Up to now, the resistance genes to BB in rice that have not been mapped are derived from mutation and local varieties, with a total of seven genes, namely xa15, Xa16, Xa17, Xa18, xa19, xa20, and xa28. xa15, a recessive gene resistant to BB of rice, is derived from the mutant of variety M41 and has resistance to Japanese races I, II, III, and IV (Nakai et al., 2008). Xa16, a dominant gene resistant to BB of rice, is derived from the variety Tetep and has resistance to Japanese race V (Ogawa, 1993). Xa17, a dominant gene resistant to BB of rice, is derived from the variety Asominori and has resistance to Japanese race II (Ogawa, 1993). Xa18, a dominant gene resistant to BB of rice, was derived from Toyonishiki, Milyang 23, IR24, and was resistant to Myanmar strain H8584 (Ogawa, 1993). xa19, a recessive gene resistant to BB of rice, is derived from the mutant XM5 of variety IR24 and has resistance to six Filipino races (Satoru et al., 2008). xa20, a recessive gene resistant to BB of rice, is derived from the mutant XM6 of variety IR24 and has resistance to six Filipino races (Taura et al., 1992b). xa28, a recessive gene resistant to BB of rice, is derived from the variety Lota Sail and resistant to race 2 of the Philippines (Lee et al., 2003).

Xa1 gene is the first reported NLR resistance genes in BB resistance gene. The gene was located in a YAC clone by DNA hybridization and recombination events and then isolated by map cloning (Yoshimura et al., 1996). But unlike the strategy of cloning Xa21, Xa1 was cloned by cDNA (Yoshimura et al., 1998). The gene contains four exons and three introns, one of which has no coding sequence. The gene encoding product is a cytoplasmic protein composed of 1,802 amino acids. Its amino end contains the NBS domain, and the carboxyl end contains the LRR functional domain, that is, the NBS-LRR-type resistance protein to BB (Yoshimura et al., 1996).

Xa1 is highly resistant to type I physiological race of BB in Japan and has specific resistance. Different from other resistance genes, the expression of Xa1 is induced by pathogen infection and trauma rather than constitutive expression. Studies have shown that the expression of Xa1 is induced by both compatible physiological races and incompatible physiological races, indicating that the damage caused by pathogen infection may induce the expression of Xa1 gene, and the increase in Xa1 gene expression may improve the efficiency of Xa1 interacting with an avirulence gene, thereby activating the Xa1-mediated disease resistance signaling pathway, so Xa1 plays a major role in the identification of pathogens (Ji et al., 2020). Recently, Xa2, Xa14, Xa31, and Xa45 have also been successfully cloned. These four genes, as alleles of Xa1, also encode NLR proteins (Ji et al., 2020; Zhang et al., 2020).

Xa3 was located in IRBB13, and Xa26 gene was identified in rice cultivar “Minghui 63.” After DNA fingerprinting analysis, fine mapping, phenotypic comparison after inoculation with Xoo and sequence analysis of candidate genes, these two genes were found to be the same gene and renamed as Xa3/Xa26 (Yoshimura et al., 1995; Peng et al., 1998; Yi et al., 2006). The Xa3/Xa26 gene was constitutively expressed. The coding region was 3,309 bp in length, with two exons and a 105 bp intron located on the cell membrane. The gene encodes a LRR receptor protein kinase composed of 1,103 amino acids, which belongs to the same type as Xa21. The structural characteristics of the two genes are very similar, including an amino-terminal signal peptide composed of 30 amino acids, an extracellular LRR domain composed of 26 incomplete LRRs, a single transmembrane region (TM), and an intracellular protein serine/threonine kinase domain (Sun et al., 2004). The amino acid of 88 ~ 771 encodes 26 incomplete leucine-rich repeats (LLRs), which are conserved sequences encoded by these genes. The main function is to identify specific pathogens and then stimulate disease resistance through signal transduction (Song et al., 1995).

Xa3/Xa26 belongs to LRR-STK resistance type and is a multi-gene family, including four members: RKa, RKb, RKc, and RKd. The gene is clustered and arranged on chromosome 11 with high conservation (Wang, 2015). It was found that the Xa3/Xa26 LRR domain may be involved in the identification of different Xoo races (Jing et al., 2009). Xa3/Xa26 is only specifically expressed in vascular bundles and surrounding cells and is low-level constitutive expression (Cao et al., 2007). The infection of pathogens had no obvious effect on the transcriptional expression intensity (Sun et al., 2004). The resistance of Xa3/Xa26 was affected by the growth period of rice. The rice containing Xa3/Xa26 was susceptible to PXO61 at seedling stage and resistant to PXO61 at adult stage. This was due to the dose effect of Xa3/Xa26. The expression level of Xa3/Xa26 was very low at the two-leaf stage and reached the highest at the tillering stage. The overexpression of Xa3/Xa26 at the seedling stage showed resistance to BB of rice. The resistance of Xa3/Xa26 is also affected by genetic background. Studies have shown that the broad and narrow resistance spectrum and the strength of resistance of Xa3 are significantly different under different genetic backgrounds, and even there is a phenomenon of recessive transformation, which is also the reason for the diversification of Xa3 gene naming (Xa4b, Xa6, and xa9). The resistance is different in different indica rice and japonica rice, but in general, the resistance of Xa3/Xa26 in japonica rice is stronger than that in indica rice (Cao et al., 2007). The Xa3/Xa26 gene family reflects the competition and co-evolution of rice BB resistance genes and pathogens. Some genes have been resistant to BB and then lost resistance. However, in the later evolution process, they have regained the function of disease resistance by point mutation (Cao et al., 2007).

Xa4 was located on the M3H8 subclone at the end of the long arm of chromosome 11 and located between markers RM224 and RM114 (Lee et al., 2003). The genetic distance between Xa4 and RFLP marker R1056 was 0.5 cM, and the marker R1506 was located at 116.2 cM on the chromosome clone OSJBa0047M04. Through recombinant test and sequence analysis, the Xa4 gene was fine mapped within 47Kb (Sun et al., 2003) and then successfully cloned. Xa4 encodes a wall-associated kinase (WAK) consisting of 707 amino acids, containing a predicted galacturonic acid binding domain, a calcium-binding epidermal growth factor domain, a transmembrane helix, and a STK domain. The protein encoded by recessive xa4 has an amino acid variation (D152E) after the galacturonic acid binding domain (Keming et al., 2017).

Xa4 is a dominant gene, which was identified in cultivated rice varieties IR20, IR22, IR72, and TKM6. Xa4 is mainly resistant to Philippine races 1, 5, 7, and 8 and also has strong resistance to seven BB races in China (Amante-Bordeos et al., 1992). The cell WAK encoded by Xa4 can accelerate the synthesis of cell cellulose, thereby inhibiting cell wall porosity, strengthening plant cell wall, and effectively preventing the invasion of pathogens. It is a natural barrier for plant protection. In addition, Xa4 can achieve excellent improvement of plant height without affecting the yield of grain crops. By reducing the height of the plant and improving the mechanical strength of the plant, the plant is not easy to break under harsh natural conditions, which further improves the lodging resistance of rice plants and is conducive to practical production and utilization. Due to the simultaneous improvement of multiple key agronomic traits, Xa4 has been widely used in the global rice breeding program (Keming et al., 2017).

xa5 was derived from three Bangladesh varieties DV85, DV86, and DZ78 and then was initially located on chromosome 5 (Iyer and Mccouch, 2004). By using near-isogenic lines IRBB5 and IR24 as parents, xa5 was finely mapped between SNPS marker RS7 and SSR marker RM611 at the short arm end of chromosome 5, with genetic distance of 0.5 cM and physical distance of 70 kb (Blair et al., 2003). Different from the above functional complementation verification methods of cloned genes, the confirmation of candidate genes of xa5 was performed by mutant analysis, and then cloned successfully (Iyer and Mccouch, 2004). Chinese researchers have continued to complete the functional complementation test of xa5 candidate genes, which further confirmed the previous results (Jiang et al., 2006).

xa5 is an incomplete recessive gene for resistance during the whole growth period, which is constitutive expression like its allelic dominant gene Xa5 (Jiang et al., 2006). The coding product of this gene is the γ subunit of transcription factor TFIIA, which is composed of 106 amino acids. The corresponding DNA sequence contains four exons (one of which has no coding sequence) and three introns. TFIIAγ is a transcription factor of eukaryotes. It has 50% homology with TFIIAγ of Drosophila and human, and 85–93% homology with Arabidopsis, maize, barley, sugarcane, and wheat. Most plants and rice have the same TFIIAγ susceptibility alleles.

xa5 is resistant to races 1, 2, 3, and 5 of the Philippines (Li et al., 1999). xa5 can inhibit the transfer of Xoo invading rice, thereby resisting BB of rice (Iyer-Pascuzzi et al., 2008). In addition, this gene has a typical structure of disease resistance gene, and glutamic acid is the 39th amino acid of its coding product. If the xa5 coding sequence is mutated here, the expression product cannot interact with non-toxic effectors, and rice also loses its disease resistance function (Jiang et al., 2006). Therefore, the disease resistance of this gene is due to the change of two bases, which makes the encoded hydrophobic valine become hydrophilic glutamic acid. There are two pathogenic variants of Xoo, which are effectors (TALEs) of Xoo and Alternaria solani. They can directly interact with TFIIAγ5 and activate the expression of susceptible genes in the host. The mutation of recessive gene xa5 destroys its combination with TALE, thus triggering plant defense responses (Yuan et al., 2016).

Xa7, a dominant gene resistant to rice BB, is a dominant gene resistant to rice BB at booting stage in three varieties DV85, DV86, and DZ78 from Bangladesh (Sidhu et al., 1978). It is located between markers GDSSR02 and RM20593, with genetic distances of 0.07 and 0.14 cM, respectively. In addition, the variety Zhenhui 084 of Xa7 was also bred. After identification, Xa7 has resistance to multiple physiological races of the Philippines in the whole growth period, which is of great significance for rice resistance to BB (Porter et al., 2003). Xa7 was initially located at 107.5 cM on the long arm of chromosome 6 in rice, and then, the genetic map constructed by molecular markers was finely mapped. Through a series of polymorphic molecular markers such as AFLP, STS, and SSR, Xa7 was mapped between M1 and M3 with a genetic distance of 2.7 cM (Porter et al., 2003). Under the utilization of more susceptible F2 plants of IR24 × IRBB7, Xa7 was located in the region of 118.5 kb (Nipponbare genome; Shen et al., 2008). But the gene was not cloned for a long time. Recently, the cloning of Xa7 gene has made breakthrough progress. At the same time, Xa7 was mutated by radiation. Nine lines with high susceptibility to BB were screened from more than 20,000 mutant lines over 5 years. One mutant line happened to have chromosome deletion at the location of Xa7 gene. The size of the deletion fragment was determined to be 107 kb by high-throughput sequencing. By comparing the overlapping regions between the gene localization region and the chromosome deletion region, Xa7 was further locked in the 28 kb region. Through a large number of verification of transgenic functions of rice, Xa7 was finally cloned successfully (Chen et al., 2021).

Studies have shown that Xoo’s two important TALEs (AvrXa7 and PthXo3) have overlapping regions in Xa7 promoter effector binding elements (EBEs). Xa7 is induced by PXO86 (avrXa7) and PXO61 (pthXo3) at the same time. AvrXa7 and PthXo3 can trigger Xa7 expression, which makes rice materials containing the gene have broad-spectrum characteristics (Chen et al., 2021). In addition, by using IRBB7, IRBB4, and IRBB21 as donors, the polymeric resistance restorer lines with Xa4 + Xa7 double genes and Xa4 + Xa7 + Xa21 triple genes were obtained, which provided the possibility for breeding new resistant varieties.

It was found that after more than 10 years of field planting, the resistance of Xa7 gene could be maintained for more than 10 years (Cruz et al., 2000). Related studies have shown that the resistance of Xa7 to BB is stronger and more durable than that of genes such as Xa4 and Xa10 (Webb et al., 2010). In general, high temperature is conducive to bacterial growth and promotion of infection. However, under the environmental conditions of high-temperature stress, the resistance pathway mediated by disease resistance gene Xa7 can more effectively limit the growth and reproduction of Beauveria bassiana compared with genes such as Xa3, Xa4, Xa5, and Xa10 (Cohen et al., 2017). RNA-Seq analysis showed that in susceptible plants, high temperature upregulated genes in plant hormone abscisic acid biosynthesis and response pathways, while in plants with Xa7-mediated resistance, high temperature inhibited the expression of these genes. Moreover, salicylic acid is an important plant disease resistance hormone in plant disease resistance response. Under high-temperature stress, the response genes of both resistant and susceptible plants to salicylic acid have been downregulated, indicating that the resistance enhancement mediated by Xa7 under high temperature may not depend on salicylic acid signal transduction. This may be the reason why the resistance of resistance gene Xa7 is more durable (Cohen et al., 2017). Other studies have shown that Xa7 is induced by the secretion effector (TALEs) AvrXa7 of Xoo to produce defense responses to prevent the invasion of Xanthomonas oryzae. This induction is faster and stronger at high temperatures, and Xa7 is more resistant.

Xa10 was originally found in Cas209 and has race-specific resistance to BB of rice (Yoshimura et al., 1983). Xa10 was initially located on the long arm of chromosome 11 of rice, in the 0.28 cM interval between markers M491 and M419, and was co-segregated with S723 and M604 (Gu et al., 2008). Then, the gene was cloned by map. Xa10 encodes a small molecule protein composed of 126 amino acid residues, and it is predicted that the gene contains four potential transmembrane helixes and an ED domain at the C-terminal. The promoter region of Xa10 has elements that bind to AvrXa10, and its transcription is specifically activated by AvrXa10 (Dongsheng et al., 2014).

The protein encoded by Xa10 is located on the endoplasmic reticulum membrane in the form of hexaploid. It causes the hypersensitivity of host cells by affecting the balance of endoplasmic reticulum and intracellular calcium ions, leading to cell death, thereby limiting the continued reproduction and infection of pathogens, thereby producing BB resistance. The expression of Xa10 in rice, tobacco, and salad cells leads to programmed cell death. It is speculated that Xa10 is at the end of a signal pathway that can be induced to trigger programmed cell death, and this is achieved through a conservative system that maintains endoplasmic reticulum and Ca²⁺ homeostasis. In the F2 population of IR24 × IRBB10, it was found that Xa10-mediated resistance to PXO99A did not follow Mendelian genetic law; that is, the segregation ratio was not 3:1 (Gu et al., 2008). The new near-isogenic line IRBB10A of Xa10 was developed under the genetic background of IR24. Its expression was induced by physiological race PXO99A, but it was not induced by uninoculated or inoculated with PXO99A without avrXa10, indicating that AvrXa10 could specifically recognize EBEAvrXa10 and initiate the expression of Xa10.

xa13 was located on the long arm of chromosome 8, and the genetic distance was less than 0.4 cM by using the F2 line of the hybrid offspring of IR24 × IRBB13 and the F2 line of the hybrid offspring of IRBB13 × IR65598-112 (Sanchez et al., 1999). Subsequently, xa13 was successfully cloned through fine mapping and candidate target gene analysis. xa13 is a recessive disease resistance gene, which has specific resistance to PXO99. xa13 is composed of five exons, encoding SWEET protein containing 307 amino acids, which is located on the plasma membrane (Vikal et al., 2014).

Different promoter regions of xa13 lead to differences in protein products encoded by its dominant allele Xa13 gene (Ginny et al., 2010). xa13 was hardly induced by pathogens and injuries, and its dominant allele Xa13 could be strongly induced by PXO99 but not by mechanical injuries. It is believed that xa13 is different from other disease-resistant genes, and its disease-resistant function is caused by the loss of the power of induced transcription caused by natural selection (Yuan et al., 2009). Both xa13 and its dominant allele Xa13 were expressed at low levels in rice leaves, but at high levels in inflorescence and pollen sac of rice. Studies have found that inhibiting the expression of xa13 and Xa13 at the same time will improve the resistance of plants, but will lead to male sterility in rice, indicating that xa13 gene controls the disease resistance of rice and the growth and development of pollen (Li et al., 2012).

Copper is not only an important trace element in plants but also an important component of some pesticides. It can inhibit the growth of BB, and BB strain PXO99 is more sensitive to copper than other strains, which is also the reason why xa13 has specific resistance to PXO99. The corresponding dominant gene Xa13 of xa13 is a susceptible gene, which is basically consistent with the coding region of xa13, and is different from the mutation of 18 bases in its promoter region. Because of the mutation of the cis-acting element of the promoter, PthXo1 secreted by the pathogen cannot bind to its promoter. PthXo1 cannot bind to the promoter of xa13 gene and thus cannot induce the expression of xa13 gene. Thus, plant host cells can inhibit the growth of PXO99A by maintaining the balance of copper ion concentration in vascular bundle ducts, thereby making plants resistant. In rice containing Xa13, copper transporters can play a role in the xylem of plants by binding to the coding product of Xa13, removing copper ions that can inhibit the pathogenic function of Xoo, leading to the rapid growth and reproduction of Xoo in xylem, and rice is susceptible (Yuan et al., 2010; Yuan and Wang, 2013).

Xa21 is the first resistance gene isolated by map-based cloning, showing excellent resistance to physiological races 1–6 of BB in the Philippines (Song et al., 1995). This gene has been transferred into near-isogenic lines with IR24 as the background and has been widely used in rice genetic breeding. It was also found that Xa21 gene was co-segregated with molecular markers such as RG103, RAPD818, and RAPD248. The Xa21 gene was located and cloned by map-based cloning, but the homologous sequence method was also used in the study. The efficiency of cloning gene was greatly improved by using this method (Wang, 1996).

The gene contains an 843 bp intron that encodes a protein composed of 1,025 amino acids, and the encoded protein belongs to the receptor-like kinase (RLK; Song et al., 1995). The protein structure is divided into nine regions, including signal peptide region, unknown function region, LRRs, a charged region, TM, a charged region, perimembrane region (JM), serine–threonine kinase domain (STK), and carboxy-terminal tail region. The resistance of Xa21 is related to the LRRs and STK regions. The resistance mediated by Xa21 depends on the activity of these two regions. The former is composed of 23 incomplete LRRs, which are involved in protein–protein interactions and are related to pathogen identification (Wang et al., 1998). The latter is a typical signal molecule for early defense immune response of plants (Park et al., 2010).

It was found that the downstream signal transduction was determined by the kinase region and was transcribed throughout the whole process without the influence of Xoo infection. However, its disease resistance was affected by various stages of rice growth and development. With the growth and development of rice, its disease resistance gradually increased, and it was completely resistant at tillering stage (Zhang et al., 2010). The disease resistance of Xa21 is similar to that of Xa3/Xa26 and is also affected by genetic background (Jing et al., 2009). Under the background of “IR24” or “Minghui 63,” the resistance of Xa21 and Xa3/Xa26 to both compatible and non-compatible races gradually increased from seedling stage to adult stage, and the resistance change was the most obvious during the four-leaf stage to the peak tillering stage. However, under the background of “Mudanjiang 8,” Xa21 and Xa3/Xa26 resistance was not affected by growth period.

With the deepening of research, more and more Xa21 binding proteins (XB) have been found to be involved in Xa21-mediated disease resistance (Pruitt et al., 2015). For example, XB3 is a positive regulator of XA21-mediated immune response. The combination of XA21 and XB3 will promote the phosphorylation of XB3 and stimulate disease resistance (Xu et al., 2006). XB10 is a negative regulator of XA21-mediated immune response, which can inhibit the expression of defense genes by binding to XA21 (Park et al., 2017). XB15 is a PP2C protein phosphatase that can negatively regulate cell death and negatively regulate XA21-mediated immune response (Wang et al., 2007). XB24 is an ATP enzyme that can promote the phosphorylation of XA21 (Ying et al., 2010). The autophosphorylation of Ser686, Thr688, and Ser689 can stabilize XA21 to resist development-controlled protease activity (Peng et al., 2008).

The avirulence gene AvrXa21 of XA21 is named RaxX. When the pathogen invades, the LRR region of XA21 protein recognizes and binds to the effector RaxX protein of the pathogen, thereby initiating the PTI process (Park et al., 2008). The specific interaction process between Xa21 and RaxX is that endoplasmic reticulum molecular chaperones and auxiliary molecular chaperones participate in the biosynthesis of Xa21. After the synthesis of Xa21 polypeptide, it needs to be processed by endoplasmic reticulum and transported to plasma membrane before it can play its biological function. When XB24 is combined with the intracellular near membrane region of XA21, XA21 is in the inactive state of self-phosphorylation. When RaxX binds to the extracellular LRRs domain of XA21, XB24 separates from Xa21 and activates the kinase domain of XA21. The self-phosphorylated Thr705 transfers the phosphoryl group to another residue of XA21, which activates XA21. Then, the XA21 kinase domain is segmented and transported to the cell core, which binds to the transcription factor (TF) WRKY62 and further triggers the expression of defense genes (Chen et al., 2010).

A new gene resistant to BB from common wild rice was identified by resistance spectrum evaluation, resistance-type comparison, and genetic analysis, which was named Xa23 (Li et al., 2006). Xa23 gene was transferred to “Jingang 30” and cultivated into near-isogenic line CBB23. The F2 generation of “Jingang 30” and CBB23 hybrids was used as mapping population, and then, the molecular markers closely linked to Xa23 were found through various ways. BAC library and Shotgun library were constructed for sequencing and genetic transformation. Finally, Xa23 gene was successfully cloned (Chunlian, 2006). Xa23 was located between markers C189 and RM206, with a genetic distance of 0.8 and 1.9 cM, respectively. The genetic distance of RFLP marker C1003A from the same side of C189 was 0.4 cM. Markers C1003A and RM206 covered five clones: OSJNBa0072L08, OSJNBa006K21, P0480H08, OSJNBa0029K08, and B1356F10, with a genetic position of 84.6–88.4 cM.

Xa23 gene has a broad spectrum of resistance, resistance to Philippine races 1 ~ 10, Chinese pathogenic races 1 ~ 7, and Japanese races 1 ~ 3, a total of 20 domestic and foreign BB identification strains, and completely dominant and whole growth resistance (Wang et al., 2014b). Through the identification of Xa23 transgenic plants resistance to BB, it was found that when the Xa23 gene insertion site was different, the degree of disease resistance was significantly different, and the degree of disease resistance of T0 plants can be accurately and stably inherited to T1 and T2 generations (Zhou et al., 2011). Xa23 encodes a protein consisting of 113 amino acids, which has 50% homology with the known Executor protein XA10. The transmembrane helix structure of Xa23 protein is also partially overlapped with that of Xa10 protein. Unlike Xa10, Xa23 has broad-spectrum resistance and can be activated by TALE effector AvrXa23 (Wang et al., 2015). Xa23 transcription is specifically induced by AvrXa23. The susceptible xa23 allele has the same open reading frame region (ORF113) as the dominant gene Xa23 for disease resistance. The reason for the polymorphism between the two genes is that the promoter region is different. The susceptible xa23 lacks the TALE binding element (EBE) that can specifically bind to AvrXa23. Under normal conditions, the ORF113 of Xa23 had a very low transcription level in resistant and susceptible varieties, but it was induced by pathogenic bacteria in CBB23 and transgenic plants. This induced expression was not detected in susceptible varieties JG30, Nipponbare, and MDJ8. ORF113-RNAi plants were susceptible to PXO99A, indicating that Xa23-mediated resistance needs to increase the expression of ORF113. There is a 7 bp polymorphism in the promoter region of resistant Xa23 in susceptible xa23 and CBB23 in JG30, which is related to the effector binding element of AvrXa23 (Wang et al., 2015). These results suggest that Xa23 plays a role in disease resistance by identifying TALEs in pathogens.

xa25 is derived from the cultivated rice “Minghui 63.” The gene is located between RFLP markers R887 and G1314 on chromosome 12 of rice, with the map distances of 3.0 and 7.3 cM, respectively (Chen et al., 2002), and then isolated through map cloning (Liu et al., 2011). xa25 has specific resistance to physiological race PXO339 and belongs to the sugar transporter (SWEET) family gene (Rmer et al., 2010). xa25 encodes a MtN3/saliva family protein containing 296 amino acids, which is ubiquitous in eukaryotes. Its allelic dominant susceptibility gene Xa25 also encodes a member of the MtN3 gene family, and the encoded product is a protein composed of 293 amino acids. The resistance mediated by Xa25 is different from that of most other R genes. It shows recessive resistance at seedling stage and dominant resistance at adult stage (Liu et al., 2011). Not only the number of amino acids is different, but also the encoded protein has eight amino acids.

xa25 showed unique resistance to PXO339 by inhibiting the growth of Xoo at seedling stage and mature stage, respectively. The transfer of Xa25 to resistant rice carrying xa25 could lead to the weakening of resistance to PXO339. Only PXO339 in different strains could rapidly induce the expression of Xa25, but did not induce the expression of xa25. It was speculated that Xa25 and Xa13 were also induced by specific TAL effectors in pathogens, thus causing host susceptibility. To confirm this hypothesis, promoter structure analysis showed that xa25 from resistant varieties and Xa25 from susceptible varieties had multiple sites in the promoter region, which may be the cause of different resistance (Liu et al., 2011).

The cis-acting element of dominant Xa25 gene promoter contains PthXo2 binding site, which can be recognized and induced by effectors. Xa25 is a sucrose transporter gene. Its expression can leak sucrose, glucose, and other photosynthetic products to the intercellular space of rice. These substances are used by pathogenic bacteria, which are beneficial to the infection and reproduction of pathogenic bacteria, and then make plants susceptible. However, there is a mutation at this site on the cis-acting element of the recessive xa25 gene promoter, so that it could not be recognized by the pathogen effector PthXo2, and thus, the plant showed resistance to diseases (Zhou et al., 2015). Therefore, compared with Xa25, the characteristics of xa25-encoded protein and its expression pattern in the interaction between rice and Xoo indicate that the resistance mechanism mediated by xa25 is different from most R proteins (Hutin et al., 2016).

Xa27, derived from Oryzae minuta, has broad-spectrum resistance to Xoo. Xa27 was introduced into the susceptible variety “IR24” by hybridization and backcross, and the near isogenic line IRBB27 was constructed, and Xa27 was isolated by map cloning strategy (Gu et al., 2004). Xa27 and avrXa27 are the first combinations of resistance genes and corresponding nontoxic genes cloned from rice. Xa27 has no intron and only one exon, which is a non-intragenic gene. Induced by the coding product of the non-toxic gene avrXa27 interacting with it, the gene encodes a protein consisting of 113 amino acids and containing a α-helix domain. The resistance and susceptibility alleles of Xa27 also encode the same protein (Gu et al., 2005). The difference between the two genes is that the xa27 promoter has a 10 bp sequence upstream of the promoter ATG, and 25 bases upstream of the TATA frame.

Although the resistance allele and susceptible allele of Xa27 encoded the same protein, Xa27 was only expressed in the adjacent cell tissues of rice infection under the infection of X. oryzae containing avrXa27. This indicated that the induced expression of Xa27 was not induced by the system, but by the pathogen, and was only induced by the non-affinity strain containing avrXa27. This mechanism acts as a local defense and belongs to non-systematic defense. In addition, the Xa27 infiltration system could resist the BB strain that originally infected IRBB27, and the promoter replacement experiment proved that the expression difference of Xa27 in the resistant and susceptible parents was controlled by the promoter (Gu et al., 2005). Xa27 gel block test showed that the affinity between Xa27 promoter and AvrXa27 was at least 100 times that between xa27 promoter and AvrXa27. When Xa27 was driven by the PR1 gene promoter, the plants were resistant to both compatible and non-compatible pathogens, and the secondary cell wall of vascular bundle was thickened at the infection site, suggesting that Xa27 might resist the invasion of pathogens by increasing the thickness of the secondary cell wall of vascular bundle. In order to verify the accuracy of the speculation, further subcellular localization found that XA27 may be transported to the vascular bundle cavity and the xylem parenchyma cell wall by cell exocytosis and accumulate more XA27 in vascular tissue. When the amino acid anchor signal sequence of XA27 was mutated, XA27 could not be subcellularly located and rice plants lost the ability to resist disease (Wu et al., 2008b).

The xa41 gene is a recessive resistance gene identified in African wild rice. It was found by analyzing the promoter polymorphism of OsSWEET14, the main susceptible gene of BB in 169 rice germplasm resources (Hutin et al., 2016). The 18 bp deletion in the promoter region of OsSWEET14 gene represents a new resistance allele, named xa41. The recessive gene xa41 and its allelic dominant gene Xa41 also encode MtN3/saliva family proteins. The promoter of Xa41 contains four binding sites of TALE (AvrXa7, Tal5, PthXo3, and TalC), which can be induced to express, so that the plant is susceptible (Yu et al., 2011). xa41 is the 18 bp deletion allele of Xa41 at the promoter, and the 18 bp deletion overlaps with the recognition sites of AvrXa7 and Tal5, thus producing resistance to Xoo strains containing these two TALEs (Streubel et al., 2013).

The SWEET susceptible gene families Xa13, Xa25, and Xa41 were induced to express due to the presence of TALE binding elements in the promoter, which were identified by the pathogen. This part of the susceptible genes effectively obtained breeding materials with broad-spectrum disease resistance through gene editing technology (Oliva et al., 2019; Xu et al., 2019). In the future, such susceptible genes can be directly edited in high-yield and high-quality varieties or super hybrid rice parents to create new varieties with high yield and high resistance in large scale.

Previously, several major resistance genes such as Xa2, Xa14, and Xa31 were located near the cloned Xa1 gene, but the cloning of these genes has not been completed. Recently, Xa2, Xa14, Xa31, and Xa45 were successfully cloned (Ji et al., 2020). These four genes, as alleles of Xa1, are all distributed on chromosome 4 and also encode NLR proteins, indicating the existence of gene duplication and functional evolution. Xa2 and Xa31 have the same sequence, which is actually the same gene. These genes are highly conserved and structurally similar at nucleotide and predicted amino acid levels. The main difference is that the repeat numbers of 93 amino acid residues at the C-terminal of protein are different. For example, the repeat numbers of XA14 and XA45 are 4 and 7, respectively.

Xa1 gene is a member of NBS-LRR plant disease resistance genes (Yoshimura et al., 1998). The analysis of disease resistance genes near Xa1 gene on the long arm of chromosome 4 reveals that the region is rich in NBS-LRR sequences (Freddy and Nishimura, 2018). Xa1 and its alleles Xa2, Xa14, Xa31, and Xa45 are a class of NLR genes, and the mediation of its disease resistance mechanism is also related to TALE. The NLR protein encoded by Xa1 had specific resistance to BB. XA1 stimulated resistance to BB by identifying several TALEs including PthXo1, Tal4, and Tal9d. Further studies have found that truncated interference TALE (iTALE) lacking transcriptional activation domain can interfere with the resistance given by XA1 (Ji et al., 2016). The resistance spectrum of Xa1 alleles was also inhibited to some extent by iTALEs, and the resistance spectrum of Xa2, Xa31, and Xa14 to Xoo was different from that of Xa1, but also inhibited by iTALEs. This is the first report that the resistance genes inhibited by iTALE can mediate different resistance. These genes encode NBS-LRR proteins, and the key to determining the main difference is the functional domain of LRR at the carboxyl end (Biaoming et al., 2020).

Up to now, more than 40 rice BB resistance genes have been discovered, but most of the resistance genes are inevitably controlled by recessive genes, the control spectrum is narrow and the resistance is weak. Therefore, there are few resistance genes that can be put into practical production. In the actual breeding practice, the widely used BB resistance genes include xa5, xa13, and Xa23. In recent years, single-gene rice varieties have been planted in different degrees throughout the country. In the long run, the genetic structure of local rice pathogens will be changed, and mutant new races will be produced to infect the original resistance source, resulting in the disappearance of the resistance of the original varieties and bringing serious economic losses to the local crops. It has been reported that the application of single antigen will produce new Xoo strains in some areas. For example, Chinese race VIII that can cause Xa21 disease was found in Guangdong, China (Zhang, 2005).

Therefore, it is not limited to the use of one resistance gene, but the comprehensive utilization of multiple resistance genes has become an effective means of breeding and production. Different rice BB resistance genes are polymerized into the same variety through reasonable comprehensive utilization, rotation, and mixed utilization, so that the target crops can obtain better resistance (Dai et al., 2010). The common forms of gene polymerization are two-gene polymerization, three-gene polymerization, and four-gene polymerization. The common forms of gene combination are double dominant gene combination and one recessive gene combination. The common gene binding forms in China are: Xa4 + Xa21, Xa21 + Xa23, Xa7 + Xa21, Xa4 + Xa21 + Xa23, and Xa4 + xa5 + xa13 + Xa21. For example, the Xa4 + xa5 polymerization system was developed by MAS technology (Cao et al., 2007). The xa5 + xa13 + Xa21 polyline bred by molecular marker-assisted backcross breeding strategy showed high resistance (Pradhan et al., 2015). The resistance genes Xa21 and Pi54 to BB and blast were polymerized into the restorer line RPHR-1005, and the progeny materials with high resistance to BB and blast were obtained by marker-assisted backcross breeding (Kumar et al., 2016). These genes showed high resistance and broad-spectrum characteristics by polymerization or combination.

In summary, the existing breeding practices have proved that the polymerization of different resistance genes into the same variety can enhance the resistance of varieties to varying degrees, broaden the resistance spectrum of varieties, and delay the decline of resistance of varieties through the interaction between resistance genes.

The resistance of rice and the pathogenicity of BB is a process of co-evolution and long-term competition. The change of any party will cause the change of the other party. The mutation of the physiological race of BB will cause the variation of rice, and the external pressure on rice will also cause the mutation of the physiological race of BB. In order to effectively control the mutation and infection of rice BB, it is necessary to continuously explore new resistant resources (Lee et al., 2011).

Xa1 gene was isolated and cloned by Japanese researchers in 1998 (Yoshimura et al., 1998). It is reported that many full-length TALEs can trigger Xa1-mediated resistance. However, interfering iTALE in pathogen PXO99A interferes with Xa1-mediated resistance. iTALE exists in many Xoo strains, resulting in the narrowing of the resistance of Xa1, so the application of Xa1 is not much (Ji et al., 2016). The genes such as Xa4 and xa5 excavated later are more resistant and broad-spectrum than Xa1 and have been widely used in practical production (Li et al., 1999). The main rice varieties in China have also introduced resistance genes such as Xa3, Xa21, and Xa23, which once effectively controlled BB and made the incidence of BB lighter and lighter. However, with the gradual warming of the global environment and the continuous variation of BB, new pathogenic varieties have emerged, leading to the gradual loss of resistance of main rice varieties. However, under the environmental conditions of high-temperature stress, the disease resistance pathway mediated by the disease resistance gene Xa7 can more effectively limit the growth and reproduction of BB compared with genes such as Xa3, Xa4, Xa5, and Xa10 (Cohen et al., 2017). Xa7 has been successfully cloned recently, and under the condition of global warming, Xa7 reflects the stronger breeding value of its own genes (Chen et al., 2021).

It can be seen that although significant progress has been made in molecular breeding for BB resistance in China, the variation of pathogen itself and the stress of adverse environmental conditions still threaten the effectiveness of existing resistance genes. The disease resistance of rice is essentially the result of the interaction between the target crop rice and pathogenic bacteria under specific conditions and the two evolve and compete with each other. In the long-term interaction process, due to the continuous emergence of new pathogenic strains and the evolution of pathogenic physiological races, the effectiveness of existing rice resistance genes continues to decrease. Therefore, continuous cloning of new genes with broad-spectrum and long-lasting disease resistance from rice to resist the infection of rice BB is the basis and key to the success of disease resistance breeding.

Due to the unique climatic conditions and geographical location, wild rice and local rice resources in China are extremely rich, and many excellent genetic traits have been retained in the long-term self-evolution for many years. Particularly, wild rice resources not only show the characteristics of high resistance to BB, but also are partially immune.

At present, there are many effective genes for resistance to BB cloned from wild rice resources. For example, Xa21 is the first cloned gene for resistance to BB in rice, which is from wild rice with long stamens (Park et al., 2012). Xa23 is a broad-spectrum resistance gene to BB found in long-acting wild rice (Zhou et al., 2015). Xa27 is derived from tetraploid small-grain wild rice (Bimolata et al., 2013). xa41 is identified on wild rice in Africa. These resistance genes excavated from wild rice germplasm resources have broad-spectrum resistance to Xoo. For example, Xa21, Xa23, Xa27, and other resistance genes excavated from wild rice varieties have been widely used in production practice and achieved ideal resistance effect. In addition, there are also some resistance genes from wild rice: xa32 in the new germplasm Y76 obtained by somatic hybridization between wild rice verrucous and cultivated rice from Xishuangbanna, Yunnan (Ruan et al., 2008); Xa36 from Australian wild rice and cultivated rice hybrids (Miao et al., 2010); and Xa38 from annual common wild rice (Ellur et al., 2016), etc. These genes have been mapped but not cloned and have broad application prospects.

The wild rice resources that have been explored and utilized and other resistance genes that have not been found are valuable breeding resources for rice resistance to BB. By revealing the resistance mechanism of wild rice and local rice, it is of great significance to enrich the resistance gene pool of rice and further clarify the genetic basis of disease resistance in rice cultivation.

With the continuous warming of global climate, the continuous growth of population and the continuous reduction of cultivated land, the traditional agricultural production methods, and methods cannot meet the needs of the development of modern society. Therefore, there is an urgent need for scientific and technological innovation to improve crop varieties and traits. Through gene editing, specific target genes can be targeted modified, which can greatly make up for the deficiency of natural mutation and achieve the specific purpose required for production (Hassan et al., 2021).

The development of gene editing technology has experienced a long process, from the initial zinc finger nuclei (ZFNs), transcription activator-like effector nucleases (TALENs) to CRISPR/cas9. The editing efficiency and operability of gene editing technology have been continuously improved, which has attracted extensive attention. It is worth noting that by knocking out the promoter and other key elements of host susceptibility genes, the expression of crop susceptibility genes by pathogenic microorganisms can be regulated and disease-resistant germplasm can be created. For example, knocking out the EBE region of the promoters of susceptibility genes OSSWEET11, OSSWEET 14, and OSSWEET 13 in rice leads to the inability of TaL effector protein to activate the expression of relevant susceptibility genes, resulting in extensive resistance of rice to BB (Xu et al., 2019).

The breakthrough of gene editing technology represented by CRISPR/cas9 makes the current gene operation more mobile and feasible. CRISPR/cas9 gene editing technology is simpler and cheaper than traditional breeding methods (Wang et al., 2014a). The research shows that CRISPR/cas9 gene editing technology has greatly improved the gene editing efficiency of tomato, wheat, rice, soybean, and other crops. The second generation CRISPR/cas9 gene editing technology gradually formed in the later stage is easier to realize single-base editing. Single-base editing can realize base substitution from cytosine (c) to thymine (T) and adenine (a) to guanine (g; Komor et al., 2016). For example, by fusing RNA adenylate deaminase with cas9 notch enzyme, the conversion of target base a to G can be realized (Gaudelli et al., 2018). The translation of genes can be terminated in advance by converting the codon encoded by amino acids into a stop codon (Kuscu et al., 2017). These new single-base editing strategies greatly expand the application scope of gene editing technology and lay a foundation for obtaining new disease resistant materials.

Although the low editing efficiency and high miss rate still exist in gene editing (Qin et al., 2020), which limits the large-scale application of this technology, the rapid development of gene editing technology in the past two decades can now create genetic variations with high accuracy and specificity. Therefore, gene editing technology is also widely used in polyploid breeding, germplasm resource innovation, and molecular design breeding. It is believed that with the maturity of this technology, it will play a greater role in crop breeding.