<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.3 20070202//EN" "journalpublishing.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="2.3" xml:lang="EN">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Front. Plant Sci.</journal-id>
<journal-title>Frontiers in Plant Science</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">Front. Plant Sci.</abbrev-journal-title>
<issn pub-type="epub">1664-462X</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Frontiers Media S.A.</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpls.2023.1272362</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Plant Science</subject>
<subj-group>
<subject>Original Research</subject>
</subj-group>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Postglacial phylogeography, admixture, and evolution of red spruce (<italic>Picea rubens</italic> Sarg.) in Eastern North America</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Bashalkhanov</surname>
<given-names>Stanislav</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn003">
<sup>&#x2020;</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2399016"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/conceptualization/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/formal-analysis/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/investigation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/methodology/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Johnson</surname>
<given-names>Jeremy S.</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2507944"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/formal-analysis/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name>
<surname>Rajora</surname>
<given-names>Om P.</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn001">
<sup>*</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1191634"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/conceptualization/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/funding-acquisition/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/investigation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/methodology/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/project-administration/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/resources/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/supervision/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
<institution>Faculty of Forestry and Environmental Management, University of New Brunswick</institution>, <addr-line>Fredericton, NB</addr-line>, <country>Canada</country>
</aff>
<aff id="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
<institution>Department of Forestry, Michigan State University</institution>, <addr-line>East Lansing, MI</addr-line>, <country>United States</country>
</aff>
<author-notes>
<fn fn-type="edited-by">
<p>Edited by: Daniel Pinero, National Autonomous University of Mexico, Mexico</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="edited-by">
<p>Reviewed by: John Birks, University of Bergen, Norway; Mark Ford, United States Department of the Interior, United States</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="corresp" id="fn001">
<p>*Correspondence: Om P. Rajora, <email xlink:href="mailto:Om.Rajora@unb.ca">Om.Rajora@unb.ca</email>
</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="present-address" id="fn003">
<p>&#x2020;Present address: Stanislav Bashalkhanov, Maritime Provinces Higher Education Commission, Fredericton, NB, Canada</p>
</fn>
</author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>12</day>
<month>10</month>
<year>2023</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="collection">
<year>2023</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>14</volume>
<elocation-id>1272362</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>03</day>
<month>08</month>
<year>2023</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>26</day>
<month>09</month>
<year>2023</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#xa9; 2023 Bashalkhanov, Johnson and Rajora</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2023</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Bashalkhanov, Johnson and Rajora</copyright-holder>
<license xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">
<p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.</p>
</license>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<p>Climate change is a major evolutionary force that can affect the structure of forest ecosystems worldwide. Red spruce (<italic>Picea rubens</italic> Sarg.) has recently faced a considerable decline in the Southern Appalachians due to rapid environmental change, which includes historical land use, and atmospheric pollution. In the northern part of its range, red spruce is sympatric with closely related black spruce (<italic>Picea mariana</italic> (Mill.) B.S.P.), where introgressive hybridization commonly occurs. We investigated range-wide population genetic diversity and structure and inferred postglacial migration patterns and evolution of red spruce using nuclear microsatellites. Moderate genetic diversity and differentiation were observed in red spruce. Genetic distance, maximum likelihood and Bayesian analyses identified two distinct population clusters: southern glacial populations, and the evolutionarily younger northern populations. Approximate Bayesian computation suggests that patterns of admixture are the result of divergence of red spruce and black spruce from a common ancestor and then introgressive hybridization during post-glacial migration. Genetic diversity, effective population size (<italic>N<sub>e</sub>
</italic>) and genetic differentiation were higher in the northern than in the southern populations. Our results along with previously available fossil data suggest that <italic>Picea rubens</italic> and <italic>Picea mariana</italic> occupied separate southern refugia during the last glaciation. After initial expansion in the early Holocene, these two species faced a period of recession and formed a secondary coastal refugium, where introgressive hybridization occurred, and then both species migrated northward. As a result, various levels of black spruce alleles are present in the sympatric red spruce populations. Allopatric populations of <italic>P. rubens</italic> and <italic>P. mariana</italic> have many species-specific alleles and much fewer alleles from common ancestry. The pure southern red spruce populations may become critically endangered under projected climate change conditions as their ecological niche may disappear.</p>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>postglacial migration</kwd>
<kwd>glacial refugia</kwd>
<kwd>genetic diversity and population structure</kwd>
<kwd>interspecific hybridization</kwd>
<kwd>molecular evolution</kwd>
<kwd>approximate Bayesian computation</kwd>
<kwd>biogeography</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<counts>
<fig-count count="3"/>
<table-count count="6"/>
<equation-count count="0"/>
<ref-count count="100"/>
<page-count count="16"/>
<word-count count="9935"/>
</counts>
<custom-meta-wrap>
<custom-meta>
<meta-name>section-in-acceptance</meta-name>
<meta-value>Plant Systematics and Evolution</meta-value>
</custom-meta>
</custom-meta-wrap>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec id="s1" sec-type="intro">
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>The current structure of forest ecosystems in the Northern Hemisphere formed several thousand years ago because of major transcontinental migrations caused by climate fluctuations after the Last Glacial Maximum (LGM). This is a relatively short time on the evolutionary scale, especially for long-lived tree species, whose frontier populations may have occupied their current habitats for only a small number of generations. Repeated founder events associated with rapid postglacial migrations, mixture of lineages originating from different glacial refugia, and possible interspecific gene flow make the genetic structure of these frontier populations highly dynamic. At the same time, the trailing populations at the southern margin of the species&#x2019; range often face decline when they are outcompeted by species better adapted to the new warmer climates (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">Hampe and Petit, 2005</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">Beckage et&#xa0;al., 2008</xref>) or cannot survive for other reasons regardless of competition. The projected rates of future climate change exceed those observed after the LGM (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B42">IPCC, 2022</xref>). For many Eastern North American tree species, the ecological optima will move northward at least by 100 km, and for several species the expected range shifts will likely exceed 250 km by the end of this century (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B44">Iverson and Prasad, 1998</xref>). Knowledge of the evolutionary history of a species is important to better understand its current state, making predictions of its fate in the future (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B49">Johnson et&#xa0;al., 2016</xref>; Johnson et&#xa0;al., 2018), and development of conservation programs if needed (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">Hoban et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>) &#x2013; particularly in the light of today&#x2019;s rates of global climate change and human caused habitat fragmentation. This requires comprehensive analysis of genetic processes in tree populations at various evolutionary stages (Johnson et&#xa0;al., 2018) and spatial scales (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B55">LaRue et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>) &#x2013; from the expanding front to the declining trailing edge.</p>
<p>Red spruce (<italic>Picea rubens</italic> Sarg.) is an excellent model system to consider postglacial migration and evolution of northern temperate forest trees in relation to climate change and interspecific hybridization. because: (1) its northern populations are only a few generations old, whereas its southern populations are fragmented and currently restricted to high elevations, including potential refugia, and northern populations are genetically differentiated from southern populations; (2) it is sensitive to climate and environmental changes and has experienced massive diebacks from environmental change caused by the combined effects of climate warming, historical land use, and industrial pollution; and (3) it hybridizes naturally with black spruce (<italic>Picea mariana</italic> (Mill.) B.S.P.) in the northern parts of its range, but its evolutionary relationships with black spruce are not clear; and (4) very little is known about its postglacial migration and evolution.</p>
<p>Red spruce is an important and characteristic component of late-successional forests of eastern Canada and the northeastern United States. The natural range of red spruce covers territories from North Carolina in the United States to eastern Ontario and Nova Scotia in Canada (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Burns and Honkala, 1990</xref>). In the northern part of its range, red spruce is one of the main components of cold temperate forests, whereas the southern populations are largely scattered and discontinuous, and occur either at mountainous sites, or in cool and moist wetlands (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Burns and Honkala, 1990</xref>). Red spruce is characterized by relatively low overall genetic diversity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Eckert, 1989</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">Hawley and DeHayes, 1994</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B79">Perron et&#xa0;al., 2000</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B85">Rajora et&#xa0;al., 2000a</xref>) and a narrow ecological niche that make it sensitive to climate and environmental changes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">DeHayes et&#xa0;al., 1991</xref>). A major decrease in the size of red spruce populations from 1800 onward has been associated, in part, with climate warming (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">Hamburg and Cogbill, 1988</xref>), though it should be noted that there have been some recent observations of red spruce re-expansion (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B90">Rollins et&#xa0;al., 2010</xref>). Since the 1960&#x2019;s, a significant decline of red spruce populations has also been observed at many high elevation sites along the Appalachian Mountain chain (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">DeHayes and Hawley, 1992</xref>). This decline has been associated with the complex damaging effects of industrial emissions - reduced growth, defoliation and poor cold tolerance commonly observed in the affected stands (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Friedland et&#xa0;al., 1984</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B63">McLaughlin et&#xa0;al., 1987</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">DeHayes et&#xa0;al., 1991</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B64">McLaughlin et&#xa0;al., 1993</xref>). Within the southern part of its range, red spruce is restricted to colder high elevation locations. These isolated populations of red spruce represent a valuable portion of the species&#x2019; gene pool, which are likely to be highly sensitive to climate warming.</p>
<p>In the northern parts of its range, red spruce is sympatric with closely related black spruce, where introgressive hybridization occurs between these two species (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B67">Morgenstern and Farrar, 1964</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B61">Manley, 1972</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">Gordon, 1976</xref>). Since the criteria for identification of interspecific hybrids between <italic>P. rubens</italic> and <italic>P. mariana</italic> are not rigid, estimates of the degree of introgression vary from extensive to minor among studies (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B67">Morgenstern and Farrar, 1964</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B61">Manley, 1972</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">Gordon, 1976</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">Fowler et&#xa0;al., 1988</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Bobola et&#xa0;al., 1996</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B77">Perron and Bousquet, 1997</xref>). Additional analysis is required to understand the evolutionary relationships between red spruce and black spruce, as well as ongoing processes in the hybrid zones.</p>
<p>The history of the postglacial migrations in red spruce probably had significant influence on the population structure in this species, and it should be considered when dissecting the more recent effects of air pollution, logging, and climate change and developing a conservation genetic strategy for its forest genetic resources in North America. However, very little is known on postglacial migration and evolution of red spruce. Based on higher allozyme allelic richness and heterozygosity observed in northern than southern red spruce populations, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">Hawley and DeHayes (1994)</xref> speculated that these two population groups originated from two separate glacial refugia: one in the southern Appalachian Mountains, and another situated in the coastal areas, which later became continental shelf to the east of the mid-Atlantic states. On the other hand, the genetic distance analysis in their study did not show separation between the northern and southern populations as would be expected if the populations originated from two glacial refugia. The higher genetic diversity in the northern red spruce populations may be a result of natural hybridization with black spruce instead of their origins from separate glacial refugia. Spruce was widespread in the continental United States during the glaciation: various <italic>Picea</italic> macrofossils and pollen grains occur from the ice margin to east-central Louisiana but are absent in the Atlantic coastal areas (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B45">Jackson and Overpeck, 2000</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B46">Jackson et&#xa0;al., 2000</xref>). Fossil records indicate that red spruce survived in the southern Appalachians during glaciation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B46">Jackson et&#xa0;al., 2000</xref>) and do not support the existence of the second red spruce refugium during LGM. Red spruce existed in central Appalachians around 15,000 years BP (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B98">Watts, 1979</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B58">Lindbladh et&#xa0;al., 2003</xref>). Coastal refugia for spruce may have existed during the warmer mid-Holocene period to play a significant role at the later stages of recolonization process, but not during the LGM (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B91">Schauffler and Jacobson, 2002</xref>). Pollen stratigraphies indicated that <italic>P. rubens</italic> was not widely represented in the northern part of its current range until 1000-1500 years BP (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B58">Lindbladh et&#xa0;al., 2003</xref>).</p>
<p>In the present study, we investigated range-wide genetic diversity and population genetic structure of red spruce and reconstructed the history of its postglacial migrations using highly variable microsatellite markers of the nuclear genome. We evaluated two concurrent hypotheses: 1.) whether the existing red spruce populations have originated from a single LGM refugium, or 2.) there have been multiple refugia. Under the 1.) hypothesis of recolonization from a single LGM refugium, isolation by distance and reduced genetic diversity levels in the northern populations associated with the repeated founder events may be expected. 2.) Multiple refugia can be revealed by clear genetic differentiation among lineages based on multilocus genetic structure. The migration time frames can be established from the recently available fossil pollen stratigraphies. We also assessed the evolutionary relationships between red spruce and black spruce and addressed the question whether red spruce is genetically depauperate using Bayesian analysis, highly variable molecular markers, and robust sample sizes.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2" sec-type="materials|methods">
<title>Materials and methods</title>
<sec id="s2_1">
<title>Red spruce populations, field sampling and DNA isolation</title>
<p>Eight populations of red spruce were sampled across the range of this species (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>). Six populations formed a transect along the Appalachian Mountain chain, and two populations were from New Brunswick (NB) and Nova Scotia (NS), completing a latitudinal cross-section of the northern part of the species&#x2019; range. Five populations (WV, TN, NY, NB, and NS) were old-growth red spruce stands without significant human intervention documented in the past, and three (ME, QC, and NH) were represented by bulked seeds collected between 1997 and 2001 from about 50 mature trees (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">
<bold>Table&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>). Seeds were obtained from the Canadian Forest Service seed bank. Sixty mature trees, spaced at least 50 m apart to eliminate possible family structure effects, were sampled in the five old-growth red spruce populations, and sixty seeds were randomly selected from each of the three bulked-seed populations. Minimum spacing between trees was calculated based on the average seed dispersal distance (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Burns and Honkala, 1990</xref>). To make sure that the bulked seed lots were not subject to a possible bottleneck effect, we compared their genetic diversity parameters with populations represented by the foliage samples. We found no significant difference in allelic richness and heterozygosity between the two sample groups. Possible heterozygosity fluctuations among seeds and adult trees due to the selection against highly inbred individuals should be negligible as the latter are mostly eliminated at the seed formation stage (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B72">O'Connell et&#xa0;al., 2006a</xref>). Using seed collections along with other sample types is a common practice when the natural populations cannot be accessed due to logistical reasons or harvesting (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">Hawley and DeHayes, 1994</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B47">Jaramillo-Correa et&#xa0;al., 2004</xref>).</p>
<fig id="f1" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;1</label>
<caption>
<p>Geographic distribution of <italic>Picea rubens</italic> and <italic>Picea mariana</italic> in eastern North America, adapted from Little (1971). Species ranges are indicated by the red (southern red spruce), and dark grey (black spruce) shading. Purple shading indicates the northern red spruce sympatric zone with black spruce. Red box on the inset map indicates the extent of the study area. Sampled populations (back triangles) are indicated and labeled as per <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">
<bold>Table&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>. Red spruce populations sampled: TN, Tennessee; WV, West Virginia; NH, New Hampshire; NY, New York; ME, Maine; QC, Quebec; NB, New Brunswick; NS, Nova Scotia; Black spruce: NL, Labrador; MB, Manitoba.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-14-1272362-g001.tif"/>
</fig>
<table-wrap id="T1" position="float">
<label>Table&#xa0;1</label>
<caption>
<p>Red spruce and black spruce populations sampled and their geographic locations.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" rowspan="2" align="center">Population<break/>ID</th>
<th valign="middle" rowspan="2" align="center">Region</th>
<th valign="middle" rowspan="2" align="center">Location</th>
<th valign="middle" colspan="2" align="center">Geographic coordinates</th>
<th valign="middle" rowspan="2" align="center">Elevation (m)</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Latitude</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Longitude</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<th valign="top" colspan="6" align="left">Red spruce populations</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="center">TN</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">SRS</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Mt. Clingmans Dome, Great Smoky Mountains National Park, Tennessee</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">35&#x2da;35&#x2019;N</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">083&#x2da;28&#x2019;W</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">800 m</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="center">WV</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">SRS</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Gaudineer Knob, Monongahela National Forest, West Virginia</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">38&#x2da;38&#x2019;N</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">079&#x2da;50&#x2019;W</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1242 m</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="center">NY</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">SRS</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Mt. Rusk, Catskill Forest Preserve, New York</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">42&#x2da;12&#x2019; N</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">074&#x2da;16&#x2019;W</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1100 m</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="center">NH</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">NRS</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Andorra Forest, New Hampshire</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">43&#x2da;05&#x2019;N</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">072&#x2da;07&#x2019;W</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">360 m</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="center">ME</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">NRS</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Pittston Farm, Maine</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">45&#x2da;45&#x2019;N</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">069&#x2da;45&#x2019;W</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">n/a</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="center">QC</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">NRS</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Lac Moreau, Quebec</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">47&#x2da;54&#x2019;N</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">068&#x2da;51&#x2019;W</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">330 m</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="center">NB</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">NRS</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Loch Alva Lake, New Brunswick</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">45&#x2da;16&#x2019;N</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">066&#x2da;18&#x2019;W</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">150 m</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="center">NS</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">NRS</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Abraham Lake, Nova Scotia</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">45&#x2da;10&#x2019;N</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">062&#x2da;37&#x2019;W</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">196 m</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="top" colspan="6" align="left">Black spruce populations</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="center">MB</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">BS</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Pine Falls, Manitoba</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">50&#x2da;41&#x2019;N</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">095&#x2da;54&#x2019;W</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">274 m</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="center">NL</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">BS</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">Goose Bay, Labrador</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">53&#x2da;17&#x2019;N</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">060&#x2da;25&#x2019;W</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">n/a</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn>
<p>Red spruce populations were divided into southern (SRS) and northern (NRS) groups on the basis of their geographic location, UPGMA, and Bayesian genetic clustering.</p>
</fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<p>The sample size of 60 individuals per population allowed us to capture most allelic diversity in red spruce populations, both in the evolutionary young northern and older southern populations (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">Bashalkhanov et&#xa0;al., 2009</xref>). A minimum sample size of 57 individuals was recommended to detect all alleles with the threshold frequency of 0.09 with a 95% probability (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">Gillet, 1999</xref>).</p>
<p>To estimate the possible effects of introgressive hybridization of <italic>P. rubens</italic> with <italic>P. mariana</italic> in the sympatric zone and to understand evolutionary relationships between these species, two pure black spruce populations were included in the analysis: Pine Falls population from Manitoba (MB) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B86">Rajora and Pluhar, 2003</xref>), and Goose Bay population from Labrador (NL) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>; <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">
<bold>Table&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>). The Pine Falls population sample consisted of needles from mature trees, whereas the Goose Bay population was represented by a bulked seed collection. These two populations of <italic>P. mariana</italic> possibly originated from separate glacial refugia, according to the mitochondrial haplotype distribution analysis (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B47">Jaramillo-Correa et&#xa0;al., 2004</xref>).</p>
<p>Foliage samples were collected in plastic bags with 10 g silica gel pouches as desiccant and kept at ambient temperatures in the field. Upon arrival to the lab, the samples were stored at -20&#x2da;C. Genomic DNA was isolated using a high-throughput magnetic fishing protocol (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">Bashalkhanov and Rajora, 2008</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_2">
<title>Microsatellite genotyping</title>
<p>Microsatellite markers targeting the biparentally-inherited nuclear (nu) genome were used to genotype the sampled individuals for various genetic diversity, population genetic structure, and phylogeography analyses.</p>
<p>Expressed Sequence Tag (EST)-based and genomic sequence-based microsatellite markers, previously developed in the Rajora lab for <italic>P. glauca</italic> and <italic>P. mariana</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B94">Shi et&#xa0;al., 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B83">Rajora and Mann, 2021</xref>), were tested for amplification and polymorphism detection in red spruce. Genomic microsatellites had a higher proportion of null alleles. Only one showed the absence of null alleles during preliminary screening and was selected for future analysis. Most EST-based markers yielded good amplification results in <italic>P. rubens</italic>, <italic>P. mariana</italic>, and <italic>P. glauca</italic>. Eight EST-based microsatellites with 2-bp and 3-bp core repeats were selected for subsequent genotyping (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">
<bold>Table&#xa0;2</bold>
</xref>). Mutation rates for 2-bp repeats are normally higher than that for 3-bp and 4-bp repeats (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">Chakraborty et&#xa0;al., 1997</xref>), and they may provide information about the evolutionary processes occurring at different time scales. One of the primers in each pair carried a standard M13 tail sequence to facilitate fluorescent labeling and detection. In total, genotypes of 600 trees were determined for nine microsatellite loci (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">
<bold>Table&#xa0;2</bold>
</xref>; <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1"><bold>Supplementary Data File 1</bold></xref>).</p>
<table-wrap id="T2" position="float">
<label>Table&#xa0;2</label>
<caption>
<p>Microsatellite primers sequences, amplification conditions, amplicon size range, and number of alleles observed in <italic>Picea rubens</italic>.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" rowspan="2" align="center">Locus ID<sup>A</sup>
</th>
<th valign="middle" rowspan="2" align="center">Genebank Accession #</th>
<th valign="middle" rowspan="2" align="center">Primer sequences, 5&#x2019;-3&#x2019;</th>
<th valign="middle" colspan="2" align="center">Amplification conditions</th>
<th valign="middle" rowspan="2" align="center">Repeat motif</th>
<th valign="middle" rowspan="2" align="center">Allele size range<sup>1</sup>
</th>
<th valign="middle" rowspan="2" align="center">Number of alleles<sup>2</sup>
</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="top" align="center">T<sub>A</sub>, &#x2da;C</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">MgCl<sub>2</sub>, mM</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">
<italic>RPGSE03</italic>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">CN480906</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">F:M13*-AGCTAACTGGACTGGGACCTT<break/>R:CCGCACATGATATCCACAAG</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">50</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.5</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">(TTA)<sub>6</sub>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">223-244</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">8</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">
<italic>RPGSE04</italic>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">CK442213</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">F:M13*-CTTGATTTTTGGCGATCGTT<break/>R:GAACCGGAGGAGATGGACTA</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">58</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.8</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">(CCG)<sub>6</sub>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">200-248</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">16</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">
<italic>RPGSE05</italic>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">CK442392</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">F:M13**-CCGATTCAGGCAAGAGAATC<break/>R:TCACTGGCCACAGTTTATCG</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">50</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.5</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">(GAA)<sub>6</sub>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">257-281</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">7</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">
<italic>RPGSE08</italic>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">CK443173</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">F:M13**-TCTCAAGAGAGGACGGAGGA<break/>R:GCATTCTGAGAGCCTTGCTT</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">50</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.5</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">(GAA)<sub>6</sub>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">227-230</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">
<italic>RPGSE10</italic>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">CK441912</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">F:M13*-ATACGTTGGCGTTTCCGTCT<break/>R:TGAGGGCTTATGGACTACGC</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">59.5</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.5</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">(GGA)<sub>6</sub>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">174-231</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">13</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">
<italic>RPGSE29</italic>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">CN480899</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">F:M13*-TGGCTTTTTATTCCAGCAAG<break/>R:GCCAGATTTTGCAAAGTGGA</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">52</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.5</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">(GA)<sub>11</sub>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">241-287</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">23</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">
<italic>RPGSE34</italic>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">CN480905</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">F:M13*-CCAATTTGGTCCAATCTAGCA<break/>R:GGATGTGTTTTGGAGGGTTG</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">50</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.5</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">(GA)<sub>10</sub>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">255-299</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">23</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">
<italic>RPGSE35</italic>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">CN480907</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">F:M13*-TGGCTCTCATCCAGAAAAGAA<break/>R:GGCTGCTCTCTTATCCGTTTT</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">52</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.5</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">(TA)<sub>26</sub>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">151-207</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">25</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">
<italic>RPMSA13</italic>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">KJ847213</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">F:M13*-AACCATGAAACCCTAGCGACT<break/>R:TGAGGACTTAGGCCCACATT</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">53</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.8</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">(GA)<sub>9</sub>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">171-295</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">25</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn>
<p>
<italic>
<sup>A</sup>RPGSE03, RPGSE04, RPGSE05, RPGSE08, RPGSE10, RPGSE29, RPGSE34</italic>, and <italic>RPGSE35</italic> are genic microsatellite markers developed from <italic>Picea glauca</italic> EST sequences (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B83">Rajora and Mann, 2021</xref>). <italic>RPMSA13</italic> is a genomic microsatellite marker developed from AFLP fragment in <italic>Picea mariana</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B94">Shi et&#xa0;al., 2014</xref>).</p>
</fn>
<fn>
<p>*M13F-tail: 5&#x2019;-IRDye700/800-CACGACGTTGTAAAACGAC-3&#x2019;;</p>
</fn>
<fn>
<p>**M13R-tail: 5&#x2019;-IRDye700/800-GGATAACAATTTCACACAGG-3&#x2019;.</p>
</fn>
<fn>
<p>
<sup>1</sup> &#x2013; Amplicon size, <sup>2</sup> &#x2013; Total number of alleles in all populations studied.</p>
</fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<p>Amplification reactions were performed in 10 &#x3bc;l reaction volume with 10 ng template DNA, 0.2 mM dNTP, 1.5-1.8 mM MgCl<sub>2</sub>, 0.25-0.83 pmol of each primer, 0.5 pmol of fluorescent labeled M13 primer (5&#x2019;-IRDye700/800), 1x GoTaq Flexi Clear reaction buffer and 0.25 units of GoTaq Flexi DNA Polymerase (Promega, Madison, WI; Cat # M8295). Thermal cycling profiles were as follows: 2 min at 94&#xb0;C, then 5 cycle touchdown step: 30 s at 94&#xb0;C, 45 s initially at 65&#xb0;C, then touchdown -2&#xb0;C/cycle, 45 s at 72&#xb0;C, followed by 33 cycles each of 30 s at 94&#xb0;C, 45 s at the T<sub>A</sub> (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">
<bold>Table&#xa0;2</bold>
</xref>), 45 s at 72&#xb0;C, and the final extension at 72&#xb0;C for 5 min. The heating and cooling rates in the Eppendorf EP-S thermal cyclers were set to 6&#xb0;C/s and 4.5&#xb0;C/s, respectively.</p>
<p>Amplification products with incorporated fluorescent labels were separated on LiCor 4300 Genetic Analyzers (LiCor, Lincoln, NE). Up to 4 primer pairs were used in multiplex PCR with two loci running in each of the 700 nm and 800 nm IRDye detection channels. A minimum gap of 40 bp was maintained between loci to avoid overlapping of alleles. The gels were scored with SAGA GT/MX 3.3. software, followed by manual data verification. Alleles were designated based on their amplicon sizes.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_3">
<title>Genetic diversity analysis</title>
<p>Raw data were exported to a Microsoft Excel file. Data format conversions were performed with the Microsatellite Toolkit for Microsoft Excel (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B75">Park, 2001</xref>). Data quality for microsatellites was verified by the MICROCHECKER program (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B96">Van Oosterhout et&#xa0;al., 2004</xref>). MICROCHECKER can indicate possible presence of null alleles if there is an overall significant excess of homozygotes, and if it is evenly distributed across the homozygote classes. Then basic genetic diversity parameters, such as the mean number of alleles per locus, allele frequencies, expected and observed heterozygosity values, and the inbreeding coefficient (<italic>F</italic>
<sub>IS</sub>) &#x2013; were calculated using the Microsatellite Toolkit and R (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B89">R Core Team, 2022</xref>). Alleles specific to <italic>P. rubens</italic> and <italic>P. mariana</italic> were counted. The effective number of alleles per locus (A<italic>
<sub>E</sub>
</italic>) was determined as an inverse of expected homozygosity as described in (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B73">O'Connell et&#xa0;al., 2006b</xref>). Latent genetic potential (LGP) and genotypic additivity (richness) (G<sub>A</sub>) were calculated as described in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B87">Rajora et&#xa0;al. (2000b)</xref>. Latent genetic potential (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Bergmann et&#xa0;al., 1990</xref>) provides estimates for the content of rare and low frequency alleles in a population that might contribute to its adaptive potential under the changing environmental conditions. Genotypic additivity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B87">Rajora et&#xa0;al., 2000b</xref>) describes the genotypic diversity in a population. Observed G<sub>A</sub> is the total number of genotypes observed in a population summed over all the loci. The expected G<sub>A</sub> is a sum of the theoretical number of single-locus genotypes in a diploid population. The Shannon&#x2019;s information index (I) was calculated for each population. It has the advantage that it does not assume a population to be in the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium, which may be unlikely in evolutionary young, or highly fragmented populations. One-way ANOVA was used for each genetic diversity measure to test the differences between the allopatric <italic>P. rubens</italic> and <italic>P. mariana</italic> populations, and the red spruce populations from the sympatric zone. Potential deviations from the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium were assessed by Fisher&#x2019;s exact test (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">Guo and Thompson, 1992</xref>) implemented in ARLEQUIN 3.5 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Excoffier and Lischer, 2010</xref>). The Ewens-Watterson neutrality test (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">Ewens, 1972</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B97">Watterson, 1978</xref>) was also carried out using ARLEQUIN 3.5 to examine the possible deviations in the observed genetic variation from the neutral expectations. Tests for possible bottleneck events and isolation by distance were carried out using BOTTLENECK 1.2.02 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B80">Piry et&#xa0;al., 1999</xref>), and IBD 1.52 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">Bohonak, 2002</xref>) programs, respectively. Effective population sizes were estimated through <italic>&#x3b8;</italic> using the maximum likelihood coalescent approach implemented in the MIGRATE 3.0 program (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Beerli, 2008</xref>), assuming the infinite allele mutation model for all markers, and the average mutation rate of 1x10<sup>-3</sup>, which is typical for microsatellite loci (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B92">Schl&#xf6;tterer and Wiehe, 1999</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B62">Marriage et&#xa0;al., 2009</xref>) and has been used in conifers (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B74">Pandey and Rajora, 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B88">Rajora and Zinck, 2021</xref>). General statistical tests were carried out using the R statistical environment (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B89">R Core Team, 2022</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_4">
<title>Population genetic structure analysis</title>
<p>Genetic differentiation between populations was assessed by <italic>G</italic>
<sub>ST</sub> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B69">Nei, 1973</xref>), <italic>F</italic>
<sub>ST</sub> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B99">Weir and Cockerham, 1984</xref>), and <italic>R</italic>
<sub>ST</sub> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B95">Slatkin, 1995</xref>), calculated using the FSTAT 2.9.3 program (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">Goudet, 2001</xref>). Several different approaches were used to determine the gene pool subdivision within red spruce and between red and black spruce. Groupwise <italic>F</italic>
<sub>ST</sub> and Nei&#x2019;s genetic distance (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B68">Nei, 1972</xref>) estimates were determined using the R statistical program (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B89">R Core Team, 2022</xref>) and the ADEgenet package (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B51">Jombart, 2008</xref>). Population group comparisons were made based on various pairwise distance measures, including Nei&#x2019;s genetic distance (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B68">Nei, 1972</xref>), <italic>F</italic>
<sub>ST</sub> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B99">Weir and Cockerham, 1984</xref>), and Nm (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B100">Wright, 1931</xref>). The subdivision between the population groups was further tested by AMOVA using the ARLEQUIN 3.5 program. Bayesian clustering analysis implemented in STRUCTURE 2.3.4 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B81">Pritchard et&#xa0;al., 2000</xref>) was used to infer the population structure with (location prior) and without referring to predefined geographical populations. Tests were run for K=1&#x2013;14, in 10 iterations of 500,000 sweeps, plus 100,000 burn-in sweeps using the admixture and correlated allele frequency models. The number of populations/genetic groups in the data set was estimated using the &#x394;K parameter suggested by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">Evanno et&#xa0;al. (2005)</xref>. Plots of population membership were constructed using CLUMPAK (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B52">Kopelman et&#xa0;al., 2015</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_5">
<title>Phylogenetic and phylogeography analyses</title>
<p>To infer the patterns of the postglacial expansions of red spruce, pairwise Nei&#x2019;s genetic distances (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B68">Nei, 1972</xref>), <italic>F</italic>
<sub>ST</sub>, and &#x3b4;&#x3bc;<sup>2</sup> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">Goldstein et&#xa0;al., 1995</xref>) were calculated using the POPULATIONS 1.2.30 program (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B54">Langella, 1999</xref>) with 1,000 bootstrap replications. <italic>F</italic>
<sub>ST</sub> and standard genetic distances assume the infinite allele mutation model (IAM), and &#x3b4;&#x3bc;<sup>2</sup> is based on the stepwise mutation model (SMM). Unweighted pair group method with arithmetic mean (UPGMA) trees were constructed, and a majority rule consensus tree was produced. UPGMA is not based on any particular evolutionary model, which may be beneficial when the population differentiation is driven by a complex interplay of several factors. Maximum likelihood trees were also constructed with CONTML program from the PHYLIP 3.67 software package (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">Felsenstein, 2004</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_6">
<title>Population evolutionary history and admixture analysis</title>
<p>To assess historical patterns and dynamics of admixture and introgression between red and black spruce approximate Bayesian computation was run using DIYABC 2.1.0 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">Cornuet et&#xa0;al., 2014</xref>). First, a model of divergence from a common ancestor between red spruce and black spruce was compared to the alternative scenarios where either red spruce or black spruce split from one another. Following the finding that the most likely scenario was that the two species split from a common ancestor three possible divergence scenarios were tested: 1.) an ancestral model where all three populations diverged from a common ancestor (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;2B</bold>
</xref>), 2.) a hierarchical model where black and red spruce diverged from a common ancestor and the admixed population diverged from black spruce (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;2C</bold>
</xref>), and 3.) an admixture model where red and black spruce diverged from a common ancestor and the admixture population resulted from geneflow between the red and black spruce populations following divergence (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;2D</bold>
</xref>). Red and black spruce populations were grouped based on their geographic location and Structure analysis, representing southern red spruce (TN, WV, NY), black spruce (NL and MB), and sympatric northern red spruce (NH, ME, QC, NB, NS). Relative posterior probabilities were computed to provide statistical support to select the most likely scenario. 1,000,000 simulations were performed, and the most likely scenario was evaluated by comparing the posterior probabilities using logistic regression on 1% of simulated datasets closest to the observed data. Following selection of the most likely scenario, parameters were estimated including effective population size and number of generations since divergence and admixture. We used 29 years as the selected generation time based on <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Capblancq et&#xa0;al. (2020)</xref> to extrapolate to number of years since divergence. Scenarios were assessed using principal components analysis comparing deviations of the summary statistics of the posterior predictive distribution to the observed data. In addition to the pooled population samples, we selected six groupings of individual populations to test individually. The groupings included all three southern individual red spruce populations (NY, WV, TN), one admixed population (NB), and MB or NL black spruce populations (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Supplementary Figure S1</bold>
</xref>). We estimated relative posterior probabilities and assessed their fit as outlined above. Following model selection, we estimated the scenario parameters.</p>
<fig id="f2" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;2</label>
<caption>
<p>
<bold>(A)</bold> Bar plot estimation of the membership coefficient (Q) for each spruce individual grouped on the geographic location. The figure is shown for K = 2 through 5, under the admixture model. The Evanno method (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">Evanno et&#xa0;al., 2005</xref>) suggested K=2 as the optimal clustering level (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Figure S2</bold>
</xref>). At K = 2 the split is between red and black spruce. K = 3 was selected as the sub-structure grouping level based on the Evano method (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Figure S3</bold>
</xref>). Red spruce populations: Tennessee, West Virginia, New York, New Hampshire, Maine, Quebec, New Brunswick, Nova Scotia. Black spruce: Labrador, Manitoba. Allopatric southern red spruce populations from Tennessee, West Virginia, and New York are well defined, while the northern populations show high degree of admixture. Note the presence of genotypes similar to red spruce lineages in &#x201c;pure&#x201d; black spruce population from Labrador. Historical patterns of admixture and introgression between red and black spruce were assessed using approximate Bayesian computation. Tested divergence scenarios included: <bold>(B)</bold> an admixture model where red and black spruce diverged from a common ancestor and the admixture population resulted from geneflow between the red and black spruce populations following divergence, <bold>(C)</bold> an ancestral model where all three populations diverged from a common ancestor, and <bold>(D)</bold> a hierarchical model where black and red spruce diverged from a common ancestor. The three populations tested include Southern Red Spruce (SRS) &#x2013; blue line, Northern Red Spruce (NRS) &#x2013; red line, and Black Spruce (BS) &#x2013; green line. <bold>(D)</bold> NA = starting effective population size, T2 = divergence time (in generations) from most recent common ancestor, T1 = time (in generations) of admixture event, ra = gene flow rate from red spruce, and 1-ra is gene flow rate from black spruce. Relative posterior probabilities were computed to provide statistical support to select the most likely scenario. 1,000,000 simulations were performed, and the most likely scenario was evaluated by comparing the posterior probabilities using logistic regression on 1% of simulated datasets closest to the observed data.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-14-1272362-g002.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s3" sec-type="results">
<title>Results</title>
<sec id="s3_1">
<title>Allele composition and genetic diversity</title>
<p>Nuclear microsatellites with different core repeat sizes demonstrated contrasting patterns of molecular variation. Microsatellite markers with dinucleotide repeats had higher genetic variability (A=22.5) than the markers with trinucleotide repeats (A=7.8). This is consistent with the previously documented lower mutation rates in trinucleotide repeats lower than dinucleotide repeats (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">Chakraborty et&#xa0;al., 1997</xref>).</p>
<p>Overall, 139 alleles were detected at the nine nuclear SSR loci (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Table S1</bold>
</xref>). Out of those, 36 alleles were specific to red spruce, and 10 were specific to black spruce (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Table S1</bold>
</xref>). Allopatric populations of <italic>P. rubens</italic> and <italic>P. mariana</italic> had different distribution of allele frequencies (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Table S1</bold>
</xref>). For example, at the locus <italic>RPGSE03</italic>, allele 229 was the most common (frequency 0.66&#x2013;1.00) in red spruce, whereas in black spruce it showed low frequency (0.09&#x2013;0.11). On the other hand, alleles 232 and 238 at <italic>RPGSE03</italic> were common in black spruce but were absent in the southern allopatric red spruce populations and occurred at lower frequencies in the sympatric red spruce populations. The allele 198 at <italic>RPGSE10</italic> was common in black spruce (frequency 0.37&#x2013;0.48), but rare in southern red spruce. Overall, frequencies of 16 alleles demonstrated significant correlation with latitude in red spruce populations (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Table S1</bold>
</xref>): 7 out of 39 alleles in microsatellite loci with 3-bp core repeat units, and 9 out of 90 alleles in microsatellites with 2-bp repeats. A highly significant positive correlation between the pairwise <italic>F</italic>
<sub>ST</sub> values and geographic distances among the 8 red spruce populations was observed for trinucleotide nuclear repeats (Mantel test <italic>r</italic>=0.74, <italic>p</italic>=0.001). This may be related to the increasing proportion of the black spruce alleles in the northern populations of <italic>P. rubens</italic>, rather than true isolation by distance. Once the loci <italic>RPGSE03</italic> and <italic>RPGSE10</italic> were removed from the analysis, the correlation between <italic>F</italic>
<sub>ST</sub> and geographic distance was no longer significant. Dinucleotide microsatellites had high numbers of low frequency alleles having limited effect on the observed <italic>F</italic>
<sub>ST</sub> values, thus they did not show significant isolation by distance in red spruce.</p>
<p>Observed (H<sub>O</sub>) and expected (H<sub>E</sub>) heterozygosity in red spruce populations varied between 0.36&#x2013;0.44 and 0.49&#x2013;0.62, respectively (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">
<bold>Table&#xa0;3</bold>
</xref>). Moderate to significant heterozygote deficiency was detected in all populations, with average <italic>F</italic>
<sub>IS</sub>=0.256, which is significantly higher than that previously reported for allozyme markers in red spruce (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">Hawley and DeHayes, 1994</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B85">Rajora et&#xa0;al., 2000a</xref>). Populations from Maine, Quebec, and New Brunswick had <italic>F</italic>
<sub>IS</sub> of 0.318, 0.340, and 0.299, respectively (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">
<bold>Table&#xa0;3</bold>
</xref>). Wilcoxon&#x2019;s rank test under the infinite allele mutation model (IAM) indicated an excess of heterozygotes in populations from New Hampshire and Quebec. However, with the limited number of loci employed, heterozygosity was a poor estimator of genome-wide inbreeding (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Balloux et&#xa0;al., 2004</xref>). Significant deviations from the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium were observed in all populations of red spruce, and they were more pronounced in the northern part of the species&#x2019; range (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Table S2</bold>
</xref>). Ewens-Watterson neutrality test did not reveal any significant evidence for selection (lowest <italic>p</italic>-value ~0.78).</p>
<table-wrap id="T3" position="float">
<label>Table&#xa0;3</label>
<caption>
<p>Population genetic diversity parameters in 8 red and 2 black spruce populations.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" align="left">Population</th>
<th valign="middle" align="right">A<sub>T</sub>
</th>
<th valign="middle" align="right">A (SE)</th>
<th valign="middle" align="right">A<sub>E</sub>
</th>
<th valign="middle" align="right">H<sub>E</sub> (SD)</th>
<th valign="middle" align="right">H<sub>O</sub> (SD)</th>
<th valign="middle" align="right">
<italic>F</italic>
<sub>IS</sub>
</th>
<th valign="middle" align="right">LGP</th>
<th valign="middle" align="right">G<sub>A</sub>(O)</th>
<th valign="middle" align="right">G<sub>A</sub>(E)</th>
<th valign="middle" align="right">I</th>
<th valign="middle" align="right">
<italic>N<sub>e</sub>
</italic>
</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">TN</td>
<td valign="top" align="right">63</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="right">7.00 (1.67)</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="right">1.95</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="right">0.487 (0.129)</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="right">0.437 (0.022)</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="right">0.104</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="right">58.35</td>
<td valign="top" align="right">127</td>
<td valign="top" align="right">352</td>
<td valign="top" align="right">1.120</td>
<td valign="top" align="right">364</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">WV</td>
<td valign="top" align="right">64</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="right">7.11 (1.78)</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="right">2.06</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="right">0.515 (0.132)</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="right">0.381 (0.021)</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="right">0.261</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="right">59.59</td>
<td valign="top" align="right">128</td>
<td valign="top" align="right">373</td>
<td valign="top" align="right">1.172</td>
<td valign="top" align="right">332</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">NY</td>
<td valign="top" align="right">60</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="right">6.67 (1.12)</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="right">2.00</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="right">0.500 (0.097)</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="right">0.376 (0.023)</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="right">0.251</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="right">55.45</td>
<td valign="top" align="right">96</td>
<td valign="top" align="right">275</td>
<td valign="top" align="right">1.050</td>
<td valign="top" align="right">326</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">NH</td>
<td valign="top" align="right">57</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="right">6.33 (1.39)</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="right">2.07</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="right">0.517 (0.113)</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="right">0.394 (0.021)</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="right">0.240</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="right">52.62</td>
<td valign="top" align="right">111</td>
<td valign="top" align="right">279</td>
<td valign="top" align="right">1.113</td>
<td valign="top" align="right">294</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">ME</td>
<td valign="top" align="right">69</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="right">7.67 (1.66)</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="right">2.27</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="right">0.560 (0.111)</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="right">0.383 (0.022)</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="right">0.318</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="right">64.99</td>
<td valign="top" align="right">129</td>
<td valign="top" align="right">398</td>
<td valign="top" align="right">1.261</td>
<td valign="top" align="right">346</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">QC</td>
<td valign="top" align="right">81</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="right">9.00 (1.91)</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="right">2.66</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="right">0.624 (0.103)</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="right">0.413 (0.021)</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="right">0.340</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="right">77.57</td>
<td valign="top" align="right">155</td>
<td valign="top" align="right">536</td>
<td valign="top" align="right">1.435</td>
<td valign="top" align="right">409</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">NB</td>
<td valign="top" align="right">69</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="right">7.67 (1.82)</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="right">2.07</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="right">0.517 (0.104)</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="right">0.363 (0.021)</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="right">0.299</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="right">64.61</td>
<td valign="top" align="right">117</td>
<td valign="top" align="right">418</td>
<td valign="top" align="right">1.166</td>
<td valign="top" align="right">340</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">NS</td>
<td valign="top" align="right">68</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="right">7.56 (1.56)</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="right">2.17</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="right">0.539 (0.104)</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="right">0.422 (0.022)</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="right">0.217</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="right">63.80</td>
<td valign="top" align="right">123</td>
<td valign="top" align="right">378</td>
<td valign="top" align="right">1.199</td>
<td valign="top" align="right">405</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">NL</td>
<td valign="top" align="right">85</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="right">9.44 (1.96)</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="right">2.45</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="right">0.591 (0.109)</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="right">0.406 (0.022)</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="right">0.316</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="right">81.27</td>
<td valign="top" align="right">161</td>
<td valign="top" align="right">581</td>
<td valign="top" align="right">1.440</td>
<td valign="top" align="right">394</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">MB</td>
<td valign="top" align="right">83</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="right">9.22 (1.96)</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="right">2.53</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="right">0.604 (0.103)</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="right">0.478 (0.022)</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="right">0.209</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="right">79.39</td>
<td valign="top" align="right">163</td>
<td valign="top" align="right">563</td>
<td valign="top" align="right">1.428</td>
<td valign="top" align="right">442</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">SRS</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">61A</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">6.81A</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">2.03A</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">0.506A</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">0.404A</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">0.202A</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">57A</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">122A</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">335A</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">1.135A</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">330A</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">NRS</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">69A</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">7.71A</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">2.23A</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">0.548A</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">0.391A</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">0.285A</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">65A</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">124A</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">401A</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">1.222A</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">365A</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">
<italic>p</italic>
<sub>SRS-NRS</sub>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">0.140</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">0.138</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">0.235</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">0.208</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">0.536</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">0.125</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">0.141</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">0.886</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">0.307</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">0.348</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">0.248</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">RS</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">66B</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">7.38B</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">2.16A</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">0.532A</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">0.396A</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">0.254A</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">62B</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">123B</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">376B</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">1.190B</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">352A</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">BS</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">84A</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">9.33A</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">2.49A</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">0.597A</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">0.442A</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">0.263A</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">80A</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">162A</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">572A</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">1.434A</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">418A</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">
<italic>p</italic>
<sub>RS-BS</sub>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">
<bold>0.012</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">
<bold>0.012</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">0.087</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">0.076</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">0.088</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">0.884</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">
<bold>0.013</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">
<bold>0.015</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">
<bold>0.013</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">
<bold>0.023</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="right">0.063</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn>
<p>A<sub>T</sub>, total number of alleles for all loci; A, mean number of alleles; A<sub>E</sub>, effective number of alleles per locus; LGP, latent genetic potential; G<sub>A</sub>(O), observed number of genotypes (genotypic additivity); G<sub>A</sub>(E), expected genotypic additivity; I, Shannon&#x2019;s information index; <italic>Ne</italic>, effective population size inferred from coalescent &#x3b8; estimates. Population groups: SRS, Southern populations of <italic>Picea rubens</italic> (according to the Structure Analysis): TN, WV, and NY; NRS, Northern populations of <italic>Picea rubens</italic>: NH, ME, QC, NB, and NS; RS, All populations of red spruce; BS, All populations of <italic>Picea mariana</italic>: NL, and MB. Individual population names are listed in <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">
<bold>Table&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>. p-values are given for one-way ANOVA among the corresponding population groups. Bold p values are significant at 95% confidence. Duncan means separation test at &#x3b1;=0.05 was done on the same groups.</p>
</fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<p>Observed and expected heterozygosity and inbreeding coefficients were similar among <italic>P. rubens</italic> and <italic>P. mariana</italic>, but allelic richness, latent genetic potential, genotypic additivity, and Shannon diversity indices were significantly higher in black spruce. The northern red spruce populations had higher allelic and genotypic genetic diversity and <italic>N<sub>e</sub>
</italic> (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">
<bold>Table&#xa0;3</bold>
</xref>). However, the differences in genetic diversity levels and <italic>N<sub>e</sub>
</italic> were not statistically significant between the northern and southern red spruce (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">
<bold>Table&#xa0;3</bold>
</xref>). The two populations from NY and NH had the lowest latent genetic potential values.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_2">
<title>Population genetic structure and phylogeography</title>
<p>Microsatellite markers indicated moderate levels of genetic differentiation between the red spruce populations: total multilocus <italic>F</italic>
<sub>ST</sub> 8.5%, <italic>R</italic>
<sub>ST</sub> 6.6% for all microsatellite loci, and <italic>F</italic>
<sub>ST</sub> 10.0%, <italic>R</italic>
<sub>ST</sub> 8.5% for dinucleotide repeats, and <italic>F</italic>
<sub>ST</sub> 5.8%, <italic>R</italic>
<sub>ST</sub> 4.9% for trinucleotide repeats loci. Earlier studies based on allozyme markers reported <italic>G</italic>
<sub>ST</sub> of 7.5% (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">Hawley and DeHayes, 1994</xref>), and <italic>F</italic>
<sub>ST</sub> of 4.7% (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B85">Rajora et&#xa0;al., 2000a</xref>).</p>
<p>Bayesian clustering carried out using STRUCTURE 2.3.4. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B81">Pritchard et&#xa0;al., 2000</xref>) and assessed using the Evano method (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">Evanno et&#xa0;al., 2005</xref>) suggested 2 major clusters based on the admixture model using both location prior (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;2A</bold>
</xref>, <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Figure S2</bold>
</xref>) and no location prior (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Figure S3</bold>
</xref>; <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Figure S4</bold>
</xref>) models. Two minor peaks were also suggested at K=3 and K=4 (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Figures S2</bold>
</xref>, <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>S3</bold>
</xref>) indicating genetic substructure within the sampled populations. At K=2, the split is between red and black spruce, as expected (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;2A</bold>
</xref>, <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Figure S4</bold>
</xref>), and K=3 agrees with partitioning of populations between SRS, NRS, and BS (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;2A</bold>
</xref>). The pure red spruce populations TN, WV and NY were consistently closely related, with both WV and NY sharing closer ancestry with TN. Five populations showed some level of increased admixture from BS including NH, ME, QC, NB, and NS. Pure <italic>P. mariana</italic> from NL and MB also were in good agreement. The &#x201c;pure&#x201d; black spruce from NL had some admixed red spruce lineages.</p>
<p>The UPGMA tree based on the Nei&#x2019;s standard genetic distances (IAM model implied) was generally consistent with the geographic distribution of the sampled populations and formed four clusters: southern populations from TN and WV, along with NH; northern NB and NS, plus NY; ME and QC; and the two pure black spruce populations of NL and MB (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;3</bold>
</xref>). SMM-based methods demonstrated poor resolution and absence of concordance with spatial distances. Northern red spruce populations share a significant proportion of black spruce alleles (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Table S1</bold>
</xref>) as a possible result of previously documented introgressive hybridization (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B77">Perron and Bousquet, 1997</xref>), which leads to biased <italic>R</italic>
<sub>ST</sub> and &#x3b4;&#x3bc;<sup>2</sup> estimates. Maximum likelihood trees generally confirmed the UPGMA clustering pattern, although bootstrap support among red spruce populations was weak (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Figure S5</bold>
</xref>). The Maine and Quebec populations were found to be genetically closer to <italic>P. mariana</italic>. Both populations are located in the middle of the introgression zone (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B77">Perron and Bousquet, 1997</xref>), and a higher proportion of black spruce alleles may be expected. Heterozygote deficiency in those two populations is probably related to the distribution of allele frequencies in hybrid populations leading to elevated H<sub>E</sub>, rather than actual inbreeding or sampling bias as the differences in H<sub>O</sub> are not statistically significant from other populations. An old-growth red spruce population from New Brunswick has similar excess of H<sub>E</sub>. Groupwise AMOVA indicated that 3.40% of the genetic variation was between the northern and southern red spruce population groups, 3.47% among populations within groups and 93.13% within populations. This partition of the genetic variation was statistically significant (<italic>P</italic>=0.000 to 0.015). Pairwise genetic sub-division estimates indicate noticeable differentiation among the northern and southern populations of red spruce. At the same time, genetic differentiation between red and black spruce is significantly higher than the within-species subdivision (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T4">
<bold>Table&#xa0;4</bold>
</xref>).</p>
<fig id="f3" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;3</label>
<caption>
<p>An unweighted pair group method with arithmetic mean (UPGMA) cluster plot of 8 red spruce and 2 black spruce populations based on <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B68">Nei (1972)</xref> genetic distance for microsatellite markers. Population names and locations are provided in <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">
<bold>Table&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>. Bootstrap support values are given for 1000 replications. Red spruce populations: TN &#x2013; Tennessee, WV, West Virginia; NH, New Hampshire; NY , New York,; ME, Maine; QC, Quebec; NB, New Brunswick; NS, Nova Scotia. Black spruce: NL, Labrador; MB, Manitoba.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-14-1272362-g003.tif"/>
</fig>
<table-wrap id="T4" position="float">
<label>Table&#xa0;4</label>
<caption>
<p>Pairwise genetic subdivision estimates between and within population groups.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="top" align="center">Groups</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">Nei GD</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">
<italic>F</italic>
<sub>ST</sub>
</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">Nm</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">SRS&#x2013;NRS</td>
<td valign="top" align="right">0.127 (0.084-0.213)</td>
<td valign="top" align="right">0.038</td>
<td valign="top" align="right">6.381</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">SRS&#x2013;BS</td>
<td valign="top" align="right">0.381 (0.277-0.469)</td>
<td valign="top" align="right">0.171</td>
<td valign="top" align="right">1.210</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">NRS&#x2013;BS</td>
<td valign="top" align="right">0.351 (0.224-0.585)</td>
<td valign="top" align="right">0.124</td>
<td valign="top" align="right">1.771</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">NRS&#x2013;NRS</td>
<td valign="top" align="right">0.142 (0.037-0.289)</td>
<td valign="top" align="right">0.089</td>
<td valign="top" align="right">2.559</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">SRS&#x2013;SRS</td>
<td valign="top" align="right">0.064 (0.045-0.083)</td>
<td valign="top" align="right">0.048</td>
<td valign="top" align="right">4.958</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">RS&#x2013;RS</td>
<td valign="top" align="right">0.126 (0.037-0.289)</td>
<td valign="top" align="right">0.085</td>
<td valign="top" align="right">2.691</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">RS&#x2013;BS</td>
<td valign="top" align="right">0.362 (0.224-0.585)</td>
<td valign="top" align="right">0.135</td>
<td valign="top" align="right">1.596</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">BS&#x2013;BS</td>
<td valign="top" align="right">0.159</td>
<td valign="top" align="right">0.081</td>
<td valign="top" align="right">2.836</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn>
<p>Nei GD&#x2013; pairwise <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B68">Nei (1972)</xref> genetic distances and range within and between population groups of <italic>Picea rubens</italic> and <italic>Picea mariana</italic>. <italic>F</italic>
<sub>ST</sub> &#x2013; groupwise <italic>F</italic>
<sub>ST</sub> estimates. Nm &#x2013; gene flow (Nm=(1/<italic>F</italic>
<sub>ST</sub>-1)/4) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B100">Wright, 1931</xref>). Population groups: SRS &#x2013; Southern populations of <italic>Picea rubens</italic> TN, WV, and NY; NRS &#x2013; Northern populations of <italic>Picea rubens</italic>: NH, ME, QC, NB, and NS; RS &#x2013; All populations of red spruce; BS &#x2013; All populations of <italic>Picea mariana</italic>: NL, and MB.</p>
</fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<p>Approximate Bayesian computation identified the admixture model as the most likely scenario based on its higher posterior probability (0.8863) compared to the hierarchical split (0.0353) and divergence from a common ancestor scenario (0.0784) (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Figure S6</bold>
</xref>). Model checking indicated that the admixture scenario fits well with the data as indicated by the observed data centering on the cluster of posterior predictive distribution in the PCA (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Figure S7</bold>
</xref>). Values of effective population size based on the estimates of posterior distributions of parameters suggest that red spruce and black spruce expanded from an ancestral population to their current populations 4290 generations ago. An admixture event occurred around 343 generations ago (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T5">
<bold>Table&#xa0;5</bold>
</xref>). At an assumed generation time of 29 years (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Capblancq et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>) the admixture event occurred following the LGM approximately 9,947 ybp. The admixture rates of both red and black spruce with the admixed population are 0.66 and 0.34 respectively. DIYABC does not consider geneflow following divergence, rather only admixture. Because there is pronounced substructure (based on Structure analysis) between SRS, NRS, and BS and genetic differentiation we are reasonably confident in our ability to assess our scenarios using approximate Bayesian computation. Assessment of individual populations resulted in similar results, with the admixture scenario identified as the most likely model among the six population groupings and the admixture event occurring between 218-1890 generations ago depending on the population combinations compared (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Table S5</bold>
</xref>; <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Figure S1</bold>
</xref>).</p>
<table-wrap id="T5" position="float">
<label>Table&#xa0;5</label>
<caption>
<p>Parameter estimates from approximate Bayesian computation admixture scenario.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="top" align="left">
</th>
<th valign="top" align="left">Parameter</th>
<th valign="top" align="left">Mean</th>
<th valign="top" align="left">Median</th>
<th valign="top" align="left">Mode</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">SRS</td>
<td valign="top" align="right">
<italic>N<sub>e</sub>1</italic>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="right">4440.00</td>
<td valign="top" align="right">4220.00</td>
<td valign="top" align="right">3360.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">BS</td>
<td valign="top" align="right">
<italic>N<sub>e</sub>2</italic>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="right">5750.00</td>
<td valign="top" align="right">5670.00</td>
<td valign="top" align="right">5470.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">NRS</td>
<td valign="top" align="right">
<italic>N<sub>e</sub>3</italic>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="right">6960.00</td>
<td valign="top" align="right">7150.00</td>
<td valign="top" align="right">7930.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Admix</td>
<td valign="top" align="right">
<italic>t1</italic>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="right">343.00</td>
<td valign="top" align="right">246.00</td>
<td valign="top" align="right">186.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">RS Admixture Rate</td>
<td valign="top" align="right">
<italic>Ra</italic>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="right">0.66</td>
<td valign="top" align="right">0.69</td>
<td valign="top" align="right">0.66</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">BS Admixture Rate</td>
<td valign="top" align="right">
<italic>1-ra</italic>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="right">0.34</td>
<td valign="top" align="right">0.31</td>
<td valign="top" align="right">0.34</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">MRCA</td>
<td valign="top" align="right">
<italic>t2</italic>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="right">4290.00</td>
<td valign="top" align="right">3860.00</td>
<td valign="top" align="right">3050.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="right"/>
<td valign="top" align="right">
<italic>NA</italic>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="right">1800.00</td>
<td valign="top" align="right">1030.00</td>
<td valign="top" align="right">88.30</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn>
<p>N<sub>e</sub>1, effective population size of SRS; N<sub>e</sub>2, effective population size of BS; N<sub>e</sub>3, effective population size of NRS. NA, starting effective population size; t2, divergence time (in generations) from most recent common ancestor; t1, time (in generations) of admixture event; ra, gene flow rate from red spruce; and 1-ra is the gene flow rate from black spruce. Generation time is assumed to be 29 years. MRCA, most recent common ancestor.</p>
</fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s4" sec-type="discussion">
<title>Discussion</title>
<sec id="s4_1">
<title>Genetic diversity of red spruce</title>
<p>Our results suggest that red spruce has moderate levels of genetic variation. It may be difficult to compare genetic diversity estimates obtained from microsatellite with that obtained from allozyme markers due to the inherently different mutation rates (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">Avise, 2004</xref>). Nevertheless, microsatellite genetic diversity levels were about 4-5 times higher than that of allozyme genetic diversity levels reported in red spruce (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T6">
<bold>Table&#xa0;6</bold>
</xref>). Microsatellite allelic diversity observed in red spruce populations (A=6.3&#x2013;9.0, average 7.4) was like that documented in Sitka spruce-<italic>Picea sitchensis</italic> (A=5.7&#x2013;10.0, average 7.7 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B66">Mimura and Aitken, 2007</xref>), and sympatric white spruce, <italic>Picea glauca</italic> (average A=6.83) based on EST microsatellites (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Fageria and Rajora, 2013</xref>) but lower than observed in this species based on genomic (A=16.38; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B84">Rajora et&#xa0;al., 2005</xref>) or genomic and EST microsatellites (average A=11.38; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Fageria and Rajora, 2013</xref>) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T6">
<bold>Table&#xa0;6</bold>
</xref>) and <italic>P. mariana</italic> (A=9.22-9.44; this study &#x2013; <xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">
<bold>Table&#xa0;3</bold>
</xref>). There is variation in mutation rates among different microsatellite loci resulting in different levels of genetic variation revealed by these loci, which makes study-to-study comparisons difficult. In our study, genetic diversity estimates for <italic>P. rubens</italic> and <italic>P. mariana</italic> populations were obtained using the same set of microsatellite markers. Our study suggests that red spruce has lower allelic diversity, latent genetic potential, expected and observed genotypic richness than black spruce for the same microsatellite markers (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">
<bold>Table&#xa0;3</bold>
</xref>). However, the genetic diversity observed in red spruce in our study was similar to that reported for transcontinental white spruce based on six EST microsatellites (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Fageria and Rajora, 2013</xref>), three of which were the same as we used in our study. Because eight of the nine microsatellite markers we used in our study were EST microsatellites, a comparison with the results obtained from EST microsatellites is more valid than from genomic microsatellites as genetic diversity at EST microsatellites is much lower than at genomic microsatellites (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Fageria and Rajora, 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Fageria and Rajora, 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B82">Rajora et&#xa0;al., 2023</xref>).</p>
<table-wrap id="T6" position="float">
<label>Table&#xa0;6</label>
<caption>
<p>Genetic diversity and fixation index (<italic>F</italic>) estimates in representative <italic>Picea</italic> species with endemic or regional (R) and widespread or transcontinental (T) distribution.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Species</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">Distribution</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">A</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">H<sub>O</sub>
</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">H<sub>E</sub>
</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">
<italic>F</italic>
</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Marker system</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Reference</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">
<italic>P. rubens</italic>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">R</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="right">1.60</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="right">0.097</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="right">0.100</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="right">0.030</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">Allozymes</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">(<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B85">Rajora et&#xa0;al., 2000a</xref>)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">
<italic>P. rubens</italic>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">R</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="right">1.6</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="right">0.091</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="right">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="right">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">Allozymes</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">(<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Eckert, 1989</xref>)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">
<italic>P. rubens</italic>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">R</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="right">2.4</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="right">0.078</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="right">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="right">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">Allozymes</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">(<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B64">McLaughlin et&#xa0;al., 1993</xref>)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">
<italic>P. rubens</italic>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">R</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="right">1.47</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="right">0.075</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="right">0.079</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="right">0.051</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">Allozymes</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">(<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">Hawley and DeHayes, 1994</xref>)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">
<italic>P. martinezii</italic>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">R</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="right">1.39</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="right">0.104</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="right">0.111</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="right">0.063</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">Allozymes</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">(<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B56">Ledig et&#xa0;al., 2000</xref>)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">
<italic>P. omorika</italic>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">R</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="right">1.50</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="right">0.073</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="right">0.067</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="right">-0.090</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">Allozymes</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">(<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">Ballian et&#xa0;al., 2006</xref>)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">
<italic>P. obovata</italic>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">T</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="right">2.91</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="right">0.161</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="right">0.168</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="right">0.042</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">Allozymes</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">(<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B53">Kravchenko et&#xa0;al., 2008</xref>)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">
<italic>P. mariana</italic>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">T</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="right">2.52</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="right">0.222</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="right">0.308</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="right">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">Allozymes</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">(<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B86">Rajora and Pluhar, 2003</xref>)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">
<italic>P. mariana</italic>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">T</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="right">2.70</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="right">0.339</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="right">0.300</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="right">-0.130</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">Allozymes</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">(<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">Isabel et&#xa0;al., 1995</xref>)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">
<italic>P. glauca</italic>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">T</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="right">3.03</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="right">0.342</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="right">0.344</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="right">0.006</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">Allozymes</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">(<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B73">O'Connell et&#xa0;al., 2006b</xref>)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">
<italic>P. rubens</italic>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">R</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="right">1.60</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="right">0.069</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="right">0.077</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="right">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">c-DNA STS</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">(<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B79">Perron et&#xa0;al., 2000</xref>)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">
<italic>P. mariana</italic>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">T</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="right">2.00</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="right">0.103</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="right">0.122</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="right">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">c-DNA STS</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">(<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B79">Perron et&#xa0;al., 2000</xref>)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">
<italic>P. mariana</italic>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">T</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="right">7.6</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="right">0.430</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="right">0.590</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left"/>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">SSR (EST)</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">(<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B83">Rajora and Mann, 2021</xref>)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">
<italic>P. mariana</italic>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">T</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="right">9.38</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="right">0.401</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="right">0.609</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="right">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">SSR (genomic)</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">(<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B94">Shi et&#xa0;al., 2014</xref>)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">
<italic>P. rubens</italic>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">R</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="right">6.20</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="right">0.381</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="right">0.618</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="right">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">SSR (genomic)</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">(<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B94">Shi et&#xa0;al., 2014</xref>)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">
<italic>P. glauca</italic>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">T</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="right">16.38</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="right">0.649</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="right">0.851</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="right">0.237</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">SSR (genomic)</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">(<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B84">Rajora et&#xa0;al., 2005</xref>)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">
<italic>P. glauca</italic>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">T</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="right">11.38</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="right">0.529</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="right">0.655</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="right">0.177</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">SSR (EST+genomic)</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">(<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Fageria and Rajora, 2013</xref>)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">
<italic>P.glauca</italic>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">T</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="right">6.83</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="right">0.412</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="right">0.488</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="right">0.147</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">SSR (EST)</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">(<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Fageria and Rajora, 2013</xref>)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">
<italic>P. glauca</italic>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">T</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="right">10.57</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="right">0.490</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="right">0.637</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="right">0.210</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">SSR (EST+ genomic)</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">(<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Fageria and Rajora, 2014</xref>)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">
<italic>P. glauca</italic>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">T</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="right">9.18</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="right">0.470</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="right">0.648</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="right">0.292</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">SSR (EST+genomic)</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">(<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B82">Rajora et&#xa0;al., 2023</xref>)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">
<italic>P. abies</italic>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">T</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="right">15.14</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="right">0.494</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="right">0.634</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="right">0.221</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">SSR</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">(<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B65">Meloni et&#xa0;al., 2007</xref>)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">
<italic>P. sitchensis</italic>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">R</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="right">7.70</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="right">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="right">0.678</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="right">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">SSR (genomic)</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">(<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B66">Mimura and Aitken, 2007</xref>)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">
<italic>P. mariana</italic>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">T</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="right">9.33</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="right">0.442</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="right">0.597</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="right">0.260</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">SSR</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">Present study</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">
<italic>P. rubens</italic>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">R</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="right">7.38</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="right">0.396</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="right">0.532</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="right">0.256</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">SSR</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">Present study</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">
<italic>P. rubens*</italic>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">R</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="right">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="right">0.008</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="right">0.094</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="right">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">Exome SNP</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">(<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Capblancq et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>)</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn>
<p>- =not reported.</p>
</fn>
<fn>
<p>A, Number of alleles per locus; H<sub>O</sub>, observed heterozygosity; H<sub>E</sub>, expected heterozygosity.</p>
</fn>
<fn>
<p>
<bold>* =</bold> H<sub>0</sub> and H<sub>E</sub> means calculated from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Capblancq et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref> <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Supplemental Data</bold>
</xref>.</p>
</fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<p>Species with narrower or regional distribution ranges typically have lower genetic diversity than the species with broad or transcontinental ranges (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">Hamrick et&#xa0;al., 1992</xref>). This is well reflected in <italic>Picea rubens</italic> and <italic>Picea sitchensis</italic>, which have similar geographic distribution patterns following the dominant mountain systems in their respective regions. Measured with the same marker system (allozymes or microsatellites), allelic diversity and heterozygosity in red spruce were generally lower than in transcontinental or wide-spread spruce species (e.g., <italic>P. glauca</italic>, <italic>P. mariana, P. abies</italic>), but similar to other spruce species that have regional or narrow distribution ranges or to transcontinental white spruce based on EST microsatellites (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T6">
<bold>Table&#xa0;6</bold>
</xref>). Previously reported allelic diversity for allozyme markers in red spruce varied from A=1.47 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">Hawley and DeHayes, 1994</xref>) to A=1.60 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B85">Rajora et&#xa0;al., 2000a</xref>) and 2.40 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Eckert, 1989</xref>). This is similar to the mean allozyme allelic diversity of A=1.83 alleles per locus averaged across 102 studies in gymnosperms (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">Hamrick et&#xa0;al., 1992</xref>). Although <italic>P. rubens</italic> has lower overall genetic diversity levels than sympatric black spruce and white spruce and some other spruce species with very wide or transcontinental distributions, we cannot conclude that this species is genetically depauperate as previously reported (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B79">Perron et&#xa0;al., 2000</xref>).</p>
<p>Southern populations of red spruce demonstrated slightly lower nuclear microsatellite allelic (11.6%) and genotypic (1.6% or 16.5%) diversity, <italic>N<sub>e</sub>
</italic> (9.6%) and expected heterozygosity (7.7%) compared to the northern populations, although the differences were not statistically significant (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">
<bold>Table&#xa0;3</bold>
</xref>). <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">Hawley and DeHayes (1994)</xref> also reported 4.5% higher allelic richness in the northern red spruce populations. Introgressive hybridization with <italic>P. mariana</italic> may have enriched the allelic diversity in the northern populations of <italic>P. rubens</italic> in the sympatric zone. On balance, southern red spruce populations showed slightly higher (3.3%) observed heterozygosity than the northern populations. This is in contrast with the report of higher observed heterozygosity (0.0885) in northern versus southern (0.0747) populations by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">Hawley and DeHayes (1994)</xref>.</p>
<p>Our results demonstrated that red spruce and black spruce have a substantial number of species-specific alleles for the nuclear microsatellites, and that the northern red spruce populations have significant influx of black spruce alleles (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Table S1</bold>
</xref>). Deviations from the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium were observed in all populations of red spruce (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Table S2</bold>
</xref>). Repeated colonization events and introgressive hybridization with <italic>P. mariana</italic> in the northern part of the species range, and migration to uplands and air pollution effects in the southern populations may be the likely cause of these deviations (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Bashalkhanov et&#xa0;al., 2013</xref>).</p>
<p>Our study suggests that most of the nuclear genetic diversity resides among individuals within populations in red spruce with inter-population genetic differentiation of about 8% (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T4">
<bold>Tables&#xa0;4</bold>
</xref>). These results are consistent with those obtained previously for red spruce with allozymes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">Hawley and DeHayes, 1994</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B85">Rajora et&#xa0;al., 2000a</xref>) and are typical for conifers. The results indicate that the southern red spruce populations are more genetically differentiated from black spruce than the northern populations (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T4">
<bold>Tables&#xa0;4</bold>
</xref>). This may be a result of more recent introgressive hybridization with black spruce in the sympatric northern populations. Our data also demonstrate that the southern populations of red spruce are less genetically differentiated (<italic>F</italic>
<sub>ST</sub>=0.048) and have higher gene flow (Nm=4.96) among themselves than the northern populations (<italic>F</italic>
<sub>ST</sub>=0.089; Nm=2.56). Indeed, the lowest <italic>F</italic>
<sub>ST</sub> and highest gene flow was observed between TN and WV populations (<italic>F</italic>
<sub>ST</sub>=0.033; Nm=7.33) (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Table S4</bold>
</xref>). In contrast, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">Hawley and DeHayes (1994)</xref> reported higher allozyme divergence among southern versus northern red spruce populations. In our study, the two southernmost red spruce populations from Tennessee and West Virginia show a high degree of genetic similarity despite having been in isolation since mid-Holocene, which indicates that genetic drift has not played a significant role so far in these populations. Microsatellite data suggest significant gene flow occurred between these populations in the past: Nm=7.33, which contradicts previously reported high divergence between the southern red spruce populations (Nm=1.6) and the subsequent assumption of manifestation of genetic drift in southern populations (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">Hawley and DeHayes, 1994</xref>). The southern TN and WV populations may be remnants of a pure red spruce glacial refugium in Appalachians documented earlier by fossil data (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B46">Jackson et&#xa0;al., 2000</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s4_2">
<title>Postglacial migrations and evolution of <italic>Picea rubens</italic>, and <italic>Picea rubens</italic> &#x2013; <italic>Picea mariana</italic> complex</title>
<p>Lack of pronounced isolation by distance among the red spruce populations across the current distribution range, found in our study, may be an indicator of a somewhat complex post-glacial migration history of this species. Late Quaternary pollen and macrofossil data are available for many sites worldwide. In conjunction with other records of climate and environmental change they provide valuable information about the distribution of extant and extinct taxa at various spatial and temporal scales. Spruce macrofossils during the Last Glacial Maximum (ca 21000 years BP) were found at most sites to the south of the ice margin, and they are most abundant in Mississippi and Louisiana (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B46">Jackson et&#xa0;al., 2000</xref>). Molecular phylogeographic reconstruction indicated that the Mississippi Valley may have been one of the several glacial refugia for <italic>P. mariana</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B47">Jaramillo-Correa et&#xa0;al., 2004</xref>). With the retreat of the ice shield, spruce was among the first species to colonize the newly exposed areas &#x2013; a rapid migration northeast was recorded approximately 16000-12000 years BP, followed by a recession during warmer mid-Holocene periods (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B98">Watts, 1979</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B46">Jackson et&#xa0;al., 2000</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B58">Lindbladh et&#xa0;al., 2003</xref>). Cooler areas on the East Coast may have served as a secondary refugium during that period (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B45">Jackson and Overpeck, 2000</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B91">Schauffler and Jacobson, 2002</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B58">Lindbladh et&#xa0;al., 2003</xref>). Fossil pollen records indicate that red spruce was rare in New England during late Glacial and early Holocene (14000-8000 years BP), except for two smaller sites in the coastal area (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B58">Lindbladh et&#xa0;al., 2003</xref>), and it probably coexisted there with black spruce during the Late Holocene (last 1400 years), at least in Maine. It did not exist in the northeastern part of its current range until 1000-500 years BP (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B58">Lindbladh et&#xa0;al., 2003</xref>). It is often challenging to separate <italic>P. rubens</italic> and <italic>P. mariana</italic> from their pollen alone, as they have a great deal of similarity in morphology (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B58">Lindbladh et&#xa0;al., 2003</xref>). This means that <italic>P. rubens</italic> may be underestimated in the palaeoecological record where it was rare and there are some challenges in assessing the pollen record of <italic>P. rubes</italic> due to this scarcity.</p>
<p>As the red spruce populations from TN and WV are genetically close, and given the previously published fossil data, we suggest that during the Last Glacial Maximum red spruce probably occupied a single refugium in Southern Appalachians, and then migrated northward along the East Coast. Being a late successional, shade-tolerant species, it was much less abundant than the early successional black spruce, which perhaps migrated to the New England states from its Mississippi refugium. During the recession in warmer mid-Holocene, the cooler and moist Atlantic coastal areas may have sheltered both <italic>P. rubens</italic> and <italic>P. mariana</italic>. Since the two species are closely related, extensive introgressive hybridization may have occurred. Cooler climates in the region observed during the last 1500 years facilitated another rapid range expansion of red spruce and black spruce. The contemporary sympatric populations of red and black spruce may be descendants from the secondary mid-Holocene refugium, whereas southern allopatric red spruce populations probably represent the remnants of its glacial refugium.</p>
<p>Results from approximate Bayesian computation suggest a pattern of admixture with introgression occurring between red spruce and black spruce beginning approximately 343 generations ago. Beginning 4290 generations ago with an ancestral <italic>N<sub>e</sub>
</italic> of 1800, red spruce and black spruce diverged from their common ancestor. Then, around 343 generations ago, following the LGM, recontact and introgression occurred in the sympatric zone. This scenario explains the current genetic subdivision of red spruce into northern and southern variants indicated by the maximum likelihood and IAM-based trees and Bayesian structure clustering, as well as the influx of black spruce-specific alleles in the northern red spruce populations, which is detectable even in the old-growth stands. Earlier the presence of red spruce-specific mitotype in the eastern populations of black spruce was reported (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B47">Jaramillo-Correa et&#xa0;al., 2004</xref>). Occurrence of red spruce mitotype in the pure populations of <italic>P. mariana</italic> in the sympatric zone is an important indication of the two-way nature of the hybridization process. Furthermore, significant interspecific gene flow was documented in morphologically &#x201c;pure&#x201d; sympatric populations of <italic>P. rubens</italic> and <italic>P. mariana</italic> with species-specific RAPD markers (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B71">Nkongolo et&#xa0;al., 2003</xref>). Although RAPD markers have certain inherent limitations (dominance, questionable band homology, inconsistency), their results are in good agreement with the microsatellite data in the present study. We found a significant proportion of black spruce alleles in the presumably pure old-growth red spruce stands from Abraham Lake, Nova Scotia, and Loch Alva Lake, New Brunswick. Inversely, Bayesian approach suggested existence of admixed red spruce lineages in the pure black spruce population from Goose Bay, Labrador. Genetic distances based on allozyme data published by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">Hawley and DeHayes (1994)</xref>, also provide evidence of hybridization between red spruce and black spruce in New Brunswick and Nova Scotia, although the authors did not consider it significant. Since the reproductive barriers between <italic>P. rubens</italic> and <italic>P. mariana</italic> are weak, but still significant (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B60">Major et&#xa0;al., 2005</xref>), these findings can be interpreted as a result of long-term introgression, rather than local interspecific gene flow, which is consistent with the post-glacial migration and hybridization scenario outlined above. Previous studies of the introgressive hybridization between <italic>P. rubens</italic> and <italic>P. mariana</italic> may have underestimated the scale of the process.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s4_3">
<title>Red spruce &#x2013; black spruce evolutionary relationships</title>
<p>Based on high genetic similarity between red spruce and black spruce and the observation that genetic diversity in red spruce was a subset of the genetic diversity in black spruce, it has been hypothesized that <italic>P. rubens</italic> is a derivative species from <italic>P</italic>. <italic>mariana</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B79">Perron et&#xa0;al., 2000</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B48">Jaramillo-Correa and Bousquet, 2003</xref>). However, this conclusion is questionable because species-specific polymorphisms for red spruce and black spruce have been identified in both nuclear and organellar genomes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Bobola et&#xa0;al., 1992</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B78">Perron et&#xa0;al., 1995</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Bobola et&#xa0;al., 1996</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">Germano and Klein, 1999</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B71">Nkongolo et&#xa0;al., 2003</xref>), and fossil evidence suggests that these species have co-existed in various locations since the LGM (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B98">Watts, 1979</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B46">Jackson et&#xa0;al., 2000</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B58">Lindbladh et&#xa0;al., 2003</xref>).</p>
<p>Although black spruce shares a significant proportion of its allelic diversity with red spruce, both species were found to have very distinct patterns of distribution of microsatellite alleles. Thirty-six microsatellite alleles were specific to red spruce and ten microsatellite alleles were specific to black spruce (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Table S1</bold>
</xref>). In a previous study, a number of species-specific impenetrable SNP loci were identified in <italic>P. rubens</italic> and <italic>P. mariana</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">de Lafontaine et&#xa0;al., 2015</xref>). This makes it difficult to conclude that the overall genetic diversity of <italic>P. rubens</italic> is a subset of <italic>P. mariana</italic>&#x2019;s gene pool suggesting that the previously reported progenitor-derivative relationship between these two species (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B79">Perron et&#xa0;al., 2000</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B48">Jaramillo-Correa and Bousquet, 2003</xref>) is unlikely. This conclusion is further supported by the co-existence of these species in the fossil records (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B98">Watts, 1979</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B46">Jackson et&#xa0;al., 2000</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B58">Lindbladh et&#xa0;al., 2003</xref>), higher karyotype similarities of black spruce to white spruce than to red spruce (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B70">Nkongolo, 1996</xref>), and presence of many species-specific genetic variants in both the nuclear and organellar genomes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Bobola et&#xa0;al., 1992</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B78">Perron et&#xa0;al., 1995</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Bobola et&#xa0;al., 1996</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">Germano and Klein, 1999</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B71">Nkongolo et&#xa0;al., 2003</xref>). A broader phylogenetic reconstruction of the <italic>Picea</italic> genus identified <italic>P. rubens</italic> as a sister species, rather than a derivative of <italic>P. mariana</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B59">Lockwood et&#xa0;al., 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B76">Parmar et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>), which further corroborates our viewpoint. Recent isolation and genetic drift were hypothesized to be the main driving forces for red spruce speciation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B79">Perron et&#xa0;al., 2000</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B48">Jaramillo-Correa and Bousquet, 2003</xref>). However, we did not find any significant evidence for bottleneck events and genetic drift in the southern pure red spruce populations. Our results, based on sufficiently large population sample sizes (60), are in contrast from results using genomic markers that have shown a reduction in population size and long-term population decline in <italic>N<sub>e</sub>
</italic> (potentially indicating drift) following the LGM based on whole exome sequencing (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Capblancq et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>). However, the <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Capblancq et&#xa0;al. (2020)</xref> study was based on a very small sample size of 2 to 11 individuals per population. While the two species are closely related and obviously share a common ancestor, the existence of shared alleles may be a result of common ancestry, relatively recent gene flow, and introgression occurring after the LGM as indicated by our approximate Bayesian analysis. A similar picture was reported in the interspecific hybridization zones for <italic>Quercus</italic> in Europe (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B57">Lexer et&#xa0;al., 2006</xref>) and <italic>Larix</italic> in Asia (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B93">Semerikov and Lascoux, 2003</xref>).</p>
<p>We, therefore, conclude that red spruce is not likely a derivative species from black spruce and the postglacial migration history and introgressive hybridization should be considered when describing evolutionary relationships between these two closely related species.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s4_4">
<title>Conservation implications</title>
<p>Previous large-scale climatic fluctuations have played a major role in shaping the current population structure of red spruce, causing long distance migrations and gene pool rearrangement. Given the projected climate warming rates, we expect that this species might face a significant evolutionary impact in the near future. The isolated pure red spruce populations in Southern Appalachians have maintained their genetic diversity levels and they represent a significant proportion of the species&#x2019; gene pool. Although these populations have little commercial value, they form an essential habitat for several endangered plant and animal species (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Blum, 1990</xref>). Warming climates may eliminate the ecological niche for the high elevation southern red spruce populations within the next several decades. The central populations of red spruce in New Hampshire and Vermont may become more fragmented because of the rapid elevation shift in their ecological optima (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">Beckage et&#xa0;al., 2008</xref>), which places them under the risk of extinction in the future. Introgressive hybridization with <italic>P. mariana</italic> enriches the genetic diversity in <italic>P. rubens</italic>, while these two species remain ecologically different. Conservation efforts to preserve the ecologically important pure red spruce in Southern Appalachians should be strengthened. Considerable advances have been achieved in developing genomic resources and molecular markers for <italic>Picea</italic>, and future population genomics studies should take advantage of this newly developed resources, while taking into account the minimum sample sizes required for making reliable inference based on observed genetic variation.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s5" sec-type="data-availability">
<title>Data availability statement</title>
<p>The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1"><bold>Supplementary Material</bold></xref>, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s6" sec-type="author-contributions">
<title>Author contributions</title>
<p>OR: Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Writing &#x2013; original draft, Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing. SB: Conceptualization, Formal Analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Writing &#x2013; original draft, Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing. JJ: Formal Analysis, Writing &#x2013; original draft, Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing.</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<sec id="s7" sec-type="funding-information">
<title>Funding</title>
<p>The authors declare financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. The research was funded by the Canada Research Chair Program (CRC950-201869) funds and the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada Discovery Grant RGPIN 170651 to OR, SB was supported by the University of New Brunswick start-up funds provided to OR and a Canadian Forest Service graduate student&#x2019;s supplemental stipend.</p>
</sec>
<ack>
<title>Acknowledgments</title>
<p>We thank US National Park Service, USDA Forest Service, New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, New Brunswick Department of Natural Resources, and Canadian Forest Service for providing access and assistance with locating the sampling sites. We also thank Dr. Lisa O&#x2019;Connell for the assistance with the fieldwork. This manuscript has been improved by the helpful and constructive comments of two reviewers.</p>
</ack>
<sec id="s8" sec-type="COI-statement">
<title>Conflict of interest</title>
<p>The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.</p>
<p>The author(s) declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s9" sec-type="disclaimer">
<title>Publisher&#x2019;s note</title>
<p>All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s10" sec-type="supplementary-material">
<title>Supplementary material</title>
<p>The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2023.1272362/full#supplementary-material">https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2023.1272362/full#supplementary-material</ext-link>
</p>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="DataSheet_1.docx" id="SM1" mimetype="application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document"/>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="DataSheet_1.xlsx" id="SM2" mimetype="application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet"/>
</sec>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="B1">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Avise</surname> <given-names>J. C.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2004</year>). <source>Molecular markers, natural history, and evolution</source> (<publisher-loc>London, UK</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Chapman and Hall</publisher-name>).</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ballian</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Longauer</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Miki&#x107;</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Paule</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kajba</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>G&#xf6;m&#xf6;ry</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2006</year>). <article-title>Genetic structure of a rare European conifer, Serbian spruce (Picea omorika (Pan&#x10d;.) Purk.)</article-title>. <source>Plant Systematics Evol.</source> <volume>260</volume> (<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>53</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>63</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00606-006-0431-z</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Balloux</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Amos</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Coulson</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2004</year>). <article-title>Does heterozygosity estimate inbreeding in real populations</article-title>? <source>Mol. Ecol.</source> <volume>13</volume> (<issue>10</issue>), <fpage>3021</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>3031</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1365-294X.2004.02318.x</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Bashalkhanov</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Eckert</surname> <given-names>A. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rajora</surname> <given-names>O. P.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Genetic signatures of natural selection in response to air pollution in red spruce (<italic>Picea rubens, Pinaceae</italic>)</article-title>. <source>Mol. Ecol.</source> <volume>22</volume> (<issue>23</issue>), <fpage>5877</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>5889</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/mec.12546</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Bashalkhanov</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pandey</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rajora</surname> <given-names>O. P.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>A simple method for estimating genetic diversity in large populations from finite sample sizes</article-title>. <source>BMC Genet.</source> <volume>10</volume> (<issue>1</issue>), <elocation-id>84</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/1471-2156-10-84</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Bashalkhanov</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rajora</surname> <given-names>O. P.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>Protocol: A high-throughput DNA extraction system suitable for conifers</article-title>. <source>Plant Methods</source> <volume>4</volume>, <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>6</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/1755-0998.12387</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Beckage</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Osborne</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gavin</surname> <given-names>D. G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pucko</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Siccama</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Perkins</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>A rapid upward shift of a forest ecotone during 40 years of warming in the Green Mountains of Vermont</article-title>. <source>Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.</source> <volume>105</volume> (<issue>11</issue>), <fpage>4197</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>4202</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1073/pnas.0708921105</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<citation citation-type="web">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Beerli</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2008</year>) <source>Migrate version 3.0 - a maximum likelihood and Bayesian estimator of gene flow using the coalescent</source>. Available at: <uri xlink:href="http://popgen.scs.edu/migrate.html">http://popgen.scs.edu/migrate.html</uri>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Bergmann</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gregorius</surname> <given-names>H. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Larsen</surname> <given-names>J. B.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1990</year>). <article-title>Levels of genetic variation in European silver fir (<italic>Abies alba</italic>)</article-title>. <source>Genetica</source> <volume>82</volume> (<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>10</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/BF00057667</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Blum</surname> <given-names>B. M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1990</year>). <article-title>
<italic>Picea rubens</italic> Sarg. - Red spruce</article-title>. <source>Agric. Handbook US Department Agric.</source> <volume>1</volume>, <fpage>250</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>259</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Bobola</surname> <given-names>M. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Eckert</surname> <given-names>R. T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Klein</surname> <given-names>A. S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1992</year>). <article-title>Restriction fragment variation in the nuclear ribosomal DNA repeat unit within and between <italic>Picea rubens</italic> and <italic>Picea mariana</italic>
</article-title>. <source>Can. J. For. Res.</source> <volume>22</volume> (<issue>2</issue>), <fpage>255</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>263</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1139/x92-033</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Bobola</surname> <given-names>M. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Guenette</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Eckert</surname> <given-names>R. T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Klein</surname> <given-names>A. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Stapelfeldt</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Smith</surname> <given-names>D. E.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1996</year>). <article-title>Using nuclear and organelle DNA markers to discriminate among <italic>Picea rubens Picea mariana</italic>, and their hybrids</article-title>. <source>Can. J. For. Res.</source> <volume>26</volume> (<issue>3</issue>), <fpage>433</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>443</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1139/x26-049</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Bohonak</surname> <given-names>A. J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2002</year>). <article-title>IBD (Isolation by Distance): A program for analyses of Isolation by Distance</article-title>. <source>J. Heredity</source> <volume>93</volume> (<issue>2</issue>), <fpage>153</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>154</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/jhered/93.2.153</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Burns</surname> <given-names>R. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Honkala</surname> <given-names>B. H.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1990</year>). &#x201c;<article-title>"Silvics of North America, conifers. Agriculture handbook 654</article-title>,&#x201d; in <source>Tech rep.</source> (<publisher-loc>Washington DC</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>USDA</publisher-name>).</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Capblancq</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Butnor</surname> <given-names>J. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Deyoung</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Thibault</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Munson</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Nelson</surname> <given-names>D. M.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Whole-exome sequencing reveals a long-term decline in effective population size of red spruce (<italic>Picea rubens</italic>)</article-title>. <source>Evolutionary Appl.</source> <volume>13</volume> (<issue>9</issue>), <fpage>2190</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2205</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/eva.12985</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Capblancq</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Munson</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Butnor</surname> <given-names>J. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Keller</surname> <given-names>S. R.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Genomic drivers of early-life fitness in Picea rubens</article-title>. <source>Conserv. Genet.</source> <volume>22</volume> (<issue>6</issue>), <fpage>963</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>976</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10592-021-01378-7</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Chakraborty</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kimmel</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Stivers</surname> <given-names>D. N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Davison</surname> <given-names>L. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Deka</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1997</year>). <article-title>Relative mutation rates at di-, tri-, and tetranucleotide microsatellite&#x2009;loci</article-title>. <source>Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.</source> <volume>94</volume> (<issue>3</issue>), <fpage>1041</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1046</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1073/pnas.94.3.1041</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B18">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Cornuet</surname> <given-names>J.-M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pudlo</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Veyssier</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dehne-Garcia</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gautier</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Leblois</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>DIYABC v2.0: a software to make approximate Bayesian computation inferences about population history using single nucleotide polymorphism, DNA sequence and microsatellite data</article-title>. <source>Bioinformatics</source> <volume>30</volume> (<issue>8</issue>), <fpage>1187</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1189</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/bioinformatics/btt763</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B19">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>DeHayes</surname> <given-names>D. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hawley</surname> <given-names>G. J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1992</year>). <article-title>Genetic implications in the decline of red spruce</article-title>. <source>Water Air Soil pollut.</source> <volume>62</volume> (<issue>3</issue>), <fpage>233</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>248</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/BF00480258</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B20">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>DeHayes</surname> <given-names>D. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Thornton</surname> <given-names>F. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Waite</surname> <given-names>C. E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ingle</surname> <given-names>M. A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1991</year>). <article-title>Ambient cloud deposition reduces cold tolerance of red spruce seedlings</article-title>. <source>Can. J. For. Res.</source> <volume>21</volume> (<issue>8</issue>), <fpage>1292</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1295</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1139/x91-180</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B21">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>de Lafontaine</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Prunier</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>G&#xe9;rardi</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bousquet</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Tracking the progression of speciation: variable patterns of introgression across the genome provide insights on the species delimitation between progenitor&#x2013;derivative spruces (Picea mariana &#xd7; P. rubens)</article-title>. <source>Mol. Ecol.</source> <volume>24</volume> (<issue>20</issue>), <fpage>5229</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>5247</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/mec.13377</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B22">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Eckert</surname> <given-names>R. T.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1989</year>). &#x201c;<article-title>Genetic variation in red spruce and its relation to forest decline in northeastern United States</article-title>,&#x201d; in <source>Air pollution and forest decline. (Proc. 14th Intl. Meeting Specialists Air Pollution Effects in Forest Ecosystems</source>. Eds. <person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname>Bucher</surname> <given-names>J. B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bucher-Wallin</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<publisher-loc>Birmensodorf</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>IUFRO P2.05</publisher-name>).</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B23">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Evanno</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Regnaut</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Goudet</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2005</year>). <article-title>Detecting the number of clusters of individuals using the software STRUCTURE: a simulation study</article-title>. <source>Mol. Ecol.</source> <volume>14</volume> (<issue>8</issue>), <fpage>2611</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2620</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1365-294X.2005.02553.x</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B24">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ewens</surname> <given-names>W. J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1972</year>). <article-title>The sampling theory of selectively neutral alleles</article-title>. <source>Theor. Population Biol.</source> <volume>3</volume> (<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>87</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>112</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/0040-5809(72)90035-4</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B25">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Excoffier</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lischer</surname> <given-names>H. E. L.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Arlequin suite ver 3.5: a new series of programs to perform population genetics analyses under Linux and Windows</article-title>. <source>Mol. Ecol. Resour.</source> <volume>10</volume> (<issue>3</issue>), <fpage>564</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>567</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1755-0998.2010.02847.x</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B26">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Fageria</surname> <given-names>M. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rajora</surname> <given-names>O. P.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Effects of harvesting of increasing intensities on genetic diversity and population structure of white spruce</article-title>. <source>Evolutionary Appl.</source> <volume>6</volume> (<issue>5</issue>), <fpage>778</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>794</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/eva.12064</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B27">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Fageria</surname> <given-names>M. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rajora</surname> <given-names>O. P.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Effects of silvicultural practices on genetic diversity and population structure of white spruce in Saskatchewan</article-title>. <source>Tree Genet. Genomes</source> <volume>10</volume> (<issue>2</issue>), <fpage>287</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>296</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11295-013-0682-0</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B28">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Felsenstein</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2004</year>). <source>PHYLIP (Phylogeny Inference Package) version 3.6</source> (<publisher-name>University of Washington, Seattle: Department of Genome Sciences</publisher-name>).</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B29">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Fowler</surname> <given-names>D. P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Park</surname> <given-names>Y. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gordon</surname> <given-names>A. G.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1988</year>). <article-title>Genetic variation of red spruce in the Maritimes</article-title>. <source>Can. J. For. Res.</source> <volume>18</volume> (<issue>6</issue>), <fpage>703</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>709</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1139/x88-107</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B30">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Friedland</surname> <given-names>A. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gregory</surname> <given-names>R. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Karenlampi</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Johnson</surname> <given-names>A. H.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1984</year>). <article-title>Winter damage to foliage as a factor in red spruce decline</article-title>. <source>Can. J. For. Res.</source> <volume>14</volume> (<issue>6</issue>), <fpage>963</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>965</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1139/x84-173</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B31">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Germano</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Klein</surname> <given-names>A. S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1999</year>). <article-title>Species-specific nuclear and chloroplast single nucleotide polymorphisms to distinguish <italic>Picea glauca</italic>, <italic>P. mariana</italic> and <italic>P. rubens</italic>
</article-title>. <source>Theor. Appl. Genet.</source> <volume>99</volume> (<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>37</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>49</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s001220051206</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B32">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Gillet</surname> <given-names>E. M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1999</year>). &#x201c;<article-title>Minimum sample sizes for sampling genetic marker distributions</article-title>,&#x201d; in <source>Final Compendium of the Research Project "Development, optimization and validation of molecular tools for assessment of biodiversity in forest trees" in the European Union DGXII Biotechnology FW IV Research Programme Molecular Tools for Biodiversity</source>. Ed. <person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname>Gillet</surname> <given-names>E. M</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B33">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Goldstein</surname> <given-names>D. B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Linares</surname> <given-names>A. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cavallie-Sforza</surname> <given-names>L. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Feldman</surname> <given-names>M. W.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1995</year>). <article-title>An evaluation of genetic distance for use with microsatellite loci</article-title>. <source>Genetics</source> <volume>139</volume>, <fpage>463</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>471</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/genetics/139.1.463</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B34">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Gordon</surname> <given-names>A. G.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1976</year>). <article-title>The taxonomy and genetics of <italic>Picea rubens</italic> and its relationship to <italic>Picea mariana</italic>
</article-title>. <source>Can. J. Bot.</source> <volume>54</volume> (<issue>9</issue>), <fpage>781</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>813</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1139/b76-084</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B35">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Goudet</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2001</year>). <source>FSTAT, a program to estimate and test gene diversities and fixation indices (version 2.9.3)</source>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B36">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Guo</surname> <given-names>S. W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Thompson</surname> <given-names>E. A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1992</year>). <article-title>Performing the exact tes of Hary-Weinberg proportion for multiple alleles</article-title>. <source>Biometrics</source> <volume>48</volume>, <fpage>361</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>372</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2307/2532296</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B37">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Hamburg</surname> <given-names>S. P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cogbill</surname> <given-names>C. V.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1988</year>). <article-title>Historical decline of red spruce populations and climatic warming</article-title>. <source>Nature</source> <volume>331</volume> (<issue>6155</issue>), <fpage>428</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>431</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/331428a0</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B38">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Hampe</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Petit</surname> <given-names>R. J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2005</year>). <article-title>Conserving biodiversity under climate change: the rear edge matters</article-title>. <source>Ecol. Lett.</source> <volume>8</volume> (<issue>5</issue>), <fpage>461</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>467</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00739.x</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B39">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Hamrick</surname> <given-names>J. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Godt</surname> <given-names>M. J. W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sherman-Broyles</surname> <given-names>S. L.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1992</year>). &#x201c;<article-title>Factors influencing levels of genetic diversity in woody plant species</article-title>,&#x201d; in <source>Population Genetics of Forest Trees: Proceedings of the International Symposium on Population Genetics of Forest Trees Corvallis, Oregon, U.S.A., July 31&#x2013;August 2,1990</source>. Eds. <person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname>Adams</surname> <given-names>W. T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Strauss</surname> <given-names>S. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Copes</surname> <given-names>D. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Griffin</surname> <given-names>A. R.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<publisher-loc>Dordrecht</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Springer Netherlands</publisher-name>), <fpage>95</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>124</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B40">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Hawley</surname> <given-names>G. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>DeHayes</surname> <given-names>D. H.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1994</year>). <article-title>Genetic diversity and population structure of red spruce (<italic>Picea rubens</italic>)</article-title>. <source>Can. J. Bot.</source> <volume>72</volume> (<issue>12</issue>), <fpage>1778</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1786</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1139/b94-219</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B41">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Hoban</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Archer</surname> <given-names>F. I.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bertola</surname> <given-names>L. D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bragg</surname> <given-names>J. G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Breed</surname> <given-names>M. F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bruford</surname> <given-names>M. W.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Global genetic diversity status and trends: towards a suite of Essential Biodiversity Variables (EBVs) for genetic composition</article-title>. <source>Biol. Rev.</source> <volume>97</volume> (<issue>4</issue>), <fpage>1511</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1538</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/brv.12852</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B42">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<collab>IPCC</collab>
</person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <source>Climate change 2022: Impacts, adaptations, and vulnerability. Contributions of working group II to the sixth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climage change</source> (<publisher-loc>Geneva, Switzerland</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change</publisher-name>).</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B43">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Isabel</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Beaulieu</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bousquet</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1995</year>). <article-title>Complete congruence between gene diversity estimates derived from genotypic data at enzyme and random amplified polymorphic DNA loci in black spruce</article-title>. <source>Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.</source> <volume>92</volume> (<issue>14</issue>), <fpage>6369</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>6373</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1073/pnas.92.14.6369</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B44">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Iverson</surname> <given-names>L. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Prasad</surname> <given-names>A. M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1998</year>). <article-title>Predicting abundance of 80 tree species following climate change in the eastern United States</article-title>. <source>Ecol. Monogr.</source> <volume>68</volume> (<issue>4</issue>), <fpage>465</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>485</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1890/0012-9615(1998)068[0465:PAOTSF]2.0.CO;2</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B45">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Jackson</surname> <given-names>S. T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Overpeck</surname> <given-names>J. T.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2000</year>). <article-title>Responses of plant populations and communities to environmental changes of the late Quaternary</article-title>. <source>Paleobiology</source> <volume>26</volume> (<issue>sp4</issue>), <fpage>194</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>220</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1666/0094-8373(2000)26[194:roppac]2.0.co;2</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B46">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Jackson</surname> <given-names>S. T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Webb</surname> <given-names>R. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Anderson</surname> <given-names>K. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Overpeck</surname> <given-names>J. T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Webb Iii</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Williams</surname> <given-names>J. W.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2000</year>). <article-title>Vegetation and environment in Eastern North America during the Last Glacial Maximum</article-title>. <source>Quaternary Sci. Rev.</source> <volume>19</volume> (<issue>6</issue>), <fpage>489</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>508</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S0277-3791(99)00093-1</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B47">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Jaramillo-Correa</surname> <given-names>J. P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Beaulieu</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bousquet</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2004</year>). <article-title>Variation in mitochondrial DNA reveals multiple distant glacial refugia in black spruce (<italic>Picea mariana</italic>), a transcontinental North American conifer</article-title>. <source>Mol. Ecol.</source> <volume>13</volume> (<issue>9</issue>), <fpage>2735</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2747</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1365-294X.2004.02258.x</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B48">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Jaramillo-Correa</surname> <given-names>J. P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bousquet</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2003</year>). <article-title>New evidence from mitochondrial DNA of a progenitor-derivative species relationship between black spruce and red spruce (<italic>Pinaceae</italic>)</article-title>. <source>Am. J. Bot.</source> <volume>90</volume> (<issue>12</issue>), <fpage>1801</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1806</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3732/ajb.90.12.1801</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B49">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Johnson</surname> <given-names>J. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gaddis</surname> <given-names>K. D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cairns</surname> <given-names>D. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lafon</surname> <given-names>C. W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Krutovsky</surname> <given-names>K. V.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Plant responses to global change: Next generation biogeography</article-title>. <source>Phys. Geogr.</source> <volume>37</volume>, <fpage>93</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>119</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/02723646.2016.1162597</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B50">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Johnson</surname> <given-names>J. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Krutovsky</surname> <given-names>K. V.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rajora</surname> <given-names>O. P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gaddis</surname> <given-names>K. D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cairns</surname> <given-names>D. M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2019</year>). &#x201c;<article-title>Advancing biogeography through population genomics</article-title>,&#x201d; in <source>Population Genomics: Concepts, Approaches and Applications</source>. Ed. <person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname>Rajora</surname> <given-names>O. P.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<publisher-name>Springer</publisher-name>:<publisher-loc>Nature Switzerland AG, Cham</publisher-loc>).</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B51">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Jombart</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>adegenet: a R package for the multivariate analysis of genetic markers</article-title>. <source>Bioinformatics</source> <volume>24</volume>, <page-range>1403&#x2013;1405</page-range>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/bioinformatics/btn129</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B52">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kopelman</surname> <given-names>N. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mayzel</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jakobsson</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rosenberg</surname> <given-names>N. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mayrose</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Clumpak: a program for identifying clustering modes and packaging population structure inferences across K</article-title>. <source>Mol. Ecol. Resour</source>. <volume>15</volume>, <fpage>1179</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1191</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/1755-0998.12387</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B53">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kravchenko</surname> <given-names>A. N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Larionova</surname> <given-names>A. Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Milyutin</surname> <given-names>L. I.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>Genetic polymorphism of Siberian spruce (Picea obovata Ledeb.) in Middle Siberia</article-title>. <source>Russian J. Genet.</source> <volume>44</volume> (<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>35</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>43</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1134/S1022795408010055</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B54">
<citation citation-type="web">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Langella</surname> <given-names>O.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1999</year>) <source>Populations</source>. Available at: <uri xlink:href="http://bioinformatics.org/~tryphon/populations/">http://bioinformatics.org/~tryphon/populations/</uri>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B55">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>LaRue</surname> <given-names>E. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rohr</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Knott</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dodds</surname> <given-names>W. K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dahlin</surname> <given-names>K. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Thorp</surname> <given-names>J. H.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>The evolution of macrosystems biology</article-title>. <source>Front. Ecol. Environ.</source> <volume>19</volume> (<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>11</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>19</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/fee.2288</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B56">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ledig</surname> <given-names>F. T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bermejo-Vel&#xe1;zquez</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hodgskiss</surname> <given-names>P. D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Johnson</surname> <given-names>D. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Flores-L&#xf3;pez</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jacob-Cervantes</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2000</year>). <article-title>The mating system and genic diversity in Mart&#xed;nez spruce, an extremely rare endemic of M&#xe9;xico's Sierra Madre Oriental: an example of facultative selfing and survival in interglacial refugia</article-title>. <source>Can. J. For. Res.</source> <volume>30</volume> (<issue>7</issue>), <fpage>1156</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1164</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1139/x00-052</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B57">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Lexer</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kremer</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Petit</surname> <given-names>R. J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2006</year>). <article-title>COMMENT: Shared alleles in sympatric oaks: recurrent gene flow is a more parsimonious explanation than ancestral polymorphism</article-title>. <source>Mol. Ecol.</source> <volume>15</volume> (<issue>7</issue>), <fpage>2007</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2012</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1365-294X.2006.02896.x</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B58">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Lindbladh</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jacobson</surname> <given-names>G. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Schauffler</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2003</year>). <article-title>The postglacial history of three <italic>Picea</italic> species in New England, USA</article-title>. <source>Quaternary Res.</source> <volume>59</volume> (<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>61</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>69</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S0033-5894(02)00023-6</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B59">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Lockwood</surname> <given-names>J. D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Aleksi&#x107;</surname> <given-names>J. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zou</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Renner</surname> <given-names>S. S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>A new phylogeny for the genus Picea from plastid, mitochondrial, and nuclear sequences</article-title>. <source>Mol. Phylogenet. Evol.</source> <volume>69</volume> (<issue>3</issue>), <fpage>717</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>727</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ympev.2013.07.004</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B60">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Major</surname> <given-names>J. E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mosseler</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Johnsen</surname> <given-names>K. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rajora</surname> <given-names>O. P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Barsi</surname> <given-names>D. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kim</surname> <given-names>K. H.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2005</year>). <article-title>Reproductive barriers and hybridity in two spruces, <italic>Picea rubens</italic> and <italic>Picea mariana</italic>, sympatric in eastern North America</article-title>. <source>Can. J. Bot.</source> <volume>83</volume> (<issue>2</issue>), <fpage>163</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>175</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1139/b04-161</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B61">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Manley</surname> <given-names>S. A. M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1972</year>). <article-title>The occurrence of hybrid swarms of red and black spruces in central New Brunswick</article-title>. <source>Can. J. For. Res.</source> <volume>2</volume> (<issue>4</issue>), <fpage>381</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>391</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1139/x72-060</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B62">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Marriage</surname> <given-names>T. N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hudman</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mort</surname> <given-names>M. E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Orive</surname> <given-names>M. E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Shaw</surname> <given-names>R. G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kelly</surname> <given-names>J. K.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>Direct estimation of the mutation rate at dinucleotide microsatellite loci in <italic>Arabidopsis thaliana</italic> (Brassicaceae)</article-title>. <source>Heredity</source> <volume>103</volume> (<issue>4</issue>), <fpage>310</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>317</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/hdy.2009.67</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B63">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>McLaughlin</surname> <given-names>S. B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Downing</surname> <given-names>D. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Blasing</surname> <given-names>T. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cook</surname> <given-names>E. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Adams</surname> <given-names>H. S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1987</year>). <article-title>An analysis of climate and competition as contributors to decline of red spruce in high elevation Appalachian forests of the Eastern United states</article-title>. <source>Oecologia</source> <volume>72</volume> (<issue>4</issue>), <fpage>487</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>501</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/BF00378973</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B64">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>McLaughlin</surname> <given-names>S. B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tjoelker</surname> <given-names>M. G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Roy</surname> <given-names>W. K.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1993</year>). <article-title>Acid deposition alters red spruce physiology: laboratory studies support field observations</article-title>. <source>Can. J. For. Res.</source> <volume>23</volume> (<issue>3</issue>), <fpage>380</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>386</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1139/x93-055</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B65">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Meloni</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Perini</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Binelli</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2007</year>). <article-title>The distribution of genetic variation in Norway spruce (Picea abies Karst.) populations in the western Alps</article-title>. <source>J. Biogeogr.</source> <volume>34</volume> (<issue>6</issue>), <fpage>929</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>938</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1365-2699.2006.01668.x</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B66">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Mimura</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Aitken</surname> <given-names>S. N.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2007</year>). <article-title>Adaptive gradients and isolation-by-distance with postglacial migration in Picea sitchensis</article-title>. <source>Heredity</source> <volume>99</volume> (<issue>2</issue>), <fpage>224</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>232</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/sj.hdy.6800987</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B67">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Morgenstern</surname> <given-names>E. K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Farrar</surname> <given-names>J. L.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1964</year>). &#x201c;<article-title>Natural hybridization in red spruce and black spruce</article-title>,&#x201d; in <source>Technical Report No. 4</source> (<publisher-loc>Toronto, Ontario, Canada</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>University of Toronto</publisher-name>).</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B68">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Nei</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1972</year>). <article-title>Genetic distance between populations</article-title>. <source>Am. Nat.</source> <volume>106</volume> (<issue>949</issue>), <fpage>283</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>&amp;</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1086/282771</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B69">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Nei</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1973</year>). <article-title>Analysis of gene diversity in subdivided populations</article-title>. <source>Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. States America</source> <volume>70</volume> (<issue>12</issue>), <fpage>3321</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>3323</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1073/pnas.70.12.3321</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B70">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Nkongolo</surname> <given-names>K. K.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1996</year>). <article-title>Chromosome analysis and DNA homology in three <italic>Picea</italic> species, <italic>P. mariana, P. rubens</italic>, and <italic>P. glauca</italic> (<italic>Pinaceae</italic>)</article-title>. <source>Plant Systematics Evol.</source> <volume>203</volume> (<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>27</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>40</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/BF00985235</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B71">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Nkongolo</surname> <given-names>K. K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Deverno</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Michael</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2003</year>). <article-title>Genetic validation and characterization of RAPD markers differentiating black and red spruces: molecular certification of spruce trees and hybrids</article-title>. <source>Plant Systematics Evol.</source> <volume>236</volume> (<issue>3</issue>), <fpage>151</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>163</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00606-002-0236-7</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B72">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>O'Connell</surname> <given-names>L. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mosseler</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rajora</surname> <given-names>O. P.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2006</year>a). <article-title>Impacts of forest fragmentation on the reproductive success of white spruce (<italic>Picea glauca</italic>)</article-title>. <source>Can. J. Bot.</source> <volume>84</volume> (<issue>6</issue>), <fpage>956</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>965</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1139/b06-051</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B73">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>O'Connell</surname> <given-names>L. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mosseler</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rajora</surname> <given-names>O. P.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2006</year>b). <article-title>Impacts of forest fragmentation on the mating system and genetic diversity of white spruce (<italic>Picea glauca</italic>) at the landscape level</article-title>. <source>Heredity</source> <volume>97</volume> (<issue>6</issue>), <fpage>418</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>426</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/sj.hdy.6800886</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B74">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Pandey</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rajora</surname> <given-names>O. P.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Genetic diversity and differentiation of core vs. peripheral populations of eastern white cedar, <italic>Thuja occidentalis</italic> (<italic>Cupressaceae</italic>)</article-title>. <source>Am. J. Bot.</source> <volume>99</volume> (<issue>4</issue>), <fpage>690</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>699</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3732/ajb.1100116</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B75">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Park</surname> <given-names>S. D. E.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2001</year>). <source>Trypanotolerance in West African cattle and the population genetic effects of selection</source> (<publisher-name>University of Dublin</publisher-name>).</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B76">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Parmar</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cattonaro</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Phillips</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Vassiliev</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Morgante</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rajora</surname> <given-names>O. P.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Assembly and annotation of red spruce (Picea rubens) chloroplast genome, identification of simple sequence repeats, and phylogenetic analysis in Picea</article-title>. <source>Int. J. Mol. Sci.</source> <volume>23</volume> (<issue>23</issue>), <fpage>15243</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/ijms232315243</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B77">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Perron</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bousquet</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1997</year>). <article-title>Natural hybridization between black spruce and red spruce</article-title>. <source>Mol. Ecol.</source> <volume>6</volume> (<issue>8</issue>), <fpage>725</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>734</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1046/j.1365-294X.1997.00243.x</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B78">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Perron</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gordon</surname> <given-names>A. G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bousquet</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1995</year>). <article-title>Species-specific RAPD fingerprints for the closely related <italic>Picea mariana</italic> and <italic>P. rubens</italic>
</article-title>. <source>Theor. Appl. Genet.</source> <volume>91</volume> (<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>142</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>149</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/BF00220871</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B79">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Perron</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Perry</surname> <given-names>D. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Andalo</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bousquet</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2000</year>). <article-title>Evidence from sequence-tagged-site markers of a recent progenitor-derivative species pair in conifers</article-title>. <source>Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.</source> <volume>97</volume> (<issue>21</issue>), <fpage>11331</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>11336</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1073/pnas.200417097</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B80">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Piry</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Luikart</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cornuet</surname> <given-names>J. M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1999</year>). <article-title>Computer note. BOTTLENECK: a computer program for detecting recent reductions in the effective size using allele frequency data</article-title>. <source>J. Heredity</source> <volume>90</volume> (<issue>4</issue>), <fpage>502</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>503</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/jhered/90.4.502</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B81">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Pritchard</surname> <given-names>J. K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Stephens</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Donnelly</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2000</year>). <article-title>Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data</article-title>. <source>Genetics</source> <volume>155</volume> (<issue>2</issue>), <fpage>945</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>959</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/genetics/155.2.945</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B82">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Rajora</surname> <given-names>O. P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fageria</surname> <given-names>M. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fitzsimmons</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>Effects of Wild Forest Fires on Genetic Diversity and Population Structure of a Boreal Conifer, White Spruce (Picea glauca (Moench) Voss): Implications for Genetic Resource Management and Adaptive Potential under Climate Change</article-title>. <source>Forests</source> <volume>14</volume> (<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>157</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/f14010157</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B83">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Rajora</surname> <given-names>O. P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mann</surname> <given-names>I. K.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Development and characterization of Novel EST-based single-copy genic microsatellite DNA markers in white spruce and black spruce</article-title>. <source>Mol. Biol. Rep.</source> <volume>48</volume> (<issue>3</issue>), <fpage>2963</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2971</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11033-021-06231-1</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B84">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Rajora</surname> <given-names>O. P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mann</surname> <given-names>I. K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Shi</surname> <given-names>Y.-Z.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2005</year>). <article-title>Genetic diversity and population structure of boreal white spruce (Picea glauca) in pristine conifer-dominated and mixedwood forest stands</article-title>. <source>Can. J. Bot.</source> <volume>83</volume> (<issue>9</issue>), <fpage>1096</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1105</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1139/b05-083</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B85">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Rajora</surname> <given-names>O. P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mosseler</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Major</surname> <given-names>J. E.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2000</year>a). <article-title>Indicators of population viability in red spruce, <italic>Picea rubens.</italic> II. Genetic diversity, population structure, and mating behavior</article-title>. <source>Can. J. Bot.</source> <volume>78</volume> (<issue>7</issue>), <fpage>941</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>956</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1139/b00-066</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B86">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Rajora</surname> <given-names>O. P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pluhar</surname> <given-names>S. A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2003</year>). <article-title>Genetic diversity impacts of forest fires, forest harvesting, and alternative reforestation practices in black spruce (<italic>Picea mariana</italic>)</article-title>. <source>Theor. Appl. Genet.</source> <volume>106</volume> (<issue>7</issue>), <fpage>1203</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1212</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00122-002-1169-9</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B87">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Rajora</surname> <given-names>O. P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rahman</surname> <given-names>M. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Buchert</surname> <given-names>G. P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dancik</surname> <given-names>B. P.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2000</year>b). <article-title>Microsatellite DNA analysis of genetic effects of harvesting in old-growth eastern white pine (<italic>Pinus strobus</italic>) in Ontario, Canada</article-title>. <source>Mol. Ecol.</source> <volume>9</volume> (<issue>3</issue>), <fpage>339</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>348</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1046/j.1365-294x.2000.00886.x</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B88">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Rajora</surname> <given-names>O. P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zinck</surname> <given-names>J. W. R.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Genetic Diversity, Structure and Effective Population Size of Old-Growth vs. Second-Growth Populations of Keystone and Long-Lived Conifer, Eastern White Pine (Pinus strobus): Conservation Value and Climate Adaptation Potential</article-title>. <source>Front. Genet.</source> <volume>12</volume>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fgene.2021.650299</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B89">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<collab>R Core Team</collab>
</person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>R: A language and environment for statistical computing</article-title>. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, (<publisher-loc>Vienna, Austria:  R Foundation for Statistical Computing</publisher-loc>). URL <uri xlink:href="https://www.R-project.org/">https://www.R-project.org/</uri>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B90">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Rollins</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Adams</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Stephenson</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Changes in forest composition and structure across the red spruce-hardwood ecotone in the central Appalachians</article-title>. <source>Castanea</source> <volume>75</volume> (<issue>3</issue>), <fpage>303</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>314</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2179/09-052.1</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B91">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Schauffler</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jacobson</surname> <given-names>J. G. L.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2002</year>). <article-title>Persistence of coastal spruce refugia during the Holocene in northern New England, USA, detected by stand-scale pollen stratigraphies</article-title>. <source>J. Ecol.</source> <volume>90</volume> (<issue>2</issue>), <fpage>235</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>250</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1046/j.1365-2745.2001.00656.x</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B92">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Schl&#xf6;tterer</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wiehe</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1999</year>). &#x201c;<article-title>Microsatellites, a neutral marker to infer selective sweeps</article-title>,&#x201d; in <source>Microsatellites: evolution and applications</source>. Ed. <person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname>Goldsmith</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<publisher-loc>New York</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Oxford University Press</publisher-name>).</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B93">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Semerikov</surname> <given-names>V. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lascoux</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2003</year>). <article-title>Nuclear and cytoplasmic variation within and between Eurasian Larix (<italic>Pinaceae</italic>) species</article-title>. <source>Am. J. Bot.</source> <volume>90</volume> (<issue>8</issue>), <fpage>1113</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1123</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3732/ajb.90.8.1113</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B94">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Shi</surname> <given-names>Y.-Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Forneris</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rajora</surname> <given-names>O. P.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Highly Informative Single-Copy Nuclear Microsatellite DNA Markers Developed Using an AFLP-SSR Approach in Black Spruce (Picea mariana) and Red Spruce (P. rubens)</article-title>. <source>PloS One</source> <volume>9</volume> (<issue>8</issue>), <fpage>e103789</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0103789</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B95">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Slatkin</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1995</year>). <article-title>A measure of population subdivision based on microsatellite allele frequencies</article-title>. <source>Genetics</source> <volume>139</volume> (<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>457</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>462</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/genetics/139.1.457</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B96">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Van Oosterhout</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hutchinson</surname> <given-names>W. F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wills</surname> <given-names>D. P. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Shipley</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2004</year>). <article-title>micro-checker: software for identifying and correcting genotyping errors in microsatellite data</article-title>. <source>Mol. Ecol. Notes</source> <volume>4</volume> (<issue>3</issue>), <fpage>535</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>538</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1471-8286.2004.00684.x</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B97">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Watterson</surname> <given-names>G. A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1978</year>). <article-title>The homozygosity test of neutrality</article-title>. <source>Genetics</source> <volume>88</volume> (<issue>2</issue>), <fpage>405</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>417</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/genetics/88.2.405</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B98">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Watts</surname> <given-names>W. A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1979</year>). <article-title>Late Quaternary vegetation of central Appalachia and the New Jersey coastal plain</article-title>. <source>Ecol. Monogr.</source> <volume>49</volume> (<issue>4</issue>), <fpage>427</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>469</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2307/1942471</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B99">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Weir</surname> <given-names>B. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cockerham</surname> <given-names>C. C.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1984</year>). <article-title>Estimating F-statistics for the analysis of population structure</article-title>. <source>Evolution</source> <volume>38</volume> (<issue>6</issue>), <fpage>1358</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1370</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2307/2408641</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B100">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wright</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1931</year>). <article-title>Evolution in mendelian populations</article-title>. <source>Genetics</source> <volume>16</volume> (<issue>2</issue>), <fpage>97</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>159</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/genetics/16.2.97</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>