<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.3 20070202//EN" "journalpublishing.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="2.3" xml:lang="EN">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Front. Plant Sci.</journal-id>
<journal-title>Frontiers in Plant Science</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">Front. Plant Sci.</abbrev-journal-title>
<issn pub-type="epub">1664-462X</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Frontiers Media S.A.</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpls.2023.1200136</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Plant Science</subject>
<subj-group>
<subject>Original Research</subject>
</subj-group>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Microbial interactions and metabolisms in response to bacterial wilt and black shank pathogens in the tobacco rhizosphere</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Tang</surname>
<given-names>Qianjun</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn003">
<sup>&#x2020;</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname>
<given-names>Tianbo</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn003">
<sup>&#x2020;</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Teng</surname>
<given-names>Kai</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Xiao</surname>
<given-names>Zhipeng</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Cai</surname>
<given-names>Hailin</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname>
<given-names>Yunsheng</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/529397"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name>
<surname>Xiao</surname>
<given-names>Yunhua</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3">
<sup>3</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn001">
<sup>*</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/193246"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname>
<given-names>Wu</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn001">
<sup>*</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/906701"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
<institution>College of Plant Protection, Hunan Agricultural University</institution>, <addr-line>Changsha</addr-line>, <country>China</country>
</aff>
<aff id="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
<institution>Laboratory of Plant Protection, Hunan Tobacco Science Institute</institution>, <addr-line>Changsha</addr-line>, <country>China</country>
</aff>
<aff id="aff3">
<sup>3</sup>
<institution>College of Bioscience and Biotechnology, Hunan Agricultural University</institution>, <addr-line>Changsha</addr-line>, <country>China</country>
</aff>
<author-notes>
<fn fn-type="edited-by">
<p>Edited by: Delong Meng, Central South University, China</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="edited-by">
<p>Reviewed by: Anton Hartmann, Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, Germany; Jing Cong, Qingdao University of Science and Technology, China</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="corresp" id="fn001">
<p>*Correspondence: Yunhua Xiao, <email xlink:href="mailto:huazipiaoling.123@163.com">huazipiaoling.123@163.com</email>; Wu Chen, <email xlink:href="mailto:chenwuwarrior@163.com">chenwuwarrior@163.com</email>
</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="equal" id="fn003">
<p>&#x2020;These authors have contributed equally to this work</p>
</fn>
</author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>20</day>
<month>06</month>
<year>2023</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="collection">
<year>2023</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>14</volume>
<elocation-id>1200136</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>04</day>
<month>04</month>
<year>2023</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>31</day>
<month>05</month>
<year>2023</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#xa9; 2023 Tang, Liu, Teng, Xiao, Cai, Wang, Xiao and Chen</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2023</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Tang, Liu, Teng, Xiao, Cai, Wang, Xiao and Chen</copyright-holder>
<license xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">
<p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.</p>
</license>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<sec>
<title>Background</title>
<p>Tobacco bacterial wilt (TBW) and black shank (TBS) are responsible for substantial economic losses worldwide; however, microbial interactions and metabolisms in response to TBW and TBS pathogens in the tobacco rhizosphere remain unclear.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Methods</title>
<p>We explored and compared the response of rhizosphere microbial communities to these two plant diseases with the incidences in moderate and heavy degrees by sequencing of 16S rRNA gene amplicons and bioinformatics analysis.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Results and discussions</title>
<p>We found that the structure of rhizosphere soil bacterial communities was significantly (<italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.05) changed from the incidences of TBW and TBS, which also led to decreased Shannon diversity and Pielou evenness. Compared with the healthy group (CK), the OTUs with significantly (<italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.05) decreased relative abundances were mostly affiliated with Actinobacteria (e.g., <italic>Streptomyces</italic> and <italic>Arthrobacter</italic>) in the diseased groups, and the OTUs with significantly (<italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.05) increased relative abundances were mainly identified as Proteobacteria and Acidobacteria. Also, molecular ecological network analysis showed that the nodes (&lt;467) and links (&lt;641) were decreased in the diseased groups compared with the control group (572; 1056), suggesting that both TBW and TBS weakened bacterial interactions. In addition, the predictive functional analysis indicated that the relative abundance of genes related to the biosynthesis of antibiotics (e.g., ansamycins and streptomycin) was significantly (<italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.05) decreased due to incidences of TBW and TBS, and antimicrobial tests showed that some Actinobacteria strains (e.g., <italic>Streptomyces</italic>) and their secreted antibiotics (e.g., streptomycin) could effectively inhibit the growth of these two pathogens.</p>
</sec>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>bacterial wilt</kwd>
<kwd>black shank</kwd>
<kwd>actinobacteria</kwd>
<kwd>bacterial interaction</kwd>
<kwd>biosynthesis of antibiotics</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<counts>
<fig-count count="7"/>
<table-count count="3"/>
<equation-count count="0"/>
<ref-count count="64"/>
<page-count count="13"/>
<word-count count="5896"/>
</counts>
<custom-meta-wrap>
<custom-meta>
<meta-name>section-in-acceptance</meta-name>
<meta-value>Plant Symbiotic Interactions</meta-value>
</custom-meta>
</custom-meta-wrap>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec id="s1" sec-type="intro">
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>Soil-borne diseases caused by bacteria or fungi often occur in agriculture and bring huge economic losses, and plant resistance mechanisms to plant diseases are complex (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Deverall, 1987</xref>). Many researchers showed that the incidence of plant soil-borne diseases was closely related to plant species and soil environments (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">Kyselkov&#xe1; et&#xa0;al., 2009</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B42">Schreiter et&#xa0;al., 2018</xref>). For plant autoimmune mechanisms, plants can recognize pathogen-associated molecular patterns and pathogen-delivered effectors to stimulate corresponding responses. Plants can strengthen existing defenses, elicit other defense mechanisms (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">G&#xf3;mez-G&#xf3;mez and Boller, 2002</xref>) mediated by secondary signal molecules such as salicylic acid, ethylene, and jasmonic acid, and fine-tune their defense responses (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B54">Wang et&#xa0;al., 2002</xref>).</p>
<p>The soil environment, including biotic (e.g., populations of bacteria and fungi) and abiotic (e.g., soil type and nutrients) factors, is critical to impacting disease incidence (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">Choi et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Gu et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Kim et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">Ren et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B63">Zhang et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>). Microbes in the rhizosphere soil are the first protective screen against plant soil-borne pathogens (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Kwak et&#xa0;al., 2018</xref>), and they can hinder pathogen growth through competent (e.g., nutrient and space) and antagonistic (e.g., antimicrobial peptide and phenolic acid antibacterial agent) actions. Many microbial ecological agents have recently been isolated from rhizosphere soil samples to control plant diseases (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B48">Tan et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B55">Wang et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Kim et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>). For example, <italic>Bacillus</italic> spp., isolated from wheat soil samples, could effectively reduce the growth of <italic>Fusarium graminearum</italic> strains causing fusarium head blight (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B47">Stumbriene et&#xa0;al., 2018</xref>), and <italic>Flavobacterium</italic> sp. TRM1, isolated from rhizosphere soil, could suppress <italic>Ralstonia solanacearum</italic> disease development (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Kwak et&#xa0;al., 2018</xref>). Therefore, it is necessary to understand rhizosphere soil microbial communities and their associations with plant disease incidence.</p>
<p>Some soil-borne diseases often co-occur, making disease management more difficult. Many methods, e.g., promoting plant immune reaction, optimizing agronomic management, and developing biocontrol agents, were studied to prevent disease incidence. The plant immune system is determined by plant genes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Deverall, 1987</xref>), which need direct and hard genetic manipulation. The disease inhibiting efficiency of optimizing agronomic management is limited. Therefore, more and more researchers have focused on the beneficial rhizosphere soil or endophytic microbes. The anti-pathogen mechanism of microbes is expected to be complex, especially for different pathogens (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">Bacon and White, 2016</xref>). For example, some antibiotics are broad-spectrum antimicrobials, and some are limited (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B60">Yao et&#xa0;al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">Cao et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>). Therefore, high abundances and diverse species of probiotics in the rhizosphere soil may effectively prevent and control multiple diseases. Besides, disease incidence or infection was largely related to indigenous ecological interactions and stability disrupted by pathogens, and in return, close interactions and strong stability of soil microbial communities may be necessary to suppress disease incidences or infections for plants (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">Miliute et&#xa0;al., 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B56">Xiao et&#xa0;al., 2018</xref>).</p>
<p>Tobacco (<italic>Nicotiana tobacum</italic>) is an economically important crop worldwide. Tobacco bacterial wilt (TBW) and tobacco black shank (TBS), respectively caused by the bacterial pathogen <italic>Ralstonia solanacearum</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B62">Yin et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>) and fungal pathogen <italic>Phytophthora nicotianae</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Jin and Shew, 2021</xref>), are two accompanying of the most devastating soil-borne diseases resulting in severe losses in yield and quality of tobacco. Although many previous studies found a difference in rhizosphere microbial diversity after the infection of pathogenic bacteria and pathogenic fungi, few studies were conducted in the same field, crop, and period. In this study, we explored the composition and interactions of rhizosphere soil microbial communities in response to incidences of TBW and TBS in the same field, crop, and period by sequencing of 16S rRNA gene amplicons. Our results indicated that the diseased rhizosphere microbial communities decreased diversity and interactions as well as decreased functional species for the biosynthesis of antibiotics, leading to incidences of both bacterial and fungal diseases, and these plant pathogens could further weaken community functions. This study provides new insights into our understanding of broad-spectrum Actinobacteria and has important implications for controlling TBW and TBS with microbes.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2" sec-type="materials|methods">
<title>Materials and methods</title>
<sec id="s2_1">
<title>Rhizosphere soil sampling</title>
<p>Rhizosphere soil samples were collected from a long-term ecological research site for a tobacco (<italic>N. tabacum</italic> cultivar K326) consecutive monoculture experiment located in Xiangxi, Hunan, China. Soil type of this research site was clayey and climate is humid subtropical monsoon. Fertilizer consisted of 50 kg/mu special basal fertilizer, 20 kg/mu special top dressing, 15 kg/mu bioorganic fertilizer, and 5 kg/mu hole-applied fertilizer. Its N:P:K (N, P<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub>, and K<sub>2</sub>O) was 1:1.2:2.43. Transplanted tobacco was irrigated with 300 kg/mu water and 5 kg/mu hole-applied fertilizer. No pest or disease controls was applied during the whole experiment. <italic>N. tabacum</italic> cultivar K326 was introduced by Northup King Seed Company (America) to Yunnan province (China) in 1985. It was now preserved in the Tobacco Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, where we obtained and used seeds with permission.</p>
<p>At the <italic>N. tabacum</italic> harvesting stage in July 2017, we investigated the disease index of each tobacco plant in an area planted with 100 tobacco plants. The bacterial wilt and black shank disease index of each plant were determined based on the Chinese national standard GB/T 23222-2008, as described by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">Gao et&#xa0;al. (2015)</xref>, ranging from 0 (lowest) to 9 (highest). In this study, moderate infection with a disease index of 1, 3 and 5, and heavy infection with a disease index of 7 and 9.</p>
<p>We designed five groups: the group with no disease (CK), the group moderately infected by TBW (BWM), the group heavily infected by TBW (BWH), the group moderately infected by TBS (BSM), and the group of heavily infected by TBS (BSH). Eight rhizosphere soil samples were collected using a clean spade for each group following <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Kwak et&#xa0;al. (2018)</xref>. The whole roots of each tobacco plant were collected at a soil depth of 0&#x2013;20 cm. The loose soil particles adhering to the roots were shaken off. Afterward, the roots were placed in a 200-mL tube containing 100 mL of phosphate buffered saline buffer, and washed 3 times with shaking at 180 r/min. Finally, the rhizosphere soils were obtained after centrifuged at 10 000 r/min for 10&#xa0;min and removing the supernatant. The rhizosphere soil samples were stored at -80&#xb0;C before DNA extraction.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_2">
<title>DNA extraction, amplification, 16S rRNA gene sequencing and data processing</title>
<p>DNA extraction, amplification, 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing, and data processing followed by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B56">Xiao et&#xa0;al. (2018)</xref>. The rhizosphere soil from each root collection was homogenized, and 1.0&#xa0;g from each sample was used for DNA extraction using a PowerSoil DNA Isolation Kit (MO BIO, San Diego, USA). DNA extracts were purified by electrophoresis on a 0.7% agarose gel using a DNA gel extraction kit (OMEGA, USA). The 16S rRNA gene was amplified with primer pair 515F (5&#x2019;-GTGCCAGCMGCCGCGGTAA-3&#x2019;) and 806R (5&#x2019;-GGACTACHVGGGTWTCTAAT-3&#x2019;), combined with Illumina adapter sequences, a pad and a linker of two bases, and barcodes on the reverse primer. PCR products were purified, and the concentration was quantified with a NanoDrop ND-1000 spectrophotometer (NanoDrop Technologies, Wilmington, USA). The products were sequenced on a MiSeq machine (Illumina, San Diego, CA) using a 500-cycle kit. All 16S rRNA gene sequences were submitted to the Sequence Read Archive (SRA) of NCBI, and the accession number is PRJNA899683.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_3">
<title>Molecular ecological network construction and characterization</title>
<p>Random matrix theory (RMT)-based approaches were used for network construction (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B61">Yin et&#xa0;al., 2015</xref>), hub and connector OTU identification and the topological property were determined with a similar threshold (0.95). OTUs, presented in 8 out of 8 replicates, were used for network analysis to ensure data reliability. Various network properties were characterized, such as average degree, average path distance, average clustering coefficient, and modularity index. The network modules were generated using rapid greedy modularity optimization. The experimental data used for constructing phylogenetic molecular ecological networks (pMENs) were based on 16S rRNA gene sequences, and Gephi 0.9.2 software was used to visualize network graphs. The pMENs were constructed separately based on sequencing data of five treatments to reveal the effects of different disease incidences on the microbial network interactions.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_4">
<title>Functional profiling</title>
<p>Prior to functional gene prediction using PICRUSt (phylogenetic investigation of communities by reconstruction of unobserved states) described by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">Langille et&#xa0;al. (2013)</xref>, the detected OTUs were reclassified using the GREENGENES reference database. Subsequently, PICRUSt uses 16S rRNA genes to infer metagenome gene functional content from phylogenetic information. The predictions are precalculated for genes in databases, including the Kyoto Encyclopaedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG). The input data were first normalized by copy number by dividing each OTU by the known 16S rRNA copy number abundance before metagenome predictions and subsequent collapse into functional pathways. The output of PICRUSt consists of a table of functional gene counts as KEGG orthologs (KOs). The Nearest Sequenced Taxon Index (NSTI) value was used to validate the reliability of predicted metagenomes and functional pathways.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_5">
<title>Species isolation and identification</title>
<p>According to data analysis, Actinobacteria could play a key role in inhibiting <italic>P. nicotianae</italic> and <italic>R. solanacearum</italic> growth. We isolated some Actinobacteria strains from the rhizosphere soil of healthy tobacco plants in the above sampling site using GAUZE&#x2019;s Medium NO.1. <italic>P. nicotianae</italic> HD1 and <italic>R. solanacearum</italic> GMI1000 were obtained originally from diseased <italic>N. tabacum</italic> roots. The single-species antagonism experiments were conducted as the description in our previous study (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">Liu et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>). And the antagonistic isolates were identified following <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Ghodhbane-Gtari et&#xa0;al. (2010)</xref> based on 16S rRNA gene sequences against the NCBI database. The 16S rDNA sequence was amplified by PCR using primers 27F (5-AGAGTTTGATCACTGGCTCAG-3) and 1492R (5-CGGCTTACCTTGTTACGACTT-3).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_6">
<title>Antimicrobial tests of antibiotics</title>
<p>The antimicrobial effect of several antibiotics was tested by the filtering paper method. Antibiotics included streptomycin, tetracycline and novobiocin, which are biosynthesized by Actinobacteria. The pathogens were <italic>P. nicotianae</italic> (incubated in the PDA medium) and bacterial pathogen <italic>R. solanacearum</italic> (incubated in the LB Agar).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_7">
<title>Pot experiments</title>
<p>The effect of antagonistic strain on TBW and TBS was investigated by a pot experiment in the greenhouse. The cultivated tobacco seedlings (5 to 6 true leaves) were transplanted into pots with sterilized soil. Fifteen days after transplantation, the root was rinsed with the bacterial solution of strain 4-9 (1&#xd7;10<sup>8</sup> CFU/mL). The treatment with sterile distilled water replaced bacterial solution was a negative control (CK). Eighteen seedlings of each treatment were repeated 3 times, and 50 mL bacterial solution or sterile distilled water was applied to each plant. 24&#xa0;h after root irrigation, zoospore/bacterial suspensions were inoculated with a concentration of 1&#xd7;10<sup>4</sup>/mL (20 mL per plant). The incidence of TBS was observed 30 days after inoculation with <italic>P. nicotiana</italic>, and the incidence of TBW was observed 15 days after inoculation with <italic>R. solanacearum</italic>. Disease classification was according to the Chinese national standard GB/T 23222-2008, further calculating the incidence, disease index and prevention effect.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_8">
<title>Statistical analysis</title>
<p>The community diversity was assessed using the Shannon diversity index (<italic>H</italic>&#x2032;) and species diversity index. Differences in diversity and relative abundances of bacterial composition based on Tukey&#x2019;s test were conducted by a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and response ratio analysis (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Deng et&#xa0;al., 2012</xref>). Detrended correspondence analysis (DCA) and dissimilarity tests were conducted to analyze the bacterial community structure. Linear regression analysis was carried out to explore relationships between disease suppression and microbial diversity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Barber&#xe1;n et&#xa0;al., 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B53">Wagg et&#xa0;al., 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">Cui et&#xa0;al., 2016</xref>). All analyses were performed using R v.3.6.3 and STAMP v 2.1.3. The functional/key OTUs were identified following <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B45">Sheng et&#xa0;al. (2008)</xref> by comparing their 16S rRNA gene sequences to the NCBI database, and the phylogenetic tree was constructed using MEGA 5.2 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Kumar et&#xa0;al., 2018</xref>).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s3" sec-type="results">
<title>Results</title>
<sec id="s3_1">
<title>Overview of rhizosphere soil bacterial communities</title>
<p>After clustering at the 97% sequence identity, 4955 OTUs were identified to comprise the soil bacterial community. The &#x3b1;-diversity index, including Shannon diversity and Pielou evenness, were shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">
<bold>Table&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>. Compared with the CK group (<italic>H</italic>&#x2019;: 6.387; <italic>J</italic>&#x2019;: 0.824), the Shannon diversity index was significantly (<italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.05) decreased in the BWH (5.830), BSM (6.054) and BSH (5.679) groups, and Pielou evenness index was significantly (<italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.05) reduced in the BSH group (0.758). DCA showed that the CK samples were segregated from the BWM and BWH samples (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;1A</bold>
</xref>), and the BWM and BWH samples were also segregated from each other. Similarly, the CK samples were separated from the BSM and BSH samples (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;1B</bold>
</xref>). Further dissimilarity tests showed that although the structure of BWM or BSM microbial communities was not significantly (<italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.05) different, the CK group was significantly (<italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.05) different from the other four pathogenic groups, and the heavily infected groups (BWH and BSH) were significantly (<italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.05) different (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Additional file 1</bold>
</xref>), indicating the structure of rhizosphere soil bacterial communities was influenced by plant diseases at different degrees.</p>
<table-wrap id="T1" position="float">
<label>Table&#xa0;1</label>
<caption>
<p>Shannon diversity and Pielou evenness of microbial communities in the five groups.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" align="left">Sample</th>
<th valign="middle" align="left">Shannon diversity (H&#x2019;)</th>
<th valign="middle" align="left">Pielou evenness (J&#x2019;)</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">CK</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">6.387 &#xb1; 0.341a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">0.824 &#xb1; 0.034a</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">BWM</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">5.867 &#xb1; 0.253ab</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">0.784 &#xb1; 0.031ab</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">BWH</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">5.83 &#xb1; 0.196b</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">0.776 &#xb1; 0.03ab</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">BSM</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">6.054 &#xb1; 0.501b</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">0.783 &#xb1; 0.05ab</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">BSH</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">5.679 &#xb1; 0.311b</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">0.758 &#xb1; 0.036b</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn>
<p>&#x201c;a&#x201d; and &#x201c;b&#x201d; indicated the significant (p &lt; 0.05) difference.</p>
</fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<fig id="f1" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;1</label>
<caption>
<p>The ordination plots of all samples for the community structure analyzed by detrended correspondence analysis <bold>(A, B)</bold> and Venn diagram <bold>(C, D)</bold>. CK: control group; BWM: the group of moderately infected by TBW; BWH: the group of heavily infected by TBW; BSM: the group of moderately infected by TBS; BSH: the group of heavily infected by TBS.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-14-1200136-g001.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>The Venn diagram showed that there were 936, 175 and 335 unique OTUs in the CK, BWM and BWH groups, respectively, and the number of core OTUs was 2165 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;1C</bold>
</xref>), occupying the relative abundance up to 99%. Similarly, there were 665, 456 and 201 unique OTUs in the CK, BSM and BSH groups, respectively (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;1D</bold>
</xref>), and 2295 core OTUs, occupying up to 99% relative abundance.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_2">
<title>The compositions of rhizosphere soil bacterial communities shifted under the incidence of TBW and TBS</title>
<p>At the phylum level, the bacterial composition of five groups consisted of 26 phyla, which were mostly dominated by Proteobacteria (26.0~53.8%), Actinobacteria (8.0~33.6%), Acidobacteria (5.1~19.8%), Chloroflexi (1.2~15.1%), Bacteroidetes (1.4~9.3%), Thaumarchaeota (0.1~18.6%), and Verrucomicrobia (0.7~7.5%) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;2A</bold>
</xref>). However, compared with the CK group, the relative abundances of some phyla were changed under the incidence of plant diseases. ANOVA results showed that the average relative abundances of four phyla (Verrucomicrobia, BRC1, Latescibacteria, and Armatimonadetes) were significantly (<italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.05) lower, and two (Chloroflexi and WPS-2) were significantly (<italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.05) higher in the BWM group (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;2D</bold>
</xref>); the average relative abundances of five phyla (Actinobacteria, Verrucomicrobia, BRC1, Latescibacteria, and Armatimonadetes) were significantly (<italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.05) lower, and six (Chloroflexi, Thaumarchaeota, Firmicutes, Euryarchaeota, Parcubacteria and WPS-2) were significantly (<italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.05) higher (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;2E</bold>
</xref>) in the BWH group; the average relative abundance of one phylum (BRC1) were significantly (<italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.05) lower, and two (Chloroflexi and Chlamydiae) were significantly (<italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.05) higher in the BSM group (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;2F</bold>
</xref>); the average relative abundances of six phyla (Acidobacteria, Verrucomicrobia, BRC1, Latescibacteria, Armatimonadetes and WPS-1) were significantly (<italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.05) lower, and three (Chloroflexi, Parcubacteria and WPS-2) were significantly (<italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.05) higher in the BSH group (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;2G</bold>
</xref>). Besides, only one phylum showed a significant (<italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.05) difference between BWM and BSM groups and two phyla between BWH and BSH groups (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">
<bold>Figures&#xa0;2H, I</bold>
</xref>).</p>
<fig id="f2" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;2</label>
<caption>
<p>The compositions of microbial communities in phylum <bold>(A)</bold>, genus <bold>(B)</bold>, OTU <bold>(C)</bold> levels, and the significant phyla between each two groups <bold>(D&#x2013;I)</bold>.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-14-1200136-g002.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>At the genus level (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;2B</bold>
</xref>), compared with the CK group, the relative abundances of some genera were also changed by plant diseases. ANOVA results showed that: the average relative abundances of 84 genera (e.g., <italic>Gp6</italic>, <italic>Streptomyces</italic> and <italic>Gp4</italic>) were significantly (<italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.05) lower and 43 (e.g., <italic>Rhodanobacter</italic>, <italic>Gp1</italic>, and <italic>Gp2</italic>) were significantly (<italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.05) higher in the BWM group (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Additional file 2</bold>
</xref>); the average relative abundances of 91 genera (e.g., <italic>Streptomyces</italic>, <italic>Gp6</italic>, and <italic>Gp4</italic>) were significantly (<italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.05) lower and 26 (e.g., <italic>Nitrososphaera</italic>, <italic>Gp1</italic> and <italic>Rhodanobacter</italic>) were significantly (<italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.05) higher in the BWH group (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Additional file 3</bold>
</xref>); the average relative abundance of 60 genera (e.g., Gp6, Gp4 and <italic>Spartobacteria</italic>_<italic>genera</italic>_<italic>incertae</italic>_<italic>sedis</italic>) were significantly (<italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.05) lower, and 27 (e.g., <italic>Ktedonobacter</italic>, <italic>Geothrix</italic> and <italic>Terriglobus</italic>) were significantly (<italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.05) higher in the BSM group (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Additional file 4</bold>
</xref>); the average relative abundances of 113 genera (e.g., <italic>Gp6</italic>, <italic>Streptomyces</italic> and <italic>Gp4</italic>) were significantly (<italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.05) lower, and 37 (e.g., <italic>Rhodanobacter</italic>, <italic>Gp1</italic> and <italic>Ktedonobacter</italic>) were significantly (<italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.05) higher in the BSH group (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Additional file 5</bold>
</xref>).</p>
<p>At the OTU level (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;2C</bold>
</xref>), compared with the CK group, the composition of the other four groups was significantly (<italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.05) different. ANOVA results showed that: the average relative abundances of 691 OTUs were significantly lower, and 239 were significantly (<italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.05) higher in the BWM group (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Additional file 6</bold>
</xref>); the average relative abundances of 654 OTUs were significantly (<italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.05) lower, and 197 were significantly (<italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.05) higher in the BWH group (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Additional file 7</bold>
</xref>); the average relative abundance of 456 OTUs were significantly (<italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.05) lower, and 198 were significantly higher in the BSM group (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Additional file 8</bold>
</xref>); the average relative abundances of 821 OTUs were significantly (<italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.05) lower, and 128 were significantly (<italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.05) higher in the BSH group (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Additional file 9</bold>
</xref>).</p>
<p>We further aligned the 16S rRNA sequences of top 10 OTUs with the largest decrease (15 OTUs, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;3</bold>
</xref>) or increase (19 OTUs, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f4">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;4</bold>
</xref>) of relative abundances compared with the CK group to the NCBI database. The top 10 decreased OTUs were identical in the BWM, BWH, and BSH groups (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3">
<bold>Figures&#xa0;3B, C, E</bold>
</xref>), suggesting their importance in controlling the incidence of TBW and TBS. The phylogenetic tree (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;3A</bold>
</xref>) indicated that six OTUs (OTU_8, OTU_16, OTU_17, OTU_34, OTU_42, and OTU_3189) were identified as Actinobacteria (<italic>Amycolatopsis</italic>, <italic>Lentzea</italic>, <italic>Arthrobacter</italic>, <italic>Janibacter</italic>, <italic>Streptomyces</italic>), two OTUs (OTU_74 and OTU_155) were identified as Acidobacteria (<italic>Gp4</italic> and <italic>Gp6</italic>), and one OTU (OTU_6) was identified as proteobacteria (<italic>Sphingobium</italic>). In the BSM group, five OTUs were the same as the other three groups, and five were different (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;3D</bold>
</xref>). The top 10 increased OTUs (19 OTUs in total) were different in the different groups (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f4">
<bold>Figures&#xa0;4B&#x2013;E</bold>
</xref>), but most of them were identified as Proteobacteria (6 OTUs) and Acidobacteria (5 OTUs) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f4">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;4A</bold>
</xref>). The relative abundances of OTU_2 (Thaumarchaeota) and OTU_18 (Acidobacteria_<italic>Geothrix</italic>) were increased in the four diseased groups.</p>
<fig id="f3" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;3</label>
<caption>
<p>Phylogenetic tree <bold>(A)</bold> of the top 10 decreased OTUs in BWM <bold>(B)</bold>, BWH <bold>(C)</bold>, BSM <bold>(D)</bold>, and BSH <bold>(E)</bold> groups, compared with the CK group.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-14-1200136-g003.tif"/>
</fig>
<fig id="f4" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;4</label>
<caption>
<p>Phylogenetic tree <bold>(A)</bold> of the top 10 increased OTUs in BWM <bold>(B)</bold>, BWH <bold>(C)</bold>, BSM <bold>(D)</bold>, and BSH <bold>(E)</bold> groups, compared with the CK group.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-14-1200136-g004.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_3">
<title>Network interactions of bacterial communities shifted under the incidence of TBW and TBS</title>
<p>To discern possible microbial interactions in response to TBW and TBS, molecular ecological networks (MENs) were constructed with 16S rRNA sequencing data using the RMT-based network approaches (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f5">
<bold>Figures&#xa0;5A&#x2013;E</bold>
</xref>). Major topological properties of empirical MENs of microbial communities in the nine groups were shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">
<bold>Table&#xa0;2</bold>
</xref>. With the same threshold (0.900), their correlations were more than 0.750, indicating that the degree distributions in both constructed molecular ecological networks fitted the power-law model well. There were more nodes and links in the CK group (572 nodes and 1056 links) than those in the BWM (396 and 521), BWH (346 and 435), BSM (466 and 640), and BSH (392 and 512) groups. It showed interactions of rhizosphere soil microbial communities could be disrupted by pathogens of plant diseases, and the higher degree of plant diseases could lead to more network destruction compared to the CK group.</p>
<fig id="f5" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;5</label>
<caption>
<p>Molecular ecological networks in CK <bold>(A)</bold>, BWM <bold>(B)</bold>, BWH <bold>(C)</bold>, BSM <bold>(D)</bold>, and BSH <bold>(E)</bold> groups, and the <italic>Z</italic>-<italic>P</italic> plot showing the distribution of OTUs based on their topological roles <bold>(F)</bold>. The color of the circle represented the module in the network interaction. The topological role of each OTU was determined according to the scatter plot of within-module connectivity (Zi) and among-module connectivity (Pi).</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-14-1200136-g005.tif"/>
</fig>
<table-wrap id="T2" position="float">
<label>Table&#xa0;2</label>
<caption>
<p>Topological properties of the empirical pMENs of soil bacterial communities in five groups.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" align="left">Network Indexes</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">CK</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">BWM</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">BWH</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">BSM</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">BSH</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Total nodes</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">572</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">396</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">346</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">466</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">392</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Total links</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1056</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">521</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">435</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">640</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">512</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Threshold</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.900</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.900</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.900</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.900</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.900</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">R square of power-law</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.84</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.755</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.869</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.82</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.859</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">moduel</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">46</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">49</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">56</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">63</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">61</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">modurity</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.742</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.846</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.848</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.829</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.859</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Average degree (avgK)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">3.692</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2.631</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2.514</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2.747</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2.612</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Average clustering coefficient (avgCC)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.237</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.201</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.223</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.182</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.229</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Average path distance (GD)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">7.692</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">8.381</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">7.557</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">7.357</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">7.609</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Connectedness (Con)</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.731</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.527</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.242</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.415</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.31</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Efficiency</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.993</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.992</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.98</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.99</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.986</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
<p>There were also more module hubs (2 hubs) and connectors (14 connectors) in the CK group (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f5">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;5F</bold>
</xref>). We further aligned the 16S rRNA sequences of all hubs and connectors (23 OTUs; 16 in CK; 4 in BWM; 2 in BWH; 1 in BSM; 1 in BSH) to the NCBI database (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Additional file 10</bold>
</xref>), and found that 11 OTUs were associated with Actinobacteria, and the other 12 OTUs with Proteobacteria (3 OTUs), Acidobacteria (3 OTUs), Verrucomicrobia (2 OTUs), Firmicutes (1 OTU), Gematimonadetes(1 OTU), Armatimonadetes(1 OTU), and unclassified phylum (1 OTU). OTU_48 (Proteobacteria_<italic>Ramlibacter</italic>) was a connector in both CK and BSM groups. Among the 23 OTUs, 14 OTUs (OTU_624, OTU_42, OTU_7584, OTU_2102, OTU_48, OTU_7351, OTU_9474, OTU_631, OTU_483, OTU_38, OTU_96, OTU_48, OTU_279, and OTU_671) were significantly (<italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.05) different between the CK group and the diseased groups, and interestingly, the other 13 OTUs were higher in the CK group except OTU_671 (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Additional file 10</bold>
</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_4">
<title>Metabolic diversity</title>
<p>Based on the 16S rRNA sequences, potential functions were predicted to explore changes of functional diversity and composition by plant pathogens. Although the functional diversity index showed no significant difference among these five groups (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Additional file 11</bold>
</xref>), DCA results showed that the CK samples were segregated from the diseased samples (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f6">
<bold>Figures&#xa0;6A, B</bold>
</xref>), which was further verified using the dissimilarity tests (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Additional file 12</bold>
</xref>). There were about 6900 core genes in these groups, and more unique genes (121/126) were in the CK group compared with the other diseased groups (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f6">
<bold>Figures&#xa0;6C, D</bold>
</xref>). Compared with the CK group, the relative abundance of genes related to metabolisms of carbohydrate, terpenoids and polyketides was significantly (<italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.05) decreased in the diseased groups, especially in the BWH group. In contrast, the relative abundance of genes related to cell process (e.g., cell motility) was significantly (<italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.05) increased (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Additional file 13</bold>
</xref>) in the diseased groups.</p>
<fig id="f6" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;6</label>
<caption>
<p>The ordination plots of all samples for the predicted genes analyzed by detrended correspondence analysis <bold>(A, B)</bold> and Venn diagram <bold>(C, D)</bold>.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-14-1200136-g006.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>We further explored the change in gene abundances related to antibiotics biosynthesis pathways (metabolism of terpenoids and polyketides and biosynthesis of other secondary metabolites). ANOVA results showed that the relative abundances of 6 pathways, including biosynthesis of 12-, 14- and 16-membered macrolides, biosynthesis of ansamycins, polyketide sugar unit biosynthesis, biosynthesis of enediyne antibiotics, streptomycin biosynthesis, and penicillin and cephalosporin biosynthesis, were significantly decreased in all diseased groups (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">
<bold>Table&#xa0;3</bold>
</xref>). Besides, 13 pathways (e.g., tetracycline biosynthesis and carbapenem biosynthesis) were also weakened, and three pathways (caffeine metabolism, tropane, piperidine and pyridine alkaloid biosynthesis, and isoflavonoid biosynthesis) were enhanced in individual diseased groups (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">
<bold>Table&#xa0;3</bold>
</xref>).</p>
<table-wrap id="T3" position="float">
<label>Table&#xa0;3</label>
<caption>
<p>The key pathways with significant (<italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.05) differences between the CK group and each diseased group.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" align="left">Metabolism</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Pathway</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">CK vs. BWM (%)</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">CK vs. BWH (%)</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">CK vs. BSM (%)</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">CK vs. BSH (%)</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" rowspan="12" align="left">Metabolism of terpenoids and polyketides</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Biosynthesis of 12-, 14- and 16-membered macrolides</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">9.07E-05</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.16E-04</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">7.45E-05</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.11E-04</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Biosynthesis of type II polyketide backbone</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">6.10E-03</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">7.15E-03</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">7.84E-03</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Biosynthesis of ansamycins</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">7.62E-04</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.35E-03</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">8.25E-04</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.24E-03</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Tetracycline biosynthesis</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.21E-04</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">9.48E-05</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Polyketide sugar unit biosynthesis</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2.71E-02</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">3.09E-02</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.71E-02</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">3.19E-02</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Biosynthesis of vancomycin group antibiotics</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">3.00E-03</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2.89E-03</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">3.26E-03</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Biosynthesis of enediyne antibiotics</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">8.15E-04</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.00E-03</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">7.15E-04</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">9.47E-04</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Type I polyketide structures</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.62E-03</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.76E-03</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Insect hormone biosynthesis</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">5.82E-06</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">5.82E-06</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Biosynthesis of type II polyketide products</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">3.00E-03</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Limonene and pinene degradation</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.31E-03</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Geraniol degradation</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">3.68E-03</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" rowspan="11" align="left">Biosynthesis of other secondary metabolites</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Carbapenem biosynthesis</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.07E-03</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.08E-03</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.22E-03</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Biosynthesis of secondary metabolites-other antibiotics</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.33E-03</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.57E-03</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.67E-03</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Caffeine metabolism</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">-9.96E-05</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">-1.61E-04</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Streptomycin biosynthesis</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">3.30E-04</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">3.91E-04</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">3.09E-04</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">3.61E-04</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Tropane, piperidine and pyridine alkaloid biosynthesis</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">-3.83E-03</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">-4.86E-03</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Penicillin and cephalosporin biosynthesis</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">5.90E-03</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.12E-02</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">7.00E-03</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">8.02E-03</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Novobiocin biosynthesis</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">5.91E-05</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">5.34E-05</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">6.16E-05</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Isoflavonoid biosynthesis</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">-4.06E-03</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Indole alkaloid biosynthesis</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">4.91E-06</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">5.88E-06</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Phenylpropanoid biosynthesis</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.33E-03</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Betalain biosynthesis</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">-2.69E-03</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn>
<p>CK vs. BWM, BWH, BSM, or BSH indicated the relative abundance of genes in the CK group minus that in the BWM, BWH, BSM, or BSH group, respectively.</p>
</fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_5">
<title>Antagonistic effects of Actinobacteria and inhibition effects of antibiotics</title>
<p>Six strains were obtained after isolation on GAUZE&#x2019;s medium NO. 1 of the rhizosphere soils in healthy tobacco plants. Through antagonism experiments, four strains could inhibit the growth of <italic>P. nicotianae</italic> HD1 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f7">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;7A</bold>
</xref>). After identification, two strains (3-13 and 3-17) had the highest similarity to <italic>Streptomyces sakaiensis</italic> (99%), one (4-9) similarity to <italic>Streptomyces acidiscabies</italic> (99%), and one (4-2) similarity to <italic>Stenotrophomonas maltophilia</italic> (99%). A further experiment found that three strains could inhibit the growth of <italic>R. solanacearum</italic> GMI1000 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f7">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;7B</bold>
</xref>).</p>
<fig id="f7" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;7</label>
<caption>
<p>Antagonistic effects. The plate-antagonistic effects of isolated Actinobacteria strains on <italic>P. nicotianae</italic> HD1 <bold>(A)</bold> and <italic>R. solanacearum</italic> GMI1000 <bold>(B)</bold>; The plate-inhibition experiments of some antibiotics on <italic>P. nicotianae</italic> HD1 <bold>(C)</bold> and <italic>R. solanacearum</italic> GMI1000 <bold>(D)</bold>; The pot-antagonistic effects of strain 4-9 on <italic>P. nicotianae</italic> HD1 <bold>(E)</bold> and <italic>R. solanacearum</italic> GMI1000 <bold>(F)</bold>.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-14-1200136-g007.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>Filtering paper methods (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f7">
<bold>Figures&#xa0;7C, D</bold>
</xref>) showed that streptomycin (100 &#x3bc;g/ml), tetracycline (100 &#x3bc;g/ml), novobiocin (300 &#x3bc;g/ml) and vancomycin (100 &#x3bc;g/ml) could inhibit the growth of <italic>R. solanacearum</italic> GMI1000, and streptomycin (50 mg/ml) and novobiocin (100 mg/ml) could inhibit the growth of <italic>P. nicotianae</italic> HD1.</p>
<p>Results of the pot experiment indicated that compared with the CK group, the index and incidence of TBW (62.76%; 45.53%) and TBS (12.1%; 20.36%) in the group inoculated with strain 4-9 were significantly decreased (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f7">
<bold>Figures&#xa0;7E, F</bold>
</xref>). The control efficiency of strain 4-9 was 60.40% on TBS and 30.67% on TBW.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s4" sec-type="discussion">
<title>Discussion</title>
<p>Previous studies focused on using microbial antagonists for controlling soil-borne diseases, and many biocontrol agents were found virtually for plant disease biocontrol against a single pathogen (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Dunne et&#xa0;al., 1997</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Liu et&#xa0;al., 2007</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">Shanks et&#xa0;al., 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">Han et&#xa0;al., 2016</xref>). However, managing just one of the pathogens may not fully solve the problem since different pathogens often co-occur on the same plant, resulting in a disease complex causing synergistic yield losses (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B44">Shen et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>). An environmentally friendly alternative could be using multiple strains with a broad spectrum of antagonism against multiple pathogens, which may provide excellent and new options for soil-borne disease control. TBW is a bacterial disease, and TBS is a fungal disease, which usually results in severe losses of yield and quality of tobacco, so that TBW and TBS can be excellent model for biocontrol research. The first task is to find effectively broad-spectrum microorganisms (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B64">Zheng et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B46">Shi et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>). In this study, we studied the response of rhizosphere soil microbial communities to these two plant diseases.</p>
<p>The relationship between rhizosphere soil bacterial community composition/structure and crop disease incidence was well studied (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">Mengesha et&#xa0;al., 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">Ma et&#xa0;al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B56">Xiao et&#xa0;al., 2018</xref>). It is clear that rhizosphere soil microbial communities generally differ between healthy and diseased plants (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">Niu et&#xa0;al., 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B59">Yang et&#xa0;al., 2017</xref>). After plants are infected, the soil microbial diversity and the abundance of probiotics decrease, and microbial interactions could be destroyed (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">Niu et&#xa0;al., 2017</xref>), which is also found in this study. It was also indicated that the change in rhizosphere soil microbial communities was more evident with the increased disease index. Although rhizosphere soil microbial communities showed some differences between different types (caused by fungi or bacteria) of plant diseases, they offered much more similarities. It is hypothesized that bacterial and fungal diseases would have different effects on rhizosphere soil microecology. Indeed, the composition and structure of rhizosphere soil microbial communities were different between the BWH and BSH groups, and three possible mechanisms are: the invasive ability of various pathogens is different; the plant immunocompetence to various pathogens are different; the effective probiotics are different (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">Horst and Kenneth, 1990</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">Keen et&#xa0;al., 1993</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">Ojiambo and Scherm, 2006</xref>). However, in our study, many results suggest that after different diseases are outbursts, the rhizosphere soil microbial community alters in a similar direction. The diversity index did not show differences between the TBS and TBW groups (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">
<bold>Table&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>); microbial interactions appeared to be simple; most of the varied populations (e.g., Actinobacteria) were found to be similar; most varied pathways (e.g., biosynthesis of secondary metabolites, biosynthesis of ansamycins) were almost the same among diseased groups.</p>
<p>The resistance mechanisms to plant diseases are complex, mainly depending on the plant-soil-microbe interaction in the soil system (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">Rasmussen et&#xa0;al., 2019</xref>). After the plants were transplanted in the same area, some were healthy, some were lightly diseased, and some were heavily diseased, which seems stochastic. Once pathogens occur in plant tissues, root exudates will be influenced (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">Gulati et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>). Root exudates have specialized roles in nutrient cycling and signal transduction between a root and its surrounding soil (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Jonasson et&#xa0;al., 1999</xref>), as well as in plant responses to environmental stresses (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">Liu et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>). Root exudates play essential roles in the root-root, root-microbe, and microbe-microbe interactions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">Bais et&#xa0;al., 2004</xref>). Some secretions, e.g., cutin, are screened against plant pathogens (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">Maurel et&#xa0;al., 1994</xref>). The diversity and stability of normal plant flora are other factors to inhibit or kill pathogens (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B50">Tilman and Downing, 1994</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B49">Tilman et&#xa0;al., 1997</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Fitter et&#xa0;al., 2005</xref>). Generally, the more closely and stable this system is, the stronger its protective ability is. Also, probiotics and their secondary metabolites play important roles in decreasing the infection of pathogens (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Fravel, 1988</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Howell, 2003</xref>). A well-conditioned cycle should be that normal root exudates improve soil nutrients and soil microecological environments and are beneficial for probiotics to grow, which protects the plant from pathogen infection and accelerates plant growth. Otherwise, a vicious cycle may be that the changed and bad root exudates, as toxic resources, decrease soil nutrients, promote pathogen growth, inhibit probiotics, destroy the stability of soil microecology, and further aggravate the plant disease. Therefore, although the appearance of pathogens or their types is random, the plant-soil-microbe interaction determines the colonization of pathogens and the occurrence of plant diseases.</p>
<p>Analyses of high-throughput sequencing data suggested that Actinobacteria (e.g., <italic>Amycolatopsis</italic>, <italic>Lentzea</italic>, <italic>Arthrobacter Mycobacterium</italic>, and <italic>Streptomyces</italic>) and their biosynthesis of antimicrobial peptides (e.g., ansamycins, novobiocin, streptomycin, tetracycline) played crucial roles in inhibiting both TBS and TBW. We further emphasized that some isolated Actinobacteria and some antimicrobial peptides (e.g., novobiocin, streptomycin) could inhibit both <italic>P. nicotianae</italic> HD1. and <italic>R. solanacearum</italic> GMI1000. The researches for Actinobacteria as biological control agents of plant disease are of interest, given their ability to colonize healthy plant tissues and produce antibiotics <italic>in situ</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B51">Trujillo et&#xa0;al., 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">Jose et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B58">Yadav et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>). For example, <italic>Streptomyces</italic> isolated from healthy banana plants could produce antifungal molecules that inhibited the growth of <italic>Fusarium oxysporum</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Cao et&#xa0;al., 2005</xref>). <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B57">Yacine et&#xa0;al. (2014)</xref> found that <italic>Streptomyces</italic> were isolated from tomatoes and native plants of the <italic>Algerian Sahara</italic> and screened for biocontrol activity against <italic>Rhizotocnia solani</italic>. Actinobacteria are the source of two-thirds of naturally derived antibiotics and a range of antihelminthic, antifungal, antibacterial, anticancer, and immunosuppressive drugs (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B52">Ventura et&#xa0;al., 2007</xref>). The impressive list of important anti-infective compounds synthesized by Actinobacteria includes streptomycin, tetracyclines, chloramphenicol, novobiocin, ansamycins, erythromycin, vancomycin, and kanamycin, and some of these (e.g., ansamycins) are broad-spectrum antibiotics (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">Mahajan and Balachandran, 2012</xref>). Our pot experiment also showed <italic>Streptomyces acidiscabies</italic> 4-9 could effectively control TBW and TBS. Therefore, some broad-spectrum Actinobacteria may be biocontrol agents for both tobacco bacterial and fungal diseases in the future. However, since in the final pot experiments sterilized soil was applied and heavy inoculation with selected Streptomyces strains was used, there is still a long way to a practical application of Streptomyces strains for biocontrol of wilt and black shark diseases of tobacco.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s5" sec-type="conclusions">
<title>Conclusions</title>
<p>Compared with healthy plants, the composition and structure of rhizosphere soil microbial communities showed some differences in diseased plants infected with TBW or TBSwith decreased species diversity, destructive networks, and decreased functionality involved in the biosynthesis of antibiotics, which might be the characteristics of the diseased soils. Actinobacteria (e.g., <italic>Amycolatopsis</italic>, <italic>Arthrobacter Mycobacterium, Streptomyces</italic>) were the effective probiotics, and their biosynthesis of antimicrobial peptides (e.g., novobiocin and streptomycin) played crucial roles in controlling the growth of bacterial and fungal pathogens.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s8" sec-type="data-availability">
<title>Data availability statement</title>
<p>The data presented in the study are deposited in the Sequence Read Archive (SRA) of NCBI repository, accession number PRJNA899683.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s9" sec-type="author-contributions">
<title>Author contributions</title>
<p>WC and QT contributed to the study&#x2019;s conception and design. Research, material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by TL, KT, ZX, and HC. The first draft of the manuscript was written by YX. TL, QT, YW and WC commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version. </p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<sec id="s10" sec-type="funding-information">
<title>Funding</title>
<p>This study was supported by the key Research project of Hunan Province (2021NK1040), the key project of Science and Technology Project of China National Tobacco Corporation [110202101050 (LS-10) and 110202201019 (LS-03)], the key project of Science and Technology of Hunan Branch of China National Tobacco Corporation (CS2022KJ02 and XX2022-2024Aa01), Scientific Research Project of Education Department of Hunan Province (21A0142).</p>
</sec>
<ack>
<title>Acknowledgments</title>
<p>Hunan Engineering &amp; Technology Research Center for Agricultural Big Data Analysis &amp; Decision-making, and Tobacco Technology Center of Xiangxi provided field space.</p>
</ack>
<sec id="s11" sec-type="COI-statement">
<title>Conflict of interest</title>
<p>The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s12" sec-type="disclaimer">
<title>Publisher&#x2019;s note</title>
<p>All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s13" sec-type="supplementary-material">
<title>Supplementary material</title>
<p>The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2023.1200136/full#supplementary-material">https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2023.1200136/full#supplementary-material</ext-link>
</p>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="DataSheet_1.docx" id="SM1" mimetype="application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document"/>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="DataSheet_2.pdf" id="SM2" mimetype="application/pdf"/>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="DataSheet_3.pdf" id="SM3" mimetype="application/pdf"/>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="DataSheet_4.pdf" id="SM4" mimetype="application/pdf"/>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="DataSheet_5.pdf" id="SM5" mimetype="application/pdf"/>
</sec>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="B1">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Bacon</surname> <given-names>C. W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>White</surname> <given-names>J. F.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Functions, mechanisms and regulation of endophytic and epiphytic microbial communities of plants</article-title>. <source>Symbiosis</source> <volume>68</volume>, <fpage>87</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>98</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s13199-015-0350-2</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Bais</surname> <given-names>H. P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Park</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Weir</surname> <given-names>T. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Callaway</surname> <given-names>R. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Vivanco</surname> <given-names>J. M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2004</year>). <article-title>How plants communicate using the underground information superhighway</article-title>. <source>Trends Plant Sci.</source> <volume>9</volume>, <fpage>26</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>32</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.tplants.2003.11.008</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Barber&#xe1;n</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ramirez</surname> <given-names>K. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Leff</surname> <given-names>J. W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bradford</surname> <given-names>M. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wall</surname> <given-names>D. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fierer</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Why are some microbes more ubiquitous than others? predicting the habitat breadth of soil bacteria</article-title>. <source>Ecol. Lett.</source> <volume>17</volume>, <fpage>794</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>802</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/ele.12282</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Cao</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Landick</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Campbell</surname> <given-names>E. A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>A roadmap for designing narrow-spectrum antibiotics targeting bacterial pathogens</article-title>. <source>Microbial Cell</source> <volume>9</volume>, <fpage>136</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>138</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.15698/mic2022.07.780</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Cao</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Qiu</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>You</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tan</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2005</year>). <article-title>Isolation and characterization of endophytic streptomycete antagonists of fusarium wilt pathogen from surface-sterilized banana roots</article-title>. <source>FEMS Microbiol. Lett.</source> <volume>247</volume>, <fpage>147</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.femsle.2005.05.006</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Choi</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Choi</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lee</surname> <given-names>P. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Roy</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Khan</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lee</surname> <given-names>H. J.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Alteration of bacterial wilt resistance in tomato plant by microbiota transplant</article-title>. <source>Front. Plant Sci.</source> <volume>11</volume>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpls.2020.01186</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Cui</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fan</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yin</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Song</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Huang</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tang</surname> <given-names>Y. J.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Long-term organic and inorganic fertilization alters temperature sensitivity of potential N<sub>2</sub>O emissions and associated microbes</article-title>. <source>Soil Biol. Biochem.</source> <volume>93</volume>, <fpage>131</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>141</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.soilbio.2015.11.005</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Deng</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>He</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xu</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Qin</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Van Nostrand</surname> <given-names>J. D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>L. Y.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Elevated carbon dioxide alters the structure of soil microbial communities</article-title>. <source>Appl. Environ. Microbiol.</source> <volume>78</volume>, <fpage>2991</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2995</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/AEM.06924-11</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Deverall</surname> <given-names>B. J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1987</year>). <article-title>Book review - mechanisms of resistance to plant diseases</article-title>. <source>Australas. Plant Pathol.</source> <volume>16</volume>, <elocation-id>68</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1071/APP9870068</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Dunne</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Crowley</surname> <given-names>J. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Moenne-Loccoz</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dowling</surname> <given-names>D. N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bruijn</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fergal</surname> <given-names>O.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1997</year>). <article-title>Biological control of <italic>Pythium ultimum</italic> by <italic>Stenotrophomonas maltophilia</italic> W81 is mediated by an extracellular proteolytic activity</article-title>. <source>Microbiology</source> <volume>143</volume>, <fpage>3921</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>3931</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1099/00221287-143-12-3921</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Fitter</surname> <given-names>A. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gilligan</surname> <given-names>C. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hollingworth</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kleczkowski</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Twyman</surname> <given-names>R. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pitchford</surname> <given-names>J. W.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2005</year>). <article-title>Biodiversity and ecosystem function in soil</article-title>. <source>Funct. Ecol.</source> <volume>19</volume>, <fpage>369</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>377</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.0269-8463.2005.00969.x</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Fravel</surname> <given-names>D. R.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1988</year>). <article-title>Role of antibiosis in the biocontrol of plant diseases</article-title>. <source>Annu. Rev. Phytopathol.</source> <volume>26</volume>, <fpage>75</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>91</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1146/annurev.py.26.090188.000451</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Gao</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xu</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Song</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>W. Z.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Tobacco serine/threonine protein kinase gene NrSTK enhances black shank resistance</article-title>. <source>Genet. Mol. Res.</source> <volume>14</volume>, <fpage>16415</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4238/2015.December.9.11</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ghodhbane-Gtari</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Essoussi</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chattaoui</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chouaia</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jaouani</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Daffonchio</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Isolation and characterization of non-frankia actinobacteria from root nodules of <italic>Alnus glutinosa</italic>, <italic>Casuarina glauca</italic> and <italic>Elaeagnus angustifolia</italic>
</article-title>. <source>Symbiosis</source> <volume>50</volume>, <fpage>51</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>57</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s13199-009-0029-7</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>G&#xf3;mez-G&#xf3;mez</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Boller</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2002</year>). <article-title>Flagellin perception: a paradigm for innate immunity</article-title>. <source>Trends Plant Sci.</source> <volume>7</volume>, <fpage>251</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>256</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S1360-1385(02)02261-6</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Gu</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cao</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Mechanism of intermittent deep tillage and different depths improving crop growth from the perspective of rhizosphere soil nutrients, root system architectures, bacterial communities, and functional profiles</article-title>. <source>Front. Microbiol.</source> <volume>12</volume>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmicb.2021.759374</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Gulati</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ballhausen</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kulkarni</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Grosch</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Garbeva</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>A non-invasive soil-based setup to study tomato root volatiles released by healthy and infected roots</article-title>. <source>Sci. Rep.</source> <volume>10</volume>, <fpage>12704</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41598-020-69468-z</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B18">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Han</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>You</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Feng</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Biocontrol potential of antagonist bacillus subtilis Tpb55 against tobacco black shank</article-title>. <source>BioControl</source> <volume>61</volume>, <fpage>195</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>205</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10526-015-9705-0</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B19">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Horst</surname> <given-names>R. K.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1990</year>). <article-title>Plant diseases and their pathogens</article-title>. In: <source>Westcott&#x2019;s Plant Disease Handbook</source>. (<publisher-loc>Boston, MA</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Springer</publisher-name>). doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/978-1-4615-8143-7_4</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B20">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Howell</surname> <given-names>C. R.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2003</year>). <article-title>Mechanisms employed by <italic>Trichoderma</italic> species in the biological control of plant diseases: the history and evolution of current concepts</article-title>. <source>Plant Dis.</source> <volume>87</volume>, <fpage>4</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>10</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1094/PDIS.2003.87.1.4</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B21">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Jin</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Shew</surname> <given-names>H. D.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Components of aggressiveness in <italic>Phytophthora nicotianae</italic> during adaptation to multiple sources of partial resistance in tobacco</article-title>. <source>Plant Dis.</source> <volume>105</volume>, <fpage>1960</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1966</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1094/PDIS-09-20-1929-RE</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B22">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Jonasson</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Michelsen</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Schmidt</surname> <given-names>I. K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Nielsen</surname> <given-names>E. V.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1999</year>). <article-title>Responses in microbes and plants to changed temperature, nutrient, and light regimes in the arctic</article-title>. <source>Ecology</source> <volume>80</volume>, <fpage>1828</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2307/176661</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B23">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Jose</surname> <given-names>P. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Maharshi</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jha</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Actinobacteria in natural products research: progress and prospects</article-title>. <source>Microbiological Res.</source> <volume>246</volume>, <elocation-id>126708</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.micres.2021.126708</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B24">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Keen</surname> <given-names>N. T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bent</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Staskawicz</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1993</year>). <article-title>Plant disease resistance genes: interactions with pathogens and their improved utilization to control plant diseases</article-title>. <source>Discrete Appl. Mathematics</source> <volume>157</volume>, <fpage>341</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>352</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/978-3-540-77120-3_31</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B25">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kim</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Park</surname> <given-names>A. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Song</surname> <given-names>C. W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Song</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kim</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Biological control efficacy and action mechanism of <italic>Klebsiella pneumoniae</italic> JCK-2201 producing meso-2,3-Butanediol against tomato bacterial wilt</article-title>. <source>Front. Microbiol.</source> <volume>13</volume>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmicb.2022.914589</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B26">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kumar</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Stecher</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Knyaz</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tamura</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>MEGA X: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis across computing platforms</article-title>. <source>Mol. Biol. Evol.</source> <volume>35</volume>, <fpage>1547</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1549</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/molbev/msy096</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B27">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kwak</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kong</surname> <given-names>H. G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Choi</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kwon</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Song</surname> <given-names>J. Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lee</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Rhizosphere microbiome structure alters to enable wilt resistance in tomato</article-title>. <source>Nat. Biotechnol.</source> <volume>36</volume>, <fpage>1100</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1109</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nbt.4232</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B28">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kyselkov&#xe1;</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kopeck&#xfd;</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Frapolli</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>D&#xe9;fago</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>S&#xe1;gov&#xe1;mareckov&#xe1;</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Grundmann</surname> <given-names>G. L.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>Comparison of rhizobacterial community composition in soil suppressive or conducive to tobacco black root rot disease</article-title>. <source>Isme J.</source> <volume>3</volume>, <fpage>1127</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1138</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/ismej.2009.61</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B29">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Langille</surname> <given-names>M. G. I.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zaneveld</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Caporaso</surname> <given-names>J. G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mcdonald</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Knights</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Joshua</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Predictive functional profiling of microbial communities using 16S rRNA marker gene sequences</article-title>. <source>Nat. Biotechnol.</source> <volume>31</volume>, <fpage>814</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>821</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nbt.2676</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B30">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>C. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>T. T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lian</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gu</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Caer</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2007</year>). <article-title>Study of the antifungal activity of <italic>Acinetobacter baumannii</italic> LCH001 <italic>in vitro</italic> and identification of its antifungal components</article-title>. <source>Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol.</source> <volume>76</volume>, <fpage>459</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>466</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00253-007-1010-0</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B31">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xiao</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yin</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yi</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hsiang</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Effects of cultured root and soil microbial communities on the disease of nicotiana tabacum caused by <italic>Phytophthora nicotianae</italic>
</article-title>. <source>Front. Microbiol.</source> <volume>11</volume>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmicb.2020.00929</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B32">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xu</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Qu</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Enantioselective effects of imazethapyr on arabidopsis thaliana root exudates and rhizosphere microbes</article-title>. <source>Sci. Total Environ.</source> <volume>716</volume>, <elocation-id>137121</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137121</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B33">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ma</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zheng</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Duo</surname> <given-names>J. L.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Biological control tobacco bacterial wilt and black shank and root colonization by bio-organic fertilizer containing bacterium <italic>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</italic> NXHG29</article-title>. <source>Appl. Soil Ecol.</source> <volume>129</volume>, <fpage>136</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>144</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.apsoil.2018.05.011</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B34">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Mahajan</surname> <given-names>G. B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Balachandran</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Antibacterial agents from actinomycetes - a review</article-title>. <source>Front. Bioscience</source> <volume>4</volume> (<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>240</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>53</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2741/373</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B35">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Maurel</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Leblanc</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Barbier-Brygoo</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Perrot-Rechenmann</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bouvier-Durand</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Guern</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1994</year>). <article-title>Alterations of auxin perception in rolB-transformed tobacco protoplasts (Time course of rolB mRNA expression and increase in auxin sensitivity reveal multiple control by auxin)</article-title>. <source>Plant Physiol.</source> <volume>105</volume>, <fpage>1209</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1215</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1104/pp.105.4.1209</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B36">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Mengesha</surname> <given-names>W. K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Powell</surname> <given-names>S. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Evans</surname> <given-names>K. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Barry</surname> <given-names>K. M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Diverse microbial communities in non-aerated compost teas suppress bacterial wilt</article-title>. <source>World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol.</source> <volume>33</volume> (<issue>3</issue>), <fpage>49</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11274-017-2212-y</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B37">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Miliute</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Buzaite</surname> <given-names>O.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Baniulis</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Stanys</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Bacterial endophytes in agricultural crops and their role in stress tolerance: a review</article-title>. <source>Zemdirbyste-Agriculture</source> <volume>102</volume>, <fpage>465</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>478</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.13080/z-a.2015.102.060</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B38">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Niu</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chao</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xiao</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Insight into the effects of different cropping systems on soil bacterial community and tobacco bacterial wilt rate</article-title>. <source>J. Basic Microbiol.</source> <volume>57</volume>, <fpage>3</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>11</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/jobm.201600222</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B39">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ojiambo</surname> <given-names>P. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Scherm</surname>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2006</year>). <article-title>Biological and application-oriented factors influencing plant disease suppression by biological control: a meta-analytical review</article-title>. <source>Phytopathology</source>. <volume>96</volume> (<issue>11</issue>), <fpage>1168</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1174</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1094/PHYTO-96-1168</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B40">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Rasmussen</surname> <given-names>P. U.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bennett</surname> <given-names>A. E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tack</surname> <given-names>A. J. M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>The impact of elevated temperature and drought on the ecology and evolution of plant&#x2013;soil microbe interactions</article-title>. <source>J. Ecol.</source> <volume>108</volume>, <fpage>337</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>352</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/1365-2745.13292</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B41">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ren</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhu</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mei</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xie</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>&#x3b2;-aminobutyric acid (BABA)-induced resistance to tobacco black shank in tobacco (<italic>Nicotiana tabacum</italic> l.)</article-title>. <source>PloS One</source> <volume>17</volume>, <elocation-id>e267960</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0267960</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B42">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Schreiter</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Babin</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Smalla</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Grosch</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Rhizosphere competence and biocontrol effect of <italic>Pseudomonas</italic> sp. RU47 independent from plant species and soil type at the field scale</article-title>. <source>Front. Microbiol.</source> <volume>9</volume>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmicb.2018.00097</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B43">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Shanks</surname> <given-names>R. M. Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dashiff</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Alster</surname> <given-names>J. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kadouri</surname> <given-names>D. E.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Isolation and identification of a bacteriocin with antibacterial and antibiofilm activity from <italic>Citrobacter freundii</italic>
</article-title>. <source>Arch. Microbiol.</source> <volume>194</volume>, <fpage>575</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>587</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00203-012-0793-2</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B44">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Shen</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Shi</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bo</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Fungal inhibition of agricultural soil pathogen stimulated by nitrogen-reducing fertilization</article-title>. <source>Front. Bioengineering Biotechnol.</source> <volume>10</volume>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fbioe.2022.866419</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B45">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Sheng</surname> <given-names>X. F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jiang</surname> <given-names>C. Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>He</surname> <given-names>L. Y.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>Characterization of plant growth-promoting <italic>Bacillus edaphicus</italic> NBT and its effect on lead uptake by Indian mustard in a lead-amended soil</article-title>. <source>Can. J. Microbiol.</source> <volume>54</volume>, <fpage>417</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>422</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1139/W08-020</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B46">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Shi</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xu</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yu</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cheng</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Analysis of rhizosphere bacterial communities of tobacco resistant and non-resistant to bacterial wilt in different regions</article-title>. <source>Sci. Rep.</source> <volume>12</volume>, <fpage>18309</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41598-022-20293-6</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B47">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Stumbriene</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gudiukaite</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Semaskiene</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Svegzda</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jonaviciene</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Suproniene</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Screening of new bacterial isolates with antifungal activity and application of selected bacillus sp. cultures for biocontrol of <italic>Fusarium graminearum</italic> under field conditions</article-title>. <source>Crop Prot.</source> <volume>113</volume>, <fpage>22</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>28</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.cropro.2018.07.006</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B48">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Tan</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zeng</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xiao</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gu</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Fungi-bacteria associations in wilt diseased rhizosphere and endosphere by interdomain ecological network analysis</article-title>. <source>Front. Microbiol.</source> <volume>12</volume>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmicb.2021.722626</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B50">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Tilman</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Downing</surname> <given-names>J. A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1994</year>). <article-title>Biodiversity and stability in grasslands</article-title>. <source>Nature</source> <volume>367</volume>, <fpage>363</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>365</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/367363a0</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B49">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Tilman</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Knops</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wedin</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Reich</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ritchie</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Siemann</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1997</year>). <article-title>The influence of functional diversity and composition on ecosystem processes</article-title>. <source>Sci. (American Assoc. Advancement Science)</source> <volume>277</volume>, <fpage>1300</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1302</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1126/science.277.5330.1300</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B51">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Trujillo</surname> <given-names>M. E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Riesco</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Benito</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Carro</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Endophytic actinobacteria and the interaction of micromonospora and nitrogen fixing plants</article-title>. <source>Front. Microbiol.</source> <volume>6</volume>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmicb.2015.01341</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B52">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ventura</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Canchaya</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tauch</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chandra</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fitzgerald</surname> <given-names>G. F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chater</surname> <given-names>K. F.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2007</year>). <article-title>Genomics of actinobacteria: tracing the evolutionary history of an ancient phylum</article-title>. <source>Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.</source> <volume>71</volume>, <fpage>495</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>548</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/MMBR.00005-07</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B53">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wagg</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bender</surname> <given-names>S. F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Widmer</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>van der Heijden</surname> <given-names>M. G. A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Soil biodiversity and soil community composition determine ecosystem multifunctionality</article-title>. <source>Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.</source> <volume>111</volume>, <fpage>5266</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>5270</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1073/pnas.1320054111</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B54">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>K. L. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ecker</surname> <given-names>J. R.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2002</year>). <article-title>Ethylene biosynthesis and signaling networks</article-title>. <source>Plant Cell</source> <volume>14</volume>, <fpage>S131</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>S151</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1105/tpc.001768</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B55">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Morcillo</surname> <given-names>R. J. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yu</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xue</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rufian</surname> <given-names>J. S.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>A bacterial effector protein uncovers a plant metabolic pathway involved in tolerance to bacterial wilt disease</article-title>. <source>Mol. Plant</source> <volume>14</volume>, <fpage>1281</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1296</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.molp.2021.04.014</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B56">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Xiao</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Meng</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tao</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gu</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yin</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>The role of soil bacterial community during winter fallow period in the incidence of tobacco bacterial wilt disease</article-title>. <source>Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol.</source> <volume>102</volume>, <fpage>2399</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2412</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00253-018-8757-3</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B57">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Yacine</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Omrane</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Amine</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Nasserdine</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Florence</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Abdelghani</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Biocontrol of <italic>Rhizoctonia solani</italic> damping-off and promotion of tomato plant growth by endophytic actinomycetes isolated from native plants of Algerian Sahara</article-title>. <source>Microbiological Res</source>. <volume>169</volume> (<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>59</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>65</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;0.1016/j.micres.2013.06.014
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B58">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Yadav</surname> <given-names>K. K.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Actinobacteria interventions in plant and environment fitness. Microbiomes and plant health</article-title>. In: <person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname>Solanki</surname> <given-names>M. K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kashyap</surname> <given-names>P. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kumari</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (Eds.), <source>Panoply and their Applications</source>. <publisher-name>Academic Press</publisher-name>, pp. <fpage>397</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>427</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/B978-0-12-819715-8.00014-8</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B59">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xiao</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gu</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>An integrated insight into the relationship between soil microbial community and tobacco bacterial wilt disease</article-title>. <source>Front. Microbiol.</source> <volume>8</volume>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmicb.2017.02179</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B60">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Yao</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Carter</surname> <given-names>R. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Vuagniaux</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Barbier</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rosch</surname> <given-names>J. W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rock</surname> <given-names>C. O.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>A pathogen-selective antibiotic minimizes disturbance to the microbiome</article-title>. <source>Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.</source> <volume>60</volume>, <fpage>4264</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>4273</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/AAC.00535-16</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B61">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Yin</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Niu</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ren</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cong</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fan</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>An integrated insight into the response of sedimentary microbial communities to heavy metal contamination</article-title>. <source>Sci. Rep.</source> <volume>5</volume>, <fpage>93</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>102</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/srep14266</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B62">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Yin</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Guo</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xu</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Precision probiotics in agroecosystems: multiple strategies of native soil microbiotas for conquering the competitor <italic>Ralstonia solanacearum</italic>
</article-title>. <source>MSystems</source> <volume>7</volume> (<issue>3</issue>), <elocation-id>e01159&#x2013;21</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/msystems.01159-21</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B63">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Deng</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Alleviating soil acidification could increase disease suppression of bacterial wilt by recruiting potentially beneficial rhizobacteria</article-title>. <source>Microbiol. Spectr.</source> <volume>10</volume> (<issue>2</issue>), <elocation-id>e02333-21</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/spectrum.02333-21</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B64">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zheng</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Han</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wei</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yuan</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Exploring biocontrol agents from microbial keystone taxa associated to suppressive soil: a new attempt for a biocontrol strategy</article-title>. <source>Front. Plant Sci.</source> <volume>12</volume>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpls.2021.655673</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>