<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.3 20070202//EN" "journalpublishing.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="2.3" xml:lang="EN">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Front. Plant Sci.</journal-id>
<journal-title>Frontiers in Plant Science</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">Front. Plant Sci.</abbrev-journal-title>
<issn pub-type="epub">1664-462X</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Frontiers Media S.A.</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpls.2024.1378573</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Plant Science</subject>
<subj-group>
<subject>Original Research</subject>
</subj-group>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Impact of irradiance and inorganic carbon availability on heterologous sucrose production in <italic>Synechococcus elongatus</italic> PCC 7942</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Yun</surname>
<given-names>Lisa</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2146966"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/data-curation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/formal-analysis/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/investigation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/methodology/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/project-administration/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/resources/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/validation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/visualization/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zegarac</surname>
<given-names>Robert</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/resources/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name>
<surname>Ducat</surname>
<given-names>Daniel C.</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn001">
<sup>*</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/443394"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/conceptualization/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/funding-acquisition/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/methodology/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/project-administration/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/supervision/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
<institution>Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Michigan State University</institution>, <addr-line>East Lansing, MI</addr-line>, <country>United States</country>
</aff>
<aff id="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
<institution>Department of Energy-Michigan State University Plant Research Laboratories, Michigan State University</institution>, <addr-line>East Lansing, MI</addr-line>, <country>United States</country>
</aff>
<author-notes>
<fn fn-type="edited-by">
<p>Edited by: Bo Wang, Vanderbilt University, United States</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="edited-by">
<p>Reviewed by: Amit Srivastava, University of Jyv&#xe4;skyl&#xe4;, Finland</p>
<p>Tao Sun, Tianjin University, China</p>
<p>Martin Hagemann, University of Rostock, Germany</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="corresp" id="fn001">
<p>*Correspondence: Daniel C. Ducat, <email xlink:href="mailto:ducatdan@msu.edu">ducatdan@msu.edu</email>
</p>
</fn>
</author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>08</day>
<month>04</month>
<year>2024</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="collection">
<year>2024</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>15</volume>
<elocation-id>1378573</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>29</day>
<month>01</month>
<year>2024</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>27</day>
<month>03</month>
<year>2024</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#xa9; 2024 Yun, Zegarac and Ducat</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2024</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Yun, Zegarac and Ducat</copyright-holder>
<license xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">
<p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.</p>
</license>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<p>Cyanobacteria have been proposed as a potential alternative carbohydrate feedstock and multiple species have been successfully engineered to secrete fermentable sugars. To date, the most productive cyanobacterial strains are those designed to secrete sucrose, yet there exist considerable differences in reported productivities across different model species and laboratories. In this study, we investigate how cultivation conditions (specifically, irradiance, CO<sub>2</sub>, and cultivator type) affect the productivity of sucrose-secreting <italic>Synechococcus elongatus</italic> PCC 7942. We find that <italic>S. elongatus</italic> produces the highest sucrose yield in irradiances far greater than what is often experimentally utilized, and that high light intensities are tolerated by <italic>S. elongatus</italic>, especially under higher density cultivation where turbidity may attenuate the effective light experienced in the culture. By increasing light and inorganic carbon availability, <italic>S. elongatus cscB</italic>/<italic>sps</italic> produced a total of 3.8 g L<sup>-1</sup> of sucrose and the highest productivity within that period being 47.8 mg L<sup>-1</sup> h<sup>-1</sup>. This study provides quantitative description of the impact of culture conditions on cyanobacteria-derived sucrose that may assist to standardize cross-laboratory comparisons and demonstrates a significant capacity to improve productivity via optimizing cultivation conditions.</p>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>cyanobacteria</kwd>
<kwd>sucrose</kwd>
<kwd>feedstocks</kwd>
<kwd>bioproduction</kwd>
<kwd>high cell density</kwd>
<kwd>cultivation</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<contract-sponsor id="cn001">National Science Foundation<named-content content-type="fundref-id">10.13039/100000001</named-content>
</contract-sponsor>
<contract-sponsor id="cn002">U.S. Department of Energy<named-content content-type="fundref-id">10.13039/100000015</named-content>
</contract-sponsor>
<contract-sponsor id="cn003">National Institutes of Health<named-content content-type="fundref-id">10.13039/100000002</named-content>
</contract-sponsor>
<counts>
<fig-count count="3"/>
<table-count count="0"/>
<equation-count count="0"/>
<ref-count count="44"/>
<page-count count="10"/>
<word-count count="5736"/>
</counts>
<custom-meta-wrap>
<custom-meta>
<meta-name>section-in-acceptance</meta-name>
<meta-value>Aquatic Photosynthetic Organisms</meta-value>
</custom-meta>
</custom-meta-wrap>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec id="s1" sec-type="intro">
<label>1</label>
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>There is a need for sustainable carbohydrate feedstocks as we increasingly look to biotechnology and green chemistry approaches for energy and other commodity chemicals. Sucrose is one significant feedstock for bio-ethanol (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">Balat and Balat, 2009</xref>) and is a promising building block for many value-added chemicals (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">Peters et&#xa0;al., 2010</xref>). However, sucrose is typically produced by plant crop species (<italic>e.g.</italic>, sugar beet and sugar cane) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">Peters et&#xa0;al., 2010</xref>), giving rise to ethical concerns about diverting arable land and potable water from food production to fuel and chemicals (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Graham-Rowe, 2011</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Lang et&#xa0;al., 2017</xref>). Cellulosic biomass is another promising alternative source of fermentable carbohydrates that is under active study, yet the high costs of converting lignocellulosic materials into simple carbohydrates suitable for fermentation is currently prohibitive (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Graham-Rowe, 2011</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B44">Ziolkowska, 2014</xref>). For these reasons, an alternative source for sucrose that circumvents the controversies and complexities of plants is desirable.</p>
<p>Cyanobacteria are a diverse phylum of photosynthetic prokaryotes that are under consideration as an alternative carbohydrate feedstock species due to their ability to hyperaccumulate soluble sugars under certain growth conditions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Hays and Ducat, 2015</xref>). Moreover, cyanobacteria are less likely to compete for land and water resources with food crops, are faster growing, relatively easier to genetically engineer, and have a higher photosynthetic efficiency than land plant sources of carbohydrate feedstocks (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">Parmar et&#xa0;al., 2011</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">Satta et&#xa0;al., 2023</xref>). One promising approach for cyanobacterial sucrose production involves the heterologous expression of sucrose permease (<italic>cscB</italic>), which was originally reported to allow up to ~80% of fixed carbon to be exported in the form of sucrose when expressed in the model cyanobacterium, <italic>Synechococcus elongatus</italic> PCC 7942 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">Ducat et&#xa0;al., 2012</xref>). The high productivity of such strains is in part due to an emergent property whereby photosynthetic activity is increased: exporting sucrose increases the quantum efficiency of photosystem II, rate of photosystem II oxygen evolution, and carbon fixation rate (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">Ducat et&#xa0;al., 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">Abramson et&#xa0;al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">Santos-Merino et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">2023</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">Wang et&#xa0;al., 2023</xref>). Additional genetic modifications have been employed to increase sucrose export by increasing carbon flux to the sucrose synthesis pathway and/or decreasing flux to potential competing pathways, with mixed success (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">Santos-Merino et&#xa0;al., 2023</xref>). For example, multiple groups have shown that sucrose productivity can be enhanced by artificially over-expressing sucrose phosphate synthase (<italic>sps</italic>), an enzyme involved in a rate-limiting step of sucrose synthesis, in the background of sucrose exporting lines (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">Ducat et&#xa0;al., 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Duan et&#xa0;al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">Hays et&#xa0;al., 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Qiao et&#xa0;al., 2018</xref>).</p>
<p>Similar strategies to enable sucrose export have been used across a variety of cyanobacterial species; <italic>cscB</italic> has been expressed in <italic>S. elongatus</italic> UTEX 2973 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">Lin et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">Zhang et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>), <italic>Synechococcus</italic> sp. PCC 7002 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">Xu et&#xa0;al., 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Han et&#xa0;al., 2023</xref>), and <italic>Synechocystis</italic> sp. PCC 6803 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Du et&#xa0;al., 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">Thiel et&#xa0;al., 2019</xref>). Different cyanobacterial species exhibit varying rates of sucrose productivity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">Santos-Merino et&#xa0;al., 2023</xref>), though it is often uncertain if inter-species differences are due to genetics, distinct conditions utilized for laboratory growth, metabolic requirements, tolerances for environmental stresses, or inherent photosynthetic capacities (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">Billis et&#xa0;al., 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">Ungerer et&#xa0;al., 2018b</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">Cassier-Chauvat et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Adomako et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>). For instance, <italic>S. elongatus</italic> PCC 7942 and <italic>S. elongatus</italic> UTEX 2973 share 99.9% genome similarity, yet the latter has significantly faster growth rates, higher light and temperature tolerances, and has been reported to have a significantly higher sucrose productivity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B42">Yu et&#xa0;al., 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">Ungerer et&#xa0;al., 2018b</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">Lin et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Adomako et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>). A handful of single nucleotide polymorphisms appear to significantly contribute to enhanced tolerance of light and heat in <italic>S. elongatus</italic> UTEX 2973 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">Ungerer et&#xa0;al., 2018b</xref>), and these strains also exhibit substantially faster growth rates (2.5 hour doubling time compared to 7-8 hours). Therefore, it is possible that the increased sucrose productivity of engineered <italic>S. elongatus</italic> UTEX 2973 strains may be due to an inherently improved photosynthetic capacity. Alternatively, other factors like higher routine temperature, light growth conditions or altered partitioning of fixed carbon may contribute to the productivity of <italic>S. elongatus</italic> UTEX 2973 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Mueller et&#xa0;al., 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">Hendry et&#xa0;al., 2019</xref>).</p>
<p>In this study, we set out to systematically assess how different laboratory equipment and growth conditions impact the efficacy of sucrose production, with a particular focus on light and inorganic carbon availability as two critical factors that may impact sucrose secretion rates, and that could contribute (in part or in full) to the differences in sucrose productivity observed across different laboratories and cyanobacterial species. The interest in exploring cyanobacteria as an alternative carbohydrate feedstock has led to many recent reports documenting sucrose production, yet, as we recently reviewed (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">Santos-Merino et&#xa0;al., 2023</xref>), there can be considerable variation in productivity between different publications, even when the species and genetic modifications are identical. We explored a variety of commercial and custom-built cyanobacterial growth chambers, and report cultivation conditions and bioproduction values in standardized units to facilitate cross-comparisons between laboratories. We find a direct relationship between irradiance used for cyanobacterial cultivation and sucrose productivity, especially when inorganic carbon availability was not limiting. Our results may be valuable for the broader community of scientists working with different strains of cyanobacteria engineered as potential alternative carbohydrate feedstocks, and especially point to limitations imposed on productivity caused by inefficient CO<sub>2</sub> delivery methods. Additionally, our results have implications for the degree of variation in sucrose productivity of related cyanobacterial species, which may be significantly influenced by cultivation conditions rather than solely due to inherent metabolic and physiological limitations of slower-growing species.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2" sec-type="materials|methods">
<label>2</label>
<title>Materials and methods</title>
<sec id="s2_1">
<label>2.1</label>
<title>Strains and cultivation conditions</title>
<p>The base strain of cyanobacteria we utilize for our sucrose measurements is constructed as reported in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">Abramson et&#xa0;al., 2016</xref>. Briefly, this strain contains a copy of sucrose permease (<italic>cscB</italic>) under an IPTG-inducible Ptrc promoter installed into Neutral Site 3. An additional copy of sucrose phosphate synthase (<italic>sps</italic>) cloned from <italic>Synechocystis</italic> sp. PCC 6803 is also expressed under Ptrc and is integrated into the genome at Neutral Site 2. Inducible <italic>sps</italic> allows us to bypass the requirement for external salt for sucrose production that is in many sucrose-secreting strains. For results from &#x201c;wild-type&#x201d; (WT) strains, we use the ATCC strain of <italic>S. elongatus</italic> PCC 7942 (ATCC #33912).</p>
<p>
<italic>S. elongatus</italic> PCC 7942 strains were routinely grown in BG-11 media (C3061, Sigma-Aldrich, USA) supplemented with 1 g L<sup>-1</sup> HEPES and set to pH 8.3 with NaOH to maintain or expand cultures. Cultures were incubated in a Multitron Infors HT incubator at 32&#xb0;C with 2% CO<sub>2</sub>, 150 rpm shaking, and ~150 &#x3bc;mol photons<sup>-2</sup> s<sup>-1</sup> of continuous light from Sylvania 15 W Gro-Lux fluorescent bulbs. To standardize the growth history of strains between different experiments, all cultures were back-diluted 1:10 into BG-11 for three days prior to initiating any of the reported experiments. When needed, 1 mM IPTG was added to induce the expression of <italic>cscB</italic> and <italic>sps</italic> genes at time = 0 h. Chloramphenicol (Cm; 25 &#x3bc;g mL<sup>-1</sup>) and kanamycin (Kn; 50 &#x3bc;g mL<sup>-1</sup>) were used to maintain <italic>cscB</italic> and <italic>sps</italic>, respectively. Antibiotics were not added on the final day of back-dilution to minimize confounding effects.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_2">
<label>2.2</label>
<title>Examining light tolerance and sucrose production in MC-1000 multi-cultivators</title>
<p>The MC-1000 multi-cultivator system (Photon System Instruments, Czech Republic) was used to examine the light tolerance of <italic>S. elongatus</italic> PCC 7942; the device emits cool white light at varying light intensities (150, 250, 500, 1000, 2000, or 2500 &#x3bc;mol photons m<sup>-2</sup> s<sup>-1</sup>). MC-1000 cultures were kept at 32&#xb0;C and provided with 3% CO<sub>2</sub>. Overnight cultures were back-diluted to an OD<sub>750</sub> of ~0.3 into MC-1000 vessels with fresh BG-11 media supplemented with 10 mM HCO<sub>3</sub>
<sup>-</sup>, and induced with 1 mM IPTG as needed for low-starting density experiments. Samples were taken at 0, 24, 48, and 72 h for OD<sub>750</sub> and sucrose measurements.</p>
<p>For the experiments specifically evaluating high-light with high-starting density cultivation in the MC-1000 system, overnight cultures (prepared as outlined in section 2.1) were pelleted in a benchtop centrifuge. The supernatant was removed, and the cell pellet was resuspended with fresh BG-11 media supplemented with 10 mM HCO<sub>3</sub>
<sup>-</sup> to an OD<sub>750</sub> of ~1.5 or 2.0 (provided 2000 and 2500 &#x3bc;mol photons m<sup>-2</sup> s<sup>-1</sup>, respectively). An additional 10 mM HCO<sub>3</sub>
<sup>-</sup> was added at 24 h for vessels that were provided bicarbonate daily. Samples were taken at 0, 24, and 48 h for OD<sub>750</sub> measurements and sucrose quantification.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_3">
<label>2.3</label>
<title>Sucrose production in high-density multi-cultivators</title>
<p>The High-Density Cultivation (HDC) 6.10B starter kit (CellDEG GmbH, Germany) was used for high-CO<sub>2</sub> and high-density cultivation. The kit consists of a bottom base with a buffer reservoir and 10 mL cultivators with a gas-permeable bottom membrane. At the start of the experiments, the reservoir was filled with 200 mL of a 3 M KHCO<sub>3</sub>/3 M K<sub>2</sub>CO<sub>3</sub> solution to provide CO<sub>2</sub>. Cultures prepared in BG-11 were centrifuged for 10 min at 3700 x<italic>g</italic> and 22&#xb0;C before removing the supernatant and resuspending to an OD<sub>750</sub> of ~0.3 with CD media. CD media is designed to sustain extended periods of high-density cultivation of photosynthetic microbes, and has higher concentrations of macronutrients (N, P, and K) and micronutrients (Mg, S, Ca, Na, Cl, Fe, Zn, and Mo) relative to BG-11. Due to its enrichment, CD media has a high osmolarity (~140 mOsm) that is approximately three times greater than of BG-11 (~40 mOsm); the exact composition is available on protocols.io (dx.doi.org/10.17504/protocols.io.2bxgapn). Relevant cultures were induced with 1 mM IPTG before transferring 12 mL to the HDC system cultivators. Moderate-light HDC experiments were incubated in a Multitron incubator (Infors HT, Switzerland) providing ~150 rpm shaking and ~250 &#x3bc;mol photons m<sup>-2</sup> s<sup>-1</sup> from Sylvania 15 W Gro-Lux fluorescent bulbs. High-light HDC experiments were incubated in a growth chamber (AL-36L4, Percival Scientific, USA) with either ~500 &#x3bc;mol photons m<sup>-2</sup> s<sup>-1</sup> for 0-120 h, or ~500 &#x3bc;mol photons m<sup>-2</sup> s<sup>-1</sup> for 0-48 h and ~1000 &#x3bc;mol photons m<sup>-2</sup> s<sup>-1</sup> for 48-120 h from a light array fabricated in-house consisting of four equidistant chip-on-board (COB) LED lights (BXRA-56C5300-H, Bridgelux, USA)(<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Supplementary Figure S1</bold>
</xref>). Both incubators provided 2% ambient CO<sub>2</sub>, constant illumination, and ~150 rpm shaking. Samples were taken at 0, 24, 48, 72, 96, and 120 h to measure OD<sub>750</sub> and to collect supernatant for sucrose quantification.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_4">
<label>2.4</label>
<title>Measuring light penetration through culture depth</title>
<p>The following experimental configuration was used to measure the relationship between surface irradiance, light penetration, and culture turbidity: a glass graduated cylinder with a clear bottom was clamped onto a ring stand. A Submersible Spherical Micro Quantum Sensor (US-SQS/L; WALZ, Germany) connected to a LI-250A light meter (LI-COR, USA) was clamped above and in-center of the graduated cylinder. A single COB LED from the in-house lighting device was placed below and center of the graduated cylinder. With this setup, 5 cm of liquid (BG-11 or cell culture at the indicated OD<sub>750</sub>) fill the graduated cylinder, and the sensor measures the light that penetrates through the liquid when 0, 1, 2, or 3 cm away from the light interface of the culture (0 cm). A black, opaque sheet was wrapped around the graduated cylinder to cover all but the bottom 4 cm of the culture to block ambient light.</p>
<p>To set the desired irradiance (150, 500, 1000, 2000, 3000, or 4000 &#xb5;mol photons m<sup>-2</sup> s<sup>-1</sup>), the graduated cylinder was filled with 5 cm of BG-11, and the sensor was placed flush to the bottom of the glass to measure the incoming light at 0 cm. WT cultures were prepared as outlined in Section 2.1, pelleted, and supernatants removed. Pellets were resuspended with fresh BG-11 to create a concentrate that was diluted with BG-11 to 0.3, 1.0, 2.0, 5.0, and 10.0 OD<sub>750</sub>. Five mL of each culture filled the graduated cylinder and penetrating irradiances at 1, 2, and 3 cm were recorded at applicable light intensities. For this and setting the irradiance, the average function of the LI-250A was used in which the device averages the values recorded over a 15-second interval.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_5">
<label>2.5</label>
<title>Sucrose quantification</title>
<p>Samples collected at the time points specified above were pelleted in a microcentrifuge; the supernatants were saved and stored at -20&#xb0;C until the end of the experiment. Sucrose quantification was performed using the Sucrose/D-Glucose Assay Kit (K-SUCGL; Megazyme, USA).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_6">
<label>2.6</label>
<title>Dry cell weight determination</title>
<p>To determine the dry cell weight of <italic>S. elongatus</italic> PCC 7942 strains, cultivation conditions were recreated as outlined in Section 2.2 for low-starting density experiments in the MC-1000, and Section 2.3 for moderate-light experiments in the HDC. Samples were collected at a variety of culture densities (OD<sub>750</sub>) in order to generate a broad distribution for standard curves correlating OD<sub>750</sub> with dry cell biomass (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Supplementary Figure S2</bold>
</xref>). The OD<sub>750</sub> of collected samples was determined with a visible spectrophotometer (Genesys 20; Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA), washed with Milli-Q water twice, and resuspended into the desired OD<sub>750</sub> with Milli-Q water. Three to 20 mL of the prepared samples were pelleted in a Falcon tube and most of the supernatant removed; the remaining water was used to create a concentrated resuspension to transfer to a pre-weighed 3 mL glass test tube. Milli-Q water was used as needed to rinse the Falcon tube and added to the glass test tube. Samples were dried in a 90&#xb0;C oven for 24 h, or until the mass remained stable. The mass of the empty glass test tube was subtracted from the final weight, and the resulting value was divided by the volume used to determine the dry cell weight (g L<sup>-1</sup>) for corresponding OD<sub>750</sub>. Python was used to create a linear regression model and derive the function parameters, which was then used to convert OD<sub>750</sub> into dry cell weight.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s3" sec-type="results">
<label>3</label>
<title>Results</title>
<sec id="s3_1">
<label>3.1</label>
<title>Assessing high-light tolerance in <italic>S. elongatus</italic>
</title>
<p>We first selected a strain of <italic>S. elongatus</italic> PCC 7942 that has been engineered for sucrose secretion in a salt-independent manner. Briefly, hyperaccumulation of cytosolic sucrose is a common strategy for osmotic stress protection in many freshwater cyanobacterial species (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Kl&#xe4;hn and Hagemann, 2011</xref>), where this compatible solute can act as a counter osmoticum while also conferring other cellular protective effects. A rate-limiting step of sucrose biosynthesis occurs at the enzyme sucrose phosphate synthase (SPS), that catalyzes the condensation of NDP-glucose with fructose-6-phosphate to form sucrose-6-phosphate. SPS enzymes are frequently encoded as a bi-domanial protein that also contains sucrose-6-phosphate phosphatase (SPP) activity that dephosphorylates this intermediate to sucrose. We and others have found that expression of sucrose permease (<italic>cscB</italic>), a symporter of sucrose and protons, will lead to the export of cytosolic sucrose to the medium (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">Ducat et&#xa0;al., 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">Santos-Merino et&#xa0;al., 2023</xref>). In <italic>S. elongatus</italic> PCC 7942 strains with inducible copies of both <italic>sps</italic> and <italic>cscB</italic>, sucrose synthesis and export can be achieved in the absence of external osmotic pressure (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">Abramson et&#xa0;al., 2016</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">Lin et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Dan et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>). We therefore selected this strain to minimize the requirement for addition of salt to the growth medium.</p>
<p>We first used the MC-1000 multi-cultivator to evaluate the impact of varied light intensity (150, 250, 500, 1000, 2000 &#xb5;mol photons m<sup>-2</sup> s<sup>-1</sup>) on growth and sucrose production of <italic>S. elongatus</italic> PCC 7942 <italic>cscB</italic>/<italic>sps</italic> strains and to broadly assess light tolerance. The growth of WT strains cultured with 150 and 1000 &#xb5;mol photons m<sup>-2</sup> s<sup>-1</sup>, and non-exporting <italic>cscB</italic>/<italic>sps</italic> with 1000 &#xb5;mol photons m<sup>-2</sup> s<sup>-1</sup> grew at similar rates, reaching a final density of ~2.2 OD<sub>750</sub> (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;1A</bold>
</xref>, left). Sucrose-exporting strains, however, can partition a large fraction of their fixed carbon to secreted sucrose, leading to less cellular growth and biomass under certain conditions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">Ducat et&#xa0;al., 2012</xref>)(<italic>see also</italic>, <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Supplementary Figure S3</bold>
</xref>). The highest OD<sub>750</sub> among sucrose exporters were from cultures grown with moderate irradiances of 250 and 500 &#xb5;mol photons m<sup>-2</sup> s<sup>-1</sup> (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;1A</bold>
</xref>, center and right), though differences were not statistically significant from other exporting conditions (p &gt; 0.05). For sucrose-secreting lines in the MC-1000, there was a direct correlation between illumination and both cell growth and sucrose production up to 500 &#xb5;mol photons m<sup>-2</sup> s<sup>-1</sup>; light intensities beyond this threshold led to a decline in productivity (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">
<bold>Figures&#xa0;1A, B</bold>
</xref>). Sucrose production over 72 hours peaked at 0.56 g L<sup>-1</sup> for 250 &#xb5;mol photons m<sup>-2</sup> s<sup>-1</sup> and 0.68 g L<sup>-1</sup> for 500 &#xb5;mol photons m<sup>-2</sup> s<sup>-1</sup> (p &lt; 0.001 against all other light conditions) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;1B</bold>
</xref>). The relationship between irradiance and growth, however, is abolished when strains are not induced to export sucrose, and growth rates were relatively unaffected by illumination between 150 and 1000 &#xb5;mol photons m<sup>-2</sup> s<sup>-1</sup> (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;1A</bold>
</xref>, left). These data suggest that high light may indeed be harmful, and the increased photosynthetic capacity provided by a heterologous sink (<italic>i.e.</italic>, sucrose export) is not protective against light stress. However, it appears that <italic>S. elongatus</italic> PCC 7942 can remain resilient when not imposed with the additional burden of producing and secreting sucrose.</p>
<fig id="f1" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;1</label>
<caption>
<p>Growth and sucrose yields of WT and <italic>cscB</italic>/<italic>sps</italic>-expressing <italic>S. elongatus</italic> grown in the MC-1000 under various light intensities. <bold>(A)</bold> The OD<sub>750</sub> of non-sucrose exporting (center and right) strains. Plots were split for visual clarity. <bold>(B)</bold> sucrose production of cultures started at low cell density (~0.3 OD<sub>750</sub>). Brackets in the legend denote significant differences (p &lt; 0.05) at 72 h by one-way ANOVA in <bold>(A)</bold> all cultures and <bold>(B)</bold> induced cultures. The <bold>(C)</bold> OD<sub>750</sub> and <bold>(D)</bold> sucrose production of cultures started at high cell densities (~1.5 and 2 OD<sub>750</sub>). Error bars denote standard deviation.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-15-1378573-g001.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>To evaluate if the sucrose productivity in these experiments was limited by a low-starting density, we increased the starting inoculation density. Since the effects of self-shading within higher density cultures lead to an effectively lower irradiation under the same outside illumination, we utilized brighter lights for our high-density starter cultures of 1.5 and 2.0 OD<sub>750</sub>, the upper range of OD<sub>750</sub> the MC-1000 was able to support. To select the irradiances for these dense cultures, we revisited the most successful light intensity in our previous experiment. Cultures of 0.3 OD<sub>750</sub> exposed to 500 &#xb5;mol photons m<sup>-2</sup> s<sup>-1</sup> light receive ~300 &#xb5;mol photons m<sup>-2</sup> s<sup>-1</sup> light when measured 1 cm from the surface (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Supplementary Figure S4</bold>
</xref>). Application of 2000 and 2500 &#xb5;mol photons m<sup>-2</sup> s<sup>-1</sup> to cultures of 1.5 and 2.0 OD<sub>750</sub>, respectively, would achieve similar internal light intensities (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Supplementary Figure S4</bold>
</xref>).</p>
<p>We observed limited growth within the first 24 h of these cultures, but the density of the culture plateaued or declined in the following day to values statistically similar to starting turbidities (p &gt; 0.05) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;1C</bold>
</xref>). Cultures grown with 2000 &#xb5;mol photons m<sup>-2</sup> s<sup>-1</sup> produced 0.23 g L<sup>-1</sup> sucrose within the first day, and had a final sucrose content of 0.35 g L<sup>-1</sup> (p &gt; 0.4); cultures grown with 2500 &#xb5;mol photons m<sup>-2</sup> s<sup>-1</sup> produced 0.22 and 0.28 g L<sup>-1</sup> sucrose at 24 and 48 h (p = 1.0), respectively (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;1D</bold>
</xref>). Notably, the level of sucrose production from high density cultures was only marginally improved (~15%) at 48 h relative to cultures seeded at a lower density grown with 2000 &#xb5;mol photons m<sup>-2</sup> s<sup>-1</sup> (p = 0.002) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">
<bold>Figures&#xa0;1B, D</bold>
</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_2">
<label>3.2</label>
<title>Optimizing high cell density cultivation with increased irradiance and CO<sub>2</sub>
</title>
<p>Curiously, both the cellular growth rate and sucrose productivity were relatively modest in the MC-1000 in comparison to values reported for similar strains by our group and others (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">Santos-Merino et&#xa0;al., 2023</xref>), suggesting that these cultures might be limited by another environmental variable (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">
<bold>Figures&#xa0;1A, B</bold>
</xref>). Although 3% CO<sub>2</sub> was bubbled into the cultivation tubes for these experiments, the method of delivery (sparging via a large-bore needle) may not be the most efficient compared to other methods for enriching inorganic carbon. Consistent with a possible inorganic carbon limitation, sucrose productivity was slightly, but significantly, enhanced in MC-1000 cultures supplemented with 10 mM HCO<sub>3</sub>
<sup>-</sup> (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;1B</bold>
</xref>) relative to cultures without bicarbonate when grown with 500, 1000, and 2000 &#xb5;mol photons m<sup>-2</sup> s<sup>-1</sup> (p = 0.038, 0.020, 0.028, respectively) (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Supplementary Figure S5</bold>
</xref>). However, we were unable to overcome any potential limitation of inorganic carbon in dense cultures through the supplementation of additional HCO<sub>3</sub>
<sup>-</sup> (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Supplementary Figure S6</bold>
</xref>).</p>
<p>To more directly evaluate the hypothesis that carbon limitation was limiting for growth and sucrose productivity in the MC-1000, we utilized the High-Density Cultivation (HDC) system (CellDEG GmbH, Germany). These cultivation vessels are designed to deliver a saturating level of inorganic carbon through a permeable membrane with a large surface area (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">Lippi et&#xa0;al., 2018</xref>). Using an identical growth medium (BG-11), a significant enhancement of cell growth and sucrose production was observed in the CellDeg HDC system relative to the MC-1000 with comparable illumination (250 &#x3bc;mol photons m<sup>-2</sup> s<sup>-1</sup>). Strains that were not induced to export sucrose grew to 5.3 OD<sub>750</sub> over 72 h while producing a marginal amount of sucrose (0.02 g L<sup>-1</sup>). Strains induced to secrete sucrose grew to 4.6 OD<sub>750</sub> and produced 1.0 g L<sup>-1</sup> sucrose (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">
<bold>Figures&#xa0;2A, B</bold>
</xref>). Curiously, under these conditions of high inorganic carbon availability, we observed little, but significant, difference in growth rate in the sucrose-exporting strains despite a significant rate of carbon export in the form of sucrose (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">
<bold>Figures&#xa0;2A, B, E</bold>
</xref>).</p>
<fig id="f2" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;2</label>
<caption>
<p>Growth and sucrose production of induced and uninduced <italic>cscB</italic>/<italic>sps</italic>-expressing <italic>S. elongatus</italic> grown in the CellDEG HDC cultivator system at moderate light intensity (~250 &#x3bc;mol photons m<sup>-2</sup> s<sup>-1</sup>). The OD<sub>750</sub> and sucrose production, respectively, of cultures grown in <bold>(A, B)</bold> BG-11 media, and <bold>(C, D)</bold> CD media. <bold>(E)</bold> Total fixed carbon for induced strains in BG-11 and CD media as shown by sucrose and dry cell weight accumulated per day. Error bars denote standard deviation. Asterisks denote significant differences between induction conditions at the indicated timepoint by independent samples t-test (p &lt; 0.005). Daggers denote significant differences in induced cultures between <bold>(A, B)</bold> and <bold>(B, C)</bold> conditions by independent samples t-test (p &lt; 0.001).</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-15-1378573-g002.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>Since nutrients in BG-11 medium can become limiting at higher density, we next evaluated an enriched medium (CD) designed to support high-density cultures, such as those achievable in the HDC system (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Dienst et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>). When cultures were grown in CD media, non-exporting strains reached 11.1 OD<sub>750</sub> over the course of 5 days (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;2C</bold>
</xref>), while also secreting a disproportionally high level of sucrose for an uninduced culture (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;2D</bold>
</xref>). Strains induced to export sucrose were significantly stunted in growth after 120 h (3 OD<sub>750</sub>; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;2C</bold>
</xref>) and secreted sucrose at a higher rate.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_3">
<label>3.3</label>
<title>Increasing light and CO<sub>2</sub> availability to enhance sucrose synthesis</title>
<p>Environmental conditions enriched with nutrients and inorganic carbon supported substantially higher cyanobacterial production with increased irradiation. Cultivating <italic>cscB</italic>/<italic>sps</italic> strains with high CO<sub>2</sub> (HDC) and with 500 &#x3bc;mol photons m<sup>-2</sup> s<sup>-1</sup>, non-exporting and sucrose-exporting strains reached OD<sub>750</sub> of 15.8 and 5.2, respectively (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;3A</bold>
</xref>). Furthermore, strains induced to secrete sucrose accumulated up to 3.3 g L<sup>-1</sup> over the course of 5 days, while uninduced cultures accumulated 1.15 g L<sup>-1</sup> (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;3B</bold>
</xref>). Further enhancements in bioproduction could be achieved by further increasing light intensity to 1000 &#x3bc;mol photons m<sup>-2</sup> s<sup>-1</sup> at 48 h when cultures were more turbid: sucrose-secreting strains reached an OD<sub>750</sub> of 6.0 and sucrose yields of 3.8 g L<sup>-1</sup> (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3">
<bold>Figures&#xa0;3C, D</bold>
</xref>). Uninduced strains under these growth conditions achieved 18.4 OD<sub>750</sub> and secreted a surprisingly high amount of sucrose, reaching 2.3 g/L sucrose at the end of 120 h.</p>
<fig id="f3" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;3</label>
<caption>
<p>Growth and sucrose production of induced and uninduced <italic>cscB</italic>/<italic>sps</italic>-expressing <italic>S. elongatus</italic> grown in the HDC system with moderately high and high-light intensity (MH and H, respectively) and CD media. The OD<sub>750</sub> and supernatant sucrose concentration of cultures grown with <bold>(A, B)</bold> 500 &#x3bc;mol photons m<sup>-2</sup> s<sup>-1</sup> for 0-120 h, and <bold>(C, D)</bold> 500 &#x3bc;mol photons m<sup>-2</sup> s<sup>-1</sup> for 0-48 h and 1000 &#x3bc;mol photons m<sup>-2</sup> s<sup>-1</sup> for 48-120 h. Error bars denote standard deviation. Asterisks denote significant differences between induction conditions at the indicated timepoint by independent samples t-test (p &lt; 0.001). Daggers denote significant differences in induced cultures between <bold>(A, B)</bold> and <bold>(C, D)</bold> conditions by independent samples t-test (p&#xa0;&lt; 0.005).</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-15-1378573-g003.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s4" sec-type="discussion">
<label>4</label>
<title>Discussion</title>
<p>Considerable variation in the productivity of cyanobacteria engineered to secrete sucrose has been reported in the literature (a summarized table can be viewed in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">Santos-Merino et&#xa0;al., 2023</xref>);, and this variability has significant implications for the viability of biotechnological applications. Obviously, light is a crucial component of photosynthetically driven cultivation, yet it is also well-established that over-irradiation of cyanobacteria can lead to cell damage and/or death if surplus light energy is not safely dissipated (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Montgomery, 2014</xref>). <italic>S. elongatus</italic> PCC 7942 has been often described in the literature as a strain that prefers a relatively low-light, and many groups routinely cultivate this strain &#x2264;100 &#xb5;mol photons m<sup>-2</sup> s<sup>-1</sup>. Our results show that light and CO<sub>2</sub> availability strongly impact the bioproductivity of sucrose-secreting cyanobacterial strains, independent of the genetic background. Under conditions of high nutrient and CO<sub>2</sub> availability, cell biomass and sucrose secretion rates are positively correlated with irradiation, up to 1000 &#x3bc;mol photons m<sup>-2</sup> s<sup>-1</sup> (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">
<bold>Figures&#xa0;2</bold>
</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3">
<bold>3</bold>
</xref>): a light intensity regarded as photodamaging for <italic>S. elongatus</italic> PCC 7942 in some literature. The light tolerance we observe is consistent with recent publications reporting that the maximum growth rate of <italic>S. elongatus</italic> PCC 7942 is achieved with 400 &#xb5;mol photons m<sup>-2</sup> s<sup>-1</sup> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">Takatani et&#xa0;al., 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">Ungerer et&#xa0;al., 2018a</xref>). Further complication of <italic>S. elongatus</italic> PCC 7942&#x2019;s light tolerance is that self-shading in dense cultures or chambers with long optical cross-sections can rapidly attenuate effective light availability (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Andersson et&#xa0;al., 2019</xref>). Our results suggest that differences in cyanobacterial cultivation conditions likely can account for a significant portion of variability (up to 3- to 10-fold) in reported sucrose production values, even when solely accounting for strains grown in common, commercially available photobioreactors.</p>
<p>We observe that the mechanism of CO<sub>2</sub> delivery strongly impacts the bioproduction potential for sucrose-secreting cyanobacteria at higher light intensities. In the MC-1000 cultivator, CO<sub>2</sub> is delivered via a bubble column-style sparging system, and we observed indications of carbon limitation despite continual sparging with 3% CO<sub>2</sub> gas. In the MC-1000, a positive correlation for production was observed with increasing illumination up to &#x2264; 500 &#x3bc;mol photons m<sup>-2</sup> s<sup>-1</sup> (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">
<bold>Figures&#xa0;1A, B</bold>
</xref>). Interestingly, even the highest light conditions were not lethal (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;1A</bold>
</xref>; 2000 &#xb5;mol photos m<sup>-2</sup> s<sup>-1</sup> is roughly equivalent to full, midday sunlight), although <italic>S. elongatus</italic> PCC 7942 is frequently described in the literature as a low-light tolerant strain (<italic>e.g</italic>., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">Ungerer et&#xa0;al., 2018b</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">Takatani et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">Walker and Pakrasi, 2022</xref>). Furthermore, the final OD<sub>750</sub> and sucrose productivities of strains cultivated in the MC-1000 system were substantially lower than values reported by our group and others with the same growth medium in other bioreactor designs (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">Abramson et&#xa0;al., 2016</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Qiao et&#xa0;al., 2018</xref>). One possible explanation may be that inorganic carbon availability could be limiting, despite the continual sparging of 3% CO<sub>2</sub> delivered via a stream of CO<sub>2</sub> bubbles through a submerged needle design (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Markou et&#xa0;al., 2014</xref>).</p>
<p>When cultures were grown under conditions with greater inorganic carbon and/or nutrient availability, increasing illumination resulted in an even greater boost in productivity. The HDC system uses cultivators with a gas-permeable bottom inserted into a carrier plate that exposes it to the CO<sub>2</sub> headspace created by a HCO<sub>3</sub>
<sup>-</sup> buffer reservoir; the device can generate up to 8% CO<sub>2</sub> under the conditions outlined in this work (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">CellDEG GmbH, 2020</xref>). Using the HDC system, uninduced <italic>cscB</italic>/<italic>sps</italic> strains achieved an OD<sub>750</sub> of 5.3, while induced strains reached an OD<sub>750</sub> of 4.6 and sucrose yield of 1.0 g L<sup>-1</sup> when grown in BG-11 media (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">
<bold>Figures&#xa0;2A, B</bold>
</xref>). For sucrose-exporting strains, this amounts to 245% higher OD<sub>750</sub> and 188% more sucrose than cultures grown in the MC-1000 with the same media and irradiance (250 &#xb5;mol photons m<sup>-2</sup> s<sup>-1</sup>). Importantly, under conditions of saturating inorganic carbon, we do not observe a &#x201c;cost&#x201d; for sucrose secretion, as indicated by the comparable levels of cellular biomass even when substantial sucrose is secreted (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;2E</bold>
</xref>). This suggests that growth does not have to be sacrificed when inorganic carbon is not a limiting factor, assuming that the fraction of fixed carbon diverted to sucrose production does not exceed a threshold value. By comparison, when grown in CD media, the OD<sub>750</sub> of non-exporting strains rose to an average of 11.1, but the OD<sub>750</sub> of sucrose-secreting strains dropped to ~3.0 at the end of the 120 h experimental period (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;2C</bold>
</xref>). We attribute this loss of cell biomass in cultures induced to secrete sucrose to the higher osmotic pressure of CD medium. At ~140 mOsm, CD medium has an osmolarity that is approximately 3-fold higher than that of BG-11 alone and can provide osmotic pressure equivalent to BG-11 supplemented with ~50 mM NaCl. The strain in this study produces sucrose utilizing a heterologous salt-independent SPS; however, increased salt or osmotic stress engages the endogenous salt-dependent sucrose production pathways and has been shown to lead to a higher diversion of fixed carbon toward sucrose biosynthesis (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">Ducat et&#xa0;al., 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">Kirsch et&#xa0;al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Liang et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>). Sucrose exporters grown in CD media produced 139% more sucrose than their BG-11 counterparts by 72 hours, and a total of 1.8 g L<sup>-1</sup> sucrose by 120 h (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;2D</bold>
</xref>). Non-exporting strains in CD media produce more sucrose than in BG-11 as well; this can also be explained by the medium exerting osmotic stress, and thus activating the native SPS.</p>
<p>To potentially combine the productivity gains of cultivating with high light with those of high CO<sub>2</sub> availability, we required a separate light source capable of reaching intensities beyond those of most commercial photobioreactors. For this purpose, we created a custom LED light source in-house consisting of four COB LEDs used for growth of photosynthetic organisms; when placed above the HDC and shaker, there is generally an equitable distribution of light between the six cultivators. By cultivating strains in the HDC system with CD media and 250 &#xb5;mol photons m<sup>-2</sup> s<sup>-1</sup>, growth and sucrose yield increased in both induced and uninduced <italic>cscB</italic>/<italic>sps</italic> strains. By doubling irradiance to 500 &#xb5;mol photons m<sup>-2</sup> s<sup>-1</sup>, OD<sub>750</sub> and sucrose yield increased by 173% and 182%, respectively, in <italic>cscB</italic>/<italic>sps</italic> expressing strains (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3">
<bold>Figures&#xa0;3A, B</bold>
</xref>). Non-sucrose exporting strains underwent a 142% and 251% increase in growth and sucrose, respectively. Finally, a further increase in culture productivity could be achieved by both increasing light intensity to 1000 &#xb5;mol photons m<sup>-2</sup> s<sup>-1</sup> while taking advantage of the self-shading of higher density cultures. By doubling the light intensity of cultures that were grown with 500 &#xb5;mol photons m<sup>-2</sup> s<sup>-1</sup> at 48 h (average of 2.3 OD<sub>750</sub>), cell growth increased by 17% (p &lt; 0.001) and sucrose productivity increased by 15% (p &lt; 0.005) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3">
<bold>Figures&#xa0;3C, D</bold>
</xref>). The highest sucrose productivity we report was reached under these conditions, at 47.8 mg L<sup>-1</sup> h<sup>-1</sup>. Surprisingly, sucrose bioproduction was nearly as strong in strains not induced to express <italic>cscB</italic>/<italic>sps</italic> (highest productivity observed at 45.3 mg L<sup>-1</sup> h<sup>-1</sup>), likely due to a combination of very high cell density (OD<sub>750</sub> up to 18.3) and induction of endogenous sucrose production via native osmotic-responsive pathways (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3">
<bold>Figures&#xa0;3A, B</bold>
</xref>). This latter observation may suggest an alternative route for high sucrose production from late-phase, dense cultures with only basal levels of activation of the sucrose export pathway.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s5" sec-type="conclusions">
<label>5</label>
<title>Conclusion</title>
<p>In this study we assessed how irradiance, inorganic carbon availability, and cultivation method affect the growth and sucrose production of <italic>S. elongatus</italic> PCC 7942. We found that increasing light intensity up to 1000 &#xb5;mol photons m<sup>-2</sup> s<sup>-1</sup> has a positive effect on sucrose production, and higher irradiances can be tolerated if cultures grow into sufficient turbidity. By adjusting light regimes and increasing CO<sub>2</sub> availability, <italic>S. elongatus</italic> PCC 7942 <italic>cscB</italic>/<italic>sps</italic> reached a productivity of 47.8 mg sucrose L<sup>-1</sup> h<sup>-1</sup>, which is comparable or exceeds other reported strains, including some metabolic engineering interventions that can negatively affect cell health. Our survey underscores the importance of cultivation conditions on sucrose productivity and may partially explain the variability observed across different institutions using similar strains. These results may contribute insights into future optimization of cyanobacterial bioproduction efforts.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s6" sec-type="data-availability">
<title>Data availability statement</title>
<p>The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Supplementary Material</bold>
</xref>. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s7" sec-type="author-contributions">
<title>Author contributions</title>
<p>LY: Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Validation, Visualization, Writing &#x2013; original draft, Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing. RZ: Resources, Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing. DCD: Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Methodology, Project administration, Supervision, Writing &#x2013; original draft, Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing.</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<sec id="s8" sec-type="funding-information">
<title>Funding</title>
<p>The author(s) declare financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. The research reported in this manuscript was primarily supported by the National Science Foundation and the Division of Molecular and Cellular Bioscience (Grant: 1845463) to DCD. Fellowship and training support for LY provided by a fellowship from the Plant Biotechnology for Health and Sustainability Training Program at Michigan State University (Grant: NIH T32-GM110523). Additional institutional and facilities support from the Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) under grant DE-FG02-91ER2002.</p>
</sec>
<ack>
<title>Acknowledgments</title>
<p>We thank the Ducat Lab for their helpful comments on the manuscript, the Kerfeld Lab for the use of equipment, and the staff of the Plant Research Laboratory for their technical assistance.</p>
</ack>
<sec id="s9" sec-type="COI-statement">
<title>Conflict of interest</title>
<p>The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s10" sec-type="disclaimer">
<title>Publisher&#x2019;s note</title>
<p>All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s11" sec-type="supplementary-material">
<title>Supplementary material</title>
<p>The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2024.1378573/full#supplementary-material">https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2024.1378573/full#supplementary-material</ext-link>
</p>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Image_1.pdf" id="SM1" mimetype="application/pdf"/>
</sec>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="B1">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Abramson</surname> <given-names>B. W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kachel</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kramer</surname> <given-names>D. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ducat</surname> <given-names>D. C.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Increased photochemical efficiency in cyanobacteria via an engineered sucrose sink</article-title>. <source>Plant Cell Physiol.</source> <volume>57</volume>, <fpage>2451</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2460</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/pcp/pcw169</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Abramson</surname> <given-names>B. W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lensmire</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lin</surname> <given-names>Y. T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jennings</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ducat</surname> <given-names>D. C.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Redirecting carbon to bioproduction via a growth arrest switch in a sucrose-secreting cyanobacterium</article-title>. <source>Algal Res.</source> <volume>33</volume>, <fpage>248</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>255</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.algal.2018.05.013</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Adomako</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ernst</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Simkovsky</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chao</surname> <given-names>Y.-Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fang</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Comparative genomics of <italic>Synechococcus elongatus</italic> explains the phenotypic diversity of the strains</article-title>. <source>mBio</source> <volume>13</volume>, <fpage>e00862</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>e00822</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/mbio.00862-22</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Andersson</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Shen</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cantrell</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dandy</surname> <given-names>D. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Peers</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>The fluctuating cell-specific light environment and its effects on cyanobacterial physiology</article-title>. <source>Plant Physiol.</source> <volume>181</volume>, <fpage>547</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>564</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1104/pp.19.00480</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Balat</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Balat</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>Recent trends in global production and utilization of bio-ethanol fuel</article-title>. <source>Appl. Energy</source> <volume>86</volume>, <fpage>2273</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2282</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.apenergy.2009.03.015</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Billis</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Billini</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tripp</surname> <given-names>H. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kyrpides</surname> <given-names>N. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mavromatis</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Comparative transcriptomics between <italic>Synechococcus</italic> PCC 7942 and <italic>Synechocystis</italic> PCC 6803 provide insights into mechanisms of stress acclimation</article-title>. <source>PloS One</source> <volume>9</volume>, <elocation-id>e109738</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0109738</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Cassier-Chauvat</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Blanc-Garin</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chauvat</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Genetic, genomics, and responses to stresses in cyanobacteria: biotechnological implications</article-title>. <source>Genes</source> <volume>12</volume>, <elocation-id>500</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/genes12040500</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<collab>CellDEG GmbH</collab>
</person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <source>High-Density Cultivation System HDC 6.10B User Manual</source>. (<publisher-loc>Berlin, Germany</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>CellDeg GmbH</publisher-name>).</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Dan</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sun</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mao</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Luan</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Manipulating the expression of glycogen phosphorylase in <italic>Synechococcus elongatus</italic> PCC 7942 to mobilize glycogen storage for sucrose synthesis</article-title>. <source>Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol.</source> <volume>10</volume>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fbioe.2022.925311</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Dienst</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wichmann</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mantovani</surname> <given-names>O.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rodrigues</surname> <given-names>J. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lindberg</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>High density cultivation for efficient sesquiterpenoid biosynthesis in <italic>Synechocystis</italic> sp. PCC 6803</article-title>. <source>Sci. Rep.</source> <volume>10</volume>, <fpage>5932</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41598-020-62681-w</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Du</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liang</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Duan</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tan</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lu</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Exploring the photosynthetic production capacity of sucrose by cyanobacteria</article-title>. <source>Metab. Eng.</source> <volume>19</volume>, <fpage>17</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>25</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ymben.2013.05.001</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Duan</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Luo</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liang</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lu</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Sucrose secreted by the engineered cyanobacterium and its fermentability</article-title>. <source>J. Ocean Univ. China</source> <volume>15</volume>, <fpage>890</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>896</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11802-016-3007-8</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ducat</surname> <given-names>D. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Avelar-Rivas</surname> <given-names>J. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Way</surname> <given-names>J. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Silvera</surname> <given-names>P. A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Rerouting carbon flux to enhance photosynthetic productivity</article-title>. <source>Appl. Environ. Microbiol.</source> <volume>78</volume>, <fpage>2660</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2668</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/AEM.07901-11</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Graham-Rowe</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Agriculture: Beyond food versus fuel</article-title>. <source>Nature</source> <volume>474</volume>, <fpage>S6</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>S8</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/474S06a</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Han</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lu</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>Engineering <italic>Synechococcus</italic> sp. PCC 7002 for sustainable production of sucrose</article-title>. <source>Algal Res.</source> <volume>74</volume>, <elocation-id>103212</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.algal.2023.103212</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Hays</surname> <given-names>S. G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ducat</surname> <given-names>D. C.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Engineering cyanobacteria as photosynthetic feedstock factories</article-title>. <source>Photosynth. Res.</source> <volume>123</volume>, <fpage>285</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>295</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11120-014-9980-0</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Hays</surname> <given-names>S. G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yan</surname> <given-names>L. L. W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Silver</surname> <given-names>P. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ducat</surname> <given-names>D. C.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Synthetic photosynthetic consortia define interactions leading to robustness and photoproduction</article-title>. <source>J. Biol. Eng.</source> <volume>11</volume>, <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>14</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s13036-017-0048-5</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B18">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Hendry</surname> <given-names>J. I.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gopalakrishnan</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ungerer</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pakrasi</surname> <given-names>H. B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tang</surname> <given-names>Y. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Maranas</surname> <given-names>C. D.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Genome-scale fluxome of <italic>Synechococcus elongatus</italic> UTEX 2973 using transient 13C-labeling data</article-title>. <source>Plant Physiol.</source> <volume>179</volume>, <fpage>761</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>769</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1104/pp.18.01357</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B19">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kirsch</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kl&#xe4;hn</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hagemann</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Salt-regulated accumulation of the compatible solutes sucrose and glucosylglycerol in cyanobacteria and its biotechnological potential</article-title>. <source>Front. Microbiol.</source> <volume>10</volume>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmicb.2019.02139</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B20">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kl&#xe4;hn</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hagemann</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Compatible solute biosynthesis in cyanobacteria</article-title>. <source>Environ. Microbiol.</source> <volume>13</volume>, <fpage>551</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>562</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1462-2920.2010.02366.x</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B21">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Lang</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Schoen</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hashem</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>McDonald</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Parker</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Savelyeva</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2017</year>). &#x201c;<article-title>Chapter five - the environmental, social, and market sustainability of sugar</article-title>,&#x201d; in <source>Advances in Food Security and Sustainability</source>. Ed. <person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname>Barling</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<publisher-loc>Cambridge, MA, USA</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Elsevier</publisher-name>), <fpage>115</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>136</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/bs.af2s.2017.09.002</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B22">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Liang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Qiao</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Luo</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Freshwater Cyanobacterium <italic>Synechococcus elongatus</italic> PCC 7942 Adapts to an Environment with Salt Stress via Ion-Induced Enzymatic Balance of Compatible Solutes</article-title>. <source>Appl. Environ. Microbiol.</source> <volume>86</volume>, <fpage>2904</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2923</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/AEM.02904-19</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B23">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Lin</surname> <given-names>P. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pakrasi</surname> <given-names>H. B.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Enhanced production of sucrose in the fast-growing cyanobacterium <italic>Synechococcus elongatus</italic> UTEX 2973</article-title>. <source>Sci. Rep.</source> <volume>10</volume>, <fpage>390</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41598-019-57319-5</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B24">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Lippi</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>B&#xe4;hr</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>W&#xfc;stenberg</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wilde</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Steuer</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Exploring the potential of high-density cultivation of cyanobacteria for the production of cyanophycin</article-title>. <source>Algal Res.</source> <volume>31</volume>, <fpage>363</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>366</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.algal.2018.02.028</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B25">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Markou</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Vandamme</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Muylaert</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Microalgal and cyanobacterial cultivation: The supply of nutrients</article-title>. <source>Water Res.</source> <volume>65</volume>, <fpage>186</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>202</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.watres.2014.07.025</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B26">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Montgomery</surname> <given-names>B. L.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>The regulation of light sensing and light-harvesting impacts the use of cyanobacteria as biotechnology platforms</article-title>. <source>Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol.</source> <volume>2</volume>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fbioe.2014.00022</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B27">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Mueller</surname> <given-names>T. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ungerer</surname> <given-names>J. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pakrasi</surname> <given-names>H. B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Maranas</surname> <given-names>C. D.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Identifying the metabolic differences of a fast-growth phenotype in <italic>Synechococcus</italic> UTEX 2973</article-title>. <source>Sci. Rep.</source> <volume>7</volume>, <elocation-id>41569</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/srep41569</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B28">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Parmar</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Singh</surname> <given-names>N. K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pandey</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gnansounou</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Madamwar</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Cyanobacteria and microalgae: A positive prospect for biofuels</article-title>. <source>Bioresour. Technol.</source> <volume>102</volume>, <fpage>10163</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>10172</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.biortech.2011.08.030</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B29">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Peters</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rose</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Moser</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2010</year>). &#x201c;<article-title>Sucrose: A prospering and sustainable organic raw material</article-title>,&#x201d; in <source>Carbohydrates in Sustainable Development I</source>. Eds. <person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname>Rauter</surname> <given-names>A. P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Vogel</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Queneau</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<publisher-name>Springer</publisher-name>, <publisher-loc>Berlin, Heidelberg</publisher-loc>), <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>23</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/128_2010_58</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B30">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Qiao</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Duan</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hagemann</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Luo</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lu</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Effects of reduced and enhanced glycogen pools on salt-induced sucrose production in a sucrose-secreting strain of <italic>Synechococcus elongatus</italic> PCC 7942</article-title>. <source>Appl. Environ. Microbiol.</source> <volume>84</volume>, <fpage>e02023</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>e02017</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/AEM.02023-17</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B31">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Santos-Merino</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Torrado</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Davis</surname> <given-names>G. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>R&#xf6;ttig</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bibby</surname> <given-names>T. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kramer</surname> <given-names>D. M.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Improved photosynthetic capacity and photosystem I oxidation via heterologous metabolism engineering in cyanobacteria</article-title>. <source>Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.</source> <volume>118</volume>, <elocation-id>e2021523118</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1073/pnas.2021523118</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B32">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Santos-Merino</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yun</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ducat</surname> <given-names>D. C.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>Cyanobacteria as cell factories for the photosynthetic production of sucrose</article-title>. <source>Front. Microbiol.</source> <volume>14</volume>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmicb.2023.1126032</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B33">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Satta</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Esquirol</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ebert</surname> <given-names>B. E.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>Current metabolic engineering strategies for photosynthetic bioproduction in cyanobacteria</article-title>. <source>Microorganisms</source> <volume>11</volume>, <elocation-id>455</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/microorganisms11020455</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B34">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Takatani</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Uenosono</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hara</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yamakawa</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fujita</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Omata</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Chlorophyll and pheophytin dephytylating enzymes required for efficient repair of PSII in Synechococcus elongatus PCC 7942</article-title>. <source>Plant Cell Physiol.</source> <volume>63</volume>, <fpage>410</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>420</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/pcp/pcac006</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B35">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Takatani</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Use</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kato</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ikeda</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kojima</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Aichi</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Essential role of Acyl-ACP synthetase in acclimation of the cyanobacterium <italic>Synechococcus elongatus</italic> strain PCC 7942 to high-light conditions</article-title>. <source>Plant Cell Physiol.</source> <volume>56</volume>, <fpage>1608</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1615</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/pcp/pcv086</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B36">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Thiel</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Patrikainen</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Nagy</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fitzpatrick</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pope</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Aro</surname> <given-names>E.-M.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Redirecting photosynthetic electron flux in the cyanobacterium Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803 by the deletion of flavodiiron protein Flv3</article-title>. <source>Microb. Cell Factories</source>. <volume>18</volume>, <fpage>189</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s12934-019-1238-2</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B37">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ungerer</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lin</surname> <given-names>P.-C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>H.-Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pakrasi</surname> <given-names>H. B.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2018</year>a). <article-title>Adjustments to photosystem stoichiometry and electron transfer proteins are key to the remarkably fast growth of the cyanobacterium <italic>Synechococcus elongatus</italic> UTEX 2973</article-title>. <source>mBio</source> <volume>9</volume>, <fpage>10</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1128</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/mBio.02327-17</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B38">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ungerer</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wendt</surname> <given-names>K. E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hendry</surname> <given-names>J. I.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Maranas</surname> <given-names>C. D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pakrasi</surname> <given-names>H. B.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2018</year>b). <article-title>Comparative genomics reveals the molecular determinants of rapid growth of the cyanobacterium <italic>Synechococcus elongatus</italic> UTEX 2973</article-title>. <source>Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.</source> <volume>115</volume>, <fpage>E11761</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>E11770</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1073/pnas.1814912115</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B39">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Walker</surname> <given-names>P. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pakrasi</surname> <given-names>H. B.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>A ubiquitously conserved cyanobacterial protein phosphatase essential for high light tolerance in a fast-growing cyanobacterium</article-title>. <source>Microbiol. Spectr.</source> <volume>10</volume>, <fpage>e01008</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>e01022</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/spectrum.01008-22</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B40">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zuniga</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Guarnieri</surname> <given-names>M. T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zengler</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Betenbaugh</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Young</surname> <given-names>J. D.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>Metabolic engineering of <italic>Synechococcus elongatus</italic> 7942 for enhanced sucrose biosynthesis</article-title>. <source>Metab. Eng.</source> <volume>80</volume>, <fpage>12</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>24</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ymben.2023.09.002</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B41">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Xu</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tiago Guerra</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ludwig</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Charles Dismukes</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bryant</surname> <given-names>D. A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Altered carbohydrate metabolism in glycogen synthase mutants of <italic>Synechococcus</italic> sp. strain PCC 7002: Cell factories for soluble sugars</article-title>. <source>Metab. Eng.</source> <volume>16</volume>, <fpage>56</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>67</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ymben.2012.12.002</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B42">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Yu</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liberton</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cliften</surname> <given-names>P. F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Head</surname> <given-names>R. D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jacobs</surname> <given-names>J. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Smith</surname> <given-names>R. D.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>
<italic>Synechococcus elongatus</italic> UTEX 2973, a fast growing cyanobacterial chassis for biosynthesis using light and CO2</article-title>. <source>Sci. Rep.</source> <volume>5</volume>, <elocation-id>8132</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/srep08132</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B43">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Diao</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Song</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Shi</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Construction and analysis of an artificial consortium based on fast-growing cyanobacterium <italic>Synechococcus elongatus</italic> UTEX 2973 to produce platform chemical 3-hydroxypropionic acid from CO2</article-title>. <volume>13</volume>, <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>14</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s13068-020-01720-0</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B44">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ziolkowska</surname> <given-names>J. R.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Prospective technologies, feedstocks and market innovations for ethanol and biodiesel production in the US</article-title>. <source>Biotechnol. Rep.</source> <volume>4</volume>, <fpage>94</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>98</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.btre.2014.09.001</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>