<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.3 20070202//EN" "journalpublishing.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="2.3" xml:lang="EN">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Front. Plant Sci.</journal-id>
<journal-title>Frontiers in Plant Science</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">Front. Plant Sci.</abbrev-journal-title>
<issn pub-type="epub">1664-462X</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Frontiers Media S.A.</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpls.2023.1238896</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Plant Science</subject>
<subj-group>
<subject>Original Research</subject>
</subj-group>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Study on the effect of compound cultivation on the growth feature and active ingredients content of <italic>Salvia miltiorrhiza</italic>
</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author" equal-contrib="yes">
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname>
<given-names>Luyi</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn003">
<sup>&#x2020;</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2343329"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" equal-contrib="yes">
<name>
<surname>Tao</surname>
<given-names>Shan</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn003">
<sup>&#x2020;</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname>
<given-names>Yifan</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2233457"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Yang</surname>
<given-names>Yanmei</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Peng</surname>
<given-names>Fang</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Liao</surname>
<given-names>Hailang</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Mao</surname>
<given-names>Changqing</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wan</surname>
<given-names>Xiufu</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3">
<sup>3</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2554919"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wu</surname>
<given-names>Yu</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name>
<surname>Xu</surname>
<given-names>Zhengjun</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn001">
<sup>*</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/413718"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname>
<given-names>Chao</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn001">
<sup>*</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/434502"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
<institution>Industial Crop Research Institute, Sichuan Academy of Agricultural Sciences</institution>, <addr-line>Chengdu, Sichuan</addr-line>, <country>China</country>
</aff>
<aff id="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
<institution>Crop Ecophysiology and Cultivation Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Sichuan Agricultural University</institution>, <addr-line>Chengdu, Sichuan</addr-line>, <country>China</country>
</aff>
<aff id="aff3">
<sup>3</sup>
<institution>State Key Laboratory of Dao-di Herbs, China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences</institution>, <addr-line>Beijing</addr-line>, <country>China</country>
</aff>
<author-notes>
<fn fn-type="edited-by">
<p>Edited by: Andrea Genre, University of Turin, Italy</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="edited-by">
<p>Reviewed by: Prakash Babu Adhikari, Nagoya University, Japan</p>
<p>Rubee Devi, Eternal University, India</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="corresp" id="fn001">
<p>*Correspondence: Zhengjun Xu, <email xlink:href="mailto:mywildrice@aliyun.com">mywildrice@aliyun.com</email>; Chao Zhang, <email xlink:href="mailto:jychaozhang@163.com">jychaozhang@163.com</email>
</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="equal" id="fn003">
<p>&#x2020;These authors have contributed equally to this work and share first authorship</p>
</fn>
</author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>18</day>
<month>01</month>
<year>2024</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="collection">
<year>2023</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>14</volume>
<elocation-id>1238896</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>12</day>
<month>06</month>
<year>2023</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>27</day>
<month>12</month>
<year>2023</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#xa9; 2024 Zhang, Tao, Zhang, Yang, Peng, Liao, Mao, Wan, Wu, Xu and Zhang</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2024</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Zhang, Tao, Zhang, Yang, Peng, Liao, Mao, Wan, Wu, Xu and Zhang</copyright-holder>
<license xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">
<p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.</p>
</license>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<p>We investigated the effects of the complex cultivation of <italic>Salvia miltiorrhiza</italic> on microbial communities, secretions, yield, and active ingredients, and the mechanism of action between microbial communities, secretions, and <italic>S. miltiorrhiza</italic> growth and development. Neither maize nor soybean was suitable to grow with <italic>S. miltiorrhiza</italic>, but sesame significantly increased salvinone content, the active ingredient of <italic>S. miltiorrhiza</italic>, and Tanshinone IIA, Tanshinone I, and Cryptotanshinone increased by 27.06%, 22.76%, and 26.41%, respectively, which increased the abundance and number of microbial communities in <italic>S. miltiorrhiza</italic> roots. 16S rRNA results showed that the most abundant bacterial phyla were Proteobacteria and Acidobacteriota, and their number increased with compound planting of sesame and <italic>S. miltiorrhiza</italic>. <italic>Salvia</italic> inter-root secretions affected the microbial community and <italic>Salvia</italic> growth and development, and lipids and lipid-like molecules significantly reduced <italic>Salvia</italic> yield and active ingredients. Overall, different plant secretions can lead to differences in the natural environment and <italic>Salvia</italic> root growth and development, and the composite planting of sesame with <italic>Salvia</italic> can improve inter-root microbial communities, enhance <italic>Salvia</italic> quality, and make fuller use of land resources.</p>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>
<italic>Salvia miltiorrhiza</italic>
</kwd>
<kwd>16S rRNA</kwd>
<kwd>complex cultivation</kwd>
<kwd>inter-root secretions</kwd>
<kwd>microbial community</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<counts>
<fig-count count="8"/>
<table-count count="2"/>
<equation-count count="1"/>
<ref-count count="48"/>
<page-count count="12"/>
<word-count count="5693"/>
</counts>
<custom-meta-wrap>
<custom-meta>
<meta-name>section-in-acceptance</meta-name>
<meta-value>Plant Symbiotic Interactions</meta-value>
</custom-meta>
</custom-meta-wrap>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec id="s1" sec-type="intro">
<label>1</label>
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>
<italic>Salvia miltiorrhiza</italic> Bge. is a perennial herb in the family Labiatae, whose roots and rhizomes contain active ingredients (tanshinones and tannins) with therapeutic effects on diseases such as cardiovascular diseases, diabetes, and liver diseases (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">Liu et&#xa0;al., 2020c</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Jiang et&#xa0;al., 2022a</xref>). <italic>S. miltiorrhiza</italic> is a medicinal herb widely grown in bulk in Henan, Sichuan, Shandong, and Shaanxi (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">Wang et&#xa0;al., 2019</xref>). However, as adoption of highly efficient monocultures can lead to a decrease in quality and yield, measures such as composite cultivation are needed to promote sustainable development (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Liu et&#xa0;al., 2020a</xref>).</p>
<p>High-efficiency monocultures usually lead to disturbances in soil physicochemical properties, reduced microbial community diversity, and toxin accumulation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B45">Xin-hui et&#xa0;al., 2015</xref>). Recently, compound cropping has become an important research direction to solve continuous crop challenges. Compound cropping can increase plant species diversity, improve soil physicochemical properties, and enhance microbial community abundance by growing two or more crops simultaneously (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">Tang et&#xa0;al., 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Maitra, 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">Domeignoz-Horta et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">Tang et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>). Compound cropping can, therefore, increase agroecosystem diversity and promote sustainable agriculture (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">Stomph et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>). Studies have shown that complex planting can modify plant root natural environments (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">Wang et&#xa0;al., 2019</xref>), and stimulate the production of unique inter-root secretions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">Casper and Castelli, 2007</xref>), which regulate plant growth and promote nutrient uptake, attract specific probiotic bacteria to form plant-soil feedbacks (PSF) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">Neumann and Romheld, 2003</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">Bais et&#xa0;al., 2006</xref>), and influence microbial community formation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">Sasse et&#xa0;al., 2018</xref>).</p>
<p>The beneficial effects of intercropping in complex cropping systems, such as those involving cereals and legumes, have been extensively researched (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">Hsiao et&#xa0;al., 2019</xref>). Scholars have found that maize inter-root secretions contribute to enhanced reciprocity with legumes and promote nitrogen fixation by legumes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Jiang et&#xa0;al., 2022b</xref>). Hu demonstrated that maize inter-root secretions promote flavonoids synthesis in faba beans (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Hu et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>). However, not all plant species are conducive to a good inter-root microecological environment. For example, the combination of maize and <italic>S. miltiorrhiza</italic> was detrimental to growth and yield of the latter (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">Deng et&#xa0;al., 2017</xref>). Therefore, it is crucial to investigate suitable plants for successful <italic>Salvia</italic> complex cultivation.</p>
<p>
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Lei et&#xa0;al. (2018)</xref> found that different plants have a significant effect on <italic>S. miltiorrhiza</italic> growth and development, with pepper showing the greatest improvement in yield and quality. <italic>S. miltiorrhiza</italic> dry weight increased by 12.52%, salvianolic acid B increased by 10.25%, and tanshinone compound content significantly increased by 58.91%. Similarly, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">Liu et&#xa0;al. (2018)</xref> investigated the intercropping effects of mint, perilla, and alfalfa with <italic>S. miltiorrhiza</italic>. They found that they produced the highest weight gain and increased content of <italic>S. miltiorrhiza</italic> active ingredients. Moreover, the content of lipid-soluble components cryptotanshinone, tanshinone I, and tanshinone IIA in <italic>S. miltiorrhiza</italic> significantly increased after intercropping treatment, with the highest tanshinone content of 1.08% in <italic>S. miltiorrhiza</italic> roots after <italic>S. miltiorrhiza</italic>&#x2013;mint intercropping, which was 163.41% higher than after monocropping. However, there has been no suitable grain and oil crop identified for intercropping with <italic>S. miltiorrhiza</italic>, and little research has been conducted on the effects of different plants on <italic>S. miltiorrhiza</italic> inter-root microbial community structure and abundance. Further research is needed to explore suitable crops and the underlying mechanisms of action.</p>
<p>To address these shortcomings, we investigated the effects of three crop plants on <italic>S. miltiorrhiza</italic> inter-root microecology and growth and development. The study designed pot experiments using macrogenomics and metabolomics to analyze <italic>S. miltiorrhiza</italic> inter-root microecology and investigate its responses to different plant secretions, including changes in soil physicochemical properties, bacterial abundance, inter-root soil community composition, and metabolite production. To confirm our results, we conducted field plot experiments. We hypothesized that various plants would lead to different <italic>Salvia</italic> inter-root microbial populations and community structures, affect its root morphology, and alter its inter-root secretions.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2" sec-type="materials|methods">
<label>2</label>
<title>Materials and methods</title>
<sec id="s2_1">
<label>2.1</label>
<title>Experimental site</title>
<p>The experiments were conducted at the Industrial Crop Research Institute, Sichuan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Qingbaijiang District, Chengdu City, Sichuan Province, China (30&#xb0;42&#x2032;N, 104&#xb0;19&#x2032;E), where average annual temperature was 18&#xb0;C, and average annual precipitation was 558.1 mm (local weather bureau data). <italic>Salvia</italic> seedlings and maize, sesame, and soybean varieties were provided by the Institute of Economic Crop Breeding and Cultivation, Sichuan Academy of Agricultural Sciences. Basic Soil Properties: Potted Plants, pondus hydrogenii = 6.7, organic matter = 21.90 g/kg, available P = 43.76 mg/kg, available K = 115.50 mg/kg, total nitrogen = 1.48 g/kg; Field, potential of hydrogen = 6.0, organic matter = 19.78 g/kg, available P = 26.75 mg/kg, available K = 188.27 mg/kg, total nitrogen = 1.48 g/kg.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_2">
<label>2.2</label>
<title>Pot experiments and field experiments</title>
<p>Pot experiments were set up in six planting combinations: maize <italic>+ Salvia</italic> completely isolated (<italic>Salvia</italic>|Maize), maize <italic>+ Salvia</italic> without isolation (<italic>Salvia</italic>Maize), soybean <italic>+ Salvia</italic> completely isolated (<italic>Salvia</italic>|Soybean), soybean <italic>+ Salvia</italic> without isolation (<italic>Salvia</italic>Soybean), sesame <italic>+ Salvia</italic> completely isolated (<italic>Salvia</italic>|Sesame), and sesame <italic>+ Salvia</italic> without isolation (<italic>Salvia</italic>Sesame). <italic>S. miltiorrhiza</italic> was propagated from fresh root segments (1.3&#x2013;1.8 cm in diameter) selected from seedlings dug in January 2022, and transplanted to pots and the field after seedlings were raised in the greenhouse. The pot experiment used 0.4-m-high, 0.6-m-diameter breeding bags, including two isolation treatments and was conducted in a randomized design (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>): &#x2460; plastic film isolation where the two crops were completely separated, with no inter-root intercropping; and &#x2461; without any isolation, where the two crops can communicate openly between the roots, with inter-root secretions interacting with each other, and where inter-root intercropping is obvious. Five replicates of each treatment were made.</p>
<fig id="f1" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;1</label>
<caption>
<p>Pot experiment (<italic>n</italic> = 5). <bold>(A)</bold> Complete isolation of <italic>Salvia</italic> and other crops with plastic film, and <bold>(B)</bold> no isolation of <italic>Salvia</italic> and other crops.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-14-1238896-g001.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>The field experiments were conducted in a randomized design (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;2</bold>
</xref>), including soybean monoculture (soybeanm, 0.25 m spacing), maize monoculture (maizem, 0.4 m spacing), sesame monoculture (sesamem, 0.25 m spacing), <italic>Salvia</italic> monoculture (<italic>salvia</italic>m, 0.25 m spacing), <italic>Salvia</italic>-maize intercrop (<italic>Salvia</italic> + maize), <italic>Salvia</italic>-soybean intercrop (<italic>Salvia</italic> + soybean), and <italic>Salvia</italic>-sesame intercrop (<italic>Salvia</italic> + sesame). The size of each experimental area was 3.6 &#xd7; 5 m, and each treatment was replicated three times.</p>
<fig id="f2" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;2</label>
<caption>
<p>Layout of the fifield experiment (n = 3).</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-14-1238896-g002.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_3">
<label>2.3</label>
<title>Inter-root soil and general soil sampling</title>
<p>Soil samples were randomly taken from the field and pots at the time of sowing in March, and later mixed into composite samples that were naturally air-dried and stored in an oven for testing. Sampling was carried out in December 2022 on normal soil and inter-rhizosphere soil (soil close to plant roots and usually containing higher microbial populations than the surrounding normal soil) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Fierer, 2017</xref>). Inter-root soil (still attached to the roots) was shaken off gently and stored at &#x2212;80&#xb0;C for microbial community and inter-root metabolite analysis (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B48">Zhao et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>). Simultaneously, soil around <italic>S. miltiorrhiza</italic> plants was collected, plant roots and stones were removed, and the soil was put into a self-sealing bag, and then it was dried and ground naturally, passed through a 60-mesh sieve and set aside for soil physical and chemical property testing.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_4">
<label>2.4</label>
<title>Determination of soil physical and chemical properties</title>
<p>Soil potential of hydrogen (pH) was determined by the point method (HJ 962-2018), where soil/water is mixed at 1/2.5 (w/v), stirred vigorously for 2 min, and left for 30 min, and then pH was measured with a pH meter (PHS-SE) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Pang et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>). Soil organic matter (SOM) was determined using the Walkley&#x2013;Black method, which oxidizes SOM by H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub> and K<sub>2</sub>Cr<sub>2</sub>O<sub>7</sub>, followed by titration using FeSO<sub>4</sub> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Fu et&#xa0;al., 2015</xref>). Soil active phosphorus (available P) was measured by a spectrophotometer at 700 nm (NY/T 1121.7-2014) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Liu et&#xa0;al., 2018</xref>). Soil available potassium (available K) was determined by a flame photometer after extraction by 1 mol/L ammonium acetate (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">Saber et&#xa0;al., 1973</xref>). Soil total nitrogen was determined by the Kelvin digestion-constant distillation&#x2013;titration method, followed by digestion using an automatic Kjeldahl nitrogen tester (Hennen K1100) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B42">Wang et&#xa0;al., 2018</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_5">
<label>2.5</label>
<title>Microbial community structure and diversity analysis</title>
<p>A Soil DNA Kit was used to isolate soil microbial DNA from 5-g soil samples. The V4 hypervariable region of the bacterial gene was amplified with PCR using primers F (ACTCCTACGGGAGGCAGCA) and R (GGACTACHVGGGTWTCTAAT). After PCR processing, sequencing was conducted using an Illumina NovaSeq 6000. The raw image data files were converted to raw Sequenced Reads by Base Calling analysis. Sequenced data were filtered for connectors and low-quality using FASTP and Trimmomatic for Raw Reads to obtain high-quality valid sequences (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">Berg et&#xa0;al., 2015</xref>). Finally, the sequences were clustered with USEARCH (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Edgar, 2013</xref>) (version 10.0) at the 97% similarity level, and OTUs were filtered using 0.005% of the total number of sequences sequenced as a threshold (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Bokulich et&#xa0;al., 2013</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_6">
<label>2.6</label>
<title>Salvia inter-root metabolites</title>
<p>To analyze metabolites in inter-rhizosphere soil, a 50-mg sample was weighed and mixed with 1,000 &#x3bc;L of extraction solution containing internal standard. The mixture was then ground with steel beads and sonicated for 10 min in an ice water bath, followed by centrifugation, and the supernatant was carefully collected for testing. Metabolomics analysis was conducted using a liquid mass spectrometry system composed of a Waters Acquity I-Class PLUS UPLC tandem and a Waters Xevo G2-XS QTof high-resolution mass spectrometer (Acquity UPLC HSS T3, 1.8 &#x3bc;m 2.1*100 mm). Positive ionization mode: mobile phase A: 0.1% formic acid aqueous solution; mobile phase B: 0.1% formic acid acetonitrile; negative ionization mode: mobile phase A: 0.1% formic acid aqueous solution; mobile phase B: 0.1% formic acid acetonitrile. The Waters Xevo G2-XS QTof high-resolution mass spectrometer is capable of primary and secondary mass spectrometry data acquisition in MSe mode under acquisition software (MassLynx V4.2, Waters) control. In each data acquisition cycle, dual-channel data acquisition is possible for both low and high collision energies. Low collision energy was 2 V, the high collision energy range was 10&#x2013;40 V, and scan frequency was 0.2 s for one mass spectral map. ESI ion source parameters were as follows: capillary voltage: 2,000 V (positive ion mode) or &#x2212;1,500 V (negative ion mode); cone hole voltage: 30 V; ion source temperature: 150&#xb0;C; desolvent gas temperature: 500&#xb0;C; backblast gas flow rate: 50 L/h; desolvent gas flow rate: 800 L/h. Raw data collected by MassLynx V4.2 were processed by Progenesis QI software for peak extraction, alignment, and other data processing operations.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_7">
<label>2.7</label>
<title>Salvia root morphology and active ingredients (tanshinones and tannins)</title>
<p>
<italic>S. miltiorrhiza</italic> was harvested in December, its inter-root morphology was investigated, and its yield was measured. The number of branches, fresh weight, and dry weight of individual roots were also measured at harvest, along with root length (measured from the base of the stem) and diameter (the largest <italic>S. miltiorrhiza</italic> diameter) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Lei et&#xa0;al., 2018</xref>). After harvesting, the rhizome was dried, powdered, sieved (60 mesh), and stored to determine active ingredients. Intercrops were harvested in June and July.</p>
<p>
<italic>S. miltiorrhiza</italic> active ingredients (tanshinones and tannins) were determined using high-performance liquid chromatography. Total tanshinones and tannic acid B were determined according to the Chinese Pharmacopoeia 2015 edition, wherein tanshinones (Tanshinone IIA, Cryptotanshinone, and Tanshinone I) shall not be&lt;0.25% in total and tanshinolic acid B shall not be&lt;3.0%. Chromatographic analysis was performed with high-performance liquid chromatography equipment (Agilent 1260 series, USA) on a ZORBAXSB-C18 (4:6 mm &#xd7; 250 mm, 5 &#x3bc;m) column at a temperature of 20&#xb0;C. For salvianolic acid B determination, the mobile phase consisted of acetonitrile (A) and 0.1% phosphoric acid aqueous solution (B) in gradient elution mode for 20 min at 90% A with a flow rate of 1.0 mL min<sup>&#x2212;1</sup> and an injection volume of 10 &#x3bc;L at a detection wavelength of 286 nm. The mobile phase was composed of acetonitrile (A) and 0.02% phosphoric acid aqueous solution (B): 0&#x2013;6 min, 0%&#x2013;61% A; 6&#x2013;20 min, 61%&#x2013;90% A; 20&#x2013;20.5 min, 90%&#x2013;61% A; 20.5&#x2013;25 min, 61% A, with a flow rate of 0.8 mL min<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>, a sample volume of 10 &#x3bc;L, and a detection wavelength of 270 nm (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Liu et&#xa0;al., 2020a</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_8">
<label>2.8</label>
<title>Determination of field yield and land equivalent ratio</title>
<p>To measure land area efficiency when intercropping, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B44">Willey and Osiru (1972)</xref> introduced the land equivalent ratio (LER) concept, which reflects the yield of two crops as intercrops and as a monocrop, which can be used to evaluate the suitability of two crops for intercrop cultivation. It is:</p> <disp-formula>
<mml:math display="block" id="M1">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>L</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>E</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>R</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>p</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>L</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>E</mml:mi>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>R</mml:mi>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>p</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>L</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>E</mml:mi>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>R</mml:mi>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>Y</mml:mi>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>M</mml:mi>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfrac>
<mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>Y</mml:mi>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>M</mml:mi>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfrac>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</disp-formula>
<p>where <inline-formula>
<mml:math display="inline" id="im1">
<mml:mi>p</mml:mi>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>LER is a partial land equivalent ratio, <italic>Y<sub>1</sub>
</italic> and <inline-formula>
<mml:math display="inline" id="im2">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>Y</mml:mi>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> are the yields of seed 1 and seed 2 in interplanting, <italic>M<sub>1</sub>
</italic> and <inline-formula>
<mml:math display="inline" id="im3">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>M</mml:mi>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> are the yields of seed 1 and seed 2 in single crop, respectively.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_9">
<label>2.9</label>
<title>Data analysis</title>
<p>All statistical analyses were performed using various packages in R version 3.3.0 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">Vermeulen et&#xa0;al., 2013</xref>), including ANOVA tests for multiple comparisons of soil microbial diversity, soil properties, active ingredient content, and plant biomass. Root secretion aroma diversity and evenness indices were compared among the groups by unpaired <italic>t</italic>-tests. When <italic>p&lt;</italic> 0.05, the means of the groups were considered significantly different using the least significant difference (LSD). Principal component analysis (PCA), redundancy analysis (RDA), and heatmaps were generated using the &#x201c;ggplot2&#x201d; package in the R platform. PCA regroups all the metabolites originally identified linearly to form a new set of variables to determine differences between the groups of samples. To determine the proportion of variation in community structure explained by environmental factors, microbial community compositional components were determined by RDA, followed by variance decomposition analysis (VPA). Heatmaps were used to compare correlations between species abundance (OTUs) and various indicators, including environmental factors, plant growth parameters, and root base secretions.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s3" sec-type="results">
<label>3</label>
<title>Results</title>
<sec id="s3_1">
<label>3.1</label>
<title>Effect of different planting methods on <italic>S. miltiorrhiza</italic> growth and development</title>
<p>In commercial trade, <italic>S. miltiorrhiza</italic> yield, quality, and appearance are very important for <italic>Salvia</italic> growers to achieve profitability. The <italic>S. miltiorrhiza</italic> fresh weight index can represent its yield, while hydrophilic and lipophilic components as well as root length and diameter indicate its quality and appearance (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Liu et&#xa0;al., 2020a</xref>). Inter-root secretions between different plants had a significant effect on <italic>Salvia</italic> morphology (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">
<bold>Table&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>), and <italic>Salvia</italic> dry weight in the <italic>Salvia</italic>Sesame treatment increased by 3.21% compared to that in <italic>Salvia</italic>|Sesame when the plants were compared with and without the isolated treatment. <italic>S. miltiorrhiza</italic> fresh weight, dry weight, and root diameter were significantly decreased by inter-root secretions from maize, and all <italic>Salvia</italic> growth indices were decreased in <italic>Salvia</italic>Soybean and <italic>Salvia</italic>Maize compared to <italic>Salvia</italic>Sesame. Overall, inter-root secretions from sesame had the least effect on <italic>S. miltiorrhiza</italic> root development. The combinations <italic>Salvia</italic>Maize and <italic>Salvia</italic>Maize significantly inhibited growth, as <italic>Salvia</italic> fresh weight, dry weight, and root diameter decreased by 46.29%, 46.77%, and 27.88%, respectively.</p>
<table-wrap id="T1" position="float">
<label>Table&#xa0;1</label>
<caption>
<p>Single plant yield and agronomic traits of <italic>Salvia</italic> Tanshinone under different cropping patterns (mean  &#xb1;  S.E., <italic>n</italic> = 5).</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Treatments</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Fresh weight (g)</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Dry weight (g)</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Number of branches</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Root length (cm)</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Root width (mm)</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="center">
<italic>Salvia</italic>Maize</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">105.00 &#xb1; 25.16d</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">38.93 &#xb1; 9.51c</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">12.60 &#xb1; 3.21</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">24.50 &#xb1; 5.32a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">9.70 &#xb1; 2.16c</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="center">
<italic>Salvia</italic>|Maize</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">195.50 &#xb1; 5.26c</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">73.14 &#xb1; 8.92b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">13.60 &#xb1; 5.08</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">32.25 &#xb1; 3.59a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">13.45 &#xb1; 1.48b</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="center">
<italic>Salvia</italic>Soybean</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">227.50 &#xb1; 9.57bc</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">79.19 &#xb1; 2.88b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">16.20 &#xb1; 4.66</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">30.95 &#xb1; 4.73a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">12.01 &#xb1; 1.65b</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="center">
<italic>Salvia</italic>|Soybean</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">255.00 &#xb1; 62.45ab</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">92.55 &#xb1; 23.84ab</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">14.00 &#xb1; 8.60</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">37.37 &#xb1; 14.67a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">13.55 &#xb1; 1.24ab</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="center">
<italic>Salvia</italic>Sesame</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">288.50 &#xb1; 53.75a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">107.55 &#xb1; 16.19a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">18.20 &#xb1; 7.11a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">30.50 &#xb1; 5.26a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">13.70 &#xb1; 1.63a</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="center">
<italic>Salvia</italic>|Sesame</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">297.50 &#xb1; 37.75a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">104.20 &#xb1; 20.04a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">13.80 &#xb1; 3.27a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">37.75 &#xb1; 15.28a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">13.97 &#xb1; 0.95a</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn>
<p>maize + <italic>Salvia</italic> completely isolated (<italic>Salvia</italic>|Maize), maize + <italic>Salvia</italic> without isolation (<italic>Salvia</italic>Maize), soybean + <italic>Salvia</italic> completely isolated (<italic>Salvia</italic>|Soybean), soybean + <italic>Salvia</italic> without isolation (<italic>Salvia</italic>Soybean), sesame + <italic>Salvia</italic> completely isolated (<italic>Salvia</italic>|Sesame), and sesame + <italic>Salvia</italic> without isolation (<italic>Salvia</italic>Sesame). Standard errors (S.E.). Boxes with various lowercase letters indicate significant differences between various regimes based on the least significant difference (LSD) test (<italic>p</italic>&lt; 0.05).</p>
</fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<p>Active ingredient contents were compared under the six cultivation combinations (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;3</bold>
</xref>). There were no significant differences in tanshinolic acid B. After <italic>Salvia</italic>Sesame treatment, <italic>S. miltiorrhiza</italic> tanshinones significantly increased, with the highest levels of Tanshinone IIA, Tanshinone I, and Cryptotanshinone, showing increases of 27.06%, 22.76%, and 26.41%, respectively, compared to <italic>Salvia</italic>|Sesame. Sesame and <italic>Salvia</italic> cultivation effectively increases accumulation of Tanshinone active ingredients.</p>
<fig id="f3" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;3</label>
<caption>
<p>Histogram of active ingredient content of <italic>Salvia</italic> miltiorrhiza (<italic>n</italic> = 5). <bold>(A)</bold> Salvianolic acid B, <bold>(B)</bold> Tanshinone IIA, <bold>(C)</bold> Tanshinone I, and <bold>(D)</bold> Cryptotanshinone. Boxes with different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between various regimes based on the least significant difference (LSD) test (<italic>p</italic>&lt; 0.05).</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-14-1238896-g003.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_2">
<label>3.2</label>
<title>Effect of different planting methods on soil properties</title>
<p>In the potted soil after each treatment group (<italic>Salvia</italic>|Soybean, <italic>Salvia</italic>Soybean, <italic>Salvia</italic>|Maize, <italic>Salvia</italic>Maize, <italic>Salvia</italic>|Sesame, and <italic>Salvia</italic>Sesame), there were no significant differences in acidity (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f4">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;4A</bold>
</xref>), available P (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f4">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;4C</bold>
</xref>), organic matter (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f4">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;4D</bold>
</xref>), and total nitrogen (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f4">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;4E</bold>
</xref>). The highest available K (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f4">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;4B</bold>
</xref>) was found in <italic>Salvia</italic>Soybean (152.13 &#xb1; 13.69), which was significantly higher than available K in <italic>Salvia</italic>Sesame (122.94 &#xb1; 15.96), while there were no significant differences between plants with and without compartment treatments.</p>
<fig id="f4" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;4</label>
<caption>
<p>Inter-root soil factors under different cropping practices of <italic>Salvia</italic> and other crops (<italic>n</italic> = 3). <bold>(A)</bold> acidity, <bold>(B)</bold> available K, <bold>(C)</bold> available P, <bold>(D)</bold> organic matter, <bold>(E)</bold> total nitrogen. Boxes with different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between various regimes based on the LSD test (<italic>p</italic>&lt; 0.05).</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-14-1238896-g004.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_3">
<label>3.3</label>
<title>Effect of different planting methods on the <italic>S. miltiorrhiza</italic> inter-root bacterial community</title>
<p>Illumina detected a total of 1,121,526 clean reads generated from the 16S RNA gene in 18 samples, and a total of 8,654 OTUs were identified in all samples. The Chao1 index (a measure of &#x3b1;-diversity) was significantly lower for <italic>Salvia</italic>Soybean and <italic>Salvia</italic>Maize than for <italic>Salvia</italic>Sesame, with <italic>Salvia</italic>Soybean having the lowest (275.67 &#xb1; 83.28c) number of species (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">
<bold>Table&#xa0;2</bold>
</xref>). The Shannon and Simpson indices indicated that bacterial diversity and homogeneity were typically better for all treatments, with greater variation for <italic>Salvia</italic>Soybean.</p>
<table-wrap id="T2" position="float">
<label>Table&#xa0;2</label>
<caption>
<p>Diversity indices of the inter-root microbial communities of <italic>Salvia miltiorrhiza</italic> under different cropping patterns (mean &#xb1; S.E., <italic>n</italic> = 3).</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="top" align="center">Treatments</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">ACE</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Chao1</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Simpson</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Shannon</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="center">
<italic>Salvia</italic>Maize</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">398.67 &#xb1; 28.57b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">398.67 &#xb1; 28.57b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.9930 &#xb1; 0.0010a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">7.92 &#xb1; 0.22a</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="center">
<italic>Salvia</italic>|Maize</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">532.71 &#xb1; 15.01a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">532.67 &#xb1; 15.04a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.9936 &#xb1; 0.0016a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">8.21 &#xb1; 0.21a</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="center">
<italic>Salvia</italic>Soybean</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">275.67 &#xb1; 83.28c</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">275.67 &#xb1; 83.28c</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.9420 &#xb1; 0.0317b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5.85 &#xb1; 1.01b</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="center">
<italic>Salvia</italic>|Soybean</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">524.72 &#xb1; 39.22a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">524.67 &#xb1; 39.31a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.9925 &#xb1; 0.0012a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">8.14 &#xb1; 0.07a</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="center">
<italic>Salvia</italic>Sesame</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">580.67 &#xb1; 41.06a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">580.67 &#xb1; 41.06a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.9947 &#xb1; 0.0011a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">8.46 &#xb1; 0.15a</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="center">
<italic>Salvia</italic>|Sesame</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">571.38 &#xb1; 58.93a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">571.33 &#xb1; 58.96a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.9937 &#xb1; 0.0008a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">8.36 &#xb1; 0.17a</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn>
<p>This shows the richness (ACE, Chao1) and diversity (Simpson, Shannon) of the bacterial community. Standard errors (S.E.). Boxes with various lowercase letters indicate significant differences between various regimes based on the least significant difference (LSD) test (<italic>p</italic>&lt; 0.05).</p>
</fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<p>Additionally, there were differences in bacterial community structure after the treatment in each group. The highest abundance at bacterial phylum level was found in Proteobacteria (26.41%&#x2013;44.04%), Acidobacteriota (8.37%&#x2013;26.88%), Gemmatimonadota (4.62%&#x2013;17.40%), Actinobacteriota (3.78%&#x2013;9.13%), and unclassified_Bacteria (2.28%&#x2013;11.44%) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f5">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;5A</bold>
</xref>). Cyanobacteria and Fusobacteriota significantly increased in the <italic>Salvia</italic>Soybean treatment, accounting for 29.11% and 4.34% of total community abundance, respectively, while both did not exceed 0.1% in any other treatment. <italic>Salvia</italic>Maize and <italic>Salvia</italic>Soybean bacterial community abundance and number showed a significant decrease compared to <italic>Salvia</italic>|Maize and <italic>Salvia</italic>|Soybean, while <italic>Salvia</italic>Sesame and <italic>Salvia</italic>|Sesame bacterial community structure did not. There was no significant difference in the structure of <italic>Salvia</italic>Sesame and <italic>Salvia</italic>|Sesame bacterial communities. An RDA was performed to accurately assess the relative effects of soil physicochemical properties (potential of hydrogen, organic matter, total nitrogen, available P, and available K) on the abundance and diversity of <italic>S. miltiorrhiza</italic> inter-rhizosphere bacterial communities. The first two RDA components explained 51.48% and 19.94% of the overall variation, respectively. Furthermore, potential of hydrogen, available P, available nitrogen, total nitrogen, and organic matter appeared to play a crucial role in building bacterial communities (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f5">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;5B</bold>
</xref>). There was a negative correlation between organic matter and RDA1 (70.64%), a direct correlation between available P and RDA1 (59.13%), and a maximum contribution of 50.81% from total nitrogen to RDA2. This indicates that organic matter, available P, and total nitrogen remain the key environmental factors affecting <italic>Salvia</italic> inter-root microorganism abundance. The soil environmental factor and microbial communities correlation analysis revealed that the potential of hydrogen and Gemmatimonadota were significantly negatively correlated (<italic>r</italic>
<sup>2</sup> = 0.74; <italic>p&lt;</italic> 0.001), and available K and Patescibacteria were significantly negatively correlated (<italic>r</italic>
<sup>2</sup> = 0.74; <italic>p&lt;</italic> 0.001) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f5">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;5C</bold>
</xref>).</p>
<fig id="f5" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;5</label>
<caption>
<p>Distribution and composition of bacterial communities at the gate level under different cropping patterns (<italic>n</italic> = 3). <bold>(A)</bold> Relative abundance of staple microbial taxa on phylum level across all samples detected by 16S rRNA gene sequencing. The numbers above the bars indicate the number of microorganisms classified at the phylum level according to the sequence composition of feature. <bold>(B)</bold> Redundancy analysis of soil microbial communities and environmental parameters (RDA); arrows present the magnitude and direction of environmental factors associated with bacterial community structure. <bold>(C)</bold> Heatmap of soil environmental factors and phylum level bacterial correlations. Negative correlations and positive correlations are represented in blue and red. * indicates 0.01&lt; <italic>p</italic> &#x2264; 0.05, ** indicates 0.001&lt; <italic>p</italic> &#x2264; 0.01, *** indicates <italic>p</italic> &#x2264; 0.001.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-14-1238896-g005.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_4">
<label>3.4</label>
<title>Effect of different planting methods on <italic>S. miltiorrhiza</italic> inter-root secretions</title>
<p>After analyzing the inter-root microbial community and agronomic trait indicators of <italic>Salvia divinorum</italic>, we found that sesame was the most promising plant to grow with it. The relationship between sesame and <italic>S. miltiorrhiza</italic> inter-root secretions was further analyzed by PCA, and there were similar metabolites between <italic>Salvia</italic>Sesame and <italic>Salvia</italic>|Sesame (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f6">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;6A</bold>
</xref>). The <italic>Salvia divinorum</italic> inter-root microbial community was analyzed when the three crops were not isolated, and the lowest microbial community &#x3b1;-diversity was under <italic>Salvia</italic>Soybean treatment, while the highest microorganism abundance and number were found under <italic>Salvia</italic>Sesame treatment. This may be due to different crops resulting in different inter-root <italic>S. miltiorrhiza</italic> feedbacks. Analysis of <italic>Salvia</italic>Soybean and <italic>Salvia</italic>Sesame inter-root secretions revealed that 30 were significantly reduced in the <italic>Salvia</italic>Soybean treatment (<italic>p</italic>&lt; 0.05 and VIP &gt; 1.5) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f6">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;6B</bold>
</xref>), of which 18 belonged to the Human Metabolome Database (HMDB), with lipids and lipid-like compounds, nucleosides and analogs, organic acids and derivatives, organic oxides, and heterocyclic compounds accounting for 4.05%, 26.56%, 2.84%, 15.20%, and 8.27%, respectively. The two lowest <italic>p</italic>-value secretions screened, D-Sedoheptulose 7-phosphate and Nicotinamide-beta-riboside, both belong to the organic oxide class, and comparing the amounts of these two metabolites in <italic>Salvia</italic>Soybean and <italic>Salvia</italic>Sesame, the difference multiplicity (fold change) was &#x2212;1.63746 and -2.02996 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f6">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;6C</bold>
</xref>), respectively. The correlation heatmap between <italic>S. miltiorrhiza</italic> yield, quality, and active ingredients showed that lipids were significantly and negatively correlated with yield (fresh weight and dry weight) and quality (Tanshinone IIA, Tanshinone I, and Cryptotanshinone) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f7">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;7</bold>
</xref>).</p>
<fig id="f6" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;6</label>
<caption>
<p>Analysis of inter-root secretion differences in <italic>Salvia</italic> (<italic>n</italic> = 3). <bold>(A)</bold> Principal component analysis (PCA) of inter-root secretion between <italic>Salvia</italic>|Sesame, and <italic>Salvia</italic>Sesame. <bold>(B)</bold> Volcano plot depicting inter-root secretions between <italic>Salvia</italic>Sesame and <italic>Salvia</italic>Soybean. <bold>(C)</bold> Fold change in the expression of inter-root metabolites of <italic>Salvia miltiorrhiza</italic> between <italic>Salvia</italic>Sesame and <italic>Salvia</italic>Soybean. <bold>(B)</bold> Each point in the graph represents a metabolite; the horizontal coordinate represents the log2 value of the fold difference of a metabolite between the two samples; the vertical coordinate represents the log10 value of the <italic>p</italic>-value. Red points represent upregulated differentially expressed metabolites, blue points represent downregulated differentially expressed metabolites, and gray points represent metabolites that were detected but did not meet the filtering parameters. <bold>(C)</bold> FC (fold change).</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-14-1238896-g006.tif"/>
</fig>
<fig id="f7" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;7</label>
<caption>
<p>Correlation heatmap depicting the relationship between the six major root secretions and <italic>Salvia miltiorrhiza</italic> growth and development (<italic>n</italic> = 3). Negative correlations and positive correlations are represented in blue and red, respectively. * indicates 0.01&lt; <italic>p</italic> &#x2264; 0.05, ** indicates 0.001&lt; <italic>p</italic> &#x2264; 0.01, *** indicates <italic>p</italic> &#x2264; 0.001.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-14-1238896-g007.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_5">
<label>3.5</label>
<title>Relationships between microbial communities and <italic>Salvia</italic> root secretions, growth, and development</title>
<p>To accurately assess the effects of microbial communities on root secretions and <italic>S. miltiorrhiza</italic> growth and development, we investigated the relationships between the main secretions (lipids, nucleosides and analogs, organic acids and derivatives, organic oxygen compounds, organoheterocyclic compounds, phenylpropanoids, and polyketides), <italic>Salvia</italic> basic growth and developmental indicators (fresh weight, dry weight, and number of nucleosides), <italic>Salvia</italic> active constituents (Salvianolic acid B, Tanshinone IIA, Tanshinone I, and Cryptotanshinone), and the main microbial communities. Lipids and lipid-like molecules and Bacteroidota, Chloroflexi, Nitrospirota, Planctomycetota, and Proteobacteria were significantly negatively correlated (<italic>p</italic>&lt; 0.05) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f8">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;8</bold>
</xref>). Organic nitrogen compounds, root width, dry weight, and Patescibacteria all showed significant positive correlations (<italic>p</italic>&lt; 0.05). Fresh weight, dry weight and Bacteroidota, Planctomycetota were significantly positively correlated with each other (<italic>p</italic>&lt; 0.05). Interestingly, Bacteroidota, Planctomycetota, and Patescibacteria were all significantly positively correlated with each other (<italic>p</italic>&lt; 0.05).</p>
<fig id="f8" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;8</label>
<caption>
<p>Correlation heatmap analysis of the association between the relative abundance of bacterial phyla and major inter-root secretions, and <italic>Salvia miltiorrhiza</italic> growth and development, including the relative richness (<italic>n</italic> = 3) of the top 15 microbial phyla. Negative correlations and positive correlations are represented by blue color and red color, respectively. Horizontal ordinate represents bacterial community abundance information, and vertical ordinate represents inter-root secretion and <italic>Salvia miltiorrhiza</italic> growth and development indicators. * indicates 0.01&lt; <italic>p</italic> &#x2264; 0.05, ** indicates 0.001&lt; <italic>p</italic> &#x2264; 0.01, *** indicates <italic>p</italic> &#x2264; 0.001.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-14-1238896-g008.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_6">
<label>3.6</label>
<title>Field experiment yield and land equivalent ratio</title>
<p>Compound planting of different plants and <italic>Salvia</italic> led to differences in harvest yield and LERs. Averaging the data from three replications, <italic>S. miltiorrhiza</italic> yield after intercropping maize, soybean, and sesame was 9,817.20 <inline-formula>
<mml:math display="inline" id="im4">
<mml:mo>&#xb1;</mml:mo>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>322.20, 14,817.451,950.15, and 15,739.65 <inline-formula>
<mml:math display="inline" id="im5">
<mml:mo>&#xb1;</mml:mo>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>3,061.20 kg/hm<sup>2</sup>, respectively, while monocropping maize, soybean, sesame, and <italic>Salvia</italic> yields were 17,385.001,967.7, 3,432.45 <inline-formula>
<mml:math display="inline" id="im6">
<mml:mo>&#xb1;</mml:mo>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>488.85, 1,800.15361.20, and 16,470.00 <inline-formula>
<mml:math display="inline" id="im7">
<mml:mo>&#xb1;</mml:mo>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>3,616.80 kg/hm<sup>2</sup>, respectively. The lowest <italic>Salvia</italic> yield was after intercropping with maize, where it was reduced by 40.44%. <italic>Salvia</italic> yield was reduced by 10.11% and 4.52% when intercropped with soybean and sesame, respectively. The highest LER (1.82) was achieved with sesame and <italic>Salvia</italic> intercropping, with <italic>pLER<sub>1</sub>
</italic> and <inline-formula>
<mml:math display="inline" id="im8">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>p</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>L</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>E</mml:mi>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>R</mml:mi>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>of 0.96 and 0.86, respectively, and the lowest LER of 1.36 for soybean and <italic>Salvia</italic> intercropping. Field experiments verified that sesame and <italic>Salvia</italic> are a good intercropping combination.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s4" sec-type="discussion">
<label>4</label>
<title>Discussion</title>
<p>Compound planting patterns can effectively improve yield and quality of many medicinal plants, such as <italic>Salvia</italic> and <italic>Angelica</italic>, which are affected by successive crop barriers (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B47">Zhang et&#xa0;al., 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Liu et&#xa0;al., 2020a</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Maitra et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>). Compared to monocropping, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Liu et&#xa0;al. (2018)</xref> showed that intercropping cultivation significantly enhanced <italic>Salvia</italic> root fresh weight, dry weight, and lipid-soluble component content. We showed that the combined planting of maize and <italic>Salvia</italic> reduced <italic>Salvia</italic> yield, a result consistent with previous studies (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Lei et&#xa0;al., 2018</xref>); however, sesame and <italic>Salvia</italic> intercropping significantly increased the tanninone content of <italic>Salvia</italic> roots, while individual plant fresh and dry weight, root diameter, and branch number all increased, as did the LER (1.82) in field experiments. Many studies have demonstrated that soil factors are influenced by intercropping systems (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">Tang et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>), e.g., hydrogen potential and available P significantly increased in both inter- and non-inter-rooted soils in the sugarcane&#x2013;peanut intercropping system study group (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Pang et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>). In this study, there were no significant changes in potential of hydrogen, organic matter, available P, and total nitrogen, which may be due to the soil buffering effect, and/or the effects of plants on altering soil structure, which often takes several years to complete (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Fierer, 2017</xref>).</p>
<p>Intercropping systems similarly cause changes in inter-root microbial community composition, which are mainly due to fertilization (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Guo et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>), crop type (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">Prommer et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>), and changes associated with crop diversity, such as root secretions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">Mommer et&#xa0;al., 2016</xref>) and soil environmental factors (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">Stefan et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>). High-throughput sequencing of 16S rRNA is now an established approach (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Bhakta et&#xa0;al., 2017</xref>) for deep exploration of soil microbial community composition and abundance. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">Li et&#xa0;al. (2022)</xref> found that Acidobacteriota and Proteobacteria were the dominant phyla in the maize intercropping system, and Proteobacteria relative abundance in the intercropped maize root soil increased significantly, primarily due to interspecific root interactions resulting in differences in bacterial community structure during intercropping. Meanwhile, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">Wang et&#xa0;al. (2019)</xref> showed that crop rotation and crop set could improve soil quality and inter-root bacterial diversity to some extent, and Symbiodinium relative abundance was higher in crop rotation and crop set than in continuous crop. In our experiment, Proteobacteria (26.41%&#x2013;44.04%) and Acidobacteriota (8.37%&#x2013;26.88%) were the dominant phyla, and interestingly, they (along with Salvia ketone content) were significantly and positively correlated with the fresh and dry weights of <italic>Salvia</italic> roots that were likewise positively correlated. Meanwhile, alpha diversity of the <italic>S. miltiorrhiza</italic> inter-root microbial community was highest in bacterial number and abundance when sesame and <italic>S. miltiorrhiza</italic> were grown in combination, while it was lowest when soybean and sesame were grown in combination. Thus, microbial community structure remains an important driver of <italic>S. miltiorrhiza</italic> root yield and quality.</p>
<p>The soil environment is the primary influencing factor in determining microbial community structure (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Fierer, 2017</xref>). We found through RDA that soil environmental factors explained 51.48% and 19.94%, respectively, of the first two RDA components, which again confirmed previous studies. Available P, organic matter, and total nitrogen made the highest contribution, available P was the key factor affecting <italic>S. miltiorrhiza</italic> quality, and root Tanshinone IIA concentration was significantly and negatively correlated with soil effective phosphorus (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">Liang et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>). Soil phosphorus content is also an important factor in soil bacterial community formation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Liu et&#xa0;al., 2020b</xref>). Additionally, total nitrogen is also considered the dominant factor in building microbial communities because it has key functions in cellular metabolic processes, such as energy metabolism, protein synthesis, and cell division (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">Rajan et&#xa0;al., 1991</xref>). Simultaneous analysis of soil environmental factors and microbial communities found that potential of hydrogen was negatively correlated with Gemmatimonadota, which is consistent with the findings of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Guo et&#xa0;al. (2017)</xref>.</p>
<p>In addition to inter-root secretions being a key factor affecting inter-root microorganisms (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">Wang et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>), root secretion-induced autotoxin accumulation is also widely recognized as an important contributor to crop succession disorders (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B46">Xu et&#xa0;al., 2015</xref>). The study revealed correlations between inter-root secretion and <italic>Salvia</italic> microbial communities as well as the <italic>Salvia</italic> growth and development index. It was observed that lipids and lipid-like molecules had a significant and negative correlation with <italic>Salvia</italic> yield (fresh weight and dry weight) and quality (Tanshinone IIA, Tanshinone I, and Cryptotanshinone). Additionally, lipids and lipid-like molecules and Bacteroidota, Chloroflexi, Nitrospirota, Planctomycetota, and Proteobacteria were also significantly negatively correlated. In previous studies, different inter-root secretions had different effects on shaping microbial community structure (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">Li and Wu, 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B48">Zhao et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>). Therefore, controlling lipids and lipid-like molecule contents in soil may be an important way to improve <italic>Salvia</italic> root yield and quality and play an active role in shaping <italic>Salvia</italic> inter-root microbial structure.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s5" sec-type="conclusions">
<label>5</label>
<title>Conclusions</title>
<p>The present study demonstrates that the complex cultivation of sesame and <italic>Salvia</italic> is not only a viable agricultural practice but also an effective method for optimizing land resource utilization. When sesame and <italic>Salvia</italic> are planted together, they can significantly increase <italic>Salvia</italic> tanshinone content. Furthermore, the results of our 16S rRNA sequencing analysis indicate that the number and abundance of inter-root microbial communities in <italic>Salvia</italic> are significantly higher when sesame and <italic>Salvia</italic> are planted together, compared to when <italic>Salvia</italic> is planted with either soybean or maize. Soil factors and inter-root secretions play important roles in shaping the <italic>Salvia</italic> inter-root microbial community. In particular, inter-root secretions had a significant influence on <italic>Salvia miltiorrhiza</italic> yield and quality.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s6" sec-type="data-availability">
<title>Data availability statement</title>
<p>The original contributions presented in the study are publicly available. This data can be found here: <uri xlink:href="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/bioproject/">https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/bioproject</uri> under the accession number PRJNA992203.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s7" sec-type="author-contributions">
<title>Author contributions</title>
<p>LZ and CZ designed the experiment. LZ wrote the paper and CZ revised the manuscript. ST, YZ, YY, FP, HL, CM, XW, YW, and ZX contributed to experiments and the acquisition of data. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<sec id="s8" sec-type="funding-information">
<title>Funding</title>
<p>The author(s) declare financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. This study was supported by the Chinese Materia Medica of China Agriculture Research System (CARS-21), the Ability establishment of sustainable use for valuable Chinese medicine resources (2060302), Discipline Construction Project of SAAS (2021XKJS105).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s9" sec-type="COI-statement">
<title>Conflict of interest</title>
<p>The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s10" sec-type="disclaimer">
<title>Publisher&#x2019;s note</title>
<p>All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.</p>
</sec>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="B1">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Bais</surname> <given-names>H. P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Weir</surname> <given-names>T. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Perry</surname> <given-names>L. G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gilroy</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Vivanco</surname> <given-names>J. M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2006</year>). <article-title>The role of root exudates in rhizosphere interactions with plants and other organisms</article-title>. <source>Annu. Rev. Plant Biol.</source> <volume>57</volume>, <fpage>233</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>266</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1146/annurev.arplant.57.032905.105159</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Berg</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yoon</surname> <given-names>K.-J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Will</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xiao</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kim</surname> <given-names>N.-S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Christian</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Tbr2-expressing intermediate progenitor cells in the adult mouse hippocampus are unipotent neuronal precursors with limited amplification capacity under homeostasis</article-title>. <source>Front. Biol.</source> <volume>10</volume>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11515-015-1364-0</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Bhakta</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lahiri</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bhuiyna</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rokunuzzaaman</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ohonishi</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Iwasaki</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Profiling of heavy metal(loid)-resistant bacterial community structure by metagenomic-DNA fingerprinting using PCR&#x2013;DGGE for monitoring and bioremediation of contaminated environment</article-title>. <source>Energy Ecol. Environ.</source> <volume>3</volume>, <fpage>102</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>109</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s40974-017-0079-2</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Bokulich</surname> <given-names>N. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Subramanian</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Faith</surname> <given-names>J. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gevers</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gordon</surname> <given-names>J. I.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Knight</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Quality-filtering vastly improves diversity estimates from Illumina amplicon sequencing</article-title>. <source>Nat. Methods</source> <volume>10</volume>, <fpage>57</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>59</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nmeth.2276</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Casper</surname> <given-names>B. B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Castelli</surname> <given-names>J. P.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2007</year>). <article-title>Evaluating plant-soil feedback together with competition in a serpentine grassland</article-title>. <source>Ecol. Lett.</source> <volume>10</volume>, <fpage>394</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>400</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1461-0248.2007.01030.x</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Deng</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ren</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Effects of intercropping maize on growth of <italic>salvia miltiorrhiza</italic>
</article-title>. <source>J. Anhui Agric. Sci.</source> <volume>45</volume>, <fpage>122</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>123</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.13989/j.cnki.0517-6611.2017.05.043</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Domeignoz-Horta</surname> <given-names>L. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pold</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>X.-J. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Frey</surname> <given-names>S. D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Melillo</surname> <given-names>J. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>DeAngelis</surname> <given-names>K. M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Microbial diversity drives carbon use efficiency in a model soil</article-title>. <source>Nat. Commun.</source> <volume>11</volume>, <fpage>3684</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41467-020-17502-z</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Edgar</surname> <given-names>R. C.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>UPARSE: highly accurate OTU sequences from microbial amplicon reads</article-title>. <source>Nat. Methods</source> <volume>10</volume>, <fpage>996</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>998</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nmeth.2604</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Fierer</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Embracing the unknown: disentangling the complexities of the soil microbiome</article-title>. <source>Nat. Rev. Microbiol.</source> <volume>15</volume>, <fpage>579</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>590</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nrmicro.2017.87</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Fu</surname> <given-names>M.-M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Huang</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jia</surname> <given-names>M.-M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hu</surname> <given-names>W.-Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sun</surname> <given-names>W.-X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Weindorf</surname> <given-names>D. C.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Effect of intensive greenhouse vegetable cultivation on selenium availability in soil</article-title>. <source>Pedosphere</source> <volume>25</volume>, <fpage>343</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>350</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S1002-0160(15)30002-3</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Guo</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Nasir</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lv</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dai</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gao</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Understanding the variation of microbial community in heavy metals contaminated soil using high throughput sequencing</article-title>. <source>Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf.</source> <volume>144</volume>, <fpage>300</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>306</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ecoenv.2017.06.048</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Guo</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wan</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hua</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yin</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chu</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Fertilization regime has a greater effect on soil microbial community structure than crop rotation and growth stage in an agroecosystem</article-title>. <source>Appl. Soil Ecol.</source> <volume>149</volume>, <fpage>103510</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.apsoil.2020.103510</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Hsiao</surname> <given-names>C.-J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sassenrath</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zeglin</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hettiarachchi</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rice</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Temporal variation of soil microbial properties in a corn&#x2013;wheat&#x2013;soybean system</article-title>. <source>Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J.</source> <volume>83</volume>, <fpage>1696</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1711</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2136/sssaj2019.05.0160</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Hu</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hao</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ren</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Nitrogen fixation and crop productivity enhancements codriven by intercrop root exudates and key rhizosphere bacteria</article-title>. <source>J. Appl. Ecol.</source> <volume>58</volume>, <fpage>2243</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2255</lpage>. doi. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/1365-2664.13964</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Jiang</surname> <given-names>J.-S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gu</surname> <given-names>Q.-C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Feng</surname> <given-names>Z.-M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yuan</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>P.-C.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2022</year>a). <article-title>The phenolic acids from the plant of <italic>Salvia miltiorrhiza</italic>
</article-title>. <source>Fitoterapia</source> <volume>159</volume>, <fpage>105180</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.fitote.2022.105180</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Jiang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Khan</surname> <given-names>M. U.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lin</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lin</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lin</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lin</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2022</year>b). <article-title>Evaluation of maize/peanut intercropping effects on microbial assembly, root exudates and peanut nitrogen uptake</article-title>. <source>Plant Physiol. Biochem.</source> <volume>171</volume>, <fpage>75</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>83</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.plaphy.2021.12.024</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B25">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Lei</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Guo</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ma</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cao</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>An</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Effects of compound planting on growth and quality of <italic>Salvia miltiorrhiza</italic>
</article-title>. <source>China J. Chin. Materia Med.</source> <volume>43</volume>, <fpage>1818</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1824</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.19540/j.cnki.cjcmm.20180307.011</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Luo</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tang</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Guo</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cao</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zeng</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Dynamic changes of rhizosphere soil bacterial community and nutrients in cadmium polluted soils with soybean-corn intercropping</article-title>. <source>BMC Microbiol.</source> <volume>22</volume>, <fpage>57</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s12866-022-02468-3</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B18">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Diversity and co-occurrence patterns of soil bacterial and fungal communities in seven intercropping systems</article-title>. <source>Front. Microbiol.</source> <volume>9</volume>, <elocation-id>1521</elocation-id>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmicb.2018.01521</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B19">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Liang</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kong</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jia</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dai</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>The quality of wild <italic>Salvia miltiorrhiza</italic> from Dao Di area in China and its correlation with soil parameters and climate factors</article-title>. <source>Phytochem. Anal.</source> <volume>32</volume>, <fpage>318</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>325</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/pca.2978</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B20">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Niu</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhu</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2020</year>a). <article-title>Effect study of continuous monoculture on the quality of <italic>salvia miltiorrhiza</italic> bge roots</article-title>. <source>BioMed. Res. Int.</source> <volume>2020</volume>, <fpage>4284385</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1155/2020/4284385</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B21">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xie</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Luo</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sheng</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xu</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2020</year>b). <article-title>Ecological responses of soil microbial abundance and diversity to cadmium and soil properties in farmland around an enterprise-intensive region</article-title>. <source>J. Hazard Mater</source> <volume>392</volume>, <fpage>122478</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.122478</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B22">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xu</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xie</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Effect of modified coconut shell biochar on availability of heavy metals and biochemical characteristics of soil in multiple heavy metals contaminated soil</article-title>. <source>Sci. Total Environ.</source> <volume>645</volume>, <fpage>702</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>709</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.07.115</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B23">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Qi</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hao</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pu</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2020</year>c). <article-title>A comprehensive analytical platform for unraveling the effect of the cultivation area on the composition of <italic>Salvia miltiorrhiza</italic> Bunge</article-title>. <source>Ind. Crops Prod.</source> <volume>145</volume>, <elocation-id>111952</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.indcrop.2019.111952</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B24">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wan</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lu</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Guo</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Effect of efficient ecological intercropping patterns on the growth and active ingredient content of <italic>Salvia miltiorrhiza</italic>
</article-title>. <source>J. Chin. Medicinal Materials</source> <volume>41</volume>, <fpage>1027</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1030</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.13863/j.issn1001-4454.2018.05.003</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B26">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Maitra</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Potential of intercropping system in sustaining crop productivity</article-title>. <source>Int. J. Agric. Environ. Biotechnol.</source> <volume>12</volume> (<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>39</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>45</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.30954/0974-1712.03.2019.7</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B27">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Maitra</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hossain</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Brestic</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Skalicky</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ondri&#x161;&#xed;k</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gitari</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Intercropping system-A low input agricultural strategy for food and environmental security</article-title>. <source>Agronomy</source> <volume>11</volume>, <fpage>343</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/agronomy11020343</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B28">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Mommer</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kirkegaard</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>van Ruijven</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Root-root interactions: towards A rhizosphere framework</article-title>. <source>Trends Plant Sci.</source> <volume>21</volume>, <fpage>209</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>217</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.tplants.2016.01.009</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B29">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Neumann</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Romheld</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2003</year>). <article-title>Root-induced changes in the availability of nutrients in the rhizosphere</article-title>. <source>Cheminform</source> <volume>34</volume>, <fpage>617</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>619</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/chin.200304265</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B30">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Pang</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fallah</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Weng</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tang</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tayyab</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Sugarcane-peanut intercropping system enhances bacteria abundance, diversity, and sugarcane parameters in rhizospheric and bulk soils</article-title>. <source>Front. Microbiol.</source> <volume>12</volume>, <elocation-id>815129</elocation-id>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmicb.2021.815129</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B31">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Prommer</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Walker</surname> <given-names>T. W. N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wanek</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Braun</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zezula</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hu</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Increased microbial growth, biomass, and turnover drive soil organic carbon accumulation at higher plant diversity</article-title>. <source>Glob Chang Biol.</source> <volume>26</volume>, <fpage>669</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>681</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/gcb.14777</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B32">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Rajan</surname> <given-names>S. S. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fox</surname> <given-names>R. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Saunders</surname> <given-names>W. M. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Upsdell</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1991</year>). <article-title>Influence of pH, time and rate of application on phosphate rock dissolution and availability to pastures - I. Agronomic benefits</article-title>. <source>Nutrient Cycling Agroecosystems</source> <volume>28</volume>, <fpage>85</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>93</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/bf01048860</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B33">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Saber</surname> <given-names>M. S. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Guirguis</surname> <given-names>M. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zanati</surname> <given-names>M. R.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1973</year>). <article-title>Biological and chemical determination of available phosphorus in soil. <italic>Zentralblatt f&#xfc;r Bakteriologie, Parasitenkunde, Infektionskrankheiten und Hygiene</italic>
</article-title>. <source>Zweite Naturwissenschaftliche Abteilung: Allgemeine Landwirtschaftliche und Technische Mikrobiologie</source> <volume>128</volume>, <fpage>566</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>571</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S0044-4057(73)80078-4</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B34">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Sasse</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Martinoia</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Northen</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Feed your friends: do plant exudates shape the root microbiome</article-title>? <source>Trends Plant Sci.</source> <volume>23</volume>, <fpage>25</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>41</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B35">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Stefan</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hartmann</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Engbersen</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Six</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sch&#xf6;b</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Positive effects of crop diversity on productivity driven by changes in soil microbial composition</article-title>. <source>Front. Microbiol.</source> <volume>12</volume>, <elocation-id>660749</elocation-id>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmicb.2021.660749</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B36">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Stomph</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dordas</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Baranger</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>de Rijk</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dong</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Evers</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>&#x201c;Chapter One - Designing intercrops for high yield, yield stability and efficient use of resources: Are there principles?&#x201d;</article-title> in <source>Advances in Agronomy</source>. Ed. <person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname>Sparks</surname> <given-names>D. L.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<publisher-name>Academic Press</publisher-name>), <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>50</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/bs.agron.2019.10.002</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B37">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Tang</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bernard</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Brauman</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Daufresne</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Deleporte</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Desclaux</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Increase in microbial biomass and phosphorus availability in the rhizosphere of intercropped cereal and legumes under field conditions</article-title>. <source>Soil Biol. Biochem.</source> <volume>75</volume>, <fpage>86</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>93</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.soilbio.2014.04.001</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B38">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Tang</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jiang</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Huang</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>He</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Sugarcane/peanut intercropping system improves the soil quality and increases the abundance of beneficial microbes</article-title>. <source>J. Basic Microbiol.</source> <volume>61</volume>, <fpage>165</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>176</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/jobm.202000750</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B39">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Tang</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhong</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jiang</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>He</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Huang</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Shi</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Cassava/peanut intercropping improves soil quality via rhizospheric microbes increased available nitrogen contents</article-title>. <source>BMC Biotechnol.</source> <volume>20</volume>, <fpage>13</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s12896-020-00606-1</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B40">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Vermeulen</surname> <given-names>S. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Heymans</surname> <given-names>M. W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Anema</surname> <given-names>J. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Schellart</surname> <given-names>A. J. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>van Mechelen</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>van der Beek</surname> <given-names>A. J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Economic evaluation of a participatory return-to-work intervention for temporary agency and unemployed workers sick-listed due to musculoskeletal disorders</article-title>. <source>Scand. J. Work Environ. Health</source> <volume>39</volume>, <fpage>46</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>56</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5271/sjweh.3314</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B41">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rengel</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jin</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lyu</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Ensuring future food security and resource sustainability: insights into the rhizosphere</article-title>. <source>iScience</source> <volume>25</volume>, <fpage>104168</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.isci.2022.104168</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B42">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yu</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Turak</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Huang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2018</year>
<elocation-id>1543</elocation-id>). <article-title>Effects of nitrogen and phosphorus inputs on soil bacterial abundance, diversity, and community composition in chinese fir plantations</article-title>. <source>Front. Microbiol.</source> <volume>9</volume>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmicb.2018.01543</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B43">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhu</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Variation in microbial community structure in the rhizosphere soil of <italic>Salvia miltiorrhiza</italic> Bunge under three cropping modes</article-title>. <source>Acta Ecologica Sin.</source> <volume>39</volume>, <fpage>4832</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>4843</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5846/stxb201805151071</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B44">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Willey</surname> <given-names>R. W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Osiru</surname> <given-names>D. S. O.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1972</year>). <article-title>Studies on mixtures of maize and beans (Phaseolus vulgaris) with particular reference to plant population</article-title>. <source>J. Agric. Sci.</source> <volume>79</volume>, <fpage>517</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>529</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1017/S0021859600025909</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B45">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Xin-hui</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lang</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Effect of autotoxicity and soil microbes in continuous cropping soil on angelica sinensis seedling growth and rhizosphere soil microbial population</article-title>. <source>Chin. Herbal Medicines</source> <volume>7</volume>, <fpage>88</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>93</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S1674-6384(15)60025-9</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B46">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Xu</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>Y.-G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>J.-F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Song</surname> <given-names>X.-Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhu</surname> <given-names>G.-P.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Autotoxicity in Pogostemon cablin and their allelochemicals</article-title>. <source>Rev. Bras. Farmacognosia</source> <volume>25</volume>, <fpage>117</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>123</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.bjp.2015.02.003</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B47">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lang</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bai</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Diurnal changes in photosynthesis and antioxidants of Angelica sinensis as influenced by cropping systems</article-title>. <source>Photosynthetica</source> <volume>51</volume>, <fpage>252</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>258</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11099-013-0013-6</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B48">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yuan</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hale</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wen</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Huang</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Root exudates drive soil-microbe-nutrient feedbacks in response to plant growth</article-title>. <source>Plant Cell Environ.</source> <volume>44</volume>, <fpage>613</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>628</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/pce.13928</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>