<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.3 20070202//EN" "journalpublishing.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="2.3" xml:lang="EN">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Front. Plant Sci.</journal-id>
<journal-title>Frontiers in Plant Science</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">Front. Plant Sci.</abbrev-journal-title>
<issn pub-type="epub">1664-462X</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Frontiers Media S.A.</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpls.2023.1101932</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Plant Science</subject>
<subj-group>
<subject>Original Research</subject>
</subj-group>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Effects of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on plant growth and herbivore infestation depend on availability of soil water and nutrients</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname>
<given-names>Minggang</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1357419"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname>
<given-names>Zhongbin</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3">
<sup>3</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4">
<sup>4</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Guo</surname>
<given-names>Mingjie</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3">
<sup>3</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4">
<sup>4</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name>
<surname>Qu</surname>
<given-names>Laiye</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3">
<sup>3</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4">
<sup>4</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn001">
<sup>*</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/792799"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Biere</surname>
<given-names>Arjen</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff5">
<sup>5</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/79837"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
<institution>Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Silviculture and Conservation, Beijing Forestry University</institution>, <addr-line>Beijing</addr-line>, <country>China</country>
</aff>
<aff id="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
<institution>Ecological Observation and Research Station of Heilongjiang Sanjiang Plain Wetlands, National Forestry and Grassland Administration, Beijing Forestry University</institution>, <addr-line>Beijing</addr-line>, <country>China</country>
</aff>
<aff id="aff3">
<sup>3</sup>
<institution>State Key Laboratory of Urban and Regional Ecology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences</institution>, <addr-line>Beijing</addr-line>, <country>China</country>
</aff>
<aff id="aff4">
<sup>4</sup>
<institution>College of Resources and Environment, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences</institution>, <addr-line>Beijing</addr-line>, <country>China</country>
</aff>
<aff id="aff5">
<sup>5</sup>
<institution>Department of Terrestrial Ecology, Netherlands Institute of Ecology (NIOO-KNAW)</institution>, <addr-line>Wageningen</addr-line>, <country>Netherlands</country>
</aff>
<author-notes>
<fn fn-type="edited-by">
<p>Edited by: Juan Manuel Ruiz-Lozano, (CSIC), Spain</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="edited-by">
<p>Reviewed by: Wei Zhang, Nanjing Normal University, China; Xueli He, Hebei University, China</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="corresp" id="fn001">
<p>*Correspondence: Laiye Qu, <email xlink:href="mailto:lyqu@rcees.ac.cn">lyqu@rcees.ac.cn</email>
</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="other" id="fn002">
<p>This article was submitted to Plant Symbiotic Interactions, a section of the journal Frontiers in Plant Science</p>
</fn>
</author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>26</day>
<month>01</month>
<year>2023</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="collection">
<year>2023</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>14</volume>
<elocation-id>1101932</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>18</day>
<month>11</month>
<year>2022</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>13</day>
<month>01</month>
<year>2023</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#xa9; 2023 Wang, Wang, Guo, Qu and Biere</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2023</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Wang, Wang, Guo, Qu and Biere</copyright-holder>
<license xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">
<p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.</p>
</license>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<sec>
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>Fitness of plants is affected by their symbiotic interactions with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF), and such effects are highly dependent on the environmental context.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Methods</title>
<p>In the current study, we inoculated the nursery shrub species <italic>Artemisia ordosica</italic> with AMF species <italic>Funneliformis mosseae</italic> under contrasting levels of soil water and nutrients (diammonium phosphate fertilization), to assess their effects on plant growth, physiology and natural infestation by herbivores.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Results</title>
<p>Overall, plant biomass was synergistically enhanced by increasing soil water and soil nutrient levels. However, plant height was surprisingly repressed by AMF inoculation, but only under low water conditions. Similarly, plant biomass was also reduced by AMF but only under low water and nutrient conditions. Furthermore, AMF significantly reduced leaf phosphorus levels, that were strongly enhanced under high nutrient conditions, but had only minor effects on leaf chlorophyll and proline levels. Under low water and nutrient conditions, specific root length was enhanced, but average root diameter was decreased by AMF inoculation. The negative effects of AMF on plant growth at low water and nutrient levels may indicate that under these conditions AMF inoculation does not strongly contribute to nutrient and water acquisition. On the contrary, the AMF might have suppressed the direct pathway of water and nutrient absorption by the plant roots themselves despite low levels of mycorrhizal colonization. AMF inoculation reduced the abundance of the foliar herbivore <italic>Chrysolina aeruginosa</italic> on plants that had been grown on the low nutrient soil, but not on high nutrient soil. Fertilization enhanced the abundance of this herbivore but only in plants that had received the high water treatment. The lower abundance of the herbivore on AMF plants could be related to their decreased leaf P content. In conclusion, our results indicate that AMF negatively affect the growth of <italic>Artemisia ordosica</italic> but makes them less attractive to a dominant herbivore.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Discussion</title>
<p>Our study highlights that plant responses to AMF depend not only on the environmental context, but that the direction of the responses can differ for different components of plant performance (growth vs. defense).</p>
</sec>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi</kwd>
<kwd>P fertilization</kwd>
<kwd>water addition</kwd>
<kwd>
<italic>Funneliformis mosseae</italic>
</kwd>
<kwd>nursery shrub species</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<contract-sponsor id="cn001">China Scholarship Council<named-content content-type="fundref-id">10.13039/501100004543</named-content>
</contract-sponsor>
<contract-sponsor id="cn002">Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities<named-content content-type="fundref-id">10.13039/501100012226</named-content>
</contract-sponsor>
<counts>
<fig-count count="6"/>
<table-count count="2"/>
<equation-count count="0"/>
<ref-count count="93"/>
<page-count count="13"/>
<word-count count="7829"/>
</counts>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec id="s1" sec-type="intro">
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>Nearly 90% of terrestrial plants are able to form a symbiosis with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF), which is considered evolutionarily important for plants to cope with many environmental challenges (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">Begum et&#xa0;al., 2019</xref>). In exchange for providing photosynthetic carbon in the form of lipids and sugars to AMF, plants obtain water and nutrients such as phosphorus, nitrogen and micronutrients from the fungus, that can utilize its complex hyphal network to forage for these limiting resources beyond the root zone (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B76">Smith and Read, 2008</xref>). Symbiotic associations between plants and AMF have been intensively studied, and a wide range of benefits from the symbiosis in terms of plant growth have been reported. These benefits include enhancement of plant uptake of water and nutrients, as well as the promotion of tolerance to environmental stresses like drought, salinity, heavy metal contamination, shade and extreme temperature (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B51">Mathur et&#xa0;al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Evelin et&#xa0;al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B57">Pasbani et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">Adeyemi et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">Begum et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B69">Saha et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>). In addition to enhancing plant tolerance to abiotic challenges, AMF are also identified to play important roles in protecting plants against many types of biotic stresses, e.g. pathogen infection and herbivore feeding (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">Koricheva et&#xa0;al., 2009</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Bonfante and Genre, 2010</xref>). The mitigation of effects of biotic stress by AMF operates <italic>via</italic> a large set of induced or primed morphological, physiological and biochemical changes in response to AMF colonization, including alterations in plant size, phenology, nutrition, palatability, digestibility and toxicity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B61">Qu et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>).</p>
<p>Drought is among the most frequent and devastating stresses plants experience globally (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">IPCC 2018</xref>), and its associated soil desiccation often causes strong plant growth depression by inducing closure of stomata and decreases in CO<sub>2</sub> flux for photosynthesis (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B56">Osakabe et&#xa0;al., 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Chitarra et&#xa0;al., 2016</xref>). Many studies have shown that mycorrhizal plants may utilize AMF hyphal networks as extension of their root systems to scavenge water beyond the root depletion zone, allowing these plants to overcome the drought-induced depression (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B68">Ruth et&#xa0;al., 2011</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B92">Zou et&#xa0;al., 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B53">Mickan et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>). For example, AMF inoculation to strawberry plants under drought was shown to successfully restore plant growth to similar or higher levels compared to well-watered non-mycorrhizal plants (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Boyer et&#xa0;al., 2015</xref>). Similar results were found in tobacco seedlings where AMF inoculation significantly decreased negative effects of drought stress and accordingly increased plant growth (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B46">Liu et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>). Such AMF-mediated enhancement of plant drought tolerance can be either attributed to higher water uptake efficiency as a result of AMF extra-radical mycelia, or due to AMF-activated plant adaptation to drought in the form of multiple functional traits (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B54">Nath et&#xa0;al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B67">Ruiz-Lozano et&#xa0;al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B47">Liu et&#xa0;al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B84">Wu et&#xa0;al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B93">Zou et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>).</p>
<p>In addition to providing drought tolerance, AMF are well known to assist the plants in the uptake of nutrients, in particular phosphorus, nitrogen and specific micronutrients (reviewed in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Bucking and Kafle, 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B85">Xie et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>). Inorganic phosphorus (Pi) is a key nutrient that is essential for various plant functions but not easily accessible to plants due to its low solubility and mobility in soil. Many plants cannot absorb sufficient Pi for structural or metabolic use <italic>via</italic> their own root system (direct pathway) and partly rely on uptake of Pi through the AMF hyphal network (the mycorrhizal pathway) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">Ferrol et&#xa0;al., 2019</xref>). Although AMF symbiosis has traditionally been considered as a mutualistic interaction, the outcome of the association for the plant can range from mutualism to antagonism, depending on environmental conditions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B73">Smith et&#xa0;al., 2010</xref>). AMF-induced plant growth depressions have been reported in environments where costs of the association outweigh the benefits for plants, e.g. under low light conditions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">Konvalinkov&#xe1;&#x301; and Jansa, 2016</xref>) and in P rich systems (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">Johnson et&#xa0;al., 2015</xref>). For instance, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B70">Schroeder and Janos (2005)</xref> showed that root colonization and growth benefit of red pepper and acorn squash from AMF was strongly reduced with increasing amounts of soil P. Similar results were found in studies of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">Johnson et&#xa0;al. (2015)</xref> who showed that mutualism between <italic>Andropogon gerardii</italic> and AMF only occurred in P-deficient soil. The mechanisms underlying antagonistic plant-AMF associations are still in debate (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">Johnson, 2010</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">Jin et&#xa0;al., 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B65">&#x158;ez&#xe1;&#x10d;ov&#xe1; et&#xa0;al., 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B90">Zhao et&#xa0;al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">Kaur et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>). Traditionally, failures to observe positive mycorrhizal growth responses have been explained as cases in which the net costs of the symbiosis in terms of fungal carbon use outweigh the net benefits in terms of P delivery by the fungus to the plant <italic>via</italic> the AM pathway (imbalanced C-P trade). However, observations of negative mycorrhizal growth responses even when P-transfer was highly functional, have shifted this paradigm. AMF symbiosis commonly results in a repression of the plant&#x2019;s own (direct) P-uptake pathway. Negative mycorrhizal growth responses are currently thought to arise from a reduction in P delivery <italic>via</italic> the plant&#x2019;s direct pathway that is insufficiently compensated by P-uptake <italic>via</italic> the AM pathway (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B74">Smith et&#xa0;al., 2009</xref>).</p>
<p>Moreover, recent studies have shown that not only plant growth benefits but also plant defense benefits from AMF partners depend on environmental conditions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">Bernaola and Stout, 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">Diaz et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B61">Qu et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>). AMF can prime plants, i.e., sensitize their immune system for stronger or faster responses to upcoming herbivores (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B58">Pozo and Azcon-Aguilar, 2007</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">Jung et&#xa0;al., 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B77">Song et&#xa0;al., 2013</xref>), or induce higher levels of plant defensive metabolites that reduce the damage or population size of concurrent or later arriving herbivores (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B80">Vannette et&#xa0;al., 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B82">Wang et&#xa0;al., 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B71">Sharma et&#xa0;al., 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B52">Meier and Hunter, 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">Kaur and Suseela, 2020</xref>). Other studies have shown that mycorrhizal plants tend to have enhanced tolerance to herbivory (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">Dowarah et al., 2022</xref>) or are better at recruiting beneficial organisms (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B79">Ujvari et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>). Regardless of the underlying mechanisms, the occurrence and strength of AMF effects on plant defense is often affected by the environment in which the host plants and AMF interact, leading to difficulties in application of mycorrhizal inoculation to consistently control pests in field (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Delavaux et&#xa0;al., 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">Bernaola and Stout, 2019</xref>). The availability of soil phosphorus and water are two major environmental factors that have individually been shown to determine the outcome of AMF-induced defense (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Irankhah et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B61">Qu et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>). However, their interactive effects on growth and defense, i.e., whether the effect of one factor depends on the presence of the other, are largely unknown.</p>
<p>In the current study, we manipulated soil water and nutrient content to examine how they individually and interactively affect the effects of AMF on growth and herbivore abundance of a dominant nursery shrub species <italic>Artemisia ordosica</italic> that dominates in semiarid region NW China. We hypothesize that (1) plants have overall enhanced growth and reduced herbivore abundance when roots are colonized by AMF, and these effects are stronger at relatively low levels of soil nutrients and water; (2) the impact of soil nutrient level on AMF benefits in terms of growth and lower herbivore abundance depends on soil water content, and <italic>vice versa</italic>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2" sec-type="materials|methods">
<title>Materials and methods</title>
<sec id="s2_1">
<title>Plant, soil and AMF species</title>
<p>
<italic>Artemisia ordosica</italic> Krosch. (Asteraceae) is a woody species that is widely distributed in the fixed and semi-fixed sand dunes of northwestern China. This species is a deciduous, multi-stemmed, dwarf shrub that has plumose, linearly lobate leaves and a branch system that consists of old brown branches and purple current-year twigs near the soil surface (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B72">She et&#xa0;al., 2017</xref>). <italic>A. ordosica</italic> has a deep taproot system that can reach a depth of 1&#x2013;3 m, but its lateral roots are mainly distributed in the upper soil layer of 0&#x2013;30 cm, and limited to a range of 0.4 m in diameter from the trunk (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B88">Zhang et&#xa0;al., 2008</xref>). <italic>A. ordosica</italic> is a typical shrub species in Mu Us desert, China and is widely used as a nursery plant species for soil restoration in this region (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B50">Li et&#xa0;al., 2011</xref>). The leaves of this species often start to expand in early April and the shoot biomass reaches its maximum in July, followed by a flowering season from August to late September and leaf abscission in mid-November. The species is wind dispersed by tiny light seeds over distances up to several miles. In our study, seeds of <italic>A. ordosica</italic> were collected from wild individuals at Shapotou Desert Experimental Station of the Chinese Academy Sciences, Ningxia Province China (104&#xb0;43&#x2019;8&#x201d;E, 37&#xb0;26&#x2019;28&#x201d;N) in October 2016, where the annual mean precipitation is 191 mm and the annual average temperature is 10.0&#xb0;C. The collected seeds were kept dry in the dark at room temperature until use.</p>
<p>Soils were collected from a semi-arid restoration field near the Shapotou research station, where <italic>A. ordosica</italic> is the dominant species. On average, soils from this field have a water content of 1.1%, a C/N ratio of 17.0, and contain 0.28 g/kg total N and P, and 5.31 mg/kg available N and 1.95 mg/kg available P. A soil core borer of 5 cm in diameter was used to collect a total of ca. 600 kg of soil from the 0-15 cm layer. After being collected, soils were fully mixed and immediately sieved through a 5 mm mesh and sterilized in an autoclave. A thorough sterilization of soil often requires that the standard mode of autoclaving (121&#xb0;C and 100 Kpa for 1 hour) is repeated two or three times. To minimize the time for sterilization yet ensuring thorough sterilization, we instead used a slightly stronger mode of autoclaving at 130&#xb0;C and 200 Kpa for 15 min. Heat sterilization of soil can change soil physico-chemical properties including increases in pH, electrical conductivity, release of macronutrients, and changes in soil organic matter such as increases in the levels of humic acids. These changes may have affected plant interactions with AMF. For instance, increased release of phosphorus may reduce AMF colonization whereas higher levels of humic acids can often be well combined with successful establishment and growth promoting effects of AMF (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B55">Nobre et&#xa0;al., 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Cozzolino et&#xa0;al., 2016</xref>). Sterilized soils were stored at room temperature until use. <italic>Funneliformis mosseae</italic> was used as the source of AM fungal inoculum in this study. This species forms symbioses with a wide range of plant species, including <italic>A. ordosica</italic> and was identified as one of the dominant AMF species in the rhizosphere of <italic>A. ordosica</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B60">Qian and He, 2009</xref>). <italic>F. mosseae</italic>-BGC NM04A was purchased from the Institute of Plant Nutrition and Resource in Beijing Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences, Beijing, China. The strain was originally collected from another semi-arid field site at Ejin Horo Banner, Inner Mongonia, China, ca. 400 km away from the experimental field, with a mean annual precipitation of 346 mm and average annual temperature of 6.3&#xb0;C.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_2">
<title>Experimental design</title>
<p>In total, 128 pots were prepared and each pot was filled with 4 kg sterilized soil. The pots were assigned to eight treatments representing a full-factorial combination of two mycorrhizal treatments (M+/-), two water treatments (W+/-) and two fertilization treatments (F+/-). Each treatment had 16 biological replicates (2M &#xd7; 2W &#xd7; 2F &#xd7; 16 replicates = 128 pots). To create the fertilization treatment (F+), half of randomly selected pots were individually fertilized with 0.0966 g granules of (NH4)<sub>2</sub>HPO<sub>4</sub> and thus ca. 23 mg phosphate and 21 mg nitrogen was added to each pot. The other half of the pots did not receive the fertilizer and was used as the non-fertilized treatment (F-). Therefore, following the fertilization treatment there was 10.56 mg/kg available N and 7.70 mg/kg available P in F+ soils, and 5.31 mg/kg available N and 1.95 mg/kg available P in F- soils. Tap water was used to create water treatments: half of the fertilized and non-fertilized pots individually received tap water every other day, adjusting the soil water content to 4.5% (W+). The water content of the other half of the pots was adjusted to 1.5% (W-). The water contents (4.5% vs. 1.5%) were calculated from the estimated highest and lowest percentage of water retention capacity of the soil in our experimental region within a typical growing season. The amount of added water was calculated by weighing the experimental pot and estimating plant weight from a modeled plant growth curve. The mycorrhizal treatment (M+) was created by adding fifteen grams of vital <italic>Funneliformis mosseae</italic> inoculum contained in granules consisting of hyphae, spores and substrate to half pots of each above-mentioned water or phosphate treatment prior to seedling transplantation. The other half of the pots received sterilized inocula to create the non-mycorrhizal treatment (M-).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_3">
<title>Greenhouse bioassays</title>
<p>Seeds of <italic>A. ordosica</italic> were surface-sterilized using 0.1% KMnO<sub>4</sub> for 30 min and rinsed twice in distilled water. Sterilized seeds were air-dried and germinated in commercial culture soils (Green Energy Inc., Wuzhong, China) at 20&#xb0;C and a 16 h photoperiod for 6 weeks. Similar-sized seedlings were selected and individually transplanted into plastic pots (diameter 25cm, 16.5 cm height). All pots were grouped into 16 blocks and each block consists of one replicate from each of the eight treatment combinations. All the pots were fully watered with distilled water in the early 11 days after transplantation to ensure survival of seedlings, and dead plants were immediately replaced. After this early period when all seedlings successfully survived, plants started to receive the different watering regimes to establish the watering treatments (W+/-). Following the watering treatments, height of all plants was measured every two weeks for the next 90 days. Plants were grown in a greenhouse with a 16 h photoperiod. Natural daylight was automatically supplemented with light from 400-W metal halide lamps to keep the light intensity at ca. 2000 &#x3bc;mol m<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>s<sup>&#x2212;1</sup> photon flux density. After these measurements, pots from block 1-8 were transplanted to the field to assess herbivore abundance. Those from the other blocks (block 9-16) were harvested to measure plant traits (see below).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_4">
<title>Field bioassay</title>
<p>The pots from block 1-8 were transferred to an undisturbed field site where <italic>A. ordosica</italic> populations were naturally distributed. Pots were dug into the soil with their tops leveling the soil surface and arranged in blocks at least 20 m apart according to their original block identity, with a distance of approximately 80 cm between two pots. Plants received no further fertilization or watering treatment and were naturally exposed to herbivorous insects for 4 days. After this period, plants were individually investigated to examine their colonization by herbivorous insects. Adults of the chrysomelid beetle <italic>Chrysolina aeruginosa</italic> Fald (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) showed high colonization whereas no other herbivorous insect species were found. Therefore, the numbers of <italic>C. aeruginosa</italic> were recorded as a measure of herbivore abundance.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_5">
<title>Measurements of plant functional traits</title>
<p>Plant shoot biomass - During the harvest of the greenhouse plants, each plant was separated into roots, stems and leaves. Plant leaves and stems were separately collected and oven dried at 70&#xb0;C for 72 h to determine their dry weights. Plant roots were gently washed to remove soil particles and treated as described below.</p>
<p>Root architecture - Intact fresh roots of each plant were individually scanned using an Epson Perfection 4990 Photo scanner. The obtained photos were analyzed with WinRHIZO software (Regent Instruments Inc., Quebec, Canada) to estimate specific root length (SRL), root surface area (RSA), total root volume (TRV) and average root diameter (ARD). Specific root length (SRL) was calculated as total root length divided by total root biomass of an individual plant.</p>
<p>Root biomass - A subset of lateral roots was randomly selected from each plant. After recording their fresh weight, they were stored in 70% alcohol to determine root colonization by <italic>F. mosseae</italic> (see below). For the remaining roots of each plant, we measured both fresh weight and dry weight after oven drying at 70&#xb0;C for 72 h. The dry-to-fresh weight ratio of these remaining roots was used to calculate the dry weight of the corresponding root subsample that was used for determining AMF colonization of the corresponding plant.</p>
<p>Mycorrhizal infection - Root colonization by <italic>F. mosseae</italic> was quantified using a gridline intersection method (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Bierman and Linderman, 1981</xref>). Briefly, each stored fresh root subsample was cut into at least 100 segments of 0.5-1 cm in length. These root segments were cleared in 10% KOH for 10 min at 95&#xb0;C, and stained using vinegar (5% acetic acid) and 5% black ink (Hero 440, Shanghai, China) for 8 min at 80&#x2013;90&#xb0;C. Stained roots were mounted on slides and checked for mycorrhizal structures (arbuscules, vesicles, spores and intercellular hyphae) under a compound microscope (BH-2; Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) at &#xd7;40 magnification. Presence of any of these structures was scored at 100 grid intersections, and mycorrhizal colonization rate of an individual plant was quantified as the percentage of intersections with mycorrhizal structures present (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B82">Wang et&#xa0;al., 2015</xref>).</p>
<p>Element analyses - Dried plant tissues, viz. leaves, stems and roots, were separately ground to a powder and 1 mg of the powder was weighed into tin capsules. The total nitrogen (N) content was measured using an elemental analyzer (Vario EL III, Elementar, Germany). Tissue samples were acid digested using a mixed solution of H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub> and H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> in a microwave oven, which continued until the samples were fully dissolved in the solution. The phosphorus (P) content in plant tissues was determined by ICP-OES (Optima 8300, PerkinElmer, USA).</p>    <p>Photosynthetic pigment - Leaf chlorophyll a (Chl-a), chlorophyll b (Chl-b) and carotenoid (Car) contents were determined according to the method described in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">Lichtenthaler and Welburn (1983)</xref> using 80% acetone as extraction solution. The Chl-a, Chl-b and Car contents were measured by spectrophotometry at wavelengths of 663, 645 and 480 nm, respectively (T60U, PG Instruments Ltd, Japan). Leaf proline content was measured using the acidninhydrine method described in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Bates (1973)</xref>. In brief, 0.25 g fresh leaf sample was weighed and homogenized in 5 ml 3% sulfosalicylic acid at 100&#xb0;C for 10 min before filtration. L-Proline was used as a standard for the colorimetric determination of the filtrated solution at a wavelength of 520 nm.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_6">
<title>Statistical analyses</title>
<p>Plant functional traits, including plant biomass, root traits, and leaf N and P concentrations were analyzed using a general linear mixed model (GLMM) with a maximum-likelihood (ML) iterative algorithm in R version 3.6.1. In this model, AMF inoculation (M+/-), fertilization (F+/-) and water (W+/-) additions as well as their interactions were added as fixed factors, and the identity of the block to which the plants were assigned was added as a random factor. The model was run using the <italic>lmer</italic> function in the &#x201c;lme4&#x201d; package (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Bates et&#xa0;al., 2015</xref>), and the significance of the test was estimated using the <italic>anova</italic> function in the &#x201c;lmerTest&#x201d; package (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B42">Kuznetsova et&#xa0;al., 2017</xref>). In the above models, data on leaf biomass and leaf and stem P content were log-transformed, and data on N content, root P content and SRL were square root-transformed prior to the analyses to meet assumptions of normality of the residual distribution and homogeneity of variances in data.</p>
<p>A repeated measures ANOVA (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B87">Zar, 1999</xref>) was used to analyze data on plant height, in which the treatments M, F and W were included as fixed factors and plant identity as a repeated subject. Data on insect abundance were analyzed using a generalized linear mixed model, following a &#x201c;poisson&#x201d; distribution, where M, F and W as well as their interactions were included as fixed factors, and block and plant height at the time of exposure to insect as random factors. A similar model was run without plant height as a random factor. The models were run using the <italic>glm</italic> function and the significance of the tests was estimated using the <italic>Anova</italic> function in the &#x201c;car&#x201d; package (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">Fox and Weisberg, 2019</xref>). All analyses were performed using R version 4.2.1 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B63">R Core Development Team, 2022</xref>).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s3" sec-type="results">
<title>Results</title>
<sec id="s3_1">
<title>AMF colonization</title>
<p>Overall, AMF colonization was relatively low in mycorrhizal plants (ca. 5% on average). Surprisingly, roots of plants from the non-mycorrhizal treatments were also colonized, but their colonization rate was significantly lower than that of plants from the mycorrhizal treatments (F = 4.85, p = 0.036, <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Figure S1</bold>
</xref>). Root colonization by AMF was not affected by fertilization and water supply, nor by their interaction (all p &gt;0.20).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_2">
<title>Plant growth</title>
<p>Plant height &#x2013; Plant height at the harvest was significantly enhanced by both additional water supply (+10.0%) and by additional fertilizer supply (+4.5%), and their effects acted synergistically (+20.8%) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">
<bold>Table&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>, W &#xd7; P interaction, p &lt; 0.01). Surprisingly, plant height was unaffected by AMF inoculation when plants received additional water, but was reduced by AMF when additional water was not supplied (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">
<bold>Table&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>, M &#xd7; W interaction, p &lt; 0.001). The reduction in plant height by AMF under low water conditions tended to be stronger in plants that also did not receive fertilization (-33.5%) than in plants that received the fertilizer treatment (-10.6%).</p>
<table-wrap id="T1" position="float">
<label>Table&#xa0;1</label>
<caption>
<p>Effects of fertilization (F), water addition (W) and inoculation with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (M) on plant height (repeated measures ANOVA) and on plant biomass, root traits and photosynthetic traits (General Linear Mixed Models, GLMM) of <italic>Artemisia ordosica</italic> plants grown in the greenhouse.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="top" align="left">Source</th>
<th valign="top" align="left">
<italic>df</italic>
</th>
<th valign="top" colspan="5" align="left">Plant growth traits</th>
<th valign="top" colspan="3" align="left">Photosynthesis traits</th>
<th valign="top" align="center"/>
<th valign="top" colspan="4" align="left">Root traits</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="top" align="left"/>
<th valign="top" align="center"/>
<th valign="top" align="left">Height</th>
<th valign="top" align="left">Leaf</th>
<th valign="top" align="left">Stem</th>
<th valign="top" align="left">Root</th>
<th valign="top" align="left">Total</th>
<th valign="top" align="left">Chl-a</th>
<th valign="top" align="left">Chl-b</th>
<th valign="top" align="left">Car</th>
<th valign="top" align="left">Proline</th>
<th valign="top" align="left">SRL</th>
<th valign="top" align="left">ARD</th>
<th valign="top" align="left">RSA</th>
<th valign="top" align="left">TRV</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">
<bold>M</bold>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">1</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">
<bold>5.60<sup>*</sup>
</bold>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">
<bold>15.0<sup>***</sup>
</bold>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">
<bold>10.0<sup>**</sup>
</bold>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">1.11</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">
<bold>4.48<sup>*</sup>
</bold>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.06</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.12</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.05</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">3.38</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">
<bold>4.47<sup>*</sup>
</bold>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">2.72</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.05</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.43</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">
<bold>F</bold>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">1</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">
<bold>54.4<sup>***</sup>
</bold>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">
<bold>146.3<sup>***</sup>
</bold>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">
<bold>119.0<sup>***</sup>
</bold>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">
<bold>14.0<sup>**</sup>
</bold>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">
<bold>60.0<sup>***</sup>
</bold>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.26</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.88</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.00</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">3.36</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">
<bold>60.0<sup>***</sup>
</bold>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">
<bold>21.2<sup>***</sup>
</bold>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.86</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">2.94</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">
<bold>W</bold>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">1</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">
<bold>117.1<sup>***</sup>
</bold>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">
<bold>157.8<sup>***</sup>
</bold>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">
<bold>237.0<sup>***</sup>
</bold>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">
<bold>94.6<sup>***</sup>
</bold>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">
<bold>162.7<sup>***</sup>
</bold>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">2.08</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">
<bold>15.8<sup>***</sup>
</bold>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">
<bold>8.84<sup>**</sup>
</bold>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">
<bold>8.84<sup>**</sup>
</bold>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">
<bold>162.7<sup>***</sup>
</bold>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">
<bold>40.3<sup>***</sup>
</bold>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">
<bold>40.2<sup>***</sup>
</bold>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">
<bold>53.1<sup>***</sup>
</bold>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">
<bold>M&#xd7;F</bold>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">1</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">1.95</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">3.95</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">
<bold>8.79<sup>**</sup>
</bold>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">2.03</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">
<bold>4.56<sup>*</sup>
</bold>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.57</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">2.34</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">1.50</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.86</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">
<bold>4.56<sup>*</sup>
</bold>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">
<bold>6.63<sup>*</sup>
</bold>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.02</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.41</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">
<bold>M&#xd7;W</bold>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">1</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">
<bold>12.7<sup>***</sup>
</bold>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">
<bold>6.67<sup>*</sup>
</bold>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">
<bold>14.6<sup>***</sup>
</bold>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">1.03</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">2.68</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">2.07</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.06</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">1.15</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">3.39</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">2.68</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">
<bold>10.2<sup>**</sup>
</bold>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.13</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">1.03</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">
<bold>F&#xd7;W</bold>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">1</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">
<bold>7.26<sup>**</sup>
</bold>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">
<bold>6.07<sup>*</sup>
</bold>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">
<bold>32.3<sup>***</sup>
</bold>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">
<bold>16.6<sup>***</sup>
</bold>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">
<bold>22.0<sup>***</sup>
</bold>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.62</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">
<bold>4.47<sup>*</sup>
</bold>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">3.12</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.60</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">
<bold>22.0<sup>***</sup>
</bold>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">
<bold>30.8<sup>***</sup>
</bold>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">
<bold>8.23<sup>**</sup>
</bold>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">
<bold>14.0<sup>**</sup>
</bold>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">
<bold>M&#xd7;F&#xd7;W</bold>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">1</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">2.94<sup>+</sup>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.00</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">1.12</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.36</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.36</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.09</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.00</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.25</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">
<bold>6.23<sup>*</sup>
</bold>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.36</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.63</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.00</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.07</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<p>F-values are shown in the table and those in bold indicate significant treatment effects (P &lt; 0.05). <sup>+</sup>p &lt; 0.10, <sup>*</sup>P &lt; 0.05, <sup>**</sup>P &lt; 0.01, <sup>***</sup>P &lt; 0.001; df, numerator degrees of freedom; Chl-a, chlorophyll a; Chl-b, chlorophyll b; Car, carotenoid; TRV, Total root volume; RSA, root surface area; SRL, specific root length; ARD, average root diameter. There were 16 replicates in each of AMF, P, and W treatments for plant height trait, 8 replicates for plant biomass traits, and 4 replicates for root and photosynthetic traits. Plant height was repeatedly measured over time; effects of time and its interactions with P, W and AMF are not presented in the table.</p>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<fig id="f1" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;1</label>
<caption>
<p>Development of plant height over time of <italic>Artemisia ordosica</italic> plants that were inoculated with the AMF species <italic>Funneliformis mosseae</italic> (M+) or not (M-) and that were grown under four different combinations of fertilization (F-: no fertilization; F+: fertilization) and water addition (W-: low soil water; W+: high soil water) treatments in a greenhouse. Light symbols: plants without AMF; dark symbols: plants with AMF. Data at the last time point (Week 12) were separately analyzed across all treatments in plot facets and the scatterplot with identical letters are not significantly different based on Tukey&#x2019;s <italic>post hoc</italic> test. Statistics are shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">
<bold>Table&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-14-1101932-g001.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>Plant biomass &#x2013; Like plant height, total plant biomass was significantly enhanced by additional water (+38.0%), and fertilizer (9.0%) supply, and their joint effects were strongly synergistic (+234%, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;2D</bold>
</xref>, <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">
<bold>Table&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>, W &#xd7; F interaction, p &lt; 0.001). The same was observed for individual leaf, stem and root biomass (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">
<bold>Table&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">
<bold>Figures&#xa0;2A&#x2013;C</bold>
</xref>). Effects of AMF depended on water conditions. Overall, inoculation with AMF reduced leaf, stem and total biomass, but this effect was only observed in plants that did not receive additional water supply (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">
<bold>Table&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>, M &#xd7; W, p &lt; 0.05, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">
<bold>Figures&#xa0;2A, B, D</bold>
</xref>). Notably, when mycorrhizal effects were tested separately under each of the four environmental conditions, biomass reductions were only observed for plant stems under low fertilizer and soil phosphorus conditions (paired t-test, t=5.32, p &lt; 0.05). Contrary to expectation, the benefits of AMF inoculation were thus not more pronounced at lower soil water and nutrient conditions. Root biomass was not influenced by inoculation with AMF (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">
<bold>Table&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;2C</bold>
</xref>).</p>
<fig id="f2" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;2</label>
<caption>
<p>Leaf <bold>(A)</bold>, stem <bold>(B)</bold>, root <bold>(C)</bold> biomass and total mass <bold>(D)</bold> of <italic>Artemisia ordosica</italic> plants inoculated with AMF species <italic>Funneliformis mosseae</italic> (M+) or not (M-) and grown under four different combinations of fertilization (F-: no fertilization; F+: fertilization) and water addition (W-: low soil water; W+: high soil water) treatments. Light symbols: plants received no AMF; dark symbols: plants inoculated with AMF. The boxplot shows the 25% and 75% quartiles, the median, whiskers (1.5 times the interquartile range) and the outliers of the samples, and the points in the plot area represent different replicates of the corresponding treatment. Boxplots sharing one or more identical letters are not significantly different based on Tukey&#x2019;s <italic>post hoc</italic> test. Statistics are shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">
<bold>Table&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-14-1101932-g002.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_3">
<title>Plant functional traits</title>
<p>Photosynthetic and physiological traits &#x2013; Leaf chlorophyll b, carotenoid, and proline contents were predominantly affected by water treatment. On average, proline content was higher but chlorophyll b and carotenoid contents were lower in leaves of plants that received additional water, whereas leaf chlorophyll a content was not affected by water treatment (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">
<bold>Table&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>, all p&lt;0.01, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3">
<bold>Figures&#xa0;3A&#x2013;D</bold>
</xref>). The reduction in leaf chlorophyll b content by additional water occurred only in plants that also received fertilization (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">
<bold>Table&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>, F &#xd7; W, p&lt;0.05, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;3B</bold>
</xref>). When additional fertilizer was supplied, leaf proline content was enhanced by AMF under low water conditions, but reduced by AMF under high water conditions (AMF &#xd7; F &#xd7; W interaction, P &lt; 0.05, <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">
<bold>Table&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;3D</bold>
</xref>).</p>
<fig id="f3" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;3</label>
<caption>
<p>Contents of chlorophyll a (Chl-a, <bold>A</bold>), chlorophyll b (Chl-b, <bold>B</bold>), carotenoids <bold>(C)</bold> and proline <bold>(D)</bold> in the leaves of <italic>Artemisia ordosica</italic> plants that were inoculated with the AM fungal species <italic>Funneliformis mosseae</italic> (M+) or not (M-) and grown under four different combinations of fertilization (F-: no fertilization; F+: fertilization) and water addition (W-: low soil water; W+: high soil water) treatments. Light symbols: plants received no AMF; dark symbols: plants inoculated with AMF. The boxplot shows the 25% and 75% quartiles, the median, whiskers (1.5 times the interquartile range) and the outliers of the samples, and the points in the plot area represent different replicates of the corresponding treatment. Boxplots sharing one or more identical letters are not significantly different based on Tukey&#x2019;s <italic>post hoc</italic> test. Statistics are shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">
<bold>Table&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-14-1101932-g003.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>Root traits &#x2013; Among the measured plant root traits, SRL was decreased but ARD was increased by fertilization (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">
<bold>Table&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f4">
<bold>Figures&#xa0;4A, B</bold>
</xref>). All measured root traits were significantly affected by water addition. But whereas water addition reduced SRL, it enhanced ARD, RSA and TRV. Effects of water addition were stronger in plants that were not fertilized than in fertilized plants (W &#xd7; F interactions, all p &lt; 0.01, <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">
<bold>Table&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f4">
<bold>Figures&#xa0;4A&#x2013;D</bold>
</xref>). SRL was enhanced by AMF, but this only occurred when plants did not receive fertilizer supply (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">
<bold>Table&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f4">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;4A</bold>
</xref>). The other root traits, including ARD, RSA and TRV were not affected by inoculation with AMF (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">
<bold>Table&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f4">
<bold>Figures&#xa0;4A&#x2013;D</bold>
</xref>) except for ARD that was reduced by mycorrhizal inoculation under low fertilization and water conditions but enhanced by inoculation under high fertilization and water conditions (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">
<bold>Table&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f4">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;4B</bold>
</xref>).</p>
<fig id="f4" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;4</label>
<caption>
<p>Specific root length (SRL, <bold>A</bold>), averaged root diameter (ARD, <bold>B</bold>), root surface area (RSA, <bold>C</bold>), and total root volume (TRV, <bold>D</bold>) of <italic>Artemisia ordosica</italic> plants that were inoculated with the AM fungal species <italic>Funneliformis mosseae</italic> (M+) or not (M-) and grown under four different combinations of fertilization (F-: no fertilization; F+: fertilization) and water addition (W-: low soil water; W+: high soil water) treatments. Light symbols: plants received no AMF; dark symbols: plants inoculated with AMF. The boxplot shows the 25% and 75% quartiles, the median, whiskers (1.5 times the interquartile range) and the outliers of the samples, and the points in the plot area represent different replicates of the corresponding treatment. Boxplots sharing one or more identical letters are not significantly different based on Tukey&#x2019;s <italic>post hoc</italic> test. Statistics are shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">
<bold>Table&#xa0;2</bold>
</xref>.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-14-1101932-g004.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>Leaf nutritional traits &#x2013; Concentrations of nitrogen in leaves, stems and roots were strongly enhanced by soil fertilization but reduced by water addition (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">
<bold>Table&#xa0;2</bold>
</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f5">
<bold>Figures&#xa0;5A&#x2013;C</bold>
</xref>). Especially in roots, effects of fertilization on tissue N concentrations were stronger under low water conditions than under additional water supply (W &#xd7; F interaction, p &lt; 0.05, <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">
<bold>Table&#xa0;2</bold>
</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f5">
<bold>Figures&#xa0;5A&#x2013;C</bold>
</xref>). For the concentrations of phosphorus in leaves, stems and roots a similar pattern was observed. These were significantly enhanced by fertilization (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">
<bold>Table&#xa0;2</bold>
</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f5">
<bold>Figures&#xa0;5D&#x2013;F</bold>
</xref>), but in leaves and roots this effect was more strongly observed if plants did not receive additional water (W &#xd7; F interactions, p &lt; 0.05, <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">
<bold>Table&#xa0;2</bold>
</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f5">
<bold>Figures&#xa0;5D, F</bold>
</xref>). Surprisingly, leaf P concentration was overall significantly reduced by AMF (p &lt; 0.01, <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">
<bold>Table&#xa0;2</bold>
</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f5">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;5D</bold>
</xref>). Although the interaction between AMF and fertilizer treatment was not significant, the suppressive effect of AMF on leaf P tended to be stronger under low fertilization conditions (F-W-: t-test, t <sub>[1, 3]</sub> = 4.89, p &lt; 0.05; F-W+: t-test, t <sub>[1, 3]</sub> = 2.42, p &lt; 0.10) than under high fertilizer conditions (F+W- and F+W+: both p &gt; 0.6).</p>
<table-wrap id="T2" position="float">
<label>Table&#xa0;2</label>
<caption>
<p>General Linear Mixed Models (GLMM) of the effects of inoculation with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (M), fertilization (F) and water addition (W) on plant nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) concentrations in leaves, stems and roots of <italic>Artemisia ordosica</italic> plants grown in the greenhouse, as well as generalized linear mixed model (&#x201c;poisson&#x201d; distribution) of the effects of M, F, and W treatments on the abundance of insect herbivore <italic>Chrysolina aeruginosa</italic> colonizing each plant in the field.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="top" align="left">Source</th>
<th valign="top" align="left">df</th>
<th valign="top" colspan="3" align="left">N content</th>
<th valign="top" colspan="3" align="left">P content</th>
<th valign="top" align="left">No. <italic>C. aeruginosa</italic>
</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="top" align="left"/>
<th valign="top" align="center"/>
<th valign="top" align="left">Leaf</th>
<th valign="top" align="left">Stem</th>
<th valign="top" align="left">Root</th>
<th valign="top" align="left">Leaf</th>
<th valign="top" align="left">Stem</th>
<th valign="top" align="left">Root</th>
<th valign="top" align="center"/>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">
<bold>M</bold>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">1</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">1.01</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">1.43</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">1.64</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">
<bold>8.02<sup>**</sup>
</bold>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.15</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.02</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">
<bold>11.0<sup>***</sup>
</bold>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">
<bold>F</bold>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">1</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">
<bold>15.4<sup>***</sup>
</bold>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">
<bold>44.4<sup>***</sup>
</bold>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">
<bold>6.88<sup>*</sup>
</bold>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">
<bold>389.4<sup>***</sup>
</bold>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">
<bold>34.8<sup>***</sup>
</bold>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">
<bold>12.5<sup>**</sup>
</bold>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">
<bold>9.37<sup>**</sup>
</bold>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">
<bold>W</bold>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">1</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">
<bold>11.9<sup>**</sup>
</bold>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">
<bold>39.4<sup>***</sup>
</bold>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">
<bold>12.6<sup>**</sup>
</bold>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">
<bold>9.35<sup>**</sup>
</bold>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.08</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">
<bold>5.10<sup>*</sup>
</bold>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">1.29</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">
<bold>M&#xd7;F</bold>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">1</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">1.26</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">1.51</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.83</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">3.25</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">2.35</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.87</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">
<bold>4.00<sup>*</sup>
</bold>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">
<bold>M&#xd7;W</bold>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">1</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">1.58</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">
<bold>6.60<sup>*</sup>
</bold>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.38</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.08</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.61</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.22</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.61</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">
<bold>F&#xd7;W</bold>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">1</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">3.14</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">3.63</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">
<bold>5.33<sup>*</sup>
</bold>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">
<bold>6.60<sup>*</sup>
</bold>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">1.36</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">
<bold>5.24<sup>*</sup>
</bold>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">
<bold>9.44<sup>**</sup>
</bold>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">
<bold>M&#xd7;P&#xd7;W</bold>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">1</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">1.92</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.0.33</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.30</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.03</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.03</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">1.51</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">0.26</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<p>F values for N and P content, and &#x3c7;<sup>2</sup> values for herbivore abundance are shown in the table and those in bold indicate a significant treatment effect (P &lt; 0.05). <sup>*</sup>P &lt; 0.05, <sup>**</sup>P &lt; 0.01, <sup>***</sup>P &lt; 0.001; df, numerator degrees of freedom. There were 4 replicates for data on plant N and P contents, and 8 replicates for data on number of <italic>C. aeruginosa</italic> in each of AMF, F, and W treatments.</p>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<fig id="f5" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;5</label>
<caption>
<p>Nitrogen <bold>(A&#x2013;C)</bold> and phosphorus <bold>(D&#x2013;F)</bold> concentrations of different plant tissues of <italic>Artemisia ordosica</italic> that were inoculated with the AM fungal species <italic>Funneliformis mosseae</italic> (M+) or not (M-) and grown under four different combination of fertilization (F-: no fertilization; F+: fertilization) and water addition (W-: low soil water; W+: high soil water) treatments. Light symbols: plants received no AMF; dark symbols: plants inoculated with AMF <italic>Funneliformis mosseae</italic>. The boxplot shows the 25% and 75% quartiles, the median, whiskers (1.5 times the interquartile range) and the outliers of the samples, and the points in the plot area represent different replicates of the corresponding treatment. Boxplots sharing one or more identical letters are not significantly different based on Tukey&#x2019;s <italic>post hoc</italic> test. Statistics are shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">
<bold>Table&#xa0;2</bold>
</xref>.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-14-1101932-g005.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_4">
<title>Herbivore abundance on plants transferred to the field</title>
<p>Abundance of the herbivore <italic>C. aeruginosa</italic> was significantly lower on plants inoculated by AMF than on non-mycorrhizal plants, but this effect was only significant and stronger on non-fertilized plants (mean &#xb1; s.e. in insect abundance; AMF: 0.19 &#xb1; 0.14; non-AMF: 1.31 &#xb1; 0.38; t <sub>[1, 15]</sub> = 2.70, p &lt; 0.05) than on fertilized plants (AMF: 1.56 &#xb1; 0.57; non-AMF: 2.47 &#xb1; 0.87; t <sub>[1, 15]</sub> = 1.10, p = 0.29), resulting in a significant two-way interactions between AMF and fertilization treatment (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">
<bold>Table&#xa0;2</bold>
</xref>, M &#xd7; F: &#x3c7;<sup>2</sup> = 4.00, p = 0.045, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f6">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;6</bold>
</xref>). In contrast, herbivore abundance was overall higher on plants that had been fertilized, but only when these plants had also received additional watering (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">
<bold>Table&#xa0;2</bold>
</xref>, F &#xd7; W: &#x3c7;<sup>2</sup> = 9.44, p = 0.002, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f6">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;6</bold>
</xref>). These treatment effects were not mediated by plant height (a proxy of plant size) at the time of measurement since inclusion of plant height as a covariate in the analyses (&#x3c7;<sup>2</sup> = 0.72, p = 0.397) did not alter the significance of the effects of AMF, fertilizer and watering treatments.</p>
<fig id="f6" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;6</label>
<caption>
<p>Abundance of the insect species <italic>Chrysolina aeruginosa</italic> on the aerial tissues of <italic>Artemisia ordosica</italic> that were inoculated with the AM fungal species <italic>Funneliformis mosseae</italic> (AMF+) or not (AMF-) and grown under four different combination of fertilization (F-: no fertilization; F+: fertilization) and water addition (W-: low soil water; W+: high soil water) treatments. Light symbols: plants received no AMF; dark symbols: plants inoculated with AMF <italic>Funneliformis mosseae</italic>. The boxplot shows the 25% and 75% quartiles, the median, whiskers (1.5 times the interquartile range) and the outliers of the samples, and the points in the plot area represent different replicates of the corresponding treatment. Boxplots sharing one or more identical letters are not significantly different based on Tukey&#x2019;s <italic>post hoc</italic> test. Statistics are shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">
<bold>Table&#xa0;2</bold>
</xref>.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-14-1101932-g006.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s4" sec-type="discussion">
<title>Discussion</title>
<p>Our study examined the role of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in modifying plant traits related to growth, physiology and defense, in particular to what extent the role of AMF depends on soil water and phosphorus supply. We found that AMF inoculation repressed plant growth especially under low soil water and nutrient conditions. On the other hand, AMF tended to reduce the incidence of an important herbivorous insect under low soil fertilization conditions and thus alleviate potential damage under adverse environmental conditions, which could have been mediated by the lower leaf P content of AMF-inoculated plants.</p>
<sec id="s4_1">
<title>Effects of AMF, soil water and soil P on plant growth</title>
<p>Recent years witness an increasing number of studies recognizing that the outcome of plant-AMF interactions often show a continuum ranging from mutualism to parasitism, depending on the context in which the interactions occur (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">Hoeksema et&#xa0;al., 2010</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">Johnson et&#xa0;al., 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">Jin et&#xa0;al., 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B61">Qu et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>). However, these results were mostly obtained from studies using short-lived herbaceous plant species and commercial AMF strains as a model system, and it is yet unclear whether these results apply to plants of different life forms. In the current study, a shrub species, <italic>A. ordosica</italic> was used to measure its responses to AMF under contrasting soil water and soil fertilization conditions. Our results show that inoculation of <italic>A. ordosica</italic> with a strain of the AM fungus <italic>F. mosseae</italic> that was isolated from a comparable sandy, low precipitation habitat as the collection site of the host plant seeds, overall reduced plant height, and the reduction consistently increased over time as plants grew. This result may relate to the overall low root colonization (5% on average) by the mycorrhizal strain, indicating a potentially limited opportunity for beneficial C-P trade in this symbiotic combination (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Graham and Abbott, 2000</xref>). Such low colonization rate may result in low transfer of water and nutrients to the plant. If, even at low levels of colonization, the AMF would still suppress the plant&#x2019;s direct pathway of P uptake through its own root system, this cost could outweigh the benefits of the indirect pathway provided by mycorrhizal extra-radical mycelia (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B75">Smith et&#xa0;al., 2011</xref>) and jeopardize the beneficial C-P trade traditionally hypothesized for mycorrhizal symbiosis (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Grace et&#xa0;al., 2009</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">Johnson, 2010</xref>). The reason for the overall low root colonization of <italic>A. ordosica</italic> in our experiment is unknown, but low colonization rates of <italic>F. mosseae</italic> have been observed in other plant species as well. For instance, average colonization percentages of a single <italic>F. mosseae</italic> strain varied between 2.6 and 27.0% across a range of tomato cultivars (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B78">Steinkellner et&#xa0;al., 2012</xref>). Interestingly, the cultivar with the lowest colonization percentage nevertheless showed a significant 30% increase in root dry weight in response to inoculation, whereas the root weight of the cultivar with the highest colonization percentage was not affected by <italic>F. mosseae</italic>. This indicates that, whatever the reason for low colonization is, even low percentages of colonization can significantly affect plant performance, and that the magnitude of AMF effects is not necessarily related to percentage of colonization. It should be noted that despite the low colonization in M+ plants and the unexpected presence of colonization in M- plants, possibly due to cross-contamination, AMF colonization percentages were still significantly higher in M+ plants than in M- plants, indicating that the validity of AMF treatments in our study was not compromised.</p>    <p>Given that <italic>F. mosseae</italic> was one of the dominant AMF species in the study area and that the <italic>F. mosseae</italic> isolate used in the current study originated from a region similar to the region where the plant species <italic>A. ordosica</italic> is commonly found, potential incompatibility between the two partners due to an ecological mismatch should not be a reason for the observed mycorrhizal growth depression (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">Jin et&#xa0;al., 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B65">&#x158;ez&#xe1;&#x10d;ov&#xe1; et&#xa0;al., 2017</xref>). Surprisingly, the mycorrhizal plant growth reduction was most strongly observed under low soil water and phosphorus conditions. This is in contrast with other studies showing that AMF inoculation usually alleviates adverse impacts of drought stress (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">Duc et&#xa0;al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B46">Liu et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">Jongen et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>). The mechanism underlying this drought-induced mycorrhizal plant growth reduction is unknown, but it may relate to the observed interactive negative effects of mycorrhizae and drought on root traits, such as specific root length (SRL) or average root diameter (ARD) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">Chen et&#xa0;al., 2016</xref>). Plants with higher SRL or lower ARD as observed in the current study tend to have greater plasticity in water and nutrient uptake, but they often show less mycorrhizal dependency, and this may be the reason for the mycorrhizal plant growth depression (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Eissenstat, 1992</xref>). Even more striking was the observation that the mycorrhizal growth reduction tended to be stronger under non-fertilized than under fertilized conditions. Numerous studies have shown that the mycorrhizal growth response becomes more beneficial for plants at lower nutrient levels (e.g. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B81">Vogelsang et&#xa0;al., 2006</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">Klironomos et&#xa0;al., 2011</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">Johnson et&#xa0;al., 2015</xref>), although exceptions have been reported (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B59">P&#xfc;schel et&#xa0;al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B62">Raya-Hernandez et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>). Perhaps competition for nutrients between AMF and plants occurred under these experimental conditions, which may have aggravated the AMF-induced plant growth reduction (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B45">Li et&#xa0;al., 2008</xref>).</p>
<p>The mycorrhizal growth reduction was not only observed for plant height but also for plant biomass. Our results showed that inoculation of AMF significantly reduced plant biomass, and, as observed for plant height, the strength of the AMF-induced reduction in plant biomass production depended on soil water and nutrient conditions. Leaf and stem biomass was more strongly suppressed by AMF inoculation under low water or nutrient supply than under more favorable conditions. In addition to the potential competition between AMF and host plants as previously suggested, an alternative explanation for this observation may be that the AMF strain was not adapted to perform optimally with the host under the low water and nutrient conditions since the site of origin of AMF strain used in this study has a higher mean annual precipitation than the experimental region from which the host plants were collected, mimicked by the low water and nutrient conditions. On the other hand, it is interesting to notice that root biomass was not influenced by AMF inoculation. This result indicates that the plant growth response to AMF inoculation was more sensitive to soil heterogeneity in the shoots than in the roots, suggesting the dependence of AMF-host interactions on environmental conditions may differ among plant functional organs (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B66">Roesti et&#xa0;al., 2006</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B86">Yang et&#xa0;al., 2016</xref>).</p>
<p>Many studies have shown that the photosynthetic capacity of mycorrhizal plants is often higher than that of non-mycorrhizal plants (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B48">Liu et&#xa0;al., 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B89">Zhang et&#xa0;al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">Balestrini et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>). Such improvements can be incurred by enhanced chlorophyll contents, photosynthetic rate and transpiration rate in plants following AMF colonization (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Chandrasekaran et&#xa0;al., 2019</xref>). However, in our study we did not observe significant effects of AMF inoculation on the concentration of chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b or carotenoids in <italic>A. ordosica</italic>. This result is in contrast to the results of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B91">Zhu et&#xa0;al. (2011)</xref> who showed that all these photosynthetic traits were higher in maize colonized by the AMF species <italic>Glomus etunicatum</italic> than in non-mycorrhizal plants. The lack of AMF effects on photosynthesis-related traits in our experiment may be explained by the extremely low AMF colonization rate of <italic>A. ordosica</italic> that might be insufficient to systemically induce changes in the plant&#x2019;s light harvesting capacity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Evelin et&#xa0;al., 2009</xref>). AMF inoculation also did not significantly enhance leaf levels of the osmolyte proline. Osmolytes are often synthesized under water stress in order to maintain osmotic balance (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Furlan et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>), but this was not observed in our experiment. The reasons for this unexpected result are unknown, but it may be related to the unfavorable growing environment in the greenhouse, e.g. low intensity of light, that can prevent stress-induced plant responses (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B44">Lin et&#xa0;al., 2019</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s4_2">
<title>Effects of AMF, soil water and soil P on abundance of colonizing herbivores</title>
<p>In this study, we exposed AMF inoculated and control plants grown under different soil water and nutrient conditions to natural herbivores. The relatively lower abundance of the herbivore species <italic>C. aeruginosa</italic> on mycorrhizal than on non-mycorrhizal plants when grown under low fertilizer conditions suggests a reduced attractiveness of AMF-inoculated plants for this insect species. This result complies with the finding that AMF generally induce resistance to leaf chewing herbivores (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B58">Pozo and Azcon-Aguilar, 2007</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">Koricheva et&#xa0;al., 2009</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">Jung et&#xa0;al., 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B52">Meier and Hunter, 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">Jiang et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>). However, this effect was only observed in plants grown under low soil P, illustrating the context-dependency of the effects of AMF on plant-herbivore interactions. This observation is in line with other studies. For instance, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B83">Wang et&#xa0;al. (2020)</xref> showed that only in low-nutrient soils AMF colonization was high but aphid infestation was low. Not only soil P content, but also other environmental factors such as light were reported to influence the effects of mycorrhizal inoculation on plant-insect interactions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B61">Qu et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>). Several mechanisms have been proposed to underlie plant defense responses to AMF inoculation, including priming effects or enhanced production of defensive metabolites (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">Koricheva et&#xa0;al., 2009</xref>). In our study, the observed lower incidence of <italic>C. aeruginosa</italic> on AMF-inoculated plants under low fertilization conditions could have been related to the observed lower P concentrations in mycorrhizal plant leaves under these conditions. Even though AMF incurred only a modest reduction in leaf P under these conditions, overall leaf P levels under these conditions were very low, so that further reductions may have had a significant impact on herbivore preference; lower leaf P concentrations generally represent a lower diet quality for herbivores (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B64">Real-Santillan et&#xa0;al., 2019</xref>). Interestingly, under higher fertilization levels, the preference of the herbivore for non-mycorrhizal over mycorrhizal plants disappeared. Since the overall levels of leaf phosphorus were much higher under these conditions, this could indicate that once a threshold P concentration of leaves has been reached, the preference of <italic>C. aeruginosa</italic> is no longer driven by P-demand, but by other stoichiometric resource requirements such as a higher N demand under conditions where P is no longer limiting, or by other factors not significantly affected by mycorrhizal inoculation. Leaf nitrogen is another important leaf trait that affects leaf nutritional quality for herbivores either through provisioning of primary metabolites or through N-based secondary metabolite production, but leaf N in our experiment was not significantly affected by mycorrhizal inoculation. An alternative explanation for the lower abundance of the chrysomelid beetle on AMF-inoculated plants grown under low soil fertilization could be the AMF-induced reduction in leaf and stem biomass under these conditions. However, inclusion of plant height as a covariate in the analysis did not account for any variation in herbivore abundance, so this idea is not supported by our data.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s5" sec-type="conclusions">
<title>Conclusion</title>
<p>In the current study we surprisingly found that effects of AMF on plant growth do not follow the hypothesized pattern that low availability of soil water and nutrient favor the functionality of host-AMF interactions. Mycorrhizal inoculation caused a growth depression in plant height and biomass especially under drought and low-nutrient conditions. Furthermore, we observed that AMF reduced the abundance of a specialist herbivore on plants grown under low soil fertilizer levels, which might be associated with the lower leaf P concentrations in these plants. We thus conclude that plant responses to AMF inoculation may differ in terms of the traits measured and the types of environmental factors the plants experience.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s6" sec-type="data-availability">
<title>Data availability statement</title>
<p>The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s7" sec-type="author-contributions">
<title>Author contributions</title>
<p>LQ and AB conceived the idea of this study. LQ, ZW and MG performed the experiments, and MW, LQ and AB analyzed the data and wrote the manuscript. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<sec id="s8" sec-type="funding-information">
<title>Funding</title>
<p>This research was supported by grants from the China Exchange Program JRP530-5CDP28 to AB and LQ, and by the China Scholarship Council (No. 201404910206) to LQ. MW was supported by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (2021ZY05).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s9" sec-type="COI-statement">
<title>Conflict of interest</title>
<p>The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s10" sec-type="disclaimer">
<title>Publisher&#x2019;s note</title>
<p>All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s11" sec-type="supplementary-material">
<title>Supplementary material</title>
<p>The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2023.1101932/full#supplementary-material">https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2023.1101932/full#supplementary-material</ext-link>
</p>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Image_1.tif" id="SM1" mimetype="image/tiff"/>
</sec>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="B1">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Adeyemi</surname> <given-names>N. O.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Atayese</surname> <given-names>M. O.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sakariyawo</surname> <given-names>O. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Azeez</surname> <given-names>J. O.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ridwan</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi species differentially regulate plant growth, phosphorus uptake and stress tolerance of soybean in lead contaminated soil</article-title>. <source>J. Plant Nutr.</source> <volume>44</volume>, <fpage>1633</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1648</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/01904167.2021.1871748</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Balestrini</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Brunetti</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chitarra</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Nerva</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Photosynthetic traits and nitrogen uptake in crops: Which is the role of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi</article-title>? <source>Plants-Basel</source> <volume>9</volume>, <elocation-id>1105</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/plants9091105</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Bates</surname> <given-names>L. S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1973</year>). <article-title>Rapid determination of free proline for water stress studies</article-title>. <source>Plant Soil</source> <volume>39</volume>, <fpage>205</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>207</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/BF00018060</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Bates</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Machler</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bolker</surname> <given-names>B. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Walker</surname> <given-names>S. C.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4</article-title>. <source>J. Stat. Software</source> <volume>67</volume>, <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>48</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.18637/jss.v067.i01</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Begum</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Akhtar</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ahanger</surname> <given-names>M. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Iqbal</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>P. P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mustafa</surname> <given-names>N. S.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi improve growth, essential oil, secondary metabolism, and yield of tobacco (<italic>Nicotiana tabacum</italic> l.) under drought stress conditions</article-title>. <source>Environ. Sci. pollut. Res.</source> <volume>28</volume>, <fpage>45276</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>45295</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11356-021-13755-3</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Begum</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Qin</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ahanger</surname> <given-names>M. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Raza</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Khan</surname> <given-names>M. I.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ashraf</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Role of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in plant growth regulation: Implications in abiotic stress tolerance</article-title>. <source>Front. Plant Sci.</source> <volume>10</volume>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpls.2019.01068</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Bernaola</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Stout</surname> <given-names>M. J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Effects of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on rice-herbivore interactions are soil-dependent</article-title>. <source>Sci. Rep.</source> <volume>9</volume>, <fpage>14037</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41598-019-50354-2</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Bierman</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Linderman</surname> <given-names>R. G.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1981</year>). <article-title>Quantifying vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizae: A proposed method towards standardization</article-title>. <source>New Phytol.</source> <volume>87</volume>, <fpage>63</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>67</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1469-8137.1981.tb01690.x</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Bonfante</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Genre</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Mechanisms underlying beneficial plant-fungus interactions in mycorrhizal symbiosis</article-title>. <source>Nat. Commun.</source> <volume>1</volume>, <fpage>48</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/ncomms1046</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Boyer</surname> <given-names>L. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Brain</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xu</surname> <given-names>X. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jeffries</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Inoculation of drought-stressed strawberry with a mixed inoculum of two arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi: effects on population dynamics of fungal species in roots and consequential plant tolerance to water deficiency</article-title>. <source>Mycorrhiza</source> <volume>25</volume>, <fpage>215</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>227</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00572-014-0603-6</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Bucking</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kafle</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Role of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in the nitrogen uptake of plants: current knowledge and research gaps</article-title>. <source>Agronomy-Basel</source> <volume>5</volume>, <fpage>587</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>612</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/agronomy5040587</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Chandrasekaran</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chanratana</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kim</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Seshadri</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sa</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Impact of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on photosynthesis, water status, and gas exchange of plants under salt stress - a meta-analysis</article-title>. <source>Front. Plant Sci.</source> <volume>10</volume>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpls.2019.00457</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>W. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Koide</surname> <given-names>R. T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Adams</surname> <given-names>T. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>DeForest</surname> <given-names>J. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cheng</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Eissenstat</surname> <given-names>D. M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Root morphology and mycorrhizal symbioses together shape nutrient foraging strategies of temperate trees</article-title>. <source>Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.</source> <volume>113</volume>, <fpage>8741</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>8746</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1073/pnas.1601006113</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Chitarra</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Maserti</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gambino</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Guerrieri</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Balestrini</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis-mediated tomato tolerance to drought</article-title>. <source>Plant Signal. Behav.</source> <volume>11</volume>, <elocation-id>e1197468</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/15592324.2016.1197468</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Cozzolino</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>De Martino</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Nebbioso</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Di Meo</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Salluzzo</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Piccolo</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Plant tolerance to mercury in a contaminated soil is enhanced by the combined effects of humic matter addition and inoculation with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi</article-title>. <source>Environ. Sci. pollut. Res.</source> <volume>23</volume>, <fpage>11312</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>11322</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11356-016-6337-6</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Delavaux</surname> <given-names>C. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Smith-Ramesh</surname> <given-names>L. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kuebbing</surname> <given-names>S. E.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Beyond nutrients: A meta-analysis of the diverse effects of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on plants and soils</article-title>. <source>Ecology</source> <volume>98</volume>, <fpage>2111</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2119</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>D&#xed;az</surname> <given-names>A. S. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Macheda</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Saha</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ploll</surname> <given-names>U.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Orine</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Biere</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Tackling the context-dependency of microbial-induced resistance</article-title>. <source>Agronomy</source> <volume>11</volume>, <elocation-id>1293</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/agronomy11071293</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B18">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Dowarah</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gill</surname> <given-names>S. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Agarwala</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in conferring tolerance to biotic stresses in plants</article-title>. <source>J. Plant Growth Regul.</source> <volume>41</volume>, <fpage>1429</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1444</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B19">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Duc</surname> <given-names>N. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Csintalan</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Posta</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi mitigate negative effects of combined drought and heat stress on tomato plants</article-title>. <source>Plant Physiol. Biochem.</source> <volume>132</volume>, <fpage>297</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>307</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.plaphy.2018.09.011</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B20">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Eissenstat</surname> <given-names>D. M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1992</year>). <article-title>Costs and benefits of constructing roots of small diameter</article-title>. <source>J. Plant Nutr.</source> <volume>15</volume>, <fpage>763</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>782</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B21">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Evelin</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Devi</surname> <given-names>T. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gupta</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kapoor</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Mitigation of salinity stress in plants by arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis: current understanding and new challenges</article-title>. <source>Front. Plant Sci.</source> <volume>10</volume>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpls.2019.00470</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B22">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Evelin</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kapoor</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Giri</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in alleviation of salt stress: A review</article-title>. <source>Ann. Bot.</source> <volume>104</volume>, <fpage>1263</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1280</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/aob/mcp251</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B23">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ferrol</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Azcon-Aguilar</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Perez-Tienda</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Review: Arbuscular mycorrhizas as key players in sustainable plant phosphorus acquisition: An overview on the mechanisms involved</article-title>. <source>Plant Sci.</source> <volume>280</volume>, <fpage>441</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>447</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.plantsci.2018.11.011</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B24">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Fox</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Weisberg</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <source>An R companion to applied regression, third edition</source> (<publisher-loc>Thousand Oaks, California</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>SAGE Publications, Inc.</publisher-name>).</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B25">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Furlan</surname> <given-names>A. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bianucci</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Giordano</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Castro</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Becker</surname> <given-names>D. F.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Proline metabolic dynamics and implications in drought tolerance of peanut plants</article-title>. <source>Plant Physiol. Biochem.</source> <volume>151</volume>, <fpage>566</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>578</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.plaphy.2020.04.010</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B26">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Grace</surname> <given-names>E. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cotsaftis</surname> <given-names>O.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tester</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Smith</surname> <given-names>F. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Smith</surname> <given-names>S. E.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>Arbuscular mycorrhizal inhibition of growth in barley cannot be attributed to extent of colonization, fungal phosphorus uptake or effects on expression of plant phosphate transporter genes</article-title>. <source>New Phytol.</source> <volume>181</volume>, <fpage>938</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>949</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1469-8137.2008.02720.x</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B27">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Graham</surname> <given-names>J. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Abbott</surname> <given-names>L. K.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2000</year>). <article-title>Wheat responses to aggressive and non-aggressive arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi</article-title>. <source>Plant Soil</source> <volume>220</volume>, <fpage>207</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>218</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1023/A:1004709209009</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B28">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Hoeksema</surname> <given-names>J. D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chaudhary</surname> <given-names>V. B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gehring</surname> <given-names>C. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Johnson</surname> <given-names>N. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Karst</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Koide</surname> <given-names>R. T.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>A meta-analysis of context-dependency in plant response to inoculation with mycorrhizal fungi</article-title>. <source>Ecol. Lett.</source> <volume>13</volume>, <fpage>394</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>407</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01430.x</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B29">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<collab>Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change</collab>
</person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <source>IPCC special report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5 &#x2103;: Summary for policy makers</source> (<publisher-loc>Incheon, South Korea</publisher-loc>).</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B30">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Irankhah</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chitarra</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Nerva</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Antoniou</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lumini</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Volpe</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Impact of an arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal inoculum and exogenous MeJA on fenugreek secondary metabolite production under water deficit</article-title>. <source>Environ. Exp. Bot.</source> <volume>176</volume>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.envexpbot.2020.104096</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B31">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Jiang</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tan</surname> <given-names>M. T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zheng</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>G. R.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Defense responses of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus-colonized poplar seedlings against gypsy moth larvae: A multiomics study</article-title>. <source>Hortic. Res.</source> <volume>8</volume>, <fpage>245</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41438-021-00671-3</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B32">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Jin</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>X. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gange</surname> <given-names>A. C.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Mycorrhizal-induced growth depression in plants</article-title>. <source>Symbiosis</source> <volume>72</volume>, <fpage>81</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>88</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s13199-016-0444-5</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B33">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Johnson</surname> <given-names>N. C.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Resource stoichiometry elucidates the structure and function of arbuscular mycorrhizas across scales</article-title>. <source>New Phytol.</source> <volume>185</volume>, <fpage>631</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>647</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.03110.x</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B34">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Johnson</surname> <given-names>N. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wilson</surname> <given-names>G. W. T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wilson</surname> <given-names>J. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Miller</surname> <given-names>R. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bowker</surname> <given-names>M. A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Mycorrhizal phenotypes and the law of the minimum</article-title>. <source>New Phytol.</source> <volume>205</volume>, <fpage>1473</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1484</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/nph.13172</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B35">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Jongen</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Albadran</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Beyschlag</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Unger</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Can arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi mitigate drought stress in annual pasture legumes</article-title>? <source>Plant Soil</source> <volume>472</volume>, <fpage>295</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>310</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11104-021-05233-z</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B36">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Jung</surname> <given-names>S. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Martinez-Medina</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lopez-Raez</surname> <given-names>J. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pozo</surname> <given-names>M. J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Mycorrhiza-induced resistance and priming of plant defenses</article-title>. <source>J. Chem. Ecol.</source> <volume>38</volume>, <fpage>651</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>664</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10886-012-0134-6</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B37">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kaur</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Campbell</surname> <given-names>B. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Suseela</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Root metabolome of plant&#x2013;arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis mirrors the mutualistic or parasitic mycorrhizal phenotype</article-title>. <source>New Phytol.</source> <volume>234</volume>, <fpage>672</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>687</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/nph.17994</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B38">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kaur</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Suseela</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Unraveling arbuscular mycorrhiza-induced changes in plant primary and secondary metabolome</article-title>. <source>Metabolites</source> <volume>10</volume>, <elocation-id>335</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/metabo10080335</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B39">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Klironomos</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zobel</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tibbett</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Stock</surname> <given-names>W. D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rillig</surname> <given-names>M. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Parrent</surname> <given-names>J. L.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Forces that structure plant communities: Quantifying the importance of the mycorrhizal symbiosis</article-title>. <source>New Phytol.</source> <volume>189</volume>, <fpage>366</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>370</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1469-8137.2010.03550.x</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B40">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Koricheva</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gange</surname> <given-names>A. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jones</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>Effects of mycorrhizal fungi on insect herbivores: A meta-analysis</article-title>. <source>Ecology</source> <volume>90</volume>, <fpage>2088</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2097</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1890/08-1555.1</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B41">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Konvalinkov&#xe1;</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jansa</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Lights off for arbuscular mycorrhiza: On its symbiotic functioning under light deprivation</article-title>. <source>Front. Plant Sci.</source> <volume>7</volume>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpls.2016.00782</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B42">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kuznetsova</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Brockhoff</surname> <given-names>P. B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Christensen</surname> <given-names>R. H. B.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>lmerTest package: Tests in linear mixed effects models</article-title>. <source>J. Stat. Software</source> <volume>82</volume>, <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>26</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.18637/jss.v082.i13</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B43">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Lichtenthaler</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Welburn</surname> <given-names>A. R.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1983</year>). <article-title>Determination of total carotenoids and chlorophylls a and b of leaf extracts in different solvents</article-title>. <source>Biochem. Soc Trans.</source> <volume>11</volume>, <fpage>591</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>592</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1042/bst0110591</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B44">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Lin</surname> <given-names>J. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hu</surname> <given-names>Y. Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Song</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hanninen</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>J. S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Interactive effects of drought and shading on torreya grandis seedlings: Physiological and growth responses</article-title>. <source>Trees-Struct. Funct.</source> <volume>33</volume>, <fpage>951</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>961</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00468-019-01831-8</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B45">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>H. Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Smith</surname> <given-names>F. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dickson</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Holloway</surname> <given-names>R. E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Smith</surname> <given-names>S. E.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>Plant growth depressions in arbuscular mycorrhizal symbioses: Not just caused by carbon drain</article-title>? <source>New Phytol.</source> <volume>178</volume>, <fpage>852</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>862</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1469-8137.2008.02410.x</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B46">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ma</surname> <given-names>Y. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Shen</surname> <given-names>H. T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>S. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Y. F.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Combined application of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and exogenous melatonin alleviates drought stress and improves plant growth in tobacco seedlings</article-title>. <source>J. Plant Growth Regul.</source> <volume>40</volume>, <fpage>1074</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1087</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00344-020-10165-6</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B47">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>C. Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>D. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Srivastava</surname> <given-names>A. K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>Q. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zou</surname> <given-names>Y. N.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Mycorrhiza stimulates root-hair growth and IAA synthesis and transport in trifoliate orange under drought stress</article-title>. <source>Sci. Rep.</source> <volume>8</volume>, <fpage>1978</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41598-018-20456-4</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B48">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sheng</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>C. Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tang</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Impact of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on the growth, water status, and photosynthesis of hybrid poplar under drought stress and recovery</article-title>. <source>Photosynthetica</source> <volume>53</volume>, <fpage>250</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>258</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B49">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tang</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Effect of arbuscular mycorrhizal inoculation on water status and photosynthesis of <italic>Populus cathayana</italic> males and females under water stress</article-title>. <source>Physiol. Plantarum.</source> <volume>155</volume>, <fpage>192</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>204</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/ppl.12336</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B50">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>S. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yu</surname> <given-names>F. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Werger</surname> <given-names>M. J. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dong</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zuidema</surname> <given-names>P. A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Habitat-specific demography across dune fixation stages in a semi-arid sandland: Understanding the expansion, stabilization and decline of a dominant shrub</article-title>. <source>J. Ecol.</source> <volume>99</volume>, <fpage>610</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>620</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1365-2745.2010.01777.x</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B51">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Mathur</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sharma</surname> <given-names>M. P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jajoo</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Improved photosynthetic efficacy of maize (<italic>Zea mays</italic>) plants with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) under high temperature stress</article-title>. <source>J. Photochem. Photobiol. B. Biol.</source> <volume>180</volume>, <fpage>149</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>154</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2018.02.002</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B52">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Meier</surname> <given-names>A. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hunter</surname> <given-names>M. D.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi mediate herbivore-induction of plant defenses differently above and belowground</article-title>. <source>Oikos</source> <volume>127</volume>, <fpage>1759</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1775</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/oik.05402</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B53">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Mickan</surname> <given-names>B. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hart</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Solaiman</surname> <given-names>Z. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Renton</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Siddique</surname> <given-names>K. H. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jenkins</surname> <given-names>S. N.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus-mediated interspecific nutritional competition of a pasture legume and grass under drought-stress</article-title>. <source>Rhizosphere</source> <volume>18</volume>, <elocation-id>100349</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.rhisph.2021.100349</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B54">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Nath</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bhatt</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Prasad</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gill</surname> <given-names>S. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Anjum</surname> <given-names>N. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tuteja</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Reactive oxygen species generation-scavenging and signaling during plant - arbuscular mycorrhizal and piriformospora indica interaction under stress condition</article-title>. <source>Front. Plant Sci.</source> <volume>7</volume>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpls.2016.01574</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B55">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Nobre</surname> <given-names>C. P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Huertas</surname> <given-names>O. C. T. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tardin</surname> <given-names>J. R. F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Saggin Junior</surname> <given-names>O. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fonseca</surname> <given-names>H. M. A. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Berbara</surname> <given-names>R. L. L.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Biostimulation of inoculation with <italic>Glomus proliferum</italic> and application of humic acid in the <italic>in vitro</italic> growth of <italic>Lunularia cruciate.</italic> acta bot</article-title>. <source>Brasilica</source> <volume>27</volume>, <fpage>773</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>778</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1590/S0102-33062013000400017</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B56">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Osakabe</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Osakabe</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Shinozaki</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tran</surname> <given-names>L. S. P.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Response of plants to water stress</article-title>. <source>Front. Plant Sci.</source> <volume>5</volume>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpls.2014.00086</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B57">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Pasbani</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Salimi</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Aliasgharzad</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hajiboland</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Colonization with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi mitigates cold stress through improvement of antioxidant defense and accumulation of protecting molecules in eggplants</article-title>. <source>Sci. Hortic.</source> <volume>272</volume>, <elocation-id>109575</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.scienta.2020.109575</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B58">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Pozo</surname> <given-names>M. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Azcon-Aguilar</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2007</year>). <article-title>Unraveling mycorrhiza-induced resistance</article-title>. <source>Curr. Opin. Plant Biol.</source> <volume>10</volume>, <fpage>393</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>398</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.pbi.2007.05.004</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B59">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Puschel</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Janouskova</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hujslova</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Slavikova</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gryndlerova</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jansa</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Plant-fungus competition for nitrogen erases mycorrhizal growth benefits of <italic>Andropogon gerardii</italic> under limited nitrogen supply</article-title>. <source>Ecol. Evol.</source> <volume>6</volume>, <fpage>4332</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>4346</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/ece3.2207</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B60">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Qian</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>He</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>Diversity of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi associated with a desert plant artemisia ordosica</article-title>. <source>Biodivers. Sci.</source> <volume>17</volume>, <fpage>506</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>511</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3724/SP.J.1003.2009.09020</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B61">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Qu</surname> <given-names>L. Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>M. G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Biere</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Interactive effects of mycorrhizae, soil phosphorus, and light on growth and induction and priming of defense in <italic>Plantago lanceolata</italic>
</article-title>. <source>Front. Plant Sci.</source> <volume>12</volume>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpls.2021.647372</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B62">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Raya-Hernandez</surname> <given-names>A. I.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jaramillo-Lopez</surname> <given-names>P. F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lopez-Carmona</surname> <given-names>D. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Diaz</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Carrera-Valtierra</surname> <given-names>J. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Larsen</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Field evidence for maize-mycorrhiza interactions in agroecosystems with low and high p soils under mineral and organic fertilization</article-title>. <source>Appl. Soil Ecol.</source> <volume>149</volume>, <fpage>203511</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.apsoil.2020.103511</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B63">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<collab>R Core Development Team</collab>
</person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <source>R: A language and environment for statistical computing. r found. stat. comput</source> (<publisher-loc>Vienna, Austria</publisher-loc>). Available at: <uri xlink:href="http://www.R-project.org/">http://www.R-project.org/</uri>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B64">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Real-Santillan</surname> <given-names>R. O.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>del-Val</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cruz-Ortega</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Contreras-Cornejo</surname> <given-names>H. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gonzalez-Esquivel</surname> <given-names>C. E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Larsen</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Increased maize growth and p uptake promoted by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi coincide with higher foliar herbivory and larval biomass of the fall armyworm <italic>Spodoptera frugiperda</italic>
</article-title>. <source>Mycorrhiza</source> <volume>29</volume>, <fpage>615</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>622</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00572-019-00920-3</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B65">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>&#x158;ez&#xe1;&#x10d;ov&#xe1;</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Slav&#xed;kov&#xe1;</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Konvalinkov&#xe1;</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hujslov&#xe1;</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gryndlerov&#xe1;</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gryndler</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Imbalanced carbon-for-phosphorus exchange between European arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and non-native <italic>Panicum</italic> grasses - a case of dysfunctional symbiosis</article-title>. <source>Pedobiologia</source> <volume>62</volume>, <fpage>48</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>55</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.pedobi.2017.05.004</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B66">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Roesti</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gaur</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Johri</surname> <given-names>B. N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Imfeld</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sharma</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kawaljeet</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2006</year>). <article-title>Plant growth stage, fertiliser management and bio-inoculation of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and plant growth promoting rhizobacteria affect the rhizobacterial community structure in rain-fed wheat fields. soil biol</article-title>. <source>Biochem</source> <volume>38</volume>, <fpage>1111</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1120</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.soilbio.2005.09.010</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B67">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ruiz-Lozano</surname> <given-names>J. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Aroca</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zamarreno</surname> <given-names>A. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Molina</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Andreo-Jimenez</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Porcel</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis induces strigolactone biosynthesis under drought and improves drought tolerance in lettuce and tomato</article-title>. <source>Plant Cell Environ.</source> <volume>39</volume>, <fpage>441</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>452</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/pce.12631</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B68">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ruth</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Khalvati</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Schmidhalter</surname> <given-names>U.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Quantification of mycorrhizal water uptake <italic>via</italic> high-resolution on-line water content sensors</article-title>. <source>Plant Soil</source> <volume>342</volume>, <fpage>459</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>468</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11104-010-0709-3</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B69">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Saha</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kaloterakis</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Harvey</surname> <given-names>J. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>van der Putten</surname> <given-names>W. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Biere</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Effects of light quality on colonization of tomato roots by AMF and implications for growth and defense</article-title>. <source>Plants-Basel</source> <volume>11</volume>, <elocation-id>861</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/plants11070861</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B70">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Schroeder</surname> <given-names>M. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Janos</surname> <given-names>D. P.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2005</year>). <article-title>Plant growth, phosphorus nutrition, and root morphological responses to arbuscular mycorrhizas, phosphorus fertilization, and intraspecific density</article-title>. <source>Mycorrhiza</source> <volume>15</volume>, <fpage>203</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>216</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00572-004-0324-3</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B71">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Sharma</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Anand</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kapoor</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Terpenoids in plant and arbuscular mycorrhiza-reinforced defence against herbivorous insects</article-title>. <source>Ann. Bot.</source> <volume>119</volume>, <fpage>791</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>801</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/aob/mcw263</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B72">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>She</surname> <given-names>W. W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bai</surname> <given-names>Y. X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Y. Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Qin</surname> <given-names>S. G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Plasticity in meristem allocation as an adaptive strategy of a desert shrub under contrasting environments</article-title>. <source>Front. Plant Sci.</source> <volume>8</volume>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpls.2017.01933</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B73">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Smith</surname> <given-names>S. E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Facelli</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pope</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Smith</surname> <given-names>F. A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Plant performance in stressful environments: Interpreting new and established knowledge of the roles of arbuscular mycorrhizas</article-title>. <source>Plant Soil</source> <volume>326</volume>, <fpage>3</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>20</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11104-009-9981-5</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B74">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Smith</surname> <given-names>F. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Grace</surname> <given-names>E. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Smith</surname> <given-names>S. E.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>More than a carbon economy: Nutrient trade and ecological sustainability in facultative arbuscular mycorrhizal symbioses</article-title>. <source>New Phytol.</source> <volume>182</volume>, <fpage>347</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>358</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1469-8137.2008.02753.x</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B75">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Smith</surname> <given-names>S. E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jakobsen</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gronlund</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Smith</surname> <given-names>F. A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Roles of arbuscular mycorrhizas in plant phosphorus nutrition: Interactions between pathways of phosphorus uptake in arbuscular mycorrhizal roots have important implications for understanding and manipulating plant phosphorus acquisition</article-title>. <source>Plant Physiol.</source> <volume>156</volume>, <fpage>1050</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1057</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1104/pp.111.174581</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B76">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Smith</surname> <given-names>S. E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Read</surname> <given-names>D. J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <source>Mycorrhizal symbiosis</source>. <edition>3rd Edition</edition> (<publisher-loc>London</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Academic Press</publisher-name>).</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B77">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Song</surname> <given-names>Y. Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ye</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>C. Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>R. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wei</surname> <given-names>X. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Luo</surname> <given-names>S. M.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Priming of anti-herbivore defense in tomato by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus and involvement of the jasmonate pathway</article-title>. <source>J. Chem. Ecol.</source> <volume>39</volume>, <fpage>1036</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1044</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10886-013-0312-1</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B78">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Steinkellner</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hage-Ahmed</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Garcia-Garrido</surname> <given-names>J. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Illana</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ocampo</surname> <given-names>J. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Vierheilig</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>A comparison of wild-type, old and modern tomato cultivars in the interaction with the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus <italic>Glomus mosseae</italic> and the tomato pathogen <italic>Fusarium oxysporum</italic> f. sp lycopersici</article-title>. <source>Mycorrhiza</source> <volume>22</volume> (<issue>3</issue>), <fpage>189</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>194</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00572-011-0393-z</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B79">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ujvari</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Turrini</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Avio</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Agnolucci</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Possible role of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and associated bacteria in the recruitment of endophytic bacterial communities by plant roots</article-title>. <source>Mycorrhiza</source> <volume>31</volume>, <fpage>527</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>544</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00572-021-01040-7</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B80">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Vannette</surname> <given-names>R. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hunter</surname> <given-names>M. D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rasmann</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi alter above- and below-ground chemical defense expression differentially among <italic>Asclepias</italic> species</article-title>. <source>Front. Plant Sci.</source> <volume>4</volume>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpls.2013.00361</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B81">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Vogelsang</surname> <given-names>K. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Reynolds</surname> <given-names>H. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bever</surname> <given-names>J. D.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2006</year>). <article-title>Mycorrhizal fungal identity and richness determine the diversity and productivity of a tallgrass prairie system</article-title>. <source>New Phytol.</source> <volume>172</volume>, <fpage>554</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>562</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1469-8137.2006.01854.x</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B82">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>M. G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bezemer</surname> <given-names>T. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>van der Putten</surname> <given-names>W. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Biere</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Effects of the timing of herbivory on plant defense induction and insect performance in ribwort plantain (<italic>Plantago lanceolata</italic> l.) depend on plant mycorrhizal status</article-title>. <source>J. Chem. Ecol.</source> <volume>41</volume>, <fpage>1006</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1017</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10886-015-0644-0</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B83">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tian</surname> <given-names>B. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yu</surname> <given-names>Z. Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ding</surname> <given-names>J. Q.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Effect of different combinations of phosphorus and nitrogen fertilization on arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and aphids in wheat</article-title>. <source>Insects</source> <volume>11</volume>, <elocation-id>365</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/insects11060365</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B84">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>Q. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>He</surname> <given-names>J. D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Srivastava</surname> <given-names>A. K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zou</surname> <given-names>Y. N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kuca</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Mycorrhizas enhance drought tolerance of citrus by altering root fatty acid compositions and their saturation levels</article-title>. <source>Tree Physiol.</source> <volume>39</volume>, <fpage>1149</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1158</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/treephys/tpz039</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B85">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Xie</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ren</surname> <given-names>Y. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>A. Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>C. F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zheng</surname> <given-names>Q. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Plant nitrogen nutrition: The roles of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi</article-title>. <source>J. Plant Physiol.</source> <volume>269</volume>, <elocation-id>153591</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jplph.2021.153591</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B86">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>H. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xu</surname> <given-names>J. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Guo</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Koide</surname> <given-names>R. T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dai</surname> <given-names>Y. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xu</surname> <given-names>M. M.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Predicting plant response to arbuscular mycorrhizas: The role of host functional traits</article-title>. <source>Fungal Ecol.</source> <volume>20</volume>, <fpage>79</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>83</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.funeco.2015.12.001</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B87">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zar</surname> <given-names>J. H.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1999</year>). <source>Biostatistical analysis</source>. <edition>4th Edition</edition> (<publisher-loc>Upper Saddle River</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Prentice Hall</publisher-name>).</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B88">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Z. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>X. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>X. P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xue</surname> <given-names>Q. W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>L. C.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>Distribution and seasonal dynamics of roots in a revegetated stand of <italic>Artemisia ordosica</italic> kracsh. in the tengger desert (North China)</article-title>. <source>Arid. Land. Res. Manage.</source> <volume>22</volume>, <fpage>195</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>211</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/15324980802182980</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B89">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>H. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xu</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Long</surname> <given-names>J. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sui</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>Y. N.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (<italic>Glomus mosseae</italic>) improves growth, photosynthesis and protects photosystem II in leaves of <italic>Lolium perenne</italic> l. @ in cadmium contaminated soil</article-title>. <source>Front. Plant Sci.</source> <volume>9</volume>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpls.2018.01156</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B90">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xia</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Transcriptomic analysis reveals the possible roles of sugar metabolism and export for positive mycorrhizal growth responses in soybean</article-title>. <source>Physiol. Plant</source> <volume>166</volume>, <fpage>712</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>728</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/ppl.12847</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B91">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zhu</surname> <given-names>X. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Song</surname> <given-names>F. B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>S. Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>T. D.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Effects of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus on photosynthesis and water status of maize under high temperature stress</article-title>. <source>Plant Soil</source> <volume>346</volume>, <fpage>189</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>199</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11104-011-0809-8</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B92">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zou</surname> <given-names>Y. N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>C. Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ni</surname> <given-names>Q. D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>D. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>Q. S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Mycorrhizal trifoliate orange has greater root adaptation of morphology and phytohormones in response to drought stress</article-title>. <source>Sci. Rep.</source> <volume>7</volume>, <elocation-id>41134</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/srep41134</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B93">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zou</surname> <given-names>Y. N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Srivastava</surname> <given-names>A. K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>Q. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kuca</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi regulate polyamine homeostasis in roots of trifoliate orange for improved adaptation to soil moisture deficit stress</article-title>. <source>Front. Plant Sci.</source> <volume>11</volume>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpls.2020.600792</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>