<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.3 20070202//EN" "journalpublishing.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="2.3" xml:lang="EN">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Front. Plant Sci.</journal-id>
<journal-title>Frontiers in Plant Science</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">Front. Plant Sci.</abbrev-journal-title>
<issn pub-type="epub">1664-462X</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Frontiers Media S.A.</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpls.2023.1076894</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Plant Science</subject>
<subj-group>
<subject>Original Research</subject>
</subj-group>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Stoichiometric homeostasis of N:P ratio drives species-specific symbiotic N fixation inhibition under N addition</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name>
<surname>Li</surname>
<given-names>Qiang</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn001">
<sup>*</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/552369"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Philp</surname>
<given-names>Joshua</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3">
<sup>3</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name>
<surname>Denton</surname>
<given-names>Matthew D.</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3">
<sup>3</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn001">
<sup>*</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name>
<surname>Huang</surname>
<given-names>Yingxin</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn001">
<sup>*</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/276123"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name>
<surname>Wei</surname>
<given-names>Jian</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4">
<sup>4</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn001">
<sup>*</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Sun</surname>
<given-names>Huijuan</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Li</surname>
<given-names>Yang</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff5">
<sup>5</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/624780"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zhao</surname>
<given-names>Qian</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4">
<sup>4</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
<institution>Northeast Institute of Geography and Agroecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences</institution>, <addr-line>Changchun</addr-line>, <country>China</country>
</aff>
<aff id="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
<institution>Jilin Provincial Key Laboratory of Grassland Farming, Science and Technology Department of Jilin Province</institution>, <addr-line>Changchun</addr-line>, <country>China</country>
</aff>
<aff id="aff3">
<sup>3</sup>
<institution>School of Agriculture, Food and Wine, University of Adelaide</institution>, <addr-line>Glen Osmond, SA</addr-line>, <country>Australia</country>
</aff>
<aff id="aff4">
<sup>4</sup>
<institution>College of Life Sciences, Changchun Normal University</institution>, <addr-line>Changchun</addr-line>, <country>China</country>
</aff>
<aff id="aff5">
<sup>5</sup>
<institution>College of Forestry and Grassland Science, Jilin Agricultural University</institution>, <addr-line>Changchun</addr-line>, <country>China</country>
</aff>
<author-notes>
<fn fn-type="edited-by">
<p>Edited by: Victoria Fernandez, Polytechnic University of Madrid, Spain</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="edited-by">
<p>Reviewed by: Mianhai Zheng, South China Botanical Garden (CAS), China; Tao Zhang, Northeast Normal University, China</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="corresp" id="fn001">
<p>*Correspondence: Qiang Li, <email xlink:href="mailto:liqiang@iga.ac.cn">liqiang@iga.ac.cn</email>; Matthew D. Denton, <email xlink:href="mailto:matthew.denton@adelaide.edu.au">matthew.denton@adelaide.edu.au</email>; Yingxin Huang, <email xlink:href="mailto:huangyx@iga.ac.cn">huangyx@iga.ac.cn</email>; Jian Wei, <email xlink:href="mailto:weijian@ccsfu.edu.cn">weijian@ccsfu.edu.cn</email>
</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="other" id="fn002">
<p>This article was submitted to Plant Nutrition, a section of the journal Frontiers in Plant Science</p>
</fn>
</author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>26</day>
<month>04</month>
<year>2023</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="collection">
<year>2023</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>14</volume>
<elocation-id>1076894</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>02</day>
<month>11</month>
<year>2022</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>24</day>
<month>03</month>
<year>2023</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#xa9; 2023 Li, Philp, Denton, Huang, Wei, Sun, Li and Zhao</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2023</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Li, Philp, Denton, Huang, Wei, Sun, Li and Zhao</copyright-holder>
<license xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">
<p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.</p>
</license>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<sec>
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>Symbiotic N fixation inhibition induced by N supply to legumes is potentially regulated by the relative N and P availability in soil. However, the specific responses of different legume species to changes in N:P availability remain unclear, and must be better understood to optimize symbiotic N fixation inputs under N enrichment. This study investigated mechanisms by which soil N and P supply influence the symbiotic N fixation of eight legume species, to quantify the inter-specific differences, and to demonstrate how these differences can be determined by the stoichiometric homeostasis in N:P ratios (H<sub>N:P</sub>).</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Methods</title>
<p>Eight herbaceous legume species were grown separately in outdoor pots and treated with either no fertilizer (control), N fertilizer (14&#xa0;g N m<sup>-2</sup>), P fertilizer (3.5&#xa0;g P m<sup>-2</sup>) or both N and P fertilizer. Plant nutrients, stoichiometric characteristics, root biomass, non-structural carbohydrates (NSC), rhizosphere chemistry, P mobilization, root nodulation and symbiotic N fixation were measured.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Results</title>
<p>N addition enhanced rhizosphere P mobilization but drove a loss of root biomass and root NSC <italic>via</italic> exudation of P mobilization compound (organic acid), especially so in treatments without P addition. N addition also induced a 2-14% or 14-36% decline in symbiotic N fixation per plant biomass by legumes in treatments with or without P addition, as a result of decreasing root biomass and root NSC. The changes in symbiotic N fixation were positively correlated with stoichiometric homeostasis of N:P ratios in intact plants without root nodules, regardless of P additions.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Discussion</title>
<p>This study indicates that N addition can induce relative P limitations for growth, which can stimulate rhizosphere P mobilization at the expense of root biomass and carbohydrate concentrations, reducing symbiotic N fixation in legumes. Legume species that had less changes in plant N:P ratio, such as <italic>Lespedeza daurica and Medicago varia</italic> maintained symbiotic N fixation to a greater extent under N addition.</p>
</sec>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>stoichiometry</kwd>
<kwd>N:P ratio</kwd>
<kwd>symbiotic N fixation</kwd>
<kwd>rhizosphere</kwd>
<kwd>phosphorus mobilization</kwd>
<kwd>herbaceous legume</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<counts>
<fig-count count="8"/>
<table-count count="1"/>
<equation-count count="2"/>
<ref-count count="61"/>
<page-count count="15"/>
<word-count count="7004"/>
</counts>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec id="s1" sec-type="intro">
<label>1</label>
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>Symbiotic nitrogen (N) fixation by leguminous plants contributes significant N to the global biosphere, improving the productivity and sustainability of global agriculture (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">Herridge et&#xa0;al., 2008</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B50">Vitousek et&#xa0;al., 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Farrer et&#xa0;al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">Li Q. et&#xa0;al., 2016</xref>). However, agricultural activities considerably increase the availability of soil N in many ecosystems worldwide (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">Galloway, 1998</xref>), inhibiting symbiotic N fixation by legumes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B52">West et&#xa0;al., 2005</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">Nyfeler et&#xa0;al., 2011</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B60">Zheng et&#xa0;al., 2019</xref>). One mechanism for this inhibition is the legume&#x2019;s preference for lower-cost strategies of soil mineral N uptake, in preference to the metabolically expensive option of nodule development and N fixation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B52">West et&#xa0;al., 2005</xref>). Furthermore, N enrichment potentially increases the nitrate concentration in soil, which may directly inhibit root nodulation, nodule growth, and nitrogen fixation activity by reducing the production of flavonoids involved in Nod factor synthesis (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">Nanjareddy et&#xa0;al., 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">Nishida and Suzaki, 2018</xref>), down-regulating expression of key genes controlling the development of nodule vasculature, and accelerating nodule senescence or disintegration (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">Matamoros et&#xa0;al., 1999</xref>). These mechanisms indicate that N fixation inhibition due to increased soil N availability could be common phenomena. However, some researchers have identified that N enrichment does not always downregulate symbiotic N fixation, even under high N supply, implying that additional factors may modify the effect of soil N enrichment on symbiotic N fixation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B60">Zheng et&#xa0;al., 2019</xref>).</p>
<p>Soil phosphorus (P) status may be a key abiotic factor that regulates the effect of soil N enrichment on symbiotic N fixation, given the widespread co-limitation of terrestrial plant functions by N and P availability (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Craine et&#xa0;al., 2008</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">Harpole et&#xa0;al., 2011</xref>). Legumes particularly require P for growth, root development, and formation of nodules with symbionts (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">Batterman et&#xa0;al., 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B45">Sulieman et&#xa0;al., 2013</xref>), and the symbionts also demand P-rich ATP molecules to facilitate the high energy cost of the nitrogenase reaction (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">Augusto et&#xa0;al., 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Divito and Sadras, 2014</xref>). Increasing P availability in soil can improve symbiotic N fixation across multiple sites (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">Augusto et&#xa0;al., 2013</xref>).</p>
<p>The coupling of N and P requirements during plant growth and physiological metabolism can cause changes in either N or P availability to alter plant dependence on the other nutrient (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">Reich et&#xa0;al., 2009</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">Pe&#xf1;uelas et&#xa0;al., 2013</xref>). For example, N enrichment can increase plant P demands, accelerating the depletion of soil P (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Gusewell, 2004</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">Png et&#xa0;al., 2017</xref>), and exacerbating plant P deficiency. Under the combination of low P availability and N enrichment, the imbalance between N and P supply are likely to elicit additional mechanisms that reduce symbiotic N fixation. N enrichment typically depresses root nodulation of legumes under low P availability, but enhances root nodulation under higher P availability (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Gates and Wilson, 1974</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Gentili and Huss-Danell, 2003</xref>). These studies suggest important interactions between P and N in regulating the N fixation behavior of legumes. However, the influence of the balance of N and P supply legume on plant physiology, root nodulation and symbiotic N fixation require further clarification. Increasing soil N availability may intensify P competition between host plant and nodule, because more soil available P may be assimilated by host plants to match its increasing growth and metabolism (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">Png et&#xa0;al., 2017</xref>). This competition could then inhibit symbiotic N fixation <italic>via</italic> direct reduction of P transfer into root nodules. However, previous studies indicated a strong P homeostasis in nodules (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B46">Sulieman and Tran, 2015</xref>), attributing preferential P allocation of legumes into nodules under P deficiency (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">Schulze and Drevon, 2005</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B47">Thuynsma et&#xa0;al., 2014</xref>). Relative P deficiency in soil can intensify P mobilization (increasing the availability of poorly soluble P forms) and uptake (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">Nuruzzaman et&#xa0;al., 2006</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Betencourt et&#xa0;al., 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">Png et&#xa0;al., 2017</xref>), by altering root development, root physiology and root-mycorrhizal interactions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">Pang et&#xa0;al., 2018</xref>). These intensified P uptake mechanisms may increase competition between root nodules and the host legume or other symbionts for additional resources, such as photoassimilates (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B49">Vance et&#xa0;al., 2003</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">Ryan et&#xa0;al., 2012</xref>), that may also restrict root nodule development and symbiotic N fixation.</p>
<p>There are great inter-specific differences in response of symbiotic N fixation to changed soil nutrient availability (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">Nyfeler et&#xa0;al., 2011</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B60">Zheng et&#xa0;al., 2019</xref>). Such inter-specific differences make it complex to predict and evaluate N fixation capacity of leguminous plants in changing environments. However, the underlying mechanisms responsible for these inter-specific differences are poorly understood. It is well known that changes to soil N or P availability may induce changes in plant tissue chemistry (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">L&#xfc; et&#xa0;al., 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">Li X. et&#xa0;al., 2016</xref>). However, plants have species-specific abilities to resist environmental change and maintain a relative stable inner element ratio (e.g. N:P ratio) termed stoichiometric homeostasis (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B56">Yu et&#xa0;al., 2011</xref>). The magnitude of stoichiometric homeostasis of N:P ratio can determine the variation in plant species N and P concentrations (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Gusewell, 2004</xref>) and thus can be used to predict the plant growth and nutrient use strategies under changed soil N or P availability and subsequent N:P balance (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Elser et&#xa0;al., 2010</xref>). Plant species with a greater stoichiometric homeostasis of N:P ratio potentially exhibit greater plant P deficiency under increasing N availability (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Elser et&#xa0;al., 2010</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B55">Yu et&#xa0;al., 2010</xref>). As a response to N enrichment, these species can either acquire soil P more efficiently, for example, by exudation of P-mobilizing compounds (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">Pang et&#xa0;al., 2018</xref>), intensification of arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM)-plant interactions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Betencourt et&#xa0;al., 2012</xref>), releasing more P-acquiring enzymes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">Png et&#xa0;al., 2017</xref>), or they can delay uptake of tissue N (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Elser et&#xa0;al., 2010</xref>). The stoichiometric homeostasis index has been suggested as a reliable indicator to assess the responses of plants to changed soil nutrients status, in terms of plant nutrient uptake, allocation and resorption (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Elser et&#xa0;al., 2010</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B56">Yu et&#xa0;al., 2011</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Deng et&#xa0;al., 2016</xref>), as well as ecosystem structure and function (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B55">Yu et&#xa0;al., 2010</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B57">Yu et&#xa0;al., 2015</xref>). Symbiotic N fixation contributes to tissue N concentration of legume plants and is potentially regulated by the soil N:P balance. However, it remains unknown whether the stoichiometric homeostasis of plant N:P ratios can control those species-specific responses of symbiotic N fixation to altered N and P availability through regulation of plant N and P uptake. If found to be a valid model of plant nutrient interactions, its demonstration can improve our understanding and prediction of N cycling pattern at species and community level and assist in the practical management of legume crops to maximize agricultural N fixation benefits under changing soil nutrient status.</p>
<p>Accordingly, an outdoor pot experiment testing eight herbaceous legume species was established. This experiment examined the influence of soil N and P supply interactions on the symbiotic N fixation of eight legume species, inter-specific differences in symbiotic N fixation response to N enrichment, and tested whether those differences could be explained by the stoichiometric homeostasis in N:P ratios. We hypothesized that N enrichment decreases symbiotic N fixation of legumes by reducing P concentration in root nodules, and that legume species with a greater stoichiometric homeostasis of N:P ratio have greater reduction in specific symbiotic N fixation in response to increased N availability.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2" sec-type="materials|methods">
<label>2</label>
<title>Materials and methods</title>
<sec id="s2_1">
<label>2.1</label>
<title>Study site</title>
<p>A pot experiment was conducted in the field at the Songnen Grassland Research Station in Jilin province of northeastern China (E123&#x2da;31&#xb4;, N44&#x2da;33&#xb4;). This site has a semi-arid climate. From 2000 to 2016, mean annual temperature was 5.5&#xb0;C, and annual precipitation was 404&#xa0;mm, with 81% occurring between May and September. The soil is a meadow chernozem soil with a high pH (&gt;8.5). <italic>Leymus chinensis</italic> (Trin.) Tzvel., a perennial C<sub>3</sub> rhizomatous grass dominates the vegetation in this site.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_2">
<label>2.2</label>
<title>Pot experiment design</title>
<p>Eight species of herbaceous legumes that co-occur in Songnen grasslands, consisting of&#x2019; four native species (<italic>Medicago ruthenica</italic> (L.) Sojak; <italic>Lespedeza daurica</italic> (Laxm.) Schindler; <italic>Melilotus officinalis</italic> (L.) Desr; <italic>Glycine soja</italic> Sieb. et Zucc), and four cultivated species (<italic>Medicago sativa</italic> L. cv. Aohan; <italic>Medicago falcata</italic> L. cv. Hulunbeier; <italic>Medicago varia</italic> Martin. cv. Caoyuan No.3; <italic>Lotus corniculatus</italic> L.), were grown separately in bottom-sealed plastic pots (0.3&#xa0;m depth, 0.25&#xa0;m diameter) in the field from June 2017 to September 2017. <italic>L. chinensis</italic> was also grown under the same conditions as a reference plant. Legume seeds were collected from a leguminous seed production field, while <italic>L. chinensis</italic> seeds were collected from a natural meadow at the Songnen Grassland Research Station in 2016. Cultivated soil was collected at the depth of 0 to 30cm from a natural <italic>L. chinensis</italic> meadow, then visible plant residues were removed and the soil was passed through a 2&#xa0;mm sieve and evenly mixed. In total, eighteen kg soil (pH=8.74 &#xb1; 0.04; organic matter=17.3 &#xb1; 0.3 mg g<sup>-1</sup>; total N=1.26 &#xb1; 0.03 mg g<sup>-1</sup>; total P= 0.31 &#xb1; 0.02 mg g<sup>-1</sup>) was added into each pot, to achieve a bulk density of approximately 1.25&#xa0;g cm<sup>-3</sup>, similar to that of the field site. In late May 2017, each species was sown into three replicate pots, with twelve pre-germinated seed sown, that were later thinned to four seedlings per pot. The seedlings in each pot were inoculated using crushed nodules specifically collected from the matching species in a seed production field site. Rather than inoculating plants with a single or a few known rhizobial strains, this inoculation approach increases ecological realism by allowing plant access to a broader range of naturally occurring rhizobia, and reduces the nodulation bias caused by artificially selected rhizobia, which has been used in several previous studies (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B54">Wolf et&#xa0;al., 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Li et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>).</p>
<p>The experiment was a completely randomized block design with three replicates. In each block, four treatment combinations of two levels of P addition (0 and 3.5&#xa0;g P m<sup>-2</sup> as superphosphate) and two levels of N addition (0 and 14&#xa0;g N m<sup>-2</sup> as ammonium nitrate) were arranged across each plant species. The N addition rate was assumed to be sufficient to overcome plant N limitation in this grassland region (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B58">Zhan et&#xa0;al., 2017</xref>). P addition was defined according to the N addition rate and the mean N:P ratio in natural soil (0 to 30&#xa0;cm depth). In this experiment, plants were grown for 84&#xa0;d on average. For each pot, the total N and P fertilizer allocations were divided into three equal parts and applied at three times (on 0d, 30d and 60d since planting) dissolved in water. When rainfall occurred, the pots were protected from rainfall by setting up plastic shed during the whole experiment. Each pot was given 1000&#xa0;ml water at an interval of 3 to 4 days. In each replicated block, pot placement was re-randomized weekly.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_3">
<label>2.3</label>
<title>Measurement and sampling</title>
<p>Soil and plant samples for each legume species were harvested once the plants showed the first sign of flowering activity. Before collecting plant samples, leaf photosynthetic rate was determined on 2-3 mature and intact leaves per plant for each pot, using a using a CIRAS-2 potable photosynthetic measuring system (PP-Systems, Hitchin, UK). The intact soil core with plants was carefully separated from the pot. Legume plants with rhizosphere soil adhering were then removed from the core as it was gently broken up. The rhizosphere was defined as the volume of soil adhering up to approximately 2&#xa0;mm from the root surface, which is suggested as the major P depletion zones of some legume plants (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">Nuruzzaman et&#xa0;al., 2006</xref>). Using a paintbrush, rhizosphere soil adhering to roots was gently brushed off. Then, the four plants were carefully separated from each other and the roots in each pot were lightly washed in the laboratory. Plant tissues were separated according to shoot, root and nodules for each plant and root nodule number was counted. Plant materials were subsequently dried at 60&#xb0;C for 72h and weighed. From each pot, all tissues including shoot, root and root nodules from one randomized legume individual were combined and finely ground for analysis of tissue <sup>15</sup>N abundance. Remaining shoots, roots, and nodules from each pot were combined according to tissue type, finely ground and analyzed for N and P concentrations, while the shoot and root samples were analyzed for carbohydrate concentration. The bulk soil was defined as remaining soil after rhizosphere soil sampling, which was also sampled after mixing uniformly in each pot.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_4">
<label>2.4</label>
<title>Plant and soil analysis</title>
<p>Including shoot, root and root nodule, the entire plant sample of individual legumes and <italic>L. chinensis</italic> were analyzed for <sup>15</sup>N natural abundance using a MAT253 stable isotope mass spectrometer (ThermoFisher Scientific, Waltham, USA). Total nitrogen (TN) concentration was analyzed using the Kjeldahl method (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B44">Sparks et&#xa0;al., 1996</xref>), and the total phosphorus (TP) concentration was analyzed using persulfate oxidation followed by colorimetric analysis for shoot and root samples (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B42">Schade et&#xa0;al., 2003</xref>). Non-structural carbohydrate (NSC) concentration in plant tissue was determined using an improved colorimetric method (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">Buysse and Merckx, 1993</xref>). Each rhizosphere soil sample was randomly divided into two parts; one part was transferred to a plastic bottle with 100&#xa0;ml CaCl<sub>2</sub> solution (0.2 &#x3bc;mol. L<sup>-1</sup>), the suspension was then frozen at -20&#x2103; for organic acid analysis using the Ion Chromatography method (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Baziramakenga et&#xa0;al., 1995</xref>), the other parts were oven-dried at 50&#x2103; for 4 days and ground to pass through a 0.2&#xa0;mm sieve. Soil available P concentration was determined by NaHCO<sub>3</sub> extraction according to the Olsen method (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">Olsen et&#xa0;al., 1954</xref>). Soil pH of 1&#xa0;g of soil extracted in ultrapure water was measured using a PHS-25 pH meter with a combined glass electrode (Leizi, Shanghai, China). The remaining bulk and rhizosphere soil sample was frozen at -20&#xb0;C.<inline-formula>
<mml:math display="inline" id="im1">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msubsup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>NH</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>4</mml:mn>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>&#x2009;</mml:mtext>
<mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msubsup>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> and <inline-formula>
<mml:math display="inline" id="im2">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msubsup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>NO</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>3</mml:mn>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>&#x2009;</mml:mtext>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msubsup>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> were extracted with 2 M KCl from this frozen soil sample (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Miller and Keeney, 1982</xref>), and their concentrations were determined by a Bran-Luebbe AA3 autoanalyser (Bran and Luebbe, Hamburg, Germany). All soil nutrients were calculated based on units of dry soil weight.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_5">
<label>2.5</label>
<title>Data analysis</title>
<p>The percentage of N in legume tissue derived from symbiotic N fixation (%Ndfa) was estimated according to the following formula (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B48">Unkovich et&#xa0;al., 2008</xref>):</p>
<disp-formula>
<label>(1)</label>
<mml:math display="block" id="M1">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x3b4;</mml:mo>
<mml:mtext>Ndfa</mml:mtext>
<mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>100</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>&#xd7;</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>(</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>&#xa0;&#x3b4;</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>15</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msup>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>N&#xa0;reference&#xa0;plant-&#x3b4;</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>15</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msup>
<mml:mtext>N&#xa0;legume</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mtext>&#x3b4;</mml:mtext>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>15</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msup>
<mml:mtext>N&#xa0;reference&#xa0;plant-B</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfrac>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>)</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</disp-formula><p>Where <inline-formula>
<mml:math display="inline" id="im3">
<mml:mi>&#x3b4;</mml:mi>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> <sup>15</sup>N is the atom percentage excess <sup>15</sup>N relative to atmospheric N. The term &#x2018;legume&#x2019; represents the entire legume individual including shoot, root and nodule tissues, the term &#x2018;reference plant&#x2019; represents whole <italic>L. chinensis</italic> individual including shoot and root grown under the same fertilization treatment as the legume. Here, <italic>L. chinensis</italic> was used as the reference species because it coexists with all experimental legume species and this species could represent the mean of four different reference plants in this study region in a previous study (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Li et&#xa0;al., 2015</xref>); the &#x201c;B&#x201d; value reflects the within-plant fractionation of <sup>14</sup>N and <sup>15</sup>N between shoots and nodulated roots, which is represented as the <inline-formula>
<mml:math display="inline" id="im4">
<mml:mi>&#x3b4;</mml:mi>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>
<sup>15</sup>N of legume tissues (e.g. shoot, root) fully dependent upon N<sub>2</sub> fixation. Here, it is equal to the value of <sup>15</sup>N atmosphere (0&#x2030;) because the whole legume individual was used as analysis (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B48">Unkovich et&#xa0;al., 2008</xref>). Symbiotic N fixation was calculated based on %Ndfa, legume tissue biomass and tissue N concentration. Specific symbiotic N fixation was calculated as symbiotic N fixation by unit legume biomass.</p>
<p>The P mobilization effect in the rhizosphere was calculated as the ratio of available P concentration in rhizospheric soil to available P concentration in bulk soil (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B58">Zhan et&#xa0;al., 2017</xref>). Stoichiometric homeostasis of plant N:P ratio (H<sub>N:P</sub>) is the ability of a plant to maintain a given tissue N:P ratio despite variation in the relative N:P availability of its environment (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B54">Wolf et&#xa0;al., 2017</xref>). The stoichiometric homeostasis index of plant N:P ratio (H<sub>N:P</sub>) was calculated according to the following equations (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B55">Yu et&#xa0;al., 2010</xref>):</p>
<disp-formula>
<label>(2)</label>
<mml:math display="block" id="M2">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>y</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>c</mml:mi>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mi>x</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
<mml:mo stretchy="false">/</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>H</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msup>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</disp-formula><p>where <italic>y</italic> is the N:P ratio of plants (without root nodules), <italic>x</italic> is the N:P ratio in the soil, <italic>c</italic> is a constant, <italic>H</italic> is the stoichiometric homeostasis index of plant N:P ratio.</p>
<p>All data were assessed to verify model assumptions of normality and equality of variance. Three-way ANOVA analysis was applied to determine the main and interaction effects of legume species, N and P addition on all measured variables. Mean comparisons were conducted by one-way ANOVA, followed by Duncan&#x2019;s test. Pearson&#x2019;s correlation coefficients were used to evaluate relationships between rhizosphere P mobilization, rhizosphere chemistry, AM colonization, root nodule biomass, specific symbiotic N fixation and root biomass and root NSC concentration. Regression analysis was performed to assess the relationships between H<sub>N:P</sub> of legume species and its change in rhizosphere chemistry, leaf photosynthetic rate, tissue biomass, tissue NSC concentration, and specific symbiotic N fixation under N addition with or without P addition. Significance for all statistical tests was defined as <italic>P &#x2264;</italic> 0.05. All data were analyzed using SPSS17.0 software (Chicago, IL, USA).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s3" sec-type="results">
<label>3</label>
<title>Results</title>
<sec id="s3_1">
<label>3.1</label>
<title>Soil N and P availability, rhizosphere P mobilization and rhizosphere chemistry</title>
<p>Averaged across all legume species, N and P addition increased available N and P concentrations of bulk soil by 93% and 82%, respectively. As a consequence, N addition increased the available N:P ratio, while P addition reduced the available N:P ratio in bulk soil (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>). Compared with the control, N addition enhanced P mobilization in the rhizosphere by 15-33%, and thus increased the P availability in rhizosphere by 14-35% for eight legume species (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">
<bold>Figures&#xa0;2A, B</bold>
</xref>). However, compared with P addition, the coupling addition of N and P enhanced P mobilization in the rhizosphere by 7-21%, and thus increased the P availability in rhizosphere by 4-22% for eight legume species (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">
<bold>Figures&#xa0;2A, B</bold>
</xref>). N addition reduced soil pH, and increased citric acid and malic acid concentration and <inline-formula>
<mml:math display="inline" id="im5">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msubsup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>NO</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>3</mml:mn>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>&#x2009;</mml:mtext>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msubsup>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>/<inline-formula>
<mml:math display="inline" id="im6">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msubsup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>NH</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>4</mml:mn>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>&#x2009;</mml:mtext>
<mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msubsup>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> ratio in the rhizosphere, and especially so without P addition (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;3</bold>
</xref>).</p>
<fig id="f1" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;1</label>
<caption>
<p>Available nitrogen (AN, <bold>A</bold>) and available phosphorus (AP, <bold>B</bold>) concentrations and AN : AP <bold>(C)</bold> in bulk soil under control (no fertilizer addition), N (N addition), P (P addition) and NP (addition of both N and P) for eight legume species. MS, <italic>Medicago sativa</italic>; MV, <italic>Medicago varia</italic>; MF, <italic>Medicago falcata</italic>; MR, <italic>Medicago ruthenica</italic>; LC, <italic>Lotus corniculatus</italic>; MO, <italic>Melilotus officinalis</italic>; LD, <italic>Lespedeza daurica</italic>; GS, <italic>Glycine soja.</italic> Letters (N, P, S, N&#xd7;P, N&#xd7;S, P&#xd7;S, N&#xd7;P&#xd7;S) indicate significance overall from N addition, P addition, legume species (S) and their interaction effects according to general linear model P-values, the significance level are reported as ***(P&lt;0.001). Inside the embedded figures, the bars represent the means of each independent factor and interacted treatment with significant effect.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-14-1076894-g001.tif"/>
</fig>
<fig id="f2" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;2</label>
<caption>
<p>P mobilization effect in rhizosphere (ratio of AP in the rhizosphere to that in the bulk soil) <bold>(A)</bold> and available P (AP) concentration in rhizosphere soil <bold>(B)</bold> under control (no fertilizer addition), N (N addition), P (P addition) and NP (addition of both N and P) for eight legume species. MS, <italic>Medicago sativa</italic>; MV, <italic>Medicago varia</italic>; MF, <italic>Medicago falcata</italic>; MR, <italic>Medicago ruthenica</italic>; LC, <italic>Lotus corniculatus</italic>; MO, <italic>Melilotus officinalis</italic>; LD, <italic>Lespedeza daurica</italic>; GS, <italic>Glycine soja.</italic> Letters (N, P, S, N&#xd7;P, N&#xd7;S, P&#xd7;S, N&#xd7;P&#xd7;S) indicate significance overall from N addition, P addition, legume species (S) and their interaction effects according to general linear model P-values, the significance level are reported as ***(P&lt;0.001), **(P&lt;0.01), *(P&lt;0.05). Inside the embedded figures, the bars represent the means of each independent factor and interacted treatment with significant effect.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-14-1076894-g002.tif"/>
</fig>
<fig id="f3" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;3</label>
<caption>
<p>pH <bold>(A)</bold>, citric acid concentration <bold>(B)</bold>, malic acid concentration <bold>(C)</bold> and <inline-formula>
<mml:math display="inline" id="im7">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msubsup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>NO</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>3</mml:mn>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>&#x2009;</mml:mtext>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msubsup>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>/<inline-formula>
<mml:math display="inline" id="im8">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msubsup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>NH</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>4</mml:mn>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>&#x2009;</mml:mtext>
<mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msubsup>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> ratio <bold>(D)</bold> in rhizosphere soil under control (no fertilizer addition), N (N addition), P (P addition) and NP (coupling addition of N and P) for eight legume species. MS, <italic>Medicago sativa</italic>; MV, <italic>Medicago varia</italic>; MF, <italic>Medicago falcata</italic>; MR, <italic>Medicago ruthenica</italic>; LC, <italic>Lotus corniculatus</italic>; MO, <italic>Melilotus officinalis</italic>; LD, <italic>Lespedeza daurica</italic>; GS, <italic>Glycine soja.</italic> Letters (N, P, S, N&#xd7;P, N&#xd7;S, P&#xd7;S, N&#xd7;P&#xd7;S) indicate significance overall from N addition, P addition, legume species (S) and their interaction effects according to general linear model P-values, the significance level are reported as ***(P&lt;0.001), **(P&lt;0.01), *(P&lt;0.05). Inside the embedded figures, the bars represent the means of each independent factor and interacted treatment with significant effect.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-14-1076894-g003.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_2">
<label>3.2</label>
<title>Plant photosynthesis, biomass and NSC</title>
<p>Independent of P, N addition increased leaf photosynthetic rate, total biomass and shoot biomass (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f4">
<bold>Figures&#xa0;4A&#x2013;C</bold>
</xref>). N addition had no effect on root biomass except in concert with P addition (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f4">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;4D</bold>
</xref>). N addition increased NSC concentration in shoots but decreased NSC concentration in roots without P addition (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f4">
<bold>Figures&#xa0;4E, F</bold>
</xref>). For each legume species, there was significantly negative correlations between P mobilization effect, citric acid concentration, malic acid concentration, <inline-formula>
<mml:math display="inline" id="im9">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msubsup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>NO</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>3</mml:mn>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>&#x2009;</mml:mtext>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msubsup>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>/<inline-formula>
<mml:math display="inline" id="im10">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msubsup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>NH</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>4</mml:mn>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>&#x2009;</mml:mtext>
<mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msubsup>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> ratio in the rhizosphere and root biomass or root NSC concentration, but significantly positive correlations between pH in rhizosphere and root biomass or root NSC concentration following nutrient additions (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">
<bold>Table&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>).</p>
<fig id="f4" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;4</label>
<caption>
<p>Leaf photosynthetic rate <bold>(A)</bold>, total biomass <bold>(B)</bold>, shoot biomass <bold>(C)</bold>, root biomass <bold>(D)</bold>, shoot <bold>(E)</bold> and root non-structural carbohydrate (NSC) concentration <bold>(F)</bold> under control (no fertilizer addition), N (N addition), P (P addition) and NP (addition of both N and P) for eight legume species. MS, <italic>Medicago sativa</italic>; MV, <italic>Medicago varia</italic>; MF, <italic>Medicago falcata</italic>; MR, <italic>Medicago ruthenica</italic>; LC, <italic>Lotus corniculatus</italic>; MO, <italic>Melilotus officinalis</italic>; LD, <italic>Lespedeza daurica</italic>; GS, <italic>Glycine soja.</italic> Letters (N, P, S, N&#xd7;P, N&#xd7;S, P&#xd7;S, N&#xd7;P&#xd7;S) indicate significance overall from N addition, P addition, legume species (S) and their interaction effects according to general linear model P-values, the significance level are reported as ***(P&lt;0.001), **(P&lt;0.01), *(P&lt;0.05). Inside the embedded figures, the bars represent the means of each independent factor and interacted treatment with significant effect.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-14-1076894-g004.tif"/>
</fig>
<table-wrap id="T1" position="float">
<label>Table&#xa0;1</label>
<caption>
<p>Pearson correlation coefficients between root biomass (g.m<sup>-2</sup>), root non-structural carbohydrate (NSC) concentration (%) and rhizosphere P mobilization, pH in rhizosphere, citric acid concentration in rhizosphere (&#x3bc;mol. g<sup>-1</sup>), malic acid concentration in rhizosphere (&#x3bc;mol. g<sup>-1</sup>), <inline-formula>
<mml:math display="inline" id="im11">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msubsup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>NO</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>3</mml:mn>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>&#x2009;</mml:mtext>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msubsup>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>/<inline-formula>
<mml:math display="inline" id="im12">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msubsup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>NH</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>4</mml:mn>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>&#x2009;</mml:mtext>
<mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msubsup>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> ratio in rhizosphere, arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) colonization of root (%), root nodule biomass (mg. plant<sup>-1</sup>), specific symbiotic N fixation (mg N. g<sup>-1</sup> plant) for each legume species.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" rowspan="2" align="left"/>
<th valign="middle" colspan="2" align="center">
<italic>Medicago sativa</italic>
</th>
<th valign="middle" colspan="2" align="center">
<italic>Medicago varia</italic>
</th>
<th valign="middle" colspan="2" align="center">
<italic>Medicago falcata</italic>
</th>
<th valign="middle" colspan="2" align="center">
<italic>Medicago ruthenica</italic>
</th>
<th valign="middle" colspan="2" align="center">
<italic>Lotus corniculatus</italic>
</th>
<th valign="middle" colspan="2" align="center">
<italic>Melilotus officinalis</italic>
</th>
<th valign="middle" colspan="2" align="center">
<italic>Lespedeza daurica</italic>
</th>
<th valign="middle" colspan="2" align="center">
<italic>Glycine soja</italic>
</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Root biomass</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Root NSC</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Root biomass</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Root NSC</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Root biomass</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Root NSC</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Root biomass</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Root NSC</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Root biomass</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Root NSC</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Root biomass</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Root NSC</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Root biomass</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Root NSC</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Root biomass</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Root NSC</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Rhizospheric P mobilization</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>-0.808<sup>**</sup>
</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>-0.831<sup>**</sup>
</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>-0.752<sup>**</sup>
</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>-0.936<sup>**</sup>
</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>-0.764<sup>**</sup>
</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>-0.921<sup>**</sup>
</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>-0.778<sup>**</sup>
</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>-0.923<sup>**</sup>
</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>-0.865<sup>**</sup>
</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>-0.909<sup>**</sup>
</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>-0.921<sup>**</sup>
</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>-0.945<sup>**</sup>
</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>-0.593<sup>*</sup>
</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>-0.886<sup>**</sup>
</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>-0.868<sup>**</sup>
</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>-0.935<sup>**</sup>
</bold>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">pH in rhizosphere</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>0.617<sup>*</sup>
</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>0.896<sup>**</sup>
</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.546</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>0.747<sup>**</sup>
</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>0.804<sup>**</sup>
</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>0.919<sup>**</sup>
</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>0.712<sup>**</sup>
</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>0.885<sup>**</sup>
</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>0.731<sup>**</sup>
</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>0.824<sup>**</sup>
</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>0.652<sup>*</sup>
</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>0.853<sup>**</sup>
</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.187</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.634<bold>
<sup>*</sup>
</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>0.941<sup>**</sup>
</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>0.956<sup>**</sup>
</bold>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Citric acid in rhizosphere</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>-0.822<sup>**</sup>
</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>-0.931<sup>**</sup>
</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>-0.603<sup>*</sup>
</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>-0.811<sup>**</sup>
</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>-0.609<sup>*</sup>
</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>-0.789<sup>**</sup>
</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>-0.777<sup>**</sup>
</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>-0.801<sup>**</sup>
</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>-0.679<sup>*</sup>
</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>-0.768<sup>**</sup>
</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>-0.720<sup>**</sup>
</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>-0.839<sup>**</sup>
</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>-0.623<sup>*</sup>
</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>-0.771<sup>**</sup>
</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>-0.954<sup>**</sup>
</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>-0.929<sup>**</sup>
</bold>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Malic acid in rhizosphere</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>-0.799<sup>**</sup>
</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>-0.910<sup>**</sup>
</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">-0.534</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>-0.820<sup>**</sup>
</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>-0.770<sup>**</sup>
</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>-0.785<sup>**</sup>
</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>-0.797<sup>**</sup>
</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>-0.797<sup>**</sup>
</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>-0.623<sup>*</sup>
</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>-0.673<sup>*</sup>
</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>-0.841<sup>**</sup>
</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>-0.820<sup>**</sup>
</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">-0.099</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">-0.543</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>-0.919<sup>**</sup>
</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>-0.905<sup>**</sup>
</bold>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Root nodule biomass</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.497</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>0.815<sup>**</sup>
</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.410</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>0.601<sup>*</sup>
</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.447</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>0.603<sup>*</sup>
</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>0.639<sup>*</sup>
</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>0.790<sup>**</sup>
</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.474</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>0.648<sup>*</sup>
</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.520</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>0.825<sup>**</sup>
</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.294</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>0.720<sup>**</sup>
</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>0.794<sup>**</sup>
</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>0.833<sup>**</sup>
</bold>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="middle" align="left">Specific symbiotic N fixation</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.206</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>0.589<sup>*</sup>
</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>0.880<sup>**</sup>
</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>0.938<sup>**</sup>
</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.479</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>0.637<sup>*</sup>
</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>0.610<sup>*</sup>
</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>0.932<sup>**</sup>
</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">0.530</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>0.689<sup>*</sup>
</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>0.839<sup>**</sup>
</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>0.922<sup>**</sup>
</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>0.852<sup>**</sup>
</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>0.922<sup>**</sup>
</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>0.695<sup>*</sup>
</bold>
</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">
<bold>0.698<sup>*</sup>
</bold>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn>
<p>*Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed),**Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).</p>
</fn>
<fn>
<p>The bold values represent significant correlations.</p>
</fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_3">
<label>3.3</label>
<title>N and P concentrations, and stoichiometry homeostasis of plant N:P ratio (H<sub>N:P</sub>)</title>
<p>N addition increased plant N concentration in all species, whereas P addition had negative, neutral or positive effects on plant N concentration (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f5">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;5A</bold>
</xref>). Plant P concentration was increased by P addition, while its response varied from negative to positive with N addition in different legume species (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f5">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;5B</bold>
</xref>). Averaged with and without P addition, N addition increased plant N:P ratio by 8% to 33% across legume species. Regardless of N addition and legume species, P addition decreased plant N:P ratio by an average of 12% (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f5">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;5C</bold>
</xref>). The stoichiometric homeostasis of plant N:P ratio (H<sub>N:P</sub>) showed obvious inter-specific differences, ranging from 2.72 to 9.07 with the order of <italic>L</italic>. <italic>daurica</italic> &gt; <italic>M</italic>. <italic>varia</italic> &gt; <italic>M</italic>. ruthenica &gt; <italic>M</italic>. <italic>officinalis</italic> &gt; <italic>M</italic>. <italic>falcata</italic> &gt; <italic>L</italic>. <italic>corniculatus</italic> &gt; <italic>G</italic>. soja &gt; <italic>M</italic>. <italic>sativa</italic> (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f5">
<bold>Figure 5D</bold>
</xref>).</p>
<fig id="f5" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;5</label>
<caption>
<p>Plant N concentration <bold>(A)</bold>, plant P concentration <bold>(B)</bold>, plant N:P ratio <bold>(C)</bold> under control (no fertilizer addition), N (N addition), P (P addition) and NP (addition of both N and P), and stoichiometric homeostasis of plant N:P (H<sub>N:P</sub>, d) for eight legume species. MS, <italic>Medicago sativa</italic>; MV, <italic>Medicago varia</italic>; MF, <italic>Medicago falcata</italic>; MR, <italic>Medicago ruthenica</italic>; LC, <italic>Lotus corniculatus</italic>; MO, <italic>Melilotus officinalis</italic>; LD, <italic>Lespedeza daurica</italic>; GS, <italic>Glycine soja.</italic> Letters (N, P, S, N&#xd7;P, N&#xd7;S, P&#xd7;S, N&#xd7;P&#xd7;S) indicate significance overall from N addition, P addition, legume species (S) and their interaction effects according to general linear model P-values, the significance level are reported as ***(P&lt;0.001), **(P&lt;0.01), *(P&lt;0.05). Inside the embedded figures, the bars represent the means of each independent factor and interacted treatment with significant effect. Solid triangles without a common lowercase letter differed according to Duncan&#x2019;s multiple comparison test (P&lt;0.05).</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-14-1076894-g005.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_4">
<label>3.4</label>
<title>Nodule number, nodule biomass and specific symbiotic N fixation</title>
<p>Without P addition, N addition reduced the root nodule number, root nodule biomass and specific symbiotic N fixation by 32% to 44%, 34% to 50% and 14% to 36%, respectively; with P addition, N addition reduced root nodule number, root nodule biomass and %Ndfa by 2% to 43%, 22% to 25% and 2% to 14%, respectively, among the different legume species (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f6">
<bold>Figures&#xa0;6A, B, D</bold>
</xref>). N addition and N-P interaction had no significant influence on root nodule P concentration (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f6">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;6C</bold>
</xref>). Significantly positive correlations were also found between specific symbiotic N fixation and individual root biomass, or between specific symbiotic N fixation and root NSC concentration for all legume species (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">
<bold>Table&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>).</p>
<fig id="f6" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;6</label>
<caption>
<p>Root nodule number <bold>(A)</bold>, root nodule biomass <bold>(B)</bold>, root nodule P concentration <bold>(C)</bold> and specific symbiotic N fixation <bold>(D)</bold> under control (no fertilizer addition), N (N addition), P (P addition) and NP (addition of both N and P) for eight legume species. MS, <italic>Medicago sativa</italic>; MV, <italic>Medicago varia</italic>; MF, <italic>Medicago falcata</italic>; MR, <italic>Medicago ruthenica</italic>; LC, <italic>Lotus corniculatus</italic>; MO, <italic>Melilotus officinalis</italic>; LD, <italic>Lespedeza daurica</italic>; GS, <italic>Glycine soja.</italic> Letters (N, P, S, N&#xd7;P, N&#xd7;S, P&#xd7;S, N&#xd7;P&#xd7;S) indicate significance overall from N addition, P addition, legume species (S) and their interaction effects according to general linear model P-values, the significance level are reported as ***(P&lt;0.001), **(P&lt;0.01), *(P&lt;0.05). Inside the embedded figures, the bars represent the means of each independent factor and interacted treatment with significant effect.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-14-1076894-g006.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_5">
<label>3.5</label>
<title>Correlation between H<sub>N:P</sub> of legume species and its change in rhizosphere chemistry, biomass and NSC, and specific symbiotic N fixation</title>
<p>Regression analysis generally showed significantly positive correlations between H<sub>N:P</sub> of legume species and changes in malic acid concentration, <inline-formula>
<mml:math display="inline" id="im13">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msubsup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>NO</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>3</mml:mn>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>&#x2009;</mml:mtext>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msubsup>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>/<inline-formula>
<mml:math display="inline" id="im14">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msubsup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>NH</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>4</mml:mn>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>&#x2009;</mml:mtext>
<mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msubsup>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> ratio in rhizosphere, and significantly negative correlations between H<sub>N:P</sub> of legume species and its change in rhizosphere pH under N addition, regardless of P additions (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f7">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;7</bold>
</xref>). Meanwhile, there were significantly positive correlations between H<sub>N:P</sub> of legume and its changes in leaf photosynthetic rate, root biomass, root NSC concentration following N addition with or without P addition (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f8">
<bold>Figures&#xa0;8A&#x2013;D</bold>
</xref>). N-driven change in shoot biomass for legume species was negatively correlated with its H<sub>N:P</sub> without P addition (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f8">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;8D</bold>
</xref>). Regardless of P addition, the change in shoot NSC concentration for legume species showed the reciprocal relationship with its H<sub>N:P</sub> under N addition (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f8">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;8E</bold>
</xref>). With or without P addition, the H<sub>N:P</sub> value of legume species were positively correlated with its change in specific symbiotic N fixation following N addition (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f8">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;8F</bold>
</xref>).</p>
<fig id="f7" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;7</label>
<caption>
<p>Correlation relationships between stoichiometric homeostasis of plant N:P (H<sub>N:P</sub>) of legume species and its change in pH <bold>(A)</bold>, citric acid concentration <bold>(B)</bold>, malic acid concentration <bold>(C)</bold> or <inline-formula>
<mml:math display="inline" id="im15">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msubsup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>NO</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>3</mml:mn>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>&#x2009;</mml:mtext>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msubsup>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>/<inline-formula>
<mml:math display="inline" id="im16">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msubsup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>NH</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>4</mml:mn>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>&#x2009;</mml:mtext>
<mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msubsup>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> ratio <bold>(D)</bold> in rhizosphere under N addition with or without P addition.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-14-1076894-g007.tif"/>
</fig>
<fig id="f8" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;8</label>
<caption>
<p>Correlation relationships between stoichiometric homeostasis of plant N:P (H<sub>N:P</sub>) of legume species and its change in leaf photosynthetic rate <bold>(A)</bold>, root biomass <bold>(B)</bold>, root non-structural carbohydrate (NSC) concentration <bold>(C)</bold>, shoot biomass <bold>(D)</bold>, shoot non-structural carbohydrate (NSC) concentration <bold>(E)</bold> and %Ndfa <bold>(F)</bold> under N addition with or without P addition.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-14-1076894-g008.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s4" sec-type="discussion">
<label>4</label>
<title>Discussion</title>
<sec id="s4_1">
<label>4.1</label>
<title>Legumes species responses to N and P additions, and their H<sub>N:P</sub> values</title>
<p>An increase in either N or P availability can drive plants to adjust nutrient utilization and tissue chemistry for adaptation to nutrient imbalances (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">Reich et&#xa0;al., 2009</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">Li X. et&#xa0;al., 2016</xref>). In this study, N addition primarily increased plant N concentrations, with less influence on plant P concentrations, consequently causing a significant increase in plant N:P ratio across legume species. However, N addition greatly increased plant biomass, therefore the stable plant P concentration indicates that legume species enhanced P acquisition to balance the increased biomass P demand (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">Li X. et&#xa0;al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">Png et&#xa0;al., 2017</xref>). Moreover, as observed in this study, the effect of P addition on plant N concentration, as well as the effect of N addition on plant P concentration, showed significant inter-specific differences, suggesting that species differences appear to influence the responses of plant tissue chemistry to the changes in soil N and P availability. Similarly, previous studies have suggested that the species-specific changes in tissue nutrients could occur across different plant function groups in response to varied N and P availability (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Betencourt et&#xa0;al., 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">Mayor et&#xa0;al., 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">L&#xfc; et&#xa0;al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">Li X. et&#xa0;al., 2016</xref>). The present study also demonstrated that the response of plant tissue chemistry is not phylogenetically conserved even within taxonomic family/functional group under changed environment (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B54">Wolf et&#xa0;al., 2017</xref>). According to our results, <italic>Lespedeza daurica</italic> showed a much more positive response in P uptake compared with other legume species when challenged with N enrichment. Eventually, because of species-specific responses in N and P uptakes, the changes of plant N:P ratio showed great inter-specific difference under N addition.</p>
<p>The stoichiometric homeostasis in plant N:P ratio reflect different abilities of legumes to maintain tissue N:P stability during unbalanced nutrient supply (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B55">Yu et&#xa0;al., 2010</xref>). Previously, only limited data were reported about the H<sub>N:P</sub> of legumes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B54">Wolf et&#xa0;al., 2017</xref>). In the present study, the H<sub>N:P</sub> values of eight measured legume species, especially <italic>Lespedeza daurica</italic>, were evidently higher than those previously reported for other legumes (1.8-2.7; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B54">Wolf et&#xa0;al., 2017</xref>), suggesting plant N:P ratio for legume species could be more conserved at the intraspecific level than that previously assessed, and implying that P may have increasing importance in regulating legume growth under N enrichment. Meanwhile, our results indicated that the H<sub>N:P</sub> values of legume species had greater inter-specific variability than that previously estimated (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B54">Wolf et&#xa0;al., 2017</xref>), implying that the ratio of N and P fertilizer application particularly needs to be adjusted according to species for optimizing legume production (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B54">Wolf et&#xa0;al., 2017</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s4_2">
<label>4.2</label>
<title>The effects of N and P in regulating symbiotic N fixation</title>
<p>N addition inhibited root nodulation and symbiotic N fixation in legumes, supporting previous research (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B52">West et&#xa0;al., 2005</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">Nyfeler et&#xa0;al., 2011</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B60">Zheng et&#xa0;al., 2019</xref>). However, N addition had a less inhibitory effect on symbiotic N fixation when the experimental soil was supplemented with P fertilizer, suggesting the importance of plant P status in mediating the influence of N enrichment on symbiotic N fixation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Gates and Wilson, 1974</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Gentili and Huss-Danell, 2003</xref>). In this study, N addition increased plant biomass and tissue N concentration, which enhanced the legume demands for P (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B53">White and Hammond, 2008</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">Png et&#xa0;al., 2017</xref>). Since external P supply did not increase following N addition without P&#xa0;supplementation, this N/P supply imbalance created a potential P limitation to legume growth. It was originally expected that P limitation reduced symbiotic N fixation through increasing the P competition between host legume and rhizobium, and thus reducing P transfer into root nodules. However, root nodule P was maintained at relatively stable concentration under N addition. This likely excludes the possibility that P limitation reduced P nutrition of the root nodule, and thus symbiotic N fixation in response to N additions. However, the stabilization of P levels in symbiotic tissues may be a common mechanism for allowing nodules to ameliorate the negative effects of P deficiency (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B46">Sulieman and Tran, 2015</xref>). To meet the needs of concurrent stabilization of P levels in host plants and symbiotic tissues under increased biomass by N addition, legumes likely increased P acquisition <italic>via</italic> adjustment in P uptake mechanisms (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">Pang et&#xa0;al., 2018</xref>).</p>
<p>Intensification of root-mycorrhizal interactions can be an important mechanism for legumes to enhance P acquisition (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Betencourt et&#xa0;al., 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">Ryan et&#xa0;al., 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">Pang et&#xa0;al., 2018</xref>). However, in another study using the same cultivated soil, legume species and N addition treatment, it has been confirmed that these legume species did not improve P acquisition by intensifying root-mycorrhizal interaction (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Li et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>). Alternatively, increasing root phosphatase activity may also greatly help legumes to acquire more P under N enrichment (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">Pang et&#xa0;al., 2018</xref>). However, root phosphatase activity generally had positive and neutral feedback with symbiotic N fixation across legumes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">Png et&#xa0;al., 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Li et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>), implying increased root phosphatase activity will not reduce the symbiotic N fixation. In the present study, N addition clearly stimulated P mobilization in the rhizosphere by which legumes improve P acquisition under N addition. Rhizosphere acidification of plants as observed in the current study can be a key mechanism that increases P mobilization under N addition, especially in alkaline soils, such as those in this study (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">Hinsinger et&#xa0;al., 2003</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B61">Zhou et&#xa0;al., 2009</xref>). Several physiological responses of roots may have contributed to decline of rhizosphere pH, including increased exudates of P-mobilizing compounds such as organic acids, and increased efflux of H<sup>+</sup>, which can be driven by more uptake of <inline-formula>
<mml:math display="inline" id="im17">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msubsup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>NH</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>4</mml:mn>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>&#x2009;</mml:mtext>
<mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msubsup>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>-N than <inline-formula>
<mml:math display="inline" id="im18">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msubsup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>NO</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>3</mml:mn>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>&#x2009;</mml:mtext>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msubsup>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>-N in rhizosphere (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">Hinsinger et&#xa0;al., 2003</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">Blossfeld and Gansert, 2007</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">Bilyera et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>), or increased root respiration (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">Nuruzzaman et&#xa0;al., 2006</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Li et&#xa0;al., 2007</xref>). Current results showed significant negative correlations between rhizosphere P mobilization, rhizosphere acidification and root biomass and root carbohydrate concentration, because efflux of P-mobilizing compounds (e.g., organic acids) and rhizosphere acidification likely accounted for a vast consumption of carbohydrates in the root (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Lynch et&#xa0;al., 2005</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">Ryan et&#xa0;al., 2012</xref>). As our results imply, root biomass and their carbohydrate content are important in the regulation of root nodule development and activity, providing carbon skeletons and energy to nodules (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B45">Sulieman et&#xa0;al., 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Divito and Sadras, 2014</xref>). Therefore, the N/P imbalance in soil by N addition likely has inhibited symbiotic N fixation <italic>via</italic> increased P mobilization in rhizosphere.</p>
<p>When P was supplemented, N additions induced lesser increases in rhizosphere P mobilization, and subsequently less decline in root biomass and root carbohydrate concentration. Correspondingly, specific symbiotic N fixation was less inhibited by N addition when the experimental soil received P fertilizer. Similarly, the increase in N fixation when P was supplied could also be due to the host no longer having to rely on P mobilization mechanisms to scavenge P, which potentially allowed more carbon skeletons to be available for N assimilation. These results provide further evidence to suggest a legume trade-off between rhizosphere P mobilization and symbiotic N fixation under changed N-P balance in soil, and explain a mechanism by which P availability regulates symbiotic N fixation inhibited by N enrichment.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s4_3">
<label>4.3</label>
<title>Stoichiometric homeostasis of N:P ratio drives species-specific symbiotic N fixation inhibition</title>
<p>As observed in present research, species-specific inhibition of symbiotic N fixation in response to increased soil N availability is widely reported (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">Nyfeler et&#xa0;al., 2011</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B60">Zheng et&#xa0;al., 2019</xref>). However, the underlying mechanisms responsible for these inter-specific differences have not been adequately explored. Ecological stoichiometry potentially provides a tool to address this research gap, as it services as a basis framework to control the feedback between biology and environment (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Elser et&#xa0;al., 2010</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B57">Yu et&#xa0;al., 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B59">Zheng et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>). Previously, many studies have revealed the control of substrate stoichiometry to biological N fixation in forest or agriculture ecosystems, and found that the greater decline in substrate C:N and C:(N:P) ratios generally drove the more decline in biological N fixation rate under N addition (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">Reed et&#xa0;al., 2011</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B59">Zheng et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>). However, these studies have not explained why legumes showed species-specific inhibition of symbiotic N fixation with the same change in substrate nutrient availability.</p>
<p>In this study, as N addition increased tissue N concentration and biomass of legumes, legume species with a less change (greater stoichiometric homeostasis) of plant N:P ratio had a greater P demand that will provide a greater stimulation of P mobilization in the rhizosphere under N addition (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Elser et&#xa0;al., 2010</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B55">Yu et&#xa0;al., 2010</xref>). This is supported by our finding that H<sub>N:P</sub> of legume was positively correlated with rhizosphere acidification and changes of organic acid concentration and <inline-formula>
<mml:math display="inline" id="im19">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msubsup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>NO</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>3</mml:mn>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>&#x2009;</mml:mtext>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msubsup>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>/<inline-formula>
<mml:math display="inline" id="im20">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msubsup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>NH</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>4</mml:mn>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>&#x2009;</mml:mtext>
<mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msubsup>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> ratio in the rhizosphere following N addition. Accordingly, legume species with a greater stoichiometric homeostasis of N:P ratio is expected to have a greater symbiotic N fixation inhibition under N addition because increased P mobilization may cause a greater decline in root biomass and root carbohydrate concentration (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Lynch et&#xa0;al., 2005</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">Ryan et&#xa0;al., 2012</xref>). However, in contrast to our previous hypothesis, the current results indicate that legume species that have a greater stoichiometric homeostasis of N:P ratio, instead have less reduction of symbiotic N fixation with N addition. That is because the legume species with a greater stoichiometric homeostasis of N:P ratio appear to have less decline, and even a weak increase in root biomass and root carbohydrate concentrations under N addition. It seems paradoxical that legume species with a greater increase in rhizosphere P mobilization have less decline in root biomass and root carbohydrate concentration. Further analysis explained the potential reasons: first, high H<sub>N:P</sub> species increased more sharply in plant photosynthetic rate under N addition, with greater increase in carbohydrate production compared to species with a lower H<sub>N:P</sub>. In addition, a greater increase of plant photosynthesis and carbohydrate production potentially means greater promotion of biomass and carbohydrate accumulation in legume tissues. However, our results showed that legume species with greater H<sub>N:P</sub> had less increase in shoot biomass and shoot carbohydrate concentration under N addition, implying that high H<sub>N:P</sub> legumes likely increase more photosynthate allocation into roots under N addition, compensating for the loss of root carbohydrate by rhizosphere P mobilization. Finally, as a key rhizosphere acidification mechanism, the greater increase of rhizosphere <inline-formula>
<mml:math display="inline" id="im21">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msubsup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>NO</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>3</mml:mn>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>&#x2009;</mml:mtext>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msubsup>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>/<inline-formula>
<mml:math display="inline" id="im22">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msubsup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>NH</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>4</mml:mn>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>&#x2009;</mml:mtext>
<mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msubsup>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> ratio was found in legume species with greater H<sub>N:P</sub> values under N addition. There is no evidence to indicate that changes in <inline-formula>
<mml:math display="inline" id="im23">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msubsup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>NO</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>3</mml:mn>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>&#x2009;</mml:mtext>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msubsup>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>/<inline-formula>
<mml:math display="inline" id="im24">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msubsup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>NH</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>4</mml:mn>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>&#x2009;</mml:mtext>
<mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msubsup>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> uptake of legume are physiologically relevant to loss of root biomass and carbohydrate. Therefore, high H<sub>N:P</sub> legumes may enhance the other rhizosphere acidification mechanism, such as increased relative uptake of <inline-formula>
<mml:math display="inline" id="im25">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msubsup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>NH</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>4</mml:mn>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>&#x2009;</mml:mtext>
<mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msubsup>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>-N to <inline-formula>
<mml:math display="inline" id="im26">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msubsup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>NO</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>3</mml:mn>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>&#x2009;</mml:mtext>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msubsup>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>-N in the rhizosphere, potentially inhibiting the cost of root biomass and carbohydrate under N addition. To sum up, the legume species with greater H<sub>N:P</sub> have more capacity to maintain root biomass and root carbohydrate concentration <italic>via</italic> regulation in carbon and nitrogen assimilation, consequently reducing the symbiotic N fixation inhibition under N addition.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s5" sec-type="conclusions">
<label>5</label>
<title>Conclusions</title>
<p>This research demonstrated that N addition can reduce the symbiotic N fixation of legumes by increasing the relative P limitation for growth, which stimulates rhizosphere P mobilization at the expense of root biomass and carbohydrate concentrations that regulate root nodule development and nutrition. P addition alleviates the relative P limitation induced by N addition, reducing symbiotic N fixation suppression under N enrichment. Legume species that had more stoichiometric homeostasis in plant N:P ratio have less reduction in symbiotic N fixation under N addition.</p>
<p>In conclusion, this research identified the trade-off between rhizosphere P mobilization and symbiotic N fixation as a mechanism to account for changes in symbiotic N fixation by legumes under changing N availability, and demonstrated species-specific stoichiometric control of their symbiotic N fixation response. Future research to improve legume performance should consider stoichiometric homeostasis of plant N:P ratio to provide a predictive tool for understanding how legumes respond to changes in soil nutrient status, to attain a greater symbiotic N fixation contribution to benefit soil fertility and health.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s6" sec-type="data-availability">
<title>Data availability statement</title>
<p>The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s7" sec-type="author-contributions">
<title>Author contributions</title>
<p>QL was responsible for conception, field sampling and manuscript draft writing. JP, MD, and JW was responsible for manuscript revision. YH was responsible for data analysis. HS, YL, and QZ was responsible for sampling and analysis. All&#xa0;authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<sec id="s8" sec-type="funding-information">
<title>Funding</title>
<p>This study was supported by Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (Grant No. XDA28110300) and Strategic Science and Technology Guide Project of CAS (Grant No. XDA23060403) and Natural Science Foundation of Jilin Province China (Grant No.YDZJ202201ZYTS522) and Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 31600318).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s9" sec-type="COI-statement">
<title>Conflict of interest</title>
<p>The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s10" sec-type="disclaimer">
<title>Publisher&#x2019;s note</title>
<p>All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.</p>
</sec>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="B1">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Augusto</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Delerue</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gallet-Budynek</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Achat</surname> <given-names>D. L</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Global assessment of limitation to symbiotic nitrogen fixation by phosphorus availability in terrestrial ecosystems using a meta-analysis approach</article-title>. <source>Global Biogeochem. CY.</source> <volume>27</volume>, <fpage>804</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>815</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/gbc.20069</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Batterman.</surname> <given-names>S. A</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wurzburger.</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hedin</surname> <given-names>L. O.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Nitrogen and phosphorus interact to control tropical symbiotic N2 fixation: a test in Inga punctata</article-title>. <source>J. Ecol.</source> <volume>101</volume>, <fpage>1400</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1408</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/1365-2745.12138</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Baziramakenga</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Simard</surname> <given-names>R. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Leroux</surname> <given-names>G. D.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. (<year>1995</year>). <article-title>Determination of organic acids in soil extracts by ion chromatography</article-title>. <source>Soil Biol. Biochem.</source> <volume>27</volume>, <fpage>349</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>356</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/0038-0717(94)00178-4</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Betencourt</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Duputel</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Colomb</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Desclaux</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hinsinger</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Intercropping promotes the ability of durum wheat and chickpea to increase rhizosphere phosphorus availability in a low p soil</article-title>. <source>Soil Biol. Biochem.</source> <volume>46</volume>, <fpage>181</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>190</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.soilbio.2011.11.015</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Bilyera</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hummel</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Daudin</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Santangeli</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Oburger</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Co-Localised phosphorus mobilization processes in the rhizosphere of field-grown maize jointly contribute to plant nutrition</article-title>. <source>Soil Biol. Biochem.</source> <volume>165</volume>, <fpage>108497</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.soilbio.2021.108497</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Blossfeld</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gansert</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2007</year>). <article-title>A novel non-invasive optical method for quantitative visualization of pH dynamics in the rhizosphere of plants</article-title>. <source>Plant Cell Environ.</source> <volume>30</volume>, <fpage>176</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>186</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1365-3040.2006.01616.x</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Buysse</surname> <given-names>J. A. N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Merckx</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1993</year>). <article-title>An improved colorimetric method to quantify sugar content of plant tissue</article-title>. <source>J. Exp. Bot.</source> <volume>44</volume>, <fpage>1627</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1629</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/jxb/44.10.1627</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Craine</surname> <given-names>J. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Morrow</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Stock</surname> <given-names>W. D.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>Nutrient concentration ratios and co-limitation in south African grasslands</article-title>. <source>New Phytol.</source> <volume>179</volume>, <fpage>829</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>836</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1469-8137.2008.02513.x</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Deng</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sun</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Piao</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ma</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Increased phosphate uptake but not resorption alleviates phosphorus deficiency induced by nitrogen deposition in temperate larix principis-rupprechtii plantations</article-title>. <source>New Phytol.</source> <volume>212</volume>, <fpage>1019</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1029</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/nph.14083</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Divito</surname> <given-names>G. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sadras</surname> <given-names>V. O.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>How do phosphorus, potassium and sulphur affect plant growth and biological nitrogen fixation in crop and pasture legumes</article-title>? A meta-analysis. <source>Field Crops Res.</source> <volume>156</volume>, <fpage>161</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>171</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.fcr.2013.11.004</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Elser</surname> <given-names>J. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fagan</surname> <given-names>W. F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kerkhoff</surname> <given-names>A. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Swenson</surname> <given-names>N. G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Enquist</surname> <given-names>B. J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Biological stoichiometry of plant production: metabolism, scaling and ecological response to global change</article-title>. <source>New Phytol.</source> <volume>186</volume>, <fpage>593</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>608</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1469-8137.2010.03214.x</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Farrer</surname> <given-names>E. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Suding</surname> <given-names>K. N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Knops</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Teasing apart plant community responses to n enrichment: the roles of resource limitation, competition and soil microbes</article-title>. <source>Ecol. Lett.</source> <volume>19</volume>, <fpage>1287</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1296</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/ele.12665</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Galloway</surname> <given-names>J. N.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1998</year>). <article-title>The global nitrogen cycle: changes and consequences</article-title>. <source>Environ. Pollut.</source> <volume>102</volume>, <fpage>15</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>24</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S0269-7491(98)80010-9</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Gates</surname> <given-names>C. T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wilson</surname> <given-names>J. R.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1974</year>). <article-title>The interaction of nitrogen and phosphorus on the growth, nutrient status and nodulation of stylosanthes humilis H.B.K. (townsville stylo)</article-title>. <source>Plant Soil</source> <volume>41</volume>, <fpage>325</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>333</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/BF00017260</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Gentili</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Huss-Danell</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2003</year>). <article-title>Local and systemic effects of phosphorus and nitrogen on nodulation and nodule function in <italic>Alnus incana</italic>
</article-title>. <source>J. Exp. Bot.</source> <volume>54</volume>, <fpage>2757</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2767</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/jxb/erg311</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Gusewell</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2004</year>). <article-title>N:P ratios in terrestrial plants: variation and functional significance</article-title>. <source>New Phytol.</source> <volume>164</volume>, <fpage>243</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>266</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1469-8137.2004.01192.x</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Harpole</surname> <given-names>W. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ngai</surname> <given-names>J. T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cleland</surname> <given-names>E. E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Seabloom</surname> <given-names>E. W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Borer</surname> <given-names>E. T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bracken</surname> <given-names>M. E.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Nutrient co-limitation of primary producer communities</article-title>. <source>Ecol. Lett.</source> <volume>14</volume>, <fpage>852</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>862</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01651.x</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B18">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Herridge</surname> <given-names>D. F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Peoples</surname> <given-names>M. B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Boddey</surname> <given-names>R. M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>Global inputs of biological nitrogen fixation in agricultural systems</article-title>. <source>Plant Soil</source> <volume>311</volume>, <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>18</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11104-008-9668-3</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B19">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Hinsinger</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Plassard</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tang</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jaillard</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2003</year>). <article-title>Origins of root-mediated pH changes in the rhizosphere and their responses to environmental constraints: A review</article-title>. <source>Plant Soil</source> <volume>248</volume>, <fpage>43</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>59</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1023/A:1022371130939</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B20">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sun</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bao</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2007</year>). <article-title>Diversity enhances agricultural productivity <italic>via</italic> rhizosphere phosphorus facilitation on phosphorus-deficient soils</article-title>. <source>Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.</source> <volume>104</volume>, <fpage>11192</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>11196</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1073/pnas.0704591104</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B21">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Denton</surname> <given-names>M. D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Huang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Nitrogen enrichment intensifies legume reliance on root phosphatase activity but weakens inter-specific correlations between N<sub>2</sub> fixation and mycorrhizal colonization</article-title>. <source>Plant Soil</source> <volume>465</volume>, <fpage>503</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>514</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11104-021-04989-8</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B22">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Song</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yu</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Grass-legume mixtures impact soil n, species recruitment, and productivity in temperate steppe grassland</article-title>. <source>Plant Soil</source> <volume>394</volume>, <fpage>271</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>285</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11104-015-2525-2</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B23">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yu</surname> <given-names>P. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>G. D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>D. W.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Grass-legume ratio can change soil carbon and nitrogen storage in a temperate steppe grassland</article-title>. <source>Soil Till Res.</source> <volume>157</volume>, <fpage>23</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>31</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.still.2015.08.021</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B24">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gao</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lin</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zeng</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gui</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) resorption of two dominant alpine perennial grass species in response to contrasting n and p availability</article-title>. <source>Environ. Exp. Bot.</source> <volume>127</volume>, <fpage>37</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>44</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.envexpbot.2016.03.008</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B25">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>L&#xfc;</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Reed</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yu</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>He</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Han</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Convergent responses of nitrogen and phosphorus resorption to nitrogen inputs in a semiarid grassland</article-title>. <source>Glob. Change Biol.</source> <volume>19</volume>, <fpage>2775</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2784</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/gcb.12235</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B26">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>L&#xfc;</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sasha</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yu</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Han</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Nutrient resorption helps drive intra-specific coupling of foliar nitrogen and phosphorus under nutrient-enriched conditions</article-title>. <source>Plant Soil</source> <volume>398</volume>, <fpage>111</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>120</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11104-015-2642-y</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B27">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Lynch</surname> <given-names>J. P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ho</surname> <given-names>M. D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Phosphorus</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2005</year>). <article-title>Rhizoeconomics: Carbon costs of phosphorus acquisition</article-title>. <source>Plant Soil</source> <volume>269</volume>, <fpage>45</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>56</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11104-004-1096-4</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B28">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Matamoros</surname> <given-names>M. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Baird</surname> <given-names>L. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Escuredo</surname> <given-names>P. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dalton</surname> <given-names>D. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Minchin</surname> <given-names>F. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Iturbe-Ormaetxe</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>1999</year>). <article-title>Stress-induced legume root nodule senescence. physiological, biochemical, and structural alterations</article-title>. <source>Plant Physiol.</source> <volume>121</volume>, <fpage>97</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>112</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1104/pp.121.1.97</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B29">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Mayor</surname> <given-names>J. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wright</surname> <given-names>S. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Turner</surname> <given-names>B. L.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Species-specific responses of foliar nutrients to long-term nitrogen and phosphorus additions in a lowland tropical forest</article-title>. <source>J. Ecol.</source> <volume>102</volume>, <fpage>36</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>44</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/1365-2745.12190</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B30">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Miller</surname> <given-names>R. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Keeney</surname> <given-names>D. R.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1982</year>). <source>Methods of soil analysis, part 2. chemical and microbiological properties, 2nd edn</source> (<publisher-loc>Soil Science Society of America, Madison, WI</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>American Society of Agronomy</publisher-name>).</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B31">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Nanjareddy</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Blanco</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Arthikala</surname> <given-names>M. K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Affantrange</surname> <given-names>X. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>S&#xe1;nchez</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lara</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Nitrate regulates rhizobial and mycorrhizal symbiosis in common bean (<italic>Phaseolus vulgaris</italic> l.)</article-title>. <source>J. Integr. Plant Biol.</source> <volume>56</volume>, <fpage>281</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>298</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/jipb.12156</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B32">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Nishida</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Suzaki</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Nitrate-mediated control of root nodule symbiosis, curr</article-title>. <source>Opin. Plant Biol.</source> <volume>44</volume>, <fpage>129</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>136</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.pbi.2018.04.006</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B33">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Nuruzzaman</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lambers</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bolland</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Veneklaas</surname> <given-names>E. J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2006</year>). <article-title>Distribution of carboxylates and acid phosphatase and depletion of different phosphorus fractions in the rhizosphere of a cereal and three grain legumes</article-title>. <source>Plant Soil</source> <volume>281</volume>, <fpage>109</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>120</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11104-005-3936-2</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B34">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Nyfeler</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Huguenin-Elie</surname> <given-names>O.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Suter</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Frossard</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>L&#xfc;scher</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Grass-legume mixtures can yield more nitrogen than legume pure stands due to mutual stimulation of nitrogen uptake from symbiotic and non-symbiotic sources</article-title>. <source>Agric. Ecosyst. Environ.</source> <volume>140</volume>, <fpage>155</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>163</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.agee.2010.11.022</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B35">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Olsen</surname> <given-names>S. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cole</surname> <given-names>C. V.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Watanabe</surname> <given-names>W. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dean</surname> <given-names>L. A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1954</year>). <source>Estimation of available phosphorus in soil by extraction with sodium bicarbonate</source> (<publisher-loc>Washington, DC</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>USDA Circular 939. U.S. Government Printing Office</publisher-name>).</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B36">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Pang</surname> <given-names>J. Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bansal</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>H. X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bohuon</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lambers</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ryan</surname> <given-names>M. H.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>The carboxylate-releasing phosphorus-mobilizing strategy can be proxied by foliar manganese concentration in a large set of chickpea germplasm under low phosphorus supply</article-title>. <source>New Phytol.</source> <volume>219</volume>, <fpage>518</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>529</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/nph.15200</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B37">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Pe&#xf1;uelas</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Poulter</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sardans</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ciais</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>van der Velde</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bopp</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Human-induced nitrogen-phosphorus imbalances alter natural and managed ecosystems across the globe</article-title>. <source>Nat.Commun.</source> <volume>4</volume>, <fpage>29</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>34</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/ncomms3934</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B38">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Png</surname> <given-names>G. K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Turner</surname> <given-names>B. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Albornoz</surname> <given-names>F. E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hayes</surname> <given-names>P. E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lambers</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lalibert&#xe9;</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Greater root phosphatase activity in nitrogen-fixing rhizobial but not actinorhizal plants with declining phosphorus availability</article-title>. <source>J. Ecol.</source> <volume>105</volume>, <fpage>1246</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1255</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/1365-2745.12758</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B39">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Reed</surname> <given-names>S. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cleveland</surname> <given-names>C. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Townsend</surname> <given-names>A. R.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Functional ecology of free-living nitrogen fixation: a contemporary perspective</article-title>. <source>Ann. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst.</source> <volume>42</volume>, <fpage>489</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>512</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-102710-145034</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B40">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Reich</surname> <given-names>P. B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Oleksyn</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wright</surname> <given-names>I. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Niklas</surname> <given-names>K. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hedin</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Elser</surname> <given-names>J. J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>Evidence of a general 2/3-power law of scaling leaf nitrogen to phosphorus among major plant groups and biomes</article-title>. <source>Proc. R. Soc B.</source> <volume>277</volume>, <fpage>877</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>883</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1098/rspb.2009.1818</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B41">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ryan</surname> <given-names>M. N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tibbett</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Edmonds-Tibbett</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Suriyagoda</surname> <given-names>L. D. B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lambers</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cawthray</surname> <given-names>G. R.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Carbon trading for phosphorus gain: the balance between rhizosphere carboxylates and arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis in plant phosphorus acquisition</article-title>. <source>Plant Cell Environ.</source> <volume>35</volume>, <fpage>2170</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2180</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1365-3040.2012.02547.x</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B42">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Schade</surname> <given-names>J. D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kyle</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hobbie</surname> <given-names>S. E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fagan</surname> <given-names>W. F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Elser</surname> <given-names>J. J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2003</year>). <article-title>Stoichiometric tracking of soil nutrients by a desert insect herbivore</article-title>. <source>Ecol. Lett.</source> <volume>6</volume>, <fpage>96</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>101</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1046/j.1461-0248.2003.00409.x</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B43">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Schulze</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Drevon</surname> <given-names>J. J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2005</year>). <article-title>P-deficiency increases the O2 uptake per N2 reduced in alfalfa</article-title>. <source>J. Exp. Bot.</source> <volume>56</volume>, <fpage>1779</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1784</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/jxb/eri166</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B44">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Sparks</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Page</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Helmke</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Loeppert</surname> <given-names>R. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Soltanpour</surname> <given-names>P. N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tabatabai</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>1996</year>). <article-title>Nitrogen-inorganic forms: Methods of soil analysis: Part 3-chemical methods. (Soil Science Society of America, Inc., American Society of Agronomy, Inc.)</article-title> Charpter 37, <fpage>1085</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1121</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2136/sssabookser5.3</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B45">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Sulieman</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ha</surname> <given-names>C. V.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Schulze</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tran</surname> <given-names>L. S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Growth and nodulation of symbiotic <italic>Medicago truncatula</italic> at different levels of phosphorus availability</article-title>. <source>J. Exp. Bot.</source> <volume>64</volume>, <fpage>2701</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2712</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/jxb/ert122</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B46">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Sulieman</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tran</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Phosphorus homeostasis in legume nodules as an adaptive strategy to phosphorus deficiency</article-title>. <source>Plant Sci.</source> <volume>239</volume>, <fpage>36</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>43</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.plantsci.2015.06.018</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B47">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Thuynsma</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Valentine</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kleinert</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Phosphorus deficiency affects the allocation of below-ground resources to combined cluster roots and nodules in <italic>Lupinus albus</italic>, J</article-title>. <source>Plant Physiol.</source> <volume>171</volume>, <fpage>285</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>291</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jplph.2013.09.001</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B48">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Unkovich</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Herridge</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Peoples</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cadisch</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Boddey</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Giller</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>Measuring plant-associated nitrogen fixation in agricultural systems</article-title>. <source>Aust. Centre Int. Agric. Res. (ACIAR)</source>. Charpter 8, <fpage>132</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>162</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B49">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Vance</surname> <given-names>C. P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Uhde-Stone</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Allan</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2003</year>). <article-title>Phosphorus acquisition and use: critical adaptations by plants for securing a nonrenewable resource</article-title>. <source>New Phytol.</source> <volume>157</volume>, <fpage>423</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>447</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1046/j.1469-8137.2003.00695.x</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B50">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Vitousek</surname> <given-names>P. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Menge</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Reed</surname> <given-names>S. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cleveland</surname> <given-names>C. C.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Biological nitrogen fixation: rates, patterns and ecological controls in terrestrial ecosystems</article-title>. <source>Philos. Trans. R. Soc Lond. B. Biol. Sci.</source> <volume>368</volume>, <fpage>20130119</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1098/rstb.2013.0119</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B51">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gao</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Shao</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sun</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gao</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Enhancement of rhizosphere citric acid and decrease of NO<sub>3</sub>
<sup>&#x2013;</sup>/NH<sub>4</sub>
<sup>+</sup> ratio by root interactions facilitate n fixation and transfer</article-title>. <source>Plant Soil</source> <volume>477</volume>, <fpage>169</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>182</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B52">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>West</surname> <given-names>J. B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hillerislambers</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lee</surname> <given-names>T. D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hobbie</surname> <given-names>S. E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Reich</surname> <given-names>P. B.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2005</year>). <article-title>Legume species identity and soil nitrogen supply determine symbiotic nitrogen-fixation responses to elevated atmospheric [CO<sub>2</sub>]</article-title>. <source>New Phytol.</source> <volume>167</volume>, <fpage>523</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>530</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1469-8137.2005.01444.x</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B53">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>White</surname> <given-names>P. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hammond</surname> <given-names>J. P.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <source>The Ecophysiology of Plant-Phosphorus Interactions</source>. Charpter 4, Page <fpage>51</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>58</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B54">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wolf</surname> <given-names>A. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Funk</surname> <given-names>J. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Menge</surname> <given-names>D. N. L.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>The symbionts made me do it: legumes are not hardwired for high nitrogen concentrations but incorporate more nitrogen when inoculated</article-title>. <source>New Phytol.</source> <volume>213</volume>, <fpage>690</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>699</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/nph.14303</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B55">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Yu</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Elser</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cease</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Han</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Linking stoichiometric homeostasis with ecosystem structure, functioning, and stability</article-title>. <source>Ecol. Lett.</source> <volume>13</volume>, <fpage>1390</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1399</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1461-0248.2010.01532.x</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B56">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Yu</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Elser</surname> <given-names>J. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>He</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Stoichiometric homeostasis of vascular plants in the inner Mongolia grassland</article-title>. <source>Oecologia</source> <volume>166</volume>, <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>10</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00442-010-1902-z</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B57">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Yu</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wilcox</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pierre</surname> <given-names>K. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Knapp</surname> <given-names>A. K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Han</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Smith</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Stoichiometric homeostasis predicts plant species dominance, temporal stability and responses to global change</article-title>. <source>Ecology</source> <volume>96</volume>, <fpage>2328</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2335</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1890/14-1897.1</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B58">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zhan</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhu</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bai</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Nitrogen enrichment alters plant N:P stoichiometry and intensifies phosphorus limitation in a steppe ecosystem</article-title>. <source>Environ. Exp. Bot.</source> <volume>134</volume>, <fpage>21</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>32</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.envexpbot.2016.10.014</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B59">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zheng</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Luo</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mo</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Substrate stoichiometry determines nitrogen fixation throughout succession in southern Chinese forests</article-title>. <source>Ecol. Lett.</source> <volume>23</volume>, <fpage>336</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>347</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/ele.13437</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B60">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zheng</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Luo</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mo</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Global pattern and controls of biological nitrogen fixation under nutrient enrichment: A meta-analysis</article-title>. <source>Glob. Change Biol.</source> <volume>25</volume>, <fpage>3018</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>3030</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/gcb.14705</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B61">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cao</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>Rhizosphere acidification of faba bean, soybean and maize</article-title>. <source>Sci. Total Environ.</source> <volume>407</volume>, <fpage>4356</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>4362</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2009.02.006</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>