<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.3 20070202//EN" "journalpublishing.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="2.3" xml:lang="EN">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Front. Plant Sci.</journal-id>
<journal-title>Frontiers in Plant Science</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">Front. Plant Sci.</abbrev-journal-title>
<issn pub-type="epub">1664-462X</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Frontiers Media S.A.</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpls.2024.1381549</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Plant Science</subject>
<subj-group>
<subject>Original Research</subject>
</subj-group>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Impacts of farming activities on carbon deposition based on fine soil subtype classification</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname>
<given-names>Qiuju</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/resources/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/funding-acquisition/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/supervision/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname>
<given-names>Dongdong</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/resources/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name>
<surname>Jiao</surname>
<given-names>Feng</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn001">
<sup>*</sup>
</xref>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/resources/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/funding-acquisition/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/supervision/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname>
<given-names>Haibin</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/resources/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name>
<surname>Guo</surname>
<given-names>Zhenhua</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3">
<sup>3</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn001">
<sup>*</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1735802"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/formal-analysis/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/supervision/"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
<institution>Heilongjiang Provincial Key Laboratory of Soil Environment and Plant Nutrition, Heilongjiang Institute of Black Soil Protection and Utilization, Heilongjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences</institution>, <addr-line>Harbin</addr-line>, <country>China</country>
</aff>
<aff id="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
<institution>Heilongjiang Bayi Agricultural University</institution>, <addr-line>Daqing</addr-line>, <country>China</country>
</aff>
<aff id="aff3">
<sup>3</sup>
<institution>Heilongjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Animal Husbandry Research Institute</institution>, <addr-line>Harbin</addr-line>, <country>China</country>
</aff>
<author-notes>
<fn fn-type="edited-by">
<p>Edited by: Sumit Chakravarty, Uttar Banga Krishi Viswavidyalaya, India</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="edited-by">
<p>Reviewed by: Li Xiangyi, Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), China</p>
<p>Arun Jyoti Nath, Assam University, India</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="corresp" id="fn001">
<p>*Correspondence: Feng Jiao, <email xlink:href="mailto:jiaofeng@byau.edu.cn">jiaofeng@byau.edu.cn</email>; Zhenhua Guo, <email xlink:href="mailto:gzhh00@163.com">gzhh00@163.com</email>
</p>
</fn>
</author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>31</day>
<month>05</month>
<year>2024</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="collection">
<year>2024</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>15</volume>
<elocation-id>1381549</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>04</day>
<month>02</month>
<year>2024</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>15</day>
<month>05</month>
<year>2024</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#xa9; 2024 Wang, Zhang, Jiao, Zhang and Guo</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2024</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Wang, Zhang, Jiao, Zhang and Guo</copyright-holder>
<license xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">
<p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.</p>
</license>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<sec>
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>Soil has the highest carbon sink storage in terrestrial ecosystems but human farming activities affect soil carbon deposition. In this study, land cultivated for 70 years was selected. The premise of the experiment was that the soil could be finely categorized by subtype classification. We consider that farming activities affect the soil bacterial community and soil organic carbon (SOC) deposition differently in the three subtypes of albic black soils.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Methods</title>
<p>Ninety soil samples were collected and the soil bacterial community structure was analysed by high-throughput sequencing. Relative changes in SOC were explored and SOC content was analysed in association with bacterial concentrations. </p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Results</title>
<p>The results showed that the effects of farming activities on SOC deposition and soil bacterial communities differed among the soil subtypes. Carbohydrate organic carbon (COC) concentrations were significantly higher in the gleying subtype than in the typical and meadow subtypes. <italic>RB41</italic>, <italic>Candidatus-Omnitrophus</italic> and <italic>Ahniella</italic> were positively correlated with total organic carbon (TOC) in gleying shallow albic black soil. Corn soybean rotation have a positive effect on the deposition of soil carbon sinks in terrestrial ecosystems.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Discussion</title>
<p>The results of the present study provide a reference for rational land use to maintain sustainable development and also for the carbon cycle of the earth. </p>
</sec>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>carbon sink</kwd>
<kwd>Sanjiang Plain</kwd>
<kwd>soil organic carbon</kwd>
<kwd>soil bacterial community</kwd>
<kwd>land-use model</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<contract-sponsor id="cn001">National Key Research and Development Program of China<named-content content-type="fundref-id">10.13039/501100012166</named-content>
</contract-sponsor>
<counts>
<fig-count count="4"/>
<table-count count="1"/>
<equation-count count="2"/>
<ref-count count="36"/>
<page-count count="12"/>
<word-count count="4394"/>
</counts>
<custom-meta-wrap>
<custom-meta>
<meta-name>section-in-acceptance</meta-name>
<meta-value>Functional Plant Ecology</meta-value>
</custom-meta>
</custom-meta-wrap>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec id="s1">
<title>Highlights</title>
<list list-type="bullet">
<list-item>
<p>Soil bacteria <italic>RB41</italic>, <italic>Candidatus-Omnitrophus</italic> and <italic>Ahniella</italic> being positively correlated with SOC deposition.</p>
</list-item>
<list-item>
<p>The effect of farming activities on soil bacterial communities and SOC deposition is different for the three soil subtypes.</p>
</list-item>
<list-item>
<p>Corn soybean rotation have a positive effect on the deposition of soil carbon sinks in terrestrial ecosystems.</p>
</list-item>
</list>
</sec>
<sec id="s2" sec-type="intro">
<label>1</label>
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>Soil has the highest carbon sink storage in terrestrial ecosystems (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">Tao et&#xa0;al., 2023</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Ma et&#xa0;al., 2024</xref>). Human farming activities affect carbon deposition, and soil carbon sinks change with human activities (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">Wang et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>). Black soils are the most fertile soils, providing most of the world&#x2019;s food, and there are three famous black soil belts in the world, the Sanjiang Plain in China belong one of them (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">Wu et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>). The Sanjiang Plain has been under cultivation for 73 years since 1950, which is a very short period of time compared to the process of black soil formation.</p>
<p>All of the cropland in the Sanjiang Plain is located in the black soil zone, where 25% of the soil is albic black soil (also called meadow soil, white pulp soil, albic soil) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">Wang et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>). A prerequisite for soil science research is a rigorous soil classification. In this study, we adopted the description of albic black soil (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Kumar Sootahar et&#xa0;al., 2019</xref>). <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref> shows that albic black soil is a typical classification. The albic black soils are also classified into three subtypes &#x2013; typical, meadow and gleying &#x2013; based on their topography, vegetation and soil profile characteristics. The typical subtype is found on undulating slopes and is forested vegetation and deciduous secondary forests, with no induced patches in the profile. The meadow subtype is found on elevated flats and is scrubby meadow miscellaneous grasses, with rust patches seen in the sedimentary layer. The gleying subtype is found in low-lying areas and is marshy grassy vegetation with rust spots in the albic layer. We consider that the soil bacterial communities and soil organic carbon (SOC) deposition of the three subtypes are different.</p>
<fig id="f1" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;1</label>
<caption>
<p>Location of soil samples: Sanjiang Plain is located in the black soil area; Ah represents the plough layer; E represents the albic layer; Bt represents the cohesive sedimentary layer; BC represents the transition layer; and C represents the parent material layer.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-15-1381549-g001.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>Soil organic carbon (SOC) deposition in the Sanjiang Plain has been described in a previous study (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">Wang et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>) but how SOC is formed and deposited into the soil has not yet been determined conclusively (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">Tao et&#xa0;al., 2023</xref>). SOC deposition is important for soil fertility and the ecological environment. Soil bacteria, one of the key biological factors in the SOC cycle, have a significant influence on the transformation and deposition of SOC. Soil microorganisms are mainly involved in the following processes during SOC deposition: (1) bacterial decomposition, where soil bacteria decompose organic matter by secreting enzymes to convert it into small-molecule organic matter (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Bardgett and van der Putten, 2014</xref>); (2) mineralization, in which inorganic substances in decomposition products are released by soil bacteria to form ions in the soil solution (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">Jin et&#xa0;al., 2023</xref>); and (3) assimilation, where soil bacteria convert organic matter into cellular components for growth and reproduction (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Stone et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>). Currently, the commonly used method is high-throughput sequencing technology, which is applied to study soil bacterial diversity, community structure and functional genes to provide a basis for revealing the influence of soil bacteria on organic carbon deposition (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">Ansari et&#xa0;al., 2024</xref>). In addition, stable isotope tracer techniques are used to study the role of soil bacteria in the organic carbon cycle (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Stone et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>). Both bacteria and fungi play important roles in soil carbon cycling. However, it has been reported that soil bacteria from three genera absorb approximately 50% of the carbon (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Stone et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>), so our experiment only measured soil bacteria.</p>
<p>Soil microorganisms influence carbon accumulation through multiple pathways (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">Tao et&#xa0;al., 2023</xref>). Reports correlating microbes with total organic carbon (TOC), humus organic carbon (HOC), carbohydrate organic carbon (COC) and mineralizable organic carbon (MOC) are limited. Considering that forest soil is also an important part of the soil carbon pool (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">Chen et&#xa0;al., 2023</xref>), we collected manmade forest soil (Poplars, with 4&#x2013;6 meters row spacings and 2&#x2013;3 meters individual spacings) and soil from farming activities for comparative analysis. The purpose of this study is to reveal the effect of land use on SOC deposition. And how, exactly, do soil bacteria figure into that? Specifically, this study conducted three comparisons, including two different depths, three soil subtypes, and five ground flora types. The results of the study can provide suggestions for the sustainable development of agriculture, as well as a reference for policies to rationalize carbon emissions.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3" sec-type="materials|methods">
<label>2</label>
<title>Materials and methods</title>
<sec id="s3_1">
<label>2.1</label>
<title>Test soil and sample collection</title>
<p>Soil samples were collected in the period 17&#x2013;25 April 2023 based on the distribution of the three albic black soil subtypes. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref> shows that soil samples were collected from Shuangfeng Farm in Mishan City (typical subtype, longitude 131.87, latitude 45.64), Shengli Farm (gleying subtype, longitude 133.77, latitude 47.31) in Raohe County and 852 Farm (meadow subtype, longitude 132.63, latitude 46.23) in Baoqing County. Soil profiles were excavated in multiple locations based on the topographic conditions of albic black soil formation. Three sampling locations were ultimately determined. Excavated profiles identified typical, meadow and gleying subtypes: the typical subtype has a thin black soil layer, mostly deciduous mixed wood secondary forest, with no rust spots in the profile; with the meadow subtype, rust spots are visible in the sedimentary layer; and the gleying subtype has a thicker black soil layer, with rust spots visible in the albic layer.</p>
<p>At every sampling site, soils of five land-use models were collected: uncultivated grassland/meadow (UGL), manmade forest (MF), 8&#x2013;10 years of corn soybean rotation (CSRS), 15&#x2013;20 years of corn soybean rotation (CSRL) and rice cultivation of more than 20 years (R). A random five-point sampling method was used, mixed as one sample, and three random replicates of each soil type were collected. Samples were collected at 0&#x2013;20 cm (shallow, S, plough layer) and 20&#x2013;40 cm (deep, D, plowpan), respectively; details of the 90 samples and 30 treatments, along with sample names and abbreviations, are given in <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">
<bold>Table&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>. Fertilization practices may vary slightly depending on the fertility of the individual plots. We conducted three comparisons, including two different depths (S and D), three soil subtypes (typical, gleiing, and meadow), and five ground flora types (UGL, MF, CSRS, CSRL, and R).</p>
<table-wrap id="T1" position="float">
<label>Table&#xa0;1</label>
<caption>
<p>Details of soil samples.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="top" align="left">Treatment no.</th>
<th valign="middle" align="left">Sample no.</th>
<th valign="middle" align="left">Full name</th>
<th valign="middle" align="left">Abbreviation</th>
<th valign="top" align="left">Total nitrogen<break/>(g/kg)</th>
<th valign="top" align="left">Total phosphorus (g/kg)</th>
<th valign="top" align="left">Total potassium (g/kg)</th>
<th valign="top" align="left">Fertilization, tillage, irrigation management (kg/ha)</th>
<th valign="top" align="left">Average annual production (kg/ha)</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">1</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">1-3</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Typical corn soybean rotation short-time shallow</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">TCSRSS</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">1.83</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.6</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">20.12</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Corn N 16, P 11, K 3, soybean N 3, P 8, K 5</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Corn 9500, soybean 2600</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">2</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">4-6</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Typical corn soybean rotation long-time shallow</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">TCSRLS</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">1.63</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.79</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">18.55</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Corn N 15, P 11, K 4, soybean N 2, P 8, K 4</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Corn 9350, soybean 2300</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">3</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">7-9</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Typical rice shallow</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">TRS</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">1.59</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.77</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">18.54</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">N 8, P 5, K 6</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">8300</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">4</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">10-12</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Typical manmade forest shallow</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">TMFS</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">1.29</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.66</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">17.27</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"/>
<td valign="top" align="left"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">5</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">13-15</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Typical uncultivated grassland/meadow shallow</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">TUGLS</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">2.86</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.68</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">16.59</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"/>
<td valign="top" align="left"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">6</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">16-18</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Meadow corn soybean rotation short-time shallow</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">MCSRSS</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">1.93</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.57</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">17.63</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Corn N 17, P 10, K 5, soybean N 2, P 6, K 3</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Corn 9900, soybean 2750</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">7</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">19-21</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Meadow corn soybean rotation long-time shallow</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">MCSRLS</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">1.7</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.84</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">16.23</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Corn N 15, P 9, K 4, soybean N 3, P 8, K 6</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Corn 9750, soybean 2500</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">8</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">22-24</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Meadow rice shallow</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">MRS</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">1.58</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.75</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">16.02</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">N 7.5, P 6, K 7</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">8500</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">9</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">25-27</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Meadow manmade forest shallow</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">MMFS</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">1.38</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.7</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">15.31</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"/>
<td valign="top" align="left"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">10</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">28-30</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Meadow uncultivated grassland/meadow shallow</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">MUGLS</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">1.75</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.62</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">15.31</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"/>
<td valign="top" align="left"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">11</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">31-33</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Gleying corn soybean rotation short-time shallow</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">GCSRSS</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">1.57</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.7</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">14.92</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Corn N 16, P 9, K 6, soybean N 2, P 7, K 5</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Corn 8700, soybean 2000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">12</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">34-36</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Gleying corn soybean rotation long-time shallow</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">GCSRLS</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">1.55</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.74</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">15.36</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Corn N 15, P 10, K 4, soybean N 3, P 8, K 6</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Corn 8500, soybean 1900</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">13</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">37-39</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Gleying rice shallow</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">GRS</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.99</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.41</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">16.56</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">N 7.5, P 4.5, K 6</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">7500</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">14</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">40-42</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Gleying manmade forest shallow</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">GMFS</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">1.87</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.45</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">16.84</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"/>
<td valign="top" align="left"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">15</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">43-45</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Gleying uncultivated grassland/meadow shallow</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">GUGLS</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">2.01</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.75</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">16.57</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"/>
<td valign="top" align="left"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">16</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">46-48</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Typical corn soybean rotation short-time deep</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">TCSRSD</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">1.51</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.75</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">15.04</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Corn N 16, P 11, K 3, soybean N 3, P 8, K 5</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Corn 9500, soybean 2600</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">17</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">49-51</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Typical corn soybean rotation long-time deep</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">TCSRLD</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">1.42</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.81</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">14.39</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Corn N 15, P 11, K 4, soybean N 2, P 8, K 4</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Corn 9350, soybean 2300</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">18</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">52-54</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Typical rice deep</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">TRD</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.76</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.39</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">16.65</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">N 8, P 5, K 6</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">8300</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">19</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">55-57</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Typical manmade forest deep</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">TMFD</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">1.22</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.33</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">17.62</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"/>
<td valign="top" align="left"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">20</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">58-60</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Typical uncultivated grassland/meadow deep</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">TUGLD</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">1.95</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.78</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">14.21</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"/>
<td valign="top" align="left"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">21</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">61-63</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Meadow corn soybean rotation short-time deep</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">MCSRSD</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">1.62</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.69</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">14.16</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Corn N 17, P 10, K 5, soybean N 2, P 6, K 3</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Corn 9900, soybean 2750</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">22</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">64-66</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Meadow corn soybean rotation long-time deep</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">MCSRLD</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">1.8</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.79</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">15.29</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Corn N 15, P 9, K 4, soybean N 3, P 8, K 6</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Corn 9750, soybean 2500</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">23</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">67-69</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Meadow rice deep</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">MRD</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">2.31</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.9</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">14.62</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">N 7.5, P 6, K 7</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">8500</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">24</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">70-72</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Meadow manmade forest deep</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">MMFD</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">2.86</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.66</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">13.69</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"/>
<td valign="top" align="left"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">25</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">73-75</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Meadow uncultivated grassland/meadow deep</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">MUGLD</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">1.77</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.62</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">14.65</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"/>
<td valign="top" align="left"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">26</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">76-78</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Gleying corn soybean rotation short-time deep</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">GCSRSD</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">1.64</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.78</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">13.48</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Corn N 16, P 9, K 6, soybean N 2, P 7, K 5</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Corn 8700, soybean 2000</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">27</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">79-81</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Gleying corn soybean rotation long-time deep</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">GCSRLD</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">1.86</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.75</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">14.83</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Corn N 15, P 10, K 4, soybean N 3, P 8, K 6</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Corn 8500, soybean 1900</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">28</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">82-84</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Gleying rice deep</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">GRD</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">2.24</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.85</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">14.36</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">N 7.5, P 4.5, K 6</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">7500</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">29</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">85-87</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Gleying manmade forest deep</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">GMFD</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">2.37</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.58</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">13.91</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"/>
<td valign="top" align="left"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">30</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">88-90</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Gleying uncultivated grassland/meadow deep</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">GUGLD</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">1.31</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.71</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">16.17</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"/>
<td valign="top" align="left"/>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn>
<p>Treatments: 1&#x2013;5, typical shallow (TS); 6&#x2013;10, meadow shallow (MS); 11&#x2013;15, gleying shallow (GS); 16&#x2013;20, typical deep (TD); 21&#x2013;25, meadow deep (MD); 26&#x2013;30, gleying deep (GD).</p>
</fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_2">
<label>2.2</label>
<title>Bacterial diversity analysis</title>
<p>Soil samples were cryopreserved in liquid nitrogen and sent to Allwegene Technology (Beijing, China). The genomic DNA of the samples was analysed using an E.Z.N.A. Soil DNA Kit (Omega Bio-Tek, Inc., USA). 16s rDNA libraries were constructed after DNA passed the quality test. Samples were analysed using Illumina NovaSeq6000 (Illumina, Inc.). Linear discriminant analysis of effect size (LEfSe) was performed using Python (v2.7) software for LDA, with the score threshold set at 3. Samples were analysed with a focus on <italic>Bradyrhizobium</italic>, <italic>Acidobacteria</italic> genus <italic>RB41</italic> and <italic>Streptomyces</italic>, three genera associated with carbon deposition (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Stone et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_3">
<label>2.3</label>
<title>Soil organic carbon analysis</title>
<p>The 90 soil samples described above were sent to the laboratory to measure TOC, HOC, COC and MOC according to a previously listed methods (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">Wang et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>). Briefly, these four organic carbon measurement methods were used in order: oil-bath potassium dichromate oxidation&#x2013;volumetric; sodium phosphate extraction&#x2013;potassium dichromate volumetric; constant temperature culture&#x2013;hydrochloric acid titration; and anthrone colourimetric. Changes in TOC, HOC, COC and MOC were analysed comparatively according to 30 treatments.</p>
<sec id="s3_3_1">
<label>2.3.1</label>
<title>Relative changes in SOC</title>
<p>For the 30 treatments (90 soil samples), mean values of the four SOCs (TOC, HOC, COC, and MOC) were calculated. Concentrations of MF, CSRS, CSRL and R were plotted on a heat map in comparison to the SOC concentrations at UGL. For example, the TOC variation of TCSRSS was as follows:</p>
<disp-formula>
<mml:math display="block" id="M1">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>TCSRSS</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>Change&#xa0;TOC</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
<mml:mtext>Log</mml:mtext>
<mml:mo stretchy="true">(</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>TCSRSS</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>TOC</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>TUGLS</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>TOC</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfrac>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="true">)</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</disp-formula>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_3_2">
<label>2.3.2</label>
<title>Significance analysis of SOC differences</title>
<p>The 30 treatments (90 soil samples) were grouped according to two soil depths, three albic black soil subtypes and five land uses. One-way ANOVA comparisons were performed to analyse the changes in concentrations of TOC, HOC, COC and MOC at the 95% confidence level (STATA, version 15.1). The SOC biodegradability was also calculated and analysed together (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">Liu et&#xa0;al., 2023b</xref>). For example, the SOC biodegradability of TCSRSS was as follows:</p>
<disp-formula>
<mml:math display="block" id="M2">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>TCSRSS</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>SOC&#xa0;biodegradability</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>100</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>&#xd7;</mml:mo>
<mml:mo stretchy="true">(</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>TCSRSS</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>MOC</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>TCSRSS</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>TOC</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfrac>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="true">)</mml:mo>
<mml:mo>%</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</disp-formula>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_4">
<label>2.4</label>
<title>Correlation analysis between SOC and bacterial concentration</title>
<p>Concentrations of TOC, HOC, COC and MOC were analysed by regression with bacterial operational taxonomic unit (OTU) for the 90 soil samples mentioned above. R software (version 4.1.2) with the &#x201c;ggplot2&#x201d; and &#x201c;dplyr&#x201d; packages was used. Linear regression was used in this study and an <italic>r</italic>
<sup>2</sup> value of &gt; 0.5 was considered to be a positive correlation. GraphPad Prism (version 9.0.2) was used to plot the results.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s4" sec-type="results">
<label>3</label>
<title>Results</title>
<sec id="s4_1">
<label>3.1</label>
<title>Farming activities affect the structure of soil bacterial communities</title>
<p>Bacterial beta diversity analysis is shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;2A</bold>
</xref>. The clustering results of principal component analysis based on OTU level (green ellipses) show rice cultivation as a very distinct category. The blue ellipse shows that uncultivated land and manmade forest are closer in distance. Most interesting is the orange ellipse, which contains the meadow and gleying subtypes of albic black soils but not the typical subtype.</p>
<fig id="f2" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;2</label>
<caption>
<p>Effects of farming activities on soil bacterial communities. <bold>(A)</bold> Principal component analysis based on operational taxonomic unit (OTU) level. Abbreviations are shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">
<bold>Table&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref> and the numbers at the end of the abbreviations represent three replicate experiments. The rice soil was clearly distinguished from the other soils and OTU similarity was defined as 97%. <bold>(B)</bold> Evolutionary branching diagram for linear discriminant analysis of effect size (LEfSe). Control analyses were performed according to each of the three soil types and two depths. Arrow-pointing A represents <italic>Acidobacteria</italic> genus <italic>RB41</italic> and background colour represents significant differences.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-15-1381549-g002.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>The results of LEfSe for the different soil subtypes are shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;2B</bold>
</xref>. <italic>Acidobacteria</italic> genus <italic>RB41</italic> in the gleying albic black soil differed between UGL and rice. The same occurred in the shallow of the typical and meadow albic black soils. Furthermore, <italic>Acidobacteria</italic> genus <italic>RB41</italic> differed between UGL and MF. Differences between <italic>Bradyrhizobium</italic> and <italic>Streptomyces</italic> were not detected.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s4_2">
<label>3.2</label>
<title>Farming activities affect SOC</title>
<p>
<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;3A</bold>
</xref> shows that TOC concentrations were lower than UGL in the shallow group for both the MF and R treatments, and significantly lower than UGL overall for both treatments (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;3D</bold>
</xref>). <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;3B</bold>
</xref> shows that HOC and COC concentrations were significantly lower in the shallow than the deep group. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;3C</bold>
</xref> shows that the concentration of COC was significantly higher in the gleying subtype than in the typical and meadow subtypes and that the concentration of MOC was significantly higher in the meadow subtype than in the typical and gleying subtypes. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;3E</bold>
</xref> similarly showed that the five land-use modes resulted in significant differences in SOC biodegradability.</p>
<fig id="f3" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;3</label>
<caption>
<p>Effects of farming activities on soil organic carbon (SOC). <bold>(A)</bold> Heat map of relative changes in SOC: total, humus, carbohydrate and mineralizable organic carbon (TOC, HOC, COC and MOC, respectively) levels are plotted using uncultivated grassland/meadow (UGL) as a constant reference value; red colour represents an increase and blue represents a decrease. <bold>(B&#x2013;D)</bold> Comparative violin plots of SOC concentration: <bold>(B)</bold> soil depth is divided into shallow (S) and deep (D); <bold>(C)</bold> soil type is divided into three subtypes &#x2013; typical (T), meadow (M) and gleying (G); <bold>(D)</bold> land use is divided into five classes and the classification method is shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">
<bold>Table&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>. <bold>(E)</bold> Comparative analysis of SOC biodegradability: green dots represent sample values, orange lines represent mean values and blue bars represent standard errors; different letters in the graph indicate significant differences (<italic>p&lt;</italic> 0.05).</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-15-1381549-g003.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="s4_3">
<label>3.3</label>
<title>Correlation between relative abundance of soil bacteria and SOC</title>
<p>
<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f4">
<bold>Figures&#xa0;4A&#x2013;D</bold>
</xref> show that <italic>RB41</italic>(<italic>p</italic>=0.001), <italic>Candidatus-Omnitrophus</italic>(<italic>p</italic>=0.0005) and <italic>Ahniella</italic>(<italic>p</italic>=0.002) are positively correlated with TOC in gleying shallow (GS) albic black soil. <italic>Candidatus-Omnitrophus</italic>(<italic>p</italic>=0.0001) and <italic>Ahniella</italic>(<italic>p</italic>=0.0013) are each positively correlated with MOC in meadow shallow (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f4">
<bold>Figures&#xa0;4B</bold>
</xref> (MS) and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f4">
<bold>4E</bold>
</xref> (TD)). Notably, SOCB biodegradability in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f4">
<bold>Figures&#xa0;4B, F</bold>
</xref> are each positively correlated with <italic>Candidatus-Omnitrophus</italic>(<italic>p</italic>&lt;0.0001) and <italic>Ahniella</italic>(<italic>p</italic>=0.018). Our results clarify which genus of bacteria contributes most to soil carbon deposition.</p>
<fig id="f4" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;4</label>
<caption>
<p>Correlation of relative abundance of soil bacteria with soil organic carbon (SOC). <bold>(A)</bold> Correlation of <italic>RB41</italic> with SOC in gleying shallow (GS) albic black soil; <bold>(B, C)</bold> correlation of <italic>Candidatus-Omnitrophus</italic> with SOC in meadow shallow (MS) and GS; <bold>(D&#x2013;F)</bold> correlation of <italic>Ahniella</italic> with SOC in GS, typical deep (TD) and gleying deep (GD). The <italic>r</italic>
<sup>2</sup> values are shown in parentheses and the dashed line represents the 95% confidence level.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-15-1381549-g004.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s5" sec-type="discussion">
<label>4</label>
<title>Discussion</title>
<p>Most of the carbon sinks in the terrestrial natural environment are stored in the soil (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">Tao et&#xa0;al., 2023</xref>) and a large deposition of SOC reduces the concentration of CO<sub>2</sub> in the atmosphere (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">Xiao et&#xa0;al., 2023</xref>). Due to human farming activities impacting carbon sequestration, soil carbon sinks have been altered (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">Wang et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>). There is an equilibrium relationship in the carbon cycle in the natural state and human activities undoubtedly affect this balance (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">Ren et&#xa0;al., 2023</xref>). The purpose of this study is to investigate the effect of human activities on carbon deposition based on fine soil classification. At similar latitudes, different soil types with the same tillage practices can produce different changes in soil microorganisms (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Liu et&#xa0;al., 2023d</xref>). However, none of the literature has examined soil microbial and SOC-related changes based on soil subtype.</p>
<sec id="s5_1">
<label>4.1</label>
<title>Effects of human farming activities on soil microbial communities</title>
<p>Human farming activities effect on soil microbial communities. That are multifaceted include: fertilizer application (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Guo et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">Ullah et&#xa0;al., 2023b</xref>), cultivation of different plants (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Christel et&#xa0;al., 2024</xref>), pesticide use (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Bhende et&#xa0;al., 2024</xref>) and land-use practices (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Christel et&#xa0;al., 2024</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Su et&#xa0;al., 2024</xref>). Our study found that rice cultivation led to an increase in anaerobic microorganisms, a phenomenon that was not explored in depth in this study because we are unsure of the contribution made by anaerobic microorganisms to soil carbon deposition.</p>
<p>The plough layer of the experimental land is 0-20cm deep, while plant roots can actually reach the 20-40cm depth. Additionally, arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi can extend the range reached by plant roots in the rhizosphere even further (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">Babalola et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>). A study on microplastic influence on SOC showed that bacteria are affected differently by external factors at different depths of the soil layer (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Liu et&#xa0;al., 2023c</xref>). The <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;2B</bold>
</xref> results of our study also indicate that the depth of the soil layer is an important condition that affects microorganisms. It is generally believed that the albic layer of albic black soils is not rich in nutrients and that the microorganisms living in it mainly rely on nutrients deposited from the top layer of black soil. However, the root system of plants can reach this depth and also provide the necessary nutrients for the microorganisms.</p>
<p>Different grassland-use patterns lead to changes in soil bacterial communities (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">Cao et&#xa0;al., 2023</xref>) Studies on different soil types have shown that soil microorganisms also differ among soil types under the same agricultural tillage conditions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Rodriguez-Echeverria et&#xa0;al., 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">Raji and Thangavelu, 2021</xref>). A comparative study of different SOC levels between grasslands and agricultural cultivation revealed that long-term fertilization and irrigation have led to an increase in MBC (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Li et&#xa0;al., 2019</xref>). We consider that the effect of farming activities on soil bacterial communities and SOC deposition is different for the three soil subtypes. The results of this study show that the orange ellipse analysed by principal component analysis contains the meadow and gleying subtypes of albic black soils but not the typical subtype. This suggests that it is essential to study the bacterial community variegation according to the fine soil classification. Our results <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3">
<bold>Figures&#xa0;3C, E</bold>
</xref>, showing significant differences of COC and MOC concentrations in the typical, meadow and gleying subtypes, also support this consideration.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s5_2">
<label>4.2</label>
<title>Farming activities affect SOC</title>
<p>SOC is a key indicator of soil quality. A high level of SOC means that more food can be produced (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">Boubehziz et&#xa0;al., 2024</xref>). On the one hand, soil absorbs carbon dioxide from the atmosphere and the organic fertilizers used also contain carbon sources. On the other hand, the output of food takes away part of the carbon source (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Kong et&#xa0;al., 2024</xref>). This is a SOC balance process. At the UN Climate Change Conference of the Parties (COP21) in 2015, the task was proposed to increase soil carbon input, reduce soil carbon output, and increase soil organic matter by 0.4% every year (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Gomez et&#xa0;al., 2024</xref>). SOC can be increased by agricultural management and improving soil quality (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Ullah et&#xa0;al., 2023a</xref>). We have previously reported that the pattern of SOC changes in the rice cultivation process in meadow, black and planosol soils (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">Wang et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>). The results involving meadow soil were similar to most of the results in this study; some of the different results may be due to the fact that the soil depths in this study were directly defined as 0&#x2013;20 cm (shallow) and 20&#x2013;40 cm (deep) and samples were collected without strictly following the tilth layer, plough pan layer and subsoil layer sampling (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">Wang et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>). In addition, other research teams collecting 0&#x2013;20 cm soil layer samples in river deltas reported that SOC concentrations have increased over the past 40 years (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">Liu et&#xa0;al., 2023a</xref>). However, the collection of 0&#x2013;20 cm soil layer samples analysed showed that agricultural cultivation has led to a decrease in black soil SOC concentrations over the past 35 year (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">Wang et&#xa0;al., 2023</xref>). The <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;3D</bold>
</xref> results of this study showed that TOC concentrations for the MF and R treatments were significantly lower than for UGL, similar to the results reported by other teams. However, the TOC concentrations for UGL, CSRS and CSRL treatments were not significantly different. Compared to UGL, the four land use types are adopted by humans to obtain more agricultural products. MF and R reduce TOC. The comparison of the four land use types indicates that CSRS and CSRL did not reduce TOC. Therefore, they play a positive role in the deposition of soil carbon sink in terrestrial ecosystems.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s5_3">
<label>4.3</label>
<title>Relationship between soil microorganisms and SOC deposition</title>
<p>According to the &#x201c;soil microbial carbon pump&#x201d; theory, it is believed that microorganisms are key factors in regulating the SOC pool (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Kong et&#xa0;al., 2024</xref>). The cell walls of soil microorganisms are unstable and easily decomposable, playing a positive role in soil nutrient and material cycling (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Fan et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>). Lower SOC biodegradability indicates higher SOC stability. Furthermore, SOC biodegradability decreases with increasing latitude, suggesting that SOC becomes more stable with decreasing temperature (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">Liu et&#xa0;al., 2023b</xref>). The SOC biodegradability for the CSRS and CSRL treatments in our results <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;3D</bold>
</xref> suggests higher SOC stability.</p>
<p>Our results <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f4">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;4A</bold>
</xref> indicate a positive correlation between <italic>Acidobacteria</italic> genus <italic>RB41</italic> and SOC deposition. This is similar to the results reported by Stone (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Stone et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>). In addition, we found that <italic>Candidatus-Omnitrophus</italic> and <italic>Ahniella</italic> were positively correlated with TOC in GS albic black soil (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f4">
<bold>Figures&#xa0;4C, D</bold>
</xref>). <italic>Candidatus-Omnitrophus</italic> occupies an important position in the underwater sediment (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">Williams et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">Su&#xe1;rez-Moo et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>). There are few reports on <italic>Ahniella</italic> in soil and it has only been found in sorghum rhizobiome communities (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Chou et&#xa0;al., 2023</xref>). The results of this study suggest that <italic>Candidatus-Omnitrophus</italic> and <italic>Ahniella</italic> are closely associated with SOC deposition. However, we are not sure whether SOC enhancement promotes <italic>Candidatus-Omnitrophus</italic> and <italic>Ahniella</italic> or whether <italic>Candidatus-Omnitrophus</italic> and <italic>Ahniella</italic> enhancement promotes SOC. In addition, it is not certain how SOC is transferred from <italic>Acidobacteria</italic> genus <italic>RB41</italic> to <italic>Candidatus-Omnitrophus</italic> and <italic>Ahniella</italic>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s5_4">
<label>4.4</label>
<title>limitations</title>
<p>Fungi and bacteria jointly influence soil carbon sequestration (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">Li et&#xa0;al., 2024</xref>). However, this study only investigated the role of bacteria in this process, without fully considering the promoting effects of fungi, which have a symbiotic relationship with bacteria and plants. Therefore, the study has certain limitations.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s6" sec-type="conclusions">
<label>5</label>
<title>Conclusions</title>
<p>The effects of farming activities on soil bacterial communities and SOC deposition were different in three subtypes of albic black soil. Soil bacteria play a key role in the process of organic carbon deposition, with <italic>RB41</italic>, <italic>Candidatus-Omnitrophus</italic> and <italic>Ahniella</italic> being positively correlated with SOC deposition. Understanding the mechanisms and patterns of influence of soil bacteria on organic carbon deposition can help to improve soil fertility, protect the ecological environment and provide a scientific basis for soil carbon cycle management. Future research should focus on analysis of functional genes and the community structure of soil bacteria to reveal their key roles in the process of organic carbon deposition.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s7" sec-type="data-availability">
<title>Data availability statement</title>
<p>The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author/s.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s8" sec-type="author-contributions">
<title>Author contributions</title>
<p>QW: Writing &#x2013; original draft, Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing, Resources, Funding acquisition, Supervision. DZ: Writing &#x2013; original draft, Resources. FJ: Writing &#x2013; original draft, Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing, Resources, Funding acquisition, Supervision. HZ: Writing &#x2013; original draft, Resources. ZG: Writing &#x2013; original draft, Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing, Formal analysis, Supervision.</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<sec id="s9" sec-type="funding-information">
<title>Funding</title>
<p>The author(s) declare financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (Grant number 2022YFD1500800).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s10" sec-type="COI-statement">
<title>Conflict of interest</title>
<p>The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s11" sec-type="disclaimer">
<title>Publisher&#x2019;s note</title>
<p>All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.</p>
</sec>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="B1">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ansari</surname> <given-names>W. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kumar</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Krishna</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Singh</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zeyad</surname> <given-names>M. T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tiwari</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2024</year>). <article-title>Influence of rice-wheat and sugarcane-wheat rotations on microbial diversity and plant growth promoting bacteria: Insights from high-throughput sequencing and soil analysis</article-title>. <source>Microbiol. Res.</source> <volume>278</volume>, <fpage>127533</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.micres.2023.127533</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Babalola</surname> <given-names>B. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Willing</surname> <given-names>C. E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zheng</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Y. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gan</surname> <given-names>H. Y.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Nitrogen fertilisation disrupts the temporal dynamics of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal hyphae but not spore density and community composition in a wheat field</article-title>. <source>New Phytol.</source> <volume>234</volume>, <fpage>2057</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2072</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/nph.18043</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Bardgett</surname> <given-names>R. D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>van der Putten</surname> <given-names>W. H.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Belowground biodiversity and ecosystem functioning</article-title>. <source>Nature</source> <volume>515</volume>, <fpage>505</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>511</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nature13855</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Bhende</surname> <given-names>R. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bombaywala</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dafale</surname> <given-names>N. A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2024</year>). <article-title>Unleashing potential of Pseudomonas aeruginosa RNC3 and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia RNC7 for chlorpyrifos biodegradation by genome analysis and kinetic studies</article-title>. <source>J. Hazard Mater</source> <volume>461</volume>, <fpage>132668</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jhazmat.2023.132668</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Boubehziz</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Piccini</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jimenez-Gonzalez</surname> <given-names>M. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Almendros</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2024</year>). <article-title>Spatial distribution of soil organic carbon quality descriptors determining factors that affect its sequestration in Northeast Algeria</article-title>. <source>J. Environ. Manage</source> <volume>358</volume>, <fpage>120772</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.120772</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Cao</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ma</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cui</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>Soil organic carbon fraction accumulation and bacterial characteristics in curtilage soil: Effects of land conversion and land use</article-title>. <source>PLoS One</source> <volume>18</volume>, <elocation-id>e0283802</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0283802</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Taylor</surname> <given-names>A. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Reich</surname> <given-names>P. B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hisano</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>H. Y. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chang</surname> <given-names>S. X.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>Tree diversity increases decadal forest soil carbon and nitrogen accrual</article-title>. <source>Nature</source> <volume>618</volume>, <fpage>94</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>101</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41586-023-05941-9</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Chou</surname> <given-names>M.-Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Andersen</surname> <given-names>T. B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Llontop</surname> <given-names>M. E. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Beculheimer</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sow</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Moreno</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>Terpenes modulate bacterial and fungal growth and sorghum rhizobiome communities</article-title>. <source>Microbiol. Spectr.</source> <volume>11</volume>, <fpage>e01332</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>e01323</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/spectrum.01332-23</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Christel</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chemidlin Prevost-Boure</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dequiedt</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Saby</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mercier</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tripied</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2024</year>). <article-title>Differential responses of soil microbial biomass, diversity and interactions to land use intensity at a territorial scale</article-title>. <source>Sci. Total Environ.</source> <volume>906</volume>, <fpage>167454</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.167454</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Fan</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gao</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Qu</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Improved model simulation of soil carbon cycling by representing the microbially derived organic carbon pool</article-title>. <source>ISME J.</source> <volume>15</volume>, <fpage>2248</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2263</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41396-021-00914-0</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Gomez</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Carcedo</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mean</surname> <given-names>C. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Reyes</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hok</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tivet</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2024</year>). <article-title>A dataset for soil organic carbon in agricultural systems for the Southeast Asia region</article-title>. <source>Sci. Data</source> <volume>11</volume>, <fpage>374</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41597-024-03213-3</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Guo</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lv</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>He</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Feng</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>A global meta-analysis of animal manure application and soil microbial ecology based on random control treatments</article-title>. <source>PLoS One</source> <volume>17</volume>, <elocation-id>e0262139</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0262139</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Jin</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yuan</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lan</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cheng</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>Synthesis of artificial humic acid-urea complex improves nitrogen utilization</article-title>. <source>J. Environ. Manage</source> <volume>344</volume>, <fpage>118377</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.118377</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kong</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yuan</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Song</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Guo</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2024</year>). <article-title>Soil bacterial community characteristics and its effect on organic carbon under different fertilization treatments</article-title>. <source>Front. Microbiol.</source> <volume>15</volume>, <elocation-id>1356171</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmicb.2024.1356171</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kumar Sootahar</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zeng</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Su</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bai</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>The effect of fulvic acids derived from different materials on changing properties of albic black soil in the Northeast plain of China</article-title>. <source>Molecules</source> <volume>24</volume>, <page-range>1535</page-range>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/molecules24081535</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wagg</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Castellano</surname> <given-names>M. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ding</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2024</year>). <article-title>Soil organic carbon loss decreases biodiversity but stimulates multitrophic interactions that promote belowground metabolism</article-title>. <source>Glob Chang Biol.</source> <volume>30</volume>, <elocation-id>e17101</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/gcb.17101</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>F. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>L. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>J. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Abiotic and biotic controls on dynamics of labile phosphorus fractions in calcareous soils under agricultural cultivation</article-title>. <source>Sci. Total Environ.</source> <volume>681</volume>, <fpage>163</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>174</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.05.091</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B18">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gong</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ouyang</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2023</year>a). <article-title>Continuous crop rotation increases soil organic carbon stocks in river deltas: A 40-year field evidence</article-title>. <source>Sci. Total Environ.</source> <volume>906</volume>, <fpage>167749</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.167749</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B21">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Han</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fang</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2023</year>d). <article-title>Core bacteria carrying the genes associated with the degradation of atrazine in different soils</article-title>. <source>Environ. Int.</source> <volume>181</volume>, <fpage>108303</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.envint.2023.108303</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B20">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Niu</surname> <given-names>S. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xiang</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liao</surname> <given-names>X. D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xing</surname> <given-names>S. C.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2023</year>c). <article-title>Effects of the oversized microplastic pollution layer on soil aggregates and organic carbon at different soil depths</article-title>. <source>J. Hazard Mater</source> <volume>450</volume>, <fpage>131014</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jhazmat.2023.131014</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B19">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sun</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>McLaughlin</surname> <given-names>N. B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jia</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liang</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2023</year>b). <article-title>The driving mechanism of soil organic carbon biodegradability in the black soil region of Northeast China</article-title>. <source>Sci. Total Environ.</source> <volume>884</volume>, <fpage>163835</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.163835</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B22">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ma</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pan</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2024</year>). <article-title>Natural and regenerated saltmarshes exhibit different bulk soil and aggregate-associated organic and inorganic carbon contents but similar total carbon contents</article-title>. <source>J. Environ. Manage</source> <volume>349</volume>, <fpage>119451</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.119451</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B23">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Raji</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Thangavelu</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Isolation and screening of potassium solubilizing bacteria from saxicolous habitat and their impact on tomato growth in different soil types</article-title>. <source>Arch. Microbiol.</source> <volume>203</volume>, <fpage>3147</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>3161</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00203-021-02284-9</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B24">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ren</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mao</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yu</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xu</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Huang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>China's wetland soil organic carbon pool: New estimation on pool size, change, and trajectory</article-title>. <source>Glob Chang Biol.</source> <volume>29</volume>, <fpage>6139</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>6156</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/gcb.16923</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B25">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Rodriguez-Echeverria</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Moreno</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bedmar</surname> <given-names>E. J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Genetic diversity of root nodulating bacteria associated with Retama sphaerocarpa in sites with different soil and environmental conditions</article-title>. <source>Syst. Appl. Microbiol.</source> <volume>37</volume>, <fpage>305</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>310</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.syapm.2013.11.003</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B26">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Stone</surname> <given-names>B. W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Koch</surname> <given-names>B. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Blazewicz</surname> <given-names>S. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dijkstra</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hayer</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Nutrients cause consolidation of soil carbon flux to small proportion of bacterial community</article-title>. <source>Nat. Commun.</source> <volume>12</volume>, <fpage>3381</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41467-021-23676-x</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B27">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Su</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gao</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ji</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mouazen</surname> <given-names>A. M.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2024</year>). <article-title>Soil bacterial succession with different land uses along a millennial chronosequence derived from the Yangtze River flood plain</article-title>. <source>Sci. Total Environ.</source> <volume>908</volume>, <fpage>168531</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.168531</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B28">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Su&#xe1;rez-Moo</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Remes-Rodr&#xed;guez</surname> <given-names>C. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>M&#xe1;rquez-Vel&#xe1;zquez</surname> <given-names>N. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Falc&#xf3;n</surname> <given-names>L. I.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Garc&#xed;a-Maldonado</surname> <given-names>J. Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Prieto-Dav&#xf3;</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Changes in the sediment microbial community structure of coastal and inland sinkholes of a karst ecosystem from the Yucatan peninsula</article-title>. <source>Sci. Rep.</source> <volume>12</volume>, <fpage>1110</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41598-022-05135-9</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B29">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Tao</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Huang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hungate</surname> <given-names>B. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Manzoni</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Frey</surname> <given-names>S. D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Schmidt</surname> <given-names>M. W. I.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>Microbial carbon use efficiency promotes global soil carbon storage</article-title>. <source>Nature</source> <volume>618</volume>, <fpage>981</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>985</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41586-023-06042-3</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B30">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ullah</surname> <given-names>K. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Oladosu</surname> <given-names>G. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Crooks</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2023</year>a). <article-title>Evaluating the incentive for soil organic carbon sequestration from carinata production in the Southeast United States</article-title>. <source>J. Environ. Manage</source> <volume>348</volume>, <fpage>119418</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.119418</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B31">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ullah</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Raza</surname> <given-names>M. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Abbas</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Guan</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>He</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2023</year>b). <article-title>Responses of soil microbial communities and enzyme activities under nitrogen addition in fluvo-aquic and black soil of North China</article-title>. <source>Front. Microbiol.</source> <volume>14</volume>, <elocation-id>1249471</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmicb.2023.1249471</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B33">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zheng</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Song</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>Effects of cropland reclamation on soil organic carbon in China's black soil region over the past 35 years</article-title>. <source>Glob Chang Biol.</source> <volume>29</volume>, <fpage>5460</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>5477</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/gcb.16833</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B32">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zuo</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chang</surname> <given-names>B. C.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Temporal variation in soil carbon in various paddy soil types in a cold temperate continental monsoon climate</article-title>. <source>Soil Use Manage.</source> <volume>39</volume>, <fpage>122</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>133</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/sum.12852</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B34">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Williams</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Allen</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Berengut</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cavicchioli</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Shedding light on microbial "Dark matter": Insights into novel cloacimonadota and omnitrophota from an antarctic lake</article-title>. <source>Front. Microbiol.</source> <volume>12</volume>, <elocation-id>741077</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmicb.2021.741077</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B35">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xie</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Song</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Analysis of 22-year drought characteristics in heilongjiang province based on temperature vegetation drought index</article-title>. <source>Comput. Intell. Neurosci.</source> <volume>2022</volume>, <fpage>1003243</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1155/2022/1003243</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B36">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Xiao</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yu</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>Enhanced CO(2) uptake is marginally offset by altered fluxes of non-CO(2) greenhouse gases in global forests and grasslands under N deposition</article-title>. <source>Glob Chang Biol.</source> <volume>29</volume>, <fpage>5829</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>5849</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/gcb.16869</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>