<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.3 20070202//EN" "journalpublishing.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="2.3" xml:lang="EN">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Front. Plant Sci.</journal-id>
<journal-title>Frontiers in Plant Science</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">Front. Plant Sci.</abbrev-journal-title>
<issn pub-type="epub">1664-462X</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Frontiers Media S.A.</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpls.2024.1398083</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Plant Science</subject>
<subj-group>
<subject>Original Research</subject>
</subj-group>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Optimizing agricultural sustainability: enriched organic formulations for growth, yield, and soil quality in a multi-crop system</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Garg</surname>
<given-names>Kamal</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2239383"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/investigation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/formal-analysis/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name>
<surname>Dhar</surname>
<given-names>Shiva</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn001">
<sup>*</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1091135"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/conceptualization/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/formal-analysis/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/supervision/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/project-administration/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/validation/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Sharma</surname>
<given-names>Vinod Kumar</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2403070"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/formal-analysis/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/visualization/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Azman</surname>
<given-names>Elisa Azura</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3">
<sup>3</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2670815"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/visualization/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Meena</surname>
<given-names>Rajendra Prasad</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4">
<sup>4</sup>
</xref>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/data-curation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Hashim</surname>
<given-names>Mohammad</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff5">
<sup>5</sup>
</xref>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/formal-analysis/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/visualization/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kumar</surname>
<given-names>Dileep</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff6">
<sup>6</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2363912"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/formal-analysis/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/methodology/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ali</surname>
<given-names>Ghous</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff7">
<sup>7</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2732086"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/data-curation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/formal-analysis/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Karunakaran</surname>
<given-names>Vetrivel</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff8">
<sup>8</sup>
</xref>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/formal-analysis/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/visualization/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kumar</surname>
<given-names>Yogesh</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff9">
<sup>9</sup>
</xref>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/data-curation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Athnere</surname>
<given-names>Sonal</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff10">
<sup>10</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2323881"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/formal-analysis/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kumar</surname>
<given-names>Sourabh</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff11">
<sup>11</sup>
</xref>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/formal-analysis/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Om</surname>
<given-names>Hari</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff12">
<sup>12</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2337055"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/formal-analysis/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Tuti</surname>
<given-names>Mangal Deep</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff13">
<sup>13</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/452722"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/formal-analysis/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Meena</surname>
<given-names>Babu Lal</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff14">
<sup>14</sup>
</xref>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/visualization/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/formal-analysis/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kumar</surname>
<given-names>Birendra</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/data-curation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/visualization/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Meena</surname>
<given-names>Vijendra Kumar</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/formal-analysis/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name>
<surname>Kumar</surname>
<given-names>Sanjeev</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn001">
<sup>*</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/388584"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/data-curation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/formal-analysis/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/methodology/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/visualization/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
<institution>ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute</institution>, <addr-line>New Delhi</addr-line>, <country>India</country>
</aff>
<aff id="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
<institution>ICAR- National Dairy Research Institute</institution>, <addr-line>Karnal, Haryana</addr-line>, <country>India</country>
</aff>
<aff id="aff3">
<sup>3</sup>
<institution>Department of Crop Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Universiti Putra Malaysia</institution>, <addr-line>Serdang</addr-line>, <country>Malaysia</country>
</aff>
<aff id="aff4">
<sup>4</sup>
<institution>ICAR-Vivekananda Parvatiya Krishi Anusandhan Sansthan</institution>, <addr-line>Almora, Uttarakhand</addr-line>, <country>India</country>
</aff>
<aff id="aff5">
<sup>5</sup>
<institution>ICAR-Indian Institute of Pulses Research</institution>, <addr-line>Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh</addr-line>, <country>India</country>
</aff>
<aff id="aff6">
<sup>6</sup>
<institution>ICAR-Indian Institute of Sugarcane Research</institution>, <addr-line>Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh</addr-line>, <country>India</country>
</aff>
<aff id="aff7">
<sup>7</sup>
<institution>ICAR-Central Sheep and Wool Research Institute, Arid Regional Campus (ARC)</institution>, <addr-line>Bikaner, Rajasthan</addr-line>, <country>India</country>
</aff>
<aff id="aff8">
<sup>8</sup>
<institution>ICAR-Krishi Vigyan Kendra Needamangalam</institution>, <addr-line>Thiruvarur, Tamil Nadu</addr-line>, <country>India</country>
</aff>
<aff id="aff9">
<sup>9</sup>
<institution>Chaudhary Charan Singh Haryana Agricultural University, College of Agriculture</institution>, <addr-line>Rewari, Haryana</addr-line>, <country>India</country>
</aff>
<aff id="aff10">
<sup>10</sup>
<institution>Department of Agronomy, Maharana Pratap University of Agriculture and Technology</institution>, <addr-line>Uadipur, Rajasthan</addr-line>, <country>India</country>
</aff>
<aff id="aff11">
<sup>11</sup>
<institution>Department of Agronomy, Veer Kunwar Singh College of Agriculture</institution>, <addr-line>Buxar, Bihar</addr-line>, <country>India</country>
</aff>
<aff id="aff12">
<sup>12</sup>
<institution>Department of Agronomy, Bihar Agricultural University</institution>, <addr-line>Bhagalpur, Bihar</addr-line>, <country>India</country>
</aff>
<aff id="aff13">
<sup>13</sup>
<institution>ICAR-Indian Institute of Rice Research</institution>, <addr-line>Hyderabad, Telangana</addr-line>, <country>India</country>
</aff>
<aff id="aff14">
<sup>14</sup>
<institution>ICAR- Central Soil Salinity Research Institute</institution>, <addr-line>Karnal</addr-line>, <country>India</country>
</aff>
<author-notes>
<fn fn-type="edited-by">
<p>Edited by: Anoop Kumar Srivastava, Central Citrus Research Institute (ICAR), India</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="edited-by">
<p>Reviewed by: Prabhat Pramanik, Indian Agricultural Research Institute (ICAR), India</p>
<p>Songwei Wu, Huazhong Agricultural University, China</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="corresp" id="fn001">
<p>*Correspondence: Shiva Dhar, <email xlink:href="mailto:drsdmisra@gmail.com">drsdmisra@gmail.com</email>; Sanjeev Kumar, <email xlink:href="mailto:bhanusanjeev@gmail.com">bhanusanjeev@gmail.com</email>
</p>
</fn>
</author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>19</day>
<month>06</month>
<year>2024</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="collection">
<year>2024</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>15</volume>
<elocation-id>1398083</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>08</day>
<month>03</month>
<year>2024</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>09</day>
<month>05</month>
<year>2024</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#xa9; 2024 Garg, Dhar, Sharma, Azman, Meena, Hashim, Kumar, Ali, Karunakaran, Kumar, Athnere, Kumar, Om, Tuti, Meena, Kumar, Meena and Kumar</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2024</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Garg, Dhar, Sharma, Azman, Meena, Hashim, Kumar, Ali, Karunakaran, Kumar, Athnere, Kumar, Om, Tuti, Meena, Kumar, Meena and Kumar</copyright-holder>
<license xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">
<p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.</p>
</license>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<p>Utilizing agricultural and industrial wastes, potent reservoirs of nutrients, for nourishing the soil and crops through composting embodies a sustainable approach to waste management and organic agriculture. To investigate this, a 2-year field experiment was conducted at ICAR-IARI, New Delhi, focusing on a pigeon pea&#x2013;vegetable mustard&#x2013;okra cropping system. Seven nutrient sources were tested, including a control (T<sub>1</sub>), 100% recommended dose of nitrogen (RDN) through farmyard manure (T<sub>2</sub>), 100% RDN through improved rice residue compost (T<sub>3</sub>), 100% RDN through a paddy husk ash (PHA)&#x2013;based formulation (T<sub>4</sub>), 75% RDN through PHA-based formulation (T<sub>5</sub>), 100% RDN through a potato peel compost (PPC)&#x2013;based formulation (T<sub>6</sub>), and 75% RDN through PPC-based formulation (T<sub>7</sub>). Employing a randomized block design with three replications, the results revealed that treatment T<sub>4</sub> exhibited the significantly highest seed (1.89 &#xb1; 0.09 and 1.97 &#xb1; 0.12 t ha<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>) and stover (7.83 &#xb1; 0.41 and 8.03 &#xb1; 0.58 t ha<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>) yield of pigeon pea, leaf yield (81.57 &#xb1; 4.69 and 82.97 &#xb1; 4.17 t ha<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>) of vegetable mustard, and fruit (13.54 &#xb1; 0.82 and 13.78 &#xb1; 0.81 t ha<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>) and stover (21.64 &#xb1; 1.31 and 22.03 &#xb1; 1.30 t ha<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>) yield of okra during both study years compared to the control (T<sub>1</sub>). Treatment T<sub>4</sub> was on par with T<sub>2</sub> and T<sub>6</sub> for seed and stover yield in pigeon pea, as well as okra, and leaf yield in vegetable mustard over both years. Moreover, T<sub>4</sub> demonstrated notable increase of 124.1% and 158.2% in NH<sub>4</sub>-N and NO<sub>3</sub>-N levels in the soil, respectively, over the control. The enhanced status of available nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) in the soil, coupled with increased soil organic carbon (0.41%), total bacteria population (21.1%), fungi (37.2%), actinomycetes (44.6%), and microbial biomass carbon (28.5%), further emphasized the positive impact of T<sub>4</sub> compared to the control. Treatments T<sub>2</sub> and T<sub>6</sub> exhibited comparable outcomes to T<sub>4</sub> concerning changes in available N, P, soil organic carbon, total bacteria population, fungi, actinomycetes, and microbial biomass carbon. In conclusion, treatments T<sub>4</sub> and T<sub>6</sub> emerge as viable sources of organic fertilizer, particularly in regions confronting farmyard manure shortages. These formulations offer substantial advantages, including enhanced yield, soil quality improvement, and efficient fertilizer utilization, thus contributing significantly to sustainable agricultural practices.</p>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>farmyard manure</kwd>
<kwd>microbial population</kwd>
<kwd>paddy husk ash</kwd>
<kwd>potato peel compost</kwd>
<kwd>soil enzymatic activity</kwd>
<kwd>yield</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<counts>
<fig-count count="7"/>
<table-count count="6"/>
<equation-count count="0"/>
<ref-count count="40"/>
<page-count count="16"/>
<word-count count="9062"/>
</counts>
<custom-meta-wrap>
<custom-meta>
<meta-name>section-in-acceptance</meta-name>
<meta-value>Plant Nutrition</meta-value>
</custom-meta>
</custom-meta-wrap>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec id="s1" sec-type="intro">
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>The growing global population accentuates the urgency of ensuring food sustainability, safety, and security while lessening the strain on economic, environmental, and Earth resources (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">Shubbar et&#xa0;al., 2024</xref>). Conventional farming, relying on input-intensive practices, poses long-term challenges affecting production systems, biodiversity, food quality, environmental sustainability, greenhouse gas emissions, and human health (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Mbow et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>). In response, efforts over the past two decades have focused on exploring sustainable alternatives aligned with the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals, promoting eco-friendly living and environmental stewardship (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Imran et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>).</p>
<p>Organic farming, employing natural methods for crop cultivation and ecologically sound fertilization and pest control, emerges as a pivotal approach (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">Chatterjee et&#xa0;al., 2017</xref>). Various organic sources, including farmyard manure (FYM), paddy husk ash (PHA), and potato peel compost (PPC), derived from agricultural and industrial waste, significantly contribute to sustainable practices. FYM, composed of decomposed dung, urine, litter, and leftover fodder, enables gradual nutrient release, aligning with plant requirements (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">De et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>). Similarly, PHA, a byproduct of rice milling, and potato peel waste from the food processing industry present disposal challenges, motivating their exploration for agricultural applications (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">Sharma et&#xa0;al., 2015</xref>).</p>
<p>While previous research has examined organic farming practices, our study uniquely targets the utilization of these significant industrial byproducts, which are often overlooked in traditional agricultural practices. By repurposing PHA and potato peel waste, we aim to address critical disposal challenges while simultaneously exploring their potential as enriched organic formulations in agriculture.</p>
<p>Composting, a microbial-mediated process accelerating waste breakdown, transforms complex materials into forms suitable for agricultural use (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">Zhang et&#xa0;al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">Bhattacharjya et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>). This study focuses on PHA and potato peel waste, significant global industrial wastes. Recycling these materials in agriculture not only addresses disposal challenges but also holds potential for reducing reliance on commercial fertilizers (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Ayilara et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>). PHA, abundantly produced in rice-growing countries, poses a disposal challenge due to its sheer volume, exacerbating air pollution, and greenhouse gas emissions and causing substantial nutrient loss (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Bhuvaneshwari et&#xa0;al., 2019</xref>).</p>
<p>Similarly, potato peel waste, a byproduct of the food processing industry, contains substantial starch and nutrients (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">Joshi et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>). Utilizing this waste in composting not only enriches soil microbes but also tackles the disposal challenges faced by the potato industry (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Ezejiofor et&#xa0;al., 2014</xref>). By exploring these organic amendments, our research aims to contribute to ongoing efforts in optimizing agricultural sustainability, aligning with the global push toward environmentally friendly practices.</p>
<p>Our hypothesis posits that enriched organic formulations from agricultural waste will foster plant growth and improve soil health compared to conventional production systems. To substantiate this, our research objectives encompass a comprehensive assessment of soil quality through measuring, enzymatic activity, microbial biomass, community composition, and various physical and chemical properties. Additionally, we seek to evaluate the impact of these organic formulations on nutrient accumulation in the soil profile and their influence on the growth and yield of crops, namely, pigeon pea, veg mustard, and okra, grown in rotation.</p>
<p>This study comprehensively assesses the short-term effects of organic formulations on various parameters, including soil quality. The investigation extends its focus to examine how these variables influence the growth and yield of rotationally cultivated pigeon pea&#x2013;veg mustard&#x2013;okra crops. Aligned with the overarching goal of advancing agricultural sustainability, this research seeks to unravel the advantages associated with employing enhanced organic formulations derived from agricultural waste in a multi-crop system. By delving into soil quality, nutrient dynamics, and crop performance systematically, the research aims to contribute valuable insights and propose practical solutions to global challenges in both food production and waste management.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2" sec-type="materials|methods">
<title>Materials and methods</title>
<sec id="s2_1">
<title>Experimental site description</title>
<p>The field experiment was conducted over two consecutive years (2020 and 2021) at the research farm of the Indian Agricultural Research Institute (IARI) in New Delhi (28.38&#xb0; N, 77.09&#xb0; E), situated at an elevation of 228.6 m above mean sea level. The site experiences a semi-arid to sub-tropical climate, characterized by extreme cold and hot conditions. Total rainfall during the July&#x2013;May periods was 913.6 mm in 2020&#x2013;2021 and 1682.9 mm in 2021&#x2013;2022. In June, the hottest month, mean maximum temperatures range between 40&#xb0;C and 45&#xb0;C, while mean minimum temperatures in January, the coldest month, can drop as low as 1.20&#xb0;C.</p>
<p>The soil at the experimental site exhibits a sandy clay loam texture (sand 63.8%, silt 12.2%, and clay 24.0%) with a pH of 8.1 and electrical conductivity (EC) of 0.36 dS m<sup>-1</sup> in the top 15 cm. Initial soil analysis revealed low organic carbon content (0.37%) and available nitrogen (206.2 kg ha<sup>-1</sup>), and medium levels of available phosphorus (13.6 kg ha<sup>-1</sup>) and potassium (236.0 kg ha<sup>-1</sup>). A comprehensive overview of the physio-chemical and biological properties of the soil, as determined in the initial soil examination, is presented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">
<bold>Table&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>.</p>
<table-wrap id="T1" position="float">
<label>Table&#xa0;1</label>
<caption>
<p>Initial status of soil physico-chemical and biological properties at the experimental site.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="top" rowspan="2" align="center">Sr. no.</th>
<th valign="top" rowspan="2" align="left">Particulars</th>
<th valign="top" colspan="2" align="center">Values</th>
<th valign="middle" rowspan="2" align="center">Method used and reference</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="top" align="center">2020&#x2013;2021</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">2021&#x2013;2022</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="center">
<bold>I</bold>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">
<bold>Physical properties</bold>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"/>
<td valign="top" align="left"/>
<td valign="top" align="left"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
<td valign="top" align="left">
<bold>Mechanical composition</bold>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"/>
<td valign="top" align="left"/>
<td valign="top" align="left"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
<td valign="top" align="left">1.&#x2003;Sand (%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">63.8</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">63.5</td>
<td valign="middle" rowspan="3" align="left">Hydrometer method (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Bouyoucos, 1962</xref>)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
<td valign="top" align="left">2.&#x2003;Silt (%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">17.2</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">16.8</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
<td valign="top" align="left">3.&#x2003;Clay (%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">19.0</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">19.7</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
<td valign="top" align="left">Textural class</td>
<td valign="top" colspan="2" align="left">Sandy clay loam</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Triangular method</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
<td valign="top" align="left">B.D. (0&#x2013;15 cm layer) (Mg m<sup>-3</sup>)</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">1.54</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">1.51</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Core sampler (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Bodman, 1942</xref>)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
<td valign="top" align="left">1.&#x2003;Water stable aggregates (%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">47.1</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">49.2</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Wet sieving technique (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">Haynes, 1993</xref>)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="center">
<bold>II</bold>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">
<bold>Chemical properties</bold>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"/>
<td valign="top" align="left"/>
<td valign="top" align="left"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
<td valign="top" align="left">pH (1:2.5) soil: water ratio</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">8.1</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">7.9</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Elico pH meter (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">Piper, 1950</xref>)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
<td valign="top" align="left">EC (dS m<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>) (1:2) soil: water ratio</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.36</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.35</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Solubridge method (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">Richards, 1954</xref>)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
<td valign="top" align="left">Organic carbon (%)</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.37</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.39</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Walkley and Black (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Jackson, 1973</xref>)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
<td valign="top" align="left">Available N (kg ha<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>)</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">206.2</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">211.8</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Alkaline permanganate method <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">Subbiah and Asija (1956)</xref>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
<td valign="top" align="left">NO<sub>3</sub>-N (mg kg<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>)</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">10.4</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">11.0</td>
<td valign="middle" rowspan="2" align="left">(<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Bremner and Keeney, 1966</xref>)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
<td valign="top" align="left">NH<sub>4</sub>-N (mg kg<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>)</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">6.8</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">7.6</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
<td valign="top" align="left">Available P (kg ha<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>)</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">13.6</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">14.2</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Olsen&#x2019;s method (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">Olsen, 1954</xref>)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
<td valign="top" align="left">Available K (kg ha<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>)</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">236.0</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">239.2</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Flame photometric method (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Jackson, 1973</xref>)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="center">
<bold>III</bold>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">
<bold>Biological properties</bold>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"/>
<td valign="top" align="left"/>
<td valign="top" align="left"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
<td valign="top" align="left">MBC (&#xb5;g MBC g<sup>&#x2212;1</sup> soil)</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">177.2</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">192.6</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Nunan et&#xa0;al. (1998)</xref>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
<td valign="top" align="left">DHA activity (&#xb5;g TPF g<sup>&#x2212;1</sup> soil day<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>)</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">144.2</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">149.4</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Casida et&#xa0;al. (1964)</xref>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
<td valign="top" align="left">AP activity (&#x3bc;g PNP g<sup>&#x2212;1</sup> soil hr<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>)</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">55.6</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">60.8</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">Tabatabai and Bremner (1969)</xref>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="center">
<bold>IV</bold>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">
<bold>Microbial community composition</bold>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"/>
<td valign="top" align="left"/>
<td valign="top" align="left"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
<td valign="top" align="left">Bacteria (&#xd7;10<sup>5</sup> cfu)</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">30.9</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">32.2</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">Allen (1958)</xref>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
<td valign="top" align="left">Fungi (&#xd7;10<sup>2</sup> cfu)</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">15.5</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">17.2</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Martin (1950)</xref>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
<td valign="top" align="left">Actinomycetes (&#xd7;10<sup>2</sup> cfu)</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">13.5</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">15.0</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">Allen (1958)</xref>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_2">
<title>Experimentation design and crop management</title>
<p>The experiment employed a completely randomized block design with three replications, encompassing seven nutrient sources tested across each crop season. The treatments included: T<sub>1</sub> (control), T<sub>2</sub> [100% recommended dose of nitrogen (RDN) through FYM], T<sub>3</sub> [100% RDN through improved rice residue compost (RRC)], T<sub>4</sub> (100% RDN through PHA-based formulation, T<sub>5</sub> (75% RDN through PHA-based formulation), T<sub>6</sub> (100% RDN through PPC-based formulation, and T<sub>7</sub> (75% RDN through PPC-based formulation). Each treatment had a plot size of 5.0 m &#xd7; 4.5 m. The experiment involved the cultivation of Pigeon pea variety &#x201c;Pusa Arhar 16,&#x201d; vegetable mustard &#x201c;Pusa sag 1,&#x201d; and okra variety &#x201c;Pusa Bhindi 5.&#x201d; The RDN for pigeon pea, vegetable mustard, and okra were 30, 80, and 100 kg N ha<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>, respectively.</p>
<p>Prior to crop sowing, organic formulations were applied based on RDN and the nutrient requirements of each crop in their respective treatments. The nutrient composition and detailed descriptions of the organic formulations, uniformly applied across all crops in both experimental years, are comprehensively presented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">
<bold>Tables&#xa0;2</bold>
</xref>, <xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">
<bold>3</bold>
</xref>. Farmyard manure, rice residue compost, and PPC contained 0.72%, 0.55%, and 0.61% N during 2020&#x2013;2021, and 0.70%, 0.58%, and 0.59% N (on an oven-dry weight basis) during 2021&#x2013;2022, respectively.</p>
<table-wrap id="T2" position="float">
<label>Table&#xa0;2</label>
<caption>
<p>Chemical and nutrient composition of organic manures/formulations used in the experiment.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" rowspan="3" align="left">Parameters</th>
<th valign="bottom" colspan="12" align="center">Nutrient sources</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" colspan="2" align="center">FYM</th>
<th valign="middle" colspan="2" align="center">RRC</th>
<th valign="middle" colspan="2" align="center">PHA</th>
<th valign="middle" colspan="2" align="center">PPC</th>
<th valign="middle" colspan="2" align="left">PHA-based formulation</th>
<th valign="middle" colspan="2" align="left">PP-based formulation</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="bottom" align="left">2020</th>
<th valign="bottom" align="left">2021</th>
<th valign="bottom" align="left">2020</th>
<th valign="bottom" align="left">2021</th>
<th valign="bottom" align="left">2020</th>
<th valign="bottom" align="left">2021</th>
<th valign="bottom" align="left">2020</th>
<th valign="bottom" align="left">2021</th>
<th valign="bottom" align="left">2020</th>
<th valign="bottom" align="left">2021</th>
<th valign="bottom" align="left">2020</th>
<th valign="bottom" align="left">2021</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">pH</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">8.1</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">8.0</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">7.7</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">7.6</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">7.8</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">7.7</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">7.8</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">7.9</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">7.9</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">7.8</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">8.0</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">8.0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">EC (ds m<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>)</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">3.75</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">3.76</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">3.82</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">3.84</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">3.87</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">3.85</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">3.84</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">3.86</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">3.76</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">3.77</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">3.77</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">3.78</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">TOC (%)</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">15.42</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">15.84</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">13.24</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">13.96</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">4.66</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">4.72</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">11.56</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">11.42</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">14.34</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">14.73</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">14.65</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">14.96</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">Total N (%)</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">0.72</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">0.70</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">0.55</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">0.58</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">0</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">0</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">0.61</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">0.59</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">0.65</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">0.63</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">0.70</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">0.68</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">Total P (%)</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">0.25</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">0.27</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">0.22</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">0.21</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">0.20</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">0.17</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">0.28</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">0.32</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">0.25</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">0.26</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">0.26</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">0.28</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">Total K (%)</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">0.52</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">0.49</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">1.27</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">1.34</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">1.66</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">1.75</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">0.85</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">0.90</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">0.63</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">0.62</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">0.59</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">0.57</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">Fe (mg kg<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>)</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">708.6</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">778.8</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">501.2</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">562.6</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">1252.4</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">1298.4</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">902.8</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">908.2</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">1663.0</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">1730.8</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">1838.6</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">1872.7</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">Mn (mg kg<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>)</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">341.7</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">328.6</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">232.5</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">254.3</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">298.4</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">312.5</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">284.0</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">265.4</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">327.4</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">317.0</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">330.2</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">316.0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">Cu (mg kg<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>)</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">36.2</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">40.5</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">25.6</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">30.5</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">38.4</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">43.8</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">55.8</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">47.5</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">34.4</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">38.8</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">40.7</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">41.9</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">Zn (mg kg<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>)</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">127.5</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">115.4</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">81.7</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">93.4</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">98.5</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">105.5</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">90.4</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">102.8</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">120.8</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">111.1</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">122.1</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">114.9</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">Bacteria<break/>(&#xd7;10<sup>5</sup> cfu)</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">60</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">61.4</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">51.3</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">50.2</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">14.0</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">15.2</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">46.0</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">48.2</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">55.8</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">57.1</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">58.5</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">59.8</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">Fungi (&#xd7;10<sup>2</sup> cfu)</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">43.1</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">42</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">36.0</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">38.2</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">12.0</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">11.3</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">33.0</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">35.7</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">40.2</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">39.9</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">41.6</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">41.0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">Actinomycetes (&#xd7;10<sup>2</sup> cfu)</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">35</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">37.5</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">29.2</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">30.0</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">9.0</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">9.4</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">26.4</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">25.0</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">32.5</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">32.0</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">33.4</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">35.0</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
<table-wrap id="T3" position="float">
<label>Table&#xa0;3</label>
<caption>
<p>Quantity of organic formulations applied in different crops during both the years of study.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="top" rowspan="2" align="left">Crop</th>
<th valign="top" rowspan="2" align="left">Year</th>
<th valign="top" colspan="7" align="center">Input applied (kg ha<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>)</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="top" align="left">Control</th>
<th valign="top" align="left">FYM</th>
<th valign="top" align="left">RRC</th>
<th valign="top" align="left">PHA-F (100% RDN)</th>
<th valign="top" align="left">PHA-F (75% RDN)</th>
<th valign="top" align="left">PP-F (100% RDN)</th>
<th valign="top" align="left">PP-F (75% RDN)</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Pigeon pea</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">2020</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">4167</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">5455</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">4630</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">3472</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">4317</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">3238</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"/>
<td valign="top" align="left">2021</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">4286</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">5172</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">4762</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">3571</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">4446</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">3334</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Veg. mustard</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">2020&#x2013;2021</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">11111</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">14545</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">12346</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">9259</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">11512</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">8634</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"/>
<td valign="top" align="left">2021&#x2013;2022</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">11429</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">13793</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">12698</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">9524</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">11855</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">8891</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Okra</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">2020&#x2013;2021</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">13889</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">18182</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">15432</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">11574</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">14390</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">10792</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left"/>
<td valign="top" align="left">2021&#x2013;2022</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">14286</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">17241</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">15873</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">11905</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">14818</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">11114</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
<p>Thinning was conducted at 10 days after sowing (DAS) to achieve the desired plant population, while gap filling was performed at 20 DAS to maintain a plant-to-plant distance of 20 cm in rows. At 20 DAS, one-hand weeding and hoeing were carried out in each plot to minimize weed growth and intensity. Five randomly chosen plants in each plot were tagged to record growth and yield attributing parameters. Harvesting of pigeon pea occurred when pods turned brown and grains attained relative hardness, with a moisture content of 75%&#x2013;80%. After drying, bundles were threshed using a Pullman thresher, and grains were cleaned, weighed, and converted to a hectare basis.</p>
<p>In vegetable mustard, green leaf yield was recorded after each cutting of leaves from the five selected and tagged plants, and the average leaf yield per hectare was calculated. Similarly, in okra, fruits were manually picked when green, tender, and of marketable size. After each picking, harvested fruits were weighed, and the combined total was calculated at the end to determine the yield in t ha<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>. Immediately following the last picking of green pods, plants from the net plot were harvested, and the fresh weight was recorded, with the green stover yield expressed in t ha<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_3">
<title>Preparation of organic formulations</title>
<p>FYM was prepared by aerobic windrow method in biomass utilization unit, IARI New Delhi. On an average, well-decomposed FYM contains approximately 5&#x2013;6 kg N, 1.2&#x2013; 2.0 kg P and 5&#x2013;6 kg K per tonne, respectively. Rice residue compost was prepared by windrow composting method. In this method, rice residue was thoroughly chopped and placed in windrows to hasten rate of decomposition then windrows were turned periodically. During turning, chopped residue was moistened with spray of water and cow dung slurry on the windrow, which speed up the composting process. It takes about 6&#x2013;8 weeks for complete uniform compost. Rice husk is produced during milling of rice. About 0.20 t of rice husk is produced from 1 ton of paddy and from 1 ton of rice husk, it generates approximately 0.25 ton of ash after burning, depending upon variety and climatic conditions. Recycling PHA in agriculture can address disposal challenges while also reducing the need for commercial fertilizer application. So, in this experiment, PHA-based formulation was made by mixing PHA with FYM in 20:80 ratio on weight basis. Potato peel waste is byproduct of food processing industry. Potato peel contains large amount of starch and nutrients, which can be supplemented with microbes in soil to enrich manure with nitrogen content. It can be used as an alternate source of manure for crops and to reduce environmental pollution. Therefore, potato peel-based formulation was made by mixing potato peel with FYM in 20:80 ratio on volume basis.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_4">
<title>Soil sampling and analysis</title>
<p>The multiple soil samples were collected from different locations across each plot of the experimental field in a zigzag pattern using a core auger from the 0&#x2013;15 cm soil profile initially. Additionally, at the end of the experimental period, 15 samples were collected from each plot. After removing all stubble, residues, and root biomass, a composite soil sample of approximately 500 g was obtained from each plot. Subsequently, these samples were then air dried, ground, and passed through 2 mm mesh sieve and preserved in air-tight polythene containers for subsequent chemical analysis. The rhizosphere soil samples were collected from the plant roots using a core auger sampler to measure microbial counts and enzymatic activities.</p>
<p>Bulk density (BD) of soil was assessed using core sampler method given by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Bodman (1942)</xref>. Water stable aggregates (WSAs) were quantified using wet sieving technique (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">Haynes, 1993</xref>). pH of the soil water suspension (1:2) was measured potentiometrically using Elico pH meter (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">Piper, 1950</xref>). EC was measured by conductivity bridge method (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Jackson, 1973</xref>). Microbial biomass carbon (MBC) was estimated using chloroform fumigation method as given by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Nunan et&#xa0;al. (1998)</xref>. Dehydrogenase activity (DHA) was determined according to method given by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Casida et&#xa0;al. (1964)</xref>. Alkaline phosphatase (AP) was assessed using method given by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">Tabatabai and Bremner (1969)</xref>. Total bacteria, fungi, and actinomycetes population counts were assessed by using the <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">Allen (1958)</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Martin (1950)</xref> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">Allen (1958)</xref> methods, respectively. Organic carbon (OC) content in soil samples were assessed using Walkley and Black method (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Jackson, 1973</xref>). The available N in soil was determined using alkaline potassium permanganate (KMnO<sub>4</sub>) method given by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">Subbiah and Asija (1956)</xref>. The available P content in soil was quantified using Olsen&#x2019;s method as proposed by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">Olsen (1954)</xref>. Available K was estimated using neutral ammonium acetate extraction method as described by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Jackson (1973)</xref>. NH<sub>4</sub>
<sup>+</sup>-N was analyzed via steam distillation with MgO in a micro-Kjeldahl system, while NO<sub>3</sub>
<sup>-</sup>N after reduction with Devarda&#x2019;s alloy followed by distillation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Bremner and Keeney, 1966</xref>). The N content in various plant parts was determined by using the modified Kjeldahl method (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">Subbiah and Asija, 1956</xref>). The apparent N budgeting was done based on initial N content in soils, total N content added through different formulations during two cropping cycle, biological nitrogen fixation value of 170 kg ha<sup>&#x2212;1</sup> was utilized for pigeon pea as calculated by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">Adu-Gyamfi et&#xa0;al. (1997)</xref> for one cropping cycle and total N uptake by crop plants and available N content in soil after completion of the two cropping cycles.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_5">
<title>Statistical analysis</title>
<p>The data collected over a two-year period were subjected to statistical analysis utilizing the <italic>F</italic>-test, following the methodology outlined by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Gomez and Gomez (1984)</xref>. To ascertain the significance of differences between treatment means, the standard deviation (SD) and LSD values, or Duncan&#x2019;s Multiple Range Test at a significance level of <italic>p</italic> &#x2264; 0.05, were employed, and the results are graphically represented using error bars. The correlation analysis was performed using the JASP software version 0.18.3.0.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s3" sec-type="results">
<title>Results</title>
<sec id="s3_1">
<title>Growth attributes</title>
<sec id="s3_1_1">
<title>Pigeon pea</title>
<p>Significant variations were observed in growth attributes of pigeon pea due to application of enriched organic formulations. Treatments T<sub>2</sub>, T<sub>3</sub>, T<sub>4</sub>, T<sub>5,</sub> and T<sub>6</sub> also recorded significant superiority over control (T<sub>1</sub>) for all the growth attributes. A significant maximum increase in plant height at 90 DAS (100.7 cm and 100.9 cm) and at harvest stage (124.6 cm and 124.9 cm) recorded, when subject to treatment T<sub>4</sub> in contrast to control treatment (T<sub>1</sub>) during years 2020 and 2021. In addition, treatment T<sub>4</sub> exhibited significantly maximum dry matter accumulation (DMA) per plant at 60 DAS (16.1 g and 18.0 g), 90 DAS (40.0 g and 41.1 g) and at harvest (51.4 g and 53.1 g) and number of branches per plant (17.8 and 17.9) at harvest and found significantly superior over treatment T<sub>7</sub> and T<sub>1</sub> during 2020 and 2021. Likewise, significant (<italic>p</italic> &#x2264; 0.05) increased leaf area at 90 DAS (146.1 cm<sup>2</sup> and 156.2 cm<sup>2</sup>) and leaves per plant (91.0 and 95.1) were observed under T<sub>4</sub> and found noticeably higher over T<sub>7</sub> and T<sub>1</sub> treatments during 2020 and 2021. Treatments T<sub>6</sub> and T<sub>2</sub> recorded comparable values with treatment T<sub>4</sub> for different growth attributing characters (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">
<bold>Figures&#xa0;1A&#x2013;E</bold>
</xref>).</p>
<fig id="f1" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;1</label>
<caption>
<p>Impact of enriched organic formulations on growth attributes of pigeon pea: <bold>(A)</bold> plant height, <bold>(B)</bold> dry matter accumulation, <bold>(C)</bold> Branches per plant, <bold>(D)</bold> leaves per plant, and <bold>(E)</bold> leaf area during 2020 and 2021. The data represents the mean values across treatments (T<sub>1</sub>&#x2013;T<sub>7</sub>) with error bars indicating standard deviation. Statistical significance was assessed using one-way ANOVA, with differences considered significant at <italic>p</italic> &#x2264; 0.05. Similar letter indicates the treatments are at par with each other at <italic>p</italic> &#x2264; 0.05.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-15-1398083-g001.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_1_2">
<title>Vegetable mustard</title>
<p>Significant (<italic>p</italic> &#x2264; 0.05) superiority was recorded under treatment T<sub>4</sub> in the plant height (49.5 and 50.7 cm) in vegetable mustard to the extent of 36.0% and 34.8% over control (T<sub>1</sub>) during year 2020&#x2013;2021 and 2021&#x2013;2022. Treatment T<sub>2</sub>, T<sub>3</sub>, T<sub>5,</sub> and T<sub>6</sub> found at par with treatment T<sub>4</sub> and significantly superior over T<sub>1</sub> for plant height. Similarly, T<sub>4</sub> asserting considerably (<italic>p</italic> &#x2264; 0.05) enhanced number of leaves per plant (15.0 and 15.5) and DMA (53.3 g and 54.5 g) at harvest over rest of the treatments and exhibited statistical parity with T<sub>6</sub> and T<sub>2</sub> during 2020&#x2013;2021 and 2021&#x2013;2022. Further treatment T<sub>3</sub> and T<sub>5</sub> also recorded significant superiority over T<sub>1</sub> for leaves per plant and DMA during year 2020&#x2013;2021 and 2021&#x2013;2022 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">
<bold>Figures&#xa0;2A&#x2013;C</bold>
</xref>).</p>
<fig id="f2" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;2</label>
<caption>
<p>Impact of enriched organic formulations on growth attributes of vegetable mustard: <bold>(A)</bold> plant height, <bold>(B)</bold> leaves per plant, and <bold>(C)</bold> dry matter accumulation during 2020&#x2013;2021 and 2021&#x2013;2022 at harvest. The data represent the mean values across treatments (T<sub>1</sub>&#x2013;T<sub>7</sub>) with error bars indicating standard deviation. Statistical significance was assessed using one-way ANOVA, with differences considered significant at <italic>p</italic> &#x2264; 0.05. Similar letter indicates the treatments are at par with each other at <italic>p</italic> &#x2264; 0.05.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-15-1398083-g002.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_1_3">
<title>Okra</title>
<p>Application of treatment T<sub>4</sub> significantly (<italic>p</italic> &#x2264; 0.05) enhanced the plant height (109.5 and 110.0 cm) and number of branches (2.7 and 2.8) at harvest over the control (T<sub>1</sub>) and exhibited statistical parity with remaining treatments during 2021 and 2022 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3">
<bold>Figures&#xa0;3A&#x2013;C</bold>
</xref>). Likewise, treatment T<sub>4</sub> recorded the maximum leaves at 60 DAS (27.0 and 27.9) over control to the tune of 40.6 and 36.8%, respectively, and exhibited statistically similarity with T<sub>6</sub> and T<sub>2</sub> during 2021 and 2022. Furthermore, treatment T<sub>4</sub> recorded maximum number of leaves per plant (27.0 and 27.9) and found at par with treatment T<sub>2</sub> and T<sub>6</sub> during 2020 and 2022 at 60 DAS. Treatment T<sub>2</sub> and T<sub>6</sub> also found at par with T<sub>3</sub> and T<sub>5</sub> for leaves per plant at 60 DAS during both the years. Treatment T<sub>1</sub> recorded lowest leaves per plant (19.2 and 20.4) and found at par with treatment T<sub>7</sub> during both the years of experiment.</p>
<fig id="f3" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;3</label>
<caption>
<p>Impact of enriched organic formulations on growth attributes of okra: <bold>(A)</bold> plant height, and <bold>(B)</bold> branches per plant, during 2021 and 2022 at harvest and <bold>(C)</bold> leaves per plant at 60 days after sowing. The data represent the mean values across treatments (T<sub>1</sub>&#x2013;T<sub>7</sub>) with error bars indicating standard deviation. Statistical significance was assessed using one-way ANOVA, with differences considered significant at <italic>p</italic> &#x2264; 0.05. Similar letter indicates the treatments are at par with each other at <italic>p</italic> &#x2264; 0.05.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-15-1398083-g003.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_2">
<title>Yield attributes and yield</title>
<sec id="s3_2_1">
<title>Pigeon pea</title>
<p>Significant variations were observed in pods per plant over control when applied with enriched organic formulations. The highest number of pods per plant was found with the application of T<sub>4</sub> (124.7 and 130.2), which recorded statistical parity with T<sub>6</sub> and T<sub>2</sub> during 2020 and 2021. The seeds per pod and 1000 grain weight did not vary noticeably with the use of different enriched organic formulations. Further, seed (1.89 and 1.97 t ha<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>) and stover (7.83 and 8.03 t ha<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>) yield was superior under T<sub>4</sub> being comparable to T<sub>6</sub> and T<sub>2</sub> exhibited significant increase of 41.8% and 42.0% higher seed yield over T<sub>1</sub> treatment (control) during 2020 and 2021, respectively. Treatment T<sub>5</sub> found at par with T<sub>7</sub> and recorded 23.0% and 21.6% higher seed yield and 20.3% and 18.9% stover yield compared to control treatment, respectively, during 2020 and 2021. Harvest index of pigeon pea recorded non substantial difference due to different enriched organic formulations as depicted in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f4">
<bold>Figures&#xa0;4A&#x2013;E</bold>
</xref>.</p>
<fig id="f4" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;4</label>
<caption>
<p>Impact of enriched organic formulations on yield attributes and yield of pigeon pea: <bold>(A)</bold> pods per plant, <bold>(B)</bold> seeds per pod, and <bold>(C)</bold> test weight, <bold>(D)</bold> Seed yield and <bold>(E)</bold> stover yield during 2020 and 2021 at harvest. The data represents the mean values across treatments (T<sub>1</sub>&#x2013;T<sub>7</sub>) with error bars indicating standard deviation. Statistical significance was assessed using one-way ANOVA, with differences considered significant at <italic>p</italic> &#x2264; 0.05. Similar letter indicates the treatments are at par with each other at <italic>p</italic> &#x2264; 0.05.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-15-1398083-g004.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_2_2">
<title>Vegetable mustard</title>
<p>In vegetable mustard, no significant variations were observed in leaf length and leaf with due to application of different treatments. The maximum leaf length and width were recorded under treatment T<sub>4</sub> followed by T<sub>2</sub> and T<sub>6</sub> treatments. Treatment T<sub>4</sub> was found comparable with T<sub>6</sub> and T<sub>2</sub> and demonstrated a significant (<italic>p</italic> &#x2264; 0.05) enhancement in green leaf yield (81.57 and 82.97 t ha<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>) of vegetable mustard to the tune of 60.3% and 61.7% during 2020&#x2013;2021 and 2021&#x2013;2022, respectively, over control treatment (T<sub>1</sub>). Similarly, application of T<sub>5</sub> results in 36.1% and 37.6% higher green leaf yield over control treatment (T<sub>1</sub>), respectively, during both the years (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f5">
<bold>Figures&#xa0;5A&#x2013;D</bold>
</xref>).</p>
<fig id="f5" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;5</label>
<caption>
<p>Impact of enriched organic formulations on yield attributes and yield of vegetable mustard: <bold>(A)</bold> leaf length, <bold>(B)</bold> leaf width, <bold>(C)</bold> leaf area, and <bold>(D)</bold> Green leaf yield during 2020&#x2013;2021 and 2021&#x2013;2022 at harvest. The data represents the mean values across treatments (T<sub>1</sub>&#x2013;T<sub>7</sub>) with error bars indicating standard deviation. Statistical significance was assessed using one way ANOVA, with differences considered significant at <italic>p</italic> &#x2264; 0.05. Similar letter indicates the treatments are at par with each other at <italic>p</italic> &#x2264; 0.05.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-15-1398083-g005.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_2_3">
<title>Okra</title>
<p>In okra crop, yield attributes such as days to 50% flowering, days to first harvest, and average weight of fruit was found non-significantly different when applied with different enriched organic formulations. Yield attributing character, fruits per plant varied significantly (<italic>p</italic> &#x2264; 0.05) with the application of enriched organic formulations, demonstrated significantly higher values with T<sub>4</sub> (11.5 and 12.0) in contrast to control treatment (T<sub>1</sub>) during 2021 and 2022. This treatment exhibited statistically parity with T<sub>6</sub> and T<sub>2</sub> during the years 2021 and 2022. The okra fruit (13.54 and 13.78 t ha<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>) and stover yield (21.64 and 22.03 t ha<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>) was discerned significantly highest when subjected to treatment T<sub>4</sub> and this increase was found to be comparable to the yields achieved with T<sub>6</sub> and T<sub>2</sub> during both the years (2021 and 2022). Application of T<sub>4</sub> caused a notable augmentation of fruit yield by 58.6% during 2021 and 59.2% during 2022 over control. In addition, T<sub>5</sub> at parity with T<sub>7</sub> also registers 28.2 and 29.5% higher fruit yield over control, respectively, during both the years (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f6">
<bold>Figures&#xa0;6A&#x2013;F</bold>
</xref>).</p>
<fig id="f6" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;6</label>
<caption>
<p>Impact of enriched organic formulations on yield attributes and yield of okra: <bold>(A)</bold> pods per plant, <bold>(B)</bold> pod length, <bold>(C)</bold> fruits per plant, <bold>(D)</bold> average fruit weight, <bold>(E)</bold> fruit yield, and <bold>(F)</bold> stover yield during 2021 and 2022 at harvest. The data represent the mean values across treatments (T<sub>1</sub>&#x2013;T<sub>7</sub>) with error bars indicating standard deviation. Statistical significance was assessed using one-way ANOVA, with differences considered significant at <italic>p</italic> &#x2264; 0.05. Similar letter indicates the treatments are at par with each other at <italic>p</italic> &#x2264; 0.05.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-15-1398083-g006.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_3">
<title>Changes in soil physico-chemical and biological properties</title>
<p>No significant variation in the pH and BD was recorded when applied with different enriched organic formulations. However, lowest pH (7.73) and BD (1.48) were observed under the treatment T<sub>4</sub> and statistically comparable with other treatments. Similarly, lowest EC (0.328 ds m<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>) recorded under T<sub>4</sub> and found significantly superior over T<sub>5</sub>, T<sub>7,</sub> and T<sub>1</sub>. The treatment T<sub>4</sub> (53.7%) closely followed by T<sub>6</sub> (52.8%) and T<sub>2</sub> (52.5%) showed significant (<italic>p</italic>&#xa0;&#x2264; 0.05) supremacy in rising the water-stable aggregates in soil by 15.7% over treatment T<sub>1</sub> (control) as given in <xref ref-type="table" rid="T4">
<bold>Table&#xa0;4</bold>
</xref>. The status of TOC at the end of two-year cropping cycle was remained similar under all the enriched organic formulations. However, highest organic carbon was obtained under T<sub>4</sub> (0.41%) and lowest under control (0.37%).</p>
<table-wrap id="T4" position="float">
<label>Table&#xa0;4</label>
<caption>
<p>Effect of enriched organic formulations on soil physio-chemical properties, total organic carbon, MBC and microbial community composition in soil at the end of two-year cropping cycle.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" align="left">Treatment</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">pH</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">EC</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">B.D.<break/>(Mg m<sup>-3</sup>)</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">WSA (%)</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">TOC (%)</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">MBC<break/>(mg kg<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>)</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">Bacteria<break/>(&#xd7;10<sup>5</sup> cfu)</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">Fungi (&#xd7;10<sup>2</sup> cfu)</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">Actinomycetes (&#xd7;10<sup>2</sup> cfu)</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">T<sub>1</sub>: Control</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">7.98 &#xb1; 0.09<sup>b</sup>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">0.368 &#xb1; 0.01<sup>b</sup>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">1.54 &#xb1; 0.02<sup>d</sup>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">46.4 &#xb1; 0.01<sup>d</sup>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">0.37 &#xb1; 0.01<sup>c</sup>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">177.2 &#xb1; 4.0 <sup>d</sup>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">29.9 &#xb1; 1.0<sup>d</sup>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">14.8 &#xb1; 0.3<sup>c</sup>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">12.1 &#xb1; 0.2<sup>c</sup>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">T<sub>2</sub>: FYM</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">7.80 &#xb1; 0.16<sup>ab</sup>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">0.346 &#xb1; 0.01<sup>ab</sup>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">1.49 &#xb1; 0.02<sup>ab</sup>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">52.5 &#xb1; 0.01<sup>abc</sup>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">0.40 &#xb1; 0.01<sup>ab</sup>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">217.3 &#xb1; 2.6<sup>ab</sup>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">35.2 &#xb1; 1.2<sup>ab</sup>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">19.5 &#xb1; 1.1<sup>a</sup>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">16.6 &#xb1; 0.6<sup>a</sup>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">T<sub>3</sub>: Improved RRC</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">7.88 &#xb1; 0.11<sup>ab</sup>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">0.351 &#xb1; 0.02<sup>ab</sup>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">1.50 &#xb1; 0.01<sup>bc</sup>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">49.9 &#xb1; 0.02<sup>abcd</sup>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">0.39 &#xb1; 0.02<sup>abc</sup>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">208.0 &#xb1; 8.0<sup>bc</sup>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">33.4 &#xb1; 1.3<sup>bc</sup>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">17.4 &#xb1; 0.5<sup>b</sup>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">14.7 &#xb1; 0.2<sup>b</sup>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">T<sub>4</sub>: PHA-F (100% RDN)</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">7.73 &#xb1; 0.06<sup>a</sup>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">0.328 &#xb1; 0.01<sup>a</sup>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">1.48 &#xb1; 0.02<sup>a</sup>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">53.7 &#xb1; 0.01<sup>a</sup>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">0.41 &#xb1; 0.01<sup>a</sup>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">227.7 &#xb1; 3.6<sup>a</sup>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">36.2 &#xb1; 1.2<sup>a</sup>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">20.3 &#xb1; 0.7<sup>a</sup>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">17.5 &#xb1; 0.2<sup>a</sup>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">T<sub>5</sub>: PHA-F (75% RDN)</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">7.92 &#xb1; 0.05<sup>ab</sup>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">0.359 &#xb1; 0.01<sup>b</sup>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">1.51 &#xb1; 0.01<sup>c</sup>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">49.6 &#xb1; 0.02<sup>bcd</sup>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">0.39 &#xb1; 0.02<sup>abc</sup>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">199.6 &#xb1; 6.9<sup>c</sup>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">33.2 &#xb1; 0.6<sup>bc</sup>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">17.2 &#xb1; 0.4<sup>b</sup>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">14.5 &#xb1; 0.4<sup>b</sup>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">T<sub>6</sub>: PPC-F (100% RDN)</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">7.77 &#xb1; 0.07<sup>ab</sup>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">0.341 &#xb1; 0.01<sup>ab</sup>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">1.49 &#xb1; 0.02<sup>ab</sup>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">52.8 &#xb1; 0.01<sup>ab</sup>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">0.40 &#xb1; 0.01<sup>ab</sup>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">220.2 &#xb1; 11.3<sup>ab</sup>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">35.5 &#xb1; 0.6<sup>ab</sup>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">19.7 &#xb1; 0.6<sup>a</sup>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">16.8 &#xb1; 0.6<sup>a</sup>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">T<sub>7</sub>: PPC-F (75% RDN)</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">7.93 &#xb1; 0.12<sup>ab</sup>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">0.364 &#xb1; 0.01<sup>b</sup>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">1.52 &#xb1; 0.02<sup>cd</sup>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">48.8 &#xb1; 0.01<sup>cd</sup>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">0.38 &#xb1; 0.01<sup>bc</sup>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">193.5 &#xb1; 4.4<sup>cd</sup>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">32.5 &#xb1; 1.2<sup>cd</sup>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">16.4 &#xb1; 0.4<sup>b</sup>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">13.7 &#xb1; 0.7<sup>b</sup>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">LSD (<italic>p</italic> &#x2264; 0.05)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">NS</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.024</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">NS</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">3.6</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">NS</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">15.0</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">2.4</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">1.4</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">1.1</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<p>NS indicate treatment is non-significant.</p>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<p>Significant variation in MBC, total organic carbon (TOC), and microbial population in soil after completion of two-years cropping cycle had been observed under different enriched organic formulations as depicted in <xref ref-type="table" rid="T4">
<bold>Table&#xa0;4</bold>
</xref>. Application of treatment T<sub>4</sub> registered significantly (<italic>p</italic> &#x2264; 0.05) highest value of MBC (227.7 &#xb5;g C g<sup>&#x2212;1</sup> soil) to the extent of 28.5% over control followed by T<sub>6</sub> (220.2 &#xb5;g C g<sup>&#x2212;1</sup> soil) and T<sub>2</sub> (217.3 &#xb5;g C g<sup>&#x2212;1</sup> soil) at the end of two-year cropping cycle. Furthermore, treatment T<sub>4</sub> demonstrated significantly (<italic>p</italic> &#x2264; 0.05) higher population counts of bacteria (36.2 &#xd7;10<sup>5</sup> cfu), fungi (20.3 &#xd7;10<sup>2</sup> cfu), and actinomycetes (17.5 &#xd7; 10<sup>2</sup> cfu) followed by T<sub>6</sub> and T<sub>2</sub>. Treatment T<sub>4</sub> recorded an increase of 21.1% population counts of bacteria, 37.2% counts of fungi, and 44.6% counts of actinomycetes over control at the end of two years cropping cycle. However, the lowest microbial population counts of bacteria (29.9 &#xd7;10<sup>5</sup> cfu), fungi (14.8 &#xd7;10<sup>2</sup> cfu), and actinomycetes (12.1 &#xd7;10<sup>2</sup> cfu) was found under control treatment (T<sub>1</sub>).</p>
<p>Application of all enriched organic formulations improved the soil DHA and AP by 11.6%&#x2013;43.8% and 9.9%&#x2013;45.6% relative to the control at 50% flowering stage in all the crops. Treatment T<sub>4</sub> performed equivalently to T<sub>6</sub> and T<sub>2</sub> exhibited significantly (<italic>p</italic> &#x2264; 0.05) heightened activity of dehydrogenase (210.1 and 207.8 &#x3bc;g TPF g<sup>&#x2212;1</sup> soil day<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>) in pigeon pea, (206.4 and 208.4 &#x3bc;g TPF g<sup>&#x2212;1</sup> soil day<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>) in vegetable mustard and (204.0 and 206.7 &#x3bc;g TPF g<sup>&#x2212;1</sup> soil day<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>) in okra over control treatment (T<sub>1</sub>). The AP (80.2 and 82.4 &#x3bc;g PNP g<sup>&#x2212;1</sup> soil hr<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>) in pigeon pea, (76.9 and 81.3 &#x3bc;g PNP g<sup>&#x2212;1</sup> soil hr<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>) in veg mustard, and (84.1 and 89.2 &#x3bc;g PNP g<sup>&#x2212;1</sup> soil hr<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>) in okra found significantly higher in treatment T<sub>4</sub>, which was comparable with Treatment T<sub>6</sub> and T<sub>2</sub> in soil at 50% flowering of all the crops in comparison to control at both the years (2020&#x2013;2021 and 2022). The lowest values of DHA were recorded in pigeon pea (149.4 &#xb1; 4.8 and 149.6 &#xb1; 3.6 &#x3bc;g TPF g<sup>&#x2212;1</sup> soil day<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>), vegetable mustard (147.4 &#xb1; 4.3 and 145.6 &#xb1; 4.1 &#x3bc;g TPF g<sup>&#x2212;1</sup> soil day<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>) and okra (145.1 &#xb1; 6.0 and 143.7 &#xb1; 3.7 &#x3bc;g TPF g<sup>&#x2212;1</sup> soil day<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>) under treatment T<sub>1</sub>. Similarly, the lowest values of AP were recorded in pigeon pea (58.4 &#xb1; 1.9 and 60.8 &#xb1; 1.8 &#x3bc;g TPF g<sup>&#x2212;1</sup> soil day<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>), vegetable mustard (56.4 &#xb1; 2.0 and 57.3 &#xb1; 4.7 &#x3bc;g TPF g<sup>&#x2212;1</sup> soil day<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>) and okra (54.7 &#xb1; 1.7 and 55.0 &#xb1; 4.3 &#x3bc;g TPF g<sup>&#x2212;1</sup> soil day<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>) under treatment T<sub>1</sub> (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T5">
<bold>Table&#xa0;5</bold>
</xref>).</p>
<table-wrap id="T5" position="float">
<label>Table&#xa0;5</label>
<caption>
<p>Effect of enriched organic formulations on soil DHA and AP phosphatase activity at 50% flowering of pigeon pea&#x2013;veg mustard&#x2013;okra cropping system.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" rowspan="3" align="left">Treatment</th>
<th valign="top" colspan="6" align="center">DHA (&#x3bc;g TPF g<sup>&#x2212;1</sup> soil day<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>)</th>
<th valign="top" colspan="6" align="center">AP (&#x3bc;g PNP g<sup>&#x2212;1</sup> soil hr<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>)</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="top" colspan="2" align="center">Pigeon pea</th>
<th valign="top" colspan="2" align="center">Veg mustard</th>
<th valign="top" colspan="2" align="center">Okra</th>
<th valign="top" colspan="2" align="center">Pigeon pea</th>
<th valign="top" colspan="2" align="center">Veg mustard</th>
<th valign="top" colspan="2" align="center">Okra</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="top" align="center">2020</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">2021</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">2020&#x2013;2021</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">2021&#x2013;2022</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">2021</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">2022</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">2020</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">2021</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">2020&#x2013;2021</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">2021&#x2013;2022</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">2021</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">2022</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">T<sub>1</sub>: Control</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">149.4 &#xb1; 4.8<sup>d</sup>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">149.6 &#xb1; 3.6<sup>d</sup>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">147.0 &#xb1; 4.3<sup>c</sup>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">145.8 &#xb1; 4.1<sup>e</sup>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">145.1 &#xb1; 6.0<sup>c</sup>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">143.7 &#xb1; 3.7<sup>e</sup>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">58.4 &#xb1; 1.9<sup>e</sup>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">60.8 &#xb1; 1.8<sup>d</sup>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">56.4 &#xb1; 2.0<sup>e</sup>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">57.3 &#xb1; 4.7<sup>d</sup>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">54.7 &#xb1; 1.7<sup>d</sup>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">55.0 &#xb1; 4.3<sup>d</sup>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">T<sub>2</sub>: FYM</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">196.6 &#xb1; 9.8<sup>ab</sup>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">198.6 &#xb1; 6.1<sup>a</sup>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">194.6 &#xb1; 7.7<sup>a</sup>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">197.7 &#xb1; 4.8<sup>b</sup>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">191.5 &#xb1; 5.8<sup>a</sup>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">194.3 &#xb1; 3.4<sup>b</sup>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">75.1 &#xb1; 3.0<sup>ab</sup>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">78.0 &#xb1; 2.0<sup>a</sup>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">72.8 &#xb1; 2.5<sup>ab</sup>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">76.8 &#xb1; 2.1<sup>a</sup>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">70.8 &#xb1; 2.0<sup>a</sup>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">75.5 &#xb1; 1.0<sup>a</sup>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">T<sub>3</sub>: Improved RRC</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">182.6 &#xb1; 5.8<sup>bc</sup>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">182.3 &#xb1; 4.4<sup>b</sup>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">180.2 &#xb1; 5.5<sup>b</sup>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">179.1 &#xb1; 4.9<sup>c</sup>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">177.4 &#xb1; 6.4<sup>b</sup>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">177.1 &#xb1; 6.5<sup>c</sup>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">70.6 &#xb1; 0.5<sup>bc</sup>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">72.9 &#xb1; 1.5<sup>b</sup>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">68.6 &#xb1; 0.4<sup>bc</sup>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">70.3 &#xb1; 1.9<sup>b</sup>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">66.5 &#xb1; 1.1<sup>b</sup>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">68.6 &#xb1; 2.2<sup>b</sup>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">T<sub>4</sub>: PHA-F (100% RDN)</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">210.1 &#xb1; 4.9<sup>a</sup>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">207.8 &#xb1; 2.0<sup>a</sup>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">206.4 &#xb1; 3.9<sup>a</sup>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">208.4 &#xb1; 4.0<sup>a</sup>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">204.0 &#xb1; 4.5<sup>a</sup>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">206.7 &#xb1; 3.5<sup>a</sup>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">80.2 &#xb1; 2.4<sup>a</sup>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">82.4 &#xb1; 1.7<sup>a</sup>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">76.9 &#xb1; 0.7<sup>a</sup>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">81.3 &#xb1; 1.3<sup>a</sup>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">74.9 &#xb1; 1.8<sup>a</sup>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">80.1 &#xb1; 0.6<sup>a</sup>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">T<sub>5</sub>: PHA-F (75% RDN)</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">177.9 &#xb1; 4.6<sup>c</sup>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">181.6 &#xb1; 4.5<sup>b</sup>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">176.3 &#xb1; 3.3<sup>b</sup>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">178.6 &#xb1; 4.7<sup>c</sup>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">173.8 &#xb1; 4.4<sup>b</sup>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">176.7 &#xb1; 4.6<sup>c</sup>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">69.0 &#xb1; 1.9<sup>cd</sup>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">72.1 &#xb1; 1.8<sup>b</sup>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">67.0 &#xb1; 2.5<sup>c</sup>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">69.9 &#xb1; 1.6<sup>b</sup>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">65.0 &#xb1; 2.0<sup>b</sup>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">68.3 &#xb1; 2.1<sup>b</sup>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">T<sub>6</sub>: PPC-F (100% RDN)</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">199.8 &#xb1; 11.6<sup>a</sup>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">199.3 &#xb1; 7.8<sup>a</sup>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">196.5 &#xb1; 9.8<sup>a</sup>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">198.0 &#xb1; 6.6<sup>b</sup>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">193.4 &#xb1; 9.5<sup>a</sup>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">193.2 &#xb1; 10.5<sup>b</sup>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">76.4 &#xb1; 2.4<sup>a</sup>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">78.8 &#xb1; 2.7<sup>a</sup>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">74.0 &#xb1; 2.6<sup>a</sup>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">77.4 &#xb1; 2.7<sup>a</sup>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">71.9 &#xb1; 3.0<sup>a</sup>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">75.9 &#xb1; 2.1<sup>a</sup>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">T<sub>7</sub>: PPC-F (75% RDN)</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">168.8 &#xb1; 2.7<sup>c</sup>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">166.9 &#xb1; 1.3<sup>c</sup>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">166.5 &#xb1; 2.3<sup>b</sup>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">162.9 &#xb1; 1.2<sup>d</sup>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">163.7 &#xb1; 2.7<sup>b</sup>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">160.5 &#xb1; 1.7<sup>d</sup>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">64.5 &#xb1; 3.1<sup>d</sup>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">65.9 &#xb1; 1.7<sup>c</sup>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">62.0 &#xb1; 0.9<sup>d</sup>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">62.3 &#xb1; 1.6<sup>c</sup>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">60.5 &#xb1; 0.6<sup>c</sup>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">60.8 &#xb1; 1.8<sup>c</sup>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">LSD (<italic>p</italic> &#x2264; 0.05)</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">16.0</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">10.5</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">13.3</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">9.9</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">13.7</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">12.0</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">5.3</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">4.5</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">4.3</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">4.8</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">4.1</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">5.2</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<p>Similar letter indicates the treatments are at par with each other at <italic>p</italic> &#x2264; 0.05.</p>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<p>The mineral nitrogen (NH<sub>4</sub>-N and NO<sub>3</sub>-N) content in soil at harvest of crops under various enriched organic formulations are depicted in <xref ref-type="table" rid="T6">
<bold>Table&#xa0;6</bold>
</xref>. Among these formulations, treatment T<sub>4</sub> demonstrated significantly (<italic>p</italic> &#x2264; 0.05) higher values of NH<sub>4</sub>-N (10.2 &#xb1; 0.3 and 10.4 &#xb1; 0.2 mg kg<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>) and NO<sub>3</sub>-N (18.6 &#xb1; 0.8 and 20.4 &#xb1; 0.7 mg kg<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>) content in soil after harvest of okra followed by application of T<sub>6</sub> (9.9 &#xb1; 0.3 and 9.9 &#xb1; 0.3 mg kg<sup>&#x2212;1</sup> NH<sub>4</sub>-N and 18.1 &#xb1; 0.1 and 19.8 &#xb1; 0.6 mg kg<sup>&#x2212;1</sup> NO<sub>3</sub>-N) and T<sub>2</sub> (9.7 &#xb1; 0.2 and 9.8 &#xb1; 0.1 mg kg<sup>&#x2212;1</sup> NH<sub>4</sub>-N and 17.9 &#xb1; 0.3 and 19.7 &#xb1; 0.5 mg kg<sup>&#x2212;1</sup> NO<sub>3</sub>-N) and consequently this treatment was superior over rest of the treatments with respective increase of NH<sub>4</sub>-N by 72.9% and 112.2%, NO<sub>3</sub>-N by 124.1% and 158.2% over control treatment (T<sub>1</sub>).</p>
<table-wrap id="T6" position="float">
<label>Table&#xa0;6</label>
<caption>
<p>Effect of enriched organic formulations on soil NH<sub>4</sub>-N and NO<sub>3</sub>-N, available N, P, and K status of soil at harvest of pigeon pea&#x2013;veg mustard&#x2013;okra cropping system.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" rowspan="2" align="left">Treatment</th>
<th valign="top" colspan="2" align="center">Soil NH<sub>4</sub>-N (mg kg<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>)</th>
<th valign="top" colspan="2" align="center">Soil NO<sub>3</sub>-N (mg kg<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>)</th>
<th valign="top" colspan="2" align="center">Available N (kg ha<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>)</th>
<th valign="top" colspan="2" align="center">Available P (kg ha<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>)</th>
<th valign="top" colspan="2" align="center">Available K (kg ha<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>)</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="top" align="center">2020&#x2013;21</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">2021&#x2013;22</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">2020&#x2013;21</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">2021&#x2013;22</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">2020&#x2013;21</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">2021&#x2013;22</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">2020&#x2013;21</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">2021&#x2013;22</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">2020&#x2013;21</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">2021&#x2013;22</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">T<sub>1</sub>: Control</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">5.9 &#xb1; 0.2<sup>d</sup>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">4.9 &#xb1; 0.2<sup>d</sup>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">8.3 &#xb1; 0.3<sup>d</sup>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">7.9 &#xb1; 0.3<sup>d</sup>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">199.9 &#xb1; 3.1<sup>d</sup>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">192.9 &#xb1; 2.3<sup>d</sup>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">10.6 &#xb1; 0.4 <sup>ac</sup>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">9.6 &#xb1; 0.5<sup>e</sup>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">230.3 &#xb1; 5.4<sup>c</sup>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">224.1 &#xb1; 4.7<sup>d</sup>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">T<sub>2</sub>: FYM</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">9.7 &#xb1; 0.2<sup>a</sup>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">9.8 &#xb1; 0.1<sup>a</sup>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">17.9 &#xb1; 0.3<sup>a</sup>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">19.7 &#xb1; 0.5<sup>a</sup>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">222.4 &#xb1; 2.8<sup>abc</sup>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">222.4 &#xb1; 3.4<sup>ab</sup>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">15.0 &#xb1; 0.3<sup>b</sup>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">14.6 &#xb1; 0.2<sup>bc</sup>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">243.3 &#xb1; 4.9<sup>bc</sup>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">244.9 &#xb1; 4.4<sup>bc</sup>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">T<sub>3</sub>: Improved RRC</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">8.8 &#xb1; 0.2<sup>b</sup>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">8.9 &#xb1; 0.1<sup>b</sup>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">15.6 &#xb1; 0.5<sup>b</sup>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">17.1 &#xb1; 0.1<sup>b</sup>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">216.3 &#xb1; 4.1<sup>abc</sup>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">216.4 &#xb1; 2.6<sup>abc</sup>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">14.0 &#xb1; 0.8<sup>b</sup>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">13.7 &#xb1; 0.6<sup>cd</sup>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">262.2 &#xb1; 8.0<sup>a</sup>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">263.7 &#xb1; 8.6<sup>a</sup>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">T<sub>4</sub>: PHA-F (100% RDN)</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">10.2 &#xb1; 0.3<sup>a</sup>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">10.4 &#xb1; 0.2<sup>a</sup>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">18.6 &#xb1; 0.8<sup>a</sup>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">20.4 &#xb1; 0.7<sup>a</sup>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">224.9 &#xb1; 7.8<sup>ab</sup>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">225.8 &#xb1; 7.2<sup>ab</sup>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">15.6 &#xb1; 0.2<sup>a</sup>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">15.6 &#xb1; 0.5<sup>a</sup>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">255.2 &#xb1; 12.9<sup>ab</sup>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">256.6 &#xb1; 12.1<sup>ab</sup>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">T<sub>5</sub>: PHA-F (75% RDN)</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">8.7 &#xb1; 0.5<sup>b</sup>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">8.8 &#xb1; 0.5<sup>b</sup>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">15.3 &#xb1; 0.3<sup>b</sup>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">16.9 &#xb1; 0.4<sup>b</sup>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">213.0 &#xb1; 5.9<sup>c</sup>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">210.3 &#xb1; 6.2<sup>c</sup>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">13.9 &#xb1; 0.1<sup>b</sup>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">13.5 &#xb1; 0.1<sup>d</sup>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">243.0 &#xb1; 6.2<sup>bc</sup>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">244.7 &#xb1; 4.5<sup>bc</sup>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">T<sub>6</sub>: PPC-F (100% RDN)</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">9.9 &#xb1; 0.3<sup>a</sup>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">9.9 &#xb1; 0.3<sup>a</sup>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">18.1 &#xb1; 0.1<sup>a</sup>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">19.8 &#xb1; 0.6<sup>a</sup>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">227.2 &#xb1; 2.3<sup>a</sup>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">227.3 &#xb1; 4.1<sup>a</sup>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">15.1 &#xb1; 0.4<sup>a</sup>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">14.8 &#xb1; 0.4<sup>ab</sup>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">247.3 &#xb1; 6.1<sup>abc</sup>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">251.1 &#xb1; 5.1<sup>abc</sup>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">T<sub>7</sub>: PPC-F (75% RDN)</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">7.4 &#xb1; 0.2<sup>c</sup>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">7.4 &#xb1; 0.1<sup>c</sup>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">14.0 &#xb1; 0.2<sup>c</sup>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">15.8 &#xb1; 0.3<sup>c</sup>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">215.1 &#xb1; 4.2<sup>ab</sup>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">215.1 &#xb1; 4.9<sup>bc</sup>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">13.4 &#xb1; 0.4<sup>b</sup>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">13.6 &#xb1; 0.5<sup>d</sup>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">237.4 &#xb1; 5.3<sup>bc</sup>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">238.1 &#xb1; 4.2<sup>cd</sup>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">LSD (<italic>p</italic> &#x2264; 0.05)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.7</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.6</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.0</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.1</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">10.9</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">10.7</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.8</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.9</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">17.2</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">15.5</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<p>Similar letter indicates the treatments are at par with each other at <italic>p</italic> &#x2264; 0.05.</p>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<p>The availability of soil N, P, and K varied substantially under different enriched organic formulations compared to control treatment (T<sub>1</sub>) after harvest of pigeon pea-vegetable mustard-okra cropping system as depicted in <xref ref-type="table" rid="T6">
<bold>Table&#xa0;6</bold>
</xref>. Application of T<sub>6</sub> demonstrated substantially (<italic>p</italic> &#x2264; 0.05) enhanced amount of available N in soil after harvest of okra (227.2 &#xb1; 2.3 and 227.3 &#xb1; 4.1 kg ha<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>) crop over T<sub>1</sub> treatment (199.9 &#xb1; 3.1 and 192.9 &#xb1; 2.3 kg ha<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>) and the extent of increase was 13.7% during first year and 17.8% during second year and exhibited statistically parity with other organic formulations. Application of T<sub>4</sub> being comparable to T<sub>6</sub> and T<sub>2</sub> observed greater amount of available P (15.6 &#xb1; 0.2 and 15.6 &#xb1; 0.5 kg ha<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>) in soil after harvest of okra crop and found significantly (<italic>p</italic> &#x2264; 0.05) superior over T<sub>3</sub> (14.0 &#xb1; 0.8 and 13.7 &#xb1; 0.6 kg ha<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>), T<sub>5</sub> (13.9 &#xb1; 0.1 and 13.5 &#xb1; 0.1 kg ha<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>), T<sub>7</sub> (13.4 &#xb1; 0.4 and 13.6 &#xb1; 0.5 kg ha<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>), and control (10.6 &#xb1; 0.4 and 9.6 &#xb1; 0.5 kg ha<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>) by 11.4%, 12.2%, 16.4%, and 47.2% during first year and 13.9%, 15.6%, 14.7%, and 62.5% during second year respectively. Furthermore, treatment T<sub>3</sub> (262.2 &#xb1; 8.0 and 263.7 &#xb1; 8.6 kg ha<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>) remaining on par with T<sub>4</sub> (255.2 &#xb1; 12.9 and 256.6 &#xb1; 12.1 kg ha<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>) and T<sub>6</sub> (247.3 &#xb1; 6.1 and 251.1 &#xb1; 5.1 kg ha<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>) exhibited a noteworthy increment in available K content in soil over control by 13.9% during 2020&#x2013;21 and 17.7% during 2021&#x2013;22 after harvest of okra crop. Further, the apparent N budget showed that the highest negative N balance under control treatment (T<sub>1</sub>) after completion of two cropping cycles. Among the treatments applied with enriched organic formulations, T<sub>4</sub> and T<sub>6</sub> recorded a negative balance of 46.4 and 31.2 kg N ha<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>, respectively, after completion of experiment. The treatment T<sub>3</sub> showed maximum positive balance of 98.9 kg N ha<sup>&#x2212;1</sup> followed by treatment T<sub>5</sub> and T<sub>7</sub> (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Supplementary Table&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>).</p>
<sec id="s3_3_1">
<title>Correlation between organic carbon added and soil parameters at the end of two cropping cycles</title>
<p>The correlation analysis depicted in the matrix plot (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f7">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;7</bold>
</xref>; <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Supplementary Table&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>) revealed notable positive associations (&gt; 0.822) between the amount of organic carbon added through enriched formulations and the TOC content measured at harvest. Similarly, strong positive correlations (<italic>r</italic> &gt; 0.811) were observed between the added organic carbon and MBC and microbial counts. Furthermore, substantial positive relationships (<italic>r</italic> &gt; 0.731) were identified between the added organic carbon, TOC, MBC, microbial counts, and nutrient availability measured at the conclusion of two cropping cycles. These findings highlight the interconnected nature of organic carbon inputs and various soil parameters, emphasizing their influence on soil carbon content, microbial activity, and nutrient availability over the experimental period.</p>
<fig id="f7" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;7</label>
<caption>
<p>Correlation matrix of organic carbon added via enriched formulations with total organic carbon, microbial population, and nutrient availability in soil at the end of two cropping cycles.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-15-1398083-g007.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s4" sec-type="discussion">
<title>Discussion</title>
<p>In present study, the impact of enriched organic formulations on growth parameters was discernible at later stages of crop growth contrast to the treatment T<sub>1</sub> in both 2020 and 2021. The heightened growth observed in the treatment T<sub>4</sub> can be attributed to escalated activities of beneficial microorganisms, facilitated by the augmented organic pool in the soil resulting from the application of nutrient sources in pigeon pea&#x2013;vegetable mustard&#x2013;okra cropping system. Moreover, the improved growth observed in treatments T<sub>2</sub> and T<sub>6</sub> can be attributed to the beneficial effects of organic sources. These effects are likely due to the impact of soil organic matter (SOM), which enhances the physical, chemical, and biological properties of the soil, creating a favorable environment for better plant growth in pigeon pea&#x2013;vegetable mustard-okra cropping system. Furthermore, the presence of humic acids released during the decomposition of organic materials enhances the availability of soil nutrients, leading to improved growth parameters (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">Tiwari et&#xa0;al., 2023</xref>).</p>
<p>Yield attributes are mainly influenced by genetic characteristics of varieties and environmental factors. Treatment T<sub>4</sub> recorded highest increase in yield attributes and yield (seed and stover) comparable to T<sub>6</sub> and T<sub>2</sub> over treatment T<sub>1</sub> during 2020&#x2013;2021 and 2021&#x2013;2022, respectively. Organic manures serve as a reservoir of nutrients, producing organic acids during decomposition. These acids gradually release absorbed ions throughout the crop&#x2019;s entire growth cycle, leading to improved yield attributes and yield under pigeon pea&#x2013;vegetable mustard&#x2013;okra cropping system. Additionally, the increase in yield attributes observed in treatment, T<sub>2</sub>, T<sub>4</sub>, and T<sub>6</sub> can be attributed to an increase in photosynthetic area, DMA and translocation of photosynthates toward sink tissues. The significant improvement in seed and stover yield resulting from the use of organic nutrient sources could be attributed their beneficial impact on yield attributes and their combined influence, which primarily contribute to enhanced productivity. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">Pradeep et&#xa0;al. (2018)</xref> reported increased yield attributing characters in pigeon pea when supplemented with 100% RDN through vermi-compost (2 t ha<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>) along with FYM @7.5 t ha<sup>&#x2212;1</sup> as compared to other treatments. Findings of study done by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Jakhro et&#xa0;al. (2017)</xref> reported that 75 kg N + 6 tons FYM ha<sup>&#x2212;1</sup> resulted in higher fresh weight per plant, leaf length, and leaf yield of spinach over control. In current study, no significant difference was observed in pH and BD, but the lowest pH and BD were observed under T<sub>4</sub> treatment and noticeably comparable to other treatments applied with difference enriched organic formulations. The reduction in pH caused by addition of organic manure might be due to production of organic acid during breakdown of SOM, which dissolves native salts. In treatments applied with enriched organic formulations recorded increase in BD and water-stable aggregates. The use of organic nutrient sources resulted in a decrease in BD due to increased soil organic carbon (SOC) content and enhanced root biomass. The positive effects of certain polysaccharides formed during the breakdown of organic waste by microbial activity as well as the cementing action of bacteria and fungi may be the cause of rise in water-stable aggregates in the FYM treated plot. This, in turn, facilitated improved soil aeration and better soil aggregation. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">Nandapure et&#xa0;al. (2011)</xref> reported that FYM application @5t ha<sup>&#x2212;1</sup> in sorghum-wheat cropping system recorded enhanced percentage of WSAs by 11.1% than unfertilized control plot. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">Gupta et&#xa0;al. (2012)</xref> also observed that FYM use @5t ha<sup>&#x2212;1</sup> did not bring substantial difference in pH and EC of soil and remain at par with remaining treatments after complete rotation of maize-wheat cropping system.</p>
<p>Treatment T<sub>4</sub> registered significantly (<italic>p</italic> &#x2264; 0.05) highest value of MBC to the extent of 28.5% over control (T<sub>1</sub>) and found at par with T<sub>6</sub> and T<sub>2</sub> at the end of two-year cropping cycle. The addition of readily decomposable carbon sources act as important sources of energy to carry out the activities of microorganisms, soil enzymes, and MBC. The increase in MBC in treatment T<sub>4</sub>, T<sub>6,</sub> and T<sub>2</sub> may be attributed to application of organic carbon through enriched organic formulations. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Almeida et&#xa0;al. (2011)</xref> found that adding organic carbon to the soil from nutrient sources was closely linked to increased microbial and enzymatic activity, showing a positive relationship with MBC. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">Kaur et&#xa0;al. (2005)</xref> reported that organic manures promotes the MBC in soil whereas, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">Gong et&#xa0;al. (2009)</xref> found an increase in enzymatic activities due to addition of organic manures as compared to mineral fertilizers. The status of SOC at the end of two cropping cycle was remained non-significant under all the treatments. However, highest organic carbon was obtained under T<sub>4</sub> (0.41%) due to increase application of organic carbon through application of enriched organic formulations. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">Gupta et&#xa0;al. (2012)</xref> reported that FYM application @ 5 t ha<sup>&#x2212;1</sup> did not bring substantial variation in SOC and exhibiting statistical parity with remaining treatments at the end of maize&#x2013;wheat cropping system. The DHA and AP activity was recorded significantly superior in all the treatment applied with enriched organic formulations over control (T<sub>1</sub>) in all the crops. The highest DHA and AP values were recorded in T<sub>4</sub>, which was comparable with T<sub>2</sub> and T<sub>6</sub>. The activities of DHA and AP were significantly affected by the amount of organic matter added to soils through various applications: 100% RDN via PHA/PPC-based formulation, 100% RDN via FYM, 100% RRC, and 75% RDN via PHA/PPC-based formulation. These formulations contain easily decomposable organic carbon components that exert a significant impact on the metabolic activity of soil microorganisms, resulting in enhanced DHA and AP activity in the soil. Applying organic source of nutrients improved the organic carbon which was correlated with higher enzymatic activity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Mandal et&#xa0;al., 2007</xref>).</p>
<p>Among different formulations, treatment T<sub>4</sub> demonstrated significant (<italic>p</italic> &#x2264; 0.05) increased values of NH<sub>4</sub>-N and NO<sub>3</sub>-N content in soil over control (T<sub>1</sub>) after harvest of okra during 2020&#x2013;21 and 2021&#x2013;22 and also found on par with treatment T<sub>6</sub> and T<sub>2</sub>. The higher mineral nitrogen content in soil under different treatment compared to control (T<sub>1</sub>) may be due to enhanced rate of SOM mineralization in the soil which was further enhanced by the addition of enriched organic formulation, resulted in build-up of NH<sub>4</sub>-N and NO<sub>3</sub>-N in soil. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">Bhardwaj et&#xa0;al. (2023)</xref> reported that addition of organic manure along with fertilizers enhance the mineralization thereby increase the NH<sub>4</sub>-N and NO<sub>3</sub>-N in soil.</p>
<p>All the treatment with enriched organic formulations showed parity among each for available soil nutrient content and found significantly superior over control (T<sub>1</sub>). Treatment T<sub>6</sub> demonstrated significantly (<italic>p</italic> &#x2264; 0.05) highest amount of available N in soil after harvest of okra crop over control (T<sub>1</sub>). The increased availability of nitrogen in the soil could be attributed to the favorable soil conditions fostered by the use of enriched organic formulations. These conditions likely facilitated nitrogen mineralization, resulting in higher accumulation of available nitrogen. The addition of organic matter through enriched organic formulations increased Olsen-P due to its P content and perhaps by enhancing P retention in soil through release of different organic acids and CO<sub>2</sub> during the decomposition of SOM. Further, enriched organic formulations increased soil cation exchange capacity and decreased K fixation in soil, the increase in available K under these treatments was attributed to higher release of non-exchangeable K from the soils. The direct introduction of N, P, and K either independently or through the simultaneous application of organic nutrient sources contributes to an active soil pool, resulting in increased overall N availability as well as enhanced availability of N, phosphorus P, and K in the soil (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">Babu et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">Nima et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>). Further, the apparent N budget showed that the highest negative N balance under control treatment (T<sub>1</sub>) after completion of two cropping cycles due to no application of any fertilizer or organic source of nutrient. Among the treatments applied with enriched organic formulations, T<sub>4</sub> and T<sub>6</sub> recorded an apparent negative balance of 46.4 and 31.2 kg N ha<sup>&#x2212;1</sup> respectively which might be attributed to increased nutrient uptake and enhanced yield. The treatment T<sub>3</sub> showed maximum positive balance of 98.9 kg N ha<sup>&#x2212;1</sup> followed by treatment T<sub>5</sub> and T<sub>7</sub> which could be attributed to lower yield and nutrient uptake comparison to treatment T<sub>4</sub> and T<sub>6</sub>.</p>
<p>In our study, correlation analysis showed that the relationships between organic carbon additions, soil properties, microbial biomass, and nutrient availability. The findings from this analysis provide valuable insights into the impact of organic inputs on soil health and nutrient dynamics. Firstly, we observed significant positive correlations (&gt; 0.822) between the amount of organic carbon added through enriched formulations and the TOC content at harvest. This suggests that the application of enriched organic materials contributes to an increase in SOC levels over the course of the cropping cycles. Secondly, strong positive associations (<italic>r</italic> &gt; 0.811) were identified between the added organic carbon and MBC and microbial counts. This indicates that the introduction of organic amendments promotes microbial activity in the soil. Furthermore, our analysis revealed substantial positive relationships (<italic>r</italic> &gt; 0.731) among organic carbon additions, TOC, MBC, microbial counts, and nutrient availability at the end of the two cropping cycles. These findings highlight the interconnected nature of soil parameters influenced by organic inputs, suggesting that enriched organic formulations can positively impact soil health and nutrient dynamics. Overall, these correlations underscore the importance of incorporating enriched organic materials in agricultural practices to promote soil carbon sequestration, microbial activity, and nutrient availability. The observed relationships provide scientific support for the use of sustainable organic amendments to optimize agricultural productivity and environmental stewardship.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s5" sec-type="conclusions">
<title>Conclusion</title>
<p>The application of 100% RDN through PHA and PPC based formulations proved to be optimal for achieving enhanced growth and yield in the pigeon pea&#x2013;vegetable mustard&#x2013;okra cropping system. These formulations exhibited comparable results to the traditional method of applying 100% RDN through FYM. Notably, the application of 100% RDN through PHA-based formulation emerged as particularly effective in enhancing soil quality. This effectiveness is evident in the significantly elevated activities of dehydrogenase and AP enzymes, increased nutrient availability in the soil, elevated SOC levels, improved soil aggregation, and enhanced MBC and microbial populations at the harvest of the pigeon pea-based cropping system. Consequently, these formulations are recommended for adoption in regions facing a shortage of FYM but having access to rice husk ash and potato peels, providing a sustainable solution for utilizing agricultural wastes and advancing agricultural sustainability. The findings underscore the potential of these formulations to contribute significantly to improved agricultural practices, offering a harmonious blend of environmental sustainability and enhanced food security in areas experiencing FYM scarcity.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s6" sec-type="data-availability">
<title>Data availability statement</title>
<p>The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Supplementary Material</bold>
</xref>. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s7" sec-type="author-contributions">
<title>Author contributions</title>
<p>KG: Investigation, Writing &#x2013; original draft, Formal analysis. SD: Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Supervision, Writing &#x2013; original draft, Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing, Project administration, Validation. VS: Formal analysis, Visualization, Writing &#x2013; original draft. EA: Visualization, Writing &#x2013; original draft. RM: Data curation, Writing &#x2013; original draft. MH: Formal analysis, Visualization, Writing &#x2013; original draft. DK: Formal analysis, Methodology, Writing &#x2013; original draft. GA: Data curation, Formal analysis, Writing &#x2013; original draft. VK: Formal analysis, Visualization, Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing. YK: Data curation, Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing. SA: Formal analysis, Writing &#x2013; original draft. SoK: Formal analysis, Writing &#x2013; original draft. HO: Formal analysis, Writing &#x2013; original draft. MT: Formal analysis, Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing. BM: Visualization, Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing, Formal analysis. BK: Data curation, Visualization, Writing &#x2013; original draft. VM: Formal analysis, Writing &#x2013; original draft. SaK: Data curation, Formal analysis, Methodology, Visualization, Writing &#x2013; original draft, Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing.</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<sec id="s8" sec-type="funding-information">
<title>Funding</title>
<p>The author(s) declare that no financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.</p>
</sec>
<ack>
<title>Acknowledgments</title>
<p>The authors are thankful to the Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR) and ICAR-Indian Agriculture Research Institute, New Delhi, India for providing the facility to carry out the present study.</p>
</ack>
<sec id="s9" sec-type="COI-statement">
<title>Conflict of interest</title>
<p>The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s10" sec-type="disclaimer">
<title>Publisher&#x2019;s note</title>
<p>All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s11" sec-type="supplementary-material">
<title>Supplementary material</title>
<p>The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2024.1398083/full#supplementary-material">https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2024.1398083/full#supplementary-material</ext-link>
</p>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="DataSheet_1.pdf" id="SM1" mimetype="application/pdf"/>
</sec>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="B1">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Adu-Gyamfi</surname> <given-names>J. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ito</surname> <given-names>O.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yoneyama</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Katayama</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1997</year>). <article-title>Nitrogen management and biological nitrogen fixation in sorghum/pigeonpea intercropping on Alfisols of the semi-arid tropics</article-title>. <source>Soil Sci. Plant Nutr.</source> <volume>43</volume>, <fpage>1061</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1066</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/00380768.1997.11863718</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Allen</surname> <given-names>O.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1958</year>). <article-title>Experiments in soil bacteriology</article-title>. <source>Soil Sci.</source> <volume>85</volume>, <fpage>172</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1097/00010694-195803000-00013</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Almeida</surname> <given-names>D. D. O.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Klauberg Filho</surname> <given-names>O.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Almeida</surname> <given-names>H. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gebler</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Felipe</surname> <given-names>A. F.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Soil microbial biomass under mulch types in an integrated apple orchard from Southern Brazil</article-title>. <source>Scientia Agricola</source> <volume>68</volume>, <fpage>217</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>222</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1590/S0103-90162011000200012</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ayilara</surname> <given-names>M. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Olanrewaju</surname> <given-names>O. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Babalola</surname> <given-names>O. O.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Odeyemi</surname> <given-names>O.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Waste management through composting: Challenges and potentials</article-title>. <source>Sustainability</source> <volume>12</volume>, <fpage>4456</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/su12114456</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Babu</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Singh</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Avasthe</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yadav</surname> <given-names>G. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Das</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Singh</surname> <given-names>V. K.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Impact of land configuration and organic nutrient management on productivity, quality and soil properties under baby corn in Eastern Himalayas</article-title>. <source>Sci. Rep.</source> <volume>10</volume>, <fpage>16129</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41598-020-73072-6</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Bhardwaj</surname> <given-names>A. K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Malik</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chejara</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rajwar</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Narjary</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chandra</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>Integration of organics in nutrient management for rice-wheat system improves nitrogen use efficiency via favorable soil biological and electrochemical responses</article-title>. <source>Front. Plant Sci.</source> <volume>13</volume>, <elocation-id>1075011</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpls.2022.1075011</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Bhattacharjya</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sahu</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Phalke</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Manna</surname> <given-names>M. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Thakur</surname> <given-names>J. K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mandal</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>
<italic>In situ</italic> decomposition of crop residues using lignocellulolytic microbial consortia: a viable alternative to residue burning</article-title>. <source>Environ. Sci. pollut. Res.</source> <volume>28</volume>, <fpage>32416</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>32433</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11356-021-12611-8</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Bhuvaneshwari</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hettiarachchi</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Meegoda</surname> <given-names>J. N.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Crop residue burning in India: policy challenges and potential solutions</article-title>. <source>Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health</source> <volume>16</volume>, <fpage>832</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/ijerph16050832</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Bodman</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1942</year>). <article-title>Nomograms for rapid calculation of soil density, water content, and total porosity relationships</article-title>. <source>J. Am. Soc. Agron.</source> <volume>34</volume>, <fpage>883</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>893</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2134/agronj1942.00021962003400100003x</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Bouyoucos</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1962</year>). <article-title>Hydrometer method improved for making particle size analyses of soils 1</article-title>. <source>J. Agron. J.</source> <volume>54</volume>, <fpage>464</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>465</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2134/agronj1962.00021962005400050028x</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Bremner</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Keeney</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1966</year>). <article-title>Determination and isotope-ratio analysis of different forms of nitrogen in soils: 3. Exchangeable ammonium, nitrate, and nitrite by extraction-distillation methods</article-title>. <source>Soil Sci. Soc. America J.</source> <volume>30</volume>, <fpage>577</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>582</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2136/sssaj1966.03615995003000050015x</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Casida</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
<suffix>Jr.</suffix>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Klein</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Santoro</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1964</year>). <article-title>Soil dehydrogenase activity</article-title>. <source>Soil Sci.</source> <volume>98</volume>, <fpage>371</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>376</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1097/00010694-196412000-00004</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Chatterjee</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gajjela</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Thirumdasu</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Recycling of organic wastes for sustainable soil health and crop growth</article-title>. <source>Int. J. Waste Resour.</source> <volume>7</volume>, <fpage>296</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>292</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4172/2252-5211</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>De</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>De</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Biswas</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kalaivanan</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). &#x201c;<article-title>Organic Plant Nutrient, Protection and Production Management</article-title>,&#x201d; in <source>Advances in Organic Farming</source> (<publisher-loc>Kidlington, UK</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Elsevier</publisher-name>), <fpage>115</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>131</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/B978-0-12-822358-1.00010-9</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ezejiofor</surname> <given-names>T. I. N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Enebaku</surname> <given-names>U. E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ogueke</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Waste to wealth-value recovery from agro-food processing wastes using biotechnology: a review</article-title>. <source>Br. Biotechnol. J.</source> <volume>4</volume>, <fpage>418</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.9734/BBJ</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Gomez</surname> <given-names>K. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gomez</surname> <given-names>A. A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1984</year>). <source>Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research</source> (<publisher-loc>New York</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>John wiley &amp; sons</publisher-name>).</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Gong</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yan</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hu</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gong</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>Long-term manure and fertilizer effects on soil organic matter fractions and microbes under a wheat&#x2013;maize cropping system in northern China</article-title>. <source>Geoderma</source> <volume>149</volume>, <fpage>318</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>324</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.geoderma.2008.12.010</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B18">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Gupta</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kumar</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sharma</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Singh</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kumar</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Legume intercropping and <italic>in-situ</italic> green manuring as well as FYM application in maize along with inorganic fertilizers in wheat for sustainability of maize-wheat system under rainfed conditions</article-title>. <source>Haryana J. Agron</source>. <volume>28</volume> (<issue>1&amp;2</issue>), <fpage>19</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>24</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B19">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Haynes</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1993</year>). <article-title>Effect of sample pretreatment on aggregate stability measured by wet sieving or turbidimetry on soils of different cropping history</article-title>. <source>J. Soil Sci.</source> <volume>44</volume>, <fpage>261</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>270</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1365-2389.1993.tb00450.x</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B20">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Imran</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sardar</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Khaliq</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Nawaz</surname> <given-names>M. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Shehzad</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ahmad</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Tailored bioactive compost from agri-waste improves the growth and yield of chili pepper and tomato</article-title>. <source>Front. Bioengineering Biotechnol.</source> <volume>9</volume>, <elocation-id>787764</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fbioe.2021.787764</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B21">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Jackson</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1973</year>). <source>Soil Chemical Analysis</source> Vol. <volume>498</volume> (<publisher-loc>New Delhi, India</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>, Pentice hall of India Pvt Ltd.</publisher-name>), <fpage>151</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>154</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B22">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Jakhro</surname> <given-names>M. I.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Shah</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Amanullah</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rahujo</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ahmed</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jakhro</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Growth and yield of spinach (Spinacia oleracia) under fluctuating levels of organic and inorganic fertilizers</article-title>. <source>Int. J. Dev. Res.</source> <volume>7</volume>, <fpage>11454</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>11460</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B23">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Joshi</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sethi</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Arora</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Azizi</surname> <given-names>A. F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Thippeswamy</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2020</year>). &#x201c;<article-title>Potato Peel Composition and Utilization</article-title>,&#x201d; in <source>Potato: Nutrition and Food Security</source>. Eds. <person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname>Raigond</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Singh</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dutt</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chakrabarti</surname> <given-names>S. K.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<publisher-name>Springer Singapore</publisher-name>, <publisher-loc>Singapore</publisher-loc>), <fpage>229</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>245</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B24">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kaur</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kapoor</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gupta</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2005</year>). <article-title>Impact of organic manures with and without mineral fertilizers on soil chemical and biological properties under tropical conditions</article-title>. <source>J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci.</source> <volume>168</volume>, <fpage>117</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>122</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/jpln.200421442</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B25">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Mandal</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Majumder</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bandyopadhyay</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hazra</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gangopadhyay</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Samantaray</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2007</year>). <article-title>The potential of cropping systems and soil amendments for carbon sequestration in soils under long-term experiments in subtropical India</article-title>. <source>Global Change Biol.</source> <volume>13</volume>, <fpage>357</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>369</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1365-2486.2006.01309.x</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B26">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Martin</surname> <given-names>J. P.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1950</year>). <article-title>Use of acid, rose bengal, and streptomycin in the plate method for estimating soil fungi</article-title>. <source>Soil Sci.</source> <volume>69</volume>, <fpage>215</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>232</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1097/00010694-195003000-00006</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B27">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Mbow</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rosenzweig</surname> <given-names>C. E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Barioni</surname> <given-names>L. G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Benton</surname> <given-names>T. G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Herrero</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Krishnapillai</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2020</year>). &#x201c;<article-title>Food Security</article-title>,&#x201d; in <source>Special Report: Special Report on Climate Change and Land</source> (<publisher-loc>USA</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>IPCC</publisher-name>). doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1017/9781009157988.007</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B28">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Nandapure</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sonune</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gabhane</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Katkar</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Patil</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Long term effects of integrated nutrient management on soil physical properties and crop productivity in sorghum-wheat cropping sequence in a vertisol</article-title>. <source>Indian J. Agric. Res.</source> <volume>45</volume>, <fpage>336</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>340</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B29">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Nima</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Aulakh</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sharma</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kukal</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Assessing soil quality under long-term organic vis-a-vis chemical farming after twelve years in north-western India</article-title>. <source>J. Plant Nutr.</source> <volume>44</volume>, <fpage>1175</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1192</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/01904167.2020.1862195</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B30">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Nunan</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Morgan</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Herlihy</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1998</year>). <article-title>Ultraviolet absorbance (280 nm) of compounds released from soil during chloroform fumigation as an estimate of the microbial biomass</article-title>. <source>Soil Biol. Biochem.</source> <volume>30</volume>, <fpage>1599</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1603</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S0038-0717(97)00226-5</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B31">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Olsen</surname> <given-names>S. R.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1954</year>). <source>Estimation of Available Phosphorus in Soils by Extraction with Sodium Bicarbonate</source> (<publisher-loc>Washington DC, USA</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>US Department of Agriculture</publisher-name>).</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B32">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Piper</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1950</year>). <source>Soil and Plant Analysis</source> (<publisher-loc>Australia</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Hassel Press</publisher-name>), <fpage>368</fpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B33">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Pradeep</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ullasa</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kumar Naik</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ganapathi</surname> <given-names>D. M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Effect of different organic nutrient management practices on growth, yield of pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan L. Millsp.) and soil properties</article-title>. <source>Res. J. Agric. Sci.</source> <volume>9</volume>, <fpage>352</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>357</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B34">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Richards</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1954</year>). <article-title>Diagnosis and improvement of saline and alkali soils</article-title>. <source>J. Soil Sci.</source> <volume>78</volume>, <fpage>154</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1097/00010694-195408000-00012</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B35">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Sharma</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Thind</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Singh</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Singh</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Singh</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Soil enzyme activities with biomass ashes and phosphorus fertilization to rice&#x2013;wheat cropping system in the Indo-Gangetic plains of India</article-title>. <source>Nutrient Cycling Agroecosystems</source> <volume>101</volume>, <fpage>391</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>400</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10705-015-9684-7</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B36">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Shubbar</surname> <given-names>H. T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tahir</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Al-Ansari</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2024</year>). <article-title>Bridging Qatar&#x2019;s food demand and self-sufficiency: A system dynamics simulation of the energy&#x2013;water&#x2013;food nexus</article-title>. <source>Sustain. Production Consumption</source>. <volume>46</volume>, <page-range>382&#x2013;399</page-range>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.spc.2024.02.017</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B37">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Subbiah</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Asija</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1956</year>). <article-title>A rapid procedure for the estimation of available nitrogen in soils</article-title>. <source>Curr. Sci.</source> <volume>25</volume>, <fpage>259</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>260</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B38">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Tabatabai</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bremner</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1969</year>). <article-title>Use of p-nitrophenyl phosphate for assay of soil phosphatase activity</article-title>. <source>Soil Biol. Biochem.</source> <volume>1</volume>, <fpage>301</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>307</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/0038-0717(69)90012-1</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B39">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Tiwari</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ramanathan</surname> <given-names>A. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bauddh</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Korstad</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>Humic substances: Structure, function and benefits for agroecosystems&#x2014;a review</article-title>. <source>Pedosphere.</source> <volume>33</volume> (<issue>2</issue>), <fpage>237</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>249</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B40">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jia</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Feng</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Wheat straw: an inefficient substrate for rapid natural lignocellulosic composting</article-title>. <source>Bioresource Technol.</source> <volume>209</volume>, <fpage>402</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>406</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.biortech.2016.03.004</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>