<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.3 20070202//EN" "journalpublishing.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="2.3" xml:lang="EN">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Front. Plant Sci.</journal-id>
<journal-title>Frontiers in Plant Science</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">Front. Plant Sci.</abbrev-journal-title>
<issn pub-type="epub">1664-462X</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Frontiers Media S.A.</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpls.2023.1126717</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Plant Science</subject>
<subj-group>
<subject>Original Research</subject>
</subj-group>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Image-based time series analysis to establish differential disease progression for two <italic>Fusarium</italic> head blight pathogens in oat spikelets with variable resistance</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Pavicic</surname>
<given-names>Mirko</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3">
<sup>3</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn003">
<sup>&#x2020;</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/407172"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Mouhu</surname>
<given-names>Katriina</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn003">
<sup>&#x2020;</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/158704"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Hautsalo</surname>
<given-names>Juho</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4">
<sup>4</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2170579"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Jacobson</surname>
<given-names>Daniel</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3">
<sup>3</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff5">
<sup>5</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/274608"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Jalli</surname>
<given-names>Marja</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4">
<sup>4</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/667371"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name>
<surname>Himanen</surname>
<given-names>Kristiina</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff6">
<sup>6</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn001">
<sup>*</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/364018"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
<institution>National Plant Phenotyping Infrastructure, Helsinki Institute of Life Science (HiLIFE), University of Helsinki</institution>, <addr-line>Helsinki</addr-line>, <country>Finland</country>
</aff>
<aff id="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
<institution>Department of Agricultural Sciences, Viikki Plant Science Centre</institution>, <addr-line>Helsinki</addr-line>, <country>Finland</country>
</aff>
<aff id="aff3">
<sup>3</sup>
<institution>Computational and Predictive Biology, Biosciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory</institution>, <addr-line>Oak Ridge, TN</addr-line>, <country>United States</country>
</aff>
<aff id="aff4">
<sup>4</sup>
<institution>Natural Resources Institute Finland (Luke), Management and Production of Renewable Resources Planta</institution>, <addr-line>Jokioinen</addr-line>, <country>Finland</country>
</aff>
<aff id="aff5">
<sup>5</sup>
<institution>Bredesen Center, University of Tennessee Knoxville</institution>, <addr-line>Knoxville, TN</addr-line>, <country>United States</country>
</aff>
<aff id="aff6">
<sup>6</sup>
<institution>Organismal and Evolutionary Biology Research Programme, Biocenter Finland, University of Helsinki</institution>, <addr-line>Helsinki</addr-line>, <country>Finland</country>
</aff>
<author-notes>
<fn fn-type="edited-by">
<p>Edited by: Ulrich Schurr, Helmholtz Association of German Research Centres (HZ), Germany</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="edited-by">
<p>Reviewed by: Skaidre Suproniene, Lithuanian Research Centre for Agriculture and Forestry, Lithuania; John Doonan, Aberystwyth University, United Kingdom</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="corresp" id="fn001">
<p>*Correspondence: Kristiina Himanen, <email xlink:href="mailto:kristiina.himanen@helsinki.fi">kristiina.himanen@helsinki.fi</email>
</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="equal" id="fn003">
<p>&#x2020;These authors have contributed equally to this work and share first authorship</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="other" id="fn002">
<p>This article was submitted to Plant Breeding, a section of the journal Frontiers in Plant Science</p>
</fn>
</author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>14</day>
<month>03</month>
<year>2023</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="collection">
<year>2023</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>14</volume>
<elocation-id>1126717</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>18</day>
<month>12</month>
<year>2022</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>22</day>
<month>02</month>
<year>2023</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#xa9; 2023 Pavicic, Mouhu, Hautsalo, Jacobson, Jalli and Himanen</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2023</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Pavicic, Mouhu, Hautsalo, Jacobson, Jalli and Himanen</copyright-holder>
<license xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">
<p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.</p>
</license>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<p>Oat-based value-added products have increased their value as healthy foodstuff. <italic>Fusarium</italic> head blight (FHB) infections and the mycotoxins accumulated to the oat seeds, however, pose a challenge to oat production. The FHB infections are predicted to become more prevalent in the future changing climates and under more limited use of fungicides. Both these factors increase the pressure for breeding new resistant cultivars. Until now, however, genetic links in oats against FHB infection have been difficult to identify. Therefore, there is a great need for more effective breeding efforts, including improved phenotyping methods allowing time series analysis and the identification of molecular markers during disease progression. To these ends, dissected spikelets of several oat genotypes with different resistance profiles were studied by image-based methods during disease progression by <italic>Fusarium culmorum</italic> or <italic>F. langsethiae</italic> species. The chlorophyll fluorescence of each pixel in the spikelets was recorded after inoculation by the two <italic>Fusarium</italic> spp., and the progression of the infections was analyzed by calculating the mean maximum quantum yield of PSII (F<sub>v</sub>/F<sub>m</sub>) values for each spikelet. The recorded values were (i) the change in the photosynthetically active area of the spikelet as percentage of its initial size, and (ii) the mean of F<sub>v</sub>/F<sub>m</sub> values of all fluorescent pixels per spikelet post inoculation, both indicative of the progression of the FHB disease. The disease progression was successfully monitored, and different stages of the infection could be defined along the time series. The data also confirmed the differential rate of disease progression by the two FHB causal agents. In addition, oat varieties with variable responses to the infections were indicated.</p>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>
<italic>Fusarium</italic> head blight</kwd>
<kwd>cereals</kwd>
<kwd>image based phenotyping</kwd>
<kwd>chlorophyll fluorescence</kwd>
<kwd>oats</kwd>
<kwd>time series analysis</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<counts>
<fig-count count="7"/>
<table-count count="0"/>
<equation-count count="0"/>
<ref-count count="59"/>
<page-count count="13"/>
<word-count count="7604"/>
</counts>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec id="s1" sec-type="intro">
<label>1</label>
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>Mycotoxin-producing <italic>Fusarium</italic> species cause severe <italic>Fusarium</italic> head blight (FHB) infections in cereals. FHB is a global problem that can be associated with major yield losses and considerable threat of mycotoxin contamination of wheat and barley both in North America and in Europe (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">McMullen et&#xa0;al., 1997</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Goswami and Kistler, 2004</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Johns et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>). In Nordic countries, the most severely influenced cereal is oats, an important crop for providing food, feed, and export income. In recent years, there have been several large investments in the oat-derived food processing industry. The production of high-quality oat grain is, however, compromised by FHB infections, which can reduce grain yield directly (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Kiecana et&#xa0;al., 2002</xref>) through death of developing grains, due to severe infections (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B50">Tekle et&#xa0;al., 2013</xref>), or indirectly by making the grains unacceptable for food use by accumulating mycotoxins into the grain (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">Bj&#xf8;rnstad and Skinnes, 2008</xref>). FHB is a challenging disease to manage, because it has multiple causal agents with different environmental preferences and the different <italic>Fusarium</italic> spp. can cause disease in several host species. For example, deoxynivalenol (DON) mycotoxin is produced mainly by <italic>Fusarium graminearum</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">Schwabe, 1839</xref>) in Nordic countries (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Hietaniemi et&#xa0;al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Hofgaard et&#xa0;al., 2016</xref>), but in cool growing seasons, <italic>F. culmorum</italic> (Wm.G. Sm.) Sacc. Syll. fung. (Abellini) 10: 726. (1892) may become the main DON producer (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">Kaukoranta et&#xa0;al., 2019</xref>). Additionally, T-2/HT-2 mycotoxin is produced by <italic>Fusarium</italic> species such as <italic>F. langsethiae</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B51">Torp and Nirenberg, 2004</xref>) and <italic>F. sporotrichioides</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B44">Sherb, 1915</xref>), which can dominate on years associated with warm and dry weather after anthesis (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">Kaukoranta et&#xa0;al., 2019</xref>). The further we develop our knowledge of the different mycotoxin risks associated with different <italic>Fusarium</italic> fungi in cereals, the higher is also the pressure towards tightening the regulative legislation of mycotoxin contents of food products (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Johns et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>).</p>
<p>The resistance of oats to both DON (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B49">Tekle et&#xa0;al., 2018</xref>) and T-2/HT-2-producing fungi (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Isidro-S&#xe1;nchez et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>) can be assessed in artificially inoculated field trials but several trials are needed to get consistent cultivar rankings (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B49">Tekle et&#xa0;al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">Hautsalo et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>). Controlled environments can provide more consistent estimates for the disease, but these results do not necessarily fit for selecting cultivars that would have resistance in variable field conditions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">Hautsalo et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>) due to the complex nature of FHB disease resistance. For example, FHB symptoms can be quantified, but they correlate weakly with DON mycotoxin contents in oats, whereas germination and DON levels (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B49">Tekle et&#xa0;al., 2018</xref>) or <italic>F. graminearum</italic> DNA levels and DON levels show better correlations (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B58">Yli-Mattila et&#xa0;al., 2009</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B59">Yli-Mattila et&#xa0;al., 2017</xref>). In field conditions, the host plants can, however, avoid the disease due to their morphological and phenological features such as flowering time or habit (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Herrmann et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>) and the progress and severity of the disease can also vary depending on the weather conditions. Until and even after genomic prediction models are developed for selecting resistance in breeding material, expensive mycotoxin testing must be performed in large scale. Taking into account the complexity of the disease progression, a better understanding of the development of the disease is required to determine the phenotypes indicative of the spatial and temporal resistance factors.</p>
<p>
<italic>F. graminearum, F. culmorum</italic>, and <italic>F. langsethiae</italic> infect wheat and barley spikes and oat panicles during anthesis (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B45">Schroeder et&#xa0;al., 1963</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B53">Wagacha and Muthomi, 2007</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B48">Tekle et&#xa0;al., 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Divon et&#xa0;al., 2019</xref>). <italic>Fusarium</italic> spores are more likely to land on outer floral parts than inside the florets of oats (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B48">Tekle et&#xa0;al., 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B57">Xue et&#xa0;al., 2015</xref>) and thus they must grow hyphae towards the soft floral interior tissue. In inner surfaces of the flowers, they can form infection structures such as infection cushions and foot-like structures (appressoria, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Boenisch and Sch&#xe4;fer, 2011</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Divon et&#xa0;al., 2019</xref>), which can penetrate cell walls and produce mycotoxins. In order to measure the infection and oat responses at a spikelet level in oats, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">Hautsalo et&#xa0;al. (2020)</xref> applied a point inoculation method to infect <italic>F. graminearum</italic> into oat spikelets. However, the two oat genotypes investigated that show large differences in their DON accumulation and proportion of <italic>Fusarium</italic>-infected kernels in greenhouse experiments did not differ in their fungal biomass accumulation. This suggests that if the infection is established inside the floret, there might be no mechanism preventing the spread of the fungus in oats. Typical symptoms in the field are spikelets that have lost their chlorophyll and are covered by mycelium, but this is only an end point result and a method that would allow following disease progression over time would increase our understanding of the phenomenon.</p>
<p>The changes during <italic>Fusarium</italic> infection at the cellular level are similar but slower in resistant plants compared to susceptible plants (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">Kang and Buchenauer, 2000</xref>), and the resistance mechanisms against the initial infection and infection spread are rather similar in wheat (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B54">Walter et&#xa0;al., 2010</xref>). There are several established methods for controlled monitoring of the disease progression and severity of FHB in cereal. For example, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Imathiu et&#xa0;al. (2009)</xref> screened detached wheat and oat leaves inoculated with a drop of <italic>F. langsethiae</italic> suspension and observed visible symptom development within 7 days. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Bauriegel et&#xa0;al. (2011b)</xref> inoculated wheat spikes with <italic>F. culmorum</italic> and observed the cumulative F<sub>v</sub>/F<sub>m</sub> over time. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B47">Tan et&#xa0;al. (2020)</xref> used both detached leaf assays and inoculation of wheat spikes to observe their interaction of two co-inoculated <italic>Fusarium</italic> species and received similar results from both infection systems. In contrast to FHB disease in wheat, however, the symptoms of <italic>F. langsethiae</italic> in oats are especially difficult to observe (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">Divon et&#xa0;al., 2012</xref>) and FHB symptoms are not a reliable way of producing oat cultivar ranking in FHB disease resistance (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">Hautsalo et&#xa0;al., 2018</xref>). Moreover, the oat panicle creates a physical obstacle that, in contrast to wheat, efficiently restricts the spread of the pathogens from a spikelet to another (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">Langevin et&#xa0;al., 2004</xref>). This leads to a situation where an inoculated panicle is likely to contain both infected and healthy spikelets that are scattered randomly. Therefore, the detached leaf assays or monitoring of inoculated panicles is not optimal to describe the disease progression at the organ level, and an approach focusing on the spikelets is needed.</p>
<p>Image-based phenotyping offers a solution for a non-invasive monitoring of cellular changes that occur during host&#x2013;pathogen interaction (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">Berger et&#xa0;al., 2007</xref>). Non-destructive imaging, such as fluorescence and hyperspectral imaging, is already being applied to screen for <italic>Fusarium</italic> resistance of wheat spikes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Bauriegel et&#xa0;al., 2011a</xref>). We therefore set out to develop an oat spikelet infection system using a stationary imaging facility to allow monitoring the disease progression by time series of red, green, and blue (RGB) and chlorophyll fluorescence (ChlFl) imaging. The aim was to bring the FHB infection into a controlled condition where the disease progression could be imaged in time series by multiple sensors. Placing the dissected, infected spikelets on petri plates allowed their frequent imaging and thereby analysis of the disease progression in individual spikelets. In this study, we also developed an automated pipeline for pixel-specific ChlFl data extraction tailored for the analysis of the infected spikelet. This approach allowed recording temporal and spatial differences between <italic>Fusarium</italic> species in their rate of disease progression and severity, as well as the response time of oat genotypes. In the future, the established time series analysis will hopefully pave the way for targeted molecular omics assessment of the molecular mechanisms of oat resistance.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2" sec-type="materials|methods">
<label>2</label>
<title>Materials and methods</title>
<sec id="s2_1">
<label>2.1</label>
<title>Plant material</title>
<p>Oat genotypes with known variation in their resistance against <italic>Fusarium</italic> spp. were selected for the experiments with <italic>F. langsethiae</italic> and <italic>F. culmorum</italic> infections. A commercially rejected oat variety, BOR31 (Boreal Plant Breeding Ltd., Finland), that is known to be highly susceptible towards DON accumulation and grain infection in spray inoculated greenhouse experiments (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">Hautsalo et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>) was used as a susceptible control in both experiments. For the <italic>F. langsethiae</italic> infections, the cultivar Vinger from Graminor Ltd. (Norway) was used as resistant candidate, together with Akseli, Belinda, Odal, BOR01, BOR02, and BOR31. For <italic>F. culmorum</italic> infections, two breeding lines (BOR01 and BOR02) that had shown potential resistance against FHB in oats in previous experiments (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">Hautsalo et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>) were infected together with BOR31. Each oat genotype was grown in five replicates and the experiment was replicated twice over time. Sowing of the two experiments was adjusted according to the oat growing time in greenhouse so that flowering spikelets from each genotype could be harvested at the same time for the two batches of the inoculation experiments. Thus, the experiment was performed twice at two different times during autumn 2019 and winter 2020. We refer to each repetition as batch 1 and 2 in the rest of the manuscript.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_2">
<label>2.2</label>
<title>Growth conditions at NaPPI facilities</title>
<p>The selected oat genotypes were sown in 3.5-L rose pots (Sparco, Conde-sur-Huisne, France) filled with Kekkil&#xe4; OPM 420 W R8045&#x2013;NPK 15-5-24 (Vantaa, Finland) and grown at the Modular plant phenotyping unit of the National Plant Phenotyping infrastructure (NaPPI, <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www2.helsinki.fi/en/infrastructures/national-plant-phenotyping">https://www2.helsinki.fi/en/infrastructures/national-plant-phenotyping</ext-link>) greenhouse facility at the University of Helsinki, Finland. The day/night temperature was set at 19/13&#xb0;C and the day length was 18 h supplemented with high-pressure sodium lamps (OSRAM GmbH, Munchen, Germany) regulated at 200 W/m<sup>2</sup>. After the first week of growth, seedlings were fertigated with Kekkil&#xe4; Professional Vihannes-Superex (NPK 9-5-31, 1.5 mS &gt; 1.2 mS &gt; 1.0 mS) with progressively reducing mS till the plants reached flowering stage and spikelets were ready for dissecting for the <italic>Fusarium</italic> inoculation experiments (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>).</p>
<fig id="f1" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;1</label>
<caption>
<p>Collage of the experimental workflow. <bold>(A)</bold> <italic>Fusarium</italic> cultures were prepared for conidia collection at the same time when the oat panicles were getting ready for inoculation. <bold>(B)</bold> Vacuum inoculation of panicles was performed within an exicator. <bold>(C)</bold> Dissected spikelets were placed on agar plates in exactly defined coordinates for automated detection by FIJI. <bold>(D)</bold> Imaging of spikelets on the petri plates placed on the blue imaging trays by RGB or ChlFl imaging. <bold>(E)</bold> Detection of mycelia growth symptoms by visible observations on RGB images and by ChlFl pixel data extraction for recording disease progression and severity.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-14-1126717-g001.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>For <italic>in vitro</italic> spikelet infection assays, the PlantScreen&#x2122; Compact System for small plant imaging was used. The imaging unit is in a controlled environment FytoScope Walk-In chamber (Photon System Instruments, PSI, Czech Republic; <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://www.psi.cz">www.psi.cz</ext-link>) and accommodates up to 18 imaging trays that are transported on conveyor belts between the visible light (VIS-RGB) imaging cabinet, the ChlFl imaging cabinet, and the light-isolated acclimation chamber. The growth conditions were set at photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) from 150 &#x3bc;mol m<sup>&#x2212;2</sup> s<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>, 18/6 h day length, RH 60%, and temperature 22&#xb0;C. As the sterile growth media, plant agar (Duchefa Biochemie bv, Haarlem, The Netherlands) with &#xbd; strength Murashige and Skoog media (MS, Duchefa Biochemie bv, Haarlem, The Netherlands) was used for spikelet inoculations and maintenance. The media were autoclaved and applied on round 9-cm petri plates.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_3">
<label>2.3</label>
<title>Fungal material</title>
<p>All fungal isolates used in the experiments were collected from Finnish cereal fields and were shown to produce mycotoxins in previous studies, <italic>F. culmorum</italic> (isolate 05015) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">Kokkonen et&#xa0;al., 2010</xref>) and <italic>F. langsethiae</italic> (isolate 05010) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">Kokkonen and others, 2011</xref>). The isolates were grown as single mycelium cultures on potato dextrose agar (PDA) at 18&#xb0;C in the dark (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;1A</bold>
</xref>). After 1 week, the spore production was initiated by culturing it under ultraviolet (UV-A) light (wavelength 350&#x2013;400 nm, 12 h per day) for 2 weeks. The cultures ready to be used for inoculation were stored at 4&#xb0;C. Tween-80 (0.01%) was added to inoculation suspensions to obtain uniform dispersion of conidia (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;1A</bold>
</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_4">
<label>2.4</label>
<title>Inoculation of oat spikelets</title>
<p>The inoculum of <italic>F. langsethiae</italic> and <italic>F. culmorum</italic> was applied by submerging the panicles in conidia suspension under vacuum treatment (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;1B</bold>
</xref>). For vacuum inoculation, one flowering panicle from five separate plants per genotype were harvested into 50-ml tubes. The <italic>Fusarium</italic> spp. inoculums (0.5 &#xd7; 10<sup>5</sup> conidia/ml) were added in the tube, and the tubes were placed in an exicator (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>). In addition, a control treatment with only water was included. After vacuum treatment of 30 min, the panicles were briefly washed with water. Four spikelets from each of the five individual panicles were dissected and placed on petri plates, resulting in 20 spikelets per genotype treatment and altogether 40 spikelets from the two replicate batches. The position and orientation of all spikelets on the plates were kept fixed to later allow their automated detection (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;1C</bold>
</xref>). The plates were randomized on blue imaging trays, 9 plates per tray. Trays were kept in an imaging chamber, and their lids were opened just before imaging (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;1D</bold>
</xref>). Imaging was done at 12- or 24-h interval and continued until 7&#x2013;9 days, except for the <italic>F. culmorum</italic> where the imaging ended at 3&#x2013;5 days, at the point when mycelia overgrowth was complete.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_5">
<label>2.5</label>
<title>Visible light RGB and chlorophyll fluorescence imaging</title>
<p>To assess the progression of <italic>Fusarium</italic> spp. mycelia growth and changes in spikelet appearance, indicating the disease progression, top view images were taken with visible light RGB and ChlFl FluorCam sensors as described in Pavicic et&#xa0;al (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">2021</xref>). Images of the petri plates were taken every 12&#x2013;24 h. Top view RGB2 images (resolution 2,560 &#xd7; 1,920 pixels) of individual trays were captured with GigE uEye UI-5580SEC/M 5 Mpx Camera (IDS, Germany) with SV-0814H lens, supplemented with an LED-based light source to ensure homogeneous illumination of the imaged object. Light conditions, petri plate positions on imaging trays and spikelet positions on plates, and camera settings were fixed throughout the experiments. Lids of the petri plates were removed before imaging.</p>
<p>The ChlFl measurements were performed with a FluorCam FC-800MF pulse amplitude modulated (PAM) chlorophyll fluorometer as described in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">Pavicic et&#xa0;al. (2021)</xref>. The ChlFl illumination panel (FluorCam SN-FC800-195) has pulse-modulated short-duration red&#x2013;orange flashes (620 nm), a red&#x2013;orange actinic light (620 nm) with a maximum photosynthetic photon flux density (PPFD) of 300 &#x3bc;mol m<sup>&#x2212;2</sup> s<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>, a cool white actinic light with a maximum PPDF of 500 &#x3bc;mol m<sup>&#x2212;2</sup> s<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>, and a saturating light pulse with a maximum PPDF of 3,000 &#x3bc;mol m<sup>&#x2212;2</sup> s<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>. The ChlFl imaging was done according to the principal F<sub>v</sub>/F<sub>m</sub> protocol (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B52">Tschiersch et&#xa0;al., 2017</xref>) that generated parameter images of minimum fluorescence (Fo) and maximum fluorescence (Fm) yields (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">Murchie et&#xa0;al., 2013</xref>). To score the spikelet vitality, a common plant stress indicator, the quantum yield of photosystem II (F<sub>v</sub>/F<sub>m</sub>) was utilized (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">Barbagallo et&#xa0;al., 2003</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">Berger et&#xa0;al., 2007</xref>). The light intensities were set at Act2 30%, and super 50%, and the FluorCam protocol included 20 min of dark adaptation.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_6">
<label>2.6</label>
<title>Image processing and image analysis</title>
<p>In VIS-RGB images, the spikelets were observed individually, and observations were recorded according to their coordinates on the plates. RGB images were observed for visible changes in mycelia growth and spikelet appearance such as color. Changes in these parameters were used as indicators of the disease progression. Ranking of the disease severity was based on visible damage and the disease progression was established as a range of spikelet coverage with mycelia. The coverage was ranked as percentage of the whole spikelet (0%, 25%, 50%, 75%, 100%) and other damage (yellowing, dark spots). The ChlFl image pre-processing, automated object detection, and recording of the ChlFl signal were performed using Fiji Is Just ImageJ (FIJI) software version 1.53 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B42">Schindelin et&#xa0;al., 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">Rueden et&#xa0;al., 2017</xref>) using a modified version of the method described in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">Pavicic et&#xa0;al. (2021)</xref>. First, raw ChlFl images in.fimg format were imported to FIJI as image type = 32-bit Real, width = 720, height = 560, offset = 8, and little-endian byte order, and saved as.tiff to ease the following pre-processing. Spikelet masks were created from F<sub>o</sub> images by a simple gray pixel value thresholding of 50 to create a selection of all spikelet pixels. This value was enough to capture whole spikelets while avoiding background pixels. The FIJI function Convert to Mask was used to convert the thresholded pixels to a binary image with background pixel values of 0 and spikelet pixel values of 255. Mask images were used to create a selection of background pixels only (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;1E</bold>
</xref>). The selection was then transferred to F<sub>v</sub>/F<sub>m</sub> images and background pixel values were set to &#x2013;100 for easy filtering in the data wrangling stage. Masked F<sub>v</sub>/F<sub>m</sub> images were saved as.tiff format. Finally, a rectangle was drawn around each spikelet using their pixel coordinates and the F<sub>v</sub>/F<sub>m</sub> value for all pixels within the rectangle was saved as Comma Separated Values (CSV) format using the FIJI function Save XY coordinates. All these steps are contained in four modular scripts using FIJI internal macro language (<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://github.com/mipavici/MDPI_leaf_infection/">https://github.com/mipavici/MDPI_leaf_infection/</ext-link>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_7">
<label>2.7</label>
<title>Data analysis</title>
<p>The output CSV files contain pixel intensities, and X and Y pixel coordinates in the image per spikelet per time point. The CSV files were processed with R programming language in Jupyter Lab using dplyr and tidyr packages (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">Kluyver et&#xa0;al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B56">Wickham and Girlich, 2022</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B55">Wickham et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>). CSV filenames contained information about the experiment, tray identification, and spikelet position. Thus, they were imported and added to the initial table. All background pixels were removed by keeping F<sub>v</sub>/F<sub>m</sub> &gt; &#x2212;100, and cultivar and treatment information were combined with the table. In some cases, at the edge of the spikelet or in late hours post inoculation (HPI) where <italic>Fusarium</italic> spp. mycelia covered the spikelet fluorescent tissue, some F<sub>o</sub> values can be higher than F<sub>m</sub>, creating a very low negative F<sub>v</sub>/F<sub>m</sub>. To account for this, all negative F<sub>v</sub>/F<sub>m</sub> were set to 0. Two phenotypes were created to assess infection progression: fluorescent area of spikelets in percentage and spikelet vitality. Fluorescent area of spikelets was calculated by counting the number of fluorescent pixels at each HPI and dividing it by the total fluorescent pixel count at 0 HPI. Spikelet vitality was calculated by averaging the F<sub>v</sub>/F<sub>m</sub> values of all fluorescent pixels at each HPI. Some plates were removed from the analysis after they were completely covered with mycelia. When this happened, fluorescent area of spikelets in percentage and spikelet vitality were set to 0 for the rest of the time course.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_8">
<label>2.8</label>
<title>Exclusion criteria from the analysis</title>
<p>Some spikelets opened and closed after transferring them to MS media on petri plates. This created an artificial increment of spikelet size. To account for this artifact, any spikelet that exceeded 5% of its initial size at any point during the time course was completely removed from the analysis. Furthermore, uninfected and dried spikelets were removed from the analysis. From a total of 680 spikelets, 49 and 94 spikelets were removed from batch 1 and 2, respectively.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_9">
<label>2.9</label>
<title>Statistical analysis of the data</title>
<p>To analyze the infection progression curves, the area under the disease progression curve (AUDPC) of both disease phenotypes for each spikelet was calculated according to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B46">Simko and Piepho (2012)</xref>. In this way, one value per time course was obtained. Linear mixed models were used to assess differences between AUDPCs of cultivars in each treatment. The AUDPCs were modeled using the <italic>lme4</italic> R package (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">Bates et&#xa0;al., 2015</xref>) using cultivars as the main effect and batches were fitted as random effect. Tukey Honestly Significant Difference (HSD) was calculated as <italic>post-hoc</italic> test using the <italic>multcomp</italic> R package (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">Hothorn et&#xa0;al., 2008</xref>). Summaries of statistical analysis and raw data used to create figures are provided as <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Supplementary Tables&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>-<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM4">
<bold>4</bold>
</xref>.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s3" sec-type="results">
<label>3</label>
<title>Results</title>
<p>In this study, we established a methodology for the analysis of disease progression of FHB in detached oat spikelets. In the first stage, five panicles per oat genotype were harvested and inoculated with <italic>Fusarium</italic> conidia by vacuum treatment per batch experiment. From each vacuum-treated panicle, four spikelets were dissected and placed on <italic>in vitro</italic> plates. Altogether, 20 spikelets per oat genotype in a batch were monitored for disease progression by RGB and ChlFl imaging (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">
<bold>Figures&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">
<bold>2</bold>
</xref>). Images were taken at 0, at 12, and then at every 24 HPI for 10 days. Flowering spikelets that opened during the time series were removed from the analysis. Spikelets that were not infected despite the treatment or dried out before the end of the observation period were removed from the analysis. In total, time series data from 40 spikelets per oat genotype treatment were collected from the two batches. The extracted data from the two batches were statistically analyzed as combined.</p>
<fig id="f2" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;2</label>
<caption>
<p>Time series of oat genotype BOR31 spikelets after inoculation with the two <italic>Fusarium</italic> species. <bold>(A)</bold> The progression of <italic>F. langsethiae</italic> hyphae growth over an example spikelet (RGB) and the decline of ChlFl in the same sample. <bold>(B)</bold> The progression of <italic>F. culmorum</italic> hyphae growth on one BOR31 spikelet by RGB and the decline of chlorophyll fluorescence (ChlFl) on the same sample. HPI, hours post inoculation.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-14-1126717-g002.tif"/>
</fig>
<sec id="s3_1">
<label>3.1</label>
<title>Visual assessment of the disease progression on RGB images</title>
<p>RGB images were utilized to qualitatively assess the percentage of spikelet covered by mycelia growth (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;3</bold>
</xref>). Browning, chlorotic tissue covered with white mycelium was considered as symptomatic tissue. Observations of visible symptoms indicated that <italic>F. langsethiae</italic> infection progressed more slowly (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;2A</bold>
</xref>) than <italic>F. culmorum</italic> (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;2B</bold>
</xref>). The incidence and level of visual symptoms in the inoculated spikelets were visually estimated from batch 2 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;3</bold>
</xref>), where different responses were observed across cultivars. From the inspected spikelets, only two inoculated with <italic>F. culmorum</italic> were not symptomatic, whereas all others became partly or fully covered by mycelium. At the end of the observation period, only Odal cultivar had symptomatic tissue in all spikelets inoculated with <italic>F. langsethiae</italic>. All other cultivars had variable responses regarding both the incidence and the level of observed symptoms (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;3</bold>
</xref>). At 7 days after inoculation, <italic>F. culmorum</italic> infections had fully covered the spikelets while the <italic>F. langsethiae</italic> infections were less invasive and mycelia coverage ranged from 0% to 100% coverage.</p>
<fig id="f3" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;3</label>
<caption>
<p>Visual assessment of infection incidence and symptoms on the spikelets by the different treatments at 7 days post infection. The frequencies of spikelets with different percentage of symptomatic tissue are shown as stacked bar plots. The symptomatic percentage was assessed qualitatively by visual scoring and grouped as 0%, 25%, 50%, 75%, and 100% symptomatic tissue, and other damage (yellowing, dark spots). This analysis represents the visual scoring of 20 spikelets per genotype per treatment from batch 2.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-14-1126717-g003.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_2">
<label>3.2</label>
<title>Estimation of decline in spikelet vitality and spreading of infection over time</title>
<p>Time series analysis of ChlFl images of infected oat spikelets was conducted to quantify the differences in spikelet vitality and infection spreading (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;2</bold>
</xref>). ChlFl data were collected for each pixel of the spikelets utilizing a scripted macro modified from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">Pavicic et&#xa0;al. (2021)</xref>. This strategy allowed the creation of two phenotypes to track disease progression. During the time course of <italic>Fusarium</italic> infection, some spikelet pixels become photosynthetically inactive (loss of ChlFl), or the hyphal growth blocks the ChlFl. Thus, the first phenotype tracked the disappearance of fluorescent pixels over the time course expressed as percentage of the spikelet size at 0 HPI (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f4">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;4</bold>
</xref>). The second phenotype monitored the vitality of the spikelet by averaging F<sub>v</sub>/F<sub>m</sub> values of fluorescent pixels remaining at each HPI (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f5">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;5</bold>
</xref>). The vacuum inoculation strategy impacted the vitality of the spikelets at early HPI as shown in the control line in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f5">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;5</bold>
</xref>. A recovery from the vacuum inoculation was observed in control spikelets at approximately 60 HPI, which decayed in late HPI likely due to the spikelets being detached from the plant.</p>
<fig id="f4" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;4</label>
<caption>
<p>Time series of the photosynthetically active area of spikelets. Each measurement represents the percentage of spikelet fluorescent area relative to its size at 0 hours post inoculation (HPI). All oat genotypes were inoculated with control (mock) and <italic>F. langsethiae</italic>. BOR01, BOR02, and BOR31 were inoculated in addition with <italic>F. culmorum</italic>. Blue line, vacuum control; magenta line, inoculated with <italic>F. langsethiae</italic>; orange line, inoculated with <italic>F. culmorum</italic>. Dots represent means per treatment at each HPI measured and error bars represent standard deviation. This analysis includes combined data from two experimental batches. Each data point represents the mean of 21&#x2013;38 spikelets.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-14-1126717-g004.tif"/>
</fig>
<fig id="f5" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;5</label>
<caption>
<p>Time series of oat spikelet vitality measured by F<sub>v</sub>/F<sub>m</sub> mean values per spikelet after <italic>Fusarium</italic> spp. or control inoculation. Data are presented as mean of F<sub>v</sub>/F<sub>m</sub> values of all fluorescent pixels per spikelet at different hours post inoculation (HPI). All oat genotypes were inoculated with control (mock) and <italic>F. langsethiae</italic>, and BOR01, BOR02, and BOR31 were inoculated in addition with <italic>F. culmorum</italic>. Blue line, vacuum control; magenta line, inoculated with <italic>F. langsethiae</italic>; orange line, inoculated with <italic>F. culmorum</italic>. Dots represent means per treatment at each HPI measured and error bars represent standard deviation. This analysis includes combined data from two experimental batches. Each data point represents the mean of 21&#x2013;38 spikelets.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-14-1126717-g005.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>The impact of <italic>F. culmorum</italic> to spikelet vitality (mean of F<sub>v</sub>/F<sub>m</sub>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f5">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;5</bold>
</xref>) over time was very similar for all three oat genotypes. <italic>F. culmorum</italic> evidently separated from the control at early HPI, being significantly different from control treatment at 36 HPI and reaching a value of 0 at 84 HPI (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SF1">
<bold>Supplementary Figure&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>). Mean F<sub>v</sub>/F<sub>m</sub> values of spikelets inoculated with <italic>F. culmorum</italic> were also clearly distinct from those from <italic>F. langsethiae</italic> inoculation (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;3</bold>
</xref>) that started declining significantly from the mock-inoculated control between 36 and 60 HPI (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SF1">
<bold>Supplementary Figure&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>). On average, the spikelet vitality of the <italic>F. langsethiae</italic> inoculations remained clearly above 0 for F<sub>v</sub>/F<sub>m</sub> during the entire analysis period. <italic>F. langsethiae</italic> inoculated spikelets of the breeding lines BOR01 and Vinger became significantly different from the control later (at 84 HPI) than the other oat genotypes, which had clearly declining vitality already at 60 HPI (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SF1">
<bold>Supplementary Figure&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>).</p>
<p>The spreading of fungal infection was illustrated by the relative size of spikelet visible area. In <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f4">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;4</bold>
</xref>, the differences between both <italic>Fusarium</italic> inoculation treatments could only be distinguished after 36 HPI (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f4">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;4</bold>
</xref> and <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SF1">
<bold>Supplementary Figure&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>). Similar to spikelet vitality, the <italic>F. culmorum</italic> inoculated genotypes showed a rapid decrease in fluorescent spikelet area (declining to 0 from nearly healthy values within 2 days after 36 HPI). This suggests that the fungus was able to cover the whole spikelets, preventing the detection of ChlFl. Contrastingly, the fluorescent area of spikelets inoculated with <italic>F. langsethiae</italic> conidia resembled the behavior of F<sub>v</sub>/F<sub>m</sub> values at early HPI. However, the time points when the curves presenting the inoculated treatments started to differ from the controls were not identical for different genotypes (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SF1">
<bold>Supplementary Figure&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>) and the shapes of the curves started to look different for different oat genotypes from 60 HPI onwards (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f4">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;4</bold>
</xref>). BOR01 was again the most resistant genotype separating from the control only at 84 HPI (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f4">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;4</bold>
</xref> and <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SF1">
<bold>Supplementary Figure&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>). Vinger showed a similar trend and was statistically significant already at 60 HPI, barely reaching the statistical threshold of <italic>P</italic> value &lt; 0.05.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_3">
<label>3.3</label>
<title>Area under the disease progression curve</title>
<p>To assess differences between oat genotypes in each treatment, the AUDPC was calculated using the method described in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B46">Simko and Piepho (2012)</xref>. This method allows the conversion of an entire time series to a single value that can be assessed with traditional statistical approaches. Thereby, the AUDPC was calculated for each spikelet for both phenotypes used in this study (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f6">
<bold>Figures&#xa0;6</bold>
</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f7">
<bold>7</bold>
</xref>). Although the shapes of the curves representing <italic>F. langsethiae</italic> and the decline in spikelet vitality of different oat genotypes (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f5">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;5</bold>
</xref>) are not identical, the AUDPCs are not significantly different between genotypes (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f6">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;6B</bold>
</xref>), suggesting that, on average, the impact of <italic>F. langsethiae</italic> on spikelet vitality does not differ among the studied oat genotypes. Similar results were observed in <italic>F. culmorum</italic> infections, where no statistical differences in AUDPC were observed between oat genotypes (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f6">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;6C</bold>
</xref>).</p>
<fig id="f6" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;6</label>
<caption>
<p>Area under the disease progression curve (AUDPC) of spikelet vitality measured by F<sub>v</sub>/F<sub>m</sub>. Plots show F<sub>v</sub>/F<sub>m</sub> AUDPC of the seven oat genotypes inoculated with <bold>(A)</bold> mock control, <bold>(B)</bold> <italic>F. langsethiae</italic>, or <bold>(C)</bold> <italic>F. culmorum</italic>. Small red dots correspond to data from batch 1 (b1) and small blue dots correspond to data from batch 2 (b2). Big teal dots represent AUDPC mean, and error bars represent standard deviation. Groups sharing the same letter have no statistical differences at <italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.05 assessed by Tukey HSD <italic>post hoc</italic> test. This analysis includes combined data from two experimental batches. Each data point represents the mean of 21&#x2013;38 spikelets.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-14-1126717-g006.tif"/>
</fig>
<fig id="f7" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;7</label>
<caption>
<p>Area under disease progression curve (AUDPC) of spikelet photosynthetic area relative to its size at 0 hours post infection (HPI). Plots show data of the seven oat genotypes used in this study inoculated with <bold>(A)</bold> mock control, <bold>(B)</bold> <italic>F. langsethiae</italic>, or <bold>(C)</bold> <italic>F. culmorum</italic>. Small red dots correspond to data from batch 1 (b1) and small blue dots correspond to data from batch 2 (b2). Big teal dots represent AUDPC mean, and error bars represent standard deviation. Groups sharing the same letter have no statistical differences at <italic>p</italic> &lt; 0.05 assessed by Tukey HSD <italic>post hoc</italic> test. This analysis includes combined data from two experimental batches. Each data point represents the mean of 21&#x2013;38 spikelets.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-14-1126717-g007.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>The AUDPC of spikelet fluorescent area was significantly larger for genotype BOR01 than for genotype Belinda, indicating the significantly slower spread of infection (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f7">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;7B</bold>
</xref>). Comparison with other oat genotypes yielded no statistical differences in their mean AUDPCs for fluorescent spikelet area. Although not statistically significant, a trend was observed for Vinger cultivar, which had a mean AUDPC closer to BOR1 compared to others having mean values closer to Belinda (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f7">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;7B</bold>
</xref>). No statistical differences were found for <italic>F. culmorum</italic> infections (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f7">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;7C</bold>
</xref>).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s4" sec-type="discussion">
<label>4</label>
<title>Discussion</title>
<sec id="s4_1">
<label>4.1</label>
<title>Establishing an image-based system for the time series analysis of fungal diseases</title>
<p>FHB is a global threat to cereal grain production especially in humid climates. The disease progression is relatively quick after infecting flowers and heads of cereals and therefore timely detection of the disease would allow early interventions and prevention of further spread of the disease. Thermal and hyperspectral signatures can be utilized as proxies for disease symptoms in field settings. In this study, we established a method to study the FHB disease progression using ChlFl imaging that enables the detection of symptomatic tissues before they are visible to the human eye. When disease progression in individual spikelets is observed both from the RGB images and fluorescent images, we can find at least two advantages compared to previous manually made microscope observations of <italic>Fusarium</italic> infection in oats. First, we can quantify the severity of the infection within the floral tissue, which is important since <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B48">Tekle et&#xa0;al. (2012)</xref> have shown that there can be high variation in the spreading of infections between individual spikelets. The aim was also to develop a system to describe spatial and temporal changes during the disease progression. The recorded RGB images allowed ranking the coverage of hyphae and showed the different rates and efficiencies between the two <italic>Fusarium</italic> species. The ChlFl parameters allowed establishing the decay rate of the healthy tissue as an inverse readout of the disease progression and to detect the timepoint where the oat tissue loses its photosynthetic activity, which may again be difficult to determine by human eye. To allow collecting such data from several oat genotypes treated with two <italic>Fusarium</italic> species, an automated workflow from image capturing to data analysis was established. The temporal analysis was facilitated by the use of automated pixel-specific ChlFl data extraction using the FIJI scripting. Data collection in a time series allowed recording temporal differences between <italic>Fusarium</italic> species in their rate of disease progression and severity, as well as the response time of oat genotypes. Dissecting the disease progression into a time scale will hopefully allow targeting the underlying molecular processes.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s4_2">
<label>4.2</label>
<title>Spikelet dissection method allowed observations of disease progression at the organ level</title>
<p>We monitored several different traits, i.e., phenotypes, that can explain the interaction between the selected pathogens and the host plant tissue. These phenotypes included visually estimated disease incidence and the level of visible symptoms, decline of ChlFl-based spikelet vitality (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f5">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;5</bold>
</xref>) over time, and spread of infection based on the decrease of photosynthetically active spikelet area (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f4">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;4</bold>
</xref>) over time. Each of these partially explains what is happening in the interaction between plant genotypes with variable resistance and pathogens with variable aggressiveness. The resistance against FHB causing fungi is described as a complex trait in cereals (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">Mesterh&#xe1;zy et&#xa0;al., 1999</xref>) and in oats (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">Hautsalo et&#xa0;al., 2018</xref>). The result of FHB infection in cereals such as mycotoxin contamination in the grain is merely the end outcome from numerous events such as establishment of initial infection in different spikelets (number of infected grain), the spread of infection (severity of infection within a cereal head or in the case of oats within a single spikelet), and the degradation of or tolerance against mycotoxins.</p>
<p>Considering the proportion of infected spikelets, the vacuum inoculation method efficiently infected <italic>F. culmorum</italic> into oat spikelets since only few spikelets had no symptoms after inoculation including in BOR01 genotype that was previously shown as moderately resistant against <italic>Fusarium</italic> infection (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">Hautsalo et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>). For <italic>F. langsethiae</italic>, the vacuum inoculation method left ~17% of spikelets symptomless, which suggests that this pathogen was not able to infect the spikelets as efficiently. However, <italic>F. langsethiae</italic> is generally considered as a weak pathogen that does not easily cause symptoms (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">Divon et&#xa0;al., 2012</xref>). The vacuum infiltration has been used by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">Divon et&#xa0;al. (2012)</xref> to inoculate oat seeds with <italic>F. langsethiae</italic>, leading to a loss of germination from approximately half of the tested seeds. Nevertheless, compared to yield analyses made from field and greenhouse trials that are inoculated either by sprayings or by sporulation from spawn inoculum (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">Hautsalo et&#xa0;al., 2018</xref>), the non-destructive monitoring of infection over time in vacuum-inoculated spikelets provides novel insight into the plant&#x2013;disease interaction. With the method described in this study, the individual spikelets are more likely infected, and we can see when and how long the fungi and the plants are interacting.</p>
<p>Based on the findings in this study, it seems that in the case of oats and of a DON-producing fungus such as <italic>F. culmorum</italic>, the number of infected grains might be a critical determinant of infection since we could not find significant differences among genotypes after the infection had been established. This finding is supported by the findings of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">Hautsalo et&#xa0;al. (2021)</xref> where the spikelets from two contrastingly resistant oat genotypes were infected with <italic>F. graminearum</italic> by point inoculation technique but showed no differences at 6 dpi. This type of resistance against the initial infection can be contributed by various mechanisms such as physiological and chemical properties of the flower as well as pathogen-triggered immunity reactions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">Hautsalo et&#xa0;al., 2018</xref>). However, monitoring of <italic>F. langsethiae</italic> suggests that both the incidence of initial infections and the speed of the spreading of infection might play a role. RNA sampling from the inoculated oats could reveal interesting molecular interactions taking place in the early phases of infection either between 0 and 36 HPI when no difference in the phenotype between the inoculated and the control spikelets can be seen or as far as 84 HPI when no photosynthesis can be detected for <italic>F. culmorum</italic> and respectively from 12 to 132 HPI or even longer for <italic>F. langsethiae.</italic> Nevertheless, the final ranking of the genotypes out in the field might still be attributed to other factors such as the evasion provided by the differences in flowering habit (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Herrmann et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s4_3">
<label>4.3</label>
<title>Aggressiveness of different <italic>Fusarium</italic> species</title>
<p>The findings related to the infection of two different <italic>Fusarium</italic> species in our study are in accordance with the literature. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Divon et&#xa0;al. (2019)</xref> observed the <italic>F. langsethiae</italic> to have a similar infection pathway and very similar infection structures to <italic>F. graminearum</italic>, but the rate of spreading of <italic>F. langsethiae</italic> infection was shown to be up to three times slower. Divon also mentioned to have observed that the spores of <italic>F. langsethiae</italic> germinate 10 to 15 h later than the spores of <italic>F. graminearum.</italic> The DON-mycotoxin-producing species, <italic>F. graminearum</italic> and <italic>F. culmorum</italic>, are closely related and have resemblance in their infection pathway. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">Kang and Buchenauer (2000)</xref> observed that <italic>F. culmorum</italic> spores germinated and formed more than one germ tube inside a wheat spikelet. At the beginning of the infection, they also observed hyphal networks forming on the internal surfaces of the spikelet, and by 36 HPI, the ovary and stigma were also infected. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B48">Tekle et&#xa0;al. (2012)</xref> observed the growth of <italic>F. graminearum</italic> in oat spikelet through a microscope and found that hyphal growth was observed as early as 1 DPI and the entire florets were often colonized at 3 DPI, whereas for <italic>F. langsethiae</italic>, up to 14 days was needed to detect colonization of all surfaces of the spikelet (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Divon et&#xa0;al., 2019</xref>). In our study, we start to observe damage in the photosynthetic apparatus during the second day after inoculation in the case of both fungal species, but we did not observe a sharp decline in spikelet vitality in <italic>F. langsethiae</italic> as we did for <italic>F. culmorum</italic> at any point during the entire observation period. This suggests that a longer observation period might be needed to show how low the mean spikelet vitality would decline or how large proportion of the spikelets may eventually become covered by <italic>F. langsethiae</italic>. Unfortunately, a longer observation period would also start to harm the control spikelets as the plates start to dry out.</p>
<p>Considering that the <italic>Fusarium</italic> spp. in this study are hemibiotrophic fungi (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B53">Wagacha and Muthomi, 2007</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B54">Walter et&#xa0;al., 2010</xref>) might help to understand what happens during the time series of our study. The length of symptomless phase in our data is similar to the one reported for wheat, where 24 to 32 h are the expected duration of the parasitic phase before shifting to saprophytic phase (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Gottwald et&#xa0;al., 2012</xref>). In this last phase, dead plant tissue is consumed and killed by the fungus, producing loss of ChlFl and visible degradation of the spikelet. The parasitic phase of <italic>F. langsethiae</italic> appears to be relatively longer. However, the complete coverage for some spikelets by hyphae is a sign that <italic>F. langsethiae</italic> can also effectively derive nutrients from dead plant tissue and spread efficiently. This phenomenon was observed in this study in the vitality (F<sub>v</sub>/F<sub>m</sub>) of some spikelets reaching zero by the end of the observation period.</p>
<p>The progression of infection is clearly faster for the DON-producing <italic>F. culmorum</italic> than it is for <italic>F. langsethiae</italic>, which does not produce DON mycotoxin. In wheat literature, an <italic>F. graminearum</italic> strain without functional gene for DON production was clearly less aggressive in disease development (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Boddu et&#xa0;al., 2007</xref>). Wheat resistance against <italic>F. graminearum</italic> depends on the activation at the right time of several defense pathways regulated by phytohormones (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Glazebrook, 2005</xref>) that work against either parasitic or necrotrophic pathogens (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Ding et&#xa0;al., 2011</xref>). <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Diamond et&#xa0;al. (2013)</xref> found DON to inhibit programmed cell death in <italic>Arabidopsis</italic> cell cultures, and they suggested that low levels of DON may facilitate pathogen establishment in the initial biotrophic phase of <italic>Fusarium</italic> infection whereas a higher level of DON may support the necrotrophic phase. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B47">Tan et&#xa0;al. (2020)</xref> also discovered from wheat that pre-inoculation of <italic>F. poae</italic> reduced the abundance of later inoculated <italic>F. graminearum</italic> when compared to <italic>F. graminearum</italic> inoculated alone. This indicates that a defense response activated by a <italic>Fusarium</italic> species that does not produce DON can still provide shelter from a DON-producing fungus. This finding suggests that universal resistance mechanisms against FHB pathogens could exist. Further studies should focus on the complex interactions between hosts and several fungal pathogens, and the phenotyping methods described in this study can be suggested for such studies.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s4_4">
<label>4.4</label>
<title>Resistance and susceptibility in oat cultivars</title>
<p>The oat varieties in this study represented the known variation in resistance against both <italic>Fusarium</italic> species used in inoculations. Recently published findings from naturally infected experiments made in Norway over a 10-year period (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">Hofgaard et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>) describe several differences in our genotypes well. Cultivar Odal is expected to contain resistance against the DON-producing fungi but lacks resistance to <italic>F. langsethiae</italic> and cultivar Vinger is expected to be moderately resistant against both fungi. Cultivar Belinda was found to be susceptible to both <italic>F. langsethiae</italic> infection and DON producers, while cultivar Odal has been found to be even more susceptible. In another study (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">Hautsalo et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>), cultivar BOR31 was highly susceptible to infections and DON accumulation in greenhouse, whereas cultivar Akseli was moderately resistant to infection. The same study showed that the breeding line BOR01 was the best line tested in greenhouse conditions having both a low level of DON accumulation and infected kernels. Belinda was also included in these experiments, and it had a relatively high number of infected kernels. Line BOR02 was selected based on its promising results in a low number of unpublished experiments.</p>
<p>The only difference found in <italic>F. culmorum</italic>-infected genotypes was that a couple of spikelets from BOR01 were not infected whereas spikelets of all other genotypes were infected, suggesting that BOR01 has resistance against the initial infection. This effect was observed in neither spikelet vitality nor the photosynthetically active area, where all three genotypes infected with <italic>F. culmorum</italic> showed no statistical difference and they separated from the control treatment together at 60 HPI. Similar observations were found by analyzing the AUDPC for both phenotypes. Interestingly, some differences were observed before 60 HPI, but we hypothesized that they were due to vacuum inoculation rather than <italic>F. culmorum</italic> infection. Having more time points in the analysis might also help reveal different progression patterns on different oat genotypes in future studies.</p>
<p>In <italic>F. langsethiae</italic> inoculations, only BOR01 and Vinger showed some resistance to the disease progression. Mostly all remaining genotypes separated from the control treatment at 60 HPI for both phenotypes. The exceptions were Akseli and BOR31 that showed a modest susceptibility already at 36 HPI for the photosynthetically active area and vitality, respectively. The analysis of AUDPC only showed statistical differences between the susceptible cultivar Belinda and BOR01 genotypes in the photosynthetically active area. Furthermore, Vinger genotype was not statistically significant from the other lines in the photosynthetically active area but, on average, was one of the most resistant. This result suggests that the analysis of each time point was superior to the analysis of time course trajectories to find subtle differences between genotypes. Interestingly, the cultivar Odal does not show susceptibility here, but maybe the high T-2/HT-2 contaminations in field (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">Hofgaard et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>) are due to the higher proportion of infected kernels within the samples. Further studies are necessary to determine which mechanisms interact behind the found phenotypical differences and trends.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s5" sec-type="conclusions">
<label>5</label>
<title>Conclusions</title>
<p>Improving the tolerance of cereals and especially oats against the FHB disease is a long journey. The resistance against FHB is known to be complex and impacted by several minor genes. Only a few quantitative trait loci (QTL) are currently determined against FHB in oats (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">Bj&#xf8;rnstad et al., 2017</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Isidro-S&#xe1;nchez et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>). In contrast to previous genetic studies that are based on heavy field phenotyping, the phenotyping method presented in this study provides information from the specific plant tissue. The experiments presented here were executed under controlled environment and infection conditions, preventing environmental disturbances occurring as in field trials. With these controlled phenotyping methods, we are one step closer to discovering the small differences behind the resistance. To allow developing time series analysis of the disease progression, dissected spikelets were imaged after inoculation treatments. Two different <italic>Fusarium</italic> spp. were utilized to obtain differential responses and an image-based method to allow recording the responses in space and time. We believe that this method will pave the way for detailed characterization of the disease progression in susceptible and resistant oat varieties. Rather than engaging this spikelet dissection method for breeding selection of oat cultivars for variable resistance, we propose this method for the identification of molecular markers specific for the different stages of FHB disease progression. Controlled experiments play a critical role in the molecular characterization of biological processes. A biological process can be standardized in a time series setup that allows defining samples for molecular analysis and thereby discoveries of molecular markers. We also presented here two new oat phenotypes that could be used for the discovery of molecular markers in genome-wide association studies.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s6" sec-type="data-availability">
<title>Data availability statement</title>
<p>The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Supplementary Material</bold>
</xref>. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s7" sec-type="author-contributions">
<title>Author contributions</title>
<p>Conceptualization: MP, JH, KH, KM, and MJ; methodology: MP, JH, KM, and KH; software: MP and KM; validation: MP and KM; formal analysis: KM, MP, JH, and KH; investigation: KM and KH; resources: KH, MJ, and DJ; data curation: KM and MP; writing: MP, JH, KH, and KM; visualization: MP; supervision: KH and MJ; project administration: KH, MJ, and DJ; funding acquisition: MJ, KH, DJ, and JH. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<sec id="s8" sec-type="funding-information">
<title>Funding</title>
<p>This work was supported by Becas Chile from the Chilean National Agency for Research and Development (ANID), MP (investigation); Agronomiliitto, Oiva Kuusisto grant 31.10.2017, JH and MJ (methodology); Makera grant # 533/03.01.2018, MJ and KH (project funding); NordForsk University HUB NordPlant grant # 84597, KH (project funding); HiLIFE-RIA2020 KH (facility management and coordination of research); and UH institutional open access publication in Frontiers KH.</p>
</sec>
<ack>
<title>Acknowledgments</title>
<p>Auli Kedonper&#xe4;, Lauri Lehtil&#xe4;, and Attiq Ur Rehman are acknowledged for technical assistance. This manuscript has been co-authored by UT-Battelle, LLC, under contract DE-AC05-00OR22725 with the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE). The U.S. government retains and the publisher, by accepting the article for publication, acknowledges that the U.S. government retains a nonexclusive, paid-up, irrevocable, worldwide license to publish or reproduce the published form of this manuscript, or allow others to do so, for U.S. government purposes. DOE will provide public access to these results of federally sponsored research in accordance with the DOE Public Access Plan (<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://energy.gov/downloads/doe-public-access-plan">http://energy.gov/downloads/doe-public-access-plan</ext-link>).</p>
</ack>
<sec id="s9" sec-type="COI-statement">
<title>Conflict of interest</title>
<p>The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s10" sec-type="disclaimer">
<title>Publisher&#x2019;s note</title>
<p>All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s11" sec-type="supplementary-material">
<title>Supplementary material</title>
<p>The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2023.1126717/full#supplementary-material">https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2023.1126717/full#supplementary-material</ext-link>
</p>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Image_1.tiff" id="SF1" mimetype="image/tiff">
<label>Supplementary Figure&#xa0;1</label>
<caption>
<p>Daily statistical significances of time course analysis. Spikelet vitality <bold>(A)</bold> <italic>F. langsethie</italic> <bold>(B)</bold> <italic>F. culmorum</italic>. Spikelet photosynthetically active area <bold>(C)</bold> <italic>F. langsethiae</italic> and <bold>(D)</bold> <italic>F. culmorum</italic>. Dotted line adjusted <italic>P</italic> value = 0.05.</p>
</caption>
</supplementary-material>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Table_1.xlsx" id="SM1" mimetype="application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet"/>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Table_2.xlsx" id="SM2" mimetype="application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet"/>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Table_3.xlsx" id="SM3" mimetype="application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet"/>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Table_4.xlsx" id="SM4" mimetype="application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet"/>
</sec>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="B1">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Barbagallo</surname> <given-names>R. P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Oxborough</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pallett</surname> <given-names>K. E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Baker</surname> <given-names>N. R.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2003</year>). <article-title>Rapid, noninvasive screening for perturbations of metabolism and plant growth using chlorophyll fluorescence imaging</article-title>. <source>Plant Physiol.</source> <volume>132</volume>, <fpage>485</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>493</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1104/pp.102.018093</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Bates</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>M&#xe4;chler</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bolker</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Walker</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4</article-title>. <source>J. Stat. Softw.</source> <volume>67</volume>, <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>48</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.18637/jss.v067.i01</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Bauriegel</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Giebel</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Geyer</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Schmidt</surname> <given-names>U.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Herppich</surname> <given-names>W. B.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2011</year>a). <article-title>Early detection of fusarium infection in wheat using hyper-spectral imaging</article-title>. <source>Comput. Electron. Agric.</source> <volume>75</volume>, <fpage>304</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>312</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/J.COMPAG.2010.12.006</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Bauriegel</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Giebel</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Herppich</surname> <given-names>W. B.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2011</year>b). <article-title>Hyperspectral and chlorophyll fluorescence imaging to analyse the impact of fusarium culmorum on the photosynthetic integrity of infected wheat ears</article-title>. <source>Sensors</source> <volume>11</volume>, <fpage>3765</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>3779</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/s110403765</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Berger</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Benediktyov&#xe1;</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Matou&#x161;</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bonfig</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mueller</surname> <given-names>M. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Nedbal</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2007</year>). <article-title>Visualization of dynamics of plant&#x2013;pathogen interaction by novel combination of chlorophyll fluorescence imaging and statistical analysis: Differential effects of virulent and avirulent strains of <italic>P. syringae</italic> and of oxylipins on <italic>A. thaliana</italic>
</article-title>. <source>J. Exp. Bot.</source> <volume>58</volume>, <fpage>797</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>806</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/jxb/erl208</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Bj&#xf8;rnstad</surname> <given-names>&#xc5;.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>He</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tekle</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Klos</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Huang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tinker</surname> <given-names>N. A.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Genetic variation and associations involving fusarium head blight and deoxynivalenol accumulation in cultivated oat (Avena sativa l.)</article-title>. <source>Plant Breed.</source> <volume>136</volume>, <fpage>620</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>636</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Bj&#xf8;rnstad</surname> <given-names>&#xc5;.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Skinnes</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>Resistance to <italic>Fusarium</italic> infection in oats (Avena sativa l.)</article-title>. <source>Cereal Res. Commun.</source> <volume>36</volume>, <fpage>57</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>62</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1556/CRC.36.2008.Suppl.B.9</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Boddu</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cho</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Muehlbauer</surname> <given-names>G. J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2007</year>). <article-title>Transcriptome analysis of trichothecene-induced gene expression in barley</article-title>. <source>Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact.</source> <volume>20</volume>, <fpage>1364</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1375</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1094/MPMI-20-11-1364</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Boenisch</surname> <given-names>M. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sch&#xe4;fer</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>
<italic>Fusarium graminearum</italic> forms mycotoxin producing infection structures on wheat</article-title>. <source>BMC Plant Biol.</source> <volume>11</volume>, <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>14</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/1471-2229-11-110</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Diamond</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Reape</surname> <given-names>T. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rocha</surname> <given-names>O.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Doyle</surname> <given-names>S. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kacprzyk</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Doohan</surname> <given-names>F. M.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>The <italic>Fusarium</italic> mycotoxin deoxynivalenol can inhibit plant apoptosis-like programmed cell death</article-title>. <source>PloS One</source> <volume>8</volume>, <elocation-id>e69542</elocation-id>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0069542</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ding</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xu</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yi</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kong</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Resistance to hemi-biotrophic <italic>F. graminearum</italic> infection is associated with coordinated and ordered expression of diverse defense signaling pathways</article-title>. <source>PloS One</source> <volume>6</volume> (<issue>4</issue>), <elocation-id>e19008</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0019008</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Divon</surname> <given-names>H. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>B&#xf8;e</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tveit</surname> <given-names>M. M. N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Klemsdal</surname> <given-names>S. S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Infection pathways and penetration modes of <italic>Fusarium langsethiae</italic>
</article-title>. <source>Eur. J. Plant Pathol.</source> <volume>154</volume>, <fpage>259</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>271</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10658-018-01653-3</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Divon</surname> <given-names>H. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Razzaghian</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Udnes-Aamot</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Klemsdal</surname> <given-names>S. S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>
<italic>Fusarium langsethiae</italic> (Torp and nirenberg), investigation of alternative infection routes in oats</article-title>. <source>Eur. J. Plant Pathol.</source> <volume>132</volume>, <fpage>147</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>161</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10658-011-9858-3</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Glazebrook</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2005</year>). <article-title>Contrasting mechanisms of defense against biotrophic and necrotrophic pathogens</article-title>. <source>Annu. Rev. Phytopathol.</source> <volume>43</volume>, <fpage>205</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1146/annurev.phyto.43.040204.135923</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Goswami</surname> <given-names>R. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kistler</surname> <given-names>H. C.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2004</year>). <article-title>Heading for disaster: Fusarium graminearum on cereal crops</article-title>. <source>Mol. Plant Pathol.</source> <volume>5</volume> (<issue>6</issue>), <fpage>515</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>525</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1364-3703.2004.00252.x</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Gottwald</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Samans</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>L&#xfc;ck</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Friedt</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Jasmonate and ethylene dependent defence gene expression and suppression of fungal virulence factors: Two essential mechanisms of <italic>Fusarium</italic> head blight resistance in wheat</article-title>? <source>BMC Genomics</source> <volume>13</volume>, <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>22</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/1471-2164-13-369</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Hautsalo</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jalli</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Manninen</surname> <given-names>O.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Vetel&#xe4;inen</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Evaluation of resistance to <italic>Fusarium graminearum</italic> in oats</article-title>. <source>Euphytica</source> <volume>214</volume>, <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>18</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10681-018-2222-3</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B18">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Hautsalo</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jauhiainen</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hannukkala</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Manninen</surname> <given-names>O.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Vetel&#xe4;inen</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pietil&#xe4;</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Resistance to <italic>Fusarium</italic> head blight in oats based on analyses of multiple field and greenhouse studies</article-title>. <source>Eur. J. Plant Pathol.</source> <volume>158</volume>, <fpage>15</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>33</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10658-020-02039-0</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B19">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Hautsalo</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Latvala</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Manninen</surname> <given-names>O.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Haapalainen</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hannukkala</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jalli</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Two oat genotypes with different field resistance to <italic>Fusarium</italic> head blight respond similarly to the infection at spikelet level</article-title>. <source>J. Plant Pathol.</source> <volume>103</volume>, <fpage>299</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>304</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s42161-020-00670-8</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B20">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Herrmann</surname> <given-names>M. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hautsalo</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Georgieva</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bund</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Winter</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Beuch</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Relationship between genetic variability of flowering traits and <italic>Fusarium</italic> mycotoxin contamination in oats</article-title>. <source>Crop Sci.</source> <volume>60</volume>, <fpage>852</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>862</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/csc2.20125</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B21">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Hietaniemi</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>R&#xe4;m&#xf6;</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yli-Mattila</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jestoi</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Peltonen</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kartio</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Updated survey of <italic>Fusarium</italic> species and toxins in Finnish cereal grains part a chemistry, analysis, control, exposure &amp; risk assessment</article-title>. <source>Food Additives &amp; Contaminants: Part A</source> <volume>33</volume>, <issue>5</issue>, <fpage>831</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>848</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/19440049.2016.1162112</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B22">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Hofgaard</surname> <given-names>I. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Aamot</surname> <given-names>H. U.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Torp</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jestoi</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lattanzio</surname> <given-names>V. M. T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Klemsdal</surname> <given-names>S. S.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Associations between <italic>Fusarium</italic> species and mycotoxins in oats and spring wheat from farmers&#x2019; fields in Norway over a six-year period</article-title>. <source>World Mycotoxin. J.</source> <volume>9</volume>, <fpage>365</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>378</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3920/WMJ2015.2003</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B23">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Hofgaard</surname> <given-names>I. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Brodal</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Almvik</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lillemo</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Russenes</surname> <given-names>A. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Edwards</surname> <given-names>S. G.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Different resistance to DON versus HT2+ T2 producers in Nordic oat varieties</article-title>. <source>Toxins. (Basel).</source> <volume>14</volume>, <fpage>313</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/toxins14050313</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B24">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Hothorn</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bretz</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Westfall</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>Simultaneous inference in general parametric models</article-title>. <source>Biometrical. J.</source> <volume>50</volume>, <fpage>346</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>363</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/bimj.200810425</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B25">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Imathiu</surname> <given-names>S. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ray</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Back</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hare</surname> <given-names>M. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Edwards</surname> <given-names>S. G.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>
<italic>Fusarium langsethiae</italic> pathogenicity and aggressiveness towards oats and wheat in wounded and unwounded <italic>in vitro</italic> detached leaf assays</article-title>. <source>Eur. J. Plant Pathol.</source> <volume>124</volume>, <fpage>117</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>126</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10658-008-9398-7</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B26">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Isidro-S&#xe1;nchez</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>D&#x2019;Arcy Cusack</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Verheecke-Vaessen</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kahla</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bekele</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Doohan</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Genome-wide association mapping of <italic>Fusarium langsethiae</italic> infection and mycotoxin accumulation in oat (Avena sativa l.)</article-title>. <source>Plant Genome</source> <volume>13</volume>, <elocation-id>e20023</elocation-id>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B27">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Johns</surname> <given-names>L. E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bebber</surname> <given-names>D. P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gurr</surname> <given-names>S. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Brown</surname> <given-names>N. A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Emerging health threat and cost of fusarium mycotoxins in European wheat</article-title>. <source>Nat. Food</source> <volume>3</volume>, <fpage>1014</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1019</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s43016-022-00655-z</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B28">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kang</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Buchenauer</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2000</year>). <article-title>Ultrastructural and cytochemical studies on the infection of wheat spikes by <italic>Fusarium culmorum</italic> as well as on degradation of cell wall components and localization of mycotoxins in the host tissue</article-title>. <source>Mycotoxin. Res.</source> <volume>16</volume>, <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>5</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/BF02942968</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B29">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kaukoranta</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hietaniemi</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>R&#xe4;m&#xf6;</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Koivisto</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Parikka</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Contrasting responses of T-2, HT-2 and DON mycotoxins and <italic>Fusarium</italic> species in oat to climate, weather, tillage and cereal intensity</article-title>. <source>Eur. J. Plant Pathol.</source> <volume>155</volume>, <fpage>93</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>110</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10658-019-01752-9</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B30">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kiecana</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mielniczuk</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kaczmarek</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kostecki</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Golinski</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2002</year>). <article-title>Scab response and moniliformin accumulation in kernels of oat genotypes inoculated with <italic>Fusarium avenaceum</italic> in Poland</article-title>. <source>Eur. J. Plant Pathol.</source> <volume>108</volume>, <fpage>245</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>251</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1023/A:1015169815976</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B31">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kluyver</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ragan-Kelley</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>P&#xe9;rez</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Granger</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bussonnier</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Frederic</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2016</year>). &#x201c;<article-title>Jupyter notebooks &#x2013; a publishing format for reproducible computational workflows</article-title>,&#x201d; in <source>Positioning and power in academic publishing: Players, agents and agendas</source>. Eds. <person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname>Loizides</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Schmidt</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<publisher-loc>UC Berkeley</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>IOS Press</publisher-name>), <fpage>87</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>90</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3233/978-1-61499-649-1-87</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B32">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kokkonen</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ojala</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Parikka</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jestoi</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Mycotoxin production of selected <italic>Fusarium</italic> species at different culture conditions</article-title>. <source>Int. J. Food Microbiol.</source> <volume>143</volume>, <fpage>17</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>25</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2010.07.015</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B33">
<citation citation-type="web">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kokkonen</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<collab>others</collab>
</person-group> (<year>2011</year>)<article-title>The challenge of LC/MS/MS multi-mycotoxin analysis: Heracles battling the hydra</article-title>? Available at: <uri xlink:href="http://hdl.handle.net/10138/27807">http://hdl.handle.net/10138/27807</uri>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B34">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Langevin</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Eudes</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Comeau</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2004</year>). <article-title>Effect of trichothecenes produced by <italic>Fusarium graminearum</italic> during <italic>Fusarium</italic> head blight development in six cereal species</article-title>. <source>Eur. J. Plant Pathol.</source> <volume>110</volume>, <fpage>735</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>746</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1023/B:EJPP.0000041568.31778.ad</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B35">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>McMullen</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jones</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gallenberg</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1997</year>). <article-title>Scab of wheat and barley: A re-emerging disease of devastating impact</article-title>. <source>Plant Dis.</source> <volume>81</volume>, <fpage>1008</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1021</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1094/PDIS.1997.81.12.1340</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B36">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Mesterh&#xe1;zy</surname> <given-names>&#xc1;.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bart&#xf3;k</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mirocha</surname> <given-names>C. G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Komoroczy</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1999</year>). <article-title>Nature of wheat resistance to <italic>Fusarium</italic> head blight and the role of deoxynivalenol for breeding</article-title>. <source>Plant Breed.</source> <volume>118</volume>, <fpage>97</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>110</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1046/j.1439-0523.1999.118002097.x</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B37">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Murchie</surname> <given-names>E. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lawson</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>JAJ</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>W</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>A</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>G</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Chlorophyll fluorescence analysis: a guide to good practice and understanding some new applications</article-title>. <source>J. Exp. Bot.</source> <volume>64</volume>, <fpage>3983</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>3998</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/jxb/ert208</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B38">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Pavicic</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mouhu</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bilicka</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chovan&#x10d;ek</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Himanen</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Genomic and phenomic screens for flower related RING type ubiquitin E3 ligases in arabidopsis</article-title>. <source>Front. Plant Sci.</source> <volume>8</volume>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpls.2017.00416</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B39">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Pavicic</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Overmyer</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rehman</surname> <given-names>A. U.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jones</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jacobson</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Himanen</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Image-based methods to score fungal pathogen symptom progression and severity in excised arabidopsis leaves</article-title>. <source>Plants</source> <volume>10</volume>(<issue>1</issue>):<elocation-id>158</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/plants10010158</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B40">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Pavicic</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mouhu</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Himanen</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>High throughput <italic>in vitro</italic> seed germination screen identified new ABA responsive RING-type ubiquitin E3 ligases in arabidopsis thaliana</article-title>. <source>Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult.</source> <volume>139</volume>, <fpage>563</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>575</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11240-019-01700-9</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B41">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Rueden</surname> <given-names>C. T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Schindelin</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hiner</surname> <given-names>M. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>DeZonia</surname> <given-names>B. E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Walter</surname> <given-names>A. E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Arena</surname> <given-names>E. T.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>ImageJ2: ImageJ for the next generation of scientific image data</article-title>. <source>BMC Bioinf.</source> <volume>18</volume>, <fpage>529</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s12859-017-1934-z</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B42">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Schindelin</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Arganda-Carreras</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Frise</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kaynig</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Longair</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pietzsch</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis</article-title>. <source>Nat. Methods</source> <volume>9</volume>, <fpage>676</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>682</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nmeth.2019</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B43">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Schwabe</surname> <given-names>S. H.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1839</year>). <article-title>Fusarium graminearum</article-title>. <source>Flora Anhaltina</source> <volume>2</volume>, <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>425</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B44">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<collab>Sherb</collab>
</person-group> (<year>1915</year>). <source>Mem. Cornell Univ. Agric. Exp.</source> <volume>183</volume> (<issue>1915</issue>).</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B45">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Schroeder</surname> <given-names>H. W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Christensen</surname> <given-names>J. J.</given-names>
</name>
<collab>others</collab>
</person-group> (<year>1963</year>). <article-title>Factors affecting resistance of wheat to scab caused by gibberella zeae</article-title>. <source>Phytopathology</source> <volume>53</volume>, <fpage>831</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>838</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B46">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Simko</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Piepho</surname> <given-names>H.-P.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>The area under the disease progress stairs: Calculation, advantage, and application</article-title>. <source>Phytopathology</source> <volume>102</volume>, <fpage>381</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>389</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1094/PHYTO-07-11-0216</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B47">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Tan</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ameye</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Landschoot</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>de Zutter</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>de Saeger</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>de Boevre</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>At The scene of the crime: New insights into the role of weakly pathogenic members of the <italic>Fusarium</italic> head blight disease complex</article-title>. <source>Mol. Plant Pathol.</source> <volume>21</volume>, <fpage>1559</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1572</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/mpp.12996</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B48">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Tekle</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dill-Macky</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Skinnes</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tronsmo</surname> <given-names>A. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bj&#xf8;rnstad</surname> <given-names>&#xc5;.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Infection process of <italic>Fusarium graminearum</italic> in oats (<italic>Avena sativa</italic> l.)</article-title>. <source>Eur. J. Plant Pathol.</source> <volume>132</volume>, <fpage>431</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>442</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10658-011-9888-x</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B49">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Tekle</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lillemo</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Skinnes</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Reitan</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Buraas</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bj&#xf8;rnstad</surname> <given-names>&#xc5;.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Screening of oat accessions for <italic>Fusarium</italic> head blight resistance using spawn-inoculated field experiments</article-title>. <source>Crop Sci.</source> <volume>58</volume>, <fpage>143</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>151</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2135/cropsci2017.04.0264</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B50">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Tekle</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Skinnes</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bj&#xf8;rnstad</surname> <given-names>&#xc5;.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>The germination problem of oat seed lots affected by <italic>Fusarium</italic> head blight</article-title>. <source>Eur. J. Plant Pathol.</source> <volume>135</volume>, <fpage>147</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>158</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10658-012-0074-6</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B51">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Torp</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Nirenberg</surname> <given-names>H. I.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2004</year>). <article-title>Fusarium langsethiae sp. nov. on cereals in Europe</article-title>. <source>Int. J. Food Microbiol.</source> <volume>95</volume>, <fpage>247</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>256</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B52">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Tschiersch</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Junker</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Meyer</surname> <given-names>R. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Altmann</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Establishment of integrated protocols for automated high throughput kinetic chlorophyll fluorescence analyses</article-title>. <source>Plant Methods</source> <volume>13</volume>:<fpage>54</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s13007-017-0204-4</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B53">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wagacha</surname> <given-names>J. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Muthomi</surname> <given-names>J. W.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2007</year>). <article-title>
<italic>Fusarium culmorum</italic>: Infection process, mechanisms of mycotoxin production and their role in pathogenesis in wheat</article-title>. <source>Crop Prot.</source> <volume>26</volume>, <fpage>877</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>885</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.cropro.2006.09.003</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B54">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Walter</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Nicholson</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Doohan</surname> <given-names>F. M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Action and reaction of host and pathogen during <italic>Fusarium</italic> head blight disease</article-title>. <source>New Phytol.</source> <volume>185</volume>, <fpage>54</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>66</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.03041.x</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B55">
<citation citation-type="web">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wickham</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fran&#xe7;ois</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Henry</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>M&#xfc;ller</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2022</year>) <source>Dplyr: A grammar of data manipulation</source>. Available at: <uri xlink:href="https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=dplyr">https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=dplyr</uri>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B56">
<citation citation-type="web">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wickham</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Girlich</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2022</year>) <source>Tidyr: Tidy messy data</source>. Available at: <uri xlink:href="https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=tidyr">https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=tidyr</uri>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B57">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Xue</surname> <given-names>A. G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Marchand</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Guo</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ren</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Savard</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Timing of inoculation and <italic>Fusarium</italic> species affect the severity of <italic>Fusarium</italic> head blight on oat</article-title>. <source>Can. J. Plant Sci.</source> <volume>95</volume>, <fpage>517</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>524</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4141/cjps-2014-300</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B58">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Yli-Mattila</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Parikka</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lahtinen</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>R&#xe4;m&#xf6;</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kokkonen</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rizzo</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>
<italic>Fusarium</italic> DNA levels in Finnish cereal grains</article-title>. in: <source>Current advances in molecular mycology</source> Eds. <person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname>Gherbawy</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mach Ludwig</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rai</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<publisher-loc>Nova Science Publishers, Inc.</publisher-loc>) <volume>1</volume>, <fpage>107</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>138</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B59">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Yli-Mattila</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>R&#xe4;m&#xf6;</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hussien</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rauvola</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hietaniemi</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kaitaranta</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Different grain grinding methods affect detection of <italic>Fusarium graminearum</italic> DNA and mycotoxins</article-title>. <source>Phytopathol. Mediterr.</source> (<publisher-name>Firenze University Press</publisher-name>) <volume>56</volume> (<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>167</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>174</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.14601/Phytopathol_Mediterr-20293</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>