<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.3 20070202//EN" "journalpublishing.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="2.3" xml:lang="EN">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Front. Plant Sci.</journal-id>
<journal-title>Frontiers in Plant Science</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">Front. Plant Sci.</abbrev-journal-title>
<issn pub-type="epub">1664-462X</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Frontiers Media S.A.</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpls.2023.1193465</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Plant Science</subject>
<subj-group>
<subject>Original Research</subject>
</subj-group>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Allelic expression of <italic>AhNSP2-B07</italic> due to parent of origin affects peanut nodulation</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zhao</surname>
<given-names>Zifan</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn003">
<sup>&#x2020;</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1843715"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname>
<given-names>Yichun</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn003">
<sup>&#x2020;</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2265312"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Peng</surname>
<given-names>Ze</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3">
<sup>3</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/451426"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Luo</surname>
<given-names>Ziliang</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/624005"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zhao</surname>
<given-names>Meixia</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4">
<sup>4</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2194778"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname>
<given-names>Jianping</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn001">
<sup>*</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/65009"/>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn004">
<sup>&#x2021;</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
<institution>Agronomy Department, University of Florida</institution>, <addr-line>Gainesville, FL</addr-line>, <country>United States</country>
</aff>
<aff id="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
<institution>Plant Molecular and Cellular Biology Program, University of Florida</institution>, <addr-line>Gainesville, FL</addr-line>, <country>United States</country>
</aff>
<aff id="aff3">
<sup>3</sup>
<institution>College of Horticulture, South China Agricultural University</institution>, <addr-line>Guangzhou</addr-line>, <country>China</country>
</aff>
<aff id="aff4">
<sup>4</sup>
<institution>Department of Microbiology and Cell Science, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida</institution>, <addr-line>Gainesville, FL</addr-line>, <country>United States</country>
</aff>
<author-notes>
<fn fn-type="edited-by">
<p>Edited by: Senjuti Sinharoy, National Institute of Plant Genome Research (NIPGR), India</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="edited-by">
<p>Reviewed by: Matthias Benoit, INRAE Occitanie Toulouse, France; Alexander Betekhtin, University of Silesia in Katowice, Poland</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="corresp" id="fn001">
<p>*Correspondence: Jianping Wang, <email xlink:href="mailto:wangjp@ufl.edu">wangjp@ufl.edu</email>
</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="equal" id="fn003">
<p>&#x2020;These authors have contributed equally to this work</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="other" id="fn004">
<p>&#x2021;ORCID: Jianping Wang, <uri xlink:href="https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0259-1508">orcid.org/0000-0002-0259-1508</uri>
</p>
</fn>
</author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>22</day>
<month>06</month>
<year>2023</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="collection">
<year>2023</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>14</volume>
<elocation-id>1193465</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>24</day>
<month>03</month>
<year>2023</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>19</day>
<month>05</month>
<year>2023</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#xa9; 2023 Zhao, Wang, Peng, Luo, Zhao and Wang</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2023</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Zhao, Wang, Peng, Luo, Zhao and Wang</copyright-holder>
<license xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">
<p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.</p>
</license>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<p>Legumes are well-known for establishing a symbiotic relationship with rhizobia in root nodules to fix nitrogen from the atmosphere. The nodulation signaling pathway 2 (<italic>NSP2</italic>) gene plays a critical role in the symbiotic signaling pathway. In cultivated peanut, an allotetraploid (2n = 4x = 40, AABB) legume crop, natural polymorphisms in a pair of <italic>NSP2</italic> homoeologs (<italic>N<sub>a</sub>
</italic> and <italic>N<sub>b</sub>
</italic>) located on chromosomes A08 and B07, respectively, can cause loss of nodulation. Interestingly, some heterozygous (<italic>N<sub>B</sub>n<sub>b</sub>
</italic>) progeny produced nodules, while some others do not, suggesting non-Mendelian inheritance in the segregating population at the N<sub>b</sub> locus. In this study, we investigated the non-Mendelian inheritance at the <italic>N<sub>B</sub>
</italic> locus. Selfing populations were developed to validate the genotypical and phenotypical segregating ratios. Allelic expression was detected in roots, ovaries, and pollens of heterozygous plants. Bisulfite PCR and sequencing of the <italic>N<sub>b</sub>
</italic> gene in gametic tissue were performed to detect the DNA methylation variations of this gene in different gametic tissues. The results showed that only one allele at the Nb locus expressed in peanut roots during symbiosis. In the heterozygous (<italic>N<sub>b</sub>n<sub>b</sub>
</italic>) plants, if dominant allele expressed, the plants produced nodules, if recessive allele expressed, then no nodules were produced.  qRT-PCR experiments revealed that the expression of <italic>N<sub>b</sub>
</italic> gene in the ovary was extremely low, about seven times lower than that in pollen, regardless of genotypes or phenotypes of the plants at this locus. The results indicated that <italic>N<sub>b</sub>
</italic> gene expression in peanut depends on the parent of origin and is imprinted in female gametes. However, no significant differences of DNA methylation level were detected between these two gametic tissues by bisulfite PCR and sequencing. The results suggested that the remarkable low expression of <italic>N<sub>b</sub>
</italic> in female gametes may not be caused by DNA methylation. This study provided a unique genetic basis of a key gene involved in peanut symbiosis, which could facilitate understanding the regulation of gene expression in symbiosis in polyploid legumes.</p>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>non-Mendelian inheritance</kwd>
<kwd>CAPS marker</kwd>
<kwd>monoallelic expression</kwd>
<kwd>parent of origin</kwd>
<kwd>genomic imprinting</kwd>
<kwd>DNA methylation</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<counts>
<fig-count count="5"/>
<table-count count="4"/>
<equation-count count="0"/>
<ref-count count="37"/>
<page-count count="11"/>
<word-count count="6221"/>
</counts>
<custom-meta-wrap>
<custom-meta>
<meta-name>section-in-acceptance</meta-name>
<meta-value>Plant Genetics, Epigenetics and Chromosome Biology</meta-value>
</custom-meta>
</custom-meta-wrap>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec id="s1" sec-type="intro">
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>Nitrogen is an essential element for all living organisms, particularly for legume crops producing seeds of high protein content. In nature, legumes are mostly able to self-supply nitrogen due to the establishment of symbiosis with rhizobia in root nodules for biological nitrogen fixation (BNF), which contributes to sustainable agriculture (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">Peoples et&#xa0;al., 1995</xref>). During the symbiosis, nitrogen from the atmosphere is converted into ammonia by rhizobia in root nodules, as nutrients to the plants (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">Wilson and Burris, 1947</xref>). In return, rhizobia take carbon from the host plants for their energy.</p>
<p>During the interaction between legumes and rhizobia, rhizobia first enter host plant roots either intracellularly <italic>via</italic> root hair or intercellularly <italic>via</italic> cracks on root surface (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">Madsen et&#xa0;al., 2010</xref>). Nodules are then initiated in the root cortex beneath the rhizobial infection site as the infection of rhizobia proceeds (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">Oldroyd, 2013</xref>). Rhizobia infect plant cells in the nodule primordia, where they differentiate into bacteroid, a form of rhizobia at nitrogen-fixing state. Up to date nearly two hundred genes required for the symbiosis process have been identified and characterized, mainly in two model legumes, <italic>Lotus japonicus</italic> and <italic>Medicago truncatula</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Roy et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>). The molecular signaling processes initiate when the legumes release flavonoids to attract rhizobia. In response, rhizobia secrete nodulation (Nod) factors (NFs), lipochitooligosaccharide (LCOs) signaling molecules, which can be recognized by NF receptor 1 (NFR1) and NFR5 based on the studies in <italic>L. japonicus</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Limpens, 2003</xref>; E. B. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">Madsen et&#xa0;al., 2003</xref>). The interaction between NFR1/5 and NFs stimulates symbiotic calcium oscillations, which are further decoded by Ca<sup>2+</sup>/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase (CCaMK) and CYCLOPS (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Levy et&#xa0;al., 2004</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">Yano et&#xa0;al., 2008</xref>). The output of the symbiotic signal is further transmitted by the GRAS transcriptional factors (TFs), nodulation signaling pathway 1 (NSP1) and NSP2 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">Oldroyd and Long, 2003</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Kalo, 2005</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">Arrighi et&#xa0;al., 2006</xref>) as an NSP1- NSP2 complex to induce Nodule Inception (<italic>NIN)</italic> and required for Nodulation 1 (<italic>ERN1)</italic> genes for nodule organogenesis process (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">Stracke et&#xa0;al., 2002</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Marsh et&#xa0;al., 2007</xref>).</p>
<p>Cultivated peanut (<italic>Arachis hypogaea</italic> L.) is an important legume crop grown worldwide. It is an allotetraploid (2n= 4x = 40, AABB) with a genome size of ~ 2.7 Gb (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">Bertioli et&#xa0;al., 2019</xref>). As a legume species, cultivated peanut plants can establish symbiosis with <italic>Bradyrhizobia</italic>, a genus of soil-born slow-growing bacteria, and produce nodules regularly. Mutants of non-nodulating (Nod&#x2013;) peanuts were first reported in progeny derived from the cross between two normally nodulating (Nod+) lines, PI 262090 and UF 487A-4-1-2 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Gorbet and Burton, 1979</xref>). A recent effort of a forward genetics approach uncovered that natural nucleotide polymorphisms at a pair of <italic>NSP2</italic> homoeologs caused the Nod&#x2013; mutants in cultivated peanuts (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Peng et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>). This pair of homoeologous <italic>NSP2</italic> genes are located on chromosomes 08 and 17 of two subgenomes A and B, and thus were named <italic>AhNSP2-A08</italic> (<italic>N<sub>a</sub>
</italic>) and <italic>AhNSP2-B07</italic> (<italic>N<sub>b</sub>
</italic>), respectively. The natural mutant allele <italic>n<sub>a</sub>
</italic> is a single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) from cytosine to thymidine at the 673th nucleotide in the coding region, which leads to a premature stop codon that reduces the polypeptide size from 513 to 224 amino acids (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Peng et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>). The natural mutant allele <italic>n<sub>b</sub>
</italic> is a single nucleotide deletion of the cytosine at the 119<sup>th</sup> nucleotide in the coding region, which causes a reading frame shift and leads to a premature stop codon, reducing the polypeptide size from 516 to 113 amino acids (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Peng et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>). Predictably, the protein encoding sequences of both mutated alleles <italic>n<sub>a</sub>
</italic> and <italic>n<sub>b</sub>
</italic> miss all or most of the functional domains of the GRAS TF.</p>
<p>In our previous research (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Peng et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>), crossing of the Nod+ PI 262090 and UF 487A-4-1-2 with the confirmed genotypes of <italic>N<sub>a</sub>N<sub>a</sub>n<sub>b</sub>n<sub>b</sub>
</italic> and <italic>n<sub>a</sub>n<sub>a</sub>N<sub>b</sub>N<sub>b</sub>
</italic>produce a Nod+ F<sub>1</sub> (<italic>N<sub>a</sub>n<sub>a</sub>N<sub>b</sub>n<sub>b</sub>
</italic>), the F<sub>2</sub> selfing population derived from which segregates the Nod&#x2013; phenotype with the homozygous recessive alleles at both loci (<italic>n<sub>a</sub>n<sub>a</sub>n<sub>b</sub>n<sub>b</sub>
</italic>), confirming the roles of both <italic>N<sub>a</sub>
</italic> and <italic>N<sub>b</sub>
</italic> in nodule production. Our further analysis revealed that the segregation of the nodulation phenotype follows the Mendelian inheritance with a 3:1 ratio of Nod+: Nod&#x2013; at the <italic>N<sub>a</sub>
</italic> locus in a selfing population of a heterozygous plant with the genotype of <italic>N<sub>a</sub>n<sub>a</sub>n<sub>b</sub>n<sub>b</sub>
</italic>. The plants with the genotype <italic>N<sub>a</sub>_n<sub>b</sub>n<sub>b</sub>
</italic> are Nod+, and the plants with the <italic>n<sub>a</sub>n<sub>a</sub>n<sub>b</sub>n<sub>b</sub>
</italic> genotype are Nod&#x2013;. By contrast, the phenotypic segregation ratio of Nod+ to Nod&#x2013; varied from 5:3 to 1:1 at the <italic>N<sub>b</sub>
</italic> gene locus in the selfing population of a heterozygous plant with the genotype of <italic>n<sub>a</sub>n<sub>a</sub>N<sub>b</sub>n<sub>b</sub>
</italic>, violating a Mendelian 3:1 ratio. We further confirmed that the phenotype of the heterozygous lines with the genotype of <italic>n<sub>a</sub>n<sub>a</sub>N<sub>b</sub>n<sub>b</sub>
</italic> can be either Nod+ or Nod&#x2013; (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Peng et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>), suggesting that some other mechanisms are underlying in regulation of the nodule phenotype at the <italic>N<sub>b</sub>
</italic> locus.</p>
<p>In this study, to understand the genetic mechanisms of the <italic>AhNSP2-B07</italic> gene in controlling peanut nodulation, we analyzed the segregating ratios of peanut nodulation at the <italic>N<sub>b</sub>
</italic> locus in the field, allelic expression of <italic>N<sub>b</sub>
</italic> in peanut roots and gametic tissues, and DNA methylation at the <italic>N<sub>b</sub>
</italic> locus. Our results revealed that the expression of <italic>AhNSP2-B07</italic> is paternally expressed or imprinted in the peanut genome showing parent-of-origin effects. Although the bisulfite sequencing of the promoter and coding regions of <italic>AhNSP2-B07</italic> revealed no significant differences in the methylation level between ovary and pollen, it is suspected that either the tissues we sampled didn&#x2019;t resolve to detect the gametic methylation variations or the imprinting is not due to DNA methylation. To our knowledge, this is the first functional embryonic imprinted gene identified in crop species.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2" sec-type="materials|methods">
<title>Materials and methods</title>
<sec id="s2_1">
<title>Plant materials and segregating populations in the field</title>
<p>Peanut lines derived from the cross between Nod&#x2013; E4 (<italic>n<sub>a</sub>n<sub>a</sub>n<sub>b</sub>n<sub>b</sub>
</italic>) and Nod+ E5 (<italic>n<sub>a</sub>n<sub>a</sub>N<sub>b</sub>N<sub>b</sub>
</italic>) were used in this study. E4 and E5 are sister inbred lines derived from parental lines UF 487A (Nod+) and PI 262090 (Nod+) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Peng et&#xa0;al., 2018</xref>), both of which are Virginia botanical types. The F<sub>5</sub>, F<sub>6</sub>, and F<sub>7</sub> generations of heterozygous <italic>N<sub>b</sub>n<sub>b</sub>
</italic> Nod+ lines from a cross between E4 and E5 were planted in the year 2018, 2019, and 2020, respectively. Peanut seeds were planted from late April to early May and harvested in September every year at the University of Florida Plant Science Research and Education Unit (PSREU, Citra, FL). Commercial inoculum Optimize (Monsanto, St. Louis, MO) was applied to promote nodulation in the field when seeds were planted. The nodulation phenotype was recorded with visual assessment during harvest. Peanut plants were dug out and the root nodule on the whole root system of each plant was scored as a qualitative trait. The phenotypes were recorded as Nod+ if the plants nodulated normally or Nod&#x2013; if the plants failed to produce any nodule. In a few incidences, peanut root had only a few unusual big nodules, which exhibited aboveground symptoms of nitrogen depletion, were classified as Nod&#x2013; as well (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;1D</bold>
</xref>).</p>
<fig id="f1" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;1</label>
<caption>
<p>Genotyping strategies at the <italic>N<sub>b</sub>
</italic> locus using different markers and phenotyping of nodulation. <bold>(A)</bold> Location of the INDEL marker and the CAPS marker. The INDEL marker was located at 125 Kb upstream of <italic>AhNSP2-B07</italic> (<italic>N<sub>b</sub>
</italic>), with a 23 bp deletion in the mutant allele. For the CAPS marker, a &#x201c;C&#x201d; to &#x201c;A&#x201d; mismatch in the forward primer was introduced in the 117<sup>th</sup> position of the CDS region in <italic>AhNSP2-B07</italic> to create the cutting site of XcmI for the mutant allele. &#x201c;_&#x201d; indicates the 1 bp deletion of cytosine in <italic>n<sub>b</sub>
</italic> allele. The wild-type allele was not recognized by XcmI due to the one extra nucleotide. <bold>(B)</bold> Example of genotyping using the AhB07NSP2_INDEL marker. The genotypes of individual plants (Lane 1-18) were indicated as <italic>N<sub>b</sub>N<sub>b</sub>
</italic>: 240 bp (one upper band); <italic>N<sub>b</sub>n<sub>b</sub>
</italic>: 217 bp and 240 bp (two bands); <italic>n<sub>b</sub>n<sub>b</sub>
</italic>: 217 bp (one lower band). L: 100 bp DNA ladder. <bold>(C)</bold> Example of genotyping individual plants (Lane 1-18) using the AhB07NSP2_CAPS marker. Top panel, before digestion (246 bp). Bottom panel, after digestion, <italic>N<sub>b</sub>N<sub>b</sub>
</italic>: 246 bp; <italic>N<sub>b</sub>n<sub>b</sub>
</italic>: 226 bp and 246 bp; <italic>n<sub>b</sub>n<sub>b</sub>
</italic>: 226 bp. L: 100 bp DNA ladder. <bold>(D)</bold> Nodulation phenotypes. Plants with a few big nodules were classified as Nod&#x2013;.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-14-1193465-g001.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_2">
<title>Inoculation and sampling in the greenhouse</title>
<p>The <italic>Bradyrhizobia</italic> strain Lb8 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Paudel et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>) was grown at 28&#xb0;C in 30&#xa0;ml YEM media with 20 &#xb5;g/mL chloramphenicol in a 50&#xa0;ml Falcon tube on a rotary shaker at 50 rpm for one week. When the optical density (OD) at 600 nm of the Lb8 culture reached 0.8, the cells were collected by centrifuge, washed, and adjusted to OD<sub>600</sub> of 0.15 as inoculum.</p>
<p>Peanut seeds collected from heterozygous plants (<italic>N<sub>b</sub>n<sub>b</sub>
</italic>) were sterilized with 0.1% Mercury chloride for seven minutes, washed twice with sterile water, soaked in Abound fungicide (Syngenta, Wilmington, DE) for 5 mins, washed three times with sterile water, and then transferred into the germination box and incubated at 28&#xb0;C under dark in the growth chamber. When the lateral roots started emerging around one week after seed germination, peanut roots were dip-inoculated with Lb8 inoculum. Seedlings that were dipped into the water are treated as negative controls. After inoculation, the seedlings were incubated in the germination box for two days before being transferred into the soil.</p>
<p>The primary roots of the seedlings at 2 days post-inoculation (dpi), 5 dpi, and 14 dpi were excised and snap-frozen with liquid nitrogen for RNA extraction and allelic expression examination. Biological replicates at each time point were obtained solely from seedlings that were of comparable height and size. The total RNA of the root samples was extracted using the Direct-zol RNA extraction kit (ZYMO research, Irvine, CA) following the manufacturer&#x2019;s instructions. Three micrograms of the total RNA from each sample were then reverse-transcribed into cDNA using SuperScript&#x2122; III First-Strand Synthesis System (Invitrogen, Waltham, MA). The seedlings with excised roots were re-planted in the soil pre-mixed with the <italic>Bradyrhizobia</italic> inoculum for phenotyping. The plants were dug out one month later after sampling to check the presence of nodules for phenotyping.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_3">
<title>Plant genotyping and allelic expression</title>
<p>Young leaves were collected from each plant either in the field or in the growth chamber for DNA extraction using MagJET magnetic bead (Thermo Fisher, Waltham, MA) following the protocol. A 23 bp deletion in the mutant allele (E4) located ~125 Kb apart from the <italic>AhNSP2-B07</italic> gene was identified from the sequences generated from a QTL-seq experiment (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Peng et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>), which was used as an intergenic INDEL marker (AhB07NSP2_INDEL, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;1A</bold>
</xref>) for genotyping the segregating population in the field (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;1B</bold>
</xref>). <italic>Chi</italic>-square tests were conducted to check the fitness of the phenotypic and genotypic segregation ratios.</p>
<p>To distinguish the single nucleotide deletion of the mutant allele <italic>n<sub>b</sub>
</italic> from <italic>N<sub>b</sub>
</italic>, a CAPS marker, AhB07NSP2_CAPS (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;1A</bold>
</xref>) was designed with indCAPS (<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://indcaps.kieber.cloudapps.unc.edu/">http://indcaps.kieber.cloudapps.unc.edu/</ext-link>) using the sequences surrounding the mutation site. The restriction enzyme <italic>XcmI</italic> (New England Biolabs, Ipswich, MA) was chosen to digest the PCR fragments with the maximal length difference between the <italic>N<sub>b</sub>
</italic> and <italic>n<sub>b</sub>
</italic> alleles. One artificial mismatch was introduced in the forward primer to create the recognition site of <italic>XcmI</italic> in the mutant genotype (<italic>n<sub>b</sub>
</italic>). First, a touchdown PCR program was used with the annealing temperature dropping from 65&#xb0;C to 55&#xb0;C and with an extension time of 10 s. PCR products using the root cDNA as the template were examined on a 1% agarose gel to verify the size of the product. Next, 4 &#xb5;l of the PCR product was digested with <italic>XcmI</italic> enzyme at 37&#xb0;C for 1 hour following the manufacturer&#x2019;s instruction. The digested product was visualized by gel electrophoresis with a 2% agarose gel for genotype calling (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;1C</bold>
</xref>). The PCR amplicons were further validated using Sanger sequencing (Genewiz, South Plainfield, NJ) as well.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_4">
<title>qRT-PCR analysis with gametic cells</title>
<p>Three biological replicates of plants of Nod+ <italic>N<sub>b</sub>N<sub>b</sub>
</italic>, Nod&#x2013; <italic>n<sub>b</sub>n<sub>b</sub>
</italic>, Nod+ <italic>N<sub>b</sub>n<sub>b</sub>
</italic>, and Nod&#x2013; <italic>N<sub>b</sub>n<sub>b</sub>
</italic> were selected in the field for flower collection. Unopened flower buds and fresh flower blooms were collected from each plant and kept separately in RNAlater&#x2122; Stabilization Solution (Thermo Fisher, Waltham, MA) for ovary and pollen dissection, respectively (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Supplementary Figure S1</bold>
</xref>).</p>
<p>Total RNA of ovary and pollen samples dissected from peanut flowers were extracted with RNeasy Plant Mini Kit (Qiagen, Germantown, MD) following the manufacturer&#x2019;s protocol. Total RNA integrity was examined on a 1% agarose gel by electrophoresis. The quantity was checked using NanoDrop and Qubit RNA broad range (Thermo Fisher, Waltham, MA). Potential residual genomic DNA was further digested by DNA-free&#x2122; DNA Removal Kit and Dynabeads&#x2122; mRNA Purification Kit (Thermo Fisher, Waltham, MA). One microgram of total RNA from the ovary and pollen samples was respectively used for cDNA synthesis by SuperScript&#x2122; III First-Strand Synthesis System from the RT-PCR kit (Invitrogen, Waltham, MA).</p>
<p>qRT-PCR for <italic>AhNSP2-B07</italic> was performed by using primer AhB07NSP2_q (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Supplementary Table&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>) with PowerSYBR Green PCR Master Mix (Thermo Fisher, Waltham, MA) running on QuantStudio&#x2122; 6 Flex Real-Time PCR System (Thermo Fisher, Waltham, MA), with three technical replicates using the <italic>AhUBI</italic> gene as the internal control (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Morgante et&#xa0;al., 2011</xref>). Intergenic marker AhB07NSP2_INDEL (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Supplementary Table&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>) was used to confirm the complete removal of gDNA in the cDNA samples. Quantitative analysis of gene expression was performed by using the 2<sup>&#x2212;&#x394;&#x394;CT</sup> method, and one-way or two-way ANOVA was used for statistical analysis.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_5">
<title>Bisulfite sequencing</title>
<p>A total of 12 peanut plants (3 biological replicates of Nod+ <italic>N<sub>b</sub>N<sub>b</sub>
</italic>, Nod&#x2013; <italic>n<sub>b</sub>n<sub>b</sub>
</italic>, Nod+ <italic>N<sub>b</sub>n<sub>b</sub>
</italic>, and Nod&#x2013; <italic>N<sub>b</sub>n<sub>b</sub>
</italic>, respectively) with three types of tissues, including ovary and pollen, were collected in the same way as the methods described above and used for DNA extraction. Peanut pegs were collected from the same plants, which were used a somatic-cell control. Bisulfite conversion of genomic DNA samples was performed by using EpiTect Bisulfite Kits (Qiagen, Germantown, MD) according to the manufacturer&#x2019;s instructions (<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.zymoresearch.com/pages/bisulfite-beginner-guide">https://www.zymoresearch.com/pages/bisulfite-beginner-guide</ext-link>). Converted DNA samples were assessed by 2% agarose gel electrophoresis.</p>
<p>Primers for bisulfite PCR were designed manually with several considerations: 1) limiting the amplicon size to a range of 300-500 bp, due to the DNA fragmentation during the bisulfite-converting process, 2) avoiding primer sites at any cytosine context due to their unknown methylation status, 3) avoiding non-specific sequence regions with the DNA sequences similarity higher than 98% between <italic>N<sub>a</sub>
</italic> and <italic>N<sub>b</sub>
</italic> homoeologs, and 4) comparable T<sub>m</sub> value of the forward and reverse primers. In total, 12 pairs of primers were designed for bisulfite sequencing (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;2</bold>
</xref>). Primers were designed to cover the region of the whole <italic>N<sub>b</sub>
</italic> gene from -1,690 (~the start of promoter region) to +1,551 bp (the end of CDS region) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;2</bold>
</xref>), and synthesized by Integrated DNA Technologies, Inc (IDT, Coralville, IW). The primers were primarily designed to be degenerate as C/T at the C sites if the C sites could not be avoid. According to the amplicon sequencing results, specific primers were further designed. Bisulfite-converted and unconverted genomic DNA samples were used as templates to test the specific primers. Primers only amplify the bisulfite converted but not the unconverted DNA sample were used in the experiments to ensure optimal amplification only from bisulfite-converted DNA samples. All primer sequences for bisulfite sequencing are listed in <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Supplementary Table&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>.</p>
<fig id="f2" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;2</label>
<caption>
<p>Bisulfite-PCR primer design in the promoter and the full length CDS region of <italic>AhNSP2B07</italic> and schematic representation of the structure and motifs of AhNSP2 GRAS protein.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-14-1193465-g002.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>PCR reactions were performed using EpiMark<sup>&#xae;</sup> Hot Start Taq DNA Polymerase (New England BioLabs, Ipswich, MA) and GoTaq<sup>&#xae;</sup> Master Mixes (Promega Corporation, Madison, WI). The PCR products were validated on a 2% agarose gel. Faint PCR bands were extracted from agarose gel and purified using Zymoclean Gel DNA Recovery Kit (Zymo Research, Irvine, CA). The purified DNA fragments were then used as templates to perform the second round of PCR amplification. All PCR products were sent for Sanger sequencing (Genewiz, South Plainfield, NJ) with either forward or reverse primers.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_6">
<title>Bisulfite-sequencing data analysis</title>
<p>The SnapGene software (Insightful Science, San Diego, CA) was used to align and compare the Sanger sequences with the reference DNA sequence. All the successful Sanger sequencing reads were firstly aligned to the <italic>N<sub>a</sub>
</italic> and <italic>N<sub>b</sub>
</italic> sequences to make sure that the reads were specifically amplified from the <italic>N<sub>b</sub>
</italic> gene. According to the <italic>N<sub>b</sub>
</italic> gene sequence, cytosine sequence contexts were classified as CG (M1), CHG (M2, H = A, T, or C), and CHH (M3) contexts. Methylation status in different contexts was recorded manually for each amplicon, separately. The methylation status was recorded as &#x201c;1&#x201d; if completely methylated showing a clear &#x201c;C&#x201d; peak, or as &#x201c;0&#x201d; if unmethylated showing a clear &#x201c;T&#x201d; peak on the chromatograph. If both C and T peaks were present (overlapping C and T peaks), &#x201c;0.5&#x201d; was recorded to indicate partial methylation. Missing data was labelled as &#x201c;&#x201d;.</p>
<p>The methylation ratios of individual cytosine sites were recorded for ovary, pollen, and peg tissues, respectively. The average methylation ratio in the three methylation contexts of three types of tissue was analyzed by two-way ANOVA. A logistic regression method (Position/Total Number of Observations) was used to analyze the proportion of Plant IDs with a positive &#x201c;1&#x201d; score for methylation and calculated both overall P-values as well as contrast P-values comparing ovary to pollen tissues. Other statistical analyses, including Least squares means, Odds-ratios, and the approximate 95% confidence interval, were calculated as well.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s3" sec-type="results">
<title>Results</title>
<sec id="s3_1">
<title>The ratio of Nod+ to Nod- of <italic>N<sub>b</sub>n<sub>b</sub>
</italic> lines is distorted from 3:1</title>
<p>A total of 787, 316, and 119 peanut plants derived from <italic>N<sub>b</sub>n<sub>b</sub>
</italic> lines were phenotyped for nodulation over three consecutive years as F<sub>5</sub>, F<sub>6</sub> and F<sub>7</sub> populations. The phenotypic segregation ratio in each population was distorted from Mendelian 3:1 ratio (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">
<bold>Table&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>). For example, out of the 787 F<sub>5</sub> plants, 469 and 318 are Nod+ and Nod-, respectively, which is significantly distorted from either 3:1 or 1:1 (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">
<bold>Table&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>). Next, we examined the genotypes of these three populations at the <italic>N<sub>b</sub>
</italic> locus. Genotyping the randomly selected 362, 34, and 109 individuals from F<sub>5</sub>, F<sub>6</sub>, and F<sub>7</sub> populations showed that the segregation ratio of genotypes <italic>N<sub>b</sub>N<sub>b</sub>
</italic>: <italic>N<sub>b</sub>n<sub>b</sub>
</italic>: <italic>n<sub>b</sub>n<sub>b</sub>
</italic> fitted the 1:2:1 ratio in all three populations (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">
<bold>Table&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>). The phenotypes of plants with <italic>N<sub>b</sub>N<sub>b</sub>
</italic> and <italic>n<sub>b</sub>n<sub>b</sub>
</italic> genotypes were Nod+ and Nod&#x2013; (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;1D</bold>
</xref>), respectively, with no exceptions. However, phenotypes of the <italic>N<sub>b</sub>n<sub>b</sub>
</italic> plants were either Nod+ or Nod&#x2013;, which caused the phenotypic segregation ratio to be distorted from the 3:1 ratio. A small portion of plants (~5%) with few unusual big nodules were also observed with <italic>N<sub>b</sub>n<sub>b</sub>
</italic> genotype (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;1D</bold>
</xref>), which were classified as Nod&#x2013; as they exhibited deficit of nodulation and nitrogen deficiency phenotype.</p>
<table-wrap id="T1" position="float">
<label>Table&#xa0;1</label>
<caption>
<p>Phenotypes and genotypes segregating in F<sub>5</sub>, F<sub>6</sub>, and F<sub>7</sub> populations derived from heterozygous (<italic>N<sub>b</sub>n<sub>b</sub>
</italic>) plants in the field in 2018, 2019, and 2020, respectively.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" align="left"/>
<th valign="middle" colspan="2" align="center">Phenotypes</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center"/>
<th valign="middle" colspan="2" align="center"/>
<th valign="middle" align="center"/>
<th valign="middle" colspan="3" align="center">Genotypes</th>
<th valign="bottom" align="center"/>
<th valign="bottom" align="center"/>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" align="left">Generation/Year</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Nod+</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Nod&#x2013;</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Nod+:Nod&#x2013;</th>
<th valign="middle" colspan="2" align="center">&#x3c7;<sup>2</sup> of 3:1</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">&#x3c7;<sup>2</sup> of 1:1</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">
<italic>N<sub>b</sub>N<sub>b</sub>
</italic>
</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">
<italic>N<sub>b</sub>n<sub>b</sub>
</italic>
</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">
<italic>n<sub>b</sub>n<sub>b</sub>
</italic>
</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">
<italic>N<sub>b</sub>_: n<sub>b</sub>n<sub>b</sub>
</italic>
</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">&#x3c7;<sup>2</sup> of 1:2:1</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">F<sub>5</sub>, 2018</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">469</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">318</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.47:1</td>
<td valign="middle" colspan="2" align="center">1.84E-23</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">6.71E-05</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">96</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">185</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">81</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">3.46:1</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.49</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">F<sub>6</sub>, 2019</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">163</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">153</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.07:1</td>
<td valign="middle" colspan="2" align="center">7.00E-22</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.09</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">6</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">20</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">8</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">3.25:1</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.52</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">F<sub>7</sub>, 2020</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">76</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">43</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1.77:1</td>
<td valign="middle" colspan="2" align="center">0.01</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.10</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">27</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">51</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">31</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">2.51:1</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.69</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn>
<p>A portion of plants instead of the whole population was randomly selected and genotyped each year. Thus, the total number of genotyped plants was smaller than the total number of the whole population in each generation.</p>
</fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_2">
<title>Monoallelic expression of <italic>AhNSP2-B07</italic> in peanut roots with the heterozygous genotype (<italic>N<sub>b</sub>n<sub>b</sub>
</italic>)</title>
<p>AhB07NSP2_CAPS was used to determine the allelic expression of the <italic>N<sub>b</sub>
</italic> gene in the root samples of <italic>N<sub>b</sub>n<sub>b</sub>
</italic> plants (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;3</bold>
</xref>). Owing to variability in germination time and rate, as well as the segregation at the <italic>N<sub>b</sub>
</italic> locus, the number of biological replicates of Nod+ and Nod&#x2013; <italic>N<sub>b</sub>n<sub>b</sub>
</italic> plants at each time point is limited. For root samples at 2 dpi, the <italic>N<sub>b</sub>
</italic> gene was exclusively expressed in all three Nod+ <italic>N<sub>b</sub>n<sub>b</sub>
</italic> plants, while the mutant allele <italic>n<sub>b</sub>
</italic> was solely expressed in the three Nod&#x2013; <italic>N<sub>b</sub>n<sub>b</sub>
</italic> plants, exhibiting monoallelic expression (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;3A</bold>
</xref>). The same monoallelic gene expression was also observed in the root samples at 5 dpi and 14 dpi (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;3B</bold>
</xref>). Specifically, at 5 dpi, the <italic>n<sub>b</sub>
</italic> allele was exclusively expressed in two randomly selected Nod&#x2013; <italic>N<sub>b</sub>n<sub>b</sub>
</italic> root samples, while <italic>N<sub>b</sub>
</italic> was expressed in four Nod+ <italic>N<sub>b</sub>n<sub>b</sub>
</italic> roots (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;3B</bold>
</xref>). At 14 dpi, only <italic>N<sub>b</sub>
</italic> was found to be expressed in three Nod+ <italic>N<sub>b</sub>n<sub>b</sub>
</italic> root samples (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;3B</bold>
</xref>). PCR amplification was very weak from Nod&#x2013; <italic>N<sub>b</sub>n<sub>b</sub>
</italic> at 14 dpi, thus no results were generated. The PCR amplicons from the cDNA of <italic>N<sub>b</sub>n<sub>b</sub>
</italic> root samples were further confirmed by Sanger Sequencing (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;3C</bold>
</xref>). The single clear peaks of the chromatogram indicated that all the Nod&#x2013; <italic>N<sub>b</sub>n<sub>b</sub>
</italic>only expressed the <italic>n<sub>b</sub>
</italic> allele, while Nod+ <italic>N<sub>b</sub>n<sub>b</sub>
</italic> only expressed the <italic>N<sub>b</sub>
</italic> allele (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;3D</bold>
</xref>). The amplification from cDNA samples of peanut leaves was barely visible on the gel, suggesting low expression of the <italic>N<sub>b</sub>
</italic> gene in peanut leaves (Data not shown).</p>
<fig id="f3" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;3</label>
<caption>
<p>Monoallelic expression of <italic>AhNSP2-B07</italic> in root tissues of <italic>N<sub>b</sub>n<sub>b</sub>
</italic> at 2 dpi, 5 dpi, and 14 dpi. <bold>(A)</bold> PCR of root cDNA samples at 2 dpi. Lane 1-6: biological replicates of Nod+ <italic>N<sub>b</sub>n<sub>b</sub>
</italic>, in which lanes 2, 4, and 6 were <italic>XcmI</italic>-digested PCR products of lanes 1, 3, and 5, respectively. Lane 7-12: biological replicates of Nod&#x2013; <italic>N<sub>b</sub>n<sub>b</sub>
</italic>, in which lanes 8, 10, and 12 were <italic>XcmI</italic>-digested PCR products of lanes 7, 9, and 11, respectively. <bold>(B)</bold> PCR of root cDNA samples at 5 and 14 dpi after <italic>XcmI</italic> digestion. Lane 1 and 2: Nod&#x2013; <italic>N<sub>b</sub>n<sub>b</sub>
</italic> at 5 dpi. Lane 3-6: Nod+ <italic>N<sub>b</sub>n<sub>b</sub>
</italic>at 5 dpi. Lane 7: gDNA of <italic>N<sub>b</sub>n<sub>b</sub>
</italic> as a control. Lane 8-11: Nod+ <italic>N<sub>b</sub>n<sub>b</sub>
</italic>at 14 dpi. <bold>(C)</bold> Sanger sequencing of the PCR products amplified from <italic>N<sub>b</sub>n<sub>b</sub>
</italic> root cDNA. Two representative samples from Nod&#x2013; <italic>N<sub>b</sub>n<sub>b</sub>
</italic>(top) and Nod+ <italic>N<sub>b</sub>n<sub>b</sub>
</italic>(bottom), respectively. <bold>(D)</bold> Summary of all monoallelic expressions at different time points. L: 100 bp DNA ladder.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-14-1193465-g003.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_3">
<title>The expression of <italic>AhNSP2-B07</italic> is higher in pollen than ovary</title>
<p>The monoallelic expression of <italic>AhNSP2-B07</italic> led us to ask whether <italic>AhNSP2-B07</italic> is imprinted between female and male alleles. To test this, ovary and pollen tissues were dissected from Nod+ heterozygotes (<italic>n<sub>a</sub>n<sub>a</sub>N<sub>b</sub>n<sub>b</sub>
</italic>), Nod&#x2013; heterozygotes (<italic>n<sub>a</sub>n<sub>a</sub>N<sub>b</sub>n<sub>b</sub>
</italic>), Nod&#x2013; homozygotes (<italic>n<sub>a</sub>n<sub>a</sub>n<sub>b</sub>n<sub>b</sub>
</italic>), and Nod+ homozygotes (<italic>n<sub>a</sub>n<sub>a</sub>N<sub>b</sub>N<sub>b</sub>
</italic>) for qRT-PCR analysis at the <italic>N<sub>b</sub>
</italic> locus. As expected, no amplification was detected using AhB07NSP2_INDEL (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f4">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;4A</bold>
</xref>), which targets an intergenic region. All the samples got successful amplification with the housekeeping gene <italic>AhUBI</italic> (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f4">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;4A</bold>
</xref>). The qRT-PCR results showed that the expression levels of the <italic>N<sub>b</sub>
</italic> gene were significantly higher the in pollen (<italic>p</italic>&lt;0.0001) than that in the ovary (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f4">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;4B</bold>
</xref>), regardless of the nodulation phenotype or genotype of the plants at the <italic>N<sub>b</sub>
</italic> locus. This result demonstrated that the <italic>N<sub>b</sub>
</italic> gene&#x2019;s expression was significantly suppressed in the female gametes of all peanut plants, suggesting that <italic>N<sub>b</sub>
</italic> is likely an imprinted gene.</p>
<fig id="f4" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;4</label>
<caption>
<p>Comparison of expression of <italic>N<sub>b</sub>
</italic> reveals significantly higher expression in pollen. <bold>(A)</bold> PCR products of AhB07NSP2_qw1, AhUBI, and AhB07NSP2_INDEL. For homozygous samples, Lane 1-6: <italic>N<sub>b</sub>N<sub>b</sub>
</italic>; Lane 7-12: <italic>n<sub>b</sub>n<sub>b</sub>
</italic>. For heterozygous samples, Lane 1-6: Nod+ <italic>N<sub>b</sub>n<sub>b</sub>
</italic>; Lane 7-12: Nod&#x2013; <italic>N<sub>b</sub>n<sub>b</sub>.</italic> L: 100 bp DNA ladder. P: pollen. O: ovary. R<sub>c</sub>: root cDNA. R<sub>g</sub>: root gDNA. <bold>(B)</bold> Relative expression of <italic>AhNSP2-B07</italic> across different genotypes and phenotypes. Ovary and pollen samples were collected from homozygous Nod&#x2013; <italic>n<sub>b</sub>n<sub>b</sub>
</italic>, Nod+ <italic>N<sub>b</sub>N<sub>b</sub>
</italic>, and heterozygous <italic>N<sub>b</sub>n<sub>b</sub>
</italic> with Nod+ and Nod&#x2013; phenotypes. The p-value was conducted by student&#x2019;s <italic>t</italic> test. *p &lt; 0.05. The error bars represent the standard deviation of each sample.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-14-1193465-g004.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_4">
<title>No significant difference in DNA methylation at <italic>N<sub>b</sub>
</italic> between pollen and ovary</title>
<p>Genomic imprinting is an epigenetic phenomenon that involves DNA cytosine methylation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">Rodrigues and Zilberman, 2015</xref>). To further understand whether the biased expression of the <italic>N<sub>b</sub>
</italic> gene in peanut gametes is caused by the difference in DNA methylation between female and male, bisulfite PCR and subsequent sequencing were conducted on the <italic>N<sub>b</sub>
</italic> gene including the promoter region from gametic tissues of Nod+ heterozygotes (<italic>n<sub>a</sub>n<sub>a</sub>N<sub>b</sub>n<sub>b</sub>
</italic>), Nod&#x2013; heterozygotes (<italic>n<sub>a</sub>n<sub>a</sub>N<sub>b</sub>n<sub>b</sub>
</italic>), Nod&#x2013; homozygotes (<italic>n<sub>a</sub>n<sub>a</sub>n<sub>b</sub>n<sub>b</sub>
</italic>), and Nod+ homozygotes (<italic>n<sub>a</sub>n<sub>a</sub>N<sub>b</sub>N<sub>b</sub>
</italic>). Out of 432 PCR reactions, 370 (87%) produced specific amplicons with successful Sanger sequence reads (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">
<bold>Table&#xa0;2</bold>
</xref>). The rest were either not amplified, or amplified un-specifically, or failed to be sequenced, which were all treated as missing data. All the 370 reads contained cytosines of methylated, unmethylated, or partially methylated, which basically indicated the effectiveness of bisulfite conversion. Across the full <italic>N<sub>b</sub>
</italic> gene sequence including promoter and CDS regions (3,241 bp), 633/642 cytosine sites (98.6%) were covered by the sequencing data, including 88 CG, 78 CHG, and 467 CHH sites. Among the 633 cytosine sites, 200 were unmethylated across all the samples tested. Of the rest methylated sites, the three different types of tissue had no significantly different methylation levels in the overall <italic>N<sub>b</sub>
</italic> gene sequence (<italic>p</italic>=0.1531) in all three cytosine contexts. The CG context had the highest methylation levels (0.82 ~ 0.93) followed by CHG (0.52 ~ 0.72), and CHH (0.18 ~ 0.25) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f5">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;5A</bold>
</xref>).</p>
<table-wrap id="T2" position="float">
<label>Table&#xa0;2</label>
<caption>
<p>The average ratio of successfully sequenced cytosine site in peanuts.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" align="left">Genotypes</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Phenotypes</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Number of plants tested</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Tissue</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Average Ratio of Sequenced C Sites</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">
<italic>n<sub>a</sub>n<sub>a</sub>N<sub>b</sub>N<sub>b</sub>
</italic>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Nod+</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">3</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Ovary</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">81.15%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">
<italic>n<sub>a</sub>n<sub>a</sub>n<sub>b</sub>n<sub>b</sub>
</italic>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Nod&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">3</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Ovary</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">82.04%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">
<italic>n<sub>a</sub>n<sub>a</sub>N<sub>b</sub>n<sub>b</sub>
</italic>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Nod+</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">3</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Ovary</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">75.91%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">
<italic>n<sub>a</sub>n<sub>a</sub>N<sub>b</sub>n<sub>b</sub>
</italic>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Nod&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">3</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Ovary</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">78.35%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">
<italic>n<sub>a</sub>n<sub>a</sub>N<sub>b</sub>N<sub>b</sub>
</italic>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Nod+</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">3</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Pollen</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">57.01%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">
<italic>n<sub>a</sub>n<sub>a</sub>n<sub>b</sub>n<sub>b</sub>
</italic>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Nod&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">3</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Pollen</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">63.80%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">
<italic>n<sub>a</sub>n<sub>a</sub>N<sub>b</sub>n<sub>b</sub>
</italic>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Nod+</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">3</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Pollen</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">65.20%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">
<italic>n<sub>a</sub>n<sub>a</sub>N<sub>b</sub>n<sub>b</sub>
</italic>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Nod&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">3</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Pollen</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">59.10%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">
<italic>n<sub>a</sub>n<sub>a</sub>N<sub>b</sub>N<sub>b</sub>
</italic>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Nod+</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">3</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Peg</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">79.75%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">
<italic>n<sub>a</sub>n<sub>a</sub>n<sub>b</sub>n<sub>b</sub>
</italic>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Nod&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">3</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Peg</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">66.72%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">
<italic>n<sub>a</sub>n<sub>a</sub>N<sub>b</sub>n<sub>b</sub>
</italic>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Nod+</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">3</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Peg</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">66.46%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">
<italic>n<sub>a</sub>n<sub>a</sub>N<sub>b</sub>n<sub>b</sub>
</italic>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Nod&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">3</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">Peg</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">81.83%</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
<fig id="f5" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;5</label>
<caption>
<p>No significant difference in methylation level at <italic>N<sub>b</sub>
</italic> between ovary and pollen. <bold>(A)</bold> Average methylation level in CG, CHG, and CHH contexts in the three plant tissues (<italic>p</italic>=0.1531). <bold>(B)</bold> Distribution of methylation levels in CG, CHG, and CHH contexts across the <italic>N<sub>b</sub>
</italic> gene between ovary and pollen. The X-axis represents the position of the methylation sites in the detected sequence. The bar under each X-axis shows the physical location of the promoter and CDS of the <italic>AhNSP2-B07</italic> gene. Regions showing different methylation levels between ovary and pollen are indicated with red dotted lines on the bar.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-14-1193465-g005.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>At a few regions, such as from &#x2013;670 bp to 25 bp (mostly in the promoter region), 579 bp to 726 bp, etc., slightly different methylation level was observed between the two gametic tissues (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f5">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;5B</bold>
</xref>). When look at each individual cytosine site, 269 out of the 633 sequenced cytosine sites, including 200 unmethylated and 69 methylated sites, showed the same methylation rate in all tested samples. For the rest 364 sites, no significant differences of methylation level were identified between ovary and pollen samples.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s4" sec-type="discussion">
<title>Discussion</title>
<sec id="s4_1">
<title>Expression bias of homoeologs in polyploids</title>
<p>Polyploidy, or whole genome duplication, creates novel phenotypes that enable the polyploids to better adapt to environmental changes, which is critical for crop evolution and crop domestication (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">Chen et&#xa0;al., 2007</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">Yoo et&#xa0;al., 2014</xref>). As a result of polyploidization, duplicated genes from two subgenomes known as homoeologs, may share the same functions and expression patterns or have different functions. Several potential fates could occur for homoeologs after whole genome duplication. For example, both genes keep the original function, one copy gets silenced and becomes pseudogene, or the genes diversify with different functions or expression patterns (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">Lynch and Force, 2000</xref>). Both natural polyploids and synthetic polyploids have been investigated for homoeolog expression bias at the whole genome level. Allotetraploid cotton (<italic>Gossypium hirsutum</italic>) (AADD) is one of the most widely cultivated crops from hybridization between <italic>G. arboreum</italic> (A2) and <italic>G. raimondii</italic> (D5), with 15.90&#x2013;37.96% of genes showed different expression biases towards A or D subgenomes in fibers among different cultivated cotton cultivars (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Mei et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>). In another study, <italic>Raphanobrassica</italic> (RRCC), which was artificially synthesized from <italic>Raphanus sativus</italic> (RR) and <italic>Brassica oleracea</italic> (CC) showed genome-wide unbalanced biased expression bias towards <italic>B. oleracea</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">Zhang et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>). In <italic>Arabidopsis suecica</italic>, more sequence deletions were detected in the less-expressed subgenome (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Chang et&#xa0;al., 2010</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">Garsmeur et&#xa0;al., 2014</xref>), which might lead to biased expression of the homoeologs.</p>
<p>While most of the species in the genus <italic>Arachis</italic> are diploid, <italic>A. hypogaea</italic> is an allotetraploid species, which is most likely derived from the hybridization between two wild diploid Arachis ancestors, followed by polyploidization (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Husted, 1936</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Burris and Roberts, 1993</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Kochert et&#xa0;al., 1996</xref>). Overall, the total number of biased expressed homoeologs towards the A subgenome was similar to the number towards the B subgenome (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">Bertioli et&#xa0;al., 2019</xref>). However, this difference is significant in some specific tissues, such as pericarp, perianth, root, and peg, which have significantly higher number of highly expressed genes in the B subgenome than in the A subgenome (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">Bertioli et&#xa0;al., 2019</xref>).</p>
<p>For the <italic>NSP2</italic> homoeologs in peanuts, the segregation of <italic>AhNSP2-A08</italic> fits the Mendelian segregation ratio, while the segregation of <italic>AhNSP2-B07</italic> does not. Based on the survey of the mutation rate of the two <italic>NSP2</italic> homoeologs in a US mini core collection, <italic>AhNSP2-A08</italic> has a much lower loss of function mutation rate than <italic>AhNSP2-B07</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Peng et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>), which may suggest that <italic>AhNSP2-A08</italic> has undergone stronger purifying selection during evolution while <italic>AhNSP2-B07</italic> is gradually losing its function with a higher frequency of mutation rates. Moreover, it has been revealed that <italic>AhNSP2-A08</italic> was highly expressed only in roots, whereas <italic>AhNSP2-B07</italic> was highly expressed in both roots and flowers (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Peng et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>). This indicated that <italic>AhNSP2-B07</italic> may be related to the reproductive process.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s4_2">
<title>Parental effect controlling <italic>AhNSP2-B07</italic>
</title>
<p>In a previous study (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">Gallo-Meagher et&#xa0;al., 2001</xref>), reciprocal crosses were made between Nod&#x2013; M4-2 (<italic>n<sub>a</sub>n<sub>a</sub>n<sub>b</sub>n<sub>b</sub>
</italic>) and Nod+ PI 262090 (<italic>n<sub>a</sub>n<sub>a</sub>N<sub>b</sub>N<sub>b</sub>
</italic>), the parental lines of E4 and E5 used in this study. All 30 F<sub>1</sub> progeny were Nod+ with uncountable nodules only when the wild-type allele <italic>N<sub>b</sub>
</italic> was from the male parent (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">
<bold>Table&#xa0;3</bold>
</xref>). However, when the wild-type allele <italic>N<sub>b</sub>
</italic> was inherited from the female parent, most of the F<sub>1</sub> progeny (32 out of 33) were Nod&#x2013; showing non-nodulation or only few unusual big nodules (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">
<bold>Table&#xa0;3</bold>
</xref>). The dramatic difference in F<sub>1</sub> phenotypes between reciprocal crosses suggested a parent-of-origin effect (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">Gallo-Meagher et&#xa0;al., 2001</xref>) at <italic>N<sub>b</sub>
</italic>. For the reciprocal crosses between Nod+ UF487A (<italic>N<sub>a</sub>N<sub>a</sub>n<sub>b</sub>n<sub>b</sub>
</italic>) and Nod- M4-2 (<italic>n<sub>a</sub>n<sub>a</sub>n<sub>b</sub>n<sub>b</sub>
</italic>), all F<sub>1</sub> progeny (32 and 26), except one, were Nod+, suggesting that <italic>N<sub>a</sub>
</italic> had no imprinting effect. Therefore, we hypothesized that the allele from female gametes in peanuts at the <italic>N<sub>b</sub>
</italic> locus is inhibited or imprinted with little or no expression, whereas the allele from male gametes at <italic>N<sub>b</sub>
</italic> can express normally in the offspring (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T4">
<bold>Table&#xa0;4</bold>
</xref>), which was further validated by qRT-PCR on gametic tissue (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f4">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;4</bold>
</xref>). According to this hypothesis, an equal number of Nod+ and Nod&#x2013; <italic>N<sub>b</sub>n<sub>b</sub>
</italic> offspring should be produced from the selfing population of <italic>N<sub>b</sub>n<sub>b</sub>
</italic> plants, and thus a 1 Nod+:1 Nod&#x2013; segregating ratio was expected to be observed in the field. In reality, the segregating ratio of Nod+: Nod&#x2013; fell within the range of 5:3 to 1:1 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Peng et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>). Considering the Nod&#x2013; plants have a relatively lower survival rate in the field due to nitrogen depletion, as starter nitrogen fertilizer was only applied during planting time. The practice of limiting nitrogen fertilizer maximized the phenotypic differences between Nod+ and Nod&#x2013; peanut plants in the field, which also reduced the survival rate of low vigor Nod&#x2013; plants inevitably. Therefore, the segregating ratio observed in the field during harvest is very likely shifted from the 1:1 ratio to some extent.</p>
<table-wrap id="T3" position="float">
<label>Table&#xa0;3</label>
<caption>
<p>Phenotypes of F1 progeny of reciprocal crosses between different genotypes of nodulating and non-nodulating plants (Adapted from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">Gallo-Meagher et&#xa0;al., 2001</xref>).</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" colspan="2" align="left">Cross</th>
<th valign="middle" rowspan="2" align="center">Genotypes</th>
<th valign="middle" colspan="3" align="center">Phenotypes of F<sub>1</sub>
</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" align="left">Female</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Male</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Nod+</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Few nodules</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Nod&#x2013;</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">UF 487A</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">M4-2</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<italic>N<sub>a</sub>N<sub>a</sub> n<sub>b</sub>n<sub>b</sub>
</italic> &#xd7; <italic>n<sub>a</sub>n<sub>a</sub> n<sub>b</sub>n<sub>b</sub>
</italic>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">32</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">M4-2</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">UF 487A</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<italic>n<sub>a</sub>n<sub>a</sub> n<sub>b</sub>n<sub>b</sub>
</italic> &#xd7; <italic>N<sub>a</sub>N<sub>a</sub> n<sub>b</sub>n<sub>b</sub>
</italic>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">26</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">PI262090</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">M4-2</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<italic>n<sub>a</sub>n<sub>a</sub> N<sub>b</sub>N<sub>b</sub>
</italic> &#xd7; <italic>n<sub>a</sub>n<sub>a</sub> n<sub>b</sub>n<sub>b</sub>
</italic>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">1</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">24</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">8</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">M4-2</td>
<td valign="middle" align="left">PI 262090</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<italic>n<sub>a</sub>n<sub>a</sub> n<sub>b</sub>n<sub>b</sub>
</italic> &#xd7; <italic>n<sub>a</sub>n<sub>a</sub> N<sub>b</sub>N<sub>b</sub>
</italic>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">30</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
<table-wrap id="T4" position="float">
<label>Table&#xa0;4</label>
<caption>
<p>Punnett square showing offspring genotypes of selfing <italic>N<sub>b</sub>n<sub>b</sub>
</italic> peanut plants under genomic imprinting.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="bottom" align="left" rowspan="2"/>
<th valign="bottom" align="center" rowspan="2"/>
<th valign="bottom" colspan="2" align="center">Male gametes</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="bottom" align="center">
<italic>N<sub>b</sub>
</italic>
</th>
<th valign="bottom" align="center">
<italic>n<sub>b</sub>
</italic>
</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom" rowspan="2" align="left">Female gametes</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">
<italic>N<sub>b</sub>*</italic>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">
<italic>N<sub>b</sub>
</italic>*<italic>N<sub>b</sub>
</italic> (Nod+)</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">
<italic>N<sub>b</sub>
</italic>*<italic>n<sub>b</sub>
</italic> (Nod&#x2013;)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">
<italic>n<sub>b</sub>*</italic>
</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">
<italic>N<sub>b</sub>n<sub>b</sub>
</italic>* (Nod+)</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">
<italic>n<sub>b</sub>
</italic>*<italic>n<sub>b</sub>
</italic> (Nod&#x2013;)</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn>
<p>* Indicates inhibition of the expression of AhNSP2-B07 in the ovary and the marked allele is not expressed. &#x201c;+&#x201d; means Nod+ phenotype; &#x201c;&#x2013;&#x201d; means Nod&#x2013; phenotype.</p>
</fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<p>Based on the qRT-PCR analysis, the expression of <italic>AhNSP2-B07</italic> showed a significantly higher expression in pollen than that in ovary tissues. This result further supports that allele of <italic>AhNSP2-B07</italic> in female gametes is inhibited, which is likely due to genomic imprinting. In very rare cases, the dominant <italic>N<sub>b</sub>
</italic> allele was not completely inhibited in the heterozygous <italic>N<sub>b</sub>n<sub>b</sub>
</italic> plants, resulting in few unusual big nodules being produced. The heterozygous plants with few big nodules were not sampled and focused as a separate group mainly due to the extreme low occurrence. The inhibited allele derived from female parents remains low or no expression in the offspring and only the allele from male gametes is expressed, which was validated in rhizobial infected roots, where any allele of <italic>AhNSP2-B07</italic> gene inherited from male parents is actively expressing.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s4_3">
<title>Bisulfite sequencing reveals no significant difference in methylation between ovaries and pollens</title>
<p>Gene imprinting can be caused by methylation and the process starts in gametes, where the allele is imprinted with low or no expression and subsequently remains inactive in the embryo. We compared the methylation levels of the <italic>N<sub>b</sub>
</italic> gene spanning a 1690bp promoter region and the full CDS region between the gametic tissues, ovary and pollen. However, no significant differences were detected at all methylation contexts. This result could be due to the technical difficulties in obtaining pure male and female gametic cells or the detected regulatory region of 1690bp is not sufficient. In this study, the ovary and pollen tissues were used, which still contained a significant number of somatic cells, thus adding huge background noise to precisely detect the DNA methylation level difference between the two different gametic cells as a very small proportion of the total cells in the tissues. Therefore, a single-cell epigenomic technology to precisely reveal the methylation variation at the single-cell level might be critical to further investigate the methylation variations between gametic cells (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Luo et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>). For example, single-microspore sequencing of maize has been performed to explore methylation reprogramming during the different developmental stages in plant sexual reproduction (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Kawashima and Berger, 2014</xref>). However, cultivated peanuts have much smaller volume of gametic tissues with a more complicated genome. Thus, the tissue dissection and sequencing approaches need to be specifically optimized to overcome the challenges in peanut research.</p>
<p>Besides DNA methylation, histone methylation such as trimethylation of histone H3 lysine 27 (H3K27me3) catalyzed by Polycomb-Repressive Complex 2 (PRC2) is also associated with imprinting in plants (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">K&#xf6;hler and Makarevich, 2006</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">Wolff et&#xa0;al., 2011</xref>). It was reported that the imprinted paternal allele in <italic>Arabidopsis</italic> was mediated by the PcG complex consisting of histone methyltransferase, while no parental DNA methylation asymmetry was detected in the promoter of the <italic>MEDEA</italic> (<italic>MEA</italic>) gene (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">W&#xf6;hrmann et&#xa0;al., 2012</xref>). As a future step, the histone modification of the <italic>AhNSP2-B07</italic> gene needs to be investigated.</p>
<p>In summary, this study revealed that the non-Mendelian inheritance of nodulation segregating at <italic>AhNSP2-B07</italic> is due to the inhibition of its expression in female gametes, resulting in further genomic imprinting in the embryo of offspring. This study provided a rare example of a vital symbiosis gene that has parent of origin or maternal imprinting effect in polyploid crops. The monoallelic expression of <italic>N<sub>b</sub>
</italic> in root samples explained the phenotypical distortion of Nod+: Nod&#x2013; from the 3:1 ratio. Combining the reciprocal cross and qRT-PCR results using ovary and pollen, it is confirmed that <italic>N<sub>b</sub>
</italic> was maternally imprinted. However, no significant difference of DNA methylation level of the promoter and CDS region of <italic>AhNSP2-B07</italic> was detected between ovary and pollen, and the mechanism underlying the maternal imprinting of this gene remains unclear. Our findings facilitated the understanding of gene regulation in polyploid species, which could be helpful to unveil the evolutionary process after hybridization and polyploidization in cultivated peanuts.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s6" sec-type="data-availability">
<title>Data availability statement</title>
<p>The data presented in the study are deposited in the GenBank repository with accession numbers QQ999050 to QQ999064.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s7" sec-type="author-contributions">
<title>Author contributions</title>
<p>JW conceived the research and designed the experiments. ZZ and YW performed the experiments. ZP helped with primer design and data analysis. ZL helped with the data collection in the field. ZZ and YW drafted the manuscript. MZ provided critical comments on revising the manuscript. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<sec id="s8" sec-type="funding-information">
<title>Funding</title>
<p>This study was funded by Florida Peanut Producers Association, Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services Fruit and Vegetables, and USDA-NIFA FLA-AGR-006269.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s9" sec-type="COI-statement">
<title>Conflict of interest</title>
<p>The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s10" sec-type="disclaimer">
<title>Publisher&#x2019;s note</title>
<p>All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s11" sec-type="supplementary-material">
<title>Supplementary material</title>
<p>The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2023.1193465/full#supplementary-material">https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2023.1193465/full#supplementary-material</ext-link>
</p>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="DataSheet_1.zip" id="SM1" mimetype="application/zip">
<label>Supplementary Figure&#xa0;1</label>
<caption>
<p>Tissue collection for ovary and pollen. <bold>(A)</bold>. Bloomed peanut flower for pollen collection <bold>(B)</bold>. Unopened flower bud for ovary collection <bold>(C)</bold>. Stamen <bold>(D)</bold>. Ovary with calyx tube <bold>(E)</bold>. Anther <bold>(F)</bold>. Ovary <bold>(G)</bold>. Pollen grains <bold>(H)</bold>. Ovules. St: stamen. An: anther. Po: pollen. Ov: ovule. Scale bar: a, b = 1&#xa0;cm. c, d = 1&#xa0;mm. e, f =0.25 mm. g, h = 50&#x2009;&#x3bc;m</p>
</caption>
</supplementary-material>
</sec>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="B1">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Arrighi</surname> <given-names>J.-F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Barre</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ben Amor</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bersoult</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Soriano</surname> <given-names>L. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mirabella</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2006</year>). <article-title>The <italic>Medicago truncatula</italic> lysine motif-Receptor-Like kinase gene family includes <italic>NFP</italic> and new nodule-expressed genes</article-title>. <source>Plant Physiol.</source> <volume>142</volume>, <fpage>265</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>279</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1104/pp.106.084657</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Bertioli</surname> <given-names>D. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jenkins</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Clevenger</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dudchenko</surname> <given-names>O.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gao</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Seijo</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>The genome sequence of segmental allotetraploid peanut arachis hypogaea</article-title>. <source>Nat. Genet.</source> <volume>51</volume>, <fpage>877</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>884</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41588-019-0405-z</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Burris</surname> <given-names>R. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Roberts</surname> <given-names>G. P.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1993</year>). <article-title>Biological nitrogen fixation</article-title>. <source>Annu. Rev. Nutr.</source> <volume>13</volume>, <fpage>317</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>335</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1146/annurev.nu.13.070193.001533</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Chang</surname> <given-names>P. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dilkes</surname> <given-names>B. P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>McMahon</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Comai</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Nuzhdin</surname> <given-names>S. V.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Homoeolog-specific retention and use in allotetraploid arabidopsis suecica depends on parent of origin and network partners</article-title>. <source>Genome Biol.</source> <volume>11</volume>, <fpage>R125</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/gb-2010-11-12-r125</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>Z. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ha</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Soltis</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2007</year>). <article-title>Polyploidy: genome obesity and its consequences</article-title>. <source>New Phytol.</source> <volume>174</volume>, <fpage>717</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>720</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1469-8137.2007.02084.x</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Gallo-Meagher</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dashiell</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gorbet</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2001</year>). <article-title>Parental effects in the inheritance of nonnodulation in peanut</article-title>. <source>J. Hered.</source> <volume>92</volume>, <fpage>86</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>89</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/jhered/92.1.86</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Garsmeur</surname> <given-names>O.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Schnable</surname> <given-names>J. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Almeida</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jourda</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>D&#x2019;Hont</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Freeling</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Two evolutionarily distinct classes of paleopolyploidy</article-title>. <source>Mol. Biol. Evol.</source> <volume>31</volume>, <fpage>448</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>454</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/molbev/mst230</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Gorbet</surname> <given-names>D. W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Burton</surname> <given-names>J. C.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1979</year>). <article-title>A non-nodulating Peanut1</article-title>. <source>Crop Sci.</source> <volume>19</volume>, <elocation-id>cropsci1979.0011183X001900050045x</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2135/cropsci1979.0011183X001900050045x</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Husted</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1936</year>). <article-title>Cytological studies an the peanut, arachis. II chromosome number, morphology and behavior, and their application to the problem of the origin of the cultivated forms</article-title>. <source>Cytol. (Tokyo)</source> <volume>7</volume>, <fpage>396</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>423</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1508/cytologia.7.396</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kalo</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2005</year>). <article-title>Nodulation signaling in legumes requires NSP2, a member of the GRAS family of transcriptional regulators</article-title>. <source>Science</source> <volume>308</volume>, <fpage>1786</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1789</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1126/science.1110951</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kawashima</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Berger</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Epigenetic reprogramming in plant sexual reproduction</article-title>. <source>Nat. Rev. Genet.</source> <volume>15</volume>, <fpage>613</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>624</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nrg3685</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kochert</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Stalker</surname> <given-names>H. T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gimenes</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Galgaro</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lopes</surname> <given-names>C. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Moore</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1996</year>). <article-title>RFLP AND CYTOGENETIC EVIDENCE ON THE ORIGIN AND EVOLUTION OF ALLOTETRAPLOID DOMESTICATED peanut, arachis hypogaea (Leguminosae)</article-title>. <source>Am. J. Bot.</source> <volume>83</volume>, <fpage>1282</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1291</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/j.1537-2197.1996.tb13912.x</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>K&#xf6;hler</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Makarevich</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2006</year>). <article-title>Epigenetic mechanisms governing seed development in plants</article-title>. <source>EMBO Rep.</source> <volume>7</volume>, <fpage>1223</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1227</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/sj.embor.7400854</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Levy</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bres</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Geurts</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chalhoub</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kulikova</surname> <given-names>O.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Duc</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2004</year>). <article-title>A putative Ca2+ and calmodulin-dependent protein kinase required for bacterial and fungal symbioses</article-title> <volume>303</volume> (<issue>5662</issue>), <fpage>1361</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1364</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1126/science.1093038</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Limpens</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2003</year>). <article-title>LysM domain receptor kinases regulating rhizobial nod factor-induced infection</article-title>. <source>Science</source> <volume>302</volume>, <fpage>630</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>633</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1126/science.1090074</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Luo</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fernie</surname> <given-names>A. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yan</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Single-cell genomics and epigenomics: technologies and applications in plants</article-title>. <source>Trends Plant Sci.</source> <volume>25</volume>, <fpage>1030</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1040</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.tplants.2020.04.016</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Lynch</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Force</surname> <given-names>A. G.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2000</year>). <article-title>The origin of interspecific genomic incompatibility <italic>via</italic> gene duplication</article-title>. <source>Am. Nat.</source> <volume>156</volume>, <fpage>590</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>605</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1086/316992</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B18">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Madsen</surname> <given-names>E. B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Madsen</surname> <given-names>L. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Radutoiu</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Olbryt</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rakwalska</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Szczyglowski</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2003</year>). <article-title>A receptor kinase gene of the LysM type is involved in legumeperception of rhizobial signals</article-title>. <source>Nature</source> <volume>425</volume>, <fpage>637</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>640</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nature02045</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B19">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Madsen</surname> <given-names>L. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tirichine</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jurkiewicz</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sullivan</surname> <given-names>J. T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Heckmann</surname> <given-names>A. B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bek</surname> <given-names>A. S.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>The molecular network governing nodule organogenesis and infection in the model legume lotus japonicus</article-title>. <source>Nat. Commun.</source> <volume>1</volume>, <elocation-id>10</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/ncomms1009</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B20">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Marsh</surname> <given-names>J. F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rakocevic</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mitra</surname> <given-names>R. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Brocard</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sun</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Eschstruth</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2007</year>). <article-title>
<italic>Medicago truncatula NIN</italic> is essential for rhizobial-independent nodule organogenesis induced by autoactive Calcium/Calmodulin-dependent protein kinase</article-title>. <source>Plant Physiol.</source> <volume>144</volume>, <fpage>324</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>335</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1104/pp.106.093021</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B21">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Mei</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Qi</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Han</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Guo</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Han</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Subgenome bias and temporal postponement of gene expression contributes to the distinctions of fiber quality in gossypium species</article-title>. <source>Front. Plant Sci.</source> <volume>12</volume>, <elocation-id>819679</elocation-id>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpls.2021.819679</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B22">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Morgante</surname> <given-names>C. V.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Guimar&#xe3;es</surname> <given-names>P. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Martins</surname> <given-names>A. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ara&#xfa;jo</surname> <given-names>A. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Leal-Bertioli</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bertioli</surname> <given-names>D. J.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Reference genes for quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction expression studies in wild and cultivated peanut</article-title>. <source>BMC Res. Notes</source> <volume>4</volume>, <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>11</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/1756-0500-4-339</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B23">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Oldroyd</surname> <given-names>G. E. D.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Speak, friend, and enter: signalling systems that promote beneficial symbiotic associations in plants</article-title>. <source>Nat. Rev. Microbiol.</source> <volume>11</volume>, <fpage>252</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>263</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nrmicro2990</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B24">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Oldroyd</surname> <given-names>G. E. D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Long</surname> <given-names>S. R.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2003</year>). <article-title>Identification and characterization of <italic>Nodulation-signaling pathway 2</italic> , a gene of <italic>Medicago truncatula</italic> involved in nod factor signaling</article-title>. <source>Plant Physiol.</source> <volume>131</volume>, <fpage>1027</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1032</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1104/pp.102.010710</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B25">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Paudel</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Crook</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Maya</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Peng</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Isolation, characterization, and complete genome sequence of a bradyrhizobium strain Lb8 from nodules of peanut utilizing crack entry infection</article-title>. <source>Front. Microbiol.</source> <volume>11</volume>, <elocation-id>93</elocation-id>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmicb.2020.00093</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B26">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Peng</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tan</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Shu</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Varshney</surname> <given-names>R. K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Natural polymorphisms in a pair of NSP2 homoeologs can cause loss of nodulation in peanut</article-title>. <source>J. Exp. Bot.</source> <volume>72</volume>, <fpage>1104</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1118</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/jxb/eraa505</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B27">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Peng</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tan</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>L&#xf3;pez</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Maku</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Morphological and genetic characterization of non-nodulating peanut recombinant inbred lines</article-title>. <source>Crop Sci.</source> <volume>58</volume>, <fpage>540</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>550</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2135/cropsci2017.06.0235</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B28">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Peoples</surname> <given-names>M. B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Herridge</surname> <given-names>D. F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ladha</surname> <given-names>J. K.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1995</year>). &#x201c;<article-title>Biological nitrogen fixation: an efficient source of nitrogen for sustainable agricultural production</article-title>?,&#x201d; in <source>Management of biological nitrogen fixation for the development of more productive and sustainable agricultural systems: extended versions of papers presented at the symposium on biological nitrogen fixation for sustainable agriculture at the 15th congress of soil science</source> (<publisher-loc>Acapulco, Mexico</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Springer</publisher-name>), <fpage>3</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>28</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B29">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Rodrigues</surname> <given-names>J. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zilberman</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Evolution and function of genomic imprinting in plants</article-title>. <source>Genes Dev.</source> <volume>29</volume>, <fpage>2517</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2531</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1101/gad.269902.115</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B30">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Roy</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Nandety</surname> <given-names>R. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Crook</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mysore</surname> <given-names>K. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pislariu</surname> <given-names>C. I.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Celebrating 20 years of genetic discoveries in legume nodulation and symbiotic nitrogen fixation</article-title>. <source>Plant Cell</source> <volume>32</volume>, <fpage>15</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>41</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1105/tpc.19.00279</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B31">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Stracke</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kistner</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yoshida</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mulder</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sato</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kaneko</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2002</year>). <article-title>A plant receptor-like kinase required for both bacterial and fungal symbiosis</article-title>. <source>Nature</source> <volume>417</volume>, <fpage>959</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>962</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nature00841</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B32">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wilson</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Burris</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1947</year>). <article-title>The mechanism of biological nitrogen fixation</article-title>. <source>Bacteriol. Rev.</source> <volume>11</volume>, <fpage>41</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>73</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/br.11.1.41-73.1947</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B33">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>W&#xf6;hrmann</surname> <given-names>H. J. P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gagliardini</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Raissig</surname> <given-names>M. T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wehrle</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Arand</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Schmidt</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Identification of a DNA methylation-independent imprinting control region at the arabidopsis MEDEA locus</article-title>. <source>Genes Dev.</source> <volume>26</volume>, <fpage>1837</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1850</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1101/gad.195123.112</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B34">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wolff</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Weinhofer</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Seguin</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Roszak</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Beisel</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Donoghue</surname> <given-names>M. T. A.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>High-resolution analysis of parent-of-Origin allelic expression in the arabidopsis endosperm</article-title>. <source>PloS Genet.</source> <volume>7</volume>, <elocation-id>e1002126</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.pgen.1002126</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B35">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Yano</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yoshida</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Muller</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Singh</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Banba</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Vickers</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>CYCLOPS, a mediator of symbiotic intracellular accommodation</article-title>. <source>Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.</source> <volume>105</volume>, <fpage>20540</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>20545</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1073/pnas.0806858105</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B36">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Yoo</surname> <given-names>M.-J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pires</surname> <given-names>J. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Soltis</surname> <given-names>P. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Soltis</surname> <given-names>D. E.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Nonadditive gene expression in polyploids</article-title>. <source>Annu. Rev. Genet.</source> <volume>48</volume>, <fpage>485</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>517</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1146/annurev-genet-120213-092159</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B37">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>He</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>He</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Genome-wide unbalanced expression bias and expression level dominance toward brassica oleracea in artificially synthesized intergeneric hybrids of raphanobrassica</article-title>. <source>Hortic. Res.</source> <volume>8</volume>, <fpage>246</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41438-021-00672-2</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>