<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.3 20070202//EN" "journalpublishing.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="2.3" xml:lang="EN">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Front. Plant Sci.</journal-id>
<journal-title>Frontiers in Plant Science</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">Front. Plant Sci.</abbrev-journal-title>
<issn pub-type="epub">1664-462X</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Frontiers Media S.A.</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpls.2023.1213807</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Plant Science</subject>
<subj-group>
<subject>Original Research</subject>
</subj-group>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Multi-generation study of heavy ion beam-induced mutations and agronomic trait variations to accelerate rice breeding</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ren</surname><given-names>Weibin</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn002"><sup>&#x2020;</sup></xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname><given-names>He</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn002"><sup>&#x2020;</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/404617"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Du</surname><given-names>Yan</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn002"><sup>&#x2020;</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/442310"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Li</surname><given-names>Yan</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/361237"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Feng</surname><given-names>Zhuo</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2225880"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zhou</surname><given-names>Xinhui</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kang</surname><given-names>Guisen</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Shu</surname><given-names>Qingyao</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4"><sup>4</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/143804"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Guo</surname><given-names>Tao</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff5"><sup>5</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/725732"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Guo</surname><given-names>Huijun</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff6"><sup>6</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/438400"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Yu</surname><given-names>Lixia</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Jin</surname><given-names>Wenjie</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Yang</surname><given-names>Fu</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff7"><sup>7</sup></xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Li</surname><given-names>Jingpeng</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff7"><sup>7</sup></xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ma</surname><given-names>Jianzhong</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff8"><sup>8</sup></xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Li</surname><given-names>Wenjian</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Xu</surname><given-names>Chaoli</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff9"><sup>9</sup></xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname><given-names>Xia</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname><given-names>Xiao</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Yang</surname><given-names>Chenan</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff9"><sup>9</sup></xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname><given-names>Luxiang</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff6"><sup>6</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn001"><sup>*</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1511484"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name>
<surname>Zhou</surname><given-names>Libin</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn001"><sup>*</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/441034"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="aff1"><sup>1</sup><institution>Biophysics Group, Biomedical Center, Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences</institution>, <addr-line>Lanzhou</addr-line>, <country>China</country></aff>    <aff id="aff2"><sup>2</sup><institution>University of Chinese Academy of Sciences</institution>, <addr-line>Beijing</addr-line>, <country>China</country></aff>
<aff id="aff3"><sup>3</sup><institution>State Key Laboratory of Crop Gene Exploration and Utilization in Southwest China, Sichuan Agricultural University</institution>, <addr-line>Chengdu</addr-line>, <country>China</country></aff>
<aff id="aff4"><sup>4</sup><institution>State Key Laboratory of Rice Biology, Institute of Biotechnology, Zhejiang University</institution>, <addr-line>Hangzhou</addr-line>, <country>China</country></aff>
<aff id="aff5"><sup>5</sup><institution>National Engineering Research Center of Plant Space Breeding, College of Agriculture, South China Agricultural University</institution>, <addr-line>Guangzhou</addr-line>, <country>China</country></aff>
<aff id="aff6"><sup>6</sup><institution>National Key Facility for Crop Gene Resources and Genetic Improvement, National Center of Space Mutagenesis for Crop Improvement, Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences</institution>, <addr-line>Beijing</addr-line>, <country>China</country></aff>
<aff id="aff7"><sup>7</sup><institution>Northeast Institute of Geography and Agroecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences</institution>, <addr-line>Changchun</addr-line>, <country>China</country></aff>
<aff id="aff8"><sup>8</sup><institution>School of Life Science and Engineering, Lanzhou University of Technology</institution>, <addr-line>Lanzhou</addr-line>, <country>China</country></aff>
<aff id="aff9"><sup>9</sup><institution>College of Life Science and Technology, Gansu Agricultural University</institution>, <addr-line>Lanzhou</addr-line>, <country>China</country></aff>
<author-notes>
<fn fn-type="edited-by">
<p>Edited by: Fangpu Han, Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), China</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="edited-by">
<p>Reviewed by: Jie Qiu, Shanghai Normal University, China; Chaolan Fan, Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), China</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="corresp" id="fn001">
<p>*Correspondence: Libin Zhou, <email xlink:href="mailto:libinzhoulz@gmail.com">libinzhoulz@gmail.com</email>; <email xlink:href="mailto:libinzhou@impcas.ac.cn">libinzhou@impcas.ac.cn</email>; Luxiang Liu, <email xlink:href="mailto:liuluxiang@caas.cn">liuluxiang@caas.cn</email>
</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="equal" id="fn002">
<p>&#x2020;These authors have contributed equally to this work and share first authorship</p>
</fn>
</author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>21</day>
<month>06</month>
<year>2023</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="collection">
<year>2023</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>14</volume>
<elocation-id>1213807</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>28</day>
<month>04</month>
<year>2023</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>05</day>
<month>06</month>
<year>2023</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#xa9; 2023 Ren, Wang, Du, Li, Feng, Zhou, Kang, Shu, Guo, Guo, Yu, Jin, Yang, Li, Ma, Li, Xu, Chen, Liu, Yang, Liu and Zhou</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2023</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Ren, Wang, Du, Li, Feng, Zhou, Kang, Shu, Guo, Guo, Yu, Jin, Yang, Li, Ma, Li, Xu, Chen, Liu, Yang, Liu and Zhou</copyright-holder>
<license xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">
<p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.</p>
</license>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<p>Heavy ion beam (HIB) is an effective physical mutagen that has been widely used in plant mutational breeding. Systemic knowledge of the effects caused by different HIB doses at developmental and genomic levels will facilitate efficient breeding for crops. Here we examined the effects of HIB systematically. Kitaake rice seeds were irradiated by ten doses of carbon ion beams (CIB, 25 &#x2013; 300 Gy), which is the most widely used HIB. We initially examined the growth, development and photosynthetic parameters of the M<sub>1</sub> population and found that doses exceeding 125 Gy caused significant physiological damages to rice. Subsequently, we analyzed the genomic variations in 179 M<sub>2</sub> individuals from six treatments (25 &#x2013; 150 Gy) <italic>via</italic> whole-genome sequencing (WGS). The mutation rate peaks at 100 Gy (2.66&#xd7;10<sup>-7</sup>/bp). Importantly, we found that mutations shared among different panicles of the same M<sub>1</sub> individual are at low ratios, validating the hypothesis that different panicles may be derived from different progenitor cells. Furthermore, we isolated 129 mutants with distinct phenotypic variations, including changes in agronomic traits, from 11,720 M<sub>2</sub> plants, accounting for a 1.1% mutation rate. Among them, about 50% possess stable inheritance in M<sub>3</sub>. WGS data of 11 stable M<sub>4</sub> mutants, including three lines with higher yields, reveal their genomic mutational profiles and candidate genes. Our results demonstrate that HIB is an effective tool that facilitates breeding, that the optimal dose range for rice is 67 &#x2013; 90% median lethal dose (LD<sub>50</sub>), and that the mutants isolated here can be further used for functional genomic research, genetic analysis, and breeding.</p>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>heavy ion beam</kwd>
<kwd>mutagenesis</kwd>
<kwd>rice (<italic>Oryza sativa</italic>)</kwd>
<kwd>whole-genome sequencing</kwd>
<kwd>mutation characteristics</kwd>
<kwd>mutant screening</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<contract-sponsor id="cn001">National Key Research and Development Program of China<named-content content-type="fundref-id">10.13039/501100012166</named-content>
</contract-sponsor>
<contract-sponsor id="cn002">Youth Innovation Promotion Association of the Chinese Academy of Sciences<named-content content-type="fundref-id">10.13039/501100004739</named-content>
</contract-sponsor>
<contract-sponsor id="cn003">Department of Science and Technology of Sichuan Province<named-content content-type="fundref-id">10.13039/501100004829</named-content>
</contract-sponsor>
<counts>
<fig-count count="7"/>
<table-count count="0"/>
<equation-count count="0"/>
<ref-count count="51"/>
<page-count count="16"/>
<word-count count="8856"/>
</counts>
<custom-meta-wrap>
<custom-meta>
<meta-name>section-in-acceptance</meta-name>
<meta-value>Plant Breeding</meta-value>
</custom-meta>
</custom-meta-wrap>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec id="s1" sec-type="intro">
<label>1</label>
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>Food security has increasingly become a prominent issue with the rapid increase in the population and climate change. Rice is one of the most important crops in the world feeding over half of the world&#x2019;s population (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Gross and Zhao, 2014</xref>). Thus, there is a great need in rice breeding to meet the demand. Mutations not only directly provide rich resources for breeding, but also genetic resources for functional genomics study, molecular design, and other technologies. Physical mutagenesis has played an important role in the construction of mutant populations for a long time. Currently, commonly used physical mutagens include X-rays, &#x3b3;-rays, fast neutron (FN), and heavy-ion beams (HIB). HIB is a unique physical mutagen, whose role in mutant creation is also gradually favored by breeders.</p>
<p>HIB is a kind of ionizing radiation generated from the acceleration of heavy ions by a large-scale particle accelerator. Compared with traditional physical mutagens like X-rays and &#x3b3;- rays, HIB has higher linear energy transfer (LET), meaning the energy of ionized particles deposited on its unit track is higher, leading to dense ionization in the sample (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">Kazama et&#xa0;al., 2017</xref>). Therefore, HIB can produce higher relative biological effects (RBE) and induce higher mutation frequency at lower radiation doses (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Hirano et&#xa0;al., 2015</xref>). HIB has been widely used in plant mutation-mediated breeding and construction of mutant libraries. Researchers have used HIB to construct a large number of mutants and rich varieties in model plants(<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">Tanaka et&#xa0;al., 2002</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Kitamura et&#xa0;al., 2004</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Magori et&#xa0;al., 2009</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">Du et&#xa0;al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">Du et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>), crops (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">Abe et&#xa0;al., 2002</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">Tanaka et&#xa0;al., 2002</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Ishikawa et&#xa0;al., 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Liu et&#xa0;al., 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B49">Zhang et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>) and ornamental plants (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B45">Yamaguchi et&#xa0;al., 2009b</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Hase et&#xa0;al., 2010</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">Matsumura et&#xa0;al., 2010</xref>). Various types of rice mutants have been generated by HIB irradiation, including plant height variants, leaf variants (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">Peng et&#xa0;al., 2019</xref>), low cadmium absorption(<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Ishikawa et&#xa0;al., 2012</xref>), grain variants (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">Li et&#xa0;al., 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Jiang et&#xa0;al., 2019</xref>), UV-B insensitive mutants (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">Takano et&#xa0;al., 2013</xref>), and salt-alkali tolerance (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B49">Zhang et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>).</p>
<p>In general, the first process of mutational breeding is to irradiate plant seeds with suitable radiation doses. The irradiated seeds are planted for seed collection (M<sub>1</sub> generation). Then, large-scale screening for mutants was usually carried out in the M<sub>2</sub> generation, and the selected mutants were verified in higher generations. Since the irradiation treatment is the original step of the physical mutational breeding, the selection of suitable irradiation parameters is undoubtedly the groundwork for the mutant library construction. The input dose is an important factor in controlling the amount of genetic mutations (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">Ichida et&#xa0;al., 2019</xref>). Therefore, analyzing the relationship between the irradiation dose and its biological effects on the M<sub>1</sub> generation, the genome variation spectrum in M<sub>2,</sub> and generated phenotypic variations will greatly facilitate the formulation of the irradiation design and the whole breeding work. Currently, most of studies focus on one of the above aspects, lacking an integrated evaluation through multi-generational study to investigate multi-dimensional biological effects. For example, some studies have only given the irradiation dose range based on the survival rate and fertility of the M<sub>1</sub> generation after irradiation and the phenotypic mutation rate in the M<sub>2</sub> generation, lacking the whole genome-level knowledge (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B44">Yamaguchi et&#xa0;al., 2009a</xref>), or only based on the survival rate of the M<sub>1</sub> generation after irradiation and the mutation frequency of different doses of carbon ion beams (CIB) in the exon region in the M<sub>2</sub> generation. They often recommend an optimal radiation dose range but lack more comprehensive whole genome data in M<sub>1</sub> to support it(<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">Ichida et&#xa0;al., 2019</xref>).</p>
<p>Previous studies on HIB-induced mutation characteristics mainly focused on certain doses with supporting data only from high-generation (M<sub>3</sub>-M<sub>6</sub>) phenotypic mutants(<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Li et&#xa0;al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B47">Yang et&#xa0;al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B50">Zheng et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>). There were few studies on the mutation characteristics induced by different doses of HIB using low-generation (M<sub>1</sub> - M<sub>2</sub>) mutants without phenotypic bias. Therefore, the characteristics of mutations induced by different HIB doses in the whole genome of unbiased rice mutants remain unknown.</p>
<p>Kitaake, as a model rice variety, is small and easy to reproduce and has a short life cycle (about nine weeks) and high transformation efficiency. Multiple Kitaake mutation populations have been constructed, including RNAi populations (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">Wang et&#xa0;al., 2013</xref>), T-DNA insertional populations (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">Kim et&#xa0;al., 2013</xref>), and FN-mutagenized populations (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Li et&#xa0;al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">Li et&#xa0;al., 2017</xref>). Kitaake has also been used to study some aspects of rice biology, such as disease resistance (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">Liu et&#xa0;al., 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B51">Zhou et&#xa0;al., 2018</xref>), microRNAs (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">Rodrigues et&#xa0;al., 2013</xref>), and the CRISPR-Cas9 technology (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">Xie et&#xa0;al., 2015</xref>). The reference genome data of Kitaake was released in 2019. Therefore, it is suitable for the study of radiobiological effects and mutation mechanisms (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Li et&#xa0;al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">Li et&#xa0;al., 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Jain et&#xa0;al., 2019</xref>). In this study, we first systematically studied the biological effects induced by ten CIB doses in the M<sub>1</sub> generation. Next, we looked at the mutation characteristics induced by six CIB doses (25 &#x2013; 150 Gy) in the M<sub>2</sub> generation and at different panicles of a single M<sub>1</sub> plant. We constructed mutant populations from eight CIB doses (25 &#x2013; 200 Gy), selected mutants with agronomic traits in their M<sub>2</sub> - M<sub>4</sub> generations, and identified three mutants with higher grain yields. We also selected 11 stable mutants with various phenotypes at the M<sub>4</sub> generation for re-sequencing and revealed their genomic mutational profiles of single base substitutions (SBSs) and small insertions and deletions (InDels). The candidate genes responsible for these mutant phenotypes were predicted.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2" sec-type="materials|methods">
<label>2</label>
<title>Materials and methods</title>
<sec id="s2_1">
<label>2.1</label>
<title>Materials and carbon ion beams radiation</title>
<p>Dry seeds of rice (<italic>Oryza sativa</italic> ssp Japonica, Kitaake), whose water content was adjusted to 12%, were used for mutagenic treatment. The samples were irradiated by CIB (<sup>12</sup>C<sup>6+</sup>, 967 MeV) generated by the Heavy Ion Research Facility in Lanzhou (HIRFL) at the Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences (IMP-CAS). The average LET value of CIB was 34 keV/&#x3bc;m. During CIB radiation, the seeds were placed in a 35 mm Petri dish, about 100 seeds were placed in each Petri dish, and the thickness of the seed sample was about 0.8 cm. The irradiation doses were set as 25, 50, 75, 100, 125, 150, 175, 200, 250 and 300 Gy, and the dose rate was approximately 60 Gy/min. Treatments for each dose had three replicates.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_2">
<label>2.2</label>
<title>Determination of M<sub>1</sub> seedling growth indexes</title>
<p>After CIB irradiation, 40 seeds were randomly selected from each petri dishes with three replicates at each dose. The selected seeds placed in a 10 ml centrifuge tube, added about 8 ml H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>(1%) surface disinfection for 30 min, and then washed the seeds with distilled water 3 times. Then the seeds germinated in 90 mm Petri dishes covered by three layers of wet filter paper with deionized water. The petri dishes were placed in electro-heating standing-temperature cultivator at 28&#xb0;C for germination. Seeds that developed both primary leaves and radicles were regarded as germinated. Germinated seeds were counted every day until the number did not increase, then the seed germination rates were calculated (Number of germinated seeds/total number of seeds &#xd7; 100%).</p>
<p>Rice seedlings were transferred into 1-liter hydroponic boxes with 1&#xd7; Kimura B Nutrient Solution and placed in a growth chamber. For the setting of temperature, light and humidity conditions, refer to the rice growing protocol of the Ronald lab (<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://kitbase.ucdavis.edu/">https://kitbase.ucdavis.edu/</ext-link>). Specifically, the fluorescent light was set to 14 hours with a light intensity of ~250 &#x3bc;molm<sup>-2</sup>s<sup>-2</sup>, and the temperature was maintained at 26-28&#xb0;C. During the 10 hours of darkness, the temperature was maintained at 24&#xb0;C, and the relative humidity was set to 60%. Root length and shoot length were determined at the 9th day after culture. Seedling survival rates were measured on the 14th and 21st day, and no significant difference in survival rates was found, and statistical data from the 21st day were plotted.</p>
<p>When rice seedlings have grown for 30 days (at tillering stage), their chlorophyll contents and chlorophyll fluorescence parameters were measured. Chlorophyll content was determined as described by Porra et&#xa0;al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">Porra et&#xa0;al., 1989</xref>). First, 0.2 g of leaf samples, with the main vein removed and taken from the same position on the leaf, were placed in a mortar. A small amount of quartz sand and calcium carbonate powder were added, followed by 3 ml of 95% ethanol. The sample was homogenized and then an additional 5 ml of 95% ethanol was added. Grinding was continued until the leaf tissue residue was white. After resting for 5 minutes, the sample was transferred to a 15 ml centrifuge tube and rinsed with 95% ethanol 2-3 times until the residue was completely white. The resulting solution was transferred to a centrifuge tube and centrifuged at 4000 r/min for 10 minutes. The final volume was fixed at 15 ml, and 200 &#x3bc;L supernatant was used to determine the absorbance at 665 nm, 649 nm, and 470 nm using a TECAN infinite 200 microplate reader. All of the above processes were carried out in darkness. Three replicates with three technical replicates were carried out for each radiation dose group. For chlorophyll fluorescence parameters, the new leaves at the top of the main stem during the tillering stage were selected for measurement, including ETR (II) (absolute electron transfer rate of photosystems II), Y(II) (actual photosynthetic efficiency of photosystems II), Fv/Fm (maximal photochemical efficiency of photosystems II), and Y(NO) (quantum yield of unregulated energy dissipation in photosystems II), which were determined using a Pulse-Amplitude-Modulated Chlorophyll Fluorometer (Dual-PAM-100). Three replicates were carried out for each radiation dose group.</p>
<p>After seed germination and raising seedlings in the growth chamber for 14 days, the seedlings were transplanted outdoors in barrels (size: 23 &#xd7; 21 &#xd7; 18 cm), with three rice plants in each planting barrel, in Lanzhou (36&#xb0;03&#x2032; N, 103&#xb0;40&#x2032; E). At the mature stage, 12 plants were selected for each CIB dose for the measurement of their plant height, panicle number per plant, tiller number per plant, and seed setting rate. Each panicle of an individual M<sub>1</sub> plant was separately harvested to construct the seed bank.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_3">
<label>2.3</label>
<title>Whole genome re-sequencing and mapping of reads to reference genome</title>
<p>For re-sequencing, the M<sub>2</sub> lines from irradiation with six CIB doses (25 &#x2013; 150 Gy) were selected to study the induced mutation types. Ten M<sub>1</sub> plants were selected for each irradiation dose; from each M<sub>1</sub> plant, three panicles were generally selected (two panicles for a few individuals); one seed from each panicle was selected to grow an M<sub>2</sub> plant. In M<sub>4</sub> generation, 11 stable mutants with different phenotypes were selected for re-sequencing. Total genomic DNA was extracted from young leaves of M<sub>2</sub> and M<sub>4</sub> plants by the cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) method. The integrity of DNA samples was assessed by 1% gel electrophoresis, and the OD<sub>260/</sub>OD<sub>280</sub> ratio of DNA samples was measured with a TECAN infinite 200 microplate reader. High-quality DNA samples were used for genome resequencing. A total of 179 M<sub>2</sub> samples (176 mutants and three controls) and 12 M<sub>4</sub> samples (11 mutants and one control) were re-sequenced with an Illumina NovaSeq 6000 at Novogene Biotechnology Co., Ltd. Raw data were quality-controlled and filtered, and the obtained clean data were then mapped to the KitaakeX reference genome (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Jain et&#xa0;al., 2019</xref>), using the Burrows-Wheeler-Alignment tool (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Li and Durbin, 2009</xref>) and SAMtools (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">Li et&#xa0;al., 2009</xref>). The samples and sequence information of M<sub>2</sub> and M<sub>4</sub> generations are listed in <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="ST1"><bold>Supplementary Table 1</bold></xref>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_4">
<label>2.4</label>
<title>Genomic variant detection and mutation function annotation</title>
<p>In M<sub>2</sub> generation, 13 samples, including ten M<sub>2</sub> plants and three controls, were collected for each group. Individual sample from each panicle of the same M<sub>1</sub> plant was kept separately to prevent shared mutations from being filtered. In M<sub>4</sub> generation, 11 mutants and one control were used as a group for mutation detection. Detection of genomic variations was as described by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">Du et&#xa0;al. (2017)</xref> with minor modifications. SBSs and small InDels were screened using SAMtools (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">Li et&#xa0;al., 2009</xref>) and VarScan2 (v.3.9, <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://varscan.sourceforge.net">http://varscan.sourceforge.net</ext-link>). Applying the &#x201c;samtools mpileup -f ref.fa -q 10 samples_sorted.bam| java -jar VarScan.v2.3.9.jar mpileup2snp &gt; samples.snp&#x201d; command to detect SBSs. For InDels, using the &#x201c;samtools mpileup -f ref.fa -q 10 samples_sorted.bam | java -jar VarScan.v2.3.9.jar mpileup2indel &gt; samples.indel&#x201d; command. Screening criteria were as follows: (1) the number of samples with an uncertain base at this site was zero (Samples NC = 0, the number of samples not covered or not called during sequencing). (2) The number of samples with genomic reference bases at this site was &#x2264; 1 (Samples Ref &#x2264; 1). (3) The allele frequency of reads supporting variations &#x2265; 30%, while &lt; 10% in other samples (the variant allele frequency by read count). When the variant allele frequency of reading count was &#x2265; 75%, it was considered homozygous, refer to <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://varscan.sourceforge.net/usinvarscan.html#v2.3_mpileup2snp">https://varscan.sourceforge.net/usinvarscan.html#v2.3_mpileup2snp</ext-link> for more details. Variants detected in non-irradiated parental lines and shared variants detected in different individual plants were removed. False positives in the detected mutations were counted and removed by Integrative Genomics Viewer (IGV) and Sanger sequencing (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="ST2"><bold>Supplementary Table 2</bold></xref>) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">Robinson et&#xa0;al., 2011</xref>). Then, the mutation sites were annotated. Based on the <italic>O. sativa</italic> Kitaake_499_V3.0 reference genome (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Jain et&#xa0;al., 2019</xref>), SnpEff 5.0e (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Cingolani et&#xa0;al., 2012</xref>) was used to annotate the detected variants and further analyze the effects of various mutation types on genes. The database was built from the Kitaake genome annotations. Further, we performed Gene Ontology (GO) analysis on the affected genes using eggNOG-mapper (eggNOG-mapper.embl.de) and TBtools (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Chen et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>). The biological process category was used in the GO analysis. We used eggNOG-mapper for functional annotation of Kitaake genes and to obtain background files for GO analysis. Then, TBtools (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Chen et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>) was used for enrichment analysis and plotting of the affected genes.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_5">
<label>2.5</label>
<title>Mutant population construction, mutant screening, and yield traits measurement</title>
<p>In the M<sub>2</sub> generation, 1172 M<sub>2</sub> lines (ten plants per line) from eight CIB doses (25 &#x2013; 200 Gy) were planted with a row spacing of 15 &#xd7; 20 cm in Wenjiang, Sichuan (30&#xb0;70&#x2032;N, 103&#xb0;83&#x2032;E) for mutant screening. In the M<sub>3</sub> generation, 129 mutant lines were planted with the same planting setting as M<sub>2</sub> generation in Lingshui, Hainan (18&#xb0;50&#x2032;N, 110&#xb0;04&#x2032;E). In the M<sub>4</sub> generation, the candidate high-yield mutants (A25, A28 and A96) were planted in Wenjiang, Sichuan, and the remaining mutants were planted in Lanzhou, Gansu (36&#xb0;03&#x2032; N, 103&#xb0;40&#x2032; E).</p>
<p>At full maturity, five plants were randomly selected from the middle of the row for measurement of plant height, panicles per plant, grains per panicle, and 1,000-grain weight. Plant height was measured in paddy fields. After the plump grains were dried in an oven at 42 &#xb0;C for one week, the 1,000-grain weight was measured using the SC-A grain analysis system (Wanshen Ltd., Hangzhou, China). The yields of A25, A28 and A96 were measured and calculated per square meter (m<sup>2</sup>), with each mutant containing three independent replications.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_6">
<label>2.6</label>
<title>Statistical analysis</title>
<p>Three replications were used for each treatment, and the data were presented as mean &#xb1; standard deviation (mean &#xb1; SD). The ANOVA analysis followed by <italic>post-hoc</italic> Tukey HSD was performed for significant differences (<italic>P</italic> &lt; 0.05) using SPSS 29. Graphics were created using GraphPad Prism 9 and TBtools (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Chen et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s3" sec-type="results">
<label>3</label>
<title>Results</title>
<sec id="s3_1">
<label>3.1</label>
<title>Different CIB irradiation doses have different biological effects on the life cycle of M<sub>1</sub> plants</title>
<p>We first systematically studied the biological effects induced by ten CIB doses (25, 50, 75, 100, 125, 150, 175, 200, 250 and 300 Gy). We found that seed germination (the emergence of both primary leaves and radicles) rate was over 98% at each CIB dose (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1"><bold>Figure&#xa0;1A</bold></xref>). However, root lengths and shoot lengths of 9-day seedlings were significantly lower than control, even those in the 25 Gy group (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1"><bold>Figures&#xa0;1B, C</bold></xref>). Using the single-hit multi-target (SHMT) model (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B48">Yoshitaka et&#xa0;al., 2019</xref>), we observed that the dose for reducing the shoot length to half of the control was 108.49 Gy, while the dose for reducing seedling root length to half of the control was 73.52 Gy. Thus, roots were more sensitive to CIB irradiation than shoots. Similarly, according to the SHMT model, the shoulder dose (Dq) of Kitaake was 98.82 Gy and the LD<sub>50</sub> was 112.30 Gy. When the CIB dose was over 75 Gy, the survival rate dropped dramatically; almost all seedlings died at high irradiation doses (&gt; 175 Gy) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1"><bold>Figure&#xa0;1D</bold></xref>).</p>
<fig id="f1" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;1</label>
<caption>
<p>Biological response of M<sub>1</sub> plants to different doses of CIB irradiation. <bold>(A&#x2013;D)</bold> Relative values of developmental index at seedling stage. <bold>(E&#x2013;H)</bold> Relative values of photosynthetic pigment contents at tillering stage. <bold>(I&#x2013;L)</bold> Relative values of chlorophyll fluorescence parameters at tillering stage. <bold>(M&#x2013;P)</bold> Relative values of indicators at maturity period. Data represent the mean &#xb1; SD of three replicates. Different lowercase letters represent significant differences among treatments (<italic>P</italic>&lt;0.05) by ANOVA analysis. The single-hit multi-target (SHMT) model equation is S = 1 &#x2212; (1 &#x2212; EXP(&#x2212;D/D<sub>0</sub>))<sup>N</sup>. <bold>(A&#x2013;K)</bold>, <bold>(M, P)</bold> were fitted by nonlinear curves based on a SHMT model. <bold>(L, N, O)</bold> were fitted by nonlinear curves based on a dose-response-stimulation model.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-14-1213807-g001.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>We further investigated the effects of different CIB doses on chlorophyll contents and chlorophyll fluorescence parameters at tillering stage (30-day old). The contents of chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, total chlorophyll, and carotenoid in leaves were significantly reduced when the irradiation dose was over 125 Gy (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1"><bold>Figures&#xa0;1E&#x2013;H</bold></xref>). These results indicate that high dose irradiation damages the chlorophyll biosynthesis pathway in rice. Chlorophyll fluorescence parameters showed that when the dose was lower than 100 Gy, the ETR (II), Y(II), Fv/Fm, and Y(NO) were almost unaffected. CIB greater than 100 Gy reduced ETR(II), Y(II) and Fv/Fm values (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1"><bold>Figures&#xa0;1I&#x2013;K</bold></xref>), but increased the Y (NO) value (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1"><bold>Figure&#xa0;1L</bold></xref>). These results suggest that CIB irradiation above 100 Gy, due to irradiation damage, has a significant effect on photosynthesis at tillering stage in M<sub>1</sub> plants.</p>
<p>We then measured agronomic traits at maturity, including plant height, tiller number, panicle number, and seed setting rate. We found no significant differences between treated groups and the control in plant height, tiller number, or panicle number, when CIB was lower than 125 Gy. However, when CIB was higher than 125 Gy, plant height decreased significantly (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1"><bold>Figure&#xa0;1M</bold></xref>), and the numbers of tillers and panicles of survived plants of high-dose groups were significantly higher than those of control and low-dose groups (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1"><bold>Figures&#xa0;1N, O</bold></xref>). Seed setting rate gradually decreased with increasing irradiation dose; at doses greater than 125 Gy, the seed setting rate dropped to less than 25% (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1"><bold>Figure&#xa0;1P</bold></xref>). Therefore, we conclude that doses over 125 Gy cause serious damage on rice and have significant effects on normal development in the M<sub>1</sub> generation.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_2">
<label>3.2</label>
<title>CIB-induced genomic mutation frequency has obvious dose distribution intervals in M<sub>2</sub> plants</title>
<p>According to the biological effects in M<sub>1</sub> plants after different doses of irradiation, we selected M<sub>2</sub> samples from six CIB dose groups to further study the molecular characteristics of induced mutations. A total of 176 M<sub>2</sub> lines and three control samples were re-sequenced (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="ST1"><bold>Supplementary Table 1</bold></xref>). A total of 14,336 mutations, including 10,368 SBSs, 3,368 deletions and 600 insertions, were detected in the 176 samples of the six CIB-dose groups. We found that the mutations induced by CIB were unevenly distributed throughout the genome, and the number of mutations appeared not related to the sequencing depth or gene density (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2"><bold>Figure&#xa0;2A</bold></xref>; <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="ST3"><bold>Supplementary Table 3</bold></xref>). We found that most mutations occurred in intergenic regions (30%) and upstream and downstream regions (25%), followed by introns (10%), exons (5%), and the 3&#x2019;- and 5&#x2019;-untranslated regions (UTR, 3%) (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1"><bold>Supplementary Figure 1</bold></xref>).</p>
<fig id="f2" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;2</label>
<caption>
<p>Genomic mutations induced by CIB at each dose in M<sub>2</sub> population. <bold>(A)</bold> Genome-wide distribution of mutations induced by six CIB doses in M<sub>2</sub> population. The circular tracks (from inner to outer) represent the 12 rice chromosomes on a megabase scale; GC ratio and gene density are on 100-kb windows of the reference genome KitaakeX; Tracks iv to X represent the mutations induced by doses of 25, 50, 75, 100, 125, and 150 Gy, as well as the number of all mutations induced by six doses of CIB within a non-overlapping 100-kb range of chromosomes. The highest signal heights in these tracks represent nine mutations/100-kb, seven mutations/100-kb, seven mutations/100-kb, nine mutations/100-kb, eight mutations/100-kb, nine mutations/100-kb, and nine mutations/100-kb. The color bar represents gene density within a 100-kb chromosome region, with red indicating an increase in gene density and the highest point representing 27 genes/100-kb. Blue represents a decrease in gene density, with the lowest point representing zero genes/100-kb. <bold>(B)</bold> Percentages of SBSs, deletions and insertions in each dose group. <bold>(C)</bold> Average number of induced mutations. <bold>(D)</bold> Mutation frequency at each dose. <bold>(E)</bold> Zygosity of induced mutations. <bold>(F)</bold> Average number of affected genes. <bold>(C, D, F)</bold> data represent the mean &#xb1; SD of three replicates. Different lowercase letters represent significant differences among treatments (<italic>P</italic>&lt;0.05) by ANOVA analysis.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-14-1213807-g002.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>Single base substitutions (SBSs) were the most abundant mutations in each group, accounting for more than 70%, followed by deletions (21 &#x2013; 26%) and insertions (about 5%) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2"><bold>Figure&#xa0;2B</bold></xref>; <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="ST4"><bold>Supplementary Table 4</bold></xref>). The ratios of SBSs/InDels had no significant differences among the six groups, ranging from 2.41 to 2.78 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2"><bold>Figure&#xa0;2B</bold></xref>; <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="ST4"><bold>Supplementary Table 4</bold></xref>). The number of induced mutations gradually increased from 25 to 100 Gy, but remained steady from 100 to 150 Gy, then even slightly decreased at 125 Gy, indicating that a saturated mutation level was reached at approximately 100 Gy. At 100 Gy, the average mutation number was 105.23 (&#xb1; 4.00)/line and average mutation frequency was 2.66 (&#xb1; 0.10) &#xd7; 10<sup>-7</sup>/bp (Average number of mutations/Kitaake reference genome size), showing no significant differences from those (98.17 (&#xb1; 4.40)/line and 2.48 (&#xb1; 0.11) &#xd7; 10<sup>-7</sup>/bp) at 150 Gy (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2"><bold>Figures&#xa0;2C, D</bold></xref>). When zygosity of mutations was investigated, the ratio of heterozygous to homozygous sites at each dose was 2.02 &#x2013; 2.30 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2"><bold>Figure&#xa0;2E</bold></xref>).</p>
<p>In the 176 individual M<sub>2</sub> lines, 9,961 genes were affected, among them 253 genes were highly affected (including nonsense and frameshift mutations), 630 genes were moderately affected (missense mutations), 288 genes were only lightly affected (synonymous mutations), and 8,790 genes were in introns or intergenic regions (See <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://snpeff.sourceforge.net">http://snpeff.sourceforge.net</ext-link> for details) (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="ST5"><bold>Supplementary Tables 5</bold></xref>, <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="ST6"><bold>6</bold></xref>). Among these affected genes, 2,899 were caused by InDels (29.1%) and 7062 caused by SBSs (70.9%) (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="ST5"><bold>Supplementary Table 5</bold></xref>). Similarly, 100 Gy yielded the largest number of affected genes with an average of 74 (&#xb1; 2.06)/line, including three highly-affected genes per line (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2"><bold>Figure&#xa0;2F</bold></xref>; <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="ST6"><bold>Supplementary Table 6</bold></xref>). The highly affected genes were mostly caused by InDels (&gt; 80%), only few (&lt; 20%) by SBSs (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3"><bold>Figure&#xa0;3C</bold></xref>).</p>
<fig id="f3" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;3</label>
<caption>
<p>Characteristic of SBSs and InDels induced by each dose of CIB. <bold>(A)</bold> Type and proportion of SBSs, the color bar values represent the normalized using data row scale. <bold>(B)</bold> Size distribution of InDels, the color bar values represent the normalized using data row scale. NA represents no such mutation found. <bold>(C)</bold> Genes highly impacted by SBSs and InDels. <bold>(D)</bold> Heatmap of all amino acid variations induced by CIB. The color bar represents the frequency of the amino acid variation, with darker shades of blue indicating a higher frequency of the amino acid variation. The highest mutation frequency is 5%.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-14-1213807-g003.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>For specific biological processes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">Ashburner et&#xa0;al., 2000</xref>), we found from GO analysis that the most enrichment of all the genes affected by the six doses of CIB irradiation group was observed in polyacetaldehyde metabolism, polysaccharide decomposition metabolism, and cellulose decomposition metabolism(<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1"><bold>Supplementary Figure 2</bold></xref>). Further GO analysis of different CIB irradiation group showed that they were enriched in different biological processes. The regulation of photoperiodism, flowering, cell tip expansion, and pollen tube growth had more hits at 25 Gy group, whereas the oligosaccharide catabolic process, the disaccharide catabolic process, and the carbohydrate catabolic process had more hits at 100 Gy group (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1"><bold>Supplementary Figure 2</bold></xref>). However, there were also some shared biological processes between different radiation dose groups. For example, there were 12 shared GO terms between the 75 Gy and 100 Gy radiation dose groups, including carbohydrate transport, plant epidermis morphogenesis, and positive regulation of cell differentiation, etc (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1"><bold>Supplementary Figure 3</bold></xref>; <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="ST7"><bold>Supplementary Table 7</bold></xref>). However, these biological processes were not among the top ten GO terms with the highest enrichment levels (the ten GO terms with the lowest <italic>P</italic>-values), and no consistent pattern was observed for the specific shared GO terms and genes for different doses group. Therefore, just like the uneven distribution of induced SBSs and InDels, the genes affected by CIB are also random.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_3">
<label>3.3</label>
<title>CIB induces high rates of base-transitions and small InDels (&lt;10 bp) in M<sub>2</sub> generation</title>
<p>Transitions (Ts) and Transversions (Tv) are two forms of SBS. In this study, we found that the ratios of Ts/Tv induced by the six CIB doses were between 1.17 and 1.50. Therefore, CIB induced more Ts than Tv in M<sub>2</sub> rice. Among the SBSs, G:C to A:T was the most abundant one (31.1 &#x2013; 37.6%), followed by A:T to G:C (16 &#x2013; 24.8%) and A:T to T:A (15.1 &#x2013; 18.5%); A:T to C:G, G:C to T:A and C:G to G:C were the least (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3"><bold>Figure&#xa0;3A</bold></xref>).</p>
<p>For each CIB dose, most of the induced InDels were deletions (more than 80%) (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="ST4"><bold>Supplementary Table 4</bold></xref>). The induced deletions ranged from 1 to 38 bp and insertions ranged from 1 to 17 bp. The induced deletions were mainly 1 bp (45.16% on average) and 2-10 bp (48.03% on average), with few &gt;10 bp deletions (6.81% on average). The induced insertions were mainly 1 bp (75.75% on average), with some 2-10 bp (23.43% on average) and very few &gt;10 bp (0.82% on average) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3"><bold>Figure&#xa0;3B</bold></xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_4">
<label>3.4</label>
<title>Different CIB doses induce different amino acid variations in M<sub>2</sub> plants</title>
<p>In the six CIB irradiation groups, 131 amino acid variants were induced, accounting for 34.5% of all possible amino acid variations (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3"><bold>Figure&#xa0;3D</bold></xref>). In the 25 Gy group, only 36 amino acid variations were induced, accounting for only about 9.5% of possible variations. More than 60 amino acid variants were induced at 75 Gy, 100 Gy, and 150 Gy, accounting for roughly 16% of possible variations (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1"><bold>Supplementary Figure 4</bold></xref>). The wide distribution and large number of amino acid changes induced by CIB suggests that mutations induced by CIB are relatively random. The most abundant amino acid changes are as follows: proline to serine (12%, in 25 Gy group), aspartate to tyrosine (7%, 50 Gy group), lysine to glutamate (7%, 75 Gy group), arginine to leucine (6%, 100 Gy group), leucine to serine (8%, 125 Gy group), and phenylalanine to leucine (9%, 150 Gy group) (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1"><bold>Supplementary Figure 4</bold></xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_5">
<label>3.5</label>
<title>Few mutations induced by CIB are shared by different panicles of the same M<sub>1</sub> plant</title>
<p>
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B50">Zheng et&#xa0;al. (2020)</xref> reported that after seeds were irradiated by HIB, different mutations were observed in different panicles of the same M<sub>1</sub> plant. Hence, they speculated that different panicles might be derived from different progenitor cells, but it has not been verified at the molecular level (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B50">Zheng et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>). Furthermore, the shared and unique mutation rates among different panicles from the same M<sub>1</sub> plant were not reported in previous studies. Therefore, in this study, we counted the number of genomic mutations (SBSs and InDels) shared by different panicle from the same M<sub>1</sub> rice plant. The results showed that the rate of mutations shared by the three re-sequenced panicles of a single M<sub>1</sub> plant are very low, only about 7.5% on average, and the rate shared by two panicles was 20%. Consequently, the rate of unique mutations in a single panicle was very high averaging at 66.9%. Therefore, different panicles of a single M<sub>1</sub> plant share few mutations and each panicle contains a large number of unique mutations (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f4"><bold>Figure&#xa0;4A</bold></xref>). Similar conclusions held true when all 176 lines were examined (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f4"><bold>Figure&#xa0;4B</bold></xref>).</p>
<fig id="f4" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;4</label>
<caption>
<p>Rates of mutation unique to each panicle or shared by different panicles of the same M<sub>1</sub> plant. <bold>(A)</bold> Rates of shared and unique mutations at each CIB dose. <bold>(B)</bold> Numbers of shared mutations and unique mutations in three panicles of a single M<sub>1</sub> plant from all CIB groups.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-14-1213807-g004.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_6">
<label>3.6</label>
<title>CIB irradiation effectively generates many phenotypic mutants with a wide spectrum of mutations</title>
<p>Because our goal for CIB-induced mutagenesis is to facilitate breeding, we next turned to agronomic traits. We found 129 mutants with diverse phenotypes from a population of 1,172 M<sub>2</sub> lines (ten plants per line), accounting for a 1.1% rate. Among them, decreased seed setting was the most abundant one accounting for 49.6% of the phenotypic mutants, followed by plant height variations accounting for 23.3%. Among plant height variations, dwarf mutations accounted for 20.2% and increased plant height constituted 3.1%. We also obtained phenotypic mutants in grains (3.9%), tiller number (2.4%), plant architecture (4.7%), leaf (3.1%), panicle (4.7%) and growth period (6.2%) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f5"><bold>Figure 5</bold></xref>; <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1"><bold>Supplementary Figures 5</bold></xref>, <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1"><bold>6</bold></xref>; <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="ST8"><bold>Supplementary Table 8</bold></xref>). We also counted the numbers and mutation rates of phenotypic mutants in the M<sub>2</sub> generation of all eight CIB doses (25 &#x2013; 200 Gy) in the field. We found high phenotypic mutation rates (1.36 &#x2013; 1.82%) at 75-150 Gy. Although a high dose (125 &#x2013; 150 Gy) can also induce a high phenotypic mutation rate, it causes great damages including a low survival rate and low seed setting in M<sub>1</sub> plants, rendering it difficult to obtain many seeds for further screening (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="ST9"><bold>Supplementary Table 9</bold></xref>).</p>
<fig id="f5" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;5</label>
<caption>
<p>Three mutants showing higher yields. Morphologies of whole plant, panicle, and grain, and yields of mutants A25 <bold>(A)</bold>, A28 <bold>(B)</bold>, and A96 <bold>(C)</bold> and Kitaake control. Scale bars of plants = 20 cm, scale bars of panicles = 5 cm, and scale bars of grains = 1 cm. Yields were calculated per square meter (m<sup>2</sup>) containing 50 plants in rice paddy fields with three replications. The asterisk represents a significant difference (<italic>P</italic>&lt;0.05) by Student&#x2019;s T Test.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-14-1213807-g005.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>Among the 129 mutants, about 50% of the mutant phenotypes became no longer separable in the M<sub>3</sub> generation, indicating that they are inherited as a qualitative trait. Ten mutants with more relevant agronomic traits were selected for further examination (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f5"><bold>Figure&#xa0;5</bold></xref>; <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1"><bold>Supplementary Figure 6</bold></xref>; <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="ST10"><bold>Supplementary Table 10</bold></xref>). Among them, A36 displayed larger panicles but fewer tillers compared to control, and A45 showed larger seeds but lower seed setting, fewer tillers, and shorter plants (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1"><bold>Supplementary Figure 6A</bold></xref>; <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="ST10"><bold>Supplementary Table 10</bold></xref>). A50, A60, and A110 were dwarf plants, with smaller panicles and shorter grains (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1"><bold>Supplementary Figure 6B</bold></xref>; <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="ST10"><bold>Supplementary Table 10</bold></xref>). A66 showed longer panicles and beak-shaped grains (triangular hulls). A8 showed longer panicles with smaller grains (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1"><bold>Supplementary Figure 6C</bold></xref>; <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="ST10"><bold>Supplementary Table 10</bold></xref>). Most interestingly, we also found three mutants (A25, A28, and A96) showing enhanced yields that have potentials to serve as breeding resources. These three mutants yielded significantly more grains (by 8.5 &#x2013; 11.5%) than the control, calculated per m<sup>2</sup> containing 50 plants in rice paddy fields. A25 showed a taller plant stature, more tillers, and larger panicles resulting in higher grain yield (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f5"><bold>Figure&#xa0;5A</bold></xref>; <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="ST10"><bold>Supplementary Tables 10</bold></xref>, <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1"><bold>11</bold></xref>). A28 carried a taller stature, longer panicles, and larger grains, also resulting in higher yields (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f5"><bold>Figure&#xa0;5B</bold></xref>; <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="ST10"><bold>Supplementary Tables 10</bold></xref>, <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1"><bold>11</bold></xref>). A96 exhibited a taller stature, larger panicles and larger grains, leading to higher grain yields (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f5"><bold>Figure&#xa0;5C</bold></xref>; <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="ST10"><bold>Supplementary Tables 10</bold></xref>, <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1"><bold>11</bold></xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_7">
<label>3.7</label>
<title>Mutation characteristics and candidate gene prediction of 11 phenotypically stable M<sub>4</sub> mutants</title>
<p>In the M<sub>4</sub> generation, we selected 11 mutants with stable mutant phenotypes, including A18, A90, and the above-described nine mutants with agronomic traits, and re-sequenced them to identify induced SBSs and small InDels. A total of 796 mutations were detected, including 602 SBSs (75.6%), 150 deletions (18.8%), and 44 insertions (5.5%) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f6"><bold>Figure&#xa0;6A</bold></xref>). The average number of mutations in each mutant was 72.3 (54.7 SBSs + 17.6 InDels), with the minimal number in A18 at 42 (35 SBSs + 7 InDels) and the maximal number in A96 and A110 at 102 (75 SBSs + 27 InDels) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f6"><bold>Figure&#xa0;6B</bold></xref>; <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="ST12"><bold>Supplementary Table 12</bold></xref>). The Ts/Tv ratio of SBSs was 1.1 &#x2013; 4.1, with an average of 1.88 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f6"><bold>Figures&#xa0;6C, D</bold></xref>). Among the SBSs, G:C to A:T was also the most abundant one (45.7%), followed by A:T to G:C (17.1%), A:T to T:A (13.3%) and G:C to T:A(12.1%); A:T to C:G and C:G to G:C were the least (about 5%). Deletions accounted for 77.7% of InDels, and the ratio of 1 bp: 2-10 bp: &gt;10 bp deletions was 5: 5.54: 1; the ratio of 1 bp: 2-10 bp insertions was 3: 1 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f6"><bold>Figure&#xa0;6E</bold></xref>; <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="ST12"><bold>Supplementary Tables 12</bold></xref>, <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="ST13"><bold>13</bold></xref>). The ratios of homozygous/heterozygous mutations were 1 &#x2013; 5, with an average of 2.51 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f6"><bold>Figures&#xa0;6F, G</bold></xref>; <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="ST12"><bold>Supplementary Tables 12</bold></xref>, <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="ST13"><bold>13</bold></xref>).</p>
<fig id="f6" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;6</label>
<caption>
<p>Genomic variations and candidate genes of phenotypically stable M<sub>4</sub> mutants. <bold>(A)</bold> Percentage of SBSs, deletions, and insertions. <bold>(B)</bold> Number of mutations in each mutant line. <bold>(C)</bold> Ts/Tv value in each mutant. <bold>(D)</bold> Proportion of various types of SBSs. <bold>(E)</bold> Size distribution of InDels. <bold>(F)</bold> Proportion of homozygous and heterozygous mutations in M<sub>4</sub> generation. <bold>(G)</bold> Zygosity of each mutant. <bold>(H)</bold> Total number of affected genes in each mutant. <bold>(I)</bold>&#xa0;Highly and moderately impacted genes in each mutant. <bold>(J)</bold> Circos diagrams of mutations in M<sub>4</sub>. From the outer track to the inner track: the 12 chromosomes of rice represented on a megabase scale with the candidate genes on them, gene density on 100-kb windows of reference genome KitaakeX, and distribution of mutations on each chromosome in 11 mutants. The color bar represents gene density within a 100-kb chromosome region, with red indicating an increase in gene density and the highest point representing 27 genes/100-kb. Blue represents a decrease in gene density, with the lowest point representing zero genes/100-kb. The colors of the candidate genes, A25, A28, A96 and A66 for the mutants were highlighted with the colors being purple, green, red, and blue respectively. The candidate genes for the other mutants were displayed in black.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-14-1213807-g006.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>Like the M<sub>2</sub> generation, M<sub>4</sub> mutants did not show a special pattern in the distribution of mutations (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f6"><bold>Figure&#xa0;6J</bold></xref>). The locations of mutations showed that ~70% of mutations (554) were in genic regions and 30% in intergenic regions (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1"><bold>Supplementary Figure 1</bold></xref>). In total, 796 mutations affected 554 genes, including 14 highly affected, 29 moderately affected, 12 lightly affected and 499 unaffected genes. Each mutant contains 41 &#x2013; 67 affected genes (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f6"><bold>Figures&#xa0;6H, I</bold></xref>; <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="ST14"><bold>Supplementary Table 14</bold></xref>). As these 11 M<sub>4</sub> lines were phenotypically stable, we only regarded homozygous mutations that highly or moderately impacted genes as candidate genes. Therefore, we selected 27 candidate genes for the 11 mutants, with an average of 2.46 candidates per line (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f6"><bold>Figures&#xa0;6I, J</bold></xref>; <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="ST14"><bold>Supplementary Table 14</bold></xref>). Their gene functions were revealed by searching the Kitaake eggNOG-mapper library and Rice Genome Annotation Project (<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://rice.uga.edu/analyses_search_locus.shtml">http://rice.uga.edu/analyses_search_locus.shtml</ext-link>). For example, we selected two candidate genes, <italic>OsKitaake02g378200</italic> (<italic>LOC_Os02g56610</italic>) and <italic>OsKitaake08g144100</italic> (<italic>LOC_Os08g30810</italic>) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f6"><bold>Figure&#xa0;6J</bold></xref>; <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="ST14"><bold>Supplementary Table 14</bold></xref>), for A66 which is a mutant showing beak-shaped grains or triangular glumes (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1"><bold>Supplementary Figure 6C</bold></xref>). Previous studies have shown that <italic>OsKitaake02g378200</italic> (<italic>LOC_Os02g56610</italic>) encodes a DUF640 domain protein, which controls the development of rice lemma and palea. Mutations in this gene caused beak-shaped grains or triangular glumes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Li et&#xa0;al., 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">Ma et&#xa0;al., 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B42">Wei et&#xa0;al., 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B46">Yan et&#xa0;al., 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">Ren et&#xa0;al., 2016</xref>), which is very similar to A66 phenotypes. The other candidate gene <italic>OsKitaake08g144100</italic> (<italic>LOC_Os08g30810</italic>) encoding a puromycin-sensitive aminopeptidase had no available phenotypes. Therefore, we attribute the phenotype of A66 to <italic>OsKitaake02g378200</italic> (<italic>LOC_Os02g56610</italic>) on chromosome 2 with a G deletion at position 35911065, causing a frameshift. The candidate genes and description of functions for other mutants are listed in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f6"><bold>Figure&#xa0;6J</bold></xref> and <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="ST14"><bold>Supplementary Table 14</bold></xref>.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s4" sec-type="discussion">
<label>4</label>
<title>Discussion</title>
<sec id="s4_1">
<label>4.1</label>
<title>Systematical analysis of the effects of different CIB doses on growth phenotypes in M<sub>1</sub> rice to identify an optimal dosage</title>
<p>Previous studies on the biological effects in M<sub>1</sub> generation induced by HIB irradiation were mostly partial. For example, the irradiation dose used and the measured indicators mostly only included survival rate and seed setting rate (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Hase et&#xa0;al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B50">Zheng et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>), which may lead to inaccurate selection of optimal irradiation doses. Here, we systematically investigated the biological effects induced by a wide range of dosage (10-CIB-dose) for the whole life cycle of M<sub>1</sub> generation, including growth, development, and photosynthetic indicators. Therefore, we greatly supplemented and improved the approach to more completely examine the biological effects induced by different CIB doses in rice. Based on the growth, development and photosynthetic observations on M<sub>1</sub> generation, we conclude that the upper limit of CIB doses to induce mutations for breeding Kitaake rice is ~125 Gy (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1"><bold>Figures&#xa0;1A&#x2013;P</bold></xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s4_2">
<label>4.2</label>
<title>Quantity and types of mutations induced by different doses of CIB in M<sub>2</sub> generation</title>
<p>The M<sub>2</sub> individuals treated with six CIB doses (25 &#x2013; 150 Gy) were further used to study the types of genomic mutations. Here, we randomly selected a large number of M<sub>2</sub> samples (176 in total, about 30 for each dose group) rather than a small number of samples with observable phenotypes in higher generations (M<sub>3</sub> - M<sub>6</sub>) as used in most previous studies (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">Du et&#xa0;al., 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Li et&#xa0;al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B47">Yang et&#xa0;al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B50">Zheng et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>), which were obviously biased. Therefore, our research on the mutagenic characteristics of CIB should obtain more accurate numbers. Only SBSs and InDels induced by CIB with different doses were investigated here because of two reasons. First, previous studies have shown that HIB with low LET mainly induces SBSs and small InDels (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">Kazama et&#xa0;al., 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">Kazama et&#xa0;al., 2017</xref>). Second, due to the limitation in the short read length (2&#xd7;150 bp) of the next generation sequencing (NGS), the false positive rate of structural variation (SV) detection is quite high. We found that, in the M<sub>2</sub> generation, SBSs were the most abundant type of genomic variations for each dose of CIB, accounting for more than 70%, and InDels accounted for less than 30% (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2"><bold>Figure&#xa0;2B</bold></xref>). The number of mutations increased gradually from 25 to 100 Gy CIB, but remained steady from 100 to 150 Gy, showing a peak value at 100 Gy (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2"><bold>Figure&#xa0;2C</bold></xref>; <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="ST4"><bold>Supplementary Tables 4</bold></xref>, <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1"><bold>5</bold></xref>). Meanwhile, 100 Gy CIB treatment affected the highest number of genes at 74 genes per plant (with 6.4 highly or moderately affected), but still far less genes than other mutagenic methods, such as EMS (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">Thompson et&#xa0;al., 2013</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s4_3">
<label>4.3</label>
<title>The optimal CIB dose range for construction of mutant populations and breeding of rice</title>
<p>Consequently, based on the biological effects of different CIB doses on M<sub>1</sub> plants, the WGS results of M<sub>2</sub> lines, and the field results of M<sub>2</sub> generation from eight CIB doses, we conclude that the optimal dosage for rice mutagenesis by CIB is 75 &#x2013; 100 Gy, which causes 75 &#x2013; 100% Dq or 67 &#x2013; 90% LD<sub>50</sub>. At this dose range, the M<sub>1</sub> population has relatively low damages, retaining normal growth, development, and photosynthetic physiology, with a moderate survival rate and fertility (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1"><bold>Figures&#xa0;1A&#x2013;P</bold></xref>). With this dosage, more genomic mutations were generated in the M<sub>2</sub> generation (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2"><bold>Figures&#xa0;2A&#x2013;C</bold></xref>), and more mutant lines can be screened in the field, leading to a higher rate of phenotypic variations. As the response to CIB may vary with genetic backgrounds (varieties), the CIB dose-setting can be to be adjusted within a range for different rice varieties or even different crops in practical application.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s4_4">
<label>4.4</label>
<title>Differences of mutation characteristics in different genetic generations of rice</title>
<p>We selected 11 M<sub>4</sub> stable mutants to explore their mutation characteristics. We found that there were some differences in mutation characteristics between M<sub>2</sub> and M<sub>4</sub> samples. For example, the proportions of SBSs (75.6%) and insertions (5.5%) in M<sub>4</sub> (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2"><bold>Figures&#xa0;2B</bold></xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f6"><bold>6A</bold></xref>) was lower than in M<sub>2</sub> (23.16%) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2"><bold>Figures&#xa0;2B</bold></xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f6"><bold>6A</bold></xref>). Deletions accounted for about 77.7% of InDels in M<sub>4</sub> generation (84.88% M<sub>2</sub>); the ratio of 1 bp to 2-10 bp to &gt;10 bp at 5: 5.54: 1 in M<sub>4</sub> was significantly different from the 15: 9: 1 ratio in M<sub>2</sub>, but the 1 bp to 2-10 bp insertion ratio of 3:1 in M<sub>4</sub> was not significantly different from the 2.73: 1 ratio in M<sub>2</sub> (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3"><bold>Figures&#xa0;3B</bold></xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f6"><bold>6E</bold></xref>).</p>
<p>The Ts/Tv in each M<sub>4</sub> line fluctuated widely, ranging from 1.1 to 4.1 with an average of 1.88, while the M<sub>2</sub> Ts/Tv rates were between 1.17 and 1.50, with an average of 1.28 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3"><bold>Figures&#xa0;3A</bold></xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f6"><bold>6C, D</bold></xref>). Therefore, deviations may occur using higher-generation populations and a small number of mutants to evaluate Ts and Tv. Another obvious difference is that the proportion of homozygous mutations of the 11 M<sub>4</sub> mutants was significantly higher, with the homozygous/heterozygous ratio falling between 1 and 5 and averaging at 2.51. However, this proportion in the M<sub>2</sub> generation only showed an average of 0.429 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2"><bold>Figures&#xa0;2E</bold></xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f6"><bold>6F</bold></xref>). The average mutation frequency of the M<sub>4</sub> mutants (1.83 &#xd7; 10<sup>-7</sup>/bp) was similar to that of the M<sub>2</sub> mutants, indicating that most of the induced SBSs and small InDels were heritable (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2"><bold>Figure&#xa0;2D</bold></xref>). The locations of mutations in the genome in M<sub>4</sub> and M<sub>2</sub> generations were not significantly different (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2"><bold>Figures&#xa0;2A</bold></xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f6"><bold>&#xa0;6J</bold></xref>). Therefore, the spectrum of genomic variations is related to the selected generations.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s4_5">
<label>4.5</label>
<title>Comparison of genomic variations induced by CIB and other mutagens</title>
<p>Various physical and chemical mutagens have been applied to mutational breeding. Mutation characteristics induced by different mutagens are distinct. For instance, EMS, the most widely used chemical mutagen, mainly induces point mutations evenly distributed in the genome. The mutation frequency induced by EMS is profoundly high (~1.18&#xd7;10<sup>-6</sup>/bp), with G:C to A:T change being the most abundant mutation accounting for ~88% (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">Thompson et&#xa0;al., 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Henry et&#xa0;al., 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">Li et&#xa0;al., 2017</xref>). Although SBSs were also the most abundant mutation type induced by CIB, it was not evenly distributed in the genome in our case (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2"><bold>Figure&#xa0;2A</bold></xref>). CIB can also induce multiple-base mutations, such as small InDels (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2"><bold>Figures&#xa0;2B</bold></xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3"><bold>3B</bold></xref>). InDels are more likely to induce nonsense and frameshift mutations. In this study, about 87% of highly affected genes in M<sub>2</sub> are caused by small InDels (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3"><bold>Figure&#xa0;3C</bold></xref>; <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="ST6"><bold>Supplementary Table 6</bold></xref>). Although G:C to A:T changes were the most abundant SBSs induced by CIB, its  proportion was less than 40% (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3"><bold>Figure&#xa0;3A</bold></xref>). Hence, the SBS variations induced by CIB were less biased, and more types of amino acid changes were induced (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3"><bold>Figure&#xa0;3D</bold></xref>; <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1"><bold>Supplementary Figure 4</bold></xref>).</p>
<p>The fact that the number of affected genes in each line was less (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2"><bold>Figures&#xa0;2F</bold></xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f6"><bold>6H, I</bold></xref>) can be another advantage for CIB because this means only a small segregating population is needed to determine the causative mutation derived from CIB irradiation. &#x3b3;-rays, the most widely used physical mutagen, mainly induces SBSs and small InDels, with SBSs accounting for ~70% in M<sub>3</sub> - M<sub>6</sub> generation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Li et&#xa0;al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B47">Yang et&#xa0;al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">Du et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>). Like CIB, the mutations induced by &#x3b3;-rays are unevenly distributed in the genome and mainly occur in the intergenic, upstream, and downstream regions of the genome (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B47">Yang et&#xa0;al., 2019</xref>). The difference is that CIB can induce more InDels than &#x3b3;-rays, especially InDels &gt;5 bp and larger fragments. Larger InDels may cause more highly affected genes leading to more phenotypic variations (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3"><bold>Figure&#xa0;3B</bold></xref>) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B47">Yang et&#xa0;al., 2019</xref>). Moreover, for heavy ions, different ion types have different LET, and the ion beam irradiation with higher LET, such as argon ion, is more likely to induce larger InDels and SVs. Therefore, the ion type can be selected according to the purpose of mutagenesis (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">Kazama et&#xa0;al., 2017</xref>). SBSs and small InDels induced by FN, which is another high-LET physical mutagen, are significantly different from those induced by CIB. For example, although SBSs were also the main type induced by FN in the M<sub>2</sub>-M<sub>3</sub> generations of rice, its proportion (48%) was significantly lower than by CIB (&gt; 70%), and the proportion of InDels induced by FN (40%) was significantly higher than that by CIB (average 27.5%, in this study). Therefore, researchers can select appropriate mutagens according to their purposes.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s4_6">
<label>4.6</label>
<title>CIB enriches genetic resources for rice functional genomics research</title>
<p>In this study, we studied the phenotypes of 11 M<sub>4</sub> stable mutants in detail and predicted their causal genes based on WGS (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f5"><bold>Figure&#xa0;5</bold></xref>, <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1"><bold>Supplementary Figures 5</bold></xref>, <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1"><bold>6</bold></xref>; <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="ST14"><bold>Supplementary Table 14</bold></xref>). Since these mutant traits are stable in M<sub>2</sub> - M<sub>3</sub> generations, we reason that their mutant phenotypes might be controlled by homozygous mutations in single genes. <italic>OsKitaake02g378200</italic> (<italic>LOC_Os02g56610</italic>) and <italic>OsKitaake08g144100</italic> (<italic>LOC_Os08g30810</italic>) are predicted as the candidate genes for A66 which displays beak-shaped grains/triangular hulls (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1"><bold>Supplementary Figure 6C</bold></xref>; <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="ST14"><bold>Supplementary Table 14</bold></xref>). Previous studies have reported that <italic>OsKitaake02g378200</italic> (<italic>LOC_Os02g56610</italic>) mutation caused a similar phenotype (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Li et&#xa0;al., 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">Ma et&#xa0;al., 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B42">Wei et&#xa0;al., 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B46">Yan et&#xa0;al., 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">Ren et&#xa0;al., 2016</xref>). Therefore, we attribute the phenotypic change of A66 to the G deletion at position 35911065 on chromosome 2 resulting in a frameshift in <italic>OsKitaake02g378200</italic> (<italic>LOC_Os02g56610</italic>). This also demonstrates that our prediction method is feasible. Of particular interest is A28, a mutant with good yield traits including taller plants, longer panicles, larger grains, that has two predicted candidates, <italic>OsKitaake06g252400</italic> (<italic>LOC_Os06g46400</italic>) and <italic>OsKitaake11g149500</italic>(<italic>LOC_Os11g32270</italic>) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f5"><bold>Figure&#xa0;5B</bold></xref>; <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="ST14"><bold>Supplementary Table 14</bold></xref>). We found that <italic>OsKitaake06g252400</italic> is highly expressed in shoots, pistil, anther, embryo of 25-DAP (days after pollination), and panicles (with Fragments Per Kilobase of exon model per Million mapped fragments (FPKM) &gt; 5.5), while <italic>OsKitaake11g149500</italic> is not expressed in shoots (See <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://rice.uga.edu/cgi-bin/ORF_infopage.cgi">http://rice.uga.edu/cgi-bin/ORF_infopage.cgi</ext-link> for detail). Therefore, we reason that <italic>OsKitaake06g252400</italic> is the more likely gene that causes the A28 mutant phenotype. A25 and A96 also carry improved yields, and their causal genes can be further studied focusing on the predicted candidate genes (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f5"><bold>Figures&#xa0;5A, C</bold></xref>; <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="ST14"><bold>Supplementary Table 14</bold></xref>).</p>
<p>In this study, we identified 27 candidate genes in 11 mutants (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="ST14"><bold>Supplementary Table 14</bold></xref>). We searched the functions of these genes in the Kitaake eggNOG-mapper library and Rice Genome Annotation Project (<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://rice.uga.edu/analyses_search_locus.shtml">http://rice.uga.edu/analyses_search_locus.shtml</ext-link>), but the functions of six remain unknown: <italic>OsKitaake03g360700</italic> (<italic>LOC_Os03g56724</italic>) of A8 (a mutant of longer panicles with less panicles and smaller grains, <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1"><bold>Supplementary Figure 6C</bold></xref>), <italic>OsKitaake01g001400</italic>(<italic>LOC_Os01g01170</italic>), <italic>sKitaake01g343150</italic> and <italic>OsKitaake05g245200</italic> (<italic>LOC_Os05g46440</italic>) of A18 (a dwarf mutant with low seed setting rate, <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1"><bold>Supplementary Figure 5V</bold></xref>), <italic>OsKitaake01g343150</italic> and <italic>OsKitaake05g245200</italic> (<italic>LOC_Os05g46440</italic>) of A96 (a mutant of taller plants, larger panicles, and larger grains, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f5"><bold>Figure&#xa0;5C</bold></xref>), and <italic>OsKitaake12g170400</italic>(<italic>LOC_Os12g36270</italic>)of A50 (a dwarf mutant with smaller panicles and shorter grains, <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1"><bold>Supplementary Figure 6B</bold></xref>). These genes are good candidates for further functional analysis. In conclusion, our research provides valuable new genetic resources for rice breeding.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s4_7">
<label>4.7</label>
<title>CIB has a great mutagenic potential</title>
<p>In this study, we screened various rice materials with visible phenotypes in M<sub>2</sub> generation, including variations in plant height, grains, panicles, fertility, stem and leaf, which showed a broad spectrum of phenotypic mutations induced by CIB. In M<sub>3</sub> generation, many (49.6%) lines show stable inheritance, which further demonstrates that a relative short period is needed to stabilize these mutations for breeding. There were about 70% heterozygous mutations in the M<sub>2</sub> generation (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2"><bold>Figure&#xa0;2E</bold></xref>). These heterozygous sites may be further separated to produce new phenotypic mutants in the offspring. The mutants obtained in this study enrich germplasm resources for Kitaake and for rice breeding, especially, the mutants with enhanced yield traits can be directly used in breeding practice. These phenotypic mutants can also be used to explore specific genes or alleles controlling special phenotypes by forward genetics or reverse genetics (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">Li et&#xa0;al., 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">Sun et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>).</p>
<p>Previous research proposed a hypothesis that different panicles may originate from different progenitor cells (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B50">Zheng et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>). However, it has not been verified at the molecular level. In this study, we re-sequenced plants from three different panicles derived from a single M<sub>1</sub> plant and validated this hypothesis. Moreover, our WGS results showed that the proportion of mutations shared by different panicles from the same plant was relatively low (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f4"><bold>Figure&#xa0;4</bold></xref>). Therefore, different panicles of M<sub>1</sub> may be separately collected and treated as lines of independent mutational origins, which would greatly increase the number of mutants in the population. In addition, we only screened for visually observable mutants in this study, but there are many other mutants, such as low cadmium absorption, disease resistance, salt and alkaline tolerance, higher grain quality, that would be very useful to researchers and breeders.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s5" sec-type="conclusion">
<label>5</label>
<title>Conclusion</title>
<p>This study comprehensively studied the mutagenic effects of different CIB doses in continuous multi-generations (M<sub>1</sub> - M<sub>4</sub>) of Kitaake. We assessed the biological effects induced by different doses of CIB in M<sub>1</sub> generation and the types of genomic variations induced by different doses of CIB in M<sub>2</sub> generation. An M<sub>2</sub> population induced by different CIB doses was constructed that contains a large number of valuable mutants. We estimated the optimal CIB dose range to be 75 &#x2013; 100 Gy (75 &#x2013; 100% Dq or 67 &#x2013; 90% LD<sub>50</sub>) for Kitaake (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f7"><bold>Figure&#xa0;7</bold></xref>). In the M<sub>4</sub> generation, the mutation types of stable phenotypic mutants were studied, and candidate genes for many mutants were predicted. The comparison between unselected M<sub>2</sub> and M<sub>4</sub> mutants revealed differences of mutations carried in different generations. Meanwhile, great mutagenic potential of HIB was also revealed: mutants from different panicles of a single M<sub>1</sub> plant can be screened separately, and the induced heterozygous mutations can be screened in higher generations. We also obtained three high-yield mutant lines which can be used for rice breeding and genetic analysis of these agronomic traits.</p>
<fig id="f7" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;7</label>
<caption>
<p>Overview of the mutagenic effects of different CIB doses on successive multi-generations of rice. First, after the Kitaake M<sub>0</sub> seeds were irradiated by ten CIB doses (25 &#x2013; 300 Gy), the biological effects of different doses in the whole life cycle of M<sub>1</sub> generation were systematically studied. Second, each single panicle (M<sub>2</sub> seeds) of the same plant was separately harvested at the mature stage. Furthermore, the genomic variations in M<sub>2</sub> plants and mutations unique to a single panicle or shared by different panicles of the same M<sub>1</sub> plant induced by six CIB doses (25 &#x2013; 150 Gy) were studied. Third, we also constructed M<sub>2</sub> mutant populations from eight CIB doses (25 &#x2013; 200 Gy). By examining the biological effects in M<sub>1</sub> generation induced by ten CIB doses, the mutation characteristics in M<sub>2</sub> generation induced by six CIB doses, and the M<sub>2</sub> phenotypic mutation rates induced by eight CIB doses, we conclude that the optimal dosage should cause 75 &#x2013; 100% Dq or 67 &#x2013; 90% LD<sub>50</sub>. In addition, we selected a variety of phenotypic mutants in the M<sub>2</sub> mutant population and verified the isolated mutants in M<sub>3</sub> - M<sub>4</sub> generations. Finally, we selected 11 M<sub>4</sub> phenotypic mutants to study their mutation characteristics and candidate genes.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-14-1213807-g007.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="s6" sec-type="data-availability">
<title>Data availability statement</title>
<p>The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found below: <uri xlink:href="https://ngdc.cncb.ac.cn/search/?dbId=&amp;q=CRA010864">https://ngdc.cncb.ac.cn/search/?dbId=&amp;q=CRA010864</uri>, CRA010864.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s7" sec-type="author-contributions">
<title>Author contributions</title>
<p>LZ, WR, YD and LL designed the experiments. WR, HW, YD, YL, ZF, GK, CX, XC, XL and CY carried out the experiments. LY and WJ performed the sample irradiation. HW, XZ, FY and JL carried out rice field planting. WR wrote the manuscript. YD, YL, LL, QS, TG, HG, JM and WL revised the manuscript. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<sec id="s8" sec-type="funding-information">
<title>Funding</title>
<p>This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program (2022YFD1200705), Youth Innovation Promotion Association of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Y201974), Key Research and Development Project of Guangdong Province (2022B0202060006), Crop Varietal Improvement and Insect Pests Control by Nuclear Radiation, National Natural Science Foundation of China (11975285, 12135016) and Department of Science and Technology of Sichuan Province (2022JDTD0023). The Open Research Fund of State Key Laboratory of Crop Gene Exploration and Utilization in Southwest China (SKL-ZY202209).</p>
</sec>
<ack>
<title>Acknowledgments</title>
<p>We thank Mr. Huai-an Gu (Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences) for his daily management of rice and Mr. Yun-peng Ji (Sichuan Agricultural University) for rice fielding.</p>
</ack>
<sec id="s9" sec-type="COI-statement">
<title>Conflict of interest</title>
<p>The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s10" sec-type="disclaimer">
<title>Publisher&#x2019;s note</title>
<p>All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s11" sec-type="supplementary-material">
<title>Supplementary material</title>
<p>The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2023.1213807/full#supplementary-material">https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2023.1213807/full#supplementary-material</ext-link>
</p>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="DataSheet_1.docx" id="SM1" mimetype="application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document"/>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Table_1.xlsx" id="ST1" mimetype="application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet"/>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Table_2.xlsx" id="ST2" mimetype="application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet"/>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Table_3.xlsx" id="ST3" mimetype="application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet"/>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Table_4.xlsx" id="ST4" mimetype="application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet"/>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Table_5.xlsx" id="ST5" mimetype="application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet"/>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Table_6.xlsx" id="ST6" mimetype="application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet"/>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Table_7.xlsx" id="ST7" mimetype="application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet"/>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Table_8.xlsx" id="ST8" mimetype="application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet"/>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Table_9.xlsx" id="ST9" mimetype="application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet"/>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Table_10.xlsx" id="ST10" mimetype="application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet"/>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Table_11.xlsx" id="ST11" mimetype="application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet"/>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Table_12.xlsx" id="ST12" mimetype="application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet"/>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Table_13.xlsx" id="ST13" mimetype="application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet"/>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Table_14.xlsx" id="ST14" mimetype="application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet"/>
</sec>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="B1">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Abe</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Matsuyama</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sekido</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yamaguchi</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yoshida</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kameya</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2002</year>). <article-title>Chlorophyll-deficient mutants of rice demonstrated the deletion of a DNA fragment by heavy-ion irradiation</article-title>. <source>J. Radiat. Res.</source> <volume>43 Suppl</volume>, <fpage>S157</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>S161</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1269/jrr.43.s157</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ashburner</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ball</surname> <given-names>C. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Blake</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Botstein</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Butler</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cherry</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2000</year>). <article-title>Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology</article-title>. <source>Gene Ontol. Consortium. Nat. Genet.</source> <volume>25</volume>, <fpage>25</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>29</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/75556</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Thomas</surname> <given-names>H. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Frank</surname> <given-names>M. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>He</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>TBtools: an integrative toolkit developed for interactive analyses of big biological data</article-title>. <source>Mol. Plant</source> <volume>13</volume> (<issue>8</issue>), <fpage>1194</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1202</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.molp.2020.06.009</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Cingolani</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Platts</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang le</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Coon</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Nguyen</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>A program for annotating and predicting the effects of single nucleotide polymorphisms, SnpEff: SNPs in the genome of drosophila melanogaster strain w1118; iso-2; iso-3</article-title>. <source>Fly. (Austin).</source> <volume>6</volume> (<issue>2</issue>), <fpage>80</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>92</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4161/fly.19695</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Du</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Luo</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cui</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Identification of substitutions and small insertion-deletions induced by carbon-ion beam irradiation in <italic>Arabidopsis thaliana</italic>
</article-title>. <source>Front. Plant Sci.</source> <volume>8</volume>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpls.2017.01851</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Du</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Luo</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yu</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cui</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Strategies for identification of mutations induced by carbon-ion beam irradiation in <italic>Arabidopsis thaliana</italic> by whole genome re-sequencing</article-title>. <source>Mutat. Res.</source> <volume>807</volume>, <fpage>21</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>30</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2017.12.001</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Du</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Luo</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Feng</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ren</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Genome and transcriptome-based characterization of high energy carbon-ion beam irradiation induced delayed flower senescence mutant in <italic>Lotus japonicus</italic>
</article-title>. <source>BMC Plant Biol.</source> <volume>21</volume> (<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>510</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s12870-021-03283-0</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Gross</surname> <given-names>B. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Archaeological and genetic insights into the origins of domesticated rice</article-title>. <source>Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.</source> <volume>111</volume> (<issue>17</issue>), <fpage>6190</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>6197</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1073/pnas.1308942110</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Hase</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Okamura</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Takeshita</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Narumi</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tanaka</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Efficient induction of flower-color mutants by ion beam irradiation in petunia seedlings treated with high sucrose concentration</article-title>. <source>Plant Biotechnol.</source> <volume>27</volume> (<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>99</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>103</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5511/plantbiotechnology.27.99</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Hase</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Satoh</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kitamura</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Oono</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Physiological status of plant tissue affects the frequency and types of mutations induced by carbon-ion irradiation in arabidopsis</article-title>. <source>Sci. Rep.</source> <volume>8</volume> (<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>1394</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41598-018-19278-1</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Henry</surname> <given-names>I. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Nagalakshmi</surname> <given-names>U.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lieberman</surname> <given-names>M. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ngo</surname> <given-names>K. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Krasileva</surname> <given-names>K. V.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Vasquez-Gross</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Efficient genome-wide detection and cataloging of EMS-induced mutations using exome capture and next-generation sequencing</article-title>. <source>Plant Cell.</source> <volume>26</volume>, <fpage>1382</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1397</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1105/tpc.113.121590</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Hirano</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kazama</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ishii</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ohbu</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Shirakawa</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Abe</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Comprehensive identification of mutations induced by heavy-ion beam irradiation in <italic>Arabidopsis thaliana</italic>
</article-title>. <source>Plant J.</source> <volume>82</volume> (<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>93</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>104</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/tpj.12793</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ichida</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Morita</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Shirakawa</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hayashi</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Abe</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Targeted exome sequencing of unselected heavy-ion beam-irradiated populations reveals less-biased mutation characteristics in the rice genome</article-title>. <source>Plant J.</source> <volume>98</volume> (<issue>2</issue>), <fpage>301</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>314</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/tpj.14213</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ishikawa</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ishimaru</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Igura</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kuramata</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Abe</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Senoura</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Ion-beam irradiation, gene identification, and marker-assisted breeding in the development of low-cadmium rice</article-title>. <source>Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.</source> <volume>109</volume> (<issue>47</issue>), <fpage>19166</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>19171</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1073/pnas.1211132109</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Jain</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jenkins</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Shu</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chern</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Martin</surname> <given-names>J. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Copetti</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Genome sequence of the model rice variety KitaakeX</article-title>. <source>BMC Genomics</source> <volume>20</volume> (<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>905</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.21203/rs.2.10528/v3</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Jiang</surname> <given-names>L. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>G. T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chern</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jain</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pham</surname> <given-names>N. T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Martin</surname> <given-names>J. A.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Whole-genome sequencing identifies a rice grain shape mutant, <italic>gs9-1</italic>
</article-title>. <source>Rice</source> <volume>12</volume>, <elocation-id>11</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s12284-019-0308-8</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kazama</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hirano</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Nishihara</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ohbu</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Shirakawa</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Abe</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Effect of high-LET fe-ion beam irradiation on mutation induction in <italic>Arabidopsis thaliana</italic>
</article-title>. <source>Genes &amp; Genet. Syst.</source> <volume>88</volume> (<issue>3</issue>), <fpage>189</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>197</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1266/ggs.88.189</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B18">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kazama</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ishii</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hirano</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wakana</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yamada</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ohbu</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Different mutational function of low- and high-linear energy transfer heavy-ion irradiation demonstrated by whole-genome resequencing of arabidopsis mutants</article-title>. <source>Plant J.</source> <volume>92</volume> (<issue>6</issue>), <fpage>1020</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1030</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/tpj.13738</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B19">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kim</surname> <given-names>S. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Choi</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jung</surname> <given-names>K.-H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>An</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Analysis of the early-flowering mechanisms and generation of T-DNA tagging lines in kitaake, a model rice cultivar</article-title>. <source>J. Exp. Bot.</source> <volume>64</volume> (<issue>14</issue>), <fpage>4169</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>4182</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/jxb/ert226</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B20">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kitamura</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Shikazono</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tanaka</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2004</year>). <article-title>TRANSPARENT TESTA 19 is involved in the accumulation of both anthocyanins and proanthocyanidins in arabidopsis</article-title>. <source>Plant J.</source> <volume>37</volume> (<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>104</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>114</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1046/j.1365-313x.2003.01943.x</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B21">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chern</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jain</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Martin</surname> <given-names>J. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Schackwitz</surname> <given-names>W. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jiang</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Genome-wide sequencing of 41 rice (Oryza sativa l.) mutated lines reveals diverse mutations induced by fast-neutron irradiation</article-title>. <source>Mol. Plant</source> <volume>9</volume> (<issue>7</issue>), <fpage>1078</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1081</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.molp.2016.03.009</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B22">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Durbin</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>Fast and accurate short read alignment with burrows&#x2013;wheeler transform</article-title>. <source>Bioinformatics</source> <volume>25</volume> (<issue>14</issue>), <fpage>1754</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1760</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/BIOINFORMATICS/BTP324</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B23">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Handsaker</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wysoker</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fennell</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ruan</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Homer</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>The sequence alignment/map format and SAMtools</article-title>. <source>Bioinformatics</source> <volume>25</volume> (<issue>16</issue>), <fpage>2078</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2079</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/bioinformatics/btp352</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B24">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jain</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chern</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pham</surname> <given-names>N. T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Martin</surname> <given-names>J. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wei</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>The sequences of 1,504 mutants in the model rice variety kitaake facilitate rapid functional genomic studies</article-title>. <source>Plant Cell.</source> <volume>29</volume> (<issue>6</issue>), <fpage>1218</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1231</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1105/tpc.17.00154</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B25">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Shimizu</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Nishio</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tsutsumi</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kato</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Comparison and characterization of mutations induced by gamma-ray and carbon-ion irradiation in rice (<italic>Oryza sativa</italic> l.) using whole-genome resequencing</article-title>. <source>G3 Genes|Genomes|Genetics.</source> <volume>9</volume> (<issue>11</issue>), <fpage>g3.400555.402019</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11032-019-0941-3</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B26">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sun</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tan</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhu</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fu</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2012</year>). <article-title><italic>TH1</italic>, a DUF640 domain-like gene controls lemma and palea development in rice</article-title>. <source>Plant Mol. Biol.</source> <volume>78</volume> (<issue>4-5</issue>), <fpage>351</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>359</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11103-011-9868-8</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B27">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Qu</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lu</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yu</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Relationship between plant growth and cytological effect in root apical meristem after exposure of wheat dry seeds to carbon ion beams</article-title>. <source>Nucl. Instruments. Methods Phys. Res. Section. B.: Beam. Interact. Mater. Atoms.</source> <volume>305</volume>, <fpage>9</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>15</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.nimb.2013.04.046</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B28">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>He</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kang</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>A gene cluster encoding lectin receptor kinases confers broad-spectrum and durable insect resistance in rice</article-title>. <source>Nat. Biotechnol.</source> <volume>33</volume> (<issue>3</issue>), <fpage>301</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>305</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nbt.3069</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B29">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ma</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cheng</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jin</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2012</year>). <article-title><italic>BEAK LIKE SPIKELET1</italic> is required for lateral development of lemma and palea in rice</article-title>. <source>Plant Mol. Biol. Reporter.</source> <volume>31</volume> (<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>98</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>108</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11105-012-0480-0</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B30">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Magori</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Oka-Kira</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Shibata</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Umehara</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kouchi</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hase</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>Too much love, a root regulator associated with the long-distance control of nodulation in <italic>Lotus japonicus</italic>
</article-title>. <source>Mol. Plant</source> <volume>22</volume> (<issue>3</issue>), <fpage>259</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>268</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1094/mpmi-22-3-0259</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B31">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Matsumura</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Nomizu</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Furutani</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hayashi</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Minamiyama</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hase</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Ray florets color and shape mutants induced by <sup>12</sup>C<sup>5+</sup> ion beam irradiation in chrysanthemum</article-title>. <source>Sci. Horticult.</source> <volume>123</volume> (<issue>4</issue>), <fpage>558</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>561</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.scienta.2009.11.004</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B32">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Peng</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Luo</surname> <given-names>L. X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cui</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Guo</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>Y. Z.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Characterization and fine mapping of a leaf wilt mutant, <italic>m3</italic>, induced by heavy ion irradiation of rice</article-title>. <source>Crop Sci.</source> <volume>59</volume> (<issue>6</issue>), <fpage>2679</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2688</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2135/cropsci2019.03.0167</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B33">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Porra</surname> <given-names>R. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Thompson</surname> <given-names>W. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kriedemann</surname> <given-names>P. E.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1989</year>). <article-title>Determination of accurate extinction coefficients and simultaneous equations for assaying chlorophylls a and b extracted with four different solvents: verification of the concentration of chlorophyll standards by atomic absorption spectroscopy</article-title>. <source>Biochim. Biophys. Acta (BBA). - Bioenerg.</source> <volume>975</volume> (<issue>3</issue>), <fpage>384</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>394</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S0005-2728(89)80347-0</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B34">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ren</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rao</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xu</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yu</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>The pleiotropic <italic>ABNORMAL FLOWER AND DWARF1</italic> affects plant height, floral development and grain yield in rice</article-title>. <source>J. Integr. Plant Biol.</source> <volume>58</volume> (<issue>6</issue>), <fpage>529</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>539</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/jipb.12441</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B35">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Robinson</surname> <given-names>J. T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Thorvaldsd&#xf3;ttir</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Winckler</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Guttman</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lander</surname> <given-names>E. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Getz</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Integrative genomics viewer</article-title>. <source>Nat. Biotechnol.</source> <volume>29</volume> (<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>24</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>26</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nbt.1754</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B36">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Rodrigues</surname> <given-names>J. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ruan</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Nishimura</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sharma</surname> <given-names>M. K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sharma</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ronald</surname> <given-names>P. C.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Imprinted expression of genes and small RNA is associated with localized hypomethylation of the maternal genome in rice endosperm</article-title>. <source>Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.</source> <volume>110</volume> (<issue>19</issue>), <fpage>7934</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>7939</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1073/pnas.1306164110</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B37">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Sun</surname> <given-names>X. X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lu</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>X. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Construction of a high-density mutant population of Chinese cabbage facilitates the genetic dissection of agronomic traits</article-title>. <source>Mol. Plant</source> <volume>15</volume> (<issue>5</issue>), <fpage>913</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>924</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.molp.2022.02.006</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B38">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Takano</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Takahashi</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yamamoto</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Teranishi</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yamaguchi</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sakamoto</surname> <given-names>A. N.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Isolation of a novel UVB-tolerant rice mutant obtained by exposure to carbon-ion beams</article-title>. <source>J. Radiat. Res.</source> <volume>54</volume> (<issue>4</issue>), <fpage>637</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>648</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/jrr/rrt007</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B39">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Tanaka</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sakamoto</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ishigaki</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Nikaido</surname> <given-names>O.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sun</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hase</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2002</year>). <article-title>An ultraviolet-b-resistant mutant with enhanced DNA repair in arabidopsis</article-title>. <source>Plant Physiol.</source> <volume>129</volume> (<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>64</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>71</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1104/pp.010894</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B40">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Thompson</surname> <given-names>O.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Edgley</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Strasbourger</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Flibotte</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ewing</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Adair</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>The million mutation project: a new approach to genetics in <italic>Caenorhabditis elegans</italic>
</article-title>. <source>Genome Res.</source> <volume>23</volume> (<issue>10</issue>), <fpage>1749</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1762</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1101/gr.157651.113</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B41">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zheng</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Luo</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xu</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Construction of a genomewide RNAi mutant library in rice</article-title>. <source>Plant Biotechnol. J.</source> <volume>11</volume>, <fpage>997</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1005</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/pbi.12093</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B42">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wei</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Shao</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>He</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jiao</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xie</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Fine mapping of <italic>BH1</italic>, a gene controlling lemma and palea development in rice</article-title>. <source>Plant Cell Rep.</source> <volume>32</volume> (<issue>9</issue>), <fpage>1455</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1463</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00299-013-1457-7</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B43">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Xie</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Minkenberg</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Boosting CRISPR/Cas9 multiplex editing capability with the endogenous tRNA-processing system</article-title>. <source>Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.</source> <volume>112</volume> (<issue>11</issue>), <fpage>3570</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>3575</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1073/pnas.1420294112</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B44">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Yamaguchi</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hase</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tanaka</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Shikazono</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Degi</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Shimizu</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2009</year>a). <article-title>Mutagenic effects of ion beam irradiation on rice</article-title>. <source>Breed. Sci.</source> <volume>59</volume>, <fpage>169</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>177</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1270/jsbbs.59.169</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B45">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Yamaguchi</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Shimizu</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hase</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Degi</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tanaka</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Morishita</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2009</year>b). <article-title>Mutation induction with ion beam irradiation of lateral buds of chrysanthemum and analysis of chimeric structure of induced mutants</article-title>. <source>Euphytica</source> <volume>165</volume> (<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>97</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>103</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10681-008-9767-5</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B46">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Yan</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ye</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zeng</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>He</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title><italic>Beak-shaped grain 1</italic>/<italic>TRIANGULAR HULL 1</italic>, a DUF640 gene, is associated with grain shape, size and weight in rice</article-title>. <source>Sci. China. Life Sci.</source> <volume>56</volume>, <fpage>275</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>283</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11427-013-4449-5</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B47">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Luo</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yan</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Du</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Genome-wide comparisons of mutations induced by carbon-ion beam and gamma-rays irradiation in rice <italic>via</italic> resequencing multiple mutants</article-title>. <source>Front. Plant Sci.</source> <volume>10</volume>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpls.2019.01514</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B48">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Yoshitaka</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yoshiya</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mizuho</surname> <given-names>A. N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Naruhiro</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ryoichi</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tatsuaki</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Estimation of RBE values for carbon-ion beams in the wide dose range using multicellular spheroids</article-title>. <source>Radiat. Prot. Dosimetry.</source> <volume>183</volume> (<issue>1-2</issue>), <fpage>45</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>49</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/rpd/ncy269</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B49">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ma</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Evaluation of the Saline&amp;ndash;Alkaline tolerance of rice (<italic>Oryza sativa</italic> l.) mutants induced by heavy-ion beam mutagenesis</article-title>. <source>Biol. (Basel).</source> <volume>11</volume> (<issue>1</issue>), <elocation-id>126</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/biology11010126</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B50">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zheng</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Huang</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fu</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Furusawa</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Mutagenic effect of three ion beams on rice and identification of heritable mutations by whole genome sequencing</article-title>. <source>Plants</source> <volume>9</volume> (<issue>5</issue>), <elocation-id>551</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/plants9050551</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B51">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liao</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chern</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yin</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Loss of function of a rice TPR-domain RNA-binding protein confers broad-spectrum disease resistance</article-title>. <source>Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.</source> <volume>115</volume> (<issue>12</issue>), <fpage>3174</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>3179</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1073/pnas.1705927115</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>
