When introduced to common wheat (Triticum aestivum L., 2n = 6x = 42, AABBDD) some chromosomes of Aegilops species exhibit a surprisingly elevated rate of transmission to succeeding generations, leading to segregation distortion. These chromosomes are widely recognized as “Gametocidal (Gc)” and have been used in breeding programs aiming at widening genetic diversity of common wheat (Endo, 2015). The evolution of common wheat genome over thousands of years of domestication and breeding resulted in a narrow gene pool, including the loss of genes related to resistance and tolerance to biotic and abiotic stress, and quality traits. To address this challenge, breeders seek to introduce new genes and alleles by broadening the genetic diversity through interspecific or intergeneric hybridization with wild relatives. Crop wild relatives, particularly in the tribe Triticeae, offer a promising source of novel genes and alleles (Hajjar and Hodgkin, 2007). Despite their potential, the utilization of wild genetic diversity in wheat breeding faces hurdles like hybridization barriers, abnormalities, and sterility of F₁ hybrids (Kishii, 2019). Reduced pairing during meiosis poses an additional challenge, especially when transferring genes from tertiary gene pool species (Qi et al., 2007).

Further challenges include linkage drag and insufficient compensation for substituted wheat chromatin. Hence, the integration of alien chromosome segments into the wheat genome necessitates induced chromosome rearrangements, achievable through methods such as meiotic manipulation (Copete-Parada et al., 2021; Türkösi et al., 2022; Liu et al., 2023), ionizing irradiation (Schubert et al., 2004; Guo et al., 2021; Kim et al., 2022), tissue culture (Lapitan et al., 1984; Li et al., 2000; Zhang et al., 2016), CRISPR (Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats) (Kosicki et al., 2018; Schmidt et al., 2020) or the Gc system (Endo, 1985; Farkas et al., 2023; Türkösi et al., 2024). An approach that utilizes the Gc system enables the identification of alien chromosomal regions containing target genes and facilitates the analysis of their homoeologous relationships to overcome non-collinearity between donor and wheat chromosomes. This process is crucial for well-compensating translocations beneficial for wheat improvement (Qi et al., 2007; Han et al., 2014; Farkas et al., 2023; Türkösi et al., 2024). Numerous studies have successfully implemented the Gc action for this purpose to produce wheat aneuploid lines including deletions, translocations, and telosomic lines. This strategy made it possible to construct cytological chromosome maps, study homoeologous relationships, and localize chromosome breakpoints, genes, and DNA markers, where the lack of markers or genes in wheat aneuploids correlates with the absence of the chromatin segment (Endo and Gill, 1996; Nasuda et al., 2005; Sakata et al., 2010; Ishihara et al., 2014; Kwiatek et al., 2016, 2017; Farkas et al., 2023; Türkösi et al., 2024).

In the context of wheat breeding, Gc genes have been extensively studied, in terms of the transmission mode of the alien chromosomes, particularly concerning chromosome aberrations and segregation distortion in interspecific hybridizations with Aegilops species (Endo, 1982; Tsujimoto and Tsunewaki, 1984, 1985a; Endo, 2015). Segregation distortion occurs commonly in wide hybridization, wherein the allele(s) of a heterozygous locus segregate at frequencies divergent from the anticipated Mendelian ratios of 0.5 (Sandler and Novitski, 1957; Sandler et al., 1959; Endo, 2015; King et al., 2018). This deviation results from the preferential retention of chromosomal blocks carrying genes beneficial for reproductive viability (Niranjana, 2017). Whenever the transmission rate of a chromosome or a locus deviates from the expected Mendelian ratio, the resulting phenomenon is collectively referred to as “drive”. This term encompasses both transmission advantages and segregation distortion, reflecting deviations from the Mendelian principle of equal segregation (Houben, 2017). Segregation distortion observed in inter- and intra-specific hybrids mostly arises from, either pre-fertilization barriers like abortion of female or male gametes, such as pollen tubes competition in the style, or post-fertilization obstacles like abortion of zygote/embryo (Lyttle, 1993; Manabe et al., 1999). In this aspect, Gc factors distinguish themselves from other segregation distorters (Sds) in that their impact is evident in both male and female gametophytes, and they do not confer any reproductive advantage.

Nevertheless, the presence of Sds at specific loci can pose challenges in introgression breeding if they are closely linked to agronomically important genes. Likewise, gene transfer from Aegilops species carrying Gc factor(s) can lead to partial plant sterility. Therefore, during introgression breeding, the Gc genes need to be removed from the progenies to avoid segregation distortion of agronomically desirable genes linked to them and to avoid a decrease in fertility (Marais and Pretorius, 1996). Surprisingly, a pollen-killer (Ki) locus exhibiting dominant action was discovered on the long arm of wheat chromosome 6B with similar Gc action, but its effect is limited to only male gametophytes (Loegering and Sears, 1963; Kota and Dvorak, 1988). Another instance of genes with Gc-like action was reported in Thinopyrum ponticum (Podp.) Barkworth & D.R. Dewey [Syn. Agropyron elongatum (Host) P. Beauv., Lophopyrum ponticum (Popd.) A. Löve, Elytrigia pontica (Popd.) Holub] in which the chromosome carrying Sd: Sd1 and/or Sd2 gene(s) (Kota and Dvorak, 1988; Niranjana, 2017) exhibited preferential transmission through the female gametes but not through the male gametes (Kibirige-Sebunya and Knott, 1983). In homozygotes for the Sd genes, the seed set remains normal. However, a notable decrease in seed set occurs in heterozygotes, indicating the impact of the Sd genes on reproductive outcomes in these plants. The Sd1 locus was mapped proximal to a leaf rust resistance gene Lr19 (Zhang and Dvořák, 1990). While Gc, Ki, and Sd genes contribute to segregation distortion, the behavior of Gc elements is unique. Plants carrying Gc genes in the hemi- (Gc/-) or heterozygous (Gc/gc) form are semi-sterile, whereas homozygous (Gc/Gc) plants are fully fertile (Tsujimoto, 2005).

In this review, we present the narrative of the Gc elements, specifying species carrying them; provide an overview of their discovery, interactions, mechanisms, and suppressors; and discuss their principal applications in wheat breeding.

During wheat breeding programs, scientists observed that certain chromosomes introduced from Aegilops species displayed an unexpectedly high transmission frequency to the next generation (Endo, 1990, 2015; Endo and Gill, 1996; Friebe et al., 1999). These chromosomes carry unique genes ensuring their persistence through selective abortion of gametes lacking them ( Figure 1 ). The term “Gc” is derived from “Gamete” (egg or sperm) and “Cidal” (capable of killing), signifying gamete-killer (Endo, 1990, 2015). Gc genes, responsible for this action, distort Mendelian segregation in their favor without apparent phenotypic benefits, making them evolutionarily selfish genetic elements (Kwiatek et al., 2017). Originally coined by Maan (1975), the Gc term describes the preferential transmission of an alien chromosome into common wheat, leading to its rapid increase in frequency and eventual fixation in the population (Tsujimoto, 2005).

In the process of interspecific hybridization, the stable maintenance of alien chromosomes transferred into wheat depends on their ability to substitute homoeologous chromosomes of the host plant. Notably, they are eliminated from the offspring if they do not compensate for the loss of wheat chromosomes (Taketa et al., 1995; Molnár‐Láng et al., 2005; Szakács and Molnár-Láng, 2010). Conversely, chromosomes carrying Gc genes selfishly persist in host plants. Hence, upon the emergence of a Gc element through mutation or introgression, it undergoes swift proliferation within the population due to preferential transmission. These Gc factors quickly reach fixation and embed themselves in the genome, as they eliminate gametes devoid of them. In this context, Gc genes exhibit a pronounced selfish and parasitic nature toward the host species. Nevertheless, it remains uncertain whether Gc genes retain functionality within their original species. The concept of selfish genes inducing gamete abortion due to allelic interactions is not unique to wheat. Similar phenomena have been reported in various plant species, including tomato (Rick, 1966), tobacco (Cameron and Moav, 1957; Moav et al., 1968), and rice (Sano, 1990). Analogous DNA elements have been identified in the animal kingdom, such as the P element of the Sd system in Drosophila melanogaster (Lyttle, 1993) and t haplotypes in mice (Silver, 1985, 1993). Supernumerary B chromosomes are another group of selfish DNA elements, lacking apparent selective advantages, and have been reported across eukaryotic phyla (Jones, 1995; Jones and Houben, 2003; Jones et al., 2008; Aldrich et al., 2017; Houben, 2017; Ma et al., 2017; Blavet et al., 2021; Karafiátová et al., 2021).

Several species of the genus Aegilops carry Gc genes ( Table 1 ), which were discovered in the offspring of wheat × Aegilops crosses. However, dissimilar behavior of Gc elements from various Aegilops species and different homoeologous chromosome groups of the species were observed (Endo, 1988a; Endo, 1988b; Endo, 2015). Thus, Gc effects may vary from (a) Mild, permitting slight anomalies in retained wheat chromosomes, through (b) Intense or Severe, where gametophytes lacking the alien chromosome may undergo severe chromosome abnormalities and become abortive, to (c) Very Strong, resulting in extensive chromosomal breakages when only gametes with the Gc factors are functional, leading to full transmission of the Gc carrier chromosome to the next generation. For instance, chromosome 2C^cy from Ae. cylindrica Host (jointed goatgrass) in wheat cv. Chinese Spring (CS) has a mild Gc effect ranging from lethal to semi-lethal. On the other hand, chromosome 3C^t of Ae. triuncialis L. (barb goatgrass) has an intense or severe Gc action in wheat CS, but mild or semi-lethal in other cultivars (Endo, 1988b; Tsujimoto, 2005; Niranjana et al., 2017). Moreover, it is considered that the Gc action of Ae. longissima Schw. et Musch., Ae. sharonensis Eig (Sharon goatgrass), and Ae. speltoides Tausch [syn. T. speltoides (Tausch) Gren.] is very strong, inducing extreme chromosomal mutations in gametophytes lacking the Gc chromosome, ensuring completely transmission of the Gc carrier chromosome (Miller et al., 1982; King et al., 1991a, 1991b; Nasuda et al., 1998; Friebe et al., 2003).

Thus, the mode of action of Gc elements from Ae. longissima, Ae. sharonensis, and Ae. speltoides differs from that of Gc genes of Ae. triuncialis and Ae. cylindrica and results in dissimilarities in terms of intensity and frequency of chromosome anomalies. Nevertheless, the detailed nuances of the Gc chromosome’s influence from Ae. caudata L. [syn. Ae. markgrafii (Greuter) Hammer], Ae. ovata L. [syn. Ae. geniculata Roth., T. ovatum (L.) Raspail], Ae. geniculata Roth (ovate goatgrass; syn. Ae. ovata L. pro parte), and Ae. biuncialis Vis. [syn. Ae. lorentii Hochst., Ae. macrochaeta Schuttl. et Huet, T. lorentii (Hochst), T. macrochaetum (Schuttl. et Huet) K. Richt, T. biunciale K. Richt] remain largely unexplored, particularly in terms of the intensity of the action.

Some reports on the interaction between different Gc elements have been published, but the results are controversial. By observing double monosomic addition lines derived from three different Gc chromosome sources, Endo (1982) found that the Gc genes of Ae. triuncialis do not interfere with the Gc effects of Ae. longissima or Ae. sharonensis. In addition, he found that the Gc elements of Ae. longissima dominated the action of those from Ae. sharonensis, since only the Ae. longissima chromosome was necessary for gametes to function in double monosomic addition lines. Endo (1985) further reported that Gc factors located on chromosome 4S^l of Ae. longissima or 4S^sh of Ae. sharonensis are epistatic to those on chromosome 2S^l and 2S^sh, irrespective of the species.

Tsujimoto (1995) investigated the functional relationship between six Gc elements using plants carrying two different Gc factors and identified three functional groups. The First Group includes Gc elements located on chromosomes belonging to the Aegilops homoeologous group 2. For instance, Gc transferred from Ae. speltoides to chromosome 2B of common wheat showed similar function to those on chromosome 2S^sh of Ae. sharonensis. The Second Group includes Gc genes on chromosomes 4S^sh of Ae. sharonensis and 4S^l of Ae. longissima. These genes were epistatic to the Gc genes in the first group in terms of gamete abortion and preferential transmission (Endo, 1985). Although by themselves, the Gc elements in the first group cause chromosome breakage at low frequency (Tsujimoto and Tsunewaki, 1985b; Tsujimoto and Noda, 1989), these genes enhance breakage by the Gc genes of the second group. Conversely, the Gc genes in the second group may enhance breakage by those in the first group. The Third Group includes the Gc genes on chromosome 3C^t of Ae. triuncialis and is independent in terms of the action of the Gc factors in the first or second group. It is important to note that the activity of the second and third Gc element groups are partially suppressed by the Gc inhibitor genes located on chromosomes 4B and 3B, respectively, in certain common wheat strains (Tsujimoto and Tsunewaki, 1984, 1985a; Endo, 1988b, 1988a; King and Laurie, 1993).

Based on the interactions between the different Gc genes, Tsujimoto (1995) proposed the re-designation of the gene symbols following the rules for gene symbolization in wheat. Namely, Gc1, Gc2, and Gc3 for the Gc genes in the first, second, and third groups, respectively, followed by the genome symbol carrying the gene. The relationships between these Gc factors and those on chromosome 2C^cy of Ae. cylindrica, chromosome 4M^g of Ae. geniculata and chromosome 6S^s of Ae. speltoides have not yet been examined.

The molecular mechanism by which Gc genes cause chromosome breakage and induce gamete abortion is not fully understood. The most frequent deletions are produced by a break of one arm of the chromosome followed by a loss of the acentric fragment distal to the breakpoint. This results in defective chromosomes (Werner et al., 1992) that may be stabilized by the action of telomerase. The effect of Gc in the male germline manifests itself as a mixture of normal and nonreproductive pollen, while that in the female germline appears as sporadic seed sets on spikes. Homozygotes for the Gc genes, that is, wheat disomic alien chromosome addition lines, do not show such gametic abortion because all gametes carry an alien chromosome with Gc elements (Endo and Tsunewaki, 1975; Endo, 1982, 2015; Endo and Gill, 1996).

The mode of Gc action differs from other Sd systems in two key aspects: (a) its selfish nature, which destroys gametes lacking Gc genes, and (b) its impact on both male and female gametogenesis. For instance, in plants monosomic for chromosome 4S^sh from Ae. sharonensis, approximately 50% of meiocytes at the first post-meiotic mitosis contained chromosome fragments and these fragments comprised a pair of equal-length segments of two sister chromatids (Finch et al., 1984). In monosomic conditions, the transmission frequency of chromosome 4S^sh through both the male and female gametes was shown to be at least 97.8% in various genetic backgrounds (King et al., 1991b). The ability of 4S^sh to cause chromosome fragmentation is reported not only in meiospores but also in developing embryos and endosperms. The types of aberration were similar to those seen at first pollen grain mitosis in plants monosomic for chromosome 4S^sh. Therefore, it was assumed that a single mechanism might be responsible for aberrations in meiocytes, embryos, and endosperm (King et al., 1991b).

The mode of Gc action is “sporophytic” in nature, as the genetic composition of the sporophyte dictates the sterility of the gametophyte that lacks the Gc genes (Maan, 1975; Niranjana et al., 2017). In the case of Gc factors with very strong gametocidal action in wheat CS and other wheat cultivars, such as chromosomes 4S^sh from Ae. sharonensis, 4S^l from Ae. longissima and 2S^s, 6S^s from Ae. speltoides, chromosome fragments in the form of single chromatid segments were observed during early embryo and endosperm development of plants carrying the Gc chromosome (King and Laurie, 1993; de Las Heras et al., 2001). Broken chromosome ends tend to fuse and form dicentric chromosomes and the break-fusion-bridge cycle is evident (McClintock, 1941; Werner et al., 1992). However, weaker Gc genes like the one located on Ae. cylindrica chromosome 2C^cy (Endo, 1988b), only induces moderate breakages, and the Gc chromosome is not always selectively retained. In the offspring of such plants, the recovery of chromosomal rearrangements is possible and allows for the production of deletion stocks in wheat. Endo (1988b) proposed that in cases of intense Gc action, gametophytes lacking the alien chromosome may experience significant chromosome breakages, leading to sterility and ensuring the exclusive transmission of the alien chromosome. On the contrary, when the Gc action is mild, gametophytes without the alien chromosome are fertilized, suffering slight chromosome damage, and develop into plants with chromosomal aberrations (Endo, 1988b; Tsujimoto, 2005; Niranjana et al., 2017). In case of chromosome 2C^cy, it has been suggested that the breaks occur mainly in the period between the end of meiosis and the interphase prior to the first mitosis of the pollen grain nucleus (Nasuda et al., 1998). The observation of deletions of similar size in sister chromatids at anaphase and telophase of the first pollen mitosis suggests that the breaks occur before DNA replication (Nasuda et al., 1998).

Based on the current knowledge, Gc action is triggered by chromosomes from particular Aegilops species. However, Kihara (1959) produced wheat alloplasmic lines with Ae. caudata cytoplasm without any Gc chromosomes as discussed in Tsunewaki (2015), while Friebe et al. (1992) reported the whole set of wheat-Ae. caudata disomic addition lines. Also, Feldman (1979) generated a series of seven wheat addition lines for all Ae. longissima chromosomes. These facts may indicate that these strains of the Aegilops species did not carry Gc genes. However, it is known that certain cultivars of common wheat possess genes that partially suppress the function of the Gc factors. If such cultivars with the suppressor were used as the nucleus donors of the alloplasmic lines and the recipients of the alien chromosomes, the Gc genes would not have been noticed. Moreover, if the alien species has the suppressor, Gc effect will be removed in the early backcross generations (Tsujimoto, 2005). It was reported that chromosome 3B partially inhibits the Gc action of 3C^t from Ae. triuncialis (Tsujimoto and Tsunewaki, 1984, 1985a), while 4B incompletely suppresses Gc effects of 4S^sh from Ae. sharonensis or 4S^l from Ae. longissima (Endo, 1988b, 1988a; King and Laurie, 1993).

For instance, plants with monosomic addition of chromosome 3C^t from Ae. triuncialis in the genetic background of common wheat cultivars Jones Fife (JF) and CS showed both male and female semi-sterility. However, semi-sterility did not appear in the common wheat cultivar Norin 26 (N26). Chromosome 3C^t is preferentially transmitted to the next generation from both male and female sides in JF, but only from the female side in CS (Endo and Katayama, 1978; Endo, 2007; Chen et al., 2008; Yamano et al., 2010). In the JF genetic background, both male and female gametes without chromosome 3C^t were unsuccessful whereas, in the CS background, pollen without the Gc chromosome was functional. This result suggested the existence of an incomplete suppressor in the wheat CS background.

The recovery of fertility in the 3C^t monosomic addition in N26 suggested that chromosome 3C^t is transmitted as other alien monosomes without Gc (Endo and Katayama, 1978; Yamano et al., 2010). Tsujimoto and Tsunewaki (1984, 1985a) analyzed the genetic factor in N26 that suppresses the Gc function of 3C^t. The data indicated that a single dominant suppressor gene (Igc1) controls the suppression of Gc action of the 3C^t. Through monosomic analysis, Igc1 was mapped to chromosome 3B of the N26 variety. Moreover, pollen grains carrying Igc1 had a slight advantage during fertilization over pollen grains carrying igc1. The fact that both the Gc genes and the suppressor were located on the chromosomes of the same homoeologous group and that Igc1 is located in the B genome, which originated from an outcrossing species, suggest that Igc1 also has part of the Gc properties. On the other hand, Tsujimoto (2005) reported that Igc1 cannot suppress the Gc genes that exhibit very strong actions, such as those from Ae. sharonensis, Ae. longissima or Ae. speltoides and that no Gc suppressors for these Gc genes were discovered among hundreds of common wheat cultivars tested.

Endo (1988a) reported chromosome breakage in the F₁ progeny of a cross between CS monosomic 4B and disomic alien addition lines for chromosome 4S^sh from Ae. sharonensis or 4S^l from Ae. longissima. Since mutations occurred more frequently when the monosomic plant was female than when euploid CS was female, chromosome 4B in the egg cell may partially suppress chromosome breakage (Endo, 1988a). However, King and Laurie (1993) observed chromosome anomaly in early zygotic and endosperm cells of the F₁ progeny of monosomic 4B (female) crossed with the substitution line of the chromosome 4S^sh for 4B. Similarly, Nasuda et al. (1998) observed chromosome breakage in a line possessing the Gc chromosome from Ae. speltoides. These findings suggest that 4B might not be an effective suppressor in such instances. The chromosomal abnormalities appeared to be specifically associated with gametes lacking the Gc factor.

Friebe et al. (2003) further substantiated these findings through direct demonstration via fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH). They utilized a probe targeting a repetitive DNA sequence specific to the Gc chromosome, revealing that chromosome breakage during pollen mitosis occurred exclusively in gametes without the Gc factors. Moreover, Friebe et al. (2003) produced a mutation of the Ae. sharonensis Gc element (Gc ^mut), which does not induce gametophytic chromosomal breakage in hemizygous (Gc^mut /-) or heterozygous (Gc^mut /Gc) conditions, where the plants had fully fertile spikes. The result clearly indicated that Gc encoded two agents behaving like the abovementioned RE and ME systems for chromosome breakage and DNA protection, respectively. Because Gc^mut lost the function of the RE, Gc^mut /- plants did not show semi-sterility or chromosome breakage; in addition, because of the ME-like function of Gc^mut , Gc^mut /Gc plants were fertile and showed no induction of chromosome breakage. The function of Gc^mut is similar to that of the Igc1 suppressor.

Given the ability of the Gc system to trigger chromosome aberrations, numerous scientists took advantage of this approach to produce wheat pre-breeding materials. Endo and Gill (1996) identified 436 wheat chromosome deletions in the progeny of a monosomic Ae. cylindrica 2C^cy addition line of wheat CS. Thus, about 80% of the deletions were established as homozygous stocks. Svačina et al. (2020) developed a set of 113 deletion lines for chromosome 3D in wheat CS by using the 2C^cy Gc system. The deletion stocks have been extensively utilized for physical mapping of DNA markers (Gill et al., 1996; Qi et al., 2003) and genes (Nomura et al., 2003) to specific sub-arm chromosome regions of wheat chromosomes. For instance, wheat chromosomal mutants induced by the Gc effect enabled positional cloning of Pairing homoeologous 2 (Ph2) from a 121.16 Mb candidate region on 3DS (Serra et al., 2021). Based on the analysis of a set of specifically created 3DS deletion mutants using Gc genes action (Svačina et al., 2020), combined with exome sequencing and transcriptome analysis of ph2a and ph2b mutants versus wild-type, Serra et al. (2021) identified TaMSH7-3D, a gene encoding a plant specific DNA mismatch repair protein.

The Gc system was applied to induce chromosomal changes not only in euploid common wheat but also in wheat-alien chromosome addition lines ( Figures 3 , 4 ). Besides chromosome deletions, the Gc-induced chromosome breaks lead to translocations, including intergenomic translocations as well. Structural rearrangements of cultivated barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) chromosomes were obtained in common wheat by the Gc system (Shi and Endo, 1999). The rearranged alien chromosomes, including deletions and wheat-alien translocations, were used for the physical mapping of molecular markers on chromosome 7H (Serizawa et al., 2001; Masoudi-Nejad et al., 2005), 5H (Ashida et al., 2007), 3H (Sakai et al., 2009), and 4H (Sakata et al., 2010). Friebe et al. (2000) used the Gc system of chromosome 2C^cy to induce and study the nature of chromosomal rearrangements in rye chromosomes added to wheat. Following backcrossing and selfing, 33 deletions were identified, in either homozygous or heterozygous states and covering all rye chromosomes except 7R. The Gc system was also used to produce chromosome rearrangements between Ae. ovata and hexaploid triticale by expression of the Gc action located on chromosome 4M^g from Ae. ovata (Kwiatek et al., 2016). Similarly, using the Gc mechanism located on chromosome 4M^g from Ae. geniculata Kwiatek et al. (2017) produced 41 triticale lines and seventeen of them carried chromosome aberrations.

Similarly, Farkas et al. (2023) employed the Gc mechanism located on chromosome 4M^b of Ae. biuncialis to create various wheat cv. Mv9kr1 lines, including Mv9kr1-Ae. biuncialis disomic 4U^b addition, 4M^b(4D), and 5M^b(5D) substitutions, as well as several introgression lines, leading to the establishment of species-specific molecular markers and positively influencing the morphology of spikes and seeds. These newly developed cytogenetic stocks could prove valuable as a genetic resource for introducing wild alleles of crucial genes that govern significant agronomic traits into wheat through chromosome engineering. Using Gc action of chromosome 2C^cy from Ae. cylindrica, structural changes were obtained for wild barley (H. chilense Roem. et Schult, 2n = 2x=14, H^chH^ch) chromosomes 1H^ch (Cherif-Mouaki et al., 2011), 3H^ch (Said et al., 2012), 4H^ch (Said and Cabrera, 2009), 2H^ch, and 7H^ch in wheat (Mattera et al., 2015; Palomino and Cabrera, 2019). Initially, chromosomes 2H^ch and 7H^ch, along with 2C^cy, were simultaneously acquired within the wheat genetic background ( Figure 3A ). Subsequently, chromosomes 2H^ch and 7H^ch were separated into different plants, each still accompanied by 2C^cy ( Figure 3B However, the emergence of chromosome breakages and translocations is anticipated in subsequent generations, as depicted in the schematic illustration of the Gc process ( Figure 1 ). Indeed, the wheat chromosome translocations with 7H^ch by Mattera et al. (2015) ( Figure 3C ) and with 2H^ch were obtained by Palomino and Cabrera (2019) ( Figure 3D ). Moreover, illustrations by genomic in-situ hybridization (GISH) and FISH are provided for chromosome deletions, breakpoints, and Fraction length (FL) resulting from the Gc action of 2C^cy on chromosomes 3H^ch ( Figures 4A, B ) and 4H^ch ( Figure 4C ).

The Gc system proved to be effective in inducing structural rearrangements in alien chromosomes added to common wheat from Haynaldia villosa (L.) (Chen et al., 2008), Leymus racemosus (Lam.) Tzvelev (Chen et al., 2005) and Agropyron cristatum (L.) Gaertn (2n = 4x = 28, PPPP) (Liu et al., 2010; Luan et al., 2010; Copete-Parada et al., 2021). The production of germplasms with chromosomal rearrangements allowed the location of genes and/or markers on specific sub-arm chromosome of wheat and wild relatives (Said and Cabrera, 2009; Cherif-Mouaki et al., 2011; Said et al., 2012; Ochoa et al., 2015; Said et al., 2019b; Farkas et al., 2023). In this case, the absence of markers can be directly associated with the chromosomal fragment that has been lost ( Figures 3 – 5 ). These lines also provide information on the homoeology and structure of the chromosomes and can be useful for the identification of functionally important chromosomal regions, particularly for the location of genes that determine interesting traits in agriculture, as well as to transfer new alleles from alien species to wheat.

This paper reviews the principles and use of the Gc system to induce chromosomal rearrangements in wheat with alien chromosomes originating from its wild relatives. This is crucial because maintaining and enriching genetic diversity of elite germplasm by crossbreeding is an indispensable prerequisite for adapting one of the world’s key food security crops to the demands of farmers and consumers and adapting it to the changing climate. Genetic diversity of the secondary and tertiary gene pool, including wheat ancestors and wild relatives, serves as a precious resource for this purpose.

This review is an update of the previous reviews treatises on the Gc system (Endo, 1990, 2007) and synthesizes the main characteristics of the topic that have changed over time to give rise to current understandings about the mode of action, interactions, suppressions, and practical applications of Gc genes in wheat breeding. Furthermore, it fills a gap in a recent review by Boehm and Cai (2024), which lacks a reference to the Gc system, by reviewing the current knowledge on alien introgressions in wheat breeding. The work also outlines essential strategies for leveraging alien introgression to diversify the wheat genome, providing indispensable guidance for researchers and breeders in their pursuit of crop improvement.

Several approaches can be employed to induce chromosomal aberrations. They differ in terms of mechanisms, affected cell populations, heritability, safety concerns, and applications. Moreover, each method has its own set of advantages and disadvantages.

Ionizing irradiation and chemical agents causing chromosomal breaks (clastogenes) affect a broad range of cells by directly damaging DNA in both somatic and germ cells, causing various forms of DNA damage, including single- and double-strand breaks, and nucleotide base modifications (Schubert et al., 2004; Durante and Formenti, 2018; Kim et al., 2020, 2022; Guo et al., 2021). Ionizing irradiation and clastogens induce chromosomal rearrangements, encompassing duplications, and inversions, among others, causing more infertility. Chromosomal aberrations can be heritable if arising in germ cells but not if occurring in somatic cells (Durante and Formenti, 2018; Kim et al., 2020, 2022; Guo et al., 2021). Furthermore, the irradiation method generally poses greater safety concerns due to its non-specificity and potential for widespread genetic damage. It is crucial to mention that the outcomes of irradiation and chemicals are unpredictable, constituting a completely random process (Schubert et al., 2004; Durante and Formenti, 2018; Kim et al., 2022).

In contrast, Gc chromosomes, being naturally occurring, act selectively during gametogenesis, precisely targeting germ cells to induce double-strand DNA breaks, but not affecting the somatic cells of the plant (Endo, 2015; King et al., 2018). The resulting chromosomal aberrations, such as deletions and translocations, are always heritable as they arise in reproductive cells and are passed to offspring (Nasuda et al., 2005; Sakata et al., 2010; Ishihara et al., 2014; Farkas et al., 2023; Türkösi et al., 2024). Thus, using Gc chromosomes is encouraged due to its perceived safety and efficacy in producing inherited chromosomal rearrangements (Tsujimoto, 2005; Sakata et al., 2010; Ishihara et al., 2014). The number of chromosome breaks induced by the Gc system per pollen can vary depending on various factors such as Gc chromosome category, the specific wheat genotype, environmental conditions, the presence of suppressors and other genetic modifiers (Endo and Katayama, 1978; Endo, 1988b, 2007; Tsujimoto, 2005; Chen et al., 2008; Yamano et al., 2010; Niranjana et al., 2017).

Contrasting with the approaches discussed above, recently developed CRISPR/Cas technology is renowned for its precision in genome editing and can induce chromosome aberrations at particular loci and induce double-strand breaks in somatic and germ cells (Kosicki et al., 2018). The breaks can lead to various chromosomal rearrangements such as deletions, inversions, duplications, or translocations depending on repair mechanisms and cellular context (Symington, 2016; Kosicki et al., 2018; Schmidt et al., 2020). Researchers have devised methods to use CRISPR to induce chromosomal rearrangements for studying chromosomal structure, genetic engineering, and disease modeling (Zuo et al., 2017; Kosicki et al., 2018; Schmidt et al., 2020). CRISPR’s ability to manipulate genetic material at the chromosomal level offers powerful tools beyond traditional genome editing applications (Symington, 2016; Zuo et al., 2017; Haapaniemi et al., 2018; Kosicki et al., 2018). However, despite CRISPR technology’s significant advancements in animal and medical research, its use for inducing chromosomal rearrangements in plants remains limited (Schmidt et al., 2020).

The Gc system is a highly valuable and versatile approach with a wide range of uses for wheat gene mapping and breeding. It is an efficient tool to produce cytogenetic stocks, such as deletions, translocations, and telocentrics of either wheat or alien chromosomes introgressed into wheat. This plant material could be used for gene tracking, DNA markers physical mapping, comparative genome analysis and to study homologous relationships. It has been indispensable in widening genetic diversity of cereals and improving the crop by insertion of alien chromatin segments with traits of interest into the wheat genome. The method provides remarkably novel breeding material carrying new genes or alleles delivered from wild relatives. Producing breeding material using the Gc strategy is a long-term investment, but it is essential for developing new varieties that can meet the needs of a growing population in a changing climate.

In plant breeding, accurately assessing the effects of Gc chromosomes is essential for understanding their impact on chromosomal rearrangements, genome stability, fertility, and overall breeding objectives. The most popular cytogenetic FISH-based techniques rely on hybridization of labeled probes to particular DNA sequences and allow identification of chromosome breaks (Molnár et al., 2016; King et al., 2017; Said et al., 2021). The probes are typically designed to target specific chromosome regions or whole alien chromosomes as in case of GISH probes. However, the resolution of FISH techniques may not be high enough to detect subtle chromosome rearrangements meticulously. This may lead to underestimation of the actual number of breaks induced by Gc chromosomes (Badaeva et al., 1996, 2004; Molnár et al., 2009, 2011, 2016). In case of GISH, which specifically targets alien chromosomes, it is essential to recognize its limitations in precisely quantifying induced chromosome breaks or rearrangements. If the rearrangements induced by a Gc chromosome involve wheat chromosomes rather than the alien chromosomes, they will not be captured (Said and Cabrera, 2009; Mattera et al., 2015; Ochoa et al., 2015; Palomino and Cabrera, 2019; Said et al., 2019a; Said et al., 2019b).

Given these limitations, it is crucial to consider the potential underestimation of chromosome breaks or rearrangements in the plant breeding process, especially if Gc chromosomes or similar elements are involved. Alternative techniques with higher resolution and sensitivity, such as molecular markers targeting specific chromosome regions, or whole-genome sequencing (Cherif-Mouaki et al., 2011; Said et al., 2019b, 2021), may be needed to complement FISH to provide a more comprehensive understanding of chromosomal alterations induced by Gc chromosome. Clearly, incorporating multiple analytical approaches to detect and characterize chromosomal rearrangements ensures a more robust evaluation of breeding materials and facilitates the development of improved cultivars with desired traits.

The fundamental question of how gametes with Gc genes stay normal while those without Gc do not remains unanswered, representing a current research gap that requires further investigation. Nevertheless, the abovementioned behavior aligns with the Gc chromosomes’ self-preservation strategy, wherein they eliminate gametes lacking them to ensure their own survival. This performance mirrors their actions in their original species, where they function as normal chromosomes without causing gametic damage.

Although the accurate molecular mechanism is still under investigation and the exact course may vary, research in this area continues to uncover the complexities of Gc behavior in plants. However, further efforts are required to fully clarify the intricate details of this process.

MS: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Software, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. EG: Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Validation, Visualization, Writing – review & editing. AF: Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Validation, Visualization, Writing – review & editing. IM: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Validation, Visualization, Writing – review & editing. JB: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Project administration, Resources, Validation, Visualization, Writing – review & editing. JD: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Project administration, Resources, Validation, Visualization, Writing – review & editing. AC: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Validation, Visualization, Writing – review & editing. TE: Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Validation, Visualization, Writing – review & editing.