<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.3 20070202//EN" "journalpublishing.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="2.3" xml:lang="EN">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Front. Plant Sci.</journal-id>
<journal-title>Frontiers in Plant Science</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">Front. Plant Sci.</abbrev-journal-title>
<issn pub-type="epub">1664-462X</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Frontiers Media S.A.</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpls.2022.1083753</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Plant Science</subject>
<subj-group>
<subject>Original Research</subject>
</subj-group>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Transcriptomics&#x2010;based analysis of the causes of sugar receding in Feizixiao litchi (<italic>Litchi chinensis</italic> Sonn.) pulp</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Peng</surname>
<given-names>Junjie</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2063509"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Du</surname>
<given-names>Jingjia</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wuqiang</surname>
<given-names>Ma</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1928580"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname>
<given-names>Tiantian</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Shui</surname>
<given-names>Xian</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Liao</surname>
<given-names>Haizhi</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Lin</surname>
<given-names>Xiaokai</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name>
<surname>Zhou</surname>
<given-names>Kaibing</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn001">
<sup>*</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1422385"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
<institution>Sanya Nanfan Research Institute of Hainan University</institution>, <addr-line>Sanya</addr-line>, <country>China</country>
</aff>
<aff id="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
<institution>College of Horticulture, Hainan University</institution>, <addr-line>Haikou</addr-line>, <country>China</country>
</aff>
<author-notes>
<fn fn-type="edited-by">
<p>Edited by: Jianzhao Li, Ludong University, China</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="edited-by">
<p>Reviewed by: Tao Dong, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, China; Mingyuan Wang, Huaqiao University, China</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="corresp" id="fn001">
<p>*Correspondence: Kaibing Zhou, <email xlink:href="mailto:kaibingzhou0528@163.com">kaibingzhou0528@163.com</email>
</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="other" id="fn002">
<p>This article was submitted to Crop and Product Physiology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Plant Science</p>
</fn>
</author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>22</day>
<month>12</month>
<year>2022</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="collection">
<year>2022</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>13</volume>
<elocation-id>1083753</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>16</day>
<month>11</month>
<year>2022</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>29</day>
<month>11</month>
<year>2022</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#xa9; 2022 Peng, Du, Wuqiang, Chen, Shui, Liao, Lin and Zhou</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2022</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Peng, Du, Wuqiang, Chen, Shui, Liao, Lin and Zhou</copyright-holder>
<license xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">
<p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.</p>
</license>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<p>To investigate the causes of the &#x201c;sugar receding&#x201d; in &#x2018;Feizixiao&#x2019; litchi (<italic>Litchi chinensis</italic> Sonn.) pulp, the main sugar contents and sucrose metabolism enzyme activities were measured in pulp obtained in 2020 and 2021. Pulp RNA obtained in 2020 was extracted at 35, 63, and 69 days after anthesis (DAA) for transcriptome sequencing analysis. The differential expression of genes was verified by real-time PCR for both years. The results showed that after 63 DAA, the contents of soluble sugars and sucrose decreased, and the contents of fructose and glucose increased in both years. The dynamic changes in sucrose metabolism enzyme activities were similar in both years. After 63 DAA, except for acid invertase (AI) in 2021, the activities of other enzymes decreased significantly, and the net activity of sucrose metabolism enzymes showed a strong sucrose cleavage activity. There were 18061, 19575, and 985 differentially expressed genes in 35&#xa0;d vs. 63&#xa0;d, 35&#xa0;d vs. 69&#xa0;d, and 63&#xa0;d vs. 69&#xa0;d, respectively. Ninety-one sugar metabolism genes were screened out, including sucrose synthase (SS), sucrose phosphate synthase (SPS), AI, neutral invertase (NI), hexokinase (HK), glucose 6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD), 6-phosphogluconate dehydrogenase (6PGD), phosphofructokinase (PFK), and pyruvate kinase (PK) genes. In 63&#xa0;d vs. 69&#xa0;d, seventy-five percent of sucrose metabolism genes were downregulated, seventy-seven percent of genes in glycolysis (EMP) were upregulated and the PFK genes were significantly upregulated. There was a significant linear correlation between the expression of 15 genes detected by real-time PCR and the transcriptome sequencing results (<italic>r<sub>2020</sub>
</italic> = 0.9139, <italic>r<sub>2021</sub>
</italic> = 0.8912). These results suggest that the upregulated expression of PFK genes at maturity may enhance PFK activity and promote the degradation of soluble sugar in pulp through the EMP pathway, resulting in decreased soluble sugar and sucrose contents and &#x201c;sugar receding&#x201d; in pulp. Moreover, the downregulated expression of sucrose metabolism genes in pulp decreased the activities of these enzymes, but the net activity of these enzymes resulted in cleaved sucrose and replenished levels of reducing sugars, resulting in a stable reducing sugar content.</p>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>glycolytic pathway</kwd>
<kwd>litchi</kwd>
<kwd>phosphofructokinase</kwd>
<kwd>sugar receding</kwd>
<kwd>transcriptome sequencing</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<contract-num rid="cn001">31960570</contract-num>
<contract-sponsor id="cn001">National Natural Science Foundation of China<named-content content-type="fundref-id">10.13039/501100001809</named-content>
</contract-sponsor>
<counts>
<fig-count count="7"/>
<table-count count="1"/>
<equation-count count="0"/>
<ref-count count="40"/>
<page-count count="13"/>
<word-count count="5789"/>
</counts>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec id="s1" sec-type="intro">
<label>1</label>
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>Litchi (<italic>Litchi chinensis</italic> Sonn.) is an evergreen fruit tree belonging to the Sapindaceae family, native to China (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">Menzel, 2001</xref>) and cultivated in the United States, Australia, Brazil, India, and Thailand and other places (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Pareek, 2016</xref>). It is popular among consumers for its sweet and sour taste (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Jiang et&#xa0;al., 2006</xref>). &#x2018;Feizixiao&#x2019; litchi is one of the main cultivars in Hainan Province, and is becoming increasingly popular in the world consumer market (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Jiang et&#xa0;al., 2012</xref>). It has been shown that the pulp of the fruit undergoes &#x201c;sugar receding&#x201d; when fruit ripens (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">Wang et&#xa0;al., 2017</xref>), adversely affecting its quality, which is not conducive to maximizing its economic benefits. Therefore, investigating the physiological and molecular mechanisms of the &#x201c;sugar receding&#x201d; phenomenon is beneficial for artificially regulating the fruit sugar contents and improving the commercial value of &#x2018;Feizixiao&#x2019; litchi.</p>
<p>Different varieties of litchi accumulate different types of sugars. &#x2018;Feizixiao&#x2019; litchi pulp mainly contains the reducing sugars (fructose and glucose) and sucrose (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">Wang et&#xa0;al., 2006</xref>). Leaf photosynthetic products undergoing long-distance transport are mainly in the form of sucrose from source tissues to sink tissues (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Braun et&#xa0;al., 2014</xref>), sucrose metabolism enzymes affect the accumulation of sucrose in fruit (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">Koch, 2004</xref>). Sucrose metabolism enzymes include sucrose synthase (SS), sucrose phosphate synthase (SPS), and invertases (INVs). INVs are divided into acid invertase (AI) and neutral invertase (NI). AI is found in the vacuole, cell wall and between cell walls, and NI is found in the cytoplasm (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">Yang et&#xa0;al., 2013</xref>). Moreover, SS catalyzes the reversible reaction between fructose, uridine diphosphate glucose and sucrose (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Kaur and Das, 2022</xref>), and SPS is the key rate-limiting enzyme that regulates the catalyzing process from fructose-6-phosphate to sucrose (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">Sun et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>), while INVs catalyze the cleavage of sucrose to produce fructose and glucose (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Ruan et&#xa0;al., 2010</xref>). These enzymes regulate the conversion between sucrose and reducing sugars to control the composition and content of soluble sugars imported and stored in fruits (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">Ren et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>). For example, A previous study on peaches (<italic>Prunus persica</italic> L.) showed that ABA treatment increased the activities of SS and SPS, and decreased the activity of AI, resulting in increased sucrose content in ABA-treated fruit (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">Zhao et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>). In a study on strawberries (<italic>Fragaria</italic> x <italic>ananassa</italic>), SS activity was low and had no significant contribution to sink strength, and INV activity was high, which are the main enzymes of sucrose cleavage (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">Basson et&#xa0;al., 2010</xref>). Moreover, sucrose transport related proteins affect the transport and transfer of sucrose (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">Milne et&#xa0;al., 2018</xref>), including sucrose transporters (SUTs) and sugars will eventually be exported transporters (SWEETs), which are also related to sugar accumulation. For example, the apple (<italic>Malus domestica</italic>) sucrose transporter MdSUT2.2 is highly expressed in ripening fruit, and the over&#xad;expression of <italic>MdSUT2.2</italic> increases sugar contents in apple (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Ma et&#xa0;al., 2017</xref>). In the high-sucrose budding variety of &#x2018;Nanguo (NG)&#x2019; pear (<italic>Pyrus ussuriensis</italic> Maxim.), <italic>PuSWEET15</italic> is more highly expressed in developing fruit, which accumulates more sucrose than &#x2018;NG&#x2019; (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">Li et&#xa0;al., 2020a</xref>).</p>
<p>Low temperature can inhibit the rate of glycolysis (EMP) and lead to the accumulation of sugar (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">Trevanion and Kruger, 1991</xref>), which indicates that sugar content is also controlled by other pathways. The glycolysis-tricarboxylic acid cycle aerobic respiration pathway and pentose phosphate pathway (PPP), which are important downstream metabolic pathways of reducing sugars, use reducing sugars as substrates to generate various intermediate substances and energy for normal fruit growth and development (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Kou et&#xa0;al., 2018</xref>). EMP is the first stage of the aerobic respiration pathway of the glycolysis-tricarboxylic acid cycle, so the decrease in soluble sugar content in &#x2018;Feizixiao&#x2019; litchi pulp in the late stage of growth and development should be related to EMP and PPP. The key enzymes in EMP are hexokinase (HK), phosphofructokinase (PFK) and pyruvate kinase (PK) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">Zhang et&#xa0;al., 2018</xref>); the key enzymes in PPP are glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Castiglia et&#xa0;al., 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Ramos-Martinez, 2017</xref>) and 6-phosphogluconate dehydrogenase (6PGD) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">Li et&#xa0;al., 2020b</xref>). HK catalyzes the phosphorylation of reducing sugars, which is the first important reaction of hexose metabolism (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Kandel-Kfir et&#xa0;al., 2006</xref>). Only two hexose phosphorylases, fructokinase (FK) and HK, have been discovered thus far (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">Granot et&#xa0;al., 2013</xref>), while glucose is converted into glucose 6-phosphate under the catalysis of HK to enter EMP and PPP, so HK affects the metabolism of both EMP and PPP rates. Fructose is converted to fructose 6-phosphate by FK and HK, and then fructose 6-phosphate enters EMP and PPP (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Pego and Smeekens, 2000</xref>).</p>
<p>In this study, the sugar contents of &#x2018;Feizixiao&#x2019; litchi pulp and the activities of sucrose metabolism enzymes were measured in two separate years. Through transcriptome sequencing, the differentially expressed genes of &#x2018;Feizixiao&#x2019; litchi pulp at different developmental stages were compared. We identified the key sugar metabolism genes that lead to the &#x201c;sugar receding&#x201d; of &#x2018;Feizixiao&#x2019; litchi, used real-time PCR to verify the expression patterns of these genes, and analyzed the causes of &#x201c;sugar receding&#x201d; in &#x2018;Feizixiao&#x2019; litchi pulp, which will provide a theoretical basis for artificially adjusting the sugar contents of &#x2018;Feizixiao&#x2019; litchi pulp.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2" sec-type="materials|methods">
<label>2</label>
<title>Materials and methods</title>
<sec id="s2_1">
<label>2.1</label>
<title>Plant materials</title>
<p>At team 5 in Jingpai Village, Chengmai County, Hainan Province, five 16-year-old &#x2018;Feizixiao&#x2019; litchi trees with uniform growth potential and no clear pest or health issues were selected for the experiment. &#x2018;Feizixiao&#x2019; litchi from the garden entered the physiological fruit drop period in early April, the fruit expansion period in late April, and the fruit maturity period in mid-May (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Liao et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>). Sampling was performed during the fruit expansion period and fruit ripening period, that is, starting from 35 days after anthesis (DAA) (19, Apr, 2020, 18, Apr, 2021), and five fruit of the same size in the middle and periphery of each tree were selected. The size and coloring condition of the five fruits were used as the reference for each sampling. Highly similar fruit were selected as the materials, and thirty fruits were taken from each tree. The sampling times were 35, 42, 50, 56, 63, and 69 DAA in 2020 and 35, 42, 49, 56, 63, and 70 DAA in 2021. After harvesting the samples, they were placed in liquid nitrogen for quick freezing, and then taken back to the laboratory and stored in an ultralow temperature freezer (-80&#xb0;C).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_2">
<label>2.2</label>
<title>Extraction and determination of fructose, glucose and sucrose</title>
<p>The method referenced in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">Wang et&#xa0;al. (2006)</xref> was performed with some modifications. We weighed 0.5&#xa0;g of pulp in a mortar, heated it in a microwave oven for 30 s, added 5 mL of 90% ethanol, ground the sample thoroughly, centrifuged it at 10,000 <italic>g</italic>
<sub>n</sub> for 15&#xa0;min, aspirated the supernatant and added 5 mL of 90% ethanol for another extraction. Then, we combined the two supernatants, which were evaporated in a 90&#xb0;C water bath, Then, the remaining sample was fixed with 10 mL of deionized water, and a small amount was aspirated with a syringe and filtered through a 0.45 &#x3bc;m membrane for testing. The sugar contents were determined on a Waters 2695 high-performance liquid chromatograph with an evaporative light scattering detector and a Boston Green Amino Column (4.6&#xd7;250 mm, 5 &#x3bc;m). The mobile phase ratio was acetonitrile:water = 8:2, the flow rate was 1 mL min<sup>-1</sup>, the column temperature was 35&#xb0;C, and the injection volume was 10 &#x3bc;L. High-purity glucose, fructose and sucrose (Beijing Tanmo Quality Inspection Technology Co., Ltd.) were used as the standards, and high-purity acetonitrile (Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd.) was used as the mobile phase. The sum of the fructose, glucose and sucrose contents was considered the total soluble sugar contents.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_3">
<label>2.3</label>
<title>Determination of sucrose metabolism enzyme activities</title>
<p>The pulp sucrose synthase cleavage (SS-C) and synthesis (SS-S) and AI, NI, and SPS activities were measured by double antibody sandwich-enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kits (Catalog Nos: KT8013-A, KT50452-A, KT5045-A, KT8107-A, KT5044-A, Jiangsu Kete Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Yancheng, Jiangsu, China) following the manufacturer&#x2019;s protocol.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_4">
<label>2.4</label>
<title>Transcriptome sequencing analysis and real-time PCR verification</title>
<sec id="s2_4_1">
<label>2.4.1</label>
<title>RNA extraction, library construction, sequencing and data filtering</title>
<p>According to the changes in the total soluble sugar content in &#x2018;Feizixiao&#x2019; litchi pulp in 2020, RNA was extracted from the pulp at 35, 63, and 69 DAA for transcriptome sequencing, with 3 biological replicates in each time period. A plant total RNA extraction kit (RNAprep Pure Plant Plus Kit, catalog No: DP441) from Tiangen Biochemical Technology Co., Ltd. was used for RNA extraction. The procedure was carried out according to the instructions provided in the kit. RNA integrity and DNA contamination were analyzed by agarose gel electrophoresis. RNA purity, concentration, and integrity were accurately measured on a NanoPhotometer spectrophotometer, a Qubit 2.0 Fluorometer, and an Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer, respectively. Then, a cDNA library was constructed from the high-quality RNA by Wuhan Metwell Biotechnology Co. Ltd. After the library was constructed, real-time PCR, a Qubit 2.0 fluorometer, and an Agilent 2100 bioanalyzer were used for quality inspection. Transcriptome sequencing was performed on the Illumina HiSeq platform after the library was qualified. Then, the raw reads were filtered to remove low-quality reads with adapters and to obtain clean reads.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_4_2">
<label>2.4.2</label>
<title>Sequence assembly</title>
<p>Trinity software was used to splice clean reads, and Corset (<uri xlink:href="https://code.google.com/p/corset-project/">https://code.google.com/p/corset-project/</uri>) was used to perform hierarchical clustering according to the number of reads and expression patterns of the aligned transcripts. The obtained data were stored in FASTA format, and the longest transcript obtained after hierarchical clustering was used as a unigene.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_4_3">
<label>2.4.3</label>
<title>Gene annotation and differential gene screening</title>
<p>Unigenes were inputted into the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG), nr, Swiss-Prot, Gene Ontology (GO), Clusters of Orthologous Groups of proteins/Eukaryotic Orthologous Groups of proteins (COG/KOG), and TrEMBL databases using BLAST software, and the predicted amino acid sequences of the unigenes were compared to those in Pfam database using HMMER software to obtain annotation information. RSEM software was used for mapping, and fragments per kilobase of transcript per million fragments mapped (FPKM) was used to calculate the expression of the unigenes. DESeq2 software (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Love et&#xa0;al., 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">Varet et&#xa0;al., 2016</xref>) was used to screen the differentially expressed genes.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_4_4">
<label>2.4.4</label>
<title>Differential gene enrichment analysis</title>
<p>GO and KEGG significant enrichment analysis of differentially expressed genes takes GO terms and KEGG pathways as units, respectively, and apply a hypergeometric test to find the pathways and GO terms that are significantly enriched for differentially expressed genes in the context of the whole genome.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_4_5">
<label>2.4.5</label>
<title>Primer design and real-time PCR verification</title>
<p>Fifteen differentially expressed genes were selected, and real-time PCR primers, synthesized by Shanghai Bioengineering Co., Ltd., were designed with Prime3 (<uri xlink:href="https://bioinfo.ut.ee/primer3-0.4.0/">https://bioinfo.ut.ee/primer3-0.4.0/</uri>). The extracted pulp RNA was reverse transcribed into cDNA using a cDNA synthesis Kit from Vazyme Biotechnology Co., Ltd. (Nanjing, China) and a T100FM Thermal Cycler PCR instrument from BIO-RAD (USA). The experiment was performed according to the instructions provided in the kit. Real-time PCR verification was performed with Taq Pro Universal SYBR qPCR Master Mix (Vazyme Code: Q712-02) from Vazyme Biotechnology Co., Ltd. (Nanjing, China) and a qTOWER<sup>3</sup> instrument (Jena, Germany). The relative expression of genes was calculated using the 2<sup>&#x2212;&#x394;&#x394;Ct</sup> method (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">Livak and Schmittgen, 2001</xref>) with 35 DAA as the reference, and litchi <italic>actin</italic> was used as the internal reference gene (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Jiang et&#xa0;al., 2017</xref>). The sequences of the primers are shown in <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="ST1">
<bold>Supplementary Table S1</bold>
</xref>.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_5">
<label>2.5</label>
<title>Data analysis and graphing</title>
<p>Data statistics and graphing were performed with Excel, and data analysis was performed with SAS software, in which the ANOVA program was used for variance analysis and Duncan&#x2019;s new multiple range test was used for multiple comparisons. The differential gene heatmap and Venn plot were drawn with TBtools software (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">Chen et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s3" sec-type="results">
<label>3</label>
<title>Results and analysis</title>
<sec id="s3_1">
<label>3.1</label>
<title>Identification of soluble sugar components</title>
<p>The high-performance liquid chromatograms of the pulp sugar components of the samples harvested at 63 and 69 DAA in 2020 are shown in <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="ST2">
<bold>Supplementary Figures S1A, B</bold>
</xref>. There was no significant change in fructose or glucose content and a significant decrease in sucrose content during the &#x201c;sugar receding&#x201d; period. The high-performance liquid chromatograms of the sugar content in the pulp at 63 and 70 DAA in 2021 are shown in <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="ST2">
<bold>Supplementary Figures S1C, D</bold>
</xref> and the changes in the sugar content during the &#x201c;sugar receding&#x201d; period are consistent with those in 2020. The results from both years indicated that there was no significant change in reducing sugar content and a significant decrease in sucrose content in the &#x201c;sugar receding&#x201d; period.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_2">
<label>3.2</label>
<title>Changes in the contents of fructose, glucose and sucrose in litchi pulp</title>
<p>The dynamic changes in fructose, glucose and sucrose contents in litchi pulp over the two years are shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">
<bold>Figures&#xa0;1A, B</bold>
</xref>. In 2020, the fructose content increased significantly from 35 to 50 DAA and became stable after 56 DAA. In 2021, the fructose content increased significantly from 35 to 56 DAA and then stabilized. The dynamics of fructose contents for both years were basically the same, indicating that pulp fructose continues to accumulate and increase with the expansion of the fruit and then stabilizes during maturity. Therefore, fructose is not the main component causing the &#x201c;sugar receding&#x201d; phenomenon during maturity.</p>
<fig id="f1" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;1</label>
<caption>
<p>Dynamic changes in the contents of fructose, glucose and sucrose between <bold>(A)</bold> 2020 and <bold>(B)</bold> 2021. Different letters indicate significant differences during growth at <italic>P</italic> = 0.05. Error bars represent the standard error of the mean (<italic>SEM</italic>).</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-13-1083753-g001.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>In 2020, the glucose content increased significantly from 35 to 50 DAA and remained stable from 50 to 69&#xa0;d with no significant difference between any two stages. In 2021, the glucose content increased significantly from 35 to 42 DAA and then stabilized. The dynamics of glucose contents for the two years were basically the same, indicating that glucose accumulates rapidly during the rapid expansion period of the fruit and tends to become stable during maturity. Therefore, glucose is not the main component causing the &#x201c;sugar receding&#x201d; phenomenon during maturity.</p>
<p>The sucrose content trends in both years were consistent, with a large amount of accumulation in the fruit expansion stage and a large amount of cleavage in the late stage of fruit ripening, indicating that sucrose is the main component causing the &#x201c;sugar receding&#x201d; phenomenon during maturity.</p>
<p>The dynamic changes in soluble sugar content in pulp showed the same trend. The soluble sugar contents all increased significantly in the early stage of fruit expansion, tended to become stable in the late stage of fruit expansion, peaked at 63 DAA, and then began to decline; then, the phenomenon of &#x201c;sugar receding&#x201d; occurred.</p>
<p>In summary, the content of reducing sugars continued to increase with fruit growth and development; the dynamic trends of sucrose and soluble sugar are highly similar, and their linear correlation is significant for two years (<italic>r<sub>2020</sub>
</italic>= 0.8611, <italic>r<sub>2021</sub>
</italic>= 0.8818), which indicates that the pulp of &#x2018;Feizixiao&#x2019; litchi mainly accumulates reducing sugars, and the &#x201c;sugar receding&#x201d; phenomenon in the pulp is caused by the decrease in the sucrose content in the pulp.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_3">
<label>3.3</label>
<title>Changes in the activities of sucrose metabolism enzymes</title>
<p>The dynamic changes in AI activity are shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">
<bold>Figures&#xa0;2A, B</bold>
</xref>. In 2020, the activity of AI increased significantly from 35 to 50 DAA, decreased significantly at 56 DAA, and then decreased significantly after reaching the maximum value at 63 DAA. In 2021, there was a rising-falling-rising-falling trend, the difference was significant between any two stages from 35 to 63 DAA, and there was no significant change after 63 DAA. The dynamic changes in AI activity in the two years were different, which may have been related to the different temperatures, amounts of light and other factors that occurred within the two years. However, in general, the overall activity of AI was low for both years, possibly indicating that AI had less of an effect on sucrose metabolism in &#x2018;Feizixiao&#x2019; litchi pulp.</p>
<fig id="f2" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;2</label>
<caption>
<p>Dynamic changes in sucrose metabolism enzyme activities between 2020 and 2021. <bold>(A, B)</bold> acid invertase; <bold>(C, D)</bold> neutral invertase; <bold>(E, F)</bold> sucrose synthase-cleavage; <bold>(G, H)</bold> sucrose synthase-synthesis; <bold>(I, J)</bold> sucrose phosphate synthase; <bold>(K, L)</bold> the net activity of sucrose metabolism enzymes. Different letters indicate significant differences during growth at <italic>P</italic> = 0.05. Error bars represent the standard error of the mean (<italic>SEM</italic>).</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-13-1083753-g002.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>The dynamic changes in NI activity are shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">
<bold>Figures&#xa0;2C, D</bold>
</xref>. In 2020, the activity of NI decreased, increased, and then decreased again, and the difference in activity between any two stages was significant. In 2021, NI activity increased and decreased twice, showing an &#x201c;M&#x201d;-type change trend, and reached maximum values at 35&#xa0;d and 56 DAA, with a significant decline after 56 DAA. NI activity in both years showed a significant downward trend after 56 DAA.</p>
<p>The dynamic changes in SS-C activity are shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">
<bold>Figures&#xa0;2E, F</bold>
</xref>. In 2020, the activity of SS-C showed an &#x201c;M&#x201d;-type change trend, reaching two peaks at 42 and 63 DAA. There was no significant difference between them, and there were significant differences in the rest of the stages, with significant declines from 42 to 56 DAA and 63 to 69 DAA. In 2021, there was also an &#x201c;M&#x201d;-type change trend, reaching two peaks at 42 and 52 DAA, with significant declines from 42 to 49 DAA and 56 to 70 DAA. The activity of SS-C decreased significantly in the &#x201c;sugar receding&#x201d; period in both years, but the activity was still higher than the maximum INV activity, which may indicate that the cleavage of sucrose is mainly catalyzed by SS.</p>
<p>The dynamic changes in SS-S activity are shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">
<bold>Figures&#xa0;2G, H</bold>
</xref>. In 2020, the activity of SS-S showed a dynamic trend of inclines and declines, and the difference in activity between any two stages was significant. The enzyme activity decreased and then increased significantly from 35 to 49 DAA, reached the maximum value at 63 DAA and was significantly higher than that at the other three stages after 49 DAA. The dynamic trend of SS-S activity in the two years was basically the same, and SS-S activity in the &#x201c;sugar receding&#x201d; period decreased significantly.</p>
<p>The dynamic changes in SPS activity are shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">
<bold>Figures&#xa0;2I, J</bold>
</xref>. In 2020, SPS activity showed a trend of a significant increase and then a significant decrease from 35 to 50 DAA. In 2021, it showed a trend of a significant decline and then a significant increase from 35 to 49 DAA. In the middle and late stages of fruit growth and development, there was a significant decrease, increase and then decrease trend in both years, and it decreased significantly in the &#x201c;sugar receding&#x201d; period.</p>
<p>The dynamic changes in the net activity of sucrose metabolism enzymes (difference between the cleavage and synthesis activities of sucrose metabolism enzymes) are shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">
<bold>Figures&#xa0;2K, L</bold>
</xref>. In 2020, there was a unimodal trend, reaching a maximum value at 50 DAA, decreasing significantly at 56 DAA, and continuing to gradually decrease. In 2021, there was a rising-falling-rising-falling-rising trend with significant differences between any two stages. The net activity of sucrose metabolism enzymes for both years remained at a high level in the &#x201c;sugar receding&#x201d; period, which may have caused the significant decrease in sucrose content in the &#x201c;sugar receding&#x201d; period.</p>
<p>In summary, the dynamic changes in sucrose metabolism enzyme activities were similar for both years. In the &#x201c;sugar receding&#x201d; period, except for the activity of AI, which did not change significantly in 2021, the activities of the other enzymes decreased significantly. During the growth and development of &#x2018;Feizixiao&#x2019; litchi pulp, the activity of SS-C was the highest among sucrose-cleaving enzymes, followed by NI, and that of AI was the lowest, which may indicate that SS plays a major role in cleaving sucrose. The activity of SS-C was consistently higher than that of SS-S, which may indicate that SS mainly cleaves sucrose.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_4">
<label>3.4</label>
<title>Transcriptome sequencing results</title>
<p>As shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">
<bold>Table&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>, the transcriptome sequencing data were filtered to obtain an average of 43,676,652 clean reads and 6.55 Gb of clean base. The proportion of clean reads in each sample was greater than 96%, Q20 was above 98%, Q30 was above 94%, and the GC content was higher than 45%, indicating that the sequencing quality was favorable for subsequent analyses.</p>
<table-wrap id="T1" position="float">
<label>Table&#xa0;1</label>
<caption>
<p>Statistical results of the transcriptome sequencing of &#x2018;Feizixiao&#x2019; litchi.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="top" align="left">Sample</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">Raw Reads</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">Clean Reads</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">Clean Base(G)</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">Q20(%)</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">Q30(%)</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">GC Content(%)</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">35d-1<break/>35d-2<break/>35d-3</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">46,959,760<break/>44,303,098<break/>46,957,052</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">45,551,644<break/>43,024,646<break/>45,774,790</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">6.83<break/>6.45<break/>6.87</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">98.3<break/>98.34<break/>98.29</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">94.88<break/>95<break/>94.86</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">47.25<break/>45.96<break/>45.91</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">63d-1<break/>63d-2<break/>63d-3</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">45,892,812<break/>46,358,114<break/>45,275,344</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">44,640,602<break/>45,171,552<break/>44,009,558</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">6.7<break/>6.78<break/>6.6</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">98.46<break/>98.33<break/>98.34</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">95.21<break/>94.93<break/>94.93</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">45.06<break/>45.38<break/>45.28</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">69d-1<break/>69d-2<break/>69d-3</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">42,158,766<break/>42,572,238<break/>45,151,584</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">40,912,018<break/>41,238,516<break/>43,462,948</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">6.14<break/>6.19<break/>6.52</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">98.4<break/>98.5<break/>98.35</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">95.04<break/>95.33<break/>94.98</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">45.12<break/>45.35<break/>45.43</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Mean</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">44,984,665</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">43,676,652</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">6.55</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">98.35</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">94.97</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">45.55</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Total</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">539,815,982</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">524,119,832</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn>
<p>Q20: The percentage of the number of bases with a Qphred value no less than 20 in the total number of bases. Q30: The percentage of the number of bases with a Qphred value no less than 30 in the total number of bases. GC Content: The percentage of the sum of the quantities of G and C in the total number of bases in high-quality reads.</p>
</fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_5">
<label>3.5</label>
<title>Screening results of differentially expressed genes</title>
<p>As shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3">
<bold>Figures&#xa0;3A&#x2013;D</bold>
</xref>, 18,061 genes were differentially expressed (8783 genes were downregulated, and 9278 genes were upregulated) in 35&#xa0;d vs. 63&#xa0;d; 19,575 genes were differentially expressed (9762 genes were downregulated, and 9813 genes were upregulated) in 35&#xa0;d vs. 69&#xa0;d; and 985 genes were differentially expressed (712 genes were downregulated, and 273 genes were upregulated) in 63&#xa0;d vs. 69&#xa0;d. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;3E</bold>
</xref> shows that 254 differentially expressed genes were common to all three groups, and 263 differentially expressed genes were unique to 63&#xa0;d vs. 69&#xa0;d. In 35&#xa0;d vs. 69&#xa0;d, the number of differentially expressed genes was the highest, and the number of differentially expressed genes was the lowest in 63&#xa0;d vs. 69&#xa0;d. The number of differentially expressed genes between the two groups was significantly different, indicating that some genes are differentially expressed in the various fruit growth and development stages and that the number of differentially expressed genes increases as fruit growth and development progress.</p>
<fig id="f3" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;3</label>
<caption>
<p>Volcano plot, bar plot and Venn diagram of differentially expressed genes. <bold>(A&#x2013;C)</bold> The volcano plot of 35&#xa0;d vs. 63&#xa0;d, 63&#xa0;d vs. 69&#xa0;d, 35&#xa0;d vs. 69&#xa0;d. <bold>(D)</bold> Bar plot of differentially expressed genes generated by a comparison of 35&#xa0;d vs. 63&#xa0;d, 35&#xa0;d vs. 69&#xa0;d, 63&#xa0;d vs. 69&#xa0;d. <bold>(E)</bold> Venn diagram of differentially expressed genes generated by a comparison 35&#xa0;d vs. 63&#xa0;d, 35&#xa0;d vs. 69&#xa0;d, 63&#xa0;d vs. 69&#xa0;d.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-13-1083753-g003.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_6">
<label>3.6</label>
<title>GO enrichment analysis of differentially expressed genes</title>
<p>GO enrichment analysis was performed on the differentially expressed genes in 35&#xa0;d vs. 63&#xa0;d, 63&#xa0;d vs. 69&#xa0;d, and 35&#xa0;d vs. 69&#xa0;d, and the 50 GO terms with the lowest q value were selected for representation. The results are shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f4">
<bold>Figures&#xa0;4A&#x2013;C</bold>
</xref>. Differentially expressed genes in all groups were divided into 3 major categories: biological process, cellular component and molecular function. The GO enrichment analysis results of differentially expressed genes in the three groups showed partial differences. Notably, seven PFK genes were enriched in the biological process and molecular function categories in 63&#xa0;d vs. 69&#xa0;d. It was speculated that the PFK genes influenced the changes in sugar content during the &#x201c;sugar receding&#x201d; period.</p>
<fig id="f4" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;4</label>
<caption>
<p>GO enrichment column plot. Differentially expressed genes generated by a comparison of <bold>(A)</bold> 35&#xa0;d vs. 63&#xa0;d, <bold>(B)</bold> 63&#xa0;d vs. 69&#xa0;d, <bold>(C)</bold> 35&#xa0;d vs. 69&#xa0;d are grouped into different GO terms of three ontologies: biological process, cellular component and molecular function.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-13-1083753-g004.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_7">
<label>3.7</label>
<title>KEGG enrichment analysis of differentially expressed genes</title>
<p>KEGG enrichment analysis was performed on the differentially expressed genes in 35&#xa0;d vs. 63&#xa0;d, 63&#xa0;d vs. 69&#xa0;d, and 35&#xa0;d vs. 69&#xa0;d, and the 20 pathways with the most significant enrichment were selected for representation with a bubble chart. The results are shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f5">
<bold>Figures&#xa0;5A&#x2013;C</bold>
</xref>. The plant hormone signaling pathway was enriched in all groups. Fructose and mannose metabolism, glycolysis/gluconeogenesis, and pentose phosphate pathways were found in 63&#xa0;d vs. 69&#xa0;d, and it was speculated that the differentially expressed genes of these pathways may have an impact on &#x201c;sugar receding&#x201d;.</p>
<fig id="f5" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;5</label>
<caption>
<p>KEGG enrichment bubble plot. Differentially expressed genes generated by a comparison of <bold>(A)</bold> 35&#xa0;d vs. 63&#xa0;d, <bold>(B)</bold> 63&#xa0;d vs. 69&#xa0;d, <bold>(C)</bold> 35&#xa0;d vs. 69&#xa0;d. Rich factor represents the ratio of the number of differentially expressed genes enriched by the pathway to the number of annotated genes. The color bar represents the significance test p value adjusted for multiple hypothesis testing. The number represents the number of differentially expressed genes enriched in the pathway.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-13-1083753-g005.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_8">
<label>3.8</label>
<title>Screening of differentially expressed genes</title>
<p>To further analyze the differentially expressed genes related to the &#x201c;sugar receding&#x201d; phenomenon in &#x2018;Feizixiao&#x2019; litchi pulp, a total of 91 genes related to sucrose metabolism, EMP and PPP were screened from the transcriptome data. No FK, SWEET and sucrose transporter (SUT) genes were screened due to low expression and no significant change in the &#x201c;sugar receding&#x201d; period. The log<sub>2</sub>(fold change) was calculated to plot the heatmap shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f6">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;6</bold>
</xref>. In 63&#xa0;d vs. 69&#xa0;d, four SS genes were screened out and all were downregulated; three AI genes were screened out, of which two were downregulated; two NI genes were screened out, of which one was downregulated; three SPS genes were screened out, of which two were downregulated; seven HK genes were screened out, of which five were upregulated; Twenty-five PFK genes were screened out, of which twenty-three were upregulated; twenty PK genes were screened out, of which twelve were upregulated; one G6PD gene was screened out and it was upregulated; and three 6PGD genes were screened out, of which one was upregulated. The results showed that during the &#x201c;sugar receding&#x201d; period, seventy-five percent of the sucrose metabolism enzyme genes were downregulated. In EMP, seventy-seven percent of the genes were upregulated. In PPP, two genes were upregulated, and two genes were downregulated.</p>
<fig id="f6" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;6</label>
<caption>
<p>The sugar metabolism pathway map and heatmap of differentially expressed genes in 35&#xa0;d vs. 63&#xa0;d, 63&#xa0;d vs. 69&#xa0;d, 35&#xa0;d vs. 69&#xa0;d. The color bar represents the value of log<sub>2</sub>(fold change). SS, sucrose synthase; SPS, sucrose phosphate synthase; AI, acid invertase; NI, neutral invertase; HK, hexokinase; G6PD, glucose 6-phosphate dehydrogenase; 6PGD, 6-phosphogluconate dehydrogenase; PFK, phosphofructokinase; PK, pyruvate kinase.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-13-1083753-g006.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>In summary, most of the sucrose metabolism enzyme genes were downregulated during the &#x201c;sugar receding&#x201d; period, most of the key genes in EMP were upregulated, and most of them were related to PFK genes. There was no significant difference in the key genes in PPP, indicating that reducing sugars may be mainly consumed through EMP and that PFK is a key rate-limiting enzyme in EMP in &#x2018;Feizixiao&#x2019; litchi pulp.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_9">
<label>3.9</label>
<title>Real-time PCR verification</title>
<p>
<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f7">
<bold>Figures&#xa0;7A, B</bold>
</xref> show that there was a significant linear correlation between the expression of 15 genes detected by real-time PCR and the transcriptome sequencing results (<italic>r<sub>2020</sub>
</italic>= 0.9139, <italic>r<sub>2021</sub>
</italic>= 0.8912), which proved the reliability of the transcriptome sequencing results.</p>
<fig id="f7" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;7</label>
<caption>
<p>Coefficient analyses of gene expression levels obtained from the transcriptome sequencing (RNA-Seq) and real-time PCR data. Scatterplots were generated by the log<sub>2</sub>(expression ratios) from real-time PCR (x-axis) and RNA-seq (y-axis) in <bold>(A)</bold> 2020 and <bold>(B)</bold> 2021.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-13-1083753-g007.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s4" sec-type="discussion">
<label>4</label>
<title>Discussion</title>
<sec id="s4_1">
<label>4.1</label>
<title>The relationship between sugar contents and sucrose metabolism enzyme activities</title>
<p>Sugar compositions and contents are key factors affecting the intrinsic quality of fruit (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">Borsani et&#xa0;al., 2009</xref>), and sucrose metabolism enzymes play an important role in sugar accumulation in fruit (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">Sun et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>). In this study, contents of the reducing sugars in the pulp increased continuously during the growth and development process, but the content of sucrose decreased significantly at the ripening stage, resulting in an overall decrease in the total soluble sugar content (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">
<bold>Figures&#xa0;1A, B</bold>
</xref>). Some studies have shown that AI plays an important role in sugar accumulation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">Ruan, 2014</xref>). However, the activity of AI was relatively low in this study, which may suggest that AI does not play an important role in the &#x201c;sugar receding&#x201d; phenomenon (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">
<bold>Figures&#xa0;2A, B</bold>
</xref>). Moreover, the activity of SS-C was consistently greater than that of SS-S (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">
<bold>Figures&#xa0;2E&#x2013;H</bold>
</xref>), and the same result was found in a study of sucrose accumulation in peaches (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">Vizzotto et&#xa0;al., 1996</xref>), which may indicate that SS plays an important role in sucrose cleavage. The activity of SS (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">
<bold>Figures&#xa0;2E&#x2013;H</bold>
</xref>) in the middle and late stages of fruit growth and development is consistent with the changes in sucrose content (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">
<bold>Figures&#xa0;1A, B</bold>
</xref>), a previous study in citrus (<italic>Citrus unshiu</italic> Marc.) showed that the change in SS activity at the ripening stage was consistent with the change in total sugar content (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Komatsu et&#xa0;al., 2002</xref>). It was speculated that SS played a greater role in the middle and late stages of fruit growth and development. The comprehensive effect of sucrose metabolism enzymes, that is, the net activity of sucrose metabolism enzymes, was an important factor affecting the sugar content of &#x2018;Feizixiao&#x2019; litchi pulp. The reducing sugar content increased, while the activities of enzymes that cleave sucrose decreased during the &#x201c;sugar receding&#x201d; period (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">
<bold>Figures&#xa0;2A, C&#x2013;F</bold>
</xref>), this observation may have been related to the simultaneous decrease in the activities of enzymes that synthesize sucrose (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">
<bold>Figures&#xa0;2G&#x2013;J</bold>
</xref>), so that the net activity showed a strong sucrose cleaving activity during the &#x201c;sugar receding&#x201d; period (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">
<bold>Figures&#xa0;2K, L</bold>
</xref>), resulting in a significant decrease in sucrose content (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">
<bold>Figures&#xa0;1A, B</bold>
</xref>). Moreover, a previous study showed that sugar accumulation is related to photosynthesis (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">Wang et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>), and the products of photosynthesis are mainly transported to the fruit in the form of sucrose. The &#x201c;sugar receding&#x201d; phenomenon is mainly caused by the decrease in sucrose content, and it is speculated that the photosynthetic rate of leaves may decrease during the &#x201c;sugar receding&#x201d; period. Therefore, to study the causes of the &#x201c;sugar receding&#x201d; phenomenon in &#x2018;Feizixiao&#x2019; litchi, we should study not only the changes in sucrose metabolism enzyme activities and respiratory metabolism of pulp but also need to further study photosynthesis in leaves.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s4_2">
<label>4.2</label>
<title>Analysis of the transcriptome sequencing results</title>
<p>
<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">
<bold>Figures&#xa0;1A, B</bold>
</xref> showed that the content of sucrose in &#x2018;Feizixiao&#x2019; litchi pulp decreased significantly, but the content of reducing sugars did not increase significantly, indicating that the downstream pathway of sugar metabolism consumes reducing sugars. The pulp of &#x2018;Shixia&#x2019; longan (<italic>Dimocarpus longan</italic> Lour), belonging to the Sapindaceae family, also had the &#x201c;sugar receding&#x201d; phenomenon, and the research results showed that upregulated EMP, tricarboxylic acid cycle, fermentation and energy metabolism promoted &#x201c;sugar receding&#x201d; in the pulp (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Luo et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>). In a study of potato (<italic>Solanum tuberosum</italic> L.) tubers, it was found that low temperature reduced the activity of PFK, resulting in the inhibition of EMP, the accumulation of hexose phosphates, and ultimately an increase in sugar content (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">Hammond et&#xa0;al., 1990</xref>), indicating that PFK has a significant effect on the metabolic rate and sugar accumulation of the pulp <italic>via</italic> EMP. Similar results were also found in this study. The GO enrichment analysis of the differentially expressed genes in the &#x201c;sugar receding&#x201d; period demonstrated that PFK genes were significantly enriched in the biological process and molecular function categories (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f4">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;4B</bold>
</xref>). Additionally, the KEGG enrichment analysis found that glycolysis/gluconeogenesis and pentose phosphate were significantly enriched (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f5">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;5B</bold>
</xref>). A total of 91 differentially expressed genes with high expression abundance, including sucrose metabolism genes and key genes in EMP and PPP, were screened from the transcriptome sequencing data (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f6">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;6</bold>
</xref>). Fifteen of these genes were selected for real-time PCR verification (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f7">
<bold>Figures&#xa0;7A, B</bold>
</xref>), proving the reliability of the transcriptome sequencing results. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f6">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;6</bold>
</xref> showed that the expression of SS and SPS genes was downregulated during the &#x201c;sugar receding&#x201d; period, which was consistent with the change in enzyme activity (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">
<bold>Figures&#xa0;2E-J</bold>
</xref>); Seventy-seven percent of the genes associated with EMP were upregulated, while PFK genes were expressed in high abundance, and the expression of key genes in PPP showed no significant changes (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f6">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;6</bold>
</xref>), indicating that reducing sugars mainly entered EMP and are consumed in large quantities and that PFK is the most critical rate-limiting enzyme in the glycolysis pathway in &#x2018;Feizixiao&#x2019; litchi pulp. Since no sucrose transporter genes was screened out from transcriptome data, it was speculated that &#x2018;sugar receding&#x2019; is mainly caused by the enzymes related to sucrose metabolism and EMP.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s5" sec-type="conclusions">
<label>5</label>
<title>Conclusion</title>
<p>In summary, &#x2018;Feizixiao&#x2019; litchi pulp mainly accumulates reducing sugars, and the reducing sugar content of the pulp remains unchanged during the fruit ripening period; however, the decrease in the sucrose content during the fruit ripening period is the main reason for the &#x201c;sugar receding&#x201d; phenomenon in pulp. During the fruit ripening period, the expression of PFK genes is upregulated, thereby enhancing the activity of PFK in EMP, which in turn promotes the consumption of sugar, and thereby causing the &#x201c;sugar receding&#x201d; phenomenon. Furthermore, the expression of sucrose metabolism genes is downregulated and the net activity of these enzymes tends to cleave sucrose, resulting in a stable reducing sugar content.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s6" sec-type="data-availability">
<title>Data availability statement</title>
<p>The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found below: NCBI GSE218876.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s7" sec-type="author-contributions">
<title>Author contributions</title>
<p>ZK and PJ designed the experiments. PJ, DJ, WM, CT, SX, LH, LX performed the experiments. PJ analyzed the data and wrote the manuscript. ZK revised and polished the manuscript. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<sec id="s8" sec-type="funding-information">
<title>Funding</title>
<p>This study was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 31960570).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s9" sec-type="COI-statement">
<title>Conflict of interest</title>
<p>The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s10" sec-type="disclaimer">
<title>Publisher&#x2019;s note</title>
<p>All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s11" sec-type="supplementary-material">
<title>Supplementary material</title>
<p>The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2022.1083753/full#supplementary-material">https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2022.1083753/full#supplementary-material</ext-link></p>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Table_1.docx" id="ST1" mimetype="application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document"/>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Table_2.docx" id="ST2" mimetype="application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document"/>
</sec>
<ref-list id="ref1">
<title>References</title>
<ref id="B1">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Basson</surname> <given-names>C. E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Groenewald</surname> <given-names>J.-H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kossmann</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cronj&#xe9;</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bauer</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Sugar and acid-related quality attributes and enzyme activity in strawberry fruits: Invertase is the main sucrose hydrolysing enzyme</article-title>. <source>Food Chem.</source> <volume>121</volume>, <fpage>1156</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1162</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.foodchem.2010.01.064</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Borsani</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Budde</surname> <given-names>C. O.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Porrini</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lauxmann</surname> <given-names>M. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lombardo</surname> <given-names>V. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Murray</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>Carbon metabolism of peach fruit after harvest: Changes in enzymes involved in organic acid and sugar level modifications</article-title>. <source>J. Exp. Bot.</source> <volume>60</volume>, <fpage>1823</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1837</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/jxb/erp055</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Braun</surname> <given-names>D. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ruan</surname> <given-names>Y. L.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Understanding and manipulating sucrose phloem loading, unloading, metabolism, and signalling to enhance crop yield and food security</article-title>. <source>J. Exp. Bot.</source> <volume>65</volume>, <fpage>1713</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1735</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/jxb/ert416</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Castiglia</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cardi</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Landi</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cafasso</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Esposito</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Expression and characterization of a cytosolic glucose 6 phosphate dehydrogenase isoform from barley (<italic>Hordeum vulgare</italic>) roots</article-title>. <source>Protein. Expr. Purif.</source> <volume>112</volume>, <fpage>8</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>14</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.pep.2015.03.016</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Thomas</surname> <given-names>H. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Frank</surname> <given-names>M. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>He</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>TBtools:an integrative toolkit developed for interactive analyses of big biological data</article-title>. <source>Mol. Plant</source> <volume>13</volume>, <fpage>1194</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1202</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.molp.2020.06.009</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Granot</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>David-Schwartz</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kelly</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Hexose kinases and their role in sugar-sensing and plant development</article-title>. <source>Front. Plant Sci.</source> <volume>4</volume>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpls.2013.00044</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Hammond</surname> <given-names>J. B. W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Burrell</surname> <given-names>M. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kruger</surname> <given-names>N. J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1990</year>). <article-title>Effect of low temperature on the activity of phosphofructokinase from potato tubers</article-title>. <source>Planta</source> <volume>180</volume>, <fpage>613</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>616</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/BF02411461</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Jiang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Song</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lichter</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kerdchoechuen</surname> <given-names>O.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2006</year>). <article-title>Postharvest characteristics and handling of litchi fruit &#x2014; an overview</article-title>. <source>Aust. J. Exp. Agric.</source> <volume>46</volume>, <fpage>1541</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1556</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1071/EA05108</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Jiang</surname> <given-names>S. Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xu</surname> <given-names>H. Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>H. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hu</surname> <given-names>G. B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>J. G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>H. B.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>A comparison of the costs of flowering in &#x2018;Feizixiao&#x2019; and &#x2018;Baitangying&#x2019; litchi</article-title>. <source>Sci. Hortic.</source> <volume>148</volume>, <fpage>118</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>125</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.scienta.2012.09.035</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Jiang</surname> <given-names>L. Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ye</surname> <given-names>W. W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Situ</surname> <given-names>J. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>Y. B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>X. Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kong</surname> <given-names>G. H.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>A puf RNA-binding protein encoding gene PlM90 regulates the sexual and asexual life stages of the litchi downy blight pathogen <italic>Peronophythora litchii</italic>
</article-title>. <source>Fungal Genet. Biol.</source> <volume>98</volume>, <fpage>39</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>45</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.fgb.2016.12.002</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kandel-Kfir</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Damari-Weissler</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>German</surname> <given-names>M. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gidoni</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mett</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Belausov</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2006</year>). <article-title>Two newly identified membrane-associated and plastidic tomato HXKs: characteristics, predicted structure and intracellular localization</article-title>. <source>Planta</source> <volume>224</volume>, <fpage>1341</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1352</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00425-006-0318-9</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kaur</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Das</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>An isoform of sucrose synthase involved in sink strength of potato (<italic>Solanum tuberosum</italic> l.): Molecular cloning, sequence analyses, 3-d structure, crucial motifs and expression</article-title>. <source>S AFR J. Bot.</source> <volume>149</volume>, <fpage>446</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>457</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.sajb.2022.06.032</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Koch</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2004</year>). <article-title>Sucrose metabolism: Regulatory mechanisms and pivotal roles in sugar sensing and plant development</article-title>. <source>Curr. Opin. Plant Biol.</source> <volume>7</volume>, <fpage>235</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>246</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.pbi.2004.03.014</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Komatsu</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Moriguchi</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Koyama</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Omura</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Akihama</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2002</year>). <article-title>Analysis of sucrose synthase genes in citrus suggests different roles and phylogenetic relationships</article-title>. <source>J. Exp. Bot.</source> <volume>53</volume>, <fpage>61</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>71</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/jexbot/53.366.61</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kou</surname> <given-names>J. Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wei</surname> <given-names>Y. Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>He</surname> <given-names>X. X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xu</surname> <given-names>J. Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xu</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Shao</surname> <given-names>X. F.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Infection of post-harvest peaches by monilinia fructicola accelerates sucrose decomposition and stimulates the embden&#x2013;Meyerhof&#x2013;Parnas pathway</article-title>. <source>Hortic. Res.</source> <volume>5</volume>, <elocation-id>46</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41438-018-0046-x</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Liao</surname> <given-names>H. Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lin</surname> <given-names>X. K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Du</surname> <given-names>J. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Peng</surname> <given-names>J. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>K. B.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Transcriptomic analysis reveals key genes regulating organic acid synthesis and accumulation in the pulp of litchi chinensis sonn. cv</article-title>. <source>Feizixiao. Sci. Hortic.</source> <volume>303</volume>, <elocation-id>111220</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.scienta.2022.111220</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dai</surname> <given-names>L. Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pan</surname> <given-names>B. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2020</year>b). <article-title>Molecular mechanisms of furanone production through the EMP and PP pathways in zygosaccharomyces rouxii with d-fructose addition</article-title>. <source>Food Res. Int.</source> <volume>133</volume>, <elocation-id>109137</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.foodres.2020.109137</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B18">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Guo</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yue</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bu</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jiang</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2020</year>a). <article-title>Histone acetylation at the promoter for the transcription factor PuWRKY31 affects sucrose accumulation in pear fruit</article-title>. <source>Plant Physiol.</source> <volume>182</volume>, <fpage>2035</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2046</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1104/pp.20.00002</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B19">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Livak</surname> <given-names>K. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Schmittgen</surname> <given-names>T. D.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2001</year>). <article-title>Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-delta delta C(T)) method</article-title>. <source>Methods</source> <volume>25</volume>, <fpage>402</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>408</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1006/meth.2001.1262</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B20">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Love</surname> <given-names>M. I.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Huber</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Anders</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2</article-title>. <source>Genome Biol.</source> <volume>15</volume>, <elocation-id>550</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B21">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Luo</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Shuai</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lai</surname> <given-names>T. T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liao</surname> <given-names>L. Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Duan</surname> <given-names>Z. H.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Up-regulated glycolysis, TCA, fermentation and energy metabolism promoted the &#x201c;sugar receding&#x201d; in &#x2018;Shixia&#x2019; longan (<italic>Dimocarpus longan</italic> lour.) pulp</article-title>. <source>Sci. Hortic.</source> <volume>281</volume>, <elocation-id>109998</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.scienta.2021.109998</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B22">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ma</surname> <given-names>Q. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sun</surname> <given-names>M. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lu</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>Y. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hu</surname> <given-names>D. G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hao</surname> <given-names>Y. J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Transcription factor AREB2 is involved in soluble sugar accumulation by activating sugar transporter and amylase genes</article-title>. <source>Plant Physiol.</source> <volume>174</volume>, <fpage>2348</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2362</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1104/pp.17.00502</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B23">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Menzel</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2001</year>). <article-title>The physiology of growth and cropping in lychee</article-title>. <source>Acta Hortic.</source> <volume>558</volume>, <fpage>175</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>184</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.17660/ActaHortic.2001.558.24</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B24">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Milne</surname> <given-names>R. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Grof</surname> <given-names>C. P. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Patrick</surname> <given-names>J. W.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Mechanisms of phloem unloading: shaped by cellular pathways, their conductances and sink function</article-title>. <source>Curr. Opin. Plant Biol.</source> <volume>43</volume>, <fpage>8</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>15</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.pbi.2017.11.003</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B25">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Pareek</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2016</year>). &#x201c;<article-title>Nutritional and biochemical composition of lychee (Litchi chinensis sonn.) cultivars</article-title>,&#x201d; in <source>Nutritional composition of fruit cultivars</source>. Ed. <person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname>Simmonds</surname> <given-names>M. S. J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<publisher-loc>San Diego, FL</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Academic Press</publisher-name>), <fpage>395</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>418</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/B978-0-12-408117-8.00017-9</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B26">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Pego</surname> <given-names>J. V.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Smeekens</surname> <given-names>S. C. M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2000</year>). <article-title>Plant fructokinases: A sweet family get-together</article-title>. <source>Trends Plant Sci.</source> <volume>5</volume>, <fpage>531</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>536</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S1360-1385(00)01783-0</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B27">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ramos-Martinez</surname> <given-names>J. I.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>The regulation of the pentose phosphate pathway: Remember Krebs</article-title>. <source>Arch. Biochem. Biophys.</source> <volume>614</volume>, <fpage>50</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>52</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.abb.2016.12.012</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B28">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ren</surname> <given-names>G. X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ran</surname> <given-names>X. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zeng</surname> <given-names>R. Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>J. W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Y. B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mao</surname> <given-names>C. L.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Effects of sodium selenite spray on apple production, quality, and sucrose metabolism-related enzyme activity</article-title>. <source>Food Chem.</source> <volume>339</volume>, <elocation-id>127883</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.foodchem.2020.127883</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B29">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ruan</surname> <given-names>Y. L.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Sucrose metabolism: gateway to diverse carbon use and sugar signaling</article-title>. <source>Annu. Rev. Plant Biol.</source> <volume>65</volume>, <fpage>33</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>67</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1146/annurev-arplant-050213-040251</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B30">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ruan</surname> <given-names>Y. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jin</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>Y. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>G. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Boyer</surname> <given-names>J. S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Sugar input, metabolism, and signaling mediated by invertase: Roles in development, yield potential, and response to drought and heat</article-title>. <source>Mol. Plant</source> <volume>3</volume>, <fpage>942</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>955</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/mp/ssq044</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B31">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Sun</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>C. Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhu</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jiang</surname> <given-names>C. N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>Y. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ge</surname> <given-names>Y. H.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Influences of postharvest ATP treatment on storage quality and enzyme activity in sucrose metabolism of malus domestica</article-title>. <source>Plant Physiol. Biochem.</source> <volume>156</volume>, <fpage>87</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>94</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.plaphy.2020.09.004</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B32">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Trevanion</surname> <given-names>S. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kruger</surname> <given-names>N. J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1991</year>). <article-title>Effect of temperature on the kinetic properties of pyrophosphate: fructose 6-phosphate phosphotransferase from potato tuber</article-title>. <source>J. Plant Physiol.</source> <volume>137</volume>, <fpage>753</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>759</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S0176-1617(11)81235-6</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B33">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Varet</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Brillet-Gu&#xe9;guen</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Copp&#xe9;e</surname> <given-names>J.-Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dillies</surname> <given-names>M.-A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>SARTools: A DESeq2- and EdgeR-based r pipeline for comprehensive differential analysis of RNA-seq data</article-title>. <source>PLoS ONE</source> <volume>11</volume>, <fpage>e0157022</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0157022</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B34">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Vizzotto</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pinton</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Varanini</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Costa</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1996</year>). <article-title>Sucrose accumulation in developing peach fruit</article-title>. <source>Physiol. Plant</source> <volume>96</volume>, <fpage>225</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>230</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1399-3054.1996.tb00206.x</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B35">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Brouard</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Prodhomme</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hilbert</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Renaud</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Petit</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Regulation of anthocyanin and sugar accumulation in grape berry through carbon limitation and exogenous ABA application</article-title>. <source>Food Res. Int.</source> <volume>160</volume>, <elocation-id>111478</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.foodres.2022.111478</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B36">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>H. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Huang</surname> <given-names>H. B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Huang</surname> <given-names>X. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hu</surname> <given-names>Z. Q.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2006</year>). <article-title>Sugar and acid compositions in the arils of litchi chinensis sonn.: Cultivar differences and evidence for the absence of succinic acid</article-title>. <source>J. Hortic. Sci. Biotechnol.</source> <volume>81</volume>, <fpage>57</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>62</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/14620316.2006.11512029</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B37">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yuan</surname> <given-names>M. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>S. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gao</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>K. B.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Applications of magnesium affect pericarp colour in the feizixiao litchi</article-title>. <source>J. Hortic. Sci. Biotechnol.</source> <volume>92</volume>, <fpage>559</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>567</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/14620316.2017.1322922</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B38">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>Z. Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>T. D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>H. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Huang</surname> <given-names>X. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Qin</surname> <given-names>Y. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hu</surname> <given-names>G. B.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Patterns of enzyme activity and gene expressions in sucrose metabolism in relation to sugar accumulation and composition in the aril of litchi chinensis sonn</article-title>. <source>J. Plant Physiol.</source> <volume>170</volume>, <fpage>731</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>740</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jplph.2012.12.021</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B39">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Y. X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yu</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>C. Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gai</surname> <given-names>S. P.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Dynamic of carbohydrate metabolism and the related genes highlights PPP pathway activation during chilling induced bud dormancy release in tree peony (<italic>Paeonia suffruticosa</italic>)</article-title>. <source>Sci. Hortic.</source> <volume>242</volume>, <fpage>36</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>43</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.scienta.2018.07.022</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B40">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>Y. Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tang</surname> <given-names>J. X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Brummell</surname> <given-names>D. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Song</surname> <given-names>C. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Qi</surname> <given-names>S. N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lin</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Abscisic acid alleviates chilling injury in cold-stored peach fruit by regulating the metabolism of sucrose</article-title>. <source>Sci. Hortic.</source> <volume>298</volume>, <elocation-id>111000</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.scienta.2022.111000</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>