<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.3 20070202//EN" "journalpublishing.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="2.3" xml:lang="EN">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Front. Plant Sci.</journal-id>
<journal-title>Frontiers in Plant Science</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">Front. Plant Sci.</abbrev-journal-title>
<issn pub-type="epub">1664-462X</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Frontiers Media S.A.</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpls.2025.1491038</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Plant Science</subject>
<subj-group>
<subject>Original Research</subject>
</subj-group>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Microbial determinants of soil quality in mixed larch and birch forests: network structure and keystone taxa abundances</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ge</surname>
<given-names>Zhaoxuan</given-names>
</name>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2000488/overview"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/data-curation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname>
<given-names>Xinyu</given-names>
</name>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2831750/overview"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/data-curation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/software/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname>
<given-names>Chang</given-names>
</name>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/investigation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/supervision/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Li</surname>
<given-names>Minghao</given-names>
</name>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/conceptualization/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/supervision/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname>
<given-names>Ruihan</given-names>
</name>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/supervision/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname>
<given-names>Yang</given-names>
</name>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/data-curation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname>
<given-names>Zhidong</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn001">
<sup>*</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2073250/overview"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="aff1">
<institution>College of Forestry, Hebei Agricultural University</institution>, <addr-line>Baoding</addr-line>,&#xa0;<country>China</country>
</aff>
<author-notes>
<fn fn-type="edited-by">
<p>Edited by: Sabine Dagmar Zimmermann, IPSiM Institute of Plant Science in Montpellier CNRS UMR5004, France</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="edited-by">
<p>Reviewed by: Mathimaran Natarajan, Pondicherry University, India</p>
<p>Xianzhao Liu, Chinese Academy of Forestry, China</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="corresp" id="fn001">
<p>*Correspondence: Zhidong Zhang, <email xlink:href="mailto:zhangzd@hebau.edu.cn">zhangzd@hebau.edu.cn</email>
</p>
</fn>
</author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>15</day>
<month>07</month>
<year>2025</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="collection">
<year>2025</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>16</volume>
<elocation-id>1491038</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>04</day>
<month>09</month>
<year>2024</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>25</day>
<month>06</month>
<year>2025</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#xa9; 2025 Ge, Zhang, Liu, Li, Wang, Zhang and Zhang</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2025</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Ge, Zhang, Liu, Li, Wang, Zhang and Zhang</copyright-holder>
<license xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">
<p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.</p>
</license>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<p>Changes in forest soil microbial community characteristics affect soil function and quality. However, the mechanisms through which microbes drive soil quality across different stand types remain unclear. Three typical forest types, larch (<italic>Larix principis-rupprechtii</italic>) forest (LF), birch (<italic>Betula platyphylla</italic>) forest (BF), and mixed larch and birch forest (MF), were selected to assess soil properties, microbial community characteristics, and the complexity and stability of co-occurrence networks. The results showed that stand type significantly affected soil quality, microbial community composition, and network structure. Compared to LF stands, both MF and BF stands exhibited higher levels of soil organic carbon (SOC), total nitrogen (TN), available nitrogen (AN), available phosphorus (AP), maximum water holding capacity (MWHC), and soil quality index (SQI), with the SQI increasing by 54.29% and 48.57%, respectively. The bacterial Shannon index was lower in MF and BF stands, whereas the fungal Shannon index was higher. Fungal community composition was more sensitive to variations among the three stand types than bacterial communities. The MF stands exhibited higher microbial complexity and stability, with a higher relative abundance of keystone bacterial and fungal taxa associated with nutrient cycling and transformation. These findings suggest that SQI can be enhanced by increasing soil fungal diversity, improving microbial network complexity and stability, and increasing the relative abundance of key microbial taxa. This study emphasized that the mixing of larch and birch significantly affected soil microbial community characteristics, which in turn impacted soil nutrient utilization. The insights gained provide a deeper understanding of soil nutrient cycling in plantation ecosystems, offering valuable references for sustainable forest management practices.</p>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>
<italic>Larix principis-rupprechtii</italic>
</kwd>
<kwd>microbial diversity</kwd>
<kwd>network complexity</kwd>
<kwd>network stability</kwd>
<kwd>keystone taxa</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<counts>
<fig-count count="6"/>
<table-count count="3"/>
<equation-count count="2"/>
<ref-count count="76"/>
<page-count count="13"/>
<word-count count="6487"/>
</counts>
<custom-meta-wrap>
<custom-meta>
<meta-name>section-in-acceptance</meta-name>
<meta-value>Functional Plant Ecology</meta-value>
</custom-meta>
</custom-meta-wrap>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec id="s1" sec-type="intro">
<label>1</label>
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>Soil microorganisms play a vital role in soil nutrient cycling and ecosystem function, and have received extensive attention (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">Falkowski et&#xa0;al., 2008</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B46">Lu et&#xa0;al., 2023</xref>). It is widely recognized that tree species characteristics strongly influence soil microbial community composition and function through both direct and indirect pathways (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B62">Shao et&#xa0;al., 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B53">Otsing et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>). Direct influences include the release of root exudates and the deposition of aboveground litter. The quantity and composition of root exudates&#x2014;such as organic acids and sugars&#x2014;vary among tree species, providing specific substrates and nutrients that selectively support distinct microbial taxa. Similarly, the chemical properties of litterfall directly influence microbial decomposition rates and community structure (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B55">Prescott and Grayston, 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Bai et&#xa0;al., 2023</xref>). For example, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Garau et&#xa0;al. (2019)</xref> reported that litter in broad-leaved forests generally contains higher nitrogen and phosphorus concentrations and supports more microorganisms that use soil carbon sources compared to coniferous litter. Indirectly, tree species can modify the soil microenvironment by altering pH, moisture content, and nutrient availability, thereby creating conditions that favor specific microbial assemblages (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">Khlifa et&#xa0;al., 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Chen et&#xa0;al., 2019b</xref>). For instance, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B42">Li et&#xa0;al. (2023)</xref> found that tree species-mediated differences in stand types significantly affected soil nutrient concentrations, which in turn served as the primary driver of changes in soil bacterial and fungal diversity. Moreover, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">Jiang et&#xa0;al. (2021)</xref> demonstrated fungal communities are more sensitive to environmental changes compared to bacterial communities. Therefore, exploring the relationship between tree species and soil microbes is crucial for understanding soil nutrient cycling processes and holds significant implications for effective forest management.</p>
<p>Soil microbial keystone taxa play a key role in maintaining ecological networks and functions that enable the efficient use of resources (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Banerjee et&#xa0;al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">Hernandez et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>). Co-occurrence network analysis has become a widely used tool to identify keystone taxa (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Berry and Widder, 2014</xref>). Furthermore, analyzing multiple topological features of microbial networks (e.g., indices of edges, nodes, and mean degree) can reveal the complexity and stability of microbial communities (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">Goberna and Verdu, 2022</xref>). This approach aids in understanding how microbial network structure responds to environmental changes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">Collyer et&#xa0;al., 2023</xref>). Growing evidence suggests that both network structure and keystone taxa have important implications for ecosystem multifunctionality (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B57">Qiu et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>). For instance, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">Huo et&#xa0;al. (2023)</xref> revealed that pine-oak mixed forest altered the structure of fungal community networks. Conversely, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">He et&#xa0;al. (2022)</xref> found that the co-occurrence network of soil microbial communities became more complex in pure forests dominated by <italic>Phoebe bournei</italic>. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B42">Li et&#xa0;al. (2023)</xref> reported that <italic>symbiotrophic</italic> fungi were more abundant in coniferous and broad-leaved mixed forests, whereas <italic>saprophytic</italic> fungi were more prevalent in coniferous pure forest. Despite these insights, the effects of changes in tree species characteristics on microbial networks and keystone taxa remain poorly understood.</p>
<p>Soil quality represents the fertility, availability, and restorability of soil, reflecting its overall ecological function (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Bunemann et&#xa0;al., 2018</xref>). It is essential for sustaining biological productivity and promoting the health of plants and animals (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B60">Schloter et&#xa0;al., 2003</xref>). Various methods for evaluating soil quality have been proposed, with the soil quality index (SQI) currently being widely applied (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">Gonzaga et&#xa0;al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Cui et&#xa0;al., 2024</xref>). The SQI method usually groups soil physicochemical and biochemical properties into a minimum dataset, integrating them into a single numerical value through a scoring equation for comprehensive evaluation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Bastida et&#xa0;al., 2008</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B56">Qiu et&#xa0;al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">Li et&#xa0;al., 2024</xref>). Therefore, soil quality assessed through the SQI enhances our understanding and prediction of soil ecological functions and its capacity to respond to environmental change. Additionally, soil microorganisms are closely related to soil ecosystems and can further influence soil quality (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Delgado-Baquerizo et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B45">Liu et&#xa0;al., 2024</xref>). <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B65">Wan et&#xa0;al. (2024)</xref> noted that changes in fungal community composition and reductions in bacterial diversity improved SQI on the Loess Plateau. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B45">Liu et&#xa0;al. (2024)</xref> revealed that microbial diversity, particularly the Shannon index ratio of fungi to bacteria and the relative abundance of specific dominant taxa such as <italic>Ascomycota</italic> and <italic>Acidobacteriota</italic> have been identified as key drivers of soil quality. However, current research primarily focuses on agricultural soils and methods for evaluating the soil quality index, with few studies exploring how soil microorganisms affect soil quality across different stand types.</p>
<p>Larch (<italic>Larix principis-rupprechtii</italic>), a widely used afforestation species, grows well in the subalpine regions of northern China, offering advantages such as fast growth, high-quality wood, and effective soil and wind retention, and high stress resistance (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Ge et&#xa0;al., 2023</xref>). However, the rapid expansion of pure larch forests has led to issues such as low forest productivity and stand instability, which pose significant threats to the multifunctional benefits of these forests (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">Cheng et&#xa0;al., 2023</xref>). Birch (<italic>Betula platyphylla</italic>) is commonly used as a mixed tree species in larch forests of North China. Mixed-species stands tend to support more diverse community structures and influence soil nutrient conditions and microbial communities (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B73">Zhang and Chen, 2007</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Gillespie et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>). However, their effects on soil quality remain unclear. In this study, we collected soil samples from larch forests, birch forests, and larch-birch mixed forests to examine variations in soil properties and microbial communities across different stand types. The goals were to explore the effects of microbial community characteristics on soil quality and to identify the underlying mechanisms. Specifically, this study aimed to address the following questions: (1) What are the differences in soil physicochemical properties and SQI among the stand types? (2) How do microbial community characteristics (diversity, composition, microbial network, and keystone microbial taxa) differ among stand types? (3) What are the specific mechanisms through which microbial community characteristics (diversity, composition, microbial network, and keystone taxa) influence soil quality?</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2" sec-type="materials|methods">
<label>2</label>
<title>Materials and methods</title>
<sec id="s2_1">
<label>2.1</label>
<title>Study site</title>
<p>The study area is located at the forest region in Weichang County, Hebei Province, China (from 41&#xb0;35&#x2032; N to 42&#xb0;40&#x2032;N, 116&#xb0;32&#x2032;E to 117&#xb0;14&#x2032;E) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>). The elevation ranges from 663 to1935 m. This region has a typical cold-temperate continental monsoon climate, with a mean annual temperature ranging from -1.4 to 4.7&#xb0;C and a mean annual precipitation of 380 to 560 mm. The main tree species include larch, birch, <italic>Picea asperata</italic>, and <italic>Populus davidiana.</italic>
</p>
<fig id="f1" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;1</label>
<caption>
<p>Study area and sample plots distribution in Weichang County, Hebei Province, Northern China.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-16-1491038-g001.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Map showing the distribution of different forest types overlaid with elevation in a region. Birch forests, mixed forests of birch and larch, and larch forests are marked with triangles, squares, and circles, respectively. Elevation ranges from 663 to 1935 meters, depicted in green to red. The right side includes photos labeled &#x201c;Birch forest,&#x201d; &#x201c;Mixed forest,&#x201d; and &#x201c;Larch forest."</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_2">
<label>2.2</label>
<title>Experiment design</title>
<p>Three typical stand types were selected in the region at altitudes of 1300&#x2013;1600 m, all with similar slopes and aspects: larch forest (LF), birch forest (BF), and mixed larch and birch forest (MF). The birch forests are natural secondary forests, while the mixed forests typically result from the artificial replanting of larch in the understory of BF. The larch forests studied in this study are first-generation plantations established on land that had experienced severe ecological degradation. Prior to the Qing Dynasty, the region was primarily covered by natural forests and grasslands. However, extensive human disturbances&#x2014;such as overlogging, intensive grazing, and frequent wildfires&#x2014;led to significant ecosystem deterioration. By the mid-20th century, these activities had nearly eradicated the native forests. In response, systematic restoration efforts were initiated, with large-scale afforestation projects implemented using larch as the dominant species. Tree ring analysis indicated that the trees are approximately 40&#x2013;50 years old. For each stand type, seven plots (30 &#xd7; 30 m) were established, yielding a total of 21 plots (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>). All standing trees with a diameter at breast height (DBH) &#x2265; 5 cm were numbered, and their species name, DBH, height, and other relevant information were measured and recorded. The details of the sample plots are presented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">
<bold>Table&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>.</p>
<table-wrap id="T1" position="float">
<label>Table&#xa0;1</label>
<caption>
<p>Basic stand information of the sampling plots.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Stand types</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Tree species</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Altitude (m)</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Stand age (years)</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">DBH (cm)</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Height (m)</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Stand density (trees&#xb7;ha<sup>-1</sup>)</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">LF</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">
<italic>Larix principis-rupprechtii</italic>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">1333 &#xb1; 82</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">40-50</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">16.52 &#xb1; 2.75</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">14.39 &#xb1; 2.18</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">1343 &#xb1; 210</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">MF</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">
<italic>L</italic>. <italic>principis-rupprechtii</italic>
<break/>
<italic>Betula platyphylla</italic>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">1489 &#xb1; 96</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">50-60</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">21.21 &#xb1; 2.36</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">16.64 &#xb1; 3.51</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">1073 &#xb1; 479</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">BF</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">
<italic>B</italic>. <italic>platyphylla</italic>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">1501 &#xb1; 87</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">40-55</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">18.94 &#xb1; 2.49</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">15.46 &#xb1; 1.27</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">1294 &#xb1; 352</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn>
<p>Data are means &#xb1; SE. LF, larch forest, MF, mixed larch and birch forest, BF, birch forest. DBH: diameter at breast height.</p>
</fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_3">
<label>2.3</label>
<title>Data collection</title>
<sec id="s2_3_1">
<label>2.3.1</label>
<title>Sample collection and soil properties measurements</title>
<p>In August 2022, soil samples were collected from each sample plot using the five-point sampling method. After removing the top layer of litter, a soil auger with an inner diameter of 4 cm was used to extract soil from a depth of 0&#x2013;15 cm. The samples were mixed to form a single composite sample, which was then divided equally into two parts. A total of 42 soil samples were collected (2 samples per plot, 21 plots in total). One portion of the soil samples was filtered through a sieve to remove plant roots and stones, placed into 20 ml centrifuge tubes, and stored at -80&#xb0;C for subsequent high-throughput sequencing of microorganisms. The other portion was placed on a cool lab bench to dry naturally for the determination of soil physicochemical properties. Soil bulk density (BD), maximum water holding capacity (MWHC), pH, soil organic carbon (SOC), total nitrogen (TN), available nitrogen (AN), total phosphorus (TP), and available phosphorus (AP) were measured using standard soil agrochemical analysis methods (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">Bao, 2000</xref>). Specifically, BD was measured using 100 cm&#xb3; stainless steel corers, oven-drying at 105&#xb0;C to constant mass. MWHC was determined by 24-hour saturation of undisturbed cores (100 cm&#xb3;) with free water removal. Soil pH was measured using pH meter in a soil: water (1:2.5) extract. SOC was quantified via potassium dichromate oxidation with external heating. TN was measured using the Kjeldahl digestion method. TP was evaluated via the molybdenum-antimony colorimetry. AN was measured using the Alkaline hydrolysis diffusion method, AP was using Olsen&#x2019;s bicarbonate extraction method.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_3_2">
<label>2.3.2</label>
<title>Soil DNA extraction, sequencing, and data processing</title>
<p>Nucleic acids were extracted from 0.2 and 0.5 g of soil samples using the OMEGA Soil DNA Kit (D5635-02) (Omega Bio-Tek, Norcross, GA, USA). The extracted DNA was electrophoresed on a 0.8% agarose gel to determine molecular size and quantified using a Nanodrop. For the soil bacteria project, the highly variable V3-V4 region of the bacterial rRNA 16S gene, approximately 468 bp in length, was chosen for sequencing (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">Callahan et&#xa0;al., 2016</xref>). PCR amplification was performed using the primers 338F (5&#x2032;-barcode + ACTCCTACGGGAGGCAGCA-3&#x2032;) and 806R (5&#x2032;-GGACTACHVGGGTWTCTAAT-3&#x2032;), targeting the 16S rRNA V3-V4 region of bacteria. For the soil fungal project, the ITS1 fungal region was amplified and sequenced using primers ITS5 (GGAAGTAAAAGTCGTAACAAGG) and ITS2 (GCTGCGTTCTTCATCGATGC), with a length of about 280 bp. The PCR reaction components were set up, and template DNA was pre-denatured at 98 &#xb0;C for 5 minutes to ensure complete denaturation, followed by the amplification cycle. PCR products were quantified using a Microplate reader (BioTek, FLx800) with the Quant-iT PicoGreen dsDNA Assay Kit. Quantified products for each sample were mixed based on the desired data amount and used for library preparation with Illumina&#x2019;s TruSeq Nano DNA LT Library Prep Kit. Microbiome data were analyzed using QIIME2 version 2019.4, following a modified and refined process based on the official tutorial (<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://docs.qiime2.org/2019.4/tutorials/">https://docs.qiime2.org/2019.4/tutorials/</ext-link>, accessed on 14 June 2023) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Bolyen et&#xa0;al., 2019</xref>). High throughput sequencing was carried out on the Gene Cloud platform supplied by Shanghai Paisano Biotechnology Co. Alpha diversity indices including the Shannon index, and Chao1 index were calculated using QIIME2 (2019.4) to evaluate the diversity of the microbiota within the samples.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_3_3">
<label>2.3.3</label>
<title>Calculation of soil quality index</title>
<p>The calculation of the SQI typically involves three steps (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">Huang et&#xa0;al., 2018</xref>): 1) selecting the minimum data set (MDS) that best represents soil function using principal component analysis (PCA) (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Supplementary Table S1</bold>
</xref>), 2) scoring the selected indicators (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Supplementary Table S2</bold>
</xref>), and 3) calculating the SQI using the weighted index method (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Supplementary Table S2</bold>
</xref>). Eight soil physicochemical properties were analyzed, and PCA was employed to identify the most appropriate soil quality indicators. Principal components (PCs) with eigenvalues &gt; 1.0 were considered for indicator selection (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">Andrews et&#xa0;al., 2002</xref>). The MDS retained only the most highly weighted indicators, specifically those within the top 10% of the highest weight loadings. When multiple indicators were retained in each PC, Pearson correlation analysis was used for further screening (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Supplementary Table S3</bold>
</xref>). If the high-weight indicators were uncorrelated (correlation coefficient&lt; 0.7), each indicator was included in the MDS. Otherwise, the indicator with the highest weight value was retained (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B72">Yu et&#xa0;al., 2018</xref>).</p>
<p>After selecting the MDS metrics, a nonlinear scoring function was used to convert the soil metrics into scores ranging from 0 to 1. The calculations were based on <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="eq1">Equation 1</xref>
</p>
<disp-formula id="eq1">
<label>(1)</label>
<mml:math display="block" id="M1">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>S</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>N</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>L</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="true">(</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mi>x</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>x</mml:mi>
<mml:mn>0</mml:mn>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfrac>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="true">)</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>b</mml:mi>
</mml:msup>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfrac>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</disp-formula>
<p>where <inline-formula>
<mml:math display="inline" id="im1">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>S</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>N</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>L</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> represents the nonlinear score for each indicator, taking values in the range 0-1. <inline-formula>
<mml:math display="inline" id="im2">
<mml:mi>x</mml:mi>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> is the indicator value, <inline-formula>
<mml:math display="inline" id="im3">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>x</mml:mi>
<mml:mn>0</mml:mn>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> is the average of the corresponding indicators, and <inline-formula>
<mml:math display="inline" id="im4">
<mml:mi>b</mml:mi>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> is a shape parameter determining the steepness of the non-linear scoring function. The parameter <inline-formula>
<mml:math display="inline" id="im5">
<mml:mi>b</mml:mi>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> is set to -2.5 for indicators where &#x201c;the more, the better&#x201d; applies, and 2.5 for indicators where &#x201c;the less, the better&#x201d; applies (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B58">Raiesi, 2017</xref>).</p>
<p>After scoring and weighting all MDS indicators, The SQI was calculated using <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="eq2">Equation 2</xref> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B48">Masto et&#xa0;al., 2008</xref>):</p>
<disp-formula id="eq2">
<label>(2)</label>
<mml:math display="block" id="M2">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>S</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>Q</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>I</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
<mml:mstyle displaystyle="true">
<mml:munderover>
<mml:mo>&#x2211;</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>n</mml:mi>
</mml:munderover>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>W</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>&#xd7;</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>S</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>N</mml:mi>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>L</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mstyle>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</disp-formula>
<p>where <inline-formula>
<mml:math display="inline" id="im6">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>W</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> is the weight of the indicator, calculated as the ratio of the variance of the common factor of the indicator to the total variance in the PCA. <inline-formula>
<mml:math display="inline" id="im7">
<mml:mi>n</mml:mi>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> is the number of indicators in the MDS.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_3_4">
<label>2.3.4</label>
<title>Co-occurrence network and keystone taxa</title>
<p>Microbial molecular networks were constructed to determine the effects of stand types on soil microbiomes and identify potential keystone taxa. To minimize spurious correlations, bacterial and fungal amplicon sequence variant (ASV) occurrences were required to exceed 1/5 of the sample size, and their relative abundance had to be greater than 0.01% (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">Faust, 2021</xref>). Spearman correlation analyses were performed using ASV abundance tables for bacteria and fungi, and correlation coefficients (r) and <italic>p</italic>-values were obtained (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">Barberan et&#xa0;al., 2014</xref>), with <italic>p</italic>-values adjusted for multiple comparisons using Benjamini-Hochberg false discovery rate (FDR) method, applying a significance threshold of 0.05. Correlations with | r | &gt; 0.7 and <italic>p&lt;</italic> 0.05 were considered statistically significant and used to construct the networks. Co-occurrence network analyses were conducted using the &#x2018;Hmisc&#x2019; R package (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">Harrell, 2024</xref>). Network topological parameters, including the number of nodes, number of edges, mean degree, density, network diameter, and mean path length, were extracted using the &#x2018;igraph&#x2019; package (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Cs&#xe1;rdi et&#xa0;al., 2024</xref>). Network visualization was performed using Gephi 0.10.1 (<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://gephi.org/">https://gephi.org/</ext-link>). Subsequently, the subgraph function in the &#x2018;igraph&#x2019; package was used to extract the sub-network for each sample. The average value of the sub-network&#x2019;s topological parameters was standardized to directly assess the impact of microbial network complexity on SQI. Network stability was characterized by the remaining proportion of nodes and robustness. In this study, robustness was defined as the proportion of remaining species in the network after 50% node removal (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B49">Montesinos-Navarro et&#xa0;al., 2017</xref>). The topological role of each node was calculated based on its within-module connectivity (<inline-formula>
<mml:math display="inline" id="im8">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>Z</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>) and among-module connectivity (<inline-formula>
<mml:math display="inline" id="im9">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>P</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">Guimer&#xe0; and Nunes Amaral, 2005</xref>). According to previous research, module hubs (<inline-formula>
<mml:math display="inline" id="im10">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>Z</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>&#x2265;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>, <inline-formula>
<mml:math display="inline" id="im11">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>P</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>0.62</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>), connectors (<inline-formula>
<mml:math display="inline" id="im12">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>Z</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>, <inline-formula>
<mml:math display="inline" id="im13">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>P</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>&#x2265;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>0.62</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>), and network hubs (<inline-formula>
<mml:math display="inline" id="im14">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>Z</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>&#x2265;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>2.5</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>, <inline-formula>
<mml:math display="inline" id="im15">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>P</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>&#x2265;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>0.62</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>) were defined as keystone taxa (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">Banerjee et&#xa0;al., 2019</xref>), as illustrated in <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Supplementary Figure S1</bold>
</xref>.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_4">
<label>2.4</label>
<title>Data analysis</title>
<p>The main effects of stand type on soil physicochemical properties, SQI, and microbial alpha diversity were examined using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), following tests for normality and homogeneity of variance. Multiple comparisons among different stand types were performed using Tukey&#x2019;s HSD test (<italic>P</italic>&lt; 0.05). Microbial beta diversity was assessed by Principal Coordinate Analysis (PCoA) based on the Bray-Curtis distance matrix, using the R package &#x201c;vegan&#x201d;. The analysis of similarity (ANOSIM) was conducted with the &#x201c;anosim&#x201d; function in R to compare the similarity in soil microbial community structure. Potential ecological functions were predicted using FAPROTAX and FUNGuid. Bacterial and fungal diversity were quantified by z-transforming the Chao 1 and Shannon indices, respectively. These diversity indices were then regressed to explore variation in SQI in relation to bacterial and fungal diversity, microbial network complexity, and the abundance of keystone taxa. All data analyses were conducted using R 4.3.2 software (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B59">R Core Team, 2023</xref>).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s3" sec-type="results">
<label>3</label>
<title>Results</title>
<sec id="s3_1">
<label>3.1</label>
<title>Soil properties and SQI in different stand types</title>
<p>The results indicated that all metrics varied significantly among the stand types (<italic>P&lt;</italic> 0.05) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">
<bold>Table&#xa0;2</bold>
</xref>). The contents of SOC, TN, AN, AP, and MWHC in MF were similar to that in BF but higher than in LF. No significant difference was observed in the TP content between LF and BF, although it was significantly lower in MF. BD was higher in LF, while pH was higher in BF. Additionally, stand type had a significant effect on SQI (<italic>P</italic>&lt; 0.05). MF exhibited the highest soil quality, which did not differ significantly from that of BF, whereas LF had the lowest soil quality.</p>
<table-wrap id="T2" position="float">
<label>Table&#xa0;2</label>
<caption>
<p>Indicators of soil physical and chemical properties in three stand types.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" align="left">Indicators</th>
<th valign="middle" align="left">LF</th>
<th valign="middle" align="left">MF</th>
<th valign="middle" align="left">BF</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">SOC</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">63.19 &#xb1; 12.57<sup>a</sup>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">121.01 &#xb1; 30.49<sup>b</sup>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">100.47 &#xb1; 6.71<sup>b</sup>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">TN</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">3.08 &#xb1; 0.52<sup>a</sup>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">5.46 &#xb1; 1.21<sup>b</sup>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">4.55 &#xb1; 0.63<sup>b</sup>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">TP</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">0.43 &#xb1; 0.21<sup>a</sup>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">0.97 &#xb1; 0.25<sup>b</sup>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">0.64 &#xb1; 0.15<sup>a</sup>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">AN</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">293.16 &#xb1; 49.89<sup>a</sup>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">549.19 &#xb1; 122.25<sup>b</sup>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">505.98 &#xb1; 73.18<sup>b</sup>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">AP</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">8.00 &#xb1; 2.5<sup>a</sup>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">12.93 &#xb1; 1.8<sup>b</sup>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">13.39 &#xb1; 1.7<sup>b</sup>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">pH</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">6.19 &#xb1; 0.25<sup>ab</sup>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">6.06 &#xb1; 0.09<sup>a</sup>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">6.35 &#xb1; 0.12<sup>b</sup>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">MWHC</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">37.87 &#xb1; 3.26<sup>a</sup>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">44.41 &#xb1; 2.36<sup>b</sup>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">44.12 &#xb1; 4.58<sup>b</sup>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">BD</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">0.97 &#xb1; 0.09<sup>a</sup>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">0.84 &#xb1; 0.1<sup>ab</sup>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">0.84 &#xb1; 0.09<sup>b</sup>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">SQI</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">0.35 &#xb1; 0.01<sup>a</sup>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">0.54 &#xb1; 0.05<sup>b</sup>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">0.52 &#xb1; 0.02<sup>b</sup>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn>
<p>SOC, soil organic carbon concentration (g kg<sup>-1</sup>); TN, total nitrogen content (g kg<sup>-1</sup>); TP, total phosphorus content (g kg<sup>-1</sup>); AN, available nitrogen content (g kg<sup>-1</sup>); AP, available phosphorus content (g kg<sup>-1</sup>); MWHC, maximum water holding capacity; BD, bulk density. Values are means &#xb1; standard deviation (n = 7). Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences among stand types at <italic>P</italic>&lt; 0.05 according to Tukey&#x2019;s HSD test.</p>
</fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_2">
<label>3.2</label>
<title>Change in soil microbial community diversity</title>
<p>The Chao1 richness index for soil bacteria and fungi showed no significant differences among the stand types (<italic>P</italic> &gt; 0.05, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">
<bold>Figures&#xa0;2A, C</bold>
</xref>). However, the Shannon index diversity for bacteria and fungi in MF and BF was similar, with significant differences observed when compared to LF (<italic>P&lt;</italic> 0.05, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">
<bold>Figures&#xa0;2B, D</bold>
</xref>). Specifically, the bacterial Shannon index was lower in MF and BF, while the fungal Shannon index was higher. The abundance distribution of bacterial and fungal phyla varied among the stand type. The dominant bacterial phyla were Actinobacteria, Proteobacteria, and Acidobacteria, collectively accounting for approximately 75% of the total bacterial population (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;2E</bold>
</xref>). The most abundant fungal phyla were Basidiomycota, followed by Ascomycota, which together accounted for over 75% of the total fungal population (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;2F</bold>
</xref>). The five most abundant bacterial taxa were <italic>norank</italic>_<italic>c</italic>_<italic>Subgroup</italic>_<italic>6</italic>, <italic>Candidatus Udaeobacter</italic>, <italic>Xanthobacteraceae</italic>, <italic>norank</italic>_<italic>c</italic>_<italic>KD4-96</italic>, and <italic>Mycobacterium</italic>, which collectively comprised 23.74% of the bacterial community. Similarly, the five most abundant fungal genera were <italic>Sebacina</italic>, <italic>Russula</italic>, <italic>Exophiala</italic>, <italic>Mortierella</italic>, and <italic>Inocybe</italic>, which comprised 27.54% of the fungal community, on average (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Supplementary Figure S2</bold>
</xref>).</p>
<fig id="f2" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;2</label>
<caption>
<p>Alpha diversity indices for soil bacterial <bold>(A, B)</bold> and fungal <bold>(C, D)</bold> communities, and taxonomic composition of soil bacterial <bold>(E)</bold> and fungal <bold>(F)</bold> communities at the phylum level. Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences among stand types at <italic>P&lt;</italic> 0.05.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-16-1491038-g002.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Box plots and bar graphs comparing microbial diversity and relative abundance across three samples: LF, MF, and BF. Panels A and C show Chao1 index values with p-values of 0.234 and 0.236, respectively. Panels B and D present Shannon index values with p-values of less than 0.001 and 0.031, respectively. Panels E and F illustrate the relative abundance of bacterial and fungal taxa, respectively. The legend specifies various taxa represented by different colors.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
<p>PCoA based on Bray-Curtis distance was performed to assess the isolation of soil bacterial and fungal communities. The results showed no significant difference in bacterial community beta diversity among the three stand types, as confirmed by similarity analysis (ANOSIM, R = 0.036, <italic>P =</italic> 0.391, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;3A</bold>
</xref>). In contrast, fungal communities from different stand types formed distinct clusters (ANOSIM, R = 0.391, <italic>P</italic> = 0.002, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;3B</bold>
</xref>). The first two principal components of the PCoA explained 13.95% and 10.12% of the variation in bacterial communities, and 24.72% and 6.66% of the variation in fungal communities, respectively.</p>
<fig id="f3" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;3</label>
<caption>
<p>Principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) ordination and analysis of similarity (ANOSIM) based on the Bray-Curtis dissimilarity matrix of soil bacterial <bold>(A)</bold> and fungal <bold>(B)</bold> community composition across stand types.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-16-1491038-g003.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Two principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) plots labeled A and B compare three groups: LF (green), MF (yellow), and BF (blue). Plot A shows axes PCo1 (13.95%) and PCo2 (10.12%) with ANOSIM R = 0.036 and P = 0.258. Plot B shows axes PCo1 (24.72%) and PCo2 (6.66%) with ANOSIM R = 0.391 and P = 0.002. Data points form overlapping polygons for each group.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_3">
<label>3.3</label>
<title>Co-occurrence networks of soil microorganisms</title>
<p>To determine the impact of stand types on microbial network complexity, various topological parameters were extracted for networks from different stand types. The LF network consisted of 505 nodes and 2085 edges, the BF network had 851 nodes and 2801 edges, and the MF network comprised 1031 nodes and 12,837 edges. Compared with LF, both MF and BF networks exhibited higher average degrees. In LF co-occurrence networks, microbial interactions were primarily positive, whereas MF and BF networks showed an increased ratio of negative edges compared to LF. Furthermore, the MF network had a lower network diameter and average path length (13 and 4.439, respectively) compared to the other networks (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f4">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;4A</bold>
</xref>; <xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">
<bold>Table&#xa0;3</bold>
</xref>). Overall, network complexity decreased in the order of MF, BF, and LF. Based on random species loss or targeted removal of module hubs, the MF network demonstrated significantly higher robustness (<italic>P&lt;</italic> 0.05) than LF (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f4">
<bold>Figures&#xa0;4B, C</bold>
</xref>). In line with network complexity, network stability followed the order of MF, BF, and LF.</p>
<fig id="f4" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;4</label>
<caption>
<p>Co-occurrence network based on phylum-level microbial composition across different stand types <bold>(A)</bold>. Connections in the network represent strong (Spearman&#x2019;s r absolute value &gt; 0.7) and significant (<italic>p</italic>&lt; 0.05) correlations. Node colors represent the microbial phylum to which each node belongs. The size of each node reflects its degree of connection. Red edges indicate positive interactions, while blue edges indicate negative interactions. The proportion of remaining nodes in the network after random node removal <bold>(B)</bold> and after randomly deleting 50% of the nodes <bold>(C)</bold> represents network stability.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-16-1491038-g004.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">(A) Three network diagrams represent community structures for LF, MF, and BF. Nodes and edges indicate various microbial groups with positive and negative interactions. (B) Line graph shows the proportion of retained nodes against removed nodes for LF, MF, and BF, highlighting resilience differences. (C) Box plot compares robustness across LF, MF, and BF, indicating statistical significance at P=0.031.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
<table-wrap id="T3" position="float">
<label>Table&#xa0;3</label>
<caption>
<p>Topological characteristics of microbial networks for different stand types.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" rowspan="2" align="left">Topological properties</th>
<th valign="middle" colspan="3" align="center">Stand types</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" align="left">LF</th>
<th valign="middle" align="left">MF</th>
<th valign="middle" align="left">BF</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Number of nodes</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">505</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">1031</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">851</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Number of edges</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">2085</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">12837</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">2801</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Negative edges (%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">16.590</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">19.76</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">33.130</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Network diameter</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">22</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">13</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">19</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Graph density</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">0.016</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">0.021</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">0.008</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Average degree</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">6.583</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">13.807</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">8.257</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Average path length</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">7.018</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">4.439</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">6.656</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Average clustering coefficient</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">0.688</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">0.593</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">0.547</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Modularity</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">0.873</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">0.615</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">0.845</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_4">
<label>3.4</label>
<title>Prediction of potential functions of soil microorganisms</title>
<p>Bacterial functional prediction was performed using the FAPROTAX database for annotation. As shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f5">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;5</bold>
</xref>, the proportion of functional taxa involved in N cycling was higher in MF than in the other two stand types, including taxa related to nitrite respiration, nitrification, and denitrification. Furthermore, the overall abundance of chemoheterotrophic taxa was relatively high, especially in MF. The LF stand exhibited a higher abundance of taxa associated with aromatic compound degradation. In contrast, the relative abundance of cellulolysis-related functional taxa involved in carbon fixation was higher in BF. The FUNGuild database was used to predict the ecological functions of fungi, revealing a higher proportion of &#x201c;saprotrophs&#x201d; and &#x201c;pathotrophs&#x201d; compared to &#x201c;symbiotrophs&#x201d;. Furthermore, functional taxa associated with plant pathogens, plant saprotrophs, and animal pathogens were generally more abundance in MF. The functional taxa of ectomycorrhizal and wood saprotroph were more prevalent in LF, while BF exhibited higher abundances of soil saprotrophs, endophytes, and undefined saprotrophs.</p>
<fig id="f5" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;5</label>
<caption>
<p>Variation in soil bacterial <bold>(A)</bold> and fungal <bold>(B)</bold> functional taxa across different stand types, based on FAPROTAX and FUNGuild databases, respectively.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-16-1491038-g005.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Bar charts compare the relative abundance of bacteria and fungi functions in two panels. Panel (A) shows bacterial functions categorized into C cycle, N cycle, and others, with chemoheterotrophy being the most abundant. Panel (B) depicts fungal functions, with ectomycorrhizal fungi being most abundant. Categories are compared across three sample types: LF (green), MF (orange), and BF (blue).</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_5">
<label>3.5</label>
<title>Relationship between SQI, microbial diversity, network complexity, and keystone taxa</title>
<p>Soil bacterial diversity (<italic>R</italic>
<sup>2</sup> = 0.30, <italic>P&lt;</italic> 0.05) was significantly negatively associated with soil quality (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f6">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;6A</bold>
</xref>). However, both fungal diversity (<italic>R</italic>
<sup>2</sup> = 0.24, <italic>P&lt;</italic> 0.05) and network complexity (<italic>R</italic>
<sup>2</sup> = 0.68, <italic>P&lt;</italic> 0.001) were positively associated with soil quality (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f6">
<bold>Figures&#xa0;6B, C</bold>
</xref>). Keystone taxa, which play key roles in shaping the network structure, were identified through the Zi-Pi plot (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Supplementary Figure S1</bold>
</xref>). A total of 21 module hubs (nodes with high connectivity to other members in a module) and 24 connectors (nodes linking different modules) were detected as keystone taxa. The number of keystone taxa was higher in MF (23) and BF (17) than in LF (5). At the phylum level, keystone bacterial taxa included Acidobacteria, Proteobacteria, Actinobacteria, Verrucomicrobia, and Chloroflexi, while fungal keystone taxa comprised Ascomycota, Mucoromycota, Basidiomycota, and Mortierellomycota (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Supplementary Table S4</bold>
</xref>). Additionally, soil quality was significantly related to the presence of keystone taxa (<italic>R</italic>
<sup>2</sup> = 0.30, <italic>P&lt;</italic> 0.05), with soil quality increasing in proportion to the relative abundance of keystone taxa (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f6">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;6D</bold>
</xref>).</p>
<fig id="f6" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;6</label>
<caption>
<p>The relationship between microbial diversity <bold>(A, B)</bold>, network complexity <bold>(C)</bold>, relative abundance of keystone taxa <bold>(D)</bold>, and SQI. The shaded areas represent the 95% confidence interval.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-16-1491038-g006.tif">
<alt-text content-type="machine-generated">Scatter plots illustrating relationships with Soil Quality Index (SQI). (A) Negative correlation with bacterial diversity. (B) Positive correlation with fungal diversity. (C) Strong positive correlation with complexity. (D) Positive correlation with keystone taxa. Data points are color-coded for LF, MF, and BF. Each plot features a trend line with a shaded confidence interval.</alt-text>
</graphic>
</fig>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s4" sec-type="discussion">
<label>4</label>
<title>Discussion</title>
<sec id="s4_1">
<label>4.1</label>
<title>Differences in soil characteristics across stand types</title>
<p>In the present study, significant differences in several soil properties were observed among stand types. The contents of SOC, TN, AN, and AP in MF were similar to that in BF, but higher than in LF (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">
<bold>Table&#xa0;2</bold>
</xref>). This result is consistent with the findings of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B42">Li et&#xa0;al. (2023)</xref>, indicating that mixed forests enhance nutrient availability and improve soil nutrient cycle (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B44">Liu et&#xa0;al., 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">Likulunga et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>). The observed effects can be attributed to the quality of plant litter (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B63">Thoms et&#xa0;al., 2010</xref>). Generally, coniferous forest litter has higher C/N ratios and lignin content. with a higher proportion of recalcitrant compounds compared to broadleaf forest litter (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">Cornwell et&#xa0;al., 2008</xref>). This characteristic leads to slower decomposition rates in larch forests, which may reduce soil fertility (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Ge et&#xa0;al., 2023</xref>). In contrast, the MF increases litter diversity and accelerates the accumulation of soil humus and other nutrients, thereby promoting soil fertility (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B50">Mueller et&#xa0;al., 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B66">Wang et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>). Additionally, bulk density (BD) was higher in LF stands and relatively lower in BF and MF stands (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">
<bold>Table&#xa0;2</bold>
</xref>). The lower BD, looser structure, and increased pore space in MF stands contribute to stronger water and nutrient retention capacity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B67">Xiang et&#xa0;al., 2023</xref>). In this study, the pH was higher in BF stands (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">
<bold>Table&#xa0;2</bold>
</xref>), likely due to the higher exchangeable cations, such as Mg<sup>2+</sup> and Ca<sup>2+</sup>, found in broadleaf forest litter, which enhance soil buffering capacity and raise pH (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B64">T&#xf3;th et&#xa0;al., 2011</xref>). In summary, compared to coniferous forests, mixed coniferous and broad forests exhibited higher nutrient availability.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s4_2">
<label>4.2</label>
<title>Changes in microbial community characteristics across stand types</title>
<p>Forest stand types are likely to influence soil microbial community characteristics indirectly by altering soil physicochemical properties. Although the Chao1 index of bacteria and fungi showed no significant differences among stand types, significant differences were found in the Shannon index (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">
<bold>Figures&#xa0;2A, C</bold>
</xref>). Specifically, the bacterial Shannon index was lower in MF and BF stands, while the fungal Shannon index was higher in these stands. Soil factors were closely related to the diversity of both soil bacteria and fungi (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B71">Yarwood and Hogberg, 2017</xref>). Bacterial diversity exhibited a negative correlation with SOC, TN, TP, AN, and AP, while fungal diversity showed a significant positive correlation (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Supplementary Figure S3</bold>
</xref>). Soil nutrient content was higher in MF and BF stands compared to LF stands, with elevated levels of SOC, TN, TP, AN, and AP (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">
<bold>Table&#xa0;2</bold>
</xref>). Consequently, MF and BF stands likely provide favorable microhabitats for fungal activity and growth by enhancing soil nutrient availability, which in turn increases fungal diversity. In this study, bacterial community composition did not differ significantly across stand types, but the fungal community was distinctly separated by stand type. Ascomycota contribute to the decomposition of litter and organic matter and are generally considered cellulolytic, with limited lignin-decomposing ability (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B52">Osono, 2007</xref>). The increase in litter diversity observed in MF stands, which is associated with higher levels of SOC and other nutrients (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">
<bold>Table&#xa0;2</bold>
</xref>), may explain the increased relative abundance of Ascomycota in MF stands. The abundance of Ascomycota in BF stands was similarly high, potentially due to the elevated pH levels (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;2F</bold>
</xref>; <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">
<bold>Table&#xa0;2</bold>
</xref>). Previous studies have shown that higher pH levels correlate with greater Ascomycota abundance (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">Hou et&#xa0;al., 2024</xref>). In contrast, Basidiomycota are more strongly correlated with litter biomass and are well-known for their ability to decompose lignin, a component of litter that is otherwise difficult to break down (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B47">Lundell et&#xa0;al., 2010</xref>). Given that conifer litter is more challenging to decompose than broadleaf litter (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Chen et&#xa0;al., 2019a</xref>), non-degradable carbon accumulates more readily in LF stands, leading to a higher abundance of Basidiomycota in these stands.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s4_3">
<label>4.3</label>
<title>Differences in co-occurrence networks and keystone taxa across stand types</title>
<p>Differences in microbial co-occurrence network structure, including complexity and stability, were observed among the three stand types. The soil microbial network in MF stands was found to be more complex and stable (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f4">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;4A</bold>
</xref>), consistent with the findings of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B68">Xu et&#xa0;al. (2023)</xref>. Additionally, the MF stands had a relatively high ratio of negative edges in bacterial taxa networks, whereas the LF stands displayed a greater ratio of positive edges in fungal taxa networks (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">
<bold>Table&#xa0;3</bold>
</xref>). This pattern suggests that tree species mixing in MF stands increases potential competition among bacterial taxa, while LF stands facilitate greater potential cooperation among fungal taxa. As highlighted in previous studies, the structure of soil microbial communities is susceptible to environmental factors, especially changes in soil physicochemical properties (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B51">Nkongolo and Narendrula-Kotha, 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B74">Zhang et&#xa0;al., 2023</xref>). Specifically, the contents of SOC, TN, TP, BD, and pH mainly affected the bacterial community (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Supplementary Figure S4A</bold>
</xref>), whereas SOC, TN, AN, MWHC, and pH were the key factors (<italic>P</italic>&lt; 0.01) influencing the fungal community (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Supplementary Figure S4B</bold>
</xref>). Consequently, stand types can alter the composition of keystone microbial taxa (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B42">Li et&#xa0;al., 2023</xref>). More keystone taxa were identified in MF and BF networks compared to the LF network, with most taxa belonging to <italic>Proteobacteria</italic>, <italic>Actinobacteria</italic>, <italic>Verrucomicrobia, Ascomycota</italic>, <italic>Basidiomycota</italic>, or <italic>Mortierellomycota</italic>. Furthermore, more keystone fungal taxa than bacterial taxa were observed (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Supplementary Figure S1</bold>
</xref>; <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Supplementary Table S4</bold>
</xref>). These keystone taxa, identified based on their topological roles as module hubs and connectors, play central roles in soil biogeochemical processes by mediating inter-module substrate exchange and maintaining network stability (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Banerjee et&#xa0;al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B42">Li et&#xa0;al., 2023</xref>). Their removal has been to disrupt both the structure and function of soil microbiomes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Berry and Widder, 2014</xref>). Many of these keystone taxa are associated with soil nutrient cycling and transformation. For example, keystone connectors such as the <italic>Mesorhizobium</italic> genus have been found to enhance soil nitrogen availability by linking nitrogen-fixing modules with root-associated networks (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B75">Zhong et&#xa0;al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">Laranjo et&#xa0;al., 2014</xref>). Meanwhile, module hubs like the <italic>Saitozyma</italic> genus contribute to organic matter decomposition by coordinating lignin-degrading modules (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B47">Lundell et&#xa0;al., 2010</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s4_4">
<label>4.4</label>
<title>Effects of stand type and microbial community on SQI</title>
<p>It was observed that stand type influenced SQI, with SQI being generally higher in MF and BF compared to LF (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">
<bold>Table&#xa0;2</bold>
</xref>). The superior soil properties of MF stands were the primary reason for their highest SQI. Consistent with prior findings, soil with relatively high levels of SOC, TN, AN, and lower BD tend to exhibit improved soil quality (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B61">Shao et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>). Plants contribute carbon and energy to the soil through root secretions and litter. In stands with mixed birch and larch, increased tree species diversity and litter return enhance soil quality by providing organic matter inputs and improving nutrient availability (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Bu et&#xa0;al., 2019</xref>). Microorganisms, as key drivers of soil ecological restoration, are influenced by resource allocation strategies and regulated by shifts in community metabolism (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Chen et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>). Thus, stand type can indirectly alter soil microbial communities, thereby affecting soil quality. It was demonstrated that the bacterial Shannon index was lower in MF stands, while the fungal Shannon index was higher. Further analyses indicated that the SQI exhibited a strong negative relationship with soil bacterial diversity (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f6">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;6A</bold>
</xref>), whereas a significant positive association was observed with the increase in fungal diversity (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f6">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;6B</bold>
</xref>), consistent with previous findings (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B65">Wan et&#xa0;al., 2024</xref>). This pattern may be attributed to the fact that higher bacterial diversity can reduce interspecies cooperation and intensify competition for energy and nutrients (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B54">Palmer and Foster, 2022</xref>), ultimately exerting a negative impact on soil quality. In contrast, the positive association between fungal diversity and soil quality is likely due to the key roles of fungi in decomposing soil organic matter (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B76">Zhong et&#xa0;al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B70">Yan et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>). Specifically, saprophytic fungi are particularly important in breaking down complex organic materials (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B65">Wan et&#xa0;al., 2024</xref>), facilitating the release of nutrients. Additionally, many fungi form biotrophic relationships with plant roots (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B76">Zhong et&#xa0;al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B45">Liu et&#xa0;al., 2024</xref>), enhancing nutrients absorption by plants and improving soil quality through increased plant litter input (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B65">Wan et&#xa0;al., 2024</xref>). Moreover, soil nutrient availability and substrate quality are known to influence specific microbial taxa (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B69">Xu et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>). In this study, a greater number of keystone taxa were identified in the MF microbial network, and their relative abundance showed a positive relationship with SQI (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f6">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;6D</bold>
</xref>). Soil quality was significantly related to these keystone taxa through their role in shaping the structure and function of microbial co-occurrence networks (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Berry and Widder, 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Banerjee et&#xa0;al., 2018</xref>). Additionally, it was observed that soil quality improved as microbial network complexity increased (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f6">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;6C</bold>
</xref>).</p>
<p>We used FAPROTAX and FUNGuild software to further predict the ecological functions of bacterial and fungal taxa in different forest stand types. The relative abundance of bacterial taxa associated with nitrite respiration, nitrification, denitrification, and chemoheterotroph was higher in MF stands (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f5">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;5A</bold>
</xref>). These bacterial taxa play essential roles in the cycling of organic matter and nitrogen in ecosystems (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Gu et&#xa0;al., 2019</xref>), enhancing nutrient availability in MF stands (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">
<bold>Table&#xa0;2</bold>
</xref>) and alleviating resource limitations for certain microbial taxes. Regarding fungal taxa, the proportions of &#x201c;saprotroph&#x201d; and &#x201c;pathotroph&#x201d; were higher in MF and BF stands, whereas ectomycorrhizal and wood saprotroph taxa were abundant in LF stands (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f5">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;5B</bold>
</xref>). This distribution may be attributed to differences in soil nutrient availability, litter quality, tree species characteristics, and the colonization strategies of fungal communities (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B69">Xu et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>). As an ectomycorrhizal species, larch produces litter with high lignin content (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">Cornwell et&#xa0;al., 2008</xref>), which promotes the colonization of decomposer communities adapted to lower nutrient conditions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">Asplund et&#xa0;al., 2019</xref>). In conclusion, stand types could influence microbial network complexity and stability by regulating keystone taxa, thereby affecting soil quality and ecosystem functions.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s5" sec-type="conclusions">
<label>5</label>
<title>Conclusion</title>
<p>This study revealed the mechanisms driving SQI improvement across different stand types from a microbiological perspective. It was demonstrated that MF stands reduced soil physical properties (BD), improved nutrient availability (SOC, TN, AN, and AP), increased soil fungal diversity, and promoted greater microbial network complexity and stability. Furthermore, the relative abundance of keystone bacterial and fungal taxa involved in soil carbon and nitrogen cycling was shown to contribute to soil quality improvement. In summary, stand types influence soil quality both directly, by altering soil properties, and indirectly, by affecting microbial diversity, network complexity and stability, as well as the abundance of keystone taxa. These findings offer valuable insights into soil nutrient cycling mechanisms and provide a basis for improving forest management practices. For instance, promoting symbiotic relationships between plants and fungi by selecting suitable plant species or optimizing mixed forest ratios can improve soil structure and nutrient cycling. Additionally, introducing keystone saprophytic fungi microbial groups are proposed to improve soil quality by accelerating the decomposition of soil organic matter and facilitating nutrient release.</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<sec id="s6" sec-type="data-availability">
<title>Data availability statement</title>
<p>The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Supplementary Material</bold>
</xref>. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s7" sec-type="author-contributions">
<title>Author contributions</title>
<p>XZ: Writing &#x2013; original draft, Data curation, Software. CL: Investigation, Supervision, Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing. ML: Conceptualization, Supervision, Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing. RW:&#xa0;Supervision, Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing. YZ: Data curation, Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing. ZG: Data curation, Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing. ZZ: Writing &#x2013; original draft, Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s8" sec-type="funding-information">
<title>Funding</title>
<p>The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article. This work was funded by the State Key Research and Development Program (2023YFD2200803), the National Natural Science Foundation of China, grant number 32071759, and the Hebei Province Key R &amp; D Program of China, grant number 22326803D.</p>
</sec>
<ack>
<title>Acknowledgments</title>
<p>We would like to appreciate our graduate students and many local staff, who have conducted the tough field investigation and sampling work in the study area.</p>
</ack>
<sec id="s9" sec-type="COI-statement">
<title>Conflict of interest</title>
<p>The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s10" sec-type="disclaimer">
<title>Publisher&#x2019;s note</title>
<p>All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s11" sec-type="supplementary-material">
<title>Supplementary material</title>
<p>The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2025.1491038/full#supplementary-material">https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2025.1491038/full#supplementary-material</ext-link>
</p>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="DataSheet1.docx" id="SM1" mimetype="application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document"/>
</sec>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="B1">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Andrews</surname> <given-names>S. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Karlen</surname> <given-names>D. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mitchell</surname> <given-names>J. P.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2002</year>). <article-title>A comparison of soil quality indexing methods for vegetable production systems in Northern California</article-title>. <source>Agric. Ecosyst. Environ.</source> <volume>90</volume>, <fpage>25</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>45</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/s0167-8809(01)00174-8</pub-id>
</citation></ref>
<ref id="B2">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Asplund</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kauserud</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ohlson</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Nybakken</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Spruce and beech as local determinants of forest fungal community structure in litter, humus and mineral soil</article-title>. <source>FEMS Microbiol. Ecol.</source> <volume>95</volume>, <elocation-id>fiy232</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/femsec/fiy232</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30481314</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B3">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Bai</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wei</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ming</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Shu</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Shen</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>Tree species mixing begets admixture of soil microbial communities: Variations along bulk soil, rhizosphere soil and root tissue</article-title>. <source>Geoderma</source> <volume>438</volume>, <elocation-id>116638</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.geoderma.2023.116638</pub-id>
</citation></ref>
<ref id="B4">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Banerjee</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Schlaeppi</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>van der Heijden</surname> <given-names>M. G. A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Keystone taxa as drivers of microbiome structure and functioning</article-title>. <source>Nat. Rev. Microbiol.</source> <volume>16</volume>, <fpage>567</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>576</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41579-018-0024-1</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29789680</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B5">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Banerjee</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Schlaeppi</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>van der Heijden</surname> <given-names>M. G. A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Reply to &#x2018;Can we predict microbial keystones?&#x2019;</article-title>. <source>Nat. Rev. Microbiol.</source> <volume>17</volume>, <fpage>194</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>194</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41579-018-0133-x</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30538306</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B6">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Bao</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2000</year>). <source>Soil agrochemical analysis</source> (<publisher-loc>Beijing</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>China agriculture press</publisher-name>).</citation></ref>
<ref id="B7">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Barberan</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bates</surname> <given-names>S. T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Casamayor</surname> <given-names>E. O.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fierer</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Using network analysis to explore co-occurrence patterns in soil microbial communities</article-title>. <source>Isme J.</source> <volume>8</volume>, <fpage>952</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>952</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/ismej.2013.236</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21900968</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B8">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Bastida</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zsolnay</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hernandez</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Garcia</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>Past, present and future of soil quality indices: A biological perspective</article-title>. <source>Geoderma</source> <volume>147</volume>, <fpage>159</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>171</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.geoderma.2008.08.007</pub-id>
</citation></ref>
<ref id="B9">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Berry</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Widder</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Deciphering microbial interactions and detecting keystone species with co-occurrence networks</article-title>. <source>Front. Microbiol.</source> <volume>5</volume>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmicb.2014.00219</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24904535</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B10">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Bolyen</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rideout</surname> <given-names>J. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dillon</surname> <given-names>M. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bokulich</surname> <given-names>N. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Abnet</surname> <given-names>C. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Al-Ghalith</surname> <given-names>G. A.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Reproducible, interactive, scalable and extensible microbiome data science using QIIME 2</article-title>. <source>Nat. Biotechnol.</source> <volume>37</volume>, <fpage>1091</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1091</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41587-019-0252-6</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31399723</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B11">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Bu</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Huang</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xu</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zang</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ding</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Plant functional traits are the mediators in regulating effects of abiotic site conditions on aboveground carbon stock-evidence from a 30 ha tropical forest plot</article-title>. <source>Front. Plant Sci.</source> <volume>9</volume>, <elocation-id>1958</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpls.2018.01958</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30687357</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B12">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Bunemann</surname> <given-names>E. K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bongiorno</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bai</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Creamer</surname> <given-names>R. E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>De Deyn</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>De Goede</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Soil quality - A critical review</article-title>. <source>Soil Biol. Biochem.</source> <volume>120</volume>, <fpage>105</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>125</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.soilbio.2018.01.030</pub-id>
</citation></ref>
<ref id="B13">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Callahan</surname> <given-names>B. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mcmurdie</surname> <given-names>P. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rosen</surname> <given-names>M. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Han</surname> <given-names>A. W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Johnson</surname> <given-names>A. J. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Holmes</surname> <given-names>S. P.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>DADA2: High-resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data</article-title>. <source>Nat. Methods</source> <volume>13</volume>, <fpage>581</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>583</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nmeth.3869</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">27214047</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B14">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>F.-S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>G. G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fang</surname> <given-names>X.-M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wan</surname> <given-names>S.-Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liang</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. (<year>2019</year>a). <article-title>Nitrogen deposition effect on forest litter decomposition is interactively regulated by endogenous litter quality and exogenous resource supply</article-title>. <source>Plant Soil</source> <volume>437</volume>, <fpage>413</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>426</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11104-019-04006-z</pub-id>
</citation></ref>
<ref id="B15">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jing</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fang</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Microbial respiratory thermal adaptation is regulated by r-/K-strategy dominance</article-title>. <source>Ecol. Lett.</source> <volume>25</volume>, <fpage>2489</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2499</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/ele.14106</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">36134698</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B16">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xiang</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ouyang</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zeng</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2019</year>b). <article-title>Tree species identity surpasses richness in affecting soil microbial richness and community composition in subtropical forests</article-title>. <source>Soil Biol. Biochem.</source> <volume>130</volume>, <fpage>113</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>121</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.soilbio.2018.12.008</pub-id>
</citation></ref>
<ref id="B17">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Cheng</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ge</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>Predicting the growth suitability of <italic>Larix principis-rupprechtii</italic> Mayr based on site index under different climatic scenarios</article-title>. <source>Front. Plant Sci.</source> <volume>14</volume>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpls.2023.1097688</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">36818869</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B18">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Collyer</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Perkins</surname> <given-names>D. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Petsch</surname> <given-names>D. K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Siqueira</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Saito</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>Land-use intensification systematically alters the size structure of aquatic communities in the Neotropics</article-title>. <source>Global Change Biol.</source> <volume>29</volume>, <fpage>4094</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>4106</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/gcb.16720</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">37059700</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B19">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Cornwell</surname> <given-names>W. K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cornelissen</surname> <given-names>J. H. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Amatangelo</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dorrepaal</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Eviner</surname> <given-names>V. T.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>Plant species traits are the predominant control on litter decomposition rates within biomes worldwide</article-title>. <source>Ecol. Lett.</source> <volume>11</volume>, <fpage>1065</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1071</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01219.x</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">18627410</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B20">
<citation citation-type="web">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Cs&#xe1;rdi</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Nepusz</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Traag</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Horv&#xe1;t</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zanini</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Noom</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2024</year>). <source>igraph: Network analysis and visualization</source>. Available online at: <uri xlink:href="https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/igraph/index.html">https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/igraph/index.html</uri> (Accessed <access-date>June 4, 2024</access-date>).</citation></ref>
<ref id="B21">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Cui</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Feng</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gui</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2024</year>). <article-title>A comprehensive evaluation of soil quality in the Three River Headwaters Region, China</article-title>. <source>Global Ecol. Conserv.</source> <volume>54</volume>, <elocation-id>e03155</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.gecco.2024.e03155</pub-id>
</citation></ref>
<ref id="B22">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Delgado-Baquerizo</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Reich</surname> <given-names>P. B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Trivedi</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Eldridge</surname> <given-names>D. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Abades</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Alfaro</surname> <given-names>F. D.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Multiple elements of soil biodiversity drive ecosystem functions across biomes</article-title>. <source>Nat. Ecol. Evol.</source> <volume>4</volume>, <fpage>210</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>220</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41559-019-1084-y</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32015427</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B23">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Falkowski</surname> <given-names>P. G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fenchel</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Delong</surname> <given-names>E. F.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>The microbial engines that drive Earth&#x2019;s biogeochemical cycles</article-title>. <source>Science</source> <volume>320</volume>, <fpage>1034</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1039</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1126/science.1153213</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">18497287</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B24">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Faust</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Open challenges for microbial network construction and analysis</article-title>. <source>Isme J.</source> <volume>15</volume>, <fpage>3111</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>3118</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41396-021-01027-4</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">34108668</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B25">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Garau</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Morillas</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Roales</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Castaldi</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mangia</surname> <given-names>N. P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Spano</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Effect of monospecific and mixed Mediterranean tree plantations on soil microbial community and biochemical functioning</article-title>. <source>Appl. Soil Ecol.</source> <volume>140</volume>, <fpage>78</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>88</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.apsoil.2019.04.005</pub-id>
</citation></ref>
<ref id="B26">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ge</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>Effects of two-year nitrogen and phosphorus additions on nutrient release and enzyme activity during leaf litter decomposition in <italic>Larix principis-rupprechtii</italic> plantation</article-title>. <source>Plant Soil</source> <volume>487</volume>, <fpage>521</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>532</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11104-023-05950-7</pub-id>
</citation></ref>
<ref id="B27">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Gillespie</surname> <given-names>L. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hattenschwiler</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Milcu</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wambsganss</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Shihan</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Tree species mixing affects soil microbial functioning indirectly via root and litter traits and soil parameters in European forests</article-title>. <source>Funct. Ecol.</source> <volume>35</volume>, <fpage>2190</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2204</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/1365-2435.13877</pub-id>
</citation></ref>
<ref id="B28">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Goberna</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Verdu</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Cautionary notes on the use of co-occurrence networks in soil ecology</article-title>. <source>Soil Biol. Biochem.</source> <volume>166</volume>, <elocation-id>108534</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.soilbio.2021.108534</pub-id>
</citation></ref>
<ref id="B29">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Gonzaga</surname> <given-names>M. I. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cunha Bispo</surname> <given-names>M. V.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Da Silva</surname> <given-names>T. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dos Santos</surname> <given-names>W. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>De Santana</surname> <given-names>I. L.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Atlantic forest soil as reference in the soil quality evaluation of coconut orchards (<italic>Cocos nucifer</italic>a L) under different management</article-title>. <source>Semina-Ciencias Agrar.</source> <volume>37</volume>, <fpage>3847</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>3857</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5433/1679-0359.2016v37n6p3847</pub-id>
</citation></ref>
<ref id="B30">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Gu</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hu</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cheng</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bai</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Application of organic fertilizer improves microbial community diversity and alters microbial network structure in tea (<italic>Camellia sinensis</italic>) plantation soils</article-title>. <source>Soil Tillage Res.</source> <volume>195</volume>, <elocation-id>104356</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.still.2019.104356</pub-id>
</citation></ref>
<ref id="B31">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Guimer&#xe0;</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Nunes Amaral</surname> <given-names>L. A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2005</year>). <article-title>Functional cartography of complex metabolic networks</article-title>. <source>Nature</source> <volume>433</volume>, <fpage>895</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>900</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nature03288</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">15729348</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B32">
<citation citation-type="web">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Harrell</surname> <given-names>F. E.</given-names>
<suffix>Jr</suffix>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2024</year>). <source>Hmisc: Harrell miscellaneous</source>. Available online at: <uri xlink:href="https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/Hmisc/index.html">https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/Hmisc/index.html</uri> (Accessed <access-date>June 4, 2024</access-date>).</citation></ref>
<ref id="B33">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>He</surname> <given-names>G. X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Peng</surname> <given-names>T. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Guo</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wen</surname> <given-names>S. Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ji</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Forest succession improves the complexity of soil microbial interaction and ecological stochasticity of community assembly: Evidence from <italic>Phoebe bournei</italic>-dominated forests in subtropical regions</article-title>. <source>Front. Microbiol.</source> <volume>13</volume>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmicb.2022.1021258</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">36519170</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B34">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Hernandez</surname> <given-names>D. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>David</surname> <given-names>A. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Menges</surname> <given-names>E. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Searcy</surname> <given-names>C. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Afkhami</surname> <given-names>M. E.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Environmental stress destabilizes microbial networks</article-title>. <source>Isme J.</source> <volume>15</volume>, <fpage>1722</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1734</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41396-020-00882-x</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33452480</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B35">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Hou</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yu</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Han</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhai</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Farooq</surname> <given-names>T. H.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2024</year>). <article-title>Dynamic Shifts in Soil Fungal Functional Group Characteristics across Distinct Vegetation Types during Ecological Restoration in Degraded Red Soil Regions</article-title>. <source>Forests</source> <volume>15</volume>, <elocation-id>89</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/f15010089</pub-id>
</citation></ref>
<ref id="B36">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Huang</surname> <given-names>Z. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Selvalakshmi</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Vasu</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>Q. Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hao</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Identification of indicators for evaluating and monitoring the effects of Chinese fir monoculture plantations on soil quality</article-title>. <source>Ecol. Indic.</source> <volume>93</volume>, <fpage>547</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>554</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.05.034</pub-id>
</citation></ref>
<ref id="B37">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Huo</surname> <given-names>X. Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ren</surname> <given-names>C. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>D. X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>R. Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Y. S.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>Microbial community assembly and its influencing factors of secondary forests in Qinling Mountains</article-title>. <source>Soil Biol. Biochem.</source> <volume>184</volume>, <elocation-id>109075</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.soilbio.2023.109075</pub-id>
</citation></ref>
<ref id="B38">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Jiang</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xing</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hu</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Changes in soil bacterial and fungal community composition and functional groups during the succession of boreal forests</article-title>. <source>Soil Biol. Biochem.</source> <volume>161</volume>, <elocation-id>108393</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.soilbio.2021.108393</pub-id>
</citation></ref>
<ref id="B39">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Khlifa</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Paquette</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Messier</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Reich</surname> <given-names>P. B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Munson</surname> <given-names>A. D.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Do temperate tree species diversity and identity influence soil microbial community function and composition</article-title>? <source>Ecol. Evol.</source> <volume>7</volume>, <fpage>7965</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>7974</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/ece3.3313</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29043048</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B40">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Laranjo</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Alexandre</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Oliveira</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Legume growth-promoting rhizobia: An overview on the <italic>Mesorhizobium</italic> genus</article-title>. <source>Microbiological Res.</source> <volume>169</volume>, <fpage>2</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>17</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.micres.2013.09.012</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24157054</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B41">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fu</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liang</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2024</year>). <article-title>Changes in soil quality during different ecological restoration years in the abandoned coal mine area of southern China</article-title>. <source>Soil Sci. Soc. America J.</source> <volume>88</volume>, <fpage>2311</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2328</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/saj2.20775</pub-id>
</citation></ref>
<ref id="B42">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xie</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yin</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>Interspecific plant-plant interactions increase the soil microbial network stability, shift keystone microbial taxa, and enhance their functions in mixed stands</article-title>. <source>For. Ecol. Manage.</source> <volume>533</volume>, <elocation-id>120851</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.foreco.2023.120851</pub-id>
</citation></ref>
<ref id="B43">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Likulunga</surname> <given-names>L. E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rivera P&#xe9;rez</surname> <given-names>C. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Schneider</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Daniel</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Polle</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Tree species composition and soil properties in pure and mixed beech-conifer stands drive soil fungal communities</article-title>. <source>For. Ecol. Manage.</source> <volume>502</volume>, <elocation-id>119709</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.foreco.2021.119709</pub-id>
</citation></ref>
<ref id="B44">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lei</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xiang</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yan</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Accumulation of soil organic C and N in planted forests fostered by tree species mixture</article-title>. <source>Biogeosciences</source> <volume>14</volume>, <fpage>3937</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>3945</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/bg-14-3937-2017</pub-id>
</citation></ref>
<ref id="B45">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>W. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhu</surname> <given-names>Z. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lu</surname> <given-names>Z. G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Oladele</surname> <given-names>O. P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dang</surname> <given-names>Y. P.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2024</year>). <article-title>Soil quality associated with microbial community characteristics and dominant taxa across different tillage practices</article-title>. <source>Land Degradation Dev.</source> <volume>35</volume>, <fpage>4682</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>4695</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/ldr.5249</pub-id>
</citation></ref>
<ref id="B46">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Lu</surname> <given-names>Y. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lyu</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xiong</surname> <given-names>X. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Deng</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jiang</surname> <given-names>Y. M.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>Understory ferns promote the restoration of soil microbial diversity and function in previously degraded lands</article-title>. <source>Sci. Total Environ.</source> <volume>870</volume>, <elocation-id>161934</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.161934</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">36736396</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B47">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Lundell</surname> <given-names>T. K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Makela</surname> <given-names>M. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hilden</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Lignin-modifying enzymes in filamentous basidiomycetes - ecological, functional and phylogenetic review</article-title>. <source>J. Basic Microbiol.</source> <volume>50</volume>, <fpage>5</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>20</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/jobm.200900338</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20175122</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B48">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Masto</surname> <given-names>R. E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chhonkar</surname> <given-names>P. K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Singh</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Patra</surname> <given-names>A. K.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>Alternative soil quality indices for evaluating the effect of intensive cropping, fertilisation and manuring for 31 years in the semi-arid soils of India</article-title>. <source>Environ. Monit. Assess.</source> <volume>136</volume>, <fpage>419</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>435</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10661-007-9697-z</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">17457684</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B49">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Montesinos-Navarro</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hiraldo</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tella</surname> <given-names>J. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Blanco</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Network structure embracing mutualism-antagonism continuums increases community robustness</article-title>. <source>Nat. Ecol. Evol.</source> <volume>1</volume>, <fpage>1661</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1669</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41559-017-0320-6</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28970589</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B50">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Mueller</surname> <given-names>K. E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hobbie</surname> <given-names>S. E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chorover</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Reich</surname> <given-names>P. B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Eisenhauer</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Effects of litter traits, soil biota, and soil chemistry on soil carbon stocks at a common garden with 14 tree species</article-title>. <source>Biogeochemistry</source> <volume>123</volume>, <fpage>313</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>327</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10533-015-0083-6</pub-id>
</citation></ref>
<ref id="B51">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Nkongolo</surname> <given-names>K. K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Narendrula-Kotha</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Advances in monitoring soil microbial community dynamic and function</article-title>. <source>J. Appl. Genet.</source> <volume>61</volume>, <fpage>249</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>263</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s13353-020-00549-5</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32062778</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B52">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Osono</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2007</year>). <article-title>Ecology of ligninolytic fungi associated with leaf litter decomposition</article-title>. <source>Ecol. Res.</source> <volume>22</volume>, <fpage>955</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>974</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11284-007-0390-z</pub-id>
</citation></ref>
<ref id="B53">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Otsing</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Anslan</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ambrosio</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Koricheva</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tedersoo</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Tree species richness and neighborhood effects on ectomycorrhizal fungal richness and community structure in boreal forest</article-title>. <source>Front. Microbiol.</source> <volume>12</volume>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmicb.2021.567961</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33692762</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B54">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Palmer</surname> <given-names>J. D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Foster</surname> <given-names>K. R.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Bacterial species rarely work together</article-title>. <source>Science</source> <volume>376</volume>, <fpage>581</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>582</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1126/science.abn5093</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">35511986</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B55">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Prescott</surname> <given-names>C. E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Grayston</surname> <given-names>S. J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Tree species influence on microbial communities in litter and soil: Current knowledge and research needs</article-title>. <source>For. Ecol. Manage.</source> <volume>309</volume>, <fpage>19</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>27</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.foreco.2013.02.034</pub-id>
</citation></ref>
<ref id="B56">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Qiu</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Peng</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cheng</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Minimum data set for evaluation of stand density effects on soil quality in <italic>Larix principis-rupprechtii</italic> plantations in North China</article-title>. <source>Ecol. Indic.</source> <volume>103</volume>, <fpage>236</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>247</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.04.010</pub-id>
</citation></ref>
<ref id="B57">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Qiu</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhu</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Reich</surname> <given-names>P. B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Banerjee</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Erosion reduces soil microbial diversity, network complexity and multifunctionality</article-title>. <source>Isme J.</source> <volume>15</volume>, <fpage>2474</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2489</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41396-021-00913-1</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33712698</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B58">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Raiesi</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>A minimum data set and soil quality index to quantify the effect of land use conversion on soil quality and degradation in native rangelands of upland arid and semiarid regions</article-title>. <source>Ecol. Indic.</source> <volume>75</volume>, <fpage>307</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>320</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.12.049</pub-id>
</citation></ref>
<ref id="B59">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<collab>R Core Team</collab>
</person-group> (<year>2023</year>). <source>R: A language and environment for statistical computing</source> (<publisher-loc>Vienna, Austria</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>R Foundation for Statistical Computing</publisher-name>). Available online at: <uri xlink:href="https://www.R-project.org">https://www.R-project.org</uri> (Accessed October 31, 2023).</citation></ref>
<ref id="B60">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Schloter</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dilly</surname> <given-names>O.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Munch</surname> <given-names>J. C.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2003</year>). <article-title>Indicators for evaluating soil quality</article-title>. <source>Agriculture Ecosyst. Environ.</source> <volume>98</volume>, <fpage>255</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>262</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S0167-8809(03)00085-9</pub-id>
</citation></ref>
<ref id="B61">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Shao</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ai</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sun</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hou</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dong</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Soil quality assessment under different forest types in the Mount Tai, central Eastern China</article-title>. <source>Ecol. Indic.</source> <volume>115</volume>, <elocation-id>106439</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106439</pub-id>
</citation></ref>
<ref id="B62">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Shao</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hu</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xie</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Linkage of microbial residue dynamics with soil organic carbon accumulation during subtropical forest succession</article-title>. <source>Soil Biol. Biochem.</source> <volume>114</volume>, <fpage>114</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>120</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.soilbio.2017.07.007</pub-id>
</citation></ref>
<ref id="B63">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Thoms</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gattinger</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jacob</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Thomas</surname> <given-names>F. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gleixner</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Direct and indirect effects of tree diversity drive soil microbial diversity in temperate deciduous forest</article-title>. <source>Soil Biol. Biochem.</source> <volume>42</volume>, <fpage>1558</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1565</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.soilbio.2010.05.030</pub-id>
</citation></ref>
<ref id="B64">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>T&#xf3;th</surname> <given-names>J. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Nagy</surname> <given-names>P. T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Krakomperger</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Veres</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kotrocz&#xf3;</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kincses</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Effect of litter fall on soil nutrient content and pH, and its consequences in view of climate change</article-title>. <source>Acta Silv. Lignaria Hung.</source> <volume>7</volume>, <fpage>75</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>86</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.37045/aslh-2011-0006</pub-id>
</citation></ref>
<ref id="B65">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wan</surname> <given-names>P. X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>Z. K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yuan</surname> <given-names>Z. Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wei</surname> <given-names>H. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Huang</surname> <given-names>F. Q.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2024</year>). <article-title>Fungal community composition changes and reduced bacterial diversity drive improvements in the soil quality index during arable land restoration</article-title>. <source>Environ. Res.</source> <volume>244</volume>, <elocation-id>117931</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.envres.2023.117931</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">38103774</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B66">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dong</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Du</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Huang</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Changes of nutrient release and enzyme activity during the decomposition of mixed leaf litter of <italic>Larix principis-rupprechtii</italic> and broadleaved tree species</article-title>. <source>Chin. J. Appl. Ecol.</source> <volume>32</volume>, <fpage>1709</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1716</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.13287/j.1001-9332.202105.008.</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">34042365</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B67">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Xiang</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Qiang</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>Soil quality evaluation of typical vegetation and their response to precipitation in loess hilly and gully areas</article-title>. <source>Forests</source> <volume>14</volume>, <elocation-id>1909</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/f14091909</pub-id>
</citation></ref>
<ref id="B68">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Xu</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hu</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jiao</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bell</surname> <given-names>S. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xu</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>Depth-dependent effects of tree species identity on soil microbial community characteristics and multifunctionality</article-title>. <source>Sci. Total Environ.</source> <volume>878</volume>, <elocation-id>162972</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.162972</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">36958562</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B69">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Xu</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ren</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Du</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Soil nutrient supply and tree species drive changes in soil microbial communities during the transformation of a multi-generation <italic>Eucalyptus</italic> plantation</article-title>. <source>Appl. Soil Ecol.</source> <volume>166</volume>, <elocation-id>103991</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.apsoil.2021.103991</pub-id>
</citation></ref>
<ref id="B70">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Yan</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sun</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liang</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wei</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Change in composition and potential functional genes of soil bacterial and fungal communities with secondary succession in Quercus liaotwigensis forests of the Loess Plateau, western China</article-title>. <source>Geoderma</source> <volume>364</volume>, <elocation-id>114199</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.geoderma.2020.114199</pub-id>
</citation></ref>
<ref id="B71">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Yarwood</surname> <given-names>S. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hogberg</surname> <given-names>M. N.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Soil bacteria and archaea change rapidly in the first century of Fennoscandian boreal forest development</article-title>. <source>Soil Biol. Biochem.</source> <volume>114</volume>, <fpage>160</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>167</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.soilbio.2017.07.017</pub-id>
</citation></ref>
<ref id="B72">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Yu</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Selecting the minimum data set and quantitative soil quality indexing of alkaline soils under different land uses in northeastern China</article-title>. <source>Sci. Total Environ.</source> <volume>616</volume>, <fpage>564</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>571</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.10.301</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29154147</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B73">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>J. T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>T. G.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2007</year>). <article-title>Effects of mixed <italic>Hippophae rhamnoides</italic> on community and soil in planted forests in the Eastern Loess Plateau, China</article-title>. <source>Ecol. Eng.</source> <volume>31</volume>, <fpage>115</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>121</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ecoleng.2007.06.003</pub-id>
</citation></ref>
<ref id="B74">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Z. Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Qiang</surname> <given-names>F. F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>G. Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>C. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ai</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>Distribution characteristics of soil microbial communities and their responses to environmental factors in the sea buckthorn forest in the water-wind erosion crisscross region</article-title>. <source>Front. Microbiol.</source> <volume>13</volume>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmicb.2022.1098952</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">36704571</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B75">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zhong</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xu</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ren</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Edaphic factors but not plant characteristics mainly alter soil microbial properties along a restoration chronosequence of Pinus tabulaeformis stands on Mt. Ziwuling, China</article-title>. <source>For. Ecol. Manage.</source> <volume>453</volume>, <elocation-id>117625</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.foreco.2019.117625</pub-id>
</citation></ref>
<ref id="B76">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zhong</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yan</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Shangguan</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Decreased occurrence of carbon cycle functions in microbial communities along with long-term secondary succession</article-title>. <source>Soil Biol. Biochem.</source> <volume>123</volume>, <fpage>207</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>217</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.soilbio.2018.05.017</pub-id>
</citation></ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>