<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.3 20070202//EN" "journalpublishing.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="2.3" xml:lang="EN">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Front. Plant Sci.</journal-id>
<journal-title>Frontiers in Plant Science</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">Front. Plant Sci.</abbrev-journal-title>
<issn pub-type="epub">1664-462X</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Frontiers Media S.A.</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpls.2022.1077152</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Plant Science</subject>
<subj-group>
<subject>Original Research</subject>
</subj-group>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Relationships between stable isotope natural abundances (&#x3b4;<sup>13</sup>C and &#x3b4;<sup>15</sup>N) and water use efficiency in rice under alternate wetting and drying irrigation in soils with high clay contents</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname>
<given-names>Zhenchang</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn003">
<sup>&#x2020;</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2058479"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname>
<given-names>Jinjing</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn003">
<sup>&#x2020;</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname>
<given-names>Yaosheng</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3">
<sup>3</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/463818"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Agathokleous</surname>
<given-names>Evgenios</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4">
<sup>4</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/395315"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name>
<surname>Hamoud</surname>
<given-names>Yousef Alhaj</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff5">
<sup>5</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn001">
<sup>*</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1649924"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name>
<surname>Qiu</surname>
<given-names>Rangjian</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff6">
<sup>6</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn001">
<sup>*</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/183544"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Hong</surname>
<given-names>Cheng</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Tian</surname>
<given-names>Minghao</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Shaghaleh</surname>
<given-names>Hiba</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff7">
<sup>7</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1891705"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Guo</surname>
<given-names>Xiangping</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
<institution>College of Agricultural Science and Engineering, Hohai University</institution>, <addr-line>Nanjing</addr-line>, <country>China</country>
</aff>
<aff id="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
<institution>Jiangsu Province Engineering Research Center for Agricultural Soil-Water Efficient Utilization, Carbon Sequestration and Emission Reduction</institution>, <addr-line>Nanjing</addr-line>, <country>China</country>
</aff>
<aff id="aff3">
<sup>3</sup>
<institution>Institute of Environment and Sustainable Development in Agriculture, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences</institution>, <addr-line>Beijing</addr-line>, <country>China</country>
</aff>
<aff id="aff4">
<sup>4</sup>
<institution>School of Applied Meteorology, Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology</institution>, <addr-line>Nanjing</addr-line>, <country>China</country>
</aff>
<aff id="aff5">
<sup>5</sup>
<institution>Department of Soil and Land Reclamation, Aleppo University</institution>, <addr-line>Aleppo</addr-line>, <country>Syria</country>
</aff>
<aff id="aff6">
<sup>6</sup>
<institution>State Key Laboratory of Water Resources and Hydropower Engineering Science, Wuhan University</institution>, <addr-line>Wuhan</addr-line>, <country>China</country>
</aff>
<aff id="aff7">
<sup>7</sup>
<institution>College of Environment, Hohai University</institution>, <addr-line>Nanjing</addr-line>, <country>China</country>
</aff>
<author-notes>
<fn fn-type="edited-by">
<p>Edited by: Junliang Fan, Northwest A&amp;F University, China</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="edited-by">
<p>Reviewed by: Zhenhua Wei, Northwest A&amp;F University, China; Nawab Ali, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Agricultural University, Pakistan</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="corresp" id="fn001">
<p>*Correspondence: Yousef Alhaj Hamoud, <email xlink:href="mailto:yousef-hamoud11@hotmail.com">yousef-hamoud11@hotmail.com</email>; Rangjian Qiu, <email xlink:href="mailto:qiurangjian@whu.edu.cn">qiurangjian@whu.edu.cn</email>
</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="equal" id="fn003">
<p>&#x2020;These authors have contributed equally to this work and share first authorship</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="other" id="fn002">
<p>This article was submitted to Plant Abiotic Stress, a section of the journal Frontiers in Plant Science</p>
</fn>
</author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>02</day>
<month>12</month>
<year>2022</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="collection">
<year>2022</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>13</volume>
<elocation-id>1077152</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>22</day>
<month>10</month>
<year>2022</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>14</day>
<month>11</month>
<year>2022</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#xa9; 2022 Wang, Liu, Wang, Agathokleous, Hamoud, Qiu, Hong, Tian, Shaghaleh and Guo</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2022</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Wang, Liu, Wang, Agathokleous, Hamoud, Qiu, Hong, Tian, Shaghaleh and Guo</copyright-holder>
<license xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">
<p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.</p>
</license>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<p>Natural abundance of the stable isotope (&#x3b4;<sup>13</sup>C and &#x3b4;<sup>15</sup>N) in plants is widely used to indicate water use efficiency (WUE). However, soil water and texture properties may affect this relationship, which remains largely elusive. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to evaluate &#x3b4;<sup>13</sup>C as affected by different combinations of alternate wetting and drying irrigation (AWD) with varied soil clay contents in different organs and whole plant and assess the feasibility of using &#x3b4;<sup>13</sup>C and &#x3b4;<sup>15</sup>N as a physiological indicator of whole-plant water use efficiency (WUE<sub>whole-plant</sub>). Three AWD regimes, I<sub>100</sub> (30 mm flooded when soil reached 100% saturation), I<sub>90</sub> (30 mm flooded when reached 90% saturation) and I<sub>70</sub> (30 mm flooded when reached 70% saturation) and three soil clay contents, 40% (S<sub>40</sub>), 50% (S<sub>50</sub>), and 60% (S<sub>60</sub>), were included. Observed variations in WUE<sub>whole-plant</sub> did not conform to theoretical expectations of the organs &#x3b4;<sup>13</sup>C (&#x3b4;<sup>13</sup>C<sub>organs</sub>) of plant biomass based on pooled data from all treatments. However, a positive relationship between &#x3b4;<sup>13</sup>C<sub>leaf</sub> and WUE<sub>ET</sub> (dry biomass/evapotranspiration) was observed under I<sub>90</sub> regime, whereas there were no significant relationships between &#x3b4;<sup>13</sup>C<sub>organs</sub> and WUE<sub>ET</sub> under I<sub>100</sub> or I<sub>70</sub> regimes. Under I<sub>100</sub>, weak relationships between &#x3b4;<sup>13</sup>C<sub>organs</sub> and WUE<sub>ET</sub> could be explained by (i) variation in C allocation patterns under different clay content, and (ii) relatively higher rate of panicle water loss, which was independent of stomatal regulation and photosynthesis. Under I<sub>70</sub>, weak relationships between &#x3b4;<sup>13</sup>C<sub>organs</sub> and WUE<sub>ET</sub> could be ascribed to (i) bigger cracks induced by water-limited irrigation regime and high clay content soil, and (ii) damage caused by severe drought. In addition, a negative relationship was observed between WUE<sub>whole-plant</sub> and shoot &#x3b4;<sup>15</sup>N (&#x3b4;<sup>15</sup>N<sub>shoot</sub>) across the three irrigation treatments, indicating that WUE<sub>whole-plant</sub> is tightly associated with N metabolism and N isotope discrimination in rice. Therefore, &#x3b4;<sup>13</sup>C should be used cautiously as an indicator of rice WUE<sub>whole-plant</sub> at different AWD regimes with high clay content, whereas &#x3b4;<sup>15</sup>N could be considered an effective indicator of WUE<sub>whole-plant</sub>.</p>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>alternate wetting and drying irrigation</kwd>
<kwd>soil clay content</kwd>
<kwd>&#x3b4;<sup>13</sup>C</kwd>
<kwd>&#x3b4;<sup>15</sup>N</kwd>
<kwd>water use efficiency</kwd>
<kwd>
<italic>Oryza sativa L</italic>
</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<contract-num rid="cn001">B210202118</contract-num>
<contract-num rid="cn002">52079041, 52179036</contract-num>
<contract-num rid="cn003">Grant No. 003080</contract-num>
<contract-num rid="cn004">Jiangsu Distinguished Professor program</contract-num>
<contract-sponsor id="cn001">Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities<named-content content-type="fundref-id">10.13039/501100012226</named-content>
</contract-sponsor>
<contract-sponsor id="cn002">National Natural Science Foundation of China<named-content content-type="fundref-id">10.13039/501100001809</named-content>
</contract-sponsor>
<contract-sponsor id="cn003">Startup Foundation for Introducing Talent of Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology<named-content content-type="fundref-id">10.13039/501100013156</named-content>
</contract-sponsor>
<contract-sponsor id="cn004">Government of Jiangsu Province<named-content content-type="fundref-id">10.13039/501100002949</named-content>
</contract-sponsor>
<counts>
<fig-count count="6"/>
<table-count count="2"/>
<equation-count count="7"/>
<ref-count count="62"/>
<page-count count="16"/>
<word-count count="8707"/>
</counts>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec id="s1" sec-type="intro">
<title>Introduction</title>    <p>As one of the world&#x2019;s most widely cultivated crops, rice provides calories for half the world&#x2019;s population (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">Runkle et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>). Nearly two-thirds of the total rice production depends on flooded irrigation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B47">Umesh et&#xa0;al., 2018</xref>). However, water for agriculture is facing increasing challenges due to land degradation, water scarcity, chemical contamination, and extreme weather caused by climate changes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">K&#xfc;mmerer et&#xa0;al., 2018</xref>). Since crop yield losses due to water deficit is greater than those attributed to other environmental stressors worldwide, efficient use of water resources is of paramount significance (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">Gao et&#xa0;al., 2018</xref>). At leaf level, water use efficiency (WUE) is often defined as the ratio between carbon fixation (A<sub>n</sub>) and stomatal conductance to water vapor (g<sub>s</sub>) (so-called intrinsic WUE, viz WUE<sub>i</sub>). The WUE at whole-plant level (WUE<sub>whole-plant</sub>) is usually represented by three functions: (i) WUE<sub>T</sub>=Total dry biomass/transpiration (T) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B45">Topbjerg et&#xa0;al., 2014</xref>), (ii) WUE<sub>ET</sub>=Total dry biomass/evapotranspiration (ET), and (iii) WUE<sub>I</sub>=Total dry biomass/irrigation amount (I) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">Gao et&#xa0;al., 2018</xref>). The WUE based on transpiration contains information about plant photosynthesis with water physiological processes and seems to be most relevant for crop physiological traits (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">Impa et&#xa0;al., 2005</xref>). The WUE<sub>ET</sub> and WUE<sub>I</sub> are mainly determined from dry matter production and soil water loss (relating to transpiration and soil surface evaporation for WUE<sub>ET</sub>, and relating to transpiration, soil surface evaporation as well as seepage and percolation of soil for WUE<sub>I</sub>, respectively). Therefore, the WUE<sub>ET</sub> and WUE<sub>I</sub> can be used as an integrated indicator of environmental conditions affecting plant water relations and dry matter production (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B60">Zhao et&#xa0;al., 2004</xref>).</p>
<p>Instead of traditional flooded irrigation of rice, an efficient water&#x2013;saving practice, called alternate wetting and drying (AWD) irrigation, has been widely used. This irrigation practice introduces unsaturated soil conditions into the irrigation scheduling during the growing season, which allows a reduction in the water layer depth until the soil is slightly dry before the next irrigation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">Oliver et&#xa0;al., 2019</xref>). Numerous studies have demonstrated that AWD improves WUE<sub>whole-plant</sub> by 35&#x2013;63% (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Reis et&#xa0;al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">Oliver et&#xa0;al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Haque et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">Song et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>). However, several studies reported that the low soil water potential during drying stage of AWD would adversely affect crop physiology and growth, eventually reducing the yield and exhibiting a low WUE<sub>whole-plant</sub> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B48">Walley et&#xa0;al., 1999</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Carrijo et&#xa0;al., 2017</xref>). In addition, seepage and evapotranspiration vary with different statuses of water and soil in the field, for instance, seepage values during cultivated stage were observed to be as high as 25 mm day<sup>&#x2212;1</sup> due to soil cracks in rice fields (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Datta et&#xa0;al., 2017</xref>). Therefore, it remains debatable whether WUE is improved under AWD, especially in different soil types.</p>
<p>Soil clay content is another factor that can directly or indirectly affect WUE. Clay content affects the ability of soil to retain carbon (C), water, and nutrient ions, thus affecting the biophysiochemical processes in plants (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B42">Silver et&#xa0;al., 2000</xref>). The interaction between soil texture and irrigation regime is complex. Soil with high clay content expend and swell periodically under AWD in paddy fields, easily causing cracks whose volumes are affected by the severity of the drought (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">Al-Jeznawi et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Bordoloi et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>). The existence of cracks can promote the evaporation rate through the increased soil&#x2013;air interface, aggravating the damage of drought (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">Cheng et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>). Moreover, cracks offer a preferential flow path (closely related to seepage and percolation) in subsequent irrigation, accelerating water and fertilizer infiltration and influencing plant physiological responses, hence indirectly reducing yield and WUE (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B52">Wang et&#xa0;al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">Cheng et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>). Meanwhile, the tearing effect of cracks on the root system under the high clay content will also affect the plant dry matter allocation and physiological processes, therefore affecting WUE (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">Ma et&#xa0;al., 2008</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">Ren et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>). Due to the influence of cracks and soil texture, soil with different clay contents not only differs in evaporation and leakage, but also leads to varied plant physiological responses, such as photosynthesis, transpiration, and C transfer and allocation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">Awale et&#xa0;al., 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">Dou et&#xa0;al., 2016</xref>). Therefore, the responses of varying types of WUE, such as WUE<sub>T</sub>, WUE<sub>ET</sub>, and WUE<sub>I</sub>, to AWD regimes may differ in the presence of different clay contents.</p>
<p>The theory linking &#x3b4;<sup>13</sup>C and WUE has been well established, and the physiological basis of such relationship is also well understood. Plants are known to vary in their discrimination against heavy isotope of carbon during the assimilation process of CO<sub>2</sub> by photosynthetic carboxylase (30&#x2030;) and the diffusion process of atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> through stomata into leaves (4.4&#x2030;) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">Domergue et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>). Therefore, environmental factors affecting any of the A<sub>n</sub> and g<sub>s</sub> could have a direct effect on &#x3b4;<sup>13</sup>C in plants (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">Livingston et&#xa0;al., 1999</xref>). For example, under drought condition, the isotope discrimination for <sup>13</sup>C is relatively low, leading to an enriched <sup>13</sup>C in plant matter (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">Domergue et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>). As a result, there exists a positive linear relationship between &#x3b4;<sup>13</sup>C and WUE<sub>i</sub> in many crop species under drought conditions. Since WUE<sub>whole-plant</sub> is highly related to WUE<sub>i</sub>, the &#x3b4;<sup>13</sup>C in plant dry matter is supposed to be strongly correlated with the WUE<sub>whole-plant</sub> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">Blankenagel et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>).</p>
<p>Although several studies found that &#x3b4;<sup>13</sup>C in leaf is positively correlated with WUE<sub>whole-plant</sub> under a certain degree of water deficit (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Gouveia et&#xa0;al., 2019a</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">Mininni et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>), the change of WUE<sub>whole-plant</sub> is not always consistent with the change of plant &#x3b4;<sup>13</sup>C under different irrigation regimes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B48">Walley et&#xa0;al., 1999</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B60">Zhao et&#xa0;al., 2004</xref>). For instance, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B60">Zhao et&#xa0;al. (2004)</xref> found that &#x3b4;<sup>13</sup>C in rice leaf at different growth periods was negatively correlated or even uncorrelated with WUE under varied irrigation regimes. Under a slight degree of water deficit for AWD, the cracks are probably small or do not exist (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">Alhaj Hamoud et&#xa0;al., 2018</xref>), while high clay content may suggest a changed stomatal conductance or photosynthetic capacity through the improved water and nitrogen condition in soil (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B42">Silver et&#xa0;al., 2000</xref>), eventually affecting &#x3b4;<sup>13</sup>C value in plants. Nonetheless, under severe degree of water deficit for AWD, the soil with high clay content may strongly swell and shrink, leading to the formation of cracks (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">Al-Jeznawi et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>). This could tear roots and influence the biomass allocation of plant organs (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B42">Silver et&#xa0;al., 2000</xref>), hence in turn it may affect &#x3b4;<sup>13</sup>C in plant dry matter. However, the effect of different irrigation regimes as a function of varied soil clay contents on &#x3b4;<sup>13</sup>C remains unknown. Additionally, the isotopic signatures of individual organs are more readily available for physiological and biochemical analysis compared to the whole-plant. The question thus arises as to whether &#x3b4;<sup>13</sup>C<sub>organs</sub> can be used to predict information on &#x3b4;<sup>13</sup>C<sub>whole-plant</sub>. In particular, the internal partitioning and metabolism of primary assimilation may generate &#x3b4;<sup>13</sup>C differences between plant organs (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">Robinson et&#xa0;al., 2000</xref>). Therefore, we hypothesized that different AWD regimes under varied soil clay contents could influence the C allocation and &#x3b4;<sup>13</sup>C values in various organs, by influencing the soil condition such as water and fertilizer. The relationship between &#x3b4;<sup>13</sup>C<sub>organ</sub> and &#x3b4;<sup>13</sup>C<sub>whole-plant</sub>, and between &#x3b4;<sup>13</sup>C<sub>organ</sub> and WUE<sub>whole-plant</sub> as a function of varied soil clay contents might be modified accordingly.</p>
<p>In addition to &#x3b4;<sup>13</sup>C, the N isotope composition (&#x3b4;<sup>15</sup>N) of plant was also reported as a physiological indicator responding to drought stress conditions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B46">Ulrich et&#xa0;al., 2019</xref>). The WUE<sub>whole-plant</sub> is closely related to the WUE<sub>i</sub> (A<sub>n</sub>/g<sub>s</sub>) of leaves as previously discussed (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">Blankenagel et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>). Hence, any factor influencing A<sub>n</sub> and/or <italic>g<sub>s</sub>
</italic> would have a direct effect on WUE<sub>i</sub>, in turn affecting WUE<sub>whole-plant</sub>. It was reported that WUE<sub>i</sub> was positively correlated with leaf nitrogen concentration ([N]<sub>leaf</sub>) under well-watered conditions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B45">Topbjerg et&#xa0;al., 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B44">Tang et&#xa0;al., 2017</xref>). Considering the variation of [N]<sub>leaf</sub> and &#x3b4;<sup>15</sup>N in plants were both closely linked to N metabolism in plants (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B56">Yousfi et&#xa0;al., 2013</xref>), it is suggested that there is a link between WUE<sub>whole-plant</sub> and &#x3b4;<sup>15</sup>N in plants. Consistent with this, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B57">Yousfi et&#xa0;al. (2012)</xref> showed that leaf &#x3b4;<sup>15</sup>N was negatively correlated with transpiration efficiency in durum wheat exposed to salinity and water deficit. A similar relationship between &#x3b4;<sup>15</sup>N<sub>leaf</sub> and WUE has also been reported in potato (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B45">Topbjerg et&#xa0;al., 2014</xref>). However, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Cao et&#xa0;al. (2014)</xref> revealed that WUE was positively correlated with &#x3b4;<sup>15</sup>N in poplar (<italic>Populus</italic>) genotypes. The reasons for this discrepancy remain unknown. In addition, different AWD regimes under varied soil clay contents could also affect N metabolism as well as [N]<sub>leaf</sub> and &#x3b4;<sup>15</sup>N in different organs by influencing soil water and fertilizer conditions, therefore it might alter the relationship between the &#x3b4;<sup>15</sup>N and WUE, which, however, also remains unclear.</p>
<p>In this study, an experiment was conducted to investigate the C allocation and <sup>13</sup>C distribution in various organs of rice plants as influenced by different irrigation regimes and clay contents. We hypothesized that different irrigation regimes and clay contents could lead to changes in g<sub>s</sub> and A<sub>n</sub> of rice, thus affecting changes in WUE, &#x3b4;<sup>13</sup>C, and &#x3b4;<sup>15</sup>N. The combined application of different irrigation regimes and soil clay contents may cause C allocation changes, affecting the relationship between WUE and &#x3b4;<sup>13</sup>C, as well as between &#x3b4;<sup>13</sup>C<sub>organ</sub> and &#x3b4;<sup>13</sup>C<sub>whole-plant</sub>. Therefore, the main objectives of this study were to (1) investigate the effect of clay content on carbon allocation of rice organs under three irrigation regimes; (2) evaluate the effect of different irrigation regimes and clay contents on WUE and &#x3b4;<sup>13</sup>C at the organ and the whole-plant levels, and (3) comprehensively analyze the relationships between (i) WUE and &#x3b4;<sup>13</sup>C<sub>organ</sub>, (ii) WUE and &#x3b4;<sup>15</sup>N<sub>organ</sub>, and (iii) &#x3b4;<sup>13</sup>C<sub>whole-plant</sub> and &#x3b4;<sup>13</sup>C<sub>organ</sub>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2" sec-type="materials|methods">
<title>Materials and methods</title>
<sec id="s2_1">
<title>Experimental site</title>
<p>The experiment was conducted at the Experimental Farm of the Soil and Water Engineering Department of Hohai University, Nanjing, China (longitude 118&#xb0;83&#x2032;E and latitude 31&#xb0;95&#x2032;N) during July and October, 2016. The area has a typical humid subtropical monsoon climate with an annual precipitation of 1062 mm. The mean temperature is 15.5&#xb0;C. The used cylindrical pots were 51 cm in height and had a 16 cm inner diameter. Each pot was firstly filled with 1.2 kg gravel-sand soil at the bottom and then covered with 8 kg of dry soil. A drainage hole at the bottom of each pot and a movable basin under the pot were used to collect percolation water. Detailed information about the experimental pots was reported in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B50">Wang et&#xa0;al. (2022)</xref>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_2">
<title>Experimental design</title>
<p>The experiment had nine treatments, consisting of three water regimes and three soil clay contents. Each treatment was replicated four times. The pots were placed under a plastic shelter on a randomized complete block design. For the three water treatments, the pots maintained 25 mm of water over 7 d after transplanting to ensure plant establishment. After that, the upper limit in all the treatments was set as 30 mm flooding water, and the lower limits were 100%, 90%, and 70% of saturated soil water content, respectively (denoted as I<sub>100</sub>, I<sub>90</sub>, and I<sub>70</sub>, respectively). The specific irrigation process in this study is shown in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B50">Wang et&#xa0;al. (2022)</xref>. The soil treatment was controlled using three different soil clay contents, i.e. 40%, 50%, and 60% (denoted as S<sub>40</sub>, S<sub>50</sub> and S<sub>60</sub>, respectively). The original soil (i.e. S<sub>40</sub>) had a sand, silt, and clay fraction of 20.81%, 38.94%, and 40.25%, respectively. The S<sub>50</sub> and S<sub>60</sub> treatments were formed by mixing with respective amounts of pure clay. The selected physicochemical properties and corresponding measurements of soil are same as reported in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B50">Wang et&#xa0;al. (2022)</xref>.</p>
<p>Two seedlings of rice (<italic>Oryza sativa</italic> L cv. Nanjing44) were transplanted in each pot on 20 July, 2016. Potassium phosphate (0.10 g P kg<sup>&#x2212;1</sup> soil) and potassium sulfate (0.13 g K kg<sup>&#x2212;1</sup> soil) were applied and incorporated before transplanting. In addition, all pots were fertilized with urea (0.15 g N kg<sup>&#x2212;1</sup> soil) in a four-split-application during vegetative and reproductive growth stages.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_3">
<title>Soil water content and soil crack volume</title>    <p>The original pot weight with dry soil was recorded. The gravimetrical soil moisture content was measured by weighing the pots based on weight loss every day:</p>
<disp-formula>
<label>(1)</label>
<mml:math display="block" id="M1">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>Soil&#xa0;moisture&#xa0;content&#xa0;=&#xa0;(wet&#xa0;soil&#xa0;-&#xa0;dry&#xa0;soil)/dry&#xa0;soil&#xa0;</mml:mtext>
<mml:mo>&#xd7;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>100%</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</disp-formula>    <p>The length, depth, and width of soil cracks were recorded by a steel rule with a 2mm diameter steel rod when the soil water content reached the lower limit of irrigation (100%, 90%, 70% saturated moisture respectively) before each irrigation event. The soil crack volume was calculated by assuming triangular shape of the cracks (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">Bandyopadhyay et&#xa0;al., 2003</xref>):</p>
<disp-formula>
<label>(2)</label>
<mml:math display="block" id="M2">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>V=</mml:mtext>
<mml:mstyle displaystyle="true">
<mml:mo>&#x2211;</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>0.5</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>&#xd7;</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>d</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>w</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>l</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mstyle>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</disp-formula>
<p>where d, w and l are the depth, width, and length of the crack (cm), respectively.</p>
<p>The data of average crack volume was shown in <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Supplementary Figure&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_4">
<title>Plant sampling and measurements</title>
<sec id="s2_4_1">
<title>SPAD, panicle length and dry biomass</title>
<p>The relative chlorophyll content (SPAD) was estimated with a portable chlorophyll meter (SPAD-502, Konica Minolta, Japan). All SPAD readings were taken at the middle portion of fully expanded flag leaf of rice at the full heading stage and were determined between 08:00 h and 11:00 h on a sunny day. The SPAD values of each pot were the average readings of five randomly selected flag leaves. After harvest of rice, the panicle length was measured by a ruler. In addition, grain, stem, leaf, and root samples were separately collected in paper bags. All samples were oven dried at 70&#xb0;C for 72 h to a constant weight to measure the dry biomass.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_4_2">
<title>Carbon concentration, carbon and nitrogen isotopic composition</title>    <p>After weighing, the rice samples were ground into a fine powder and sieved (2mm), and 0.1 g of fine powdered rice organs was used for measurement of isotopic composition. Carbon concentration([C], %), carbon isotopic composition (&#x3b4;<sup>13</sup>C, &#x2030;) and nitrogen isotopic composition (&#x3b4;<sup>15</sup>N, &#x2030;) in plant organs were determined using an Elemental Analyzer System (vario PYRO cube, Elementar Analysensysteme GmbH, Germany) interfaced with an Isotope Mass Spectrometer (Isoprime 100, Elementar Analysensysteme GmbH, Germany). The carbon content in organ (C<sub>organ</sub>) was calculated from the [C]<sub>organ</sub> and the dry biomass of the respective organ. The whole plant C content (C<sub>whole-plant</sub>) was calculated from the C<sub>grain</sub>, C<sub>stem</sub>, C<sub>leaf</sub>, and C<sub>root</sub>. The C allocation (%) of organ was defined as the ratio of C<sub>organ</sub> to C<sub>whole-plant</sub>. The &#x3b4;<sup>13</sup>C and &#x3b4;<sup>15</sup>N value of rice organs can be calculated as:</p>
<disp-formula>
<label>(3)</label>
<mml:math display="block" id="M3">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>&#x3b4;</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#x2030;</mml:mo>
<mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>[</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#xa0;</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>(</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>R</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>s</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>a</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>m</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>p</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>l</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>e</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>R</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>s</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>a</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>n</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>d</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>a</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>r</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>d</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfrac>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>)</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>]</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#xd7;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>1000</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</disp-formula>
<p>where R is the ratio of <sup>13</sup>C/<sup>12</sup>C or <sup>15</sup>N/<sup>14</sup>N.</p>    <p>The &#x3b4;<sup>13</sup>C <sub>whole-plant</sub> was calculated as follows:</p>
<disp-formula>
<label>(4)</label>
<mml:math display="block" id="M4">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mtext>&#x3b4;</mml:mtext>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>13</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msup>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mtext>C</mml:mtext>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>w</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>h</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>o</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>l</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>e</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>p</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>l</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>a</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>n</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mtext>&#x2030;=</mml:mtext>
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mtext>&#x3b4;</mml:mtext>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>13</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msup>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mtext>C</mml:mtext>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>grain</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#xd7;</mml:mo>
<mml:mtext>C</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>g</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>r</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>a</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>n</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>+&#x3b4;</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>13</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msup>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mtext>C</mml:mtext>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>stem</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#xd7;</mml:mo>
<mml:mtext>C</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>s</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>e</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>m</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mtext>&#x3b4;</mml:mtext>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>13</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msup>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mtext>C</mml:mtext>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>leaf</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#xd7;</mml:mo>
<mml:mtext>C</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>l</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>e</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>a</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>f</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
<mml:msup>
<mml:mtext>&#x3b4;</mml:mtext>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>13</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msup>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mtext>C</mml:mtext>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>root</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>&#xd7;</mml:mo>
<mml:mtext>C</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>r</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>o</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>o</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mtext>C</mml:mtext>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>w</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>h</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>o</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>l</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>e</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>p</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>l</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>a</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>n</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfrac>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</disp-formula>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_4_3">
<title>Evapotranspiration and WUE</title>    <p>The amounts of irrigation and percolation water were measured after each irrigation event and were shown in <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Supplementary Figure&#xa0;2</bold>
</xref>. The total evapotranspiration (ET) over the growing season for each pipe was determined as the summation of difference between total irrigation water volume and percolation water volume. The accumulative transpiration was calculated by subtracting the water evaporation from the evapotranspiration, as shown in <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Supplementary Figure&#xa0;2</bold>
</xref>. The detailed measurement of the surface evaporation loss was displayed in <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Supplementary information</bold>
</xref>. Water use efficiencies (WUE<sub>s</sub>) were computed as</p>
<disp-formula>
<label>(5)</label>
<mml:math display="block" id="M5">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>WUE</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>ET</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>total&#xa0;drybiomass</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>total&#xa0;amount&#xa0;of&#xa0;evapotranspiration</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfrac>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</disp-formula>
<disp-formula>
<label>(6)</label>
<mml:math display="block" id="M6">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>WUE</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>I</mml:mtext>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>total&#xa0;drybiomass</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>total&#xa0;amount&#xa0;of&#xa0;irrigation</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfrac>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</disp-formula>
<disp-formula>
<label>(7)</label>
<mml:math display="block" id="M7">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>WUE</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>T</mml:mtext>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>total&#xa0;drybiomass</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>total&#xa0;amount&#xa0;of&#xa0;transpiration</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mfrac>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</disp-formula>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_5">
<title>Statistical analysis</title>
<p>All data were analyzed with SPSS software (version 13.0, SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). The data were firstly tested for normality and homogeneity using the Shapiro-Wilks test and the Cochran&#x2019;s C-test, respectively. Then, differences between either irrigation regimes or soil clay content for the variables measured were tested using two-ways analysis of variance. When significant differences were detected, multiple comparisons of means were carried out with Duncan&#x2019;s test at a 5% confidence level. In addition, a linear regression analysis was carried out to determine the relationship between (i) WUE and &#x3b4;<sup>13</sup>C<sub>organs</sub>, (ii) WUE and &#x3b4;<sup>15</sup>N<sub>organs</sub>, and (iii) &#x3b4;<sup>13</sup>C<sub>organs</sub> and &#x3b4;<sup>13</sup>C<sub>whole-plant</sub>. Pearson correlation analysis was performed to test for correlations among &#x3b4;<sup>15</sup>N<sub>organs</sub>, &#x3b4;<sup>13</sup>C<sub>organs</sub>, [C] <sub>organs</sub>, C allocation rate to diverse organs, SPAD of flag leaves, and crack volume at a 5% confidence level.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s3" sec-type="results">
<title>Results</title>
<sec id="s3_1">
<title>SPAD and panicle length</title>
<p>There were significant differences (<italic>p</italic>&lt; 0.01) in the SPAD values under different water regimes and soil clay contents (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;1A</bold>
</xref>). The AWD application (I<sub>90</sub> and I<sub>70</sub>) decreased the SPAD values compared with flooding regime, whereas the elevated clay content significantly increased the SPAD. Compared to I<sub>100</sub>, the SPAD values under the I<sub>90</sub> and I<sub>70</sub> regimes decreased by 6.07% and 14.01%, respectively, across soil clay contents. The SPAD values under S<sub>50</sub> and S<sub>60</sub> increased by 8.42% and 16.08%, respectively, compared to S<sub>40</sub>, across water regimes. There was no significant (<italic>p</italic> &gt; 0.05) interaction between the water regime and clay content on SPAD values. In addition, as shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;1B</bold>
</xref>, the panicle length was significantly influenced by irrigation as well as soil clay content. Across soil clay content, the I<sub>70</sub> and I<sub>90</sub> regimes significantly decreased the panicle length by 31.60% and 6.49%, respectively, compared to I<sub>100</sub>. Across irrigation regimes, the panicle length notably increased with the increased clay content (<italic>p</italic>&lt;0.01).</p>
<fig id="f1" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;1</label>
<caption>
<p>The output of two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) for <bold>(A)</bold> SPAD readings of flag leaves and <bold>(B)</bold> panicle length as influenced by different water regimes and soil clay contents (mean &#xb1; SD; n = 4). I<sub>70</sub>, I<sub>90</sub> and I<sub>100</sub> represent irrigation regimes of flooding with 30mm (upper limit) as the soil water reaches 70% of saturation (lower limit); flooding with 30mm (upper limit) as the soil water reaches 90% of saturation (lower limit) and flooding with 30mm (upper limit) as the soil water reaches 100% of saturation (lower limit). S<sub>40</sub>, S<sub>50</sub>, and S<sub>60</sub> indicate soil clay content with 40%, 50% and 60% respectively. I, S, and I&#xd7;S indicate irrigation regime, soil type, and the interaction between irrigation regime (I) and soil type (S), respectively. ns and ** represent no significance and <italic>p</italic>&lt;0.01, respectively.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-13-1077152-g001.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_2">
<title>Biomass, ET, and WUE</title>
<p>
<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;2</bold>
</xref> shows the effects of water regimes and soil clay contents on the dry biomass of rice organs, evapotranspiration (ET) and WUE<sub>ET</sub>. The two-way analysis of variance revealed significant (<italic>p</italic>&lt; 0.01) differences between the total dry biomass of rice due to the application of different water regimes and soil clay contents (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;2A</bold>
</xref>). The total biomass notably increased with elevating clay content, but decreased with a reduction in lower-limit of AWD. Compared to S<sub>40</sub>, the soil treatment S<sub>50</sub> and S<sub>60</sub> increased the total biomass by 21.72% and 46.65%, respectively, across irrigation regime. The ET was only significantly affected by the irrigation regimes (<italic>p</italic>&lt;0.01). The ET under I<sub>100</sub> was significantly higher than that under I<sub>90</sub> and I<sub>70</sub> regimes, across soil clay content. There were also significant (<italic>p</italic>&lt; 0.01) differences for total transpiration under different water regimes and soil clay contents (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Supplementary Figure&#xa0;2C</bold>
</xref>). With reduction in the lower-limit from 100% to 70% of saturated water content, the transpiration values decreased by 16.39% across soil clay contents. In addition, the transpiration value under S<sub>40</sub> was 15.62% greater than that under S<sub>60</sub>, across water regimes. There was no significant interaction between the water regime and soil clay content on transpiration (<italic>p</italic> &gt; 0.05).</p>
<fig id="f2" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;2</label>
<caption>
<p>The effect of treatment and output of two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) for <bold>(A)</bold> dry biomass of grain, stem, leaf, and root, <bold>(B)</bold>evapotranspiration (ET), and <bold>(C)</bold> WUE<sub>ET</sub> of rice as influenced by different water regimes and soil clay contents (mean &#xb1; SD; n = 4). I<sub>70</sub>, I<sub>90</sub> and I<sub>100</sub> represent irrigation regimes of flooding with 30mm (upper limit) when the soil water reaches 70% of saturation (lower limit); flooding with 30mm (upper limit) as the soil water reaches 90% of saturation (lower limit); and flooding with 30mm (upper limit) as the soil water reaches 100% of saturation (lower limit). S<sub>40</sub>, S<sub>50</sub>, and S<sub>60</sub> indicate soil clay content with 40%, 50% and 60% respectively. Different letters mean significant differences (<italic>p</italic>&lt;0.05). I, S, and I&#xd7;S indicate irrigation regime, soil type, and the interaction between irrigation regime (I) and soil type (S), respectively. ns and ** represent no significance and <italic>p</italic>&lt;0.01, respectively..</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-13-1077152-g002.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>
<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;2C</bold>
</xref> showed significant (<italic>p</italic>&lt; 0.01) differences in WUE<sub>ET</sub> under different water regimes and soil clay contents. I<sub>100</sub> resulted in the highest WUE<sub>ET</sub> while the lowest WUE<sub>ET</sub> value was observed under I<sub>70</sub>, when analyzed across the soil clay contents. With the increase in soil clay content, the WUE<sub>ET</sub> significantly increased. WUE<sub>ET</sub> under S<sub>50</sub> and S<sub>60</sub> increased by 22.97% and 56.08%, respectively, compared to S<sub>40</sub>, across the water regimes. As shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;2C</bold>
</xref>, no interaction (<italic>p</italic> &gt; 0.05) on WUE<sub>ET</sub> was found for the water regime and soil clay content treatments. The effect of water regimes and soil clay contents on the WUE<sub>T</sub> and WUE<sub>I</sub> is shown in <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Supplementary Figure&#xa0;3</bold>
</xref>. Increased clay content significantly enhanced both WUE<sub>T</sub> and WUE<sub>I</sub>. For WUE<sub>T</sub>, across soil clay contents, the highest value and the lowest value were was found in I<sub>90</sub> and I<sub>70</sub> application, respectively.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_3">
<title>C concentration and allocation</title>
<p>For all organs of rice, leaf C concentration ([C]) was significantly affected by soil clay content application (<italic>p</italic>&lt;0.05, <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">
<bold>Table&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>). The C allocation in the grain and leaf was both affected (<italic>p</italic>&lt; 0.01) by water regimes and soil clay contents (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">
<bold>Table&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>). Differences (<italic>p</italic>&lt; 0.01) in stem C allocation were also found under the different water regimes. The root C allocation varied with the soil clay contents (<italic>p</italic>&lt; 0.05). Specifically, C allocation in the leaf was higher (<italic>p</italic>&lt; 0.01) under I<sub>70</sub> than that under I<sub>100</sub>, across the soil clay content treatments, whereas a contrary trend was observed for grain. The stem C allocation was highest in I<sub>70</sub> and lowest in I<sub>90</sub>. With increased clay content, across the irrigation treatments, the C allocation in the grain markedly decreased, but the C allocation in the root significantly increased. For example, the highest value of root C allocation, as an average, was 11.72% under S<sub>60</sub> while the lowest value was 9.30% in S<sub>40</sub>.</p>
<table-wrap id="T1" position="float">
<label>Table&#xa0;1</label>
<caption>
<p>The output of treatments and two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) for the carbon concentration ([C]) values in grain, stem, leaf, and root, and C allocation of grain, stem, leaf, and root subjected to different water regimes and soil clay contents.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="top" align="left"/>
<th valign="top" colspan="2" align="center">Leaf C</th>
<th valign="top" colspan="2" align="center">Stem C</th>
<th valign="top" colspan="2" align="center">Root C</th>
<th valign="top" colspan="2" align="center">Grain C</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="top" align="left">Treatment</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">Concentration (%)</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">Allocation (%)</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">Concentration (%)</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">Allocation (%)</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">Concentration (%)</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">Allocation (%)</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">Concentration (%)</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">Allocation (%)</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">I<sub>100</sub>-S<sub>40</sub>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="char" char="&#xb1;">33.92 &#xb1; 2.69ab</td>
<td valign="top" align="char" char="&#xb1;">23.74 &#xb1; 1.66b</td>
<td valign="top" align="char" char="&#xb1;">38.49 &#xb1; 1.17a</td>
<td valign="top" align="char" char="&#xb1;">19.00 &#xb1; 0.54ab</td>
<td valign="top" align="char" char="&#xb1;">37.94 &#xb1; 6.72a</td>
<td valign="top" align="char" char="&#xb1;">9.91 &#xb1; 1.29ab</td>
<td valign="top" align="char" char="&#xb1;">42.20 &#xb1; 0.20a</td>
<td valign="top" align="char" char="&#xb1;">47.36 &#xb1; 1.2a</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">I<sub>100</sub>-S<sub>50</sub>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="char" char="&#xb1;">31.41 &#xb1; 2.74b</td>
<td valign="top" align="char" char="&#xb1;">21.58 &#xb1; 2.38c</td>
<td valign="top" align="char" char="&#xb1;">39.63 &#xb1; 0.35a</td>
<td valign="top" align="char" char="&#xb1;">19.57 &#xb1; 0.04ab</td>
<td valign="top" align="char" char="&#xb1;">43.97 &#xb1; 5.05a</td>
<td valign="top" align="char" char="&#xb1;">11.80 &#xb1; 2.31a</td>
<td valign="top" align="char" char="&#xb1;">42.67 &#xb1; 0.13a</td>
<td valign="top" align="char" char="&#xb1;">47.06 &#xb1; 0.12a</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">I<sub>100</sub>-S<sub>60</sub>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="char" char="&#xb1;">35.42 &#xb1; 0.62a</td>
<td valign="top" align="char" char="&#xb1;">24.33 &#xb1; 0.44b</td>
<td valign="top" align="char" char="&#xb1;">41.51 &#xb1; 6.68a</td>
<td valign="top" align="char" char="&#xb1;">19.83 &#xb1; 3.31ab</td>
<td valign="top" align="char" char="&#xb1;">40.34 &#xb1; 13.2a</td>
<td valign="top" align="char" char="&#xb1;">12.75 &#xb1; 3.81a</td>
<td valign="top" align="char" char="&#xb1;">41.38 &#xb1; 1.04a</td>
<td valign="top" align="char" char="&#xb1;">43.09 &#xb1; 2.5b</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">I<sub>90</sub>-S<sub>40</sub>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="char" char="&#xb1;">33.85 &#xb1; 1.35ab</td>
<td valign="top" align="char" char="&#xb1;">25.16 &#xb1; 0.46b</td>
<td valign="top" align="char" char="&#xb1;">34.08 &#xb1; 8.46a</td>
<td valign="top" align="char" char="&#xb1;">17.55 &#xb1; 3.65b</td>
<td valign="top" align="char" char="&#xb1;">39.18 &#xb1; 2.36a</td>
<td valign="top" align="char" char="&#xb1;">10.41 &#xb1; 0.94ab</td>
<td valign="top" align="char" char="&#xb1;">41.8 &#xb1; 1.59a</td>
<td valign="top" align="char" char="&#xb1;">45.46 &#xb1; 2.95ab</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">I<sub>90</sub>-S<sub>50</sub>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="char" char="&#xb1;">35.41 &#xb1; 1.95a</td>
<td valign="top" align="char" char="&#xb1;">24.48 &#xb1; 1.52b</td>
<td valign="top" align="char" char="&#xb1;">38.25 &#xb1; 0.62a</td>
<td valign="top" align="char" char="&#xb1;">19.17 &#xb1; 0.6ab</td>
<td valign="top" align="char" char="&#xb1;">38.44 &#xb1; 3.83a</td>
<td valign="top" align="char" char="&#xb1;">10.83 &#xb1; 1.01a</td>
<td valign="top" align="char" char="&#xb1;">42.34 &#xb1; 0.52a</td>
<td valign="top" align="char" char="&#xb1;">45.52 &#xb1; 1.57ab</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">I<sub>90</sub>-S<sub>60</sub>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="char" char="&#xb1;">35.47 &#xb1; 0.45a</td>
<td valign="top" align="char" char="&#xb1;">25.33 &#xb1; 0.25b</td>
<td valign="top" align="char" char="&#xb1;">38.16 &#xb1; 0.52a</td>
<td valign="top" align="char" char="&#xb1;">19.16 &#xb1; 0.81ab</td>
<td valign="top" align="char" char="&#xb1;">40.76 &#xb1; 5.65a</td>
<td valign="top" align="char" char="&#xb1;">11.96 &#xb1; 1.60a</td>
<td valign="top" align="char" char="&#xb1;">42.51 &#xb1; 0.75a</td>
<td valign="top" align="char" char="&#xb1;">43.55 &#xb1; 0.99b</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">I<sub>70</sub>-S<sub>40</sub>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="char" char="&#xb1;">34.52 &#xb1; 1.91a</td>
<td valign="top" align="char" char="&#xb1;">27.57 &#xb1; 1.21a</td>
<td valign="top" align="char" char="&#xb1;">36.97 &#xb1; 2.24a</td>
<td valign="top" align="char" char="&#xb1;">21.08 &#xb1; 1.13a</td>
<td valign="top" align="char" char="&#xb1;">38.64 &#xb1; 3.81a</td>
<td valign="top" align="char" char="&#xb1;">7.57 &#xb1; 1.06b</td>
<td valign="top" align="char" char="&#xb1;">42.25 &#xb1; 0.96a</td>
<td valign="top" align="char" char="&#xb1;">43.79 &#xb1; 2.96b</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">I<sub>70</sub>-S<sub>50</sub>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="char" char="&#xb1;">34.41 &#xb1; 1.89a</td>
<td valign="top" align="char" char="&#xb1;">27.24 &#xb1; 0.80a</td>
<td valign="top" align="char" char="&#xb1;">38.22 &#xb1; 0.40a</td>
<td valign="top" align="char" char="&#xb1;">21.7 &#xb1; 0.46a</td>
<td valign="top" align="char" char="&#xb1;">40.07 &#xb1; 7.22a</td>
<td valign="top" align="char" char="&#xb1;">10.80 &#xb1; 2.09a</td>
<td valign="top" align="char" char="&#xb1;">41.82 &#xb1; 0.53a</td>
<td valign="top" align="char" char="&#xb1;">40.27 &#xb1; 2.17c</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">I<sub>70</sub>-S<sub>60</sub>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="char" char="&#xb1;">35.40 &#xb1; 0.50a</td>
<td valign="top" align="char" char="&#xb1;">28.63 &#xb1; 0.61a</td>
<td valign="top" align="char" char="&#xb1;">38.13 &#xb1; 0.94a</td>
<td valign="top" align="char" char="&#xb1;">21.74 &#xb1; 0.98a</td>
<td valign="top" align="char" char="&#xb1;">39.3 &#xb1; 7.71a</td>
<td valign="top" align="char" char="&#xb1;">10.43 &#xb1; 1.19ab</td>
<td valign="top" align="char" char="&#xb1;">41.97 &#xb1; 0.59a</td>
<td valign="top" align="char" char="&#xb1;">39.2 &#xb1; 0.28c</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">F test I</td>
<td valign="top" align="char" char="&#xb1;">ns</td>
<td valign="top" align="char" char="&#xb1;">**</td>
<td valign="top" align="char" char="&#xb1;">ns</td>
<td valign="top" align="char" char="&#xb1;">**</td>
<td valign="top" align="char" char="&#xb1;">ns</td>
<td valign="top" align="char" char="&#xb1;">ns</td>
<td valign="top" align="char" char="&#xb1;">ns</td>
<td valign="top" align="char" char="&#xb1;">**</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">F test S</td>
<td valign="top" align="char" char="&#xb1;">*</td>
<td valign="top" align="char" char="&#xb1;">**</td>
<td valign="top" align="char" char="&#xb1;">ns</td>
<td valign="top" align="char" char="&#xb1;">ns</td>
<td valign="top" align="char" char="&#xb1;">ns</td>
<td valign="top" align="char" char="&#xb1;">*</td>
<td valign="top" align="char" char="&#xb1;">ns</td>
<td valign="top" align="char" char="&#xb1;">**</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">F <italic>I&#xd7;S</italic>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="char" char="&#xb1;">ns</td>
<td valign="top" align="char" char="&#xb1;">ns</td>
<td valign="top" align="char" char="&#xb1;">ns</td>
<td valign="top" align="char" char="&#xb1;">ns</td>
<td valign="top" align="char" char="&#xb1;">ns</td>
<td valign="top" align="char" char="&#xb1;">ns</td>
<td valign="top" align="char" char="&#xb1;">ns</td>
<td valign="top" align="char" char="&#xb1;">ns</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn>
<p>Values are mean &#xb1; S.D. (n = 4) for each measurement. I<sub>70</sub>, I<sub>90</sub> and I<sub>100</sub> represent irrigation regimes of flooding with 30mm (upper limit) as the soil water reaches 70% of saturation (lower limit); flooding with 30mm (upper limit) as the soil water reaches 90% of saturation (lower limit) and flooding with 30mm (upper limit) as the soil water reaches 100% of saturation (lower limit). S<sub>40</sub>, S<sub>50</sub>, and S<sub>60</sub> indicate soil clay content with 40%, 50% and 60% respectively. Different letters mean significant differences (p&lt;0.05) according to the Duncan&#x2019;s test. I, S, and I&#xd7;S indicate irrigation regime, soil type, and the interaction between irrigation regime (I) and soil type (S), respectively. ns, *, ** and represent no significance, 0.01&lt;p&lt;0.05, and p&lt;0.01, respectively.</p>
</fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<p>Under the I<sub>100</sub> and I<sub>70</sub> regimes, significant differences were found among the three soil clay contents for C allocation of several organs. However, under the I<sub>90</sub> regime, it was similar among the three soil clay contents for all organs. For instance, when increasing the soil clay content from 40% to 60%, the grain C allocation decreased by 9.03% in I<sub>100</sub> and 10.48% in I<sub>70</sub>. The interaction between the water regimes and clay contents was not significant (<italic>p</italic> &gt; 0.05) for any [C] and C allocation in the different organs.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_4">
<title>Variations of &#x3b4;<sup>13</sup>C in plant organs and whole-plant</title>
<p>The &#x3b4;<sup>13</sup>C<sub>grain</sub> was affected (<italic>p</italic>&lt; 0.05) by the soil clay content and the interaction between water regime and soil clay content (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;3A</bold>
</xref>). With the increasing soil clay content, the &#x3b4;<sup>13</sup>C<sub>grain</sub> decreased under I<sub>70</sub> and I<sub>100</sub> regime, but showed a different trend under the I<sub>90</sub> regime. Across water regimes, the &#x3b4;<sup>13</sup>C<sub>grain</sub> under S<sub>40</sub> (-25.70&#x2030;) was significantly higher than that under S<sub>60</sub> (-26.97&#x2030;). The lowest and highest &#x3b4;<sup>13</sup>C<sub>grain</sub> (-27.49&#x2030;&#x2013;24.94&#x2030;) were found under the I<sub>70</sub>-S<sub>60</sub> and I<sub>100</sub>-S<sub>40</sub> treatments, respectively.</p>
<fig id="f3" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;3</label>
<caption>
<p>The effects of treatments and output of two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) for &#x3b4;<sup>13</sup>C values in <bold>(A)</bold> grain, <bold>(B)</bold> leaf, <bold>(C)</bold> stem, <bold>(D)</bold> root and <bold>(E)</bold> whole-plant as influenced by different water regimes and soil clay contents (mean &#xb1; SD; n = 4). I<sub>70</sub>, I<sub>90</sub> and I<sub>100</sub> represent irrigation regimes of flooding with 30mm (upper limit) as the soil water reaches 70% of saturation (lower limit); flooding with 30mm (upper limit) as the soil water reaches 90% of saturation (lower limit) and flooding with 30mm (upper limit) as the soil water reaches 100% of saturation (lower limit). S<sub>40</sub>, S<sub>50</sub>, and S<sub>60</sub> indicate soil clay content with 40%, 50% and 60% respectively. Different letters mean significant differences (<italic>p</italic>&lt;0.05). I, S, and I&#xd7;S indicate irrigation regime, soil type, and the interaction between irrigation regime (I) and soil type (S), respectively. ns, *, ** and represent no significance, 0.01&lt;<italic>p</italic>&lt;0.05, and <italic>p</italic>&lt;0.01, respectively.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-13-1077152-g003.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>The &#x3b4;<sup>13</sup>C values in both leaf and the whole-plant level were significantly influenced by the interaction of water regimes and soil clay contents (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;3B, E</bold>
</xref>, <italic>p</italic>&lt;0.01). For I<sub>70</sub>, the &#x3b4;<sup>13</sup>C<sub>leaf</sub> was highest in S<sub>40</sub>, followed by S<sub>50</sub> and S<sub>60</sub>. For I<sub>90</sub>, the &#x3b4;<sup>13</sup>C<sub>leaf</sub> showed an increasing trend with the elevated soil clay content. For I<sub>100</sub>, the &#x3b4;<sup>13</sup>C<sub>leaf</sub> decreased with clay content in the order of S<sub>50</sub>, S<sub>40,</sub> and S<sub>60</sub> applications. The &#x3b4;<sup>13</sup>C<sub>whole-plant</sub> showed similar variations as the &#x3b4;<sup>13</sup>C<sub>leaf</sub> with varied soil clay contents. The lowest &#x3b4;<sup>13</sup>C<sub>leaf</sub> and &#x3b4;<sup>13</sup>C<sub>whole-plant</sub> existed under I<sub>90</sub>-S<sub>40</sub>, while the lowest values of &#x3b4;<sup>13</sup>C<sub>leaf</sub> and the &#x3b4;<sup>13</sup>C<sub>whole-plant</sub> existed under the I<sub>90</sub>-S<sub>60</sub> and I<sub>70</sub>-S<sub>40</sub>, respectively. In addition, &#x3b4;<sup>13</sup>C increased slightly from shoot to root. Especially, under I<sub>100</sub>-S<sub>40</sub>, the &#x3b4;<sup>13</sup>C in grain was significantly higher than that in other organs.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_5">
<title>Relationships between WUE and carbon isotopic composition, and nitrogen isotopic composition</title>
<p>There was no significant relationship found between WUE<sub>ET</sub> and <italic>&#x3b4;</italic>
<sup>13</sup>C in rice organs based on the pooled data of nine treatments (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Supplementary Figure&#xa0;4</bold>
</xref>). Nevertheless, across the soil clay content treatments, there was a significantly positive relationship between WUE<sub>ET</sub> and &#x3b4;<sup>13</sup>C<sub>leaf</sub> (R<sup>2</sup>=0.73, <italic>p</italic>&lt;0.01) under I<sub>90</sub> irrigation regime (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f4">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;4B</bold>
</xref>), whereas there was no significant relationship between <italic>&#x3b4;</italic>
<sup>13</sup>C<sub>organs</sub> and WUE<sub>ET</sub> under I<sub>100</sub> or I<sub>70</sub> AWD regimes (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f4">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;4A, C</bold>
</xref>). The WUE<sub>I</sub> and WUE<sub>T</sub> presented a similar trend for their relationships with rice <italic>&#x3b4;</italic>
<sup>13</sup>C<sub>organs</sub> (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Supplementary Figure&#xa0;5</bold>
</xref>). Significant relationships were found between (i) WUE<sub>I</sub> and &#x3b4;<sup>13</sup>C<sub>leaf</sub> (R<sup>2</sup>=0.78, <italic>p</italic>&lt;0.01), (ii) WUE<sub>I</sub> and &#x3b4;<sup>13</sup>C<sub>stem</sub> (R<sup>2</sup>=0.39, <italic>p</italic>&lt;0.05), and (iii) WUE<sub>T</sub> and &#x3b4;<sup>13</sup>C<sub>leaf</sub> (R<sup>2</sup>=0.71, <italic>p</italic>&lt;0.01) under I<sub>90</sub> regime. Across the irrigation regimes, no significant relationship was observed between &#x3b4;<sup>13</sup>C<sub>organs</sub> and WUE<sub>s</sub> under any soil treatments (<italic>p</italic>&gt;0.05, data not shown).</p>
<fig id="f4" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;4</label>
<caption>
<p>Relationships between WUE<sub>ET</sub> and carbon isotope composition of diverse rice organs (&#x3b4;<sup>13</sup>C<sub>organs</sub>) <bold>(A&#x2013;C)</bold>; and between &#x3b4;<sup>13</sup>C <sub>whole-plant</sub> and &#x3b4;<sup>13</sup>C<sub>organs</sub> <bold>(D&#x2013;F)</bold> as influenced by different water regimes. *, ** and represent 0.01&lt;<italic>p</italic>&lt;0.05, and <italic>p</italic>&lt;0.01, respectively.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-13-1077152-g004.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>Furthermore, a linear regression was carried out to reveal the variation tendency of the &#x3b4;<sup>13</sup>C<sub>whole-plant</sub> with the &#x3b4;<sup>13</sup>C<sub>organs</sub> under three water regimes (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f4">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;4D-F</bold>
</xref>). The &#x3b4;<sup>13</sup>C<sub>whole-plant</sub> could be expressed as a function of the &#x3b4;<sup>13</sup>C<sub>grain</sub> under I<sub>100</sub> (R<sup>2</sup>=0.38, <italic>p</italic>&lt; 0.05) and I<sub>70</sub> regimes (R<sup>2</sup>=0.73, <italic>p</italic>&lt; 0.01), respectively. For I<sub>90</sub> regime, there were significantly positive relationships between (i) &#x3b4;<sup>13</sup>C<sub>whole-plant</sub> and &#x3b4;<sup>13</sup>C<sub>grain</sub> (R<sup>2</sup>=0.82, <italic>p</italic>&lt;0.01), (ii) &#x3b4;<sup>13</sup>C <sub>whole-plant</sub> and &#x3b4;<sup>13</sup>C<sub>stem</sub> (R<sup>2</sup>=0.86, <italic>p</italic>&lt;0.01), and (iii) &#x3b4;<sup>13</sup>C<sub>whole-plant</sub> and &#x3b4;<sup>13</sup>C<sub>leaf</sub> (R<sup>2</sup>=0.59, <italic>p</italic>&lt;0.01).</p>
<p>The SPAD values are positively correlated with the WUE<sub>ET</sub> across the irrigation regimes (R<sup>2</sup>=0.72, <italic>p</italic>&lt;0.01, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f5">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;5</bold>
</xref>). Additionally, there was a significantly negative correlation between WUE<sub>I</sub> and &#x3b4;<sup>15</sup>N<sub>grain</sub> (R<sup>2</sup>=0.14, <italic>p</italic>&lt;0.05), and between WUE<sub>I</sub> and &#x3b4;<sup>15</sup>N<sub>leaf</sub> (R<sup>2</sup>=0.22, <italic>p</italic>&lt;0.01) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f6">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;6</bold>
</xref>) based on pooled data. The WUE<sub>ET</sub> was negatively correlated with &#x3b4;<sup>15</sup>N in grain (R<sup>2</sup>=0.24, <italic>p</italic>&lt;0.01), stem (R<sup>2</sup>=0.15, <italic>p</italic>&lt;0.05), and leaf (R<sup>2</sup>=0.21, <italic>p</italic>&lt;0.01) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f6">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;6</bold>
</xref>). Similarly, the WUE<sub>T</sub> was significantly and negatively correlated with grain (R<sup>2</sup>=0.23, <italic>p</italic>&lt;0.01), stem (R<sup>2</sup>=0.16, <italic>p</italic>&lt;0.05), and leaf (R<sup>2</sup>=0.20, <italic>p</italic>&lt;0.01) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f6">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;6</bold>
</xref>).</p>
<fig id="f5" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;5</label>
<caption>
<p>The relationship between SPAD and WUE<sub>ET</sub> as influenced by different water regimes and soil clay contents. ** represents <italic>p</italic>&lt;0.01.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-13-1077152-g005.tif"/>
</fig>
<fig id="f6" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;6</label>
<caption>
<p>Relationships between three kinds of water use efficiency (WUE<sub>I</sub>, WUE<sub>ET</sub>, WUE<sub>T</sub>) and nitrogen isotope composition of diverse rice organs (&#x3b4;<sup>15</sup>N<sub>grain</sub>, &#x3b4;<sup>15</sup>N<sub>stem</sub>, &#x3b4;<sup>15</sup>N<sub>leaf</sub>, &#x3b4;<sup>15</sup>N <sub>root</sub>) as influenced by different water regimes and soil clay contents. ns, *, ** and represent no significance, 0.01&lt;<italic>p</italic>&lt;0.05, and <italic>p</italic>&lt;0.01, respectively.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-13-1077152-g006.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_6">
<title>Pearson correlation analysis</title>
<p>Pearson&#x2019;s correlations among SPAD, &#x3b4;<sup>13</sup>C and &#x3b4;<sup>15</sup>N of diverse organs are shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">
<bold>Table&#xa0;2</bold>
</xref>. The &#x3b4;<sup>15</sup>N<sub>grain</sub> (r= -0.50, <italic>p&lt;</italic> 0.01), &#x3b4;<sup>15</sup>N<sub>stem</sub> (r= -0.42, <italic>p&lt;</italic> 0.05) and &#x3b4;<sup>15</sup>N<sub>leaf</sub> (r= -0.44, <italic>p&lt;</italic> 0.01) showed a strong negative correlation with SPAD value. In addition, a significantly positive relation between (i) <italic>&#x3b4;</italic>
<sup>13</sup>C<sub>grain</sub> and <italic>&#x3b4;</italic>
<sup>13</sup>C<sub>stem</sub> (r= 0.40, <italic>p</italic>&lt;0.05), (ii) <italic>&#x3b4;</italic>
<sup>13</sup>C<sub>grain</sub> and <italic>&#x3b4;</italic>
<sup>13</sup>C<sub>leaf</sub> (r= 0.41, <italic>p</italic>&lt;0.05), and (iii) <italic>&#x3b4;</italic>
<sup>13</sup>C<sub>stem</sub> and <italic>&#x3b4;</italic>
<sup>13</sup>C<sub>leaf</sub> (r= 0.54, <italic>p</italic>&lt;0.01) were found in the current study.</p>
<table-wrap id="T2" position="float">
<label>Table&#xa0;2</label>
<caption>
<p>Pearson correlation coefficients for SPAD reading, &#x3b4;<sup>13</sup>C values in grain, stem, leaf, and root, and &#x3b4;<sup>15</sup>N of grain, stem, leaf, and root.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="top" align="left"/>
<th valign="top" align="center">SPAD</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">&#x3b4;<sup>13</sup>C<sub>grain</sub>
</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">&#x3b4;<sup>13</sup>C<sub>stem</sub>
</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">&#x3b4;<sup>13</sup>C<sub>leaf</sub>
</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">&#x3b4;<sup>13</sup>C <sub>root</sub>
</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">&#x3b4;<sup>15</sup>N<sub>grain</sub>
</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">&#x3b4;<sup>15</sup>N<sub>stem</sub>
</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">&#x3b4;<sup>15</sup>N<sub>leaf</sub>
</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">&#x3b4;<sup>15</sup>N <sub>root</sub>
</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">SPAD</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">-0.09</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.00</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.01</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.07</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">-0.50**</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">-0.42*</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">-0.44**</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.114</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x3b4;<sup>13</sup>C<sub>grain</sub>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
<td valign="top" align="center">1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.40*</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.41*</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">-0.27</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.11</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">-0.02</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.12</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">-0.18</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x3b4;<sup>13</sup>C<sub>stem</sub>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
<td valign="top" align="center">1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.54**</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">-0.02</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">-0.02</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">-0.05</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">-0.12</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">-0.16</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x3b4;<sup>13</sup>C<sub>leaf</sub>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
<td valign="top" align="center">1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">-0.23</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.03</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.01</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">-0.14</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">-0.30</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x3b4;<sup>13</sup>C <sub>root</sub>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
<td valign="top" align="center">1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">-0.23</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">-0.30</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">-0.11</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.29</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x3b4;<sup>15</sup>N<sub>grain</sub>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
<td valign="top" align="center">1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.48*</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.30</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.13</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x3b4;<sup>15</sup>N<sub>stem</sub>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
<td valign="top" align="center">1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.29</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.22</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x3b4;<sup>15</sup>N<sub>leaf</sub>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
<td valign="top" align="center">1</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">-0.07</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x3b4;<sup>15</sup>N <sub>root</sub>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
<td valign="top" align="center"/>
<td valign="top" align="center">1</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn>
<p>*indicates significant differences at 0.01&lt;p&lt;0.05; **indicates significant differences at p&lt;0.01.</p>
</fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<p>The correlations between the crack volume, [C] and the C allocation of diverse organs are shown in <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Supplementary Table&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>. With increasing crack volume, the C allocation to grain decreased in varying degrees (r=-0.69, <italic>p</italic>&lt;0.01) while the C allocation to stem and leaf increased (r=0.47, <italic>p</italic>&lt;0.01 and r=0.81, <italic>p</italic>&lt;0.01, respectively). However, the crack volume did not have a significant correlation with any organs [C] (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Table S1</bold>
</xref>). Furthermore, the [C]<sub>grain</sub> was negatively correlated with the [C]<sub>stem</sub> (r=-0.40, <italic>p</italic>&lt; 0.05). For the C allocation of diverse organs, the C allocation to stem and leaf in rice showed a strong negative correlation with grain (r=-0.66, <italic>p</italic>&lt;0.01 and r=-0.69, <italic>p</italic>&lt;0.01, respectively).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s4" sec-type="discussion">
<title>Discussion</title>
<sec id="s4_1">
<title>Effects of irrigation regimes and soil clay contents on WUE<sub>s</sub>
</title>
<p>Water-saving irrigation regime, such as AWD, can improve WUE while maintaining or even increasing rice yield (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">Song et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>). Consistent with this, in the current study, an increased WUE<sub>T</sub> of rice was observed when reducing the lower-limit of irrigation from 100% to 90% of saturated water content, though the differences were not statistically significant (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Supplementary Figure&#xa0;3</bold>
</xref>). Nevertheless, when the irrigation lower-limit further decreased to 70% of saturated water content, a significantly lower WUE<sub>T</sub> was observed compared to I<sub>100</sub> and I<sub>90</sub> regimes (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Supplementary Figure&#xa0;3</bold>
</xref>), which mainly due to the higher degree of water deficit in AWD under the I<sub>70</sub> treatment (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Carrijo et&#xa0;al., 2017</xref>). It has been reported that slight drought stress could induce partially stomatal closure, hereby decreasing transpiration and improving WUE<sub>T</sub> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">Ma et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>). Whereas, severe drought stress impaired carbon fixation and physiological disorders in plants, such as the reduction of photosynthetic capacity, leading to decreased WUE<sub>T</sub> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B51">Wang et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>). A previous study also indicated that SPAD values of leaves were closely related to photosynthetic capacity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B49">Wang et&#xa0;al., 2012</xref>). The significantly lower SPAD values of I<sub>70</sub> compared to I<sub>90</sub> and I<sub>100</sub> (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;1A</bold>
</xref>) could indicate the decreased photosynthetic capacity in I<sub>70</sub>. Consequently, the biomass of I<sub>70</sub> was significantly decreased with a reduction in WUE<sub>T</sub> compared to I<sub>100</sub> (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;2A</bold>
</xref> and <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Supplementary Figure&#xa0;3</bold>
</xref>). Similarly, WUE<sub>ET</sub> of I<sub>70</sub> was observed significantly lower than those of I<sub>100</sub> and I<sub>90</sub> (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;2C</bold>
</xref>).</p>
<p>In addition to irrigation regimes, the clay content of soil also affected the WUE<sub>ET</sub> and WUE<sub>T</sub> of rice. In the present study, the WUE<sub>ET</sub> and WUE<sub>T</sub> increased with the elevation of soil clay contents (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;2C</bold>
</xref> and <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Supplementary Figure&#xa0;3</bold>
</xref>) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">Fotovat et&#xa0;al., 2007</xref>). Similarly, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">Dou et&#xa0;al. (2016)</xref> found that, compared to sand soils, the plants grown in clay soil exhibited higher WUE due to better nitrogen status by increased availability of organic matters and water in clay soil as well as improved nitrogen uptake for plants. Consistent with this, higher SPAD values was observed in the presence of elevated clay content (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;1A</bold>
</xref>), which could increase plant photosynthesis capacity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B49">Wang et&#xa0;al., 2012</xref>), in line with higher biomass production under this treatment (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;2A</bold>
</xref>). WUE<sub>I</sub> showed a similar changing trend under different irrigation regimes with varied clay content as WUE<sub>ET</sub> and WUE<sub>T</sub> (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;2C</bold>
</xref> and <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Supplementary Figure&#xa0;3</bold>
</xref>), implying that the three WUEs were mainly regulated by photosynthesis associated with biomass production (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">Fotovat et&#xa0;al., 2007</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s4_2">
<title>Effect of irrigation regimes and soil clay contents on carbon allocation and &#x3b4;<sup>13</sup>C values of different organs</title>
<p>Previous studies reported that carbon allocation in different organs of crops could be induced by irrigation regimes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Arndt and Wanek, 2002</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">Oliver et&#xa0;al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">Liu et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>). In this study, there were significant differences in C allocation to different organs of rice grown under different irrigation regimes (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">
<bold>Table&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>). Regarding aboveground organs, C allocation to grain decreased significantly with reduced level of irrigation, but a contrary trend was observed for stem and leaf (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">
<bold>Table&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>). This result is in contrast to the finding of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">Song et&#xa0;al. (2021)</xref> showing that AWD promoted carbohydrate transfer from stem to grain compared to flooding irrigation. A possible explanation is that moderate drought stress could increase the transfer of C to grain, but this could not occur under severe drought stress due to the drought damage (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">Oliver et&#xa0;al., 2019</xref>). Additionally, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">Liu et&#xa0;al. (2020)</xref> suggested that when plants were exposed to drought stress, the new carbohydrates were preferentially transported from shoot to root, and consequently resulted in an increase of C allocation to root. However, in the current study, the C allocation to belowground organs were not affected by irrigation regimes (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">
<bold>Table&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>). The phenomenon may be attributed to the larger cracks formed in AWD, which could stretch and tear the roots and might influence the C allocation among organs by inducing root-pruning signal (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Supplementary Table&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Bordoloi et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>).</p>
<p>In addition to irrigation regime, soil clay content also affected the C allocation of different organs in rice (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">
<bold>Table&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>). Under I<sub>100</sub> and I<sub>70</sub> treatment, C allocation to grain varied with clay contents (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">
<bold>Table&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>), possibly due to the changed water and nitrogen status of soil as affected by the increased clay contents (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">Fotovat et&#xa0;al., 2007</xref>), as previous studies indicated that C allocation of plants differed significantly with respect to the water and fertilizer conditions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B54">Xu et al., 2007</xref>). Nonetheless, under the I<sub>90</sub> treatment, similar C allocation was observed among organs under different clay contents (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">
<bold>Table&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>). The possible reason for this discrepancy is ascribed to the soil clay content-induced cracks. For the I<sub>100</sub> regime, no soil crack was observed with high soil water potential (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Supplementary Figure&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>). Therefore, the different clay contents under the same irrigation regime led to the differences in the ability of soils to retain C, water, and nutrient ions, which might impact the C allocation to grain and leaf (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">
<bold>Table&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>) by affecting plant photosynthetic capacity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B61">Zhao et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>). For I<sub>70</sub>, the crack volumes were positively correlated with soil clay contents (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Supplementary Figure&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>), which in turn may significantly influence the soil water and fertilizer contents due to enhanced preferential flow (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">Cheng et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>). Hence, the C allocation pattern in rice was changed accordingly (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">
<bold>Table&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>). Regarding I<sub>90</sub>, the potential increase in N leaching loss associated with enlarged crack volumes (detailed information shown in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B50">Wang et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>) was largely offset by the rise in nitrogen retention capacity associated with increased clay content, thereby restricting the variation in the availability of water and nitrogen in soil and C allocation in rice.</p>
<p>It has been widely accepted that variation in allocation patterns in plants could result in &#x3b4;<sup>13</sup>C changes in plant organs (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">De Souza et&#xa0;al., 2005</xref>). Compared to autotrophic organs (leaves) that supply plants with carbon, heterotrophic organs (stems, grains and roots) tend to be rich in <sup>13</sup>C (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B58">Zhang et&#xa0;al., 2015</xref>). The difference of &#x3b4;<sup>13</sup>C values among organs under I<sub>90</sub> was significantly smaller than those under I<sub>100</sub> and I<sub>70</sub>, though there was still a tendency for increased &#x3b4;<sup>13</sup>C from leaf to root (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;3</bold>
</xref>). Other potential reasons for organ-specific differences in &#x3b4;<sup>13</sup>C could be related to the differences in fractionation processes during the enzymatic reactions, and the chemical composition of different organs, such as the amounts of lipids and lignin (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">Kano-nakata et&#xa0;al., 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B58">Zhang et&#xa0;al., 2015</xref>). It was found that &#x3b4;<sup>13</sup>C<sub>whole-plant</sub> also showed a strong correlation with &#x3b4;<sup>13</sup>C<sub>leaf</sub> under the I<sub>90</sub> regime (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f4">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;4E</bold>
</xref>), which was in agreement with the finding of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Gouveia et&#xa0;al. (2019b)</xref>. Moreover, &#x3b4;<sup>13</sup>C<sub>grain</sub> showed the most consistent and significant correlation with &#x3b4;<sup>13</sup>C <sub>whole-plant</sub> under three irrigation regimes (I<sub>100</sub>, I<sub>90</sub> and I<sub>70</sub>) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f4">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;4D-F</bold>
</xref>). This result may be attributed to the isotopic fractionation during the allocation and transfer processes of carbon within plants (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">Sanchez-Bragado et al., 2014</xref>). As shown in equation 4, &#x3b4;<sup>13</sup>C <sub>whole-plant</sub> was the integrated &#x3b4;<sup>13</sup>C values of different organs. Similarly, as indicated by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Araus et&#xa0;al. (1993)</xref> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B62">Zhu et&#xa0;al. (2021)</xref>, &#x3b4;<sup>13</sup>C<sub>grain</sub> was the result of the combined &#x3b4;<sup>13</sup>C values of assimilates produced by different photosynthetic organs, such as the ears and the flag leaves, responsible for grain filling after anthesis, and the remobilization of nonstructural carbohydrate reserves stored in the specific organ, such as the sheaths and culm. Thus, accordingly, &#x3b4;<sup>13</sup>C<sub>grain</sub> showed the most consistent correlation with &#x3b4;<sup>13</sup>C <sub>whole-plant</sub> across different treatments, and might be a priority indicator of &#x3b4;<sup>13</sup>C <sub>whole-plant</sub>. The strong negative correlation between [C]<sub>grain</sub> and [C]<sub>stem</sub> found in this study (<italic>p</italic>&lt;0.05, r=-0.40, <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Supplementary Table&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>) further supported the aforementioned speculation. However, there were weak correlations between other &#x3b4;<sup>13</sup>C<sub>organs</sub> (&#x3b4;<sup>13</sup>C<sub>leaf</sub>, &#x3b4;<sup>13</sup>C<sub>stem</sub>, &#x3b4;<sup>13</sup>C<sub>root</sub>) and &#x3b4;<sup>13</sup>C<sub>whole-plant</sub> under I<sub>100</sub> or I<sub>70</sub> treatment (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f4">
<bold>Figures&#xa0;4D, F</bold>
</xref>). We speculated that this weak correlation may be related to variations in carbon allocation patterns under the two regimes with varied soil clay contents (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">
<bold>Table&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s4_3">
<title>Relationship between &#x3b4;<sup>13</sup>C<sub>organs</sub> and WUE and &#x3b4;<sup>13</sup>C<sub>whole- plant</sub>
</title>
<p>
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Farquhar and Richards (1984)</xref> reported that C<sub>i</sub>/C<sub>a</sub> was negatively related to WUE<sub>i</sub>, while C<sub>i</sub>/C<sub>a</sub> was negatively related to organ &#x3b4;<sup>13</sup>C. Thus, it could be concluded that there was a positive relationship between organ &#x3b4;<sup>13</sup>C and WUE<sub>i</sub>. However, in this study, there was no significant correlation between &#x3b4;<sup>13</sup>C<sub>organs</sub> and WUE<sub>whole-plant</sub> based on pooled data (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Supplementary Figure&#xa0;4</bold>
</xref>). This phenomenon could be explained as follows. First, the possible varied leaf boundary layer conductance among different treatments might result in WUE<sub>i</sub> independence from stomatal conductance, C<sub>i</sub>/C<sub>a</sub> and &#x3b4;<sup>13</sup>C (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Cernusak et&#xa0;al., 2009</xref>). In this study, although we did not measure leaf boundary layer conductance between the intercellular spaces and the atmosphere, the significantly higher water loss through transpiration as well as the increased leaf biomass for I<sub>100</sub>, compared to I<sub>70</sub> (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">
<bold>Figure 2A</bold>
</xref> and <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Supplementary Figure&#xa0;2</bold>
</xref>), might indirectly indicate the varied microclimate and plant statuses caused by different irrigation regimes. Second, the degree of dark respiration, changed mesophyll conductance (g<sub>m</sub>) under different environmental conditions, and varied proportions of uncontrolled water loss to the transpiration might disturb the relationship between C<sub>i</sub>/C<sub>a</sub>, &#x3b4;<sup>13</sup>C and A<sub>n</sub>/T (photosynthesis rate/transpiration rate) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Farquhar et&#xa0;al., 1989</xref>), which consequently result in a poor relationship between organs &#x3b4;<sup>13</sup>C and WUE<sub>whole-plant</sub>. Interestingly, when the data were grouped into different irrigation regimes, relationships between &#x3b4;<sup>13</sup>C and WUE<sub>whole-plant</sub> varied with changed irrigation regimes (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f4">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;4</bold>
</xref> and <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Supplementary Figure&#xa0;5</bold>
</xref>). For I<sub>90</sub>, there was a significant positive relationship between &#x3b4;<sup>13</sup>C and WUE<sub>whole-plant</sub>, which was in agreement with the findings by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">Mininni et&#xa0;al. (2022)</xref>. However, there were no significant relationships between the WUE and &#x3b4;<sup>13</sup>C<sub>whole-plant</sub> in I<sub>100</sub> and I<sub>70</sub> treatment. For I<sub>100</sub>, the poor relationship between &#x3b4;<sup>13</sup>C of plant organs and WUE<sub>whole-plant</sub> might be related to the relatively higher rate of panicle water loss. As indicated by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">Scartazza et&#xa0;al. (1998)</xref>, most water loss through panicle was cuticular, which was independent of stomatal regulation and photosynthesis. Hence, high rates of panicle transpiration might disturb the relationships between &#x3b4;<sup>13</sup>C and WUE in rice. In this study, increased panicle length (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;1B</bold>
</xref>) as well as greater grain weight (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;2A</bold>
</xref>) for I<sub>100</sub> compared to I<sub>90</sub> and I<sub>70</sub> might indicate that the relatively higher proportions of panicle water loss to total transpiration would disturb the relationship between &#x3b4;<sup>13</sup>C and WUE in rice under I<sub>100</sub>. Furthermore, changes of carbon allocation pattern for I<sub>100</sub> with varied soil clay content (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">
<bold>Table&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>) might also lead to a breakdown in the relationship between &#x3b4;<sup>13</sup>C<sub>leaf</sub> and WUE<sub>whole-plant</sub> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B53">Wen et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>). For I<sub>70</sub>, the weak relationship between &#x3b4;<sup>13</sup>C and WUE<sub>whole-plant</sub> (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f4">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;4</bold>
</xref> and <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Supplementary Figure&#xa0;5</bold>
</xref>) might be due to physiological damages under severe water deficit, such as severely reduced photosynthetic enzyme activity and consequently disrupted photosynthetic process (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Bogati and Walczak, 2022</xref>). In addition, for I<sub>70</sub>, the bigger cracks formed in this water-limited irrigation regime were associated with the stimulated leaching of water and nitrogen. Meanwhile, the tearing effect of cracks on the root system under the high clay content together with the reduced availability of water and nitrogen in I<sub>70</sub> might deteriorate the physiological disorder process, which consequently results in breakdown of the relationship between &#x3b4;<sup>13</sup>C<sub>leaf</sub> and the WUE<sub>whole-plant</sub>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s4_4">
<title>Relationship between organs &#x3b4;<sup>15</sup>N and WUE</title>
<p>In contrast to the relationship between &#x3b4;<sup>13</sup>C and WUE<sub>whole-plant</sub>, which varies with irrigation regimes, we found a significant negative correlation between &#x3b4;<sup>15</sup>N<sub>leaf</sub> and WUE<sub>whole-plant</sub> based on pooled data (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f6">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;6</bold>
</xref>). This result is consistent with the findings of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B45">Topbjerg et&#xa0;al. (2014)</xref> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B57">Yousfi et&#xa0;al. (2012)</xref> but contrasting to the results of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Cao et&#xa0;al. (2014)</xref>. WUE<sub>whole-plant</sub> is known to be highly associated with WUE<sub>i</sub>, controlled by either A<sub>n</sub> or g<sub>s</sub>, or a combination of both, and could be improved by enhancing the A<sub>n</sub> or by lowering g<sub>s</sub>. In this study, with the elevated soil clay content, the WUE<sub>ET</sub> significantly increased (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;2C</bold>
</xref>), mainly due to the increased photosynthetic capacity. SPAD has been extensively used to indicate the [N] and photosynthetic capacity in the leaf in the last few years, and a higher SPAD would mean a higher A<sub>n</sub> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">Fotovat et&#xa0;al., 2007</xref>). With the increased clay content, the [N]<sub>leaf</sub> increased accordingly, thereby increasing the A<sub>n</sub> and WUE<sub>ET</sub>. Consistent with this, SPAD was significantly positively correlated with WUE<sub>ET</sub> in this experiment (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f5">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;5</bold>
</xref>). In addition, if the increased WUE<sub>i</sub> was only linked to SPAD, then a positive correlation between SPAD and &#x3b4;<sup>13</sup>C<sub>leaf</sub> associated with time-integrated WUE<sub>i</sub> would be expected. However, in the present study, there was no clear relationship between SPAD and &#x3b4;<sup>13</sup>C (<italic>p</italic>&gt;0.05, <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">
<bold>Table&#xa0;2</bold>
</xref>), indicating that other factors may control increased WUE<sub>ET</sub>, such as decreased stomatal conductance in response to abiotic stress (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">Desrochers et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>). As mentioned previously, SPAD had a significant positive correlation with clay content (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;1A</bold>
</xref>). Under water-saving irrigation, with the increase of clay content, larger cracks formed in field could stretch and tear the roots, which is similar to the effect of root pruning (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Bordoloi et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>), which could decrease both stomatal conductance and transpiration due to the pruning-induced root signals (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">Ma et&#xa0;al., 2008</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Feng et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>). In this study, the large cracks observed under the same AWD regime with high clay content might suggest a strong stress signal generated by root pruning. Consequently, the stomatal conductance of rice was speculated to be reduced accordingly. Meanwhile, previous studies have shown that reduced g<sub>s</sub> would lead to a reduction in the loss of ammonia and nitrous oxide, hence decreasing &#x3b4;<sup>15</sup>N in leaf (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B57">Yousfi et&#xa0;al., 2012</xref>). Therefore, increased WUE<sub>ET</sub> and WUE<sub>T</sub> caused by reduced g<sub>s</sub> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B55">Yan et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>) was expected to be negatively correlated with &#x3b4;<sup>15</sup>N<sub>leaf</sub>, which is consistent with the results of this study.</p>
<p>Another reason for the negative relationship between <sup>15</sup>N and WUE<sub>whole-plant</sub> might be the decreased <inline-formula>
<mml:math display="inline" id="im1">
<mml:mtext>N</mml:mtext>
<mml:msubsup>
<mml:mtext>O</mml:mtext>
<mml:mn>3</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
</mml:msubsup>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>transport from root to shoot of plants exposed to stress-condition (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B57">Yousfi et&#xa0;al., 2012</xref>). Due to the fractionation induced by nitrate reductase (NR), <inline-formula>
<mml:math display="inline" id="im2">
<mml:mtext>N</mml:mtext>
<mml:msubsup>
<mml:mtext>O</mml:mtext>
<mml:mn>3</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
</mml:msubsup>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> not assimilated in the roots would be enriched in <sup>15</sup>N and exported to shoots for assimilation, causing an increased &#x3b4;<sup>15</sup>N in shoots relative to roots (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B59">Zhang et&#xa0;al., 2017</xref>). Hence, stress conditions would restrict <inline-formula>
<mml:math display="inline" id="im3">
<mml:mtext>N</mml:mtext>
<mml:msubsup>
<mml:mtext>O</mml:mtext>
<mml:mn>3</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
</mml:msubsup>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> transport from the roots to the shoots, therefore increasing <sup>15</sup>N in root while decreasing it in the shoots compared with the flooding irrigation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B57">Yousfi et&#xa0;al., 2012</xref>). In our study, the clay contents in soil were positively correlated with SPAD (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;1A</bold>
</xref>). Moreover, as shown in <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Supplementary Figure&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>, the soil clay contents were also positively correlated with crack volume under AWD. As suggested aforementioned, higher crack volumes under AWD might imply a strengthened abiotic stress for crop, and consequently reduced <inline-formula>
<mml:math display="inline" id="im4">
<mml:mtext>N</mml:mtext>
<mml:msubsup>
<mml:mtext>O</mml:mtext>
<mml:mn>3</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
</mml:msubsup>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> from root to shoot, and ultimately resulted in the decrease of &#x3b4;<sup>15</sup>N in shoot. Thus, a negative relationship between SPAD and shoot &#x3b4;<sup>15</sup>N was likely to be found (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">
<bold>Table&#xa0;2</bold>
</xref>). In this study, the C and N allocation to roots were significantly increased with the elevated soil clay content (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">
<bold>Table&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>), which further demonstrated that the large crack reduced the export of <inline-formula>
<mml:math display="inline" id="im5">
<mml:mtext>N</mml:mtext>
<mml:msubsup>
<mml:mtext>O</mml:mtext>
<mml:mn>3</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
</mml:msubsup>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula> from roots to shoots. Moreover, the WUE<sub>ET</sub> showed a significant positive correlation with SPAD (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f5">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;5</bold>
</xref>), but a negative correlation with &#x3b4;<sup>15</sup>N (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f6">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;6</bold>
</xref>). Hence, the SPAD values tend to be negatively correlated with the &#x3b4;<sup>15</sup>N (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">
<bold>Table&#xa0;2</bold>
</xref>) and further supported that the increased WUE was probably due to a combination of A<sub>n</sub> and g<sub>s</sub>. However, it should be noted that <sup>15</sup>N in plants can also be influenced by the variations of soil nutrients (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B44">Tang et&#xa0;al., 2017</xref>), which was limited by the occurrence of cracks. In this case, the discrimination process for <sup>15</sup>N during the N uptake tends to be slight, resulting in an increased <sup>15</sup>N in plants while the WUE was decreased by the crack. Therefore, a significant negative relationship between the WUE and &#x3b4;<sup>15</sup>N was found (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f6">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;6</bold>
</xref>), but further trials are needed to examine the actual underlying mechanism.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s5" sec-type="conclusions">
<title>Conclusions</title>
<p>WUE<sub>whole-plant</sub> generally increased with higher soil clay content. Variations in WUE<sub>whole-plant</sub> were not consistent with variations in &#x3b4;<sup>13</sup>C of organs under varied irrigation regimes with high clay contents. The rice &#x3b4;<sup>13</sup>C <sub>leaf</sub> was closely and positively related to the WUE<sub>whole-plant</sub> under I<sub>90</sub> regimes, whereas &#x3b4;<sup>13</sup>C <sub>organs</sub> was not related to WUE<sub>whole-plant</sub> under I<sub>100</sub> or I<sub>70</sub> water regime. Among the organs, significant correlations were observed between <italic>&#x3b4;</italic>
<sup>13</sup>C<sub>grain</sub> and <italic>&#x3b4;</italic>
<sup>13</sup>C<sub>whole-plant</sub> under I<sub>100</sub>, I<sub>90</sub> and I<sub>70</sub> regimes. In addition, based on pooled data, WUE<sub>whole-plant</sub> showed a significant negative correlation with &#x3b4;<sup>15</sup>N<sub>shoot</sub>. Therefore, it is suggested that &#x3b4;<sup>13</sup>C could not be used as a reliable indicator of differences in WUE<sub>whole-plant</sub> associated with changes in irrigation regimes and clay content, whereas &#x3b4;<sup>15</sup>N could be considered as an effective indicator of WUE<sub>whole-plant</sub>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s6" sec-type="data-availability">
<title>Data availability statement</title>
<p>The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Supplementary Material</bold>
</xref>. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s7" sec-type="author-contributions">
<title>Author contributions</title>
<p>ZCW and YAH designed the experiments. ZCW and JJL wrote the article and made critical revisions. CH and MHT helped in analyzing the data. YAH and RJQ supervised the experiments. RJQ, YSW, EA, HS, XPG edited and complemented the manuscript writing and its discussion. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s8" sec-type="funding-information">
<title>Funding</title>
<p>This study was funded by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (B210202118), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (52079041,52179036). EA acknowledges multi-year support from The Startup Foundation for Introducing Talent of Nanjing University of Information Science &amp; Technology (NUIST), Nanjing, China (Grant No. 003080) and the Jiangsu Distinguished Professor program of the People&#x2019;s Government of Jiangsu Province.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s9" sec-type="COI-statement">
<title>Conflict of interest</title>
<p>The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s10" sec-type="disclaimer">
<title>Publisher&#x2019;s note</title>
<p>All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<sec id="s11" sec-type="supplementary-material">
<title>Supplementary material</title>
<p>The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2022.1077152/full#supplementary-material">https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2022.1077152/full#supplementary-material</ext-link>
</p>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="DataSheet_1.pdf" id="SM1" mimetype="application/pdf"/>
</sec>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="B1">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Alhaj Hamoud</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Guo</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rasool</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Effects of irrigation water regime, soil clay content and their combination on growth, yield, and water use efficiency of rice grown in south China</article-title>. <source>Int. J. Agric. Biol. Eng.</source> <volume>11</volume>, <fpage>126</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>136</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.25165/j.ijabe.20181104.3895</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Al-Jeznawi</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sanchez</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Al-Taie</surname> <given-names>A. J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Effect of wetting-drying cycles on desiccation crack pattern and soil behavior</article-title>. <source>Key Eng. Mater.</source> <volume>857</volume>, <fpage>188</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>194</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.857.188</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Araus</surname> <given-names>J. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Brown</surname> <given-names>H. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Febrero</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bort</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Seeret</surname> <given-names>M. D.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1993</year>). <article-title>Ear photosynthesis, carbon isotope discrimination and the contribution of respiratory CO<sub>2</sub> to differences in grain mass in durum wheat</article-title>. <source>Plant Cell Environ.</source> <volume>16</volume>, <fpage>383</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>392</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1365-3040.1993.tb00884.x</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Arndt</surname> <given-names>S. K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wanek</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2002</year>). <article-title>Use of decreasing foliar carbon isotope discrimination during water limitation as a carbon tracer to study whole plant carbon allocation</article-title>. <source>Plant Cell Environ.</source> <volume>25</volume>, <fpage>609</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>616</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1046/j.1365-3040.2002.00838.x</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Awale</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chatterjee</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kandel</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ransom</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>U.S. north-central: Denitrification loss of fertilizer nitrogen during drought year under soil with high clay content</article-title>. <source>Crop Soils</source> <volume>46</volume>, <fpage>24</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>32</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2134/cs2013-46-4-7</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Bandyopadhyay</surname> <given-names>K. K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mohanty</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Painuli</surname> <given-names>D. K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Misra</surname> <given-names>A. K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hati</surname> <given-names>K. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mandal</surname> <given-names>K. G.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2003</year>). <article-title>Influence of tillage practices and nutrient management on crack parameters in a Vertisol of central India</article-title>. <source>Soil Tillage Res</source>. <volume>71</volume>, <fpage>133</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>142</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S0167-1987(03)00043-6</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Blankenagel</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Eggels</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Frey</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Grill</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bauer</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dawid</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Natural alleles of the abscisic acid catabolism gene ZmAbh4 modulate water use efficiency and carbon isotope discrimination in maize</article-title>. <source>Plant Cell</source> <volume>00</volume>, <fpage>0</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>13</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/plcell/koac200</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Bogati</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Walczak</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>The impact of drought stress on soil microbial community, enzyme activities and plants</article-title>. <source>Agronomy</source> <volume>12</volume>, <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>26</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/agronomy12010189</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Bordoloi</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ni</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ng</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ng</surname> <given-names>C. W. W.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Soil desiccation cracking and its characterization in vegetated soil: A perspective review</article-title>. <source>Sci. Total Environ.</source> <volume>729</volume>, <fpage>138760</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138760</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Cao</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jia</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jiang</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Anatomical, physiological and transcriptional responses of two contrasting poplar genotypes to drought and re-watering</article-title>. <source>Physiol. Plant</source> <volume>151</volume>, <fpage>480</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>494</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/ppl.12138</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Carrijo</surname> <given-names>D. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lundy</surname> <given-names>M. E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Linquist</surname> <given-names>B. A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Rice yields and water use under alternate wetting and drying irrigation: A meta-analysis</article-title>. <source>F. Crop Res.</source> <volume>203</volume>, <fpage>173</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>180</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.fcr.2016.12.002</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Cernusak</surname> <given-names>L. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Winter</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Turner</surname> <given-names>B. L.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>Physiological and isotopic (&#x3b4;<sup>13</sup>C and &#x3b4;<sup>18</sup>O) responses of three tropical tree species to water and nutrient availability</article-title>. <source>Plant Cell Environ.</source> <volume>32</volume>, <fpage>1441</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1455</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1365-3040.2009.02010.x</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Cheng</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tang</surname> <given-names>C. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xu</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zeng</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Shi</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Water infiltration in a cracked soil considering effect of drying-wetting cycles</article-title>. <source>J. Hydrol.</source> <volume>593</volume>, <fpage>125640</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125640</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Datta</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ullah</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ferdous</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2017</year>). &#x201c;<article-title>Water management in rice</article-title>,&#x201d; in <source>Rice prod. worldw</source> (<publisher-loc>Springer Cham</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Springer International Publishing</publisher-name>), <fpage>255</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>277</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Reis</surname> <given-names>A. F. B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Almeida</surname> <given-names>R. E. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lago</surname> <given-names>B. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Trivelin</surname> <given-names>P. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Linquist</surname> <given-names>B. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Favarin</surname> <given-names>J. L.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Aerobic rice system improves water productivity, nitrogen recovery and crop per- formance in Brazilian weathered lowland soil</article-title>. <source>Field Crops Res</source> <volume>218</volume>, <fpage>59</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>68</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.fcr.2018.01.002</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>De Souza</surname> <given-names>C. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Maroco</surname> <given-names>J. P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dos Santos</surname> <given-names>T. P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rodrigues</surname> <given-names>M. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lopes</surname> <given-names>C. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pereira</surname> <given-names>J. S.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2005</year>). <article-title>Impact of deficit irrigation on water use efficiency and carbon isotope composition (&#x3b4;<sup>13</sup>C) of field-grown grapevines under Mediterranean climate</article-title>. <source>J. Exp. Bot.</source> <volume>56</volume>, <fpage>2163</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2172</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/jxb/eri216</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Desrochers</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Brye</surname> <given-names>K. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pollock</surname> <given-names>E. D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kristofer Brye</surname> <given-names>C. R.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Long-term agricultural practice effects on carbon and nitrogen isotopes of soil organic matter fractions</article-title>. <source>Agrosyst. Geosci. Environ.</source> <volume>5</volume>, <elocation-id>e20232</elocation-id>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/agg2.20232</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B18">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Domergue</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Abadie</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lalande</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Deswarte</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>B&#xe9;dard</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Derory</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Grain carbon isotope composition is a marker for allocation and harvest index in wheat</article-title>. <source>Plant Cell Environ.</source> <volume>45</volume>, <fpage>2145</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2157</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/pce.14339</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B19">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Dou</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Soriano</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tabien</surname> <given-names>R. E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Soil texture and cultivar effects on rice (<italic>Oryza sativa, l.</italic>) grain yield, yield components and water productivity in three water regimes</article-title>. <source>PloS One</source> <volume>11</volume>, <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>12</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0150549</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B20">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Farquhar</surname> <given-names>G. D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ehleringer</surname> <given-names>J. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hubick</surname> <given-names>K. T.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1989</year>). <article-title>Carbon isotope discrimination and photosynthesis</article-title>. <source>Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol.</source> <volume>40</volume>, <fpage>503</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>537</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1146/annurev.pp.40.060189.002443</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B21">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Farquhar</surname> <given-names>G. D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Richards</surname> <given-names>R. A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1984</year>). <article-title>Isotopic composition of plant carbon correlates with water-use efficiency of wheat genotypes</article-title>. <source>Aust. J. Plant Physiol</source>. <volume>11</volume>, <fpage>539</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>552</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1071/PP9840539</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B22">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Feng</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kong</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kong</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Coordination of root growth with root morphology, physiology and defense functions in response to root pruning in <italic>Platycladus orientalis</italic>
</article-title>. <source>J. Adv. Res.</source> <volume>36</volume>, <fpage>187</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>199</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jare.2021.07.005</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B23">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Fotovat</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Valizadeh</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Toorchi</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2007</year>). <article-title>Association between water-use efficiency components and total chlorophyll content (SPAD) in wheat (<italic>Triticum aestivum</italic> l.) under well-watered and drought stress conditions</article-title>. <source>J. Food Agric. Environ.</source> <volume>5</volume>, <fpage>225</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>227</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B24">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Gao</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sun</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tong</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Evaluation of rice drought stress response using carbon isotope discrimination</article-title>. <source>Plant Physiol. Biochem.</source> <volume>132</volume>, <fpage>80</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>88</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.plaphy.2018.08.030</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B25">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Gouveia</surname> <given-names>C. S. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ganan&#xe7;a</surname> <given-names>J. F. T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Slaski</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lebot</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pinheiro de Carvalho</surname> <given-names>M.&#xc2;.A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2019</year>a). <article-title>Stable isotope natural abundances (&#x3b4;<sup>13</sup>C and &#x3b4;<sup>15</sup>N) and carbon-water relations as drought stress mechanism response of taro (<italic>Colocasia esculenta</italic> l</article-title>. <source>Schott). J. Plant Physiol.</source> <volume>232</volume>, <fpage>100</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>106</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jplph.2018.11.024</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B26">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Gouveia</surname> <given-names>C. S. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ganan&#xe7;a</surname> <given-names>J. F. T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Slaski</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lebot</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pinheiro de Carvalho</surname> <given-names>M.&#xc2;.A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2019</year>b). <article-title>Variation of carbon and isotope natural abundances (&#x3b4;<sup>15</sup>N and &#x3b4;<sup>13</sup>C) of whole-plant sweet potato (<italic>Ipomoea batatas</italic> l.) subjected to prolonged water stress</article-title>. <source>J. Plant Physiol.</source> <volume>243</volume>, <fpage>153052</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jplph.2019.153052</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B27">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Haque</surname> <given-names>A. N. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Uddin</surname> <given-names>M. K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sulaiman</surname> <given-names>M. F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Amin</surname> <given-names>A. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hossain</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Aziz</surname> <given-names>A. A.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Impact of organic amendment with alternate wetting and drying irrigation on rice yield, water use efficiency and physicochemical properties of soil</article-title>. <source>Agronomy</source> <volume>11</volume>, <fpage>1529</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/agronomy11081529</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B28">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Impa</surname> <given-names>S. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Nadaradjan</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Boominathan</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Shashidhar</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bindumadhava</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sheshshayee</surname> <given-names>M. S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2005</year>). <article-title>Carbon isotope discrimination accurately reflects variability in WUE measured at a whole plant level in rice</article-title>. <source>Crop Sci.</source> <volume>45</volume>, <fpage>2517</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2522</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2135/cropsci2005.0119</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B29">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kano-nakata</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tatsumi</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Inukai</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Asanuma</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Effect of various intensities of drought stress on &#x3b4;<sup>13</sup>C variation among plant organs in rice: Comparison of two cultivars</article-title>. <source>Am. J. Plant Sci.</source> <volume>5</volume>, <fpage>1686</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1693</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4236/ajps.2014.511183</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B30">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>K&#xfc;mmerer</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dionysiou</surname> <given-names>D. D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Olsson</surname> <given-names>O.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fatta-Kassinos</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>A path to clean water</article-title>. <source>Science</source> <volume>361</volume>, <fpage>222</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>224</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1126/science.aau2405</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B31">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Root respiration and belowground carbon allocation respond to drought stress in a perennial grass (<italic>Bothriochloa ischaemum</italic>)</article-title>. <source>Catena</source> <volume>188</volume>, <fpage>104449</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.catena.2019.104449</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B32">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Livingston</surname> <given-names>N. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Guy</surname> <given-names>R. D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sun</surname> <given-names>Z. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ethier</surname> <given-names>G. J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1999</year>). <article-title>The effects of nitrogen stress on the stable carbon isotope composition, productivity and water use efficiency of white spruce (<italic>Picea glauca</italic> (Moench) Voss) seedlings</article-title>. <source>Plant Cell Environ.</source> <volume>22</volume>, <fpage>281</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>289</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1046/j.1365-3040.1999.00400.x</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B33">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ma</surname> <given-names>W. T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tcherkez</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>X. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sch&#xe4;ufele</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Schnyder</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Accounting for mesophyll conductance substantially improves <sup>13</sup>C-based estimates of intrinsic water-use efficiency</article-title>. <source>New Phytol.</source> <volume>229</volume>, <fpage>1326</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1338</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/nph.16958</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B34">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ma</surname> <given-names>S. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xu</surname> <given-names>B. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>F. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>W. Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Huang</surname> <given-names>Z. B.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>Effects of root pruning on competitive ability and water use efficiency in winter wheat</article-title>. <source>F. Crop Res.</source> <volume>105</volume>, <fpage>56</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>63</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.fcr.2007.07.005</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B35">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Mininni</surname> <given-names>A. N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tuzio</surname> <given-names>A. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Brugnoli</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dichio</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sofo</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Carbon isotope discrimination and water use efficiency in interspecific <italic>Prunus hybrids</italic> subjected to drought stress</article-title>. <source>Plant Physiol. Biochem.</source> <volume>175</volume>, <fpage>33</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>43</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.plaphy.2022.01.030</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B36">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Oliver</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cochrane</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Magnusson</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Brachi</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Monaco</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Volante</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Effects of water management and cultivar on carbon dynamics, plant productivity and biomass allocation in European rice systems</article-title>. <source>Sci. Total Environ.</source> <volume>685</volume>, <fpage>1139</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1151</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.06.110</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B37">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ren</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Qiu</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Shen</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Stable carbon isotope (&#x3b4;13C) composition in leaf of pinus sylvestris var. mongolica in hulunbuir and its relationship with ecological stoichiometry and environmental factors</article-title>. <source>Preprints</source> <fpage>2021060551</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.20944/preprints202106.0551.v1</pub-id>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B38">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Robinson</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Handley</surname> <given-names>L. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Scrimgeour</surname> <given-names>C. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gordon</surname> <given-names>D. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Forster</surname> <given-names>B. P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ellis</surname> <given-names>R. P.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2000</year>). <article-title>Using stable isotope natural abundances (&#x3b4;<sup>15</sup>N and &#x3b4;<sup>13</sup>C) to integrate the stress responses of wild barley (<italic>Hordeum spontaneum</italic> c. koch.) genotypes</article-title>. <source>J. Exp. Bot.</source> <volume>51</volume>, <fpage>41</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>50</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/jxb/51.342.41</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B39">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Runkle</surname> <given-names>B. R. K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Seyfferth</surname> <given-names>A. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Reid</surname> <given-names>M. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Limmer</surname> <given-names>M. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Moreno-Garc&#xed;a</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Reavis</surname> <given-names>C. W.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Socio-technical changes for sustainable rice production: Rice husk amendment, conservation irrigation, and system changes</article-title>. <source>Front. Agron.</source> <volume>3</volume>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fagro.2021.741557</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B40">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Sanchez-Bragado</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Elazab</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Serret</surname> <given-names>M. D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bort</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Nieto-Taladriz</surname> <given-names>M. T.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Contribution of the ear and the flag leaf to grain filling in durum wheat inferred from the carbon isotope signature: Genotypic and growing conditions effects</article-title>. <source>J. Integr. Plant Biol.</source> <volume>56</volume>, <fpage>444</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>454</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/jipb.12106</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B41">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Scartazza</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lauteri</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Guido</surname> <given-names>M. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Brugnoli</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1998</year>). <article-title>Carbon isotope discrimination in leaf and stem sugars, water-use efficiency and mesophyll conductance during different developmental stages in rice subjected to drought</article-title>. <source>Aust. J. Plant Physiol.</source> <volume>25</volume>, <fpage>489</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>498</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1071/PP98017</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B42">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Silver</surname> <given-names>W. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Neff</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>McGroddy</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Veldkamp</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Keller</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cosme</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2000</year>). <article-title>Effects of soil texture on belowground carbon and nutrient storage in a lowland Amazonian forest ecosystem</article-title>. <source>Ecosystems</source> <volume>3</volume>, <fpage>193</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>209</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s100210000019</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B43">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Song</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Das</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hu</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Alternate wetting and drying irrigation and phosphorus rates affect grain yield and quality and heavy metal accumulation in rice</article-title>. <source>Sci. Total Environ.</source> <volume>752</volume>, <fpage>141862</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141862</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B44">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Tang</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yin</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sun</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>The coupling effects of water deficit and nitrogen supply on photosynthesis, WUE, and stable isotope composition in <italic>Picea asperata.</italic> acta physiol</article-title>. <source>Plant</source> <volume>39</volume>, <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>11</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11738-017-2451-4</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B45">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Topbjerg</surname> <given-names>H. B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kaminski</surname> <given-names>K. P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Markussen</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>K&#xf8;rup</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Nielsen</surname> <given-names>K. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kirk</surname> <given-names>H. G.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Physiological factors affecting intrinsic water use efficiency of potato clones within a dihaploid mapping population under well-watered and drought-stressed conditions</article-title>. <source>Sci. Hortic.</source> <volume>178</volume>, <fpage>61</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>69</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.scienta.2014.08.006</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B46">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ulrich</surname> <given-names>D. E. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sevanto</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Peterson</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ryan</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dunbar</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Effects of soil microbes on functional traits of loblolly pine (Pinus taeda) seedling families from contrasting climates</article-title>. <source>Front. Plant Sci.</source> <volume>10</volume>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpls.2019.01643</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B47">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Umesh</surname> <given-names>M. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mallesha</surname>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chittapur</surname> <given-names>B. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Angadi</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Alternate wetting and drying (AWD) irrigation for rice to enhance water productivity and sustainable production: A review</article-title>. <source>J. Farm Sci.</source> <volume>30</volume>, <fpage>441</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>449</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B48">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Walley</surname> <given-names>F. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Matus</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lafond</surname> <given-names>G. P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>van Kessel</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1999</year>). <article-title>Water-use efficiency and carbon isotopic composition in reduced tillage systems</article-title>. <source>Soil Sci. Soc Am. J.</source> <volume>63</volume>, <fpage>356</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>361</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2136/sssaj1999.03615995006300020013x</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B49">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kang</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jensen</surname> <given-names>C. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Alternate partial root-zone irrigation reduces bundle-sheath cell leakage to CO<sub>2</sub> and enhances photosynthetic capacity in maize leaves</article-title>. <source>J. Exp. Bot.</source> <volume>63</volume>, <fpage>1145</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1153</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/jxb/err331</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B50">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hamoud</surname> <given-names>Y. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Qiu</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Agathokleous</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Natural <sup>15</sup>N abundance as an indicator of nitrogen utilization efficiency in rice under alternate wetting and drying irrigation in soils with high clay contents</article-title>. <source>Sci. Total Environ.</source> <volume>838</volume>, <fpage>156528</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.156528</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B51">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Z. Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>J. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>He</surname> <given-names>J. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Downregulating VAC14 in guard cells causes drought hypersensitivity by inhibiting stomatal closure</article-title>. <source>Front. Plant Sci.</source> <volume>11</volume>, <elocation-id>1</elocation-id>&#x2013;<lpage>10</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpls.2020.602701</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B52">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Z.-Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fan</surname> <given-names>S.-M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mwiya</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xie</surname> <given-names>M.-X.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Effects of straw incorporation on desiccation cracking patterns and horizontal flow in cracked clay loam</article-title>. <source>Soil Tillage Res</source>. <volume>182</volume>, <fpage>130</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>143</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/J.STILL.2018.04.006</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B53">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wen</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Qu</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lu</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Guan</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Combining tree-ring width and carbon isotope data to investigate stem carbon allocation in an evergreen coniferous species</article-title>. <source>Agric. For. Meteorol.</source> <volume>316</volume>, <fpage>108845</fpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.agrformet.2022.108845</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B54">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Xu</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2007</year>). <article-title>Combined effects of elevated CO<sub>2</sub> and soil drought on carbon and nitrogen allocation of the desert shrub <italic>Caragana intermedia</italic>
</article-title>. <source>Plant Soil</source> <volume>301</volume>, <fpage>87</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>97</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11104-007-9424-0</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B55">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Yan</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Han</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sun</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Huang</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Variations in the natural <sup>13</sup>C and <sup>15</sup>N abundance of plants and soils under long-term n addition and precipitation reduction: interpretation of c and n dynamics</article-title>. <source>For. Ecosyst.</source> <volume>7</volume>, <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>13</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s40663-020-00257-w</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B56">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Yousfi</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Serret</surname> <given-names>M. D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Araus</surname> <given-names>J. L.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Comparative response of &#x3b4;<sup>13</sup>C, &#x3b4;<sup>18</sup>O and &#x3b4;<sup>15</sup>N in durum wheat exposed to salinity at the vegetative and reproductive stages</article-title>. <source>Plant Cell Environ.</source> <volume>36</volume>, <fpage>1214</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1227</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/pce.12055</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B57">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Yousfi</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Serret</surname> <given-names>M. D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>M&#xe1;rquez</surname> <given-names>A. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Voltas</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Araus</surname> <given-names>J. L.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Combined use of &#x3b4;<sup>13</sup>C, &#x3b4;<sup>18</sup>O and &#x3b4;<sup>15</sup>N tracks nitrogen metabolism and genotypic adaptation of durum wheat to salinity and water deficit</article-title>. <source>New Phytol.</source> <volume>194</volume>, <fpage>230</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>244</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1469-8137.2011.04036.x</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B58">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gu</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bao</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cao</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hao</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>He</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Nitrogen control of <sup>13</sup>C enrichment in heterotrophic organs relative to leaves in a landscape-building desert plant species</article-title>. <source>Biogeosciences</source> <volume>12</volume>, <fpage>15</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>27</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/bg-12-15-2015</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B59">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>J. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gu</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>J. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lin</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>The interaction between nitrogen and phosphorous is a strong predictor of intra-plant variation in nitrogen isotope composition in a desert species</article-title>. <source>Biogeosciences</source> <volume>14</volume>, <fpage>131</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>144</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/bg-14-131-2017</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B60">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kondo</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Maeda</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ozaki</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2004</year>). <article-title>Water-use efficiency and carbon isotope discrimination in two cultivars of upland rice during different developmental stages under three water regimes</article-title>. <source>Plant Soil</source> <volume>261</volume>, <fpage>61</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>75</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1023/B:PLSO.0000035562.79099.55</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B61">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liang</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Shao</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xie</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Interactive effects of elevated CO<sub>2</sub> and nitrogen fertilization levels on photosynthesized carbon allocation in a temperate spring wheat and soil system</article-title>. <source>Pedosphere</source> <volume>31</volume>, <fpage>191</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>203</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S1002-0160(20)60056-X</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B62">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zhu</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>T. W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xue</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Shi</surname> <given-names>A. L.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>
<sup>15</sup>N tracer-based analysis on nitrogen utilization laws of rice under different irrigation modes</article-title>. <source>Mol. Plant Breed</source> <volume>19</volume>, <fpage>3687</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>3697</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.13271/j.mpb.019.003687</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>