<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.3 20070202//EN" "journalpublishing.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="2.3" xml:lang="EN">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Front. Plant Sci.</journal-id>
<journal-title>Frontiers in Plant Science</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">Front. Plant Sci.</abbrev-journal-title>
<issn pub-type="epub">1664-462X</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Frontiers Media S.A.</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpls.2023.1273193</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Plant Science</subject>
<subj-group>
<subject>Original Research</subject>
</subj-group>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Multiple and multidrug resistance in <italic>Botrytis cinerea</italic>: molecular mechanisms of MLR/MDR strains in Greece and effects of co-existence of different resistance mechanisms on fungicide sensitivity</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Sofianos</surname>
<given-names>Georgios</given-names>
</name>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1972606"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/data-curation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/investigation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Samaras</surname>
<given-names>Anastasios</given-names>
</name>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/380268"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/data-curation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/investigation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name>
<surname>Karaoglanidis</surname>
<given-names>Georgios</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn001">
<sup>*</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/375578"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/funding-acquisition/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/supervision/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="aff1">
<institution>Laboratory of Plant Pathology, Faculty of Agriculture, Forestry and Natural Environment, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki</institution>, <addr-line>Thessaloniki</addr-line>, <country>Greece</country>
</aff>
<author-notes>
<fn fn-type="edited-by">
<p>Edited by: Gianfranco Romanazzi, Marche Polytechnic University, Italy</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="edited-by">
<p>Reviewed by: Rita Milvia De Miccolis Angelini, University of Bari Aldo Moro, Italy; Inmaculada Larena, Instituto Nacional de Investigaci&#xf3;n y Tecnolog&#xed;a Agraria y Alimentaria (INIA-CSIC), Spain</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="corresp" id="fn001">
<p>*Correspondence: Georgios Karaoglanidis, <email xlink:href="mailto:gkarao@agro.auth.gr">gkarao@agro.auth.gr</email>
</p>
</fn>
</author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>05</day>
<month>10</month>
<year>2023</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="collection">
<year>2023</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>14</volume>
<elocation-id>1273193</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>05</day>
<month>08</month>
<year>2023</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>15</day>
<month>09</month>
<year>2023</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#xa9; 2023 Sofianos, Samaras and Karaoglanidis</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2023</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Sofianos, Samaras and Karaoglanidis</copyright-holder>
<license xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">
<p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.</p>
</license>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<p>
<italic>Botrytis cinerea</italic> is a high-risk pathogen for fungicide resistance development. Within the fungal populations, strains have developed multiple mutations in different target genes leading to multiple resistance (MLR) or mutations associated with overexpression of efflux transporters leading to multidrug resistance (MDR). These types of resistance are a major threat, and their successful management is a major challenge. The current study was initiated to a) determine frequencies of MLR/MDR strains in populations originating from several crops, b) identify the types of MDR that occur in Greece, and c) determine interactions between MLR and MDR at the level of sensitivity to botryticides. The frequencies of MLR/MDR phenotypes were determined in 515 isolates subjected to bioassays using discriminatory concentrations of thiophanate-methyl, iprodione, cyprodinil, fenhexamid, boscalid, fluopyram, fludioxonil, pyraclostrobin, and tolnaftate. Interestingly, 7.8% and 31.3% of isolates from strawberry and rootstock seedlings were resistant to every single fungicide class, while MDR phenotypes from strawberries, rootstocks, and tomatoes accounted for 26%, 87%, and 13.4%, respectively. The MLR and MDR isolates were further molecularly analyzed regarding genes <italic>erg27</italic>, <italic>sdhB</italic>, <italic>Bcpos5</italic>, and <italic>Mrr1</italic>, responsible for resistance to fenhexamid, boscalid and fluopyram, cyprodinil, and MDR, respectively. The different mutations&#x2019; presence was determined along with a new mutation in <italic>Mrr1</italic> leading to MDR. MDR isolates were characterized as MDR1 or MDR1h based on the presence of a 3-bp deletion in <italic>Mrr1</italic>. MDR1h was predominant in isolates from rootstocks and MDR1 from tomatoes and strawberries, whereas the most frequent target-site mutations were F412S (<italic>erg27</italic>), H272R (<italic>sdhB</italic>), and L412F (<italic>Bcpos5</italic>). To determine whether the accumulation of target-site mutations along with MDR mutations exhibits an additive effect concerning fungicide resistance, the sensitivity of isolates possessing the predominant target-site mutations was calculated in both the presence and the absence of MDR-associated mutations. EC<sub>50</sub> in cyprodinil and boscalid increased to about twofold in the presence of MDR mutations, while there was no difference for fenhexamid. In conclusion, MLR/MDR frequencies are notably high in heavily treated crops in Greece, and the combination of MLR and MDR mutations leads to even higher fungicide resistance levels, highlighting the importance of resistance management.</p>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>ABC transporters</kwd>
<kwd>gray mold</kwd>
<kwd>fungicide resistance</kwd>
<kwd>MFS transporters</kwd>
<kwd>
<italic>mrr1</italic> gene</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<counts>
<fig-count count="8"/>
<table-count count="1"/>
<equation-count count="0"/>
<ref-count count="65"/>
<page-count count="13"/>
<word-count count="7101"/>
</counts>
<custom-meta-wrap>
<custom-meta>
<meta-name>section-in-acceptance</meta-name>
<meta-value>Plant Pathogen Interactions</meta-value>
</custom-meta>
</custom-meta-wrap>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec id="s1" sec-type="intro">
<label>1</label>
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>Gray mold caused by <italic>Botrytis cinerea</italic> Pers.Fr (teleomorph <italic>Botryotinia fuckeliana</italic> (de Bary) Whetzel) is one of the most destructive diseases of high-value crops throughout the world. The pathogen can infect more than 1,400 plant species, among which major agricultural crops are included such as grapes, greenhouse-grown vegetables, ornamental plants, and stone, pome, and small berry fruits. It causes mostly pre- or postharvest fruit decays and, in addition, leaf blights or leaf spots, stem cankers, flower rots, and damping off of seedlings (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">Molly and Grant-Downton, 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B54">Shaw et&#xa0;al., 2016</xref>). Based on its extremely broad host range and its scientific and economic significance, <italic>B. cinerea</italic> is ranked as the second most important plant pathogenic fungus (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">Dean et&#xa0;al., 2012</xref>). Currently, efforts to develop new disease management methods that are highly effective and environmentally friendly are intensive and include RNA interference, biological control, or plant resistance inducers (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B48">Roca-Couso et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B50">Samaras et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B56">Spada et&#xa0;al., 2023</xref>). However, none of these methods can provide control efficacy similar to that provided by fungicides, and thus, chemical control remains the major gray mold management method under conditions favorable for the development of the disease. A wide array of fungicides that belong to several target-site- specific chemical classes, such as the anilinopyrimidines (Aps; FRAC 9), sterol biosynthesis inhibitors class III and SBIs class III (FRAC 17), phenylpyrroles (PPs; FRAC 12), quinone outside inhibitors (QoIs; FRAC 11), succinate dehydrogenase inhibitors (SDHIs; FRAC 7), benzimidazoles (MBCs; FRAC 1), and dicarboximides (DCs; FRAC 2), are available against the pathogen (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">Fillinger and Walker, 2016</xref>).</p>    <p>However, successful control of gray mold with the use of fungicides is hampered by resistance development, one of the major restricting factors in the success of chemical control because of reduction or even complete loss of control efficacy that may lead to failures in disease management. Such problems have been faced in the past in <italic>B. cinerea</italic> populations that have developed resistance worldwide to all site-specific fungicides, associated with target site modifications due to mutations&#x2019; presence in genes encoding the target site of the fungicides (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">Brent and Hollomon, 2007</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Hahn, 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Fernandez-Ortuno et&#xa0;al., 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">Fillinger and Walker, 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B53">Shao et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>). More recent studies have shown that in pathogen populations throughout the world, strains have been selected possessing more than one target-site alternation conferring resistance to the respective fungicides and leading to multiple resistance (MLR) to fungicides (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">de Miccolis Angelini et&#xa0;al., 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B49">Rupp et&#xa0;al., 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B44">Naegele et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>).</p>
<p>In addition to target site modifications, more mechanisms have been associated with fungicide resistance development in <italic>B. cinerea</italic>. Among them, overexpression of efflux transporters located in the plasma membranes plays a crucial role and leads to resistance development in several chemically and structurally unrelated compounds (multidrug resistance (MDR)). Two major families of efflux transporters have been recognized and associated with resistance to fungicides in fungal species: ABC transporters (ATP-binding Cassette superfamily) and MFS transporters (Major Facilitator Superfamily transporters) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">de Waard et&#xa0;al., 2006</xref>). The evidence for MDR due to increased fungicide efflux in plant pathogenic filamentous fungi is relatively limited. So far, field strains overexpressing ABC and MFS transporters have been described in <italic>B. cinerea</italic>, <italic>Zymoseptoria tritici</italic>, <italic>Penicillium digitatum</italic>, and <italic>Penicillium expansum</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">Kretschmer et&#xa0;al., 2009</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B46">Omrane et&#xa0;al., 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B51">Samaras et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>). In <italic>B. cinerea</italic>, four different types of MDR strains have been recognized (MDR1, MDR1h, MDR2, and MDR3) differing in both their spectrum and level of resistance to fungicides and linked with overexpression of <italic>atrB</italic>- and <italic>mfsM2</italic>- encoded efflux transporters (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">Kretschmer et&#xa0;al., 2009</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">Mernke et&#xa0;al., 2011</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">Leroch et&#xa0;al., 2013</xref>). In addition to differences in fungicide sensitivity levels, the various MDR types may also differ in their fitness level, although further investigations are required to clarify this issue (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">Kretschmer et&#xa0;al., 2009</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Chen et&#xa0;al., 2016</xref>).</p>
<p>In Greece, <italic>B. cinerea</italic> has developed resistance to almost all the target- site-specific botryticides that have been used for its control on several crops (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Bardas et&#xa0;al., 2008</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B52">Samuel et&#xa0;al., 2011</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B60">Veloukas et&#xa0;al., 2011</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Chatzidimopoulos et&#xa0;al., 2013</xref>). Recently, it became evident that in fungal populations originating from major crops heavily treated with botryticides, subpopulations with multiple resistance have been built up, but information related to their frequencies remains scarce (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">Bardas et&#xa0;al., 2010</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">Konstantinou et&#xa0;al., 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">Makris et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>). However, nothing is known related to the presence of fungal strains possessing resistance mechanisms that are associated with MDR.</p>
<p>The development of resistance to fungicides by <italic>B. cinerea</italic> is a major threat to modern agriculture, and its successful management is a major challenge. With varying levels of resistance to the main fungicides now present in the fungal populations throughout the world, coupled with the expected decrease in the number of fungicide active ingredients available to European farmers as a result of the European Green Deal, a better understanding of how resistance develops and evolves becomes increasingly important. Furthermore, MLR or MDR is hard to manage with the most common tactics of fungicide resistance management that include alternations or use of fungicide mixtures. Therefore, knowledge of the composition of <italic>B. cinerea</italic> populations in terms of MLR or MDR frequencies is a prerequisite for the development and application of resistance management strategies. In addition, although the effect of MDR is considered to be low for plant pathogens since it is in general associated with low/moderate resistance levels, the effect on fungal sensitivity of its combination with target-site modifications remains largely unknown. Thus, this study was initiated aiming to i) determine frequencies of MLR and MDR in pathogen populations originating from different hosts, ii) identify mutations associated with either target site modifications or increased efflux activity of membrane transporters, and iii) determine the effect on the levels of resistance to fungicides of the simultaneous presence in the same strains of different resistance mechanisms. A preliminary report on parts of this study has already been presented at the 1st Joint Botrytis-Sclerotinia Symposium 2022 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B55">Sofianos et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2" sec-type="materials|methods">
<label>2</label>
<title>Materials and methods</title>
<sec id="s2_1">
<label>2.1</label>
<title>Sampling of isolates</title>
<p>Pathogen isolates were collected during 2019 and 2020 from infected fruit of tomatoes, grapes, and strawberries showing rot symptoms and infected stone-fruit rootstock seedlings showing damping-off symptoms. Sampling was conducted in several regions, all located around mainland Greece (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>). The samples were collected from plant organs with abundant sporulation on their rotten surface. Conidia were harvested from the sporulating lesions using sterile cotton swabs, followed by their transfer to acidified potato dextrose agar (PDA) medium (lactic acid at 0.5 ml/liter [vol/vol]) to suppress bacterial contamination. After 20 h of incubation at 22&#xb0;C, the germinated spores were observed under a dissecting microscope, and from each sample, a single germinated spore was transferred to fresh PDA plates. The single-spore cultures were incubated at 20&#xb0;C for 7 days and then conserved at 4&#xb0;C for later use. In total, 515 isolates were obtained and used in this study. Details concerning the number of isolates per region and host are provided in <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">
<bold>Table&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>.</p>
<fig id="f1" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;1</label>
<caption>
<p>Map of Greece showing the sampling areas of <italic>Botrytis cinerea</italic> isolates used in the current study.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-14-1273193-g001.tif"/>
</fig>
<table-wrap id="T1" position="float">
<label>Table&#xa0;1</label>
<caption>
<p>Number of <italic>Botrytis cinerea</italic> isolates collected from several hosts and several regions of Greece during 2019 and 2020.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="top" align="center">Region</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">Host</th>
<th valign="top" align="left">Number of isolates</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="center">Preveza</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Tomatoes</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">126</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="center">Katerini</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Strawberries</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">60</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="center">Manolada</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Strawberries</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">82</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="center">Arta</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Stone-fruit rootstock seedlings</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">67</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="center">Kavala</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Grapes</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">38</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="center">Nemea</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Grapes</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">94</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="center">Zitsa</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Grapes</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">44</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="center">Amynteo</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">Grapes</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">4</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_2">
<label>2.2</label>
<title>Fungicide sensitivity assays and phenotypic characterization</title>
<p>To determine the fungicide resistance profile of the collected isolates, previously developed protocols and determined discriminatory concentrations of fungicides were used (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">Leroch et&#xa0;al., 2011</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B64">Weber, 2011</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B57">Testempasis et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>). Fungicides tested were as follows: the MBC thiophanate-methyl (Neotopsin 70WG, K+N Efthimiadis, Greece), the DC iprodione (Rovral 50SC, BASF, Greece), the AP cyprodinil (Chorus 50WG, Syngenta, Greece), the PP fludioxonil (Geoxe 50WG, Syngenta, Greece), the QoI pyraclostrobin (Comet 20EC, BASF, Greece), the SBI class III fenhexamid (Teldor 50WG, Bayer CropScience, Greece), the SDHI boscalid (Cantus 50WG, BASF, Greece), fluopyram (Luna Privilege 50 SC, Bayer CropScience, Greece) and tolnaftate (Sigma Co., St. Louis, MO, USA). The assays were performed on a solid agar medium containing the following discriminatory concentrations: thiophanate-methyl at 5 mg/L, fenhexamid at 3 mg/L, iprodione at 7.5 mg/L, boscalid at 7.5 mg/L, cyprodinil at 8 mg/L, fludioxonil at 1 mg/L, fluopyram at 2 mg/L, and pyraclostrobin at 25 mg/L (with 100 mg/L of salicylic hydroxamic acid; SHAM, Sigma Co., St. Louis, MO, USA) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B65">Weber and Hahn, 2011</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">Leroch et&#xa0;al., 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B57">Testempasis et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B50">Samaras et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>).</p>
<p>To determine the resistance profile of the collected isolates to thiophanate-methyl, iprodione, pyraclostrobin, fludioxonil, and fenhexamid, conidial suspension (2 &#xd7; 10<sup>5</sup> spores/ml) aliquots (20 &#x3bc;l) of each isolate were prepared and then applied to hydroxyapatite (HA) medium (4 g of yeast extract, 4 g of glucose, 10 g of malt extract, and 15 g of agar per liter of medium), amended with the respective fungicide discriminatory concentrations. Likewise, the sensitivity to cyprodinil was determined with the transfer of the conidial suspension to Gamborg B5 medium (3 g of Gamborg, 1.36 g of KH<sub>2</sub>PO<sub>4</sub>, 9.9 g of glucose, and 15 g of agar per liter of medium, pH 5.5), amended with cyprodinil at the respective discriminatory concentration. After 72 h of incubation at 20&#xb0;C in the dark, mycelial growth was evaluated. Isolates showing clear, visible mycelial growth were classified as resistant, while the absence of such growth characterized sensitive ones.</p>
<p>To determine the resistance profile of isolates to boscalid and fluopyram, conidial suspensions (40 &#x3bc;l) were prepared and spread onto yeast-bacto-acetate-agar (YBA) (10 g of yeast extract, 10 g of Bacto peptone, 20 g of sodium acetate, and 15 g of agar per liter of medium), amended with the discriminatory concentrations of boscalid or fluopyram. After 20 h of incubation at 20&#xb0;C in the dark, the conidia were examined microscopically for germination. Isolates were classified as either sensitive based on the absence of conidial germination or resistant based on the presence of conidial germination. Conidia that were considered resistant possessed a germ tube at least two times longer than the conidium length.</p>
<p>To determine whether any of the isolates is MDR, all the isolates were subjected to conidial germination assay on sucrose agar (SA) plates amended with tolnaftate at the concentration of 5 &#x3bc;g/ml (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Chapeland et&#xa0;al., 1999</xref>). The plates were incubated at 20&#xb0;C in the dark, and the isolates with germinated conidia were considered tolnaftate-resistant. A conidium was considered germinated when its germ tube had a length at least two times longer than the conidium length.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_3">
<label>2.3</label>
<title>DNA extraction</title>
<p>DNA was extracted from fungal cultures grown in Potato Dextrose Broth (PDB) (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) for 3 days at 22&#xb0;C as previously described by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">Konstantinou et&#xa0;al. (2015)</xref>, using the QIA Puregene Core Kit A (Qiagen GmbH, Hilden, Germany). DNA concentration and purity were measured using a P330 nanophotometer (Implen GmbH, Munich, Germany).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_4">
<label>2.4</label>
<title>Identification of target-site mutations in <italic>sdhB</italic>, <italic>erg27</italic>, and <italic>Bcpos5</italic> genes</title>
<p>In isolates that were found to be phenotypically resistant to boscalid, fenhexamid, and cyprodinil, site modifications in the respective target genes <italic>sdh</italic>, <italic>erg27</italic>, and <italic>BcPos5</italic> were identified with direct sequencing. The primer pair IpBcBeg/IpBcEnd, and primers SdhC1 to SdhC5 and SdhD1-D2 developed by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">Leroux et&#xa0;al. (2010)</xref> were used to amplify <italic>sdhB</italic>, <italic>sdhC</italic>, and <italic>sdhD</italic> subunits in all the isolates found to be resistant to the SDHIs. Similarly, <italic>erg27</italic> gene of all the fenhexamid-resistant isolates was amplified using the primer pair erg27Beg/erg27End (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Fillinger et&#xa0;al., 2008</xref>). To identify mutations conferring resistance to APs, target gene <italic>BcPos5</italic> of the resistant isolates was amplified (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B42">Mosbach et&#xa0;al., 2017</xref>). For this purpose, the primer pair BcposF/BcposR2 was designed for both amplification of the product and Sanger sequencing, yielding a 1,398-bp product, while the primer pair BcposF2/BcposR was used only for the sequencing process. The PCR products were purified with Monarch<sup>&#xae;</sup> PCR &amp; DNA Cleanup Kit (NEB) according to the manufacturer&#x2019;s protocol and then subjected to Sanger sequencing for the identification of the resistance-conferring mutations in <italic>sdh</italic>, <italic>erg27</italic>, and <italic>BcPos5</italic> genes. The primers used for target gene amplification are listed in <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Supplementary Table&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_5">
<label>2.5</label>
<title>Genotypic characterization of MDR isolates</title>
<p>To molecularly characterize the different MDR types, routine identification of MDR1h isolates was conducted by amplifying an <italic>mrr1</italic> gene fragment using the primer pair <italic>Mrr1</italic>_spez_F/<italic>Mrr1</italic>-Pira, followed by digestion with HpyCH4V (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">Leroch et&#xa0;al., 2013</xref>). To test for the presence of MDR2 and MDR3 types, the <italic>mfsM2</italic> upstream region was amplified with the primer mfsM2-pfor/mfsM2-prev (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">Kretschmer et&#xa0;al., 2009</xref>). In order to identify MDR1-related mutations and MDR1h ones, apart from &#x394;V/L497, <italic>mrr1</italic> gene was sequenced in its entirety. Because of the great diversity of <italic>mrr1</italic> between <italic>B. cinerea sensu stricto</italic> and <italic>B. cinerea</italic> group S, different sets of primers were designed and used for each subgroup. These primer pairs are listed in <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Supplementary Table&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_6">
<label>2.6</label>
<title>Identification of <italic>Botrytis</italic> species/group</title>
<p>The collected isolates were identified as <italic>B. cinerea sensu stricto</italic>, <italic>Botrytis pseudocinerea</italic>, and <italic>B. cinerea</italic> group S based on diagnostic assays developed by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">Leroch et&#xa0;al. (2013)</xref> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B47">Plesken et&#xa0;al. (2015)</xref>. To discriminate between <italic>B. cinerea</italic> group S and <italic>B. cinerea sensu stricto</italic> or <italic>B. pseudocinerea</italic>, a duplex PCR was applied to detect a 21-bp insertion in <italic>mrr1</italic>, present only in <italic>B. cinerea</italic> group S using the primer pair <italic>Mrr1</italic>_spez_F/<italic>Mrr1</italic>_spez_R (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">Leroch et&#xa0;al., 2013</xref>). Similarly, by using the primer pair BcinN-in-F/BcinN-in-R, an 18-bp indel in <italic>mrr1</italic> gene was detected in <italic>B. cinerea</italic> group S or <italic>B. pseudocinerea</italic> isolates, but not in <italic>B. cinerea sensu stricto</italic> isolates (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">Leroch et&#xa0;al., 2013</xref>). The identification results of this duplex PCR assay were further verified by a second PCR assay that differentiates <italic>B. pseudocinerea</italic> from <italic>B. cinerea sensu stricto</italic> and <italic>B. cinerea</italic> group S, based on a <italic>B. pseudocinerea</italic> 24-bp deletion in the homolog of the <italic>B. cinerea</italic> gene BCIG_07159, using the primer pair g2944_137_F/g2944_137_R (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B47">Plesken et&#xa0;al., 2015</xref>). A complete list of primer pair sequences used in this study is provided in <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Supplementary Table&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>. Genomic DNA was used as the template for all reactions. All PCRs were carried out in 25- &#x3bc;l volume with One<italic>Taq</italic>
<sup>&#xae;</sup> 2X Master Mix with Standard Buffer (NEB) used in the following concentrations: 10 &#xb5;M of Forward Primer 0.5 &#x3bc;l, 10 &#xb5;M of Reverse Primer 0.5 &#x3bc;l, One<italic>Taq</italic> 2X Master Mix with Standard Buffer 12.5 &#x3bc;l, DNA 100 ng (3 &#x3bc;l), and nuclease-free water up to 25 &#x3bc;l. PCR amplification protocols were as those described by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">Leroch et&#xa0;al. (2013)</xref> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B47">Plesken et&#xa0;al. (2015)</xref>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_7">
<label>2.7</label>
<title>Determination of the synergistic effect of target site and MDR mutations on fungal sensitivity to fungicides</title>
<p>To test whether the coexistence of target-site mutations along with MDR ones in the same strains affects their sensitivity to fungicides, a group of 58 isolates was subjected to sensitivity measurement in terms of EC<sub>50</sub> calculation to cyprodinil, boscalid, and fenhexamid. Among these 58 isolates, 24 isolates possessed only target site alternations (single, double, or triple) to <italic>Bcpos5</italic> (L412F), <italic>sdhB</italic> (H272R), and <italic>erg27</italic> (F412S); 26 isolates possessed both the same target site alternations, and in addition, they also possessed the &#x394;L/V497 deletion in <italic>mrr1</italic> gene associated with the MDR1h type of resistance, while eight isolates (including the reference strain B05.10) possessed neither target site nor MDR mutations and used as reference strains of wild-type sensitivity. A complete list of the isolates used for fungicide sensitivity measurements along with their phenotypic and genotypic characteristics is provided in <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Supplementary Table&#xa0;2</bold>
</xref>. Sensitivity measurements to boscalid were based on the inhibition of conidial germ tube growth on YBA medium amended with boscalid at concentrations of 0 &#x3bc;g/ml, 0.001 &#x3bc;g/ml, 0.005 &#x3bc;g/ml, 0.01 &#x3bc;g/ml, 0.05 &#x3bc;g/ml, 0.1 &#x3bc;g/ml, 0.5 &#x3bc;g/ml, 1 &#x3bc;g/ml, 2.5 &#x3bc;g/ml, 5 &#x3bc;g/ml, 10 &#x3bc;g/ml, and 15 &#x3bc;g/ml, following a bioassay procedure described previously (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B60">Veloukas et&#xa0;al., 2011</xref>). Sensitivity measurements to cyprodinil and fenhexamid were based on the inhibition of mycelial growth on Gamborg B5 or HA medium, amended with 0 &#x3bc;g/ml, 0.1 &#x3bc;g/ml, 0.05 &#x3bc;g/ml, 0.1 &#x3bc;g/ml, 0.5 &#x3bc;g/ml, 1 &#x3bc;g/ml, 5 &#x3bc;g/ml, 7.5 &#x3bc;g/ml, 10 &#x3bc;g/ml, 15 &#x3bc;g/ml, 20 &#x3bc;g/ml, and 30 &#x3bc;g/ml of cyprodinil and 0 &#x3bc;g/ml, 0.01 &#x3bc;g/ml, 0.03 &#x3bc;g/ml, 0.1 &#x3bc;g/ml, 0.3 &#x3bc;g/ml, 1 &#x3bc;g/ml, 3 &#x3bc;g/ml, 10 &#x3bc;g/ml, and 30 &#x3bc;g/ml of fenhexamid. The plates were incubated at 20&#xb0;C in the dark for about 4 days, and the colonies&#x2019; diameter was measured after the end of the incubation period (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">Konstantinou et&#xa0;al., 2015</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_8">
<label>2.8</label>
<title>Data analysis</title>
<p>The EC<sub>50</sub> values were determined by plotting the relative inhibition of the diameter of mycelial growth or the relative inhibition of germ tube growth against the Log10 of fungicide concentrations. Calculations were performed with the use of SAS (JMP; SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA). Resistance factors (RFs) were calculated by dividing the EC<sub>50</sub> value of each isolate by the mean EC<sub>50</sub> value of the wild-type isolates.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s3" sec-type="results">
<label>3</label>
<title>Results</title>
<sec id="s3_1">
<label>3.1</label>
<title>Resistance frequencies to specific fungicide classes</title>
<p>The precise frequencies of resistance to each fungicide class in the sampled populations are provided in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;2</bold>
</xref>. The <italic>B. cinerea</italic> population originating from grapes was the pathogen population less affected by resistance development. The entire population originating from grapes was sensitive to SBIs and PPs, while only less than 10% of the population was resistant to APs, SDHIs, and DCs. In contrast, resistance frequencies to most of the fungicides tested in the populations originating from the remaining hosts were substantially high. The higher frequencies of resistance were observed for QoIs with values of 88.6%, 89.3%, and 86.8% in the tomato, strawberry, and rootstock populations, respectively. Similarly high were the resistance frequencies to MBCs, despite the little or no use of them during the latest decades and to DCs. Resistance frequencies were lower for SBIs or SDHIs with values of 70.1%, 76.2%, and 73.7% or 69.2%, 57.1%, and 70.4% for tomatoes, strawberries, and rootstocks, respectively. While resistance frequency to APs was high in the strawberry and rootstock populations with values of 61% and 65%, respectively, only 18.2% of the isolates collected from tomato plants were resistant to this fungicide group. Isolates with resistance to PPs were found only in the populations originating from rootstock seedlings and strawberries at frequencies of 41.6% and 14%, respectively, while the populations originating from either tomatoes or grapes were completely sensitive to this fungicide class (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;2</bold>
</xref>).</p>
<fig id="f2" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;2</label>
<caption>
<p>Frequencies of resistance to several fungicide classes (APs, anilinopyrimidines-cyprodinil; DCs, dicarboximides-iprodione; SBIs class III, sterol biosynthesis inhibitors class III -fenhexamid; SDHIs, succinate dehydrogenase inhibitors -boscalid and fluopyram; PPs, phenylpyrroles-fludioxonil; QoIs, quinone outside inhibitors -pyraclostrobin; MBCs, benzimidazoles-thiophanate-methyl) in <italic>Botrytis cinerea</italic> populations collected from several hosts.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-14-1273193-g002.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_2">
<label>3.2</label>
<title>Multiple-resistance frequencies</title>
<p>Accumulation of more than one target-site resistance-conferring mutations in the same strain can lead to MLR phenotypes. Here, we analyzed the MLR patterns of the collected isolates by categorizing them as R0 (sensitive), R1 (resistant to one fungicide class), and R2-R7 (resistant to two to seven fungicide classes simultaneously). MLR frequencies were very low in isolates originating from grapes, with most of them being sensitive to all the tested fungicides or resistant to a single fungicide class (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;3</bold>
</xref>). No resistance to more than three different fungicide classes was recorded among isolates obtained from grapes. In contrast, multiple resistance phenotypes were observed in high frequencies in the populations originating from the remaining three hosts. Interestingly, the sum of R5, R6, and R7 phenotypes corresponded to more than 55% of the total population in strawberry and rootstock populations tested, while a high frequency of the isolates (27.6%) obtained from rootstock seedlings were resistant to all the seven fungicides tested (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;3</bold>
</xref>).</p>
<fig id="f3" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;3</label>
<caption>
<p>Frequencies of resistance of <italic>Botrytis cinerea</italic> strains originating from tomato, strawberry, grape, and stone-fruit rootstock seedling crops with multiple resistance (MLR) to several fungicide classes.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-14-1273193-g003.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_3">
<label>3.3</label>
<title>Target site modifications in AP-, SBI class III-, and SDHI-resistant strains</title>
<p>The identification of the mutations in the target genes of AP, SDHI, and SBI class III fungicides revealed a high variability of different resistance-conferring mutations. The entire spectrum and the frequencies of the identified target-site mutations in the AP-, SBI class III-, and SDHI-resistant isolates are provided in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f4">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;4</bold>
</xref>. Within the AP-resistant fraction, L412F was by far the most common mutation in all the three AP-resistant subpopulations originating from strawberry, tomato, and rootstock seedlings, while L412V and G408V were found at much lower frequencies. The latter was only found in strawberry isolates. Likewise, regarding SDHIs, H272R was expectedly the dominant mutation followed by N230I, while the mutations H272Y and P225F were identified only in a very low number of isolates originating from grapes and strawberries, respectively. As for fSBIs class III, in the population originating from tomatoes, F412S was the most common <italic>erg27</italic> mutation in the resistant fraction of the population followed by relatively high frequencies of the F412I and &#x394;P298 substitutions. Similarly, in the population originating from strawberries F412S was the most common mutation followed by &#x394;P298 and the triple combination of F412S, E263D, and P250F mutations. In contrast, in the population originating from the rootstock seedlings, isolates possessing the triple combination of mutations (F412S, E263D, and P250F) were by far predominant in the SBI class III-resistant subpopulation with only a limited number of resistant isolates possessing either F412S or T63I mutations (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f4">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;4</bold>
</xref>).</p>
<fig id="f4" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;4</label>
<caption>
<p>Frequencies of <italic>Botrytis cinerea</italic> isolates possessing different target site modifications in <italic>BcPos5</italic>, <italic>sdhB</italic>, and <italic>erg27</italic> genes, associated with resistance to AP, SDHI, and SBI class III fungicides, respectively. The triple mutation pattern in <italic>erg27</italic> consists of F412S, E263D, and P250F substitutions.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-14-1273193-g004.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_4">
<label>3.4</label>
<title>Phenotypic and genotypic characterization of MDR strains</title>
<p>Assessment of resistance to tolnaftate was used as an indicator of MDR in the isolates tested in this study. Phenotypic assessment using the discriminatory concentration of 5 &#x3bc;g/ml of tolnaftate revealed that 17.3% and 22.8% of the isolates originating from tomatoes and strawberries, respectively, were resistant to tolnaftate, while none of the isolates originating from grapes was found to be resistant (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Supplementary Figure&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>). In contrast, the frequency of MDR strains in the isolates set originating from rootstock seedlings reached the value of 85.4% (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Supplementary Figure&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>).</p>
<p>The genotypic characterization of the tolnaftate-resistant isolates was conducted by using several molecular assays described in the respective Materials and Methods section. Sequencing of <italic>mfsM2</italic> gene showed that none of the isolates possessed the promoter rearrangement of <italic>mfsm2</italic>, and thus, neither MDR2 nor MDR3 genotypes were recorded from any host. The genotypic background of the tested isolates, in terms of the revealed HpyCH4V digestion profile and <italic>mrr1</italic> sequence data, showed that all the MDR isolates originating from tomato were classified as MDR1, accounting for a frequency of 16.1% in the total tomato population tested, while in strawberry, 19.7% and 6.2% of the isolates belonged to MDR1 and MDR1h, respectively (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f5">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;5</bold>
</xref>). In contrast, the population originating from rootstock seedlings was dominated by the MDR1h genotype identified at a frequency of 73%, while only 5.9% of the population was identified as MDR1 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f5">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;5</bold>
</xref>).</p>
<fig id="f5" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;5</label>
<caption>
<p>Frequency of types of multidrug resistance (MDR) in <italic>Botrytis cinerea</italic> isolates originating from different hosts.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-14-1273193-g005.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>The sequencing of <italic>mrr1</italic> gene showed that three distinct genotypes existed within the MDR fraction of the tested population (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f6">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;6A</bold>
</xref>). The first genotype (genotype A) was that of MDR1 isolates possessing only the V575G mutation in <italic>mrr1</italic> gene. This genotype was identified in all (100%) of the MDR isolates originating from tomatoes and in 67% of the MDR isolates originating from strawberries (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f6">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;6B</bold>
</xref>). The second MDR1 genotype (genotype B) was characterized by a set of seven different <italic>mrr1</italic> mutations (A/V287S, L497V, A498V, F568S, A615V, R634K, and N/D666G) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f6">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;6A</bold>
</xref>) and was found to exist in a limited number of MDR isolates originating from rootstock seedling plants and strawberry fruit. The third genotype (Genotype C) identified by the sequencing of <italic>mrr1</italic> gene of the MDR isolates was that of the MDR1h strains. These strains, in addition to the &#x394;L/V497 deletion that characterizes the MDR1h strains, also possessed a set of five different mutations in the <italic>mrr1</italic> sequence (A/V287S, S/M432T, F568S, R634K, and N/D666G). Within the MDR fraction of the population, MDR1h strains were identified at a frequency of 93% in the rootstock seedling population and at a frequency of 12% in the strawberry population (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f6">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;6B</bold>
</xref>).</p>
<fig id="f6" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;6</label>
<caption>
<p>Mutations and deletions found in the transcription factor <italic>mrr1</italic> of multidrug-resistant strains of <italic>Botrytis cinerea</italic> originating from different hosts in Greece <bold>(A)</bold> and their respective frequencies on each host <bold>(B)</bold>. All mutations and deletions were indicated based on the <italic>mrr1</italic> sequence of the reference strain B05.10.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-14-1273193-g006.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_5">
<label>3.5</label>
<title>Identification of <italic>Botrytis</italic> species/groups</title>
<p>The molecular detection of the insertions in <italic>mrr1</italic> gene enabled the differentiation of the population tested in this study in <italic>B. cinerea sensu stricto</italic>, <italic>B. pseudocinerea</italic>, and <italic>B. cinerea</italic> group S. Results showed that there was great differentiation in the population&#x2019;s composition depending on the host of origin and the intensity of selection force determined by the fungicide application history. <italic>B. pseudocinerea</italic> was not identified in any of the four sampled hosts. In the populations originating from tomatoes and grapes, <italic>B. cinerea sensu stricto</italic> was by far the predominant species, while on these hosts, <italic>B. cinerea</italic> group S was identified in frequencies much lower than 10% (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f7">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;7</bold>
</xref>). In contrast, <italic>B. cinerea</italic> group S was the predominant species in rootstock seedlings, accounting for more than 90% of the total population tested. In strawberries, the frequencies of <italic>B. cinerea</italic> and <italic>B. cinerea</italic> group S accounted for 79% and 21%, respectively (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f7">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;7</bold>
</xref>). In addition, all the MDR1h isolates were identified as <italic>Botrytis</italic> group S, whereas MDR1 isolates were identified as either <italic>B. cinerea sensu stricto</italic> or <italic>B. cinerea</italic> group S. Furthermore, all the MDR1 isolates that had been identified as <italic>B. cinerea sensu stricto</italic> possessed the mutation V575G in <italic>mrr1</italic> gene. No other mutation in <italic>mrr1</italic> gene was reported in MDR1 strains, identified as <italic>B. cinerea sensu stricto</italic>.</p>
<fig id="f7" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;7</label>
<caption>
<p>Frequencies of <italic>Botrytis cinerea sensu stricto</italic> and <italic>Botrytis cinerea</italic> group S in pathogen populations obtained from several hosts.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-14-1273193-g007.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_6">
<label>3.6</label>
<title>Combination of target-site and MDR mutations can lead to even greater resistance levels</title>
<p>The sensitivity measurements in a wide range of pathogen isolates possessing either the most common target site modifications of F412S, H272R, and L412F in <italic>erg27</italic>, <italic>sdhB</italic>, and <italic>Bcpos5</italic>, respectively, or the same target-site mutations along with the MDR1h-associated modification of &#x394;L/V497 in <italic>mrr1</italic> gene showed that in isolates possessing both resistance mechanisms, there was an increased level of resistance to the AP fungicide cyprodinil and the SDHI boscalid compared to that in isolates possessing only the respective target site alterations (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f8">
<bold>Figures&#xa0;8A, B</bold>
</xref>, respectively). In contrast, the inhibition of mycelial growth at the different concentrations of fenhexamid of both types of resistant isolated tested was similar (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f8">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;8C</bold>
</xref>). Precise sensitivity measurements in terms of EC<sub>50</sub> and the respective RF values revealed that isolates possessing only target site modifications in <italic>sdhB</italic> or <italic>BcPos5</italic> showed RF values ranging from 32.5 to 72.5 and from 27.5 to 45.5 for boscalid and cyprodinil, respectively, while isolates possessing both target site alterations and the MDR1h mechanism of resistance showed higher RF values ranging from 24.5 to 170 and from 37.4 to &gt;120 for boscalid and cyprodinil, respectively (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Supplementary Table&#xa0;2</bold>
</xref>). However, no marked differences in the levels of resistance to fenhexamid were observed among isolates possessing only the F412S mutation in <italic>erg27</italic> or both the F412S and MDR1h deletions with RF values ranging from 90.4 to 371 and from 78 to 371, respectively (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Supplementary Table&#xa0;2</bold>
</xref>).</p>
<fig id="f8" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;8</label>
<caption>
<p>Mean relative inhibition (%) of spore germ tube elongation in the presence of different concentrations of boscalid <bold>(A)</bold> and mean relative inhibition (%) of mycelial growth in the presence of different concentrations of cyprodinil <bold>(B)</bold> or fenhexamid <bold>(C)</bold> of <italic>Botrytis cinerea</italic> isolates possessing target site alterations or both target site alterations and the <italic>mrr1</italic> modification &#x394;L/V497 leading to the MDR1h phenotype. Vertical lines indicate the standard error of the mean.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-14-1273193-g008.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s4" sec-type="discussion">
<label>4</label>
<title>Discussion</title>
<p>Monitoring data obtained in this study showed a widespread presence of resistance to several fungicide classes in <italic>B. cinerea</italic> populations in the most heavily treated crops in Greece. Such data confirm previous reports suggesting the development of high resistance frequencies in fungal populations originating from several hosts to APs, QoIs, SDHIs, DCs, or SBIs class III in several regions of Greece (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">Myresiotis et&#xa0;al., 2007</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Avenot et&#xa0;al., 2008</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">Bardas et&#xa0;al., 2010</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B52">Samuel et&#xa0;al., 2011</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">Konstantinou et&#xa0;al., 2015</xref>). The resistance frequencies in fungal populations originating from strawberry, greenhouse- grown tomato, or rootstock seedlings were high for almost all fungicide classes, with the exception of PPs. All these crops are grown in closed environments such as greenhouses or high height tunnels that facilitate the development of high relative humidity conditions favoring the development of the disease and necessitating a high number of fungicide spray applications to successfully combat it. In contrast, lower resistance frequencies were observed in the populations originating from wine grapes. The dry climate of the Mediterranean region contributes to a relatively low risk for gray mold development on grapes and, thus, in a limited number of botryticide applications in contrast to northwestern Europe where grapevines are heavily treated with botryticides. Similarly low resistance frequencies have been observed in <italic>B. cinerea</italic> populations from grapes in Australia, while in northwestern European countries, resistance frequencies in the grape populations are higher (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">Leroch et&#xa0;al., 2011</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B62">Walker et&#xa0;al., 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Harper et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>). Differences in the frequencies of fungicide resistance within <italic>B. cinerea</italic> populations originating from different hosts have been observed on several crops and several places of the world and have been correlated with differences in the level of crop susceptibility to the pathogen, the total number of fungicide spray applications applied on the crop, and the availability of cultural control methods as an alternative to chemicals (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Cosseboom and Hu, 2021</xref>.)</p>
<p>In addition to the observed high resistance frequencies to specific fungicide classes in heavily treated crops, the results of this study showed that in the same crops, high frequencies of isolates showing resistance to multiple modes of action (MLR) have been selected. The observed frequencies of MLR strains in the populations originating from strawberries and tomatoes were higher compared to the respective frequencies reported in a previous survey from the same region (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">Konstantinou et&#xa0;al., 2015</xref>). Thus, in the current study, we documented a further increase in MLR frequencies within the fungal population. Multiple resistance to fungicides in <italic>B. cinerea</italic> is a rapidly expanding problem in the fungal populations worldwide, reported in several studies during the last decade (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">Leroch et&#xa0;al., 2011</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">de Miccolis Angelini et&#xa0;al., 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">Fernandez-Ortuno et&#xa0;al., 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">Li et&#xa0;al., 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">Lu et&#xa0;al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">Campia et&#xa0;al., 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B49">Rupp et&#xa0;al., 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Cosseboom et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">Makris et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B44">Naegele et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>). The observed increased frequencies of MLR strains in populations from crops heavily treated with fungicides are obviously associated with the high number of sprays required to successfully control the disease, the application of pre-packed mixtures of different active ingredients that are of high risk for resistance development, or the absence of effective alternative control methods that could contribute to a reduction of selection pressure. Moreover, in addition to botryticides applied against gray mold, the fungal population on some of these hosts may be exposed to fungicides that are applied against other foliar or fruit diseases. Such an exposure increases the selection pressure on the fungal population and may contribute to the increased MLR frequencies observed in our study.</p>
<p>Sequence analysis of the target genes of boscalid (SDHI), cyprodinil (AP), and fenhexamid (SBIs class III) uncovered a variety of mutations associated with target-site resistance. In the boscalid-resistant fraction of the populations originating from all the sampled hosts, H272R was found to be, by far, the most common mutation followed by N230I, while other mutations such as H272Y or P225F were found in very low frequencies. These results are in line with the results of several other studies conducted worldwide, suggesting that H272R is the most common <italic>sdh</italic>B mutation conferring resistance to some of the SDHI fungicides (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">Hu et&#xa0;al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Harper et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>). Interestingly, in our study, an increase of the N230I mutation frequency accompanied by a decrease in the frequency of H272Y mutation was observed, compared to frequencies reported in previous monitoring studies conducted in Greece on the same hosts and the same sampling regions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B60">Veloukas et&#xa0;al, 2011</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">Konstantinou et&#xa0;al., 2015</xref>). This type of change in the frequencies of these mutations is most probably associated with the introduction into the spray programs of a new SDHI fungicide, fluopyram, which has been registered for use on tomatoes, strawberries, or grapes against several diseases (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B59">Veloukas and Karaoglanidis, 2012</xref>). It is well established that N230I confers resistance to several SDHIs including fluopyram, while H272Y is associated with hypersensitivity to fluopyram (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B61">Veloukas et&#xa0;al., 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">Laleve et&#xa0;al., 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Fernandez-Ortuno et&#xa0;al., 2017</xref>). Thus, the introduction of fluopyram into the spray programs led to a reduction of the fluopyram-hypersensitive H272Y strains and favored the selection of fluopyram-resistant N230I strains. Overall, these data confirm the necessity of continuous monitoring for changes in the <italic>sdh</italic> gene mutation frequencies within the fungal populations to adopt the appropriate resistance management strategies since it is well established that the different <italic>sdh</italic> mutations affect in different ways the level of sensitivity to various SDHIs and the fitness of the resistant strains (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B61">Veloukas et&#xa0;al., 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">Laleve et&#xa0;al., 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B58">Veloukas et&#xa0;al., 2014</xref>).</p>
<p>Sequencing of <italic>erg27</italic> gene in the fenhexamid-resistant fraction of the population revealed the presence of a wide array of mutations associated with resistance to SBI class III fungicides. In total, within the fenhexamid-resistant fraction of the population, six different mutations were identified, with F412S being predominant in the populations originating from tomatoes and strawberries. In contrast in the population originating from stone-fruit rootstock seedlings, the predominant genotype was that of isolates possessing a combination of three different <italic>erg27</italic> mutations (F412S, E263D, and P250F). All these six mutations have been reported previously in several monitoring studies (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Grabke et&#xa0;al., 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">Avenot et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">Alzohairy et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>). Mutations located in codon 412 of <italic>erg27</italic> strongly affect the binding of SBI class III fungicides to their target site and are associated with high resistance levels to fenhexamid. F412S has been reported as the most common <italic>erg27</italic> mutation conferring resistance to this fungicide class, wherever resistance to SBIs class III has been developed; thus, our results are in agreement with these reports (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Fillinger et&#xa0;al., 2008</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Grabke et&#xa0;al., 2013</xref>).</p>
<p>Resistance to APs is also widespread throughout the world (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">Latorre et&#xa0;al., 2002</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">Leroch et&#xa0;al., 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B53">Shao et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>), while in Greece, the first cases of APs resistance in <italic>B. cinerea</italic> populations were documented in 2007 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">Myresiotis et&#xa0;al., 2007</xref>). Despite the fact that APs is a relatively old fungicide class introduced against gray mold during the 1990s and the first cases of resistance were reported in the late 1990s (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Chapeland et&#xa0;al., 1999</xref>), it was only in 2017 when <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B42">Mosbach et&#xa0;al. (2017)</xref> identified several AP resistance-conferring mutations in genes encoding proteins that are involved in mitochondrial processes, providing evidence that APs are primarily targeting the mitochondrial metabolism. Among several mutations identified as AP resistance-conferring mutations, L412F in <italic>Bcpos5</italic> and <italic>E407K</italic> in <italic>Bcmdl1</italic> were included. The former has been found as the predominant mutation in the AP-resistant subpopulation tested by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B42">Mosbach et&#xa0;al. (2017)</xref>, while, more recently in an AP-resistant subpopulation originating from China, the latter was found to be predominant (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">Fan et&#xa0;al., 2023</xref>).</p>
<p>In addition to target site resistances in the fungal population, the presence of isolates showing MDR phenotype was evident. These isolates were showing low-to- moderate levels of resistance to fludioxonil, a fungicide for which only rarely has been reported target site resistance in <italic>B. cinerea</italic> because of the low fitness of the resistant isolates (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">Dowling et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B63">Wang et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>). The sequencing of the transcription factor gene <italic>mrr1</italic> in these isolates confirmed their identity as MDR strains. The presence of MDR strains is confirmed for the first time in Greece, while previously their presence has been reported in Germany, France, the USA, and China (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Kretschmer and Hahn, 2008</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">Kretschmer et&#xa0;al., 2009</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">Leroch et&#xa0;al., 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">Fernandez-Ortuno et&#xa0;al., 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B53">Shao et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>). The sequencing of <italic>mrr1</italic> gene of the MDR strains revealed the presence of three distinct genotypes. The predominant genotype was that of the MDR1h strains characterized by the 3-bp deletion at codon 497 in the <italic>mrr1</italic> exon. Apart from this deletion, the MDR1h isolates had several target point alterations throughout <italic>mrr1</italic> gene. MDR1h was identified for the first time in strawberry fields in Germany (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">Fournier et&#xa0;al., 2005</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">Leroch et&#xa0;al., 2013</xref>), while, later on, it was also reported in strawberry fields in the USA (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Fernandez-Ortuno et&#xa0;al., 2015</xref>). The expression levels of <italic>atrB</italic> in MDR1h strains are generally higher compared to those of MDR1 leading consequently to higher levels of resistance to fungicides (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">Leroch et&#xa0;al., 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Fernandez-Ortuno et&#xa0;al., 2015</xref>). MDR1h strains were found to be the predominant MDR strains in the population originating from rootstock seedlings, while they were completely absent in the population originating from tomatoes. The predominance of MDR1h strains on rootstock seedlings is associated with the fact that this crop is the most heavily treated crop with fungicides among those sampled, while it is well established that the selection of MDR1h strains is stronger in most heavily treated crops than in crops where fungicide use is less common (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">Leroch et&#xa0;al., 2013</xref>). The second MDR genotype identified in the current study was a set of MDR1 isolates possessing seven different mutations in the <italic>mrr1</italic> sequence. Most of these mutations have already been reported as <italic>mrr1</italic> mutations associated with the overexpression of <italic>BcatrB</italic> in MDR1 isolates from Europe, Australia, and the USA (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">Kretschmer et&#xa0;al., 2009</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">Leroch et&#xa0;al., 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Fernandez-Ortuno et&#xa0;al, 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Harper et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>). Interestingly, the third genotype identified as MDR1 was a set of isolates that possessed only the V575G substitution in <italic>mrr1</italic> gene. All the MDR1 isolates originating from tomatoes possessed this mutation, while it was also observed in a limited number of isolates originating from strawberries. This mutation is reported for the first time; however, another mutation in the same codon (V575M) has been previously reported by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">Leroch et&#xa0;al. (2013)</xref> and was associated with the overexpression of <italic>BcatrB</italic>. All the isolates possessing this mutation have been identified as <italic>B. cinerea sensu stricto</italic>.</p>
<p>Interestingly, in all of our MDR1 or MDR1h isolates, the resistance mechanism associated with <italic>atrB</italic> overexpression coexisted with target site modifications in the same strains. The higher accumulation of target site resistances in MDR strains of the pathogen has been observed in the past in <italic>B. cinerea</italic> populations from several hosts in Germany (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">Leroch et&#xa0;al., 2013</xref>) and from strawberries in the USA and Norway (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Fernandez-Ortuno et&#xa0;al., 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B45">Nielsen et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>). Thus, our results provide further evidence supporting the theory of a stepwise pattern of accumulation of resistance mutations in <italic>B. cinerea</italic> populations (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">Li et&#xa0;al., 2014</xref>). However, little is known about the effect of the coexistence of different resistance mechanisms on the levels of resistance of <italic>B. cinerea</italic> strains. In general, overexpression of efflux transporters as a resistance mechanism leads to low/moderate levels of resistance in plant pathogenic fungi (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">Leroch et&#xa0;al., 2013</xref>). The combination of different resistance mechanisms in the same strain may lead to increased resistance levels as has been shown in fungal species such as <italic>P. digitatum</italic> or <italic>Z. tritici</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B46">Omrane et&#xa0;al., 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">de Ramon-Carbonell and Sanchez-Torres, 2020</xref>) Herein, we provided evidence that the coexistence of two different resistance mechanisms increases the level of resistance to some fungicides and thus increases the risk for the lower performance of the fungicides that are affected. However, this was not the case for fenhexamid for which the coexistence of <italic>erg27</italic> mutations with <italic>mrr1</italic> modifications did not lead to resistance levels higher than those obtained due to the <italic>erg27</italic> modifications. This result is in accordance with previous studies showing that overexpression of <italic>BcatrB</italic> (and thus MDR1/MDR1h) is not correlated with increased detoxification of fenhexamid (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">Kretschmer et&#xa0;al., 2009</xref>).</p>
<p>In conclusion, in the current study, we reported on changes in the multiple resistance frequencies of <italic>B. cinerea</italic> populations originating from several hosts in Greece and on the frequencies of multidrug-resistant strains, which are reported for the first time in Greece. The data presented in this study highlight the practical importance of MLR/MDR in the field since resistance levels against certain fungicides might be higher than previously anticipated and might be used as a tool to design resistance management programs. The observed high frequencies of MLR isolates and the confirmed presence of MDR strains within the fungal populations present a challenge for the control of the pathogen, particularly in crops where multiple botryticide applications are required. This challenge necessitates research toward the development of fungicides with novel modes of action or the adoption of novel control strategies that will lead to the successful control of the selected MLR and MDR strains and the reduction of the selection pressure.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s5" sec-type="data-availability">
<title>Data availability statement</title>
<p>The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s6" sec-type="author-contributions">
<title>Author contributions</title>
<p>GS: Data curation, Investigation, Writing &#x2013; original draft. AS: Data curation, Investigation, Writing &#x2013; original draft. GK: Funding acquisition, Supervision, Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing.</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<sec id="s7" sec-type="funding-information">
<title>Funding</title>
<p>The authors declare financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. The research project was supported by the Hellenic Foundation for Research and Innovation (H.F.R.I.) under the &#x201c;2nd Call for H.F.R.I. Research Projects to support Faculty Members &amp; Researchers&#x201d; (Project Number: 2959).</p>
</sec>
<ack>
<title>Acknowledgments</title>
<p>Part of the content of this manuscript has been presented at the 18th International Botrytis Symposium &amp; 17th International Sclerotinia Workshop, June 13&#x2013;17, 2022, Avignon, France.</p>
</ack>
<sec id="s8" sec-type="COI-statement">
<title>Conflict of interest</title>
<p>The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s9" sec-type="disclaimer">
<title>Publisher&#x2019;s note</title>
<p>All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s10" sec-type="supplementary-material">
<title>Supplementary material</title>
<p>The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2023.1273193/full#supplementary-material">https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2023.1273193/full#supplementary-material</ext-link>
</p>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Image_1.jpeg" id="SM1" mimetype="image/jpeg"/>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Table_1.docx" id="SM2" mimetype="application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document"/>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Table_2.docx" id="SM3" mimetype="application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document"/>
</sec>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="B1">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Alzohairy</surname> <given-names>S. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gillett</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Saito</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Naegele</surname> <given-names>R. N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xiao</surname> <given-names>C. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Miles</surname> <given-names>T. D.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Fungicide resistance profiles of <italic>Botrytis cinerea</italic> isolates from Michigan vineyards and development of a TaqMan assay for detection of fenhexamid resistance</article-title>. <source>Plant Dis.</source> <volume>105</volume>, <fpage>285</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>294</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1094/PDIS-05-20-1087-RE</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Avenot</surname> <given-names>H. F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Morgan</surname> <given-names>D. P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Quattrini</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Michailides</surname> <given-names>T. J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Phenotypic and molecular characterization of fenhexamid resistance in <italic>Botrytis cinerea</italic> isolates collected from pistachio orchards and grape vineyards in California</article-title>. <source>Crop Prot.</source> <volume>133</volume>, <elocation-id>105133</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.cropro.2020.105133</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Avenot</surname> <given-names>H. F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sellam</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Karaoglanidis</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Michailides</surname> <given-names>T. J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>Characterization of mutations in the iron-sulphur subunit of succinate dehydrogenase correlating with boscalid resistance in <italic>Alternaria alternata</italic> from California pistachio</article-title>. <source>Phytopathology</source> <volume>98</volume>, <fpage>736</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>742</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1094/PHYTO-98-6-0736</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Bardas</surname> <given-names>G. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Myresiotis</surname> <given-names>C. K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Karaoglanidis</surname> <given-names>G. S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>Stability and fitness of anilinopyrimidine-resistant strains of <italic>Botrytis cinerea</italic>
</article-title>. <source>Phytopathology</source> <volume>98</volume>, <fpage>443</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>450</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1094/PHYTO-98-4-0443</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Bardas</surname> <given-names>G. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Veloukas</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Koutita</surname> <given-names>O.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Karaoglanidis</surname> <given-names>G. S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Multiple resistance of <italic>Botrytis cinerea</italic> from kiwifruit to SDHIs, QoIs and fungicides of other chemical groups</article-title>. <source>Pest Manage. Sci.</source> <volume>66</volume>, <fpage>967</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>973</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/ps.1968</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Brent</surname> <given-names>K. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hollomon</surname> <given-names>D. W.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2007</year>). <source>Fungicide resistance: the assessment of risk</source> (<publisher-loc>Brussels, Belgium</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Fungicide Resistance Action Committee</publisher-name>). Available at: <uri xlink:href="http://www.frac.info/frac/publication/anhang/FRAC_Mono2_2007.pdf">http://www.frac.info/frac/publication/anhang/FRAC_Mono2_2007.pdf</uri>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Campia</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Venturini</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Moreno-Sanz</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Casati</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Toffolatti</surname> <given-names>S. L.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Genetic structure and fungicide sensitivity of <italic>Botrytis cinerea</italic> populations isolated from grapevine in northern Italy</article-title>. <source>Plant Pathol.</source> <volume>66</volume>, <fpage>890</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>899</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/ppa.12643</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Chapeland</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fritz</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lanen</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gredt</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Leroux</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1999</year>). <article-title>Inheritance and mechanisms of resistance to anilinopyrimidine fungicides in <italic>Botrytis cinerea</italic> (<italic>Botryotinia fuckeliana</italic>)</article-title>. <source>Pest. Biochem. Physiol.</source> <volume>64</volume>, <fpage>85</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>100</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1006/pest.1999.2414</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Chatzidimopoulos</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Papaevaggelou</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pappas</surname> <given-names>A. C.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Detection and characterization of fungicide resistant phenotypes of <italic>Botrytis cinerea</italic> in lettuce crops in Greece</article-title>. <source>Eur. J. Plant Pathol.</source> <volume>137363&#x2013;</volume>, <fpage>76</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10658-013-0248-x</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>S. N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Luo</surname> <given-names>C. X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hu</surname> <given-names>M. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Schnabel</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Fitness and competitive ability of <italic>botrytis cinerea</italic> isolates with resistance to multiple chemical classes of fungicides</article-title>. <source>Phytopathology</source> <volume>106</volume> (<issue>9</issue>), <fpage>997</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1005</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1094/PHYTO-02-16-0061-R</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Cosseboom</surname> <given-names>S. D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hu</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Identification and characterization of fungicide resistance in Botrytis populations from small fruit fields in the Mid-Atlantic United States</article-title>. <source>Plant Dis.</source> <volume>105</volume>, <fpage>2366</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2373</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1094/PDIS-03-20-0487-RE</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Cosseboom</surname> <given-names>S. D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Schnabel</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hu</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Competitive ability of multi-fungicide resistant <italic>Botrytis cinerea</italic> in a blackberry planting over three years</article-title>. <source>Pest. Biochem. Physiol.</source> <volume>163</volume>, <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>7</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.pestbp.2019.11.008</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Dean</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Van Kan</surname> <given-names>J. A. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pretorius</surname> <given-names>Z. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hammond-Kosack</surname> <given-names>K. E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Di Pietro</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Spanu</surname> <given-names>P. D.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>The top 10 fungal pathogens in molecular plant pathology</article-title>. <source>Mol. Plant Pathol.</source> <volume>13</volume> (<issue>4</issue>), <fpage>414</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>430</lpage>. doi: 1111/j.1364-3703.2011.00783.x
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>de Miccolis Angelini</surname> <given-names>R. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rotolo</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Masiello</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gerin</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pollastro</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Faretra</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Occurrence of fungicide resistance in populations of <italic>Botryotinia fuckeliana</italic> (<italic>Botrytis cinerea</italic>) on table grape and strawberry in southern Italy</article-title>. <source>Pest Manage. Sci.</source> <volume>70</volume>, <fpage>1785</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1796</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/ps.3711</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>de Ramon-Carbonell</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sanchez-Torres</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Significance of 195 bp-enhancer of <italic>PdCYP51B</italic> in the acquisition of <italic>Penicillium digitatum</italic> DMI resistance and increase of fungal virulence</article-title>. <source>Pest. Biochem. Physiol.</source> <volume>165</volume>, <fpage>104522</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.pestbp.2020.01.003</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>de Waard</surname> <given-names>M. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Andrade</surname> <given-names>A. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hayashi</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Schoonbeek</surname> <given-names>H. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Stergiopoulos</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zwiers</surname> <given-names>L. H.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2006</year>). <article-title>Impact of fungal drug transporters on fungicide sensitivity, multidrug resistance and virulence</article-title>. <source>Pest Manage. Sci.</source> <volume>62</volume>, <fpage>195</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>207</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/ps.1150</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Dowling</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gelain</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>May De Mio</surname> <given-names>L. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Schnabel</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Characterization of high fludioxonil resistance in <italic>Botrytis cinerea</italic> isolates from Calibrachoa flowers</article-title>. <source>Phytopathology</source> <volume>111</volume>, <fpage>478</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>484</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1094/PHYTO-07-20-0268-R</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B18">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Fan</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhu</surname> <given-names>Y. X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>M. Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yin</surname> <given-names>W. X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>G. Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hahn</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>Mitochondrial inner membrane ABC transporter <italic>Bcmdl1</italic> is involved in conidial germination, virulence, and resistance to anilinopyrimidine fungicides in <italic>Botrytis cinerea</italic>
</article-title>. <source>Microbiol. Spectr.</source> <volume>15</volume>, <fpage>e0010823</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/spectrum.00108-23</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B19">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Fernandez-Ortuno</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Grabke</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bryson</surname> <given-names>P. K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Amiri</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Peres</surname> <given-names>N. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Schnabel</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Fungicide resistance profiles in <italic>Botrytis cinerea</italic> from strawberry fields of seven southern U.S. States</article-title>. <source>Plant Dis.</source> <volume>98</volume>, <fpage>825</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>833</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1094/PDIS-09-13-0970-RE</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B20">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Fernandez-Ortuno</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Grabke</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Schnabel</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Independent emergence of resistance to seven chemical classes of fungicides in <italic>botrytis cinerea</italic>
</article-title>. <source>Phytopathology</source> <volume>105</volume> (<issue>4</issue>), <fpage>424</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>432</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1094/PHYTO-06-14-0161-R</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B21">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Fernandez-Ortuno</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>P&#xe9;rez-Garc&#xed;a</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chamorro</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>de la Pe&#xf1;a</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>de Vicente</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tor&#xe9;s</surname> <given-names>J. A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Resistance to the SDHI fungicides boscalid, fluopyram, fluxapyroxad, and penthiopyrad in <italic>Botrytis cinerea</italic> from commercial strawberry fields in Spain</article-title>. <source>Plant Dis.</source> <volume>101</volume>, <fpage>1306</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1313</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1094/PDIS-01-17-0067-RE</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B22">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Fillinger</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Leroux</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Auclair</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Barreau</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Al Hajj</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Debieu</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>Genetic analysis of fenhexamid-resistant field isolates of the phytopathogenic fungus <italic>Botrytis cinerea</italic>
</article-title>. <source>Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.</source> <volume>52</volume> (<issue>11</issue>), <fpage>3933</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>3940</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/AAC.00615-08</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B23">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Fillinger</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Walker</surname> <given-names>A. S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2016</year>). &#x201c;<article-title>Chemical control and resistance management of botrytis diseases</article-title>,&#x201d; in <source>Botrytis - the fungus, the pathogen and its management in agricultural systems</source>. Eds. <person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname>Fillinger</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Elad</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<publisher-loc>Cham</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Springer</publisher-name>), <fpage>189</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>216</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/978-3-319-23371-0_10</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B24">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Fournier</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Giraud</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Albertini</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Brygoo</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2005</year>). <article-title>Partition of the <italic>Botrytis cinerea</italic> complex in France using multiple gene genealogies</article-title>. <source>Mycologia</source> <volume>97</volume>, <fpage>1251</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1267</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3852/mycologia.97.6.1251</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B25">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Grabke</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fernandez-Ortuno</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Schnabel</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Fenhexamid resistance in <italic>Botrytis cinerea</italic> from strawberry fields in the Carolinas is associated with four target gene mutations</article-title>. <source>Plant Dis.</source> <volume>97</volume>, <fpage>271</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>276</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1094/PDIS-06-12-0587-RE</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B26">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Hahn</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>The rising threat of fungicide resistance in plant pathogenic fungi: Botrytis as a case study</article-title>. <source>J. Chem. Biol.</source> <volume>28</volume>, <fpage>133</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>141</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s12154-014-0113-1</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B27">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Harper</surname> <given-names>L. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Paton</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hall</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>McKay</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Oliver</surname> <given-names>R. P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lopez-Ruiz</surname> <given-names>F. J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Fungicide resistance characterized across seven modes of action in <italic>Botrytis cinerea</italic> isolated from Australian vineyards</article-title>. <source>Pest Manage. Sci.</source> <volume>78</volume>, <fpage>1326</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1340</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/ps.6749</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B28">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Hu</surname> <given-names>M. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fernandez-Ortuno</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Schnabel</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Monitoring resistance to SDHI fungicides in <italic>Botrytis cinerea</italic> from strawberry fields</article-title>. <source>Plant Dis.</source> <volume>100</volume>, <fpage>959</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>965</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1094/PDIS-10-15-1210-RE</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B29">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Konstantinou</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Veloukas</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Leroch</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Menexes</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hahn</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Karaoglanidis</surname> <given-names>G. S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Population structure, fungicide resistance profile, and <italic>sdhB</italic> mutation frequency of <italic>Botrytis cinerea</italic> from strawberry and greenhouse-grown tomato in Greece</article-title>. <source>Plant Dis.</source> <volume>99</volume>, <fpage>240</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>248</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1094/PDIS-04-14-0373-RE</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B30">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kretschmer</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hahn</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>Fungicide resistance and genetic diversity of <italic>Botrytis cinerea</italic> isolates from a vineyard in Germany</article-title>. <source>J. Plant Dis. Prot.</source> <volume>115</volume>, <fpage>214</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>219</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/BF03356266</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B31">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kretschmer</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Leroch</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mosbach</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Walker</surname> <given-names>A. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fillinger</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mernke</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>Fungicide-driven evolution and molecular basis of multidrug resistance in field populations of the grey mould fungus <italic>Botrytis cinerea</italic>
</article-title>. <source>PloS Pathog.</source> <volume>5</volume>, <fpage>e1000696</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.ppat.1000696</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B32">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Laleve</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fillinger</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Walker</surname> <given-names>A.-S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Fitness measurements reveals contrasting costs in homologous recombinant mutants of <italic>Botrytis cinerea</italic> resistant to succinate dehydrogenase inhibitors</article-title>. <source>Fungal Genet. Biol.</source> <volume>67</volume>, <fpage>24</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>36</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.fgb.2014.03.006</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B33">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Latorre</surname> <given-names>B. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Spadaro</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rioja</surname> <given-names>M. E.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2002</year>). <article-title>Occurrence of resistant strains of <italic>Botrytis cinerea</italic> to anilinopyrimidine fungicides in table grapes in Chile</article-title>. <source>Crop Prot.</source> <volume>21</volume>, <fpage>957</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>961</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S0261-2194(02)00074-1</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B34">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Leroch</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kretschmer</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hahn</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Fungicide resistance phenotypes of <italic>Botrytis cinerea</italic> isolates from commercial vineyards in South West Germany</article-title>. <source>J. Phytopathol.</source> <volume>159</volume>, <fpage>63</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>65</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1439-0434.2010.01719.x</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B35">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Leroch</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Plesken</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Weber</surname> <given-names>R. W. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kauff</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Scalliet</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hahn</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Gray mold populations in German strawberry fields are resistant to multiple fungicides and dominated by a novel clade closely related to <italic>Botrytis cinerea</italic>
</article-title>. <source>Appl. Environ. Microbiol.</source> <volume>79</volume>, <fpage>159</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>167</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/AEM.02655-12</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B36">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Leroux</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gredt</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Leroch</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Walker</surname> <given-names>A. S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Exploring mechanisms of resistance to respiratory inhibitors in field strains of <italic>Botrytis cinerea</italic>, the causal agent of gray mold</article-title>. <source>Appl. Environ. Microbiol.</source> <volume>76</volume>, <fpage>6615</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>6630</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/AEM.00931-10</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B37">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fernandez-Ortuno</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Grabke</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Luo</surname> <given-names>C. X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bridges</surname> <given-names>W. C.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Location-specific fungicide resistance profiles and evidence for stepwise accumulation of resistance in <italic>Botrytis cinerea</italic>
</article-title>. <source>Plant Dis.</source> <volume>98</volume>, <fpage>1066</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1074</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1094/PDIS-10-13-1019-RE</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B38">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Lu</surname> <given-names>X. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jiao</surname> <given-names>X. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hao</surname> <given-names>J. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>A. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gao</surname> <given-names>W. W.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Characterization of resistance to multiple fungicides in <italic>Botrytis cinerea</italic> populations from Asian ginseng in northeastern China</article-title>. <source>Eur. J. Plant Pathol.</source> <volume>144</volume> (<issue>3</issue>), <fpage>467</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>476</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10658-015-0786-5</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B39">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Makris</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Nikoloudakis</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Samaras</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Karaoglanidis</surname> <given-names>G. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kanetis</surname> <given-names>L. I.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Under pressure: A comparative study of <italic>botrytis cinerea</italic> populations from conventional and organic farms in Cyprus and Greece</article-title>. <source>Phytopathology</source> <volume>112</volume>, <fpage>2236</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2247</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1094/PHYTO-12-21-0510-R</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B40">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Mernke</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dahm</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Walker</surname> <given-names>A. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lal&#xe8;ve</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fillinger</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Leroch</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Two promoter rearrangements in a drug efflux transporter gene are responsible for the appearance and spread of multidrug resistance phenotype MDR2 in <italic>Botrytis cinerea</italic> isolates in French and German vineyards</article-title>. <source>Phytopathology</source> <volume>101</volume> (<issue>10</issue>), <fpage>1176</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1183</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1094/PHYTO-02-11-0046</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B41">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Molly</surname> <given-names>F. M. D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Grant-Downton</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2015</year>). &#x201c;<article-title>&#x201c;<italic>Botrytis</italic>-biology, detection and quantification&#x201d;</article-title>,&#x201d; in <source>Botrytis - the fungus, the pathogen and its management in agricultural systems</source>. Eds. <person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname>Fillinger</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Elad</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<publisher-loc>Cham</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Springer</publisher-name>), <fpage>17</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>34</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/978-3-319-23371-0_2</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B42">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Mosbach</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Edel</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Farmer</surname> <given-names>A. D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Widdison</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Barchietto</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dietrich</surname> <given-names>R. A.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Anilinopyrimidine resistance in <italic>botrytis cinerea</italic> is linked to mitochondrial function</article-title>. <source>Front. Microbiol.</source> <volume>30</volume> (<issue>8</issue>). doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmicb.2017.02361</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B43">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Myresiotis</surname> <given-names>C. K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Karaoglanidis</surname> <given-names>G. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tzavella-Klonari</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2007</year>). <article-title>Monitoring for resistance of <italic>Botrytis cinerea</italic> isolates from vegetable crops to anilinopyrimidine, phenylpyrrole, hydroxyanilide, benzimidazole and dicarboximide fungicides</article-title>. <source>Plant Dis.</source> <volume>91</volume>, <fpage>407</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>413</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1094/PDIS-91-4-0407</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B44">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Naegele</surname> <given-names>R. P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Abdelsamad</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>DeLong</surname> <given-names>J. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Saito</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xiao</surname> <given-names>C. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Miles</surname> <given-names>T. D.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Fungicide resistance and host influence on population structure in botrytis spp. from specialty crops in california</article-title>. <source>Phytopathology</source>, <volume>112</volume>, <fpage>2549</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2559</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1094/PHYTO-03-22-0070-R</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B45">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Nielsen</surname> <given-names>K. A. G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sk&#xe5;rn</surname> <given-names>M. N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Str&#xf8;meng</surname> <given-names>G. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Brurberg</surname> <given-names>M. B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Stensvand</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Pervasive fungicide resistance in <italic>Botrytis</italic> from strawberry in Norway: Identification of the grey mould pathogen and mutations</article-title>. <source>Plant Pathol.</source> <volume>71</volume>, <fpage>1392</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1403</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/ppa.13557</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B46">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Omrane</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sghyer</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Aud&#xe9;on</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lanen</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Duplaix</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Walker</surname> <given-names>A. S.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Fungicide efflux and the MgMFS 1 transporter contribute to the multidrug resistance phenotype in <italic>Zymoseptoria tritici</italic> field isolates</article-title>. <source>Environ. Microbiol.</source> <volume>17</volume> (<issue>8</issue>), <fpage>2805</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2823</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/1462-2920.12781</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B47">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Plesken</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Weber</surname> <given-names>R. W. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rupp</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Leroch</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hahn</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>
<italic>Botrytis pseudocinerea</italic> is a significant pathogen of several crop plants but susceptible to displacement by fungicide-resistant <italic>B. cinerea</italic> strains</article-title>. <source>Appl. Environ. Microbiol.</source> <volume>81</volume>, <fpage>7048</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>7056</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/AEM.01719-15</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B48">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Roca-Couso</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Flores-F&#xe9;lix</surname> <given-names>J. D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rivas</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Mechanisms of action of microbial biocontrol agents against <italic>Botrytis cinerea</italic>
</article-title>. <source>J. Fungi</source> <volume>7</volume> (<issue>12</issue>), <elocation-id>1045</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/jof7121045</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B49">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Rupp</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Weber</surname> <given-names>R. W. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rieger</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Detzel</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hahn</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Spread of <italic>Botrytis cinerea</italic> strains with multiple fungicide resistance in German horticulture</article-title>. <source>Front. Microbiol.</source> <volume>7</volume>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmicb.2016.02075</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B50">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Samaras</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hadjipetrou</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Karaoglanidis</surname> <given-names>G. S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>
<italic>Bacillus amyloliquefaciens</italic> strain QST713 may contribute to the management of SDHIs resistance in <italic>Botrytis cinerea</italic>
</article-title>. <source>Pest Manage. Sci.</source> <volume>77</volume>, <fpage>1316</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1327</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/ps.6145</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B51">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Samaras</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ntasiou</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Myresiotis</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Karaoglanidis</surname> <given-names>G. S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Multidrug resistance of <italic>Penicillium expansum</italic> to fungicides: whole transcriptome analysis of MDR strains reveals overexpression of efflux transporter genes</article-title>. <source>Int. J. Food Microbiol.</source> <volume>335</volume>, <elocation-id>108896</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2020.108896</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B52">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Samuel</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Papayiannis</surname> <given-names>L. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Leroch</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Veloukas</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hahn</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Karaoglanidis</surname> <given-names>G. S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Evaluation of the incidence of the G143A mutation and <italic>cytb</italic> intron presence in the cytochrome <italic>bc-1</italic> gene conferring QoI resistance in <italic>Botrytis cinerea</italic> populations from several hosts</article-title>. <source>Pest Manag Sci.</source> <volume>67</volume>, <fpage>1029</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1036</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/ps.2226</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B53">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Shao</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ma</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Advances in understanding fungicide resistance in <italic>Botrytis cinerea</italic> in China</article-title>. <source>Phytopathology</source> <volume>111</volume>, <fpage>455</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>463</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1094/PHYTO-07-20-0313-IA</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B54">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Shaw</surname> <given-names>M. W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Emmanuel</surname> <given-names>C. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Emilda</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Terhem</surname> <given-names>R. B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Shafia</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tsamaidi</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Analysis of cryptic, systemic Botrytis infections in symptomless hosts</article-title>. <source>Front. Plant Sci.</source> <volume>10</volume>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpls.2016.00625</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B55">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Sofianos</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Samaras</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Karaoglanidis</surname> <given-names>G. S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2022</year>). &#x201c;<article-title>Multiple and Multidrug resistance in <italic>Botrytis cinerea</italic>: Molecular mechanisms of MLR/MDR phenotypes in Greece and effects of co-existence of different resistance mechanisms on fungicide sensitivity</article-title>,&#x201d; in <source>Book of abstracts of the 1<sup>st</sup> joint botrytis-sclerotinia symposium, 13-17 june 2022</source> (<publisher-loc>France</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Avignon</publisher-name>), <fpage>100</fpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B56">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Spada</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pugliesi</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fambrini</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Palpacelli</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pecchia</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>Knockdown of <italic>Bmp1</italic> and <italic>Pls1</italic> Virulence Genes by Exogenous Application of RNAi-Inducing dsRNA in <italic>Botrytis cinerea</italic>
</article-title>. <source>Int. J. Mol. Sci.</source> <volume>24</volume> (<issue>5</issue>), <elocation-id>4869</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/ijms24054869</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B57">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Testempasis</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pucket</surname> <given-names>R. D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Michailides</surname> <given-names>T. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Karaoglanidis</surname> <given-names>G. S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Genetic structure and fungicide resistance profile of Botrytis spp. populations causing postharvest gray mold of pomegranate fruit in Greece and California</article-title>. <source>Postharvest Biol. Technol.</source> <volume>170</volume>, <fpage>111319</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.postharvbio.2020.111319</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B58">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Veloukas</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kalogeropoulou</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Markoglou</surname> <given-names>A. N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Karaoglanidis</surname> <given-names>G. S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Fitness and competitive ability of <italic>Botrytis cinerea</italic> field-isolates with dual resistance to SDHI and QoI fungicides, associated with several <italic>sdh</italic>B and the <italic>cyt</italic>b G143A mutations</article-title>. <source>Phytopathology</source> <volume>104</volume>, <fpage>347</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>356</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1094/PHYTO-07-13-0208-R</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B59">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Veloukas</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Karaoglanidis</surname> <given-names>G. S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Biological activity of the succinate dehydrogenase inhibitor fluopyram against <italic>Botrytis cinerea</italic> and fungal baseline sensitivity</article-title>. <source>Pest Manage. Sci.</source> <volume>68</volume>, <fpage>858</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>864</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/ps.3241</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B60">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Veloukas</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Leroch</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hahn</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Karaoglanidis</surname> <given-names>G. S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Detection and molecular characterization of boscalid-resistant <italic>Botrytis cinerea</italic> isolates from strawberry</article-title>. <source>Plant Dis.</source> <volume>95</volume>, <fpage>1302</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1307</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1094/PDIS-04-11-0317</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B61">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Veloukas</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Markoglou</surname> <given-names>A. N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Karaoglanidis</surname> <given-names>G. S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Differential effect of <italic>SdhB</italic> gene mutations on the sensitivity to SDHI fungicides in</article-title>. <source>Botrytis cinerea. Plant Dis.</source> <volume>97</volume>, <fpage>118</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>122</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1094/PDIS-03-12-0322-RE</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B62">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Walker</surname> <given-names>A. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Micoud</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>R&#xe9;muson</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Grosman</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gredt</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Leroux</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>French vineyards provide information that opens ways for effective resistance management of <italic>Botrytis cinerea</italic> (grey mould)</article-title>. <source>Pest Manage. Sci.</source> <volume>69</volume>, <fpage>667</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>678</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/ps.3506</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B63">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Imran</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hu</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Huang</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Characterization of the field fludioxonil resistance and its molecular basis in <italic>Botrytis cinerea</italic> from Shanghai province in China</article-title>. <source>Microorganisms</source> <volume>9</volume>, <elocation-id>266</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/microorganisms9020266</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B64">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Weber</surname> <given-names>R. W. S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Resistance of <italic>Botrytis cinerea</italic> to multiple fungicides in northern German small-fruit production</article-title>. <source>Plant Dis.</source> <volume>95</volume>, <fpage>1263</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1269</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1094/PDIS-03-11-0209</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B65">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Weber</surname> <given-names>R. W. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hahn</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>A rapid and simple method for determining fungicide resistance in Botrytis</article-title>. <source>J. Plant Dis. Prot.</source> <volume>118</volume> (<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>17</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>25</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/BF03356376</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>