<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.3 20070202//EN" "journalpublishing.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="2.3" xml:lang="EN">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Front. Plant Sci.</journal-id>
<journal-title>Frontiers in Plant Science</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">Front. Plant Sci.</abbrev-journal-title>
<issn pub-type="epub">1664-462X</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Frontiers Media S.A.</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpls.2023.1214429</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Plant Science</subject>
<subj-group>
<subject>Original Research</subject>
</subj-group>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Assessing water stress in a high-density apple orchard using trunk circumference variation, sap flow index and stem water potential</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name>
<surname>Wheeler</surname>
<given-names>William D.</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn001">
<sup>*</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1982079"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Black</surname>
<given-names>Brent</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Bugbee</surname>
<given-names>Bruce</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/925467"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
<institution>Crop Physiology Laboratory, Department of Plants, Soils, and Climate, Utah State University</institution>, <addr-line>Logan, UT</addr-line>, <country>United States</country>
</aff>
<aff id="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
<institution>Pomology Extension, Department of Plants, Soils, and Climate, Utah State University</institution>, <addr-line>Logan, UT</addr-line>, <country>United States</country>
</aff>
<author-notes>
<fn fn-type="edited-by">
<p>Edited by: Bhaskar Bondada, Washington State University, United States</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="edited-by">
<p>Reviewed by: Sergio Tombesi, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Italy; Lei Ding, Universit&#xe9; Catholique de Louvain, Belgium; Emerson Alves da Silva, Instituto de Pesquisas Ambientais, Brazil</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="corresp" id="fn001">
<p>*Correspondence: William D. Wheeler, <email xlink:href="mailto:william.wheeler@agnet.tamu.edu">william.wheeler@agnet.tamu.edu</email>
</p>
</fn>
</author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>03</day>
<month>08</month>
<year>2023</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="collection">
<year>2023</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>14</volume>
<elocation-id>1214429</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>29</day>
<month>04</month>
<year>2023</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>19</day>
<month>07</month>
<year>2023</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#xa9; 2023 Wheeler, Black and Bugbee</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2023</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Wheeler, Black and Bugbee</copyright-holder>
<license xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">
<p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.</p>
</license>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<sec>
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>Automated plant-based measurements of water stress have the potential to advance precision irrigation in orchard crops. Previous studies have shown correlations between sap flow, line variable differential transform (LVDT) dendrometers and fruit tree drought response. Here we report season-long automated measurement of maximum daily change in trunk diameter using band dendrometers and heated needles to measure a simplified sap flow index (SFI).</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Methods</title>
<p>Measurements were made on two apple cultivars that were stressed at 7 to 12 day intervals by withholding irrigation until the average stem water potential (&#x3a8;<sub>Stem</sub>) dropped below -1.5 MPa, after which irrigation was restored and the drought cycle repeated.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Results</title>
<p>Dendrometer measurements of maximum daily trunk shrinkage (MDS) were highly correlated (r&#xb2; = 0.85) with pressure chamber measurements of stem water potential. The SFI measurements were less correlated with stem water potential but were highly correlated with evaporative demand (r&#xb2; = 0.82) as determined by the Penman-Monteith equation (ET<sub>r</sub>).</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Discussion</title>
<p>The high correlation of SFI to ET<sub>r</sub> suggests that high-density orchards resemble a continuous surface, unlike orchards with widely spaced trees. The correlations of MDS and SFI to &#x3a8;<sub>Stem</sub> were higher during the early season than the late season growth. Band dendrometers are less labor intensive to install than LVDT dendrometers and are non-invasive so are well suited to commercialization.</p>
</sec>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>band dendrometer</kwd>
<kwd>sap flow</kwd>
<kwd>stem water potential</kwd>
<kwd>water stress</kwd>
<kwd>Fuji</kwd>
<kwd>Scilate</kwd>
<kwd>high density</kwd>
<kwd>dwarfing rootstocks</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<contract-sponsor id="cn001">Utah Agricultural Experiment Station<named-content content-type="fundref-id">10.13039/100007199</named-content>
</contract-sponsor>
<counts>
<fig-count count="5"/>
<table-count count="3"/>
<equation-count count="0"/>
<ref-count count="72"/>
<page-count count="15"/>
<word-count count="8516"/>
</counts>
<custom-meta-wrap>
<custom-meta>
<meta-name>section-in-acceptance</meta-name>
<meta-value>Plant Physiology</meta-value>
</custom-meta>
</custom-meta-wrap>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec id="s1" sec-type="intro">
<label>1</label>
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>Commercial apple production in many areas of the world is almost exclusively accomplished through grafting of genetically different fruit bearing scions to well adapted rootstocks. Newly established orchards have shifted toward dwarfing rootstocks and high planting densities (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B61">Robinson, 2006</xref>). Furthermore, one of the most common and widely planted apple rootstocks is M.9 due to its highly dwarfing nature, precociousness and high fruit set (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">Fallahi et&#xa0;al., 2002</xref>). Dwarfing rootstocks have reduced root volumes, which makes them more prone to drought stress and necessitates careful irrigation management (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">Gon&#xe7;alves et&#xa0;al., 2006</xref>). In pome fruit, regulated deficit irrigation during fruit development has been found to increase fruit number and soluble solids content while decreasing fruit size (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B46">Marsal et&#xa0;al., 2002</xref>). When deficit irrigation was applied during vegetative growth, vigorous shoot growth and trunk expansion was suppressed (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Ebel et&#xa0;al., 1995</xref>). Without precise regulation of this irrigation deficit however drought can quickly reduce yields and can lead to tree mortality. Conversely, over application of irrigation can promote excessive vegetative growth, increased pathogen pressure and leach nutrients from the rootzone (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">Bonany and Camps, 1996</xref>). Precise understanding of tree water status can inform irrigation timing, ensure tree health and maximize productivity. An accurate and cost-effective method that can be easily implemented in the field is urgently needed to help orchard producers advance precision irrigation methodology and maximize yields</p>
<p>Evapotranspiration (ET) modeling is a widely used tool for estimating crop water loss in commercial orchard management to estimate tree water status. Numerous models exist to compute potential evapotranspiration (ET) (e.g. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B59">Priestley and Taylor, 1972</xref> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B59">Priestley and Taylor, 1972</xref>), <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">Hargreaves and Samani, 1985</xref> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">Hargreaves and Samani, 1985</xref>), <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B63">Shuttleworth and Wallace, 1985</xref> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B63">Shuttleworth and Wallace, 1985</xref>)); the most widely used is the FAO - 56 Penman-Monteith equation. Reference evapotranspiration values for a grass (ET<sub>0</sub>) or alfalfa-like (ET<sub>r</sub>) crop are commonly reported from weather stations and are then used in conjunction with empirically derived crop coefficients to estimate specific crop water losses. While this methodology is effective in many annual crops, results in orchard crops have been mixed (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B54">Naor et&#xa0;al., 2008</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Dzikiti et&#xa0;al., 2018</xref>). The height of orchard trees and low planting densities compared to those of reference crops have been cited as reasons for divergence of orchard ET from modeled ET with modifying crop coefficients (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">Jarvis, 1984</xref>). For these reasons, the use of reference models as an accurate predictor of tree water status has been questioned (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Annandale and Stockle, 1994</xref>).</p>
<p>Soil moisture measurements are a relatively inexpensive and intuitive method for controlling irrigation in commercial orchards but have several limitations. Soil moisture is an indirect measure of tree hydration, and tree hydration is determined by both soil water availability and environmental demand (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">Jones, 2004</xref>). Moreover, soil heterogeneity and the extensive spread of tree roots mean that soil moisture availability can vary greatly within an orchard, making it necessary to use a large number of soil moisture sensors to capture this variability (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B58">Pardossi et&#xa0;al., 2009</xref>).</p>
<p>Direct plant-based measurements of water stress have long been considered the best approach for automating irrigation in orchard crops (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">Jones, 2004</xref>). Midday stem water potential (&#x3a8;<sub>Stem</sub>) is considered a reliable indicator of peak water stress for fruit trees (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B53">Naor et&#xa0;al., 1995</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">Doltra et&#xa0;al., 2007</xref>), but the use of Scholander type pressure chambers to determine &#x3a8;<sub>stem</sub> is labor intensive, time consuming and cannot easily be automated. To achieve accurate deficit irrigation, orchard managers need plant-based measurements that are easily automated and interpreted.</p>
<p>Sap flow sensors can provide a direct, near instantaneous method for measuring sap flow, which is highly correlated with tree transpiration (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">Burgess et&#xa0;al., 2001</xref>). However, calibrating these types of sensors for absolute values is complex and prone to error, even for experienced researchers (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Forster, 2017</xref>). Relative values of heat velocity and sap flow are well correlated to environmental demand and transpiration (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Burgess and Dawson, 2007</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">Ballester et&#xa0;al., 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Forster, 2017</xref>). If the primary objective is to analyze and leverage sap flow responses to biotic or abiotic stressors, sap flow sensors can be used to estimate relative transpiration without extensive calibration.</p>
<p>Diurnal trunk diameter variation has also been proposed as an automated measure of plant water status for irrigation scheduling (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">Goldhamer and Fereres, 2001</xref>). During the night, the stem rehydrates and its diameter reaches its maximum near sunrise. Stem diameter then contracts during the day and reaches its minimum diameter a few hours after solar noon when evaporative demand is highest (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">Ginestar and Castel, 1995</xref>). The difference between the maximum and minimum trunk diameters in a 24-hour period is referred to as the maximum daily shrinkage (MDS) and is well correlated with &#x3a8;<sub>stem</sub> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Fern&#xe1;ndez and Cuevas, 2010</xref>). However, the use of point dendrometers, which are sensitive to position on the tree, has limited the effectiveness of dendrometers for irrigation scheduling due to the high degree of variability between measurements (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B56">Ortu&#xf1;o et&#xa0;al., 2010</xref>). Band dendrometers, on the other hand, measure changes in trunk circumference and can minimize position errors (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Corell et&#xa0;al., 2014</xref>). Although widely used in forestry, band dendrometers have seen limited use in horticulture applications.</p>
<p>We sought to evaluate the effectiveness of a simplified relative sap flow index (SFI) and trunk circumferential fluctuations from band dendrometers as indicators for tree water status and irrigation scheduling in high density apple plantings. We investigated the correlation between atmospheric evaporative demand and sensor readings compared to midday &#x3a8;<sub>Stem</sub>. We hypothesized that declining SFI values would be strongly correlated with decreasing &#x3a8;<sub>Stem</sub>, indicating water stress. Additionally, we expected to observe a strong correlation between MDS from band dendrometers and &#x3a8;<sub>Stem</sub>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2" sec-type="materials|methods">
<label>2</label>
<title>Materials and methods</title>
<sec id="s2_1">
<label>2.1</label>
<title>Site description</title>
<p>Research was conducted at the Utah State University Research Farm located in Kaysville, UT (41&#xb0; 01&#x2019; 21&#x201d; N by 111&#xb0; 55&#x2019; 51&#x201d;W, elevation 1325&#xa0;m) during the 2020 growing season (5/9/2020 &#x2013; 10/7/2020). The region has a semi-arid continental climate under the K&#xf6;ppen classification system with average annual rainfall of 380&#xa0;mm and an annual average pan evapotranspiration is 995&#xa0;mm (57-year average). Sampling was done in a 0.5&#xa0;ha, 6<sup>th</sup> leaf, high density apple (<italic>Malus</italic> x <italic>domestica</italic> Borkh.) planting, with 1.5&#xa0;m in row spacing and approximately 3&#xa0;m between rows oriented north to south. Trees were trained to a tall spindle system with trunk diameters averaging 6-7&#xa0;cm, 30&#xa0;cm above the soil surface (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B62">Robinson et&#xa0;al., 2008</xref>). The orchard was originally established to examine the potential relationship between initial graft union strength and subsequent drought tolerance (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">Adams, 2016</xref>) and these goals ran concurrently with our trial. For this study two scion and rootstock combinations consisting of fruiting scions &#x2018;Scilate&#x2019; (Envy&#x2122;) (Scilate) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B72">White, 2009</xref>) and &#x2018;Aztec Fuji&#x2019; (Fuji) grafted with M.9 rootstocks were planted in blocks of six trees and replicated four times in a randomized complete block design.</p>
<p>To investigate drought responses irrigation was withheld from the entire plot until midday &#x3a8;<sub>stem</sub> from an average of twenty randomly selected trees dropped below -1.5 MPa. Then, between 20 and 80&#xa0;mm of irrigation water was applied to recharge soil water. Initial applications of irrigation water were around 20&#xa0;mm (~6 hrs run time) based on historical practice. However, this was deemed insufficient for deep soil recharge and irrigation was increased to 50 to 80&#xa0;mm (~24 hrs cumulative run time) for subsequent applications. Trees were irrigated with micro-spray emitters with a 2&#xa0;m overlapping spray radius with an approximate application rate of 3.4&#xa0;mm hr<sup>-1</sup>. Over the course of the study, three irrigation events were initiated to return trees to non-drought stressed conditions, in addition to precipitation events that occurred mostly in the beginning of the season and naturally brought trees out of drought conditions. Soils were a well-drained Kidman series fine sandy loam. Four CR1000 dataloggers (Campbell Scientific, Logan UT, USA) were used to collect data from sap flow, dendrometer, and soil moisture sensors (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>).</p>
<fig id="f1" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;1</label>
<caption>
<p>Representative experimental setup in a high-density apple block in which &#x2018;Aztec Fuji&#x2019; and &#x2018;Scilate&#x2019; (Envy&#x2122;) fruiting scions were grafted to Malling 9 Selection NICTM 29 rootstocks. <bold>(A)</bold> A band dendrometer (above) and sap flow sensor (below) were installed 0.5&#xa0;m above the soil surface, above the graft junction and were continuously monitored throughout the trial. <bold>(B)</bold> One of four dataloggers with insulation (center box) connected to two sensor instillations with thermal and protective shielding (left and right of center box).</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-14-1214429-g001.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_2">
<label>2.2</label>
<title>Stem water potential</title>
<p>Stem water potential (&#x3a8;<sub>Stem</sub>) was measured twice weekly using a Scholander pressure chamber (Model 610; PMS Instrument Company, Albany, OR, USA). Three fully expanded leaves located near the main trunk of one tree per block (n=4) were covered with mylar bags for at least 2 hours before excision and measurement. Readings from the 3 leaves were averaged per tree and used in statistical analysis. Measurements were taken during midday (12:00 &#x2013; 14:00) to ensure consistency and minimize the effects of diurnal variation.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_3">
<label>2.3</label>
<title>Soil moisture</title>
<p>Soil water content was measured using dielectric sensors (GS3; Decagon Devices, Inc., Pullman, WA) installed between replicated plots (n=4). Readings were used to represent soil moisture for both Scilate and Fuji scions in each replicate plot. Sensors were buried one meter into the row at depths of 20&#xa0;cm and 80&#xa0;cm. The Topp equation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B68">Topp et&#xa0;al., 1980</xref>) was used to convert dielectric permittivity volumetric water content (&#x3b8;). Soil water measurements were used to evaluate the effectiveness of irrigation treatments and their impact on plant water status.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_4">
<label>2.4</label>
<title>Sap flow index</title>
<p>Sap flow index (SFI) was measured using three-needle heat-pulse sensors (East 30 Sensors; Pullman, WA). Needles were made of stainless steel and were 1.2&#xa0;mm in diameter, 35&#xa0;mm long and spaced 6&#xa0;mm apart. The outermost needles contained three precision thermistors, located at 5&#xa0;mm, 17.5&#xa0;mm and 30&#xa0;mm from the needle base. For this study the thermistors located at 30&#xa0;mm were not used as they were in the non-conducting heartwood. The innermost needle housed a 45 &#x3a9; nichrome wire heater, excited with 12&#xa0;V for 8 sec every half hour. Individual trees within the blocks were selected to accommodate sensor cable lengths with one tree instrumented per block (n=4). A drill guide was used during installation to ensure accurate spacing and prevent probe misalignment. Sensors were placed approximately 0.5&#xa0;m from the soil surface, above the graft junction and below the lowest branches; care was taken to avoid knots and deformities (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>).</p>
<p>Heat velocity was determined using the dual method approach to resolve low and high rates of flow as suggested by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">Forster (2020)</xref> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">Forster, 2020</xref>). Briefly, the dual method approach utilizes the P&#xe9;clet equation to transition between the heat ratio method (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">Burgess et&#xa0;al., 2001</xref>) and temperature maximum method (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">Cohen, 1991</xref>) based on whether conduction or convection is the dominant process of heat transfer. Thermal diffusivity was assumed to be 0.0023 cm<sup>2</sup> s<sup>-1</sup> based on previously reported values for apple (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">Forster, 2020</xref>). Measurements were made every 30&#xa0;min and averaged hourly and daily. A polynomial wounding correction was applied to measurements based on a 1.7&#xa0;mm drill diameter (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">Burgess et&#xa0;al., 2001</xref>). Average daily wound corrected heat pulse velocity measurements provided an index of sap flow and used in all statistical analyses.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_5">
<label>2.5</label>
<title>Trunk circumferential variation</title>
<p>Tree trunk circumferential variation was measured using band dendrometers (D6; UMS, Munich, Germany). Maximum daily shrinkage was calculated by the difference in a 24-hour period between the maximum and minimum trunk circumference. Maximum daily trunk circumference was determined once a day from the maximum circumference measurement that occurred between midnight and noon. Daily trunk growth rate (TGR) was calculated from the change in the maximum daily circumference from one day to the next (TGR = max. circumference day (n+1) &#x2013; max. circumference day (n)). Circumferential growth patterns were analyzed by normalizing ending dendrometer voltages to final average scion circumferences. Dendrometers were installed approximately 0.5&#xa0;m above the soil surface just above sap flow sensors on the North side of the tree (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>). A cable made of Invar steel, which has an expansion coefficient close to zero, was used to secure the dendrometer around the stem (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B42">Katerji et&#xa0;al., 1994</xref>). Teflon mesh was placed between the sensor apparatus and tree trunk to allow the dendrometer to smoothly expand and contract diurnally and slowly expand to accommodate trunk growth over the growing season. Both the band dendrometer and sap flow sensors were shielded using a ridged metal frame that was insulated to minimize thermal loading.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_6">
<label>2.6</label>
<title>Harvest and growth measurements</title>
<p>Fruit was harvested on day of the year (DOY) 281 and total harvest weight and crop load were determined per tree (n= 24). Average fruit size was calculated from the harvest weight and number of fruit per tree. Final trunk circumferential measurements were taken 30&#xa0;cm above the soil surface for all trees using a flexible tape measure. Trunk cross sectional area (TCSA) was computed from these measurements. Stem elongation measurements were taken from three shoots per tree (n = 24), measuring from the last year&#x2019;s growth to the tip of the new shoot.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_7">
<label>2.7</label>
<title>Environmental measurements</title>
<p>Environmental data were collected by a weather station maintained by the Utah Climate Center located approximately 0.25&#xa0;km to the southwest of the block. Sensors included a propeller blade and vane wind sensor (Model 05103, R.M. Young, Traverse City MI, USA), temperature/humidity probe (EE08, E+E Electronik, Engerwitzdorf, Austria), solar pyranometer (SP-230, Apogee Instruments, Logan UT, USA), and tipping bucket rain gage (TE525, Texas Electronics, Dallas TX, USA). Alfalfa reference evapotranspiration was estimated from these data using the American Society of Civil Engineers standardized reference ET<sub>r</sub> equation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Allen et&#xa0;al., 2005</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_8">
<label>2.8</label>
<title>Statistics</title>
<p>Four replicate blocks per scion were instrumented with sap flow sensors (n =4) and three blocks per treatment were instrumented with band dendrometers (n = 3). With the exception of one replicate block where only sap flow sensors were used, the same trees were instrumented with both sap flow and band dendrometers and &#x3a8;<sub>Stem</sub> was collected from the instrumented trees. When analyzing correlations to &#x3a8;<sub>Stem</sub>, data were adjusted to reflect sample sizes of sap flow sensors and band dendrometers. Harvest, final trunk circumference, and stem elongation data were analyzed from all blocks in the plot. Data were separated into &#x201c;early&#x201d; and &#x201c;late&#x201d; seasonal responses based on understanding of phenological stages and analysis of circumferential growth (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B44">Liu et&#xa0;al., 2012</xref>). Late season responses were judged to begin at day of the year 185 based on plateauing of Fuji circumferential growth which corresponded roughly with date of the end of spur leaf expansion and beginning of fruit development. Sap flow index, MDS and &#x3a8;<sub>Stem</sub> were examined for correlations to environmental variables using linear regression. Sap flow index and MDS were also examined for correlations to &#x3a8;<sub>Stem</sub> using linear regression. Differences between grafted scions over the course of the season in SFI, MDS and &#x3a8;<sub>Stem</sub> were determined utilizing a linear mixed effects regression. A multiple linear regression model was used to identify the relationship between independent environmental variables and SFI. Statistical analysis was conducted using R statistical software (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s3" sec-type="results">
<label>3</label>
<title>Results</title>
<sec id="s3_1">
<label>3.1</label>
<title>Environmental conditions</title>
<p>Daily averages for the most significant environmental variables: air temperature (T<sub>a</sub>), vapor pressure deficit (VPD), alfalfa reference evapotranspiration (ET<sub>r</sub>), and soil moisture (&#x3b8;) readings at 20&#xa0;cm and 80&#xa0;cm below the soil surface are shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;2</bold>
</xref>. Average daily air temperature was 21.9&#xb0;C and ranged from 7.1 to 31&#xb0;C. Vapor pressure deficit averaged daily over the season was 1.85 kPa and ranged from 0.28 to 3.58 kPa. Correlations of physiological measurements to average daily VPD were compared to maximum observed VPD, and VPD averaged two hours before and after solar noon. This restricted time interval VPD averaging (e.g. daylight hours only, mid-day hours only) did not improve correlations compared to average daily VPD. Average daily ET<sub>r</sub> was 5.47&#xa0;mm d<sup>-1</sup> over the season and ranged between 2.03 and 8.38&#xa0;mm d<sup>-1</sup>. Rain fall occurred primarily in the beginning of the season and rainfall values totaled 97&#xa0;mm over the course of the trial. There were 13 irrigation events over the course of the trial, accounting for approximately 555&#xa0;mm of applied water. Soil moisture 20&#xa0;cm below the surface of the soil averaged 0.21 m<sup>3</sup> m<sup>-3</sup> and ranged from 0.09 to 0.34 m<sup>3</sup> m<sup>-3</sup> while &#x3b8;-80 cm below the soil surface averaged 0.22 m<sup>3</sup> m<sup>-3</sup> and ranged from 0.13 to 0.29 m<sup>3</sup> m<sup>-3</sup>. Daily wind speed averaged 1.8&#xa0;m s<sup>-1</sup> over the course of the trial and solar radiation (R<sub>n</sub>) averaged 24.9 MJ m<sup>-2</sup> d<sup>-1</sup> ranging from 9.4 to 31.7 MJ m<sup>-2</sup> d<sup>-1</sup>. There was a severe weather event that occurred on DOY 252 during which gusts of wind around 40&#xa0;m s<sup>-1</sup> were recorded, equivalent to wind speeds of that of a category 2 hurricane. As a result of this severe weather event, several trees (8) were uprooted and a significant portion (&gt;50%) of fruit was blown from the trees. Fortunately, none of the instrumented trees were uprooted. Fruit loss was judged to have affected both scions similarly and harvest data was deemed useful for analysis.</p>
<fig id="f2" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;2</label>
<caption>
<p>Time series of environmental data over the trial. Data for average air temperature (T<sub>a</sub>), vapor pressure deficit (VPD), evapotranspiration (ETr) and precipitation/irrigation collected by a weather station approximately 0.25&#xa0;km away from the experimental apple block. This was compared to maximum daily shrinkage (MDS) (n=3), sap flow index (SFI) (n=4) and stem water potential (&#x3a8;<sub>stem</sub>) (n=4). Lighter colors used for MDS, SFI and &#x3a8;<sub>Stem</sub> denote early season data while darker colors denote late season data. Error bars represent standard error.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-14-1214429-g002.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_2">
<label>3.2</label>
<title>Trunk circumferential variation</title>
<p>Starting average circumferences were significantly different between Fuji and Scilate, with Fuji averaging 21.4 &#xb1; 0.02&#xa0;cm and Scilate averaging 19.0 &#xb1; 0.09&#xa0;cm (P = 0.01). This significant difference (P = 0.03) persisted at the end of the trial period with final trunk circumference of Fuji averaging 22.3 &#xb1; 0.7&#xa0;cm and Scilate averaging 21.0 &#xb1; 0.8&#xa0;cm (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">
<bold>Table&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>). Total circumferential growth was greater in Scilate (P&lt; 0.01), with circumferences increasing by an average of 2.0 &#xb1; 0.4&#xa0;cm while Fuji circumferences increased by an average of 0.9 &#xb1; 0.3&#xa0;cm over the trial period (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;3</bold>
</xref>). Differences in the pattern of circumferential growth were also noted, with Fuji rapidly putting on growth early in the season and then plateauing later season, while Scilate steadily put on growth until late in the season.</p>
<table-wrap id="T1" position="float">
<label>Table&#xa0;1</label>
<caption>
<p>Fruit harvest parameters and final trunk and stem measurements for &#x2018;Aztec Fuji&#x2019; and &#x2018;Scilate&#x2019; (Envy&#x2122;) scions grafted to Malling 9 Selection NIC&#x2122; 29 rootstocks.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" align="left"/>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Harvest Weight</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Crop load</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Crop load/TCSA</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Fruit Size</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Ending circumference</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Trunk cross sectional area (TCSA)</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Shoot elongation</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" align="left">Scion</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">kg fruit/tree</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">#/tree</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">#/cm<sup>2</sup> TCSA</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">g/fruit</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">cm</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">cm<sup>2</sup>
</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">cm</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Fuji</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">22.2</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">119</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">3.08</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">193</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">22.3</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">40.1</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">33.7</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Scilate</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">11.7</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">52</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.49</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">228</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">21</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">35.3</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">31</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">p value</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&lt; 0.01</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&lt; 0.01</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&lt; 0.01</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&lt; 0.01</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.03</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.03</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.07</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn>
<p>A severe weather event occurred on day of the year 252 in which gusts of wind reached up to 40<bold>&#xa0;m/s</bold> causing a significant amount of fruit loss (~50%).</p>
</fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<fig id="f3" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;3</label>
<caption>
<p>Maximum daily circumference <bold>(A)</bold> and daily circumferential growth rate <bold>(B)</bold> measured by band dendrometers of three replicate trees from five-year-old &#x2018;Aztec Fuji&#x2019; and &#x2018;Scilate&#x2019; (Envy&#x2122;) fruiting scions on Malling 9 rootstocks over the course of the growing season. Data are normalized to average ending circumference, measured by hand, for each scion to show growth patterns. A severe weather event occurred on day 252 of the year in which gusts of wind reached up to 40&#xa0;m/s caused severe damage to the orchard.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-14-1214429-g003.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>Daily TGR was significantly different (P = 0.02) between the two cultivars over the course of the trial, with Scilate cultivars averaging higher TGR. Analysis of TGR did not find strong correlations to atmospheric drivers R<sub>n</sub> (Fuji, r&#xb2; = 0.05; Scilate, r&#xb2; = 0.23), T<sub>a</sub> (Fuji, NS; Scilate, r&#xb2; = 0.13), VPD (Fuji, r&#xb2; = 0.03; Scilate, r&#xb2; = 0.08) or ET<sub>r</sub> (Fuji, NS; Scilate, r&#xb2; = 0.30) (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>S1 Figure</bold>
</xref>). Daily TGR was also not significantly correlated to &#x3b8; at the 20&#xa0;cm level and poorly correlated at the 80&#xa0;cm level (Fuji, r&#xb2; = 0.28; Scilate, r&#xb2; = 0.12). Poor or not significant correlations of TGR to &#x3a8;<sub>stem</sub> were observed (Fuji, r&#xb2; = 0.10; Scilate, NS) (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>S1 Figure</bold>
</xref>).</p>
<p>Measurements of MDS were not significantly different over the trial period (P = 0.30). Data were still segregated by scion for analysis because of differences in crop load and ending circumferences. Linear regression analysis was used to examine correlations to environmental variables while controlling for phenological stage (before and after DOY 185) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">
<bold>Table&#xa0;2</bold>
</xref>).</p>
<table-wrap id="T2" position="float">
<label>Table&#xa0;2</label>
<caption>
<p>Coefficients of determination.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" rowspan="2" align="left">Parameter</th>
<th valign="middle" rowspan="2" align="center">Season</th>
<th valign="middle" rowspan="2" align="center">Cultivar</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">R<sub>n</sub>
</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">T<sub>a</sub>
</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">VPD</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">ETr</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">&#x3b8; at 20 cm</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">&#x3b8; at 80 cm</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" align="center">(MJ m<sup>-2</sup> d<sup>-1</sup>)</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">(C)</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">(VPD)</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">(mm day<sup>-1</sup>)</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">(cm<sup>3</sup> cm<sup>-3</sup>)</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">(cm<sup>3</sup> cm<sup>-3</sup>)</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" rowspan="4" align="left">MDS</td>
<td valign="middle" rowspan="2" align="center">Early</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Fuji</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.2</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.61</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.53</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.46</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.17</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.3</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Scilate</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.15</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.64</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.56</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.45</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.19</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.22</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" rowspan="2" align="center">Late</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Fuji</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.71</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.45</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.45</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.69</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.39</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">NS</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Scilate</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.68</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.61</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.61</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.75</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.3</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.08</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" rowspan="4" align="left">SFI</td>
<td valign="middle" rowspan="2" align="center">Early</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Fuji</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.37</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.84</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.77</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.76</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">NS</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.04</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Scilate</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.33</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.88</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.87</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.83</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">NS</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">NS</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" rowspan="2" align="center">Late</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Fuji</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.74</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.79</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.78</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.88</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.12</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">NS</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Scilate</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.73</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.8</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.82</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.89</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.11</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">NS</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" rowspan="4" align="left">&#x3a8;<sub>Stem</sub>
</td>
<td valign="middle" rowspan="2" align="center">Early</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Fuji</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.22</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.7</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.76</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.7</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.12</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.12</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Scilate</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.19</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.67</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.77</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.64</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.03</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.04</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" rowspan="2" align="center">Late</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Fuji</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.39</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.42</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.31</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.46</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.59</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.23</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Scilate</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.37</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.46</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.4</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.45</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.42</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.25</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn>
<p>Coefficients of determination (r&#xb2;) between environmental inputs and maximum daily trunk shrinkage (MDS), sap flow index (SFI), and mid-day stem water potential (&#x3a8;<sub>Stem</sub>) for &#x2018;Aztec Fuji&#x2019; and &#x2018;Scilate&#x2019; (Envy&#x2122;) scions grafted to Malling 9 Selection NIC&#x2122; 29 rootstocks. Both scion/rootstock combinations were subjected to multiple dry down events over the course of the trial. NS indicates no statistically significant regression.</p>
</fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<p>Early in the season, MDS of both Fuji and Scilate were most highly correlated to T<sub>a</sub> (Fuji, r&#xb2; = 0.61; Scilate r&#xb2; = 0.64), followed by VPD (Fuji, r&#xb2; = 0.53; Scilate r&#xb2; = 0.56), and ET<sub>r</sub> (Fuji, r&#xb2; = 0.46; Scilate r&#xb2; = 0.45). Later in the season, scion correlation patterns to environmental drivers differed, with Fuji being most correlated to R<sub>n</sub> (r&#xb2; = 0.71), followed by ET<sub>r</sub> (r&#xb2; = 0.69) and then T<sub>a</sub> (r&#xb2; = 0.45) and VPD (r&#xb2; = 0.45). In the Scilate scions the two most significant correlations were flipped compared to Fuji, with ET<sub>r</sub> (r&#xb2; = 0.75) being the most highly correlated followed by R<sub>n</sub> (r&#xb2; = 0.68), and T<sub>a</sub> (r&#xb2; = 0.45) and VPD (r&#xb2; = 0.45) being equal. Maximum daily shrinkage was less correlated to &#x3b8; than atmospheric variables. Early in the season &#x3b8; at 80&#xa0;cm depth was more correlated to MDS (Fuji r&#xb2; = 0.30; Scilate r&#xb2; = 0.22) than &#x3b8; at 20&#xa0;cm (Fuji r&#xb2; = 0.17; Scilate r&#xb2; = 0.19). This pattern flipped later in the season with &#x3b8; at 20&#xa0;cm being better correlated to MDS (Fuji r&#xb2; = 0.39; Scilate r&#xb2; = 0.30) than &#x3b8; at 80&#xa0;cm (Fuji NS; Scilate r&#xb2; = 0.08). When pooling MDS data by scion and across early and late season, linear regression analysis identified ET<sub>r</sub> as the most significant atmospheric determinant of MDS and &#x3b8; at 20&#xa0;cm the most significant soil moisture depth. Multiple linear regression model utilizing ET<sub>r</sub> and &#x3b8; at 20&#xa0;cm accounted for 77% of variation in MDS.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_3">
<label>3.3</label>
<title>Stem water potential</title>
<p>There was no significant difference in &#x3a8;<sub>Stem</sub> (P = 0.93) between the Fuji and Scilate scions with Fuji averaging -1.39 &#xb1; 0.07 MPa and Scilate averaging -1.23 &#xb1; 0.08 MPa over the course of the growing season (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;2</bold>
</xref>). Scions were separated for analysis based on differences in harvest and final growth data. Responses to all environmental variables were examined using linear regressions (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">
<bold>Table&#xa0;2</bold>
</xref>). Early season responses of &#x3a8;<sub>Stem</sub> in both Fuji and Scilate showed strong correlations to VPD (Fuji, r&#xb2; = 0.76; Scilate, r&#xb2; = 0.77), T<sub>a</sub> (Fuji, r&#xb2; = 0.70; Scilate, r&#xb2; = 0.67) and ET<sub>r</sub> (Fuji, r&#xb2; = 0.70; Scilate, r&#xb2; = 0.64). During the late season &#x3a8;<sub>Stem</sub> responses showed medium correlations to almost all measured environmental variables, apart from wind speed. For Fuji scions the most significant correlations in declining order were &#x3b8; at 20&#xa0;cm (r&#xb2; = 0.59), ET<sub>r</sub> (r&#xb2; = 0.46), T<sub>a</sub> (r&#xb2; = 0.42), R<sub>n</sub> (r&#xb2; = 0.39), VPD (r&#xb2; = 0.31), and &#x3b8; at 80&#xa0;cm (r&#xb2; = 0.25). In Scilate scions most significant correlations were: T<sub>a</sub> (r&#xb2; = 0.46), ET<sub>r</sub> (r&#xb2; = 0.45), &#x3b8; at 20&#xa0;cm (r&#xb2; = 0.42), VPD (r&#xb2; = 0.40), R<sub>n</sub> (r&#xb2; = 0.37), and &#x3b8; at 80&#xa0;cm (r&#xb2; = 0.25). When pooling &#x3a8;<sub>Stem</sub> data across scion and phenological stage, multiple linear regression modeling utilizing ET<sub>r</sub> and &#x3b8; at 20&#xa0;cm accounted for 41% of variation in &#x3a8;<sub>Stem</sub>. Pooled scion &#x3a8;<sub>Stem</sub> was also examined for correlations to pooled MDS and SFI (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f4">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;4</bold>
</xref>). Controlling for seasonality improved correlation coefficients between SFI and MDS. Early season data were more correlated with MDS measurements (r&#xb2; = 0.85) than SFI (r&#xb2; = 0.69). Late season correlations declined in both MDS and SFI, though MDS remained well correlated (r&#xb2; = 0.71), while SFI correlations declined significantly (r&#xb2; = 0.36).</p>
<fig id="f4" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;4</label>
<caption>
<p>Correlations to principal above and below ground environmental drivers across scion type. Correlations between maximum daily trunk shrinkage, sap flow index, and mid-day &#x3a8;<sub>stem</sub> and ETr and volumetric water content at 20&#xa0;cm. Data were pooled for &#x2018;Aztec Fuji&#x2019; and &#x2018;Scilate&#x2019; (Envy&#x2122;) scions on Malling 9 rootstocks and over the entire season. NS indicates no statistically significant regression.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-14-1214429-g004.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_4">
<label>3.4</label>
<title>Sap flow index</title>
<p>Sap flow index was not significantly different (p = 0.97) between the two grafted scions over the course of the season (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;2</bold>
</xref>). Early in the season, both scions were highly correlated to T<sub>a</sub> (Fuji, r&#xb2; = 0.84; Scilate, r&#xb2; = 0.88), VPD (Fuji, r&#xb2; = 0.77; Scilate, r&#xb2; = 0.87), and ET<sub>r</sub> (Fuji, r&#xb2; = 0.76; Scilate, r&#xb2; = 0.83) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">
<bold>Table&#xa0;2</bold>
</xref>). Later in the season this trend remained the same with correlations to ET<sub>r</sub> improving (Fuji, r&#xb2; = 0.88; Scilate, r&#xb2; = 0.89) followed by T<sub>a</sub> (Fuji, r&#xb2; = 0.79; Scilate, r&#xb2; = 0.80), VPD (Fuji, r&#xb2; = 0.78; Scilate, r&#xb2; = 0.82), and R<sub>n</sub> (Fuji, r&#xb2; = 0.74; Scilate, r&#xb2; = 0.73). There were no significant correlations to wind speed or &#x3b8; at either the 20 or 80 depth during either the early or late season. When pooling data by scion and season, linear regression analysis found that ET<sub>r</sub> (r&#xb2; = 0.82) was the most significant atmospheric driver and &#x3b8; at 20 and 80&#xa0;cm were not significantly correlated (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f4">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;4</bold>
</xref>)(<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>S2 Figure</bold>
</xref>). Multiple linear regression modeling using ET<sub>r</sub> and &#x3b8; at 20&#xa0;cm accounted for 84% of variation in SFI readings.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_5">
<label>3.5</label>
<title>Measurement variability</title>
<p>Stem water potential had a combined season long coefficient of variation (<inline-formula>
<mml:math display="inline" id="im1">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>C</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>V</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>S</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>a</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>n</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>d</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>a</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>r</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>d</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#xa0;</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>d</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>e</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>v</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>a</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>o</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>n</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>M</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>e</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>a</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>n</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfrac>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>) of 12.4% with average CV values being slightly lower for Fuji (9.5%) than Scilate (11.2%) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">
<bold>Table&#xa0;3</bold>
</xref>). Maximum daily shrinkage had a combined CV of 31.9% with Fuji being slightly more variable (29.3%) than Scilate (25.8%). Sap flow indexes were the most variable, having an overall CV of 37.1% with Fuji being significantly (47.0%) more variable than Scilate (25.7%).</p>
<table-wrap id="T3" position="float">
<label>Table&#xa0;3</label>
<caption>
<p>Variability of measurements.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" align="left">Scion</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">&#x3a8;<sub>Stem</sub>
</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">MDS</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">SFI</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Fuji</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">9.50%</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">29.30%</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">47.00%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Scilate</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">11.20%</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">25.80%</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">25.70%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Combined</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">12.40%</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">31.90%</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">37.10%</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn>
<p>Coefficients of variation (%) of midday stem water potential (&#x3a8;<sub>Stem</sub>), maximum daily shrinkage (MDS) and sap flow index (SFI) measured on fruiting &#x2018;Aztec Fuji&#x2019; and &#x2018;Scilate&#x2019; (Envy&#x2122;) both grafted to Malling 9 Selection NIC&#x2122; 29 rootstocks. Values are presented for data over the course of the season from four replicate trees for measures of SFI and &#x3a8;<sub>Stem</sub> and three replicate trees for MDS. SFI and MDS are daily averages for a 151 day trial period while &#x3a8;<sub>Stem</sub> average 43 different measurements over the course of the season.</p>
</fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_6">
<label>3.6</label>
<title>Harvest and final growth</title>
<p>&#x2018;Aztec Fuji&#x2019; scions had significantly higher (P &gt; 0.01) fruit harvest mass per tree averaging 22.2 &#xb1; 4.0&#xa0;kg per tree while the Scilate averaged 11.7 &#xb1; 1.8&#xa0;kg per tree (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">
<bold>Table&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>). Individual fruit mass was higher (P = 0.02) in Scilate averaging 227.6 &#xb1; 9.2&#xa0;g per fruit compared to Fuji which average 192.9 &#xb1; 10.3&#xa0;g per fruit. &#x2018;Aztec Fuji&#x2019; had more (P &gt; 0.01) fruit per tree, averaging 119 &#xb1; 15 compared to Scilate which averaged 52 &#xb1; 4 fruit per tree. Normalizing for trunk cross sectional area (TCSA) Fuji maintained higher numbers of fruit averaging 3.1 &#xb1; 0.6 fruits per cm&#xb2; of TCSA while Scilate averaged 1.5 &#xb1; 0.2 fruits per cm&#xb2; of TCSA. Stem elongation in Fuji appeared slightly more (33.7 &#xb1; 0.6&#xa0;cm) than Scilate (31.0 &#xb1; 1.4&#xa0;cm), but differences were not significant (p = 0.07).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s4" sec-type="discussion">
<label>4</label>
<title>Discussion</title>
<sec id="s4_1">
<label>4.1</label>
<title>Trunk circumferential variation and growth</title>
<p>Studies have shown that the phenological stages of growth in orchard trees can impact the response of MDS to environmental drivers and &#x3a8;<sub>Stem</sub> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Egea et&#xa0;al., 2009</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B45">Marsal et&#xa0;al., 2015</xref>). In particular, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B44">Liu et&#xa0;al. (2012)</xref> identified two seasonal stages of growth in apple (cv. Golden Delicious) based on trunk diameter growth and leaf area index. During the first stage, which was characterized by rapid leaf area and trunk expansion, trees emerged from dormancy and anthesis occurred. The second stage was marked by a plateauing of trunk growth and leaf area index, coupled with rapid expansion and maturing of fruit. In this study, we observed a plateauing of maximum daily trunk circumference in the Fuji scion around day 185 (3 July), although it was less pronounced than reported by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B44">Liu et&#xa0;al. (2012)</xref> (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;2</bold>
</xref>). On the other hand, we noticed only minor slowing of growth in the Scilate cultivar, with circumference measurements continuing to increase until late in the growing season. While fruit size was larger in the Scilate scions, overall crop load (fruit #/cm<sup>2</sup> TCSA) was lower (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">
<bold>Table&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>). Shoot elongation was not statistically different at &#x3b1; of 0.05, which, given smaller TCSA and lower crop load in the Scilate, suggests greater carbon allocation to vegetative growth. Furthermore, continued circumferential growth later in the season in Scilate scions was likely due to lighter crop load and reduced carbon allocation to fruiting compared to Fuji.</p>
<p>After controlling for phenological stage of growth, it was observed that the correlations of MDS to &#x3a8;<sub>Stem</sub> were strongest early in the season and declined after DOY 185 (July 3<sup>rd</sup>) when fruit development became the dominant factor affecting tree responses. This finding was consistent with previous studies using point dendrometers that have documented declining correlations of MDS to &#x3a8;<sub>Stem</sub> in plum and peach as the season progressed (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">Intrigliolo and Castel, 2006</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B45">Marsal et&#xa0;al., 2015</xref>). In this study, reduced correlations of MDS to &#x3a8;<sub>Stem</sub> in the late season are attributed to a combination of factors, including fruit load and extended drought.</p>
<p>The onset of fruit development increases osmotic loading of the phloem, which impacts water storage dynamics of the tree (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B56">Ortu&#xf1;o et&#xa0;al., 2010</xref>). Under well-watered conditions, osmotic loading can result in greater swelling of cambium tissues during nighttime recharge of water (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B71">Wang et&#xa0;al., 1995</xref>), resulting in increased MDS readings in relation to &#x3a8;<sub>Stem</sub> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">Intrigliolo and Castel, 2007</xref>). However, in this study, MDS values decreased for the same &#x3a8;<sub>Stem</sub> (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f5">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;5</bold>
</xref>), indicating that the opposite trend was observed. Moreover, although the Fuji had higher yield and crop load at harvest, MDS values were not significantly higher (p = 0.30) than those of the Scilate (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">
<bold>Table&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>). Soil moisture content and &#x3a8;<sub>Stem</sub> were on average lower throughout the plot after DOY 185 indicating greater water stress during fruiting. This limited soil water availability could have inhibited nighttime recharge of stem water and diurnal trunk expansion. Additionally, stored water can account for up to 50% of transpirational demand (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">K&#xf6;cher et&#xa0;al., 2013</xref>). More negative osmotic potential in the cambium tissues could have acted as a competitive sink for stored water, limiting trunk contraction due to transpirational loss. The combination of greater osmotic loading and limited soil water availability could in this way depress MDS responses.</p>
<fig id="f5" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;5</label>
<caption>
<p>Early and late season correlations to stem water potential. Correlations of maximum daily trunk shrinkage and sap flow index to mid-day &#x3a8;<sub>stem</sub> for fruiting scions &#x2018;Aztec Fuji&#x2019; and &#x2018;Scilate&#x2019; (Envy&#x2122;) on Malling 9 rootstocks. Data were segregated into early (light grey and red circles) season responses that corresponded with spur leaf development and fruit set, and late season (black and dark red triangles) responses which corresponded with elongation of terminal and bourse shoots. NS indicates no statistically significant regression.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-14-1214429-g005.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>Previous studies have suggested that MDS values follow a parabolic response to &#x3a8;<sub>Stem</sub>, with MDS values increasing until a species-specific threshold is reached, after which they decline (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B56">Ortu&#xf1;o et&#xa0;al., 2010</xref>). This response has been attributed to various factors, including depletion of water reservoirs in the phloem and surrounding xylem tissues as well as stomatal and osmotic regulation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">Garnier and Berger, 1986</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B60">Remorini and Massai, 2003</xref>). However, in this study, MDS values increased linearly with more negative &#x3a8;<sub>Stem</sub>. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B56">Ortu&#xf1;o et al. (2010)</xref> reported MDS began to decline after &#x3a8;<sub>Stem</sub> values reached -2.5 MPa in potted apple trees. Minimum &#x3a8;<sub>Stem</sub> values in this study reached ~ -2.0 MPa at which time leaf curling, tip burn and low &#x3b8; were observed. This was judged to be significant water stress, beyond what would be tolerated in commercial production.</p>
<p>Although previous research has suggested that daily growth is a better indicator of drought stress than MDS in rapidly growing young trees (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B55">Nortes et&#xa0;al., 2005</xref>), significant correlations between daily growth and environmental parameters or &#x3a8;<sub>Stem</sub> were not observed in this study. Trees were at the 6<sup>th</sup> leaf at the time of the study, which is considered to be mature and past the stage of initial rapid growth in which daily growth is the most sensitive parameter for water stress.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s4_2">
<label>4.2</label>
<title>Sap flow index</title>
<p>Previous research has indicated that the correlation between sap flow and environmental drivers can vary depending on the phenological stage of the tree (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Chen et&#xa0;al., 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B67">Tie et&#xa0;al., 2017</xref>). For instance, daily sap flow rates presented by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B44">Liu et&#xa0;al. (2012)</xref> showed that correlations of sap flow to T<sub>a</sub>, VPD, and ET<sub>r</sub> improved over the course of the season. Similarly, data presented in this study found that correlations of R<sub>n</sub> and ET<sub>r</sub> with sap flow increased over the season. However, correlations to T<sub>a</sub> and VPD showed no significant improvement (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">
<bold>Table&#xa0;2</bold>
</xref>). Liu et&#xa0;al.&#x2019;s (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B44">Liu et&#xa0;al., 2012</xref>) findings could be attributed to the inclusion of data from early spring when trees had fully leafed out, resulting in low sap flow readings and thus low correlations. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B67">Tie et&#xa0;al. (2017)</xref> addressed this issue by normalizing the data to leaf area index, leading to improved correlation coefficients throughout the season. In this study, data collection was initiated after trees had leafed out, which improved early season correlations and more closely matched data from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B67">Tie et&#xa0;al. (2017)</xref>. Previous studies have identified VPD, R<sub>a</sub>, T<sub>a</sub>, &#x3b8;, and leaf area index as predominant drivers of sap flow in various trees and environmental conditions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">Ford et&#xa0;al., 2004</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">Dragoni et&#xa0;al., 2005</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">Agam et&#xa0;al., 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B47">Mobe et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>). In this study ET<sub>r</sub>, VPD, and T<sub>a</sub> were most strongly correlated to SFI, while R<sub>a</sub> was only well correlated later in the season. Interestingly, &#x3b8; was not significantly correlated to SFI at any point in time. Shifts in seasonal SFI response were most likely due to older leaves accounting for a larger portion of the tree canopy, which are less responsive to environmental drivers due to greater internal shading and reduced stomatal conductance compared to recently matured leaves (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Constable and Rawson, 1980</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">Flore and Lakso, 2011</xref>).</p>
<p>Correlations to ET<sub>r</sub> were high during both the early and late season and showed significant overlap, and seasonal correlations pooled across scion type were also strong (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f4">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;4</bold>
</xref>). High correlations of SFI to ET<sub>r</sub> was unexpected given the published literature which points to divergence in orchard ET from reference ET (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">Jarvis, 1984</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">Dragoni et&#xa0;al., 2005</xref>). Reference ET models utilize idealized values for canopy characteristics that reflect a continuous, short, dense, and homogenous crop with a relatively large boundary layer. Because of these assumed canopy characteristics and boundary layer effects, reference ET models have been better correlated to incoming solar radiation than bulk atmospheric conditions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">Jarvis, 1984</xref>). Tall, widely spaced trees coupled with the large amount of self-shading mean that bulk atmospheric conditions (e.g. VPD) is often a better predictor of orchard ET values (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">Dragoni et&#xa0;al., 2005</xref>). We hypothesize that in high density orchard plantings with interconnected canopies, aerodynamic resistance is higher creating boundary layer effects that decouple orchard ET from bulk air properties, especially later in the season as leaf area index reaches a maximum. Additionally, highly managed fruit tree orchards utilize pruning and training techniques to maximize canopy radiation capture.</p>
<p>Previous research has shown linear correlations of sap flow readings to &#x3a8;<sub>Stem</sub> under non-limiting soil water conditions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B56">Ortu&#xf1;o et&#xa0;al., 2010</xref>). Both early and late seasonal responses followed this same pattern of increasing sap flow with decreasing &#x3a8;<sub>Stem</sub> (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f5">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;5</bold>
</xref>). Correlations of SFI to &#x3a8;<sub>Stem</sub> were stronger in the early season while late season correlations decreased. Declining correlations later in the season could be a function of stomatal regulation, however fruiting deciduous orchards have been shown to have higher stomatal conductance, transpiration and carbon assimilation than de-fruited trees of the same age (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B54">Naor et&#xa0;al., 2008</xref>). Similar to depressed correlations of MDS, SFI correlations to &#x3a8;<sub>Stem</sub> most likely declined due to limited soil water availability combined with solute loading, leaf age and crop load.</p>
<p>Several studies have reported reductions of peak sap velocities following severe drought. Researchers have also noted an inward radial shift of peak velocities toward the heartwood (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Cermak and Nadezhdina, 1998</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">Ford et&#xa0;al., 2004</xref>). Based on these findings <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B50">Nadezhdina et&#xa0;al. (2007)</xref> suggested that analysis of the shape of the sap wood profile might be a reliable indicator for irrigation scheduling. Studies in olive, apple and Asian pear however did not find significant variation in sap velocity profiles under a range of soil water availability and atmospheric demand (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Fern&#xe1;ndez et&#xa0;al., 2008</xref>). Our analysis of the ratio of outer to inner SFI found a moderate correlation to &#x3a8;<sub>Stem</sub> when pooling scions (r&#xb2; = 0.48) (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>S3 Figure</bold>
</xref>). It may be possible that the proposed technique is not applicable for diffuse porous species such as apple, but could work for ring porous species which have a bimodal radial distribution of vessel diameters. This means that they do not produce steep gradients in sap velocity between the inner and outer sapwood (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Bush et&#xa0;al., 2010</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B70">Tyree and Zimmermann, 2013</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s4_3">
<label>4.3</label>
<title>Stem water potential</title>
<p>A saturating response of season long &#x3a8;<sub>Stem</sub> to VPD has previously been reported in apple (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">De Swaef et&#xa0;al., 2009</xref>) where a linear relationship has been described in olive (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B48">Moriana et&#xa0;al., 2012</xref>), prune (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">Fereres and Goldhamer, 2003</xref>) and plum (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">Intrigliolo and Castel, 2006</xref>). <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">De Swaef et&#xa0;al. (2009)</xref> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">De Swaef et&#xa0;al., 2009</xref>) speculated that the saturating response seen in apples may be due to restricted root volumes. In dwarfing rootstocks, like the one used in this study, lower rootzone volumes have been associated with reduced drought tolerance (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B69">Tworkoski et&#xa0;al., 2016</xref>). When &#x3a8;<sub>Stem</sub> is pooled across scions and seasonally a polynomial function produces a greater fit (r&#xb2; = 0.62; <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>S4 Figure</bold>
</xref>) than a simple linear one (r&#xb2; = 0.53; <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>S4 Figure</bold>
</xref>) making data presented here in line with observation by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">De Swaef et&#xa0;al. (2009)</xref>. Overall &#x3a8;<sub>Stem</sub> was less impacted by environmental drivers then SFI and MDS with division of readings by seasonality improving early season correlations and depressing correlations later in the season. It is unclear from this study if phenological stage of growth affects &#x3a8;<sub>Stem</sub> response or if drier conditions later in the season caused seasonal differences in response.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s4_4">
<label>4.4</label>
<title>Discussion of relative sap flow index</title>
<p>The accurate calibration of absolute sap flow using heat pulse techniques involves several technical calibrations, including measuring sapwood density, sapwood moisture content, area of conducting tissue, correcting needle misalignment, and determining the thermal diffusivity of the sapwood (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B66">Taylor et&#xa0;al., 2013</xref>). However, these complex calibrations present significant challenges to the adoption of sap flow as an irrigation tool in commercial orchards where equipment and expertise may not be available. Even in research settings, accurate calibration for absolute sap flow is difficult, with an average error rate of 34% in published studies and most measurements underestimating tree water usage (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Forster, 2017</xref>).</p>
<p>Determinations of sap flow rely on measured changes in temperature and time elapsed to calculate the velocity of a pulse of heat as it is carried through the trunk (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B65">Swanson and Whitfield, 1981</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">Cohen, 1991</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">Burgess et&#xa0;al., 2001</xref>). Thermal accounting of conductive and convective properties of the trunk and sap are then employed to derive sap velocity from heat velocity and estimates of conducting tissue area are subsequently used to estimate sap flow. Typically, thermal properties are determined through either coring the tree before the trial or destructively harvesting the tree after the trial, and these properties are then treated as constants throughout the measurement campaign. In this study we focused solely on measurements of heat velocity, without attempting to derive accurate measures of sap flow. By simplifying the application and removing the need for technical calibrations, we remove barriers to use. The use of relative measures of sap flow is not without precedent, several researchers have used either indexes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B49">Nadezhdina, 1999</xref>), normalized values (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Burgess and Dawson, 2007</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">Ballester et&#xa0;al., 2012</xref>) or relative measures (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">Doronila and Forster, 2015</xref>) of sap flow in tree water use analysis. We argue that understanding the underlying pattern of sap flow is essential in informing tree responses to water stress, and absolute measurements are not necessary for this purpose. The SFI values presented here follow trends seen in the literature of calibrated sap flow, as described above.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s4_5">
<label>4.5</label>
<title>Measurement variability</title>
<p>High tree-to-tree measurement variability has been cited as a reason for limited adoption of sap flow sensors and dendrometers as irrigation tools in commercial orchards (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B56">Ortu&#xf1;o et&#xa0;al., 2010</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Fern&#xe1;ndez, 2017</xref>). In analyzing coefficients of variation (<inline-formula>
<mml:math display="inline" id="im2">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>C</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>V</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>S</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>a</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>n</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>d</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>a</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>r</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>d</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#xa0;</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>d</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>e</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>v</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>a</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>o</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>n</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>M</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>e</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>a</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>n</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfrac>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>)for this trial we found that MDS and SFI were more variable than &#x3a8;<sub>Stem</sub> (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">
<bold>Table&#xa0;3</bold>
</xref>). <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B51">Naor and Cohen (2003)</xref> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B51">Naor and Cohen, 2003</xref>) noted the same pattern in apple with &#x3a8;<sub>Stem</sub> having the least tree to tree variability, followed by MDS and SFI. The study authors attributed high variability of MDS to variability in vasculature area and tree hydraulic conductance. Variability in SFI was speculated by the authors to be due to tree-to-tree differences in canopy size and thus rates of transpiration. Plant water status on the other hand is a more holistic measure of plant response that incorporates many different crop characteristics and physiological responses (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B52">Naor et&#xa0;al., 2005</xref>). The higher degree of variability in MDS and SFI is also partially explained by the high degree of environmental correlation of these measures. When pooling data by scion and season, multiple linear regression utilizing ET<sub>r</sub> and &#x3b8; at 20&#xa0;cm accounted for 41% of reading variation of &#x3a8;<sub>Stem</sub> compared to 77% of the reading variation in MDS, and 85% of SFI. Previous studies have compared the signal intensity (SI) of MDS, sap flow and &#x3a8;<sub>Stem</sub> by contrasting readings from well-watered trees to those of deficit irrigated or drought stressed trees. While utilizing SI reduced the amount of environmental variability, physiological parameters followed the same pattern seen in this study with &#x3a8;<sub>Stem</sub> having the lowest variability, followed by MDS and SFI (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Fern&#xe1;ndez and Cuevas, 2010</xref>). Overall CV of MDS from band dendrometers used in this study was 31.9% which is higher than studies CV values for point dendrometers summarized by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Fern&#xe1;ndez and Cuevas (2010)</xref>, which averaged 12.5% for fruit trees. This result was surprising given that circumferential measurements incorporate a larger area and reduce viability. Greater variability necessitates more instrumentation to reduce sampling errors, this in turn drives up the initial investment cost of any sensor-controlled irrigation system. These costs however, should be measured against the amount of labor and time needed to collect &#x3a8;<sub>Stem</sub> measurements and the ability of automated measurements to more comprehensively capture seasonal records.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s4_6">
<label>4.6</label>
<title>Irrigation scheduling and future considerations</title>
<p>Previous researchers have automated irrigation based on set thresholds of MDS (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Bussi et&#xa0;al., 1999</xref>) or sap flow (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">Cohen, 1991</xref>). Some researchers have sought to overcome the impact of environmental drivers and phenological stages on MDS and sap flow by using ratios of automated irrigation treatments to well-watered controls (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B57">Ortu&#xf1;o et&#xa0;al., 2006</xref>). Other studies have relied on mechanistic models based on sap flow and trunk water storage have been used to estimate &#x3a8;<sub>Stem</sub> and automate irrigation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B64">Steppe et&#xa0;al., 2008</xref>). However, the long-term adoption and large-scale application of these strategies are hindered by the issue of sensor variability and the technical expertise required for implementation. This study primarily focused on sensor responses in high density apple and the evaluation of alternative sensors and sensor readings. Although more easily adopted for commercial application, the variability of these alternative sensors and sensor readings was similar or greater than that reported in the literature. Future research should focus on easily adopted sensor readings that can reliably distinguish physiological responses related to drought from responses due to simple environmental variation and changes in phenological stage.</p>
<p>In addition to addressing sensor responses, sensor-based irrigation scheduling must also consider how signals can inform irrigation application amounts. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B64">Steppe et&#xa0;al. (2008)</xref> based irrigation amounts on measured sap flow, while other researchers have used trunk diameter and sap flow trigger a timed irrigation application. One limitation of using a sap flow index as suggested in this study is it does not provide an absolute measure of sap flow and thereby an estimation of tree water usage. However, a responsive enough signal of plant water stress that can directly trigger on demand irrigation could bypass the need to calculate specific irrigation amounts (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">Jones, 2004</xref>). Furthermore, tree-derived estimates of irrigation amount must take into account not only tree water uptake but also percolation, competitive uptake from surrounding crops, evaporative loss and ground water recharge from below. When considering water use from instrumented crops alone, this may lead to underestimation irrigation amounts that need to be compensated.</p>
<p>Finally, irrigation application must consider its effects on yield and growth which are the ultimate goals in irrigation management. Previous research focusing on regulated deficit irrigation has shown controlled drought through the withholding irrigation applications to be effective in a number of fruit tree species. This practice has the additional documented benefits of: reduced vegetative growth and reductions in labor hours associated with pruning, improved postharvest quality and fruit shelf life, and greater resilience to pathogens (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">Goldhamer et&#xa0;al., 2005</xref>). Much research has focused on linking physiological measurements determined through automated data acquisition to &#x3a8;<sub>Stem</sub>, for which there is a large body of reported literature linking values to yield and fruit size. A mechanistic approach could consider photosynthetic rate and carbon partitioning of the tree and develop a predictive model that would incorporate automated irrigation amounts and timing to control fruit development (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B64">Steppe et&#xa0;al., 2008</xref>). However, implementing such an approach would again require technical expertise to implement, posing a barrier for adoption.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s5" sec-type="conclusions">
<label>5</label>
<title>Conclusions</title>
<p>Given the difficulty of calibrating heat pulse sensors to derive absolute sap flow, relative values provide a reliable indication of sap flow responses to environmental conditions while lowering barriers to entry. However, even relative sap flow is not a reliable method for irrigation scheduling and sap flow sensors must be replaced each year.</p>
<p>Band dendrometers provide significant advantages over point dendrometers because they can be quickly and non-invasively installed or removed. Maximum daily shrinkage (MDS) measurements were well correlated to &#x3a8;<sub>Stem</sub>. In semiarid regions, MDS measurements could replace labor intensive &#x3a8;<sub>Stem</sub> measurements.</p>
<p>Controlling for seasonality improved correlations of MDS and SFI to &#x3a8;<sub>Stem</sub>. Correlations declined as the season progressed, likely due to crop loading, soil water availability and leaf age. SFI, however, was highly correlated with ET<sub>r</sub> throughout the season. Our results suggest that high density plantings create a more continuous surface for aerodynamic resistance so that ET<sub>r</sub> is more highly correlated than in widely-spaced trees in traditional orchards. Thus, orchard density needs to be considered when scheduling irrigation.</p>
<p>This study highlights the complex interplay between environmental conditions and tree water use dynamics, which can vary depending on species and phenological stage. MDS and sap flow measurements can provide insights into tree water status, but it is important to consider fruit load and soil moisture content when interpreting these data.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s6" sec-type="data-availability">
<title>Data availability statement</title>
<p>The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Supplementary Material</bold>
</xref>. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s7" sec-type="author-contributions">
<title>Author contributions</title>
<p>WW, BBu, and BBl contributed to the design of the study, statistical analysis and interpretation of the data. WW wrote the first draft of the manuscript. BBu and BBl provided revisions to the manuscript and figures. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<sec id="s8" sec-type="funding-information">
<title>Funding</title>
<p>Funding for this project was made possible by a USDA- NIFA Specialty Crop Block Grant administered by the Utah Department of Agriculture, the Utah Water Initiative grant program, and the Utah Agricultural Experiment Station, Utah State University (journal paper number 9430).</p>
</sec>
<ack>
<title>Acknowledgments</title>
<p>We would like to thank the Utah Climate Center for their loan of equipment and technical support. We would also like to thank the following people for their extensive technical support and intellectual contributions: Brad Althouse, Alec Hay, Andrew Swain, and Stephanie N. Nehiba.</p>
</ack>
<sec id="s9" sec-type="COI-statement">
<title>Conflict of interest</title>
<p>The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s10" sec-type="disclaimer">
<title>Publisher&#x2019;s note</title>
<p>All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s11" sec-type="supplementary-material">
<title>Supplementary material</title>
<p>The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2023.1214429/full#supplementary-material">https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2023.1214429/full#supplementary-material</ext-link>
</p>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="DataSheet_1.docx" id="SM1" mimetype="application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document"/>
</sec>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="B1">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Adams</surname> <given-names>S. W.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>The Effects of Rootstock, Scion, Grafting Method and Plant Growth Regulators on Flexural Strength and Hydraulic Resistance of Apple</article-title>. Master Thesis. <publisher-loc>USA</publisher-loc>:<publisher-name> Utah State University</publisher-name>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Agam</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cohen</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Berni</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Alchanatis</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kool</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dag</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>An insight to the performance of crop water stress index for olive trees</article-title>. <source>Agric. Water Manage.</source> <volume>118</volume>, <fpage>79</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>86</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.agwat.2012.12.004</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Allen</surname> <given-names>R. G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pereira</surname> <given-names>L. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Smith</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Raes</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wright</surname> <given-names>J. L.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2005</year>). <article-title>FAO-56Dual crop coefficient method for estimating evaporation from soil and application extensions</article-title>. <source>J. Irrigation Drainage Eng.</source> <volume>131</volume>, <fpage>2</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>13</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1061/(asce)0733-9437(2005)131:1(2</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Annandale</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Stockle</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1994</year>). <article-title>Fluctuation of crop evapotranspiration coefficients with weather: a sensitivity analysis</article-title>. <source>Irrigation Sci.</source> <volume>15</volume>, <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>7</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/bf00187789</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ballester</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Castel</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Testi</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Intrigliolo</surname> <given-names>D. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Castel</surname> <given-names>J. R.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Can heat-pulse sap flow measurements be used as continuous water stress indicators of citrus trees</article-title>? <source>Irrigation Sci.</source> <volume>31</volume>, <fpage>1053</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1063</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00271-012-0386-5</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Bonany</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Camps</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1996</year>). <article-title>Effects of different irrigation levels on apple fruit quality</article-title>. <source>Acta Hortic.</source> <volume>466</volume>, <fpage>47</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>52</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.17660/actahortic.1998.466.8</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Burgess</surname> <given-names>S. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Adams</surname> <given-names>M. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Turner</surname> <given-names>N. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Beverly</surname> <given-names>C. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ong</surname> <given-names>C. K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Khan</surname> <given-names>A. A.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2001</year>). <article-title>An improved heat pulse method to measure low and reverse rates of sap flow in woody plants</article-title>. <source>Tree Physiol.</source> <volume>21</volume>, <fpage>589</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>598</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/treephys/21.9.589</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Burgess</surname> <given-names>S. S. O.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dawson</surname> <given-names>T. E.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2007</year>). <article-title>Using branch and basal trunk sap flow measurements to estimate whole-plant water capacitance: a caution</article-title>. <source>Plant Soil</source> <volume>305</volume>, <fpage>5</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>13</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11104-007-9378-2</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Bush</surname> <given-names>S. E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hultine</surname> <given-names>K. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sperry</surname> <given-names>J. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ehleringer</surname> <given-names>J. R.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Calibration of thermal dissipation sap flow probes for ring- and diffuse-porous trees</article-title>. <source>Tree Physiol.</source> <volume>30</volume>, <fpage>1545</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1554</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/treephys/tpq096</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Bussi</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Huguet</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Besset</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Girard</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1999</year>). <article-title>Irrigation scheduling of an early maturing peach cultivar using tensiometers and diurnal changes in stem diameter</article-title>. <source>Fruits</source> <volume>54</volume>, <fpage>57</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>66</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/bf01102813</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Cermak</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Nadezhdina</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1998</year>). <article-title>Sapwood as the scaling parameter-defining according to xylem water content or radial pattern of sap flow</article-title>? <source>Annales Des. Sci. forestieres</source> <volume>55</volume>, <fpage>509</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>521</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1051/forest:19980501</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wei</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Response of relative sap flow to meteorological factors under different soil moisture conditions in rainfed jujube (Ziziphus jujuba Mill.) plantations in semiarid Northwest China</article-title>. <source>Agric. Water Manage.</source> <volume>136</volume>, <fpage>23</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>33</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.agwat.2014.01.001</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Cohen</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1991</year>). <article-title>Determination of orchard water requirement by a combined trunk sap flow and meteorological approach</article-title>. <source>Irrigation Sci.</source> <volume>12</volume>, <fpage>93</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>98</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/bf00190016</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Constable</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rawson</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1980</year>). <article-title>Effect of leaf position, expansion and age on photosynthesis, transpiration and water use efficiency of cotton</article-title>. <source>Funct. Plant Biol.</source> <volume>7</volume>, <fpage>89</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>100</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1071/pp9800089</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Corell</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gir&#xf3;n</surname> <given-names>I. F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Galindo</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Torrecillas</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Torres-S&#xe1;nchez</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>P&#xe9;rez-Pastor</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Using band dendrometers in irrigation scheduling</article-title>. <source>Agric. Water Manage.</source> <volume>142</volume>, <fpage>29</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>37</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.agwat.2014.04.005</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>De Swaef</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Steppe</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lemeur</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>Determining reference values for stem water potential and maximum daily trunk shrinkage in young apple trees based on plant responses to water deficit</article-title>. <source>Agric. Water Manage.</source> <volume>96</volume>, <fpage>541</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>550</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.agwat.2008.09.013</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Doltra</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Oncins</surname> <given-names>J. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bonany</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cohen</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2007</year>). <article-title>Evaluation of plant-based water status indicators in mature apple trees under field conditions</article-title>. <source>Irrigation Sci.</source> <volume>25</volume>, <fpage>351</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>359</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00271-006-0051-y</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B18">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Doronila</surname> <given-names>A. I.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Forster</surname> <given-names>M. A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Performance measurement <italic>via</italic> sap flow monitoring of three eucalyptus species for mine site and dryland salinity phytoremediation</article-title>. <source>Int. J. Phytoremed.</source> <volume>17</volume>, <fpage>101</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>108</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/15226514.2013.850466</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B19">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Dragoni</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lakso</surname> <given-names>A. N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Piccioni</surname> <given-names>R. M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2005</year>). <article-title>Transpiration of apple trees in a humid climate using heat pulse sap flow gauges calibrated with whole-canopy gas exchange chambers</article-title>. <source>Agric. For. Meteorol.</source> <volume>130</volume>, <fpage>85</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>94</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.agrformet.2005.02.003</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B20">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Dzikiti</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Volschenk</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Midgley</surname> <given-names>S. J. E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>L&#xf6;tze</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Taylor</surname> <given-names>N. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gush</surname> <given-names>M. B.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Estimating the water requirements of high yielding and young apple orchards in the winter rainfall areas of South Africa using a dual source evapotranspiration model</article-title>. <source>Agric. Water Manage.</source> <volume>208</volume>, <fpage>152</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>162</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.agwat.2018.06.017</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B21">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ebel</surname> <given-names>R. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Proebsting</surname> <given-names>E. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Evans</surname> <given-names>R. G.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1995</year>). <article-title>Deficit irrigation to control vegetative growth in apple and monitoring fruit growth to schedule irrigation</article-title>. <source>HortScience</source> <volume>30</volume>, <fpage>1229</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1232</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.21273/HORTSCI.30.6.1229</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B22">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Egea</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pag&#xe1;n</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Baille</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Domingo</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Nortes</surname> <given-names>P. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>P&#xe9;rez-Pastor</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>Usefulness of establishing trunk diameter based reference lines for irrigation scheduling in almond trees</article-title>. <source>Irrigation Sci.</source> <volume>27</volume>, <fpage>431</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>441</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00271-009-0157-0</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B23">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Fallahi</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Colt</surname> <given-names>W. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fallahi</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chun</surname> <given-names>I.-J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2002</year>). <article-title>The importance of apple rootstocks on tree growth, yield, fruit quality, leaf nutrition, and photosynthesis with an emphasis on Fuji'</article-title>. <source>HortTechnology</source> <volume>12</volume>, <fpage>38</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>44</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.21273/horttech.12.1.38</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B24">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Fereres</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Goldhamer</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2003</year>). <article-title>Suitability of stem diameter variations and water potential as indicators for irrigation scheduling of almond trees</article-title>. <source>J. Hortic. Sci. Biotechnol.</source> <volume>78</volume>, <fpage>139</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>144</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/14620316.2003.11511596</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B25">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Fern&#xe1;ndez</surname> <given-names>J. E.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Plant-based methods for irrigation scheduling of woody crops</article-title>. <source>Horticulturae</source> <volume>3</volume>, <elocation-id>35</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/horticulturae3020035</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B26">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Fern&#xe1;ndez</surname> <given-names>J. E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cuevas</surname> <given-names>M. V.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Irrigation scheduling from stem diameter variations: A review</article-title>. <source>Agric. For. Meteorol.</source> <volume>150</volume>, <fpage>135</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>151</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.agrformet.2009.11.006</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B27">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Fern&#xe1;ndez</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Green</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Caspari</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Diaz-Espejo</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cuevas</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>The use of sap flow measurements for scheduling irrigation in olive, apple and Asian pear trees and in grapevines</article-title>. <source>Plant Soil</source> <volume>305</volume>, <fpage>91</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>104</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11104-007-9348-8</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B28">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Flore</surname> <given-names>J. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lakso</surname> <given-names>A. N.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Environmental and physiological regulation of photosynthesis in fruit crops</article-title>. <source>Hortic. Rev.</source> <page-range>111&#x2013;157</page-range>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/9781118060841.ch4</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B29">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ford</surname> <given-names>C. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Goranson</surname> <given-names>C. E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mitchell</surname> <given-names>R. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Will</surname> <given-names>R. E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Teskey</surname> <given-names>R. O.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2004</year>). <article-title>Diurnal and seasonal variability in the radial distribution of sap flow: predicting total stem flow in Pinus taeda trees</article-title>. <source>Tree Physiol.</source> <volume>24</volume>, <fpage>951</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>960</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/treephys/24.9.951</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B30">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Forster</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>How reliable are heat pulse velocity methods for estimating tree transpiration</article-title>? <source>Forests</source> <volume>8</volume> (<issue>9</issue>), <page-range>350</page-range>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/f8090350</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B31">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Forster</surname> <given-names>M. A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>The importance of conduction versus convection in heat pulse sap flow methods</article-title>. <source>Tree Physiol.</source> <volume>40</volume>, <fpage>683</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>694</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/treephys/tpaa009</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B32">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Garnier</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Berger</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1986</year>). <article-title>Effect of water stress on stem diameter changes of peach trees growing in the field</article-title>. <source>J. Appl. Ecol.</source> <volume>23</volume> (<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>193</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>209</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2307/2403091</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B33">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ginestar</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Castel</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1995</year>). <article-title>Use of stem dendrometers as indicators of water stress in drip-irrigated citrus trees</article-title>. <source>Acta Hortic.</source> <volume>421</volume>, <fpage>209</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>222</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.17660/actahortic.1998.421.22</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B34">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Goldhamer</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fereres</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2001</year>). <article-title>Irrigation scheduling protocols using continuously recorded trunk diameter measurements</article-title>. <source>Irrigation Sci.</source> <volume>20</volume>, <fpage>115</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>125</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s002710000034</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B35">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Goldhamer</surname> <given-names>D. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Viveros</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Salinas</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2005</year>). <article-title>Regulated deficit irrigation in almonds: effects of variations in applied water and stress timing on yield and yield components</article-title>. <source>Irrigation Sci.</source> <volume>24</volume>, <fpage>101</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>114</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00271-005-0014-8</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B36">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Gon&#xe7;alves</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Moutinho-Pereira</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Santos</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Silva</surname> <given-names>A. P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bacelar</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Correia</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2006</year>). <article-title>Scion&#x2013;rootstock interaction affects the physiology and fruit quality of sweet cherry</article-title>. <source>Tree Physiol.</source> <volume>26</volume>, <fpage>93</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>104</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/treephys/26.1.93</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B37">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Hargreaves</surname> <given-names>G. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Samani</surname> <given-names>Z. A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1985</year>). <article-title>Reference crop evapotranspiration from temperature</article-title>. <source>Appl. Eng. Agric.</source> <volume>1</volume>, <fpage>96</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>99</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.13031/2013.26773</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B38">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Intrigliolo</surname> <given-names>D. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Castel</surname> <given-names>J. R.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2006</year>). <article-title>Performance of various water stress indicators for prediction of fruit size response to deficit irrigation in plum</article-title>. <source>Agric. Water Manage.</source> <volume>83</volume>, <fpage>173</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>180</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.agwat.2005.12.005</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B39">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Intrigliolo</surname> <given-names>D. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Castel</surname> <given-names>J. R.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2007</year>). <article-title>Crop load affects maximum daily trunk shrinkage of plum trees</article-title>. <source>Tree Physiol.</source> <volume>27</volume>, <fpage>89</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>96</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/treephys/27.1.89</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B40">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Jarvis</surname> <given-names>P. G.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1984</year>). <article-title>Coupling of transpiration to the atmosphere in horticultural crops: the omega factor</article-title>. <source>Acta Hortic.</source> <volume>171</volume>, <fpage>187</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>206</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/jxb/erh213</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B41">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Jones</surname> <given-names>H. G.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2004</year>). <article-title>Irrigation scheduling: advantages and pitfalls of plant-based methods</article-title>. <source>J. Exp. Bot.</source> <volume>55</volume>, <fpage>2427</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2436</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/jxb/erh213</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B42">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Katerji</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tardieu</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bethenod</surname> <given-names>O.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Quetin</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1994</year>). <article-title>Behavior of maize stem diameter during drying cycles: comparison of two methods for detecting water stress</article-title>. <source>Crop Sci.</source> <volume>34</volume>, <fpage>165</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>169</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2135/cropsci1994.0011183x003400010029x</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B43">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>K&#xf6;cher</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Horna</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Leuschner</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Stem water storage in five coexisting temperate broad-leaved tree species: significance, temporal dynamics and dependence on tree functional traits</article-title>. <source>Tree Physiol.</source> <volume>33</volume>, <fpage>817</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>832</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/treephys/tpt055</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B44">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Du</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kang</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tong</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Trunk sap flow characteristics during two growth stages of apple tree and its relationships with affecting factors in an arid region of Northwest China</article-title>. <source>Agric. Water Manage.</source> <volume>104</volume>, <fpage>193</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>202</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.agwat.2011.12.014</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B45">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Marsal</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gelly</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mata</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Arbon&#xe9;s</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rufat</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Girona</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Phenology and drought affects the relationship between daily trunk shrinkage and midday stem water potential of peach trees</article-title>. <source>J. Hortic. Sci. Biotechnol.</source> <volume>77</volume>, <fpage>411</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>417</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/14620316.2002.11511514</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B46">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Marsal</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mata</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Arbon&#xe9;s</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rufat</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Girona</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2002</year>). <article-title>Regulated deficit irrigation and rectification of irrigation scheduling in young pear trees: an evaluation based on vegetative and productive response</article-title>. <source>Eur. J. Agron.</source> <volume>17</volume>, <fpage>111</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>122</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S1161-0301(02)00002-3</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B47">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Mobe</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dzikiti</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Volschenk</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zirebwa</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ntshidi</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Midgley</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Using sap flow data to assess variations in water use and water status of apple orchards of varying age groups in the Western Cape Province of South Africa</article-title>. <source>Water SA</source> <volume>46</volume>, <fpage>213</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>224</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.17159//wsa/2020.v46.i2.8236</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B48">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Moriana</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>P&#xe9;rez-L&#xf3;pez</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Prieto</surname> <given-names>M. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ram&#xed;rez-Santa-Pau</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>P&#xe9;rez-Rodriguez</surname> <given-names>J. M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Midday stem water potential as a useful tool for estimating irrigation requirements in olive trees</article-title>. <source>Agric. Water Manage.</source> <volume>112</volume>, <fpage>43</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>54</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.agwat.2012.06.003</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B49">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Nadezhdina</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1999</year>). <article-title>Sap flow index as an indicator of plant water status</article-title>. <source>Tree Physiol.</source> <volume>19</volume>, <fpage>885</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>891</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/treephys/19.13.885</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B50">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Nadezhdina</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Nadezhdin</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ferreira</surname> <given-names>M. I.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pitacco</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2007</year>). <article-title>Variability with xylem depth in sap flow in trunks and branches of mature olive trees</article-title>. <source>Tree Physiol.</source> <volume>27</volume>, <fpage>105</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>113</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/treephys/27.1.105</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B51">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Naor</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cohen</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2003</year>). <article-title>Sensitivity and variability of maximum trunk shrinkage, midday stem water potential, and transpiration rate in response to withholding irrigation from field-grown apple trees</article-title>. <source>HortScience</source> <volume>38</volume>, <fpage>547</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>551</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.21273/hortsci.38.4.547</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B52">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Naor</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gal</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Peres</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2005</year>). <article-title>The inherent variability of water stress indicators in apple, nectarine and pear orchards, and the validity of a leaf-selection procedure for water potential measurements</article-title>. <source>Irrigation Sci.</source> <volume>24</volume>, <fpage>129</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>135</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00271-005-0016-6</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B53">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Naor</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Klein</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Doron</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1995</year>). <article-title>Stem water potential and apple size</article-title>. <source>J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci.</source> <volume>120</volume>, <fpage>577</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>582</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.21273/jashs.120.4.577</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B54">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Naor</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Naschitz</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Peres</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gal</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>Responses of apple fruit size to tree water status and crop load</article-title>. <source>Tree Physiol.</source> <volume>28</volume>, <fpage>1255</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1261</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/treephys/28.8.1255</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B55">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Nortes</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>P&#xe9;rez-Pastor</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Egea</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Conejero</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Domingo</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2005</year>). <article-title>Comparison of changes in stem diameter and water potential values for detecting water stress in young almond trees</article-title>. <source>Agric. Water Manage.</source> <volume>77</volume>, <fpage>296</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>307</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.agwat.2004.09.034</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B56">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ortu&#xf1;o</surname> <given-names>M. F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Conejero</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Moreno</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Moriana</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Intrigliolo</surname> <given-names>D. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Biel</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Could trunk diameter sensors be used in woody crops for irrigation scheduling? A review of current knowledge and future perspectives</article-title>. <source>Agric. Water Manage.</source> <volume>97</volume>, <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>11</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.agwat.2009.09.008</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B57">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ortu&#xf1;o</surname> <given-names>M. F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Garc&#xed;a-Orellana</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Conejero</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ruiz-S&#xe1;nchez</surname> <given-names>M. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mounzer</surname> <given-names>O.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Alarc&#xf3;n</surname> <given-names>J. J.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2006</year>). <article-title>Relationships between climatic variables and sap flow, stem water potential and maximum daily trunk shrinkage in lemon trees</article-title>. <source>Plant Soil</source> <volume>279</volume>, <fpage>229</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>242</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11104-005-1302-z</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B58">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Pardossi</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Incrocci</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Incrocci</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Malorgio</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Battista</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bacci</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>Root zone sensors for irrigation management in intensive agriculture</article-title>. <source>Sensors</source> <volume>9</volume>, <fpage>2809</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2835</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/s90402809</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B59">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Priestley</surname> <given-names>C. H. B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Taylor</surname> <given-names>R. J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1972</year>). <article-title>On the assessment of surface heat flux and evaporation using large-scale parameters</article-title>. <source>Monthly weather Rev.</source> <volume>100</volume>, <fpage>81</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>92</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1175/1520-0493(1972)100&lt;0081:otaosh&gt;2.3.co;2</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B60">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Remorini</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Massai</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2003</year>). <article-title>Comparison of water status indicators for young peach trees</article-title>. <source>Irrigation Sci.</source> <volume>22</volume>, <fpage>39</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>46</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00271-003-0068-4</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B61">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Robinson</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2006</year>). <article-title>The evolution towards more competitive apple orchard systems in the USA</article-title>. <source>Acta Hortic.</source> <volume>772</volume>, <fpage>491</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>500</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.17660/actahortic.2008.772.81</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B62">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Robinson</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hoying</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Reginato</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>The tall spindle planting system: Principles and performance</article-title>. <source>Acta Hortic.</source> <volume>903</volume>, <fpage>571</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>579</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.17660/actahortic.2011.903.79</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B63">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Shuttleworth</surname> <given-names>W. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wallace</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1985</year>). <article-title>Evaporation from sparse crops-an energy combination theory</article-title>. <source>Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc.</source> <volume>111</volume>, <fpage>839</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>855</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/qj.49711146910</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B64">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Steppe</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>De Pauw</surname> <given-names>D. J. W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lemeur</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>A step towards new irrigation scheduling strategies using plant-based measurements and mathematical modelling</article-title>. <source>Irrigation Sci.</source> <volume>26</volume>, <fpage>505</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>517</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00271-008-0111-6</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B65">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Swanson</surname> <given-names>R. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Whitfield</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1981</year>). <article-title>A numerical analysis of heat pulse velocity theory and practice</article-title>. <source>J. Exp. Bot.</source> <volume>32</volume>, <fpage>221</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>239</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/jxb/32.1.221</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B66">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Taylor</surname> <given-names>N. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ibraimo</surname> <given-names>N. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Annandale</surname> <given-names>J. G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Everson</surname> <given-names>C. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Vahrmeijer</surname> <given-names>J. T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gush</surname> <given-names>M. B.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Are sap flow measurements useful for determining water use of fruit orchards, when absolute values are important</article-title>? <source>Acta Hortic.</source> <volume>991</volume>, <fpage>77</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>83</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.17660/ActaHortic.2013.991.9</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B67">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Tie</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hu</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tian</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Guan</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lin</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Environmental and physiological controls on sap flow in a subhumid mountainous catchment in North China</article-title>. <source>Agric. For. Meteorol.</source> <volume>240-241</volume>, <fpage>46</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>57</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.agrformet.2017.03.018</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B68">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Topp</surname> <given-names>G. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Davis</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Annan</surname> <given-names>A. P.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1980</year>). <article-title>Electromagnetic determination of soil water content: Measurements in coaxial transmission lines</article-title>. <source>Water Resour. Res.</source> <volume>16</volume>, <fpage>574</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>582</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1029/WR016i003p00574</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B69">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Tworkoski</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fazio</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Glenn</surname> <given-names>D. M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Apple rootstock resistance to drought</article-title>. <source>Scientia Hortic.</source> <volume>204</volume>, <fpage>70</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>78</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.scienta.2016.01.047</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B70">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Tyree</surname> <given-names>M. T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zimmermann</surname> <given-names>M. H.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2013</year>). &#x201c;<article-title>Xylem Structure and the Ascent of Sap</article-title>,&#x201d; in <source>Springer Series in Wood Science.</source> (<publisher-loc>London</publisher-loc>:<publisher-name> Springer Science &amp; Business Media</publisher-name>).</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B71">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Quebedeaux</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Stutte</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1995</year>). <article-title>Osmotic adjustment: effect of water stress on carbohydrates in leaves, stems and roots of apple</article-title>. <source>Funct. Plant Biol.</source> <volume>22</volume>, <fpage>747</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>754</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1071/pp9950747</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B72">
<citation citation-type="patent">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>White</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2009</year>). <source>Apple tree variety named &#x2018;Scilate&#x2019;.</source> U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, United Sates Plant Patent: US PP20,477 P3.</citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>