Front. Plant Sci. Frontiers in Plant Science Front. Plant Sci. 1664-462X Frontiers Media S.A. 10.3389/fpls.2022.1081728 Plant Science Correction Corrigendum: Divergence with gene flow and contrasting population size blur the species boundary in Cycas Sect. Asiorientales, as inferred from morphology and RAD-seq data Chang Jui-Tse 1 Chao Chien-Ti 1 Nakamura Koh 2 Liu Hsiao-Lei 3 Luo Min-Xin 1 Liao Pei-Chun 1 * 1 School of Life Science, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei, Taiwan 2 Botanic Garden, Field Science Center for Northern Biosphere, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan 3 Department of Anthropology, Smithsonian Institution, National Museum of Natural History, Washington, DC, United States

Edited and Reviewed by: Angelica Cibrian-Jaramillo, Instituto Politecnico Nacional de México (CINVESTAV), Mexico

*Correspondence: Pei-Chun Liao, pcliao@ntnu.edu.tw

This article was submitted to Plant Systematics and Evolution, a section of the journal Frontiers in Plant Science

 12 01 2023 2022 13 1081728 27 10 2022 19 12 2022 Copyright © 2023 Chang, Chao, Nakamura, Liu, Luo and Liao 2023 Chang, Chao, Nakamura, Liu, Luo and Liao

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

 A corrigendum on Divergence with gene flow and contrasting population size blur the species boundary in Cycas Sect. Asiorientales, as inferred from morphology and RAD-seq data by Chang J-T, Chao C-T, Nakamura K, Liu H-L, Luo M-X and Liao P-C (2022) Front. Plant Sci. 13:824158. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.824158 continental island Cycas Kuroshio long distance dispersal speciation species concept

In the published article, there was an error in Figure 4 as published. The draft of measured leaf trait was modified from journal which figure usage was not CC-BY. Therefore, the original modification was not allowed without permission, and the new figure should be provided.

There was also an error in the caption for Figure 4 . The updated draft did not modify the figure from Setoguchi et al., 2009. We have corrected Figure 4 and its caption.

Morphometrics of leaf, leaflet, seed, and megasporophyll. The number block is the sample size. The ratio is calculated as the length divided by the width. The black and red stars are not significant and significant, respectively, diagnostic traits between Cycas revoluta and Cycas taitungensis. The draft of the measured organ is modified from Li and Keng (1975). Insert. angle, insertion angle; Leaflet num. per side, leaflet number per side; Mega. lateral spine num., megasporophyll lateral spine number; Mega. length, megasporophyll lamina length; Mega. ratio, megasporophyll lamina ratio; Mega. width, megasporophyll lamina width. The part labels a-q are the plant trait corresponding to depiction and Table 2.

The authors apologize for these errors and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.