<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.3 20070202//EN" "journalpublishing.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="2.3" xml:lang="EN">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Front. Plant Sci.</journal-id>
<journal-title>Frontiers in Plant Science</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">Front. Plant Sci.</abbrev-journal-title>
<issn pub-type="epub">1664-462X</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Frontiers Media S.A.</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpls.2023.1254103</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Plant Science</subject>
<subj-group>
<subject>Original Research</subject>
</subj-group>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Low soil available phosphorus level reduces cotton fiber length via osmoregulation</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Sun</surname>
<given-names>Miao</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn003">
<sup>&#x2020;</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2366332"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/conceptualization/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/funding-acquisition/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/investigation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/methodology/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zheng</surname>
<given-names>Cangsong</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn003">
<sup>&#x2020;</sup>
</xref>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/conceptualization/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/investigation/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Feng</surname>
<given-names>Weina</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1572315"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/formal-analysis/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Shao</surname>
<given-names>Jingjing</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/formal-analysis/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Pang</surname>
<given-names>Chaoyou</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name>
<surname>Li</surname>
<given-names>Pengcheng</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn001">
<sup>*</sup>
</xref>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/conceptualization/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name>
<surname>Dong</surname>
<given-names>Helin</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn001">
<sup>*</sup>
</xref>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/conceptualization/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/"/>
<role content-type="https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/funding-acquisition/"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>    <aff id="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
<institution>State Key Laboratory of Cotton Bio-breeding and Integrated Utilization, Institute of Cotton Research, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences</institution>, <addr-line>Anyang</addr-line>, <country>China</country>
</aff>
<aff id="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
<institution>Western Agricultural Research Center, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences</institution>, <addr-line>Changji</addr-line>, <country>China</country>
</aff>
<author-notes>
<fn fn-type="edited-by">
<p>Edited by: Anoop Kumar Srivastava, Central Citrus Research Institute (ICAR), India</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="edited-by">
<p>Reviewed by: Hongmei Cai, Huazhong Agricultural University, China; Angamuthu Manikandan, Indian Agricultural Research Institute (ICAR), India; Suresh Kumar Malhotra, ICAR- Directorate of Knowledge Management in Agriculture, India</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="corresp" id="fn001">
<p>*Correspondence: Pengcheng Li, <email xlink:href="mailto:lipengcheng@caas.cn">lipengcheng@caas.cn</email>; Helin Dong, <email xlink:href="mailto:donghelin@caas.cn">donghelin@caas.cn</email>
</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="equal" id="fn003">
<p>&#x2020;These authors have contributed equally to this work and share first authorship</p>
</fn>
</author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>18</day>
<month>08</month>
<year>2023</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="collection">
<year>2023</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>14</volume>
<elocation-id>1254103</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>06</day>
<month>07</month>
<year>2023</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>01</day>
<month>08</month>
<year>2023</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#xa9; 2023 Sun, Zheng, Feng, Shao, Pang, Li and Dong</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2023</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Sun, Zheng, Feng, Shao, Pang, Li and Dong</copyright-holder>
<license xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">
<p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.</p>
</license>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<sec>
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>Phosphorus (P) deficiency hinders cotton (<italic>Gossypium hirustum</italic> L.) growth and development, seriously affecting lint yield and fiber quality. However, it is still unclear how P fertilizer affects fiber length.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Methods</title>
<p>Therefore, a two-year (2019-2020) pool-culture experiment was conducted using the split-plot design, with two cotton cultivars (CCRI-79; low-P tolerant and SCRC-28; low-P sensitive) as the main plot. Three soil available phosphorus (AP) contents (P<sub>0</sub>: 3 &#xb1; 0.5, P<sub>1</sub>: 6 &#xb1; 0.5, and P<sub>2</sub> (control) with 15 &#xb1; 0.5 mg kg<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>) were applied to the plots, as the subplot, to investigate the impact of soil AP content on cotton fiber elongation and length. </p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Results</title>
<p>Low soil AP (P<sub>0</sub> and P<sub>1</sub>) decreased the contents of the osmotically active solutes in the cotton fibers, including potassium ions (K<sup>+</sup>), malate, soluble sugar, and sucrose, by 2.2&#x2013;10.2%, 14.4&#x2013;47.3%, 8.7&#x2013;24.5%, and 10.1&#x2013;23.4%, respectively, inhibiting the vacuoles from facilitating fiber elongation through osmoregulation. Moreover, soil AP deficiency also reduced the activities of enzymes participated in fiber elongation (plasma membrane H<sup>+</sup>-ATPase (PM-H<sup>+</sup>-ATPase), vacuole membrane H<sup>+</sup>-ATPase (V-H<sup>+</sup>-ATPase), vacuole membrane H<sup>+</sup>-translocating inorganic pyrophosphatase (V-H<sup>+</sup>-PPase), and phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase (PEPC)). The PM-H<sup>+</sup>-ATPase, V-H<sup>+</sup>-ATPase, V-H<sup>+</sup>-PPase, and PEPC were reduced by 8.4&#x2013;33.0%, 7.0&#x2013;33.8%, 14.1&#x2013;38.4%, and 16.9&#x2013;40.2%, respectively, inhibiting the transmembrane transport of the osmotically active solutes and acidified conditions for fiber cell wall, thus limiting the fiber elongation. Similarly, soil AP deficiency reduced the fiber length by 0.6&#x2013;3.0 mm, mainly due to the 3.8&#x2013;16.3% reduction of the maximum velocity of fiber elongation (V<sub>Lmax</sub>). Additionally, the upper fruiting branch positions (FB<sub>10&#x2013;11</sub>) had higher V<sub>Lmax</sub> and longer fiber lengths under low soil AP. </p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Discussion</title>
<p>Cotton fibers with higher malate content and V-H<sup>+</sup>-ATPase and V-H<sup>+</sup>-PPase activities yielded longer fibers. And the malate and soluble sugar contents and V-H<sup>+</sup>-ATPase and PEPC activities in the SCRC-28's fiber were more sensitive to soil AP deficiency in contrast to those of CCRI-79, possibly explaining the SCRC-28 fiber length sensitivity to low soil AP.</p>
</sec>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>cotton</kwd>
<kwd>soil available phosphorus</kwd>
<kwd>low-phosphorus tolerant ability</kwd>
<kwd>osmoregulation</kwd>
<kwd>fiber length</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<counts>
<fig-count count="13"/>
<table-count count="2"/>
<equation-count count="4"/>
<ref-count count="49"/>
<page-count count="17"/>
<word-count count="7665"/>
</counts>
<custom-meta-wrap>
<custom-meta>
<meta-name>section-in-acceptance</meta-name>
<meta-value>Plant Nutrition</meta-value>
</custom-meta>
</custom-meta-wrap>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec id="s1" sec-type="intro">
<label>1</label>
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>Phosphorus (P) is one of the three nutrient elements essential for cotton (<italic>Gossypium hirustum</italic> L.) growth and development (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Sun et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>). It can stimulate budding and flowering in the middle growth stage and promote the maturity and weight increase of cotton bolls in the late growth stage, thus directly affecting the lint yield and fiber quality (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">Sun et&#xa0;al., 2018</xref>). According to statistics, there are 5.7&#xd7;10<sup>9</sup> ha of land with AP deficiency on earth, which affects agricultural production (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">Cordell et&#xa0;al., 2009</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">Xu et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>), and about 30% of China&#x2019;s farmland has only 3&#x2212;5 mg kg<sup>-1</sup> of AP (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Gao et&#xa0;al., 2019</xref>). Cotton production is concentrated in Xinjiang and the saline-alkali areas in China. The soil types of these cotton growing areas are mostly calcareous, with a high P fixation capacity. Coupled with drought and limited rain, the lack of available phosphorus (AP) in the soil is a major problem in these cotton-growing areas (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">Wang et&#xa0;al., 2010</xref>). Therefore, applying a large quantity of P fertilizer is necessary to ensure a high yield and quality of cotton and reduce P fertilizer utilization efficiency in cotton fields (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Chen et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>). However, there is a shortage of high-grade P rock resources and a low mining recovery rate of P in China, which may cause a P fertilizer shortage in the future (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B49">Zhou et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>).</p>
<p>Cotton is the major industrial crop for natural fiber production (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B45">Yang et&#xa0;al., 2023</xref>), and cotton textiles are produced primarily in China, which is the world&#x2019;s largest producer of cotton. The cotton industry provides economic income for cotton farmers and raw materials for the textile industry, thus playing a vital role in the national economy (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B46">Yu, 2018</xref>). There is increasing demand for high cotton fiber quality. Thus, the cotton plants need sufficient P supply during the whole growth period to ensure lint yield and fiber quality (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Chen et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>).</p>
<p>Compared with the cotton plants supplied with 40.3 kg&#xb7;P<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub> ha<sup>-1</sup>, the cotton fiber length, strength, and micronaire value of the plants without P treatment decreased by 1.6%, 1.0%, and 2.6%, respectively (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">Sarkar and Majumdar, 2002</xref>). P deficiency (no P) reduced the length (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Gutstein, 1970</xref>) and strength (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">Li et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>) of cotton fibers but increased the micronaire value (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">Li et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>) compared to applying superphosphate or triple superphosphate. However, the P application rate of 0&#x2212;90 kg&#xb7;P<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub> ha<sup>-1</sup> did not affect the cotton fiber quality indicators (length, strength, and micronaire value) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">Mukundan et&#xa0;al., 1990</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">Tewolde and Fernandez, 2003</xref>). In summary, the effects of P fertilizers on cotton fiber quality are inconsistent, probably due to the different cotton varieties (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">Mukundan et&#xa0;al., 1990</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">Tewolde and Fernandez, 2003</xref>) or the amount/type of P fertilizer used (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Gutstein, 1970</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">Mukundan et&#xa0;al., 1990</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">Li et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>). These differences might also be related to the soil AP content of the experimental sites.</p>
<p>The leaves subtending cotton bolls provide 60% to 87% of carbon for the cotton bolls, seriously affecting their growth and development (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">Ashley, 1972</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">Constable and Rawson, 1980</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">Wullschleger and Oosterhuis, 1990</xref>). Thus, the leaves and bolls are the primary &#x201c;sources&#x201d; and &#x201c;sinks&#x201d; of photosynthetic products. Cotton yield and quality are influenced by the &#x201c;subtending leaves - cotton bolls&#x201d; association (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Liu et&#xa0;al., 2014</xref>). Our earlier research found that by decreasing sucrose synthesis and transportation in the leaves subtending cotton bolls, there is a decrease in cotton boll biomass and lint yield for two cotton cultivars (CCRI-79; low-P tolerant and SCRC-28; low-P sensitive) when the soil AP content is low (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Sun et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>). However, the regulatory mechanisms of fiber quality remain poorly understood.</p>
<p>Cotton fiber cells begin transitioning from expansion elongation (non-polar) to polar elongation at two days post-anthesis (DPA). The fiber cell elongation determines the length of cotton fibers, an important parameter in the textile industry (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B45">Yang et&#xa0;al., 2023</xref>). Vacuolar turgor supports the elongated fiber cells, and the elongation direction is determined by both turgor pressure and cell wall structure (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">Mao, 2019</xref>). There are four predominant osmotically active solutes in fiber cells: potassium ion (K<sup>+</sup>), malate, soluble sugar, and sucrose. After entering the vacuoles through the reverse content gradient, these solutes exert osmoregulation, causing water to enter the vacuoles and fiber cells during elongation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Ruan et&#xa0;al., 1997</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Ruan et&#xa0;al., 2001</xref>). The plasma membrane (PM) H<sup>+</sup>-ATPase (PM-H<sup>+</sup>-ATPase) pumps out H<sup>+</sup>, forming transmembrane ion gradients to provide the initial power for the transmembrane transport of osmotically active solutes. Meanwhile, the acidification of the surrounding environment facilitates cell wall expansion. Vacuolar membrane H<sup>+</sup>-ATPase (V-H<sup>+</sup>-ATPase) and H<sup>+</sup>-translocating inorganic pyrophosphatase (H<sup>+</sup>-PPase) play similar roles (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">Smart et&#xa0;al., 1998</xref>). Low P significantly increased sucrose content in cotton leaves (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Liu et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>) and the H<sup>+</sup>-ATPase activity of rice roots (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B47">Zhang, 2011</xref>). Phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase (PEPC) is the rate-limiting enzyme for malate synthesis in fiber cells (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">Smart et&#xa0;al., 1998</xref>); however, its transcript levels greatly vary under low P conditions. The <italic>PEPC</italic> gene was up-regulated in tobacco (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">Toyota et&#xa0;al., 2003</xref>) but down-regulated in <italic>Arabidopsis</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">Wu et&#xa0;al., 2003</xref>) under low P conditions. Thus, there is a need to further investigate whether low P would affect the osmotically active solutes&#x2019; contents (K<sup>+</sup>, malate, soluble sugar, and sucrose) and the related enzymes&#x2019; activities (PM-H<sup>+</sup>-ATPase, V-H<sup>+</sup>-ATPase, V-H<sup>+</sup>-PPase, and PEPC) of cotton fiber cells through the &#x201c;subtending leaves (source) - cotton fiber (sink)&#x201d; association. Determining whether these effects impact the cotton fiber length and the mechanisms involved is also important.</p>
<p>Therefore, this research explored (1) elongation and length of cotton fibers in the presence of soil AP deficiency; (2) the relationship between osmotically active solute contents and linked enzymes activities during fiber elongation and leaf P content of subtending leaves; (3) the key osmotically active solutes and enzymes when soil AP is low. Our findings provide a reference for further research on improving fiber qualities in low AP soil.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2" sec-type="materials|methods">
<label>2</label>
<title>Materials and methods</title>
<sec id="s2_1">
<label>2.1</label>
<title>Description of the experimental site</title>
<p>In Anyang (36&#xb0;06&#x2032; N and 114&#xb0;21&#x2032; E), Henan, China, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences&#x2019; Institute of Cotton Research carried out a two-year pool-culture study from 2019 to 2020. Each pool was 3.6-m-long, 4-m-wide and 1.5-m-high. The experimental soil type is classified as Inceptisols (USDA Soil Taxonomy). Clay loam was the soil used in the experiment (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Li et&#xa0;al., 2017</xref>). Among soil layers within 0&#x2212;20 cm, the organic matter, total nitrogen, and available nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium were respectively 12.9&#xa0;g kg<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>, 0.86 mg kg<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>, 64.4 mg kg<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>, 3.1 mg kg<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>, and 163.6 mg kg<sup>&#x2212;1</sup> in 2019 and 13.1&#xa0;g kg<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>, 0.85 mg kg<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>, 63.3 mg kg<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>, 3.0 mg kg<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>, and 180.4 mg kg<sup>&#x2212;1</sup> in 2020. Meteorological data of the cotton growing seasons in 2019 and 2020 are presented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">
<bold>Table&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>.</p>
<table-wrap id="T1" position="float">
<label>Table&#xa0;1</label>
<caption>
<p>Anyang experimental station weather data for the growing seasons of 2019 and 2020.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" align="left">Month</th>
<th valign="middle" colspan="2" align="left">Sunshine duration (h)</th>
<th valign="middle" colspan="2" align="left">Average temperature (&#xb0;C)</th>
<th valign="middle" colspan="2" align="left">Precipitation (mm)</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left"/>
<td valign="middle" align="left">2019</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">2020</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">2019</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">2020</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">2019</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">2020</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">April</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">193.6</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">284.4</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">14.4</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">14.2</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">70.4</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">28.8</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">May</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">297.7</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">294.3</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">22.0</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">22.2</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">5.0</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">39.5</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">June</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">256.7</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">206.5</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">27.9</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">26.2</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">55.4</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">50.4</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">July</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">260.2</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">204.4</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">28.5</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">26.0</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">42.0</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">29.2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">August</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">186.6</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">196.4</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">25.5</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">26.0</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">116.1</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">156.1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">September</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">213.7</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">226.3</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">22.0</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">21.9</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">51.3</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">3.6</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">October</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">139.9</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">123.1</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">15.4</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">14.4</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">51.5</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">9.9</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Average/total</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">1548.4</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">1535.4</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">22.2</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">21.6</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">391.7</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">317.5</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn>
<p>During the experiments, all weather data was collected from an automatic weather station 4 kilometers away.</p>
</fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_2">
<label>2.2</label>
<title>Management of experimental fields and design of experiments</title>
<p>The research used the split-plot design, with the main plot consisting of the low-P-tolerant cotton cultivar CCRI-79 and the low-P-sensitive cultivar SCRC-28, selected in the previous study (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Sun et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>). The subplots contained three soil AP levels; 3 &#xb1; 0.5 mg kg<sup>-1</sup> (P<sub>0</sub>, extreme soil AP deficiency), 6 &#xb1; 0.5 mg kg<sup>-1</sup> (P<sub>1</sub>, moderate soil AP deficiency), and 15 &#xb1; 0.5 mg kg<sup>-1</sup> (P<sub>2</sub>, control). The soils from 20&#x2013;40 cm depth in the field were chosen to develop P-deficiency in pool soil. Soil AP levels were regulated using triple superphosphate (44% P<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub>) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Sun et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>). The P fertilizer amount of 0, 50.6, and 202.4&#xa0;g pool<sup>&#x2212;1</sup> was applied in P<sub>0</sub>, P<sub>1</sub>, and P<sub>2</sub> during both years. The nitrogen fertilizer used was 225&#xa0;kg N ha<sup>-1</sup> (urea, 46% N), and 50% of the fertilizer was used for basal application before sowing (April 23, 2019, and April 15, 2020), while the other 50% for topdressing in the early flowering stage (July 22, 2019, and July 6, 2020). Furthermore, the potassium fertilizer used was 150&#xa0;kg K<sub>2</sub>O ha<sup>-1</sup> (potassium sulfate, 51% K<sub>2</sub>O) and was applied as basal fertilizer (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Li et&#xa0;al., 2017</xref>). We applied the base fertilizer 7 days before sowing, and we watered the soil to dissolve it. An analysis of soil samples at the 0&#x2212;20 cm soil layer was conducted one month after the application of base fertilizer at the surface level of the soil, after which the samples were dried and sieved at a fineness of 1&#xa0;mm. The soil AP contents were determined by the Olsen-P method (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B44">Yang and Jacobsen, 1990</xref>). Thereafter, cotton seeds were planted through manual drilling (April 30, 2019, and April 24, 2020). Five rows of 80&#xa0;cm spacing were used in each experimental plot with an area of 14.4 m<sup>2</sup> and a density of 52,500 plants per hectare. Every treatment was conducted in three replicates, and field management was in accordance with the management measures for high-yielding cotton cultivation.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_3">
<label>2.3</label>
<title>Sampling and handling</title>
<p>During the flowering period of cotton plants, 8&#x2212;10 cotton bolls of the first fruit node in the lower fruiting branches (FB<sub>2-3</sub>), middle fruiting branches (FB<sub>6-7</sub>), and upper fruiting branches (FB<sub>10-11</sub>) were collected at 5, 10, 15, 17, 24, 31, 38, and 45 DPA (8:00-9:00 a.m.). The harvested cotton bolls were placed on ice, and the cotton fibers were peeled off from the cotton seeds within one hour. Thereafter, we analyzed the malate content and enzyme activity of one third (1/3) of the cotton fibers that were frozen in liquid nitrogen and held at -80&#xb0;C. Another 1/3 was dried at 70&#xb0;C to a constant weight to determine K<sup>+</sup> and carbohydrate contents. The remaining 1/3 was used for fiber length measurement.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_4">
<label>2.4</label>
<title>Measuring K<sup>+</sup>, malate, and carbohydrate contents of the cotton fibers</title>
<p>After crushing with a disintegrator, dried cotton fiber samples were sieved at 0.5&#xa0;mm. Thereafter, K<sup>+</sup> was extracted from the samples using the H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub>-H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> digestion method, and its content was determined by an atomic absorption spectrometer (NOVAA400P, Analytik Jena GmbH, Jena, Germany) at 769.9 nm.</p>
<p>After snap-freezing in liquid nitrogen, 50 mg of frozen fiber samples were ground into powder, and a 1-hour extraction at 80&#xb0;C was performed on the powder using 1.5&#xa0;ml of the buffer containing 1.2&#xa0;ml of absolute ethanol, 100 mM Hepes-KOH (pH 7.1), and 20 mM MgCl<sub>2</sub> to obtain the crude extract. We centrifuged the crude extract at 12000&#xd7;g (5&#xa0;min), and the supernatant was collected and mixed with 150 &#x3bc;l of active carbon (100 mg ml<sup>-1</sup>). The mixture was centrifuged under the same conditions, and the supernatant was collected. Finally, 5&#xa0;ml of the supernatant was transferred into a 10&#xa0;ml cuvette, and 1&#xa0;ml of Tris-HCl (0.2&#xa0;mol L<sup>-1</sup> Tris, 0.2&#xa0;mol L<sup>-1</sup> HCl, and pH 5.36) was added and mixed. Incubate for 15&#xa0;min with distilled water topped up to 25&#xa0;ml. The malate contents were measured on the spectrophotometer (SPECORD 40, Analytik Jena GmbH, Jena, Germany) at 656 nm using the colorimetric method (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B48">Zhang et&#xa0;al., 2017</xref>).</p>
<p>Weighed (0.1&#xa0;g) cotton fibers were placed in a 10&#xa0;ml centrifuge tube with 5&#xa0;ml of 80% ethanol (v/v) and incubated at 80&#xb0;C for carbohydrates extraction (30&#xa0;min). The extracts were centrifuged (10000&#xd7;g, 5&#xa0;min), and a 25&#xa0;ml volumetric flask was used to collect the supernatant. Repetition of the extraction procedure was performed, and the obtained supernatant was topped up to 25&#xa0;ml with ethanol (80%, v/v). In accordance with Hendrix et&#xa0;al. (1993), we measured the soluble sugar and sucrose contents.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_5">
<label>2.5</label>
<title>PEPC, PM-H<sup>+</sup>-ATPase, V-H<sup>+</sup>-ATPase, and V-H<sup>+</sup>-PPase activities in cotton fibers</title>
<p>
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Hu et&#xa0;al. (2018)</xref> method was used to measure PEPC, V-H<sup>+</sup>-ATPase, and V-H<sup>+</sup>-PPase activities. Briefly, the fiber powder was extracted with 5&#xa0;ml of the buffer containing 30 mM Hepes-Tris (pH 7.4), 250 mM mannitol, 3 mM ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (PMSF), 1.5% (w/v) polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) 4000, 1 mM dithiothreitol (DTT), and 0.1% (w/v) bovine serum albumin (BSA). In a centrifuge operated at 4&#xb0;C, the homogenate was centrifuged (480&#xd7;g, 10&#xa0;min) and the supernatants were stored to measure the enzyme activities. The reaction solution (1100 &#xb5;l) for PEPC activity assay contained 800 &#x3bc;l of the reaction buffer (30 mM Hepes-Tris (pH 7.5), 10 mM MgCl<sub>2</sub>, 10 mM NaHCO<sub>3</sub>, and 0.5 mM DTT), 100 &#x3bc;l of crude enzyme solution, 100 &#xb5;l of malate dehydrogenase (EC 1.1.1.37, 100 U ml<sup>-1</sup>, SIGMA), and 100 &#xb5;l of 30 mM PEP. The PEPC activity was measured using the colorimetric method at 340 nm. For V-H<sup>+</sup>-ATPase activity determination, the reaction solution (500 &#xb5;L) contained 400 &#x3bc;l of the reaction buffer (30 mM Hepes-Tris (pH 7.5), 3 mM MgSO<sub>4</sub>, 50 mM KCl, 0.5 mM NaN<sub>3</sub>, 0.125 mM (NH<sub>4</sub>)<sub>2</sub> MoO<sub>4</sub>, and 0.125 mM Na<sub>3</sub>VO<sub>4</sub>), 50 &#x3bc;l of crude enzyme solution, and 50 &#x3bc;l of 20 mM ATP-Tris. Half-hour was spent incubating the mixed solution at 30&#xb0;C. In order to terminate the reaction, 1&#xa0;ml of the stop solution (5% (NH<sub>4</sub>)<sub>2</sub>MoO<sub>4</sub>: 5 M H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub>: H<sub>2</sub>O=1: 1: 3) was added. Finally, 200 &#x3bc;l of chromogenic agent (0.25&#xa0;g of aminophenol sulfonic acid in 100&#xa0;ml of 1.5% Na<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>3</sub> (pH 5.5) mixed with 0.5&#xa0;g of Na<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>3</sub>) was added and the mixture was incubated for 20&#xa0;min at 37&#xb0;C. The V-H<sup>+</sup>-PPase activity was also determined using the colorimetric method at 660 nm. Its reaction solution (500 &#xb5;l) contained 400 &#x3bc;l of the reaction buffer (30 mM Hepes-Tris (pH 7.5), 3 mM MgSO<sub>4</sub>, 50 mM KCl, 0.5 mM NaN<sub>3</sub>, and 0.125 mM (NH<sub>4</sub>)<sub>2</sub> MoO<sub>4</sub>), 50 &#x3bc;l of crude enzyme solution, and 50 &#x3bc;l of 20 mM PP-Tris. The following measurement steps were the same as those employed to determine V-H<sup>+</sup>-ATPase activity. PM-H<sup>+</sup>-ATPase was isolated using Hu et&#xa0;al.&#x2019;s method (2018). In brief, frozen fiber tissues were ground in an ice bath with 5&#xa0;ml of cold buffer comprising 50 mM Hepes-Tris (pH 7.0), 300 mM sucrose, 8 mM EDTA, 2 mM PMSF, 1.5% (w/v) PVP 4000, 4 mM DTT, and 0.2% (w/v) BSA. In 4&#xb0;C, the homogenate was centrifuged (10000&#xd7;g, 20&#xa0;min). In order to analyze enzyme activity in the supernatants, the supernatants were stored. The reaction solution (500 &#xb5;L) for PEPC activity assay contained 400 &#x3bc;l of reaction buffer (30 mM Hepes-Tris (pH 6.5), 3 mM MgSO<sub>4</sub>, 50 mM KCl, 0.5 mM NaN<sub>3</sub>, 0.125 mM (NH<sub>4</sub>)<sub>2</sub> MoO<sub>4</sub>), 50 &#x3bc;l of crude enzyme solution, and 50 &#xb5;l of 20 mM ATP-Tris. The subsequent measurement processes were in accordance with those of V-H<sup>+</sup>-ATPase activity determination.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_6">
<label>2.6</label>
<title>Cotton fiber length</title>
<p>Boiling cotton bolls formed before 30 DPA in 0.1% (v/v) HCl separated fibers from cotton seeds (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Schubert et&#xa0;al., 1973</xref>). The fibers were stretched through the flowing water method (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">Thaker et&#xa0;al., 1989</xref>), and their lengths were measured using a vernier caliper.</p>
<p>For cotton bolls formed after 30 DPA, the fibers were peeled and incubated at 60&#xb0;C (30&#xa0;min) and then at 40&#xb0;C (2&#xa0;h). The fibers were finally incubated in a standard assay chamber for 48&#xa0;h, with temperature and humidity set at 20 &#xb1; 2&#xb0;C and 65 &#xb1; 5%, respectively. The fiber length was then determined using a photoelectric stapler (Y-146, Taicang Electron Apparatus Co., Ltd., China) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">Yang et&#xa0;al., 2016</xref>).</p>
<p>The fibers were obtained by ginning seed cotton from cotton bolls harvested on September 15, 2019, and September 15, 2020. After drying the cotton fiber samples to a constant weight at 35&#xb0;C, the fiber length was analyzed at the Supervision, Inspection, and Test Center of Cotton Quality, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, China.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_7">
<label>2.7</label>
<title>Statistical analysis</title>
<p>In order to calculate means, standard errors, and coefficients of variation (CV, %), Microsoft Excel 2007 (Microsoft Corp., Redmond, WA, USA) was used. The SPSS statistical software Version 23.0 (IBM Corp., New York, NY, USA) was used to conduct a variance analysis for all treatments at a 5% significance level, applying the least significant difference (LSD). In order to analyze each variable&#x2019;s specific relevance, Pearson correlation coefficient was used.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s3" sec-type="results">
<label>3</label>
<title>Results</title>
<sec id="s3_1">
<label>3.1</label>
<title>Osmotically active solute contents of the fibers</title>
<p>Low soil AP levels (P<sub>0</sub> and P<sub>1</sub>) decreased the fiber K<sup>+</sup> contents (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>). Under P<sub>1</sub> and P<sub>0</sub>, the average fiber K<sup>+</sup> contents reduced by 7.3&#x2212;8.8% and 10.3&#x2212;12.3% in CCRI-79 and 10.6&#x2212;22.7% and 20.8&#x2212;33.1% in SCRC-28, respectively, at the 3 fruiting branch positions (FBPs) compared to P<sub>2</sub>. Low soil AP had less effect at the FB<sub>10&#x2013;11</sub> compared to FB<sub>2&#x2013;3</sub> and FB<sub>6&#x2013;7</sub> (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>). For all soil AP levels, CCRI-79 and SCRC-28 had average fiber K<sup>+</sup> contents of 11.2-12.7 mg g<sup>-1</sup> and 9.5-12.9 mg g<sup>-1</sup>, respectively. However, SCRC-28 had a higher CV (15.3%) than CCRI-79 (6.3%). CCRI-79 had fiber K<sup>+</sup> contents 6.9 and 18.0% higher than SCRC-28 in P<sub>1</sub> and P<sub>0</sub>, but 1.5% lower in P<sub>2</sub> (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>).</p>
<fig id="f1" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;1</label>
<caption>
<p>Cotton fiber potassium ion (K<sup>+</sup>) content in relation to soil available phosphorus (AP) levels in 2019 and 2020. FB: fruiting branch. P<sub>0</sub>: 3 &#xb1; 0.5 mg kg<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>. P<sub>1</sub>: 6 &#xb1; 0.5 mg kg<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>. P<sub>2</sub>: 15 &#xb1; 0.5 mg kg<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>. The cotton fibers were collected at 5, 10, 17, 24, and 31 days post-anthesis (DPA) (8:00-9:00 a.m.). Error bars indicate SE (n = 3).</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-14-1254103-g001.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>The fiber malate content increased at 5&#x2212;10 DPA and decreased at 10&#x2212;31 DPA (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;2</bold>
</xref>). Under the P<sub>1</sub> and P<sub>0</sub> treatments, the malate content decreased by 14.4&#x2013;17.0% and 20.2&#x2013;22.5% for CCRI-79, and 20.7&#x2013;30.0% and 35.4&#x2013;47.3% for SCRC-28, respectively, across the three FBPs in 2019 and 2020. SCRC-28 had a greater CV of 25.6% compared to CCRI-79&#x2019;s CV of 6.3%. Additionally, In P<sub>1</sub> and P<sub>0</sub>, CCRI-79 had malate contents that were 7.9% and 26.5% higher than SCRC-28, respectively, but in P<sub>2</sub>, they were 3.3% lower. At the same soil AP level, fibers from FB<sub>6&#x2013;7</sub> and FB<sub>10&#x2013;11</sub> had higher malate content in contrast with FB<sub>2&#x2013;3</sub> (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;2</bold>
</xref>). According to the above data, SCRS-28 (low-P sensitive) had greater reductions of K<sup>+</sup> and malate contents in fibers than CCRI-79 (low-P tolerant) under low soil AP treatments (P<sub>0</sub> and P<sub>1</sub>).</p>
<fig id="f2" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;2</label>
<caption>
<p>Cotton fiber malate content in relation to soil available phosphorus (AP) levels in 2019 and 2020. FB: fruiting branch. P<sub>0</sub>: 3 &#xb1; 0.5 mg kg<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>. P<sub>1</sub>: 6 &#xb1; 0.5 mg kg<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>. P<sub>2</sub>: 15 &#xb1; 0.5 mg kg<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>. The cotton fibers were collected at 5, 10, 17, 24, and 31 days post-anthesis (DPA) (8:00-9:00 a.m.). Error bars indicate SE (n = 3).</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-14-1254103-g002.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>Nevertheless, the soluble sugar content of fibers from the three FBPs declined with the development of cotton bolls, especially at 10&#x2013;31 DPA compared to 5&#x2013;10 DPA (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;3</bold>
</xref>). Compared to P<sub>2</sub>, the soluble sugar content reduced by 9.1&#x2212;9.6% and 16.5&#x2212;20.9% for CCRI-79, in P<sub>1</sub> and P<sub>0</sub> at the three FBPs, respectively, over the two years. A similar change pattern was observed for SCRC-28, with an 8.7&#x2212;12.4% and 16.5&#x2212;24.5% decrease under the same conditions (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;3</bold>
</xref>).</p>
<fig id="f3" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;3</label>
<caption>
<p>Cotton fiber soluble sugar content in relation to soil available phosphorus (AP) levels in 2019&#x2212;2020. FB: fruiting branch. P<sub>0</sub>: 3 &#xb1; 0.5 mg kg<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>. P<sub>1</sub>: 6 &#xb1; 0.5 mg kg<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>. P<sub>2</sub>: 15 &#xb1; 0.5 mg kg<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>. The cotton fibers were collected at 5, 10, 17, 24, and 31 days post-anthesis (DPA) (8:00-9:00 a.m.). Error bars indicate SE (n = 3).</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-14-1254103-g003.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>Interestingly, the fiber sucrose content had a similar trend with the soluble sugar content during the fiber elongation progress (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f4">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;4</bold>
</xref>). During the course of 24 months, under P<sub>1</sub> and P<sub>0</sub>, the sucrose content at the three FBPs was reduced by 10.1&#x2212;14.2% and 19.0&#x2212;20.4% in CCRI-79 and by 10.1&#x2212;13.2% and 19.3&#x2212;22.2% in SCRC-28, respectively. Moreover, the fibers of FB<sub>10&#x2013;11</sub> registered lower decline rates of the sucrose content than FB<sub>2&#x2013;3</sub> and FB<sub>6&#x2013;7</sub> for CCRI-79 but higher decline rates for SCRC-28 in 2019 and 2020 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f4">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;4</bold>
</xref>).</p>
<fig id="f4" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;4</label>
<caption>
<p>Cotton fiber sucrose content in relation to soil available phosphorus (AP) levels in 2019&#x2212;2020. FB: fruiting branch. P<sub>0</sub>: 3 &#xb1; 0.5 mg kg<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>. P<sub>1</sub>: 6 &#xb1; 0.5 mg kg<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>. P<sub>2</sub>: 15 &#xb1; 0.5 mg kg<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>. The cotton fibers were collected at 5, 10, 17, 24, and 31 days post-anthesis (DPA) (8:00-9:00 a.m.). Error bars indicate SE (n = 3).</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-14-1254103-g004.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_2">
<label>3.2</label>
<title>Relationship between P contents and osmotically active solutes contents</title>
<p>Positive relations existed between the osmotically active solutes involved in fiber elongation, especially the K<sup>+</sup> and soluble sugar contents, and P content of subtending leaves of both cultivars at 10&#x2212;31 DPA (<italic>p</italic>&lt;0.05) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f5">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;5</bold>
</xref>). Significantly positive correlations were also observed between these contents from 10 to 24 DPA (<italic>p</italic>&lt;0.05) (except for malate content of CCRI-79 at 24 DPA). The correlation between the P content of the leaves and the sucrose content of the fibers were all significantly positive (<italic>p</italic>&lt;0.05) at 10 DPA for SCRC-28 and 31 DPA for CCRI-79 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f5">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;5</bold>
</xref>).</p>
<fig id="f5" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;5</label>
<caption>
<p>Relationship between osmotically active solute content engaged in fiber elongation and phosphorus (P) contents of the subtending leaves in 2019&#x2212;2020. The P content data of the subtending leaves were referred from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Sun et&#xa0;al. (2022)</xref>. * and ** represent significant differences at <italic>p</italic>&lt;0.05 and <italic>p</italic>&lt;0.01. n=18, <italic>R</italic> <sub>0.05&#xa0;</sub>=&#xa0;0.468, <italic>R</italic> <sub>0.01&#xa0;</sub>=&#xa0;0.590.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-14-1254103-g005.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_3">
<label>3.3</label>
<title>Activities of enzymes associated with fiber elongation</title>
<p>The PM-H<sup>+</sup>-ATPase (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f6">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;6</bold>
</xref>), V-H<sup>+</sup>-ATPase (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f7">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;7</bold>
</xref>), and V-H<sup>+</sup>-PPase (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f8">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;8</bold>
</xref>) activities of fiber presented similar trends reaching its maximum at 17 DPA and declining with increasing soil AP content. Under P<sub>1</sub> and P<sub>0</sub>, the PM-H<sup>+</sup>-ATPase activity increased by 8.4&#x2212;10.5% and 11.3&#x2212;14.4% for CCRI-79 and by 14.9&#x2212;20.5% and 21.8&#x2212;33.0% for SCRC-28, respectively at all the FBPs in the two years compared to P<sub>2</sub> (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f6">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;6</bold>
</xref>). As compared to SCRC-28, CCRI-79 exhibited 8.5 and 15.8% higher activity of fiber PM-H<sup>+</sup>-ATPase under P<sub>1</sub> and P<sub>0</sub>, but 0.6% lower under P<sub>2</sub> (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f6">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;6</bold>
</xref>). The V-H<sup>+</sup>-ATPase activities reduced by 7.0&#x2212;9.8% and 5.9&#x2212;10.4% for CCRI-79, and by 12.4&#x2212;18.6% and 23.4&#x2212;33.8% for SCRC-28 under P<sub>1</sub> and P<sub>0</sub>, respectively, in contrast with P<sub>2</sub> treatments throughout the FBPs and growing seasons (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f7">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;7</bold>
</xref>). Nevertheless, under P<sub>1</sub> and P<sub>0</sub>, the V-H<sup>+</sup>-PPase activities decreased by 14.1&#x2212;19.4% and 17.2&#x2212;20.5% in CCRI-79, and by 18.3&#x2212;23.7% and 28.5&#x2212;38.4% in SCRC-28, respectively, in contrast with P<sub>2</sub> treatments throughout the FBPs and the two years (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f8">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;8</bold>
</xref>).</p>
<fig id="f6" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;6</label>
<caption>
<p>The H<sup>+</sup>-ATPase activities of the cotton fiber plasma membrane (PM) (PM-H<sup>+</sup>-ATPase) in relation to soil available phosphorus (AP) levels in 2019&#x2212;2020. FB, fruiting branch. P<sub>0</sub>: 3 &#xb1; 0.5 mg kg<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>. P<sub>1</sub>: 6 &#xb1; 0.5 mg kg<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>. P<sub>2</sub>: 15 &#xb1; 0.5 mg kg<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>. The cotton fibers were collected at 5, 10, 17, 24, and 31 days post-anthesis (DPA) (8:00-9:00 a.m.). Error bars indicate SE (n = 3).</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-14-1254103-g006.tif"/>
</fig>
<fig id="f7" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;7</label>
<caption>
<p>The H<sup>+</sup>-ATPase activities of the cotton fibers vacuole membrane (V-H<sup>+</sup>-ATPase) in relation to soil available phosphorus (AP) levels in 2019-2020. FB, fruiting branch. P<sub>0</sub>: 3 &#xb1; 0.5 mg kg<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>. P<sub>1</sub>: 6 &#xb1; 0.5 mg kg<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>. P<sub>2</sub>: 15 &#xb1; 0.5 mg kg<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>. The cotton fibers were collected at 5, 10, 17, 24, and 31 days post-anthesis (DPA) (8:00-9:00 a.m.). Error bars indicate SE (n = 3).</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-14-1254103-g007.tif"/>
</fig>
<fig id="f8" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;8</label>
<caption>
<p>The H<sup>+</sup>-translocating inorganic pyrophosphatase (H<sup>+</sup>-PPase) activities of the cotton fibers vacuole membrane (V-H<sup>+</sup>-PPase) in relation to soil available phosphorus (AP) levels in 2019&#x2212;2020. FB, fruiting branch. P<sub>0</sub>: 3 &#xb1; 0.5 mg kg<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>. P<sub>1</sub>: 6 &#xb1; 0.5 mg kg<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>. P<sub>2</sub>: 15 &#xb1; 0.5 mg kg<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>. The cotton fibers were collected at 5, 10, 17, 24, and 31 days post-anthesis (DPA) (8:00-9:00 a.m.). Error bars indicate SE (n = 3).</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-14-1254103-g008.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>The fiber PEPC activity presented a single-peaked curve during fiber elongation and reached its climax at 17 DPA (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f9">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;9</bold>
</xref>). Compared to P<sub>2</sub>, the PEPC activity for CCRI-79 reduced by 16.6&#x2212;21.7% and 22.6&#x2212;23.4% in P<sub>1</sub> and P<sub>0</sub> at the three FBPs in 2019&#x2212;2020. Similarly, in P<sub>1</sub> and P<sub>0</sub>, the PEPC activity reduced by 20.9&#x2212;26.5% and 30.0&#x2212;40.2% for SCRC-28. Low soil AP levels (P<sub>1</sub> and P<sub>0</sub>) reduced the PEPC activities of fibers in the FB<sub>10&#x2013;11</sub> compared to FB<sub>2&#x2013;3</sub> and FB<sub>6&#x2013;7</sub> in SCRC-28 but had less effect on the three FBPs of CCRI-79. Obviously, the variations in the four enzymes involved in fiber elongation of SCRC-28 were greater than those of CCRI-79 under low-P-stress.</p>
<fig id="f9" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;9</label>
<caption>
<p>The phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase (PEPC) activities of the cotton fibers in relation to soil available phosphorus (AP) levels in 2019 and 2020. FB, fruiting branch. P<sub>0</sub>: 3 &#xb1; 0.5 mg kg<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>. P<sub>1</sub>: 6 &#xb1; 0.5 mg kg<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>. P<sub>2</sub>: 15 &#xb1; 0.5 mg kg<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>. The cotton fibers were collected at 5, 10, 17, 24, and 31 days post-anthesis (DPA) (8:00-9:00 a.m.). Error bars indicate SE (n = 3).</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-14-1254103-g009.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_4">
<label>3.4</label>
<title>Interrelationship between P contents and key enzymes activities</title>
<p>Among the two cultivars, the enzymes involved in fiber elongation and P content were positively correlated, peculiarly PM-H<sup>+</sup>-ATPase and PEPC activities (<italic>p</italic>&lt;0.01), during fiber elongation (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f10">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;10</bold>
</xref>). The positive correlations between P contents, and the V-H<sup>+</sup>-ATPase activities and V-H<sup>+</sup>-PPase were very significant (<italic>p</italic>&lt;0.01) at 10&#x2212;31 DPA in SCRC-28, and significant (<italic>p</italic>&lt;0.05) at 10&#x2212;17 DPA in CCRI-79 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f10">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;10</bold>
</xref>).</p>
<fig id="f10" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;10</label>
<caption>
<p>Interrelationship between the activities of the enzymes engaged in fiber elongation and phosphorus (P) contents of the subtending leaves in 2019&#x2212;2020. The P content data of the subtending leaves were referenced from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Sun et&#xa0;al. (2022)</xref>. * and ** show significant differences at <italic>p</italic>&lt;0.05 and <italic>p</italic>&lt;0.01. n=18, <italic>R</italic> <sub>0.05&#xa0;</sub>=&#xa0;0.468, <italic>R</italic> <sub>0.01&#xa0;</sub>=&#xa0;0.590.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-14-1254103-g010.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_5">
<label>3.5</label>
<title>Dynamic changes in the fiber length on the different fruiting branches</title>
<p>The lack of AP in soil seriously hindered the growth and development of cotton plants (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f11">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;11A</bold>
</xref>), thereby affecting fiber length (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">
<bold>Table&#xa0;2</bold>
</xref>). The fiber length changes formed an &#x201c;s-shape&#x201d; curve during the development of cotton bolls, which could be fitted using the logistic equation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">Yang et&#xa0;al., 2016</xref>) as follows:</p>
<fig id="f11" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;11</label>
<caption>
<p>The growth phenotype of CCRI-79 and SCRC-28 under three soil available phosphorus (AP) levels <bold>(A)</bold> and the schematic diagram shows the mechanism of how soil AP deficiency affects fiber elongation <bold>(B)</bold>.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-14-1254103-g011.tif"/>
</fig>
<table-wrap id="T2" position="float">
<label>Table&#xa0;2</label>
<caption>
<p>Elongation eigenvalues influenced by soil phosphorus availability (AP) in 2019&#x2212;2020.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" align="left" colspan="3"/>
<th valign="middle" colspan="5" align="left">2019</th>
<th valign="middle" colspan="5" align="left">2020</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Cultivar</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">FBP</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">AP Treatment</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">R<sup>2</sup>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">V<sub>Lmax</sub>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">T<sub>L</sub>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">L<sub>max</sub>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">L<sub>obs</sub>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">R<sup>2</sup>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">V<sub>Lmax</sub>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">T<sub>L</sub>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">L<sub>max</sub>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">L<sub>obs</sub>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left"/>
<td valign="middle" align="left"/>
<td valign="middle" align="left"/>
<td valign="middle" align="left"/>
<td valign="middle" align="left">(mm d<sup>-1</sup>)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">(d)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">(mm)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">(mm)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left"/>
<td valign="middle" align="left">(mm d<sup>-1</sup>)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">(d)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">(mm)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">(mm)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">CCRI-79</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">FB<sub>2-3</sub>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">P<sub>0</sub>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">1.000</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">2.4</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">7.6</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">28.0</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">27.8b</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">0.999</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">2.2</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">8.4</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">27.6</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">27.6b</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left"/>
<td valign="middle" align="left"/>
<td valign="middle" align="left">P<sub>1</sub>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">1.000</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">2.5</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">7.5</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">28.6</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">28.7ab</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">0.999</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">2.3</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">8.2</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">28.6</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">28.3ab</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left"/>
<td valign="middle" align="left"/>
<td valign="middle" align="left">P<sub>2</sub>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">0.999</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">2.7</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">7.4</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">30.2</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">29.6a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">0.999</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">2.4</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">7.9</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">29.4</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">29.5a</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left"/>
<td valign="middle" align="left"/>
<td valign="middle" align="left">CV (%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">0.1</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">6.0</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">1.3</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">3.9</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">3.1</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">0.0</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">4.3</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">3.1</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">3.2</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">3.4</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left"/>
<td valign="middle" align="left">FB<sub>6-7</sub>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">P<sub>0</sub>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">1.000</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">2.5</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">7.6</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">28.3</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">28.3b</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">0.999</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">2.2</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">8.4</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">28.6</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">28.6b</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left"/>
<td valign="middle" align="left"/>
<td valign="middle" align="left">P<sub>1</sub>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">0.999</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">2.6</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">7.2</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">28.9</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">29.3a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">0.999</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">2.4</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">8.2</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">29.3</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">29.3ab</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left"/>
<td valign="middle" align="left"/>
<td valign="middle" align="left">P<sub>2</sub>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">0.999</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">2.7</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">7.3</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">29.9</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">29.6a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">0.999</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">2.5</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">7.9</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">30.1</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">30.3a</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left"/>
<td valign="middle" align="left"/>
<td valign="middle" align="left">CV (%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">0.1</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">3.8</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">2.8</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">2.8</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">2.4</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">0.0</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">6.5</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">3.1</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">2.6</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">2.9</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left"/>
<td valign="middle" align="left">FB<sub>10-11</sub>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">P<sub>0</sub>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">1.000</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">2.5</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">7.6</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">28.3</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">28.1b</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">0.999</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">2.3</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">8.4</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">28.9</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">28.9b</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left"/>
<td valign="middle" align="left"/>
<td valign="middle" align="left">P<sub>1</sub>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">1.000</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">2.5</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">7.5</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">28.0</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">28.8a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">0.999</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">2.4</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">8.2</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">29.9</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">29.6ab</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left"/>
<td valign="middle" align="left"/>
<td valign="middle" align="left">P<sub>2</sub>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">0.999</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">2.6</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">7.4</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">29.5</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">29.3a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">0.999</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">2.5</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">7.9</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">30.0</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">30.1a</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left"/>
<td valign="middle" align="left"/>
<td valign="middle" align="left">CV (%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">0.1</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">2.3</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">1.3</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">2.8</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">2.0</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">0.0</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">4.2</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">3.1</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">2.1</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">2.1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">SCRC-28</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">FB<sub>2-3</sub>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">P<sub>0</sub>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">0.998</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">2.0</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">8.3</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">25.2</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">25.4b</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">0.999</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">2.1</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">8.4</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">26.9</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">26.7b</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left"/>
<td valign="middle" align="left"/>
<td valign="middle" align="left">P<sub>1</sub>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">0.994</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">2.4</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">7.9</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">28.1</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">28.2a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">1.000</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">2.3</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">8.3</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">28.2</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">28.1a</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left"/>
<td valign="middle" align="left"/>
<td valign="middle" align="left">P<sub>2</sub>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">0.995</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">2.5</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">7.8</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">29.4</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">29.1a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">0.999</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">2.4</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">7.9</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">29.2</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">28.9a</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left"/>
<td valign="middle" align="left"/>
<td valign="middle" align="left">CV (%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">0.2</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">11.5</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">3.3</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">7.8</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">6.9</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">0.1</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">6.7</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">3.2</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">4.1</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">4.1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left"/>
<td valign="middle" align="left"/>
<td valign="middle" align="left">P<sub>0</sub>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">0.998</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">2.1</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">8.3</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">26.7</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">26.9c</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">0.999</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">2.2</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">8.4</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">28.1</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">27.8 b</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left"/>
<td valign="middle" align="left"/>
<td valign="middle" align="left">P<sub>1</sub>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">0.994</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">2.3</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">7.9</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">27.9</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">28.0b</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">1.000</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">2.3</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">8.4</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">29.5</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">29.3ab</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left"/>
<td valign="middle" align="left"/>
<td valign="middle" align="left">P<sub>2</sub>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">0.995</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">2.5</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">7.7</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">29.2</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">28.9a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">0.999</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">2.5</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">7.9</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">30.0</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">29.7 a</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left"/>
<td valign="middle" align="left"/>
<td valign="middle" align="left">CV (%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">0.2</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">8.7</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">3.8</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">4.5</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">3.6</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">0.1</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">6.5</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">3.5</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">3.4</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">3.5</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left"/>
<td valign="middle" align="left">FB<sub>10-11</sub>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">P<sub>0</sub>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">0.998</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">2.1</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">8.3</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">26.6</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">26.8b</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">0.999</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">2.2</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">8.4</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">27.7</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">27.4b</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left"/>
<td valign="middle" align="left"/>
<td valign="middle" align="left">P<sub>1</sub>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">0.994</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">2.3</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">7.9</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">27.2</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">27.3b</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">1.000</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">2.3</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">8.3</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">28.9</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">28.8a</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left"/>
<td valign="middle" align="left"/>
<td valign="middle" align="left">P<sub>2</sub>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">0.996</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">2.4</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">7.8</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">28.8</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">28.6a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">0.999</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">2.5</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">7.9</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">29.5</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">29.2a</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left"/>
<td valign="middle" align="left"/>
<td valign="middle" align="left">CV (%)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">0.2</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">6.7</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">3.3</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">4.1</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">3.4</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">0.1</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">6.5</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">3.2</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">3.2</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">3.3</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Significance</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left"/>
<td valign="middle" align="left"/>
<td valign="middle" align="left"/>
<td valign="middle" align="left"/>
<td valign="middle" align="left"/>
<td valign="middle" align="left"/>
<td valign="middle" align="left"/>
<td valign="middle" align="left"/>
<td valign="middle" align="left"/>
<td valign="middle" align="left"/>
<td valign="middle" align="left"/>
<td valign="middle" align="left"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Cultivar (C)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left"/>
<td valign="middle" align="left"/>
<td valign="middle" align="left"/>
<td valign="middle" align="left"/>
<td valign="middle" align="left"/>
<td valign="middle" align="left"/>
<td valign="middle" align="center">**</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left"/>
<td valign="middle" align="left"/>
<td valign="middle" align="left"/>
<td valign="middle" align="left"/>
<td valign="middle" align="center">**</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">FBP</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left"/>
<td valign="middle" align="left"/>
<td valign="middle" align="left"/>
<td valign="middle" align="left"/>
<td valign="middle" align="left"/>
<td valign="middle" align="left"/>
<td valign="middle" align="center">NS</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left"/>
<td valign="middle" align="left"/>
<td valign="middle" align="left"/>
<td valign="middle" align="left"/>
<td valign="middle" align="center">**</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">AP</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left"/>
<td valign="middle" align="left"/>
<td valign="middle" align="left"/>
<td valign="middle" align="left"/>
<td valign="middle" align="left"/>
<td valign="middle" align="left"/>
<td valign="middle" align="center">**</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left"/>
<td valign="middle" align="left"/>
<td valign="middle" align="left"/>
<td valign="middle" align="left"/>
<td valign="middle" align="center">**</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">C&#xd7;FBP</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left"/>
<td valign="middle" align="left"/>
<td valign="middle" align="left"/>
<td valign="middle" align="left"/>
<td valign="middle" align="left"/>
<td valign="middle" align="left"/>
<td valign="middle" align="center">NS</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left"/>
<td valign="middle" align="left"/>
<td valign="middle" align="left"/>
<td valign="middle" align="left"/>
<td valign="middle" align="center">NS</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">C&#xd7;AP</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left"/>
<td valign="middle" align="left"/>
<td valign="middle" align="left"/>
<td valign="middle" align="left"/>
<td valign="middle" align="left"/>
<td valign="middle" align="left"/>
<td valign="middle" align="center">*</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left"/>
<td valign="middle" align="left"/>
<td valign="middle" align="left"/>
<td valign="middle" align="left"/>
<td valign="middle" align="center">NS</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">FBP&#xd7;AP</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left"/>
<td valign="middle" align="left"/>
<td valign="middle" align="left"/>
<td valign="middle" align="left"/>
<td valign="middle" align="left"/>
<td valign="middle" align="left"/>
<td valign="middle" align="center">*</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left"/>
<td valign="middle" align="left"/>
<td valign="middle" align="left"/>
<td valign="middle" align="left"/>
<td valign="middle" align="center">NS</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">C&#xd7;FBP&#xd7;AP</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left"/>
<td valign="middle" align="left"/>
<td valign="middle" align="left"/>
<td valign="middle" align="left"/>
<td valign="middle" align="left"/>
<td valign="middle" align="left"/>
<td valign="middle" align="center">NS</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left"/>
<td valign="middle" align="left"/>
<td valign="middle" align="left"/>
<td valign="middle" align="left"/>
<td valign="middle" align="center">NS</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn>
<p>FBP, fruiting branch position; CV, coefficient of variation; V<sub>Lmax</sub>, the maximum velocity of &#xfb01;ber elongation; T<sub>L</sub>, &#xfb01;ber rapid elongation duration; L<sub>max</sub>, theoretical maximum &#xfb01;ber length; L<sub>obs</sub>, observed &#xfb01;nal &#xfb01;ber length. Different letters within a column represent significant differences at p=0.05. * and ** represent significant differences at p&lt;0.05 and p&lt;0.01. NS represents nonsignificance at p = 0.05.</p>
</fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<disp-formula>
<label>(1)</label>
<mml:math display="block" id="M1">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>L</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>L</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>max</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>a</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#xd7;</mml:mo>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mi>e</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>b</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#xd7;</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>D</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>A</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>P</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msup>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfrac>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</disp-formula>
<p>L means the fiber length (mm), L<sub>max</sub> means the theoretical maximum fiber length, and a and b mean parameters.</p>
<p>The maximum velocity of fiber elongation (V<sub>Lmax</sub>), the beginning time of rapid elongation (T<sub>B</sub>), the finishing time of rapid elongation (T<sub>F</sub>), and the rapid elongation duration (T<sub>L</sub>=T<sub>F</sub>-T<sub>B</sub>) of cotton fibers were calculated using formulas (2), (3), and (4), respectively.</p>
<disp-formula>
<label>(2)</label>
<mml:math display="block" id="M2">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mtext>V</mml:mtext>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>Lmax</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>-b</mml:mtext>
<mml:mo>&#xd7;</mml:mo>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mtext>L</mml:mtext>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>max</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>4</mml:mn>
</mml:mfrac>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</disp-formula>
<disp-formula>
<label>(3)</label>
<mml:math display="block" id="M3">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>T</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>B</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
<mml:mi>b</mml:mi>
</mml:mfrac>
<mml:mo>&#xd7;</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>ln</mml:mi>
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
<mml:msqrt>
<mml:mn>3</mml:mn>
</mml:msqrt>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>a</mml:mi>
</mml:mfrac>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</disp-formula>
<disp-formula>
<label>(4)</label>
<mml:math display="block" id="M4">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>T</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>F</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
<mml:mi>b</mml:mi>
</mml:mfrac>
<mml:mo>&#xd7;</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>ln</mml:mi>
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
<mml:msqrt>
<mml:mn>3</mml:mn>
</mml:msqrt>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>a</mml:mi>
</mml:mfrac>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</disp-formula>
<p>The rapid elongation stage of the fibers started from 10 to 24 DPA, after which the fiber length tended to stabilize (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f12">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;12</bold>
</xref>). Low soil AP levels (P<sub>0</sub> and P<sub>1</sub>) decreased the V<sub>Lmax</sub>, but increased the T<sub>L</sub>, ultimately reducing the fiber length. The fiber length variation was consistent for CCRI-79 and SCRC-28 over the two years (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">
<bold>Table&#xa0;2</bold>
</xref>). V<sub>Lmax</sub> had higher sensitivity to soil AP deficiency than T<sub>L</sub>. Compared to P<sub>2</sub>, the fiber length reduced by 2.2&#x2013;3.6% and 3.9&#x2013;6.3% in P<sub>1</sub> and P<sub>0</sub> for CCRI-79, mainly because V<sub>Lmax</sub> declined by 3.8&#x2013;5.9% and 5.9&#x2013;9.8% in 2019 and 2020 across the FBPs. For SCRC-28, the fiber length reduced by 2.2&#x2013;3.8% and 6.7&#x2013;10.2% at P<sub>1</sub> and P<sub>0</sub> in contrast with P<sub>2</sub> due to the fact that V<sub>Lmax</sub> reduced by 4.1&#x2013;6.1% and 12.2&#x2013;16.3% for both years at the three FBPs. In P<sub>1</sub> and P<sub>0</sub>, CCRI-79 had a fiber length that was 2.3 percent and 5.2 percent longer than SCRC-28. However, CCRI-79 fiber length was 2.1% longer than SCRC-28 over the two-year under P<sub>2</sub> treatment. Moreover, there were longer fibers for CCRI-79 than those for SCRS-28 in soil AP deficiency.</p>
<fig id="f12" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;12</label>
<caption>
<p>Dynamic changes of cotton fiber lengths in relation to soil available phosphorus (AP) levels in 2019&#x2212;2020. FB, fruiting branch. P<sub>0</sub>: 3 &#xb1; 0.5 mg kg<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>. P<sub>1</sub>: 6 &#xb1; 0.5 mg kg<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>. P<sub>2</sub>: 15 &#xb1; 0.5 mg kg<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>. The cotton fibers were collected at 5, 10, 15, 17, 24, 31, 38, 45 and 52 days post-anthesis (DPA) (8:00-9:00 a.m.). Error bars indicate SE (n = 3).</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-14-1254103-g012.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>The CVs of fiber length were lower in FB<sub>10&#x2013;11</sub> than in FB<sub>2&#x2013;3</sub> and FB<sub>6&#x2013;7</sub> for both cultivars, and the values were even smaller for CCRI-79. Cultivar (C) (<italic>p</italic>&lt;0.01) and AP (<italic>p</italic>&lt;0.01) had the greatest impacts on fiber length (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">
<bold>Table&#xa0;2</bold>
</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_6">
<label>3.6</label>
<title>Correlation between physiological parameters and fiber length</title>
<p>We determined the cotton fiber lengths and their relationship with the contents of the osmotically active solutes and the activities of the enzymes engaged in fiber elongation. The results showed that fiber lengths had significant positive correlations (<italic>p</italic>&lt;0.05) with the contents of all osmotically active solutes (K<sup>+</sup>, malate, soluble sugar, and sucrose) in SCRC-28 but correlated only with malate contents in CCRI-79 (<italic>p</italic>&lt;0.01) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f13">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;13</bold>
</xref>). Moreover, fiber lengths were significantly positively correlated (<italic>p</italic>&lt;0.01) with the V-H<sup>+</sup>-ATPase and V-H<sup>+</sup>-PPase activities in CCRI-79 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f13">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;13</bold>
</xref>). There was a remarkable positive correlation between fiber length and related enzyme activities in SCRC-28 as well (<italic>p</italic>&lt;0.05) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f13">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;13</bold>
</xref>).</p>
<fig id="f13" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;13</label>
<caption>
<p>Correlation between the contents of the osmotically active solutes and the activities of enzymes engaged in fiber elongation and fiber length in 2019&#x2212;2020. * and **represent significant differences at <italic>p</italic>&lt;0.05 and <italic>p</italic>&lt;0.01. n=18, <italic>R</italic> <sub>0.05&#xa0;=&#xa0;</sub>0.468, <italic>R</italic> <sub>0.01&#xa0;=&#xa0;</sub>0.590.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-14-1254103-g013.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s4" sec-type="discussion">
<label>4</label>
<title>Discussion</title>
<p>P application on cotton fiber length may have varying effects (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">Mukundan et&#xa0;al., 1990</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">Tewolde and Fernandez, 2003</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">Li et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>), possibly due to the influence of soil AP content. We analyzed soil nutrient data and found that soil AP content is the main factor affecting fiber development and length; therefore, we used low soil AP levels to induce P deficiency stress in cotton plants. Our previous study showed that low soil AP affects sucrose transport and synthesis in the subtending leaves, thereby reducing cotton boll biomass and lint yield (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Sun et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>). Therefore, the current research explored the soil AP content&#x2019;s effect on cotton fiber elongation and length, which could more precisely illustrate the P status of the cotton bolls and the subtending leaves.</p>
<p>P fertilizer increased the K<sup>+</sup> content of cotton plants (including roots, stems, and leaves) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Luo et&#xa0;al., 2017</xref>) and the root malate content of alfalfa seedlings (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">Wang et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>). In the experiment, the K<sup>+</sup> contents of cotton fibers decreased by 2.9 and 6.5% under P<sub>1</sub> and P<sub>0</sub> conditions, respectively, compared to P<sub>2</sub> (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>). It indicated that soil AP deficiency hindered K absorption, thereby reducing the K<sup>+</sup> content of fibers, as reported in a previous study (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Luo et&#xa0;al., 2017</xref>). However, some studies have shown that excessive P application can reduce the K<sup>+</sup> content of lettuce (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Chen et&#xa0;al., 2015</xref>) and grass (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Sabreen et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>) due to the diluting effects caused by increased plant yield. The malate contents of the cotton fibers reduced by 19.7 and 30.6% in P<sub>1</sub> and P<sub>0</sub>, compared to P<sub>2</sub> (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;2</bold>
</xref>), indicating that low soil AP limited the malate synthesis, consistent with previous reports (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">Fernandez Del-Saz et&#xa0;al., 2017</xref>). Compared with 2019, the changes in soluble sugar content were greater under three soil AP levels in 2020. It may be related to precipitation (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">
<bold>Table&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>), and drought can exacerbate the impact of low-P-stress (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Singh et&#xa0;al., 2006a</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">Singh et&#xa0;al., 2006b</xref>). Low soil AP limited the transportation of photosynthetic products to cotton bolls (lower sucrose transformation rate) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Sun et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>), further reducing the soluble sugar and sucrose contents of the fibers (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3">
<bold>Figures&#xa0;3</bold>
</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f4">
<bold>4</bold>
</xref>). K<sup>+</sup>, malate, soluble sugar, and sucrose are important osmotically active solutes facilitating fiber elongation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Ruan et&#xa0;al., 1997</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Ruan et&#xa0;al., 2001</xref>). The K<sup>+</sup>, malate, soluble sugar, and sucrose contents of the cotton fibers were positively correlated with the P content of the subtending leaves at 10&#x2212;31 DPA (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f5">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;5</bold>
</xref>). This indicates that low soil AP reduces the contents of osmotically active solutes in the fibers by affecting P content and sucrose metabolism in the subtending leaves, further influencing fiber vacuoles which facilitate fiber elongation through osmoregulation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">Yang et&#xa0;al., 2016</xref>).</p>
<p>Low-P-stress increases root PM-H<sup>+</sup>-ATPase activities (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Shen et&#xa0;al., 2006</xref>) and promotes organic acid secretion (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B42">Yan et&#xa0;al., 2002</xref>) to enhance P absorption capacity in crops. However, in our experiment, the activities of fiber PM-H<sup>+</sup>-ATPase declined by 13.4 and 19.5% under P<sub>1</sub> and P<sub>0</sub> (soil AP deficiency), respectively, compared to P<sub>2</sub> (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f6">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;6</bold>
</xref>). A significant positive correlation (<italic>p</italic>&lt;0.01) was found between the fiber PM-H<sup>+</sup>-ATPase activity and the P content of the subtending leaves during the period of 10&#x2013;31 DPA (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f10">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;10</bold>
</xref>), similar to the report by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">Salinas et&#xa0;al. (2013)</xref>. This indicated that soil AP content has an important regulatory effect on PM-H<sup>+</sup>-ATPase activity. It also points out that there are differences in the response of PM-H<sup>+</sup>-ATPase activity to low-P-stress among crop species, and PM-H<sup>+</sup>-ATPase is mainly responsible for generating transmembrane electrochemical gradient to drive the transportation of many substances, which may be related to higher P levels (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">Chang et&#xa0;al., 2009</xref>). Additionally, the responses of fiber V-H<sup>+</sup>-ATPase, V-H<sup>+</sup>-PPase, and PEPC activities (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f7">
<bold>Figures&#xa0;7</bold>
</xref>&#x2013;<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f9">
<bold>9</bold>
</xref>) to soil AP deficiency were similar to that of PM-H<sup>+</sup>-ATPase activity (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f6">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;6</bold>
</xref>). The P content of the subtending leaves affects the activity of enzymes related to cotton fiber elongation in various ways. P levels can alter the affinities between enzymes and substrates (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">Xu et&#xa0;al., 2008</xref>), and low-P-stress can affect enzyme activities through the sucrose signaling pathways (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">Wang and Ruan, 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">Ruan, 2014</xref>). Moreover, the impact of low-P-stress on the &#x201c;source (subtending leaf)&#x201d; may lead to insufficient sucrose supply in the &#x201c;sink (cotton fiber)&#x201d; (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Sun et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>). This may trigger sucrose signaling leading to downregulation of the upstream genes coding for the related enzymes involved in fiber elongation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">Wang and Ruan, 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">Ruan, 2014</xref>), thus limiting the catalytic abilities of the enzymes at the genetic level. In our study, we verified that low soil AP level play the osmoregulation role in fiber elongation through the P content of subtending leaves (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f11">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;11B</bold>
</xref>) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">Yang et&#xa0;al., 2016</xref>).</p>
<p>After analyzing the two-year V<sub>Lmax</sub> and T<sub>L</sub> data for the CCRI-79 and SCRC-28, we found that the CVs (6.0%) of the V<sub>Lmax</sub> were greater than twice that of T<sub>L</sub> (2.8%) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">
<bold>Table&#xa0;2</bold>
</xref>), indicating that soil AP deficiency mainly reduces fiber length (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f12">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;12</bold>
</xref>) by decreasing the V<sub>Lmax</sub> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">Yang et&#xa0;al., 2016</xref>). Soil AP deficiency limited the transportation of the osmotically active solutes from subtending leaves to fibers, reducing the activity of related enzymes involved in fiber elongation, thus inhibiting fiber elongation and ultimately reducing fiber length. Moreover, low-P-stress, especially the P<sub>0</sub> treatment, highly impacted the fiber length of FB<sub>2&#x2013;3</sub> more than FB<sub>10&#x2013;11</sub>. This was because the CVs of the osmotically active solutes (K<sup>+</sup>, malate, soluble sugar, and sucrose) and related enzymes engaged in fiber elongation (PM-H<sup>+</sup>-ATPase, V-H<sup>+</sup>-ATPase, V-H<sup>+</sup>-PPase, and PEPC) were lower at FB<sub>10&#x2013;11</sub> than at FB<sub>2&#x2013;3</sub>.</p>
<p>The agronomic and yield traits of different cotton varieties have different sensitivities to low P (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Iqbal et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">Li et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>); however, it is unclear whether cotton fiber length also has varying sensitivities to low P. In our research, soil AP deficiency significantly impacted the contents of the osmotically active solutes (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f5">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;5</bold>
</xref>), activities of related enzymes involved in fiber elongation <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f10">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;10</bold>
</xref>), and fiber length (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f12">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;12</bold>
</xref>; <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">
<bold>Table&#xa0;2</bold>
</xref>) of SCRC-28 and CCRI-79. Furthermore, the responses of these parameters to soil AP deficiency showed that SCRC-28 had higher sensitivity to low-P-stress compared to CCRI-79. Among all the osmotically active solute contents, fiber K<sup>+</sup> content was the most correlated with leaf P content in CCRI-79 and SCRC-28; whereas, the interrelationship between fiber malate, soluble sugar contents, and fiber length differed between the cultivars (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f5">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;5</bold>
</xref>). The outcomes may elucidate the reason that SCRC-28 was more sensitive to low-P-stress compared to CCRI-79 (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">
<bold>Table&#xa0;2</bold>
</xref>), suggesting higher fiber malate content might be critical for fiber length (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f13">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;13</bold>
</xref>) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Ruan et&#xa0;al., 1997</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">Yang et&#xa0;al., 2016</xref>).</p>
<p>In the experiment, the fibers&#x2019; V-H<sup>+</sup>-ATPase and V-H<sup>+</sup>-PPase activities were more sensitive to P contents of the subtending leaves of SCRC-28 than CCRI-79 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f10">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;10</bold>
</xref>). Moreover, the relationship between PM-H<sup>+</sup>-ATPase and PEPC activities and fiber length had differences in the two cultivars (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f13">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;13</bold>
</xref>). The V-H<sup>+</sup>-ATPase activity decreased by 5.9&#x2013;10.4% for CCRI-79 and 12.4&#x2013;33.8% for SCRC-28 in P<sub>1</sub> and P<sub>0</sub> at all the FBPs. Moreover, the V-H<sup>+</sup>-ATPase and V-H<sup>+</sup>-PPase activities of the fibers had significant positive correlations with the fiber length (<italic>p</italic>&lt;0.05) in both cultivars. Compared with P<sub>2</sub>, in P<sub>1</sub> and P<sub>0</sub> the PEPC activity in fibers reduced by 16.6&#x2013;23.4% for CCRI-79 and 20.9&#x2013;40.2% for SCRC-28, respectively, over the course of the three FBPs and two years. And the above results revealed that the SCRC-28&#x2019;s V-H<sup>+</sup>-ATPase and PEPC activities had higher sensitivity to low soil AP levels, explaining the sensitivity of the fiber length of the low-P sensitive cultivars to soil AP deficiency.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s5" sec-type="conclusions">
<label>5</label>
<title>Conclusions</title>
<list list-type="order">
<list-item>
<p>Low soil AP levels (P<sub>0</sub> and P<sub>1</sub>) inhibited the fiber cell elongation leading to reduced V<sub>Lmax</sub> and fiber length, mainly due to lower malate content and V-H<sup>+</sup>-ATPase and V-H<sup>+</sup>-PPase activities.</p>
</list-item>
<list-item>
<p>Reduced osmotically active solute contents (K<sup>+</sup>, malate, soluble sugar, and sucrose) and the activities of the related enzymes (PM-H<sup>+</sup>-ATPase, V-H<sup>+</sup>-ATPase, V-H<sup>+</sup>-PPase, and PEPC) involved in fiber elongation was lower at FB<sub>10&#x2013;11</sub> than FB<sub>2&#x2013;3</sub> under soil AP deficiency (especially P<sub>0</sub>), suggesting that the longer fiber lengths on the upper FBPs (FB<sub>10&#x2013;11</sub>) could adapt to low soil AP compared to lower FBPs (FB<sub>2&#x2013;3</sub>).</p>
</list-item>
<list-item>
<p>Compared to CCRI-79, the fiber malate and soluble sugar contents and V-H<sup>+</sup>-ATPase and PEPC activities of SCRC-28 were more affected strongly by subtending leaves&#x2019; P content, which may elucidate that SCRC-28 shows greater sensitivity to soil AP deficiency.</p>
</list-item>
<list-item>
<p>Analyzing the impact of soil low AP on fiber osmoregulation is beneficial for developing low-P-tolerant cotton cultivars. Furthermore, it is necessary to investigate the effects of low-P on fiber gene expression and protein synthesis.</p>
</list-item>
</list>
</sec>
<sec id="s6" sec-type="data-availability">
<title>Data availability statement</title>
<p>The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s7" sec-type="author-contributions">
<title>Author contributions</title>
<p>MS: Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Writing &#x2013; original draft. CZ: Conceptualization, Investigation, Writing &#x2013; original draft. WF: Formal Analysis, Writing &#x2013; original draft. JS: Formal Analysis, Writing &#x2013; original draft. CP: Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing. PL: Conceptualization, Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing. HD: Conceptualization, Writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing, Funding acquisition.</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<sec id="s8" sec-type="funding-information">
<title>Funding</title>
<p>This research was funded by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2017YFD0201906), the Central Research Institutes of Basic Research and the Public Service Special Foundation (1610162022044), the China Agriculture Research System (CARS-15-11), and the Agricultural Science and Technology Innovation Program of Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s9" sec-type="COI-statement">
<title>Conflict of interest</title>
<p>The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s10" sec-type="disclaimer">
<title>Publisher&#x2019;s note</title>
<p>All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.</p>
</sec>
<fn-group>
<title>Abbreviations</title>
<fn fn-type="abbr">
<p>AP, available phosphorus; FB, fruiting branch; K<sup>+</sup>, potassium ion; PM-H<sup>+</sup>-ATPase, plasma membrane H<sup>+</sup>-ATPase; V-H<sup>+</sup>-ATPase, vacuole membrane H<sup>+</sup>-ATPase; V-H<sup>+</sup>-PPase, vacuole membrane H<sup>+</sup>-translocating inorganic pyrophosphatase; PEPC, phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase; CV, coefficient of variation; L, fiber length; L<sub>max</sub>, theoretical maximum fiber length; V<sub>Lmax</sub>, maximum velocity of &#xfb01;ber elongation; L<sub>obs</sub>, the observed &#xfb01;nal &#xfb01;ber length; T<sub>B</sub>, beginning time of rapid elongation; T<sub>F</sub>, finishing time of rapid elongation; T<sub>L</sub>, rapid elongation duration.</p>
</fn>
</fn-group>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="B1">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ashley</surname> <given-names>D. A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1972</year>). <article-title>
<sup>14</sup>C-labelled photosynthate translocation and utilization in cotton plants</article-title>. <source>Crop Sci.</source> <volume>12</volume> (<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>69</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>74</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2135/cropsci1972.0011183X001200010023x</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Chang</surname> <given-names>C. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hu</surname> <given-names>Y. B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sun</surname> <given-names>S. B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhu</surname> <given-names>Y. Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ma</surname> <given-names>G. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xu</surname> <given-names>G. H.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>Proton pump OsA8 is linked to phosphorus uptake and translocation in rice</article-title>. <source>J. Exp. Bot.</source> <volume>60</volume> (<issue>2</issue>), <fpage>557</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>565</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/jxb/ern298</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Z. Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tang</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>X. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xiang</surname> <given-names>H. H.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Effects of phosphate fertilizer on yield, quality and plant nutrient form in lettuce &#x2018;calcareous purple&#x2019; soil</article-title>. <source>Acta Pratac. Sin.</source> <volume>24</volume> (<issue>10</issue>), <fpage>183</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>193</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.11686/cyxb2014462</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>B. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Q. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ye</surname> <given-names>Z. P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Stiles</surname> <given-names>S. N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Feng</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Optimisation of phosphorus fertilisation promotes biomass and phosphorus nutrient accumulation, partitioning and translocation in three cotton (<italic>Gossypium hirsutum</italic>) genotypes</article-title>. <source>Crop Pasture Sci.</source> <volume>71</volume> (<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>56</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>69</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1071/CP19281</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Constable</surname> <given-names>G. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rawson</surname> <given-names>H. M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1980</year>). <article-title>Carbon production and utilization in cotton: inferences from a carbon budget</article-title>. <source>Aust. J. Plant Physiol.</source> <volume>7</volume> (<issue>4</issue>), <fpage>539</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>553</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1071/pp9800539</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Cordell</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Drangert</surname> <given-names>J. O.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>White</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>The story of phosphorus: Global food security and food for thought</article-title>. <source>Glob. Environ. Change</source> <volume>19</volume>, <fpage>292</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>305</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2008.10.009</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Fernandez Del-Saz</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Romero-Munar</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cawthray</surname> <given-names>G. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Aroca</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Baraza</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Flexas</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus colonization in Nicotiana tabacum decreases the rate of both carboxylate exudation and root respiration and increases plant growth under phosphorus limitation</article-title>. <source>Plant Soil</source> <volume>416</volume> (<issue>1-2</issue>), <fpage>97</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>106</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11104-017-3188-y</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Gao</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Huang</surname> <given-names>H. Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>H. Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xia</surname> <given-names>H. Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sun</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>Z. Y.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Phosphorus affects enzymatic activity and chemical properties of cotton soil</article-title>. <source>Plant Soil Environ.</source> <volume>65</volume>, <fpage>361</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>368</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.17221/296/2019-PSE</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Gutstein</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1970</year>). <article-title>The effect of irrigation rates and nitrogen and phosphorus fertilizers on fiber characteristics of <italic>Gossypium hirsutum</italic> L. cotton</article-title>. <source>Qualitas Plantarum Materiae Vegetabiles</source> <volume>19</volume> (<issue>4</issue>), <fpage>359</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>367</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/BF01112651</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Hu</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>J. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>S. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>B. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>Z. G.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Effects of potassium deficiency on the enzymatic changes in developing cotton fibers</article-title>. <source>Acta Physiol. Plant</source> <volume>40</volume> (<issue>5</issue>), <fpage>98</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11738-018-2674-z</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Iqbal</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kong</surname> <given-names>F. X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ullah</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ali</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>H. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>J. W.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Phosphorus Application improves the cotton yield by enhancing reproductive organ biomass and nutrient accumulation in two cotton cultivars with different phosphorus sensitivity</article-title>. <source>Agronomy</source> <volume>10</volume> (<issue>2</issue>), <elocation-id>153</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/agronomy10020153</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>P. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dong</surname> <given-names>H. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zheng</surname> <given-names>C. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sun</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>A. Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>G. P.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Optimizing nitrogen application rate and plant density for improving cotton yield and nitrogen use efficiency in the North China Plain</article-title>. <source>PloS One</source> <volume>12</volume> (<issue>10</issue>), <fpage>15</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0185550</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>H. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>J. W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ali</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Iqbal</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>S. S.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Agronomic traits at the seedling stage, yield, and fiber quality in two cotton (<italic>Gossypium hirsutum</italic> L.) cultivars in response to phosphorus deficiency</article-title>. <source>Soil Sci. Plant Nutr.</source> <volume>66</volume> (<issue>2</issue>), <fpage>308</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>316</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/00380768.2019.1709543</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>J. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Peng</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xia</surname> <given-names>H. Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>P. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>Z. Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sun</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>High soil available phosphorus favors carbon metabolism in cotton leaves in pot trials</article-title>. <source>J. Plant Growth Regul.</source> <volume>40</volume> (<issue>3</issue>), <fpage>974</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>985</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00344-020-10153-w</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lv</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ma</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Meng</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Sucrose metabolism in the subtending leaf to cotton boll at different fruiting branch nodes and the relationship to boll weight</article-title>. <source>J. Agric. Sci.</source> <volume>152</volume> (<issue>5</issue>), <fpage>790</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>804</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1017/s0021859613000488</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Luo</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hou</surname> <given-names>Y. Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>B. L.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Effect of phosphorus stress on dry matter accumulation and nutrient absorption of cotton genotypes with different phosphorus efficiency</article-title>. <source>Southwest China J. Agric. Sci.</source> <volume>30</volume> (<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>155</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>161</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.16213/j.cnki.scjas.2017.1.027</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Mao</surname> <given-names>S. C.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <source>China Cotton Cultivation</source>. <edition>4th ed.</edition> (<publisher-loc>Shanghai</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Shanghai Scientific and Technical Press</publisher-name>).</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B18">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Mukundan</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Janardhanam</surname> <given-names>K. V.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Reddy</surname> <given-names>B. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Reddy</surname> <given-names>A. S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1990</year>). <article-title>Effect of nitrogen and phosphorus on fibre quality of cotton</article-title>. <source>J. Ind. Soc Cott. Improv.</source> <volume>15</volume> (<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>30</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>33</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B19">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ruan</surname> <given-names>Y. L.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Sucrose Metabolism: Gateway to diverse carbon use and sugar signaling</article-title>. <source>Ann. Rev. Plant Biol.</source> <volume>65</volume> (<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>33</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>67</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1146/annurev-arplant-050213-040251</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B20">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ruan</surname> <given-names>Y. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chourey</surname> <given-names>P. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Delmer</surname> <given-names>D. P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Perez-Grau</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1997</year>). <article-title>The differential expression of sucrose synthase in relation to diverse patterns of carbon partitioning in developing cotton seed</article-title>. <source>Plant Physiol.</source> <volume>115</volume> (<issue>2</issue>), <fpage>375</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>385</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1104/pp.115.2.375</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B21">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ruan</surname> <given-names>Y. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Llewellyn</surname> <given-names>D. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Furbank</surname> <given-names>R. T.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2001</year>). <article-title>The control of single-celled cotton fiber elongation by developmentally reversible gating of plasmodesmata and coordinated expression of sucrose and K<sup>+</sup> transporters and expansin</article-title>. <source>Plant Cell</source> <volume>13</volume> (<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>47</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>60</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1105/tpc.13.1.47</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B22">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Sabreen</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Saiga</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Islam</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rahman</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Phosphorus fertilization affects cation balance in cool-season grasses associated with grass tetany</article-title>. <source>J. Plant Nutr.</source> <volume>45</volume> (<issue>18</issue>), <fpage>2838</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2849</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/01904167.2022.2057330</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B23">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Salinas</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sanchez</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ruiz</surname> <given-names>J. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lao</surname> <given-names>M. T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Romero</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Phosphorus levels influence plasma membrane H<sup>+</sup>-ATPase Activity and K<sup>+</sup>, Ca<sup>2+</sup>, and Mg<sup>2+</sup> assimilation in Green Bean</article-title>. <source>Commun. Soil Sci. Plan.</source> <volume>44</volume> (<issue>1-4</issue>), <fpage>456</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>464</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/00103624.2013.744127</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B24">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Sarkar</surname> <given-names>R. K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Majumdar</surname> <given-names>R. C.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2002</year>). <article-title>Effect of farmyard manure, nitrogen and phosphorus on yield and fibre quality of upland cotton (<italic>Gossypium hirsutum</italic>) in rice fallow land</article-title>. <source>Indian J. Agric. Sci.</source> <volume>72</volume> (<issue>10</issue>), <fpage>607</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>610</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B25">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Schubert</surname> <given-names>A. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Benedict</surname> <given-names>C. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Berlin</surname> <given-names>J. D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kohel</surname> <given-names>R. J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1973</year>). <article-title>Cotton fiber development - kinetics of cell elongation and secondary wall thickening</article-title>. <source>Crop Sci.</source> <volume>13</volume> (<issue>6</issue>), <fpage>704</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>709</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2135/cropsci1973.0011183X001300060035x</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B26">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Shen</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>J. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Z. Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>C. Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sasaki</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yamamoto</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2006</year>). <article-title>Root plasma membrane H<sup>+</sup>-ATPase is involved in the adaptation of soybean to phosphorus starvation</article-title>. <source>J. Exp. Bot.</source> <volume>57</volume> (<issue>6</issue>), <fpage>1353</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1362</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/jxb/erj111</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B27">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Singh</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pallaghy</surname> <given-names>C. K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Singh</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2006</year>a). <article-title>hosphorus nutrition and tolerance of cotton to water stress I. Seed cotton yield and leaf morphology</article-title>. <source>Field Crop Res.</source> <volume>96</volume>, <fpage>191</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>198</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.fcr.2005.06.009</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B28">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Singh</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pallaghy</surname> <given-names>C. K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Singh</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2006</year>b). <article-title>Phosphorus nutrition and tolerance of cotton to water stress: II. Water relations, free and bound water and leaf expansion rate</article-title>. <source>Field Crop Res.</source> <volume>96</volume>, <fpage>199</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>206</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.fcr.2005.06.011</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B29">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Smart</surname> <given-names>L. B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Vojdani</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Maeshima</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wilkins</surname> <given-names>T. A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1998</year>). <article-title>Genes involved in osmoregulation during turgor-driven cell expansion of developing cotton fibers are differentially regulated</article-title>. <source>Plant Physiol.</source> <volume>116</volume> (<issue>4</issue>), <fpage>1539</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1549</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1104/pp.116.4.1539</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B30">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Sun</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>P. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zheng</surname> <given-names>C. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sun</surname> <given-names>X. Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dong</surname> <given-names>H. L.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Soil available phosphorus deficiency reduces boll biomass and lint yield by affecting sucrose metabolism in cotton-boll subtending leaves</article-title>. <source>Agronomy</source> <volume>12</volume> (<issue>5</issue>), <elocation-id>1065</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/agronomy12051065</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B31">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Sun</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>P. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zheng</surname> <given-names>C. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>A. Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Han</surname> <given-names>H. M.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Effects of low phosphorus stress on root morphology and physiological characteristics of different cotton genotypes at the seedling stage</article-title>. <source>Cott. Sci.</source> <volume>30</volume> (<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>45</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>52</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.11963/1002-7807.smdhl.20180103</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B32">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Tewolde</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fernandez</surname> <given-names>C. J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2003</year>). <article-title>Fiber quality response of Pima cotton to nitrogen and phosphorus deficiency</article-title>. <source>J. Plant Nutr.</source> <volume>26</volume> (<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>223</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>235</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1081/pln-120016506</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B33">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Thaker</surname> <given-names>V. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Saroop</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Vaishnav</surname> <given-names>P. P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Singh</surname> <given-names>Y. D.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1989</year>). <article-title>Genotypic variations and influence of diurnal temperature on cotton fibre development</article-title>. <source>Field Crop Res.</source> <volume>22</volume> (<issue>2</issue>), <fpage>129</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>141</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/0378-4290(89)90063-4</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B34">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Toyota</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Koizumi</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sato</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2003</year>). <article-title>Transcriptional activation of phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase by phosphorus deficiency in tobacco</article-title>. <source>J. Exp. Bot.</source> <volume>54</volume> (<issue>384</issue>), <fpage>961</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>969</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/jxb/erg095</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B35">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ruan</surname> <given-names>Y. L.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Regulation of cell division and expansion by sugar and auxin signaling</article-title>. <source>Front. Plant Sci.</source> <volume>4</volume>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpls.2013.00163</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B36">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>X. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tang</surname> <given-names>C. X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Guppy</surname> <given-names>C. N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sale</surname> <given-names>P. W. G.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Cotton, wheat and white lupin differ in phosphorus acquisition from sparingly soluble sources</article-title>. <source>Environ. Exp. Bot.</source> <volume>69</volume> (<issue>3</issue>), <fpage>267</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>272</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.envexpbot.2010.04.007</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B37">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>R. Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yuan</surname> <given-names>S. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wen</surname> <given-names>W. W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>An</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Effects of phosphorus on root growth and photosynthetic physiology of alfalfa seedlings under aluminum stress</article-title>. <source>Acta Pratac. Sin.</source> <volume>30</volume> (<issue>10</issue>), <fpage>53</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>62</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B38">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ma</surname> <given-names>L. G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hou</surname> <given-names>X. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>M. Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>Y. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>F. Y.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2003</year>). <article-title>Phosphate starvation triggers distinct alterations of genome expression in Arabidopsis roots and leaves</article-title>. <source>Plant Physiol.</source> <volume>132</volume> (<issue>3</issue>), <fpage>1260</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1271</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1104/pp.103.021022</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B39">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wullschleger</surname> <given-names>S. D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Oosterhuis</surname> <given-names>D. M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1990</year>). <article-title>Photosynthetic carbon production and use by developing cotton leaves and bolls</article-title>. <source>Crop Sci.</source> <volume>30</volume> (<issue>6</issue>), <fpage>1259</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1264</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2135/cropsci1990.0011183X003000060021x</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B40">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Xu</surname> <given-names>Z. Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Di</surname> <given-names>T. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhu</surname> <given-names>Y. Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Shen</surname> <given-names>Q. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xu</surname> <given-names>G. H.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>Response of plasma membrane H<sup>+</sup>-ATPase of rice roots to the P deficiency</article-title>. <source>Plant Nutr. Fert. Sci.</source> <volume>14</volume> (<issue>2</issue>), <fpage>221</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>226</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B41">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Xu</surname> <given-names>W. F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yuan</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xu</surname> <given-names>F. Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Aslam</surname> <given-names>M. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Miao</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>The genome evolution and low-phosphorus adaptation in white lupin</article-title>. <source>Nat.Commun</source> <volume>11</volume>, <fpage>1069</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41467-020-14891-z</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B42">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Yan</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhu</surname> <given-names>Y. Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>M&#xfc;ller</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Z&#xf6;rb</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Schubert</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2002</year>). <article-title>Adaptation of H<sup>+</sup>-pumping and plasma membrane H<sup>+</sup> ATPase activity in proteoid roots of white lupin under phosphate deficiency</article-title>. <source>Plant Physiol.</source> <volume>129</volume> (<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>50</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>63</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1104/pp.010869</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B43">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>J. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hu</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>W. Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>B. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Y. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>Z. G.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Fruiting branch K<sup>+</sup> level affects cotton fiber elongation through osmoregulation</article-title>. <source>Front. Plant Sci.</source> <volume>7</volume>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpls.2016.00013</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B44">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>J. E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jacobsen</surname> <given-names>J. S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1990</year>). <article-title>Soil inorganic phosphorus fractions and their uptake relationships in calcareous soils</article-title>. <source>Soil Sci. Soc Am. J.</source> <volume>54</volume> (<issue>6</issue>), <elocation-id>1666&#x2013;1669</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2136/sssaj1990.03615995005400060027x</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B45">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>Z. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ge</surname> <given-names>X. Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lu</surname> <given-names>L. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Qin</surname> <given-names>W. Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Qanmber</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>Brassinosteroids regulate cotton fiber elongation by modulating very-long-chain fatty acid biosynthesis</article-title>. <source>Plant Cell</source> <volume>00</volume>, <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>18</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/plcell/koad060</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B46">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Yu</surname> <given-names>S. X.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>The development of cotton production in the recent hundred years of China</article-title>. <source>J. Agric.</source> <volume>8</volume> (<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>85</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>91</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B47">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>R. P.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <source>Adaptation to Pi deficiency and effects to mycorrhiza of the rice plasma memberane H<sup>+</sup>-ATPase genes</source> (<publisher-loc>Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>PhD Dissertation</publisher-name>).</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B48">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>S. Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jiang</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Determination of Malic acid in apples by visible absorption spectrometry</article-title>. <source>Chem. Res. App.</source> <volume>29</volume> (<issue>11</issue>), <fpage>1719</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1722</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B49">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>W. Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lv</surname> <given-names>Z. F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cao</surname> <given-names>J. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>Q. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ding</surname> <given-names>G. F.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Analysis on status quo of development and utilization of large phosphate resources base in China</article-title>. <source>China Energy Environ. Prot.</source> <volume>43</volume> (<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>56</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>60</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.19389/j.cnki.1003&#x2013;0506.2021.01.013</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>