<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.3 20070202//EN" "journalpublishing.dtd">
<article xml:lang="EN" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" article-type="research-article">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Front. Plant Sci.</journal-id>
<journal-title>Frontiers in Plant Science</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">Front. Plant Sci.</abbrev-journal-title>
<issn pub-type="epub">1664-462X</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Frontiers Media S.A.</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpls.2022.892096</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Plant Science</subject>
<subj-group>
<subject>Original Research</subject>
</subj-group>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Aerosol Impacts on Water Relations of Camphor (<italic>Cinnamomum camphora</italic>)</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Chi</surname> <given-names>Chia-Ju Ellen</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1545282/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Zinsmeister</surname> <given-names>Daniel</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1711985/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Lai</surname> <given-names>I-Ling</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Chang</surname> <given-names>Shih-Chieh</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1635994/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Kuo</surname> <given-names>Yau-Lun</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4"><sup>4</sup></xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name><surname>Burkhardt</surname> <given-names>J&#x000FC;rgen</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="corresp" rid="c001"><sup>&#x0002A;</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/76556/overview"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="aff1"><sup>1</sup><institution>Institute of Crop Science and Resource Conservation, University of Bonn</institution>, <addr-line>Bonn</addr-line>, <country>Germany</country></aff>
<aff id="aff2"><sup>2</sup><institution>Graduate Institute of Bioresources, National Pingtung University of Science and Technology</institution>, <addr-line>Pingtung</addr-line>, <country>Taiwan</country></aff>
<aff id="aff3"><sup>3</sup><institution>Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Studies, Center for Interdisciplinary Research on Ecology and Sustainability, National Dong Hwa University</institution>, <addr-line>Hualien</addr-line>, <country>Taiwan</country></aff>
<aff id="aff4"><sup>4</sup><institution>Department of Forestry, National Pingtung University of Science and Technology</institution>, <addr-line>Pingtung</addr-line>, <country>Taiwan</country></aff>
<author-notes>
<fn fn-type="edited-by"><p>Edited by: Nacer Bellaloui, Agricultural Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture, United States</p></fn>
<fn fn-type="edited-by"><p>Reviewed by: Ling Pan, Sichuan Agricultural University, China; Mura Jyostna Devi, Agricultural Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture, United States</p></fn>
<corresp id="c001">&#x0002A;Correspondence: J&#x000FC;rgen Burkhardt <email>j.burkhardt&#x00040;uni-bonn.de</email></corresp>
<fn fn-type="other" id="fn001"><p>This article was submitted to Plant Nutrition, a section of the journal Frontiers in Plant Science</p></fn></author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>20</day>
<month>06</month>
<year>2022</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="collection">
<year>2022</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>13</volume>
<elocation-id>892096</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>08</day>
<month>03</month>
<year>2022</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>19</day>
<month>05</month>
<year>2022</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#x000A9; 2022 Chi, Zinsmeister, Lai, Chang, Kuo and Burkhardt.</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2022</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Chi, Zinsmeister, Lai, Chang, Kuo and Burkhardt</copyright-holder>
<license xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"><p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.</p></license> </permissions>
<abstract>
<p>Major parts of anthropogenic and natural aerosols are hygroscopic and deliquesce at high humidity, particularly when depositing to leaf surfaces close to transpiring stomata. Deliquescence and subsequent salt creep may establish thin, extraordinary pathways into the stomata, which foster stomatal uptake of nutrients and water but may also cause stomatal liquid water loss by wicking. Such additional water loss is not accompanied by a wider stomatal aperture with a larger CO<sub>2</sub> influx and hypothetically reduces water use efficiency (WUE). Here, the possible direct impacts of aerosols on physical and physiological parameters of camphor (<italic>Cinnamomum camphora</italic>) were studied (i) in a greenhouse experiment using aerosol exclusion and (ii) in a field study in Taiwan, comparing trees at two sites with different aerosol regimes. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images showed that leaves grown under aerosol exclusion in filtered air (FA) were lacking the amorphous, flat areas that were abundant on leaves grown in ambient air (AA), suggesting salt crusts formed from deliquescent aerosols. Increasing vapor pressure deficit (VPD) resulted in half the Ball-Berry slope and double WUE for AA compared to FA leaves. This apparent contradiction to the wicking hypothesis may be due to the independent, overcompensating effect of stomatal closure in response to VPD, which affects AA more than FA stomata. Compared to leaves in a more polluted region in the Taiwanese Southwest, NaCl aerosols dominated the leaf surface conditions on mature camphor trees in Eastern Taiwan, while the considerably lower contact angles and the 2.5 times higher minimum epidermal conductances might have come from organic surfactants. Interpretations of SEM images from leaf surface microstructures should consider amorphous areas as possible indicators of aerosol deposition and other hygroscopic material. The amount and type of the material determine the resulting impacts on plant water relations, together with the surrounding atmosphere and ecophysiological traits.</p></abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>stomatal conductance</kwd>
<kwd>vapor pressure deficit</kwd>
<kwd>water use efficiency</kwd>
<kwd>aerosol</kwd>
<kwd>Ball-Berry model</kwd>
<kwd>turgor loss point</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<contract-num rid="cn001">57440921 </contract-num>
<contract-sponsor id="cn001">Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst<named-content content-type="fundref-id">10.13039/501100001655</named-content></contract-sponsor>
<contract-sponsor id="cn002">Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft<named-content content-type="fundref-id">10.13039/501100001659</named-content></contract-sponsor>
<counts>
<fig-count count="5"/>
<table-count count="2"/>
<equation-count count="4"/>
<ref-count count="128"/>
<page-count count="18"/>
<word-count count="14565"/>
</counts>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec sec-type="intro" id="s1">
<title>1. Introduction</title>
<p>Atmospheric aerosols are liquid, solid, or mixed suspensions of heterogeneous chemical composition, ranging from a few nanometers to almost 100 &#x003BC;m in diameter (Burkhardt and Grantz, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">2017</xref>). Natural atmospheric aerosols can be beneficial for plants as they carry nutrients (Chadwick et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">1999</xref>), but in many regions aerosol concentrations are dominated by emissions from anthropogenic sources and may negatively influence both environments and organisms (Pariyar and Noga, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B89">2018</xref>). On both global and regional scales, previous studies have long focused on the indirect impacts that atmospheric aerosols bring to plants such as the impact on water cycle, changes in radiation balance, and nutrient transport (Mahowald et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B77">2017</xref>); it has been shown that the scattering of radiation caused by aerosols contributes to the photosynthesis efficiency of canopy and stem growth, and that the micro-environment near the ground also affects plant dry matter accumulation and water utilization (Liu et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B75">2016</xref>; Wang et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B114">2018</xref>). On the other hand, recent research has started paying more attention to the direct impact of aerosols on plants, mostly centering on the hygroscopic action of accumulated deposited aerosols on foliage. Hygroscopic particulate salts on leaf surfaces facilitate the formation of microscopic leaf wetness, may cause &#x0201C;wax degradation&#x0201D; symptoms, and affect the trace gas exchange in plants (Burkhardt and Pariyar, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">2014</xref>; Coopman et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">2021</xref>; Katata and Held, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B62">2021</xref>); moreover, the aerosols deposited close to transpiring stomata become mobile by deliquescence and form highly concentrated solutions that may enter the stomata and connect with the liquid water that forms the end of the hydraulic system. This process (i.e., hydraulic activation of stomata, HAS) leads to liquid stomatal water loss; it is not accompanied by larger stomatal aperture and compensating CO<sub>2</sub> influx, so it can be considered unproductive transpiration with a negative impact on water use efficiency (WUE; Burkhardt, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">2010</xref>; Song et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B105">2015</xref>; Burkhardt and Grantz, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">2017</xref>). However, such an impact has not been consistently confirmed by experiment (Pariyar et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B88">2013</xref>; Burkhardt and Pariyar, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">2016</xref>).</p>
<p>Since the hygroscopic action is proposed as a primary factor of aerosol impact on plants (Burkhardt et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">2018</xref>), and the stomata play a key role in the adaptation to changing environmental conditions (Berry et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">2010</xref>; Bauerle and Bowden, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">2011</xref>; Miner and Bauerle, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B82">2017</xref>), this study focused on the stomatal response to the impact of aerosols, as well as its consequences for plant water relations and CO<sub>2</sub> assimilation. Leaf-level physiological differences between <italic>Cinnamomum camphora</italic> (camphor) seedlings, grown under the exposure of aerosols and the elimination of aerosols, were compared, and similarly, the situation of mature camphor trees was studied at two Taiwanese field sites with different aerosol concentrations.</p>
<p>The camphor tree is a well-known versatile tree species growing in eastern Asia. The leaves are rich in bioactive compounds, and the extracted compounds are extensively used in medical treatments. With antifungal activities, the timbers of camphor are often used as building materials and furniture. Based on these characteristics and additional historical influences, camphor has become one of the most important evergreen species in Taiwan, as well as in many other tropical and subtropical areas close by Hsieh (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B58">1981</xref>); Zhou and Yan (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B128">2016</xref>); Li et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B72">2020</xref>). On the other hand, the regional aerosol distribution pattern in Taiwan is strongly related to industry, geography, and season. The high density of the population and the subsequent industrial development causes higher anthropogenic aerosol emissions in western Taiwan (Tsai and Kuo, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B110">2005</xref>; Kishcha et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B66">2018</xref>). Due to the natural barrier formed by the Central Mountain Range, eastern Taiwan has relatively small air pollution. The seasonal difference in aerosol concentrations is most likely caused by the meteorological phenomena that dominate the dispersion of aerosols, and particularly the NaCl concentration varies with distance to the sea (Tsai and Chen, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B109">2006</xref>; Chou et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">2010</xref>; Fang and Chang, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">2010</xref>). Based on the information above, the research species was chosen and the field sites in Taiwan were defined.</p>
<p>In this study, the aerosol loading of camphor leaves was accessed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and quantification of water soluble and insoluble particulate matter from leaf washing. The light saturated photosynthetic rate (A<sub><italic>sat</italic></sub>) and AC<sub><italic>i</italic></sub> response curves were measured in order to ensure the comparable photosynthetic performance of plants from different environments. The physiological responses to aerosols were determined by foliar carbon isotope discrimination (&#x003B4;<sup>13</sup>C) as a long term measure of WUE (Condon et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">1992</xref>; Cabrera-Bosquet et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">2007</xref>); the minimum leaf conductance (g<sub><italic>min</italic></sub>) as an indicator of uncontrollable water loss and, together with the leaf water potential at turgor loss (&#x003C0;<sub><italic>tlp</italic></sub>), as indicators of drought tolerance (Mar&#x000E9;chaux et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B79">2015</xref>; Duursma et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">2019</xref>); and the proline accumulation as an additional indicator of osmotic adjustment to water deficit (Bates et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">1973</xref>; Dolatabadian et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">2008</xref>). The results of the gas exchange measurements were then introduced into the semi-empirical Ball-Berry model, which in the original form uses the relative humidity on the leaf surface and is coupled to a photosynthesis model (Farquhar et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B46">1980</xref>; Ball et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">1987</xref>). This model has been found to reflect differences in drought stress conditions between plants, and the slope factor g<sub>1</sub> is inversely related to both WUE and carbon isotope composition during carbon assimilation (Knauer et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B67">2017</xref>; Miner and Bauerle, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B82">2017</xref>; Miner et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B83">2017</xref>). The attraction of aerosols to water vapor might affect modeling outputs, mainly because the HAS mechanism creates a parallel transpiration pathway of liquid water, while the model relies on equivalent pathways of water vapor and CO<sub>2</sub> (Aphalo and Jarvis, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">1993</xref>; Monteith, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B85">1995</xref>; Burkhardt, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">2010</xref>). The original objective of this first study on aerosol- and HAS-caused effects under field conditions was the identification of physiological responses to aerosols on <italic>C. camphora</italic> in two field sites with different aerosol regimes, and their confirmation and explanation under greenhouse conditions with seedlings of the same species in filtered versus unfiltered air. Although the results did not follow the initial expectations, the study still found differential support for aerosol caused physiological responses under both field and greenhouse conditions.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="materials and methods" id="s2">
<title>2. Materials and Methods</title>
<sec>
<title>2.1. Materials Preparation and Sampling Design</title>
<sec>
<title>2.1.1. Plant Material</title>
<p>Eight seedlings of camphor were prepared with an initial height of circa 60 cm. All the present leaves were marked non-destructively before the seedlings were assigned randomly and equally into one of two greenhouses for research. After the placement, all seedlings were irrigated regularly, pruned properly due to the spatial restriction, and fertilized every other week with a complete nutrient solution including micro-nutrients (Ferty 3; Planta Duengemittel GmbH, Hohenstauf, Germany). All measurements were obtained at 12&#x02013;24 months after the seedlings were placed respectively into the greenhouses, with the plant height circa 150 cm, and only using leaves that developed inside the greenhouses.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>2.1.2. Greenhouse Growing Environment</title>
<p>The main research of this study was held in the greenhouses at the Institute of Crop Science and Resource Conservation of the University of Bonn, Germany. The two adjacent greenhouses were located on the margin of an urban area, near a multi-lane highway. One greenhouse was ventilated with ambient air (hereinafter called AA), and the other one was ventilated with filtered air (hereinafter called FA), with only about 1% of ambient aerosols remaining, representing the particles-removed environment (Grantz et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B51">2018</xref>). The total aerosol concentrations were monitored by a cloud chamber condensation nuclei counter (TSI 3783; TSI, Shoreview, MN, USA). The relative humidity and temperature of the greenhouses were recorded every minute by a Tinytag data logger (TGP 4017, 1-Kanal Temperatur Datenlogger, Sensor NTC; Gemini, RS Components GmbH, Germany), showing that the environmental parameters and conditions besides the concentration of aerosols were very similar in both greenhouses (AA: 14.35 &#x000B1; 6.66&#x000B0;C, 58.81 &#x000B1; 16.58%RH, VPD: circa 0.86 kPa; FA: 13.48 &#x000B1; 7.10&#x000B0;C, 51.79 &#x000B1; 16.45%RH, VPD: circa 0.95 kPa).</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>2.1.3. Field Sites in Taiwan</title>
<p>In addition to the greenhouse study, two sites with camphor tree plantations were chosen to verify and compare the results with. According to previous long-term monitoring results (between 2008 and 2016), the southwestern region is likely to have a higher PM<sub>2.5</sub> concentration (49.14 &#x000B1; 15.95 &#x003BC;g/m<sup>3</sup>) than the eastern region (15.62 &#x000B1; 8.73 &#x003BC;g/m<sup>3</sup>), especially during winter time (Chen et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">2018</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">2020</xref>; Ho et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B57">2020</xref>; Wang et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B115">2021</xref>). Therefore, the two plantations which are located in Pingtung county (southwestern Taiwan) and Hualien county (eastern Taiwan) were chosen for the field research. Both sites are afforestation after the abandonment of a long history of sugarcane plantation and are composed of circa 15 endemic broad-leaf tree species. The 675 ha Pingtung site was planted since 2006, while the 1,250 ha Hualien site was planted since 2002. On both sites the plantations are managed and owned by the Taiwan Sugar Corporation. In order to understand the growth status of plants and their contribution to carbon sequestration, flux towers were built and research instruments were installed for monitoring (Wu et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B117">2015</xref>; Maneke-Fiegenbaum et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B78">2018</xref>). The canopies of camphor trees were accessed by the existing scaffoldings. In Pingtung site 3 camphor trees were accessible (7 December to 13 December 2019), and in Hualien site 4 camphor trees were accessible (28 November to 4 December 2019).</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>2.1.4. Sampling Design and Data Analysis</title>
<p>An overview of measured parameters is given in <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">Table 1</xref>. The investigations tackled physical and physiological processes, which affected statistical procedures. Measurements of physical parameters (aerosol loading, contact angle, SEM) were evaluated as single leaf data in each treatment; while measurements of physiological parameters (A<sub><italic>sat</italic></sub>, AC<sub><italic>i</italic></sub> fitting data, &#x003B4;<sup>13</sup>C, g<sub><italic>min</italic></sub>, &#x003C0;<sub><italic>tlp</italic></sub>, water potential, proline concentration, g<sub><italic>sw</italic></sub> to VPD, Ball-Berry model) were evaluated with the mean value of each individual tree, then further compared between treatments. Statistical analysis was performed using R Studio (R version 4.0.3). Shapiro-Wilk test was used as a normality test for distributed data, and <italic>F</italic>-test was performed for comparing two variances. For normally distributed data, the significance of differences between different groups was estimated by using the Student&#x00027;s <italic>t</italic>-test. For data with non-normal distribution, statistical analysis was performed with the non-parametric method using Wilcoxon-Mann&#x02013;Whitney <italic>U</italic>-test to find out the differences between groups. In all statistical analyses, the differences were considered significant if the <italic>p</italic> &#x0003C; 0.05.</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="T1">
<label>Table 1</label>
<caption><p>An overview of <italic>Cinnamomum camphora</italic> measurements in the greenhouses and the fields.</p></caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead><tr>
<th/>
<th valign="top" align="center" colspan="2" style="border-bottom: thin solid #000000;"><bold>Greenhouse</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center" colspan="2" style="border-bottom: thin solid #000000;"><bold>Field</bold></th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="top" align="left"><bold>Measurement</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="left"><bold>Ambient air (AA)</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="left"><bold>Filtered air (FA)</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="left"><bold>Pingtung</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="left"><bold>Hualien</bold></th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">A<sub><italic>sat</italic></sub></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">v</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">v</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">v</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">v</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">AC<sub><italic>i</italic></sub> fitting parameters</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">v</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">v</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">v</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">v</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">SEM</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">v</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">v</td>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Particulate matter</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">v</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">v</td>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Dissolvable aerosols</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">v</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">v</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">v</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">v</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">g<sub><italic>min</italic></sub></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">v</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">v</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">v</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">v</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x003B4;<sup>13</sup>C</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">v</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">v</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">v</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">v</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x003C0;<sub><italic>tlp</italic></sub></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">v</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">v</td>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Water potential (predawn, noon)</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="left">v</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">v</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">g<sub><italic>sw</italic></sub> to VPD curves</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">v</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">v</td>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Contact angle</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">v</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">v</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">v</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">v</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Proline content</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">v</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">v</td>
<td/>
<td/>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<p><italic>The measurements include light saturated net photosynthetic rate (A<sub>sat</sub>), photosynthetic parameters fitted from AC<sub>i</sub> response curve (the response of net CO<sub>2</sub> assimilation to the CO<sub>2</sub> concentration in the intercellular airspaces of the leaf), scanning electron microscopy images (SEM), aerosol loading evaluation (the concentration of not dissolvable particulate matter and dissolvable aerosols), minimum leaf conductance (g<sub>min</sub>), carbon isotope composition (&#x003B4;<sup>13</sup>C), water potential at predawn, noon, turgor loss (&#x003C0;<sub>tlp</sub>), the response curve of stomatal conductance (g<sub>sw</sub>) to vapor pressure deficit at leaf temperature (VPD), contact angle, and proline content</italic>.</p>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>2.2. Methodologies and Experimental Design</title>
<sec>
<title>2.2.1. Scanning Electron Microscopy</title>
<p>The amount and behavior of deposited aerosols on leaf surfaces were visualized by scanning electron microscopy (SEM, Leo 1450 VP, Zeiss, Jena, Germany), in the Nees Institute for Biodiversity of Plants of the University of Bonn, Germany (conducted in May 2021). Fresh leaves were obtained from camphor seedlings grown in AA and FA greenhouses and transferred immediately into the laboratory. All samples were taken from fully expanded and dark-green leaves from the 120 cm height of the plants. Due to the requirement of a conductive coating on the surface of samples, the samples of both adaxial and abaxial sides were covered by a commonly-used palladium coating for high-vacuum SEM imaging (Achneck et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">2010</xref>). While interpreting the SEM images, the edges of the pictures were avoided due to the possible instabilities caused by the limitation and disturbance from the instrument.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>2.2.2. Aerosol Loading</title>
<p>The concentration of deposited aerosols on leaf surfaces was determined by foliar rinsing. Each leaf sample was taken pictures before placing into falcon tubes with 40 ml of Millipore water. Without the petiole steeped in the deionized water, falcon tubes were brought to ultrasonic baths (SONOREX, BANDELIN electronic GmbH &#x00026; Co. KG, Berlin, Germany) for 5 min at 30&#x000B0;C. After taking out the washed leaves, the solution in each falcon tube was filtered with a pore size 0.45 &#x003BC;m and outer diameter 33 mm syringe filter (Carl Roth GmbH &#x00026; Co. KG, Karlsruhe, Germany) in order to remove the not dissolvable particulate matter (Dzier&#x0017C;anowski et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B42">2011</xref>; Chen et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">2022</xref>). The filter was weighed before and after filtering to measure the amount of not dissolvable particulate matter deposited on leaf surfaces. The ion concentrations of the solution in falcon tubes were then measured using ion chromatography (Cl<sup>&#x02212;</sup>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1"><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>NO</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>3</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M2"><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>SO</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>4</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:math></inline-formula>), atomic absorption spectrometer (Mg<sup>2&#x0002B;</sup>), flame photometer (Na<sup>&#x0002B;</sup>, K<sup>&#x0002B;</sup>, Ca<sup>2&#x0002B;</sup>), and a continuous flow analyzer with photometric detection (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M3"><mml:msubsup><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>NH</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>4</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&#x0002B;</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:math></inline-formula>) (Burkhardt and Pariyar, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">2016</xref>). For calculating the ion concentration based on the unit of certain leaf area (including both adaxial and abaxial sides of leaf surface), ImageJ was used to analyze the leaf area of samples (Schneider et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B97">2012</xref>; Grantz et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B51">2018</xref>). The measurements of the greenhouse study were conducted in March 2021 (AA: <italic>n</italic> = 12, FA: <italic>n</italic> = 9); field research was in November to December 2019 (Pingtung: <italic>n</italic> = 17, Hualien: <italic>n</italic> = 12).</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>2.2.3. Contact Angle</title>
<p>In the greenhouse study, contact angles of 1-&#x003BC;l droplets of water on the cuticles were measured by a goniometer (DSA 30E; Kruess GmbH, Hamburg, Germany). Fully expanded fresh leaves were harvested from a 120 cm height of camphor seedlings in both greenhouse AA and FA (AA: <italic>n</italic> = 12, FA: <italic>n</italic> = 9; conducted in February 2021). The surface tension of the solution was determined by the pendant drop method and shown as angles (Burkhardt et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">2012</xref>). In the field research in December 2018 (Pingtung: <italic>n</italic> = 8, Hualien: <italic>n</italic> = 16), the droplets of water were manually applied on the leaf surfaces and the images were captured by a portable microscope (DigiMicro Profi, dnt Innovation GmbH, Germany). The contact angles were then calculated with ImageJ (Schneider et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B97">2012</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>2.2.4. Photosynthetic Parameters</title>
<p>Photosynthetic light response curve and AC<sub><italic>i</italic></sub> response curve [the response of net CO<sub>2</sub> assimilation (A) to the CO<sub>2</sub> concentration in the intercellular airspaces of the leaf (C<sub><italic>i</italic></sub>)] were measured by LI-6400 and LI-6800 Portable Photosynthesis System (LI-COR Biosciences, Lincoln, NE, USA) on fully expanded leaves at 120 cm height. For the light response curve, measurements began with the saturating irradiance (1,400 &#x003BC;mol m<sup>&#x02212;2</sup> s<sup>&#x02212;1</sup>) followed by the reductions of 1,400, 550, 200, 100, 50, 20 &#x003BC;mol m<sup>&#x02212;2</sup> s<sup>&#x02212;1</sup>, until the irradiance was 0 &#x003BC;mol m<sup>&#x02212;2</sup> s<sup>&#x02212;1</sup>. The other environmental settings remained as leaf temperature close to environment temperature, leaf vapor pressure deficit (VPD<sub><italic>leaf</italic></sub>) circa 1.5&#x02013;2 kPa, and chamber CO<sub>2</sub> concentration 400 &#x003BC;mol mol<sup>&#x02212;1</sup>. Light saturated net photosynthetic rate (A<sub><italic>sat</italic></sub>) was then defined as the net CO<sub>2</sub> assimilation (A) at irradiance 1,400 &#x003BC;mol m<sup>&#x02212;2</sup> s<sup>&#x02212;1</sup> (Herrick and Thomas, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B56">1999</xref>; Oliveira and Pe&#x000F1;uelas, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B87">2005</xref>; Sazeides et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B96">2021</xref>). On the other hand, before measuring the AC<sub><italic>i</italic></sub> response curve, leaves were acclimated to saturating irradiance (1,400 &#x003BC;mol m<sup>&#x02212;2</sup> s<sup>&#x02212;1</sup>) for 30 min with leaf temperature 20&#x000B0;C, VPD<sub><italic>leaf</italic></sub> 1.5 kPa, and flow rate 300 &#x003BC;mol s<sup>&#x02212;1</sup>. Without changing the above environmental settings, net CO<sub>2</sub> assimilation rate (A) was measured at a sequence of chamber CO<sub>2</sub> concentrations: 400, 300, 200, 100, 50, 400, 400, 400, 600, 800, 1,000, 1,200, 1,600, 2,000 &#x003BC;mol mol<sup>&#x02212;1</sup> (Feng and Dietze, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B47">2013</xref>). Afterward, maximum carboxylation rate of Rubisco (V<sub><italic>cmax</italic></sub>), maximum rate of electron transport for the given light intensity (J), maximum rate of triose phosphate use (TPU), daytime respiration (R<sub><italic>d</italic></sub>), and mesophyll conductance to CO<sub>2</sub> transfer (g<sub><italic>m</italic></sub>) were fitted with an Excel spreadsheet tool published in previous research (Sharkey et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B101">2007</xref>). The measurements of the greenhouse study were conducted in May 2021 (<italic>n</italic> = 4); field research was in November to December 2019 (Pingtung: <italic>n</italic> = 3, Hualien: <italic>n</italic> = 4).</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>2.2.5. Carbon Dioxide Discrimination</title>
<p>The carbon isotope composition was measured with an isotope ratio mass spectrometer (IRMS, C-N-S Analyzer, and MS-2020; SerCon Ltd., Crewe, UK). Three leaves from 120 cm height of camphor seedlings were taken for each sample. The harvested leaves were dried in a laboratorial oven at 60&#x000B0;C for 1 week to reach the absolute dry weight and were ground to a fine powder. 1&#x000B1;0.1 mg of ground samples were weighed with an electronic micro-balance (M2P, Sartorius Lab Instruments GmbH &#x00026; Co. KG, Goettingen, Germany) and loaded into tin capsules. During operation in the C-N-S Analyzer, the tin capsule reached 1,800&#x000B0;C and fell into the combustion furnace as CO<sub>2</sub> was injected. Soon after oxidation, the sample went through a purification process (Cr<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>, CuO, Ag-wool layer) with He carrier gas, in order to assure the complete oxidation and removal of unnecessary S in the sample. The sample then passed through the reduction furnace containing Cu at 600&#x000B0;C, where the excess CO<sub>2</sub> and H<sub>2</sub>O were removed. The resulting gas stream was carried to a gas chromatography column and then the separated CO<sub>2</sub> was brought to the mass spectrometer. During operation in the mass spectrometer, the inlet gas stream was ionized as an ion beam and was separated by a permanent magnet while passing through the passage, and then reached the final isotope detector. From the ratio of signals which were collected at the detector, the <sup>13</sup>C value was calculated. The carbon isotope composition (&#x003B4;<sup>13</sup>C) was then calculated by comparison to a standard (Condon et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">2002</xref>; Burkhardt and Pariyar, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">2016</xref>). The measurements of the greenhouse study were conducted in March 2021 (<italic>n</italic> = 3); field research was in November to December 2019 (Pingtung: <italic>n</italic> = 3, Hualien: <italic>n</italic> = 4).</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>2.2.6. Minimum Leaf Conductance</title>
<p>The samples of camphor were taken from fresh leaves and then immediately brought to the lab (<italic>n</italic> = 4; conducted in March 2021). After sealing the basis of the petiole to prevent the water loss from the petiole, the samples were labeled and the pictures of leaf surfaces were taken for calculating the leaf area with a known scale by ImageJ (Schneider et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B97">2012</xref>). During dehydration, the samples were hung on a framework with proper spaces separating the leaves in a ventilated fume hood. The samples were weighed on a digital semi-micro balance (EX125M, EXPLORER<sup>&#x024C7;</sup> SEMI-MICRO, Ohaus Corporation, Parsippany, NJ, USA) once an hour, meanwhile both the temperature and humidity of the drying environment were continuously recorded by a Tinytag data logger. This process was repeated for about 72 h, with 6&#x02013;8 measurements in the linear part of the regression line. The modified Arden Buck equation (Buck, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">1981</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">1996</xref>) was used to calculate the saturated vapor pressure (VP<sub><italic>sat</italic></sub>, kPa). Together with the leaf drying weight, relative humidity, temperature, and leaf area, g<sub><italic>min</italic></sub> values were finally calculated by the spreadsheet tool (Sack and Scoffoni, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B93">2011</xref>). The mean g<sub><italic>min</italic></sub> value of each sample was calculated by the 6&#x02013;8 measurements from the linear part of the regression line in the graph, which was supposed to be close to the g<sub><italic>min</italic></sub> value calculated by the slope in the graph. In order to compare the differences between different groups, the g<sub><italic>min</italic></sub> values were then statistically analyzed.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>2.2.7. Leaf Water Potential</title>
<p>The leaf water potential at turgor loss (&#x003C0;<sub><italic>tlp</italic></sub>) is strongly related to plant drought tolerance (Mar&#x000E9;chaux et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B79">2015</xref>). Instead of the standard pressure&#x02013;volume (p&#x02013;v) curve approach, using an osmometer is one of the most rapid and reliable methods to predict &#x003C0;<sub><italic>tlp</italic></sub> (Bartlett et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">2012a</xref>). In the greenhouse study (AA: <italic>n</italic> = 4, FA: <italic>n</italic> = 3; conducted in March 2021), branches from a certain height of the plants were cut and quickly placed into water, and then cut again underwater at least 2 cm distal to the original cut. This standard pre-treatment of rehydration was covered by a black plastic bag and performed overnight (from sunset to shortly after sunrise) 1 day before measuring. The next morning, the branches were wrapped slightly in a wet paper towel and placed in zipper bags while transferring to the lab. The bags were then stored in the fridge, with only one leaf sample taken out each time for measurements. One leaf disc was taken from one mature and fully expanded leaf per branch. The discs were taken in the middle between the midrib and margin and between the leaf tip and base, using a 6 mm diameter cork borer and avoiding secondary veins. The leaf disc was then immediately folded inside the foil square (3 &#x000D7; 3 cm<sup>2</sup>) and frozen in liquid nitrogen for 2 min in order to fracture the cell walls. Afterward, the leaf disc was punctured using tweezers 10&#x02013;12 times and then rapidly sealed in the vapor pressure osmometer (VAPRO 5600, Wescor, Inc, Logan, UT, USA). The osmolality (mmol kg<sup>&#x02212;1</sup>) was measured after the values reached equilibrium (8&#x02013;12 min waiting time). The osmotic potential (&#x003C0;<sub><italic>o</italic></sub>) was then calculated by using osmolality obtained from the vapor pressure osmometer of freeze-thawed leaf discs, following Van&#x00027;t Hoff Equation (1) which relates solute concentration to vapor pressure:</p>
<disp-formula id="E1"><label>(1)</label><mml:math id="M4"><mml:mtable class="eqnarray" columnalign="right center left"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>&#x003C0;</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>o</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>C</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>o</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>&#x000D7;</mml:mo><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#x000D7;</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>
<p>where C<sub><italic>o</italic></sub> is the molar solute concentration (mmol kg<sup>&#x02212;1</sup>), R is the universal gas constant 8.3144598E-0.6 (m<sup>3</sup> MPa K<sup>&#x02212;1</sup> mol<sup>&#x02212;1</sup>), T is the temperature (K) (Khare, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B65">2015</xref>). Due to the strong correlation between &#x003C0;<sub><italic>o</italic></sub> and &#x003C0;<sub><italic>tlp</italic></sub> (Bartlett et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">2012a</xref>), &#x003C0;<sub><italic>tlp</italic></sub> was then calculated from &#x003C0;<sub><italic>o</italic></sub> by using the adapted regression Equation (2) from previous research (Bartlett et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">2012b</xref>; Sj&#x000F6;man et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B104">2015</xref>; Banks and Hirons, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">2019</xref>):</p>
<disp-formula id="E2"><label>(2)</label><mml:math id="M5"><mml:mtable class="eqnarray" columnalign="right center left"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>&#x003C0;</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>l</mml:mi><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>0</mml:mn><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mn>2554</mml:mn><mml:mo>&#x0002B;</mml:mo><mml:mn>1</mml:mn><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><mml:mn>1243</mml:mn><mml:mo>&#x000D7;</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>&#x003C0;</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>o</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>
<p>where the <italic>R</italic><sup>2</sup> of this &#x003C0;<sub><italic>tlp</italic></sub> prediction from &#x003C0;<sub><italic>o</italic></sub> is proposed as 0.91.</p>
<p>In the field study, the leaf water potential was measured at predawn and noon time in the Pingtung site and Hualien site (<italic>n</italic> = 3 and 4, respectively). A small twig with leaves was cut off from individual camphor trees with aluminum foil slightly wrapped in order to prevent water loss; the twig was then immediately transferred into Scholander Pressure Chamber (Model 3005, Soil Moisture Equipment Corp., Santa Barbara, CA, USA) for measuring (Pariyar et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B88">2013</xref>; Kuo et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B69">2017</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>2.2.8. Proline Concentration</title>
<p>Fully expanded fresh leaves were harvested from a 120 cm height of camphor seedlings in both greenhouse AA and FA (AA: <italic>n</italic> = 4, FA: <italic>n</italic> = 3; conducted in April 2021). Five samples were taken from each seedling, and each sample contained 1&#x02013;2 leaves depending on the leaf size. Samples were placed separately in zipper bags at &#x02212;20&#x000B0;C for deep-freezing. Afterward, samples were freeze-dried for 2 days under vacuum without thawing (ALPHA 1-4 LDplus/ALPHA 2-4 LDplus, Martin Christ Gefriertrocknungsanlagen GmbH, Osterode am Harz, Germany). The samples were then ground into a fine powder (Mixer Mill MM 301, Retsch GmbH, Haan, Germany) and weighed 100 mg per sample with an analytical balance (BP 210 S, Sartorius Lab Instruments GmbH &#x00026; Co. KG, Goettingen, Germany).</p>
<p>For the extraction, 3 ml of 3% sulfosalicylic acid was added to each sample. The samples were then shaken for 20 s and centrifuged at room temperature for 20 min at 4,200 rpm. For each sample, 2 ml of supernatant solution, 2 ml of glacial acetic acid (100%), and 2 ml of ninhydrin acid solution (ninhydrin mixed with glacial acetic acid and orthophosphoric acid) were mixed in a clean test tube. After being shaken homogeneously, the samples were placed in a hot-bath (100&#x000B0;C) for 1 h to boost the chemical reaction and then brought into an ice-bath to stop the chemical reaction until they reached room temperature. Four milliliters of toluene was added to each test tube, and the test tube was closed tightly with a rubber plug before mixed on a vortex mixer for 30 s. In order to get stratification, the test tube was left standing for 15 min until the toluene and aqueous phases were separated distinctly. The toluene phase (red-colored, upper part) was then carefully transferred into a half micro-acryl cuvette, and the absorbance of the solution was measured with a spectrophotometer at wavelength 520 nm (Lambda 35 UV/Vis Spectrophotometer, Perkin Elmer LAS GmbH, Solingen, Germany). The concentration of proline was calculated from a proline standard curve following Equation (3) and was expressed as &#x003BC;eq g<sup>&#x02212;1</sup> dry matter (Dolatabadian et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">2008</xref>; Pariyar and Noga, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B89">2018</xref>).</p>
<disp-formula id="E3"><label>(3)</label><mml:math id="M6"><mml:mtable class="eqnarray" columnalign="right center left"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi>o</mml:mi><mml:mi>l</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mtext>&#x000A0;</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>&#x003BC;</mml:mi><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi>o</mml:mi><mml:mi>l</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mrow><mml:mi>g</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>A</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>520</mml:mn><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#x000D7;</mml:mo><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mo>&#x000D7;</mml:mo><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi>F</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>M</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi>o</mml:mi><mml:mi>l</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mi>e</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>&#x000D7;</mml:mo><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi>l</mml:mi><mml:mi>e</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>
<p>In Equation (3), A<sub>520<italic>nm</italic></sub> is the absorbance of the solution at wavelength 520 nm, a and b are the coefficients of slope and intercept from the linear equation (<italic>y</italic> &#x0003D; <italic>ax</italic>&#x0002B;<italic>b</italic>) of the standard proline concentrations gradient curve, V is the volume of sulfosalicylic acid (3 ml), DF is the dilution factor (1.5), the ratio of sulfosalicylic acid and supernatant solution, M<sub><italic>proline</italic></sub> is the molecular weight of proline (115.5 g mol<sup>&#x02212;1</sup>), and Wt is the weight of the initial sample (0.1 g).</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>2.2.9. Stomatal Conductance to Water Vapor</title>
<p>The gas exchange measurements were conducted in the greenhouses during cloudy days in winter (February 2021) in order to reduce the influence of circadian changes (Grantz et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B51">2018</xref>). The response curve of stomatal conductance (g<sub><italic>sw</italic></sub>) to vapor pressure deficit at leaf temperature (VPD) was determined using a steady-state gas exchange system (LI-6800). The photosynthetic photon flux density (PPFD) incident on the leaf (i.e., Q<sub><italic>in</italic></sub>) was set as 500 &#x003BC;mol m<sup>&#x02212;2</sup> s<sup>&#x02212;1</sup> to avoid over saturation. Sample cell CO<sub>2</sub> concentration was set as 400 &#x003BC;mol mol<sup>&#x02212;1</sup>, flow rate to the chamber as 300 &#x003BC;mol s<sup>&#x02212;1</sup>, chamber fan rotation rate as 14,500 rpm, and leaf temperature as 15&#x000B0;C (evaluated by the ambient environment and temperature restriction). Considering the sensibility of g<sub><italic>sw</italic></sub> to changing VPD and the instrument limitation of CO<sub>2</sub> supply, the sample was measured at a stepwise sequence of VPD: 0.50, 0.75, 1.00, 1.25, 1.50 kPa. Before switching to the next VPD set point, the gas analyzers of the sample and reference were matched to assure accuracy and stability. With each VPD, measurements were recorded every minute until the photosynthetic parameters reached equilibrium, resulting in a 40-min to 2-h acclimation. For data collection, the mean of the last 10 measurements of each VPD was taken for further statistical analysis. Not only the response curve of stomatal conductance to increasing vapor pressure deficit was displayed, but also the parameter g<sub><italic>sw</italic></sub> was performed according to the Ball-Berry model (Equation 4). This model presents g<sub><italic>sw</italic></sub> as a function of assimilation (A<sub><italic>n</italic></sub>), relative humidity (H<sub><italic>s</italic></sub>), and CO<sub>2</sub> concentration at the leaf surface (C<sub><italic>s</italic></sub>).</p>
<disp-formula id="E4"><label>(4)</label><mml:math id="M7"><mml:mtable class="eqnarray" columnalign="right center left"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>g</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mi>w</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>g</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>&#x000D7;</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>A</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>&#x000D7;</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>s</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>C</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>s</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac><mml:mo>&#x0002B;</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>g</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>
<p>The g<sub><italic>sw</italic></sub> results from the linear approach, where the slope constant (g<sub>1</sub>) is the slope of the relationship between g<sub><italic>sw</italic></sub> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M8"><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>A</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>&#x000A0;</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mtext>&#x000A0;</mml:mtext></mml:math></inline-formula>H<sub><italic>s</italic></sub>/C<sub><italic>s</italic></sub> (i.e., Ball Index), and g<sub>0</sub> comes from the intercept when A<sub><italic>n</italic></sub> is zero. The slope represents a compromise between the costs and benefits of g<sub><italic>sw</italic></sub> relative to the photosynthetic activity of the leaf (Ball et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">1987</xref>; Medlyn et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B81">2017</xref>; Miner and Bauerle, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B82">2017</xref>).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="results" id="s3">
<title>3. Results</title>
<sec>
<title>3.1. SEM Images</title>
<p>Scanning electron microscopy images in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figure 1</xref> show the cuticular and stomatal patterns on abaxial surfaces of <italic>C. camphora</italic> leaves, with clear differences in the microstructures of AA leaves (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figures 1A,C</xref>) compared to FA leaves (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figures 1B,D</xref>). On the surfaces of AA leaves, there are more particles deposited visibly, which are shown as non-transparent, brighter, and randomly distributed granules in the SEM images, compared to FA. Flat, amorphous areas are only observed on AA leaf surfaces (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figures 1A,C</xref>), and may indicate salt crusts resulting from hygroscopic aerosols after deliquescence. Around these flat areas, the wax crystals are faintly covered; additionally, the original wax structures of stomata and epidermal cells are changed in AA leaves. In <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figure 1C</xref>, it is visible that the arrangement of wax on the stomata and surrounding cells is less neatly distributed than in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figure 1D</xref>. Their appearance supports the hypothesis of the hygroscopic layer formed by deliquescent aerosols, which resulted in the overall impression of more disturbed surfaces, less defined stomatal structures, and a less visible stomata distribution for AA compared to FA leaves.</p>
<fig id="F1" position="float">
<label>Figure 1</label>
<caption><p>Scanning electron microscopy images showing the stomata patterns on the abaxial surface of <italic>Cinnamomum camphora</italic>, with magnification 500x and 2,500x. <bold>(A,C)</bold> are from AA leaves (the greenhouse with ambient air) and <bold>(B,D)</bold> are from FA leaves (the greenhouse with filtered air). Flat, amorphous areas in <bold>(A,C)</bold> are probably caused by deliquescent, hygroscopic aerosols. Such an area is, e.g., in <bold>(A)</bold> above the left part of the 50 &#x003BC;m scale.</p></caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-13-892096-g0001.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>3.2. Deposited Aerosol Concentration on Leaf Surfaces</title>
<p><xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">Table 2</xref> shows the concentration of not dissolvable particulate matter and the overall amount of dissolvable aerosols deposited on leaf surfaces in greenhouse AA and FA, each number referring to the total adaxial and abaxial leaf area. The weight of not dissolvable particulate matter deposited on AA leaves was higher than on FA leaves, with the comparable median value of 3.59 &#x003BC;g/cm<sup>2</sup> (<italic>n</italic> = 12) and 1.40 &#x003BC;g/cm<sup>2</sup> (<italic>n</italic> = 9), respectively. The total amount of dissolvable aerosols in AA was more than 9 times higher than in FA. The ratio of not dissolvable particulate matter to total deposited aerosol amount within a square centimeter in AA is 74%, and in FA is 93%. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figure 2A</xref> details the ionic composition of the dissolvable aerosols, respectively. Nitrate, sulfate, and chloride are the dominant compounds of aerosol deposition in AA, while Na, K, Mg, and ammonium are the subordinate ones. In FA, the concentration of chloride, sulfate, and K is relatively higher than the other ions. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figure 2B</xref> shows the concentration of dissolvable aerosols deposited on leaf surfaces from field sites in Taiwan. The dominant compounds in Pingtung are K and Cl, which are much higher than the concentration of nitrate, sulfate, and ammonium. Mg and Na show a value close to zero of the concentration in Pingtung. A different distribution pattern is found in Hualien, with Cl having the highest concentration, followed by Na, sulfate, K, Mg, nitrate, and ammonium. Although there are differences between compound species in Pingtung and Hualien, the total concentration of dissolvable deposited aerosols in Pingtung (1.54 &#x000B1; 0.142 &#x003BC;g/cm<sup>2</sup>, <italic>n</italic> = 17) is not significantly higher than in Hualien (1.26 &#x000B1; 0.132 &#x003BC;g/cm<sup>2</sup>, <italic>n</italic> = 12).</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="T2">
<label>Table 2</label>
<caption><p>Measurements of <italic>Cinnamomum camphora</italic> leaves from different growing environments.</p></caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead><tr>
<th/>
<th/>
<th valign="top" align="center" colspan="3" style="border-bottom: thin solid #000000;"><bold>Greenhouse</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center" colspan="3" style="border-bottom: thin solid #000000;"><bold>Field</bold></th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th/>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="top" align="left"><bold>Measurement</bold></th>
<th/>
</tr>
<tr>
<th/>
<th/>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>AA</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>FA</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>Significance</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>Pingtung</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="center"><bold>Hualien</bold></th>
<th valign="top" align="left"><bold>Significance</bold></th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">A<sub><italic>sat</italic></sub></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">(&#x003BC;mol m<sup>&#x02212;2</sup> s<sup>&#x02212;1</sup>)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">6.70 &#x000B1; 0.90</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">7.29 &#x000B1; 1.37</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><italic>p</italic> = 0.731</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">12.30 &#x000B1; 3.27</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">15.30 &#x000B1; 1.12</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>p</italic> = 0.367</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">V<sub><italic>cmax</italic></sub></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">(&#x003BC;mol m<sup>&#x02212;2</sup> s<sup>&#x02212;1</sup>)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">102.11 &#x000B1; 9.05</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">111.21 &#x000B1; 8.02</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><italic>p</italic> = 0.480</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">102.42 &#x000B1; 17.97</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">74.53 &#x000B1; 9.02</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>p</italic> = 0.191</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">J</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">(&#x003BC;mol m<sup>&#x02212;2</sup> s<sup>&#x02212;1</sup>)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">135.89 &#x000B1; 7.08</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">138.83 &#x000B1; 8.06</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><italic>p</italic> = 0.793</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">113.06 &#x000B1; 12.28</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">99.52 &#x000B1; 7.45</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>p</italic> = 0.363</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">TPU</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">(&#x003BC;mol m<sup>&#x02212;2</sup> s<sup>&#x02212;1</sup>)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">10.69 &#x000B1; 0.41</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">10.73 &#x000B1; 0.59</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><italic>p</italic> = 0.961</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">8.32 &#x000B1; 0.82</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">7.82 &#x000B1; 0.71</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>p</italic> = 0.667</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">R<sub><italic>d</italic></sub></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">(&#x003BC;mol m<sup>&#x02212;2</sup> s<sup>&#x02212;1</sup>)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">8.73 &#x000B1; 1.16</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">8.00 &#x000B1; 1.82</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><italic>p</italic> = 0.747</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.93 &#x000B1; 0.15</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.85 &#x000B1; 0.07</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>p</italic> = 0.583</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">g<sub><italic>m</italic></sub></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">(&#x003BC;mol m<sup>&#x02212;2</sup> s<sup>&#x02212;1</sup> Pa<sup>&#x02212;1</sup>)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">14.24 &#x000B1; 4.19</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5.03 &#x000B1; 2.23</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><italic>p</italic> = 0.100</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">19.73 &#x000B1; 9.44</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">22.00 &#x000B1; 5.31</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>p</italic> = 0.831</td>
</tr>
<tr style="border-top: thin solid #000000;">
<td valign="top" align="left">Particulate matter</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">(&#x003BC;g/cm<sup>2</sup>)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">3.59</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.40</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><italic>p</italic> &#x0003C;0.01</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Dissolvable aerosols</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">(&#x003BC;g/cm<sup>2</sup>)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.42 &#x000B1; 0.06</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.15 &#x000B1; 0.03</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><italic>p</italic> &#x0003C;0.001</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.54 &#x000B1; 0.14</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.26 &#x000B1; 0.13</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>p</italic> = 0.177</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">g<sub><italic>min</italic></sub></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">(mmol m<sup>&#x02212;2</sup> s<sup>&#x02212;1</sup>)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.49 &#x000B1; 0.03</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.48 &#x000B1; 0.03</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><italic>p</italic> = 0.967</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.99 &#x000B1; 0.13</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.46 &#x000B1; 0.20</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>p</italic> &#x0003C;0.01</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x003B4;<sup>13</sup>C</td>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;28.10 &#x000B1; 0.20</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;27.70 &#x000B1; 0.55</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><italic>p</italic> = 0.510</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">-31.58 &#x000B1; 0.50</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">-32.99 &#x000B1; 0.40</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>p</italic> = 0.077</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x003C0;<sub><italic>tlp</italic></sub></td>
<td valign="top" align="left">(MPa)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;3.43 &#x000B1; 0.09</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;3.26 &#x000B1; 0.08</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><italic>p</italic> = 0.210</td>
<td/>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Water potential, predawn</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">(MPa)</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;0.09 &#x000B1; 0.01</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;0.10 &#x000B1; 0.02</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>p</italic> = 0.840</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Water potential, noon</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">(MPa)</td>
<td/>
<td/>
<td/>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;0.64 &#x000B1; 0.10</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x02212;0.52 &#x000B1; 0.03</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>p</italic> = 0.210</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Contact angle, adaxial</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">(&#x000B0;)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">124.56 &#x000B1; 2.62</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">127.00 &#x000B1; 2.47</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><italic>p</italic> = 0.520</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">65.96 &#x000B1; 7.59</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">53.16 &#x000B1; 1.87</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>p</italic> = 0.093</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Contact angle, abaxial</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">(&#x000B0;)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">140.13 &#x000B1; 1.37</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">143.14 &#x000B1; 1.18</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><italic>p</italic> = 0.128</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">119.33 &#x000B1; 9.47</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">75.68 &#x000B1; 5.13</td>
<td valign="top" align="left"><italic>p</italic> &#x0003C;0.001</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Proline content</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">(&#x003BC;mol g<sup>&#x02212;1</sup>)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.57 &#x000B1; 0.57</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.22 &#x000B1; 0.39</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"><italic>p</italic> = 0.659</td>
<td/>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<p><italic>AA is the greenhouse with ambient air and FA is the greenhouse with filtered air; Pingtung is the expectedly more polluted field and Hualien is the expectedly less polluted field. The results show the key photosynthetic parameters (light saturated net photosynthetic rate (A<sub>sat</sub>), maximum carboxylation rate of Rubisco (V<sub>cmax</sub>), maximum rate of electron transport for the given light intensity (J), maximum rate of triose phosphate use (TPU), daytime respiration (R<sub>d</sub>), and mesophyll conductance to CO<sub>2</sub> transfer [g<sub>m</sub>)], the concentration of not dissolvable particulate matter, total concentration of dissolvable deposited aerosols, minimum epidermal conductance (g<sub>min</sub>), carbon isotope composition (&#x003B4;<sup>13</sup>C) values, leaf water potential at turgor loss (&#x003C0;<sub>tlp</sub>), predawn, noon, contact angles, and proline concentration. The values are presented as mean&#x000B1;SE (statistically analyzed with Student&#x00027;s t-test), besides the values of particulate, which are presented as median (statistically analyzed with Wilcoxon-Mann&#x02013;Whitney U-test). Sample size and research conducted time for each measurement are indicated in the text. Statistical significance is shown with the p-value</italic>.</p>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<fig id="F2" position="float">
<label>Figure 2</label>
<caption><p>The concentration of dissolvable aerosols deposited on leaf surfaces from greenhouses and fields, determined by foliar rinsing. <bold>(A)</bold> Ion concentration on camphor leaves from the AA (unfiltered, ambient air) and FA (filtered air) greenhouses. <bold>(B)</bold> Ion concentration on camphor leaves at Pingtung and Hualien field site.</p></caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-13-892096-g0002.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>3.3. Contact Angle</title>
<p><xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">Table 2</xref> shows the difference in contact angles on adaxial and abaxial leaves from greenhouse AA and FA, as well as of leaves from the fields. There is no significant difference in adaxial contact angles between AA (124.56 &#x000B1; 2.62, <italic>n</italic> = 12) and FA (127.00 &#x000B1; 2.47, <italic>n</italic> = 9) leaves, neither between Pingtung (65.96 &#x000B1; 7.59, <italic>n</italic> = 14) and Hualien (53.16 &#x000B1; 1.87, <italic>n</italic> = 16). With abaxial contact angles, AA leaves (140.13 &#x000B1; 1.37, <italic>n</italic> = 12) and FA leaves (143.14 &#x000B1; 1.18, <italic>n</italic> = 9) do not differ either. However, Pingtung leaves (119.33 &#x000B1; 9.47, <italic>n</italic> = 8) have higher values than Hualien leaves (75.68 &#x000B1; 5.13, <italic>n</italic> = 16).</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>3.4. Photosynthetic Parameters</title>
<p>In <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">Table 2</xref>, the key photosynthetic parameters of leaves from AA and FA are presented (<italic>n</italic> = 4). There are no significant differences in A<sub><italic>sat</italic></sub>, V<sub><italic>cmax</italic></sub>, J, TPU, R<sub><italic>d</italic></sub>, and g<sub><italic>m</italic></sub> between the leaves from two greenhouses, nor between the two field sites.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>3.5. Plant Water Relations and Drought Tolerance Measurements</title>
<sec>
<title>3.5.1. Carbon Dioxide Discrimination</title>
<p>In <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">Table 2</xref>, &#x003B4;<sup>13</sup>C values are generally less negative in the greenhouses than in the fields, but the results between more polluted and less polluted environments are not consistent. It is noted that there is a tendency toward lower values at Hualien compared to Pingtung, although the comparison is not useful (refer to below). Between the different greenhouses, where the isotope ratio could possibly allow comparison of long-term stomatal aperture due to equal environmental conditions, there is no significant difference in &#x003B4;<sup>13</sup>C between AA (&#x02212;28.10 &#x000B1; 0.20) and FA (&#x02212;27.70 &#x000B1; 0.55), respectively (<italic>n</italic> = 3).</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>3.5.2. Minimum Leaf Conductance</title>
<p>There is no significant difference in g<sub><italic>min</italic></sub> of <italic>C. camphora</italic> leaves between AA (<italic>n</italic> = 4) and FA (<italic>n</italic> = 4). The g<sub><italic>min</italic></sub> value of leaves in AA shows 0.49 &#x000B1; 0.03 mmol m<sup>&#x02212;2</sup> s<sup>&#x02212;1</sup>, very close to the g<sub><italic>min</italic></sub> value of leaves in FA which is 0.48 &#x000B1; 0.03 mmol m<sup>&#x02212;2</sup> s<sup>&#x02212;1</sup>. On the other hand, the g<sub><italic>min</italic></sub> of leaves from Pingtung (<italic>n</italic> = 3) is found much lower than in Hualien (<italic>n</italic> = 4), with the value of 0.99 &#x000B1; 0.13 mmol m<sup>&#x02212;2</sup> s<sup>&#x02212;1</sup> and 2.46 &#x000B1; 0.20 mmol m<sup>&#x02212;2</sup> s<sup>&#x02212;1</sup>, respectively (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">Table 2</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>3.5.3. Leaf Water Potential at Predawn, Noon, and Turgor Loss</title>
<p>There is no significant difference in leaf water potential at turgor loss (&#x003C0;<sub><italic>tlp</italic></sub>) in the greenhouses. Predawn and noon leaf water potential at the field sites are not significantly different (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">Table 2</xref>), supporting comparable water status during the measurement campaign.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>3.5.4. Proline Concentration</title>
<p>There is no significant difference in proline concentration of <italic>C. camphora</italic> leaves between AA (<italic>n</italic> = 4) and FA (<italic>n</italic> = 3). The accumulated proline content of leaves in AA is 1.57 &#x000B1; 0.57 &#x003BC;mol g<sup>&#x02212;1</sup>, and in FA it is 1.22 &#x000B1; 0.39 &#x003BC;mol g<sup>&#x02212;1</sup> (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">Table 2</xref>).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>3.6. Stomatal Conductance to Water Vapor</title>
<p>Stomatal conductance (g<sub><italic>sw</italic></sub>) shows a decreasing tendency as VPD increases, both in AA and FA (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">Figure 3</xref>; <italic>n</italic> = 3, respectively). In AA, the g<sub><italic>sw</italic></sub> value decreases more moderately from 0.015 &#x000B1; 0.001 mol m<sup>&#x02212;2</sup> s<sup>&#x02212;1</sup> (while VPD 0.50 kPa) to 0.009 &#x000B1; 0.0005 mol m<sup>&#x02212;2</sup> s<sup>&#x02212;1</sup> (while VPD 1.50 kPa), with small SEs. However, in FA, the g<sub><italic>sw</italic></sub> value falls more rapidly from 0.042 &#x000B1; 0.005 mol m<sup>&#x02212;2</sup> s<sup>&#x02212;1</sup> (while VPD 0.50 kPa) to 0.017 &#x000B1; 0.001 mol m<sup>&#x02212;2</sup> s<sup>&#x02212;1</sup> (while VPD 1.50 kPa). With each VPD set point, leaves in AA show a lower g<sub><italic>sw</italic></sub> value than in FA (<italic>p</italic> &#x0003C; 0.01), especially when VPD is low (i.e., 0.50 kPa). Additionally, it is shown that in both AA and FA, the g<sub><italic>sw</italic></sub> of leaves maintain a similar value instead of decreasing while VPD changes from 1.25 to 1.50 kPa. Subsequently, differences are also found for the stomatal model parameters g<sub>0</sub> and g<sub>1</sub>, calculated from the Ball Index on the basis of assimilation (A<sub><italic>n</italic></sub>), relative humidity (H<sub><italic>s</italic></sub>), and CO<sub>2</sub> concentration at the leaf surface (C<sub><italic>s</italic></sub>), and then further performed with the Ball-Berry model (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">Figure 4</xref>). The values of A<sub><italic>n</italic></sub> in AA are generally lower than FA, causing a lower range of the Ball Index. The regression line of AA leaves is, therefore, extended to the full range of the x-axis by using the data points predicted with the linear model; and two regression lines are compared based on the actual data points. Both regression lines indicate a positive correlation between g<sub><italic>sw</italic></sub> and Ball Index, representing the fitted data calculated from the leaf-scale measurements, where both of the R<sup>2</sup> values are higher than 0.90. The slope of the linear regression (g<sub>1</sub>) for AA is about half the slope for FA (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">Figure 4</xref>), and the g<sub><italic>sw</italic></sub> intercept (g<sub>0</sub>) of the linear regression for AA is also smaller than g<sub>0</sub> for FA (<italic>P</italic> &#x0003C; 0.005).</p>
<fig id="F3" position="float">
<label>Figure 3</label>
<caption><p>Stomatal conductance (g<sub><italic>sw</italic></sub>) to vapor pressure deficit (VPD) response curve, for leaves from greenhouse AA (ambient air) and greenhouse FA (filtered air). The points and error bars represent mean &#x000B1; SE (<italic>n</italic> = 3). The solid line is AA and the dashed line is FA.</p></caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-13-892096-g0003.tif"/>
</fig>
<fig id="F4" position="float">
<label>Figure 4</label>
<caption><p>Relationship of stomatal conductance with the Ball Index for leaves from greenhouse AA (ambient air) and greenhouse FA (filtered air). The linear regressions of the Ball-Berry model represent the means of linear functions fitted to data from individual leaves at all measured vapor pressure deficit (VPD) levels; the Ball Index is calculated with assimilation (A<sub><italic>n</italic></sub>), relative humidity (H<sub><italic>s</italic></sub>), and CO<sub>2</sub> concentration at the leaf surface (C<sub><italic>s</italic></sub>). The solid line is AA, with a partially dash-dotted line showing the extension to the full range of the x-axis, based on predicted data points from the linear regression; and the dashed line is FA. A statistical analysis of the slope and intercept indicates a significant difference in the Ball-Berry model between leaves from AA and FA (<italic>P</italic> &#x0003C; 0.005).</p></caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-13-892096-g0004.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="discussion" id="s4">
<title>4. Discussion</title>
<sec>
<title>4.1. Aerosol Deposition on Leaf Surfaces</title>
<p>The SEM images of <italic>C. camphora</italic> bring out comparable results with previous research regarding the relation of deposited aerosols and leaf morphology, and the formation of amorphous regions similar to so-called &#x0201C;wax degradation&#x0201D; on the cuticle or close to stomata (Burkhardt, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">2010</xref>; Burkhardt and Grantz, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">2017</xref>; Chen et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">2017</xref>). The pattern of hypothetical aerosol layer and amorphous wax degradation have been as well found on the leaf surfaces of <italic>Cryptomeria japonica</italic> (Sase et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B95">1998</xref>), <italic>Brassica oleracea (Gongylodes Group)</italic> (Burkhardt et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">2001</xref>), <italic>Platanus orientalis L</italic>. (Pourkhabbaz et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B90">2010</xref>), <italic>Pinus sylvestris L</italic>. (Burkhardt and Pariyar, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">2014</xref>), <italic>Quercus variabilis</italic> (Mo et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B84">2015</xref>), and <italic>Vigna radiata (L.) R. Wilczek</italic> (Shabnam et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B99">2021</xref>). Moreover, research has indicated that identified wax degradation might be actually a mixture of deliquescent aerosols and disturbed wax crystallization; the development of amorphous wax appearance can result from deliquescent salts covering tubular wax fibrils, following the process of (i) the attraction of water vapor by hygroscopicity; (ii) the dissolution of hygroscopic aerosols; and (iii) the resulting mobility and distribution across the leaf surface, leading to the coverage of tubular waxes by amorphous crusts and consequently showing the typical appearance of wax degradation (Burkhardt, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">2010</xref>; Burkhardt and Pariyar, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">2014</xref>; Burkhardt et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">2018</xref>). In this study, few larger deposited aerosols on AA leaf surfaces are observed as crystalline, but most of them appear to be amorphous crusts caused by the humidity cycle correlated with the deliquescence of salt and the transpiration of stomata. This phenomenon consists of the previous studies aforementioned.</p>
<p>As for the results of not dissolvable particulate matter and dissolvable aerosol concentration from leaves grown in the greenhouses, it is significant that AA leaves accumulated higher aerosol concentration than FA leaves, regardless of the total aerosol concentration and specific aerosol compounds. Compounds such as Na and Cl may come from sea salts, even though the greenhouses locate a bit distant from the coast (Burkhardt and Eiden, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">1990</xref>). In general, the dominant aerosol compounds in AA are similar to previous research which was done in the same greenhouse environment (Burkhardt and Pariyar, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">2016</xref>). Although the epicuticular wax may partially also contain aerosols (Dzier&#x0017C;anowski et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B42">2011</xref>; Vict&#x000F3;rio et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B111">2021</xref>), it is neglectable in this study since the focus is on researching the aerosol effects within one species, instead of the quantification and classification of deposited aerosols. The water dissolvable ions contributed about 30% to the overall aerosol mass found on AA leaves, which is in agreement with the reported range of European aerosol composition (Putaud et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B92">2010</xref>).</p>
<p>The ionic deposition load on leaves at Pingtung was 1.54 &#x003BC;g/cm<sup>2</sup>, exceeding the amounts on Hualien leaves (1.26 &#x003BC;g/cm<sup>2</sup>) by 22%. This difference was less than expected from long term monitoring data and literature (Lin et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B74">2008</xref>; Li et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B73">2016</xref>; Lee et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B70">2020</xref>). The ionic composition on Hualien leaves was dominated by sea salt (Na, Cl), reflecting the small distance to the sea (50 km in the main wind direction). Nitrate and sulfate are mainly composed of secondary ammonium sulfate and ammonium nitrate from industry (Yang et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B122">2017</xref>; Shen et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B103">2019</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B102">2020</xref>). Nitrate, ammonium, and potassium strongly contributed to the composition of particles on Pingtung leaves, whereas the sulfate and magnesium concentrations were higher on Hualien leaves (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figure 2B</xref>). The daily monitoring data were extracted from Taiwan Air Quality Monitoring Network, Environmental Protection Administration, Taiwan, in order to inspect the environmental aerosol concentration with an accurate time range (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">Figure 5</xref>). Continuous torrential rain probably caused the strong decrease of PM<sub>2.5</sub> concentrations shortly before the experiment at the Pingtung site, and also the removal of particles from leaves (Wang et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B113">2015</xref>), particularly from upper leaf surfaces. However, rainfall itself is also able to contribute to the ion concentrations besides washing off particles; consequently, rainfalls might affect aerosol retention and long term accumulation of ionic aerosols on leaf surfaces, and foliage traits are the more important factors related to these effects (Xu et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B121">2017</xref>; Pariyar and Noga, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B89">2018</xref>; Zhang et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B124">2019</xref>; Zhou et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B127">2020</xref>). As an evergreen tree species, <italic>C. camphora</italic> is likely subject to a higher wash off rate of fine aerosols at high rainfall intensities, causing the indistinct aerosol distribution and concentration on leaf surfaces in the Pingtung site (Xu et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B120">2019</xref>; Zhou et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B125">2021</xref>). Therefore, this inconsistency is challenging the accuracy of the other field measurements.</p>
<fig id="F5" position="float">
<label>Figure 5</label>
<caption><p>Daily monitoring data of PM<sub>2.5</sub> in the fields while experiments were conducted (Source: Taiwan Air Quality Monitoring Network, Environmental Protection Administration, Taiwan). The solid line is the Pingtung site (expectedly more polluted) and the dashed line is the Hualien site (expectedly less polluted). The vertical lines indicate the periods while experiments were conducted (Hualien site: 28 November to 4 December 2019; Pingtung site: 7 December to 13 December 2019).</p></caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-13-892096-g0005.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>4.2. Aerosol Impacts on Plant Water Relations in the Field</title>
<p>The high g<sub><italic>min</italic></sub> values and the low abaxial contact angles of leaves at the Hualien site likely are connected effects of aerosol deposition. The g<sub><italic>min</italic></sub> values were more than twice as high and the ratio between adaxial and abaxial contact angles differed compared to the Pingtung site. Although other, e.g., biotic factors cannot be excluded, both effects are likely linked to the relatively high, sea salt dominated deposition at the Hualien site. Normally, NaCl is a kosmotropic salt that does not easily extend on hydrophobic cuticles, so coastal plants are usually not affected too much by sea salt. However, this may considerably change in the presence of detergents, as shown by a strong g<sub><italic>min</italic></sub> increase in a previous experiment, where pine seedlings were sprayed with different salt solutions (Burkhardt and Pariyar, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">2014</xref>). The detergent reduces the contact angle and promotes stomatal penetration by the salt, i.e., HAS establishment. Several cases of this process in the environment were reported in Italy and Australia, where detergents from close-by landfills caused the coating of sea-spray aerosols leading to the decline of coastal forests (Bussotti et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">1995</xref>). A similar process might actually have played a role at the Hualien site because a landfill in the major source region of NaCl aerosols had been eroded by the sea for several years (Taiwan News, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B106">2018</xref>). The occurrence of such detergents on the leaves was not measured and the distance of 50 km is considerable, but still, there is a realistic chance that the high g<sub><italic>min</italic></sub> values and low contact angles were connected with this incidence.</p>
<p>Low contact angles particularly on the lower (abaxial) leaf sides of Hualien leaves point to enhanced deposition of fine, sub-micrometer aerosols, which are less affected by gravity but more by molecular mechanisms. The g<sub><italic>min</italic></sub> parameter describes the uncontrollable water loss of leaves with closed stomata. A g<sub><italic>min</italic></sub> increase is indicative of reduced drought tolerance and reflects the cuticular permeance, but also the contribution of &#x0201C;malfunctioning stomata,&#x0201D; which are linked to aerosols and HAS (Kerstiens, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B64">1996</xref>; Burkhardt, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">2010</xref>). The higher g<sub><italic>min</italic></sub> values indicate that in the case of extended droughts, aerosol deposition might possibly become problematic for the trees at the Hualien site. It is not possible to deduct further impacts of aerosols on the trees from the field measurements. The &#x003B4;<sup>13</sup>C values between the two field sites cannot be meaningfully compared, as they are influenced by too many different environmental factors, particularly soil water availability, temperature, and VPD.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>4.3. Aerosol Impacts on Plant Water Relations in the Greenhouse Study</title>
<p>The greenhouse study with equal environmental conditions between AA and FA enables the comparison of single parameters like g<sub><italic>min</italic></sub> or &#x003B4;<sup>13</sup>C. Differences between the groups can be attributed to the differences between AA and FA aerosol concentrations, as long as the AA and FA plants are physiologically comparable. This requirement was met in the present case, as seen by the comparison of A<sub><italic>sat</italic></sub> and the AC<sub><italic>i</italic></sub> curves, from which the photosynthetic parameters were extracted. These parameters were very similar between AA and FA. The higher daytime respiration R<sub><italic>d</italic></sub> was consistent between AA and FA but was several times higher than at the field sites and in an earlier field study with camphor trees (Kosugi and Matsuo, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B68">2006</xref>); possibly due to the effects of the incomparable temperature differences between the greenhouses and the fields, or the inaccuracy caused by different calculators while fitting AC<sub><italic>i</italic></sub> curve data (Sharkey, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B100">2016</xref>). It was hypothesized that physiological responses to aerosols would include higher g<sub><italic>min</italic></sub>, less negative &#x003B4;<sup>13</sup>C value, lower leaf water potential at turgor loss (Bartlett et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">2012a</xref>; Mar&#x000E9;chaux et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B79">2015</xref>), and higher proline concentration in the AA compared to the FA greenhouse. With a similar experimental approach, aerosols had caused higher g<sub><italic>min</italic></sub> for <italic>Quercus petraea, Abies alba, Pinus sylvestris</italic> (Burkhardt and Pariyar, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">2014</xref>; Burkhardt et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">2018</xref>), and <italic>Vicia faba (L.)</italic> (Grantz et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B51">2018</xref>), as well as less negative &#x003B4;<sup>13</sup>C for second year <italic>Abies alba</italic> needles, (Burkhardt et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">2018</xref>), while <italic>Helianthus annuus, Pinus sylvestris</italic>, and <italic>Fagus sylvatica</italic> were found to have more negative &#x003B4;<sup>13</sup>C values (Burkhardt and Pariyar, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">2016</xref>).</p>
<p>In this study, particularly the results of g<sub><italic>min</italic></sub> and &#x003B4;<sup>13</sup>C did not confirm the hypothesis. The g<sub><italic>min</italic></sub> results were almost identical between AA and FA greenhouses, which was about half the Pingtung values and only about one-fifth of the Hualien value. A major reason for missing significant differences probably was the small number of repetitions (<italic>n</italic> = 4). This is particularly relevant for the g<sub><italic>min</italic></sub> parameter, where due to high variances and small effects often about 20 repetitions are required to reach significant results. The high variability probably comes from the situation that the water loss by incompletely closed, &#x02018;leaky&#x00027; stomata is an individual process affecting single stomata, but often is the dominating pathway of water loss in the g<sub><italic>min</italic></sub> measurement compared to water loss across the cuticle (Heinsoo and Koppel, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B54">1998</xref>; Burkhardt, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">2010</xref>; Duursma et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">2019</xref>). A study of <italic>Hedera helix</italic> indicated that 35% of water loss occurred across the incompletely closed stomatal pores and 65% across the other part of the cuticle which is without stomata, and the cuticular transpiration of the stomatous leaf surface was about 11 times higher than the astomatous leaf surface (&#x00160;antr&#x0016F;&#x0010D;ek et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B94">2004</xref>). Moreover, taking conifer species as research material, it is concluded that the percentage of water loss from stomatal pores of detached leaves might depend on species-specific strategies for conserving water during drought (Brodribb et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">2014</xref>). Because only few studies have found significant correlations between g<sub><italic>min</italic></sub> and environmental factors, other procedures may be more useful under certain conditions (Brodribb et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">2014</xref>; Schuster et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B98">2017</xref>; Duursma et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">2019</xref>). Under less defined conditions, another possible reason for questioning the reliability of g<sub><italic>min</italic></sub> is the acclimation of plants to the environment. In general, research has shown that plants change the chemical composition of the cuticle while facing water stress, leading to a decreased g<sub><italic>min</italic></sub> value (Bengtson et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">1978</xref>; Premachandra et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B91">1992</xref>; Mackov&#x000E1; et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B76">2013</xref>; Bi et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">2017</xref>). The observation that older leaves have higher g<sub><italic>min</italic></sub> values (Jordan and Brodribb, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B60">2007</xref>), might however be caused by the damage of cuticle on old leaves or the increasing contribution of HAS establishment and induced water loss across the stomatal pore (Burkhardt, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">2010</xref>).</p>
<p>The discrimination value of carbon isotope composition (&#x003B4;<sup>13</sup>C) provides information on the long term transpiration efficiency of plants, and a lower &#x003B4;<sup>13</sup>C value is often determined as lower WUE (Farquhar and Richards, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B44">1984</xref>; Farquhar et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B45">1989</xref>; Hubick and Farquhar, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B59">1989</xref>; Condon et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">1992</xref>; Cabrera-Bosquet et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">2007</xref>), but requires equal environmental conditions between the compared groups. However, recent studies have focused on more comprehensive and practical conditions instead of an ideal growing environment such as breeding fully fertilized plants in the greenhouse (Conte et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">2003</xref>; Cabrera-Bosquet et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">2007</xref>; Burkhardt, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">2010</xref>; Berriel et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">2020</xref>; Vogado et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B112">2020</xref>). Thus, the correlation between &#x003B4;<sup>13</sup>C and WUE might be influenced by deposited aerosols and HAS, but also by soil water, the nutrient conditions, and the acclimation to stresses (Cabrera-Bosquet et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">2007</xref>; Berriel et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">2020</xref>; Tarin et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B108">2020</xref>), which is why the field values cannot be compared.</p>
<p>The hypothesis of lower leaf water potential at wilting (i.e., turgor loss point, &#x003C0;<sub><italic>tlp</italic></sub>) by aerosols was also not confirmed. &#x003C0;<sub><italic>tlp</italic></sub> is considered another important determinant of ecological and physiological drought tolerance, which is also strongly correlated with the cell solute potential at full hydration (i.e., osmotic potential, &#x003C0;<sub><italic>o</italic></sub>) (Bartlett et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">2012a</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">b</xref>; Banks and Hirons, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">2019</xref>). Previous research has focused on &#x003C0;<sub><italic>tlp</italic></sub> of plant species such as woody species, crops, and herbaceous grassland species, concluding that this indicator of drought tolerance varied across species and environmental conditions; &#x003C0;<sub><italic>tlp</italic></sub> is as well correlated slightly with several leaf functional traits such as leaf dry matter, leaf vulnerability to hydraulic failure, leaf toughness, and leaf thickness (Mar&#x000E9;chaux et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B79">2015</xref>; Griffin-Nolan et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B52">2019</xref>). Normally, a more negative &#x003C0;<sub><italic>tlp</italic></sub> increases the functional range of foliar water potential, showing a greater leaf-level drought tolerance (Mart et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B80">2016</xref>; Banks and Hirons, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">2019</xref>). Under defined conditions, a more negative &#x003C0;<sub><italic>tlp</italic></sub> would thus mean that the plant had experienced drought stress by aerosols (Navarro et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B86">2007</xref>; Burkhardt, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">2010</xref>). This should be further evaluated using experiments with higher numbers of biological repetitions, including the evaluation of an eventual accumulation of proline. Proline is an additional indicator of osmotic adjustment, responding to environmental stress such as water deficit, salinity, heat, and pollutants (Bates et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">1973</xref>; Dolatabadian et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">2008</xref>; Acosta-Motos et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">2017</xref>). In this study, the proline concentration of leaves did not differ with aerosol exposure, and concentrations in both AA and FA were relatively low.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>4.4. Aerosols and Water Use Efficiency</title>
<p>Aerosols did not decrease WUE, as it originally had been expected. Contrariwise, the VPD curve of the FA plants had higher g<sub><italic>sw</italic></sub> values than AA, which was highly significant. The subsequently calculated Ball-Berry g<sub>1</sub> parameter for FA was twice the value compared to AA. Because g<sub><italic>min</italic></sub> (which can be considered the g<sub>1</sub> factor of the Ball-Berry equation; Duursma et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">2019</xref>) was negligible compared to g<sub><italic>sw</italic></sub> for both AA and FA, this means double WUE of AA compared to FA (Equation (4); Miner and Bauerle, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B82">2017</xref>). The relationship between g<sub>1</sub> and WUE is originally linked to intrinsic WUE (A/g<sub><italic>s</italic></sub>) but is also indicative of actual (&#x0201C;instantaneous&#x0201D;) WUE (A/E; Franks et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B48">2017</xref>). According to the original HAS hypothesis (Burkhardt, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">2010</xref>), AA leaves should have lost more water than FA at the same degree of stomatal opening; and because this additional water loss is not accounted for by CO<sub>2</sub> uptake, AA leaves should have lower WUE than FA. But probably this is not the full picture and there may be several independent responses to aerosols. In an AA/FA experiment with <italic>Vicia faba (L.)</italic>, aerosol exposure (i.e., AA) had three effects (Grantz et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B51">2018</xref>):</p>
<list list-type="simple">
<list-item><p>(i) reduced stomatal apertures of <italic>Vicia faba (L.)</italic> at each level of VPD;</p></list-item>
<list-item><p>(ii) increased stomatal conductance at comparable levels of aperture;</p></list-item>
<list-item><p>(iii) lower heterogeneity between apertures of single pores, i.e., reduced patchiness.</p></list-item>
</list>
<p>In the present study with camphor, the HAS effect of additional water loss at the equal aperture (effect ii) was likely overcompensated by the aperture reduction of AA stomata (effect i). A reduction of stomatal aperture, however, is known to increase the WUE of seed plants, e.g., in response to drought stress (Franks et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B49">2015</xref>; Guerrieri et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B53">2019</xref>; Xu et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B119">2021</xref>; Yang et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B123">2021</xref>). The measured increase of WUE<sub><italic>i</italic></sub> by aerosols thus indicates a reduction of stomatal aperture, in agreement with the results of the <italic>Vicia faba (L.)</italic> experiment (Grantz et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B51">2018</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B50">2020</xref>). It is also in agreement with these earlier results that the error bars of the AA data points were smaller than for FA, indicating lower variation, higher coordination between stomatal apertures (effect iii), and less patchiness - a general susceptibility of the <italic>C. camphora</italic> to the stomatal patchiness phenomenon has earlier been reported (Takanashi et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B107">2006</xref>). The aperture reduction was not directly measured but would have been independently supported if lower &#x003B4;<sup>13</sup>C values of AA compared to FA leaves were observed. This was not the case, possibly because the results of the VPD curves and the &#x003B4;<sup>13</sup>C signals were determined by different micro-climatological conditions: The VPD curves were measured within ventilated cuvettes. The &#x003B4;<sup>13</sup>C values are a time integrated signal of gas exchange, produced under the calm greenhouse conditions with a thick leaf boundary layer surrounding the leaves most of the time; so stomatal responses are decoupled from the environmental VPD and its interaction with deposited aerosols.</p>
<p>Generally, the g<sub>1</sub> parameter represents a compromise between the costs and benefits of g<sub><italic>sw</italic></sub> relative to the photosynthetic activity of the leaf (Ball et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">1987</xref>; Miner and Bauerle, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B82">2017</xref>). The g<sub>0</sub> is normally defined as either (i) a fit parameter extrapolated as the intercept of the least squares regression between g<sub><italic>sw</italic></sub> and the Ball Index (Ball et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">1987</xref>; Ball, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">1988</xref>; Collatz et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">1991</xref>), or (ii) the residual conductance when A<sub><italic>n</italic></sub> &#x02264; 0 (Leuning, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B71">1995</xref>). The g<sub>1</sub> values here were 1.71 (AA) and 3.41 (FA) and, thus, considerably lower than the value of 7.4 observed for <italic>C. camphora</italic> in a field study (Kosugi and Matsuo, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B68">2006</xref>). Both g<sub>0</sub> and g<sub>1</sub> were at the lower end but still within the range of previously recorded values (Miner et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B83">2017</xref>; Wolz et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B116">2017</xref>). Drought affected plants, e.g., <italic>Eucalyptus, Quercus, Zea mays</italic>, and <italic>Helianthus</italic>, often have lower g<sub>1</sub> and g<sub>0</sub> values compared with well-watered plants of the same species (Cavender-Bares et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">2007</xref>; Heroult et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B55">2013</xref>; Zhou et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B126">2013</xref>; Miner and Bauerle, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B82">2017</xref>; Miner et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B83">2017</xref>). The lower g<sub>1</sub> value of AA camphor leaves compared to FA can thus possibly be interpreted as aerosol induced drought stress. The reason for the involvement of H<sub><italic>s</italic></sub> for plant transpiration in the original, semi-empirical Ball-Berry model has remained elusive and its relevance was questioned, compared to VPD which seems to be physiologically more meaningful (e.g., Monteith, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B85">1995</xref>). The successful H<sub><italic>s</italic></sub> use, however, might well be due to the direct interaction of hygroscopic, deposited aerosols with water vapor on the leaf surface. This kind of interaction is immediate and direct and the method to determine water absorption to specific salts has been used to determine the relative humidity in weather balloons (Wylie, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B118">1955</xref>).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="conclusions" id="s5">
<title>5. Conclusion</title>
<p>Fine hygroscopic aerosols are ubiquitous. Their presence on leaf surfaces often is not obvious, but the comparison of SEM images from AA and FA greenhouses is a useful method for identifying aerosol related surface structures. Greenhouse and field results behaved differently. The controlled conditions in the greenhouse aerosol exclusion study with camphor seedlings enabled a detailed perspective of aerosol interaction with the stomatal part of the water relations. Aerosols surprisingly caused higher WUE of camphor trees in the greenhouse study, which was the first detailed observation of this kind and may also have relevance on larger scales beyond the leaf-level. The sharply increased WUE of forests over the last century is a globally observed phenomenon and has mainly, but not sufficiently, been explained as a consequence of CO<sub>2</sub> increase (Keenan et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B63">2013</xref>; Knauer et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B67">2017</xref>; Kannenberg et al., <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B61">2021</xref>). The atmospheric aerosol deposition could be a hidden, contributing factor, which should be investigated.</p>
<p>In the field experiment, the particular challenges came from the cumulative, long-term nature of aerosol effects and the uncontrolled environmental conditions. However, contact angles and g<sub><italic>min</italic></sub> of leaves from the adult camphor trees were probably attributed to the amount and type of aerosols. These parameters seem to be suitable to determine aerosol effects on those parts of plant water relations which are not under stomatal control, i.e., cuticular loss and stomatal leakage by HAS. Marine aerosols, possibly polluted by organic material, might have decreased the drought tolerance of camphor trees at the Hualien site, but additional studies would be needed to confirm this.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="data-availability" id="s6">
<title>Data Availability Statement</title>
<p>The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author/s.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s7">
<title>Author Contributions</title>
<p>S-CC and JB developed the research design. C-JEC, DZ, I-LL, S-CC, and Y-LK contributed to the field work. C-JEC and DZ completed the data processing. C-JEC analyzed the data and wrote the manuscript. All the authors commented on the draft and approved the submitted version.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="funding-information" id="s8">
<title>Funding</title>
<p>This research was funded by Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst (DAAD, German Academic Exchange Service), grant numbers: 57440921 and 57393505. JB was funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation), grant number: 446535617. C-JEC acknowledges support from BIGS - Land and Food.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="COI-statement" id="conf1">
<title>Conflict of Interest</title>
<p>The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="disclaimer" id="s9">
<title>Publisher&#x00027;s Note</title>
<p>All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.</p>
</sec> </body>
<back>
<ack><p>We acknowledge Angelika Glogau, Angelika Veits, Deborah Rupprecht, Ira Kurth, Shyam Pariyar from the Institute of Crop Science and Resource Conservation, and Yaron Malkowsky from Nees Institute for Biodiversity of Plants, University of Bonn, Germany, for assisting on the analytical instruments. We are particularly grateful for the support of Cheng-Wei Lai, Chie-Yu Hong, and Hsin-Min Chung during field work.</p>
</ack>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="B1">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Achneck</surname> <given-names>H. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Serpe</surname> <given-names>M. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jamiolkowski</surname> <given-names>R. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Eibest</surname> <given-names>L. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Craig</surname> <given-names>S. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lawson</surname> <given-names>J. H.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Regenerating titanium ventricular assist device surfaces after gold/palladium coating for scanning electron microscopy</article-title>. <source>Microsc. Res. Techn</source>. <volume>73</volume>, <fpage>71</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>76</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/jemt.20757</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19642216</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B2">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Acosta-Motos</surname> <given-names>J. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ortu&#x000F1;o</surname> <given-names>M. F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bernal-Vicente</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Diaz-Vivancos</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sanchez-Blanco</surname> <given-names>M. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hernandez</surname> <given-names>J. A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Plant responses to salt stress: adaptive mechanisms</article-title>. <source>Agronomy</source> <volume>7</volume>:<fpage>18</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/agronomy7010018</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Aphalo</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jarvis</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1993</year>). <article-title>An analysis of Ball&#x00027;s empirical model of stomatal conductance</article-title>. <source>Ann. Bot</source>. <volume>72</volume>, <fpage>321</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>327</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1006/anbo.1993.1114</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<citation citation-type="thesis"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ball</surname> <given-names>J. T.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1988</year>). <source>An analysis of stomatal conductance</source> (Ph.D. thesis). <publisher-name>Stanford University Stanford, Stanford, CA, United States</publisher-name>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ball</surname> <given-names>J. T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Woodrow</surname> <given-names>I. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Berry</surname> <given-names>J. A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1987</year>). <article-title>&#x0201C;A model predicting stomatal conductance and its contribution to the control of photosynthesis under different environmental conditions,&#x0201D;</article-title> in <source>Progress in Photosynthesis Research</source> (<publisher-loc>Dordrecht</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Martinus-Nijhoff Publishers</publisher-name>), <fpage>221</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>224</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/978-94-017-0519-6_48</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Banks</surname> <given-names>J. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hirons</surname> <given-names>A. D.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Alternative methods of estimating the water potential at turgor loss point in <italic>Acer</italic> genotypes</article-title>. <source>Plant Methods</source> <volume>15</volume>, <fpage>1</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>6</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s13007-019-0410-3</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30988693</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B7">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bartlett</surname> <given-names>M. K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Scoffoni</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ardy</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sun</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cao</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2012a</year>). <article-title>Rapid determination of comparative drought tolerance traits: Using an osmometer to predict turgor loss point</article-title>. <source>Methods Ecol. Evol</source>. <volume>3</volume>, <fpage>880</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>888</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.2041-210X.2012.00230.x</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bartlett</surname> <given-names>M. K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Scoffoni</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sack</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2012b</year>). <article-title>The determinants of leaf turgor loss point and prediction of drought tolerance of species and biomes: a global meta-analysis</article-title>. <source>Ecol. Lett</source>. <volume>15</volume>, <fpage>393</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>405</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1461-0248.2012.01751.x</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22435987</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B9">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bates</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Waldren</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Teare</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1973</year>). <article-title>Rapid determination of free proline for water-stress studies</article-title>. <source>Plant Soil</source> <volume>39</volume>, <fpage>205</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>207</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/BF00018060</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20688380</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B10">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bauerle</surname> <given-names>W. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bowden</surname> <given-names>J. D.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Separating foliar physiology from morphology reveals the relative roles of vertically structured transpiration factors within red maple crowns and limitations of larger scale models</article-title>. <source>J. Exp. Bot</source>. <volume>62</volume>, <fpage>4295</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>4307</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/jxb/err156</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21617246</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B11">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bengtson</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Larsson</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liljenberg</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1978</year>). <article-title>Effects of water stress on cuticular transpiration rate and amount and composition of epicuticular wax in seedlings of six oat varieties</article-title>. <source>Physiol. Plant</source>. <volume>44</volume>, <fpage>319</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>324</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1399-3054.1978.tb01630.x</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Berriel</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Perdomo</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Monza</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Carbon isotope discrimination and water-use efficiency in <italic>Crotalaria</italic> cover crops under moderate water deficit</article-title>. <source>J. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr</source>. <volume>20</volume>, <fpage>537</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>545</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s42729-019-00142-8</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Berry</surname> <given-names>J. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Beerling</surname> <given-names>D. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Franks</surname> <given-names>P. J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Stomata: key players in the earth system, past and present</article-title>. <source>Curr. Opin. Plant Biol</source>. <volume>13</volume>, <fpage>232</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>239</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.pbi.2010.04.013</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20552724</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B14">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bi</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kovalchuk</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Langridge</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tricker</surname> <given-names>P. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lopato</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Borisjuk</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>The impact of drought on wheat leaf cuticle properties</article-title>. <source>BMC Plant Biol</source>. <volume>17</volume>:<fpage>3</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s12870-017-1033-3</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28482800</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B15">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Brodribb</surname> <given-names>T. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>McAdam</surname> <given-names>S. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jordan</surname> <given-names>G. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Martins</surname> <given-names>S. C.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Conifer species adapt to low-rainfall climates by following one of two divergent pathways</article-title>. <source>Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A</source>. <volume>111</volume>, <fpage>14489</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>14493</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1073/pnas.1407930111</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25246559</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B16">
<citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Buck</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1996</year>). <source>Model CR-1A Hygrometer With Autofill Operating Manual</source>. <publisher-loc>Aurora, CO</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Buck Research Instruments LLC</publisher-name>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Buck</surname> <given-names>A. L.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1981</year>). <article-title>New equations for computing vapor pressure and enhancement factor</article-title>. <source>J. Appl. Meteorol. Climatol</source>. <volume>20</volume>, <fpage>1527</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>1532</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1175/1520-0450(1981)020&#x0003C;1527:NEFCVP&#x0003E;2.0.CO;2</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B18">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Burkhardt</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Hygroscopic particles on leaves: nutrients or desiccants?</article-title> <source>Ecol. Monogr</source>. <volume>80</volume>, <fpage>369</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>399</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1890/09-1988.1</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B19">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Burkhardt</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Basi</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pariyar</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hunsche</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Stomatal penetration by aqueous solutions-an update involving leaf surface particles</article-title>. <source>New Phytol</source>. <volume>196</volume>, <fpage>774</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>787</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1469-8137.2012.04307.x</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22985197</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B20">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Burkhardt</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Eiden</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1990</year>). <article-title>The ion concentration of dew condensed on Norway spruce (<italic>Picea abies</italic> (L.) Karst.) and Scots pine (<italic>Pinus sylvestris</italic> L.) needles</article-title>. <source>Trees</source> <volume>4</volume>, <fpage>22</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>26</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/BF00226236</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B21">
<citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Burkhardt</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Grantz</surname> <given-names>D. A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>&#x0201C;Plants and atmospheric aerosols,&#x0201D;</article-title> in <source>Progress in Botany Vol. 78</source>, (<publisher-loc>Switzerland</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Springer</publisher-name>), <fpage>369</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>406</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/124_2016_12</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B22">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Burkhardt</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Koch</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kaiser</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2001</year>). <article-title>Deliquescence of deposited atmospheric particles on leaf surfaces</article-title>. <source>Water Air Soil Pollut</source>. <volume>1</volume>, <fpage>313</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>321</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1023/A:1013179810839</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B23">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Burkhardt</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pariyar</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Particulate pollutants are capable to &#x0201C;degrade&#x0201D; epicuticular waxes and to decrease the drought tolerance of Scots pine (<italic>Pinus sylvestris</italic> L.)</article-title>. <source>Environ. Pollut</source>. <volume>184</volume>, <fpage>659</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>667</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.envpol.2013.04.041</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23791043</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B24">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Burkhardt</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pariyar</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>How does the VPD response of isohydric and anisohydric plants depend on leaf surface particles?</article-title> <source>Plant Biol</source>. <volume>18</volume>, <fpage>91</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>100</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/plb.12402</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26417842</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B25">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Burkhardt</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zinsmeister</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Grantz</surname> <given-names>D. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Vidic</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sutton</surname> <given-names>M. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hunsche</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Camouflaged as degraded wax: Hygroscopic aerosols contribute to leaf desiccation, tree mortality, and forest decline</article-title>. <source>Environ. Res. Lett</source>. <volume>13</volume>:<fpage>85001</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1088/1748-9326/aad346</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B26">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bussotti</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Grossoni</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pantani</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1995</year>). <article-title>The role of marine salt and surfactants in the decline of Tyrrhenian coastal vegetation in Italy</article-title>. <source>Ann. Sci. For</source>. <volume>52</volume>, <fpage>251</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>261</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1051/forest:19950306</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B27">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Cabrera-Bosquet</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Molero</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bort</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nogu&#x000E9;s</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Araus</surname> <given-names>J. L.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2007</year>). <article-title>The combined effect of constant water deficit and nitrogen supply on WUE, NUE and &#x003B4;<sup>1</sup>3C in durum wheat potted plants</article-title>. <source>Ann. Appl. Biol</source>. <volume>151</volume>, <fpage>277</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>289</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1744-7348.2007.00195.x</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B28">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Cavender-Bares</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sack</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Savage</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2007</year>). <article-title>Atmospheric and soil drought reduce nocturnal conductance in live oaks</article-title>. <source>Tree Physiol</source>. <volume>27</volume>, <fpage>611</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>620</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/treephys/27.4.611</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">17242002</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B29">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Chadwick</surname> <given-names>O. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Derry</surname> <given-names>L. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Vitousek</surname> <given-names>P. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Huebert</surname> <given-names>B. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hedin</surname> <given-names>L. O.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1999</year>). <article-title>Changing sources of nutrients during four million years of ecosystem development</article-title>. <source>Nature</source> <volume>397</volume>, <fpage>491</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>497</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/17276</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B30">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xia</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ma</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Pollution monitoring using the leaf-deposited particulates and magnetism of the leaves of 23 plant species in a semi-arid city, Northwest China</article-title>. <source>Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res.</source> <volume>29</volume>, <fpage>34898</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>34911</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11356-021-16686-1</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">35040062</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B31">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>H.-L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>C.-P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tang</surname> <given-names>C.-S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lung</surname> <given-names>S.-C. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chuang</surname> <given-names>H.-C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chou</surname> <given-names>D.-W.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Risk assessment for people exposed to PM<sub>2</sub>.5 and constituents at different vertical heights in an urban area of Taiwan</article-title>. <source>Atmosphere</source> <volume>11</volume>:<fpage>1145</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/atmos11111145</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B32">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zou</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Variation in tree species ability to capture and retain airborne fine particulate matter (PM<sub>2</sub>.5)</article-title>. <source>Sci. Rep</source>. <volume>7</volume>, <fpage>1</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>11</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41598-017-03360-1</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28600533</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B33">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>M.-J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>P.-H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hsieh</surname> <given-names>M.-T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yeh</surname> <given-names>C.-H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Huang</surname> <given-names>C.-H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>C.-M.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Machine learning to relate PM<sub>2</sub>.5 and PM<sub>1</sub>0 concentrations to outpatient visits for upper respiratory tract infections in Taiwan: a nationwide analysis</article-title>. <source>World J. Clin. Cases</source> <volume>6</volume>:<fpage>200</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.12998/wjcc.v6.i8.200</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30148148</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B34">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Chou</surname> <given-names>C.-K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lee</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cheng</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yuan</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Seasonal variation and spatial distribution of carbonaceous aerosols in Taiwan</article-title>. <source>Atmos. Chem. Phys</source>. <volume>10</volume>, <fpage>9563</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>9578</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/acp-10-9563-2010</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B35">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Collatz</surname> <given-names>G. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ball</surname> <given-names>J. T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Grivet</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Berry</surname> <given-names>J. A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1991</year>). <article-title>Physiological and environmental regulation of stomatal conductance, photosynthesis and transpiration: a model that includes a laminar boundary layer</article-title>. <source>Agric. For. Meteorol</source>. <volume>54</volume>, <fpage>107</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>136</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/0168-1923(91)90002-8</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B36">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Condon</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Richards</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Farquhar</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1992</year>). <article-title>The effect of variation in soil water availability, vapour pressure deficit and nitrogen nutrition on carbon isotope discrimination in wheat</article-title>. <source>Austr. J. Agric. Res</source>. <volume>43</volume>, <fpage>935</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>947</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1071/AR9920935</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B37">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Condon</surname> <given-names>A. G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Richards</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rebetzke</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Farquhar</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2002</year>). <article-title>Improving intrinsic water-use efficiency and crop yield</article-title>. <source>Crop Sci</source>. <volume>42</volume>, <fpage>122</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>131</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2135/cropsci2002.1220</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">11756262</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B38">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Conte</surname> <given-names>M. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Weber</surname> <given-names>J. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Carlson</surname> <given-names>P. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Flanagan</surname> <given-names>L. B.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2003</year>). <article-title>Molecular and carbon isotopic composition of leaf wax in vegetation and aerosols in a northern prairie ecosystem</article-title>. <source>Oecologia</source> <volume>135</volume>, <fpage>67</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>77</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00442-002-1157-4</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">12647105</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B39">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Coopman</surname> <given-names>R. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nguyen</surname> <given-names>H. T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mencuccini</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Oliveira</surname> <given-names>R. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sack</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lovelock</surname> <given-names>C. E.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Harvesting water from unsaturated atmospheres: deliquescence of salt secreted onto leaf surfaces drives reverse sap flow in a dominant arid climate mangrove</article-title>, <source>Avicennia marina. New Phytol</source>. <volume>231</volume>, <fpage>1401</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>1414</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/nph.17461</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33983649</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B40">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Dolatabadian</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sanavy</surname> <given-names>S. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chashmi</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>The effects of foliar application of ascorbic acid (Vitamin C) on antioxidant enzymes activities, lipid peroxidation and proline accumulation of canola (<italic>Brassica napus</italic> L.) under conditions of salt stress</article-title>. <source>J. Agron. Crop Sci</source>. <volume>194</volume>, <fpage>206</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>213</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1439-037X.2008.00301.x</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B41">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Duursma</surname> <given-names>R. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Blackman</surname> <given-names>C. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lop&#x000E9;z</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Martin-StPaul</surname> <given-names>N. K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cochard</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Medlyn</surname> <given-names>B. E.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>On the minimum leaf conductance: its role in models of plant water use, and ecological and environmental controls</article-title>. <source>New Phytol</source>. <volume>221</volume>, <fpage>693</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>705</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/nph.15395</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30144393</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B42">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Dzier&#x0017C;anowski</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Popek</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gawro&#x00144;ska</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>S&#x000E6;b&#x000F8;</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gawro&#x00144;ski</surname> <given-names>S. W.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Deposition of particulate matter of different size fractions on leaf surfaces and in waxes of urban forest species</article-title>. <source>Int. J. Phytoremed</source>. <volume>13</volume>, <fpage>1037</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>1046</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/15226514.2011.552929</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21972570</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B43">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Fang</surname> <given-names>G.-C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chang</surname> <given-names>S.-C.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Atmospheric particulate (PM<sub>1</sub>0 and PM<sub>2</sub>.5) mass concentration and seasonal variation study in the Taiwan area during 2000-2008</article-title>. <source>Atmos. Res</source>. <volume>98</volume>, <fpage>368</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>377</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.atmosres.2010.07.005</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B44">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Farquhar</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Richards</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1984</year>). <article-title>Isotopic composition of plant carbon correlates with water-use efficiency of wheat genotypes</article-title>. <source>Funct. Plant Biol</source>. <volume>11</volume>, <fpage>539</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>552</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1071/PP9840539</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B45">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Farquhar</surname> <given-names>G. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ehleringer</surname> <given-names>J. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hubick</surname> <given-names>K. T.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1989</year>). <article-title>Carbon isotope discrimination and photosynthesis</article-title>. <source>Annu. Rev. Plant Biol</source>. <volume>40</volume>, <fpage>503</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>537</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1146/annurev.pp.40.060189.002443</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B46">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Farquhar</surname> <given-names>G. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>von Caemmerer</surname> <given-names>S. v.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Berry</surname> <given-names>J. A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1980</year>). <article-title>A biochemical model of photosynthetic CO<sub>2</sub> assimilation in leaves of C<sub>3</sub> species</article-title>. <source>Planta</source> <volume>149</volume>, <fpage>78</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>90</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/BF00386231</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24306196</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B47">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Feng</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dietze</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Scale dependence in the effects of leaf ecophysiological traits on photosynthesis: Bayesian parameterization of photosynthesis models</article-title>. <source>New Phytol</source>. <volume>200</volume>, <fpage>1132</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>1144</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/nph.12454</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23952643</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B48">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Franks</surname> <given-names>P. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Berry</surname> <given-names>J. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lombardozzi</surname> <given-names>D. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bonan</surname> <given-names>G. B.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Stomatal function across temporal and spatial scales: deep-time trends, land-atmosphere coupling and global models</article-title>. <source>Plant Physiol</source>. <volume>174</volume>, <fpage>583</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>602</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1104/pp.17.00287</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28446638</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B49">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Franks</surname> <given-names>P. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>W. Doheny-Adams</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Britton-Harper</surname> <given-names>Z. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gray</surname> <given-names>J. E.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Increasing water-use efficiency directly through genetic manipulation of stomatal density</article-title>. <source>New Phytol</source>. <volume>207</volume>, <fpage>188</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>195</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/nph.13347</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25754246</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B50">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Grantz</surname> <given-names>D. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Karr</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Burkhardt</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Heterogeneity of stomatal pore area is suppressed by ambient aerosol in the homobaric species, <italic>Vicia faba</italic></article-title>. <source>Front. Plant Sci</source>. <volume>11</volume>:<fpage>897</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpls.2020.00897</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32670326</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B51">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Grantz</surname> <given-names>D. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zinsmeister</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Burkhardt</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Ambient aerosol increases minimum leaf conductance and alters the aperture-flux relationship as stomata respond to vapor pressure deficit (VPD)</article-title>. <source>New Phytol</source>. <volume>219</volume>, <fpage>275</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>286</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/nph.15102</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29600514</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B52">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Griffin-Nolan</surname> <given-names>R. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ocheltree</surname> <given-names>T. W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mueller</surname> <given-names>K. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Blumenthal</surname> <given-names>D. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kray</surname> <given-names>J. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Knapp</surname> <given-names>A. K.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Extending the osmometer method for assessing drought tolerance in herbaceous species</article-title>. <source>Oecologia</source> <volume>189</volume>, <fpage>353</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>363</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00442-019-04336-w</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30627784</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B53">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Guerrieri</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Belmecheri</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ollinger</surname> <given-names>S. V.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Asbjornsen</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jennings</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xiao</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Disentangling the role of photosynthesis and stomatal conductance on rising forest water-use efficiency</article-title>. <source>Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A</source>. <volume>116</volume>, <fpage>16909</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>16914</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1073/pnas.1905912116</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31383758</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B54">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Heinsoo</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Koppel</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1998</year>). <article-title>Minimum epidermal conductance of Norway spruce (<italic>Picea abies</italic>) needles: Influence of age and shoot position in the crown</article-title>. <source>Annales Botanici Fennici</source> (JSTOR). <fpage>257</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>262</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B55">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Heroult</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lin</surname> <given-names>Y.-S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bourne</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Medlyn</surname> <given-names>B. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ellsworth</surname> <given-names>D. S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Optimal stomatal conductance in relation to photosynthesis in climatically contrasting <italic>Eucalyptus</italic> species under drought</article-title>. <source>Plant Cell Environ</source>. <volume>36</volume>, <fpage>262</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>274</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1365-3040.2012.02570.x</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22762345</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B56">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Herrick</surname> <given-names>J. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Thomas</surname> <given-names>R. B.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1999</year>). <article-title>Effects of CO<sub>2</sub> enrichment on the photosynthetic light response of sun and shade leaves of canopy sweetgum trees (<italic>Liquidambar styraciflua</italic>) in a forest ecosystem</article-title>. <source>Tree Physiol</source>. <volume>19</volume>, <fpage>779</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>786</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/treephys/19.12.779</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">10562393</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B57">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ho</surname> <given-names>C.-C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>L.-J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hwang</surname> <given-names>J.-S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Estimating ground-level PM<sub>2</sub>.5 levels in Taiwan using data from air quality monitoring stations and high coverage of microsensors</article-title>. <source>Environ. Pollut</source>. <volume>264</volume>:<fpage>114810</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.envpol.2020.114810</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32559863</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B58">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hsieh</surname> <given-names>H.-J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1981</year>). <article-title>Survey of diseases of woody plants in Taiwan (4)</article-title>. <source>Q. J. Chinese For</source>. <volume>14</volume>, <fpage>77</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>85</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B59">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hubick</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Farquhar</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1989</year>). <article-title>Carbon isotope discrimination and the ratio of carbon gained to water lost in barley cultivars</article-title>. <source>Plant Cell Environ</source>. <volume>12</volume>, <fpage>795</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>804</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1365-3040.1989.tb01641.x</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B60">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Jordan</surname> <given-names>G. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Brodribb</surname> <given-names>T. J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2007</year>). <article-title>Incontinence in aging leaves: deteriorating water relations with leaf age in <italic>Agastachys odorata</italic> (Proteaceae), a shrub with very long-lived leaves</article-title>. <source>Funct. Plant Biol</source>. <volume>34</volume>, <fpage>918</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>924</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1071/FP07166</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32689420</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B61">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kannenberg</surname> <given-names>S. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Driscoll</surname> <given-names>A. W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Szejner</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Anderegg</surname> <given-names>W. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ehleringer</surname> <given-names>J. R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Rapid increases in shrubland and forest intrinsic water-use efficiency during an ongoing megadrought. of <italic>Proc</italic></article-title>. <source>Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A</source>. <volume>118</volume>:<fpage>52</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1073/pnas.2118052118</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">34930849</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B62">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Katata</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Held</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Combined measurements of microscopic leaf wetness and dry-deposited inorganic compounds in a spruce forest</article-title>. <source>Atmos. Pollut. Res</source>. <volume>12</volume>, <fpage>217</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>224</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.apr.2020.11.004</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B63">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Keenan</surname> <given-names>T. F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hollinger</surname> <given-names>D. Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bohrer</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dragoni</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Munger</surname> <given-names>J. W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Schmid</surname> <given-names>H. P.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Increase in forest water-use efficiency as atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations rise</article-title>. <source>Nature</source> <volume>499</volume>, <fpage>324</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>327</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nature12291</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23842499</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B64">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kerstiens</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1996</year>). <article-title>Cuticular water permeability and its physiological significance</article-title>. <source>J. Exp. Bot</source>. <volume>47</volume>, <fpage>1813</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>1832</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/jxb/47.12.1813</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B65">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Khare</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>A new approach to derivation of Van&#x00027;t Hoff equation for osmotic pressure of a dilute solution</article-title>. <source>Am. Int. J. Res. Sci. Technol. Eng. Math</source>. <volume>11</volume>, <fpage>172</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>174</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B66">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kishcha</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>S.-H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lin</surname> <given-names>N.-H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>da Silva</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lin</surname> <given-names>T.-H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lin</surname> <given-names>P.-H.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Differentiating between local and remote pollution over Taiwan</article-title>. <source>Aerosol Air Qual. Res</source>. <volume>18</volume>:<fpage>1788</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4209/aaqr.2017.10.0378</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32601523</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B67">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Knauer</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zaehle</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Reichstein</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Medlyn</surname> <given-names>B. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Forkel</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hagemann</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>The response of ecosystem water-use efficiency to rising atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> concentrations: sensitivity and large-scale biogeochemical implications</article-title>. <source>New Phytol</source>. <volume>213</volume>, <fpage>1654</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>1666</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/nph.14288</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28164338</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B68">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kosugi</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Matsuo</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2006</year>). <article-title>Seasonal fluctuations and temperature dependence of leaf gas exchange parameters of co-occurring evergreen and deciduous trees in a temperate broad-leaved forest</article-title>. <source>Tree Physiol</source>. <volume>26</volume>, <fpage>1173</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>1184</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/treephys/26.9.1173</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">16740493</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B69">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kuo</surname> <given-names>Y.-L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>Y.-P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Peng</surname> <given-names>S.-H.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Variations in the predawn leaf water potential and photosynthetic rate during the dry season and drought-tolerance mechanisms of coastal tree species</article-title>. <source>Taiwan J. For. Sci</source>. <volume>32</volume>, <fpage>131</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>144</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B70">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lee</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lin</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>C.-Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tsao</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yao</surname> <given-names>T.-H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fei</surname> <given-names>M.-H.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Forecasting air quality in Taiwan by using machine learning</article-title>. <source>Sci. Rep</source>. <volume>10</volume>, <fpage>1</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>13</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41598-020-61151-7</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32139787</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B71">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Leuning</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1995</year>). <article-title>A critical appraisal of a combined stomatal-photosynthesis model for C<sub>3</sub> plants</article-title>. <source>Plant Cell Environ</source>. <volume>18</volume>, <fpage>339</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>355</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1365-3040.1995.tb00370.x</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B72">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yan</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Qi</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lin</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Emission of volatile camphor compounds from <italic>Cinnamomum camphora</italic> wood</article-title>. <source>Wood Res</source>. <volume>65</volume>, <fpage>663</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>673</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.37763/wr.1336-4561/65.4.663674</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B73">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>T.-C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yuan</surname> <given-names>C.-S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Huang</surname> <given-names>H.-C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lee</surname> <given-names>C.-L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>S.-P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tong</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Inter-comparison of seasonal variation, chemical characteristics, and source identification of atmospheric fine particles on both sides of the Taiwan Strait</article-title>. <source>Sci. Rep</source>. <volume>6</volume>, <fpage>1</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>16</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/srep22956</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26973085</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B74">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lin</surname> <given-names>C.-H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>Y.-L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lai</surname> <given-names>C.-H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Watson</surname> <given-names>J. G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chow</surname> <given-names>J. C.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>Air quality measurements from the southern particulate matter supersite in Taiwan</article-title>. <source>Aerosol Air Qual. Res</source>. <volume>8</volume>, <fpage>233</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>264</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4209/aaqr.2008.04.0012</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B75">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xiaoyu</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xiying</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>A review of the research on crop responses to the increase in aerial aerosol</article-title>. <source>Acta Ecol. Sin</source>. <volume>36</volume>, <fpage>2084</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>2090</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5846/stxb201409031751</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B76">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Mackov&#x000E1;</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Va&#x00161;kov&#x000E1;</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Macek</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hronkov&#x000E1;</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Schreiber</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>&#x00160;antru&#x0010D;ek</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Plant response to drought stress simulated by ABA application: changes in chemical composition of cuticular waxes</article-title>. <source>Environ. Exp. Bot</source>. <volume>86</volume>, <fpage>70</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>75</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.envexpbot.2010.06.005</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B77">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Mahowald</surname> <given-names>N. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Scanza</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Brahney</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Goodale</surname> <given-names>C. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hess</surname> <given-names>P. G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Moore</surname> <given-names>J. K.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Aerosol deposition impacts on land and ocean carbon cycles</article-title>. <source>Curr. Clim. Change Rep</source>. <volume>3</volume>, <fpage>16</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>31</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s40641-017-0056-z</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B78">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Maneke-Fiegenbaum</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Klemm</surname> <given-names>O.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lai</surname> <given-names>Y.-J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hung</surname> <given-names>C.-Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yu</surname> <given-names>J.-C.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Carbon exchange between the atmosphere and a subtropical evergreen mountain forest in Taiwan</article-title>. <source>Adv. Meteorol</source>. <volume>2018</volume>:<fpage>9287249</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1155/2018/9287249</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B79">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Mar&#x000E9;chaux</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bartlett</surname> <given-names>M. K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sack</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Baraloto</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Engel</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Joetzjer</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Drought tolerance as predicted by leaf water potential at turgor loss point varies strongly across species within an Amazonian forest</article-title>. <source>Funct. Ecol</source>. <volume>29</volume>, <fpage>1268</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>1277</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/1365-2435.12452</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B80">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Mart</surname> <given-names>K. B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Veneklaas</surname> <given-names>E. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bramley</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Osmotic potential at full turgor: an easily measurable trait to help breeders select for drought tolerance in wheat</article-title>. <source>Plant Breed</source>. <volume>135</volume>, <fpage>279</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>285</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/pbr.12367</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B81">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Medlyn</surname> <given-names>B. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>De Kauwe</surname> <given-names>M. G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lin</surname> <given-names>Y.-S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Knauer</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Duursma</surname> <given-names>R. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Williams</surname> <given-names>C. A.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>How do leaf and ecosystem measures of water-use efficiency compare?</article-title> <source>New Phytol</source>. <volume>216</volume>, <fpage>758</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>770</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/nph.14626</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28574148</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B82">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Miner</surname> <given-names>G. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bauerle</surname> <given-names>W. L.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Seasonal variability of the parameters of the Ball-Berry model of stomatal conductance in maize (<italic>Zea mays</italic> L.) and sunflower (<italic>Helianthus annuus</italic> L.) under well-watered and water-stressed conditions</article-title>. <source>Plant Cell Environ</source>. <volume>40</volume>, <fpage>1874</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>1886</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/pce.12990</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28556410</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B83">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Miner</surname> <given-names>G. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bauerle</surname> <given-names>W. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Baldocchi</surname> <given-names>D. D.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Estimating the sensitivity of stomatal conductance to photosynthesis: a review</article-title>. <source>Plant Cell Environ</source>. <volume>40</volume>, <fpage>1214</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>1238</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/pce.12871</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">27925232</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B84">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Mo</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ma</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xu</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sun</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lun</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Assessing the capacity of plant species to accumulate particulate matter in Beijing, China</article-title>. <source>PLoS ONE</source> <volume>10</volume>:<fpage>e0140664</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0140664</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26506104</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B85">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Monteith</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1995</year>). <article-title>A reinterpretation of stomatal responses to humidity</article-title>. <source>Plant Cell Environ</source>. <volume>18</volume>, <fpage>357</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>364</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1365-3040.1995.tb00371.x</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B86">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Navarro</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ba non</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Olmos</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>S&#x000E1;nchez-Blanco</surname> <given-names>M. d. J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2007</year>). <article-title>Effects of sodium chloride on water potential components, hydraulic conductivity, gas exchange and leaf ultrastructure of <italic>Arbutus unedo</italic> plants</article-title>. <source>Plant Sci</source>. <volume>172</volume>, <fpage>473</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>480</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.plantsci.2006.10.006</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B87">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Oliveira</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pe nuelas</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2005</year>). <article-title>Effects of winter cold stress on photosynthesis and photochemical efficiency of PSII of the Mediterranean <italic>Cistus albidus</italic> L. and <italic>Quercus ilex</italic> L</article-title>. <source>Plant Ecol</source>. <volume>175</volume>, <fpage>179</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>191</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11258-005-4876-x</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B88">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Pariyar</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Eichert</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Goldbach</surname> <given-names>H. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hunsche</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Burkhardt</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>The exclusion of ambient aerosols changes the water relations of sunflower (<italic>Helianthus annuus</italic>) and bean (<italic>Vicia faba</italic>) plants</article-title>. <source>Environ. Exp. Bot</source>. <volume>88</volume>, <fpage>43</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>52</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.envexpbot.2011.12.031</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B89">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Pariyar</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Noga</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Rainfall does not impair particulate matter accumulation on Peri-urban field crops, but improves photosynthetic activity at UV exposure</article-title>. <source>Environ. Exp. Bot</source>. <volume>156</volume>, <fpage>288</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>297</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.envexpbot.2018.09.019</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B90">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Pourkhabbaz</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rastin</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Olbrich</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Langenfeld-Heyser</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Polle</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Influence of environmental pollution on leaf properties of urban plane trees, <italic>Platanus orientalis</italic> L</article-title>. <source>Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol</source>. <volume>85</volume>, <fpage>251</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>255</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00128-010-0047-4</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20577871</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B91">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Premachandra</surname> <given-names>G. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Saneoka</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fujita</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ogata</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1992</year>). <article-title>Leaf water relations, osmotic adjustment, cell membrane stability, epicuticular wax load and growth as affected by increasing water deficits in sorghum</article-title>. <source>J. Exp. Bot</source>. <volume>43</volume>, <fpage>1569</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>1576</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/jxb/43.12.1569</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B92">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Putaud</surname> <given-names>J.-P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Van Dingenen</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Alastuey</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bauer</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Birmili</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cyrys</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>A European aerosol phenomenology-3: Physical and chemical characteristics of particulate matter from 60 rural, urban, and kerbside sites across Europe</article-title>. <source>Atmos. Environ</source>. <volume>44</volume>, <fpage>1308</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>1320</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.12.011</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B93">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sack</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Scoffoni</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Minimum epidermal conductance (g<sub><italic>m</italic></sub><italic>in</italic>, a.k.a. cuticular conductance)</article-title>. <source>Prometheus Wiki</source> <volume>35</volume>, <fpage>257</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>262</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B94">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>&#x00160;antr&#x0016F;&#x0010D;ek</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sim&#x000E1;nov&#x000E1;</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Karbulkov&#x000E1;</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>&#x00160;imkov&#x000E1;</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Schreiber</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2004</year>). <article-title>A new technique for measurement of water permeability of stomatous cuticular membranes isolated from <italic>Hedera helix</italic> leaves</article-title>. <source>J. Exp. Bot</source>. <volume>55</volume>, <fpage>1411</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>1422</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/jxb/erh150</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">15155780</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B95">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sase</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Takamatsu</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yoshida</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Inubushi</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1998</year>). <article-title>Changes in properties of epicuticular wax and the related water loss in Japanese cedar (<italic>Cryptomeria japonica</italic>) affected by anthropogenic environmental factors</article-title>. <source>Can. J. For. Res</source>. <volume>28</volume>, <fpage>546</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>556</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1139/x98-021</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B96">
<citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sazeides</surname> <given-names>C. I.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fyllas</surname> <given-names>N. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Christopoulou</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>&#x0201C;Seasonal variation in foliar properties in Mediterranean Pine forests of different post-fire age,&#x0201D;</article-title> in <source>EGU General Assembly Conference Abstracts</source>, <publisher-loc>Munich</publisher-loc>: EGU21&#x02013;1064. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/egusphere-egu21-1064</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B97">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Schneider</surname> <given-names>C. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rasband</surname> <given-names>W. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Eliceiri</surname> <given-names>K. W.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>NIH image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis</article-title>. <source>Nat. Methods</source> <volume>9</volume>, <fpage>671</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>675</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nmeth.2089</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22930834</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B98">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Schuster</surname> <given-names>A.-C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Burghardt</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Riederer</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>The ecophysiology of leaf cuticular transpiration: are cuticular water permeabilities adapted to ecological conditions?</article-title> <source>J. Exp. Bot</source>. <volume>68</volume>, <fpage>5271</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>5279</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/jxb/erx321</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29036342</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B99">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Shabnam</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Oh</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Park</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kim</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Impact of particulate matter on primary leaves of <italic>Vigna radiata</italic> (L.) R. Wilczek</article-title>. <source>Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf</source>. <volume>212</volume>:<fpage>111965</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ecoenv.2021.111965</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33550080</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B100">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sharkey</surname> <given-names>T. D.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>What gas exchange data can tell us about photosynthesis?</article-title> <source>Plant Cell Environ</source>. <volume>39</volume>, <fpage>1161</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>1163</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/pce.12641</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26390237</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B101">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sharkey</surname> <given-names>T. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bernacchi</surname> <given-names>C. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Farquhar</surname> <given-names>G. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Singsaas</surname> <given-names>E. L.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2007</year>). <article-title>Fitting photosynthetic carbon dioxide response curves for C<sub>3</sub> leaves</article-title>. <source>Plant Cell Environ</source>. <volume>30</volume>, <fpage>1035</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>1040</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1365-3040.2007.01710.x</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">17661745</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B102">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Shen</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>T.-M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lu</surname> <given-names>C.-C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yuan</surname> <given-names>C.-S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hung</surname> <given-names>C.-H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lin</surname> <given-names>C.-T.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Chemical fingerprint and source apportionment of PM<sub>2</sub>.5 in highly polluted events of southern Taiwan</article-title>. <source>Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res</source>. <volume>27</volume>, <fpage>6918</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>6935</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11356-019-07328-8</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31879868</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B103">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Shen</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yuan</surname> <given-names>C.-S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lu</surname> <given-names>C.-C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jiang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jing</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hu</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Chemical composition and health risk of PM<sub>2</sub>.5 from near-ground firecracker burning in micro region of eastern Taiwan</article-title>. <source>Aerosol Air Qual. Res</source>. <volume>19</volume>, <fpage>2252</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>2266</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4209/aaqr.2019.08.0410</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B104">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sj&#x000F6;man</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hirons</surname> <given-names>A. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bassuk</surname> <given-names>N. L.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Urban forest resilience through tree selection-Variation in drought tolerance</article-title> in <source>Acer. Urban For. Urban Green</source>. <volume>14</volume>, <fpage>858</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>865</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ufug.2015.08.004</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B105">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Song</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Maher</surname> <given-names>B. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sun</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Particulate matter deposited on leaf of five evergreen species in Beijing, China: Source identification and size distribution</article-title>. <source>Atmos. Environ</source>. <volume>105</volume>, <fpage>53</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>60</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.01.032</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B106">
<citation citation-type="web"><person-group person-group-type="author"><collab>Taiwan News</collab></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <source>Taiwan&#x00027;s Scenic Hualien Area Considers Solution to Landfill Problem</source>. Available online at: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.taiwannews.com.tw/en/news/3340588">https://www.taiwannews.com.tw/en/news/3340588</ext-link> (accessed May 13, 2022).</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B107">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Takanashi</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kosugi</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Matsuo</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tani</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ohte</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2006</year>). <article-title>Patchy stomatal behavior in broad-leaved trees grown in different habitats</article-title>. <source>Tree Physiol</source>. <volume>26</volume>, <fpage>1565</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>1578</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/treephys/26.12.1565</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">17169896</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B108">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Tarin</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nolan</surname> <given-names>R. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Medlyn</surname> <given-names>B. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cleverly</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Eamus</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Water-use efficiency in a semi-arid woodland with high rainfall variability</article-title>. <source>Global Change Biol</source>. <volume>26</volume>, <fpage>496</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>508</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/gcb.14866</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31597216</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B109">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Tsai</surname> <given-names>Y. I.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>C.-L.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2006</year>). <article-title>Atmospheric aerosol composition and source apportionments to aerosol in southern Taiwan</article-title>. <source>Atmos. Environ</source>. <volume>40</volume>, <fpage>4751</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>4763</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.04.029</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B110">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Tsai</surname> <given-names>Y. I.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kuo</surname> <given-names>S.-C.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2005</year>). <article-title>PM<sub>2</sub>.5 aerosol water content and chemical composition in a metropolitan and a coastal area in southern Taiwan</article-title>. <source>Atmos. Environ</source>. <volume>39</volume>, <fpage>4827</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>4839</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2005.04.024</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B111">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Vict&#x000F3;rio</surname> <given-names>C. P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>dos Santos</surname> <given-names>M. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Simas</surname> <given-names>N. K.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Phthalates: environmental pollutants detected in leaf epicuticular wax of <italic>Avicennia schaueriana</italic> and <italic>Rhizophora</italic> mangle from a mangrove ecosystem</article-title>. <source>Int. J. Environ. Stud</source>. <fpage>1</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>10</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/00207233.2021.1875298</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B112">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Vogado</surname> <given-names>N. O.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Winter</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ubierna</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Farquhar</surname> <given-names>G. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cernusak</surname> <given-names>L. A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Directional change in leaf dry matter &#x003B4;<sup>1</sup>3C during leaf development is widespread in C<sub>3</sub> plants</article-title>. <source>Ann. Bot</source>. <volume>126</volume>, <fpage>981</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>990</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/aob/mcaa114</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32577724</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B113">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Shi</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Effects of weather, time, and pollution level on the amount of particulate matter deposited on leaves of <italic>Ligustrum lucidum</italic></article-title>. <source>Sci. World J</source>. <volume>2015</volume>:<fpage>935942</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1155/2015/935942</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25685849</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B114">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xu</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Field evidences for the positive effects of aerosols on tree growth</article-title>. <source>Glob. Change Biol</source>. <volume>24</volume>, <fpage>4983</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>4992</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/gcb.14339</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29855126</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B115">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Y.-S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chang</surname> <given-names>L.-C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chang</surname> <given-names>F.-J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Explore regional PM<sub>2</sub>.5 features and compositions causing health effects in Taiwan</article-title>. <source>Environ. Manage</source>. <volume>67</volume>, <fpage>176</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>191</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00267-020-01391-5</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33201258</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B116">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wolz</surname> <given-names>K. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wertin</surname> <given-names>T. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Abordo</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Leakey</surname> <given-names>A. D. B.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Diversity in stomatal function is integral to modelling plant carbon and water fluxes</article-title>. <source>Nat. Ecol. Evol.</source> <volume>1</volume>, <fpage>1292</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>1298</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41559-017-0238-z</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29046531</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B117">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>C.-H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lo</surname> <given-names>Y.-H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Blanco</surname> <given-names>J. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chang</surname> <given-names>S.-C.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Resilience assessment of lowland plantations using an ecosystem modeling approach</article-title>. <source>Sustainability</source> <volume>7</volume>, <fpage>3801</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>3822</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/su7043801</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B118">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wylie</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1955</year>). <article-title>A new absolute hygrometer of high accuracy</article-title>. <source>Nature</source> <volume>175</volume>, <fpage>118</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>119</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/175118a0</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B119">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Xu</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Long</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Feng</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhu</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sai</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chirkova</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>GABA signalling modulates stomatal opening to enhance plant water use efficiency and drought resilience</article-title>. <source>Nat. Commun</source>. <volume>12</volume>, <fpage>1</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>13</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41467-021-21694-3</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33782393</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B120">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Xu</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yu</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bao</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Desai</surname> <given-names>A. R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Size distribution of particulate matter in runoff from different leaf surfaces during controlled rainfall processes</article-title>. <source>Environ. Pollut</source>. <volume>255</volume>:<fpage>113234</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.envpol.2019.113234</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31541810</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B121">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Xu</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bao</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mo</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yu</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fan</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Influence of rainfall duration and intensity on particulate matter removal from plant leaves</article-title>. <source>Sci. Tot. Environ</source>. <volume>609</volume>, <fpage>11</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>16</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.07.141</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28732292</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B122">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>H.-Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tseng</surname> <given-names>Y.-L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chuang</surname> <given-names>H.-L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>T.-C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yuan</surname> <given-names>C.-S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lee</surname> <given-names>J. J.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Chemical fingerprint and source identification of atmospheric fine particles sampled at three environments at the tip of southern Taiwan</article-title>. <source>Aerosol Air Qual. Res</source>. <volume>17</volume>, <fpage>529</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>542</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4209/aaqr.2016.03.0102</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B123">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>Y.-J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bi</surname> <given-names>M.-H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nie</surname> <given-names>Z.-F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jiang</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>X.-D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fang</surname> <given-names>X.-W.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Evolution of stomatal closure to optimize water-use efficiency in response to dehydration in ferns and seed plants</article-title>. <source>New Phytol</source>. <volume>230</volume>, <fpage>2001</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>2010</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/nph.17278</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33586157</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B124">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>McNulty</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>An investigation on the leaf accumulation-removal efficiency of atmospheric particulate matter for five urban plant species under different rainfall regimes</article-title>. <source>Atmos. Environ</source>. <volume>208</volume>, <fpage>123</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>132</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.04.010</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B125">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cong</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xie</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Rainfall intensity plays an important role in the removal of PM from the leaf surfaces</article-title>. <source>Ecol. Indic</source>. <volume>128</volume>, <fpage>107</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>778</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107778</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B126">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Duursma</surname> <given-names>R. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Medlyn</surname> <given-names>B. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kelly</surname> <given-names>J. W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Prentice</surname> <given-names>I. C.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>How should we model plant responses to drought? An analysis of stomatal and non-stomatal responses to water stress</article-title>. <source>Agric. For. Meteorol</source>. <volume>182</volume>, <fpage>204</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>214</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.agrformet.2013.05.009</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25192884</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B127">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yan</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhai</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cong</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>The PM removal process of wetland plant leaves with different rainfall intensities and duration</article-title>. <source>J. Environ. Manage</source>. <volume>275</volume>, <fpage>111</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>239</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111239</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32846360</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B128">
<citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yan</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Conservation and applications of camphor tree (<italic>Cinnamomum camphora</italic>) in China: ethnobotany and genetic resources</article-title>. <source>Genet. Resour. Crop Evolut</source>. <volume>63</volume>, <fpage>1049</fpage>&#x02013;<lpage>1061</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10722-015-0300-0</pub-id></citation>
</ref>
</ref-list> 
</back>
</article> 