<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.3 20070202//EN" "journalpublishing.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="2.3" xml:lang="EN">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Front. Plant Sci.</journal-id>
<journal-title>Frontiers in Plant Science</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">Front. Plant Sci.</abbrev-journal-title>
<issn pub-type="epub">1664-462X</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Frontiers Media S.A.</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpls.2024.1369015</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Plant Science</subject>
<subj-group>
<subject>Original Research</subject>
</subj-group>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Optimization of nutrient management improves productivity, quality and sustainability of albino tea cultivar Baiye-1</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zhu</surname>
<given-names>Yun</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/formal-analysis/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/investigation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ma</surname>
<given-names>Lifeng</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3">
<sup>3</sup>
</xref>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/conceptualization/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/formal-analysis/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/funding-acquisition/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/investigation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Geng</surname>
<given-names>Saipan</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/formal-analysis/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/investigation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name>
<surname>Ruan</surname>
<given-names>Jianyun</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3">
<sup>3</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn001">
<sup>*</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/418377"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/conceptualization/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/data-curation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/funding-acquisition/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/project-administration/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/supervision/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
<institution>Tea Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences</institution>, <addr-line>Hangzhou, Zhejiang</addr-line>, <country>China</country>
</aff>
<aff id="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
<institution>Key Laboratory of Biology, Genetics and Breeding of Special Economic Animals and Plants, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs</institution>, <addr-line>Hangzhou, Zhejiang</addr-line>, <country>China</country>
</aff>
<aff id="aff3">
<sup>3</sup>
<institution>Xihu National Agricultural Experimental Station for Soil Quality, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs</institution>, <addr-line>Hangzhou, Zhejiang</addr-line>, <country>China</country>
</aff>
<author-notes>
<fn fn-type="edited-by">
<p>Edited by: M. J. I. Shohag, University of Florida, United States</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="edited-by">
<p>Reviewed by: Meng Xu, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, China</p>
<p>Tianyuan Yang, Anhui Agricultural University, China</p>
<p>Yuhua Wang, Nanjing Agricultural University, China</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="corresp" id="fn001">
<p>*Correspondence: Jianyun Ruan, <email xlink:href="mailto:jruan@mail.tricaas.com">jruan@mail.tricaas.com</email>
</p>
</fn>
</author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>02</day>
<month>05</month>
<year>2024</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="collection">
<year>2024</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>15</volume>
<elocation-id>1369015</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>11</day>
<month>01</month>
<year>2024</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>02</day>
<month>04</month>
<year>2024</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#xa9; 2024 Zhu, Ma, Geng and Ruan</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2024</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Zhu, Ma, Geng and Ruan</copyright-holder>
<license xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">
<p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.</p>
</license>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<p>Proper nutrient management is crucially important to the sustainable development of tea production. Compared to normal green-leaf cultivars, albino tea cultivars produce green tea of superior quality characterized by high contents of amino acids as a result of the hydrolysis of chloroplast proteins at albinism. However, the advantage of albino tea cultivars was offset by inferior growth and yield performance because of low contents of chlorophylls and limited photosynthesis capacity. Our understanding about the nutrition characteristics of albino tea cultivars was very limited. A four-year field experiment was conducted to develop proper nutrient management for Baiye-1 to overcome its weakness of low productivity without a tradeoff in tea quality and environmental risks. The nutrient management schemes were formulated by optimizing the rate and ratio of nitrogen (N), phosphorus, potassium and magnesium together with substitution of chemical fertilizers with organic manures. The total amounts of nutrients in the optimized schemes were reduced by 25% compared to the local farmers&#x2019; practice (FP). Results showed that optimized rates and ratio of nutrients together with partial substitution of chemical fertilizers with rapeseed cake manure more considerably improved albino tea yield, the contents of free amino acids, total polyphenol and catechins relative to FP. Partial substitution of chemical fertilizers with commercial livestock manure decreased tea quality, which was likely caused by a dilution effect of increasing tea yield and decreasing N status of tea plants. Full organic substitution of chemical fertilizers by rapeseed cake manure improved tea yield and quality but had relatively low agronomic efficiency and profit. The effect of optimized nutrient management schemes was associated with the improvement of nutritional status in tea plants. The present work demonstrated that the optimization of nutrient management considerably improved albino tea yield, quality and profit while decreased the application rate of fertilizers and the intensity of greenhouse gas emissions.</p>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>free amino acid</kwd>
<kwd>catechin</kwd>
<kwd>organic substitution</kwd>
<kwd>nutrient use efficiency (NUE)</kwd>
<kwd>greenhouse gas emissions</kwd>
<kwd>nitrogen nutrition</kwd>
<kwd>albino tea cultivar</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<contract-sponsor id="cn001">National Key Research and Development Program of China<named-content content-type="fundref-id">10.13039/501100012166</named-content>
</contract-sponsor>
<counts>
<fig-count count="4"/>
<table-count count="5"/>
<equation-count count="9"/>
<ref-count count="45"/>
<page-count count="12"/>
<word-count count="6981"/>
</counts>
<custom-meta-wrap>
<custom-meta>
<meta-name>section-in-acceptance</meta-name>
<meta-value>Plant Nutrition</meta-value>
</custom-meta>
</custom-meta-wrap>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec id="s1" sec-type="intro">
<label>1</label>
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>Tea (<italic>Camellia sinensis</italic>) is a valuable cash crop widely planted in Asia and Africa and plays important roles in increasing farmers&#x2019; income and alleviating poverty of rural areas. The tea quality is determined by internal chemical ingredients (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B42">Zhang and Ruan, 2016</xref>). In recent years, natural mutants with albino, yellow or purple young shoots have been cultivated and cherished for their high contents of components such as free amino acids, flavonoids and anthocyanins in China, Japan and Kenya (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Kilel et&#xa0;al., 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Li et&#xa0;al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">Yamashita et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>). Baiye-1 (once named as Anjibaicha) is a temperature-sensitive albino tea cultivar. In spring, young shoots of Baiye-1 show periodic change from green to etiolated in the early spring and afterwards back to green colors, which is dependent upon the air temperature. At albinism the chloroplast is destructed and protease activity increases leading to the hydrolysis of proteins and high accumulation of free amino acids (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Li et&#xa0;al., 2018</xref>). Thus, green tea processed from young shoots of albino cultivars has superior quality of strong umami taste and fresh aroma resulting from the high level of amino acids and hence higher price and economic profit. For example, it was reported that the average price of fresh young shoots of Baiye-1 was 200 &#x2212; 300 Yuan kg<sup>-1</sup>, which was 2 &#x2212; 3 times of normal varieties in Hubei province (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">Zeng, 2018</xref>). High benefit promoted the rapid expansion of Baiye-1, making it one of the largest clonal varieties planted in China with an area of 267 thousand hectares in 2015 and the planting area was kept increasing in the recent years (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Li et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>). However, the economic advantage albino tea cultivars was offset by inferior growth and yield performance due to low contents of chlorophylls and limited photosynthesis capacity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">Zhang et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>). According to a recent survey covering 26 counties of nine provinces, the profit per area of Baiye-1 was only 27% higher than other varieties (Professor Aiqin Jiang, personal communication). Therefore, promotion of yield while maintaining good quality in the meantime is a challenge for albino tea cultivars including Baiye-1.</p>
<p>Fertilization is an essential field management to ensure tea yield, quality and profit in the meantime as nutrient deficiency significantly reduces the contents of amino acids and aroma compounds in tea (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B45">Zhou et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>). Proper nutrient management requires the application of right source of nutrients at the right rate (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Johnston and Bruulsema, 2014</xref>). Nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P) and potassium (K) are the most popularly nutrients applied in tea plantations (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Mishima et&#xa0;al., 2010</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Ni et&#xa0;al., 2019</xref>). Increasing N supply stimulates the expression of genes and the activity of enzymes involved in N uptake and assimilation, and promotes the biosynthesis and accumulation of amino acids (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Ruan et&#xa0;al., 2010</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Liu et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">2021</xref>). Application of P and K fertilizers increased the concentrations of total polyphenols, catechins, free amino acids and aroma compounds (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Lin et&#xa0;al., 2012</xref>) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">Venkatesan and Ganapathy, 2004</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Ruan et&#xa0;al., 2013</xref>). However, recent works showed that the overuse of chemical fertilizers and improper nutrient balance in tea plantations had been a major problem (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Mishima et&#xa0;al., 2010</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Ni et&#xa0;al., 2019</xref>). Excessive supply of N, P and K nutrients reduces tea quality (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">Venkatesan and Ganapathy, 2004</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">Owuor et&#xa0;al., 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">Ding et&#xa0;al., 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">Chen et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>). Furthermore, high and excessive application of synthetic N fertilizer deteriorates soil properties (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">Yang et&#xa0;al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">Ma et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>) and induces strong N<sub>2</sub>O emission (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">Wang et&#xa0;al., 2020a</xref>). Therefore, the recommendation of the right rate of fertilizers is the preconditions ensuring profitable and environmental friendly tea production with reduced greenhouse gas emissions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">Liang et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Tang et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>). On the other hand, organic fertilizers such as de-oiled rapeseed cake manure and decomposed livestock and poultry excrement were important nutrient sources for tea plantations (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Ni et&#xa0;al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">Sun et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>). Combining application of organic manures with chemical fertilizers is recommended as a practical solution to reduce the input of chemical fertilizers and to improve nutrient use efficiency without negative impact on tea yield and quality (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">Wang et&#xa0;al., 2020b</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">Huang et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">Ma et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>). There were large body of information concerning nutrition characteristics and fertilization of normal green-leaf cultivars. However, to the best of our knowledge, the understanding about the nutrition characteristics of albino tea cultivars was extremely limited. Furthermore, the mechanism of high accumulation of free amino acids in Baiye-1 is different from that of normal green leaf tea cultivars of which is a result of stimulated N assimilation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Ruan et&#xa0;al., 2010</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Liu et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">Zhang et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>). There is a need to develop proper nutrient management for Baiye-1 to overcome its weakness of low productivity without a tradeoff in tea quality and environmental risks.</p>
<p>The present field experiment was conducted to test the effect of optimized nutrient management on yield, quality and nutrient use efficiency of Baiye-1 tea plantation. The nutrient management practices were optimized by integrating two approaches. One approach was to optimize the rates of nutrients N, P, K, Mg and their ratio by replacing the common compound NPK fertilizer of equal nutrient formular (N-P<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub>-K<sub>2</sub>O = 15-15-15) with a specially formulated compound fertilizer (N-P<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub>-K<sub>2</sub>O-MgO = 18-8-12-2). Another approach was to substitute chemical fertilizers fully or partly with organic manures, i.e. rapeseed cake manure or commercial livestock manure. These schemes were compared to farmer&#x2019;s practices. The objective was to develop efficient nutrient management schemes for albino tea plantations towards better yield and quality, higher profit with less environmental risks.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2" sec-type="materials|methods">
<label>2</label>
<title>Materials and methods</title>
<sec id="s2_1">
<label>2.1</label>
<title>Field experiment</title>
<p>A field experiment was set up in 2016 in Boming tea plantation, Anji County, Zhejiang Province, China. The soil pH was 4.48 and the contents of organic matter, total N, available P, available K and available Mg were 14.36 mg g<sup>-1</sup>, 0.86 mg g<sup>-1</sup>, 52 mg kg<sup>-1</sup>, 131 mg kg<sup>-1</sup> and 30 mg kg<sup>-1</sup>, respectively. The tea cultivar was Baiye-1 and the plants were 20 years old. Before the start of field experiment, tea plants received common compound fertilizer (N-P<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub>-K<sub>2</sub>O = 15-15-15) together with rapeseed cake manure (N-P<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub>-K<sub>2</sub>O = 5.8-2.7-1.5), a practice widespread in tea plantations of China according to a previous survey (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Ni et&#xa0;al., 2019</xref>). This practice is hereafter referred to as farmers&#x2019; practice (FP) and was compared to three optimized schemes (treatments) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">
<bold>Table&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>). In the first scheme referred to as RSM, the chemical compound fertilizers were fully substituted by rapeseed cake manure (RSM). In the second scheme referred to as SCF+RSM, the common compound fertilizer of equal nutrient formular was replaced by a specially formulated compound fertilizer (N-P<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub>-K<sub>2</sub>O-MgO = 18-8-12-2) together with organic manure rapeseed cake and urea. In the third scheme referred to as SCF+LSM, the specially formulated compound fertilizer (SCF) was applied together with commercial livestock manure (LSM) and urea. The treatment referred to as HCF received high rates of fertilizers (as common compound fertilizer, rapeseed cake manure and urea) to investigate the effect of over-application of fertilizers (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Ni et&#xa0;al., 2019</xref>). The rates of fertilizers in treatments are presented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">
<bold>Table&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>. RSM, SCF+RSM and RSM+LSM had the same total amounts of nutrient N, P and K, which were reduced by 25% compared to that of FP (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">
<bold>Table&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>). Compared to FP, N rate was increased (by 5.7%) in RSM, decreased in SCF+RSM (by 4.2%) and in SCF+LSM (by 19.5%). The ratio of N-P-K fertilizers was optimized to be close to their ratios in young shoots. The ratio was decreased in RSM, SCF+RSM and HCF whereas that of K was slightly increased in SCF+LSM compared to that of FP (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">
<bold>Table&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>). Organic manures and compound fertilizers were applied in October. Urea in SCF+RSM, SCF+LSM and HCF was separately into two applications with equal amounts, one in early February and the second in the end of April after the harvest of spring tea. Fertilizers were applied to furrows between rows followed by covering with soil. There were totally six treatments including a control (CK) without any fertilizers. The plot area was 20 m<sup>2</sup> and plots were randomly arranged in the field. Each treatment was replicated for three times. All other field management was the same as in the FP.</p>
<table-wrap id="T1" position="float">
<label>Table&#xa0;1</label>
<caption>
<p>Source, amount and cost of fertilizers in treatments.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" align="left" rowspan="2">Nutrient</th>
<th valign="middle" colspan="6" align="left">Treatment</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" align="left">CK</th>
<th valign="middle" align="left">FP</th>
<th valign="middle" align="left">RSM</th>
<th valign="middle" align="left">SCF+RSM</th>
<th valign="middle" align="left">SCF+LSM</th>
<th valign="middle" align="left">HCF</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" colspan="7" align="left">Chemical fertilizers</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">&#x2003;N (kg ha<sup>-1</sup>)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">0</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">144</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">0</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">168</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">168</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">850</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">&#x2003;P (kg ha<sup>-1</sup>)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">0</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">144</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">0</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">65</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">65</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">450</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">&#x2003;K (kg ha<sup>-1</sup>)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">0</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">144</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">0</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">98</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">98</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">450</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" colspan="7" align="left">Organic fertilizers</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">&#x2003;N (kg ha<sup>-1</sup>)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">0</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">117</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">276</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">83</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">42</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">38</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">&#x2003;P (kg ha<sup>-1</sup>)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">0</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">54</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">128</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">39</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">38</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">16</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">&#x2003;K (kg ha<sup>-1</sup>)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">0</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">30</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">71</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">22</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">63</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">11</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">&#x2003;ONSR (%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">/</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">45</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">100</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">33</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">20</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">4</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" colspan="7" align="left">Sum</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">&#x2003;N (kg ha<sup>-1</sup>)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">0</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">261</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">276</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">250</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">210</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">888</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">&#x2003;P (kg ha<sup>-1</sup>)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">0</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">86</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">56</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">43</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">46</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">203</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">&#x2003;K (kg ha<sup>-1</sup>)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">0</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">145</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">58</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">97</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">134</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">383</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">&#x2003;Total (kg ha<sup>-1</sup>)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">0</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">492</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">390</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">390</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">390</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">1474</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">&#x2003;N-P-K ratio</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">/</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">1-0.33-0.55</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">1-0.20-0.21</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">1-0.17-0.39</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">1-0.22-0.64</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">1-0.23-0.43</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">&#x2003;Cost (Yuan ha<sup>-1</sup>)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">0</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">9840</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">14100</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">7995</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">7095</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">15105</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn>
<p>CK, no fertilizer; FP, farmer&#x2019;s practice consisting of common compound fertilizer (N-P<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub>-K<sub>2</sub>O=15-15-15) and rapeseed cake manure; RSM, rapeseed cake manure; SCF+RSM, specially formulated compound fertilizer (SCF, N-P<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub>-K<sub>2</sub>O-MgO=18-8-12-2) and rapeseed cake manure; SCF+LSM, SCF and livestock manure; HCF, high amount of common compound fertilizer and rapeseed cake manure; ONSR, the share of N from organic manures in the total amount of N fertilizers; Cost, including fertilizer and application costs.</p>
</fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_2">
<label>2.2</label>
<title>Samples and measurements</title>
<p>Young spring shoots were harvested by hand and were weighed. The weights of each harvest were summed as the annual fresh yield. Yield data of 2018-2020 were presented in the present work whereas those of 2017 was not included to eliminate the turnover effect from farmer&#x2019;s practice to the fertilization treatments. Samples of young shoots were collected to measure the concentrations of nutrients in harvested teas. The concentration of N in teas and mature leaf samples was determined by an elemental analyzer (Vario Macro Cube, Elementar Analysensysteme GmbH, Langenselbold, Germany) and those of P and K were determined by Inductive Coupled Plasma-Atomic Emission Spectrometer (iCAP&#x2122; 7400 ICP-OES, Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA) after digestion at 550&#xb0;C and re-dissolved in dilute nitric acid. Mature leaves of tea plants were sampled on March 21, 2020, dried in an electric oven at 60 &#xb0;C, and finely ground to determine the concentrations of nutrients.</p>
<p>The contents of quality-related metabolites in teas were determined in the fourth year of field experiment assuming that the nutrition status of plants reached stable conditions. Tea samples of the first and second harvest were taken on March 22 and 26, 2020, quickly frozen in liquid nitrogen, freeze-dried and finely ground. Powder of tea samples (100 mg) were extracted with 5 mL of H<sub>2</sub>O in a boiling water bath for 5 min (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">Ma et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>). The extract was used for the determination of total free amino acid (TFAA) by spectrophotometry after reaction with ninhydrin reagent and total polyphenol (TP) after reaction with Fe-tartrate reagent (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Ruan et&#xa0;al., 2013</xref>). The composition of free amino acids in the extract was determined by High Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) using Waters AccQ&#x2022;Tag&#x2122; pre-column derivatization kit following the manufacturer&#x2019;s instruction (Waters Corporation, Milford, MA, USA). The content of caffeine and the composition of catechins in the extract were determined by HPLC (Waters Corporation, Milford, MA, USA) equipped with a C<sub>18</sub> reverse phase column (250 &#xd7; 4.6 mm) according to the method previously described (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">Wu et&#xa0;al., 2012</xref>). Contents of amino acids, caffeine and catechins were quantified by their areas of chromatographic peaks against those of authentic standards.</p>
<p>Soil samples were taken in the end of field experiment (October 2020) from 5 randomly selected sites to 1 m depth at five separate layers, i.e. 0-20, 20-40, 40-60, 60-80 and 80-100 cm and mixed thoroughly per plot. Stones and debris of roots were removed and samples were separated into two portions after thorough-out mixture. Fresh soil was temporarily stored in a refrigerator at 4&#xb0;C before the determination of water content and inorganic nitrogen. Ammonium and nitrate in fresh soil were extracted by 2 mol l<sup>-1</sup> potassium chloride and determined by Discrete Chemistry Analyzer (Smartchem 140, AMS Alliance, Frepillon, France). Soil pH was measured in 1:2.5 water paste of air-dried soil samples by a glass electrode (Orion 3 Star, Thermo Ltd., Waltham, MA, USA).</p>
<p>The average price of fresh spring teas was approximately 150 Yuan kg<sup>-1</sup> according to the local market. The net profit of fertilization was calculated as the difference between the values of fresh young shoots of treatments (V<sub>F</sub>) and CK (V<sub>CK</sub>) and the fertilization cost (C<sub>F</sub>) according to the following <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="eq1">Equation (1)</xref>. Cost of harvesting young shoots was not taken into account as this provided important employment and cash income for local labors.</p>
<disp-formula id="eq1">
<label>(1)</label>
<mml:math display="block" id="M1">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>Profit</mml:mtext>
<mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mtext>V</mml:mtext>
<mml:mtext>F</mml:mtext>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mtext>V</mml:mtext>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>CK</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mtext>C</mml:mtext>
<mml:mtext>F</mml:mtext>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</disp-formula>
<p>Agronomical efficiency (AE, kg kg<sup>-1</sup>) was calculated from the yield (Y<sub>F</sub>) and the rate (R<sub>F</sub>) of N, P and K (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">
<bold>Table&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>) in the treatments relative to the yield of CK (Y<sub>CK</sub>) according to the following <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="eq2">Equation (2)</xref>:</p>
<disp-formula id="eq2">
<label>(2)</label>
<mml:math display="block" id="M2">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>A</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>E</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>Y</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>F</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mtext>Y</mml:mtext>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>CK</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">/</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>R</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>F</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</disp-formula>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_3">
<label>2.3</label>
<title>Estimation of greenhouse gas emission derived from fertilization</title>
<p>The greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions derived from fertilization were divided into four parts: production and transportation of fertilizers, and direct and indirect N<sub>2</sub>O emissions caused by N fertilizer application according to default method of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Forster et&#xa0;al., 2007</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">Hergoualc&#x2019;h et&#xa0;al., 2019</xref>). The area scaled GHG (CO<sub>2</sub> equivalent) generated from the production and transportation of chemical fertilizers (GHG<sub>A-Pr</sub> and GHG <sub>A-Tr</sub>) was estimated from their application rates per hectare (<italic>F</italic>) and respective emission factors (EF) according to the following <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="eq3">Equation (3)</xref>. The emission factors of manufacture and transportation were 8.21 and 0.09 for N fertilizer, 0.73 and 0.06 for P fertilizer, 0.5 and 0.05 for K fertilizer, respectively (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Forster et&#xa0;al., 2007</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">Zhang et&#xa0;al., 2013</xref>).</p>
<disp-formula id="eq3">
<label>(3)</label>
<mml:math display="block" id="M3">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>GHG&#xa0;</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>A</mml:mtext>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
<mml:mtext>Pr</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>&#xa0;or&#xa0;GHG&#xa0;</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>A</mml:mtext>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
<mml:mtext>Tr</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
<mml:mstyle displaystyle="true">
<mml:msubsup>
<mml:mo>&#x2211;</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>N</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>P</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>K</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>3</mml:mn>
</mml:msubsup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>EF</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>&#xa0;i</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>&#xd7;</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>F</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mstyle>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</disp-formula>
<p>The direct emission of N<sub>2</sub>O (dE<sub>N2O</sub>) from the application of chemical and organic N fertilizers was estimated from their application rates per hectare (<italic>F<sub>N</sub>
</italic>) and their respective emission factors according to the following <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="eq4">Equation (4)</xref>. The EF for chemical and organic N fertilizers were 0.0175 and 0.0261 according to the most recent meta-analysis (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">Wang et&#xa0;al., 2020a</xref>). These values were slightly lower than 0.0272 (or 2.72%) which used for both chemical and organic N fertilizers in the previous works (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Tang et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>).</p>
<disp-formula id="eq4">
<label>(4)</label>
<mml:math display="block" id="M4">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>dE&#xa0;</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>N</mml:mtext>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
<mml:mtext>O</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
<mml:mtext>&#xa0;</mml:mtext>
<mml:mstyle displaystyle="true">
<mml:msubsup>
<mml:mo>&#x2211;</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>o</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>r</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>g</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>a</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>n</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>c</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#xa0;</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>N</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>,</mml:mo>
<mml:mo>&#xa0;</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>c</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>h</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>e</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>m</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>c</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>a</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>l</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#xa0;</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>N</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
</mml:msubsup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>EF</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>i</mml:mtext>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>&#xd7;</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>F</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>N</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mstyle>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</disp-formula>
<p>The indirect N<sub>2</sub>O emissions (idE<sub>N2O</sub>) caused by the application of N fertilizers were calculated from N rate per hectare, fractions of N loss through leaching (FN<sub>L</sub>, %) and runoff (FN<sub>R</sub>, %), and default emission factor (0.011, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">Hergoualc&#x2019;h et&#xa0;al., 2019</xref>) according to the following <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="eq5">Equation (5)</xref>. FN<sub>L</sub> was 14.5% based on our three-year lysimeter experiment of similar soil type and texture with the same cultivar Baiye-1 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B44">Zheng, 2022</xref>). FN<sub>R</sub> was 8.2% according to a field experiment of green tea with similar soil, weather and topographical conditions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">Xie et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>). The current value of FN<sub>L</sub> was higher while that of FN<sub>R</sub> was lower than 9.8% which was adopted for both in the previous work (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Tang et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>).</p>
<disp-formula id="eq5">
<label>(5)</label>
<mml:math display="block" id="M5">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>idE&#xa0;</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>N</mml:mtext>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
<mml:mtext>O</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>F</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>N</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>&#xd7;</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>FN</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>L</mml:mtext>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>FN</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>R</mml:mtext>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#xd7;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>0.011</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</disp-formula>
<p>The direct and indirect emissions of N<sub>2</sub>O (dE<sub>N2O</sub>) were converted to CO<sub>2</sub> equivalent greenhouse gas emission (GHG<sub>A-FN</sub>) according to the following <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="eq6">Equation (6)</xref>.</p>
<disp-formula id="eq6">
<label>(6)</label>
<mml:math display="block" id="M6">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>GHG</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>A</mml:mtext>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
<mml:mtext>FN</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>dE</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>N</mml:mtext>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
<mml:mtext>O</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>idE</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>N</mml:mtext>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
<mml:mtext>O</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#xd7;</mml:mo>
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>44</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>28</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfrac>
<mml:mo>&#xd7;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>298</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</disp-formula>
<p>The area scaled total emission (GHG<sub>A</sub>) from production, transportation and application of fertilizer was calculated according to the following <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="eq7">Equation (7)</xref> and was further converted to per yield (GHG<sub>Y</sub>) and profit (GHG<sub>P</sub>) scales according to the following <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="eq8">Equations (8)</xref>, <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="eq9">(9)</xref>, respectively.</p>
<disp-formula id="eq7">
<label>(7)</label>
<mml:math display="block" id="M7">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>GHG</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>A</mml:mtext>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>&#xa0;GHG</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>A</mml:mtext>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
<mml:mtext>Pr</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>GHG</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>A</mml:mtext>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
<mml:mtext>Tr</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>GHG</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>A</mml:mtext>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
<mml:mtext>FN</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</disp-formula>
<disp-formula id="eq8">
<label>(8)</label>
<mml:math display="block" id="M8">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>GHG</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>Y</mml:mtext>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>&#xa0;GHG</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>A&#xa0;</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>&#xf7;</mml:mo>
<mml:mtext>Yield</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</disp-formula>
<disp-formula id="eq9">
<label>(9)</label>
<mml:math display="block" id="M9">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>GHG</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>P</mml:mtext>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>&#xa0;GHG</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>A&#xa0;</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>&#xf7;</mml:mo>
<mml:mtext>Profit</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</disp-formula>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_4">
<label>2.4</label>
<title>Statistical analysis</title>
<p>To test the effect of fertilization data were subjected to one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) combined with the least significant difference (LSD) test by SigmaStat embedded in SigmaPlot (Version 12.5, Systat Software Inc., Palo Alto, CA 94303).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s3" sec-type="results">
<label>3</label>
<title>Results</title>
<sec id="s3_1">
<label>3.1</label>
<title>The concentrations of nutrients in teas and mature leaves of tea plants</title>
<p>The concentrations of N, P and K in teas of both harvests appeared not directly related to the application rates of fertilizers (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>). However, the concentrations of N in teas of both harvests were significantly decreased in SCF+LSM (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">
<bold>Figures&#xa0;1A, B</bold>
</xref>). The concentrations of P and K in teas were inconsistently affected by fertilization treatments between the two harvests. Their concentrations in the first harvest (March 22) were considerably decreased in RSM and SCF+RSM compared to those in CK (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">
<bold>Figures&#xa0;1C, E</bold>
</xref>). Their concentrations in the second harvest were unaffected by fertilization treatments (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">
<bold>Figures&#xa0;1D, F</bold>
</xref>).</p>
<fig id="f1" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;1</label>
<caption>
<p>Response of the concentrations of N <bold>(A, B)</bold>, P <bold>(C, D)</bold> and K <bold>(E, F)</bold> in teas of the first harvest <bold>(A, C, E)</bold> and second harvest <bold>(B, D, F)</bold> to the application rate of fertilizers. Error bars are standard deviations of three replicates. Bars in red without data point are LSD values indicative of significant (p&lt;0.05) difference among treatments.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-15-1369015-g001.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>Compared to CK, the concentrations of N in mature leaves of tea plants were significantly increased by fertilization. Their concentrations were most considerably increased in HCF and HCF+RSM but least increased in SCF+LSM (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;2A</bold>
</xref>). There were significantly positive relation between the N concentration of mature leaves and the N application rate, which could be well described by a quadratic equation (R<sup>2 =</sup> 0.742, p&lt;0.0001). The concentrations of P in mature leaves of tea plants were significantly decreased in RSM, SCF+RSM and SCF+LSM and unchanged in FP and HCF compared to that of CK (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;2B</bold>
</xref>). The concentrations of K in mature leaves of tea plants were significantly increased in SCF+LSM, HCF and RSM but were unaffected in SCF+RSM and FP compared to that CK (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;3B</bold>
</xref>). The responses of P and K concentrations in mature leaves to the rates of P and K fertilizers, respectively could not be described by any defined equations.</p>
<fig id="f2" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;2</label>
<caption>
<p>Response of the concentrations of N <bold>(A)</bold>, P <bold>(B)</bold> and K <bold>(C)</bold> in mature leaves of tea plants to the application rate of fertilizers. Error bars are standard deviations of three replicates. Bars in red without data point are LSD values indicative of significant (p&lt;0.05) difference among treatments.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-15-1369015-g002.tif"/>
</fig>
<fig id="f3" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;3</label>
<caption>
<p>Relations between the concentrations of total free amino acid (TFAA, <bold>A</bold>), theanine <bold>(B)</bold>, glutamine <bold>(C)</bold> and caffeine <bold>(D)</bold> in teas of the first (closed symbols) and second harvest (open symbols) with those of N or K in mature leaves of tea plants.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-15-1369015-g003.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_2">
<label>3.2</label>
<title>The concentrations of free amino acids in teas</title>
<p>The concentrations total free amino acid (TFAA) in teas were significantly increased in HCF but decreased in SCF+LSM in both harvests compared to those of CK (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">
<bold>Table&#xa0;2</bold>
</xref>). Compared to that of CK, the TFAA concentration in the first harvest was significantly increased in SCF+RSM. The TFAA concentrations in both harvests were not significantly affected in RSM and FP. There were significantly (p&lt;0.01) linear positive correlations between TFAA concentrations in both harvests and the N concentrations in mature leaves of tea plants (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;3A</bold>
</xref>).</p>
<table-wrap id="T2" position="float">
<label>Table&#xa0;2</label>
<caption>
<p>Contents of total free amino acid (TFAA, mg g<sup>-1</sup>) and free amino acids (&#x3bc;mol g<sup>-1</sup>) in teas.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" align="left">Treatment</th>
<th valign="middle" align="left">TFAA</th>
<th valign="middle" align="left">Thea</th>
<th valign="middle" align="left">Gln</th>
<th valign="middle" align="left">Glu</th>
<th valign="middle" align="left">Asp</th>
<th valign="middle" align="left">Phe</th>
<th valign="middle" align="left">Ser</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" colspan="8" align="left">First harvest (March 22)</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">CK</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">56.6&#xb1;1.2cd</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">116.7&#xb1;2.7b</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">36.5&#xb1;3.1b</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">16.3&#xb1;1.3b</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">11.0&#xb1;0.9b</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">7.0&#xb1;0.2ab</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">3.4&#xb1;0.3b</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">FP</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">60.2&#xb1;1.4bc</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">117.7&#xb1;3.8b</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">40.4&#xb1;1.7b</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">15.9&#xb1;0.9b</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">11.5&#xb1;0.6b</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">6.9&#xb1;0.3ab</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">3.1&#xb1;0.2b</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">RSM</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">59.9&#xb1;1.7bc</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">119.6&#xb1;6.4b</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">37.4&#xb1;3.9b</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">17.0&#xb1;1.2b</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">10.8&#xb1;0.8b</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">6.6&#xb1;0.2bc</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">3.1&#xb1;0.3b</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">SCF+RSM</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">63.0&#xb1;3.6b</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">138.8&#xb1;0.2a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">40.6&#xb1;1.3b</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">17.3&#xb1;1.0b</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">11.5&#xb1;0.7b</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">7.0&#xb1;0.1a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">3.5&#xb1;0.2b</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">SCF+LSM</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">53.5&#xb1;2.4d</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">104.8&#xb1;2.0c</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">31.6&#xb1;1.9c</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">16.6&#xb1;1.2b</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">10.6&#xb1;0.8b</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">6.4&#xb1;0.1cd</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">3.3&#xb1;0.2b</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">HCF</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">67.3&#xb1;1.1a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">133.4&#xb1;10.5a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">46.4&#xb1;1.5a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">22.1&#xb1;1.0a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">13.1&#xb1;0.2a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">6.2&#xb1;0.2d</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">4.3&#xb1;0.6a</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" colspan="8" align="left">Second harvest (March 26)</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">CK</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">54.7&#xb1;1.8bc</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">135.4&#xb1;0.4c</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">28.9&#xb1;0.6bc</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">16.5&#xb1;0.6a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">8.8&#xb1;0.3ab</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">4.6&#xb1;0.1b</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">3.9&#xb1;0.1a</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">FP</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">58.5&#xb1;4.3ab</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">135.8&#xb1;1.9c</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">30.2&#xb1;1.7b</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">15.9&#xb1;1.5a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">8.5&#xb1;0.8ab</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">4.6&#xb1;0.1b</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">3.8&#xb1;0.3ab</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">RSM</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">55.1&#xb1;1.1b</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">145.3&#xb1;1.9a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">27.3&#xb1;3.0bcd</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">14.1&#xb1;0.4b</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">7.7&#xb1;0.1b</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">4.3&#xb1;0.1c</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">3.4&#xb1;0.2b</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">SCF+RSM</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">56.0&#xb1;2.1b</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">140.1&#xb1;2.8b</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">26.2&#xb1;1.8cd</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">16.5&#xb1;1.1a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">8.9&#xb1;0.7ab</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">5.6&#xb1;0.0a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">4.0&#xb1;0.1a</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">SCF+LSM</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">50.9&#xb1;1.3c</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">119.7&#xb1;0.8d</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">24.5&#xb1;1.0d</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">16.4&#xb1;0.7a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">8.6&#xb1;0.4ab</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">4.6&#xb1;0.1b</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">3.9&#xb1;0.2a</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">HCF</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">62.2&#xb1;3.4a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">138.4&#xb1;1.8bc</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">38.6&#xb1;2.4a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">17.0&#xb1;0.6a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">9.5&#xb1;1.0a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">4.2&#xb1;0.2c</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">4.2&#xb1;0.3a</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn>
<p>Thea, theanine; Gln, glutamine; Glu, glutamate; Asp, asparate; Phe, phenylalanine.</p>
</fn>
<fn>
<p>Different letters following data of the same columns indicate significant differences (p&lt; 0.05) among treatments for the specified harvest.</p>
</fn>
<fn>
<p>Data are means and standard deviations of three replicates.</p>
</fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<p>The compositions of free amino acids were significantly affected by fertilizers but the effects were inconsistent between the two harvests (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">
<bold>Table&#xa0;2</bold>
</xref>). Compared to CK, FP had little effect on the compositions of free amino acids. RSM affected the composition of free amino acids only in the second harvest, increasing that of theanine (Thea) but decreasing those of glutamate (Glu) and phenylalanine (Phe). SCF+RSM increased Thea concentrations in both harvests whereas had little effect on those of other amino acids. SCF+LSM decreased the concentrations of Thea and glutamine (Gln) in both harvests compared to CK. HCF increased concentrations of most amino acids including Thea compared to CK in the first harvest but had smaller effects in the second harvest. The concentrations of Thea and Gln of both harvests linearly related to the concentrations of N in mature leaves of tea plants (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3">
<bold>Figures&#xa0;3B, C</bold>
</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_3">
<label>3.3</label>
<title>The concentrations of caffeine, total polyphenol and catechins in teas</title>
<p>Compared to CK, SCF+LSM decreased the concentrations of caffeine in both harvests (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">
<bold>Table&#xa0;3</bold>
</xref>). SCF+RSM increased while HCF decreased the concentrations of caffeine in teas of the second harvest. The concentrations of caffeine was negatively correlated with K concentrations of mature leaves (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;3D</bold>
</xref>). Compared to CK, SCF+RSM increased the concentrations of total polyphenol (TP) in both harvests mostly among the treatments. By contrast, HCF decreased the concentrations of TP, catechins and the ratio of TP/TFAA in both harvests compared to CK. The concentrations of TP and catechins in HCF were the lowest among fertilization treatments with only a few exceptions. The concentrations of catechins were also affected by other fertilization treatments but inconsistently between the two harvests (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">
<bold>Table&#xa0;3</bold>
</xref>). SCF+LSM decreased the concentrations of EGC and ECG in the first harvest but increased those in the second harvest. FP decreased the concentrations of ECG in the first harvest and those of EGCG and EC in the second harvest. The concentrations of catechins were only weakly affected in RSM compared to CK.</p>
<table-wrap id="T3" position="float">
<label>Table&#xa0;3</label>
<caption>
<p>Concentrations of caffeine, total polyphenols (TP), the ratio of TP/TFAA and catechins in teas.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" align="left" rowspan="2">Treatment</th>
<th valign="middle" align="left" rowspan="2">Caffeine</th>
<th valign="middle" align="left" rowspan="2">TP</th>
<th valign="middle" align="left" rowspan="2">TP/TFAA</th>
<th valign="middle" colspan="4" align="left">Catechin (mg g<sup>-1</sup>)</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" align="left">EGCG</th>
<th valign="middle" align="left">EGC</th>
<th valign="middle" align="left">ECG</th>
<th valign="middle" align="left">EC</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" colspan="8" align="left">First harvest (March 22)</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">CK</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">9.39&#xb1;0.14a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">238.1&#xb1;5.6b</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">4.21&#xb1;0.04ab</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">26.8&#xb1;0.9a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">9.77&#xb1;0.23b</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">4.69&#xb1;0.02a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">4.26&#xb1;0.07</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">FP</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">9.05&#xb1;0.20ab</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">234.2&#xb1;6.6bc</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">3.89&#xb1;0.20b</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">24.9&#xb1;0.2ab</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">9.87&#xb1;0.20b</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">4.26&#xb1;0.05b</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">4.07&#xb1;0.09</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">RSM</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">9.15&#xb1;0.36ab</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">238.4&#xb1;2.2b</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">3.98&#xb1;0.13b</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">26.4&#xb1;1.1a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">10.66&#xb1;0.46a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">4.79&#xb1;0.26a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">4.16&#xb1;0.21</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">SCF+RSM</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">9.38&#xb1;0.16a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">249.9&#xb1;7.6a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">3.98&#xb1;0.32b</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">26.2&#xb1;0.5a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">11.00&#xb1;0.31a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">4.70&#xb1;0.12a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">3.92&#xb1;0.20</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">SCF+LSM</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">8.64&#xb1;0.63b</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">235.2&#xb1;3.3bc</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">4.40&#xb1;0.20a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">23.4&#xb1;1.3bc</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">8.96&#xb1;0.61c</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">4.05&#xb1;0.31bc</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">3.94&#xb1;0.14</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">HCF</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">9.10&#xb1;0.36ab</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">226.3&#xb1;1.7c</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">3.36&#xb1;0.06c</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">22.4&#xb1;1.5c</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">9.24&#xb1;0.21c</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">3.93&#xb1;0.09c</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">4.23&#xb1;0.43</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" colspan="8" align="left">Second harvest (March 26)</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">CK</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">9.23&#xb1;0.22b</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">257.6&#xb1;3.5ab</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">4.72&#xb1;0.22a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">24.9&#xb1;0.9a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">8.35&#xb1;0.36b</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">3.80&#xb1;0.06b</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">5.37&#xb1;0.07a</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">FP</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">9.44&#xb1;.20ab</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">238.9&#xb1;4.0cd</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">4.10&#xb1;0.27bc</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">22.7&#xb1;0.5b</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">8.64&#xb1;0.27b</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">3.86&#xb1;0.18b</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">4.32&#xb1;0.20d</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">RSM</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">9.08&#xb1;0.19b</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">232.4&#xb1;10.3d</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">4.22&#xb1;0.11b</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">23.5&#xb1;0.8ab</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">8.89&#xb1;0.42b</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">3.68&#xb1;0.09b</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">3.80&#xb1;0.11e</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">SCF+RSM</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">9.66&#xb1;0.32a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">269.3&#xb1;13.2a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">4.81&#xb1;0.41a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">24.5&#xb1;1.0a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">8.71&#xb1;0.27b</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">4.07&#xb1;0.10a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">4.52&#xb1;0.12c</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">SCF+LSM</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">8.68&#xb1;0.24c</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">249.4&#xb1;5.4bc</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">4.90&#xb1;0.09a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">24.6&#xb1;0.5a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">10.070.38a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">4.17&#xb1;0.04a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">5.08&#xb1;0.08b</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">HCF</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">8.59&#xb1;0.02c</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">230.9&#xb1;4.2d</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">3.72&#xb1;0.19c</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">17.6&#xb1;0.4c</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">8.35&#xb1;0.18b</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">3.49&#xb1;0.02c</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">4.96&#xb1;0.02b</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn>
<p>EGCG, epigallocatechin-3-gallate; EGC, epigallocatechin; ECG, epicatechin-3-gallate; EC, epicatechin.</p>
</fn>
<fn>
<p>Different letters following data of the same columns indicate significant differences (p&lt; 0.05) among treatments for the specified harvest.</p>
</fn>
<fn>
<p>Data are means and standard deviations of three replicates.</p>
</fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<fig id="f4" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;4</label>
<caption>
<p>pH <bold>(A)</bold> and the contents of NH<sub>4</sub>
<sup>+</sup> <bold>(B)</bold> and NO<sub>3</sub>
<sup>-</sup> <bold>(C)</bold> in the soil profile. Error bars are standard deviations of three replicates. Single bars in red along with columns are LSD values indicative of significant (<italic>p</italic>&lt;0.05) difference among treatments at the specified depth.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-15-1369015-g004.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_4">
<label>3.4</label>
<title>Yield, profit and nutrient use efficiency</title>
<p>The yield was relatively stable with small variations (CVs 7.7 &#x2212; 12.1%) between experimental years (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T4">
<bold>Table&#xa0;4</bold>
</xref>). Compared to CK without any fertilizers, fertilization treatments significantly increased tea yield by 33.6% &#x2212; 58.7% (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T4">
<bold>Table&#xa0;4</bold>
</xref>). Yields were slightly (p&gt;0.05) higher in SCF+RSM, HCF and SCF+LSM and slightly lower in RSM than in FP. The profit of fertilization varied from 19794 to 51284 Yuan ha<sup>-1</sup> (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T4">
<bold>Table&#xa0;4</bold>
</xref>). The profit and profit/cost ratio were the lowest in RSM and the highest in SCF+RSM. SCF+RSM and SCF+LSM had 80% and 35% higher profits than FP, respectively. The HCF had higher profit than FP but much lower profit and profit/cost ratio than SCF+RSM and SCF+LSM.</p>
<table-wrap id="T4" position="float">
<label>Table&#xa0;4</label>
<caption>
<p>Fresh yield, profit, profit/cost ratio, nutrient content in young shoots and agronomical efficiency (AE).</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" align="left" rowspan="2">Parameter</th>
<th valign="middle" colspan="6" align="left">Treatment</th>
</tr>    <tr>
<th valign="middle" align="left">CK</th>
<th valign="middle" align="left">FP</th>
<th valign="middle" align="left">RSM</th>
<th valign="middle" align="left">SCF+RSM</th>
<th valign="middle" align="left">SCF+LSM</th>
<th valign="middle" align="left">HCF</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">&#x2003;Yield (kg ha<sup>-1</sup>)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">673&#xb1;82b</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">929&#xb1;111a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">899&#xb1;77a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">1069&#xb1;76a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">984&#xb1;110a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">1000&#xb1;97a</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">&#x2003;Profit (Yuan ha<sup>-1</sup>)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">/</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">28477</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">19794</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">51284</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">39443</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">33863</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">&#x2003;Profit/cost ratio</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">/</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">2.89</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">1.40</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">6.41</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">5.56</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">2.24</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" colspan="7" align="left">Nutrient content (kg ha<sup>-1</sup>)</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">&#x2003;N</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">8.70&#xb1;0.80d</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">12.37&#xb1;1.63bc</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">11.89&#xb1;0.66c</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">13.98&#xb1;0.98ab</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">12.81&#xb1;1.73abc</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">14.78&#xb1;0.75a</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">&#x2003;P</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">0.89&#xb1;0.10c</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">1.24&#xb1;0.15b</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">1.20&#xb1;0.06b</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">1.44&#xb1;0.11a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">1.33&#xb1;0.14ab</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">1.51&#xb1;0.10a</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">&#x2003;K</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">3.00&#xb1;0.64c</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">4.18&#xb1;0.90abc</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">4.09&#xb1;0.62bc</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">5.06&#xb1;0.82ab</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">4.47&#xb1;0.97ab</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">5.43&#xb1;0.21a</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" colspan="7" align="left">AE (kg kg<sup>-1</sup>)</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">&#x2003;N</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">/</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">0.98&#xb1;0.11b</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">0.82&#xb1;0.10b</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">1.57&#xb1;0.28a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">1.48&#xb1;0.16a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">0.37&#xb1;0.04c</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">&#x2003;P</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">/</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">2.96&#xb1;0.34cd</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">4.05&#xb1;0.51c</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">8.71&#xb1;1.57a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">6.90&#xb1;0.76b</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">1.61&#xb1;0.17d</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">&#x2003;K</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">/</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">1.77&#xb1;0.20b</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">3.84&#xb1;0.49a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">4.00&#xb1;0.72a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">2.32&#xb1;0.26b</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">0.85&#xb1;0.09c</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn>
<p>Different letters following data of the same line indicate significant difference (p&lt; 0.05) among treatments.</p>
</fn>
<fn>
<p>Data are means and standard deviations of three years (2018-2020).</p>
</fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<p>The contents of N, P and K in the young shoots, which were calculated from shoot dry tea yield and nutrient concentrations, were significantly increased by fertilization (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T4">
<bold>Table&#xa0;4</bold>
</xref>). The contents of N and P were significantly increased, in a decreasing order, by HCF and SCF+RSM, followed by SCF+LSM, FP and RSM. Compared to CK, K contents of young shoots were increased significantly by HCF, SCF+RSM, SCF+LSM but unaffected by FP and RSM. The agronomic efficiency (AE) of N, P and K fertilizers were the highest in SCF+RSM and the lowest in HCF (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T4">
<bold>Table&#xa0;4</bold>
</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_5">
<label>3.5</label>
<title>Soil properties and greenhouse gas emissions</title>
<p>Fertilization significantly decreased soil pH of all layers (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f4">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;4A</bold>
</xref>). The lowest soil pH was found in RSM and HCF. The concentrations of residual NO<sub>3</sub>
<sup>&#x2013;</sup>N and NH<sub>4</sub>
<sup>+</sup>-N varied largely among different soil layers and mainly accumulated at the surface soil (depth 0-20 cm) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f4">
<bold>Figures&#xa0;4B, C</bold>
</xref>). The amounts of NO<sub>3</sub>
<sup>&#x2212;</sup>-N and NH<sub>4</sub>
<sup>+</sup>-N in the surface soil (0-20 cm) accounted for 49.9% and 35.1% of the total profile (assuming an unform bulk density) down to 1 m depth, respectively. HCF had extremely high residual NO<sub>3</sub>
<sup>&#x2212;</sup>-N in the soil down to the depth of 60-80 cm. The concentration ratios of NO<sub>3</sub>
<sup>&#x2212;</sup>-N/NH<sub>4</sub>
<sup>+</sup>-N were significantly higher in HCF than in other treatments.</p>
<p>Area (GHG<sub>A</sub>) and yield (GHG<sub>Y</sub>) scaled total greenhouse gas emissions were decreased in SCF+RSM, SCF+LSM and RSM compared to FP (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T5">
<bold>Table&#xa0;5</bold>
</xref>). SCF+LSM had the lowest GHG<sub>A</sub> and GHG<sub>Y</sub>. Compared to FP, the profit scaled total greenhouse gas emissions (GHG<sub>P</sub>) were decreased in SCF+RSM and SCF+LSM but increased in RSM. GHG<sub>A</sub>, GHG<sub>Y</sub> and GHG<sub>P</sub> were the highest in HCF, which were 3.7 &#x2212; 4.4, 3.5 &#x2212; 4.4 and 2.0 &#x2212; 4.9 times higher than those in other fertilization treatments, respectively.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s4" sec-type="discussion">
<label>4</label>
<title>Discussion</title>
<sec id="s4_1">
<label>4.1</label>
<title>Response of tea yield and quality to the rate and ratio of nutrients</title>
<p>Compared to CK, tea yield was significantly increased (33.6% &#x2212; 58.7%) by fertilization, indicating the important contribution of fertilization to improve the productivity of Baiye-1. However, tea yields did not statistically differ among fertilization treatments in spite of different rates of fertilizers. The N concentrations of mature leaves and the contents of amino acids, TP and TP/TFAA significantly responded to the application rate of N fertilizers. In the present experiment, we included a special treatment HCF to evaluate the effect of extremely high rate of fertilizers which had been used in plantations of normal green cultivars (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Mishima et&#xa0;al., 2010</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Ni et&#xa0;al., 2019</xref>). High N rate in HCF significantly increased yield and the concentrations of TFAA and main amino acids (such as Thea and Gln) but decreased the concentrations of total polyphenol and catechins, resulting in the unbalance of TP and TFAA and weakening the intensity of the tea infusion. These results suggest that application N fertilizers at the rate of 250~276 kg ha<sup>&#x2212;1</sup> in SCF+RSM, FP and RSM appeared to supply sufficient N to tea plants. However, HCF produced higher profit regardless of higher fertilization cost than FP because of good price of tea. This might help explain the reason why over-application of fertilizers had been popular in tea plantations (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Ni et&#xa0;al., 2019</xref>).</p>
<p>The contents of free amino acid and polyphenols were insignificantly affected in FP although the yield was significantly increased (by 38%) compared to CK. Compared to FP and CK, SCF+RSM increased the concentrations of TFAA, Thea, total polyphenol and catechins, thereby improved the overall tea quality. This was associated with the significantly increased concentration of N in mature leaves of tea plants in SCF+RSM (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;2A</bold>
</xref>). Our previous work showed that N in the mature leaves is removable to support the growth and metabolism of spring tea hence significantly affects the contents of amino acids of spring tea (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">Liu et&#xa0;al., 2016</xref>), which is also supported by the present findings of their close relationships (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;3</bold>
</xref>). The photosynthesis rate was likely improved in leaves of increased N content (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Okano et&#xa0;al., 1997</xref>). SCF+RSM had slightly lower N rate than FP and it was likely that their different effects on tea quality might be partially related to the optimization of P, K rates and their ratio against N to better meet the requirement of tea plants. The amounts of P and K input in SCF+RSM were reduced by 47% and 31%, respectively, compared to FP, by replacing compound fertilizer of equal nutrient formular (N-P<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub>-K<sub>2</sub>O = 15-15-15) with that of specialized formular (N-P<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub>-K<sub>2</sub>O = 18-8-12). The ratio of N, P and K in SCF+RSM was optimized to 1-0.17-0.39, which was more closed to the ratio of their contents in young shoots (1-0.10-0.35, <xref ref-type="table" rid="T4">
<bold>Table&#xa0;4</bold>
</xref>). This result is consistent with recent findings showing that over application of P and K fertilizers reduce green tea quality (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">Wei et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">Zhang et&#xa0;al., 2023</xref>). The concentrations of P and K in young shoots and mature leaves hardly responded to the rates of fertilizers (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">
<bold>Figures&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">
<bold>2</bold>
</xref>). The specially formulated compound fertilizer contained Mg and provided additional Mg (16 kg MgO ha<sup>-1</sup>), which might also play a role (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Ruan et&#xa0;al., 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">He et&#xa0;al., 2023</xref>). A recent field experiment showed that application of tea-specific fertilizer together with rapeseed cake manure improves the aroma of green tea (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">Huang et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s4_2">
<label>4.2</label>
<title>Response of tea yield and quality to the substitution of chemical fertilizers with organic manures</title>
<p>In the present work, chemical fertilizers were substituted by organic manures fully in RSM and partially in SCF+RSM and SCF+LSM. The yield increase and profit were much lower in the full substitution (RSM) than in the partial substitution (SCF+RSM, SCF+LSM) and even lower than those in FP for the high fertilization cost and relative lower yield of RSM. On the other hand, the quality of tea was improved in RSM and SCF+RSM for the significant increase of Thea content compared to in FP and CK. Nevertheless, it appeared that tea quality was improved more considerably in SCF+RSM relative to RSM for greater increase of the contents of amino acids (Glu, Phe and Ser), caffeine, TP and EGCG. These results confirmed our previous findings that partial substitution of chemical fertilizers by organic manure had better effect than the full substitution (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Ji et&#xa0;al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">Ma et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>). These effects might be explained by the increased N concentration of mature leaves indicative of improved N nutrition of tea plants as the result of more readily available N supply in the partial (SCF+RSM) than in the full substitution (RSM) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;2A</bold>
</xref>).</p>
<p>The concentrations of TFAA and free amino acids in SCF+LSM were generally decreased compared to other fertilization treatments. Tea plants in SCF+LSM had low N status which was indicated by low N concentration in mature leaves of plants (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;2A</bold>
</xref>). This is partly explained by its low N application rate, which was 16 &#x2212; 24% lower than in FP, RSM and SCF+RSM. Furthermore, it was likely that the availability of N in livestock manure with a high C/N ratio was lower than that of rapeseed cake manure with a low C/N ratio. Previous work showed that there was a significant negative correlation between manure C:N ratio and N mineralization in the manure-amended soils (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">Qian and Schoenau, 2002</xref>). On the other hand, SCF+LSM decreased the concentrations of TFAA and main amino acids (Thea and Gln) compared to CK, which likely had been caused by a dilution effect as the result of significantly increased yield. The SCF+LSM scheme may be further optimized by increasing N application rate to improve N supply. The present work suggests that the effect of substitution is dependent on the type of organic manure and the bioavailability of nutrients.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s4_3">
<label>4.3</label>
<title>Effect of the optimized nutrient management on nutrient use efficiency and environmental risks</title>
<p>Greenhouse gas emission in tea field has been estimated by IPCC default method in recent works. Production and application of N fertilizer accounted for a large portion of the GHG emissions in tea industry (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">Liang et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Tang et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>). SCF+LSM had the lowest area scaled GHG<sub>A</sub> emission for its low N fertilizer rate. RSM had lower GHG<sub>A</sub> than SCF+RSM and both of them had lower GHG<sub>A</sub> than FP. However, an opposite result was found in greenhouse gas emissions (GHG<sub>Y</sub> and GHG<sub>P</sub>) per yield and profit, which were much higher in RSM than in SCF+RSM and SCF+LSM. In all these treatments, it was assumed that organic manure had been locally recycled without long-distance transportation. In case of long-distance transportation of organic manures, RSM would have higher gas emissions due to its low nutrient content and high moisture content. Therefore, it appears that the full substitution of chemical fertilizers by rapeseed cake manure had not economic and sustainability advantages over the partial substitution. The application rate of N and the estimated GHGs in the present work were lower than those of the previous work in normal green-leaf cultivars based on Nutrient Expert (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Tang et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>).</p>
<p>Nutrient use efficiency is an important indicator evaluating the impact of an applied fertilizer on crop production and economic return (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Fixen et&#xa0;al., 2015</xref>). A recent work showed that the agronomic efficiency (AE) was positively correlated with the free amino acid content, income, and negatively with global warming potential of tea (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">Tang et&#xa0;al., 2023</xref>). The present work showed that AEs were increased in SCF+RSM together with increases of tea productivity, the contents of free amino acids, total polyphenols and economic profit as well as reduced greenhouse gas emissions. The AEs of the present work were relatively low compared to the reported values in tea (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">Tang et&#xa0;al., 2023</xref>) and other crops (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Fixen et&#xa0;al., 2015</xref>), which was likely attributed to the low yield of Baiye-1. On the other hand, AEs in HCF were decreased because of high amount of applied fertilizers. However, the low AEs of HCF did not necessarily reflect low income and low contents of free amino acids, a finding inconsistent with the recent finding (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">Tang et&#xa0;al., 2023</xref>). However, HCF remarkably increased greenhouse gas emission as well as the contents of residual NO<sub>3</sub>
<sup>&#x2212;</sup>-N in the deep soil hence enhanced the risk of N leaching. These results indicated that over-use of fertilizers deteriorated Baiye-1 tea quality and imposed serious environmental risks.</p>
<table-wrap id="T5" position="float">
<label>Table&#xa0;5</label>
<caption>
<p>Estimated greenhouse gas emission (CO<sub>2</sub> equivalent) derived from fertilization.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" align="left" rowspan="2">Parameter</th>
<th valign="middle" align="left" rowspan="2">Unit</th>
<th valign="middle" colspan="6" align="left">Treatment</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" align="left">CK</th>
<th valign="middle" align="left">FP</th>
<th valign="middle" align="left">RSM</th>
<th valign="middle" align="left">SCF+RSM</th>
<th valign="middle" align="left">SCF+LSM</th>
<th valign="middle" align="left">HCF</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">GHG<sub>A-Pr</sub>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">(kg ha<sup>-1</sup>)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">0</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">1359</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">0</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">1476</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">1476</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">7532</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">GHG<sub>A-Tr</sub>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">(kg ha<sup>-1</sup>)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">0</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">29</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">0</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">24</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">24</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">126</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" colspan="8" align="left">Direct emission</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">&#x2003;GHG<sub>N_CF</sub>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">(kg ha<sup>-1</sup>)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">0</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">1180</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">0</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">1377</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">1377</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">6966</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">&#x2003;GHG<sub>N_OF</sub>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">(kg ha<sup>-1</sup>)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">0</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">1430</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">3373</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">1014</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">513</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">464</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">&#x2003;Sum</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">(kg ha<sup>-1</sup>)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">0</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">2610</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">3373</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">2391</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">1890</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">7430</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" colspan="8" align="left">Indirect emission</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">&#x2003;Leaching</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">(kg ha<sup>-1</sup>)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">0</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">195</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">207</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">188</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">157</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">665</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">&#x2003;Runoff</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">(kg ha<sup>-1</sup>)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">0</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">110</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">117</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">106</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">89</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">375</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">&#x2003;GHG<sub>A</sub>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">(kg ha<sup>-1</sup>)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">0</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">4304</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">3696</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">4185</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">3636</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">16128</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">&#x2003;GHG<sub>Y</sub>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">(kg kg<sup>-1</sup>)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">0</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">4.63</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">4.11</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">3.92</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">3.70</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">16.13</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">&#x2003;GHG<sub>P</sub>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">(kg Yuan<sup>-1</sup>)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">0</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">0.151</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">0.187</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">0.082</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">0.092</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">0.476</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn>
<p>GHG<sub>A-Pr</sub> and GHG<sub>A-Tr</sub>, area scaled greenhouse gas emission derived from the production and transportation of chemical fertilizers, respectively; GHG<sub>N_CF</sub> and GHG<sub>N_OF</sub>, area scaled greenhouse gas (N<sub>2</sub>O) emission derived from the application of chemical N and organic fertilizers, respectively; GHG<sub>A</sub>, area scaled total greenhouse gas emission derived from fertilization; GHG<sub>Y</sub>, yield scaled greenhouse gas emission; GHG<sub>P</sub>, profit scaled greenhouse gas emission.</p>
</fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s5" sec-type="conclusions">
<label>5</label>
<title>Conclusion</title>
<p>In conclusion, the yield, quality and profit of albino tea were considerably increased by the optimization of nutrient management schemes formulating the rates and ratio of N, P, K and Mg and the partial substitution of chemical fertilizers with rapeseed cake manure. Partial substitution of chemical fertilizers with commercial livestock manure decreased the contents of free amino acids regardless of increasing yield, suggesting that the effect of substitution is dependent on the type of organic manure and the bioavailability of nutrients. Full organic substitution of chemical fertilizers increased tea yield and quality but had relatively low agronomic efficiency and profit than partial substitution. The effect of optimized nutrient management schemes was associated with the improvement of nutritional status in tea plants. The present work demonstrated that optimization of nutrient management considerably improved albino tea yield, quality and profit while decreased the input amounts of fertilizers and the intensity of greenhouse gas emissions.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s6" sec-type="data-availability">
<title>Data availability statement</title>
<p>The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s7" sec-type="author-contributions">
<title>Author contributions</title>
<p>YZ: Formal analysis, Investigation, Writing &#x2013; original draft. LM: Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Writing &#x2013; original draft. SG: Formal analysis, Investigation, Writing &#x2013; original draft. JR: Conceptualization, Data curation, Funding acquisition, Project administration, Supervision, Writing &#x2013; original draft, Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing.</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<sec id="s8" sec-type="funding-information">
<title>Funding</title>
<p>The author(s) declare financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. This work was funded by the National Key Research and Development Project (2021YFD1601100), the Agricultural Department of Zhejiang Province through the contract (No. 2022SNJF037), the Earmarked Fund for China Agriculture Research System (CARS-19), and the Agricultural Science and Technology Innovation Program of the Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CAAS-ASTIP-TRICAAS).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s9" sec-type="COI-statement">
<title>Conflict of interest</title>
<p>The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s10" sec-type="disclaimer">
<title>Publisher&#x2019;s note</title>
<p>All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.</p>
</sec>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="B1">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jiang</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yu</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Effects of long-term nitrogen fertilization on the formation of metabolites related to tea quality in subtropical China</article-title>. <source>Metabolites</source> <volume>11</volume>, <fpage>146</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/metabo11030146</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ding</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jia</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xiao</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Phosphate stresses affect ionome and metabolome in tea plants</article-title>. <source>Plant Physiol. Biochem.</source> <volume>120</volume>, <fpage>30</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>39</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.plaphy.2017.09.007</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Fixen</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Brentrup</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bruulsema</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Garcia</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Norton</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zingore</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2015</year>). &#x201c;<article-title>&#x201c;Nutrient/fertilizer use efficiency: measurement, current situation and trends,&#x201d;</article-title>,&#x201d; in <source>Managing Water and Fertilizer for Sustainable Agricultural Intensification</source>. Eds. <person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname>Drechsel</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Heffer</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Magen</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mikkelsen</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wichelns</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<publisher-name>International Fertilizer Industry Association (IFA), International Water Management Institute (IWMI), International Plant Nutrition Institute (IPNI), International Potash Institute (IPI</publisher-name>, <publisher-loc>Paris, France</publisher-loc>), <fpage>8</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>37</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Forster</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ramaswamy</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Artaxo</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Berntsen</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Betts</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fahey</surname> <given-names>D. W.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2007</year>). &#x201c;<article-title>&#x201c;Changes in Atmospheric Constituents and in Radiative Forcing,&#x201d;</article-title>,&#x201d; in <source>Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change</source>. Eds. <person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname>Solomon</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Qin</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Manning</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Marquis</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Averyt</surname> <given-names>K. B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tignor</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Miller</surname> <given-names>H. L.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<publisher-name>Cambridge University Press</publisher-name>, <publisher-loc>Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA</publisher-loc>).</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>He</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Huang</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yin</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Weng</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>Magnesium is a nutritional tool for the yield and quality of oolong tea (Camellia sinensis L.) and reduces reactive nitrogen loss</article-title>. <source>Scientia Hortic.</source> <volume>308</volume>, <fpage>111590</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.scienta.2022.111590</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Hergoualc&#x2019;h</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Akiyama</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bernoux</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chirinda</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Del Prado</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kasimir</surname> <given-names>&#xc5;.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2019</year>). &#x201c;<article-title>&#x201c;N2O emissions from managed soils, and CO2 emissions from lime and urea application,&#x201d;</article-title>,&#x201d; in <source>2019 Refinement to the 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories Volume 4 Agriculture, Forestry and Other Land Use</source>. Eds. <person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname>Buendia</surname> <given-names>E.C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tanabe</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kranjc</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Baasansuren</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>M. Fukuda</surname> <given-names>N. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Osako</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pyrozhenko</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Shermanau</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Federici</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<publisher-name>The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change</publisher-name>, <publisher-loc>Switzerland</publisher-loc>).</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Huang</surname> <given-names>D. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Y. P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>H. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tan</surname> <given-names>R. R.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Application of tea-specific fertilizer combined with organic fertilizer improves aroma of green tea</article-title>. <source>Horticulturae</source> <volume>8</volume>, <fpage>950</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/horticulturae8100950</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ji</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>You</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yi</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ni</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Guo</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Effects of organic substitution for synthetic N fertilizer on soil bacterial diversity and community composition: A 10-year field trial in a tea plantation</article-title>. <source>Agriculture Ecosyst. Environ.</source> <volume>268</volume>, <fpage>124</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>132</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.agee.2018.09.008</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Johnston</surname> <given-names>A. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bruulsema</surname> <given-names>T. W.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>4R nutrient stewardship for improved nutrient use efficiency</article-title>. <source>Proc. Eng.</source> <volume>83</volume>, <fpage>365</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>370</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.proeng.2014.09.029</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kilel</surname> <given-names>E. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Faraj</surname> <given-names>A. K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wanyoko</surname> <given-names>J. K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wachira</surname> <given-names>F. N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mwingirwa</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Green tea from purple leaf coloured tea clones in Kenya- their quality characteristics</article-title>. <source>Food Chem.</source> <volume>141</volume>, <fpage>769</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>775</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.foodchem.2013.03.051</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>C. F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ma</surname> <given-names>J. Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Huang</surname> <given-names>D. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ma</surname> <given-names>C. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jin</surname> <given-names>J. Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yao</surname> <given-names>M. Z.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Comprehensive dissection of metabolic changes in albino and green tea cultivars</article-title>. <source>J. Agric. Food Chem.</source> <volume>66</volume>, <fpage>2040</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2048</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1021/acs.jafc.7b05623</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xiang</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zheng</surname> <given-names>G. Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wei</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Advance of the breeding, extension and industrialization of tea cultivars with special colors in China</article-title>. <source>China Tea</source> <volume>42</volume>, <fpage>52</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>57</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Liang</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ridoutt</surname> <given-names>B. G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>L. Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xie</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>M. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>Z. B.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>China&#x2019;s tea industry: net greenhouse gas emissions and mitigation potential</article-title>. <source>Agriculture</source> <volume>11</volume>, <fpage>363</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/agriculture11040363</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Lin</surname> <given-names>Z.-H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Qi</surname> <given-names>Y.-P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>R.-B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>F.-Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>L.-S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Effects of phosphorus supply on the quality of green tea</article-title>. <source>Food Chem.</source> <volume>130</volume>, <fpage>908</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>914</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.foodchem.2011.08.008</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>Z.-W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>J.-X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhuang</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Integrative transcriptome, proteome, and microRNA analysis reveals the effects of nitrogen sufficiency and deficiency conditions on theanine metabolism in the tea plant (Camellia sinensis)</article-title>. <source>Horticulture Res.</source> <volume>7</volume>, <fpage>65</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41438-020-0290-8</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fang</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ruan</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Accumulation of amino acids and flavonoids in young tea shoots is highly correlated with carbon and nitrogen metabolism in roots and mature leaves</article-title>. <source>Front. Plant Sci.</source> <volume>12</volume>, <elocation-id>756433</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpls.2021.756433</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>J. W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Q. F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>M. Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ma</surname> <given-names>L. F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Shi</surname> <given-names>Y. Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ruan</surname> <given-names>J. Y.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Metabolomic analyses reveal distinct change of metabolites and quality of green tea during the short duration of a single spring season</article-title>. <source>J. Agric. Food Chem.</source> <volume>64</volume>, <fpage>3302</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>3309</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1021/acs.jafc.6b00404</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B18">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ma</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Shi</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yi</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ji</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cheng</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Response of tea yield, quality and soil bacterial characteristics to long-term nitrogen fertilization in an eleven-year field experiment</article-title>. <source>Appl. Soil Ecol.</source> <volume>166</volume>, <fpage>103976</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.apsoil.2021.103976</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B19">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ma</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhu</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Geng</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ruan</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Response of nutritional status and tea quality to the rate and substitution of chemical fertilizers with organic manure</article-title>. <source>Horticulturae</source> <volume>8</volume>, <fpage>1198</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/horticulturae8121198</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B20">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Mishima</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Endo</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kohyama</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Nitrogen and phosphate balance on crop production in Japan on national and prefectural scales</article-title>. <source>Nutrient Cycling Agroecosystems</source> <volume>87</volume>, <fpage>159</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>173</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10705-009-9324-1</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B21">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ni</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liao</surname> <given-names>W.-Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yi</surname> <given-names>X.-Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Niu</surname> <given-names>S.-Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ma</surname> <given-names>L.-F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Shi</surname> <given-names>Y.-Z.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Fertilization status and reduction potential in tea gardens of China</article-title>. <source>J. Plant Nutr. Fertilizers</source> <volume>25</volume>, <fpage>421</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>432</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.11674/zwyf.18078</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B22">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Okano</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chutani</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Matsuo</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1997</year>). <article-title>Suitable level of nitrogen fertilizer for tea (Camellia sinensis L.) Plants in relation to growth, photosynthesis, nitrogen uptake and accumulation of free amino acids</article-title>. <source>Japanese J. Crop Sci.</source> <volume>66</volume>, <fpage>279</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>287</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1626/jcs.66.279</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B23">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Owuor</surname> <given-names>P. O.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Okal</surname> <given-names>A. W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kamau</surname> <given-names>D. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Msomba</surname> <given-names>S. W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Uwimana</surname> <given-names>M. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kamunya</surname> <given-names>S. M.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Influence of nitrogen fertilizer rates and harvesting intervals on clonal tea green leaf fatty acid levels in the Lake Victoria basin of Kenya</article-title>. <source>J. Food Agric. Environ.</source> <volume>11</volume>, <fpage>667</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>674</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B24">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Qian</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Schoenau</surname> <given-names>J. J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2002</year>). <article-title>Availability of nitrogen in solid manure amendments with different C:N ratios</article-title>. <source>Can. J. Soil Sci.</source> <volume>82</volume>, <fpage>219</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>225</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4141/S01-018</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B25">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ruan</surname> <given-names>J. Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Haerdter</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gerendas</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Impact of nitrogen supply on carbon/nitrogen allocation: a case study on amino acids and catechins in green tea [<italic>Camellia sinensis</italic> (L.) O. Kuntze] plants</article-title>. <source>Plant Biol.</source> <volume>12</volume>, <fpage>724</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>734</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/plb.2010.12.issue-5</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B26">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ruan</surname> <given-names>J. Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ma</surname> <given-names>L. F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Shi</surname> <given-names>Y. Z.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Potassium management in tea plantations: Its uptake by field plants, status in soils, and efficacy on yields and quality of teas in China</article-title>. <source>J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci.</source> <volume>176</volume>, <fpage>450</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>459</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/jpln.201200175</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B27">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ruan</surname> <given-names>J. Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ma</surname> <given-names>L. F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>Y. J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Magnesium nutrition on accumulation and transport of amino acids in tea plants</article-title>. <source>J. Sci. Food Agric.</source> <volume>92</volume>, <fpage>1375</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1383</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/jsfa.v92.7</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B28">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Sun</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fan</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ma</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kong</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Correlation among metabolic changes in tea plant Camellia sinensis (L.) shoots, green tea quality and the application of cow manure to tea plantation soils</article-title>. <source>Molecules</source> <volume>26</volume>, <fpage>6180</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/molecules26206180</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B29">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Tang</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fu</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pan</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xu</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Han</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>Improving tea (Camellia sinensis) quality, economic income, and environmental benefits by optimizing agronomic nitrogen efficiency: A synergistic strategy</article-title>. <source>Eur. J. Agron.</source> <volume>142</volume>, <fpage>126673</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.eja.2022.126673</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B30">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Tang</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zheng</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ma</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sun</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Applying Nutrient Expert system for rational fertilisation to tea (<italic>Camellia sinensis</italic>) reduces environmental risks and increases economic benefits</article-title>. <source>J. Cleaner Production</source> <volume>305</volume>, <fpage>127197</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127197</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B31">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Venkatesan</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ganapathy</surname> <given-names>M. N. K.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2004</year>). <article-title>Impact of nitrogen and potassium fertiliser application on quality of CTC teas</article-title>. <source>Food Chem.</source> <volume>84</volume>, <fpage>325</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>328</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S0308-8146(03)00215-2</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B32">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Geng</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liang</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2020</year>b). <article-title>Optimization of reduced chemical fertilizer use in tea gardens based on the assessment of related environmental and economic benefits</article-title>. <source>Sci. Total Environ.</source> <volume>713</volume>, <fpage>136439</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.136439</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B33">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yao</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pan</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yan</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2020</year>a). <article-title>Tea-planted soils as global hotspots for N<sub>2</sub>O emissions from croplands</article-title>. <source>Environ. Res. Lett.</source> <volume>15</volume>, <fpage>104018</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1088/1748-9326/aba5b2</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B34">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wei</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Shi</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ruan</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Metabolomics reveal that the high application of phosphorus and potassium in tea plantation inhibited amino-acid accumulation but promoted metabolism of flavonoid</article-title>. <source>Agronomy</source> <volume>12</volume>, <fpage>1086</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/agronomy12051086</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B35">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xu</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>H&#xe9;ritier</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Andlauer</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Determination of catechins and flavonol glycosides in Chinese tea varieties</article-title>. <source>Food Chem.</source> <volume>132</volume>, <fpage>144</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>149</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.foodchem.2011.10.045</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B36">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Xie</surname> <given-names>S. W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Feng</surname> <given-names>H. X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yu</surname> <given-names>Z. Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>C. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wei</surname> <given-names>C. Y.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Organic fertilizer reduced carbon and nitrogen in runoff and buffered soil acidification in tea plantations: Evidence in nutrient contents and isotope fractionations</article-title>. <source>Sci. Total Environ</source>. <volume>762</volume>, <fpage>143059</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143059</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B37">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Yamashita</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kambe</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ohshio</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kunihiro</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tanaka</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Suzuki</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Integrated metabolome and transcriptome analyses reveal etiolation-induced metabolic changes leading to high amino acid contents in a light-sensitive Japanese albino tea cultivar</article-title>. <source>Front. Plant Sci.</source> <volume>11</volume>, <elocation-id>611140</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpls.2020.611140</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B38">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ni</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Shi</surname> <given-names>Y. Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yi</surname> <given-names>X. Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Q. F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fang</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Effects of long-term nitrogen application on soil acidification and solution chemistry of a tea plantation in China</article-title>. <source>Agriculture Ecosyst. Environ.</source> <volume>252</volume>, <fpage>74</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>82</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.agee.2017.10.004</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B39">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zeng</surname> <given-names>W. C.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Overview of the tea market in Hubei province in 2017 and analysis of its trends in 2018</article-title>. <source>Hubei Agric. Sci. Hubei Agric. Sci.</source> <volume>57</volume>, <fpage>143</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>144</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B40">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dou</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>He</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ju</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>David</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>New technologies reduce greenhouse gas emissions from nitrogenous fertilizer in China</article-title>. <source>Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. United States America</source> <volume>110</volume>, <fpage>8375</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>8380</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1073/pnas.1210447110</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B41">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wei</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Shi</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>The reduction of tea quality caused by irrational phosphate application is associated with anthocyanin metabolism</article-title>. <source>Beverage Plant Res.</source> <volume>3</volume>, <fpage>10</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.48130/BPR-2023-0010</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B42">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ruan</surname> <given-names>J. Y.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2016</year>). &#x201c;<article-title>&#x201c;Tea: Analysis and Tasting&#x201d;</article-title>,&#x201d; in <source>The Encyclopedia of Food and Health</source>. Eds. <person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname>Caballero</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Finglas</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Toldr&#xe1;</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<publisher-name>Academic Press</publisher-name>, <publisher-loc>Oxford</publisher-loc>).</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B43">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gao</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Shen</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Multi-omics research in albino tea plants: Past, present, and future</article-title>. <source>Scientia Hortic.</source> <volume>261</volume>, <fpage>108943</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.scienta.2019.108943</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B44">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zheng</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Study on the monitoring methods of nitrate leaching and features of nitrogen leaching in tea plantation. (Ph. D. Thesis)</article-title>. <publisher-name>Graduate School of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences</publisher-name>, <publisher-loc>Beijing</publisher-loc>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B45">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zeng</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cui</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tang</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Soil nutrient deficiency decreases the postharvest quality-related metabolite contents of tea (<italic>Camellia sinensis</italic> (L.) Kuntze) leaves</article-title>. <source>Food Chem.</source> <volume>377</volume>, <fpage>132003</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.foodchem.2021.132003</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>