in the organic system). This interaction was not observed in the HYPR populations, where HYPR-O had consistently higher disease severity. The interaction in the ORBV populations suggests organically bred families may have developed resistance mechanisms specific to organic environments, whereas the HYPR populations&#x2019; inconsistent response raises questions about the stability of this interaction. Previous research into the root rot susceptibility of the Common Bean Coordinated Agricultural Project (BeanCAP) Snap Bean Diversity Panel classified both OR5630 and Black Valentine as highly resistant to the western Oregon root rot complex, which may partially explain the variation observed in G &#xd7; E interactions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">Huster et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>). Other root traits showed less straightforward patterns, suggesting complex interactions between genotype and soil conditions. These findings are not unexpected, as root traits frequently show high plasticity in field environments (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B73">Strock et&#xa0;al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B79">Vieira et&#xa0;al., 2008</xref>). This plasticity may itself be advantageous, as suggested by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Burridge et&#xa0;al. (2016)</xref> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B86">Zhu et&#xa0;al. (2010)</xref>, but the trends observed in this study do not point to any consistent genotypic variation. Although our sampling protocol sought to characterize true variation in field-grown populations, the use of more controlled assays, such as <italic>in vitro</italic> germination tests, may result in clearer population trends. The significance of the production system across nearly all traits confirms that environmental factors tied to organic or conventional management can strongly influence phenotypes. These results emphasize the importance of breeding within organic environments to bolster adaptation, particularly for traits showing strong environmental dependencies (i.e., vigor, disease, root architecture). The observed crossover interactions indicate potential trade-offs between conventional and organic selection, underscoring the need for breeders to strategically prioritize traits based on the specific demands of each production system.</p>
<p>Heritability analysis in early-season and root system traits indicated consistent heritability values across production systems. For certain traits, namely germination percentage, seedling vigor, root diameters, and disease rating, the heritability was higher in the organic production system than in the conventional production system. These findings, in conjunction with improved performance of organically-bred populations within the organic environment, support the theory of optimizing the correlation of genotype performance in specific test environments and in the target population of environments within breeding programs.</p>
<p>The genetic linkage maps generated for this work had between 285 and 398 markers, and a coverage ranging from 813.26 to 991.36 cM, which correspond to 78 and 95 percent coverage, respectively, of the Stampede x Red Hawk map (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B72">Song et&#xa0;al., 2015</xref>). The final marker number was an improvement over initial maps made for the populations, described by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">King (2019)</xref>; however, the final maps had fewer markers than those generated for other mapping populations that utilized the BARCBean6K BeadChip or the BARCBean12K BeadChip (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">Bassett et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Heilig et&#xa0;al., 2017</xref>). We attribute this primarily to the relatively small population sizes, approximately 90 families within each population. Furthermore, we anticipate that the low marker number in the HYPR maps was a result of the parental background, as both parents originate from the Andean gene pool (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B80">Wallace et&#xa0;al., 2018</xref>). One of the parents of the ORBV populations, &#x2018;OR5630&#x2019;, is derived from both Andean and Middle American backgrounds. The other parent, &#x2018;Black Valentine&#x2019;, originates from the Andean gene pool. The ORBV populations had greater genetic diversity amongst the loci covered, likely due to these differences in the gene pools of the parents (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B80">Wallace et&#xa0;al., 2018</xref>). Quantitative trait loci (QTL) analysis was conducted to identify chromosomal regions linked to important traits for <italic>Phaseolus vulgaris</italic>, and many of these loci aligned with regions found in other studies (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Supplementary Table&#xa0;11</bold>
</xref>). QTL with higher values of phenotypic variation (R<sup>2</sup>) suggest the effect of additive genes in the control of traits. Many QTL were near or overlapping regions noted in the <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Arriagada et&#xa0;al. (2022)</xref> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">Izquierdo et&#xa0;al. (2023)</xref> meta-QTL analyses for important bean yield traits, including 100-seed weight on LGs 2, 3, 5, and 7; days to flowering on LGs 1, 3, 4, 5, and 11; and seed yield on LGs 1, 6, and 7. Additionally, the QTL we found for 100-seed weight on Pv07 is consistent with several other studies (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Gonz&#xe1;lez et&#xa0;al., 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">Koinange et&#xa0;al., 1996</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B59">P&#xe9;rez-Vega et&#xa0;al., 2010</xref>). A QTL we identified for root disease on LG 3 contained a significant SNP (12,661,037 bp) that <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">Huster et&#xa0;al. (2021)</xref> identified for the same trait in a genome-wide association study (GWAS). <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">Hagerty et&#xa0;al. (2015)</xref> found a QTL linked to <italic>Fusarium solani</italic> resistance that was also located on LG 3. We identified several QTL linked to root diameter on LG 7, similar to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B50">L&#xf3;pez-Mar&#xed;n et&#xa0;al. (2009)</xref>.</p>
<p>There were several notable trends for the quantitative trait loci found for these populations. A number of the identified QTL were stable over two or more years and in multiple growing systems. These regions included the following: days to germination on LG 6_1; germination percentage on LG 6_1, and LG 7; vigor on LG 7; 100-seed weight on LG 2, LG 5, and LG 7. The ORBV and HYPR populations had significant QTL in at least two years on LG 7 for germination percentage, vigor, and 100-seed weight. One-hundred seed weight on LG 7 is consistent with <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Gonz&#xe1;lez et&#xa0;al. (2017)</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">Koinange et&#xa0;al. (1996)</xref>, and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B59">P&#xe9;rez-Vega et&#xa0;al. (2010)</xref>. Variation in seed related traits is highly influenced by seed color and important seed proteins (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">Johnson et&#xa0;al., 1996</xref>). Both the <italic>P</italic> locus, which has been linked to seed pigmentation in beans, and phaseolin, one of the most important seed proteins in beans, have been found on LG 7 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">Johnson et&#xa0;al., 1996</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">Koinange et&#xa0;al., 1996</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B51">McClean et&#xa0;al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B53">Moghaddam et&#xa0;al., 2014</xref>). One of the two stable regions found for 100 seed weight on LG 7, with a peak in the 32.3 Mb region, was within a meta-QTL identified by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">Izquierdo et&#xa0;al. (2023)</xref> that contained a serine/threonine-protein kinase (STK) gene (<italic>Phvul.007G174900</italic>). STK genes have been linked to flowering and seed weight in rice, and grain yield in maize (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Deng et&#xa0;al., 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">Hu et&#xa0;al., 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">Jia et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>). In the same study, this same region on LG 6_1 corresponded with a meta-QTL noted to contain a receptor associated kinase (RAK) (<italic>Phvul.006G020700</italic>) that was associated with seed yield, seed weight, and days to physiological maturity. These two stable regions on LG 6_1 and LG 7 also overlap with meta-QTL in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">Izquierdo et&#xa0;al. (2023)</xref> that were noted to be correlated with performance in drought conditions. The stable QTL for 100 seed weight found on LG 2 and LG 7 were in the same regions as multiple meta-QTL found by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Arriagada et&#xa0;al. (2022)</xref>. Many of the QTL for important traits were in similar regions for both the organically and conventionally bred populations; however, there were exceptions and QTL for several traits were unique to a single breeding history for a particular cross. For example, we identified a marker related to days to 50% flowering in the ORBV-O population on LG 3, but found QTL for the ORBV-C population on LG 1_2 and LG 8_1. Deviations across breeding history such as these were also found for the days to 50% flowering trait in the HYPR populations and for markers related to seed weight per plant. Some populations had significant QTL in different regions depending on the growing system. For example, the HYPR-C population had a stable QTL for vigor on LG 7 in both organic and conventional systems in 2020 and 2021, but there were unique QTL on LG 4 and LG 6&#x2013;1 that were only significant in the organic growing system in 2020. Similarly, in 2020, there was a significant QTL on LG 7 in both production systems related to days to germination, and a QTL on LG 8 in both systems in 2021. Yet, in both 2020 and 2021, ORBV-O had a unique QTL in the conventional system &#x2013; one on LG 4 in 2020 and one on LG 2_1 in 2021. For some traits, the populations only had significant QTL in one growing system. For example, there were only significant QTL in the conventional growing system for &#x2018;100 seed weight&#x2019;, and in the organic system for &#x2018;Basal Root Diameter 1 and 2.&#x2019; Environment-specific QTL and distortion are consistent with studies on other crops, some of which suggest that the same traits selected in different environments may actually be different traits resulting from certain genes, or gene networks, activating or inactivating due to environmental signals (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">Ceccarelli and Grando, 2007</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B48">Lin and Togashi, 2002</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B63">Pswarayi et&#xa0;al., 2008</xref>).</p>
<p>Preliminary work with our data looking at broad-scale genomic differences suggested that populations from the same cross are quite similar at a broad level. Following this, we investigated segregation distortion to determine whether certain chromosomal regions showed differential selection depending on breeding history, and whether there were regions distorted in both crosses. Segregation distortion is common in many plants, including <italic>Phaseolus vulgaris</italic>, and may be linked to incompatibility genes or genes related to sporophytic selection (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Blair et&#xa0;al., 2003</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">C&#xf3;rdoba et&#xa0;al., 2010</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B82">Wang et&#xa0;al., 2005</xref>). Incompatibility between gene pools is common in beans and may explain some of these selection pressures, although distortion was higher in the HYPR populations. Notably, the HYPR population parents are from more similar gene pools than the parents of the ORBV populations.</p>
<p>In both crosses we utilized, there were significant differences in the SNPs and regions that were distorted in each system (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f5">
<bold>Figures&#xa0;5A</bold>
</xref> and 5B; <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Supplementary Tables&#xa0;11</bold>
</xref> and <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Supplementary Table&#xa0;12</bold>
</xref>). Among all sampled bi-allelic SNPs, 9% were skewed in ORBV-O, 8% in ORBV-C, 11% in HYPR-O, and 15% in HYPR-C (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Supplementary Table&#xa0;12</bold>
</xref>). Differences between populations from the same cross were compared by linkage group in <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Supplementary Table&#xa0;12</bold>
</xref> and noted in results. These differences were likely caused by selection in the respective systems, as they came from the same F<sub>1</sub> populations. There were a few notable regions that had high levels of segregation distortion in all populations. There was a region of high segregation distortion on LG 2 (47&#x2013;49 Mbp) in all populations, with the exception of ORBV-C, which had some distorted SNPs near this region. In the HYPR populations, there was a strong skew towards the maternal allele in both populations &#x2013; with a stronger skew in the organic population. In contrast, the paternal allele was favored in this region in the ORBV populations. There were no significant QTL found in this region on LG 2; however, there was a QTL found for root disease in ORBV-C in the organic growing system in 2021 that was skewed towards the maternal allele. All populations had many distorted SNPs that skewed strongly towards the paternal allele on LG 7, along with many distorted SNPs skewed towards the maternal allele on LG 10.</p>
<p>To our knowledge, this work comprises the first combined look at the role of parentage and breeding history on bean performance in organic production systems. Our findings suggest that breeding within organic environments is an effective, and in some cases preferable, approach for harnessing qualitative fitness. We found significant crossover G &#xd7; E interactions in seedling vigor and root rot disease, indicating breeding under organic management can significantly improve progeny performance in those environments. We also identified important shifts in germination speed and rate within the white-seeded families of organically-bred populations, along with overlapping QTL on linkage groups 4 and 7 for these traits. These QTL may serve as a basis for marker-assisted selection for early-season performance in future organic bean breeding efforts. Although our work identified significant variation within the white-seeded populations, a specific explanation for the higher germination rate in the organically-bred families remains elusive. Further explorations of the seed coat morphology in the white-seeded families of these populations may provide insight into these changes, and how they may best be leveraged in subsequent breeding work. While we were able to improve the linkage maps for our study populations compared to preliminary maps generated by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">King (2019)</xref>, the final marker number in the maps remained low compared to similar studies (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">Bassett et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Heilig et&#xa0;al., 2017</xref>). This may be attributed, in part, to the relatively small population size of approximately 90 families. Furthermore, we anticipate the low marker number in the HYPR populations is influenced by the genetic relatedness of the parents, which both originate primarily from the Andean background. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B77">Vargas et&#xa0;al. (2021)</xref> encountered similar issues when SNP genotyping populations generated from parents of the Andean gene pool, although our final marker numbers were higher than their final maps. Given our small population sizes, our work may be improved by using a genotyping-by-sequencing (GBS) approach to generate maps with higher marker numbers.</p>
<p>Broadly, our results suggest that enhanced performance in organic production systems may be captured through breeding and selection within organic production environments. This work led to the identification of specific traits relevant to establishing vigorous and adaptable plants for organic systems. Furthermore, we identified genetic markers associated with these traits, comprising a toolbox of loci that are useful for organic bean breeding. If breeders are able to improve and release varieties that are better suited to organic production, it is reasonable to expect declines in the organic-conventional yield gap. This work has critical implications for the organic industry, as seed companies seek to improve the cultivars that are available for organic production and farmers seek suitable varieties that are competitive in organic environments.</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<sec id="s5" sec-type="data-availability">
<title>Data availability statement</title>
<p>Data and R code for all analyses and figures are available in a public repository on GitHub (<uri xlink:href="https://github.com/hpark37/SnapBean_BreedingHistory">https://github.com/hpark37/SnapBean_BreedingHistory</uri>). The SNP genotyping datasetsgenerated for each of the four populations used in this study can be found in the Oregon StateUniversity Scholars Archive at <uri xlink:href="https://ir.library.oregonstate.edu/concern/datasets/rx914010m">https://ir.library.oregonstate.edu/concern/datasets/rx914010m</uri>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s6" sec-type="author-contributions">
<title>Author contributions</title>
<p>HR: Formal Analysis, Investigation, Visualization, Writing &#x2013; original draft, Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing. RK: Formal Analysis, Investigation, Writing &#x2013; original draft, Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing. JD: Formal Analysis, Writing &#x2013; original draft, Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing. JM: Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Resources, Supervision, Writing &#x2013; original draft, Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s7" sec-type="funding-information">
<title>Funding</title>
<p>The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article. This material is based upon work that is supported by the National Institute of Food and Agriculture, U.S. Department of Agriculture, through the Western Sustainable Agricultural Research and Extension program under project number GW21-229. USDA is an equal opportunity employer and service provider. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the author (s) and do not necessarily reflect the view of the U.S. Department of Agriculture. This project was funded by a grant from the United States Department of Agriculture National Institute of Food and Agriculture (NIFA) AFRI grant #2014-67013- 22420, and by the Northern Organic Vegetable Improvement Collaborative (NOVIC) project, which is funded by the Organic Research and Extension Initiative (USDA/NIFA): NOVIC 2: 2014-51300-22223 &amp; NOVIC 3: 2018-51300-28430.</p>
</sec>
<ack>
<title>Acknowledgments</title>
<p>We thank Dr. Qijian Song at the USDA-ARS Soybean Genomics and Improvement Laboratory at the Beltsville Agricultural Research Center laboratory in Beltsville, MD for performing the SNP chip genotyping. We thank Dr. Shinji Kawai, Casey Wilson, Taylor Kamsler, and Jane Smeins for their assistance in setting up field trials and collecting data. We also thank Haidar Arkwazee and Abigail Huster for their contributions to the development of the four snap bean populations utilized in this work.</p>
</ack>
<sec id="s8" sec-type="COI-statement">
<title>Conflict of interest</title>
<p>The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s9" sec-type="ai-statement">
<title>Generative AI statement</title>
<p>The author(s) declare that no Generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s10">
<title>Correction Note</title>
<p>﻿This article has been corrected with minor changes. These changes do not impact the scientific content of the article.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s11" sec-type="disclaimer">
<title>Publisher&#x2019;s note</title>
<p>All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s12" sec-type="supplementary-material">
<title>Supplementary material</title>
<p>The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2025.1533039/full#supplementary-material">https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2025.1533039/full#supplementary-material</ext-link>
</p>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Image1.jpeg" id="SM1" mimetype="image/jpeg">
<label>Supplementary Figure&#xa0;1</label>
<caption>
<p>Linkage maps of organically bred <italic>Phaseolus vulgaris</italic> RIL population, ORBV-O (OR5630 &#xd7; Black Valentine, organic breeding history). SNP names (consisting of linkage group, physical position in base pairs and base pair substitutions) are shown on the right with corresponding linkage position (cM) shown on the left of each chromosome.</p>
</caption>
</supplementary-material>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Image2.jpeg" id="SM2" mimetype="image/jpeg">
<label>Supplementary Figure&#xa0;2</label>
<caption>
<p>Linkage maps of conventionally bred <italic>Phaseolus vulgaris</italic> RIL population, ORBV-C (OR5630 &#xd7; Black Valentine, conventional breeding history). SNP names (consisting of linkage group, physical position in base pairs and base pair substitutions) are shown on the right with corresponding linkage position (cM) shown on the left of each chromosome.</p>
</caption>
</supplementary-material>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Image3.jpeg" id="SM3" mimetype="image/jpeg">
<label>Supplementary Figure&#xa0;3</label>
<caption>
<p>Linkage maps of organically bred <italic>Phaseolus vulgaris</italic> RIL population, HYPR-O (Hystyle &#xd7; Provider, organic breeding history). SNP names (consisting of linkage group, physical position in base pairs and base pair substitutions) are shown on the right with corresponding linkage position (cM) shown on the left of each chromosome.</p>
</caption>
</supplementary-material>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Image4.jpeg" id="SM4" mimetype="image/jpeg">
<label>Supplementary Figure&#xa0;4</label>
<caption>
<p>Linkage maps of conventionally bred <italic>Phaseolus vulgaris</italic> RIL population, HYPR-C (Hystyle &#xd7; Provider, conventional breeding history). SNP names (consisting of linkage group, physical position in base pairs and base pair substitutions) are shown on the right with corresponding linkage position (cM) shown on the left of each chromosome.</p>
</caption>
</supplementary-material>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Table1.xlsx" id="SM5" mimetype="application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet"/>
</sec>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="B1">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Allen</surname> <given-names>F. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Comstock</surname> <given-names>R. E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rasmusson</surname> <given-names>D. C.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1978</year>). <article-title>Optimal environments&#xa0;for yield testing</article-title>. <source>Crop Sci.</source> <volume>18</volume>, <fpage>747</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>751</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2135/cropsci1978.0011183X001800050013x</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Anand</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rodriguez Lopez</surname> <given-names>C. M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>ChromoMap: An R package for interactive visualization of multi-omics data and annotation of chromosomes</article-title>. <source>BMC Bioinf.</source> <volume>23</volume>, <fpage>33</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s12859-021-04556-z</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Arriagada</surname> <given-names>O.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ar&#xe9;valo</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cabeza</surname> <given-names>R. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Carrasco</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Schwember</surname> <given-names>A. R.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Meta-QTL analysis for yield components in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris l.)</article-title>. <source>Plants</source> <volume>12</volume>, <elocation-id>1</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/plants12010117</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Badgley</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Moghtader</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Quintero</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zakem</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chappell</surname> <given-names>M. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Avil&#xe9;s-V&#xe1;zquez</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2007</year>). <article-title>Organic agriculture and the global food supply</article-title>. <source>Renewable Agric. Food Syst.</source> <volume>22</volume>, <fpage>86</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>108</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1017/S1742170507001640</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Bara&#x144;ski</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>&#x15a;rednicka-Tober</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Volakakis</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Seal</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sanderson</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Stewart</surname> <given-names>G. B.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Higher antioxidant and lower cadmium concentrations and lower incidence of pesticide residues in organically grown crops: A systematic literature review and meta-analyses</article-title>. <source>Br. J. Nutr.</source> <volume>112</volume>, <fpage>794</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>811</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1017/S0007114514001366</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Bassett</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Katuuramu</surname> <given-names>D. N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Song</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cichy</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>QTL mapping of seed quality traits including cooking time, flavor, and texture in a yellow dry bean (Phaseolus vulgaris l.) population</article-title>. <source>Front. Plant Sci.</source> <volume>12</volume>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpls.2021.670284</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<citation citation-type="web">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Bates</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Maechler</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bolker [aut</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Walker</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Christensen</surname> <given-names>R. H. B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Singmann</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2024</year>). <source>
<italic>lme4: Linear Mixed-Effects Models using &#x201c;Eigen&#x201d; and S4</italic> (Version 1.1-35.5)</source>. Available online at: <uri xlink:href="https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/lme4/index.html">https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/lme4/index.html</uri> (Accessed <access-date>May 26, 2024</access-date>).</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Bengtsson</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ahnstr&#xf6;m</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Weibull</surname> <given-names>A.-C.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2005</year>). <article-title>The effects of organic agriculture on biodiversity and abundance: A meta-analysis: Organic agriculture, biodiversity and abundance</article-title>. <source>J. Appl. Ecol.</source> <volume>42</volume>, <fpage>261</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>269</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1365-2664.2005.01005.x</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Blair</surname> <given-names>M. W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pedraza</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Buendia</surname> <given-names>H. F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gait&#xe1;n-Sol&#xed;s</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Beebe</surname> <given-names>S. E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gepts</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2003</year>). <article-title>Development of a genome-wide anchored microsatellite map for common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)</article-title>. <source>Theor. Appl. Genet.</source> <volume>107</volume>, <fpage>1362</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1374</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00122-003-1398-6</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Blossei</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>G&#xe4;belein</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Uptmoor</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hammann</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2024</year>). <article-title>Superior resistance to Phytophthora infestans in new pre-breeding potato clones under different nitrogen fertilisation regimes used in organic agriculture</article-title>. <source>Biol. Agric. Horticulture</source> <volume>40</volume>, <fpage>69</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>77</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/01448765.2023.2265895</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Blum</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jordan</surname> <given-names>W. R.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1985</year>). <article-title>Breeding crop varieties for stress environments</article-title>. <source>Crit. Rev. Plant Sci.</source> <volume>2</volume>, <fpage>199</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>238</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/07352688509382196</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Broman</surname> <given-names>K. W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gatti</surname> <given-names>D. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Simecek</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Furlotte</surname> <given-names>N. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Prins</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yandell</surname> <given-names>B. S.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>R/qtl2: Software for mapping quantitative trait loci with high-dimensional data and multiparent populations</article-title>. <source>Genetics</source> <volume>211</volume>, <fpage>495</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>502</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1534/genetics.118.301595</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Brooker</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Brown</surname> <given-names>L. K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>George</surname> <given-names>T. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pakeman</surname> <given-names>R. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Palmer</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ramsay</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Active and adaptive plasticity in a changing climate</article-title>. <source>Trends Plant Sci.</source> <volume>27</volume>, <fpage>717</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>728</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.tplants.2022.02.004</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Burridge</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jochua</surname> <given-names>C. N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bucksch</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lynch</surname> <given-names>J. P.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Legume shovelomics: High&#x2014;Throughput phenotyping of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) and cowpea (Vigna unguiculata subsp, unguiculata) root architecture in the field</article-title>. <source>Field Crops Res.</source> <volume>192</volume>, <fpage>21</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>32</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.fcr.2016.04.008</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Cabrera-P&#xe9;rez</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Llorens</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Escol&#xe0;</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Royo-Esnal</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Recasens</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>Organic mulches as an alternative for under-vine weed management in Mediterranean irrigated vineyards: Impact on agronomic performance</article-title>. <source>Eur. J. Agron.</source> <volume>145</volume>, <elocation-id>126798</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.eja.2023.126798</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ceccarelli</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1989</year>). <article-title>Wide adaptation: How wide</article-title>? <source>Euphytica</source> <volume>40</volume>, <fpage>197</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>205</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/BF00024512</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ceccarelli</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Grando</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2007</year>). <article-title>Decentralized-participatory plant breeding: An example of demand driven research</article-title>. <source>Euphytica</source> <volume>155</volume>, <fpage>349</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>360</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10681-006-9336-8</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B18">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Cirak</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Myers</surname> <given-names>J. R.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Cosmetic stay-green trait in snap bean and the event cascade that reduces seed germination and emergence</article-title>. <source>J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci.</source> <volume>146</volume>, <fpage>329</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>338</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.21273/JASHS05038-20</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B19">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Colley</surname> <given-names>M. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dawson</surname> <given-names>J. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zystro</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hoagland</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liou</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Myers</surname> <given-names>J. R.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2025</year>). <source>Influence of organic and conventional management systems on carrot performance and implications for organic plant breeding</source>. (<publisher-loc>Alexandria, VA</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci.</publisher-name>). doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.21273/JASHS05459-24</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B20">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>C&#xf3;rdoba</surname> <given-names>J. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chavarro</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Schlueter</surname> <given-names>J. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jackson</surname> <given-names>S. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Blair</surname> <given-names>M. W.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Integration of physical and genetic maps of common bean through BAC-derived microsatellite markers</article-title>. <source>BMC Genomics</source> <volume>11</volume>, <elocation-id>436</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/1471-2164-11-436</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B21">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Deguchi</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kawamoto</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tanaka</surname> <given-names>O.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fushimi</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Uozumi</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>Compost application increases the soil temperature on bare Andosol in a cool climate region</article-title>. <source>Soil Sci. Plant Nutr.</source> <volume>55</volume>, <fpage>778</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>782</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1747-0765.2009.00420.x</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B22">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Deng</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Luo</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xiao</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pan</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>The genetic architecture of amino acids dissection by association and linkage analysis in maize</article-title>. <source>Plant Biotechnol. J.</source> <volume>15</volume>, <fpage>1250</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1263</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/pbi.12712</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B23">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>De Ron</surname> <given-names>A. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rodi&#xf1;o</surname> <given-names>A. P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Santalla</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gonz&#xe1;lez</surname> <given-names>A. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lema</surname> <given-names>M. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mart&#xed;n</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Seedling emergence and phenotypic response of common bean germplasm to different temperatures under controlled conditions and in open field</article-title>. <source>Front. Plant Sci.</source> <volume>7</volume>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpls.2016.01087</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B24">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Donohue</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dorn</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Griffith</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kim</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Aguilera</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Polisetty</surname> <given-names>C. R.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2005</year>). <article-title>The evolutionary ecology of seed germination of Arabidopsis thaliana: Variable natural selection on germination timing</article-title>. <source>Evolution</source> <volume>59</volume>, <fpage>758</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>770</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.0014-3820.2005.tb01751.x</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B25">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Duncan</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Every</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>MacSwan</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>State College, Federal Cooperative Extension Service</surname> <given-names>O.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1960</year>). <source>Commercial production of polesnap beans in Oregon.</source> (<publisher-loc>Corvallis, Or.</publisher-loc>:<publisher-name>Federal Cooperative Extension Service, Oregon State College</publisher-name>).</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B26">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Gepts</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2001</year>). &#x201c;<article-title>Phaseolus vulgaris (Beans)</article-title>,&#x201d; in <source>Encyclopedia of genetics</source> (<publisher-loc>Amsterdam, Netherlands</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Elsevier</publisher-name>), <fpage>1444</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1445</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1006/rwgn.2001.1749</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B27">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Gonz&#xe1;lez</surname> <given-names>A. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yuste-Lisbona</surname> <given-names>F. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fern&#xe1;ndez-Lozano</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lozano</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Santalla</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2017</year>). &#x201c;<article-title>Genetic mapping and QTL analysis in common bean</article-title>,&#x201d; in <source>The common bean genome. Compendium of Plant Genomes.</source> Eds. <person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname>P&#xe9;rez de la Vega</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Santalla</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Marsolais</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<publisher-loc>Cham</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Springer</publisher-name>), <fpage>69</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>107</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/978-3-319-63526-2_4</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B28">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Hagerty</surname> <given-names>C. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cuesta-Marcos</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cregan</surname> <given-names>P. B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Song</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>McClean</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Noffsinger</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Mapping Fusarium solani and Aphanomyces euteiches Root Rot Resistance and Root Architecture Quantitative Trait Loci in Common Bean</article-title>. <source>Crop Sci.</source> <volume>55</volume>, <fpage>1969</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1977</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2135/cropsci2014.11.0805</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B29">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Haley</surname> <given-names>C. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Knott</surname> <given-names>S. A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1992</year>). <article-title>A simple regression method for mapping quantitative trait loci in line crosses using flanking markers</article-title>. <source>Heredity</source> <volume>69</volume>, <fpage>315</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>324</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/hdy.1992.131</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B30">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Heilig</surname> <given-names>J. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Beaver</surname> <given-names>J. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wright</surname> <given-names>E. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Song</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kelly</surname> <given-names>J. D.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>QTL analysis of symbiotic nitrogen fixation in a black bean population</article-title>. <source>Crop Sci.</source> <volume>57</volume>, <fpage>118</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>129</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2135/cropsci2016.05.0348</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B31">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Hu</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>He</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sun</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xin</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>A Kelch motif-containing serine/threonine protein phosphatase determines the large grain QTL trait in rice</article-title>. <source>J. Integr. Plant Biol.</source> <volume>54</volume>, <fpage>979</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>990</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/jipb.12008</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B32">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Huster</surname> <given-names>A. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wallace</surname> <given-names>L. T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Myers</surname> <given-names>J. R.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Associated SNPs, heritabilities, trait correlations, and genomic breeding values for resistance in snap beans (Phaseolus vulgaris l.) to root rot caused by Fusarium solani (mart.) f. Sp. Phaseoli (Burkholder)</article-title>. <source>Front. Plant Sci.</source> <volume>12</volume>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpls.2021.697615</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B33">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Isik</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Holland</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Maltecca</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <source>Genetic data analysis for plant and animal breeding</source>. <edition>1st ed. 2017</edition> (<publisher-loc>Gewerbestrasse, Switzerland</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Springer International Publishing: Imprint: Springer</publisher-name>). doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/978-3-319-55177-7</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B34">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Izquierdo</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kelly</surname> <given-names>J. D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Beebe</surname> <given-names>S. E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cichy</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>Combination of meta-analysis of QTL and GWAS to uncover the genetic architecture of seed yield and seed yield components in common bean</article-title>. <source>Plant Genome</source> <volume>16</volume>, <elocation-id>e20328</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/tpg2.20328</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B35">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Jia</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jian</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>A serine/threonine protein kinase encoding gene KERNEL NUMBER PER ROW6 regulates maize grain yield</article-title>. <source>Nat. Commun.</source> <volume>11</volume>, <fpage>988</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41467-020-14746-7</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B36">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Johnson</surname> <given-names>W. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Men&#xe9;ndez</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Nodari</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Koinange</surname> <given-names>E. M. K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Magnusson</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Singh</surname> <given-names>S. P.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>1996</year>). <article-title>Genotypes, environments, and genomes in Phaseolus-Vigna spp.: Sa) revisited</article-title>. <source>J. Agric. Genomics</source> <volume>2</volume>, <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>19</lpage>. Available online at: <uri xlink:href="https://wheat.pw.usda.gov/jag/papers96/paper596/sax2.htm">https://wheat.pw.usda.gov/jag/papers96/paper596/sax2.htm</uri>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B37">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>King</surname> <given-names>R. M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <source>Breeding Snap Beans for Organic Agriculture: Genomic Shifts under Different Agricultural Management Systems</source> (<publisher-name>Oregon State University</publisher-name>). Available at: <uri xlink:href="https://ir.library.oregonstate.edu/concern/graduate_thesis_or_dissertations/kp78gn560">https://ir.library.oregonstate.edu/concern/graduate_thesis_or_dissertations/kp78gn560</uri>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B38">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Knapp</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>van der Heijden</surname> <given-names>M. G. A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>A global meta-analysis of yield stability in organic and conservation agriculture</article-title>. <source>Nat. Commun.</source> <volume>9</volume>, <fpage>3632</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41467-018-05956-1</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B39">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kniss</surname> <given-names>A. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Savage</surname> <given-names>S. D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jabbour</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Commercial crop yields reveal strengths and weaknesses for organic agriculture in the United States</article-title>. <source>PloS One</source> <volume>11</volume>, <elocation-id>e0161673</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0161673</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B40">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Koinange</surname> <given-names>E. M. K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Singh</surname> <given-names>S. P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gepts</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1996</year>). <article-title>Genetic control of the domestication syndrome in common bean</article-title>. <source>Crop Sci.</source> <volume>36</volume>, <elocation-id>cropsci1996.0011183X003600040037x</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2135/cropsci1996.0011183X003600040037x</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B41">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kraemer</surname> <given-names>Z. P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Myers</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <source>Evaluating snap bean cultivars for response to addition of biological and mineral nitrogen</source> (<publisher-name>Oregon State University</publisher-name>).</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B42">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kravchenko</surname> <given-names>A. N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Snapp</surname> <given-names>S. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Robertson</surname> <given-names>G. P.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Field-scale experiments reveal persistent yield gaps in low-input and organic cropping systems</article-title>. <source>Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.</source> <volume>114</volume>, <fpage>926</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>931</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1073/pnas.1612311114</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B43">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Laitinen</surname> <given-names>R. A. E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Nikoloski</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Genetic basis of plasticity in plants</article-title>. <source>J. Exp. Bot.</source> <volume>70</volume>, <fpage>739</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>745</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/jxb/ery404</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B44">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Lammerts van Bueren</surname> <given-names>E. T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jones</surname> <given-names>S. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tamm</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Murphy</surname> <given-names>K. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Myers</surname> <given-names>J. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Leifert</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>The need to breed crop varieties suitab le for organic farming, using wheat, tomato and broccoli as examples: A review</article-title>. <source>NJAS - Wageningen J. Life Sci.</source> <volume>58</volume>, <fpage>193</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>205</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.njas.2010.04.001</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B45">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Lee</surname> <given-names>H.-J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yun</surname> <given-names>Z.-S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Consumers&#x2019; perceptions of organic food attributes and cognitive and affective attitudes as determinants of their purchase intentions toward organic food</article-title>. <source>Food Qual. Preference</source> <volume>39</volume>, <fpage>259</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>267</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.foodqual.2014.06.002</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B46">
<citation citation-type="web">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Lenth</surname> <given-names>R. V.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bolker</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Buerkner</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gin&#xe9;-V&#xe1;zquez</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Herve</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jung</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2024</year>). <source>
<italic>emmeans: Estimated Marginal Means, aka Least-Squares Means</italic> (Version 1.10.4)</source>. Available online at: <uri xlink:href="https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/emmeans/index.html">https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/emmeans/index.html</uri> (Accessed <access-date>May 26, 2024</access-date>).</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B47">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>Y. P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>You</surname> <given-names>M. P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Colmer</surname> <given-names>T. D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Barbetti</surname> <given-names>M. J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Effect of timing and duration of soil saturation on soilborne Pythium diseases of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris)</article-title>. <source>Plant Dis.</source> <volume>99</volume>, <fpage>112</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>118</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1094/PDIS-09-13-0964-RE</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B48">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Lin</surname> <given-names>C. Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Togashi</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2002</year>). <article-title>Genetic improvement in the presence of genotype by environment interaction</article-title>. <source>Anim. Sci. J.</source> <volume>73</volume>, <fpage>3</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>11</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1046/j.1344-3941.2002.00001.x</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B49">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Lopez</surname> <given-names>A. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Nix</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hickey</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dawson</surname> <given-names>J. C.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2024</year>). <source>Improved tomato breeding lines adapted to organic farming systems have enhanced flavor, yield, and disease resistance</source>. (<publisher-loc>Alexandria, VA</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>HortScience</publisher-name>). doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.21273/HORTSCI17799-24</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B50">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>L&#xf3;pez-Mar&#xed;n</surname> <given-names>H. D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rao</surname> <given-names>I. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Blair</surname> <given-names>M. W.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>Quantitative trait loci for root morphology traits under aluminum stress in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)</article-title>. <source>TAG. Theor. Appl. Genet. Theoretische Und Angewandte Genetik</source> <volume>119</volume>, <fpage>449</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>458</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00122-009-1051-0</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B51">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>McClean</surname> <given-names>P. E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bett</surname> <given-names>K. E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Stonehouse</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lee</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pflieger</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Moghaddam</surname> <given-names>S. M.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>White seed color in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) results from convergent evolution in the P (pigment) gene</article-title>. <source>New Phytol.</source> <volume>219</volume>, <fpage>1112</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1123</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/nph.15259</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B52">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Miklas</surname> <given-names>P. N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Stavely</surname> <given-names>J. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kelly</surname> <given-names>J. D.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1993</year>). <article-title>Identification and potential use of a molecular marker for rust resistance in common bean</article-title>. <source>Theor. Appl. Genet.</source> <volume>85&#x2013;85</volume>, <fpage>745</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>749</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/BF00225014</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B53">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Moghaddam</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Stonehouse</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lee</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mamidi</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bello</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Miklas</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Molecular genetic analysis of the Phaseolus vulgaris P locus</article-title>. <source>Bean Improvement Cooperative Annu. Rep.</source> <volume>57</volume>, <fpage>15</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>16</lpage>. Available at: <uri xlink:href="https://www.ars.usda.gov/research/publications/publication/?seqNo115=304927">https://www.ars.usda.gov/research/publications/publication/?seqNo115=304927</uri> (Accessed <access-date>April 3, 2025</access-date>).</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B54">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Mokrani</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rai</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Belabid</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cherif</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cherif</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mahjoubi</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Pseudomonas diversity in western Algeria: Role in the stimulation of bean germination and common bean blight biocontrol</article-title>. <source>Eur. J. Plant Pathol.</source> <volume>153</volume>, <fpage>397</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>415</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10658-018-1566-9</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B55">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Murphy</surname> <given-names>K. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Campbell</surname> <given-names>K. G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lyon</surname> <given-names>S. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jones</surname> <given-names>S. S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2007</year>). <article-title>Evidence of varietal adaptation to organic farming systems</article-title>. <source>Field Crops Res.</source> <volume>102</volume>, <fpage>172</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>177</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.fcr.2007.03.011</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B56">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ozaktan</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Uzun</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Uzun</surname> <given-names>O.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yasar Ciftci</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>Assessment of agro-morphological traits of common bean genotypes grown under organic farming conditions with multi-variate analyses and applications</article-title>. <source>Gesunde Pflanzen</source> <volume>75</volume>, <fpage>515</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>523</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10343-022-00713-3</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B57">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Park</surname> <given-names>H. E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Nebert</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>King</surname> <given-names>R. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Busby</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Myers</surname> <given-names>J. R.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>Influence of organic plant breeding on the rhizosphere microbiome of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)</article-title>. <source>Front. Plant Sci.</source> <volume>14</volume>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpls.2023.1251919</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B58">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Pe&#xf1;a</surname> <given-names>P. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Steadman</surname> <given-names>J. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Eskridge</surname> <given-names>K. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Urrea</surname> <given-names>C. A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Identification of sources of resistance to damping-off and early root/hypocotyl damage from <italic>Rhizoctonia solani</italic> in common bean (<italic>Phaseolus vulgaris</italic> L.)</article-title>. <source>Crop Prot.</source> <volume>54</volume>, <fpage>92</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>99</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.cropro.2013.04.014</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B59">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>P&#xe9;rez-Vega</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pa&#xf1;eda</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rodr&#xed;guez-Su&#xe1;rez</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Campa</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Giraldez</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ferreira</surname> <given-names>J. J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Mapping of QTLs for morpho-agronomic and seed quality traits in a RIL population of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)</article-title>. <source>Theor. Appl. Genet.</source> <volume>120</volume>, <fpage>1367</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1380</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00122-010-1261-5</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B60">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ponisio</surname> <given-names>L. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>M&#x2019;Gonigle</surname> <given-names>L. K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mace</surname> <given-names>K. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Palomino</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>de Valpine</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kremen</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Diversification practices reduce organic to conventional yield gap</article-title>. <source>Proc. R. Soc. B: Biol. Sci.</source> <volume>282</volume>, <fpage>20141396</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1098/rspb.2014.1396</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B61">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<collab>Posit Team</collab>
</person-group> (<year>2024</year>). <source>
<italic>RStudio: Integrated Development for R</italic> [Computer software]</source> (<publisher-loc>Boston, MA</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Posit Software, PBC</publisher-name>). Available at: <uri xlink:href="http://www.posit.co/">http://www.posit.co/</uri> (Accessed <access-date>May 26,2024</access-date>).</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B62">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Postma</surname> <given-names>J. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lynch</surname> <given-names>J. P.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Root cortical aerenchyma enhances the growth of maize on soils with suboptimal availability of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium</article-title>. <source>Plant Physiol.</source> <volume>156</volume>, <fpage>1190</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1201</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1104/pp.111.175489</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B63">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Pswarayi</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>van Eeuwijk</surname> <given-names>F. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ceccarelli</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Grando</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Comadran</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Russell</surname> <given-names>J. R.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>Changes in allele frequencies in landraces, old and modern barley cultivars of marker loci close to QTL for grain yield under high and low input conditions</article-title>. <source>Euphytica</source> <volume>163</volume>, <fpage>435</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>447</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10681-008-9726-1</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B64">
<citation citation-type="web">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<collab>R Core Team</collab>
</person-group> (<year>2023</year>). <source>
<italic>R: A language and environment for statistical computing</italic> [Computer software]</source>. Available online at: <uri xlink:href="https://www.R-project.org/">https://www.R-project.org/</uri> (Accessed <access-date>May 26, 2024</access-date>).</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B65">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Reimer</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Oelofse</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>M&#xfc;ller-St&#xf6;ver</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>M&#xf6;ller</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>B&#xfc;nemann</surname> <given-names>E. K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bianchi</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2023</year>) <article-title>Sustainable growth of organic farming in the EU requires a rethink of nutrient supply</article-title>. <source>Nutrient Cycling Agroecosystems.</source> <volume>129</volume>, <fpage>299</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>315</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10705-023-10297-7</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B66">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Rowland</surname> <given-names>A. V.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Menalled</surname> <given-names>U. D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pelzer</surname> <given-names>C. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sosnoskie</surname> <given-names>L. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>DiTommaso</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ryan</surname> <given-names>M. R.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>High seeding rates, interrow mowing, and electrocution for weed management in organic no-till planted soybean</article-title>. <source>Weed Sci.</source> <volume>71</volume>, <fpage>478</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>492</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1017/wsc.2023.45</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B67">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Schmutz</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>McClean</surname> <given-names>P. E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mamidi</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>G. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cannon</surname> <given-names>S. B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Grimwood</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>A reference genome for common bean and genome-wide analysis of dual domestications</article-title>. <source>Nat. Genet.</source> <volume>46</volume>, <fpage>707</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>713</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/ng.3008</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B68">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Schneider</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ballvora</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>L&#xe9;on</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2024</year>). <article-title>Deep genotyping reveals specific adaptation footprints of conventional and organic farming in barley populations&#x2014;An evolutionary plant breeding approach</article-title>. <source>Agron. Sustain. Dev.</source> <volume>44</volume>, <fpage>33</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s13593-024-00962-8</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B69">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Seufert</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ramankutty</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Foley</surname> <given-names>J. A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Comparing the yields of organic and conventional agriculture</article-title>. <source>Nature</source> <volume>485</volume>, <fpage>229</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>232</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nature11069</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B70">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Shreck</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Getz</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Feenstra</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2006</year>). <article-title>Social sustainability, farm labor, and organic agriculture: Findings from an exploratory analysis</article-title>. <source>Agric. Hum. Values</source> <volume>23</volume>, <fpage>439</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>449</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10460-006-9016-2</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B71">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Singh</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ceccarelli</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hamblin</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1993</year>). <article-title>Estimation of heritability from varietal trials data</article-title>. <source>Theor. Appl. Genet.</source> <volume>86</volume>, <fpage>437</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>441</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/BF00838558</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B72">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Song</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jia</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hyten</surname> <given-names>D. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jenkins</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hwang</surname> <given-names>E.-Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Schroeder</surname> <given-names>S. G.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>SNP assay development for linkage map construction, anchoring whole-genome sequence, and other genetic and genomic applications in common bean</article-title>. <source>G3 Genes|Genomes|Genetics</source> <volume>5</volume>, <fpage>2285</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2290</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1534/g3.115.020594</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B73">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Strock</surname> <given-names>C. F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Burridge</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Massas</surname> <given-names>A. S. F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Beaver</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Beebe</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Camilo</surname> <given-names>S. A.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Seedling root architecture and its relationship with seed yield across diverse environments in Phaseolus vulgaris</article-title>. <source>Field Crops Res.</source> <volume>237</volume>, <fpage>53</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>64</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.fcr.2019.04.012</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B74">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Toby</surname> <given-names>K. E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hutton</surname> <given-names>M. G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ford</surname> <given-names>D. R.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2007</year>). <article-title>Human Selection and the Relaxation of Legume Defences against Ineffective Rhizobia</article-title>. <source>Proc. R. Soc. B.</source> <volume>247</volume>, <fpage>3119</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>3126</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1098/rspb.2007.1187</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B75">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<collab>USDA ERS</collab>
</person-group> (<year>2024</year>). <source>USDA ERS - organic agriculture</source> (<publisher-loc>Washington, D.C.</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>USDA - Economic Research Service</publisher-name>). Available online at: <uri xlink:href="https://www.ers.usda.gov/topics/natural-resources-environment/organic-agriculture/">https://www.ers.usda.gov/topics/natural-resources-environment/organic-agriculture/</uri> (Accessed <access-date>November 22, 2024</access-date>).</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B76">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>van Ooijen</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <source>
<italic>JoinMap5</italic> (Version 5) [Computer software]</source> (<publisher-loc>Wageningen, Netherlands</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Kyazma BV</publisher-name>).</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B77">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Vargas</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mayor-Duran</surname> <given-names>V. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Buendia</surname> <given-names>H. F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ruiz-Guzman</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Raatz</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Physiological and genetic characterization of heat stress effects in a common bean RIL population</article-title>. <source>PloS One</source> <volume>16</volume>, <elocation-id>e0249859</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0249859</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B78">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Vidak</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lazarevi&#x107;</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Javornik</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>&#x160;atovi&#x107;</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Carovi&#x107;-Stanko</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Seed water absorption, germination, emergence and seedling phenotypic characterization of the common bean landraces differing in seed size and color</article-title>. <source>Seeds</source> <volume>1</volume>, <elocation-id>4</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/seeds1040027</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B79">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Vieira</surname> <given-names>R. F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Carneiro</surname> <given-names>J. E. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lynch</surname> <given-names>J. P.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>Root traits of common bean genotypes used in breeding programs for disease resistance</article-title>. <source>Pesquisa Agropecu&#xe1;ria Bras.</source> <volume>43</volume>, <fpage>707</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>712</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1590/S0100-204X2008000600006</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B80">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wallace</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Arkwazee</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Vining</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Myers</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Genetic diversity within snap beans and their relation to dry beans</article-title>. <source>Genes</source> <volume>9</volume>, <elocation-id>587</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/genes9120587</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B81">
<citation citation-type="web">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Walls</surname> <given-names>T. W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Stang</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1985</year>). <source>
<italic>The Effects of Soaking and Low Temperatures on Germination and Seedling Vigor of Snap Beans (Phaseolus vulgaris T. Cv. Slenderette)</italic> [Oregon State University]</source>. Available online at: <uri xlink:href="https://ir.library.oregonstate.edu/downloads/tq57nv37v">https://ir.library.oregonstate.edu/downloads/tq57nv37v</uri> (Accessed <access-date>November 22, 2024</access-date>).</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B82">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhu</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhai</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wan</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2005</year>). <article-title>Mapping segregation distortion loci and quantitative trait loci for spikelet sterility in rice (Oryza sativa L.)</article-title>. <source>Genet. Res.</source> <volume>86</volume>, <fpage>97</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>106</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1017/S0016672305007779</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B83">
<citation citation-type="web">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wei</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Simko</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Levy</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xie</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jin</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zemla</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2024</year>). <source>
<italic>corrplot: Visualization of a Correlation Matrix</italic> (Version 0.94) [Computer software]</source>. Available online at: <uri xlink:href="https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/corrplot/index.html">https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/corrplot/index.html</uri> (Accessed <access-date>May 26, 2024</access-date>).</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B84">
<citation citation-type="web">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wickham</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fran&#xe7;ois</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Henry</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>M&#xfc;ller</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <source>). <italic>dplyr: A Grammar of Data Manipulation</italic> (Version R package version 1.0.8) [Computer software]</source>. Available online at: <uri xlink:href="https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=dplyr">https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=dplyr</uri> (Accessed <access-date>May 26, 2024</access-date>).</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B85">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wolfe</surname> <given-names>M. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Baresel</surname> <given-names>J. P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Desclaux</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Goldringer</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hoad</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kovacs</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>Developments in breeding cereals for organic agriculture</article-title>. <source>Euphytica</source> <volume>163</volume>, <fpage>323</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10681-008-9690-9</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B86">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zhu</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lynch</surname> <given-names>J. P.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>The utility of phenotypic plasticity of root hair length for phosphorus acquisition</article-title>. <source>Funct. Plant Biol.</source> <volume>37</volume>, <fpage>313</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>322</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1071/FP09197</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>