<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.3 20070202//EN" "journalpublishing.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="2.3" xml:lang="EN">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Front. Plant Sci.</journal-id>
<journal-title>Frontiers in Plant Science</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">Front. Plant Sci.</abbrev-journal-title>
<issn pub-type="epub">1664-462X</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Frontiers Media S.A.</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpls.2024.1501400</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Plant Science</subject>
<subj-group>
<subject>Original Research</subject>
</subj-group>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>The synergistic interaction effect between biochar and plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria on beneficial microbial communities in soil</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author" equal-contrib="yes">
<name>
<surname>Zou</surname>
<given-names>Qianmei</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn003">
<sup>&#x2020;</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2849582"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/data-curation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/methodology/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/validation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/visualization/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" equal-contrib="yes">
<name>
<surname>Zhao</surname>
<given-names>Longyuan</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn003">
<sup>&#x2020;</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2850111"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/conceptualization/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/resources/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Guan</surname>
<given-names>Lirong</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/investigation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname>
<given-names>Ping</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2852202"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/visualization/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zhao</surname>
<given-names>Jie</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2852198"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/data-curation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/software/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zhao</surname>
<given-names>Yueying</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2852200"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/software/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Du</surname>
<given-names>Yunlong</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3">
<sup>3</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1848695"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/funding-acquisition/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/visualization/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name>
<surname>Xie</surname>
<given-names>Yong</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3">
<sup>3</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn001">
<sup>*</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2853251"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/funding-acquisition/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/project-administration/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/supervision/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
<institution>College of Plant Protection, Yunnan Agricultural University</institution>, <addr-line>Kunming</addr-line>, <country>China</country>
</aff>
<aff id="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
<institution>College of Chemical Engineering, Yunnan Open University</institution>, <addr-line>Kunming</addr-line>, <country>China</country>
</aff>
<aff id="aff3">
<sup>3</sup>
<institution>State Key Laboratory for Conservation and Utilization of Bio-Resources in Yunnan, Yunnan Agricultural University</institution>, <addr-line>Kunming</addr-line>, <country>China</country>
</aff>
<author-notes>
<fn fn-type="edited-by">
<p>Edited by: Khurram Shahzad, Water and Marine Sciences, Pakistan</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="edited-by">
<p>Reviewed by: Muhammad Imran, Ayub Agriculture Research Institute, Pakistan</p>
<p>Muhammad Mazhar Iqbal, University of Sargodha, Pakistan</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="corresp" id="fn001">
<p>*Correspondence: Yong Xie, <email xlink:href="mailto:yongx_km@163.com">yongx_km@163.com</email>
</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="equal" id="fn003">
<p>&#x2020;These authors have contributed equally to this work and share first authorship</p>
</fn>
</author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>19</day>
<month>12</month>
<year>2024</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="collection">
<year>2024</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>15</volume>
<elocation-id>1501400</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>25</day>
<month>09</month>
<year>2024</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>29</day>
<month>11</month>
<year>2024</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#xa9; 2024 Zou, Zhao, Guan, Chen, Zhao, Zhao, Du and Xie</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2024</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Zou, Zhao, Guan, Chen, Zhao, Zhao, Du and Xie</copyright-holder>
<license xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">
<p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.</p>
</license>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<p>Excessive use of chemical fertilizers and extensive farming can degrade soil properties so that leading to decline in crop yields. Combining plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) with biochar (BC) may be an alternative way to mitigate this situation. However, the proportion of PGPR and BC at which crop yield can be improved, as well as the improvement effect extent on different eco-geographic region and crops, remain unclear. This research used cabbage [<italic>Brassica pekinensis</italic> (Lour.) Rupr.] as the target crop and established as treatment conventional fertilization as a control and a 50% reduction in nitrogen fertilizer at the Yunnan-Guizhou Plateau of China, adding BC or PGPR to evaluate the effects of different treatments on cabbage yield and the soil physicochemical properties. Specifically, high-throughput sequencing probed beneficial soil microbial communities and investigated the impact of BC and PGPR on cabbage yield and soil properties. The results revealed that the soil alkaline hydrolyzable nitrogen (AH-N), available phosphorus (AP), and available potassium (AK) contents were higher in the BC application than in control. The BC application or mixed with PGPR significantly increased the soil organic matter (OM) content (P&lt;0.05), with a maximum of 42.59 g/kg. Further, applying BC or PGPR significantly increased the abundance of beneficial soil microorganisms in the whole growth period of cabbage (P&lt;0.05), such as <italic>Streptomyces</italic>, <italic>Lysobacter</italic>, and <italic>Bacillus</italic>. Meanwhile, the co-application of BC and PGPR increased the abundance of <italic>Pseudomonas</italic>, and also significantly enhanced the Shannon index and Simpson index of bacterial community (P&lt;0.05). Combined or not with PGPR, the BC application significantly enhanced cabbage yield (P&lt;0.05), with the highest yield reached 1.41 fold of the control. Our research indicated that BC is an suitable and promising carrier of PGPR for soil improvement, combining BC and PGPR can effectively ameliorate the diversity of bacterial community even in acid red soil rhizosphere, and the most direct reflection is to improve soil fertility and cabbage yield.</p>
</abstract>
<abstract abstract-type="graphical">
<title>Graphical Abstract</title>
<p>
<graphic xlink:href="fpls-15-1501400-g006.tif" position="anchor"/>
</p>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>beneficial microbial communities</kwd>
<kwd>biological agents</kwd>
<kwd>rhizosphere microorganisms</kwd>
<kwd>soil improvement</kwd>
<kwd>soil physicochemical properties</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<counts>
<fig-count count="5"/>
<table-count count="3"/>
<equation-count count="1"/>
<ref-count count="45"/>
<page-count count="14"/>
<word-count count="7035"/>
</counts>
<custom-meta-wrap>
<custom-meta>
<meta-name>section-in-acceptance</meta-name>
<meta-value>Plant Nutrition</meta-value>
</custom-meta>
</custom-meta-wrap>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec id="s1" sec-type="intro">
<label>1</label>
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>The invention and application of chemical fertilizers are paramount in addressing human food security and ensuring an adequate supply of horticultural products, serving as the material foundation for high-quality and high-yield vegetables. However, due to lack of access to optimizing cultivation techniques and over-pursuing high yield, producers are prone to overusing chemical fertilizers in the vegetable production. Such excessive fertilizer application results in low fertilizer efficiency and poor production benefits, resource waste and product quality declines, and other environmental concern, which adversely impacting the sustainability in agriculture (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">Lyu et&#xa0;al., 2023</xref>). As a result, microbial fertilizers that figuring with improving soil nutrient content, fertilizer utilization and restore soil health have emerged.</p>
<p>Microbial fertilizers contain active microorganisms that can yield specific fertilization effects in agricultural production. Active microorganisms are crucial in generating these effects (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Liu et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>). The availability and broad spectrum of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) are particularly prominent among potential soil microorganisms used for preparing microbial fertilizers. Recently, the application of PGPR in agriculture has steadily increased and is expected to replace chemical fertilizers, pesticides, and other growth regulators, serving as a significant nutritional source for crop growth. Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) are bacteria that inhabit the rhizosphere of plants and enhance plant growth when inoculated onto seeds, root systems, root tubers, rhizomes, or soil. The mechanism of action of PGPR includes phytohormone production (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">Park et&#xa0;al., 2017</xref>), nitrogen fixation and phosphorus solubilization (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Bargaz et&#xa0;al., 2018</xref>), inter-organismal signal production (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">Smith et&#xa0;al., 2015</xref>), antibiotic release as biocontrol agents and so on (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Ogran et&#xa0;al., 2019</xref>). Therefore, research on utilizing PGPR for biological control has become a hot topic (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">De La Torre-Ruiz et&#xa0;al., 2016</xref>). However, studies have also indicated that PGPR may negatively affect plant growth, as cyanides produced by bacteria could adversely impact development (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">Agbodjato and Babalola, 2024</xref>). Moreover, directly incorporating liquid inoculants into the soil may lead to complex exogenous bacteria adhering to soil particles, significantly reducing their vertical mobility and capacity to colonize the rhizosphere (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">Ahmed et&#xa0;al., 2023</xref>). Therefore, adding carriers can enhance the colonization capacity and effectiveness of microorganisms during plant growth and development (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Ehinmitan et&#xa0;al., 2024</xref>). Thus, exploring colonization carriers or supporting technologies that favor beneficial microbial has become a direction for further promoting microbial fertilizers.</p>
<p>Biochar (BC) is a pyrolytic product derived from organic matter under high-temperature and oxygen-limited conditions. BC possesses an excellent porous structure, and it can improve soil physicochemical properties and enhance soil fertility (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">Sui et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>). This high-temperature carbon adsorbs non-polar or weakly polar organic solutes, particularly those containing aromatic structures, including enzymes and other substances essential for microbial processes in soil. Research indicates that BC can alter the composition and abundance of soil microorganism communities, suggesting that it is beneficial for the growth of indigenous soil microorganisms (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">Tan et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>). Besides, BC significantly influences microorganism-mediated soil nutrient transformations, affecting soil structure or nutrient cycling, directly or indirectly impacting plant growth. For instance, BC-based rhizobial inoculants can remarkably enhance the symbiotic relationship between legumes and rhizobia, reducing nitrogen fertilizer requirements and promoting crop growth (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Egamberdieva et&#xa0;al., 2016</xref>).</p>
<p>Furthermore, studies have shown that the use of BC as a carrier material for microorganism inoculation can provide survival niches and nutrients for microorganism proliferation, safeguarding microorganism from various external stressors, such as desiccation, high temperatures, and toxic elements (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">Bolan et&#xa0;al., 2023</xref>). Biochar exhibits stable properties and has a long residence time in the soil, making its use as a soil amendment a tripartite win strategy influencing crop yield, soil carbon-nitrogen transformation, and global warming potential (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Hossain et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>). Thus, we hypothesized that utilizing BC can improve the survival rate of inoculants after entering the soil as a carrier for PGPR and enhance soil properties.</p>
<p>Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria acted as alive agent, its effects, especially the BC and PGPR synergistic interaction output may varies on different geographic and crop conditions. Currently, research on the co-application of BC and PGPR primarily focuses on drought resistance and productivity effects in food crops such as wheat (<italic>Triticum aestivum</italic> L.) and peanuts (<italic>Arachis hypogaea</italic> L.) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Alam et&#xa0;al., 2024</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">Noureen et&#xa0;al., 2024</xref>), with few of studies focusing on vegetable, especially foliage vegetable (e.g cabbage [<italic>Brassica pekinensis</italic> (Lour.) Rupr.]) which characterizing short-period growth and high multiple cropping index pattern. As a result, excessive use of fertilizers has become a conventional measurement in the production of such horticulture crops. Reasonably, it is sound that reducing fertilizer application is a instant and effective strategy to mitigate adverse consequences. However, this approach may lead to challenges such as nutrient deficiency in the soil and decreased crop yields. Therefore, the purpose of the present research is to elucidate whether the co-application of BC and PGPR can effectively compensate for the adverse effects of fertilizer reduction in the specific environment as the Yunnan-Guizhou Plateau. Specifically, we attempt to shed light on whether the combination can effectively enrich beneficial microorganisms in the soil to improve soil health condition, and whether they have synergistic effects in improving vegetable production. Thus, we employed a nitrogen fertilizer reduction approach to improve soil in conjunction with BC and microbial formulation applications. The effectiveness of BC and PGPR in enhancing soil microorganism communities was determined by comparing soil physicochemical properties, the structure of soil microorganism communities, and crop yields under different treatments. The present study aims to provide a theoretical basis for the effective application of PGPR in agricultural/horticultural production.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2" sec-type="materials|methods">
<label>2</label>
<title>Materials and methods</title>
<sec id="s2_1">
<label>2.1</label>
<title>Overview of the experimental area</title>
<p>The experimental area was set at Taixing Agricultural Technology Co., Ltd. Vegetable Production Base, Dali City, Xiangyun County, Yunnan Province (25&#xb0;12&#x2019;05&#x201d; N,100&#xb0;25&#x2019;22&#x201d; E). The experimental area is located in northwest central Yunnan Province. The area has a northern subtropical monsoon climate of the plateau, with an average annual temperature of 14.7&#xb0;C, a frost-free period of 228 days, an annual rainfall of 810 mm, and an annual sunshine duration of 2,624 h. Initially, an analysis of soil physicochemical properties was conducted, the relevant index are as follows: the contents of soil pH (pH), organic matter (OM), alkaline hydrolyzable nitrogen (AH-N), available phosphorus (AP), and available potassium (AK) are 7.60, 26.59 mg/kg, 90.30 mg/kg, 27.97 mg/kg, respectively.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_2">
<label>2.2</label>
<title>Materials</title>
<p>The tested crop was cabbage [<italic>Brassica pekinensis</italic> (Lour.) Rupr.], and the seeds were supplied by the Taixing Agricultural Technology Co., Ltd. The fertilizers applied, sources and their nutrient content are summarized in <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Supplementary Table&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>. The BC treatment was formulated using a 3:2 mass ratio of BC to lignite, and the biological agents were granular PGPR (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Supplementary Table&#xa0;2</bold>
</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_3">
<label>2.3</label>
<title>Experimental design</title>
<p>Six treatments and one control were designed in this experiment (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">
<bold>Table&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>). A completely randomized experimental design was adopted, repeated three times, with a plot area of 14 m<sup>2</sup>, totaling 21 residential areas. The planted density of Chinese cabbage was 25 cm &#xd7; 25 cm, totaling eight rows (28 plants per row) and 28 lines (eight plants per line).</p>
<table-wrap id="T1" position="float">
<label>Table&#xa0;1</label>
<caption>
<p>Field trails design and treatments in this research.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" rowspan="2" align="left">Treatment</th>
<th valign="top" colspan="4" align="left">Experimental design</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" align="left">BC(kg/hm<sup>2)</sup>
</th>
<th valign="middle" align="left">Lignite (kg/hm<sup>2</sup>)</th>
<th valign="middle" align="left">PGPR (kg/hm<sup>2</sup>)</th>
<th valign="middle" align="left">Reduction in nitrogen fertilizer (%)</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">A</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">B</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">9.00 &#xd7; 10<sup>3</sup>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">6.00 &#xd7; 10<sup>3</sup>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">C</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">1.50 &#xd7; 10<sup>2</sup>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">D</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">9.00 &#xd7; 10<sup>3</sup>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">6.00 &#xd7; 10<sup>3</sup>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">1.50 &#xd7; 10<sup>2</sup>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">E</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">9.00 &#xd7; 10<sup>3</sup>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">6.00 &#xd7; 10<sup>3</sup>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">50</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">F</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">1.50 &#xd7; 10<sup>2</sup>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">50</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">G</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">9.00 &#xd7; 10<sup>3</sup>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">6.00 &#xd7; 10<sup>3</sup>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">1.50 &#xd7; 10<sup>2</sup>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">50</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
<p>Two-season cabbage was planted to avoid the influence of temperature and light conditions across different seasons. Biochar, lignite, and PGPR were sprayed and plowed evenly before planting cabbage. The fertilization schemes for each treatment are detailed in <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Supplementary Table&#xa0;3</bold>
</xref>. The control and conventional fertilization amounts of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium were 347.70 kg/hm<sup>2</sup>, 86.25 kg/hm<sup>2</sup>, 123.00 kg/hm<sup>2</sup>. The nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium amounts in the nitrogen reduction treatment were 174.75 kg/hm<sup>2</sup>, 79.20 kg/hm<sup>2</sup>, 173.10 kg/hm<sup>2</sup>. All treatments used a water fertilization mixture, and the reduction ratios were respectively 50%, 8%, and -41%.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_4">
<label>2.4</label>
<title>Methods</title>
<sec id="s2_4_1">
<label>2.4.1</label>
<title>Sample collection</title>
<p>Before the two-season cabbage planting, soil samples before planting cabbage (CK) and soil samples adding microbial agents to the soil before planting cabbage (CK-0) were collected using the five-point sampling method as blank controls for measuring the soil microbial community structure. Soil samples of 0&#x2013;20 cm depth were collected each time. These samples were collected from each plot repeatedly three times and were mixed. A total of six rhizosphere samples were collected each season. Five cabbage plants with the same growth vigor were determined using an &#x201c;S&#x201d;-shaped point arrangement in the middle and late growth periods of the two seasons of cabbage. Next, the weeds and dead leaves around the cabbages were cleaned. Later, the cabbage plants were uprooted, and after shaking off the larger pieces of soil from the root system, small pieces of soil or soil particles attached to the root surface (about 2&#x2013;3 mm) were collected as rhizosphere soil samples (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Lu et&#xa0;al., 2015</xref>), soil samples in the same plot were evenly mixed as a mixed sample, and 21 rhizosphere samples were collected in each period. A total of 42 rhizosphere samples were collected in each season. Some mixed soil samples were air dried and stored to determine soil physicochemical properties. In contrast, others were stored in a refrigerator at &#x2212;80&#xb0;C to extract the total deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) of microorganisms for high-throughput sequencing.</p>
<p>Five additional plants collected in each plot were weighed during the late growth of the two-season cabbage. The number of missing and variant plants in the plot was investigated. The actual final harvested plants in the plot were determined, and the entire harvest was obtained as the yield.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_4_2">
<label>2.4.2</label>
<title>Cabbage yield</title>
<p>The actual yield during the harvesting of Chinese cabbage was measured for each plot and converted to yield per unit area using the equation below:</p>
<disp-formula>
<mml:math display="block" id="M1">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">Y</mml:mi>
<mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">p</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">k</mml:mi>
<mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">g</mml:mi>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">/</mml:mo>
<mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">h</mml:mi>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">m</mml:mi>
<mml:mn mathvariant="bold">2</mml:mn>
</mml:msup>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">A</mml:mi>
<mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">y</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">k</mml:mi>
<mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">g</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">A</mml:mi>
<mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">p</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">m</mml:mi>
<mml:mn mathvariant="bold">2</mml:mn>
</mml:msup>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfrac>
<mml:mo>&#xd7;</mml:mo>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn mathvariant="bold">10</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mn mathvariant="bold">3</mml:mn>
</mml:msup>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</disp-formula>
<p>(<italic>Y<sub>p</sub>
</italic> represents the yield per unit area; <italic>A<sub>y</sub>
</italic> represents the actual yield per plot; <italic>A<sub>p</sub>
</italic> represents the area per plot).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_4_3">
<label>2.4.3</label>
<title>Soil physicochemical properties</title>
<p>The available nutrient content in the soil was determined after drying the sampled soil using the following methods: Soil pH was determined at a 1:5 (w/v) soil/distilled water ratio using a pH meter (Mettler Toledo Delta 320). Soil OM was determined using the potassium dichromate external heating method. Soil AH-N was measured using the alkaline hydrolysis diffusion method. Soil AP was measured using molybdenum antimony colorimetry. Soil AK was measured using the flame photometry method (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">Klotz et&#xa0;al., 2023</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_4_4">
<label>2.4.4</label>
<title>High-throughput sequencing of soil bacteria</title>
<p>The Illumina sequencing technology was used for high-throughput sequencing. Soil DNA was extracted using a DNA extraction solution. The DNA concentration was detected using agarose gel electrophoresis and NanoDrop2000 (Thermo Scientific, Wilmington, USA). The V4 region of bacterial 16S ribosomal ribonucleic acid (rRNA) genes was amplified using the primers 515F (5&#x2019;-GTGYCAGCMGCCGCGGTAA-3&#x2019;) and 806R(5&#x2019;-GGACTACHVGGGTWTCTAAT -3&#x2019;) with genomic DNA as a template. The PCR products were quantified using Qubit 2.0 Fluorometer (Thermo Scientific, Wilmington, USA) based on the preliminary results from electrophoresis. Then, according to the sequencing requirements of each sample, the corresponding proportions were mixed. Using the PE250 sequencing method, the raw offline data obtained from sequencing were concatenated and filtered to obtain high-quality target sequences for subsequent analysis.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_5">
<label>2.5</label>
<title>Statistical analysis of data</title>
<p>Field experiment and laboratory test data were preliminarily organized and drawn using Excel 2013. Using SPSS 19.0, conducted variance analysis and significance tests on soil physicochemical properties and cabbage yield. GraphPad Prism 8.0.2 and R software were used for beta diversity analyses and graphic analysis.</p>
<p>Based on the Usearch software (<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://drive5.com/uparse/">http://drive5.com/uparse/</ext-link>), the UPARSE algorithm was utilized for OTU clustering at a consistency level of 97%. The sequence with the highest frequency within each OTU was selected as the representative sequence. Taxonomic annotation analysis was conducted using the UCLUST classification method in conjunction with the SILVA database (Release_123 <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://www.arb-silva.de/">http://www.arb-silva.de/</ext-link>). Representative sequences underwent multiple sequence alignment via PyNAST. Additionally, a phylogenetic tree was constructed using FastTree. Use R language for various data conversions and use ggplot2 package for bacterial community composition analysis.</p>
<p>Alpha diversity analysis was performed using R language. Wilcoxon rank sum test and Kruskal-Wallis rank sum test were performed, and multiple comparisons were also performed. Beta diversity analysis was performed using R language. The Unifrac distance, Bray-Curtis and Jaccard distances were calculated. PCA analysis was performed using vegan package.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s3" sec-type="results">
<label>3</label>
<title>Results</title>
<sec id="s3_1">
<label>3.1</label>
<title>Effect of different fertilization treatments on soil physicochemical properties</title>
<p>Adding BC and PGPR increased the AH-N content. The BC application in the E treatment significantly increased the AP content at 160 days, reaching 19.49 mg/kg. In contrast, the improvement effect was not significant among the other treatments. Treatments D, B, and F increased pH that reached 7.78, indicating that BC and PGPR have an upward-regulating effect on pH. The F treatment reached the highest AK content at 60 days (389.95 mg/kg). The F and G treatments reached the highest content after 160 days. This result indicated that the PGPR application or a combination of BC and PGPR enhanced the AK content. Treatment D reached the highest content at 115 days, and treatment G had the highest content at 160 days, reaching 42.59 g/kg. The results showed that BC and PGPR applications could increase OM content. Still, the effect of applying PGPR alone was smaller than that of applying BC alone or BC in combination with PGPR (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">
<bold>Table&#xa0;2</bold>
</xref>).</p>
<table-wrap id="T2" position="float">
<label>Table&#xa0;2</label>
<caption>
<p>Changes in the physicochemical properties of soil under different treatments at the same time.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Physicochemical<break/>property</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Time/Day</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">A</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">B</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">C</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">D</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">E</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">F</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">G</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" rowspan="4" align="center">AH-N (mg/kg)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">30d</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">138.60 &#xb1; 3.21a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">139.30 &#xb1; 6.10a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">105.00 &#xb1; 17.94bc</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">117.60 &#xb1; 2.10ab</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">102.90 &#xb1; 3.64bc</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">107.80 &#xb1; 9.72bc</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">86.10 &#xb1; 5.56c</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">60d</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">120.40 &#xb1; 19.03a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">102.90 &#xb1; 29.40a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">101.50 &#xb1; 6.89a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">90.30 &#xb1; 12.77a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">100.80 &#xb1; 16.31a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">97.30 &#xb1; 3.05a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">94.50 &#xb1; 9.15a</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">115d</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">128.80 &#xb1; 2.52a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">128.10 &#xb1; 13.66a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">149.10 &#xb1; 29.87a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">133.00 &#xb1; 7.41a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">128.11 &#xb1; 25.66a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">155.40 &#xb1; 18.35a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">112.70 &#xb1; 7.41a</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">160d</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">129.50 &#xb1; 20.91a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">102.90 &#xb1; 10.50ab</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">116.20 &#xb1; 1.85ab</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">121.10 &#xb1; 6.89ab</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">125.30 &#xb1; 7.89a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">88.90 &#xb1; 9.10b</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">132.30 &#xb1; 8.49a</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" rowspan="4" align="center">AP (mg/kg)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">30d</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">44.04 &#xb1; 9.66a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">34.60 &#xb1; 8.31a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">38.49 &#xb1; 15.10a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">23.12 &#xb1; 5.29a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">27.78 &#xb1; 6.02a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">44.74 &#xb1; 0.40a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">20.40 &#xb1; 6.11a</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">60d</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">9.57 &#xb1; 1.80a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">8.88 &#xb1; 1.48a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">8.01 &#xb1; 0.81a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">9.49 &#xb1; 1.59a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">10.10 &#xb1; 2.23a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">8.22 &#xb1; 0.50a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">8.28 &#xb1; 1.78a</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">115d</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">8.94 &#xb1; 0.47a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">9.46 &#xb1; 1.02a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">6.93 &#xb1; 1.47b</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">10.10 &#xb1; 2.44a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">11.77 &#xb1; 1.17a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">9.46 &#xb1; 0.70a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">9.59 &#xb1; 0.35a</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">160d</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">18.18 &#xb1; 3.17ab</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">18.11 &#xb1; 4.67ab</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">12.26 &#xb1; 0.38b</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">13.08 &#xb1; 0.77ab</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">19.49 &#xb1; 2.91a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">14.10 &#xb1; 4.47ab</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">14.07 &#xb1; 0.41ab</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" rowspan="4" align="center">AK (mg/kg)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">30d</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">345.29 &#xb1; 22.52a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">346.34 &#xb1; 15.10a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">308.73 &#xb1; 19.98a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">357.44 &#xb1; 2.74a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">346.86 &#xb1; 20.68a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">342.16 &#xb1; 22.46a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">374.02 &#xb1; 22.49a</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">60d</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">305.47 &#xb1; 28.99ab</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">286.93 &#xb1; 25.79b</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">351.56 &#xb1; 40.74ab</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">309.90 &#xb1; 26.57ab</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">345.69 &#xb1; 24.74ab</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">389.95 &#xb1; 8.51a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">382.64 &#xb1; 15.16a</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">115d</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">319.18 &#xb1; 21.78a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">302.60 &#xb1; 9.42a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">367.49 &#xb1; 36.87a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">308.86 &#xb1; 18.19a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">320.22 &#xb1; 15.49a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">339.03 &#xb1; 14.69a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">334.85 &#xb1; 11.99a</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">160d</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">264.73 &#xb1; 35.42b</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">289.15 &#xb1; 39.04ab</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">307.43 &#xb1; 4.31ab</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">334.33 &#xb1; 34.32ab</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">344.25 &#xb1; 29.81ab</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">373.24 &#xb1; 3.41a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">364.10 &#xb1; 6.77a</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" rowspan="4" align="center">OM (g/kg)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">30d</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">27.89 &#xb1; 4.29bc</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">34.75 &#xb1; 3.86abc</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">25.80 &#xb1; 0.96bc</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">41.69 &#xb1; 5.89ab</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">43.42 &#xb1; 3.39a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">26.81 &#xb1; 6.84bc</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">34.79 &#xb1; 5.17abc</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">60d</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">29.08 &#xb1; 3.60a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">39.90 &#xb1; 0.51a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">23.66 &#xb1; 4.03a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">41.36 &#xb1; 4.41a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">35.72 &#xb1; 7.03a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">24.71 &#xb1; 5.31a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">32.86 &#xb1; 8.89a</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">115d</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">35.86 &#xb1; 2.90c</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">71.74 &#xb1; 4.63b</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">45.25 &#xb1; 12.90c</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">102.05 &#xb1; 2.42a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">80.53 &#xb1; 2.45b</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">34.61 &#xb1; 4.34c</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">72.80 &#xb1; 6.69b</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">160d</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">34.34 &#xb1; 6.10a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">31.98 &#xb1; 6.79a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">28.32 &#xb1; 4.96a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">39.25 &#xb1; 7.44a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">41.02 &#xb1; 9.85a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">24.47 &#xb1; 8.20a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">42.59 &#xb1; 10.12a</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" rowspan="4" align="center">pH</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">30d</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">7.42 &#xb1; 0.09ab</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">7.22 &#xb1; 0.02b</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">7.36 &#xb1; 0.06b</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">7.62 &#xb1; 0.18a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">7.58 &#xb1; 0.09a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">7.44 &#xb1; 0.09ab</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">7.58 &#xb1; 0.01a</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">60d</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">7.63 &#xb1; 0.14a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">7.66 &#xb1; 0.01a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">7.49 &#xb1; 0.07a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">7.78 &#xb1; 0.14a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">7.66 &#xb1; 0.02a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">7.60 &#xb1; 0.03a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">7.76 &#xb1; 0.03a</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">115d</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">7.57 &#xb1; 0.01a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">7.58 &#xb1; 0.03a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">7.55 &#xb1; 0.05a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">7.51 &#xb1; 0.04a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">7.47 &#xb1; 0.04a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">7.45 &#xb1; 0.05a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">7.56 &#xb1; 0.09a</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">160d</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">7.40 &#xb1; 0.03b</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">7.41 &#xb1; 0.05b</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">7.46 &#xb1; 0.02ab</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">7.41 &#xb1; 0.03b</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">7.38 &#xb1; 0.06b</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">7.61 &#xb1; 0.06a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">7.45 &#xb1; 0.06b</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn>
<p>The data in the table is the mean &#xb1; standard error of 3 replicates. Different lowercase letters in the same row indicate significant differences between treatments (p&lt;0.05), the same as below.</p>
</fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<p>In conclusion, adding BC and PGPR positively impacted soil physicochemical properties, improving soil health and fertility.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_2">
<label>3.2</label>
<title>Effect of different fertilization treatments on soil microbial community diversity</title>
<sec id="s3_2_1">
<label>3.2.1</label>
<title>Analysis of the sequencing structure of rhizosphere soil</title>
<p>A total of 3,183,060 sequences were obtained during the experiment. The final number of tag sequences used for subsequent analysis was 2,849,972 after filtering for chimeras. These tag sequences had an average sequence length of 288 bp. The dilution curves for each soil sample tended to slow gradually, indicating that the sequencing depth contained most bacterial types in the samples (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Supplementary Figure&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>). This result suggests that the sequencing adequacy was appropriate and could be utilized to analyze the community structure of bacteria.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_2_2">
<label>3.2.2</label>
<title>Structure of soil bacterial phylum-level communities</title>
<p>The bacterial operational taxonomic units (OTUs) obtained from sequencing soil samples were classified into 45 phyla, 117 classes, 310 orders, 547 families, and 1167 genera. <italic>Proteobacteria</italic>, <italic>Acidobacteria</italic>, <italic>Chloroflexi</italic>, <italic>Firmicutes</italic>, <italic>Gemmatimonadete</italic>, <italic>Bacteroidetes</italic>, <italic>Actinobacteria</italic>, <italic>Planctomycetes</italic>, <italic>Verrucomicrobia</italic>, and <italic>Thaumarchaeota</italic> were the dominant soil bacteria, and their average relative abundance was greater than 0.70% (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>). The relative abundance of <italic>Proteobacteria</italic>, <italic>Gemmatimonadetes</italic>, <italic>Actinobacteria</italic>, <italic>Bacteroidetes</italic>, and <italic>Firmicutes</italic> significantly increased after the cultivation of cabbage compared to the control, whereas <italic>Chloroflexi</italic> and <italic>Thaumarchaeota</italic> decreased.</p>
<fig id="f1" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;1</label>
<caption>
<p>The relative abundance of dominant groups of bacteria at the phylum level in soil samples.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-15-1501400-g001.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_2_3">
<label>3.2.3</label>
<title>Structure of soil bacterial genus-level communities</title>
<p>
<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;2A</bold>
</xref> illustrated the relative abundance and correlations of bacteria among the nine samples collected during the mid-growth period of cabbage in the summer season. There were significant differences between B1 and G1 and among CK, CK-0, and A1. Significant differences in community structure among C1, F1, E1, and D1 and CK, CK-0, and A1 were also detected. Therefore, the BC or PGPR application altered the soil bacterial community structure (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;2A</bold>
</xref>). We compared the 50 high-ranking species with high abundance rankings between treatments based on the community abundance data from the samples. At the genus level, the BC and PGPR applications significantly increased the relative abundance of beneficial microorganisms in the soil, including <italic>Nitrosospira</italic> and <italic>Lysobacter</italic>, which have biocontrol functions. <italic>Thermomonas</italic> and <italic>Luteimonas</italic> are associated with antibacterial effects, and <italic>Bacteroides</italic> is related to nutrient cycling. Furthermore, the BC and PGPR applications also significantly reduced the relative abundance of organic pollutant-degrading bacteria <italic>Reyranella</italic>, <italic>Nitrosospira</italic>, and <italic>Nitrobacter</italic>, which are associated with the nitrogen cycling process. Besides, the reduction of nitrogen fertilizer application did not decrease the relative abundance of beneficial bacteria, which is feasible (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;2B</bold>
</xref>; <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Supplementary Table&#xa0;4</bold>
</xref>).</p>
<fig id="f2" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;2</label>
<caption>
<p>The relative abundance and similarity of bacterial genus level in soil under different treatments in summer season Chinese cabbage and the classification. The panel <bold>(A)</bold> is the relative abundance and similarity of bacterial genus level in soil under different treatments in the mid-growth of summer season Chinese cabbage; The panel <bold>(B)</bold> is the classification of bacteria in the mid-growth of summer season Chinese cabbage; The panel <bold>(C)</bold> is the relative abundance and similarity of bacterial genus-level in soil under different treatments at the late growth of summer season Chinese cabbage; The panel <bold>(D)</bold> is the classification of bacteria in the late growth of summer season Chinese cabbage.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-15-1501400-g002.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>
<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;2C</bold>
</xref> illustrated the relative abundance and correlations of bacteria among nine samples collected during the late growth period of cabbage in the summer. There were significant differences between the treatments (CK and CK-0 and others) and significant differences in community structure among B2 and G2, D2 and F2, and A2. Applying BC, PGPR, or both combined with reduced nitrogen fertilizer altered the soil community structure. At the genus level of bacteria, applying BC and PGPR significantly increased the relative abundance of <italic>Bacillus</italic>, <italic>Lysobacter</italic>, and <italic>Bradyrhizobium</italic>, all were biocontrol agents that enhanced plant growth and inhibited the growth of pathogenic microorganisms. The abundance of these three microorganisms constituted 0.77% of the total microbial population in the samples, indicating that the application of BC and PGPR can promote plant growth and development and inhibit the occurrence of diseases (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;2D</bold>
</xref>; <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Supplementary Table&#xa0;5</bold>
</xref>).</p>
<p>
<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;3A</bold>
</xref> illustrated the relative abundance and correlations of bacteria among the nine samples collected during the mid-growth period of cabbage in the winter season. There were significant differences between the treatments (CK, CK-0) and others, and significant differences in community structure between B3, D3, E3, or G3 and A2. This indicated that A3&#x2013;G3 treatments resulted in substantial changes in the community structure compared to the control. At the genus level, the BC and PGPR application significantly increased the relative abundance of beneficial microorganisms in the soil. For instance, the abundance of <italic>Lactobacillus, Bacillus</italic>, and <italic>Pseudomonas</italic>, which have biocontrol functions, increased, along with that of <italic>Pseudoxanthomonas</italic> and <italic>Streptomyces</italic>, which have antibiotic properties and facilitate rhizosphere colonization. The abundance of <italic>Chthoniobacter</italic> and <italic>Luteolibacter</italic>, which have plant growth-promoting functions, and <italic>Bacteroides</italic> and <italic>Bradyrhizobium</italic>, which participate in the nitrogen cycle and have the nitrogen-fixing capabilities of the genera, also increased (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;3B</bold>
</xref>; <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Supplementary Table&#xa0;6</bold>
</xref>). In summary, applying BC and PGPR effectively suppressed diseases, promoted plant growth and development, and enhanced soil quality.</p>
<fig id="f3" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;3</label>
<caption>
<p>The relative abundance and similarity of bacterial genus level in soil under different treatments in winter season Chinese cabbage and the classification. The panel <bold>(A)</bold> is the relative abundance and similarity of bacterial genus level in soil under different treatments at the mid-growth of winter season Chinese cabbage; The panel <bold>(B)</bold> is the classification of bacteria in the mid-growth of winter season Chinese cabbage; The panel <bold>(C)</bold> is the relative abundance and similarity of bacterial genus-level in soil under different treatments at the late growth of winter season Chinese cabbage; The panel <bold>(D)</bold> is the classification of bacteria in the late growth of winter season Chinese cabbage.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-15-1501400-g003.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>
<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;3C</bold>
</xref> illustrated the relative abundance and correlations of bacteria among the nine samples collected during the late growth period of cabbage in winter. There were significant differences between treatments (CK and CK-0). The A4&#x2013;G4 treatments resulted in substantial alterations in the community structure compared to the control treatment. At the genus level, the BC and PGPR application or their combination with reduced nitrogen fertilization, significantly increased the relative abundance of beneficial microorganisms in the soil. These microorganisms included <italic>Bacillus</italic>, <italic>Pseudomonas</italic>, and <italic>Lactobacillus</italic>, which have biocontrol functions, <italic>Pseudoxanthomonas</italic> and <italic>Streptomyces</italic>, which have antibiotic properties and facilitate rhizosphere colonization, <italic>Chthoniobacter</italic> and <italic>Luteolibacter</italic>, which have a plant growth-promoting function, <italic>Nitrobacter</italic>, <italic>Bacteroides</italic>, and <italic>Bradyrhizobium</italic>, which participate in the nitrogen cycle and have the nitrogen-fixing capabilities of the genera (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;3D</bold>
</xref>; <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Supplementary Table&#xa0;7</bold>
</xref>). The BC and PGPR applications or their combination with reduced nitrogen fertilization enhanced soil health and fertility.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_2_4">
<label>3.2.4</label>
<title>Alpha diversity analyses</title>
<p>The Simpson index for the E treatment was lower than the control at 30 days. In contrast, the indexes in other treatments increased compared to control. The indexes across various treatments were not significant difference at 60 days. However, the indexes were the highest for the E treatment at 115 and 160 days (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">
<bold>Table&#xa0;3</bold>
</xref>). In summary, the application of BC and PGPR significantly enhanced the richness and diversity of soil microorganisms, with nitrogen reduction combined with BC having a better effect. According to <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Supplementary Table&#xa0;8</bold>
</xref>, the species richness and community diversity of the treatments increased with the advancement of the growth period of the cabbage. Regarding species dominance, there were no significant differences across various periods under G treatment, indicating that species dominance remained unchanged. Still, other treatments increased with the growth stages of the cabbage (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Supplementary Table&#xa0;8</bold>
</xref>).</p>
<table-wrap id="T3" position="float">
<label>Table&#xa0;3</label>
<caption>
<p>Bacterial diversity index comparison of different treatments at the same time.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="top" align="left">Time</th>
<th valign="top" align="left">Treatments</th>
<th valign="top" align="left">Observed</th>
<th valign="top" align="left">Chao1</th>
<th valign="top" align="left">Shannon</th>
<th valign="top" align="left">Simpson</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" rowspan="7" align="left">30d</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">A</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">943.33 d</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">1971.46 b</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">6.22 c</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.9954 de</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">B</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">1034.33 a</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">2363.63 a</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">6.41 a</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.9965 ab</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">C</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">986.33 bc</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">2162.81 ab</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">6.30 b</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.9960 bc</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">D</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">967.33 cd</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">2143.18 ab</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">6.27 bc</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.9958 cd</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">E</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">975.00 bcd</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">2021.41 ab</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">6.25 bc</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.9949 e</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">F</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">941.00 d</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">2006.25 ab</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">6.24 c</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.9956 cd</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">G</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">1006.67 ab</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">2274.97 ab</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">6.39 a</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.9966 a</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" rowspan="7" align="left">60d</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">A</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">1035.00 a</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">2456.52 a</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">6.42 a</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.9967 a</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">B</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">1029.67 a</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">2370.26 a</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">6.40 a</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.9966 a</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">C</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">1034.00 a</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">2447.25 a</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">6.40 a</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.9966 a</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">D</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">1020.33 a</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">2155.77 a</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">6.41 a</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.9968 a</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">E</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">1066.33 a</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">2408.25 a</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">6.49 a</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.9970 a</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">F</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">1018.00 a</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">2100.30 a</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">6.44 a</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.9969 a</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">G</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">1014.00 a</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">2278.52 a</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">6.41 a</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.9968 a</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" rowspan="7" align="left">115d</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">A</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">1102.33 a</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">2612.89 a</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">6.52 bc</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.9971 bc</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">B</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">1131.33 a</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">2511.65 a</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">6.60 ab</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.9975 a</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">C</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">1103.00 a</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">2730.49 a</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">6.52 bc</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.9971 bc</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">D</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">1094.00 a</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">2387.58 a</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">6.54 bc</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.9973 ab</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">E</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">1167.00 a</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">2745.82 a</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">6.65 a</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.9976 a</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">F</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">946.00 b</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">1731.75 b</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">6.39 d</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.9969 c</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">G</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">1094.33 a</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">2404.12 a</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">6.53 bc</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.9969 c</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" rowspan="7" align="left">160d</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">A</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">1070.33 c</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">2417.82 a</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">6.50 c</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.9970 c</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">B</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">1123.00 ab</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">2662.78 a</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">6.57 ab</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.9973 b</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">C</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">1106.33 abc</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">2583.75 a</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">6.56 b</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.9974 ab</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">D</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">1114.00 abc</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">2522.94 a</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">6.57 ab</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.9975 a</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">E</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">1127.00 ab</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">2672.02 a</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">6.60 ab</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.9975 a</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">F</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">1146.67 a</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">2727.46 a</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">6.62 a</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.9975 a</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">G</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">1093.67 bc</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">2556.51 a</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">6.50 c</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.9967 d</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn>
<p>Different lowercase letters in the same row indicate significant differences between treatments (p&lt;0.05).</p>
</fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_2_5">
<label>3.2.5</label>
<title>Beta diversity analyses</title>
<p>A PCA was conducted to compare the CK and CK-0 treatments with other fertilization treatments and to examine the alterations in bacterial community structure during the growth period of the summer season cabbage. The PC1 contribution rate more than PC2 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f4">
<bold>Figures&#xa0;4A, B</bold>
</xref>). The analysis of the <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f4">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;4A</bold>
</xref> revealed that the CK, CK-0, A1, B1, and G1 treatments were separated from the C1&#x2013;F1 treatment on PC1, and the differences were considerable. The C1&#x2013;F1 treatments altered the bacterial community structure in the soil. The analysis of the <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f4">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;4B</bold>
</xref> revealed that the CK and CK-0 treatments were distinctly separated from the A2&#x2013;G2 treatments on PC1. The observed differences were consistent with the bacterial relative abundance heat map analysis. The A2&#x2013;G2 treatments altered the bacterial community structure in the soil. In summary, the BC and PGPR application or their combined reduction of nitrogen fertilizers can change the structure of soil bacterial communities.</p>
<fig id="f4" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;4</label>
<caption>
<p>Principal component analysis (PCA) two-dimensional diagram of bacterial &#x3b2;-diversity in rhizosphere soil of the two season Chinese cabbage. The panel <bold>(A)</bold> is the PCA analysis map of the mid-growth period of the summer season of Chinese cabbage; The panel <bold>(B)</bold> is the PCA analysis map of the late growth period of the summer season Chinese cabbage; The panel <bold>(C)</bold> is the PCA analysis map of the mid-growth period of the winter season of Chinese cabbage; The panel <bold>(D)</bold> is the PCA analysis map of the late growth period of the winter season of Chinese cabbage.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-15-1501400-g004.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>PCA was conducted to compare CK and CK-0 with other fertilization treatments, examining the alterations in bacterial community structure during the growth period of the winter season cabbage, indicating PC1 contributes more significantly than PC2 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f4">
<bold>Figures&#xa0;4C, D</bold>
</xref>). The CK, CK-0, E3, F3, and G3 treatments were distinctly separated from the A3&#x2013;D3 treatments on PC1. The differences were considerable, showing that the A3&#x2013;D3 treatments altered the bacterial community structure in the soil (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f4">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;4C</bold>
</xref>). The CK and CK-0 treatments were distinctly separated from the A4&#x2013;G4 treatments on PC1, and the differences were considerable and consistent with the heatmap analysis of bacterial relative abundance. The A4&#x2013;G4 treatments altered the bacterial community structure in the soil (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f4">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;4D</bold>
</xref>). In summary, the BC and PGPR applications or their combined reduction of nitrogen fertilizers altered the structure of soil bacterial communities, but the enhancement effect of PGPR is significantly strong.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_3">
<label>3.3</label>
<title>Effect of different fertilization treatments on Chinese cabbage yield</title>
<p>The yield of cabbage planted in winter was higher than that grown in summer due to climate differences. During the summer, the yield of all treatments increased compared to control A, with D exhibiting the significantly highest yield. The B, C, and G treatments followed in order of yield. Still, there were no significant differences among the three treatments. The yield of the E and F treatments was the lowest, with no significant difference between them. During the winter, the D treatment reached the highest yield compared to control A, and the E treatment reached the lowest yield during winter (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f5">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;5</bold>
</xref>). The combined BC and PGPR applications significantly enhanced the yield of Chinese cabbage. At the same time, such a combined application reduced the application of nitrogen fertilizer without decreasing the yield.</p>
<fig id="f5" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;5</label>
<caption>
<p>Comparative analysis of cabbage yield within the same season. Error bars refer to the average value &#xb1; SD from three biological replicates. Different letters above the columns indicate significant differences (P&lt;0.05). * indicates significance differences at the P&lt;0.05 level.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-15-1501400-g005.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s4" sec-type="discussion">
<label>4</label>
<title>Discussion</title>
<sec id="s4_1">
<label>4.1</label>
<title>Effect of fertilization level on soil physicochemical properties</title>
<p>The physicochemical properties are the evaluation index of soil quality. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B42">Wei et&#xa0;al. (2023)</xref> found that the soil pH of the BC application treatment was 7.0% higher than that of the control. This result was also observed here (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">
<bold>Table&#xa0;2</bold>
</xref>). The BC application and the reduction of nitrogen fertilizer with PGPR in this study significantly increased soil pH. The mechanism of BC induce soil pH change depends on the alkaline ions and surface functional groups of it. Additionally, the increase in pH can constrain the mobility of heavy metals, thereby ensuring soil health (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Pan et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>). The BC application with reduced nitrogen fertilizer, the sole PGPR application, and the combined BC and PGPR application significantly increased the soil OM content (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">
<bold>Table&#xa0;2</bold>
</xref>). This result is consistent with the research results found by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">Urooj et&#xa0;al. (2022)</xref>. Such an increase in OM content occurs because BC is rich in organic carbon. Biochar application adds exogenous organic carbon to the soil, increasing the carbon pool and OM content and affecting soil fertility.</p>
<p>Alkaline hydrolyzable nitrogen can reflect the nitrogen supply capacity of the soil for the current or recent season. Alkaline hydrolyzable nitrogen is a crucial indicator of soil fertility and is critical for balancing fertilization and effectively controlling agricultural non-point source pollution. Both BC and PGPR enhanced the AH-N content in the soil (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">
<bold>Table&#xa0;2</bold>
</xref>). This result is consistent with the research results of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">Lalay et&#xa0;al. (2022)</xref>. This result may be attributed to BC enhancing the biological nitrogen fixation capacity and reducing soil N<sub>2</sub>O emissions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Harter et&#xa0;al., 2014</xref>). Moreover, PGPR can achieve nitrogen fixation, phosphorus solubilization, potassium release, and other functions by producing nitrogenase, phosphatase, nuclease, or organic acids through metabolism, thereby improving the AH-N, AP, and AK contents and soil fertility. The combination of nitrogen fertilizer reduction and PGPR and their combined use with BC significantly increased the AK content in the soil (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">
<bold>Table&#xa0;2</bold>
</xref>). This result may be because the PGPR used in this experiment is a growth-promoting strain with the ability to dissolve phosphorus and potassium, which is conducive to activating potassium in the soil, promoting plant absorption, and thus increasing the content of AK in the soil (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Olaniyan et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>). <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">Sui et&#xa0;al. (2022)</xref> have noted that adding BC and reducing nitrogen fertilizer application with BC can enhance the AP content in the soil. This result is consistent with this study (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">
<bold>Table&#xa0;2</bold>
</xref>), possibly because BC can directly interact with the applied chemical fertilizers, adsorbing phosphate within its porous structure, resulting in a slow loss of effective phosphorus from the soil (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">Yang et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s4_2">
<label>4.2</label>
<title>Effect of fertilization level on soil microbial community diversity</title>
<p>The changes of microorganisms in soil can impact plant growth, and the development of plants may also influence the variations in soil microorganisms (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">Singh et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>). This study utilized Illumina sequencing technology to demonstrate that different fertilizer treatments significantly impacted the structure of rhizosphere microbial communities in cabbage. The distribution characteristics of the dominant bacteria at the phyla and genera levels in the soil samples in this experiment were analyzed. <italic>Proteobacteria</italic>, <italic>Chloroflexi</italic>, <italic>Firmicutes</italic>, <italic>Bacteroidetes</italic>, and <italic>Actinobacteria</italic> were the dominant abundant bacteria in each treatment (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>). These microflora organisms have also been identified as dominant populations in several other studies (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">Jin et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B44">Yin et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>). This result indicated that the soil rhizosphere of the different treatments in this experiment had a common composition of dominant soil microbial communities, but the proportions were different.</p>
<p>Research has shown that <italic>Proteobacteria</italic> are primarily facultative or obligate anaerobes and heterotrophic microorganisms, and that <italic>Sphingomonas</italic> can remove refractory pollutants (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">Wang et&#xa0;al., 2024</xref>), <italic>Bradyrhizobium</italic> has a bioremediation function on soil (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">Harter et&#xa0;al., 2017</xref>). The relative abundance of <italic>Proteobacteria</italic> in the BC and PGPR combined applications was the highest in this study (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">
<bold>Figures&#xa0;2</bold>
</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3">
<bold>3</bold>
</xref>). This result indicated that beneficial microbial communities in the rhizosphere soil were greater than in the other treatments. The ability to remove soil pollutants and repair soil was also the strongest, and environmental friendliness was also the highest (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Saeed et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>). <italic>Actinomycetes</italic> can decompose cellulose and lignin, and abundant <italic>Actinomycetes</italic> are beneficial to decomposing plant organic residues in soil (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B45">Zhang et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>). In this study, the relative abundance of <italic>Actinomycetes</italic> in the combined BC and PGPR application was the highest (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">
<bold>Figures&#xa0;2</bold>
</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3">
<bold>3</bold>
</xref>), indicating that the OM content in the rhizosphere soil was high, and the soil fertility was the strongest under this treatment condition. This confirmed that the addition of BC and PGPR can indeed improve soil fertility. In addition, some <italic>Firmicutes</italic> can repair their environments, degrade or transform pollutants, and reduce the impact of soil pollution on the ecological environment. <italic>Bacillus</italic> in <italic>Firmicutes</italic> are a widely used biocontrol bacteria with long survival periods and strong resistance. Many strains of these genera have attracted widespread attention from researchers due to their nitrogen-fixing ability, resistance to pathogenic bacteria, and growth-promoting effects on plants (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Li et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">Sun et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>). The relative abundance of <italic>Firmicutes</italic> in the single PGPR application in this study was the highest, followed by the combined BC and PGPR application with reduced nitrogen fertilizer application (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">
<bold>Figures&#xa0;2</bold>
</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3">
<bold>3</bold>
</xref>). This result indicated that both treatments have high environmental friendliness, strong resistance to pathogens, and nitrogen-fixing capability. <italic>Bacteroidetes</italic> participate in the nitrogen cycling process in soil, influencing the content of mineralized nitrogen through its activities. The abundance of <italic>Bacteroidetes</italic> is also high in environments with a high OM content in the soil. In addition, the microbial <italic>Bacteroidetes</italic> community may help enhance plant defense capabilities and reduce disease occurrence (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">Pan et&#xa0;al., 2023</xref>). The relative abundance of <italic>Bacteroidetes</italic> in this study was highest in the single BC or PGPR application (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">
<bold>Figures&#xa0;2</bold>
</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3">
<bold>3</bold>
</xref>), indicating that the two treatments had strong nitrogen-fixing ability and increased soil OM content and disease resistance. In summary, the application of BC and PGPR can effectively increase the relative abundance of beneficial microbial communities in soil, especially biocontrol bacteria. They are direct indicators of root diseases in Chinese cabbage. For example, cabbage clubroot disease caused by <italic>Plasmodiophora brassicae</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Javed et&#xa0;al., 2023</xref>). It implied that the application of BC and PGPR could reduce the occurrence of root diseases in Chinese cabbage, but more evidence is needed.</p>
<p>The alpha and beta diversity analyses showed differences in the richness and diversity of rhizosphere soil bacterial communities under different treatments (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">
<bold>Table&#xa0;3</bold>
</xref>; <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Supplementary Table&#xa0;8</bold>
</xref>; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f4">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;4</bold>
</xref>). Compared to conventional fertilization, the application of single BC, single PGPR, and a combination of BC and PGPR significantly increased both the Shannon and Simpson indices of bacteria in the soil (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">
<bold>Table&#xa0;3</bold>
</xref>), indicating that the microbial diversity and species dominance of these three treatments were significantly increased, which was consistent with the results of previous studies (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Gulnaz et&#xa0;al., 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">Di Salvo et&#xa0;al., 2018</xref>). The differences in the microbial community structure may be attributed to significant differences in environmental factors, as soil physicochemical properties have significant impacts on the microbial community structure. For example, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">Wang et&#xa0;al. (2021)</xref> found that soil physicochemical properties were determinant factors driving changes in the number of soil microorganisms of Gastrodia elata. Another reason may be that different fertilizations lead to different degrees of enrichment of microbial communities. The above showed that soil physicochemical properties and fertilizers were the key factors that produce differences in the microbial community structures.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s4_3">
<label>4.3</label>
<title>Effect of fertilization level on Chinese cabbage yield</title>
<p>Dry matter is the final form of crop photosynthetic products, and it guarantees an increased crop yield. Dry matter accumulation is closely related to nitrogen supply at different growth stages. The application of nitrogen fertilizer is irreplaceable in crop production and yield enhancement. The cabbage yield in the three treatments with a 50% nitrogen reduction did not significantly decrease compared to the control (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f5">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;5</bold>
</xref>). This result is consistent with previous research results. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Fan et&#xa0;al. (2024)</xref> showed that reducing nitrogen between 54% and 80% will not significantly impact the yield of vegetables grown in Southwest China. Therefore, optimizing nitrogen fertilizer application strategies and technologies can maintain or increase vegetable yield, significantly improve nitrogen use efficiency (NUE), and reduce crop nitrogen loss. Our research also showed that BC addition could increase the yield of Chinese cabbage (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f5">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;5</bold>
</xref>), consistent with the results of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">Tang et&#xa0;al. (2022)</xref>. At the same time, PGPR has been proven to promote plant growth (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">Vejan et&#xa0;al., 2016</xref>). In this experiment, the application of PGPR also promoted increased cabbage yield, consistent with previous research findings (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Gul et&#xa0;al., 2023</xref>).</p>
<p>Our study confirmed that a co-application of BC and PGPR can positively affect the Chinese cabbage yield, and even a 50% nitrogen reduction did not lower the Chinese cabbage output. Therefore, more extensive exploration of the optimal application scheme of BC and PGPR at different scenarios and crops needs to be further studied.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s5" sec-type="conclusions">
<label>5</label>
<title>Conclusion</title>
<p>The BC application combined with PGPR significantly increased the yield of cabbage, enhanced soil fertility, optimized the microbial community structure, and increased the bacterial community diversity and relative abundance of potential growth-promoting bacteria (e.g., <italic>Sphingomonas</italic>, <italic>Bradyrhizobium</italic>, <italic>Bacillus</italic>, and <italic>Pseudomonas</italic>). A 50% nitrogen reduction did not significantly impact the above indicators.</p>
<p>In summary, BC can improve the colonization ability and effectiveness of PGPR in plant growth and development and may be an appropriate carrier for PGPR. Combining BC and PGPR could synergistically affect crop yield, soil fertility amelioration, and microbial community optimization. Our research provides a practical case for efficient fertilizer application and chemical fertilizer pollution reduction in crop production.</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<sec id="s6" sec-type="data-availability">
<title>Data availability statement</title>
<p>The data presented in the study are deposited in the Figshare repository, accession number <uri xlink:href="https://www.10.6084/m9.figshare.27932247">10.6084/m9.figshare.27932247</uri>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s7" sec-type="author-contributions">
<title>Author contributions</title>
<p>QZ: Data curation, Methodology, Validation, Visualization, Writing &#x2013; original draft, Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing. LZ: Conceptualization, Resources, Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing. LG: Investigation, Writing &#x2013; original draft. PC: Visualization, Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing. JZ: Data curation, Software, Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing. YZ: Software, Writing &#x2013; original draft. YD: Funding acquisition, Visualization, Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing. YX: Funding acquisition, Project administration, Supervision, Writing &#x2013; review&#xa0;&amp; editing.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s8" sec-type="funding-information">
<title>Funding</title>
<p>The author(s) declare financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. This work was supported by the Yunnan Academician Expert Workstation (202405AF140070), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31260415, 31760500) and the Key Project of Yunnan Provincial Department of Science and Technology (202301AS070082).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s9" sec-type="COI-statement">
<title>Conflict of interest</title>
<p>The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s11" sec-type="disclaimer">
<title>Publisher&#x2019;s note</title>
<p>All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s12" sec-type="supplementary-material">
<title>Supplementary material</title>
<p>The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2024.1501400/full#supplementary-material">https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2024.1501400/full#supplementary-material</ext-link>
</p>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="DataSheet1.docx" id="SM1" mimetype="application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document"/>
</sec>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="B1">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Agbodjato</surname> <given-names>N. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Babalola</surname> <given-names>O. O.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2024</year>). <article-title>Promoting sustainable agriculture by exploiting plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) to improve maize and cowpea crops</article-title>. <source>PeerJ</source> <volume>12</volume>, <elocation-id>e16836</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.7717/peerj.16836</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ahmed</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Noman</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Qi</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Shahid</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hussain</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Masood</surname> <given-names>H. A.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>Fertilization of microbial composts: A technology for improving stress resilience in plants</article-title>. <source>Plants (Basel).</source> <volume>12</volume>, <elocation-id>3550</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/plants12203550</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Alam</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bibi</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fatima</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Munir</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gul</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Haider</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2024</year>). <article-title>Biochar and PGPR: A winning combination for peanut growth and nodulation under dry spell</article-title>. <source>J. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr.</source> <volume>2024</volume>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s42729-024-02067-3</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Bargaz</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lyamlouli</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chtouki</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zeroual</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dhiba</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Soil microbial resources for improving fertilizers efficiency in an integrated plant nutrient management system</article-title>. <source>Front. Microbiol.</source> <volume>9</volume>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmicb.2018.01606</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Bolan</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hou</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hale</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Egamberdieva</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tammeorg</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>The potential of biochar as a microbial carrier for agricultural and environmental applications</article-title>. <source>Sci. Total Environ.</source> <volume>886</volume>, <elocation-id>163968</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.163968</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>De La Torre-Ruiz</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ruiz-Valdiviezo</surname> <given-names>V. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rinc&#xf3;n-Molina</surname> <given-names>C. I.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rodr&#xed;guez-Mendiola</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Arias-Castro</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Guti&#xe9;rrez-Miceli</surname> <given-names>F. A.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Effect of plant growth-promoting bacteria on the growth and fructan production of Agave americana L</article-title>. <source>Braz. J. Microbiol.</source> <volume>47</volume>, <fpage>587</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>596</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.bjm.2016.04.010</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Di Salvo</surname> <given-names>L. P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cellucci</surname> <given-names>G. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Carlino</surname> <given-names>M. E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Garc&#xed;a de Salamone</surname> <given-names>I. E.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria inoculation and nitrogen fertilization increase maize (Zea mays, L.) grain yield and modified rhizosphere microbial communities</article-title>. <source>Appl. Soil Ecol.</source> <volume>126</volume>, <fpage>113</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>120</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.apsoil.2018.02.010</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Egamberdieva</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wirth</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Behrendt</surname> <given-names>U.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Abd Allah</surname> <given-names>E. F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Berg</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Biochar treatment resulted in a combined effect on soybean growth promotion and a shift in plant growth promoting rhizobacteria</article-title>. <source>Front. Microbiol.</source> <volume>7</volume>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmicb.2016.00209</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ehinmitan</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Losenge</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mamati</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ngumi</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Juma</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Siamalube</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2024</year>). <article-title>BioSolutions for green agriculture: unveiling the diverse roles of plant growth-promoting Rhizobacteria</article-title>. <source>Int. J. Microbiol.</source> <volume>2024</volume>, <elocation-id>6181491</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1155/2024/6181491</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Fan</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Feng</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Huang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fan</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2024</year>). <article-title>Determining optimal range of reduction rates for nitrogen fertilization based on responses of vegetable yield and nitrogen losses to reduced nitrogen fertilizer application</article-title>. <source>Sci. Total Environ.</source> <volume>924</volume>, <elocation-id>171523</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.171523</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Gul</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Khan</surname> <given-names>I. U.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rutherford</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dai</surname> <given-names>Z. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Du</surname> <given-names>D. L.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria and biochar production from Parthenium hysterophorus enhance seed germination and productivity in barley under drought stress</article-title>. <source>Front. Plant Sci.</source> <volume>14</volume>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpls.2023.1175097</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Gulnaz</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kulmitra</surname> <given-names>A. K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ghosh</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Thejesha</surname> <given-names>A. G.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Effect of PGPR and PSB on soil chemical properties, nutrient status and microbial population changes after harvest of irrigated maize under varying levels of phosphorus</article-title>. <source>Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. Appl. Sci.</source> <volume>6</volume>, <fpage>1707</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1712</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.20546/IJCMAS.2017.610.206</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Harter</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>El-Hadidi</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Huson</surname> <given-names>D. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kappler</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Behrens</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Soil biochar amendment affects the diversity of nosZ transcripts: implications for N<sub>2</sub>O formation</article-title>. <source>Sci. Rep.</source> <volume>7</volume>, <fpage>3338</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41598-017-03282-y</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Harter</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Krause</surname> <given-names>H. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Schuettler</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ruser</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fromme</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Scholten</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Linking N<sub>2</sub>O emissions from biochar-amended soil to the structure and function of the N-cycling microbial community</article-title>. <source>ISME J.</source> <volume>8</volume>, <fpage>660</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>674</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/ismej.2013.160</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Hossain</surname> <given-names>M. Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bahar</surname> <given-names>M. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sarkar</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Donne</surname> <given-names>S. W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ok</surname> <given-names>Y. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Palansooriya</surname> <given-names>K. N.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Biochar and its importance on nutrient dynamics in soil and plant</article-title>. <source>Biochar.</source> <volume>2</volume>, <fpage>379</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>420</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s42773-020-00065-z</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Javed</surname> <given-names>M. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Schwelm</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zamani-Noor</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Salih</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Silvestre Va&#xf1;&#xf3;</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>The clubroot pathogen Plasmodiophora brassicae: A profile update</article-title>. <source>Mol. Plant Pathol.</source> <volume>24</volume>, <fpage>89</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>106</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/mpp.13283</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Jin</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jin</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Reduced chemical fertilizer combined with bio-organic fertilizer affects the soil microbial community and yield and quality of lettuce</article-title>. <source>Front. Microbiol.</source> <volume>13</volume>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmicb.2022.863325</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B18">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Klotz</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Schaller</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Engelbrecht</surname> <given-names>B. M. J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>Effects of plant-available soil silicon on seedling growth and foliar nutrient status across tropical tree species</article-title>. <source>Oikos</source> <volume>2023</volume>, <elocation-id>e10030</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/oik.10030</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B19">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Lalay</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ullah</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ahmed</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Physiological and biochemical responses of Brassica napus L. @ to drought-induced stress by the application of biochar and Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria</article-title>. <source>Microsc Res. Tech.</source> <volume>85</volume>, <fpage>1267</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1281</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/jemt.23993</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B20">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lee</surname> <given-names>S. Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cho</surname> <given-names>Y. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ghim</surname> <given-names>S. Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jung</surname> <given-names>H. Y.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Mediation of induced systemic resistance by the plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria Bacillus pumilus S2-3-2</article-title>. <source>Mol. Biol. Rep.</source> <volume>47</volume>, <fpage>8429</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>8438</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11033-020-05883-9</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B21">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Qiang</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lu</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Response of soil microbial community structure to phosphate fertilizer reduction and combinations of microbial fertilizer</article-title>. <source>Front. Environ. Sci.</source> <volume>10</volume>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fenvs.2022.899727</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B22">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Lu</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lashari</surname> <given-names>M. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ji</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zheng</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Changes in soil microbial community structure and enzyme activity with amendment of biocharmanure compost and pyroligneous solution in a saline soil from Central China</article-title>. <source>Eur. J. Soil Biol.</source> <volume>70</volume>, <fpage>67</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>76</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ejsobi.2015.07.005</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B23">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Lyu</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Backer</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Berru&#xe9;</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Martinez-Farina</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hui</surname> <given-names>J. P. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Smith</surname> <given-names>D. L.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) with microbial growth broth improve biomass and secondary metabolite accumulation of <italic>Cannabis sativa</italic> L</article-title>. <source>J. Agric. Food Chem.</source> <volume>71</volume>, <fpage>7268</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>7277</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1021/acs.jafc.2c06961</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B24">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Noureen</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Iqbal</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Muqeet</surname> <given-names>H. A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2024</year>). <article-title>Potential of drought tolerant Rhizobacteria amended with biochar on growth promotion in wheat</article-title>. <source>Plants (Basel)</source> <volume>13</volume>, <elocation-id>1183</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/plants13091183</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B25">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ogran</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yardeni</surname> <given-names>E. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Keren-Paz</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bucher</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jain</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gilhar</surname> <given-names>O.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>The plant host induces antibiotic production to select the most-beneficial colonizers</article-title>. <source>Appl. Environ. Microbiol.</source> <volume>85</volume>, <fpage>e00512</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>e00519</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/AEM.00512-19</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B26">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Olaniyan</surname> <given-names>F. T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Alori</surname> <given-names>E. T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Adekiya</surname> <given-names>A. O.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ayorinde</surname> <given-names>B. B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Daramola</surname> <given-names>F. Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Osemwegie</surname> <given-names>O. O.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>The use of soil microbial potassium solubilizers in potassium nutrient availability in soil and its dynamics</article-title>. <source>Ann. Microbiol.</source> <volume>72</volume>, <fpage>45</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s13213-022-01701-8</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B27">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Pan</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sarkar</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bolan</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Shaheen</surname> <given-names>S. M.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Pristine and iron-engineered animal- and plant-derived biochars enhanced bacterial abundance and immobilized arsenic and lead in a contaminated soil</article-title>. <source>Sci. Total Environ.</source> <volume>763</volume>, <elocation-id>144218</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.144218</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B28">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Pan</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Raaijmakers</surname> <given-names>J. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Carri&#xf3;n</surname> <given-names>V. J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>Importance of Bacteroidetes in host-microbe interactions and ecosystem functioning</article-title>. <source>Trends Microbiol.</source> <volume>31</volume>, <fpage>959</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>971</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.tim.2023.03.018</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B29">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Park</surname> <given-names>Y. G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mun</surname> <given-names>B. G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kang</surname> <given-names>S. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hussain</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Shahzad</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Seo</surname> <given-names>C. W.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Bacillus aryabhattai SRB02 tolerates oxidative and nitrosative stress and promotes the growth of soybean by modulating the production of phytohormones</article-title>. <source>PloS One</source> <volume>12</volume>, <elocation-id>e0173203</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0173203</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B30">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Saeed</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ilyas</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jayachandran</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Shabir</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Akhtar</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Shahzad</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Advances in Biochar and PGPR engineering system for hydrocarbon degradation: a promising strategy for environmental remediation</article-title>. <source>Environ. pollut.</source> <volume>305</volume>, <elocation-id>119282</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.envpol.2022.119282</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B31">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Singh</surname> <given-names>R. P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pandey</surname> <given-names>D. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jha</surname> <given-names>P. N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ma</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>ACC deaminase producing rhizobacterium Enterobacter cloacae ZNP-4 enhance abiotic stress tolerance in wheat plant</article-title>. <source>PloS One</source> <volume>17</volume>, <elocation-id>267127</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0267127</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B32">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Smith</surname> <given-names>D. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Praslickova</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ilangumaran</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Inter-organismal signaling and management of the phytomicrobiome</article-title>. <source>Front. Plant Sci.</source> <volume>6</volume>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpls.2015.00722</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B33">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Sui</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tang</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cheng</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Biochar addition regulates soil phosphorus fractions and improves release of available phosphorus under freezing-thawing cycles</article-title>. <source>Sci. Total Environ.</source> <volume>848</volume>, <elocation-id>157748</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.157748</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B34">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Sui</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tang</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Du</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cheng</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Preparation and characterization of boron-doped corn straw biochar: Fe (II)</article-title>. <source>J. Environ. Sci.</source> <volume>106</volume>, <fpage>116</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>123</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jes.2021.01.001</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B35">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Sun</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Han</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>The effects of allelochemicals from root exudates of Flaveria bidentis on two Bacillus species</article-title>. <source>Front. Plant Sci.</source> <volume>13</volume>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpls.2022.1001208</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B36">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Tan</surname> <given-names>C. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Huang</surname> <given-names>X. G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>J. Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Luo</surname> <given-names>W. H.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Effect of biochar on soil microbial metabolic activities</article-title>. <source>Chin. J. Eco-Agriculture.</source> <volume>30</volume>, <fpage>333</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>342</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.12357/cjea.20210542</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B37">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Tang</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>He</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ma</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fu</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Influence of planting methods and organic amendments on rice yield and bacterial communities in the rhizosphere soil</article-title>. <source>Front. Microbiol.</source> <volume>13</volume>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmicb.2022.918986</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B38">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Urooj</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bano</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Riaz</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Role of PGPR on the physiology of sunflower irrigated with produced water containing high total dissolved solids (TDS) and its residual effects on soil fertility</article-title>. <source>Int. J. Phytoremediation.</source> <volume>24</volume>, <fpage>567</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>579</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/15226514.2021.1957771</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B39">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Vejan</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Abdullah</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Khadiran</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ismail</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Nasrulhaq Boyce</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Role of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria in agricultural sustainability-a review</article-title>. <source>Molecules</source> <volume>21</volume>, <elocation-id>573</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/molecules21050573</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B40">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xiang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2024</year>). <article-title>The different effects of molybdate on Hg(II) bio-methylation in aerobic and anaerobic bacteria</article-title>. <source>Front. Microbiol.</source> <volume>15</volume>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmicb.2024.1376844</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B41">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Meng</surname> <given-names>G. Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mao</surname> <given-names>R. Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Su</surname> <given-names>Z. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Z. Q.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Soil physical and chemical properties, microorganisms and metabolites in different culture environments of Gastrodia elata</article-title>. <source>Chin. J. Exp. Traditional Med. Formulae.</source> <volume>14</volume>, <fpage>164</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>174</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.13422/j.cnki.syfjx.20210915</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B42">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wei</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Peng</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jeyakumar</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lin</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>Soil pH restricts the ability of biochar to passivate cadmium: A meta-analysis</article-title>. <source>Environ. Res.</source> <volume>219</volume>, <elocation-id>115110</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.envres.2022.115110</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B43">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>An</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jin</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sun</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Effects of biochar addition on the abundance, speciation, availability, and leaching loss of soil phosphorus</article-title>. <source>Sci. Total Environ.</source> <volume>758</volume>, <elocation-id>143657</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143657</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B44">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Yin</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Suo</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zheng</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>You</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Biochar-compost amendment enhanced sorghum growth and yield by improving soil physicochemical properties and shifting soil bacterial community in a coastal soil</article-title>. <source>Front. Environ. Sci.</source> <volume>10</volume>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fenvs.2022.1036837</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B45">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhu</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhu</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liang</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Exploring dynamics and associations of dominant lignocellulose degraders in tomato stalk composting</article-title>. <source>J. Environ. Manage.</source> <volume>294</volume>, <elocation-id>113162</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113162</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>