<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.3 20070202//EN"
"journalpublishing.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="2.3" xml:lang="EN">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Front. Plant Sci.</journal-id>
<journal-title>Frontiers in Plant Science</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">Front. Plant Sci.</abbrev-journal-title>
<issn pub-type="epub">1664-462X</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Frontiers Media S.A.</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpls.2025.1514045</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Plant Science</subject>
<subj-group>
<subject>Original Research</subject>
</subj-group>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Maize breeding enhances lodging resistance through vertical allocation changes of stem dry matter and nitrogen</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name>
<surname>Ruiz</surname>
<given-names>Alejo</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn001">
<sup>*</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn003">
<sup>&#x2020;</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2864555"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/formal-analysis/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/investigation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/methodology/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/visualization/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Listello</surname>
<given-names>Agustin</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2874879"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/data-curation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/investigation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/methodology/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Trifunovic</surname>
<given-names>Slobodan</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/conceptualization/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/funding-acquisition/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/resources/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/supervision/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name>
<surname>Archontoulis</surname>
<given-names>Sotirios V.</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn001">
<sup>*</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/251962"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/conceptualization/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/funding-acquisition/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/methodology/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/project-administration/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/resources/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/supervision/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
<institution>Department of Agronomy, Iowa State University</institution>, <addr-line>Ames,
IA</addr-line>, <country>United States</country>
</aff>
<aff id="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
<institution>Bayer Crop Science</institution>, <addr-line>Chesterfield, MO</addr-line>, <country>United States</country>
</aff>
<author-notes>
<fn fn-type="edited-by">
<p>Edited by: Serena Varotto, University of Padua, Italy</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="edited-by">
<p>Reviewed by: Abil Dermail, Khon Kaen University, Thailand</p>
<p>Ping Zhang, Zhejiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, China</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="corresp" id="fn001">
<p>*Correspondence: Alejo Ruiz, <email xlink:href="mailto:aruiz@iastate.edu">aruiz@iastate.edu</email>; Sotirios V. Archontoulis, <email xlink:href="mailto:sarchont@iastate.edu">sarchont@iastate.edu</email>
</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="present-address" id="fn003">
<p>&#x2020;Present address: Alejo Ruiz, Farming Solutions &amp; Digital, Corteva Agriscience, Johnston, IA, United States</p>
</fn>
</author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>14</day>
<month>03</month>
<year>2025</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="collection">
<year>2025</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>16</volume>
<elocation-id>1514045</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>19</day>
<month>10</month>
<year>2024</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>12</day>
<month>02</month>
<year>2025</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#xa9; 2025 Ruiz, Listello, Trifunovic and Archontoulis</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2025</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Ruiz, Listello, Trifunovic and Archontoulis</copyright-holder>
<license xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">
<p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.</p>
</license>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<p>The maize stem provides structural support to other plant organs and stores carbohydrates and nitrogen (N) that can be remobilized to grain. Yet it remains unknown whether breeding programs have indirectly affected vertical stem dry matter and N allocation. Our objectives were to i) determine the dry matter and N allocations across different stem portions in maize hybrids released from 1980 to 2020 at the start (R2) and end of grain-filling period (R6), and ii) investigate the dry matter and N remobilization patterns by stem portion. We studied 23 Bayer Crop Science hybrids (release year 1980 to 2020) of different relative maturities (short and long maturity) in 2021 and 2022. Stem dry weight, N concentration, and N content by stem portion (four equal-length sections) were measured at R2 and R6 stages. We found that the average vertical distribution of the stem dry matter and N content along the plant height was 8% (top), 17% (middle-top), 29% (middle-bottom), and 46% (bottom). Maize breeding slightly reduced the total stem dry matter and N content at R2 stage in both relative maturities, and this reduction occurred in the top two quarters, with no significant change in the bottom stem portion. At R6 stage, the N content was significantly reduced in long maturity hybrids, and all the stem portions contributed to this reduction. Newer hybrids of both relative maturities remobilized less dry matter than the older hybrids (17 vs 20%) but slightly more N (39 vs 36%). We concluded that maize breeding efforts have indirectly affected vertical stem dry matter allocation towards less stem dry matter above the ear leaf. This change reduces plants&#x2019; center of gravity, which could explain why new hybrids are more resistant to lodging and can accommodate high plant densities. This study brings new data and knowledge, which enhances our understanding of indirect breeding consequences on maize plant traits.</p>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>genetic gain</kwd>
<kwd>plant breeding</kwd>
<kwd>plant height</kwd>
<kwd>stalk</kwd>
<kwd>lodging</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<contract-sponsor id="cn001">Foundation for Food and Agriculture Research<named-content content-type="fundref-id">10.13039/100011929</named-content>
</contract-sponsor>
<counts>
<fig-count count="4"/>
<table-count count="3"/>
<equation-count count="2"/>
<ref-count count="47"/>
<page-count count="10"/>
<word-count count="5090"/>
</counts>
<custom-meta-wrap>
<custom-meta>
<meta-name>section-in-acceptance</meta-name>
<meta-value>Plant Physiology</meta-value>
</custom-meta>
</custom-meta-wrap>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec id="s1" sec-type="intro">
<label>1</label>
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>Over the last decades, maize breeding has significantly increased grain yield by ~100 kg ha<sup>-1</sup> year<sup>-1</sup> across different germplasms (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Duvick et&#xa0;al., 2004</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">Abdala et&#xa0;al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">King et&#xa0;al.,&#xa0;2024</xref>). In addition to higher yields, maize breeding has reduced&#xa0;the&#xa0;proportion of stems in the total biomass while enhancing ear&#xa0;dry matter, the leaf-to-stem ratio, above-ground dry matter&#xa0;and nitrogen (N) accumulation at maturity, and stem N remobilization (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Chen et&#xa0;al., 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Mueller et&#xa0;al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">Saenz et&#xa0;al., 2025</xref>). Despite these changes, which could potentially increase genotypes susceptibility to lodging, breeding efforts have successfully reduced stalk lodging susceptibility by 0.16% per year (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">Russell, 1984</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Duvick et&#xa0;al., 2004</xref>). Stalk lodging can affect biomass accumulation during grain filling and mechanical harvest, leading to an annual yield loss of 5-20% worldwide (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Flint-Garcia et&#xa0;al., 2003</xref>).</p>
<p>Dry matter and N in the grains can derive from two sources: (i) photosynthesis and N uptake during grain-fill period and (ii) remobilization from stems and leaves. The amount of remobilization varies across growing conditions (environment x management) and genotype choices that determine the grain demand (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Daynard et&#xa0;al., 1969</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">Fairey and Daynard, 1978</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">Setter and Meller, 1984</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">Ouattar et&#xa0;al., 1987</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Kiniry et&#xa0;al., 1992</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Bihmidine et&#xa0;al., 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Fernandez et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>). Data from 30 site-year-management combinations in Iowa, USA, showed that maize stems remobilize, on average, 25% of the dry matter and 55% of the N content during grain-fill period (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Archontoulis et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>). Leaves typically remobilize more dry matter and N than stems (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">Li et&#xa0;al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">Fan et&#xa0;al., 2023</xref>), while the degree of remobilization has been associated with the amount of dry matter or N at silking time (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">DeBruin et&#xa0;al., 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">Fan et&#xa0;al., 2023</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">Palmero et&#xa0;al., 2024</xref>). Furthermore, dry matter and N remobilization are higher under stressful conditions (water, N-stress) than under non-stress (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">Ouattar et&#xa0;al., 1987</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">Uhart and Andrade, 1995</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Chen et&#xa0;al., 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">Sekhon et&#xa0;al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">Fan et&#xa0;al., 2023</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">Palmero et&#xa0;al., 2024</xref>).</p>
<p>Maize breeding has increased stem N remobilization with years of hybrid release (from 31 to 58%) but not leaf N remobilization, which has remained at the same levels (around 55%; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Mueller et&#xa0;al., 2019</xref>). This strategy could maintain the leaves photosynthetically active for a longer period (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">DeBruin et&#xa0;al., 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Mueller et&#xa0;al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Fernandez et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>). <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">Fan et&#xa0;al. (2023)</xref> provided further physiological insight into vertical patterns of dry matter and N remobilization from leaves. They showed that leaves positioned in the middle of the canopy remobilize more dry matter and N to grains than the top or bottom leaves. In contrast to leaves, stems must provide structural support in addition to providing carbohydrates and N to the grain. Information regarding stem dry matter and N allocation and remobilization across the plant height (different stem sections) remains unknown and can provide insight into standability and stem logging resistance.</p>
<p>Maize breeding has successfully decreased susceptibility to stalk lodging while reducing the stem proportion in the total plant biomass and enhancing dry matter partitioning to the ear and N remobilization from the stem. Based on these changes, we hypothesize that maize breeding most likely has reduced the dry matter and N remobilization from the bottom parts of the plant. In this study, we investigate this hypothesis by measuring stem dry matter and N allocation and remobilization patterns at different plant heights (stem portions) in 23 hybrids released from 1980 to 2020. Specifically, our objectives were:</p>
<list list-type="order">
<list-item>
<p>To determine stem vertical dry matter and N allocation patterns at the onset and end of the grain-fill period in maize hybrids released from 1980 to 2020.</p>
</list-item>
<list-item>
<p>To investigate stem vertical dry matter and N remobilization patterns during the grain-fill period.</p>
</list-item>
</list>
<p>Understanding these factors could help explain how breeding programs have successfully developed hybrids that exhibit higher productivity while enhancing stalk resistance. This is particularly challenging given the apparent trade-off between lodging resistance and high productivity in maize (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B47">Zhang et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2" sec-type="materials|methods">
<label>2</label>
<title>Materials and methods</title>
<sec id="s2_1">
<label>2.1</label>
<title>Experimental design and crop management</title>
<p>Two on-farm field experiments, one with 12 short maturity maize hybrids (from 100 to 105-day) and one with 11 long maturity maize hybrids (from 110 to 115-day), were conducted in central Iowa, USA, in 2021 and 2022, We evaluated in total 23 Bayer Crop Science maize hybrids commercialized from 1980 to 2020 (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">
<bold>Table&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>). Hybrids were selected based on their commercial relevance and were all conventional with no GMO traits.</p>
<table-wrap id="T1" position="float">
<label>Table&#xa0;1</label>
<caption>
<p>Hybrid name, year of release, and relative maturity (RM) used in the experiments.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" colspan="3" align="center">Short maturity</th>
<th valign="middle" colspan="3" align="center">Long maturity</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Name</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Year</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">RM</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Name</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Year</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">RM</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" align="center"/>
<th valign="middle" align="center"/>
<th valign="middle" align="center">days</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center"/>
<th valign="middle" align="center"/>
<th valign="middle" align="center">days</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">T1000</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1983</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">100</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">T1100</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1983</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">110</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">LH74+LH59</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1986</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">105</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">LH74+LH51</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1986</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">110</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">DK547</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1986</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">105</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">LH132+LHE136</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1986</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">115</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">DK527</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1994</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">102</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">DK604</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1994</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">110</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">LH198+LH172</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1995</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">102</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">DK618</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1996</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">111</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">DK521</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1995</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">102</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">DKC61-69</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2005</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">111</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">DKC52-43</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2003</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">102</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">DKC63-42</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2006</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">113</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">DKC52-21</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2004</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">102</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">DKC61-21</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2006</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">111</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">DKC52-59</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2006</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">102</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">213-19VT2P</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2016</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">113</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">DKC52-04</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2013</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">102</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">DKC51-54</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2015</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">111</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">DKC55-20</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2015</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">105</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">DKC60-88</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2017</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">110</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">DKC54-38</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2014</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">104</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center"/>
<td valign="middle" align="center"/>
<td valign="middle" align="center"/>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn>
<p>All hybrids were conventional with no GMO traits.</p>
</fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<p>The experimental design was a randomized complete block with two replications. In the short maturity hybrids experiments, the plot size was 15 m<sup>2</sup> (4-row plot), while in the long maturity hybrid experiments, 60 m<sup>2</sup> (8-row plot). Maize hybrids were planted at near optimum planting dates for this region (Apr 30 to May 13; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">Baum et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>), at current plant densities of 7.9 to 8.5 pl m<sup>-2</sup>, and received sufficient N fertilizer application (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">
<bold>Table&#xa0;2</bold>
</xref>). Maize hybrids were sown with precision planters used in breeding programs. Experiments were all rainfed, with a row spacing of 76 cm, and the previous crop was soybean.</p>
<table-wrap id="T2" position="float">
<label>Table&#xa0;2</label>
<caption>
<p>Weather data, management practices, and average grain yield across experiments.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" rowspan="2" align="center">Year</th>
<th valign="middle" rowspan="2" align="center">Maturity</th>
<th valign="middle" rowspan="2" align="center">Location</th>
<th valign="middle" colspan="4" align="center">Weather</th>
<th valign="middle" colspan="3" align="center">Management practices</th>
<th valign="middle" rowspan="2" align="center">Grain yield</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Precipitation</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Temperature</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">VPD</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Radiation</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Plant date</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Plant density</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">N<break/>rate</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" align="center"/>
<th valign="middle" align="center"/>
<th valign="middle" align="center"/>
<th valign="top" align="center">mm</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">&#xb0;C</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">kPa</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">MJ m<sup>-2</sup>
</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">Date</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Plants m<sup>-2</sup>
</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">kg N ha<sup>-1</sup>
</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">Mg ha<sup>-1</sup>
</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" rowspan="2" align="center">2021</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Short</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Britt, IA</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">611</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">19.2</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.80</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3173</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">May 1</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">7.9</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">151</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">13.2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Long</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Fraser, IA</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">573</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">19.9</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.84</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3208</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">April 30</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">8.4</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">202</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">14.9</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" rowspan="2" align="center">2022</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Short</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Fraser, IA</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">537</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">18.8</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.82</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3139</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">May 13</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">8.4</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">202</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">12.0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Long</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Fraser, IA</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">537</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">18.8</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.82</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3139</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">May 13</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">8.5</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">202</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">14.2</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn>
<p>Cumulative precipitation, average air temperature, average vapor pressure deficit (VPD), and cumulative solar radiation from April through September. Grain yield data at 150 g kg<sup>-1</sup> moisture.</p>
</fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_2">
<label>2.2</label>
<title>Environmental conditions</title>
<p>The soil at all experimental fields was clay loam, rich in soil organic matter (3.4% in 0-30cm) and with a shallow water table (mean 1.3 m, range: 0.3 to 3 m; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Archontoulis et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">Elli and Archontoulis, 2023</xref>). Weather conditions for the experiments were provided by Bayer Crop Science (gridded weather dataset ERA5-Land, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">Mu&#xf1;oz-Sabater et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>). The cumulative growing season (April through September) rain was 591 mm in 2021 and 537 mm in 2022, with the 30-yr average being 677 mm (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">
<bold>Table&#xa0;2</bold>
</xref>). Crops experienced 16% below-normal rainfall (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Supplementary Figure S1</bold>
</xref>), and slightly above normal radiation (&lt;5%) in both years. The mean growing season temperature was 1.3&#xb0;C above normal in 2021 and around normal in 2022 (normal = 18.6&#xb0;C). The growing season average vapor pressure deficit (VPD) averaged 0.82 kPa, which was 25% above normal across locations and years.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_3">
<label>2.3</label>
<title>Plant measurements and calculations</title>
<p>Plant counts were determined early in the season, showing an average plant density of 8.3 pl m<sup>-2</sup> with very small variability among plots within an experiment (average standard deviation of 0.39 pl m<sup>-2</sup> and coefficient of variation of 4.8%). At the start of grain-fill (R2 stage) and at physiological maturity (R6 stage, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">Abendroth et&#xa0;al., 2011</xref>), one plant was harvested from the center rows of each plot at the ground level. Following plant harvest, the brace roots, leaf blades, ears, and tassel were removed from the plant, and the stem was cut into four equal-length sections (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>). Samples were dried in a forced-air oven at 60&#xb0;C until constant weight and weighed separately. After grounding the samples, stem N and C concentrations were determined using a CHNS Elemental Analyzer (Elementar Americas). Plant and ear heights were measured during plant harvest as the distance from the soil surface to the insertion of the flag leaf blade and from the soil surface to the base of the main ear, respectively. Prior to mechanical harvest, five consecutive ears from the center row were hand harvested for grain N content (CHNS Elemental Analyzer). Plot-level grain yield estimates were derived from the middle rows of each plant using combine harvesters. Grain yield data are reported here at 150 g kg<sup>-1</sup> moisture, while dry matter and N content data are reported on dry basis.</p>
<fig id="f1" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;1</label>
<caption>
<p>Methodology used to measure vertical stem dry matter, N concentration, and N content (left). Based on plant height, the stem was cut into four equal-length sections. Relative maturities, hybrids, and experiments average data for R2 and R6 stages (right). Bars represent the standard error of the mean. Significant differences exist between R2 and R6 for all traits and stem sections.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-16-1514045-g001.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>Stem dry matter (DM) and N remobilization were determined as:</p>
<disp-formula id="eq1">
<label>(1)</label>
<mml:math display="block" id="M1">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtable>
<mml:mtr>
<mml:mtd columnalign="left">
<mml:mi>S</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>e</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>m</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#xa0;</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>D</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>M</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#xa0;</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>r</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>e</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>m</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>o</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>b</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>l</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>z</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>a</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>o</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>n</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#xa0;</mml:mo>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo>
<mml:mo>%</mml:mo>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo></mml:mtd></mml:mtr>
<mml:mtr>
<mml:mtd columnalign="left">
<mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>S</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>e</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>m</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#xa0;</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>D</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>M</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#xa0;</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>a</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#xa0;</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>R</mml:mi>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>&#xa0;</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>s</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>a</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>g</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>e</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#xa0;</mml:mo>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
<mml:mo>&#xa0;</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>S</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>e</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>m</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#xa0;</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>D</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>M</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#xa0;</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>a</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#xa0;</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>R</mml:mi>
<mml:mn>6</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>&#xa0;</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>s</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>a</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>g</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>e</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>S</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>e</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>m</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#xa0;</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>D</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>M</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#xa0;</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>a</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#xa0;</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>R</mml:mi>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>&#xa0;</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>s</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>a</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>g</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>e</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfrac>
<mml:mo>&#xa0;</mml:mo>
<mml:mo>*</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>100</mml:mn></mml:mtd></mml:mtr>
</mml:mtable>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</disp-formula>
<disp-formula id="eq2">
<label>(2)</label>
<mml:math display="block" id="M2">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtable>
<mml:mtr>
<mml:mtd columnalign="left"><mml:mi>S</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>e</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>m</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#xa0;</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>N</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#xa0;</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>r</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>e</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>m</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>o</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>b</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>l</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>z</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>a</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>o</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>n</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#xa0;</mml:mo>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo>
<mml:mo>%</mml:mo>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo></mml:mtd></mml:mtr>
<mml:mtr>
<mml:mtd columnalign="left">
<mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>S</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>e</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>m</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#xa0;</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>N</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#xa0;</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>a</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#xa0;</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>R</mml:mi>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>&#xa0;</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>s</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>a</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>g</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>e</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#xa0;</mml:mo>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
<mml:mo>&#xa0;</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>S</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>e</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>m</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#xa0;</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>N</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#xa0;</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>a</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#xa0;</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>R</mml:mi>
<mml:mn>6</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>&#xa0;</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>s</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>a</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>g</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>e</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>S</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>e</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>m</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#xa0;</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>N</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#xa0;</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>a</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#xa0;</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>R</mml:mi>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>&#xa0;</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>s</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>a</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>g</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>e</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfrac>
<mml:mo>&#xa0;</mml:mo>
<mml:mo>*</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>100</mml:mn></mml:mtd></mml:mtr>
</mml:mtable>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</disp-formula>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_4">
<label>2.4</label>
<title>Statistical analysis</title>
<p>Plant trait genetic gain was calculated using a linear fixed-effect model using the <italic>lm</italic> function in R (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">R Core Team, 2022</xref>). We analyzed separately the genetic gain for each trait, stem section, and relative maturity combination. The statistical model included the hybrid year of release, season, replicates within a season, and the interaction hybrid year of release with season as fixed effects. Genetic gain significance (hybrid year of release effect) was tested using a type III F-test (<italic>emmeans</italic> package; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">Lenth et&#xa0;al., 2023</xref>). We found weak evidence of year of release and season interaction across most traits. Thus, a single genetic gain was reported across seasons. Mean comparisons between R2 and R6 stem dry matter, N concentration, and N content were made by paired t-test (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>). Regression analyses in R (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">R Core Team, 2022</xref>) were used to explore stem sections dry matter and N remobilization relationships.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s3" sec-type="results">
<label>3</label>
<title>Results</title>
<sec id="s3_1">
<label>3.1</label>
<title>Grain yield, grain N content, and plant and ear height</title>
<p>Across experiments and hybrids, the grain yield significantly increased with the year of hybrid release from 8.3 to 16.9 Mg ha<sup>-1</sup> (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;2a</bold>
</xref>). Long maturity hybrids had consistently greater yields than the short maturity hybrids. However, the genetic gain was similar across relative maturities (134 kg ha<sup>-1</sup> year<sup>-1</sup>; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;2a</bold>
</xref>). The grain N amount significantly increased with the year of hybrid release (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;2b</bold>
</xref>) but at different rates depending on relative maturity. The grain N content genetic gain in long maturity hybrids was 2-fold greater than that of short maturity hybrids (1.02 vs. 0.53 kg N ha<sup>-1</sup> year<sup>-1</sup>; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;2b</bold>
</xref>).</p>
<fig id="f2" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;2</label>
<caption>
<p>Grain yield <bold>(a)</bold>, grain N content <bold>(b)</bold>, plant height <bold>(c)</bold>, and ear height <bold>(d)</bold> for short and long maturity hybrids released between 1980 and 2020. The points represent the average per hybrid across experiments.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-16-1514045-g002.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>Across all hybrids, the plant height ranged from 227 to 256 cm (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;2c</bold>
</xref>), the ear height from 92 to 136 cm (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;2d</bold>
</xref>), and the ear-to-plant height ratio from 0.40 to 0.53 (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Supplementary Figure S2</bold>
</xref>). In&#xa0;long maturity hybrids, plant and ear heights were significantly (p&lt;0.05) reduced with the year of release by 0.26 and 0.22 cm year<sup>-1</sup>, respectively (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">
<bold>Figures&#xa0;2c, d</bold>
</xref>). New long maturity maize hybrids had 9&#xa0;cm shorter plant height and 8 cm lower ear height compared to old hybrids. The ear-to-plant height ratio did not change with the hybrid year of release in long maturity products. In short maturity hybrids, the plant height, ear height, and ear-to-plant height ratio did not change with the year of release (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">
<bold>Figures&#xa0;2c, d</bold>
</xref>; <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Supplementary Figure S2</bold>
</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_2">
<label>3.2</label>
<title>Stem dry matter accumulation and allocation</title>
<p>Across hybrids, the total stem dry matter ranged from 75 to 104 g plant<sup>-1</sup> at R2 stage and from 55 to 83 g plant<sup>-1</sup> at R6 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;3</bold>
</xref>). On average, the whole stem dry matter decreased by 18% from R2 to R6 stage (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">
<bold>Table&#xa0;3</bold>
</xref>; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>). The average vertical distribution of the stem dry matter along the plant height was: 8% (top), 18% (middle-top), 30% (middle-bottom) and 44% (bottom, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>). The relative distribution of dry matter changed little from R2 to R6 stage (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>).</p>
<fig id="f3" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;3</label>
<caption>
<p>Stem dry matter, N concentration, and N content for stem quarters at the start of grain-fill (R2, solid line) and physiological maturity (R6, dashed lined) in short maturity (blue) and long maturity (orange) hybrids released between 1980 and 2020. The points represent the average per hybrid across experiments. Genetic gains and significance are detailed in <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Supplementary Table S1</bold>
</xref>.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-16-1514045-g003.tif"/>
</fig>
<table-wrap id="T3" position="float">
<label>Table&#xa0;3</label>
<caption>
<p>Stem dry matter, N concentration, and N content and remobilization from different stem portions (see <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>) at R2 and R6 stages for old and new hybrids from each relative maturity group (103 vs 111-day).</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="bottom" rowspan="4" align="center"/>
<th valign="bottom" colspan="6" align="center">Short maturity</th>
<th valign="bottom" colspan="6" align="center">Long maturity</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="bottom" colspan="3" align="center">1983</th>
<th valign="bottom" colspan="3" align="center">2015</th>
<th valign="bottom" colspan="3" align="center">1983</th>
<th valign="bottom" colspan="3" align="center">2017</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="bottom" align="center">R2</th>
<th valign="bottom" align="center">R6</th>
<th valign="bottom" align="center">Remob</th>
<th valign="bottom" align="center">R2</th>
<th valign="bottom" align="center">R6</th>
<th valign="bottom" align="center">Remob</th>
<th valign="bottom" align="center">R2</th>
<th valign="bottom" align="center">R6</th>
<th valign="bottom" align="center">Remob</th>
<th valign="bottom" align="center">R2</th>
<th valign="bottom" align="center">R6</th>
<th valign="bottom" align="center">Remob</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="bottom" align="center"/>
<th valign="bottom" align="center"/>
<th valign="bottom" align="center">%</th>
<th valign="bottom" align="center"/>
<th valign="bottom" align="center"/>
<th valign="bottom" align="center">%</th>
<th valign="bottom" align="center"/>
<th valign="bottom" align="center"/>
<th valign="bottom" align="center">%</th>
<th valign="bottom" align="center"/>
<th valign="bottom" align="center"/>
<th valign="bottom" align="center">%</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<th valign="bottom" colspan="13" align="left">Dry matter (g plant<sup>-1</sup>)</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">Top</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">7.9</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">6.5</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">18</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">5.7</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">5.6</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">8.0</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">6.8</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">15</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">6.5</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">6.1</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">6</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">Mid-top</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">15.8</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">13.3</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">15</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">12.8</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">11.6</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">9</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">16.5</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">15.6</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">5</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">14.0</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">12.5</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">10</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">Mid-bottom</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">26.8</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">20.0</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">25</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">23.1</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">19.7</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">15</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">29.0</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">22.6</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">22</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">25.7</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">22.3</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">13</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">Bottom</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">37.7</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">29.3</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">22</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">38.9</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">29.5</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">24</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">40.8</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">31.5</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">23</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">40.0</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">31.7</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">21</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">
<bold>Total</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">
<bold>88.2</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">
<bold>69.2</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>22</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">
<bold>80.6</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">
<bold>66.4</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>18</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">
<bold>94.3</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">
<bold>76.5</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>19</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">
<bold>86.2</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">
<bold>72.6</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>16</bold>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="bottom" colspan="13" align="left">Nitrogen concentration (%)</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">Top</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">0.71</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">0.62</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">0.65</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">0.52</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">0.72</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">0.54</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">0.60</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">0.51</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">Mid-top</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">0.72</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">0.62</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">0.68</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">0.54</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">0.69</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">0.60</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">0.66</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">0.53</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">Mid-bottom</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">0.79</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">0.55</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">0.75</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">0.56</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">0.68</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">0.53</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">0.73</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">0.49</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">Bottom</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">0.86</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">0.69</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">0.82</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">0.61</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">0.85</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">0.66</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">0.73</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">0.53</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">
<bold>Total</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">
<bold>0.80</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">
<bold>0.63</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>-</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">
<bold>0.77</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">
<bold>0.58</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>-</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">
<bold>0.75</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">
<bold>0.60</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>-</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">
<bold>0.71</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">
<bold>0.52</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>-</bold>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="bottom" colspan="13" align="left">Nitrogen content (g N plant<sup>-1</sup>)</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">Top</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">0.06</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">0.04</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">25</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">0.04</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">0.03</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">23</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">0.06</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">0.04</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">37</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">0.04</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">0.03</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">18</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">Mid-top</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">0.11</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">0.08</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">26</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">0.09</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">0.06</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">28</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">0.11</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">0.09</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">16</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">0.09</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">0.07</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">28</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">Mid-bottom</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">0.21</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">0.11</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">48</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">0.18</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">0.11</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">36</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">0.19</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">0.12</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">37</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">0.19</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">0.10</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">43</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">Bottom</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">0.31</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">0.20</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">36</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">0.32</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">0.18</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">44</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">0.34</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">0.21</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">38</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">0.29</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">0.17</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">43</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">
<bold>Total</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">
<bold>0.69</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">
<bold>0.44</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>37</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">
<bold>0.63</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">
<bold>0.39</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>38</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">
<bold>0.70</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">
<bold>0.46</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>34</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">
<bold>0.61</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">
<bold>0.37</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>39</bold>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn>
<p>Values are mean estimates derived from the models shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;3</bold>
</xref>.</p>
</fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<p>In both relative maturities, newer hybrids had less total stem dry matter at R2 stage than older hybrids (-0.28 g plant<sup>-1</sup> year<sup>-1</sup>, <italic>p</italic>&gt;0.05). The overall reduction from 1980 to 2020 hybrids was 10% and occurred in the top three-quarters, with no significant change in the bottom stem portion (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;3</bold>
</xref>). Because of this, new hybrids had 7% (long maturity) and 13% (short maturity) increased relative allocation of dry matter at the bottom stem portions at R2 stage (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">
<bold>Table&#xa0;3</bold>
</xref>). At R6 stage, the patterns were similar to those in R2 stage, with no change in stem dry matter at the bottom with the year of release and a reduction in top-plant stem dry matter, which led to an overall insignificant change in total stem dry weight in both relative maturities (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;3</bold>
</xref>; <xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">
<bold>Table&#xa0;3</bold>
</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_3">
<label>3.3</label>
<title>Stem nitrogen concentration and allocation</title>
<p>Across hybrids, whole stem average N concentration ranged from 0.67 to 0.88% at R2 stage and from 0.45 to 0.68% at R6 stage (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;3</bold>
</xref>). On average, the whole stem N concentration decreased by 24% from R2 to R6 stage (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>; <xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">
<bold>Table&#xa0;3</bold>
</xref>). The average vertical distribution of the stem N concentration was relatively uniform along the plant height at both growth stages, with a slightly higher N concentration at the bottom of the stem at R2 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>; <xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">
<bold>Table&#xa0;3</bold>
</xref>). In long maturity hybrids, whole stem average N concentration was similar between old and new hybrids at R2 stage, but there was a significant decrease of -0.0023% year<sup>-1</sup> (<italic>p</italic>&lt;0.05) at R6 stage. Most of this reduction was driven by the bottom stem portion (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;3</bold>
</xref>). In short maturity hybrids, whole stem average N concentration slightly decreased (<italic>p</italic>&gt;0.05) with the year of hybrid release for both R2 and R6 stages (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;3</bold>
</xref>; <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Supplementary Table S1</bold>
</xref>).</p>
<p>Across hybrids, the total stem N content ranged from 0.51 to 0.82 g N plant<sup>-1</sup> at R2 stage and from 0.32 to 0.55 g N plant<sup>-1</sup> at R6 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;3</bold>
</xref>). On average, the whole stem N content decreased by 37% from R2 to R6 stage (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">
<bold>Table&#xa0;3</bold>
</xref>; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>). The average vertical distribution of the stem N content along the plant height was 8% (top), 17% (middle-top), 28% (middle-bottom), and 47% (bottom, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>), which is nearly identical to the stem dry matter distribution. The relative distribution of the stem N content along the plant remained unchanged from R2 to R6 stage (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">
<bold>Table&#xa0;3</bold>
</xref>; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>).</p>
<p>At R2 stage, newer hybrids of both relative maturities had slightly less (<italic>p</italic>&gt;0.05) total stem N content than older hybrids (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;3</bold>
</xref>). However, different stem portions exhibited different patterns with the year of release: the N content significantly (<italic>p</italic>&gt;0.01) decreased in the top-middle portions of the stem and remained unchanged in the middle-bottom portions at R2 stage (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;3</bold>
</xref>).</p>
<p>At R6 stage, newer long maturity hybrids had less (<italic>p&lt;0.05</italic>) total stem N content than older hybrids (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;3</bold>
</xref>). The reduction with the year of release was 2-fold larger for long maturity hybrids compared to short maturity hybrids (0.0027 vs. 0.0015 g N year<sup>-1</sup>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;3</bold>
</xref>). All stem portions contributed to this reduction at the R6 stage in long maturity hybrids (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;3</bold>
</xref>). In short maturity hybrids, the reduction occurred at the top-middle portions of the stem only.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_4">
<label>3.4</label>
<title>Dry matter and N remobilization</title>
<p>Across hybrids, stems remobilized 18% dry matter and 37% N content from R2 to R6 stages. Newer hybrids of both relative maturities remobilized less dry matter than the older hybrids (20% vs 17%) but slightly more N (39 vs. 36%; <xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">
<bold>Table&#xa0;3</bold>
</xref>).</p>
<p>Across hybrids and relative maturities, the below the ear leaf stem portions contributed 80% of the total stem dry matter and N remobilization (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>; <xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">
<bold>Table&#xa0;3</bold>
</xref>). The stem dry matter and N remobilization per stem portion were positively associated with the dry matter and N content at R2 stage (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f4">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;4</bold>
</xref>). Therefore, bottom stem portions with more dry matter and N contents remobilized the most (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">
<bold>Table&#xa0;3</bold>
</xref>). Furthermore, the dry matter and N remobilization patterns were similar across relative maturities and old and new hybrids (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Supplementary Figure S3</bold>
</xref>). On average, for every 1 g of remobilized dry matter, 0.01g N were remobilized (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Supplementary Figure S4</bold>
</xref>). In relative terms, we found 20% N remobilization (base) with no dry matter remobilization, and beyond that, for every 1% increase in dry matter remobilization, the N remobilization increased by 0.8% (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Supplementary Figure S4</bold>
</xref>).</p>
<fig id="f4" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;4</label>
<caption>
<p>Stem dry matter remobilization versus stem dry matter at R2 (left) and stem N remobilization versus stem N content at R2 stage (right). For stem dry matter and N remobilization see <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="eq1">Equations 1</xref> and <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="eq2">2</xref>.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-16-1514045-g004.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s4" sec-type="discussion">
<label>4</label>
<title>Discussion</title>
<p>We found that maize breeding has indirectly affected stem dry matter and N allocations and the corresponding remobilization rates (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;3</bold>
</xref>; <xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">
<bold>Table&#xa0;3</bold>
</xref>). Together with the new data on vertical distribution of stem dry matter and N along the plant height, our findings enhance our understanding of stem dry matter and N dynamics during grain-fill that could help explain why newer hybrids are more resistant to lodging (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">Russell, 1984</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Duvick et&#xa0;al., 2004</xref>).</p>
<sec id="s4_1">
<label>4.1</label>
<title>Different vertical dry matter and N distribution between stems and leaves</title>
<p>We found that most of the stem N is allocated at the bottom of the plant due to the greater dry matter content (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">
<bold>Figures&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3">
<bold>3</bold>
</xref>; <xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">
<bold>Table&#xa0;3</bold>
</xref>). This vertical pattern is different from that of leaf N distribution within the canopy, in which the most leaf N is at the middle canopy, around the ear leaf (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">Hirose and Werger, 1987</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">Bertheloot et&#xa0;al., 2008</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">Fan et&#xa0;al., 2023</xref>). Furthermore, we showed that most stem dry matter and N remobilization during grain-fill derive from the bottom stem (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">
<bold>Table&#xa0;3</bold>
</xref>). Again, this pattern differs from that of leaves, in which the largest amount of leaf dry matter and N remobilization derives from the middle of the canopy (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">Fan et&#xa0;al., 2023</xref>). These differences between stems and leaves vertical patterns are important for further understanding C and N physiological dynamics during grain-fill. Given that most previous studies reported dry matter and N vertical distribution in leaves or leaves and stems combined without focusing on the stem (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Johnson et&#xa0;al., 2010</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">Fan et&#xa0;al., 2023</xref>), our study adds new knowledge. Our results that the bottom stem quarter had a slightly greater N concentration (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>; <xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">
<bold>Table&#xa0;3</bold>
</xref>) than other stem portions agree with findings by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">DeBruin et&#xa0;al. (2013)</xref>, the only study to our knowledge that reported vertical distributions in stem N concentration.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s4_2">
<label>4.2</label>
<title>Maize breeding has decreased stem dry matter allocation above the ear leaf at R2</title>
<p>Our study is the first to report maize breeding effects on dry matter and N allocation and remobilization patterns by stem portion. Previous studies have examined maize breeding effects on the total stem dry matter and N in a small number of genotypes of long maturity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Chen et&#xa0;al., 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Fernandez et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>). Our finding that the total stem dry matter has been affected little by breeding (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;3</bold>
</xref>) agrees with the literature (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Chen et&#xa0;al., 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">Saenz et&#xa0;al., 2025</xref>). However, we revealed that this small change was not proportional across stem portions and crop stages. The top-plant stem dry matter at R2 stage has been significantly decreased by 16 to 22% in both relative maturities, while the bottom-plant stem dry matter has remained unchanged (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;3</bold>
</xref>). Because the bottom part of the stem dry matter is large (on average 45% of total, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>), no significant breeding effects are evident at the whole stem dry matter. Consequently, the distribution of dry matter within the stem has changed with breeding towards less dry matter at the top-portions of the stem (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">
<bold>Table&#xa0;3</bold>
</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s4_3">
<label>4.3</label>
<title>Long season newer hybrids have less stem N concentration at R6 stage</title>
<p>Stem N concentration remained unchanged at R2 stage in both relative maturities. However, at R6 stage, the average stem N concentration has significantly decreased in long maturity (111-day) hybrids in agreement with previous studies (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Chen et&#xa0;al., 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Fernandez et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>) and has remained unchanged in short maturity hybrids (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;3</bold>
</xref>). Interestingly, the reduction in long maturity hybrids N concentration was similar across stem sections (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;3</bold>
</xref>). Considering that stem represents up to 50% of the total maize residue (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">Bender et&#xa0;al., 2013</xref>), breeding probably has reduced maize residue quality (higher CN ratio) in long maturity hybrids, with no effect on short maturity hybrids, which could impact residue decomposition dynamics. The fact that stem N concentration has remained unchanged in short maturity hybrids is important, considering that residue decomposition constraints are more significant in the target environments of this group of hybrids (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">Sindelar et&#xa0;al., 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">King et&#xa0;al., 2024</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s4_4">
<label>4.4</label>
<title>Breeding had contrasting effects on stem dry matter and N remobilization</title>
<p>Maize hybrids remobilized a 2-fold larger amount of stem N than dry matter (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">
<bold>Table&#xa0;3</bold>
</xref>), in agreement with literature (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Chen et&#xa0;al., 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Archontoulis et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>). Breeding slightly reduced stem dry matter remobilization but slightly increased stem N remobilization in both relative maturities, in agreement with previous findings (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">
<bold>Table&#xa0;3</bold>
</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Chen et&#xa0;al., 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Mueller et&#xa0;al., 2019</xref>). The larger N requirements (grain N content, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;2</bold>
</xref>) in newer hybrids, together with a lesser stem minimum N concentration boundary (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Fernandez et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>), might have resulted in the greater stem N remobilization. In fact, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">DeBruin et&#xa0;al. (2017)</xref> found that grain N was positively associated with hybrid leaf N remobilization at limited N availability. Furthermore, we found that the greater stem N remobilization of the new hybrids is due to greater N remobilization at the bottom of the stem, providing new evidence supporting the greater N use efficiency in newer hybrids (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Mueller et&#xa0;al., 2019</xref>). Similar to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">DeBruin et&#xa0;al. (2013)</xref> findings for the leaves and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Ciampitti et&#xa0;al. (2013)</xref> for the shoot, we found that stem sections with more dry matter and N remobilized the most (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f4">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;4</bold>
</xref>). However, we found that stems remobilized only 0.46g N per g N content at R2, in comparison to the 0.63g reported in leaves (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">DeBruin et&#xa0;al., 2013</xref>). These remobilization relationships were consistent across maturities and hybrids year of release (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Supplementary Figure S3</bold>
</xref>).</p>
<p>This study does not account for management effects such as N fertilizer rate and plant density, which can affect N remobilization (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">Uhart and Andrade, 1995</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">Fan et&#xa0;al., 2023</xref>). Previous era studies found that genotypic differences in N content and remobilization between hybrids released in different years were only evidenced under sufficient/high N availabilities (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Haegele et&#xa0;al., 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">DeBruin et&#xa0;al., 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Fernandez et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>). Besides, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Chen et&#xa0;al. (2015)</xref> found that plant density treatments did not affect stem N remobilization. Therefore, the breeding effects on dry matter and N allocation and remobilization reported in this study might have been more moderate if hybrids had been tested under N-limiting conditions.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s4_5">
<label>4.5</label>
<title>Stem dry matter allocation might explain lodging resistance in newer hybrids</title>
<p>Newer hybrids support greater ear biomass and remobilize more N from the stem into the grain (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;2</bold>
</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Mueller et&#xa0;al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">Ruiz et&#xa0;al., 2023</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">Saenz et&#xa0;al., 2025</xref>), characteristics that make a crop more susceptible to lodging. However, newer hybrids are more resistant to lodging (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Duvick and Cassman, 1999</xref>). Lodging resistance is typically related to plant architecture, stem node diameter and internode length, stem N remobilization, synthesis of lignin and cellulose, and disease tolerance (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">Rajcan and Tollenaar, 1999</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">Jackson-Ziems et&#xa0;al., 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Bian et&#xa0;al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B45">Xue et&#xa0;al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Ahmad et&#xa0;al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B42">Stubbs et&#xa0;al., 2023</xref>). However, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B44">Xue et&#xa0;al. (2020)</xref> showed that most genotypic differences in resistance to stalk lodging were explained by plant and ear height, stem dry weight, and average dry weight per unit length of the bottom nodes. In addition, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B47">Zhang et&#xa0;al. (2021</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B46">2023)</xref> evaluated hybrids with different lodging susceptibility and found that lodging-resistant hybrids had lower plant and ear height and partitioned more dry matter to the stem base. Our study showed that new long maturity plants were shorter and had lower ear height (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;2</bold>
</xref>), even though the ear-to-plant height ratio did not change with the hybrid year (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Supplementary Figure S3</bold>
</xref>). Besides, we found, for both maturities, a reduction in the dry matter allocation to the top stem sections with the hybrid year or release (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;3</bold>
</xref>), increasing the relative contribution of the bottom quarter to the total stem dry matter (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">
<bold>Table&#xa0;3</bold>
</xref>). This change in dry matter allocation reduces the height of the plants&#x2019; center of gravity, which could explain why newer hybrids are more resistant to lodging. Future research could investigate the long-term effects of breeding on other traits associated with lodging resistance, such as lignin and cellulose content in the stem.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s5" sec-type="conclusions">
<label>5</label>
<title>Conclusion</title>
<p>We concluded that maize breeding efforts for greater yields have indirectly affected vertical stem dry matter and N allocation and remobilization patterns. Newer hybrids allocate less stem dry matter above the ear leaf than old hybrids in both relative maturities. The allocation of dry matter to the bottom portions of the stem remained unchanged with the year of hybrid release in both maturities. This change in vertical dry matter allocation along the stem reduces plants&#x2019; center of gravity, which could explain why new hybrids are more resistant to lodging and can accommodate increased plant densities compared to old hybrids. Maize breeding decreased the stem N concentration only in long maturity hybrids at R6 stage without affecting vertical distribution. The lesser stem N concentration implies lower residue quality in the new hybrids, which may affect residue decomposition patterns. The stem N remobilization was nearly doubled (37%) compared to dry matter remobilization (18%), and its distribution along the plant height was more uniform than that of dry matter. Maize breeding slightly reduced stem dry matter remobilization but increased stem N remobilization in both relative maturities. Overall, this study brings new data and knowledge, enhancing our understanding of historical yield increases and indirect consequences on maize plant traits.</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<sec id="s6" sec-type="data-availability">
<title>Data availability statement</title>
<p>The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s7" sec-type="author-contributions">
<title>Author contributions</title>
<p>AR: Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Visualization, Writing &#x2013; original draft. AL: Data curation, Investigation, Methodology, Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing. ST: Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Resources, Supervision, Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing. SA: Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s8" sec-type="funding-information">
<title>Funding</title>
<p>The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article. This study was supported by FFAR (project title: Evaluating the relative influence of maize breeding, field management, and environmental setting on crop production and sustainability targets), Bayer Crop Science, Leopold Center for Sustainable Development, the Plant Science Institute of Iowa State University, the Fulbright Program, and the Argentina Ministry of Education. </p>
</sec>
<ack>
<title>Acknowledgments</title>
<p>We thank Bayer&#x2019;s maize breeding testing team for setting up and managing the field experiments. We also thank Emily Wright, Mickala Stallman, and Antonella Ferela from Iowa State University for their assistance with data collection, Clarice Mensah from Bayer Crop Science for coordinating field experiments, and Bobby Brauer from Bayer Crop Science for providing the weather data.</p>
</ack>
<sec id="s9" sec-type="COI-statement">
<title>Conflict of interest</title>
<p>ST is employed by Bayer Crop Science.</p>
<p>The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.</p>
<p>The author(s) declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s10" sec-type="ai-statement">
<title>Generative AI statement</title>
<p>The author(s) declare that no Generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s11" sec-type="disclaimer">
<title>Publisher&#x2019;s note</title>
<p>All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s12" sec-type="supplementary-material">
<title>Supplementary material</title>
<p>The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2025.1514045/full#supplementary-material">https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2025.1514045/full#supplementary-material</ext-link>
</p>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="DataSheet1.docx" id="SM1" mimetype="application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document"/>
</sec>
<fn-group>
<title>Abbreviations</title>
<fn fn-type="abbr" id="abbrev1">
<p>N, nitrogen; VPD, vapor pressure deficit.</p>
</fn>
</fn-group>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="B1">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Abdala</surname> <given-names>L. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Vitantonio-Mazzini</surname> <given-names>L. N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gerde</surname> <given-names>J. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mart&#xed; Ribes</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Murtagh</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Borras</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Dry milling grain quality changes in Argentinean maize genotypes released from 1965 to 2016</article-title>. <source>Field Crops Res.</source> <volume>226</volume>, <fpage>74</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>82</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.fcr.2018.07.008</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Abendroth</surname> <given-names>L. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Elmore</surname> <given-names>R. W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Boyer</surname> <given-names>M. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Marlay</surname> <given-names>S. K.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <source>Corn growth and development</source> (<publisher-loc>Ames, IA, US</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Iowa State Univ. Ext. Publ</publisher-name>), <fpage>1009</fpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ahmad</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kamran</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ali</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bilegjargal</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cai</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ahmad</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Uniconazole application strategies to improve lignin biosynthesis, lodging resistance and production of maize in semiarid regions</article-title>. <source>Field Crops Res.</source> <volume>222</volume>, <fpage>66</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>77</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.fcr.2018.03.015</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Archontoulis</surname> <given-names>S. V.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Castellano</surname> <given-names>M. j.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Licht</surname> <given-names>M. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Nichols</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Baum</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Huber</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Predicting crop yields and soil-plant nitrogen dynamics in the US Corn Belt</article-title>. <source>Crop Sci.</source> <volume>60</volume>, <fpage>721</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>738</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/csc2.20039</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Baum</surname> <given-names>M. E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Licht</surname> <given-names>M. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Huber</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Archontoulis</surname> <given-names>S. V.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Impacts of climate change on the optimum planting date of different maize cultivars in the central US Corn Belt</article-title>. <source>Eur. J. Agron.</source> <volume>119</volume>, <fpage>126101</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.eja.2020.126101</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Bender</surname> <given-names>R. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Haegele</surname> <given-names>J. W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ruffo</surname> <given-names>M. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Below</surname> <given-names>F. E.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Nutrient uptake, partitioning, and remobilization in modern, transgenic insect-protected maize hybrids</article-title>. <source>Agron. J.</source> <volume>105</volume>, <fpage>161</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>170</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2134/agronj2012.0352</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Bertheloot</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Martre</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Andrieu</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>Dynamics of light and nitrogen distribution during grain filling within wheat canopy</article-title>. <source>Plant Physiol.</source> <volume>148</volume>, <fpage>1707</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1720</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1104/pp.108.124156</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Bian</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jia</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cai</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ma</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Eneji</surname> <given-names>A. E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cui</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Effects of tillage practices on root characteristics and root lodging resistance of maize</article-title>. <source>Field Crops Res.</source> <volume>185</volume>, <fpage>89</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>96</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.fcr.2015.10.008</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Bihmidine</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hunter</surname> <given-names>C. T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Johns</surname> <given-names>C. E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Koch</surname> <given-names>K. E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Braun</surname> <given-names>D. M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Regulation of assimilate import into sink organs: Update on molecular drivers of sink strength</article-title>. <source>Front. Plant Sci.</source> <volume>4</volume>, <elocation-id>1</elocation-id>&#x2013;<lpage>15</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpls.2013.00177</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kumudini</surname> <given-names>S. V.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tollenaar</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Vyn</surname> <given-names>T. J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Plant biomass and nitrogen partitioning changes between silking and maturity in newer versus older maize hybrids</article-title>. <source>Field Crops Res.</source> <volume>183</volume>, <fpage>315</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>328</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.fcr.2015.08.013</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ciampitti</surname> <given-names>I. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Murrell</surname> <given-names>S. T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Camberato</surname> <given-names>J. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tuinstra</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xia</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Friedemann</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Physiological dynamics of maize nitrogen uptake and partitioning in response to plant density and nitrogen stress factors: II</article-title>. <source>Reprod. phase. Crop Sci.</source> <volume>53</volume>, <fpage>2588</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2602</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2135/cropsci2013.01.0041</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Daynard</surname> <given-names>T. B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tanner</surname> <given-names>J. W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hume</surname> <given-names>D. J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1969</year>). <article-title>Contribution of stalk soluble carbohydrates to grain yield in corn (<italic>Zea mays</italic> L.)</article-title>. <source>Crop Sci.</source> <volume>9</volume>, <fpage>831</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>834</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2135/cropsci1969.0011183X000900060050x</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>DeBruin</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Messina</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Munaro</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Thompson</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Conlon-Beckner</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fallis</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>N distribution in maize plant as a marker for grain yield and limits on&#xa0;its&#xa0;remobilization after flowering</article-title>. <source>Plant Breed.</source> <volume>132</volume>, <fpage>500</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>505</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/pbr.2013.132.issue-5</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>DeBruin</surname> <given-names>J. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Schussler</surname> <given-names>J. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mo</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cooper</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Grain yield and nitrogen accumulation in maize hybrids released during 1934 to 2013 in the US Midwest</article-title>. <source>Crop Sci.</source> <volume>57</volume>, <fpage>1431</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1446</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2135/cropsci2016.08.0704</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Duvick</surname> <given-names>D. N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cassman</surname> <given-names>K. G.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1999</year>). <article-title>Post-Green Revolution trends in yield potential of temperate maize in the north-central United States</article-title>. <source>Crop Sci.</source> <volume>39</volume>, <fpage>1622</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1630</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2135/cropsci1999.3961622x</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Duvick</surname> <given-names>D. N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Smith</surname> <given-names>J. S. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cooper</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2004</year>). <article-title>Long-term selection in a commercial hybrid maize breeding program</article-title>. <source>Plant Breed. Rev.</source> <volume>4</volume>, <fpage>109</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>151</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/9780470650288.ch4</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Elli</surname> <given-names>E. F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Archontoulis</surname> <given-names>S. V.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>Dissecting the contribution of weather and management on water table dynamics under present and future climate scenarios in the US Corn Belt</article-title>. <source>Agron. Sustain. Dev.</source> <volume>43</volume>, <fpage>36</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s13593-023-00889-6</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B18">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Fairey</surname> <given-names>N. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Daynard</surname> <given-names>T. B.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1978</year>). <article-title>Assimilate distribution and utilization in maize</article-title>. <source>Can. J. Plant Sci.</source> <volume>58</volume>, <fpage>719</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>730</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4141/cjps78-107</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B19">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Fan</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ming</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Evers</surname> <given-names>J. B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xie</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>Nitrogen availability determines the vertical patterns of accumulation, partitioning, and reallocation of dry matter and nitrogen in maize</article-title>. <source>Field Crops Res.</source> <volume>297</volume>, <fpage>108927</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.fcr.2023.108927</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B20">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Fernandez</surname> <given-names>J. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Messina</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rotundo</surname> <given-names>J. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ciampitti</surname> <given-names>I. A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Integrating nitrogen and water-soluble carbohydrates dynamics in maize: A comparison of hybrids from different decades</article-title>. <source>Crop Sci.</source> <volume>61</volume>, <fpage>1360</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1373</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/csc2.20338</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B21">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Flint-Garcia</surname> <given-names>S. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jampatong</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Darrah</surname> <given-names>L. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>McMullen</surname> <given-names>M. D.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2003</year>). <article-title>Quantitative trait locus analysis of stalk strength in four maize populations</article-title>. <source>Crop Sci.</source> <volume>43</volume>, <fpage>13</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>22</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2135/cropsci2003.0013</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B22">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Haegele</surname> <given-names>J. W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cook</surname> <given-names>K. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Nichols</surname> <given-names>D. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Below</surname> <given-names>F. E.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Changes in&#xa0;nitrogen use traits associated with genetic improvement for grain yield of maize&#xa0;hybrids released in different decades</article-title>. <source>Crop Sci.</source> <volume>53</volume>, <fpage>1256</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1268</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2135/cropsci2012.07.0429</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B23">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Hirose</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Werger</surname> <given-names>M. J. A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1987</year>). <article-title>Maximizing daily canopy photosynthesis with respect to the leaf nitrogen allocation pattern in the canopy</article-title>. <source>Oecologia</source> <volume>72</volume>, <fpage>520</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>526</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/BF00378977</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B24">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Jackson-Ziems</surname> <given-names>T. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rees</surname> <given-names>J. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Harveson</surname> <given-names>R. M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <source>Common Stalk Rot Diseases of Corn</source> (<publisher-loc>Lincoln, NE</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Bulletin of The University of Nebraska at Lincoln</publisher-name>).</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B25">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Johnson</surname> <given-names>J. M. F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wilhelm</surname> <given-names>W. W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Karlen</surname> <given-names>D. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Archer</surname> <given-names>D. W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wienhold</surname> <given-names>B. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lightle</surname> <given-names>D. T.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Nutrient removal as a function of corn stover cutting height and cob harvest</article-title>. <source>Bioenergy Res.</source> <volume>3</volume>, <fpage>342</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>352</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s12155-010-9093-3</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B26">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>King</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ferela</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Vyn</surname> <given-names>T. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Trifunovic</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Eudy</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hurburgh</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2024</year>). <article-title>Genetic gains in short-season corn hybrids: Grain yield, yield components, and grain quality traits</article-title>. <source>Crop Sci.</source> <volume>2024</volume>, <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>16</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/csc2.21199</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B27">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kiniry</surname> <given-names>J. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tischler</surname> <given-names>C. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rosenthal</surname> <given-names>W. D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gerik</surname> <given-names>T. J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1992</year>). <article-title>Nonstructural carbohydrate utilization by sorghum and maize shaded during grain growth</article-title>. <source>Crop Sci.</source> <volume>32</volume>, <fpage>131</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>137</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2135/cropsci1992.0011183X003200010029x</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B28">
<citation citation-type="web">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Lenth</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Singman</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Love</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Buerkner</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Herve</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>R package emmeans: estimated marginal means</article-title>. Available online at: <uri xlink:href="https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/emmeans/index.html">https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/emmeans/index.html</uri> (Accessed October 19, 2024).</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B29">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Song</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xu</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Vertical distributions of chlorophyll and nitrogen and their associations with photosynthesis under drought and rewatering regimes in a maize field</article-title>. <source>Agric. Meteor.</source> <volume>272&#x2013;273</volume>, <fpage>40</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>54</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.agrformet.2019.03.026</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B30">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Mueller</surname> <given-names>S. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Messina</surname> <given-names>C. D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Vyn</surname> <given-names>T. J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Simultaneous gains in grain yield and nitrogen efficiency over 70 years of maize genetic improvement</article-title>. <source>Sci. Rep.</source> <volume>9</volume>, <fpage>9095</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41598-019-45485-5</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B31">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Mu&#xf1;oz-Sabater</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dutra</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Agust&#xed;-Panareda</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Albergel</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Arduini</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Balsamo</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>ERA5-Land: A state-of-the-art global reanalysis dataset for land applications</article-title>. <source>Earth Syst. Sci. Data Discuss.</source> <volume>2021</volume>, <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>50</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/essd-13-4349-2021</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B32">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ouattar</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jones</surname> <given-names>R. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Crookston</surname> <given-names>R. K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kajeiou</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1987</year>). <article-title>Effect of drought on water relations of developing maize kernels</article-title>. <source>Crop Sci.</source> <volume>27</volume>, <fpage>730</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>735</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2135/cropsci1987.0011183X002700040026x</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B33">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Palmero</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fernandez</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Habben</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Schussler</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Masek</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Weers</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2024</year>). <article-title>Optimization of carbon and nitrogen partitioning in DP202216 maize hybrids</article-title>. <source>Field Crop Res.</source> <volume>310</volume>, <fpage>109345</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.fcr.2024.109345</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B34">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Rajcan</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tollenaar</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1999</year>). <article-title>Source: Sink ratio and leaf senescence in maize: II. Nitrogen metabolism during grain filling</article-title>. <source>Field Crops Res.</source> <volume>60</volume>, <fpage>255</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>265</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S0378-4290(98)00143-9</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B35">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<collab>R Core Team</collab>
</person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <source>R: a language and environment for statistical computing</source> (<publisher-loc>Vienna, Austria</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>R Foundation for statistical Computing</publisher-name>). Available at: <uri xlink:href="https://www.R-project.org/">https://www.R-project.org/</uri> (Accessed October 19, 2024).</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B36">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ruiz</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Trifunovic</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Eudy</surname> <given-names>D. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sciarresi</surname> <given-names>C. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Baum</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Danalatos</surname> <given-names>G. J.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>Harvest index has increased over the last 50 years of maize breeding</article-title>. <source>Field Crops Res.</source> <volume>300</volume>, <fpage>108991</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.fcr.2023.108991</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B37">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Russell</surname> <given-names>W. A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1984</year>). <article-title>Agronomic performance of maize cultivars representing different eras of breeding</article-title>. <source>Maydica</source> <volume>29</volume>, <fpage>375</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>390</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B38">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Saenz</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ruiz</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sciarresi</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>King</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Baum</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ferela</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2025</year>). <article-title>Historical increases in plant density increased vegetative maize biomass while breeding increased reproductive biomass and allocation to ear over stem</article-title>. <source>Field Crop Res.</source> <volume>322</volume>, <fpage>109704</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.fcr.2024.109704</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B39">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Sekhon</surname> <given-names>R. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Breitzman</surname> <given-names>M. W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Silva</surname> <given-names>R. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Santoro</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rooney</surname> <given-names>W. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>de Leon</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Stover composition in maize and sorghum reveals remarkable genetic variation and plasticity for carbohydrate accumulation</article-title>. <source>Front. Plant Sci.</source> <volume>7</volume>, <elocation-id>1</elocation-id>&#x2013;<lpage>12</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpls.2016.00822</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B40">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Setter</surname> <given-names>T. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Meller</surname> <given-names>V. H.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1984</year>). <article-title>Reserve carbohydrate in maize stem</article-title>. <source>Plant Physiol.</source> <volume>75</volume>, <fpage>617</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>622</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1104/pp.75.3.617</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B41">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Sindelar</surname> <given-names>A. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Coulter</surname> <given-names>J. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lamb</surname> <given-names>J. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Vetsch</surname> <given-names>J. A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Agronomic responses of continuous corn to stover, tillage, and nitrogen management</article-title>. <source>Agron. J.</source> <volume>105</volume>, <fpage>1498</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1506</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2134/agronj2013.0181</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B42">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Stubbs</surname> <given-names>C. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kunduru</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bokros</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Verges</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Porter</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cook</surname> <given-names>D. D.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>Moving toward short stature maize: The effect of plant height on maize stalk lodging resistance</article-title>. <source>Field Crop Res.</source> <volume>300</volume>, <fpage>109008</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.fcr.2023.109008</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B43">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Uhart</surname> <given-names>S. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Andrade</surname> <given-names>F. H.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1995</year>). <article-title>Nitrogen and carbon accumulation and remobilization during grain filling in maize under different source/sink ratios</article-title>. <source>Crop Sci.</source> <volume>35</volume>, <fpage>183</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>190</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2135/cropsci1995.0011183X003500010034x</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B44">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Xue</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gao</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fan</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ming</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Traits of plant morphology, stalk mechanical strength, and biomass accumulation in the selection of lodging-resistant maize cultivars</article-title>. <source>Eur. J. Agron.</source> <volume>117</volume>, <fpage>126073</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.eja.2020.126073</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B45">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Xue</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gou</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Shi</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yao</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>How high plant density of maize affects basal internode development and strength formation</article-title>. <source>Crop Sci.</source> <volume>56</volume>, <fpage>3295</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>3306</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2135/cropsci2016.04.0243</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B46">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gu</surname> <given-names>S. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Y. Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xu</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>Xi.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>The relationships between maize (Zea mays L.) lodging resistance and yield formation depend on dry matter allocation to ear and stem</article-title>. <source>Crop J.</source> <volume>11</volume>, <fpage>258</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>268</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.cj.2022.04.020</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B47">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gu</surname> <given-names>S. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Y. Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>R. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yan</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Morphological and mechanical variables associated with lodging in maize (Zea mays L.)</article-title>. <source>Field Crop Res.</source> <volume>269</volume>, <fpage>108178</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.fcr.2021.108178</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>