<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.3 20070202//EN" "journalpublishing.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="2.3" xml:lang="EN">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Front. Plant Sci.</journal-id>
<journal-title>Frontiers in Plant Science</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">Front. Plant Sci.</abbrev-journal-title>
<issn pub-type="epub">1664-462X</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Frontiers Media S.A.</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpls.2022.1093507</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Plant Science</subject>
<subj-group>
<subject>Original Research</subject>
</subj-group>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Reduction in soil CO<sub>2</sub> efflux through alteration of hydrothermal factor in milk vetch (<italic>Astragalus sinicus</italic> L.)-rapeseed (<italic>Brassica napus</italic> L.) intercropping system</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zhou</surname>
<given-names>Quan</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3">
<sup>3</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2089549"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Gunina</surname>
<given-names>Anna</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3">
<sup>3</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/458388"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname>
<given-names>Jiao</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Xing</surname>
<given-names>Yi</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2117638"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Xiong</surname>
<given-names>Ying</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4">
<sup>4</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Guo</surname>
<given-names>Zhiming</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff5">
<sup>5</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname>
<given-names>Longchang</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn001">
<sup>*</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
<institution>College of Agronomy and Biotechnology, Southwest University/Key Laboratory of Eco-environments in Three Gorges Reservoir Region, Ministry of Education/Engineering Research Center of South Upland Agriculture, Ministry of Education</institution>, <addr-line>Chongqing</addr-line>, <country>China</country>
</aff>
<aff id="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
<institution>Jiangxi Agricultural University/Key Laboratory of Crop Physiology, Ecology and Genetic Breeding, Ministry of Education</institution>, <addr-line>Nanchang</addr-line>, <country>China</country>
</aff>
<aff id="aff3">
<sup>3</sup>
<institution>Department of Environmental Chemistry, University of Kassel</institution>, <addr-line>Witzenhausen</addr-line>, <country>Germany</country>
</aff>
<aff id="aff4">
<sup>4</sup>
<institution>College of Agriculture, Henan University of Science and Technology</institution>, <addr-line>Luoyang</addr-line>, <country>China</country>
</aff>
<aff id="aff5">
<sup>5</sup>
<institution>Key Laboratory of Vegetation Restoration and Management of Degraded Ecosystems, South China Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences</institution>, <addr-line>Guangzhou</addr-line>, <country>China</country>
</aff>
<author-notes>
<fn fn-type="edited-by">
<p>Edited by: Abraham J. Escobar-Guti&#xe9;rrez, L&#x2019;alimentation et l&#x2019;environnement (INRAE), France</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="edited-by">
<p>Reviewed by: Honghai Luo, Shihezi University, China; Jiban Shrestha, Nepal Agricultural Research Council, Nepal</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="corresp" id="fn001">
<p>*Correspondence: Longchang Wang, <email xlink:href="mailto:wanglc2003@163.com">wanglc2003@163.com</email>
</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="other" id="fn002">
<p>This article was submitted to Crop and Product Physiology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Plant Science</p>
</fn>
</author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>10</day>
<month>01</month>
<year>2023</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="collection">
<year>2022</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>13</volume>
<elocation-id>1093507</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>09</day>
<month>11</month>
<year>2022</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>15</day>
<month>12</month>
<year>2022</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#xa9; 2023 Zhou, Gunina, Chen, Xing, Xiong, Guo and Wang</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2023</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Zhou, Gunina, Chen, Xing, Xiong, Guo and Wang</copyright-holder>
<license xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">
<p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.</p>
</license>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<sec>
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>Intercropping has a potential to reduce the CO<sub>2</sub> emission from farmlands. Limited information is available on the underlying reasons.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Methods</title>
<p>This study investigated the effect of milk vetch (<italic>Astragalus sinicus</italic> L.) (MV), rapeseed (<italic>Brassica napus</italic> L.) monoculture (RS) and intercropping (Intercrop) on soil CO<sub>2</sub> emissions, moisture and temperature in a bucket experiment during 210 days from October 2015 to May 2016 on Chongqing, China.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Results</title>
<p>The results showed that soil CO<sub>2</sub> efflux of MV, RS and Intercrop was 1.44, 1.55 and 2.08 &#x3bc;mol&#xb7;m<sup>-2</sup>&#xb7;s<sup>-1</sup> during seedling and stem elongation stages and 3.08, 1.59 and 1.95 &#x3bc;mol&#xb7;m<sup>-2</sup>&#xb7;s<sup>-1</sup> during flowering and podding stages. At seeding and stem elongation stages Intercrop had 1.4 times higher soil CO<sub>2</sub> efflux than the mean of MV and RS. In contrast, MVhad 1.6 times higher soil CO<sub>2</sub> efflux than Intercrop thereafter, which shows it was inhibited if milk vetch presents as Intercrop only. Decreased sensitivity of soil respiration to temperature in 1.4 times and lower soil moisture by Intercrop were found compared to MV. Intercrop decreased soil moisture, especially at the seedling and stem elongation stages, compared to the monoculture. The fluctuation on soil respiration in RS and Intercrop was slight with changes in soil moisture.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>Conclusion</title>
<p>Thus, milk vetch-rapeseed system has a potential to decrease CO<sub>2</sub> emission from farmland, however soil moisture should be regulated properly.</p>
</sec>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>legume-brassica intercrops</kwd>
<kwd>greenhouse gas emission</kwd>
<kwd>soil temperature</kwd>
<kwd>soil moisture</kwd>
<kwd>SOM balance</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<counts>
<fig-count count="6"/>
<table-count count="0"/>
<equation-count count="0"/>
<ref-count count="42"/>
<page-count count="8"/>
<word-count count="2869"/>
</counts>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec id="s1" sec-type="intro">
<label>1</label>
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>The CO<sub>2</sub> production from agriculture accounts for 23% of anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">Smith et&#xa0;al., 2007</xref>). If intercropping with legumes or cereals is introduced (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Hu et&#xa0;al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Cui et&#xa0;al., 2019</xref>), this emission can be substantially reduced (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Gan et&#xa0;al., 2011</xref>), because such systems have a high potential to sequester soil organic carbon (SOC) by reducing soil respiration (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">Chai et&#xa0;al., 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Hu et&#xa0;al., 2015</xref>). Namely, pea - maize or wheat - maize intercropping reduces soil respiration from maize strips during the growing season (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Li et&#xa0;al., 2001</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Qin et&#xa0;al., 2013</xref>); pea - oat intercropping reduces CO<sub>2</sub> emission during the period with higher precipitation; barley - pea intercropping also results in 10% higher soil C sequestration than barley monoculture (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">Chapagain and Riseman, 2014</xref>).</p>
<p>Agricultural ecosystems increase SOC sequestration up to 4% if intercropping with legumes or cereals is introduced compared to crop monoculture (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Cong et&#xa0;al., 2015</xref>). This is associated with: i) regulation of crop growth by intercropping, and thus, reduction of root exudates and following CO<sub>2</sub> efflux (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Dyer et&#xa0;al., 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Qin et&#xa0;al., 2013</xref>); ii) changes in the composition of microbial community structure and decrease in biomass and functional diversity under one of the species (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">Zhou et&#xa0;al., 2019b</xref>) or stimulation of soil microbial biomass growth under intercropping (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Latati et&#xa0;al., 2017</xref>), and iii) the regulation of soil CO<sub>2</sub> efflux by plant species composition, which may be suppressed by reduce of net primary production because of water availability shortage (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">Zhou et&#xa0;al., 2019a</xref>). Therefore, various intercropping systems (e.g., rapeseed (pea) - maize, wheat-soybean (maize)) can have the potential to reduce the soil CO<sub>2</sub> efflux from farmland (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Li et&#xa0;al., 2001</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">Chai et&#xa0;al., 2014</xref>).</p>
<p>Soil hydrothermal factors play an important role in CO<sub>2</sub> efflux from farmland (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">Hursh et&#xa0;al., 2017</xref>). Temperature is the most important factor affecting soil respiration, and there is a positive relationship between them (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">Hursh et&#xa0;al., 2017</xref>). Plant community composition affects soil respiration's temperature sensitivity. The temperature sensitivity of soil respiration is affected by plant community composition (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">Mauritz and Lipson, 2021</xref>). Higher temperatures are generally expected to enhance soil C losses due to increased soil decomposition (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Crowther et&#xa0;al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Bond-Lamberty et&#xa0;al., 2018</xref>). The sensitivity of respiration to temperature changes with the soil water content, substrate availability, and species composition (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">Geist and Lambin, 2004</xref>). The combined factors of soil temperature and moisture would better predict soil respiration (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Feng et&#xa0;al., 2018</xref>). Soil moisture also strongly affects the changes in SOM (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">Jassal et&#xa0;al., 2008</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">Wang et&#xa0;al., 2014</xref>), respiration (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Bouma et&#xa0;al., 1997</xref>), and microbial activity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">Hallett and Young, 1999</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">Drenovsky et&#xa0;al., 2004</xref>), and the synergistic relationship between soil respiration and moisture can greatly increase or decrease the decomposition rate of SOM, depending on the direction of moisture change (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">Sierra et&#xa0;al., 2015</xref>). However, it is not yet clear how hydrothermal factors will be changed in the intercropping of the legume with brassica and what the response of CO<sub>2</sub> emission will be.</p>
<p>Milk vetch (<italic>Astragalus sinicus</italic> L.) intercropping with rapeseed (<italic>Brassica napus</italic> L.) can enhance farmland productivity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">Zhou et&#xa0;al., 2018</xref>), change the microbial community structure and decrease microbial biomass and functional activity in the rapeseed rhizosphere (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">Zhou et&#xa0;al., 2019b</xref>). To verify the potential of intercropping to reduce the CO<sub>2</sub> emission, the soil respiration from milk vetch - rapeseed system was monitored together with the temperature and moisture for the entire development of crops and compared to the monoculture. Considering that intercropping can improve water use efficiency (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">Ren et&#xa0;al., 2017</xref>), and can decrease soil temperature (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">Gong et&#xa0;al., 2019</xref>) because of the large soil surface cover, it was hypothesized that soil CO<sub>2</sub> efflux would be lower compared to the monocultures. The objective of the experiment was to explore the effects of intercropping on soil respiration and to determine the relationship between soil respiration and hydrothermal factors.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2" sec-type="materials|methods">
<label>2</label>
<title>Materials and methods</title>
<sec id="s2_1">
<label>2.1</label>
<title>Experimental site</title>
<p>The study was conducted from October 2015 to May 2016 on Southwest University experimental farm (29&#xb0;81&#x2032;N, 106&#xb0;41&#x2032;E), Beibei, Chongqing, China, which belonged to humid subtropical monsoon climate zone (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>). Soils (0-15&#xa0;cm) were classified as dystric Regosols with a pH of 6.30, the total C content of 8.6&#xa0;g kg<sup>-1</sup> and total nitrogen content of 0.97&#xa0;g kg<sup>-1</sup>.</p>
<fig id="f1" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;1</label>
<caption>
<p>Mean monthly temperature and precipitation during the experiment.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-13-1093507-g001.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_2">
<label>2.2</label>
<title>Experimental design</title>
<p>The experiment was conducted in buckets (0.7&#xa0;m in height, 0.4&#xa0;m diameter at the bottom, and 0.57&#xa0;m at the top. V = 0.12 m<sup>3</sup>), that were installed outside. Soil for the experiment was collected at 0-15&#xa0;cm depth from the Southwest University experimental farm. All soil was well-mixed after being air-dried. Each pot contained 50&#xa0;kg of dry soil in which the fertilizers (0.10&#xa0;g N kg<sup>-1</sup>, 0.10&#xa0;g P<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub> kg<sup>-1</sup> and 0.10&#xa0;g K<sub>2</sub>O kg<sup>-1</sup> dry soil) was mixed before sowing. Make sure all soil was compacted into the buckets so that the density was equal to reduce the effect on soil respiration.</p>
<p>Three cropping systems were designed: a) monoculture milk vetch (MV): Leping variety sown by broadcasting with 1.0&#xa0;g seeds in each bucket; b) monoculture rapeseed (RS): 94005 variety was sown in holes with 2 plants left after seedling emergence; c) milk vetch intercropping with rapeseed (Intercrop): rapeseed was sown in holes with 2 plants after seedling emergence and milk vetch was sown by broadcasting on both sides (0.5&#xa0;g on each side) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;2</bold>
</xref>). Crops were sown in October 2015 and were harvested in May 2016. The experiment had a randomized complete block design with six replicates.</p>
<fig id="f2" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;2</label>
<caption>
<p>Schematic diagram of the plant cultivation.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-13-1093507-g002.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_3">
<label>2.3</label>
<title>Soil respiration: Soil CO<sub>2</sub> flux</title>
<p>Soil respiration was quantified using an infrared gas analyzer (Li-Cor 6400xt photosynthesis system installed a 6400-09 soil CO<sub>2</sub> flux chamber, LI-COR Inc., Lincoln, USA). Cylindrical PVC collars (height, 0.05&#xa0;m; diameter, 0.11&#xa0;m) were placed at the core of buckets and inserted one day before measurement to reduce the disturbance of the soil. Each bucket had its own PVC collar. Soil respiration measurements were conducted once per 15 days from 1 November 2015 to 1 May 2016. Each treatment was measured in six replications, and 3 cycles were measured at every turn for each PVC collar. To minimize the influence of the diurnal variation on soil respiration, the measurements were carried out from 9:00 to 11:00 a.m.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_4">
<label>2.4</label>
<title>Soil hydrothermal factors</title>
<p>Soil temperature (&#xb0;C) outside the flux chamber at a depth of 5&#xa0;cm was monitored simultaneously with soil respiration by the infrared gas analyzer. Soil moisture (m<sup>3</sup> m<sup>-3</sup>) outside the flux chamber at a depth of 5&#xa0;cm was measured with a handheld multifunction reader (ProCheck connected GS3 sensor, Decagon Inc., USA). The final soil moisture value of each experimental unit was the average of five values taken from the same unit. Each experimental unit's final soil moisture value was the average of five values taken from the same unit.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_5">
<label>2.5</label>
<title>Statistical analysis</title>
<p>Statistical analysis of all experimental data was conducted using SPSS 17.0, Microsoft EXCEL 2010, and CANOCO 5. Soil respiration data were averaged for each growth stage and were evaluated with two-way ANOVA (two factors of crop system and growth stage). The residuals of the model were checked for normality and homogeneity by Shapiro and Leven&#x2019;s tests, respectively. If conditions were met, the Tukey test was performed at <italic>P</italic>&lt;0.05. Principal component analysis (PCA) was performed on the soil respiration of crop systems. Detrended correspondence analysis (DCA) and redundancy analysis (RDA) were performed on soil respiration and soil hydrothermal factors. The heterogeneity in soil respiration was tested with a DCA. Due to the gradient length&lt;3.0, a RDA (linear method) was applied.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s3" sec-type="results">
<label>3</label>
<title>Results</title>
<sec id="s3_1">
<label>3.1</label>
<title>Soil CO<sub>2</sub> efflux</title>
<p>Soil CO<sub>2</sub> efflux ranged between 0.53 and 4.15 &#x3bc;mol&#xb7;m<sup>-2</sup>&#xb7;s<sup>-1</sup> during the growing period of crops (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;3</bold>
</xref>). The turning point of respiration was observed at the lowest temperature during the stem elongation stage, and the pattern of respiration were also depended on the crop system. Soil CO<sub>2</sub> efflux of MV, RS and Intercrop was 1.44, 1.55, and 2.08 &#x3bc;mol&#xb7;m<sup>-2</sup>&#xb7;s<sup>-1</sup> during seedling and stem elongation stages and 3.08, 1.59, and 1.95 &#x3bc;mol&#xb7;m<sup>-2</sup>&#xb7;s<sup>-1</sup> during flowering and podding stages (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;3</bold>
</xref>). Soil CO<sub>2</sub> efflux from Intercrop was 1.4 times higher than from mean of MV and RS at seedling and stem elongation stages, however soil CO<sub>2</sub> efflux from MV was 1.6 times higher than Intercrop thereafter. The RS and Intercrop had similar CO<sub>2</sub> efflux rates after the seedling stage, whereas maximum values were found under MV (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;3</bold>
</xref>).</p>
<fig id="f3" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;3</label>
<caption>
<p>Effects of crop systems on soil respiration. Means are n=24 (seedling and stem elongation stages), n=18 (flowering stage) n=12 (podding stage) (these differences in replicates are because of the length of every growth stage was different) and standard deviations of each growth stage are show. Letters indicate significant differences among crop systems at <italic>P</italic>&lt;0.05.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-13-1093507-g003.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>The first two PC explained together more than 80% of the soil respiration variation (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f4">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;4A</bold>
</xref>). The MV was separated from Intercrop along PC1 and PC2 and only along PC1 from RS. In contrast, RS and Intercrop were only weakly separated along the PC2, and no separation along PC1 were found. Soil respiration in three crop systems could be classified into two types (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f4">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;4B</bold>
</xref>). The separation along the PC1 was due to the CO<sub>2</sub> efflux during the flowering to the podding stage, whereas separation along the PC2 was because CO2 efflux during the seedling and the stem elongation stages. Therefore, the difference in soil respiration between milk vetch and rapeseed was mainly determined by the later period of crop growth.</p>
<fig id="f4" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;4</label>
<caption>
<p>PCA scores <bold>(A)</bold> and corresponding loading values <bold>(B)</bold> for soil respiration (&#x3bc;mol&#xb7;m<sup>-2</sup>&#xb7;s<sup>-1</sup>) under various crop systems.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-13-1093507-g004.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_2">
<label>3.2</label>
<title>Soil respiration and hydrothermal factor</title>
<p>According to the DCA, soil respiration in MV, RS and Intercrop was found to be heterogeneous (gradient length&lt;3.0). RDA showed that soil respiration was positively correlated with soil temperature and negatively with moisture (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f5">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;5</bold>
</xref>). However, differences between crop systems were still observed. Firstly, MV had the closest correlation between soil respiration and hydrothermal factors, followed by Intercrop and RS. Secondly, the correlation between soil respiration and the temperature was more substantial than with soil moisture in the case of MV and RS; in the case of Intercrop, the correlation between soil respiration and moisture was stronger than that with temperature (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f5">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;5</bold>
</xref>). This indicated that Intercrop changed the responses of soil respiration to hydrothermal factors.</p>
<fig id="f5" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;5</label>
<caption>
<p>DCA and RDA of soil respiration and hydrothermal factors under various crop systems. DCA was perforemed on soil CO<sub>2</sub> efflux (&#x3bc;mol m<sup>-2</sup> s<sup>-1</sup>). RDA was performed on soil CO<sub>2</sub> efflux (&#x3bc;mol m<sup>-2</sup> s<sup>-1</sup>), soil temperature (&#xb0;C), and soil moisture (m<sup>3</sup> m<sup>-3</sup>). <italic>R</italic>
<sub>MV</sub>, <italic>R</italic>
<sub>RS</sub>, and <italic>R</italic>
<sub>Intercrop</sub> indicate soil respiration under MV, RS and Intercrop, respectively; <italic>T</italic>
<sub>MV</sub>, <italic>T</italic>
<sub>RS</sub>, and <italic>T</italic>
<sub>Intercrop</sub> indicate soil temperature; <italic>M</italic>
<sub>MV</sub>, <italic>M</italic>
<sub>RS</sub> and <italic>M</italic>
<sub>Intercrop</sub> indicate soil moisture.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-13-1093507-g005.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>The Q<sub>10</sub> values were 2.03, 1.39, and 1.45 in MV, RS, and Intercrop, respectively. Sensitivity of soil respiration to the temperature was lower in Intercrop than in MV and was independent on temperature changes, namely, although there was the same high temperature at the flowering and podding stages, the CO<sub>2</sub> emission rates from Intercrop and RS were lower than from MV (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f6">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;6</bold>
</xref>). Intercrop also decreased soil moisture, especially at the seedling and stem elongation stages, compared to the monoculture; soil CO<sub>2</sub> efflux was smaller in RS and Intercrop than in MV when soil moisture was low. The CO<sub>2</sub> efflux from RS and Intercrop was more constant under the moisture fluctuations compared with MV (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f6">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;6</bold>
</xref>), which indicates that both RS and Intercrop reduced the response of soil respiration to moisture.</p>
<fig id="f6" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;6</label>
<caption>
<p>Soil respiration and hydrothermal factor under various crop systems and plant growth stages. Data shows means and standard errors. Q<sub>10</sub> value is the sensitivity of soil respiration to temperature change, which was calculated as y=ae<sup>bx</sup>, Q<sub>10</sub> = e<sup>10b</sup>, where y is the soil respirartion, and x is temperature, a and b are fiited parameters.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-13-1093507-g006.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s4" sec-type="discussion">
<label>4</label>
<title>Discussion</title>
<p>The high CO<sub>2</sub> efflux from Intercrop at the early growth stages are explained by low competition for the soil resources between species (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">Mushagalusa et&#xa0;al., 2008</xref>), and intensive plant growth. Intercropping with RS may decrease the impact of MV on soil respiration at the later stage (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;3</bold>
</xref>) i) due to inhibition of MV growth (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">Zhou et&#xa0;al., 2018</xref>), thus, decreasing the release of root exudates from MV into the soil (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Liu et&#xa0;al., 2013</xref>) and ii) due to suppress microbial biomass and activity in the RS rhizosphere in the presence of MV (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">Zhou et&#xa0;al., 2019b</xref>), and thus, reducing rhizosphere respiration (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">Blaise et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">Yang et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>). The RS and Intercrop had similar CO<sub>2</sub> efflux rates after the seedling stage, whereas maximum values were found from MV (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;3</bold>
</xref>). This is explained by higher root exudation under N<sub>2</sub> fixing plant species (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B42">Z&#xfa;&#xf1;iga-Feest et&#xa0;al., 2018</xref>) and thus, higher rhizosphere respiration (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">Becker and Holz, 2021</xref>). This showed the positive effect of intercropping on the SOM accumulation because the CO<sub>2</sub> efflux was reduced compared to N-fixing plant monoculture.</p>
<p>Seasonal and interannual variations of CO<sub>2</sub> emission are related to the soil temperature and moisture (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">Suseela et&#xa0;al., 2012</xref>) because these parameters directly regulate microbial biomass and activity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">Zhou et&#xa0;al., 2019b</xref>). Sensitivity of soil respiration to temperature was lower in Intercrop than in MV and was independent of temperature changes (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f6">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;6</bold>
</xref>). Intercrop also decreased soil moisture, especially at the seedling and stem elongation stages, compared to the monoculture (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f6">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;6</bold>
</xref>). This explains why in the Intercrop the growth of MV was suppressed (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">Zhou et&#xa0;al., 2018</xref>). High CO<sub>2</sub> emission rate under MV observed at the flowering and podding stages can be explained more by the high soil moisture at the initial plant growth stages, then by the temperature. In contrast, the decreased CO<sub>2</sub> efflux rate under Intercrop at later stages can be directly affected by variations in moisture or temperature, and probably other factors, such as changes in the composition of microbial communities (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">Zhou et&#xa0;al., 2019b</xref>), a decrease of rhizosphere C flux (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">Suseela and Dukes, 2013</xref>) and plant species-species interactions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Dijkstra et&#xa0;al., 2010</xref>).</p>
<p>The similar trends in CO<sub>2</sub> efflux and temperature suggested that soil temperature was still the most important factor affecting soil respiration (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SF1">
<bold>Supplementary Figure&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>). Soil respiration was positively correlated with soil temperature, and a negative correlation of soil respiration to soil moisture was also found, especially in Intercrop (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f5">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;5</bold>
</xref>). It illustrated that the effect of soil moisture on soil respiration is more important in intercropping systems than in monoculture. Soil respiration responses to increases in temperature are constrained by soil moisture (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">Conant et&#xa0;al., 2004</xref>). If the soil moisture is often lower than the soil water holding capacity, the soil respiration cannot be high enough to reach the limiting point due to reduced oxygen diffusion into the soil and inhibited substrate decomposition (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">Tang et&#xa0;al., 2006</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Hu et&#xa0;al., 2017</xref>). Furthermore, as microbial respiration is linearly related to soil water content and log-linearly related to water potential (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Cook and Orchard, 2008</xref>), the decreased soil moisture will directly lead to the decrease of soil microbial biomass and functional activity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">Zhou et&#xa0;al., 2019b</xref>). Thus, the variation in soil moisture can be the real reason for inhibited soil respiration by milk vetch intercropping with rapeseed.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s5" sec-type="conclusions">
<label>5</label>
<title>Conclusions</title>
<p>Soil CO<sub>2</sub> efflux from Intercrop was 1.4 times higher than from mean of MV and RS at seedling and stem elongation stages, however, soil CO<sub>2</sub> efflux from MV was 1.6 times higher than Intercrop after that. Cultivation of legume in monoculture, although there is a positive contribution to soil N balance, can promote SOM losses compared to Brassica. In contrast, intercropping of Legume with Brassica is a beneficial agricultural practice to reduce the rate of CO<sub>2</sub> efflux, which is related to the flowering and podding stages of plant growth. The sensitivity of soil respiration to temperature decreased in Intercrop, in which the variation of soil moisture was the primary factor to inhibit soil respiration. Therefore, milk vetch-rapeseed intercropping could be a potential approach to produce low CO<sub>2</sub> emissions from farmland, however soil moisture should be adequately regulated so that agricultural intercropping systems can be well adaptable in the face of frequent global droughts.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s6" sec-type="data-availability">
<title>Data availability statement</title>
<p>The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SF1">
<bold>Supplementary Material</bold>
</xref>. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s7" sec-type="author-contributions">
<title>Author contributions</title>
<p>All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by QZ, AG and JC. The first draft of the manuscript was written by QZ and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<sec id="s8" sec-type="funding-information">
<title>Funding</title>
<p>This study was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31901476, 31871583, 31271673), the Jiangxi Provincial Natural Science Foundation (20202ACBL215002), the Special Fund for Agro-scientific Research in the Public Interest (201503127) and China Scholarship Council (CSC).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s9" sec-type="COI-statement">
<title>Conflict of interest</title>
<p>The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s10" sec-type="disclaimer">
<title>Publisher&#x2019;s note</title>
<p>All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s11" sec-type="supplementary-material">
<title>Supplementary material</title>
<p>The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2022.1093507/full#supplementary-material">https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2022.1093507/full#supplementary-material</ext-link>
</p>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Image_1.tiff" id="SF1" mimetype="image/tiff"/>
</sec>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="B1">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Becker</surname> <given-names>J. N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Holz</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Hot or not? connecting rhizosphere hotspots to total soil respiration</article-title>. <source>Plant Soil</source> <volume>464</volume>, <fpage>489</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>499</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11104-021-04963-4</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Blaise</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Velmourougane</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Santosh</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Manikandan</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>). intercrop mulch affects soil biology and microbial diversity in rainfed transgenic bt cotton hybrids</article-title>. <source>Sci. Total Environ.</source> <volume>794</volume>, <elocation-id>148787</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148787</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Bond-Lamberty</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bailey</surname> <given-names>V. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gough</surname> <given-names>C. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Vargas</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Globally rising soil heterotrophic respiration over recent decades</article-title>. <source>Nature</source> <volume>560</volume>, <fpage>80</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>83</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41586-018-0358-x</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Bouma</surname> <given-names>T. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Nielsen</surname> <given-names>K. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Eissenstat</surname> <given-names>D. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lynch</surname> <given-names>J. P.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1997</year>). <article-title>Estimating respiration of roots in soil: Interactions with soil CO2, soil temperature and soil water content</article-title>. <source>Plant Soil</source> <volume>195</volume>, <fpage>221</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>232</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1023/A:1004278421334</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Chai</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Qin</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gan</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yu</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Higher yield and lower carbon emission by intercropping maize with rape, pea, and wheat in arid irrigation areas</article-title>. <source>Agron. Sustain. Dev.</source> <volume>34</volume>, <fpage>535</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>543</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s13593-013-0161-x</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Chapagain</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Riseman</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Barley&#x2013;pea intercropping: Effects on land productivity, carbon and nitrogen transformations</article-title>. <source>Field Crops Res.</source> <volume>166</volume>, <fpage>18</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>25</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.fcr.2014.06.014</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Conant</surname> <given-names>R. T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dalla-Betta</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Klopatek</surname> <given-names>C. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Klopatek</surname> <given-names>J. M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2004</year>). <article-title>Controls on soil respiration in semiarid soils</article-title>. <source>Soil Biol. Biochem.</source> <volume>36</volume>, <fpage>945</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>951</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.soilbio.2004.02.013</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Cong</surname> <given-names>W.-F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hoffland</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Six</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sun</surname> <given-names>J.-H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bao</surname> <given-names>X.-G.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Intercropping enhances soil carbon and nitrogen</article-title>. <source>Global Change Biol.</source> <volume>21</volume>, <fpage>1715</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1726</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/gcb.12738</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Cook</surname> <given-names>F. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Orchard</surname> <given-names>V. A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>Relationships between soil respiration and soil moisture</article-title>. <source>Soil Biol. Biochem.</source> <volume>40</volume>, <fpage>1013</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1018</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.soilbio.2007.12.012</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Crowther</surname> <given-names>T. W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Todd-Brown</surname> <given-names>K. E. O.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rowe</surname> <given-names>C. W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wieder</surname> <given-names>W. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Carey</surname> <given-names>J. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Machmuller</surname> <given-names>M. B.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Quantifying global soil carbon losses in response to warming</article-title>. <source>Nature</source> <volume>540</volume>, <fpage>104</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>108</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nature20150</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Cui</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sui</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wright</surname> <given-names>D. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sun</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ran</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Carbon emission of maize-based cropping systems in the north China plain</article-title>. <source>J. Cleaner Production</source> <volume>213</volume>, <fpage>300</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>308</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.12.174</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Dijkstra</surname> <given-names>F. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Morgan</surname> <given-names>J. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Blumenthal</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Follett</surname> <given-names>R. F.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Water limitation and plant inter-specific competition reduce rhizosphere-induced c decomposition and plant n uptake</article-title>. <source>Soil Biol. Biochem.</source> <volume>42</volume>, <fpage>1073</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1082</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.soilbio.2010.02.026</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Drenovsky</surname> <given-names>R. E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Vo</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Graham</surname> <given-names>K. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Scow</surname> <given-names>K. M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2004</year>). <article-title>Soil water content and organic carbon availability are major determinants of soil microbial community composition</article-title>. <source>Microb. Ecol.</source> <volume>48</volume>, <fpage>424</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>430</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00248-003-1063-2</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Dyer</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Oelbermann</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Echarte</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Soil carbon dioxide and nitrous oxide emissions during the growing season from temperate maize-soybean intercrops</article-title>. <source>J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci.</source> <volume>175</volume>, <fpage>394</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>400</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/jpln.201100167</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Feng</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Song</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhu</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Patterns of soil respiration and its temperature sensitivity in grassland ecosystems across China</article-title>. <source>Biogeosciences</source> <volume>15</volume>, <fpage>5329</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>5341</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/bg-15-5329-2018</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Gan</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liang</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>McConkey</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Lowering carbon footprint of durum wheat by diversifying cropping systems</article-title>. <source>Field Crops Res.</source> <volume>122</volume>, <fpage>199</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>206</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.fcr.2011.03.020</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Geist</surname> <given-names>H. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lambin</surname> <given-names>E. F.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2004</year>). <article-title>Dynamic causal patterns of desertification</article-title>. <source>BioScience</source> <volume>54</volume>, <fpage>817</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>829</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1641/0006-3568(2004)054[0817:DCPOD]2.0.CO;2</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B18">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Gong</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Luo</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Responses of rhizosphere soil properties, enzyme activities and microbial diversity to intercropping patterns on the loess plateau of China</article-title>. <source>Soil Tillage Res.</source> <volume>195</volume>, <elocation-id>104355</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.still.2019.104355</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B19">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Hallett</surname> <given-names>P. D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Young</surname> <given-names>I. M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1999</year>). <article-title>Changes to water repellence of soil aggregates caused by substrate-induced microbial activity</article-title>. <source>Eur. J. Soil Sci.</source> <volume>50</volume>, <fpage>35</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>40</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1046/j.1365-2389.1999.00214.x</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B20">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Hu</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chai</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yu</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yin</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cui</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gan</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Less carbon emissions of wheat&#x2013;maize intercropping under reduced tillage in arid areas</article-title>. <source>Agron. Sustain. Dev.</source> <volume>35</volume>, <fpage>701</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>711</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s13593-014-0257-y</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B21">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Hu</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Feng</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chai</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yu</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yin</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Integration of wheat-maize intercropping with conservation practices reduces CO2 emissions and enhances water use in dry areas</article-title>. <source>Soil Tillage Res.</source> <volume>169</volume>, <fpage>44</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>53</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.still.2017.01.005</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B22">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Hu</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gan</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cui</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Feng</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yin</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Intercropping maize and wheat with conservation agriculture principles improves water harvesting and reduces carbon emissions in dry areas</article-title>. <source>Eur. J. Agron.</source> <volume>74</volume>, <fpage>9</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>17</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.eja.2015.11.019</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B23">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Hursh</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ballantyne</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cooper</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Maneta</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kimball</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Watts</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>The sensitivity of soil respiration to soil temperature, moisture, and carbon supply at the global scale</article-title>. <source>Global Change Biol.</source> <volume>23</volume>, <fpage>2090</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2103</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/gcb.13489</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B24">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Jassal</surname> <given-names>R. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Black</surname> <given-names>T. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Novak</surname> <given-names>M. D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gaumont-Guay</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Nesic</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>Effect of soil water stress on soil respiration and its temperature sensitivity in an 18-year-old temperate Douglas-fir stand</article-title>. <source>Global Change Biol.</source> <volume>14</volume>, <fpage>1305</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1318</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1365-2486.2008.01573.x</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B25">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Latati</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Aouiche</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tellah</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Laribi</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Benlahrech</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kaci</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Intercropping maize and common bean enhances microbial carbon and nitrogen availability in low phosphorus soil under Mediterranean conditions</article-title>. <source>Eur. J. Soil Biol.</source> <volume>80</volume>, <fpage>9</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>18</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ejsobi.2017.03.003</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B26">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sun</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rengel</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2001</year>). <article-title>Wheat/maize or wheat/soybean strip intercropping: II. recovery or compensation of maize and soybean after wheat harvesting</article-title>. <source>Field Crops Res.</source> <volume>71</volume>, <fpage>173</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>181</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S0378-4290(01)00157-5</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B27">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chai</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Huang</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Relationships among soil respiration, soil temperature and dry matter accumulation for wheat-maize intercropping in an arid environment</article-title>. <source>Can. J. Plant Sci.</source> <volume>93</volume>, <fpage>715</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>724</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4141/cjps2012-274</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B28">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Mauritz</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lipson</surname> <given-names>D. A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Plant community composition alters moisture and temperature sensitivity of soil respiration in semi-arid shrubland</article-title>. <source>Oecologia</source> <volume>197</volume>, <fpage>1003</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1015</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00442-021-04961-4</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B29">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Mushagalusa</surname> <given-names>G. N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ledent</surname> <given-names>J.-F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Draye</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>Shoot and root competition in potato/maize intercropping: Effects on growth and yield</article-title>. <source>Environ. Exp. Bot.</source> <volume>64</volume>, <fpage>180</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>188</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.envexpbot.2008.05.008</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B30">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Qin</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Huang</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chai</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yu</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Huang</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Grain yield and soil respiratory response to intercropping systems on arid land</article-title>. <source>Field Crops Res.</source> <volume>144</volume>, <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>10</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.fcr.2012.12.005</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B31">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ren</surname> <given-names>Y. Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>X. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>S. Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Palta</surname> <given-names>J. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>Y. L.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Influence of spatial arrangement in maize-soybean intercropping on root growth and water use efficiency</article-title>. <source>Plant Soil</source> <volume>415</volume>, <fpage>131</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>144</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11104-016-3143-3</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B32">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Sierra</surname> <given-names>C. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Trumbore</surname> <given-names>S. E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Davidson</surname> <given-names>E. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Vicca</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Janssens</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Sensitivity of decomposition rates of soil organic matter with respect to simultaneous changes in temperature and moisture</article-title>. <source>J. Adv. Modeling Earth Syst.</source> <volume>7</volume>, <fpage>335</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>356</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/2014MS000358</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B33">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Smith</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Martino</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cai</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gwary</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Janzen</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kumar</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2007</year>). <article-title>Greenhouse gas mitigation in agriculture</article-title>. <source>Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B: Biol. Sci</source>. <volume>363</volume>, <page-range>789&#x2013;813</page-range>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1098/rstb.2007.2184</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B34">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Suseela</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Conant</surname> <given-names>R. T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wallenstein</surname> <given-names>M. D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dukes</surname> <given-names>J. S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Effects of soil moisture on the temperature sensitivity of heterotrophic respiration vary seasonally in an old-field climate change experiment</article-title>. <source>Global Change Biol.</source> <volume>18</volume>, <fpage>336</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>348</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1365-2486.2011.02516.x</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B35">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Suseela</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dukes</surname> <given-names>J. S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>The responses of soil and rhizosphere respiration to simulated climatic changes vary by season</article-title>. <source>Ecology</source> <volume>94</volume>, <fpage>403</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>413</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1890/12-0150.1</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B36">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Tang</surname> <given-names>X.-L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>G.-Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>S.-G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>D.-Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>S.-Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2006</year>). <article-title>Dependence of soil respiration on soil temperature and soil moisture in successional forests in southern China</article-title>. <source>J. Integr. Plant Biol.</source> <volume>48</volume>, <fpage>654</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>663</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1744-7909.2006.00263.x</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B37">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zha</surname> <given-names>T. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jia</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Y. Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Qin</surname> <given-names>S. G.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>). soil moisture modifies the response of soil respiration to temperature in a desert shrub ecosystem</article-title>. <source>Biogeosciences</source> <volume>11</volume>, <fpage>259</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>268</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/bg-11-259-2014</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B38">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hu</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yin</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chai</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yu</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Integration of tillage and planting density improves crop production and carbon mitigation of maize/pea intercropping in the oasis irrigation area of northwestern China</article-title>. <source>Field Crops Res.</source> <volume>272</volume>, <elocation-id>108281</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.fcr.2021.108281</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B39">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Biederman</surname> <given-names>J. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cui</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kuzyakov</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2019</year>a). <article-title>Extreme-duration drought impacts on soil CO2 efflux are regulated by plant species composition</article-title>. <source>Plant Soil</source> <volume>439</volume>, <fpage>357</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>372</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11104-019-04025-w</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B40">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xing</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xie</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2019</year>b). <article-title>Influence of intercropping Chinese milk vetch on the soil microbial community in rhizosphere of rape</article-title>. <source>Plant Soil</source> <volume>440</volume>, <fpage>85</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>96</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11104-019-04040-x</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B41">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ma</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xing</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Influences of rape intercropping with Chinese milk vetch and straw mulching on productive benefits in dryland of southwest China</article-title>. <source>Acta Agronomica Sin.</source> <volume>44</volume>, <fpage>431</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>441</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3724/SP.J.1006.2018.00431</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B42">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Z&#xfa;&#xf1;iga-Feest</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mu&#xf1;oz</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bustos-Salazar</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ram&#xed;rez</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Delgado</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Valle</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>The nitrogen fixing specie sophora cassioides (Fabaceae), is nutritionally favored and their rhizosphere bacteria modified when is co-cultivated with the cluster root forming embothrium coccineum (Proteaceae)</article-title>. <source>J. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr.</source> <volume>18</volume>, <fpage>597</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>616</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4067/S0718-95162018005001801</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>