Edited and Reviewed by: Junya Mizoi, The University of Tokyo, Japan
*Correspondence: Peng Zhou,
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
Extreme environmental conditions pose significant challenges to plant survival and productivity. Over time, plants have evolved a myriad of defense mechanisms to mitigate the detrimental effects of adverse conditions. These mechanisms induce the production of a plethora of protective proteins, which play a crucial role in preserving the normal physiological and biochemical processes of plants under stress. In-depth investigation of these stress proteins may uncover significant insights into their potential applications in agricultural production.
Various stress proteins have been identified, such as late embryogenesis abundant proteins (LEA proteins, including dehydrins), reactive oxygen species (ROS) scavenging enzymes, heat shock proteins (HSPs) that serve as molecular chaperones to preserve enzyme activity and protein structure, and enzymes responsible for maintaining plant redox status and eliminating oxygen free radicals. Current research has delved into the significance and mechanisms of these stress proteins, expanding our understanding of both their depth and scope. This knowledge has been extensively applied to the study of numerous plant species, ultimately contributing to the enhancement of agricultural production and improvement of ecological environments in the long term.
This Research Topic has been meticulously organized, featuring three original research articles and one comprehensive review, designed to emphasize recent advancements in the following areas: (1) in-depth functional analysis of stress proteins, (2) regulatory networks of stress proteins, (3) bioinformatics analysis of stress proteins within the context of big data, and the cross-species evolutionary relationships of stress proteins.
A wide array of stress proteins has been identified in various plant species. However, the precise mechanisms through which some of these proteins function within plant cells remain elusive. One such example is the stress-associated protein (SAP) family. SAP family genes have been isolated from diverse plants, including
At the molecular level, plant response mechanisms to stress are multifaceted. Plants can react to stress by activating transcription factors, which in turn regulate the up or downregulation of specific genes. Alternatively, a single gene can produce various mature functional proteins to adapt to environmental changes. Post-translational modification (PTM) represents a crucial regulatory mechanism that enables plants to respond to stress.
Advancements in computer technology and the availability of various species’ genome databases have facilitated in-depth investigations of stress protein families. Genome-wide analyses of genes encoding stress proteins in specific species can provide novel insights into the distribution of gene families within genomes and the evolutionary relationships of these gene families, even between different species. In conjunction with RNA-seq data, researchers can identify more potent genes within the same gene family.
The stress-activated protein kinase (SAPK), also known as SnRK2, responds to abiotic stress through abscisic acid (ABA)-dependent or independent signaling pathways. SAPKs are promising candidate genes for enhancing plant stress resistance.
LEA proteins are highly expressed in plants under diverse abiotic stresses, bolstering plant resistance. The LEA protein family encompasses several subfamilies, including LEA_2, which is distinct from other LEA proteins and plays critical roles in plant stress tolerance. To date, the function of LEA_2 remains inadequately understood.
PZ wrote the paper. SG, LH, and WZ had revised it. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
We express our sincere gratitude to all the authors who contributed their original research articles or reviews to this Research Topic. We also extend our appreciation to all the reviewers for their diligent efforts and timely responses.
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.