<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.3 20070202//EN" "journalpublishing.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="2.3" xml:lang="EN">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Front. Plant Sci.</journal-id>
<journal-title>Frontiers in Plant Science</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">Front. Plant Sci.</abbrev-journal-title>
<issn pub-type="epub">1664-462X</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Frontiers Media S.A.</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpls.2023.1239600</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Plant Science</subject>
<subj-group>
<subject>Original Research</subject>
</subj-group>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Tree mycorrhizal type regulates leaf and needle microbial communities, affects microbial assembly and co-occurrence network patterns, and influences litter decomposition rates in temperate forest</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author" equal-contrib="yes" corresp="yes">
<name>
<surname>Tanunchai</surname>
<given-names>Benjawan</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3">
<sup>3</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn001">
<sup>*</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn003">
<sup>&#x2020;</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1341633"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" equal-contrib="yes">
<name>
<surname>Ji</surname>
<given-names>Li</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4">
<sup>4</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn003">
<sup>&#x2020;</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/838001"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Schroeter</surname>
<given-names>Simon Andreas</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff5">
<sup>5</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/595626"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wahdan</surname>
<given-names>Sara Fareed Mohamed</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff6">
<sup>6</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1142151"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Thongsuk</surname>
<given-names>Katikarn</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1863954"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Hilke</surname>
<given-names>Ines</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff5">
<sup>5</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Gleixner</surname>
<given-names>Gerd</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff5">
<sup>5</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/226572"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Buscot</surname>
<given-names>Fran&#xe7;ois</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff7">
<sup>7</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/293892"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Schulze</surname>
<given-names>Ernst-Detlef</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff5">
<sup>5</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name>
<surname>Noll</surname>
<given-names>Matthias</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3">
<sup>3</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn001">
<sup>*</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/149379"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name>
<surname>Purahong</surname>
<given-names>Witoon</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn001">
<sup>*</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/345550"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>    <aff id="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
<institution>Department of Soil Ecology, UFZ-Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research</institution>, <addr-line>Halle (Saale)</addr-line>, <country>Germany</country>
</aff>
<aff id="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
<institution>Institute of Bioanalysis, Coburg University of Applied Sciences and Arts</institution>, <addr-line>Coburg</addr-line>, <country>Germany</country>
</aff>
<aff id="aff3">
<sup>3</sup>
<institution>Bayreuth Center of Ecology and Environmental Research (BayCEER), University of Bayreuth</institution>, <addr-line>Bayreuth</addr-line>, <country>Germany</country>
</aff>
<aff id="aff4">
<sup>4</sup>
<institution>School of Forestry, Central South of Forestry and Technology</institution>, <addr-line>Changsha</addr-line>, <country>China</country>
</aff>
<aff id="aff5">
<sup>5</sup>
<institution>Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry, Biogeochemical Processes Department</institution>, <addr-line>Jena</addr-line>, <country>Germany</country>
</aff>
<aff id="aff6">
<sup>6</sup>
<institution>Department of Botany and Microbiology, Faculty of Science, Suez Canal University</institution>, <addr-line>Ismailia</addr-line>, <country>Egypt</country>
</aff>
<aff id="aff7">
<sup>7</sup>
<institution>German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv), Halle-Jena-Leipzig</institution>, <addr-line>Leipzig</addr-line>, <country>Germany</country>
</aff>
<author-notes>
<fn fn-type="edited-by">
<p>Edited by: Luciano Kayser Vargas, State Secretariat of Agriculture, Livestock and Irrigation, Brazil</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="edited-by">
<p>Reviewed by: Raffaella Balestrini, National Research Council (CNR), Italy; Franck Stefani, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada (AAFC), Canada</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="corresp" id="fn001">
<p>*Correspondence: Benjawan Tanunchai, <email xlink:href="mailto:benjawan.tanunchai@hs-coburg.de">benjawan.tanunchai@hs-coburg.de</email>; Witoon Purahong, <email xlink:href="mailto:witoon.purahong@ufz.de">witoon.purahong@ufz.de</email>; <email xlink:href="mailto:witoon.purahong@gmail.com">witoon.purahong@gmail.com</email>; Matthias Noll, <email xlink:href="mailto:Matthias.noll@hs-coburg.de">Matthias.noll@hs-coburg.de</email>
</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="equal" id="fn003">
<p>&#x2020;These authors have contributed equally to this work</p>
</fn>
</author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>29</day>
<month>11</month>
<year>2023</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="collection">
<year>2023</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>14</volume>
<elocation-id>1239600</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>13</day>
<month>06</month>
<year>2023</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>24</day>
<month>10</month>
<year>2023</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#xa9; 2023 Tanunchai, Ji, Schroeter, Wahdan, Thongsuk, Hilke, Gleixner, Buscot, Schulze, Noll and Purahong</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2023</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Tanunchai, Ji, Schroeter, Wahdan, Thongsuk, Hilke, Gleixner, Buscot, Schulze, Noll and Purahong</copyright-holder>
<license xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">
<p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.</p>
</license>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<sec>
<title>Background</title>
<p>Tree mycorrhizal types (arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and ectomycorrhizal fungi) alter nutrient use traits and leaf physicochemical properties and, thus, affect leaf litter decomposition. However, little is known about how different tree mycorrhizal species affect the microbial diversity, community composition, function, and community assembly processes that govern leaf litter-dwelling microbes during leaf litter decomposition. </p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Methods</title>
<p>In this study, we investigated the microbial diversity, community dynamics, and community assembly processes of nine temperate tree species using high-resolution molecular technique (Illumina sequencing), including broadleaved arbuscular mycorrhizal, broadleaved ectomycorrhizal, and coniferous ectomycorrhizal tree types, during leaf litter decomposition.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Results and discussion</title>
<p>The leaves and needles of different tree mycorrhizal types significantly affected the microbial richness and community composition during leaf litter decomposition. Leaf litter mass loss was related to higher sequence reads of a few bacterial functional groups, particularly N-fixing bacteria. Furthermore, a link between bacterial and fungal community composition and hydrolytic and/or oxidative enzyme activity was found. The microbial communities in the leaf litter of different tree mycorrhizal types were governed by different proportions of determinism and stochasticity, which changed throughout litter decomposition. Specifically, determinism (mainly variable selection) controlling bacterial community composition increased over time. In contrast, stochasticity (mainly ecological drift) increasingly governed fungal community composition. Finally, the co-occurrence network analysis showed greater competition between bacteria and fungi in the early stages of litter decomposition and revealed a contrasting pattern between mycorrhizal types.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Conclusion</title>
<p>Overall, we conclude that tree mycorrhizal types influence leaf litter quality, which affects microbial richness and community composition, and thus, leaf litter decomposition.</p>
</sec>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>ecological drift</kwd>
<kwd>variable selection</kwd>
<kwd>N-fixing bacteria</kwd>
<kwd>enzyme activity</kwd>
<kwd>arbuscular mycorrhiza</kwd>
<kwd>ectomycorrhiza</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<counts>
<fig-count count="5"/>
<table-count count="1"/>
<equation-count count="0"/>
<ref-count count="60"/>
<page-count count="14"/>
<word-count count="7206"/>
</counts>
<custom-meta-wrap>
<custom-meta>
<meta-name>section-in-acceptance</meta-name>
<meta-value>Plant Symbiotic Interactions</meta-value>
</custom-meta>
</custom-meta-wrap>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec id="s1" sec-type="intro">
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>The decomposition of plant litter plays a crucial role in regulating carbon (C) and nutrient cycles in terrestrial forest ecosystems (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">Aerts and de Caluwe, 1997</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Hobbie, 2015</xref>). Leaf litter highly contributes to the detritusphere, an interphase between the above- and belowground in forest ecosystems where intensive interactions among microbes occur (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">Ma et&#xa0;al., 2017</xref>). Leaf litter decomposition rates determine the velocity of nutrient turnover and transfer from primary producers to other organisms (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Keller and Phillips, 2019</xref>). Thus, litter decomposition contributes significantly to nutrient availability, soil fertility, and productivity of terrestrial forest ecosystems (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">Aerts and de Caluwe, 1997</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Hobbie, 2015</xref>). Litter decomposition is controlled by both abiotic factors, such as climate, environmental factors, and physicochemical properties of the litter, and biotic factors, especially cross-kingdom interactions between soil bacteria and fungi (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">Berg, 2000</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">Purahong et&#xa0;al., 2016</xref>). Leaf litter decomposition in forest ecosystems can even be influenced by soil microbes before leaf senescence has begun, through the symbiosis between host trees and mycorrhizal fungi (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">Jacobs et&#xa0;al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Keller and Phillips, 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B44">Seyfried et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>). Forest trees are associated with two dominant types of fungi, namely, arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) and ectomycorrhizal (EcM) fungi, to improve their nutrient uptake, growth, and fitness (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">Bonfante and Genre, 2010</xref>). These different types of symbioses between AM and EcM trees have been demonstrated to alter nutrient use traits that significantly affect leaf physicochemical properties and quality (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Keller and Phillips, 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B44">Seyfried et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>). Specifically, EcM trees tend to produce lower quality leaf litter than AM trees (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B44">Seyfried et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>). In temperate forests, such differences in leaf quality have been reported to affect leaf litter decomposition rates, which are usually higher in AM trees than in EcM trees (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Keller and Phillips, 2019</xref>). Leaf litter nitrogen (N) content and tree phylogeny have been identified as significant factors that explain the difference in litter decomposition rates between AM and EcM trees (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Keller and Phillips, 2019</xref>). Furthermore, competition between EcM fungi and saprotrophs in EcM-dominated forests can negatively affect litter decomposition in EcM trees (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B44">Seyfried et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>). However, little is known about how different tree mycorrhizal types affect microbial diversity, community composition, and function during leaf litter decomposition. The mechanisms underlying the assembly of microbial communities and their cross-kingdom interactions in plant litter of AM and EcM trees remain largely unexplored (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">Purahong et&#xa0;al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">Abrego, 2021</xref>). Several studies have shown that fungal community assembly in temperate forests is governed by stochastic processes (dispersal limitation and drift), whereas both stochastic and deterministic processes dominate the bacterial community assembly (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">Osburn et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B59">Zhang et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>). However, this information may not be fully applicable to microbes living in leaf litter, and the relative importance of each specific assembly process may vary greatly between the leaf litter of different tree mycorrhizal types and decomposition stages.</p>
<p>Cross-kingdom interactions, particularly between bacteria and fungi, are the main drivers of plant litter decomposition (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">Purahong et&#xa0;al., 2016</xref>). However, the dynamics of cross-kingdom interactions during litter decomposition and among different mycorrhizal types have not yet been investigated. While both bacteria and fungi play an important role as direct decomposers through the production and secretion of extracellular plant compound-degrading enzymes, different functional groups of bacteria act as facilitators by providing additional macronutrients such as N and phosphorus (P) for fungal decomposers (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">Purahong et&#xa0;al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">Mieszkin et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">Purahong et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>). Tree mycorrhizal type can alter the abundance and microbial community composition of leaf litter-dwelling microbes due to its significant impact on soil microbial communities (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B45">Singavarapu et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>) and leaf litter properties (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B44">Seyfried et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>). Thus, the key microbial players in leaf litter decomposition, as well as their interactions with biotic and abiotic factors, may differ greatly among the tree mycorrhizal types. However, this has not been tested yet.</p>
<p>The objectives of this study were to i) investigate microbial diversity, community composition of leaves and needles, and environmental factors in nine tree species representing different tree mycorrhizal types; ii) investigate microbial community assembly over time; iii) investigate the dynamics of co-occurrence network patterns of different tree mycorrhizal types over time and identify their associated keystone microbial taxa; and vi) investigate the relationship between microbial functions (enzyme activities) and microbial communities. We hypothesized that i) tree mycorrhizal types determine microbial richness and community composition through their specific initial physicochemical properties of the leaves and needles and ii) microbial community assembly differs among different tree mycorrhizal types and over time. We expected different co-occurrence network patterns and their associated keystone microbial taxa over time and among different tree mycorrhizal types.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2" sec-type="materials|methods">
<title>Materials and methods</title>
<sec id="s2_1">
<title>Study site, experimental setup, and design</title>
<p>The leaf litter decomposition experiment was conducted at the study site located in the Hainich-D&#xfc;n region of Thuringia, Germany (51&#xb0;12'N, 10&#xb0;18'E). Mature leaves and needles were collected, oven-dried at 25&#xb0;C for 14 days, and returned under their mother tree. Further details of the experimental design and study site have been published elsewhere (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B48">Tanunchai et&#xa0;al., 2022a</xref>) and in the <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Supplementary Material</bold>
</xref>.</p>
<p>In October 2019, at least 200&#xa0;g of mature leaves and needles were collected from three tree mycorrhizal types, each of which was represented by three tree species. Five true tree replicates were collected for each tree species, at a minimum of 5&#xa0;m apart (45 trees in total). The tree mycorrhizal types investigated in this study were i) broadleaved arbuscular mycorrhizal trees (AM_BL; <italic>Acer pseudoplatanus</italic>, <italic>Fraxinus excelsior</italic>, and <italic>Prunus avium</italic>), ii) broadleaved ectomycorrhizal trees (EcM_BL; <italic>Fagus sylvatica</italic>, <italic>Carpinus betulus</italic>, and <italic>Tilia cordata</italic>), and iii) coniferous ectomycorrhizal trees (EcM_C; <italic>Picea abies</italic>, <italic>Pinus sylvestris</italic>, and <italic>Pseudotsuga menziesii</italic>). The collected mature leaves and needles were oven-dried at 25&#xb0;C for 14 days. A nylon bag (2&#xa0;mm mesh, 5&#xa0;mm holes) was filled with 3&#xa0;g of oven-dried leaves and needles. The nylon bags were then placed under the same mother tree to mimic the actual situation of leaf litter decomposition in the environment. After 200 and 400 days of decomposition, leaf/needle samples were collected in separate sterile plastic bags with new clean gloves, transported on ice to the laboratory within 3&#xa0;h, and stored at &#x2212;80&#xb0;C for further analysis. Another set of samples was sent on ice to the physicochemical laboratory to determine leaf/needle water content, pH, and nutrients. All further analyses are summarized in the experimental scheme (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Supplementary Material</bold>
</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_2">
<title>Physiochemical and enzyme analyses</title>
<p>The procedures for the physicochemical analyses were published by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B48">Tanunchai et&#xa0;al. (2022a)</xref>. Total leaf C (C), total leaf N (N), nutrient (Ca, Fe, K, Mg, and P contents), dissolved organic C (DOC), dissolved organic N (N<sub>org</sub>), and dissolved inorganic N (N<sub>min</sub>) contents were analyzed. Leachable components were extracted by incubating wet leaf and needle samples in 30 mL of MilliQ water for 1&#xa0;h at room temperature. Five potential enzymatic activities, including three hydrolytic enzymes (&#x3b2;-glucosidase, N-acetylglucosaminidase, and acid phosphatase) and two oxidative enzymes (general peroxidase and manganese peroxidase) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">Purahong et&#xa0;al., 2016</xref>), were measured in homogenized leaves and needles. More details on the physicochemical and enzymatic analyses are provided in the <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Supplementary Material</bold>
</xref>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_3">
<title>DNA extraction and Illumina sequencing</title>
<p>The procedures for DNA extraction, Illumina sequencing, and bioinformatics have been published by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B48">Tanunchai et&#xa0;al. (2022a)</xref>. Further details are provided in the <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Supplementary Material</bold>
</xref>. Briefly, leaf and needle samples were washed three times in sterile Tween solution (0.1% vol/vol), washed three to five times using deionized water, and then incubated for 1&#xa0;h in sterile water. The ground leaf samples (~120 mg homogenized leaves and needles) were subjected to DNA extraction using the DNeasy PowerSoil Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) and a Precellys 24 tissue homogenizer (Bertin Instruments, Montigny-le-Bretonneux, France) according to the manufacturer&#x2019;s instructions.</p>
<p>The microbial communities associated with leaves and needles were profiled by amplification and sequencing of two genetic markers: the fungal internal transcribed spacer 2 (ITS2) within the nuclear ribosomal DNA (rDNA) and the bacterial 16S rRNA gene V4 region (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B54">Wei&#xdf;becker et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>). The fungal ITS2 region was amplified using the fungal universal primer pair fITS7 [5'-GTGARTCATCGAATCTTTG-3'] (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">Ihrmark et&#xa0;al., 2012</xref>) and ITS4 primer [5'-TCCTCCGCTTATTGATATGC-3'] (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B56">White et&#xa0;al., 1990</xref>) with Illumina adapter sequences. The 16S rRNA gene V4 region was amplified using the universal bacterial primer pair 515F (5'-GTGCCAGCMGCCGCGGTAA-3') and 806R (5'-GGACTACHVGGGTWTCTAAT-3') (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Caporaso et&#xa0;al., 2011</xref>) with Illumina adapter sequences. Paired-end sequencing (2 &#xd7; 300 bp) was performed on the pooled PCR products using a MiSeq Reagent kit v3 on an Illumina MiSeq system (Illumina Inc., San Diego, CA, USA) at the Department of Soil Ecology, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research, Germany.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_4">
<title>Bioinformatics</title>
<p>The 16S rRNA and ITS2 gene sequences corresponding to the forward and reverse primers were trimmed from the demultiplexed raw reads using Cutadapt (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Martin, 2011</xref>). The paired-end sequences were quality-trimmed, filtered for chimeras, and assembled using the DADA2 package (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">Callahan et&#xa0;al., 2016</xref>) through the pipeline dadasnake (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B54">Wei&#xdf;becker et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>). Assembled reads that met these criteria were retained for further analysis. High-quality reads were clustered into 15,213 bacterial and 5,030 fungal amplicon sequence variants (ASVs) after chimera removal. Rare ASVs (singletons) were removed as they may represent artificial sequences. The datasets were then rarefied to the minimum sequencing depth of bacterial and fungal sequence reads (21,000 sequences per sample). The bacterial sequencing data of mature leaves and needles (at 0 days) were not considered for rarefaction because their minimum sequence reads were 2,733 reads, which is approximately eight times lower than the minimum reads of the total samples. The richness at the different rarefaction depths of these samples was determined (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Table S1</bold>
</xref>). Finally, 14,773 rarefied bacteria and 4,896 fungal ASVs were obtained. Using absolute sequence reads instead of relative sequence read abundances reflects to a higher degree the PCR pitfalls, as reviewed earlier (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B57">Wintzingerode et&#xa0;al., 1997</xref>); therefore, the use of relative sequence read abundances is recommended (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">Schloss et&#xa0;al., 2009</xref>). To avoid sequencing bias, normalizing the data by rarefaction is recommended. After rarefaction to a minimum of 21,000 sequence reads, both bacterial and fungal rarefaction curves showed saturation, which implies that a large majority of the microbes in the community were included. The rarefaction curves of all samples reached saturation (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Supplementary Material</bold>
</xref>), which is a prerequisite for less biased sequence comparisons between samples (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">Schloss et&#xa0;al., 2009</xref>). Nevertheless, it should be noted that the rarefied data usually differ from the raw sequence read data, which may lead to a different pattern in the analyzed results, which in turn may affect ecological interpretation. Thus, the Mantel test based on the Bray&#x2013;Curtis distance with 999 permutations was applied to evaluate the correlation between the whole matrix and a rarified matrix for bacterial and fungal datasets (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B49">Tanunchai et&#xa0;al., 2022b</xref>). The results indicated that the rarefaction dataset was highly representative of the entire bacterial and fungal matrices (<italic>R</italic>
<sub>Mantel, bacteria</sub> = 0.998, <italic>P</italic> = 0.001; <italic>R</italic>
<sub>Mantel, fungi</sub> = 0.996, <italic>P</italic> = 0.001). Datasets of relative sequence read abundance were used for statistical analyses. It is also important to note that sequencing data provide only information regarding the occurrence and relative abundance of taxa, but it is not a direct measure of the absolute abundance of the taxa in the samples. To approximate the absolute abundances, further methods, such as the incorporation of internal standards of known quantity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Harrison et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>) or quantitative PCR (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B47">Tanunchai et&#xa0;al., 2023</xref>), should be considered. The metabolic functional profiles of leaf-associated bacterial communities in nine temperate tree species were predicted using Tax4Fun2 in R (v4.0.5) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B55">Wemheuer et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>, 2). The fungal ecological function of each ASV was determined using FungalTraits (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">P&#xf5;lme et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B48">Tanunchai et&#xa0;al., 2022a</xref>), according to the authors&#x2019; instructions. Further details are provided in the <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Supplementary Material</bold>
</xref>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_5">
<title>Network and community assembly analyses</title>
<p>Based on the random matrix theory (RMT), we constructed co-occurrence networks of cross-kingdoms inhabiting mature and decomposing leaves using the molecular ecological network analysis pipeline (MENA, <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://ieg4.rccc.ou.edu/mena/">http://ieg4.rccc.ou.edu/mena/</ext-link>). The network analysis was performed following the four steps described in previous studies (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B60">Zhou et&#xa0;al., 2011</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">Deng et&#xa0;al., 2012</xref>): 1) amplification sequence read collection, 2) data standardization, 3) pairwise similarity estimation, and 4) adjacent matrix construction according to an RMT-based approach. Further details are provided in the <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Supplementary Material</bold>
</xref>. The phylogenetic normalized stochasticity ratio (pNST) based on the null model theory was used to quantify the relative proportion of deterministic and stochastic processes in community assembly. All networks were visualized with Gephi v0.9.2. All of the parameters were calculated using the &#x201c;iCAMP&#x201d; package in R with the code provided by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">Ning et&#xa0;al. (2020)</xref> (<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://github.com/DaliangNing/iCAMP1">https://github.com/DaliangNing/iCAMP1</ext-link>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_6">
<title>Statistical analysis</title>
<p>The datasets were tested for normality using the Jarque&#x2013;Bera test and for equality of group variances using the <italic>F</italic>-test (for two datasets) and Levene&#x2019;s test (for more than two datasets). The effects of time, tree species, and tree mycorrhizal type on microbial community composition were visualized using non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) and tested using analysis of similarities (ANOSIM) and non-parametric multivariate analysis of variance (NPMANOVA) based on relative abundance data and the Bray&#x2013;Curtis distance measure. Over 999 permutations were performed. The relationship between different environmental factors, enzyme activities, and microbial community composition was analyzed using a goodness-of-fit statistic based on normalized relative abundance and the Bray&#x2013;Curtis distance measure. The effects of time, tree species, and tree mycorrhizal type on leaf litter mass loss, microbial ASV richness, leaf physicochemical properties, and enzyme activities were tested using repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Fisher&#x2019;s least significant difference (LSD) <italic>post-hoc</italic> test. Log transformation was used when necessary. All statistical analyses were performed using the PAST version 2.17, SPSS version 29.0, R, and RStudio version 4.2.1.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s3" sec-type="results">
<title>Results</title>
<sec id="s3_1">
<title>Microbial succession during leaf litter decomposition</title>
<p>Details of the general overview of the leaf and needle microbiomes in forest ecosystems are provided in the <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Supplementary Material</bold>
</xref>. We found three patterns of microbial succession over decomposition time. First, some microbes were enriched at 200 and 400 days of decomposition and were not initially detected in mature leaves and needles. These microbes included bacteria (such as <italic>Caulobacter</italic> (ASV10), <italic>Flavobacterium</italic> (ASV38), <italic>Brevundimonas</italic> (ASV44), <italic>Rhizobiaceae</italic> (ASV48), <italic>Polaromonas</italic> (ASV51, and ASV54); <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Figures S1, S2</bold>
</xref>; <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Table S2</bold>
</xref>) and fungi (such as <italic>Botryosphaeriales</italic> (ASV12), <italic>Herpotrichia</italic> (ASV30), <italic>Chaetomium</italic> (ASV8, and ASV19); <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Figures S3, S4</bold>
</xref>; <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Table S3</bold>
</xref>). While the enrichment of such bacteria at 200 and 400 days was consistent across all tree mycorrhizal types, the enrichment of fungi was more specific to some tree mycorrhizal types. <italic>Botryosphaeriales</italic> (fungal ASV12) was enriched only on needles of the EcM_C tree, specifically of <italic>P. menziesii</italic> (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Figures S3, S4</bold>
</xref>). <italic>Chaetomium</italic> spp. were enriched in the leaves of AM_BL (<italic>P. avium</italic>) and EcM_BL trees (<italic>T. cordata</italic>, <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Figures S3, S4</bold>
</xref>). Second, the relative sequence read abundances of bacteria (<italic>Sphingomonas</italic> (ASV6), <italic>Massilia</italic> (ASV11)) and fungi (<italic>Helotiales</italic> (ASV10), <italic>Aureobasidium</italic> (ASV9), <italic>Mycosphaerellaceae</italic> (ASV31), and <italic>Didymellaceae</italic> (ASV24)) were reduced at 200 and 400 days (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Figures S1&#x2013;S4</bold>
</xref>). The majority of these taxa were initially highly enriched in the leaves of both AM_BL and EcM_BL trees. Third, some microbes were highly enriched at 200 days of decomposition. These microbes include bacteria (<italic>Pseudomonas</italic> (ASV4), <italic>Pedobacter</italic> (ASV9), <italic>Microbacteriaceae</italic> (ASV8), and <italic>Luteibacter</italic> (ASV17)) and fungi (<italic>Alternaria</italic> (ASV2), <italic>Tetracladium</italic> (ASV14), and <italic>Mollisina</italic> (ASV17)). While the enrichment of such bacteria at 200 days was consistent across all tree mycorrhizal types (especially for EcM_C trees), the enrichment of fungi was specific to AM_BL and/or EcM_BL trees (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Figures S1&#x2013;S4</bold>
</xref>). Interestingly, <italic>Phoma</italic> (fungal ASV7) was highly enriched in <italic>P. sylvestris</italic> needles at 400 days of decomposition (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Figure S4</bold>
</xref>).</p>
<p>The absolute number of reads was checked to validate the interpretation of the relative abundance data. Similar patterns were observed in this study. First, bacteria (<italic>Caulobacter</italic> (ASV10), <italic>Flavobacterium</italic> (ASV38), <italic>Brevundimonas</italic> (ASV44), <italic>Rhizobiaceae</italic> (ASV48), <italic>Polaromonas</italic> (ASV51), <italic>Polaromonas</italic> (ASV54)) and fungi (<italic>Botryosphaeriales</italic> (ASV12), <italic>Herpotrichia</italic> (ASV30), <italic>Chaetomium</italic> (ASV8, and ASV19)) were initially not detected but were enriched at 200 and 400 days of decomposition (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Table S4</bold>
</xref>). Second, the absolute number of reads of bacteria, including <italic>Sphingomonas</italic> (ASV6), <italic>Massilia</italic> (ASV11), and fungi, including <italic>Helotiales</italic> (ASV10), <italic>Aureobasidium</italic> (ASV9), <italic>Mycosphaerellaceae</italic> (ASV31), and <italic>Didymellaceae</italic> (ASV24) declined mainly after 400 days (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Table S4</bold>
</xref>). Third, some bacteria such as <italic>Pseudomonas</italic> (ASV4), <italic>Pedobacter</italic> (ASV9), <italic>Microbacteriaceae</italic> (ASV8), <italic>Luteibacter</italic> (ASV17) and fungi such as <italic>Alternaria</italic> (ASV2), <italic>Tetracladium</italic> (ASV14), and <italic>Mollisina</italic> (ASV17) were also enriched at 200 days of decomposition (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Table S4</bold>
</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_2">
<title>Tree species and mycorrhizal types drive changes in the microbial communities, ASV richness, and thus, leaf litter decomposition over time</title>
<p>The microbial community composition in mature and decomposing leaves and needles differed among tree species, mycorrhizal types, and decomposition times (bacteria: <italic>R</italic>
<sub>ANOSIM</sub> = 0.94, <italic>F</italic>
<sub>NPMANOVA</sub> = 11.46, <italic>P</italic> &lt; 0.001; fungi: <italic>R</italic>
<sub>ANOSIM</sub> = 0.95, <italic>F</italic>
<sub>NPMANOVA</sub> = 7.54, <italic>P</italic> &lt; 0.001; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>; <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Table S5</bold>
</xref>). Tree species, tree mycorrhizal types, and sampling time significantly influenced the bacterial and fungal community composition across all sampling times (bacteria: <italic>R</italic>
<sup>2</sup> = 0.15&#x2013;0.94, <italic>P</italic> &lt; 0.001; fungi: <italic>R</italic>
<sup>2</sup> = 0.50&#x2013;0.97, <italic>P</italic> &lt; 0.001, <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">
<bold>Table&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>). While tree mycorrhizal type was detected as the main factor determining the bacterial and fungal community composition only at 0 days (<italic>R</italic>
<sup>2</sup> = 0.77&#x2013;0.88, <italic>P</italic> &lt; 0.001), tree species was the main factor controlling the microbial community composition at all sampling times (<italic>R</italic>
<sup>2</sup> = 0.87&#x2013;0.97, <italic>P</italic> &lt; 0.001, <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">
<bold>Table&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>). Sampling time was also the main factor that significantly altered bacterial community composition (<italic>R</italic>
<sup>2</sup> = 0.85, <italic>P</italic> &lt; 0.001, <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">
<bold>Table&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>).</p>
<fig id="f1" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;1</label>
<caption>
<p>Non&#x2010;metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) ordinations of bacterial <bold>(A)</bold> and fungal <bold>(B)</bold> community compositions in leaf and needle decomposition based on relative abundance. ASV richness (number of ASVs) for bacteria <bold>(C)</bold> and fungi <bold>(D)</bold> in leaf and needle decomposition. The legends for each NMDS data point are provided in the upper right of the figure. AM_BL, broadleaved arbuscular mycorrhizal trees (including AH, <italic>Acer pseudoplatanus</italic>; ES, <italic>Fraxinus excelsior</italic>; and KB, <italic>Prunus avium</italic>); EcM_BL, broadleaved ectomycorrhizal trees (including BU: <italic>Fagus sylvatica</italic>, HBU: <italic>Carpinus betulus</italic>, and LI: <italic>Tilia cordata</italic>); EcM_C, coniferous ectomycorrhizal trees (including FI, <italic>Picea abies</italic>; KI, <italic>Pinus sylvestris</italic>; and DG, <italic>Pseudotsuga menziesii</italic>). The results of PERMANOVA and ANOSIM are presented in <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Table S5</bold>
</xref>. Statistical differences between microbial ASV richness among different tree species and tree mycorrhizal types were tested using repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Fisher&#x2019;s least significant difference (LSD) <italic>post-hoc</italic> test.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-14-1239600-g001.tif"/>
</fig>
<table-wrap id="T1" position="float">
<label>Table&#xa0;1</label>
<caption>
<p>Goodness-of-fit statistics (<italic>R</italic>
<sup>2</sup>) of environmental variables fitted to the non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) ordination of bacterial and fungal communities in all tree species based on relative abundance data and Bray&#x2013;Curtis distance measure.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" rowspan="2" align="left">Factors</th>
<th valign="middle" colspan="2" align="center">All sampling times</th>
<th valign="middle" colspan="2" align="center">0 days</th>
<th valign="middle" colspan="2" align="center">200 days</th>
<th valign="middle" colspan="2" align="center">400 days</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" align="left">Bacteria</th>
<th valign="middle" align="left">Fungi</th>
<th valign="middle" align="left">Bacteria</th>
<th valign="middle" align="left">Fungi</th>
<th valign="middle" align="left">Bacteria</th>
<th valign="middle" align="left">Fungi</th>
<th valign="middle" align="left">Bacteria</th>
<th valign="middle" align="left">Fungi</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" colspan="9" align="left">Tree factors</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Tree mycorrhizal type</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">0.15***</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">0.52***</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">
<bold>0.77***</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">
<bold>0.88***</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">0.59***</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">0.61***</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">0.62***</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">0.64***</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Tree species</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.17***</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.61***</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">
<bold>0.94***</bold>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">
<bold>0.97***</bold>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">
<bold>0.87***</bold>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">
<bold>0.91***</bold>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">
<bold>0.90***</bold>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">
<bold>0.94***</bold>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="top" colspan="9" align="left">Time factor</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Sampling times</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">
<bold>0.85***</bold>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.50***</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">NA</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">NA</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">NA</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">NA</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">NA</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">NA</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="top" colspan="9" align="left">Plot factors</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Soil water content</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.23***</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.43***</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.41***</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.45***</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.65***</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.64***</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.37***</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.43***</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Soil pH</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.14**</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.04</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.44***</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.40***</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.33***</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.17*</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.27**</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.15*</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Latitude</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.42***</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.58***</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.63***</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">
<bold>0.70***</bold>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.47***</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.61***</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.65***</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.64***</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Longitude</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.10**</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.17***</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.15*</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.12</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.05</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.35***</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.18*</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.40***</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="top" colspan="9" align="left">Leaf physicochemical properties</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Leaf water content</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">0.16***</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">0.22***</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">0.22**</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">0.18*</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">0.49***</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">0.42***</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">0.40***</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">0.39***</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Leaf pH</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.36***</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.30***</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.19*</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.27**</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.45***</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.30***</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.28***</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.36***</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">C  content</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.41***</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.52***</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">
<bold>0.72</bold>***</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.55***</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.49***</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.58***</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.37***</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.34**</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">DOC  content</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.60***</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.25***</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.62***</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.56***</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.15*</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.06</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.11</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.07</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">N  content</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.37***</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.19***</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.17*</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.16*</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.09</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.07</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.03</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.17*</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">N<sub>min</sub>  content</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.10**</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.06*</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.34**</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.23**</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.08</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.07</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.02</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.04</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">N<sub>org</sub>  content</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.37***</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.07**</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.60***</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.46***</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.23**</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.03</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.04</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.03</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">C:N ratio</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.57***</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.35***</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.17*</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.12</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.23**</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.21**</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.13</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.27**</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">C:P ratio</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.12***</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.13***</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.20*</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.35***</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.08</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.07</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.25**</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.20**</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">N:P ratio</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.19***</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.21***</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.66***</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.67***</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.16*</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.15*</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.26**</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.22**</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Ca concentration</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.36***</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.39***</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.66***</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.60***</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.40***</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.38***</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.33***</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.26**</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Fe concentration</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.29***</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.24***</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.25**</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.26**</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.23**</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.34***</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.34***</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.21*</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">K concentration</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.06*</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.06*</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.03</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.02</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.04</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.19*</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.18*</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.08</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Mg concentration</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.23***</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.26***</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.48***</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.43***</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.37***</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.43***</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.17*</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.15*</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">P concentration</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.25***</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.17***</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.35***</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.38***</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.11</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.09</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.39***</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.35***</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn>
<p>Bold values indicate statistical significance with <italic>R</italic>
<sup>2</sup> &#x2265; 0.70.</p>
</fn>
<fn>
<p>*<italic>P</italic> &lt; 0.05, **<italic>P</italic> &lt; 0.01, ***<italic>P</italic> &lt; 0.001, NA = Not applicable..</p>
</fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<p>Tree mycorrhizal types also significantly affected microbial richness throughout the decomposition period (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Table S6</bold>
</xref>; <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>). At 0 day, microbial richness was the highest in the needles of EcM_C trees. In addition, we found that decomposition time significantly affected bacterial richness. The bacterial richness in the leaves and needles of all mycorrhizal types increased significantly with time (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>; <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Table S6</bold>
</xref>). However, no significant effect of decomposition time on fungal richness was observed (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Table S6</bold>
</xref>). Fungal richness observed in the leaves of AM_BL and EcM_BL trees tended to increase over time, while the fungal richness in the needles of EcM_C trees decreased after 200 days of incubation.</p>
<p>The tree mycorrhizal type and decomposition time significantly influenced the mass loss of the leaves and needles (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;2</bold>
</xref>). Mass losses were the lowest in ectomycorrhizal conifers [at 200 days, values ranged from 14.8% &#xb1; 2.2% (mean &#xb1; SE), and at 400 days, values ranged from 54.1% &#xb1; 3.6% (mean &#xb1; SE)] and the highest in AM_BL trees [at 200 days, values ranged from 47.7% &#xb1; 4.0% (mean &#xb1; SE), and at 400 days, values ranged from 80.1% &#xb1; 4.1% (mean &#xb1; SE)] (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;2</bold>
</xref>). </p>
<fig id="f2" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;2</label>
<caption>
<p>Molar mass loss of the leaves and needles of nine temperate tree species after 200 and 400 days of exposure. AM_BL, broadleaved arbuscular mycorrhizal trees; EcM_BL, broadleaved ectomycorrhizal trees; EcM_C, coniferous ectomycorrhizal trees. Statistical differences between molar mass losses among different tree species were tested using repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Fisher&#x2019;s least significant difference (LSD) <italic>post-hoc</italic> test.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-14-1239600-g002.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_3">
<title>Different assembly patterns in litter-associated bacterial and fungal communities across tree mycorrhizal types</title>
<p>Based on the null model, the relative contribution of ecological stochasticity to bacterial and fungal community assembly was calculated. The pNST values of the litter-associated bacterial communities of all trees at 400 days were lower than those at 0 days, and the relative proportion of variable selection increased over time (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3">
<bold>Figures&#xa0;3A, B</bold>
</xref>, <italic>P</italic> &lt; 0.05). Compared with AM_BL trees, the bacterial communities inhabiting EcM_BL and/ or EcM_C trees had a higher pNST value (<italic>P</italic> &lt; 0.05), suggesting that fewer stochastic processes were observed in AM_BL trees. For fungi, the pNST values of the AM_BL and EcM_BL trees increased with decomposition time (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;3C</bold>
</xref>, <italic>P</italic> &lt; 0.05). In contrast, the pNST value of EcM_C trees at 200 days was the lowest.</p>
<fig id="f3" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;3</label>
<caption>
<p>The ecological stochasticity in the potentially litter-associated bacterial <bold>(A)</bold> and fungal <bold>(C)</bold> community assembly estimated by the phylogenetic normalized stochasticity ratio (pNST). The value of 0.5 represents the boundary between the more deterministic (&lt;0.5) and more stochastic (&gt;0.5) assemblies. Data with different capital letters indicate significant differences at the 5% level between different sampling times in the same mycorrhizal type (<italic>P</italic> &lt; 0.05), while different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between different mycorrhizal types in the same sampling time (<italic>P</italic> &lt; 0.05). The relative contributions (%) of the community assembly processes based on pNST in shaping the litter-associated bacterial <bold>(B)</bold> and fungal <bold>(D)</bold> communities. HS, homogeneous selection; VS, variable selection; HD, homogenizing dispersal; UP, undominated process; DL, dispersal limitation; AM_BL, broadleaved arbuscular mycorrhizal trees; EcM_BL, broadleaved ectomycorrhizal trees; EcM_C, coniferous ectomycorrhizal trees.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-14-1239600-g003.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>At 200 and 400 days of decomposition, the community assembly of litter-associated bacteria was mainly controlled by variable selection processes, whereas the fungal community was governed by drift (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3">
<bold>Figures&#xa0;3B, D</bold>
</xref>). In addition, a higher proportion of drift in the litter-associated bacterial community was found in the EcM_C trees at 0 day (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;3B</bold>
</xref>). More importantly, a higher drift process of the litter-associated fungal community was observed at 200 and 400 days (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;3D</bold>
</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_4">
<title>The microbial co-occurrence network and keystone taxa are important for leaf and needle decomposition</title>
<p>The co-occurrence networks between bacteria and fungi (interkingdom) varied between the mycorrhizal types and sampling times (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f4">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;4</bold>
</xref>). The divergent network topologies showed an obvious shift between broadleaved (AM_BL and EcM_BL) and coniferous (EcM_C) trees (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f4">
<bold>Figures&#xa0;4A&#x2013;C</bold>
</xref>). Notably, the network complexity of the interkingdom network was higher in EcM_BL trees than in the AM_BL and EcM_C groups (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Table S7</bold>
</xref>). Compared with conifers, the litter-associated interkingdom at 0 days and 200 days in AM_BL and EcM_BL trees had more nodes and a higher average degree (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Table S7</bold>
</xref>). The lower percentage of negative links in EcM_C trees indicated that the interkingdom network in conifers was more connected among ASVs and that there was less competition among ASVs than in broadleaved trees (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Table S7</bold>
</xref>). Interestingly, the total number of links and the proportion of negative links from all mycorrhizal types increased at 200 days and then decreased at 400 days, indicating more competition at a later stage of litter decomposition in forests (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Table S7</bold>
</xref>). N-fixing bacteria (<italic>Brevundimonas</italic>, <italic>Methylobacterium-Methylorubrum</italic>, <italic>Pseudomonas</italic>, and <italic>Sphingomonas</italic>), saprotrophic fungi (<italic>Chalara</italic>, <italic>Coprinellus</italic>, <italic>Hypholoma</italic>, <italic>Praetumpfia</italic>, and <italic>Tothia</italic>), and plant pathogenic fungi (<italic>Neocatenulostroma</italic>, <italic>Pleurophoma</italic>, <italic>Truncatella</italic>, and <italic>Venturia</italic>) were identified as network module hubs and connectors (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f5">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;5</bold>
</xref>). <italic>Sphingomonas</italic> was identified as network connectors and/or module hubs in co-occurrence networks across sampling times.</p>
<fig id="f4" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;4</label>
<caption>
<p>Interkingdom modular networks among mycorrhizal types and sampling times. The node colors represent different modules. <bold>(A)</bold> Initial litter phase (0 days); <bold>(B)</bold> 200 days of litter decomposition; <bold>(C)</bold> 400 days of litter decomposition. The connections denote a strong (Spearman&#x2019;s <italic>&#x3c1;</italic> &gt; 0.6) and significant (<italic>P</italic> &lt; 0.01) correlations. AM_BL, broadleaved arbuscular mycorrhizal trees; EcM_BL, broadleaved ectomycorrhizal trees; EcM_C, coniferous ectomycorrhizal trees.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-14-1239600-g004.tif"/>
</fig>
<fig id="f5" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;5</label>
<caption>
<p>Topological roles of ASVs at 0 days <bold>(A)</bold>, 200 days <bold>(B)</bold>, and 400 days <bold>(C)</bold> decayed phase networks, as displayed by the <italic>Zi</italic>&#x2013;<italic>Pi</italic> plot. AM_BL, broadleaved arbuscular mycorrhizal trees; EcM_BL, broadleaved ectomycorrhizal trees; EcM_C, coniferous ectomycorrhizal trees. The connectivity of each node was calculated based on its within-module connectivity (<italic>Zi</italic>) and among-module connectivity (<italic>Pi</italic>) to identify the keystone species according to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">Olesen et al., 2007</xref>.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-14-1239600-g005.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_5">
<title>Factors influencing the leaf and needle microbial communities</title>
<p>Overall, we found that the tree mycorrhizal types influenced most of the leaf physicochemical properties (<italic>P</italic> &lt; 0.001, <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Table S6</bold>
</xref>). We found that plot factors and leaf physicochemical properties were also significantly correlated with the microbial community composition (both bacteria and fungi, <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">
<bold>Table&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>). The plot factors and leaf physicochemical properties showed significant responses to microbial community composition across all sampling times included soil water content (<italic>R</italic>
<sup>2</sup> = 0.23&#x2013;0.65, <italic>P</italic> &lt; 0.001), latitude (<italic>R</italic>
<sup>2</sup> = 0.42&#x2013;0.70, <italic>P</italic> &lt; 0.001), leaf water content, pH, total C, N:P ratio, Ca, Fe, and Mg concentration (<italic>R</italic>
<sup>2</sup> = 0.15&#x2013;0.72, <italic>P</italic> &lt; 0.05&#x2013;0.001). Latitude was also the main factor corresponding to the fungal community composition (<italic>R</italic>
<sup>2&#xa0;=&#xa0;</sup>0.70, <italic>P</italic> &lt; 0.001, <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">
<bold>Table&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>), while total C content was another main factor for bacterial community composition at 0 day (<italic>R</italic>
<sup>2</sup> = 0.72, <italic>P</italic> &lt; 0.001, <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">
<bold>Table&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>). Notably, DOC and N content (total N, dissolved inorganic N, and organic N) were significantly correlated with bacterial and fungal communities only at 0 days (<italic>R</italic>
<sup>2</sup> = 0.16&#x2013;0.62, <italic>P</italic> &lt; 0.001&#x2013;0.05).</p>
<p>When considering AM_BL, EcM_BL, and EcM_C separately, we found similar and dissimilar patterns of factors corresponding to bacterial and fungal community compositions (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Table S8</bold>
</xref>). Similar patterns that were observed across all considerations (AM_BL, EcM_BL, and EcM_C) were as follows: i) tree species was the main factor affecting the fungal community composition across all sampling times (<italic>R</italic>
<sup>2</sup> = 0.83&#x2013;1.00, <italic>P</italic> &lt; 0.001), and ii) sampling times were the main factors corresponding to both bacterial and fungal community compositions (<italic>R</italic>
<sup>2</sup> = 0.79&#x2013;0.90, <italic>P</italic> &lt; 0.001). The leaf and soil pH patterns were the first to differ. Leaf pH correlated significantly with bacterial and fungal community composition at most sampling times (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Table S8</bold>
</xref>). While leaf pH continued to significantly correlate with microbial community composition in AM_BL trees at 200 and 400 days, soil pH became more important for the microbial community composition in EcM_BL and EcM_C at 200 and 400 days (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Table S8</bold>
</xref>). Second, total C and DOC showed no significant correlation with the microbial community composition of AM_BL trees at 0 days, but they were significantly correlated with the microbial community composition of EcM_BL trees and were the main factors determining the microbial community composition of EcM_C trees (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Table S8</bold>
</xref>). Third, C:P and N:P ratios were the main factors that significantly corresponded to the fungal community composition in EcM_C trees at 0 days and C:N, C:P, and N:P ratios at 400 days; however, in other tree mycorrhizal types, they showed only moderate correlation or no correlation with the microbial community composition (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Table S8</bold>
</xref>). Details of enzyme activities and their association with microbial communities are provided in the <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Supplementary Material</bold>
</xref>.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s4" sec-type="discussion">
<title>Discussion</title>
<sec id="s4_1">
<title>Microbial richness, community composition, and their corresponding factors in nine tree species representing different tree mycorrhizal types</title>
<p>The results of this study confirmed our hypothesis that the mycorrhizal type of the tree affects nutrient acquisition and, thus, the nutrient traits of mature leaves and needles, which in turn determine the microbial community composition in the mature leaves and needles (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>; <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">
<bold>Table&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>). The effect of mycorrhizal type on microbial community composition was high at time 0 (mature leaves and needles) and decreased at later stages of decomposition. Previous studies (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">Bonfante and Genre, 2010</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">Jacobs et&#xa0;al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Keller and Phillips, 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B44">Seyfried et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>) have reported that tree mycorrhizal types play an important role in determining the nutrient traits of leaf litter and, thus, in selecting the phyllosphere microbiome prior to leaf senescence. Indeed, we found that the patterns of microbial community composition were correlated with nutrient content in different tree mycorrhizal types (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">
<bold>Table&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>). In mature leaves and needles before leaf senescence, DOC and N content (total N, dissolved inorganic N, and organic N) were more important in mature leaves and needles. Leachable C and N are the key components in the production of leaf litter-decomposing enzymes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Hoppe et&#xa0;al., 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">Purahong et&#xa0;al., 2016</xref>). These two factors, namely, the initial phyllosphere microbiome and nutrient traits in the leaf litter, represent leaf litter quality and will later determine the leaf litter decomposition rate (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B46">Strickland et&#xa0;al., 2009</xref>). Indeed, we found that the leaf litter of AM trees decomposed faster than the leaves and needles of EcM broadleaves and conifers. This finding is consistent with a previous study of investigation on leaf litter decomposition in temperate forests (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Keller and Phillips, 2019</xref>).</p>
<p>The succession of microbial community composition during leaf litter decomposition and its relationship to leaf litter quality is of great interest to scientists in various fields, especially ecology, microbiology, and forestry (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">Purahong et&#xa0;al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B50">Tl&#xe1;skal et&#xa0;al., 2016</xref>). Nevertheless, previous studies (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">Purahong et&#xa0;al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B50">Tl&#xe1;skal et&#xa0;al., 2016</xref>) have investigated microbial succession or only bacterial succession in one or two tree species. In this study, we revealed the microbial community dynamics and succession during leaf litter decomposition of nine temperate tree species, including broadleaf AM, broadleaf EcM, and conifer EcM. <italic>Caulobacter</italic>, <italic>Flavobacterium</italic>, <italic>Brevundimonas</italic>, <italic>Rhizobiaceae</italic>, <italic>Polaromonas</italic>, <italic>Botryosphaeriales</italic>, <italic>Herpotrichia</italic>, and <italic>Chaetomium</italic> were able to enrich the decomposing leaves and needles at 200 and 400 days, whereas <italic>Sphingomonas</italic>, <italic>Massilia</italic>, <italic>Helotiales</italic>, <italic>Aureobasidium</italic>, <italic>Mycosphaerellaceae</italic>, and <italic>Didymellaceae</italic> were drastically reduced at 200 and 400 days (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Figures S1&#x2013;S4</bold>
</xref>). Interestingly, fungal enrichment was more specific to certain mycorrhizal tree types. Nevertheless, an increase in the relative abundance of a taxon can be explained by several different scenarios (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Harrison et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>). Thus, the absolute number of reads was checked to validate the above interpretation. The enrichment patterns of these microbes were mostly conserved when the absolute count of the sequence reads was considered. Nevertheless, further methods, such as the incorporation of internal standards of known quantity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Harrison et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>) or quantitative PCR (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B47">Tanunchai et&#xa0;al., 2023</xref>), should be considered to better and directly approximate the absolute abundances in samples.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s4_2">
<title>More cross-kingdom competition in the early stages of different mycorrhizal litter decomposition</title>
<p>The relationship between bacteria and fungi (based on co-occurrence network patterns) differed among the tree mycorrhizal types during the decomposition period, which was consistent with our hypothesis. Network analysis can be used to determine how the environment affects an underlying network of ecological dependencies (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">Montoya et&#xa0;al., 2006</xref>). Given the characteristics of leaf habitats, cross-kingdom interactions in leaf microbial networks respond rapidly to environmental fluctuations (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Barranca et&#xa0;al., 2015</xref>). Identifying bacterial and fungal associations within and between litter decomposition communities is critical for understanding this process (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">Purahong et&#xa0;al., 2016</xref>). In the present study, the leaf-associated microbial community members colonizing broadleaved trees were more sensitive to environmental variation than those colonizing conifers, and there was less cross-kingdom competition in the EcM_C group (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f4">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;4</bold>
</xref>). Broadleaved trees tend to have more &#x201c;opportunistic&#x201d; strategies and longer leaf lives than evergreens (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B42">Reich, 1995</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B58">Wright et&#xa0;al., 2004</xref>). AM litter is more readily decomposed than EcM litter due to its higher nutrient and polyphenol content, which is conducive to the growth of fungal pathogens and saprotrophs that rely on C and energy from the plant litter (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Averill et&#xa0;al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Keller and Phillips, 2019</xref>). <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">Fang et&#xa0;al. (2020)</xref> demonstrated that a higher abundance of saprotrophic fungi in the soil around AM trees results in a faster decomposition rate for AM leaf litter compared with EcM leaf litter.</p>
<p>More importantly, the average clustering coefficient was relatively higher at 0 days than at 200 and 400 days (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f4">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;4</bold>
</xref>; <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Table S7</bold>
</xref>), suggesting that the bacterial&#x2013;fungal network is less connected at later stages and may be more susceptible to external perturbations such as environmental influences. The theory of priority effects suggests that in the early stages of colonization, an early colonist can preempt niches and exclude later-arriving species by competing with them for resources (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Cline and Zak, 2015</xref>). To the best of our knowledge, fungi have the potential to compete with bacteria for resources and expel them from their territories during the early decomposition phase (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B52">Tsujiyama and Minami, 2005</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">Purahong et&#xa0;al., 2016</xref>). In this study, we found that the percentage of links and negative links increased at 200 days and then decreased at 400 days, suggesting that more competitive and antagonistic relationships were present at the early stage of litter decomposition. We inferred that the competition potential of the cross-kingdom varied during the decomposition process due to niche differentiation. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Cline and Zak (2015)</xref> showed that bacterial communities were decoupled from environmental changes and relatively stable despite different decomposition phases, mainly benefiting from readily available substances formed by fungal exoenzymes. Taken together, our network analyses (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f4">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;4</bold>
</xref>) revealed that microbial interactions changed with the succession of litter decomposition and showed a contrasting pattern between mycorrhizal types.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s4_3">
<title>Variable selection and drift play important roles in regulating community assembly of leaf-associated microbiota</title>
<p>The proportion of determinisms and stochasticity that govern microbial communities change differently depending on the tree mycorrhizal type throughout the course of litter decomposition. Accumulating evidence suggests that plant-associated microbial communities are not random assemblages but rather are characterized by general rules for assembly and have well-defined phylogenetic relationships (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Carlstr&#xf6;m et&#xa0;al., 2019</xref>). Assessing the ecological processes that govern the community assembly of leaf-associated microbiota provides a future avenue for advancing our understanding of litter decomposition (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Carlstr&#xf6;m et&#xa0;al., 2019</xref>). In this study, the community assembly of leaf-associated bacteria was dominated by variable selection with a striking increase in the proportion of deterministic processes over time. This selective filtering and recruitment of different microorganisms can be attributed to niche adaptation and modification (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">Maignien et&#xa0;al., 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">Hamonts et&#xa0;al., 2018</xref>). Several successful colonizers inhabiting litter niches either compete for resources or cooperate to maintain stable coexistence (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B51">Trivedi et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>). <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Cline and Zak (2015)</xref> revealed that deviations in community assembly are significantly influenced by the respiration of early colonizers in the early stages. In addition, we found that stochastic processes (mainly drift) governed the assembly of fungal communities inhabiting the EcM leaves and needles (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;3</bold>
</xref>). <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B53">Vellend (2010)</xref> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Chase and Myers (2011)</xref> reported that drift is more prominent under conditions of reduced biodiversity (e.g., smaller populations and/or lower species richness). It has also been reported that a smaller habitat space and a lower dispersal rate, which are characteristic of needles, can increase stochasticity, especially ecological drift (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">Hanson et&#xa0;al., 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Evans et&#xa0;al., 2017</xref>). We observed an increasing trend in stochasticity in broadleaved trees (AM_BL and EcM_BL groups) during litter decomposition (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;3</bold>
</xref>). Previous studies have suggested that initial plant colonization is favored by high-resource conditions, resulting in strong priority effects and divergent community assembly trajectories (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Ejrn&#xe6;s et&#xa0;al., 2006</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Kardol et&#xa0;al., 2013</xref>). There is increasing evidence that the decomposition of N-rich, labile AM leaf litter results in increased mineral N availability and SOM content relative to EcM soil (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">Phillips et&#xa0;al., 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Keller and Phillips, 2019</xref>). Overall, community assemblages of leaf-associated microbiota are a multistep process that depends on species interactions, drift, and environmental selection.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s4_4">
<title>Link between enzyme activities and microbial communities</title>
<p>In this study, we found a correlation between enzyme activity and bacterial and fungal communities. Although fungi are known for their important role in decomposing complex biopolymers, bacteria can play direct and indirect roles in degrading complex leaf litter (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">de Gonzalo et&#xa0;al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">Purahong et&#xa0;al., 2016</xref>). We found that the mass loss of different tree mycorrhizal types was directly related to the presence of some bacterial functional groups, especially N-fixing bacteria. We observed that the mass loss of needles from the EcM_C tree after 200 days of decomposition was significantly lower than that of the leaves from AM_BL and EcM_BL trees (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;2</bold>
</xref>). Brown rot and ascomycetous fungi dominate the fungal community composition in mature (0 days) and decomposing leaves and needles at 200 days. We further found that at 0 days (mature leaves and needles), N-fixing bacteria, <italic>Massilia</italic>, <italic>Methylobacterium</italic>-<italic>Methylorubrum</italic>, <italic>Pseudomonas</italic>, and <italic>Sphingomonas</italic> were highly abundant in senescing leaves of AM_BL and EcM_BL trees, whereas only <italic>Sphingomonas</italic> was abundant in the senescing needles of the EcM_C tree (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Figure S2</bold>
</xref>). <italic>Pseudomonas</italic> dominated the bacterial community composition after 200 days of decomposition, whereas <italic>Sphingomonas</italic> co-dominated. <italic>Pseudomonas</italic> has been reported to be both an N-fixing bacterium and to produce a different type of peroxidase, bacterial DyP-type peroxidase, that modifies lignin (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">de Gonzalo et&#xa0;al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Desnoues et&#xa0;al., 2003</xref>). Saprotrophic fungi require available N to produce exoenzymes for leaf litter decomposition (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Hoppe et&#xa0;al., 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">Purahong et&#xa0;al., 2016</xref>). Thus, N availability may be the rate-limiting step in leaf litter decomposition (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">Osono and Takeda, 2005</xref>). The high mass loss at 400 days (up to 89%) was associated with an increase in enzyme activity, especially oxidative enzyme activity. This is consistent with the enrichment of <italic>Mycena</italic>, which has been reported to decompose lignin (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">Miyamoto et&#xa0;al., 2000</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Kellner et&#xa0;al., 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">Purahong et&#xa0;al., 2016</xref>). Furthermore, we found a link between oxidative enzyme activity and the bacterial community at 400 days (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Figure S5</bold>
</xref>). Bacteria may not directly secrete the measured oxidative enzymes; however, some bacteria (such as <italic>Sphingobium</italic> and <italic>Novosphingobium</italic>) have been reported to secrete glutathione-dependent enzymes (&#x3b2;-etherases and lyases) that act on the lignin degradation process (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">de Gonzalo et&#xa0;al., 2016</xref>). A full discussion of the relationship between enzyme activity and the microbial community is provided in the <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Supplementary Material</bold>
</xref>.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s5" sec-type="conclusion">
<title>Conclusion</title>
<p>The fungal and bacterial community compositions of AM and EcM broadleaved trees as well as EcM conifer trees have only been studied for a few tree species. In this comprehensive study, we demonstrated for the first time that tree mycorrhizal types are critical for nutrient status, molar mass loss, and hydrolytic and oxidative enzyme activities of the microbial community and, thus, for the ecosystem service of leaf/needle decomposition. Moreover, each tree mycorrhizal type showed a specific community assembly process, and the microbial network architecture of broadleaved AM and EcM trees was more similar to each other than that of conifer EcM trees. Future research should use manipulation experiments to investigate the interactions of the community members, which were very abundant in our study, to decipher their respective roles in the leaf or needle decomposition process.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s6" sec-type="data-availability">
<title>Data availability statement</title>
<p>Illumina sequencing of bacterial and fungal datasets for 0, 200, and 400 days presented in the study are deposited in The National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) database under BioProject ID PRJNA753096 and PRJNA890590.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s7" sec-type="author-contributions">
<title>Author contributions</title>
<p>WP and E-DS conceived of and designed the study. BT, WP, SW, and E-DS led the experimental setup. BT, LJ, WP, SW, and E-DS collected the samples and metadata. WP, MN, and FB contributed the reagents and laboratory equipment. BT, KT, and WP performed the DNA analysis. SW led the bioinformatics analysis. BT, LJ, and WP led the microbial taxonomy and data analyses. LJ led the microbial network and community assembly analyses. SS, IH, and GG led the physicochemical analyses. BT, LJ, and WP drafted the manuscript. MN and WP supervised BT. MN, E-DS, and FB reviewed the manuscript and provided comments and suggestions. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<sec id="s8" sec-type="funding-information">
<title>Funding</title>
<p>The author(s) declare financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. This work was partially funded by the internal research budget of WP, Department of Soil Ecology, UFZ-Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research.</p>
</sec>
<ack>
<title>Acknowledgments</title>
<p>The community composition data were computed at the High-Performance Computing (HPC) Cluster EVE, a joint effort of both the Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (UFZ) and the German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig. We thank Beatrix Schnabel and Melanie G&#xfc;nther for their help with the Illumina sequencing. We thank the Helmholtz Association, the Federal Ministry of Education and Research, the State Ministry of Science and Economy of Saxony-Anhalt, and the State Ministry for Higher Education, Research, and the Arts Saxony. Benjawan Tanunchai acknowledges the Peter and Traudl Engelhorn Foundation for their financial support through her postdoc scholarship.</p>
</ack>
<sec id="s9" sec-type="COI-statement">
<title>Conflict of interest</title>
<p>The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s10" sec-type="disclaimer">
<title>Publisher&#x2019;s note</title>
<p>All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s11" sec-type="supplementary-material">
<title>Supplementary material</title>
<p>The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2023.1239600/full#supplementary-material">https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2023.1239600/full#supplementary-material</ext-link>
</p>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="DataSheet_1.zip" id="SM1" mimetype="application/zip"/>
</sec>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="B1">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Abrego</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Wood-inhabiting fungal communities: Opportunities for integration of empirical and theoretical community ecology</article-title>. <source>Fungal Ecol.</source> <volume>54</volume>, <fpage>101112</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.funeco.2021.101112</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Aerts</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>de Caluwe</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1997</year>). <article-title>Nutritional and plant-mediated controls on leaf litter decomposition of <italic>Carex</italic> Species</article-title>. <source>Ecology</source> <volume>78</volume>, <fpage>244</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2307/2265993</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Averill</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bhatnagar</surname> <given-names>J. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dietze</surname> <given-names>M. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pearse</surname> <given-names>W. D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kivlin</surname> <given-names>S. N.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Global imprint of mycorrhizal fungi on whole-plant nutrient economics</article-title>. <source>Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.</source> <volume>116</volume>, <fpage>23163</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>23168</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1073/pnas.1906655116</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Barranca</surname> <given-names>V. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cai</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Low-rank network decomposition reveals structural characteristics of small-world networks</article-title>. <source>Phys. Rev. E</source> <volume>92</volume>, <elocation-id>62822</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1103/PhysRevE.92.062822</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Berg</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2000</year>). <article-title>Litter decomposition and organic matter turnover in northern forest soils</article-title>. <source>For. Ecol. Manage.</source> <volume>133</volume>, <fpage>13</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>22</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S0378-1127(99)00294-7</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Bonfante</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Genre</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Mechanisms underlying beneficial plant&#x2013;fungus interactions in mycorrhizal symbiosis</article-title>. <source>Nat. Commun.</source> <volume>1</volume>, <fpage>48</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/ncomms1046</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Callahan</surname> <given-names>B. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>McMurdie</surname> <given-names>P. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rosen</surname> <given-names>M. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Han</surname> <given-names>A. W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Johnson</surname> <given-names>A. J. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Holmes</surname> <given-names>S. P.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>DADA2: High-resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data</article-title>. <source>Nat. Methods</source> <volume>13</volume>, <fpage>581</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>583</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nmeth.3869</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Caporaso</surname> <given-names>J. G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lauber</surname> <given-names>C. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Walters</surname> <given-names>W. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Berg-Lyons</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lozupone</surname> <given-names>C. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Turnbaugh</surname> <given-names>P. J.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Global patterns of 16S rRNA diversity at a depth of millions of sequences per sample</article-title>. <source>PNAS</source> <volume>108</volume>, <fpage>4516</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>4522</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1073/pnas.1000080107</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Carlstr&#xf6;m</surname> <given-names>C. I.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Field</surname> <given-names>C. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bortfeld-Miller</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>M&#xfc;ller</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sunagawa</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Vorholt</surname> <given-names>J. A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Synthetic microbiota reveal priority effects and keystone strains in the <italic>Arabidopsis</italic> phyllosphere</article-title>. <source>Nat. Ecol. Evol.</source> <volume>3</volume>, <fpage>1445</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1454</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41559-019-0994-z</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Chase</surname> <given-names>J. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Myers</surname> <given-names>J. A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Disentangling the importance of ecological niches from stochastic processes across scales</article-title>. <source>Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond., B, Biol. Sci.</source> <volume>366</volume>, <fpage>2351</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2363</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1098/rstb.2011.0063</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Cline</surname> <given-names>L. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zak</surname> <given-names>D. R.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Initial colonization, community assembly and ecosystem function: fungal colonist traits and litter biochemistry mediate decay rate</article-title>. <source>Mol. Ecol.</source> <volume>24</volume>, <fpage>5045</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>5058</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/mec.13361</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>de Gonzalo</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Colpa</surname> <given-names>D. I.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Habib</surname> <given-names>M. H. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fraaije</surname> <given-names>M. W.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Bacterial enzymes involved in lignin degradation</article-title>. <source>J. Biotechnol.</source> <volume>236</volume>, <fpage>110</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>119</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jbiotec.2016.08.011</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Deng</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jiang</surname> <given-names>Y.-H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>He</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Luo</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Molecular ecological network analyses</article-title>. <source>BMC Bioinf.</source> <volume>13</volume>, <elocation-id>113</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/1471-2105-13-113</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Desnoues</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lin</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Guo</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ma</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Carre&#xf1;o-Lopez</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Elmerich</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2003</year>). <article-title>Nitrogen fixation genetics and regulation in a <italic>Pseudomonas stutzeri</italic> strain associated with rice</article-title>. <source>Microbiology</source> <volume>149</volume>, <fpage>2251</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2262</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1099/mic.0.26270-0</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ejrn&#xe6;s</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bruun</surname> <given-names>H. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Graae</surname> <given-names>B. J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2006</year>). <article-title>Community assembly in experimental grasslands: Suitable environment or timely arrival</article-title>? <source>Ecology</source> <volume>87</volume>, <fpage>1225</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1233</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1890/0012-9658(2006)87[1225:caiegs]2.0.co;2</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Evans</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Martiny</surname> <given-names>J. B. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Allison</surname> <given-names>S. D.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Effects of dispersal and selection on stochastic assembly in microbial communities</article-title>. <source>ISME J.</source> <volume>11</volume>, <fpage>176</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>185</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/ismej.2016.96</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Fang</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liang</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Huang</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yu</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Abundance of saprotrophic fungi determines decomposition rates of leaf litter from arbuscular mycorrhizal and ectomycorrhizal trees in a subtropical forest</article-title>. <source>Soil Biol. Biochem.</source> <volume>149</volume>, <elocation-id>107966</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.soilbio.2020.107966</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B18">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Hamonts</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Trivedi</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Garg</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Janitz</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Grinyer</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Holford</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Field study reveals core plant microbiota and relative importance of their drivers</article-title>. <source>Environ. Microbiol.</source> <volume>20</volume>, <fpage>124</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>140</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/1462-2920.14031</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B19">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Hanson</surname> <given-names>C. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fuhrman</surname> <given-names>J. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Horner-Devine</surname> <given-names>M. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Martiny</surname> <given-names>J. B. H.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Beyond biogeographic patterns: processes shaping the microbial landscape</article-title>. <source>Nat. Rev. Microbiol.</source> <volume>10</volume>, <fpage>497</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>506</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nrmicro2795</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B20">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Harrison</surname> <given-names>J. G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Calder</surname> <given-names>W. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Shuman</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Buerkleet</surname> <given-names>C. A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>The quest for absolute abundance: The use of internal standards for DNA-based community ecology</article-title>. <source>Mol. Ecol. Resour.</source> <volume>21</volume>, <fpage>30</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>43</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/1755-0998.13247</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B21">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Hobbie</surname> <given-names>S. E.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Plant species effects on nutrient cycling: revisiting litter feedbacks</article-title>. <source>Trends Ecol. Evol.</source> <volume>30</volume>, <fpage>357</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>363</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.tree.2015.03.015</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B22">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Hoppe</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kahl</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Karasch</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wubet</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bauhus</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Buscot</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Network analysis reveals ecological links between N-fixing bacteria and wood-decaying fungi</article-title>. <source>PloS One</source> <volume>9</volume>, <elocation-id>e88141</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0088141</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B23">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ihrmark</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>B&#xf6;deker</surname> <given-names>I. T. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cruz-Martinez</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Friberg</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kubartova</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Schenck</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>New primers to amplify the fungal ITS2 region &#x2013; evaluation by 454-sequencing of artificial and natural communities</article-title>. <source>FEMS Microbiol. Ecol.</source> <volume>82</volume>, <fpage>666</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>677</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1574-6941.2012.01437.x</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B24">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Jacobs</surname> <given-names>L. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sulman</surname> <given-names>B. N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Brzostek</surname> <given-names>E. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Feighery</surname> <given-names>J. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Phillips</surname> <given-names>R. P.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Interactions among decaying leaf litter, root litter and soil organic matter vary with mycorrhizal type</article-title>. <source>J. Ecol.</source> <volume>106</volume>, <fpage>502</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>513</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/1365-2745.12921</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B25">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kardol</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Souza</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Classen</surname> <given-names>A. T.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Resource availability mediates the importance of priority effects in plant community assembly and ecosystem function</article-title>. <source>Oikos</source> <volume>122</volume>, <fpage>84</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>94</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1600-0706.2012.20546.x</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B26">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Keller</surname> <given-names>A. B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Phillips</surname> <given-names>R. P.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Leaf litter decay rates differ between mycorrhizal groups in temperate, but not tropical, forests</article-title>. <source>New Phytol.</source> <volume>222</volume>, <fpage>556</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>564</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/nph.15524</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B27">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kellner</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Luis</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pecyna</surname> <given-names>M. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Barbi</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kapturska</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kr&#xfc;ger</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Widespread occurrence of expressed fungal secretory peroxidases in forest soils</article-title>. <source>PloS One</source> <volume>9</volume>, <elocation-id>e95557</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0095557</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B28">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ma</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Razavi</surname> <given-names>B. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Holz</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Blagodatskaya</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kuzyakov</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Warming increases hotspot areas of enzyme activity and shortens the duration of hot moments in the root-detritusphere</article-title>. <source>Soil Biol. Biochem.</source> <volume>107</volume>, <fpage>226</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>233</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.soilbio.2017.01.009</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B29">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Maignien</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>DeForce</surname> <given-names>E. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chafee</surname> <given-names>M. E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Eren</surname> <given-names>A. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Simmons</surname> <given-names>S. L.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Ecological succession and stochastic variation in the assembly of <italic>Arabidopsis thaliana</italic> phyllosphere communities</article-title>. <source>mBio</source> <volume>5</volume>, <fpage>e00682</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>e00613</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/mBio.00682-13</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B30">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Martin</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Cutadapt removes adapter sequences from high-throughput sequencing reads</article-title>. <source>EMBnet.journal</source> <volume>17</volume>, <fpage>10</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>12</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.14806/ej.17.1.200</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B31">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Mieszkin</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Richet</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bach</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lambrot</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Augusto</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bu&#xe9;e</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Oak decaying wood harbors taxonomically and functionally different bacterial communities in sapwood and heartwood</article-title>. <source>Soil Biol. Biochem.</source> <volume>155</volume>, <elocation-id>108160</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.soilbio.2021.108160</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B32">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Miyamoto</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Igarashi</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Takahashi</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2000</year>). <article-title>Lignin-degrading ability of litter-decomposing basidiomycetes from <italic>Picea</italic> forests of Hokkaido</article-title>. <source>Mycoscience</source> <volume>41</volume>, <fpage>105</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>110</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/BF02464317</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B33">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Montoya</surname> <given-names>J. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pimm</surname> <given-names>S. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sol&#xe9;</surname> <given-names>R. V.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2006</year>). <article-title>Ecological networks and their fragility</article-title>. <source>Nature</source> <volume>442</volume>, <fpage>259</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>264</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nature04927</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B34">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ning</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yuan</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Guo</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>A quantitative framework reveals ecological drivers of grassland microbial community assembly in response to warming</article-title>. <source>Nat. Commun.</source> <volume>11</volume>, <fpage>4717</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41467-020-18560-z</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B35">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Olesen</surname> <given-names>J. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bascompte</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dupont</surname> <given-names>Y. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jordano</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2007</year>). <article-title>The modularity of pollination networks</article-title>. <source>PNAS</source> <volume>104</volume>, <fpage>19891</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>19896</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1073/pnas.0706375104</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B36">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Osburn</surname> <given-names>E. D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Aylward</surname> <given-names>F. O.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Barrett</surname> <given-names>J. E.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Historical land use has long-term effects on microbial community assembly processes in forest soils</article-title>. <source>ISME Commun.</source> <volume>1</volume>, <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>4</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s43705-021-00051-x</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B37">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Osono</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Takeda</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2005</year>). <article-title>Decomposition of organic chemical components in relation to nitrogen dynamics in leaf litter of 14 tree species in a cool temperate forest</article-title>. <source>Ecol. Res.</source> <volume>20</volume>, <fpage>41</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>49</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11284-004-0002-0</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B38">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Phillips</surname> <given-names>R. P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Brzostek</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Midgley</surname> <given-names>M. G.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>The mycorrhizal-associated nutrient economy: a new framework for predicting carbon&#x2013;nutrient couplings in temperate forests</article-title>. <source>New Phytol.</source> <volume>199</volume>, <fpage>41</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>51</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/nph.12221</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B39">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>P&#xf5;lme</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Abarenkov</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Henrik Nilsson</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lindahl</surname> <given-names>B. D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Clemmensen</surname> <given-names>K. E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kauserud</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>FungalTraits: a user-friendly traits database of fungi and fungus-like stramenopiles</article-title>. <source>Fungal Diversity</source> <volume>105</volume>, <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>16</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s13225-020-00466-2</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B40">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Purahong</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tanunchai</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Muszynski</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Maurer</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wahdan</surname> <given-names>S. F. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Malter</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Cross-kingdom interactions and functional patterns of active microbiota matter in governing deadwood decay</article-title>. <source>Proc. R. Soc. B: Biol. Sci.</source> <volume>289</volume>, <fpage>20220130</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1098/rspb.2022.0130</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B41">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Purahong</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wubet</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lentendu</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Schloter</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pecyna</surname> <given-names>M. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kapturska</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Life in leaf litter: novel insights into community dynamics of bacteria and fungi during litter decomposition</article-title>. <source>Mol. Ecol.</source> <volume>25</volume>, <fpage>4059</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>4074</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/mec.13739</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B42">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Reich</surname> <given-names>P. B.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1995</year>). <article-title>Phenology of tropical forests: patterns, causes, and consequences</article-title>. <source>Can. J. Bot.</source> <volume>73</volume>, <fpage>164</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>174</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1139/b95-020</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B43">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Schloss</surname> <given-names>P. D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Westcott</surname> <given-names>S. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ryabin</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hall</surname> <given-names>J. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hartmann</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hollister</surname> <given-names>E. B.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>Introducing mothur: open source, platform- independent, community-supported software for describing and compar- ing microbial communities</article-title>. <source>Appl. Environ. Microbiol.</source> <volume>75</volume>, <fpage>7537</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>7541</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/AEM.01541-09</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B44">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Seyfried</surname> <given-names>G. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dalling</surname> <given-names>J. W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>W. H.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Mycorrhizal type effects on leaf litter decomposition depend on litter quality and environmental context</article-title>. <source>Biogeochemistry</source> <volume>155</volume>, <fpage>21</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>38</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10533-021-00810-x</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B45">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Singavarapu</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Beugnon</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bruelheide</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cesarz</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Du</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Eisenhauer</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Tree mycorrhizal type and tree diversity shape the forest soil microbiota</article-title>. <source>Environ. Microbiol</source>. <volume>24</volume>, <page-range>4236&#x2013;4255</page-range>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/1462-2920.15690</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B46">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Strickland</surname> <given-names>M. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Osburn</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lauber</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fierer</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bradford</surname> <given-names>M. A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>Litter quality is in the eye of the beholder: initial decomposition rates as a function of inoculum characteristics</article-title>. <source>Funct. Ecol.</source> <volume>23</volume>, <fpage>627</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>636</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1365-2435.2008.01515.x</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B47">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Tanunchai</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ji</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Schr&#xf6;der</surname> <given-names>O.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gawol</surname> <given-names>S. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Geissler</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wahdan</surname> <given-names>S. F. M.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2023</year>). <article-title>Fate of a biodegradable plastic in forest soil: Dominant tree species and forest types drive changes in microbial community assembly, influence the composition of plastisphere, and affect poly(butylene succinate-co-adipate) degradation</article-title>. <source>Sci. Total Environment.</source> <volume>873</volume>, <elocation-id>162230</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.162230</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B48">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Tanunchai</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ji</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Schroeter</surname> <given-names>S. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wahdan</surname> <given-names>S. F. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hossen</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Delelegn</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2022</year>a). <article-title>FungalTraits vs. FUNGuild: comparison of ecological functional assignments of leaf- and needle-associated fungi across 12 temperate tree species</article-title>. <source>Microb. Ecol</source>. <volume>85</volume>, <page-range>411&#x2013;428</page-range>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00248-022-01973-2</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B49">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Tanunchai</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ji</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Schroeter</surname> <given-names>S. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wahdan</surname> <given-names>S. F. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Larpkern</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lehnert</surname> <given-names>A.-S.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2022</year>b). <article-title>A poisoned apple: First insights into community assembly and networks of the fungal pathobiome of healthy-looking senescing leaves of temperate trees in mixed forest ecosystem</article-title>. <source>Front. Plant Sci.</source> <volume>13</volume>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpls.2022.968218</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B50">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Tl&#xe1;skal</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Vo&#x159;&#xed;&#x161;kov&#xe1;</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Baldrian</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Bacterial succession on decomposing leaf litter exhibits a specific occurrence pattern of cellulolytic taxa and potential decomposers of fungal mycelia</article-title>. <source>FEMS Microbiol. Ecol.</source> <volume>92</volume>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/femsec/fiw177</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B51">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Trivedi</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Leach</surname> <given-names>J. E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tringe</surname> <given-names>S. G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sa</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Singh</surname> <given-names>B. K.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Plant&#x2013;microbiome interactions: from community assembly to plant health</article-title>. <source>Nat. Rev. Microbiol.</source> <volume>18</volume>, <fpage>607</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>621</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41579-020-0412-1</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B52">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Tsujiyama</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Minami</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2005</year>). <article-title>Production of phenol-oxidizing enzymes in the interaction between white-rot fungi</article-title>. <source>Mycoscience</source> <volume>46</volume>, <fpage>268</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>271</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10267-005-0243-y</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B53">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Vellend</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Conceptual synthesis in community ecology</article-title>. <source>The Quarterly Review of Biology</source> <volume>85</volume>, <fpage>183</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>206</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1086/652373</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B54">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wei&#xdf;becker</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Schnabel</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Heintz-Buschart</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Dadasnake, a Snakemake implementation of DADA2 to process amplicon sequencing data for microbial ecology</article-title>. <source>GigaScience</source> <volume>9</volume>, <page-range>1&#x2013;8</page-range>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/gigascience/giaa135</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B55">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wemheuer</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Taylor</surname> <given-names>J. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Daniel</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Johnston</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Meinicke</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Thomas</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Tax4Fun2: prediction of habitat-specific functional profiles and functional redundancy based on 16S rRNA gene sequences</article-title>. <source>Environ. Microbiome</source> <volume>15</volume>, <elocation-id>11</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s40793-020-00358-7</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B56">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>White</surname> <given-names>T. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bruns</surname> <given-names>T. D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lee</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Taylor</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1990</year>). &#x201c;<article-title>&#x201c;Amplification and Direct Sequencing of Fungal Ribosomal RNA Genes for Phylogenetics,&#x201d;</article-title>,&#x201d; in <source>PCR Protocols: A Guide to Methods and Applications</source>. Eds. <person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname>Innis</surname> <given-names>M. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gelfand</surname> <given-names>D. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sninsky</surname> <given-names>J. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>White</surname> <given-names>T. J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<publisher-loc>San Diego</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Academic Press</publisher-name>), <fpage>315</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>322</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B57">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wintzingerode</surname> <given-names>F. V.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>G&#xf6;bel</surname> <given-names>U.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Stackebrandt</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1997</year>). <article-title>Determination of microbial diversity in environmental samples: pitfalls of PCR-based rRNA analysis</article-title>. <source>FEMS Microbiol. Rev.</source> <volume>21</volume>, <fpage>213</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>229</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1574-6976.1997.tb00351.x</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B58">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wright</surname> <given-names>I. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Reich</surname> <given-names>P. B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Westoby</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ackerly</surname> <given-names>D. D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Baruch</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bongers</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2004</year>). <article-title>The worldwide leaf economics spectrum</article-title>. <source>Nature</source> <volume>428</volume>, <fpage>821</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>827</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nature02403</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B59">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Guan</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hao</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xie</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Changes in assembly processes of soil microbial communities in forest-to-cropland conversion in Changbai Mountains, northeastern China</article-title>. <source>Sci. Total Environ.</source> <volume>818</volume>, <elocation-id>151738</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.151738</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B60">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Deng</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Luo</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>He</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Phylogenetic molecular ecological network of soil microbial communities in response to elevated CO<sub>2</sub>
</article-title>. <source>mBio</source> <volume>2</volume>, <fpage>e00122</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>e00111</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/mBio.00122-11</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>