<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.3 20070202//EN" "journalpublishing.dtd">
<article xml:lang="EN" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" article-type="review-article" dtd-version="2.3">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Front. Plant Sci.</journal-id>
<journal-title>Frontiers in Plant Science</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">Front. Plant Sci.</abbrev-journal-title>
<issn pub-type="epub">1664-462X</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Frontiers Media S.A.</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpls.2022.891626</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Plant Science</subject>
<subj-group>
<subject>Review</subject>
</subj-group>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Sulfur Dioxide: An Emerging Signaling Molecule in Plants</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name>
<surname>Li</surname>
<given-names>Zhong-Guang</given-names>
</name>
<xref rid="aff1" ref-type="aff"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<xref rid="aff2" ref-type="aff"><sup>2</sup></xref>
<xref rid="aff3" ref-type="aff"><sup>3</sup></xref>
<xref rid="c001" ref-type="corresp"><sup>&#x002A;</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/345978/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Li</surname>
<given-names>Xiao-Er</given-names>
</name>
<xref rid="aff1" ref-type="aff"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<xref rid="aff2" ref-type="aff"><sup>2</sup></xref>
<xref rid="aff3" ref-type="aff"><sup>3</sup></xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname>
<given-names>Hong-Yan</given-names>
</name>
<xref rid="aff1" ref-type="aff"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<xref rid="aff2" ref-type="aff"><sup>2</sup></xref>
<xref rid="aff3" ref-type="aff"><sup>3</sup></xref>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="aff1"><sup>1</sup><institution>School of Life Sciences, Yunnan Normal University</institution>, <addr-line>Kunming</addr-line>, <country>China</country></aff>
<aff id="aff2"><sup>2</sup><institution>Engineering Research Center of Sustainable Development and Utilization of Biomass Energy, Ministry of Education</institution>, <addr-line>Kunming</addr-line>, <country>China</country></aff>
<aff id="aff3"><sup>3</sup><institution>Key Laboratory of Biomass Energy and Environmental Biotechnology, Yunnan Normal University</institution>, <addr-line>Kunming</addr-line>, <country>China</country></aff>
<author-notes>
<fn id="fn0001" fn-type="edited-by"><p>Edited by: Girdhar Kumar Pandey, University of Delhi, India</p></fn>
<fn id="fn0002" fn-type="edited-by"><p>Reviewed by: Gaurav Zinta, Institute of Himalayan Bioresource Technology (CSIR), India; Mohammad Yusuf, United Arab Emirates University, United Arab Emirates</p></fn>
<corresp id="c001">&#x002A;Correspondence: Zhong-Guang Li, <email>zhongguang_li@163.com</email></corresp>
<fn id="fn0003" fn-type="other"><p>This article was submitted to Plant Physiology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Plant Science</p></fn>
</author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>09</day>
<month>05</month>
<year>2022</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="collection">
<year>2022</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>13</volume>
<elocation-id>891626</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>08</day>
<month>03</month>
<year>2022</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>25</day>
<month>04</month>
<year>2022</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#x00A9; 2022 Li, Li and Chen.</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2022</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Li, Li and Chen</copyright-holder>
<license xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">
<p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.</p>
</license>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<p>Sulfur dioxide (SO<sub>2</sub>) has long been viewed as toxic gas and air pollutant, but now is being verified as a signaling molecule in mammalian cells. SO<sub>2</sub> can be endogenously produced and rapidly transformed into sulfur-containing compounds (e.g., hydrogen sulfide, cysteine, methionine, glutathione, glucosinolate, and phytochelatin) to maintain its homeostasis in plant cells. Exogenous application of SO<sub>2</sub> in the form of gas or solution can trigger the expression of thousands of genes. The physiological functions of these genes are involved in the antioxidant defense, osmotic adjustment, and synthesis of stress proteins, secondary metabolites, and plant hormones, thus modulating numerous plant physiological processes. The modulated physiological processes by SO<sub>2</sub> are implicated in seed germination, stomatal action, postharvest physiology, and plant response to environmental stresses. However, the review on the signaling role of SO<sub>2</sub> in plants is little. In this review, the anabolism and catabolism of SO<sub>2</sub> in plants were summarized. In addition, the signaling role of SO<sub>2</sub> in seed germination, stomatal movement, fruit fresh-keeping, and plant response to environmental stresses (including drought, cold, heavy metal, and pathogen stresses) was discussed. Finally, the research direction of SO<sub>2</sub> in plants is also proposed.</p>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>sulfur dioxide</kwd>
<kwd>signaling molecule</kwd>
<kwd>seed germination</kwd>
<kwd>fruit fresh-keeping</kwd>
<kwd>stomatal movement</kwd>
<kwd>stress response</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<contract-num rid="cn1">32160065</contract-num>
<contract-sponsor id="cn1">National Natural Science Foundation of China<named-content content-type="fundref-id">10.13039/501100001809</named-content></contract-sponsor>
<counts>
<fig-count count="2"/>
<table-count count="1"/>
<equation-count count="0"/>
<ref-count count="44"/>
<page-count count="9"/>
<word-count count="7447"/>
</counts>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec id="sec1" sec-type="intro">
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>For so long, sulfur dioxide (SO<sub>2</sub>) has been viewed as a harmful gas and air pollutant. SO<sub>2</sub> can dissolve in water and form sulfurous acid (H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>3</sub>), which in turn dissociates into sulfite (<inline-formula>
<mml:math id="M1">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msubsup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>3</mml:mn>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msubsup>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>), bisulfite (<inline-formula>
<mml:math id="M2">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HSO</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mn>3</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
</mml:msup>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>), and hydrogen ion (H<sup>+</sup>). In neutral solution, the ratio of <inline-formula>
<mml:math id="M3">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msubsup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>3</mml:mn>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msubsup>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>/<inline-formula>
<mml:math id="M4">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HSO</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mn>3</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
</mml:msup>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> is 3/1 (M/M; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref33">Singh et al., 2012</xref>). Therefore, the toxicity of SO<sub>2</sub> mainly roots in three derivants, that is, <inline-formula>
<mml:math id="M5">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msubsup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>3</mml:mn>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msubsup>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>, <inline-formula>
<mml:math id="M6">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HSO</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mn>3</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
</mml:msup>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>, and H<sup>+</sup>. <inline-formula>
<mml:math id="M7">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msubsup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>3</mml:mn>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msubsup>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> and <inline-formula>
<mml:math id="M8">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HSO</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mn>3</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
</mml:msup>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> are strong nucleophiles, which can deleteriously react with the sulfhydryl groups (&#x2013;SH)-containing proteins (including enzymes) and then alter their functions and activities, thus disturbing physiological and biochemical metabolism (e.g., photosynthesis, respiration, and ion balance), and even leading to cell death. H<sup>+</sup> can lower the pH value of the cells and their compartmentations, followed by affecting the activities of the enzymes and interfering with the cellular metabolism (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref13">Huang et al., 2021</xref>). In addition, SO<sub>2</sub> can induce the accumulation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) by oxidizing sulfite into sulfate and/or activating NADPH oxidase (NOX), which in turn cause biomembrane damage, protein disintegration, DNA damage, chromosome aberration, gene mutation, Golgi body destruction, and programmed cell death (PCD) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref28">Okpodu et al., 1996</xref>). Therefore, high concentration of SO<sub>2</sub> can damage plant at morphological, physiological, biochemical, and molecular levels. For example, SO<sub>2</sub> can reduce photosynthesis by disrupting thylakoid function, interfering with electron transport chain and membrane permeability, destroying pigments, and affecting carbon allocation, leads to leaf damage (e.g., yellow spots, discoloration, and necrosis), growth inhibition, and even plant death (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref18">Lee et al., 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref13">Huang et al., 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref24">Li and Yi, 2022</xref>).</p>
<p>SO<sub>2</sub>, as a signaling molecule, can endogenously produce by the catalysis of aspartate aminotransferase (AAT) and NOX using hydrogen sulfide (H<sub>2</sub>S) as substrate in animal system (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref13">Huang et al., 2021</xref>). Endogenous SO<sub>2</sub> executes a positive role in reducing brain injury, lung injury, myocardial injury, and hypertension; regulating vascular remodeling, myocardial remodeling, collagen remodeling, ion channels, cell proliferation, endoplasmic reticulum stress, and protein posttranslational modification (mainly sulfenylation by H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>). Therefore, the abnormal production of endogenous SO<sub>2</sub> commonly leads to colitis, hypertension, atherosclerosis, neuronal damage, vascular calcification, myocardial hypertrophy, myocardial injury, pulmonary hypertension, and acute lung injury (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref13">Huang et al., 2021</xref>). These studies indicate that SO<sub>2</sub>, as signaling molecule, plays an essential role in many physiological and pathological processes.</p>
<p>In general, signaling molecules, such as calcium ion (Ca<sup>2+</sup>), ROS, nitric oxide (NO), and H<sub>2</sub>S, exhibit the common characteristics: small molecule, fast dispersal, dual effects, controllability of generation and elimination, biological activity, reprogramming gene expression, and so forth (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">Chen et al., 2011</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref17">Khan et al., 2019</xref>). Small molecules are easy to be quickly biosynthesized/released to initiate signaling, and then immediately eliminated to terminate signaling. In addition, signaling molecules can be rapidly spread from production sites to effect sites to exert their biological effects by their receptors/sensors. Dual effects of signaling molecules refer to their toxicity at high concentration and signaling role at low concentration. Therefore, they must be maintained homeostasis in cells (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref17">Khan et al., 2019</xref>). Finally, signaling molecules can specially bind to their receptors/sensors and then reprogram gene expression, further regulating cellular metabolism (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">Chen et al., 2011</xref>). It is quite clear that small molecule SO<sub>2</sub> meets these criterions, indicating its signaling role in organisms.</p>
<p>In plants, SO<sub>2</sub> can be generated in the form of <inline-formula>
<mml:math id="M9">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msubsup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>3</mml:mn>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msubsup>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> during sulfate <inline-formula>
<mml:math id="M10">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>(</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msubsup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>4</mml:mn>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msubsup>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>)</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> reduction (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref20">Li et al., 2020</xref>). Recently, exogenous application of SO<sub>2</sub> in the form of gas (mg&#x2009;m<sup>&#x2212;3</sup>) or solution (Na<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>3</sub>/NaHSO<sub>3</sub>, 3/1, M/M), at low concentrations, has been found to exert a positive role in seed germination (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref36">Wang et al., 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref34">Sun et al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref5">Guo et al., 2021</xref>), stomatal movement (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref35">Taylor et al., 1981</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref37">Wei et al., 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref12">Hu et al., 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref39">Yi et al., 2017</xref>), fruit fresh-keeping (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref16">Joradol et al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref41">Zhang et al., 2022</xref>), and plant response to adverse environments (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref11">Hu et al., 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref43">Zhu et al., 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref6">Han et al., 2018</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref7">2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref38">Xue and Yi, 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref25">Li et al., 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref27">Ma, 2021</xref>). These studies indicate that SO<sub>2</sub> is emerging as a signaling molecule in plants. However, the review on SO<sub>2</sub> signaling in plants is little summarized. In this review, SO<sub>2</sub> homeostasis in plants and its signaling role in seed germination, stomatal action, fruit fresh-keeping, and plant response to environmental stress (including drought, cold, heavy metal, and pathogen infection) were concluded. The aim of this paper highlighted that SO<sub>2</sub> is an emerging signaling molecule in plants.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec2">
<title>Metabolism of SO<sub>2</sub></title>
<sec id="sec3">
<title>Anabolism of SO<sub>2</sub></title>
<p>Similar to other signaling molecules, SO<sub>2</sub> homeostasis in plants is maintained by its production (i.e., anabolism) and elimination (i.e., catabolism; <xref rid="fig1" ref-type="fig">Figure 1</xref>). In plants, the endogenous production of SO<sub>2</sub> mainly roots in the reduction of <inline-formula>
<mml:math id="M11">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msubsup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>4</mml:mn>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msubsup>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>. <inline-formula>
<mml:math id="M12">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msubsup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>4</mml:mn>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msubsup>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> absorbed by roots is activated by ATP sulfurylase (ATPS), producing adenosine 5&#x2032;-phosphosulfate (APS), which is transformed into <inline-formula>
<mml:math id="M13">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msubsup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>3</mml:mn>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msubsup>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> (main form of SO<sub>2</sub> in solution) by APS reductase (APR) using glutathione (GSH) as reducing agent (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref20">Li et al., 2020</xref>). In addition, cysteine (Cys) can change into cysteine sulfinate (Cts) by the catalysis of cysteine dioxygenase (CDO), and then produce &#x03B2;-sulfinylpyruvate (SP), which automatically form SO<sub>2</sub> without any enzyme catalysis and release pyruvate (Pyr; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref40">Yu et al., 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref14">Huang et al., 2022</xref>). Also, SO<sub>2</sub> can be released from hydrogen sulfide (H<sub>2</sub>S) and its derivant thiosulfate (TS) under the catalysis of NOX, sulfide oxidase (SO), and TS sulfurtransferase (TST), respectively (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref19">Li et al., 2009</xref>). Similarly, sulfur-containing amino acids (SAA) also can generate SO<sub>2</sub> by the catalysis of amino acid oxidase (AAO; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref30">Rausch and Wachter, 2005</xref>). However, the detailed mechanisms of SO<sub>2</sub>-producing pathways in plant growth, development, and response to environmental stress need to be further dissected in the coming days.</p>
<fig position="float" id="fig1">
<label>Figure 1</label>
<caption><p>Anabolism and catabolism of sulfur dioxide (SO<sub>2</sub>) in plants. AAO, amino acid oxidase; APR, APS reductase; APS, adenosine 5&#x2032;-phosphosulfate; ATPS, ATP sulfurylase; CDO, cysteine dioxygenase (CDO); CS, Cys synthetase; Cts, cysteine sulfinate; Cys, cysteine; Cyst, cystathionine; DHAR, dehydroascorbate reductase; &#x03B3;-ECS, &#x03B3;-glutamycysteine synthetase; Gly I, glyoxalase I; Gly II, glyoxalase II; GR, glutathione reductase; GS, GSH synthesis; GSH, glutathione; GSL, glucosinolate; GSSG, oxidized GSH; Hcy, homocystine; H<sub>2</sub>S, hydrogen sulfide; Met, methionine; MG, methylglyoxal; NOX, NADPH oxidase; OPH, O-phosphohomoserine; PC, phytochelatin; Pry, pyruvate; SAA, sulfur-containing amino acids; SGL, S-D-lactoylglutathione; SIR, sulfite reductase; SO, sulfide oxidase; SP, &#x03B2;-sulfinylpyruvate; Thr, threonine; Ts, threonine synthetase; TS, thiosulfate; TST, TS sulfurtransferase.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fpls-13-891626-g001.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="sec4">
<title>Catabolism of SO<sub>2</sub></title>
<p>Analogue to its production, the scavenging of excessive SO<sub>2</sub> is primarily achieved by the enzyme-catalysis pathways (<xref rid="fig1" ref-type="fig">Figure 1</xref>). Endogenous SO<sub>2</sub> is easy to dissolve in water and produce <inline-formula>
<mml:math id="M14">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msubsup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>3</mml:mn>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msubsup>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>, which is in turn reduced into H<sub>2</sub>S by <inline-formula>
<mml:math id="M15">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msubsup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>3</mml:mn>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msubsup>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> reductase (SIR), followed by synthesizing Cys under the catalysis of Cys synthetase (CS; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref9">Hasanuzzaman et al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref20">Li et al., 2020</xref>). Cys is a common precursor for biosynthesis of numerous biological molecules such as GSH, phytochelatin (PC), phytoalexins (PA), cystathionine (Cyst), homocystine (Hcy), methionine (Met), ethylene (ETH), and glucosinolate (GSL; <xref rid="fig1" ref-type="fig">Figure 1</xref>). GSH, as an important reducing agent in plant cells, which can be synthesized from Cys under the successive catalysis of &#x03B3;-glutamycysteine synthetase (&#x03B3;-ES) and GSH synthesis (GS; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref40">Yu et al., 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref14">Huang et al., 2022</xref>). GSH and its oxidized form (GSSG) can mutually convert by dehydroascorbate reductase (DHAR) and glutathione reductase (GR) using dehydroascorbate and NADPH as electron acceptor and electron donor, respectively (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">Bartoli et al., 2017</xref>). Also, GSH can further synthesize PC to chelate heavy metal in plant cells, thus reducing the toxicity of heavy metal (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref20">Li et al., 2020</xref>). In addition to these, Cys can transform into other amino acids such as Cyst, Hcy, and Met (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref19">Li et al., 2009</xref>), further regulating the metabolism of amino acids in plants. These metabolic pathways are closely associated with the acquisition of stress tolerance in plants, also indicating the signaling role of SO<sub>2</sub>.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="sec5">
<title>Signaling Role of SO<sub>2</sub></title>
<p>Increasing evidences show that exogenous application of SO<sub>2</sub> in a gas (mg&#x2009;m<sup>&#x2212;3</sup>, fumigation) or solution (Na<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>3</sub>/NaHSO<sub>3</sub>, 3/1, irrigation) form could reprogramme the expression of thousands of genes. The physiological functions of these genes include antioxidant defense, osmotic adjustment, cell wall modification, and the synthesis of stress proteins (including heat shock proteins, HSP; and pathogen-related proteins, PR), secondary metabolites, and plant hormones (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref21">Li and Yi, 2012a</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref22">b</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref23">2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref42">Zhao and Yi, 2014</xref>), which in turn modulated several physiological processes, such as seed germination, stomatal action, postharvest physiology, and plant response to environmental stresses, including drought, cold, heavy metal, and pathogen stresses (<xref rid="tab1" ref-type="table">Table 1</xref>). In addition, the modulation of these physiological processes is involved in the interaction of SO<sub>2</sub> and other signaling molecules, such as H<sub>2</sub>S, NO, ROS, cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP), and plant hormones (<xref rid="fig2" ref-type="fig">Figure 2</xref>). In this section, the signaling role of SO<sub>2</sub> in plants will be stated in detail.</p>
<table-wrap position="float" id="tab1">
<label>Table 1</label>
<caption><p>Examples of the role of SO<sub>2</sub> signaling in plant growth and response to environmental stress.</p></caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th align="char" valign="top" char="&#x00D7;"><bold>Species</bold></th>
<th align="char" valign="top" char="&#x00D7;"><bold>Response</bold></th>
<th align="char" valign="top" char="&#x00D7;"><bold>SO</bold><sub><bold>2</bold></sub> <bold>donor</bold></th>
<th align="char" valign="top" char="&#x00D7;"><bold>Role</bold></th>
<th align="char" valign="top" char="&#x00D7;"><bold>References</bold></th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Maize</td>
<td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="3">Seed germination</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">0&#x2009;~&#x2009;5&#x2009;mM Na<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>3</sub>/NaHSO<sub>3</sub></td>
<td align="left" valign="top">Triggering NOX-dependent ROS signaling and elevating amylase activity</td>
<td align="left" valign="top"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref5">Guo et al., 2021</xref></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Wheat</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">0.1&#x2009;mM Na<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>3</sub>/NaHSO<sub>3</sub></td>
<td align="left" valign="top">Delaying programmed cell death (PCD) and triggering H<sub>2</sub>S/NO/ROS signaling</td>
<td align="left" valign="top"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref34">Sun et al., 2018</xref></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Barley</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">0.05&#x2009;mM Na<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>3</sub>/NaHSO<sub>3</sub></td>
<td align="left" valign="top">Delaying PCD and triggering H<sub>2</sub>S/NO/ROS signaling</td>
<td align="left" valign="top"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref36">Wang et al., 2017</xref></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Potato</td>
<td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="3">Stomatal movement</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">0&#x2009;~&#x2009;5&#x2009;mM Na<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>3</sub>/NaHSO<sub>3</sub></td>
<td align="left" valign="top">Triggering H<sub>2</sub>S/NO signaling</td>
<td align="left" valign="top"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref12">Hu et al., 2014</xref></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top"><italic>H. fulva</italic></td>
<td align="left" valign="top">0&#x2009;~&#x2009;5&#x2009;mM Na<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>3</sub>/NaHSO<sub>3</sub></td>
<td align="left" valign="top">Triggering PCD and NO/ROS/Ca<sup>2+</sup> signaling</td>
<td align="left" valign="top"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref37">Wei et al., 2013</xref></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top"><italic>Vicia faba</italic></td>
<td align="left" valign="top">0.25&#x2009;~&#x2009;6&#x2009;mM Na<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>3</sub>/NaHSO<sub>3</sub></td>
<td align="left" valign="top">Triggering NO/ROS/Ca<sup>2+</sup> signaling</td>
<td align="left" valign="top"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref39">Yi et al., 2017</xref></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Longan</td>
<td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="2">Fruit fresh-keeping</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">500&#x2009;~&#x2009;2,500&#x2009;mg/L SO<sub>2</sub></td>
<td align="left" valign="top">Triggering NOX-dependent ROS signaling</td>
<td align="left" valign="top"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref16">Joradol et al., 2019</xref></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Grape</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">200&#x2009;&#x03BC;l/L</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">Driving AsA-GSH cycle and regulating sulfur metabolism</td>
<td align="left" valign="top"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref41">Zhang et al., 2022</xref></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Wheat</td>
<td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="2">Drought</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">0&#x2009;~&#x2009;20&#x2009;mg/m<sup>3</sup> SO<sub>2</sub></td>
<td align="left" valign="top">Triggering H<sub>2</sub>S signaling, synthesizing osmolyte, and activating antioxidant system</td>
<td align="left" valign="top"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref25">Li et al., 2021</xref></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Foxtail</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">30&#x2009;mg/m<sup>3</sup> SO<sub>2</sub></td>
<td align="left" valign="top">Synthesizing osmolyte, triggering stomatal closure, and activating antioxidant system</td>
<td align="left" valign="top"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref7">Han et al., 2019</xref></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Arabidopsis</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">Cold</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">50&#x2009;&#x03BC;M Na<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>3</sub>/NaHSO<sub>3</sub><break/>30&#x2009;mg/m<sup>3</sup> SO<sub>2</sub></td>
<td align="left" valign="top">Activating C-repeated binding factor (CBF) pathway and antioxidant system, synthesizing anthocyanin</td>
<td align="left" valign="top"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref27">Ma (2021)</xref></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Wheat</td>
<td align="left" valign="top" rowspan="2">Cadmium</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">1 and 2&#x2009;mM Na<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>3</sub>/NaHSO<sub>3</sub></td>
<td align="left" valign="top">Triggering H<sub>2</sub>S signaling, synthesizing osmolyte, and activating antioxidant system</td>
<td align="left" valign="top"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref11">Hu et al., 2015</xref></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Foxtail</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">0.5&#x2009;mM Na<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>3</sub>/NaHSO<sub>3</sub></td>
<td align="left" valign="top">Triggering PCD, activating antioxidant system, and reducing metal transporters</td>
<td align="left" valign="top"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref6">Han et al., 2018</xref></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" valign="top">Wheat</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">Aluminium</td>
<td align="left" valign="top">1.2&#x2009;mM Na<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>3</sub>/NaHSO<sub>3</sub></td>
<td align="left" valign="top">Triggering H<sub>2</sub>S signaling, activating antioxidant system, and reducing aluminium accumulation</td>
<td align="left" valign="top"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref43">Zhu et al., 2015</xref></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
<fig position="float" id="fig2">
<label>Figure 2</label>
<caption><p>Signaling role of sulfur dioxide (SO<sub>2</sub>) in plants. AAT, aspartate aminotransferase; ABA, abscisic acid; APR, adenosine 5'-phosphosulfate reductase; AsA, ascorbic acid; CAT, catalase; cGMP, cyclic guanosine monophosphate; ETH, ethylene; GR, glutathione reductase; GS, glutathione synthetase; GSH, glutathione; GSL, glucosinolate; H<sub>2</sub>S, hydrogen sulfide; HSF, heat shock factor; HSP, heat shock proteins; JA, jasmonic acid; MM, methylation modification; NO, nitric oxide; NOX, NADPH oxidase; PA, phytoalexins; PAL, phenylalanine ammonia-lyase; P5CS, &#x0394;<sup>1</sup>-pyrroline-5-carboxylate synthetase; POD, peroxidase; PPO, polyphenol oxidase; PR, pathogenesis-related proteins; Pro, proline; ROS, reactive oxygen species; SA, salicylic acid; SOD, superoxide dismutase; TSP, total soluble proteins; TSS, total soluble sugars; TST, thiosulfate sulfurtransferase.</p></caption>
<graphic xlink:href="fpls-13-891626-g002.tif"/>
</fig>
<sec id="sec6">
<title>Seed Germination</title>
<p>Seed germination is the first and key stage of plant life cycle, which is sensitive to environmental stress, especially soil environment stress. Therefore, seed germination is the basis for crop production and vegetation recovery. In general, seed priming, especially chemical priming, can improve seed vigor, seed germination, and seedling viability, as well as the resistance of seedlings to adverse environments (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref001">Paul et al., 2022</xref>). In maize seeds, pretreatment with SO<sub>2</sub> (1&#x2009;mM) facilitated seed germination and increased seed vigor. In addition, the SO<sub>2</sub>-pretreated germinating seeds had higher NOX activity and ROS level, while NOX inhibitor, diphenyleneiodinium, inhibited ROS accumulation and germination and vigor of maize seeds pretreated with SO<sub>2</sub> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref5">Guo et al., 2021</xref>). Also, SO<sub>2</sub> pretreatment up-regulated the expression and activity of &#x03B1;-amylase in germinating maize seeds (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref5">Guo et al., 2021</xref>). These data imply that SO<sub>2</sub> might function as signaling molecule in facilitating the germination of maize seeds by mobilizing reserves <italic>via</italic> activating NOX-dependent ROS production.</p>
<p>In wheat seeds, pretreatment with 100&#x2009;&#x03BC;M SO<sub>2</sub> donor (NaHSO<sub>3</sub>/Na<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>3</sub>, 1/3&#x2009;M/M) postponed PCD, restrained the coalescence of small protein storage vacuoles, and reduced the accumulation of ROS (e.g., hydrogen peroxide, H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>; and superoxide anion, O<sub>2</sub><sup>&#x2013;</sup>) in aleurone cells pretreated with gibberellin (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref34">Sun et al., 2018</xref>). In addition, SO<sub>2</sub>-pretreated germinating seeds, compared to treatment with gibberelin alone, sustained higher activities of catalase (CAT), guaiacol peroxidase (POD), ascorbate peroxidase (APX), and superoxide dismutase (SOD), while had lower activities of lipoxygenase (LOX) and polyphenol oxidase (PPO; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref34">Sun et al., 2018</xref>). Also, SO<sub>2</sub>-pretreated aleurone layers induced the production of endogenous H<sub>2</sub>S and NO, whereas the supplement of cPTIO (NO scavenger) accelerated PCD in both SO<sub>2</sub>&#x2013; and H<sub>2</sub>S-pretreated aleurone cells (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref34">Sun et al., 2018</xref>). These results indicate that SO<sub>2</sub> can trigger H<sub>2</sub>S/NO signaling to delay PCD in wheat aleurone layers pretreated with gibberellin <italic>via</italic> activating antioxidant enzyme system.</p>
<p>Similarly, in barley (<italic>Hordeum vulgare</italic> L.) seeds, pretreatment with SO<sub>2</sub> donor (NaHSO<sub>3</sub>/Na<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>3</sub>, 50&#x2009;&#x03BC;M) alleviated PCD induced by gibberelin in aleurone layers in a concentration-dependent fashion (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref36">Wang et al., 2017</xref>). Additionally, SO<sub>2</sub> pretreatment increased the activities of SOD, CAT, APX, POD, and glutathione reductase (GR), while weakened that of LOX, reduced the levels of H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>, O<sub>2</sub><sup>&#x2013;</sup>, and malondialdehyde (MDA) in aleurone layers (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref36">Wang et al., 2017</xref>). Furthermore, SO<sub>2</sub> pretreatment triggered the accumulation of endogenous H<sub>2</sub>S and NO in aleurone layers (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref36">Wang et al., 2017</xref>), similar to the results reported by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref34">Sun et al. (2018)</xref> in wheat. These data suggest that SO<sub>2</sub> might regulate the germination of barley seeds by attenuating PCD <italic>via</italic> the interaction among H<sub>2</sub>S, NO, and ROS signaling.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec7">
<title>Stomatal Movement</title>
<p>Stomata is a major gate that plants exchange with carbon dioxide, oxygen, and water, its movement (i.e., opening and closure) influences photosynthesis, respiration, and transpiration, as well as plant resistance to environmental stress, especially drought stress (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref15">Jia and Zhang, 2008</xref>). Stomatal movement is strictly controlled by a signaling network composed of many second messengers, such as Ca<sup>2+</sup>, NO, ROS (mainly H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>), H<sub>2</sub>S, and plant hormones (especially abscisic acid, ABA; ethylene, ETH; and cytokinin, CTK; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref29">Qi et al., 2018</xref>). Therefore, priming with signaling molecules can alter stomatal aperture and enhance the tolerance of plants to environmental stress. In sweet potato (<italic>Ipomoea batatas</italic>), treatment of epidermal strips with the different concentrations (0&#x2009;~&#x2009;5&#x2009;mM) of Na<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>3</sub>/NaHSO<sub>3</sub> solutions (SO<sub>2</sub> donor) rapidly increased the levels of endogenous H<sub>2</sub>S and NO, and then induced stomatal closure in a dose-dependent manner (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref12">Hu et al., 2014</xref>). In addition, the stomatal closure induced by SO<sub>2</sub> was reversed by hypotaurine (H<sub>2</sub>S scavenger) and cPTIO (NO scavenger; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref12">Hu et al., 2014</xref>), indicating that the SO<sub>2</sub>-triggered stomatal closure might be mediated by the H<sub>2</sub>S and NO signaling pathways. Also, in broad bean (<italic>Vicia faba</italic> L.), low concentrations (0.0001&#x2009;~&#x2009;0.1&#x2009;&#x03BC;M) of sulfurous acid (H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>3</sub>, as SO<sub>2</sub> donor) facilitated stomatal opening by reducing the level of endogenous ABA to antagonize its action (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref35">Taylor et al., 1981</xref>). Adversely, a high concentration (10&#x2009;&#x03BC;M) of H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>3</sub> inhibited stomatal opening by increasing the level of endogenous ABA (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref35">Taylor et al., 1981</xref>).</p>
<p>In <italic>Hemerocallis fulva</italic>, the epidermal strips treated with the different concentrations (1&#x2009;~&#x2009;5&#x2009;mM) of SO<sub>2</sub> donor (Na<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>3</sub>/NaHSO<sub>3</sub>) were found to reduce the guard cells vigor and induce cell death in a concentration-dependent manner (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref37">Wei et al., 2013</xref>). The SO<sub>2</sub>-induced death cells exhibited the features of apoptosis (i.e., nuclear condensation, nuclear elongation, and DNA fragmentation), indicating SO<sub>2</sub> could trigger PCD in guard cells. Additionally, the levels of endogenous NO, ROS, and Ca<sup>2+</sup> were increased by SO<sub>2</sub>, while reduced by NO scavenger (cPTIO), nitrate reductase (NO-producing enzyme) inhibitor (NaN<sub>3</sub>), ROS scavengers (ascorbic acid, AsA; and CAT), Ca<sup>2+</sup> chelating agent (EGTA), and plasma membrane Ca<sup>2+</sup> channel blocker (LaCl<sub>3</sub>), thus decreasing cell death (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref37">Wei et al., 2013</xref>). Also, AsA treatment decreased the levels of NO and Ca<sup>2+</sup> compared with the SO<sub>2</sub> treatment alone, whereas NaN<sub>3</sub> treatment decreased ROS and Ca<sup>2+</sup> levels, but LaCl<sub>3</sub> treatment had no significant effect on NO and ROS levels (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref37">Wei et al., 2013</xref>). These data imply that SO<sub>2</sub> could induce PCD in guard cells by intertwining NO, ROS, and Ca<sup>2+</sup> signaling pathways in <italic>H. fulva</italic>, which might be a major cause for SO<sub>2</sub>-induced stomatal closure.</p>
<p>Similarly, in <italic>Vicia faba</italic>, SO<sub>2</sub> hydrates (Na<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>3</sub>/NaHSO<sub>3</sub>) induced guard cell death in a dose-dependent fashion (ranging from 0.25 to 6&#x2009;mM; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref39">Yi et al., 2017</xref>). Meanwhile, SO<sub>2</sub> induced an increase in the level of endogenous NO, H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>, and Ca<sup>2+</sup> in guard cells of <italic>Vicia faba</italic>, similar to the data reported by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref37">Wei et al. (2013)</xref> in <italic>H. fulva</italic>. In addition, treatment with exogenous NO donor enhanced the toxicity of SO<sub>2</sub>, whereas NO scavenger (cPTIO) and synthesis inhibitors (L-NAME and tungstate) weakened SO<sub>2</sub> toxicity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref39">Yi et al., 2017</xref>). Likewise, the toxicity of SO<sub>2</sub> was also blocked by ROS scavenger (AsA and CAT), Ca<sup>2+</sup> chelating agent (EGTA), and Ca<sup>2+</sup> channel inhibitor (LaCl<sub>3</sub>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref39">Yi et al., 2017</xref>). Also, treatment with both cPTIO and AsA reversed SO<sub>2</sub>-induced increase in Ca<sup>2+</sup> level in guard cells, while cPTIO and AsA treatment alone blocked SO<sub>2</sub>-induced H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> and NO accumulation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref39">Yi et al., 2017</xref>). These data suggest that SO<sub>2</sub> toxicity might be achieved by joint action of NO, ROS, and Ca<sup>2+</sup> signaling in guard cells of <italic>Vicia faba</italic>, further supporting the hypothesis proposed by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref37">Wei et al. (2013)</xref>. In addition to stomatal movement, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref10">Haworth et al. (2012)</xref> reported that SO<sub>2</sub> could change stomatal density (SD), stomatal index (SI), and SD/SI ratio in <italic>Lepidozamia hopei</italic>, <italic>Lepidozamia peroffskyana</italic>, <italic>Ginkgo biloba</italic>, <italic>Nageia nagi</italic>, <italic>Podocarpus macrophyllus</italic>, <italic>Araucaria bidwillii</italic>, and <italic>Aagathis australis</italic>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec8">
<title>Fruit Fresh-Keeping</title>
<p>Shelf-life of the fruits and vegetables determines their quality and economic value. To lengthen the shelf-life, numerous physical and chemical methods are used in the process of fruits and vegetables storage (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref16">Joradol et al., 2019</xref>). The physical methods are involved in water, fertilizer, gas (e.g., oxygen and carbon dioxide), heat (temperature), and light; while chemical methods are mainly fresh-keeping agent treatments (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref41">Zhang et al., 2022</xref>). In Longan (<italic>Dimocarpus longan</italic> Lour. cv. Daw) fruits, SO<sub>2</sub> fumigation (500&#x2009;~&#x2009;2,500&#x2009;mg&#x2009;L<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>) reduced pericarp browning, lengthened shelf-life, and improved the quality of fruits by enhancing antioxidant capacity compared with the control without SO<sub>2</sub> fumigation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref16">Joradol et al., 2019</xref>). In addition, the fruits fumigated with SO<sub>2</sub> had a higher content of endogenous H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>, which reached a maximum within 6&#x2009;~&#x2009;12&#x2009;h. Also, SO<sub>2</sub> treatment up-regulated the gene expression of NOX and SOD (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref16">Joradol et al., 2019</xref>). These data indicate that SO<sub>2</sub> fumigation can induce the NOX-dependent H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> signaling, which in turn enhance the antioxidant capacity, thereby lengthening the shelf-life of fruits.</p>
<p>Similarly, in table grapes, SO<sub>2</sub> treatment (200&#x2009;&#x03BC;l&#x2009;L<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>) inhibited fruit decay and reduced the levels of H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> and MDA compared to the control without SO<sub>2</sub> treatment (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref41">Zhang et al., 2022</xref>). Additionally, SO<sub>2</sub> treatment up-regulated the expression of <italic>VvSiR, VvSAT1</italic>, <italic>VvSAT2</italic>, and <italic>VvOASTL</italic>, which in turn increased the activities of sulfite reductase, serine acetyltransferase, and <italic>O</italic>-acetylserine (thiol)-lyase, as well as the content of Cys (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref41">Zhang et al., 2022</xref>). Likewise, the gene expression level, enzyme activity, and antioxidant content related to AsA-GSH cycle was enhanced by SO<sub>2</sub> treatment in grapes. Also, the expression of <italic>VvGS</italic> (GSH synthetase) was up-regulated by SO<sub>2</sub> treatment in table grapes, while the transcription level of <italic>VvHPCA1-4</italic> and <italic>VvHPCA3</italic> (evaluating the degree of oxidative damage) was down-regulated (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref41">Zhang et al., 2022</xref>). These data indicate that SO<sub>2</sub> can lengthen the shelf-life of table grapes by maintaining H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> homeostasis to reduce postharvest oxidative damage <italic>via</italic> driving the AsA-GSH cycle.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec9">
<title>Drought Response</title>
<p>Drought stress commonly leads to osmotic and oxidative stress due to the shortage of water and the overaccumulation of ROS in plant cells. The approaches alleviating osmotic and oxidative stresses can boost the resistance of plants to drought stress (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref32">Salehi-Lisar and Bakhshayeshan-Agdam, 2016</xref>). In wheat seedlings, under drought stress, pretreatment with SO<sub>2</sub> (0&#x2009;~&#x2009;20&#x2009;mg&#x2009;m<sup>&#x2212;3</sup>) improved the survival percentage and relative water content (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref25">Li et al., 2021</xref>), indicating that SO<sub>2</sub> could increase drought tolerance. The further experiments showed that SO<sub>2</sub> pretreatment improved the content of proline (Pro) and activities of SOD and POD, which in turn reduced the accumulation of H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> and MDA in drought-treated wheat seedlings. In addition, SO<sub>2</sub> pretreatment down-regulated the expression of <italic>TaNAC69</italic> (transcription factor gene), while the expression of other transcription factor genes (<italic>TaERF1</italic> and <italic>TaMYB30</italic>) insignificantly changed but maintained a higher levels in wheat seedlings under drought stress conditions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref25">Li et al., 2021</xref>). Also, SO<sub>2</sub> pretreatment induced an increase in H<sub>2</sub>S in wheat seedlings under drought stress, while H<sub>2</sub>S scavenger hypotaurine decreased the activities of SOD and POD, as well as the expression of transcription factor genes, followed by increasing the accumulation of H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> and MDA, returning to the level of drought treatment alone (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref25">Li et al., 2021</xref>). These data suggest that SO<sub>2</sub> can increase the drought tolerance of wheat seedlings by accumulating osmolytes and activating antioxidant enzmyes <italic>via</italic> H<sub>2</sub>S signaling pathway.</p>
<p>In like manner, in foxtail millet seedlings, SO<sub>2</sub> fumigation (30&#x2009;mg&#x2009;m<sup>&#x2212;3</sup>) decreased stomatal apertures and leaf transpiration rate, which in turn improved the relative water content in the leaves of drought-stressed seedlings (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref7">Han et al., 2019</xref>), thus improving the drought tolerance of seedlings. Additionally, SO<sub>2</sub> pretreatment increased the activity of &#x0394;<sup>1</sup>-pyrroline-5-carboxylate synthetase (P5CS), reduced that of Pro dehydrogenase (ProDH), and corresponding gene expression, followed by accumulating Pro in the leaves of drought-stressed seedlings (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref7">Han et al., 2019</xref>). Moreover, application of SO<sub>2</sub> up-regulated the gene expression of CAT and POD and increased the activities of corresponding enzymes in the leaves of drought-stressed plants, which in turn alleviated drought-induced oxidative damage (i.e., decreasing MDA content) by scavenging H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref7">Han et al., 2019</xref>). These results imply that SO<sub>2</sub> fumigation can increase drought tolerance in foxtail millet seedlings by combined effect of stomatal closure, Pro accumulation, and antioxidant defense. Similarly, under drought stress, SO<sub>2</sub> pre-exposure (30&#x2009;mg&#x2009;m<sup>&#x2212;3</sup>) increased SOD, POD, and O-acetylserine(thio)lyase (OASTL) activities and GSH, Cys, and nonprotein thiol (NPT) contents in Arabidopsis plants, which in turn alleviated oxidative stress (i.e., reducing H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> and MDA accumulation; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref24">Li and Yi, 2022</xref>). Meanwhile, SO<sub>2</sub> increased Pro level by up-regulating gene expression and activity of P5CS and down-regulating that of ProDH, followed by reducing water loss, stomatal conductance, and transpiration rate, thus increasing net photosynthetic rate, water use efficiency, and photosynthetic pigment contents (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref24">Li and Yi, 2022</xref>), indicating that SO<sub>2</sub> can improve the tolerance of Arabidopsis plants to drought stress.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec10">
<title>Cold Response</title>
<p>Cold stress includes chilling (above freezing point, resulting in chilling injury) and freezing stress (below freezing point, leading to freezing injury). Both chilling and freezing stress can trigger osmotic and oxidative stresses (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref31">Ritonga and Chen, 2020</xref>). Therefore, the enhanced osmoregulation and antioxidant capacity by chemical priming are closely related with low temperature stress tolerance in plants. Presoaking of seeds with the different concentrations of (0, 10, 25, 50, and 100&#x2009;&#x03BC;M) SO<sub>2</sub> alleviated the cold-induced growth inhibition. Among concentrations, 50&#x2009;&#x03BC;M SO<sub>2</sub> presoaking was the most efficient (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref27">Ma, 2021</xref>). Similarly, pretreatment of <italic>Arabidopsis thaliana</italic> seeds with 50&#x2009;&#x03BC;M SO<sub>2</sub> boosted the cold resistance of <italic>A. thaliana</italic> seedlings. Otherwise, SO<sub>2</sub> presoaking up-regulated the expression of <italic>AtCAT3</italic> and <italic>AtPOD</italic>, and increased the activities of corresponding CAT and POD, which in turn reduced the level of endogenous H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref27">Ma, 2021</xref>). Meanwhile, 50&#x2009;&#x03BC;M SO2 pretreatment up-regulated the expression of genes related to anthocyanin synthesis (i.e., <italic>AtPAL2, AtCHS, AtCHI, and AtF3H</italic>), followed by promoting the synthesis of anthocyanin. Interestingly, SO<sub>2</sub> pretreatment also activated the expression of genes (i.e., <italic>AtICE1, AtICE2, AtCBF1, AtCBF2, AtCBF3, AtCOR15a, and AtCOR15b</italic>) involved in C-repeated binding factor (CBF) signaling pathways, mainly cold-response signaling pathways (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref27">Ma, 2021</xref>).</p>
<p>Parallelly, SO<sub>2</sub> (30&#x2009;mg&#x2009;m<sup>&#x2212;3</sup>) exposure reduced stomatal aperture and ROS accumulation by enhancing POD activity under cold stress (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref27">Ma, 2021</xref>). Also, SO<sub>2</sub> exposure promoted Pro accumulation by increasing P5CS activity and lowering PDH activity as well as activated the gene expression of CBF signaling pathways (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref27">Ma, 2021</xref>), thus improving the cold adaptability of <italic>Arabidopsis thaliana</italic>. Similarly, exposure of <italic>Arabidopsis thaliana</italic> (Col-0) to the different concentrations of SO<sub>2</sub> increased O<sub>2</sub><sup>&#x2013;</sup> generation rate and H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> content in Arabidopsis shoots, and up-regulated the gene expression of POD, SOD, and glutathione peroxidase (GPX), as well as increased the activity of corresponding enzymes and the content of GSH. Additionally, SO<sub>2</sub> exposure increased isoenzymatic isoforms of SOD (FeSOD and Cu/ZnSOD) and POD, while decreased CAT isoforms (CAT2 and CAT3; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref22">Li and Yi, 2012b</xref>). Similarly, in Arabidopsis, SO<sub>2</sub> exposure (30&#x2009;mg&#x2009;m<sup>&#x2212;3</sup>) down-regulated the expression of miR398, which in turn increased the transcript level of its target genes Cu/Zn-SOD (<italic>CSD1</italic> and <italic>CSD2</italic>) and increased the activity of SOD (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref26">Li et al., 2017</xref>). Similarly, SO<sub>2</sub> up-regulated the expression of miR395 expression, followed by decline in the transcript level of its target genes, ATP sulfurylases (<italic>APS3</italic> and <italic>APS4</italic>) and sulfate transporter (<italic>SULTR2;1</italic>), implying miR398 and miR395 participate in the resistance of Arabidopsis plants to oxidative stress induced by SO<sub>2</sub> exposure. These data suggest that SO<sub>2</sub>-induced ROS act as a signal to trigger plant defense response.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec11">
<title>Heavy Metal Response</title>
<p>Heavy metals, such as cadmium (Cd), mercury, arsenic, and aluminum, have become the major pollutants with the development of modern agriculture and industry. Heavy metals can disturb cellular metabolism, inhibit seed germination and plant growth, and even influence on human health by entering into food chain (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">Ghori et al., 2019</xref>). Therefore, heavy metal pollutions have become a huge challenge for crop production, food safety, and human health. How to improve the resistance of crop plants to heavy metal stress and reduce its endogenous accumulation is an urgent issue. In wheat seeds, Cd-inhibited seed germination, while the inhibiting effects were alleviated by exogenous application of SO<sub>2</sub> (Na<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>3</sub>/NaHSO<sub>3</sub> (3/1) solution as SO<sub>2</sub> donor) in a concentration-dependent manner and the optimal concentration was between 1 and 2&#x2009;mM (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref11">Hu et al., 2015</xref>). Additionally, SO<sub>2</sub> donor pretreatment enhanced the activities of amylase and esterase, which in turn resulted in the accumulation of total soluble sugars (TSS) and total soluble protein (TSP) in germinating seeds under Cd stress (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref11">Hu et al., 2015</xref>). Also, SO<sub>2</sub> pretreatment reduced the overproduction of MDA, H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>, and O<sub>2</sub><sup>&#x2013;</sup>, as well as the loss of plasma membrane integrity of the radicle tips of seedlings under Cd stress (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref11">Hu et al., 2015</xref>). Further experiment data showed that SO<sub>2</sub> increased the activities of POD, APX, SOD, and CAT, lowered level of LOX in germinating wheat seeds (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref11">Hu et al., 2015</xref>). Interestingly, compared with the control, SO<sub>2</sub> pretreatment increased the level of endogenous H<sub>2</sub>S in germinating wheat seeds (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref11">Hu et al., 2015</xref>). These data suggest that SO<sub>2</sub> can promote the germination of wheat seeds under Cd stress by mobilizing reserves and activating antioxidant system <italic>via</italic> H<sub>2</sub>S signaling pathway.</p>
<p>In foxtail millet seedlings, application of SO<sub>2</sub> derivatives (0.5&#x2009;mM) reduced the Cd-inhibited seedling growth and Cd-induced oxidative damage (i.e., reducing MDA accumulation) in the leaves of seedlings (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref6">Han et al., 2018</xref>). Additionally, SO<sub>2</sub> treatment enhanced the activities of CAT and SOD and drove AsA-GSH cycle, which in turn reduced the accumulation of Cd-elicited O<sub>2</sub><sup>&#x2013;</sup> and H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> in the leaves of seedlings (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref6">Han et al., 2018</xref>). Furthermore, SO<sub>2</sub> application increased the contents of GSH and phytochelatin (PC) by promoting sulfur assimilation, followed by enhancing Cd-detoxification capacity in seedlings. Further experiments showed that SO<sub>2</sub> derivatives down-regulated the expression of genes related to Cd uptake and translocation (i.e., <italic>NRAMP1</italic>, <italic>NRAMP6</italic>, <italic>IRT1</italic>, <italic>IRT2</italic>, <italic>HMA2</italic>, and <italic>HMA4</italic>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref6">Han et al., 2018</xref>), thus reducing Cd accumulation in the shoots and roots of Cd-stressed seedlings.</p>
<p>Similarly, in wheat seeds, pretreatment with SO<sub>2</sub> donor (NaHSO<sub>3</sub>/Na<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>3</sub>, 1/3) at 1.2&#x2009;mM increased the activities of POD, CAT, and APX, and lowered that of LOX, and reduced the accumulation of O<sub>2</sub><sup>&#x2013;</sup>, H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>, and MDA in germinating seeds under aluminum stress (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref43">Zhu et al., 2015</xref>). As expected, SO<sub>2</sub> pretreatment increased the level of endogenous H<sub>2</sub>S in wheat seeds, while reduced the content of ROS, which in turn maintained the integrity of biomembrane and reduced aluminum accumulation in wheat seedling radicles (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref43">Zhu et al., 2015</xref>). Also, SO<sub>2</sub> pretreatment down-regulated the expression of alumium-responsive genes (i.e., <italic>TaWali1</italic>, <italic>TaWali2</italic>, <italic>TaWali3</italic>, <italic>TaWali5</italic>, <italic>TaWali6</italic>, and <italic>TaALMT1</italic>) in seedling radicles under aluminum stress (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref43">Zhu et al., 2015</xref>). These data indicate that SO<sub>2</sub> can improve seed germination of wheat under aluminum stress by enhancing antioxidant capacity and reducing the accumulation of aluminum <italic>via</italic> H<sub>2</sub>S signaling pathway.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec12">
<title>Pathogen Response</title>
<p>Besides enhancing abiotic stress tolerance, exogenously applied SO<sub>2</sub> also can improve the resistance of plants to biotic stress (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref42">Zhao and Yi, 2014</xref>). In <italic>Arabidopsis</italic> plants, SO<sub>2</sub> pre-exposure (30&#x2009;mg&#x2009;m<sup>&#x2212;3</sup>) increased the resistance to <italic>Botrytis cinerea</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref38">Xue and Yi, 2018</xref>). Further experiments showed that SO<sub>2</sub> pretreatment up-regulated the expression levels of the defense-related genes (<italic>PAL</italic>, <italic>PPO</italic>, <italic>PR2</italic>, and <italic>PR3</italic>), which encode phenylalanine ammonia-lyase (PAL), polyphenol oxidase (PPO), &#x03B2;-1,3-glucanase (BGL), and chitinase (CHI), and increased the activities of PAL, PPO, BGL, and CHI (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref38">Xue and Yi, 2018</xref>). Also, SO<sub>2</sub> pre-exposure increased the transcript levels of microRNAs (MIR393, MIR160, and MIR167), correspondingly decreased the gene expression of their targets involved in the auxin signaling pathway. Adversely, the expression levels of the primary auxin-response genes (<italic>GH3-like</italic>, <italic>BDL/IAA12</italic>, and <italic>AXR3/IAA17</italic>) were down-regulated by SO<sub>2</sub> pre-exposure in <italic>Arabidopsis</italic> plants (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref38">Xue and Yi, 2018</xref>). These data imply that SO<sub>2</sub> increases the disease resistance of Arabidopsis plants to <italic>Botrytis cinerea</italic> by enhancing the defense-related gene expression and enzyme activity as well as suppressing the auxin signaling pathway mediated by miRNA.</p>
<p>In addition, Arabidopsis plants, the transcriptome analysis identified that SO<sub>2</sub> fumigation (30&#x2009;mg&#x2009;m<sup>&#x2212;3</sup>) led to the change in the expression of 2,780 genes, the genes involved in biotic stress resistance, ROS production and scavenging, and sulfur assimilation were up-regulated (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref42">Zhao and Yi, 2014</xref>). Likewise, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref22">Li and Yi (2012b)</xref> reported that SO<sub>2</sub> (30&#x2009;mg&#x2009;m<sup>&#x2212;3</sup>) treatment triggered the different expression of 2,780 genes, the functions of which were mainly involved in signal transduction, transcription regulation, molecular structure, transport, binding, and metabolism. Many different expression genes encoding antioxidant enzymes (POD, GPX, and SOD), heat shock proteins (HSP), pathogenesis-related (PR) proteins, and cytochrome P450 were up-regulated by SO<sub>2</sub> in Arabidopsis shoots (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref22">Li and Yi, 2012b</xref>). In Arabidopsis, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref21">Li and Yi (2012a)</xref>, using Affymetrix GeneChip technology, found that the expression of 494 genes was significantly changed by SO<sub>2</sub> exposure (30&#x2009;mg&#x2009;m<sup>&#x2212;3</sup>), they encoded antioxidant enzymes (e.g., GST, POD, and thioredoxin), HSP, and PR, as well as were involved in the ETH signaling pathway, phenylpropanoid pathway, and cell wall modification. Similarly, SO<sub>2</sub> exposure enhanced the production of ROS, as signaling molecule, increased the activities of SOD, POD, glutathione peroxidase (GPX), and GST in Arabidopsis plants (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref21">Li and Yi, 2012a</xref>). Also, in fresh table grapes (<italic>V. vinifera</italic> L. &#x201C;Crimson Seedless&#x201D;), transcriptomics approaches also found that SO<sub>2</sub> treatment (140&#x2009;&#x03BC;l&#x2009;L<sup>&#x2212;1</sup>) up-regulated the expression of enzymes genes related to sulfur-metabolizing enzymes (especially directing towards chelation and conjugation), redox homeostasis, and plant hormones (e.g., auxin, AUX; ethylene, ETH; and jasmonic acid, JA) signaling pathways (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">Giraud et al., 2012</xref>). Generally, salicylic acid (SA) level is closely related to plant disease resistance. In Arabidopsis thaliana plants, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref8">Hao et al. (2011)</xref> found that the <italic>snc1</italic> mutants (with high SA content) had higher tolerance to SO<sub>2</sub> than <italic>nahG</italic> plants (with low SA content), implying that endogenous SA and signaling might play an essential role in plant responses to SO<sub>2</sub> stress. These studies further support the fact that SO<sub>2</sub> increases disease resistance in Arabidopsis plants.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="sec13">
<title>Conclusion and Perspectives</title>
<p>Mounting evidences show that SO<sub>2</sub> can not only regulate seed germination, stomatal movement, and postharvest physiology, but also plants respond to environmental stresses, such as drought, cold, and heavy metal, and pathogen stresses. Numerous studies identified that SO<sub>2</sub> meets the requirements of signaling molecules in plants, emerging as a novel signaling role in many plant physiological processes. SO<sub>2</sub> as a novel signaling molecule can exert its physiological functions either alone or interaction with other signaling molecules, such as Ca<sup>2+</sup>, H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>, NO, H<sub>2</sub>S, cGMP, and plant hormones (e.g., ABA, SA, ETH, and JA; <xref rid="fig2" ref-type="fig">Figure 2</xref>). SO<sub>2</sub> can enhance antioxidant system (e.g., SOD, CAT, POD, APX, GR, GSH, and AsA) and osmoregulation system (e.g., Pro, TTP, TSS, and P5CS), drive secondary metabolism (e.g., GLS and PA accumulation), synthesize stress proteins (e.g., HSP, HSF, PR, PAL, and PPO), and modulate epigenetic modifications (e.g., DNA methylation modification (MM) and miRNAs), thus regulating several plant physiological functions (<xref rid="fig2" ref-type="fig">Figure 2</xref>). Though, the signaling role of SO<sub>2</sub> in plants has been verified in a large amount of physiological processes, numerous open questions still need to be further answered in more detail in the coming days. In mammalian cells, the AAT/SO<sub>2</sub> pathway is contributed to SO<sub>2</sub> signaling; however, in plants, besides the APR/<inline-formula>
<mml:math id="M16">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msubsup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>3</mml:mn>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msubsup>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> pathway (<xref rid="fig1" ref-type="fig">Figure 1</xref>), the detailed metabolic pathways of SO<sub>2</sub> are waiting for being further expounded. Correspondingly, the knowledge on the exact concentrations of SO<sub>2</sub> in plant cells and subcellular structures as well as its receptors/sensors remains to be found. Though SO<sub>2</sub> could improve multiple stress tolerance, whether SO<sub>2</sub> can induce the tolerance of plants to heat, salt, and flooding stresses and the underlying mechanisms requires to be further explored. In addition, the signaling interaction of SO<sub>2</sub> with Ca<sup>2+</sup>, ROS, NO, H<sub>2</sub>S, methylglyoxal, and cyclic nucleotide in plants under both physiological and stress conditions is necessary to be uncovered. With the development of omics, the effects of SO<sub>2</sub> on transcriptome, metabolome, proteome, and phenome in plants have to be settled urgently.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec14">
<title>Author Contributions</title>
<p>Z-GL conceived, designed, and wrote the manuscript, while X-EL and H-YC wrote the anabolism and catabolism of SO<sub>2</sub>, respectively. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec15" sec-type="funding-information">
<title>Funding</title>
<p>This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (32160065 and 31760069).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="conf1" sec-type="COI-statement">
<title>Conflict of Interest</title>
<p>The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="sec17" sec-type="disclaimer">
<title>Publisher&#x2019;s Note</title>
<p>All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="ref1"><citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bartoli</surname> <given-names>C. G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Buet</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gergoff Grozeff</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Galatro</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Simontacchi</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2017</year>). &#x201C;<article-title>Ascorbate-glutathione cycle and abiotic stress tolerance in plants</article-title>&#x201D; in <source>Ascorbic Acid in Plant Growth, Development and Stress Tolerance.</source> eds. <person-group person-group-type="editor"><name><surname>Hossain</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Munn&#x00E9;-Bosch</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Burritt</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Diaz-Vivancos</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fujita</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lorence</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<publisher-loc>Cham</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Springer</publisher-name>), <fpage>177</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>200</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="ref2"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>S. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tang</surname> <given-names>C. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jin</surname> <given-names>H. F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Du</surname> <given-names>J. B.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Sulfur dioxide acts as a novel endogenous gaseous signaling molecule in the cardiovascular system</article-title>. <source>Chin. Med. J.</source> <volume>124</volume>, <fpage>1901</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1905</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3760/cma.j.issn.0366-6999.2011.12.024</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref3"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ghori</surname> <given-names>N. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ghori</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hayat</surname> <given-names>M. Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Imadi</surname> <given-names>S. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gul</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Altay</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Heavy metal stress and responses in plants</article-title>. <source>Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol.</source> <volume>16</volume>, <fpage>1807</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1828</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s13762-019-02215-8</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref4"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Giraud</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ivanova</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gordon</surname> <given-names>C. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Whelan</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Considine</surname> <given-names>M. J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Sulphur dioxide evokes a large scale reprogramming of the grape berry transcriptome associated with oxidative signalling and biotic defence responses</article-title>. <source>Plant Cell Environ.</source> <volume>35</volume>, <fpage>405</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>417</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1365-3040.2011.02379.x</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21689113</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref5"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Guo</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Song</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xia</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Sulfur dioxide promotes seed germination by modulating reactive oxygen species production in maize</article-title>. <source>Plant Sci.</source> <volume>312</volume>:<fpage>111027</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.plantsci.2021.111027</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">34620432</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref6"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Han</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hao</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yi</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Sulfur dioxide derivatives alleviate cadmium toxicity by enhancing antioxidant defence and reducing Cd<sup>2+</sup> uptake and translocation in foxtail millet seedlings</article-title>. <source>Ecotox. Environ. Safe.</source> <volume>157</volume>, <fpage>207</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>215</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ecoenv.2018.03.084</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29625394</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref7"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Han</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yi</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Enhanced drought tolerance of foxtail millet seedlings by sulfur dioxide fumigation</article-title>. <source>Ecotox. Environ. Safe.</source> <volume>178</volume>, <fpage>9</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>16</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ecoenv.2019.04.006</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30980964</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref8"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hao</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xu</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Feng</surname> <given-names>S. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ma</surname> <given-names>C. Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Role of endogenous salicylic acid in Arabidopsis response to elevated sulfur dioxide concentration</article-title>. <source>Biol. Plant.</source> <volume>55</volume>, <fpage>297</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>304</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10535-011-0042-6</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref9"><citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hasanuzzaman</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hossain</surname> <given-names>M. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bhuyan</surname> <given-names>M. H. M. B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mahmud</surname> <given-names>J. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nahar</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fujita</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). &#x201C;<article-title>The role of sulfur in plant abiotic stress tolerance: molecular interactions and defense mechanisms</article-title>,&#x201D; in <source>Plant Nutrients and Abiotic Stress Tolerance.</source> eds. <person-group person-group-type="editor"><name><surname>Hasanuzzaman</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fujita</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Oku</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Nahar</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hawrylak-Nowak</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name></person-group> (<publisher-loc>Singapore</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Springer</publisher-name>), <fpage>221</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>252</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="ref10"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Haworth</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Elliott-Kingston</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gallagher</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fitzgerald</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>McElwain</surname> <given-names>J. C.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Sulphur dioxide fumigation effects on stomatal density and index of non-resistant plants: implications for the stomatal palaeo-[CO<sub>2</sub>] proxy method</article-title>. <source>Rev. Palaeobot. Palynol.</source> <volume>182</volume>, <fpage>44</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>54</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.revpalbo.2012.06.006</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref11"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hu</surname> <given-names>K. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bai</surname> <given-names>G. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>W. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yan</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hu</surname> <given-names>L. Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>Y. H.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Sulfur dioxide promotes germination and plays an antioxidant role in cadmium-stressed wheat seeds</article-title>. <source>Plant Growth Regul.</source> <volume>75</volume>, <fpage>271</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>280</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10725-014-9951-7</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref12"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hu</surname> <given-names>K. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tang</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>D. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hu</surname> <given-names>L. Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>Y. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>Y. S.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Stomatal closure in sweet potato leaves induced by sulfur dioxide involves H2S and NO signaling pathways</article-title>. <source>Biol. Plant.</source> <volume>58</volume>, <fpage>676</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>680</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10535-014-0440-7</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref13"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Huang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lv</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tang</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Du</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jin</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Endogenous sulfur dioxide is a new gasotransmitter with promising therapeutic potential in cardiovascular system</article-title>. <source>Sci. Bull.</source> <volume>66</volume>, <fpage>1604</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1607</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.scib.2021.04.003</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref14"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Huang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lv</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tang</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Du</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jin</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Sulfur dioxide: endogenous generation, biological effects, detection, and therapeutic potential</article-title>. <source>Antioxidant Redox Signal.</source> <volume>36</volume>, <fpage>256</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>274</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1089/ars.2021.0213</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref15"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Jia</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>Stomatal movements and long-distance signaling in plants</article-title>. <source>Plant signal. behave.</source> <volume>3</volume>, <fpage>772</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>777</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4161/psb.3.10.6294</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">19513229</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref16"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Joradol</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Uthaibutra</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lithanatudom</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Saengnil</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Induced expression of NOX and SOD by gaseous sulfur dioxide and chlorine dioxide enhances antioxidant capacity and maintains fruit quality of &#x2018;Daw&#x2019; longan fruit during storage through H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> signaling</article-title>. <source>Postharv. Biol. Technol.</source> <volume>156</volume>:<fpage>110938</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.postharvbio.2019.110938</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref17"><citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Khan</surname> <given-names>M. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Reddy</surname> <given-names>P. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ferrante</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Khan</surname> <given-names>N. A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <source>Plant Signaling Molecules: Role and Regulation under Stressful Environments.</source> <publisher-loc>Cambridge</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Elsevier</publisher-name>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="ref18"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lee</surname> <given-names>H. K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Khaine</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kwak</surname> <given-names>M. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jang</surname> <given-names>J. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lee</surname> <given-names>T. Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lee</surname> <given-names>J. K.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>The relationship between SO<sub>2</sub> exposure and plant physiology: a mini review</article-title>. <source>Hortic. Environ. Biotechnol.</source> <volume>58</volume>, <fpage>523</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>529</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s13580-017-0053-0</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref19"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bazer</surname> <given-names>F. W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gao</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jobgen</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Johnson</surname> <given-names>G. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>Amino acids and gaseous signaling</article-title>. <source>Amino Acids</source> <volume>37</volume>, <fpage>65</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>78</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00726-009-0264-5</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref20"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gao</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Sulfur homeostasis in plants</article-title>. <source>Int. J. Mol. Sci.</source> <volume>21</volume>:<fpage>8926</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/ijms21238926</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33255536</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref21"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yi</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2012a</year>). <article-title>Differential expression of Arabidopsis defense-related genes in response to sulfur dioxide</article-title>. <source>Chemosphere</source> <volume>87</volume>, <fpage>718</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>724</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.chemosphere.2011.12.064</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22265681</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref22"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yi</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2012b</year>). <article-title>Effect of sulfur dioxide on ROS production, gene expression and antioxidant enzyme activity in Arabidopsis plants</article-title>. <source>Plant Physiol. Biochem.</source> <volume>58</volume>, <fpage>46</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>53</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.plaphy.2012.06.009</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">22771435</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref23"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yi</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Photosynthetic responses of Arabidopsis to SO<sub>2</sub> were related to photosynthetic pigments, photosynthesis gene expression and redox regulation</article-title>. <source>Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf.</source> <volume>203</volume>:<fpage>111019</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ecoenv.2020.111019</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32888606</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref24"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yi</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Enhancement of drought tolerance in Arabidopsis plants induced by sulfur dioxide</article-title>. <source>Ecotoxicology.</source> doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10646-022-02530-w</pub-id> <comment>[Epub ahead of print]</comment>. , PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">35296952</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref25"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>L. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yi</surname> <given-names>H. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>X. P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Qi</surname> <given-names>H. X.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Sulfur dioxide enhance drought tolerance of wheat seedlings through H<sub>2</sub>S signaling</article-title>. <source>Ecotox. Environ. Safe.</source> <volume>207</volume>:<fpage>111248</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ecoenv.2020.111248</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32927156</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref26"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yi</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xue</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yi</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>miR398 and miR395 are involved in response to SO<sub>2</sub> stress in Arabidopsis thaliana</article-title>. <source>Ecotoxicology</source> <volume>26</volume>, <fpage>1181</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1187</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10646-017-1843-y</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28819808</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref27"><citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ma</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <source>Sulfur Dioxide Enhanced Cold Stress Adaptability of Arabidopsis Thaliana.</source> <publisher-loc>Taiyuan</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Shanxi University</publisher-name>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="ref28"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Okpodu</surname> <given-names>C. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Alscher</surname> <given-names>R. G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Grabau</surname> <given-names>E. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cramer</surname> <given-names>C. L.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1996</year>). <article-title>Physiological, biochemical and molecular effects of sulfur dioxide</article-title>. <source>J. Plant Physiol.</source> <volume>148</volume>, <fpage>309</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>316</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S0176-1617(96)80258-6</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref001"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Paul</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dey</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kundu</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Seed priming: an emerging tool towards sustainable agriculture</article-title>. <source>Plant Growth Regul.</source> doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10725-021-00761-1</pub-id> (, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">16662135</pub-id><volume>in press</volume>).</citation></ref>
<ref id="ref29"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Qi</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Song</surname> <given-names>C. P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kangasj&#x00E4;rvi</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhu</surname> <given-names>J. K.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Reactive oxygen species signaling and stomatal movement in plant responses to drought stress and pathogen attack</article-title>. <source>J. Integr. Plant Biol.</source> <volume>60</volume>, <fpage>805</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>826</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/jipb.12654</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29660240</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref30"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Rausch</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wachter</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2005</year>). <article-title>Sulfur metabolism: a versatile platform for launching defence operations</article-title>. <source>Trends Plant Sci.</source> <volume>10</volume>, <fpage>503</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>509</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.tplants.2005.08.006</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">16143557</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref31"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ritonga</surname> <given-names>F. N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Physiological and molecular mechanism involved in cold stress tolerance in plants</article-title>. <source>Plan. Theory</source> <volume>9</volume>:<fpage>560</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/plants9050560</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32353940</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref32"><citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Salehi-Lisar</surname> <given-names>S. Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bakhshayeshan-Agdam</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2016</year>). &#x201C;<article-title>Drought stress in plants: causes, consequences, and tolerance</article-title>&#x201D; in <source>Drought Stress Tolerance in Plants.</source> eds. <person-group person-group-type="editor"><name><surname>Hossain</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wani</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bhattacharjee</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Burritt</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tran</surname> <given-names>L. S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<publisher-loc>Cham</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Springer</publisher-name>), <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>16</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="ref33"><citation citation-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Singh</surname> <given-names>L. P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gill</surname> <given-names>S. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gill</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tuteja</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2012</year>). &#x201C;<article-title>Mechanism of sulfur dioxide toxicity and tolerance in crop plants</article-title>&#x201D; in <source>Improving Crop Resistance to Abiotic Stress.</source> eds. <person-group person-group-type="editor"><name><surname>Tuteja</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gill</surname> <given-names>S. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tiburcio</surname> <given-names>A. F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tuteja</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<publisher-loc>Weinheim</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Wiley</publisher-name>), <fpage>133</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>163</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="ref34"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sun</surname> <given-names>K. K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhu</surname> <given-names>D. B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yao</surname> <given-names>G. F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Sulfur dioxide acts as an antioxidant and delays programmed cell death in wheat aleurone layers upstream of H<sub>2</sub>S and NO signaling pathways</article-title>. <source>Biol. Plant.</source> <volume>62</volume>, <fpage>809</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>816</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10535-018-0796-1</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref35"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Taylor</surname> <given-names>J. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Reid</surname> <given-names>D. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Pharis</surname> <given-names>R. P.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1981</year>). <article-title>Mutual antagonism of sulfur dioxide and abscisic acid in their effect on stomatal aperture in broad bean (<italic>Vicia faba</italic> L.) epidermal strips</article-title>. <source>Plant Physiol.</source> <volume>68</volume>, <fpage>1504</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1507</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1104/pp.68.6.1504</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">16662135</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref36"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>S. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Y. X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Huang</surname> <given-names>Z. Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tang</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hu</surname> <given-names>K. D.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Sulfur dioxide alleviates programmed cell death in barley aleurone by acting as an antioxidant</article-title>. <source>PLoS One</source> <volume>12</volume>:<fpage>e0188289</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0188289</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29155872</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref37"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wei</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xin</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cao</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Signal regulation involved in sulfur dioxide-induced guard cell apoptosis in <italic>Hemerocallis fulva</italic></article-title>. <source>Ecotox. Environ. Safe.</source> <volume>98</volume>, <fpage>41</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>45</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ecoenv.2013.09.029</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24125868</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref38"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Xue</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yi</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Enhanced Arabidopsis disease resistance against <italic>Botrytis cinerea</italic> induced by sulfur dioxide</article-title>. <source>Ecotox. Environ. Safe.</source> <volume>147</volume>, <fpage>523</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>529</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ecoenv.2017.09.011</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28917191</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref39"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Yi</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bai</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Xue</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yi</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>NO and H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> contribute to SO<sub>2</sub> toxicity via Ca<sup>2+</sup> signaling in <italic>Vicia faba</italic> guard cells</article-title>. <source>Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res.</source> <volume>24</volume>, <fpage>9437</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>9446</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11356-017-8612-6</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28236197</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref40"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Yu</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yuan</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Prodrugs of persulfides, sulfur dioxide, and carbon disulfide: important tools for studying sulfur signaling at various oxidation states</article-title>. <source>Antioxidant Redox Signal.</source> <volume>33</volume>, <fpage>1046</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1059</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1089/ars.2019.7880</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">32041416</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref41"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yuan</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wei</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Sulfur dioxide mitigates oxidative damage by modulating hydrogen peroxide homeostasis in postharvest table grapes</article-title>. <source>Postharv. Biol. Technol.</source> <volume>188</volume>:<fpage>111877</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.postharvbio.2022.111877</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref42"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yi</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Genome-wide transcriptome analysis of Arabidopsis response to sulfur dioxide fumigation</article-title>. <source>Mol. Gen. Genomics.</source> <volume>289</volume>, <fpage>989</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>999</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00438-014-0870-0</pub-id>, PMID: <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">24889700</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="ref43"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhu</surname> <given-names>D. B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hu</surname> <given-names>K. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Guo</surname> <given-names>X. K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hu</surname> <given-names>L. Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>Y. H.</given-names></name> <etal/></person-group>. (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Sulfur dioxide enhances endogenous hydrogen sulfide accumulation and alleviates oxidative stress induced by aluminum stress in germinating wheat seeds</article-title>. <source>Oxid. Med. Cell Long.</source> <volume>2015</volume>:<fpage>612363</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1155/2015/612363</pub-id></citation></ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>