<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.3 20070202//EN" "journalpublishing.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="2.3" xml:lang="EN">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Front. Plant Sci.</journal-id>
<journal-title>Frontiers in Plant Science</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">Front. Plant Sci.</abbrev-journal-title>
<issn pub-type="epub">1664-462X</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Frontiers Media S.A.</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpls.2022.1075038</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Plant Science</subject>
<subj-group>
<subject>Original Research</subject>
</subj-group>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Fungicide sensitivity levels in the Lithuanian <italic>Zymoseptoria tritici</italic> population in 2021</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name>
<surname>Lavrukait&#x117;</surname>
<given-names>Karolina</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn001">
<sup>*</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2057119"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Heick</surname>
<given-names>Thies M.</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/470805"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ramanauskien&#x117;</surname>
<given-names>J&#x16b;rat&#x117;</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/2098261"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Armonien&#x117;</surname>
<given-names>Rita</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/506212"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ronis</surname>
<given-names>Antanas</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
<institution>Lithuanian Research Centre for Agriculture and Forestry, Institute of Agriculture</institution>, <addr-line>Akademija</addr-line>, <country>Lithuania</country>
</aff>
<aff id="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
<institution>Department of Agroecology, Aarhus University</institution>, <addr-line>Slagelse</addr-line>, <country>Denmark</country>
</aff>
<author-notes>
<fn fn-type="edited-by">
<p>Edited by: Pramod Prasad, Indian Institute of Wheat and Barley Research (ICAR), India</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="edited-by">
<p>Reviewed by: Fengping Chen, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, China; Mustafa Zakieh, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Sweden; Lee P&#xf5;llumaa, Estonian Crop Research Institute, Estonia</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="corresp" id="fn001">
<p>*Correspondence: Karolina Lavrukait&#x117;, <email xlink:href="mailto:karolina.lavrukaite@lammc.lt">karolina.lavrukaite@lammc.lt</email>
</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="other" id="fn002">
<p>This article was submitted to Plant Pathogen Interactions, a section of the journal Frontiers in Plant Science</p>
</fn>
</author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>11</day>
<month>01</month>
<year>2023</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="collection">
<year>2022</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>13</volume>
<elocation-id>1075038</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>20</day>
<month>10</month>
<year>2022</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>20</day>
<month>12</month>
<year>2022</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#xa9; 2023 Lavrukait&#x117;, Heick, Ramanauskien&#x117;, Armonien&#x117; and Ronis</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2023</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Lavrukait&#x117;, Heick, Ramanauskien&#x117;, Armonien&#x117; and Ronis</copyright-holder>
<license xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">
<p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.</p>
</license>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<p>
<italic>Zymoseptoria tritici</italic> causes the disease known as septoria leaf blotch in winter wheat and is a major factor in yield loss worldwide. Farmers are inclined to use fungicides to protect their crops; however, the efficacy of these measures is rapidly decreasing due to the natural mechanisms of mutation emergence in pathogen populations. Increasing fungicide resistance is being recorded worldwide, therefore, screening of the current situation in Lithuania is essential to determine the subsequent steps of crop protection strategies. In this study, <italic>in vitro</italic> fungicide sensitivity tests, mutation detection, and field experiments were carried out. The mean EC<sub>50</sub> values for prothioconazole-desthio and mefentrifluconazole were 0.14 and 0.28 mg/l, respectively. Increased frequency of the mutation S524T, linked to DMIs resistance, was observed. Results revealed that the dominant point mutation in the gene <italic>CYP51</italic> was I381V, and the most frequent <italic>CYP51</italic> haplotype was D13 (V136C, I381V, Y461H, S524T). The mutation G143A, linked to QoI resistance, was detected in &#xbe; of the population. Mutations conferring resistance to SDHIs were not detected in single pycnidium isolates. Two-year field experiments likewise showed no decline in field efficacy of SDHI fungicide in Lithuania. Moreover, the baseline sensitivity of the Lithuanian <italic>Z. tritici</italic> population to QiI fungicide fenpicoxamid was established. The findings of this study provide an update on the current status of fungicide resistance in the Lithuanian <italic>Z. tritici</italic> population.</p>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>fungicide resistance</kwd>
<kwd>DMI</kwd>
<kwd>QoI</kwd>
<kwd>QiI</kwd>
<kwd>SDHI</kwd>
<kwd>Septoria tritici blotch</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<counts>
<fig-count count="3"/>
<table-count count="6"/>
<equation-count count="1"/>
<ref-count count="50"/>
<page-count count="10"/>
<word-count count="5023"/>
</counts>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec id="s1" sec-type="intro">
<label>1</label>
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>The estimated wheat yield loss due to pests and diseases ranges from 10.1 to 28.1% globally and reaches almost 25% in Northwest Europe (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">Savary et&#xa0;al., 2019</xref>). Despite the availability of different disease control methods, such as varietal resistance or crop rotation, continuous fungicide application is the most prevalent way of reducing yield loss (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Lynch et&#xa0;al., 2017</xref>). However, farmers are currently facing the challenge of increased fungicide resistance in various plant pathogens (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">J&#xf8;rgensen et&#xa0;al., 2018a</xref>). Over the last decade, numerous studies have reported cases of fungicide resistance in such pathogens, especially <italic>Zymoseptoria tritici</italic> which causes the foliar wheat disease Septoria tritici blotch (STB) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">Rehfus et&#xa0;al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">M&#xe4;e et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">J&#xf8;rgensen et&#xa0;al., 2021a</xref>). STB is distributed worldwide and occurs in areas with moderate temperatures and higher humidity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B45">Torriani et&#xa0;al., 2015</xref>). The rapid development of resistance to various classes of fungicide in <italic>Z. tritici</italic> had been linked to its mixed (asexual and sexual) reproductive system (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">Brunner et&#xa0;al., 2008</xref>).</p>
<p>Fungicides with different modes of action (MoA) are used in STB disease control, for example, 14-demethylation inhibitors (DMI), succinate dehydrogenase inhibitors (SDHI), quinone outside inhibitors (QoI), and multi-site inhibitors, such as folpet and sulfur. The use of single-site fungicides, such as DMIs, SDHIs, and QoIs, increases the risk of resistance development. The multi-site inhibitors, however, affect multiple target sites in the pathogen and, thus, the pathogen is less likely to develop resistance against it (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Hobbelen et&#xa0;al., 2011</xref>). Nevertheless, there are currently no products containing multi-site inhibitors against <italic>Z. tritici</italic> in Lithuania.</p>
<p>QoI fungicides inhibit cellular respiration by binding to the Qo site of the cytochrome b (C<italic>ytb</italic>) complex. The point mutation G143A in the <italic>Cytb</italic> gene had been linked to resistance to QoI fungicides in <italic>Z. tritici</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Grasso et&#xa0;al., 2006</xref>), and is broadly spread across Europe (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Cheval et&#xa0;al., 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Heick et&#xa0;al., 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">M&#xe4;e et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>). In addition, resistance to QoI fungicides had been recorded to spread independently in separate locations (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B44">Torriani et&#xa0;al., 2009</xref>). Therefore, these fungicides are not recommended for use against STB. However, QoIs are still used in Lithuania and other Northeast European countries, mainly targeting rust diseases (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">M&#xe4;e et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>). Following the recent introduction of a new active ingredient fenpicoxamid, another group of fungicides, which act upon a different site of <italic>Cytb</italic>, had been receiving more attention. This active ingredient belongs to the quinone inside inhibitors (QiI) group, which inhibit the mitochondrial respiratory bc1 complex at the Q<sub>i</sub> binding site (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">Owen et&#xa0;al., 2017</xref>).</p>
<p>SDHIs inhibit fungal respiration by disrupting the functioning of the succinate dehydrogenase (SDH) enzyme in the pathogens&#x2019; mitochondria. The mutations conferring resistance to SDHIs occur in SDH enzyme subunits B, C, and D (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">Sierotzki and Scalliet, 2013</xref>). Although studies had shown good efficacy of SDHIs against <italic>Z. tritici</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">Rehfus et&#xa0;al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">Kiiker et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>), over the last two decades, a decline in sensitivity has been observed in Germany (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">Birr et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>). Several mutations had been linked to reduced sensitivity to SDHI fungicides, such as B-T268I, C-T79N, V-N86S, and C-H152R (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">Rehfus et&#xa0;al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">FRAC, 2022</xref>).</p>
<p>DMI fungicides target the sterol 14-&#x3b1;-demethylase of the pathogen, thus preventing the demethylation and production of sterols, which are essential to the maintenance of membrane fluidity and permeability (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">Jefcoate, 1978</xref>). The control of fungal diseases had relied heavily on DMI fungicides since their introduction to the present day (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">Russell, 2005</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">J&#xf8;rgensen and Heick, 2021b</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Klink et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>). This fungicide group possesses not only protective, but also curative activity when used against <italic>Z. tritici</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">J&#xf8;rgensen et&#xa0;al., 2018b</xref>). However, the reduction in <italic>Z. tritici</italic> sensitivity towards DMI fungicides had been recorded by several researchers worldwide (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">Sykes et&#xa0;al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">M&#xe4;e et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">J&#xf8;rgensen et&#xa0;al., 2021a</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Klink et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>). Declined DMI sensitivity in <italic>Z. tritici</italic> had been linked to multiple mechanisms, such as mutations in the target gene (<italic>CYP51</italic>), overexpression of the <italic>CYP51</italic> gene, and enhanced active fungicide efflux (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B50">Ziogas and Malandrakis, 2015</xref>). Moreover, cross-resistance within the group of DMIs adds to the reduction in sensitivity of <italic>Z. tritici</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">Omrane et&#xa0;al., 2017</xref>). As described previously, mutations in the <italic>CYP51</italic> gene are associated with a decrease in sensitivity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">J&#xf8;rgensen et&#xa0;al., 2021a</xref>). These mutations include D134G, V136A/C/G, A379G, I381V, S524T, changes among amino acids 459 to 461, and so forth (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">Cools and Fraaije, 2013</xref>). Various attempts have been made to classify CYP51 haplotypes. One method employed the distinction of haplotypes based on DMI resistance, whereas another evaluated the number of key alterations within a haplotype (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">Leroux et&#xa0;al., 2007</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Huf et&#xa0;al., 2018</xref>).</p>
<p>The prevalence of fungicide resistance in <italic>Z. tritici</italic> challenges farmers and researchers to pursue novel and efficient methods of plant protection. It is essential to conduct routine monitoring in order to select the most appropriate protection strategies and fungicides for a specific region (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">Kiiker et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>). Notably, a pattern of gradually increasing numbers of fungicide resistance cases and mutation frequencies had been observed from East to West Europe (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">J&#xf8;rgensen et&#xa0;al., 2018b</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">Hellin et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>). Thus, the main aim of this work was to determine the current status of resistance to fungicides with different MoA in relation to resistance-linked mutations in the Lithuanian <italic>Z. tritici</italic> population. In order to provide a comprehensive overview and a sound recommendation for farmers, a molecular mutation screening was carried out as well as <italic>in vitro</italic> sensitivity assays and field experiments.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2" sec-type="materials|methods">
<label>2</label>
<title>Materials and methods</title>
<sec id="s2_1">
<label>2.1</label>
<title>Field sampling and isolate collection</title>
<p>Leaves with typical STB lesions were collected in 2021 from commercial winter wheat fields in 23 locations across Lithuania (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>). Samples from these locations were used for <italic>Z. tritici</italic> single pycnidium isolates isolation and as bulk samples for DNA extraction from leaves. A total of 42 <italic>Z. tritici</italic> single pycnidium isolates were isolated (1-2 isolates from each of the 23 locations). Without prior surface sterilization, the 3-4&#xa0;cm leaf pieces with characteristic STB lesions were placed in &#xf8; 9&#xa0;cm Petri dishes, containing filter paper moistened with demineralized water, and kept at room temperature for 24&#xa0;h. Using a sterile needle, cirrhi from a single pycnidium were transferred onto potato dextrose agar (PDA), containing 0.01% streptomycin. The plates containing PDA were incubated at 17&#xb0;C with a 12&#xa0;h white light/12&#xa0;h darkness cycle for 5 days. Individual spore colonies were collected and conserved in 20% glycerol at &#x2212;80&#xb0;C.</p>
<fig id="f1" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;1</label>
<caption>
<p>Map indicating sampling locations of the <italic>Z. tritici</italic> population across Lithuania in 2021.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-13-1075038-g001.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_2">
<label>2.2</label>
<title>Fungicide sensitivity test</title>
<p>
<italic>In vitro</italic> sensitivity test was performed with the fungicides prothioconazole-desthio, mefentrifluconazole, and fenpicoxamid (all Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). Sensitivity tests were conducted as described by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Heick et&#xa0;al. (2020)</xref>, with the concentrations of prothioconazole-desthio set to 0.0165, 0.049, 0.15, 0.44, 1.33, 4.0, 12.0 mg L<sup>-1</sup> and mefentrifluconazole and fenpicoxamid both set to 0.01, 0.02, 0.1, 0.2, 1.0, 2.0, 6.0 mg L<sup>-1</sup>. Sensitivity to fungicides was calculated by non-linear regression (curve-fit) as the concentration of fungicide, which inhibits fungal growth by 50% (EC<sub>50</sub>). The calculations were carried out using GraphPad Prism (GraphPad Software, La Jolla, CA, USA). The isolate IPO 323 (Dutch field strain first isolated in 1984) was included in the sensitivity test as a reference. Resistance factors (R.F.) were calculated using the formula: (EC<sub>50</sub> of the isolate)/(EC<sub>50</sub> of reference isolate IPO 323).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_3">
<label>2.3</label>
<title>DNA extraction from a bulk of leaf samples and <italic>Z. tritici</italic> fungal isolates</title>
<p>From each sample (from 23 locations), 50 leaf cores (5 cores from 10 leaves each) containing STB lesions, were excised using a 2&#xa0;mm biopsy puncher. Each bulk of samples comprised of 50 leaf cores was freeze-dried and homogenized using a Geno/Grinder<sup>&#xae;</sup> 2010 (Spex<sup>&#xae;</sup>SamplePrep, Stanmore, United Kingdom) for 3x45 s at 1,500 rpm in 1.5 mL tubes with a steel ball (&#xf8; 5&#xa0;mm) inside. The bulked samples represent the same field, from which the respective single isolates were collected. The same procedure was applied for the homogenization of fungal isolates. For each of the 42 isolates, 30 mg of fungal material were used. DNA was extracted from the homogenized leaf/fungal material using Sbeadex&#x2122; mini plant kit (LG Genomics, Teddington, UK) according to the manufacturer&#x2019;s protocol on a KingFisher&#x2122; Flex Purification System (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Roskilde, Denmark) and eluted in 50 &#xb5;l elution buffer</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_4">
<label>2.4</label>
<title>Molecular analysis of target site mutations</title>
<p>Forty-two single pycnidium isolates were tested for mutations conferring resistance to QoI, SDHI, and DMI fungicides. The presence of mutation G143A in the <italic>Cytb</italic> gene was determined using Kompetitive Allele Specific PCR (KASP) (LGC Genomics, Teddington, U.K.) genotyping (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Kildea et&#xa0;al., 2014</xref>). The frequencies of mutations C-T79N and C-N86S in SDH-C genes were determined using qPCR assays as described by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">Hellin et&#xa0;al. (2021)</xref>. Moreover, the DNA of bulk leaf samples from each of the 23 locations were also screened to determine the frequencies of mutations C-T79N and C-N86S in SDH-C genes.</p>
<p>The presence of target site mutations in the <italic>CYP51</italic> gene was determined, as described by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Kildea et&#xa0;al. (2019)</xref>. The complete CYP51 gene sequence in the isolates was determined by following the amplification of the gene in each isolate using three overlapping PCRs. All PCR reactions were performed using: 1 unit GoTaqFlexi DNA polymerase (Promega, Madison, USA), 5.0 &#x3bc;l 5&#xd7; GoTaqFlexi PCR Buffer (Promega, Madison, USA), 1.5 &#x3bc;L MgCl<sub>2</sub>, 2.0 &#x3bc;L of dNTPs (2,5 mM each), 2,5 &#xb5;l forward and reverse primers (both 10&#xb5;M) (see <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Table S1</bold>
</xref>), and 1.0 &#x3bc;L DNA and brought to a final reaction volume of 25 &#x3bc;L with Gibco water. The conditions for PCR reactions were as follows: initial denaturation at 94&#xb0;C for 2&#xa0;min, 35 cycles at 94&#xb0;C for 30 s, annealing at 58&#xb0;C for 30 s, and 72&#xb0;C for 1&#xa0;min, with the final extension step at 72&#xb0;C for 10&#xa0;min. PCR products were purified and sequenced by Macrogen Europe B.V. (Amsterdam, Netherlands). Sequence assembly and alignment were performed using the CLC workbench (QIAGEN, Aarhus, Denmark), where <italic>Z. tritici CYP51</italic> protein (GenBank accession no. AY730587) was used as a reference. According to the combination of target site mutations in the <italic>CYP51</italic> gene, the isolates were assigned to <italic>CYP51</italic> haplotypes, as described by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Huf et&#xa0;al. (2018)</xref>. All reactions described above were carried out using an Applied Biosystems ViiaTM 7 Real-time PCR system machine (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Denmark).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_5">
<label>2.5</label>
<title>Overexpression of the <italic>CYP51</italic> and <italic>MFS1</italic> genes</title>
<p>The presence of insertions in the <italic>CYP51</italic> promoter region conferring overexpression of the gene was determined for all isolates as described by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">Cools et&#xa0;al. (2012)</xref>. PCR reactions were carried out in a total volume of 25 &#x3bc;l containing 10.375 &#x3bc;l Gibco water, 5.0 &#x3bc;l 5&#xd7; GoTaqFlexi PCR buffer (Promega, Madison, USA), 1.5 &#x3bc;L MgCl<sub>2</sub>, 2.0 &#x3bc;L of each dNTP, 10 &#x3bc;M forward primer Mg51-proF and reverse primer Mg51-seqR each, 1 unit GoTaqFlexi DNA polymerase (Promega, Madison, USA), and 1.0 &#x3bc;l DNA (approximately 5 ng &#x3bc;l<sup>&#x2013;1</sup>). The conditions for PCR reactions were as follows: initial denaturation at 94&#xb0;C for 2&#xa0;min, 40 cycles at 94&#xb0;C for 30 s, annealing at 60&#xb0;C for 30 s, and 72&#xb0;C for 1&#xa0;min, with the final extension step at 72&#xb0;C for 5&#xa0;min. PCR reactions were carried out in an Applied Biosystems 2720 Thermal Cycler (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Denmark). The DNA amplicons were loaded on a 1% agarose gel containing SYBR<sup>&#xae;</sup> Safe DNA Gel Stain (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Denmark) and run at 100&#xa0;V for 45&#xa0;min.</p>
<p>The presence of enhanced efflux, also referred to as multi-drug resistance (MDR), in the isolates was determined using PCR with specific primers MFS_2F and MFS_4R as described by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">Omrane et&#xa0;al. (2015)</xref>. PCR reactions were carried out in an Applied Biosystems 2720 Thermal Cycler (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Denmark). The DNA amplicons were loaded on a 1% agarose gel containing SYBR<sup>&#xae;</sup> Safe DNA Gel Stain (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Denmark) and run at 100&#xa0;V for 45&#xa0;min.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_6">
<label>2.6</label>
<title>Field trials</title>
<p>Two field experiments were conducted on winter wheat in Lithuania to test the efficacy of fungicides with different MoA against STB in 2020 and 2021 (GPS coordinates: 55.3820, 23.8556). The experiments were set up with four replicates and complete randomization within each replicate. The trials included five different solo fungicides at full dose and an untreated control; the details of the fungicide doses are shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">
<bold>Table&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>. Fungicide application was performed at growth stage 39 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B49">Zadoks et&#xa0;al., 1974</xref>) using a bicycle plot sprayer at low pressure (3&#xa0;bar), flat fan nozzles, and water volume of 300&#xa0;l ha<sup>-1</sup>. The winter wheat cultivar &#x2018;KWS Emil&#x2019; was selected for both years. Local wheat-growing practices were applied for other plant protection measures and fertilization.</p>
<table-wrap id="T1" position="float">
<label>Table&#xa0;1</label>
<caption>
<p>Fungicide treatments (active ingredients g ha<sup>-1</sup>) applied in the field trials at GS 39.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" align="left">Treatment</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">MoA</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">g a.i. ha<sup>-1</sup>
</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Untreated</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Azoxystrobin</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">QoI</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">250</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Pyraclostrobin</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">QoI</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">250</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Fluxapyroxad</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">SDHI</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">125</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Benzovindiflupyr</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">SDHI</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">75</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Prothioconazole</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">DMI</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">200</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
<p>Disease assessments on three upper leaves were carried out at growth stages 39, 59, and 77according to EPPO guideline 1/26 (4) at. The severity of the disease per season was expressed by the area under the disease progress curve (AUDPC) value (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B42">Simko and Piepho, 2012</xref>):</p>
<disp-formula>
<mml:math display="block" id="M1">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>A</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>U</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>D</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>P</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>C</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
<mml:mstyle displaystyle="true">
<mml:munderover>
<mml:mo>&#x2211;</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>n</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:munderover>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mfrac>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>y</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
<mml:mtext>&#xa0;</mml:mtext>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>y</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>2</mml:mn>
</mml:mfrac>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>x</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>(</mml:mo>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
<mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
<mml:mn>1</mml:mn>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:msub>
<mml:mo>&#x2013;</mml:mo>
<mml:mtext>&#xa0;</mml:mtext>
<mml:msub>
<mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>i</mml:mi>
</mml:msub>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>)</mml:mo>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:mstyle>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</disp-formula>
<p>where <italic>n</italic> is the total number of assessments; y<italic>
<sub>i</sub>
</italic> &#x2013; disease severity (%) at the <italic>i</italic>th assessment; t<italic>
<sub>i</sub>
</italic> &#x2013; days at the <italic>i</italic>th assessment.</p>
<p>The trials were harvested with a small plot harvester Haldrup C-85 (Germany). Grain yield was adjusted to 15% moisture content and converted to t/ha.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_7">
<label>2.7</label>
<title>Statistical analysis</title>
<p>Statistical analysis of the experimental data was performed by applying the analysis of variance (ANOVA) using the PROC GLM procedure of software <italic>SAS</italic>, version 9.4 (SAS Institute, USA). Duncan&#x2019;s multiple range test was selected to determine the differences between treatments (<italic>p</italic>&lt; 0.05) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">Raudonius, 2017</xref>).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s3" sec-type="results">
<label>3</label>
<title>Results</title>
<sec id="s3_1">
<label>3.1</label>
<title>Fungicide sensitivity screening</title>
<p>Forty isolates were tested for sensitivity to prothioconazole-desthio, mefentrifluconazole, and fenpicoxamid, as 2 of the initial isolates (out of 42) were contaminated by other microorganisms. The mean EC<sub>50</sub> value for prothioconazole-desthio was 0.14 mg/l, with single isolates ranging from 0.01 to 1.37 mg/l (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">
<bold>Table&#xa0;2</bold>
</xref>). The average EC<sub>50</sub> value for mefentrifluconazole was 0.28 mg/l, with single isolates ranging from 0.01 to 1.7 mg/l. The EC<sub>50</sub> values of reference isolate IPO 323 was 0.01 mg/l both for prothioconazole-desthio and mefentrifluconazole. The average resistance factors for prothioconazole-desthio and mefentrifluconazole were 14 and 28, respectively. The average EC<sub>50</sub> value for fenpicoxamid was 0.24 mg/l, with single isolate values ranging from 0.06 to 0.95 mg/l. The EC<sub>50</sub> value of the reference isolate IPO 323 for fenpicoxamid was likewise 0.24 mg/l, therefore, the mean resistance factor for it was 1, ranging from 0 to 4.</p>
<table-wrap id="T2" position="float">
<label>Table&#xa0;2</label>
<caption>
<p>Mean EC<sub>50</sub> (mg/l) values and resistance factors (RF) for prothioconazole-desthio, mefentrifluconazole and fenpicoxamid in <italic>Z. tritici</italic> isolates from Lithuania.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" align="left"/>
<th valign="top" align="center">Reference IPO323</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Average</th>
<th valign="middle" align="left">RF</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Prothioconazole-desthio</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.01</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.14 (0.01-1.37)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">14</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Mefentrifluconazole</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.01</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.28 (0.01-1.7)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">28</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Fenpicoxamid</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.24</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.24 (0.06-0.95)</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_2">
<label>3.2</label>
<title>QoI and SDHI resistance</title>
<p>All 42 <italic>Z. tritici</italic> single pycnidium isolates were tested to determine the presence of <italic>Cytb</italic> gene mutation G143A which had been linked to high resistance levels to QoI fungicides. The mutation was found in 76.2% (32 out of 42) isolates (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T3">
<bold>Table&#xa0;3</bold>
</xref>
<bold>).</bold> The mutations C-T79N and C-N86S, related to resistance to SDHI fungicides, were not detected in the single pycnidium isolates.</p>
<table-wrap id="T3" position="float">
<label>Table&#xa0;3</label>
<caption>
<p>Frequency of mutations conferring resistance to QoI and SDHI fungicides in Lithuania in 2021.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="bottom" align="left">Mutation</th>
<th valign="bottom" align="center">Wild type</th>
<th valign="bottom" align="center">Mutated</th>
<th valign="bottom" align="center">Frequency (%)</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">G143A</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">10</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">32</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">76.2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">N86S</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">42</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="bottom" align="left">T79N</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">42</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">0</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">0</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</table-wrap>
<p>A total of 23 DNA samples from a bulk of leaves, originating from 23 locations throughout Lithuania, were tested to determine the frequency of the alterations C-T79N and C-N86S in SDH-C. The alteration C-T79N was not detected in these samples. The alteration C-N86S, however, was found in 3 samples at low frequencies (5.83, 8.28, and 17%).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_3">
<label>3.3</label>
<title>DMI resistance-conferring mechanisms</title>
<p>The sequencing of <italic>Z. tritici</italic> isolates from Lithuania revealed at least three mutations per isolate. A total of 13 target site alterations were detected amongst 39 isolates (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;2</bold>
</xref>). The most frequent mutation, I381V, was found in all the isolates. Two different alterations were found at amino acid positions 459&#x2013;461; either by deletion of Y459 and G460 or by the substitution Y461H. The latter was detected in 59% of the isolates, while the remaining 41% of the isolates contained the deletion of Y459 and G460. Another frequently detected mutation was L50S; this alteration was found in nearly 70% of isolates. The alteration S524T, related to decreased sensitivity to many azoles, was found in 41% of the isolates.</p>
<fig id="f2" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;2</label>
<caption>
<p>Frequency of thirteen most frequent mutations in CYP 51 gene in Lithuania 2021.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-13-1075038-g002.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>Across all 39 isolates of <italic>Z. tritici</italic>, 9 different <italic>CYP51</italic> haplotypes were identified (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T4">
<bold>Table&#xa0;4</bold>
</xref>). Haplotype D13 showed the highest frequency, representing 30.8% of isolates. This haplotype consists of four mutations in <italic>CYP51</italic>: V136C, I381V, Y461H, and S524T. The second most frequent haplotype was F2 (L50S, S188N, I381V, Del459/460, and N513K), representing 28.2% of the isolates. Haplotype C8 (L50S, I381V, and Y461H) represented 10.3% of the isolates. These 3 haplotypes comprised almost 70%of the <italic>Z. tritici</italic> population of isolates from Lithuania. The haplotypes of the two isolates were not identified. One of those consisted of alterations L50S, S188N, A379G, I381V, A410T, Del459/460 in <italic>CYP51</italic>. Another one contained alterations L50S, V136G, S188N, I381V, Del459/460, N513K.</p>
<table-wrap id="T4" position="float">
<label>Table&#xa0;4</label>
<caption>
<p>The frequency of <italic>CYP51</italic> haplotypes of <italic>Z. tritici</italic> found in the isolates from Lithuania and positions of target site mutations they contain.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" rowspan="2" align="left">Haplotypes</th>
<th valign="top" colspan="12" align="center">Position of target site mutation</th>
<th valign="top" rowspan="2" align="center">Frequency (%)</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="top" align="center">L50</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">D134</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">V136</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">S188</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">A379</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">I381</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">A410</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">Y459</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">G460</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">Y461</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">N513</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">S524</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">
<bold>C8</bold>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">S</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">V</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">H</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">
<bold>10.3</bold>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">
<bold>D13</bold>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">C</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">V</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">H</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">T</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">
<bold>30.8</bold>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">
<bold>E4</bold>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">S</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">G</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">A</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">V</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">H</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">
<bold>7.7</bold>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">
<bold>E7</bold>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">S</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">C</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">V</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">H</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">T</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">
<bold>2.6</bold>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">
<bold>F2</bold>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">S</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">N</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">V</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">del</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">del</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">K</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">
<bold>28.2</bold>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">
<bold>F4</bold>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">S</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">C</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">N</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">V</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">H</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">T</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">
<bold>5.1</bold>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">
<bold>F8</bold>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">S</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">G</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">A</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">V</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">H</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">T</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">
<bold>2.6</bold>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">
<bold>G1</bold>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">S</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">N</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">G</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">V</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">del</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">del</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">K</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">
<bold>2.6</bold>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">
<bold>H5</bold>
</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">S</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">N</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">G</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">V</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">T</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">del</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">del</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">K</td>
<td valign="top" align="left">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">
<bold>5.1</bold>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn>
<p>&#x2013; means no mutation at this position.</p>
</fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<p>Forty-two isolates were screened for the presence of inserts in the <italic>CYP51</italic> promoter region. Two isolates from the Lithuanian population contained the wild-type promoter without inserts (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;3</bold>
</xref>). The insert of 120 bp was detected in 35.7% of the isolates. In the majority (59.5%) of the isolates, the 866 bp insert was detected.</p>
<fig id="f3" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;3</label>
<caption>
<p>Frequency of inserts in the promoter region of the CYP51 gene (%) in <italic>Z. tritici</italic> isolates from Lithuania in 2021.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-13-1075038-g003.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>The assay to determine possible MDR revealed that one of the isolates (21-ZT-LT-14-01) had a promotor insert in the <italic>MFS1</italic> gene. It was determined to be a novel type of insert.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_4">
<label>3.4</label>
<title>Field experiment</title>
<p>The field efficacy of fungicides with different MoA was determined <italic>via</italic> the area under disease progress curve (AUDPC) values. Field experiments were carried out in 2020 and 2021; average AUDPC values varied from 43.65 to 184.53 (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T5">
<bold>Table&#xa0;5</bold>
</xref>). The results from field trials showed moderate control of STB in field trials, however, treatments showed significant field efficacy. Fluxapyroxad showed the highest efficacy in both years by decreasing the AUDPC by 76.2 and 63.1% in 2020 and 2021, respectively. The field efficacy of azoxystrobin was the lowest, yielding 42.0 and 38.7% in 2020 and 2021, respectively.</p>
<table-wrap id="T5" position="float">
<label>Table&#xa0;5</label>
<caption>
<p>The area under disease progress curve (AUDPC) of winter wheat infected by <italic>Z. tritici</italic> in 2020 and 2021.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" rowspan="2" align="left">Treatment</th>
<th valign="middle" rowspan="2" align="center">g ha<sup>-1</sup>
</th>
<th valign="middle" colspan="2" align="center">2020</th>
<th valign="top" colspan="2" align="center">2021</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" align="center">AUDPC</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">% Control</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">AUDPC</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">% Control</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Untreated</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">184.53 c</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">133.26 d</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Azoxystrobin</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">250</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">106.95 b</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">42.0</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">81.75 c</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">38.7</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Pyraclostrobin</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">250</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">88.32 b</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">52.1</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">60.45 ab</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">54.6</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Fluxapyroxad</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">125</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">43.65 a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">76.2</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">49.19 a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">63.1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Benzovindiflupyr</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">75</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">46.74 a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">74.7</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">65.50 abc</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">50.9</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Prothioconazole</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">200</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">99.91 b</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">45.9</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">76.81 bc</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">42.4</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn>
<p>Different letters represent significant differences (p&lt;0.05).</p>
</fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<p>All treatments resulted in increased grain yield, improving it within the ranges of 0.1-5.1% and 2.2-14.2% in 2020 and 2021, respectively, in comparison with untreated control (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T6">
<bold>Table&#xa0;6</bold>
</xref>). In both years, the highest significant grain yield increase was obtained from treatment with fluxapyroxad; the increase reflected the level of disease control. The lowest yield increase was determined by applying azoxystrobin and pyraclostrobin in 2020 and 2021, respectively.</p>
<table-wrap id="T6" position="float">
<label>Table&#xa0;6</label>
<caption>
<p>Effect of fungicides on the grain yield of winter wheat in 2020 and 2021.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" align="left">Treatment</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">g ha<sup>-1</sup>
</th>
<th valign="middle" colspan="2" align="center">2020</th>
<th valign="top" colspan="2" align="center">2021</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="middle" align="left"/>
<th valign="top" align="center"/>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Yield t ha<sup>-1</sup>
</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Yield increase, %</th>
<th valign="middle" align="center">Yield t ha<sup>-1</sup>
</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">Yield increase, %</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Untreated</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">8.89 a</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">6.93 a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">&#x2013;</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Azoxystrobin</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">250</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">8.90 a</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">0.1</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">7.45 cd</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">7.5</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Pyraclostrobin</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">250</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">9.05 abc</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">1.8</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">7.08 ab</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">2.2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Fluxapyroxad</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">125</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">9.34 c</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">5.1</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">7.92 f</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">14.2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Benzovindiflupyr</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">75</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">9.17 abc</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">3.2</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">7.31 bc</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">5.4</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">Prothioconazole</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">200</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">9.15 abc</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">2.9</td>
<td valign="middle" align="center">7.74 def</td>
<td valign="bottom" align="center">11.6</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn>
<p>Different letters represent significant difference (P&lt;0.05).</p>
</fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s4" sec-type="discussion">
<label>4</label>
<title>Discussion</title>
<p>The first research project, aiming to evaluate the sensitivity levels of <italic>Z. tritici</italic> to DMI fungicides in Lithuania was by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">Ronis et&#xa0;al., 2014</xref>. Subsequently, studies performed by researchers from Denmark (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B48">Wieczorek et&#xa0;al., 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Heick et&#xa0;al., 2017</xref>) and Estonia (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">M&#xe4;e et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>) included few samples from Lithuania in their studies. The latter screened not only the sensitivity to DMI fungicides, but also QoI and SDHI fungicides and mechanisms related to resistance occurrence (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">M&#xe4;e et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>). Therefore, the present study was carried out to identify any possible changes and determine the current status of fungicide resistance in the Lithuanian <italic>Z. tritici</italic> population.</p>
<p>DMI fungicides have been used for almost 40 years in Lithuania, where they are essential fungicides for STB control, as in the rest of Europe. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">Ronis et&#xa0;al. (2014)</xref> reported a decline in sensitivity of the Lithuanian <italic>Z. tritici</italic> population to DMI fungicides epoxiconazole and cyproconazole between 2009 and 2011.&#xa0;A fungicide sensitivity test was carried out with two DMI fungicides: prothioconazole-desthio and mefentrifluconazole. Moreover, the frequencies of <italic>CYP51</italic> mutations, which are related to sensitivity decrease, were investigated. Furthermore, in this study, the isolates were classified by the number of alterations in the <italic>CYP51</italic> gene.</p>
<p>Prothioconazole has been used since 2006 in mixtures with other active ingredients. However, as a solo product it was registered only in 2018 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B46">VATZUM, 2018</xref>). Although the EC<sub>50</sub> values in this study for prothioconazole-desthio varied, the mean value remained similar to the one reported in 2020 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">M&#xe4;e et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>); therefore, no visible shift was observed. In the field experiment, prothioconazole had a similar control of STB as was showcased in 2014 by Ronis et&#xa0;al., thus reflecting an observed stabilization of DMIs in 2019 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Heick et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>).</p>
<p>One isolate stood out due to its high EC<sub>50</sub> value for prothioconazole-desthio (1.37 mg/l). This isolate contained a combination of mutations D134G, V136A, and S524T. This combination was confirmed to be related to reduced sensitivity for prothioconazole (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">Cools and Fraaije, 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Kildea et&#xa0;al., 2019</xref>). The isolates from this study, possessing a combination of D134G and V136A, had low EC<sub>50</sub> values for prothioconazole-desthio, as opposed to the findings of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Huf et&#xa0;al. (2018)</xref>. Overall, this study showed an increase in the frequency of mutation S524T, which significantly influences DMI sensitivity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">Cools et&#xa0;al., 2011</xref>). As seen over the past decade, there is a tendency of increasing mutation S524T and V136C frequencies in the Lithuanian Z. tritici population (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B48">Wieczorek et&#xa0;al., 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Heick et&#xa0;al., 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">M&#xe4;e et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>). The mutation I381V was found in all investigated isolates, thus continuing to be the dominant mutation in Lithuania (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Heick et&#xa0;al., 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">M&#xe4;e et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>).</p>
<p>Mefentrifluconazole was introduced in the European and Lithuanian markets in 2020: It is a new DMI group fungicide with superior efficacy against <italic>Z. tritici</italic> amongst other fungicides in the group (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Bryson et&#xa0;al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">J&#xf8;rgensen et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>). The sensitivity test with mefentrifluconazole revealed high diversity in EC<sub>50</sub> values. The reason for this variation could be linked to the previous findings showing the cross-resistance pattern. Other studies revealed a strong correlation between the sensitivity of mefentrifluconazole and tebuconazole (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">M&#xe4;e et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>), as well as trifluconazole and difenoconazole (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">Cools and Fraaije, 2013</xref>). Although it is unknown if mefentrifluconazole selects for specific alterations, the isolates carrying the mutation A410T (7.7%) had higher EC<sub>50</sub> values for mefentrifluconazole.</p>
<p>The overexpression of the target gene, which is likewise associated with reduced sensitivity towards fungicides, was screened in this study. The 866 bp insertion at higher frequencies was already found in the Lithuanian <italic>Z. tritici</italic> population back in 2017 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Heick et&#xa0;al., 2017</xref>). However, the 120 bp insertions were discovered for the first time by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">M&#xe4;e et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>. Our findings showed an increase in the frequency of the latter type of insertion. The 120 bp insertion was primarily found in isolates with <italic>CYP51</italic> haplotype F2 (L50S, S188N, I381V, Del459/460, N513K), in accordance with studies carried out in other countries (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">Cools et&#xa0;al., 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Huf et&#xa0;al., 2018</xref>).</p>
<p>Enhanced active fungicide efflux, also known as multi-drug resistance (MDR), has also been reported as a resistance mechanism. MDR is explained as the overexpression of the &#x201c;major facilitator gene&#x201d; (<italic>MFS1</italic>). So far, 3 types of inserts (type I, II, and III) in the promoter region were identified concerning <italic>MFS1</italic> overexpression (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">Leroux and Walker, 2011</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">Omrane et&#xa0;al., 2017</xref>). In the present study, none of these were detected; however, we found one insertion that had not been reported previously. Initial studies do not implicate that this novel insert is associated with enhanced efflux activity (data not shown).</p>
<p>As mentioned previously, alteration of <italic>Cytb</italic> at location G143 is responsible for the resistance to QoI group fungicides. Our results showed that the frequency of this mutation in the Lithuanian <italic>Z. tritici</italic> population increased slightly in comparison to the results obtained in 2020 by A. M&#xe4;e et&#xa0;al. Moreover, it quadrupled over the past eight years (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Heick et&#xa0;al., 2017</xref>), thus, explaining the relatively low efficacy of azoxystrobin and pyraclostrobin in the field trial. Fenpicoxamid is a relatively new active ingredient in fungicides, demonstrating a novel mode of action (QiI), and is currently not registered in Lithuania. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Fouch&#xe9; et&#xa0;al. (2021)</xref> linked the alteration G37V in <italic>Cytb</italic> to reduced sensitivity in <italic>Z. tritici</italic> strains, therefore, future monitoring for fenpicoxamid is essential. In this study, the sensitivity test with fenpicoxamid was performed; these results can serve as baseline sensitivity data in future investigations.</p>
<p>Although the SDH subunit C has numerous mutations, the alterations T79N and N86S are the most frequent and had been linked to reduced sensitivity to SDHI fungicides (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">Rehfus et&#xa0;al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">Hellin et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>). In the present study, these mutations were not detected in <italic>Z. tritici</italic> single isolates. Similarly, none of these mutations were identified in Estonia, Latvia, or Poland in 2019 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">Hellin et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>). The field experiment further confirms these findings, as fluxapyroxad had the highest efficacy against the disease. No single isolates were found to harbour C-T79N or C-N86S, which had been associated with reduced field efficacy when present in high frequencies. However, when assessing the frequency of these mutations in bulk samples, the mutation N86S was found in 3 samples, which suggests that these mutations are starting to occur in our region.</p>
<p>The more frequent development of resistance to fungicides is induced by the chosen control measures (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Heick et&#xa0;al., 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">J&#xf8;rgensen et&#xa0;al., 2021a</xref>). Several measures had already been investigated to delay the emergence and spread of fungicide resistance in pathogen populations, and to ensure effective disease control. Researchers suggest strategies that include choosing resistant varieties, using fungicide mixtures and dose rate changing (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Hobbelen et&#xa0;al., 2014</xref>), minimizing the number of fungicide applications by selecting appropriate application timings (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B47">Verikaite et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>), and other integrated pest management (IPM) measures (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">Ponomarenko et&#xa0;al., 2011</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s5" sec-type="conclusions">
<label>5</label>
<title>Conclusions</title>
<p>The current fungicide resistance status in <italic>Z. tritici</italic> in Lithuania follows the tendencies observed in other European countries. While the field efficacy of QoI group fungicides has been significantly comprised by the advent and spread of the target site mutation G143A, a more gradually shifting field efficacy of DMI fungicides is observed. This has been associated with the complexity of <italic>CYP51</italic> alteration combinations and a more distinct cross-resistance pattern. Presently, no reduction in field efficacy of SDHI fungicides in Lithuania is reported, however, the first occurrences of mutations are being recorded. Resistance to the newly released DMI mefentrifluconazole and the QiI fenpicoxamid fungicides was observed at sufficiently low levels. Nevertheless, to prolong the longevity of both old and new active ingredients, the integration of anti-resistance measures embedded in an IPM approach should be imperative.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s6" sec-type="data-availability">
<title>Data availability statement</title>
<p>The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s7" sec-type="author-contributions">
<title>Author contributions</title>
<p>KL: investigation, writing&#x2013;original draft, writing&#x2013;review and editing, visualization. TH: conceptualization, methodology, writing&#x2013;review and editing. JR: supervision, writing&#x2013;review and editing. RA: writing&#x2013;review and editing. AR: writing&#x2013;review and editing. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<sec id="s8" sec-type="COI-statement">
<title>Conflict of interest</title>
<p>The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s9" sec-type="disclaimer">
<title>Publisher&#x2019;s note</title>
<p>All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s10" sec-type="supplementary-material">
<title>Supplementary material</title>
<p>The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2022.1075038/full#supplementary-material">https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2022.1075038/full#supplementary-material</ext-link></p>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Table_1.docx" id="SM1" mimetype="application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document"/>
</sec>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="B1">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Birr</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hasler</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Verreet</surname> <given-names>J.-A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Klink</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Temporal changes in sensitivity of <italic>Zymoseptoria tritici</italic> field populations to different fungicidal modes of action</article-title>. <source>Agriculture</source> <volume>11</volume>, <elocation-id>269</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/agriculture11030269</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Brunner</surname> <given-names>P. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Stefanato</surname> <given-names>F. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>McDonald</surname> <given-names>B. A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>Evolution of the CYP51 gene in <italic>Mycosphaerella graminicola</italic>: evidence for intragenic recombination and selective replacement</article-title>. <source>Mol. Plant Pathol.</source> <volume>9</volume>, <fpage>305</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>316</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1364-3703.2007.00464.x</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<citation citation-type="confproc">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Bryson</surname> <given-names>R. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Stammler</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hu</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Strobel</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Meyer</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Moronval</surname> <given-names>M. H.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2018</year>) <conf-name>Mefentrifluconazole - the first Isopropanol-azole fungicide for the control of Zymospetoria tritici including field isolates with known complex CYP51 haplotypes. In 12e Conference Int. sur les Mal. des Plantes, 11 12 decembre 2018, Tours (France). Vegephyl</conf-name>, <fpage>222</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>231</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Cheval</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Siah</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bomble</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Popper</surname> <given-names>A. D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Reignault</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Halama</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Evolution of QoI resistance of the wheat pathogen zymoseptoria tritici in northern France</article-title>. <source>Crop Prot.</source> <volume>92</volume>, <fpage>131</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>133</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.cropro.2016.10.017</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Cools</surname> <given-names>H. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bayon</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Atkins</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lucas</surname> <given-names>J. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fraaije</surname> <given-names>B. A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Overexpression of the sterol 14&#x3b1;-demethylase gene (MgCYP51) in <italic>Mycosphaerella graminicola</italic> isolates confers a novel azole fungicide sensitivity phenotype</article-title>. <source>Pest Manage. Sci.</source> <volume>68</volume>, <fpage>1034</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1040</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/ps.3263</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Cools</surname> <given-names>H. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fraaije</surname> <given-names>B. A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Update on mechanisms of azole resistance in <italic>Mycosphaerella graminicola</italic> and implications for future control</article-title>. <source>Pest Manage. Sci.</source> <volume>69</volume> (<issue>2</issue>), <fpage>150</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>155</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/ps.3348</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Cools</surname> <given-names>H. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mullins</surname> <given-names>J. G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fraaije</surname> <given-names>B. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Parker</surname> <given-names>J. E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kelly</surname> <given-names>D. E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lucas</surname> <given-names>J. A.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Impact of recently emerged sterol 14a-demethylase (CYP51) variants of <italic>Mycosphaerella graminicola</italic> on azole fungicide sensitivity</article-title>. <source>Appl. Environ. Microbiol.</source> <volume>77</volume>, <fpage>3830</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>3837</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/aem.00027-11</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<citation citation-type="web">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<collab>FRAC (Working Group of the Fungicide Resistance Action Committee) (2022) Minutes of the Succinate Dehydrogenase Inhibitor (SDHI) meeting</collab>
</person-group>. Available at: <uri xlink:href="https://www.frac.info/docs/default-source/working-groups/sdhi-fungicides/sdhi-meeting-minutes/minutesof-the-2022-sdhi-meeting-with-recommendations-for-2022-from-18th-jan-2022.pdf?sfvrsn=a0034e9a_2">https://www.frac.info/docs/default-source/working-groups/sdhi-fungicides/sdhi-meeting-minutes/minutesof-the-2022-sdhi-meeting-with-recommendations-for-2022-from-18th-jan-2022.pdf?sfvrsn=a0034e9a_2</uri> (Accessed <access-date>01 August 2022</access-date>).</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Fouch&#xe9;</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Michel</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lal&#xe8;ve</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Young</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Meunier</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Directed evolution predicts cytochrome b G37V target site modification as probable adaptive mechanism towards the QiI fungicide fenpicoxamid in <italic>Zymoseptoria tritici</italic>
</article-title>. <source>Environ. Microbiol.</source> <volume>24</volume>, <fpage>1117</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1132</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/1462-2920.15760</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Grasso</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Palermo</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sierotzki</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Garibaldi</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gisi</surname> <given-names>U.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2006</year>). <article-title>Cytochrome b gene structure and consequences for resistance to qo inhibitor fungicides in plant pathogens</article-title>. <source>Pest Manage. Science.</source> <volume>62</volume>, <fpage>(6) 465</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>472</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/ps.1236</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Heick</surname> <given-names>T. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Justesen</surname> <given-names>A. F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>J&#xf8;rgensen</surname> <given-names>L. N.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Resistance of wheat pathogen <italic>Zymoseptoria tritici</italic> to DMI and QoI fungicides in the Nordic-Baltic region - a status</article-title>. <source>Eur. J. Plant Pathology.</source> <volume>149</volume>, <fpage>669</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>682</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10658-017-1216-7</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Heick</surname> <given-names>T. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Matzen</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>J&#xf8;rgensen</surname> <given-names>N. L.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Reduced field efficacy and sensitivity of demethylation inhibitors in the Danish and Swedish <italic>Zymoseptoria tritici</italic> populations</article-title>. <source>Eur. J. Plant Pathol.</source> <volume>157</volume> <page-range>625&#x2013;636</page-range>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10658-020-02029-2</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Hellin</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Duvivier</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Heick</surname> <given-names>T. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fraaije</surname> <given-names>B. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bataille</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Clinckemaillie</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Spatio-temporal distribution of DMI and SDHI fungicide resistance of <italic>Zymoseptoria tritici</italic> throughout Europe based on frequencies of key target-site alterations</article-title>. <source>Pest Manage. Science.</source> <volume>77</volume> (<issue>12</issue>), <fpage>5576</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>5588</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/ps.6601</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Hobbelen</surname> <given-names>P. H. F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Paveley</surname> <given-names>N. D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>van den Bosch</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Delaying selection for fungicide insensitivity by mixing fungicides at a low and high risk of resistance development: A modeling analysis</article-title>. <source>Phytopathology</source> <volume>101</volume>, <fpage>1224</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1233</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1094/PHYTO-10-10-0290</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Hobbelen</surname> <given-names>P. H. F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Paveley</surname> <given-names>N. D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>van den Bosch</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>The emergence of resistance to fungicides</article-title>. <source>PloS One</source> <volume>9</volume>, <elocation-id>e91910</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0091910</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Huf</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rehfus</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lorenz</surname> <given-names>K. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bryson</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Voegele</surname> <given-names>R. T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Stammler</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Proposal for a new nomenclature for CYP51haplotypes in <italic>Zymoseptoria tritici</italic> and analysis of their distribution in Europe</article-title>. <source>Plant Pathol.</source> <volume>67</volume>, <fpage>1706</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1712</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/ppa.12891</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>J&#xf8;rgensen</surname> <given-names>L. N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Heick</surname> <given-names>T. M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>b). <article-title>Azole use in agriculture, horticulture, and wood preservation &#x2013; is it indispensable</article-title>? <source>Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol.</source> <volume>11</volume>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fcimb.2021.730297</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B18">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>J&#xf8;rgensen</surname> <given-names>L. N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Matzen</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hansen</surname> <given-names>J. G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Semaskiene</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Korbas</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Danielewicz</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2018</year>b). <article-title>Four azoles&#x2019; profile in the control of septoria, yellow rust and brown rust in wheat across Europe</article-title>. <source>Crop Protection.</source> <volume>105</volume>, <fpage>16</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>27</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.cropro.2017.10.018</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B19">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>J&#xf8;rgensen</surname> <given-names>L. N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Matzen</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Havis</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Holdgate</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Clark</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Blake</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2020</year>). &#x201c;<article-title>Efficacy of common azoles and mefentrifluconazole against septoria, brown rust and yellow rust in wheat across Europe</article-title>,&#x201d; in <source>Modern fungicides and antifungal compounds IX</source>. Eds. <person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname>Deising</surname> <given-names>H. B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fraaije</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mehl</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Oerke</surname> <given-names>E. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sierotzki</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Stammler</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<publisher-loc>Braunschweig</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>DPG Verlag</publisher-name>), <fpage>27</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>34</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B20">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>J&#xf8;rgensen</surname> <given-names>L. N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Matzen</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Heick</surname> <given-names>T. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Havis</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Holdgate</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Clark</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2021</year>a). <article-title>Decreasing azole sensitivity of z. tritici in Europe contributes to reduced and varying field efficacy</article-title>. <source>J. Plant Dis. Prot.</source> <volume>128</volume>, <fpage>287</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>301</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s41348-020-00372-4</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B21">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>J&#xf8;rgensen</surname> <given-names>L. N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Oliver</surname> <given-names>R. P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Heick</surname> <given-names>T. M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2018</year>a). <article-title>Occurrence and avoidance of fungicide resistance in cereal diseases</article-title>. <source>Integrated Dis. Manage. wheat barley</source>, <fpage>255</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>280</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B22">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>J&#xf8;rgensen</surname> <given-names>L. N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Oliver</surname> <given-names>R. P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Heick</surname> <given-names>T. M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2018</year>b). &#x201c;<article-title>Occurrence and avoidance of fungicide resistance in cereal diseases,&#x201d; in Integrated Disease Management of Wheat and Barley</article-title>. ed. R. Oliver, (<publisher-name>Cambridge: Burleigh Dodds Science Publishing Limited</publisher-name>), <fpage>69</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>93</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B23">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Jefcoate</surname> <given-names>C. R.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1978</year>). &#x201c;<article-title>Measurement of substrate and inhibitor binding to microsomal cytochrome p-450 by optical-difference spectroscopy</article-title>,&#x201d; in <source>Biomembranes, part c, methods in enzymology</source>, vol. <volume>52</volume> . Eds. <person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname>Fleischer</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Packer</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<publisher-loc>New York, NY</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Elsevier</publisher-name>), <fpage>258</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>279</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S0076-6879(78)52029-6</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B24">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kiiker</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Juurik</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Heick</surname> <given-names>T. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>M&#xe4;e</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Changes in DMI, SDHI, and QoI fungicide sensitivity in the Estonian <italic>Zymoseptoria tritici</italic> population between 2019 and 2020</article-title>. <source>Microorganisms</source> <volume>9</volume>, <elocation-id>814</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/microorganisms9040814</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B25">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kildea</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Heick</surname> <given-names>T. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Grant</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mehenni-Ciz</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dooley</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>A combination of target-site alterations, overexpression and enhanced efflux activity contribute to reduced azole sensitivity present in the Irish <italic>Zymoseptoria tritici</italic> population</article-title>. <source>Eur. J. Plant Pathology.</source> <volume>154</volume>, <fpage>529</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>540</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10658-019-01676-4</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B26">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kildea</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mehenni-Ciz</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Spink</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>O&#x2019;Sullivan</surname> <given-names>E</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>. (<year>2014</year>). &#x201c;<article-title>Changes in the frequency of Irish mycophaerella graminicola CYP51 variants 2006&#x2013;2011</article-title>,&#x201d; in <source>17th international reinhardsbrunn symposium</source>. Eds. <person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname>Dehne</surname> <given-names>H. W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Deising</surname> <given-names>H. B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fraaije</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gisi</surname> <given-names>U.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hermann</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mehl</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<publisher-loc>Braunschweig, Germany</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>DPG Spectrum Phytomedizin</publisher-name>), <fpage>143</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>144</lpage>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B27">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Klink</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Verreet</surname> <given-names>J.-A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hasler</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Birr</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Will triazoles still be of importance in disease control of <italic>Zymoseptoria tritici</italic> in the future</article-title>? <source>Agronomy</source> <volume>11</volume>, <elocation-id>933</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/agronomy11050933</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B28">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Leroux</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Albertini</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gautier</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gredt</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Walker</surname> <given-names>A. S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2007</year>). <article-title>Mutations in the CYP51 gene correlated with changes in sensitivity to sterol 14 alpha-demethylation inhibitors in field isolates of <italic>Mycosphaerelia graminicola</italic>
</article-title>. <source>Pest Manage. Sci.</source> <volume>63</volume> (<issue>7</issue>), <fpage>688</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>698</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/ps.1390</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B29">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Leroux</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Walker</surname> <given-names>A. S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Multiple mechanisms account for resistance to sterol 14alpha-demethylation inhibitors in field isolates of <italic>Mycosphaerella graminicola</italic>
</article-title>. <source>Pest Manage. Science.</source> <volume>67</volume>, <fpage>44</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>59</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/ps.2028</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B30">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Lynch</surname> <given-names>J. P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Glynn</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kildea</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Spink</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Yield and optimum fungicide dose rates for winter wheat (<italic>Triticum aestivum</italic> l.) varieties with contrasting ratings for resistance to septoria tritici blotch</article-title>. <source>Field Crops Res.</source> <volume>204</volume> <page-range>89&#x2013;100</page-range>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.fcr.2017.01.012</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B31">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>M&#xe4;e</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fillinger</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Soov&#xe4;li</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Heick</surname> <given-names>T. M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Fungicide sensitivity shifting of <italic>Zymoseptoria tritici</italic> in the Finnish-Baltic region and a novel insertion in the MFS1 promoter</article-title>. <source>Front. Plant Sci.</source> <volume>11</volume>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpls.2020.00385</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B32">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Omrane</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Aud&#xe9;on</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ignace</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Duplaix</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Aouini</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kema</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Plasticity of the <italic>MFS1</italic> promoter leads to multi-drug resistance in the wheat pathogen <italic>Zymoseptoria tritici</italic>
</article-title>. <source>mSphere</source> <volume>2</volume>, <fpage>e00393</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>e00317</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/mSphere.00393-17</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B33">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Omrane</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sghyer</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Aud&#xe9;on</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lanen</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Duplaix</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Walker</surname> <given-names>A. S.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Fungicide efflux and the MgMFS1 transporter contribute to the multidrug resistance phenotype in <italic>Zymoseptoria tritici</italic> field isolates</article-title>. <source>Environ. Microbiol.</source> <volume>17</volume> (<issue>8</issue>), <fpage>2805</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2823</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/1462-2920.12781</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B34">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Owen</surname> <given-names>W. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yao</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Myung</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kemmitt</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Leader</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Meyer</surname> <given-names>K. G.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Biological characterization of fenpicoxamid, a new fungicide with utility in cereals and other crops</article-title>. <source>Pest Manage. science.</source> <volume>73</volume> (<issue>10</issue>), <fpage>2005</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2016</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/ps.4588</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B35">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ponomarenko</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Goodwin</surname> <given-names>S. B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kema</surname> <given-names>G. H. J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Septoria tritici blotch (STB) of wheat</article-title>. <source>Plant Health Instructor</source>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1094/PHI-I-2011-0407-01</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B36">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Raudonius</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Application of statistics in plant and crop research: important issues</article-title>. <source>Zemdirbyste-Agriculture.</source> <volume>104</volume> (<issue>4</issue>), <fpage>377</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>382</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.13080/z-a.2017.104.048</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B37">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Rehfus</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Strobel</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bryson</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Stammler</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Mutations in <italic>sdh</italic> genes in field isolates of <italic>Zymoseptoria tritici</italic> and impact on the sensitivity to various succinate dehydrogenase inhibitors</article-title>. <source>Plant Pathol.</source> <volume>67</volume>, <fpage>175</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>180</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/ppa.12715</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B38">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ronis</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>J&#xf8;rgensen</surname> <given-names>L. N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sema&#x161;kien&#x117;</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gauril&#x10d;ikien&#x117;</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ramanauskien&#x117;</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Sensitivity of <italic>Mycosphaerella graminicola</italic> isolates to demethylation-inhibiting (DMI) fungicides</article-title>. <source>Zemdirbyste-Agriculture.</source> <volume>101</volume> (<issue>2</issue>), <fpage>177</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>184</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.13080/z-a.2014.101.023</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B39">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Russell</surname> <given-names>P. E.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2005</year>). <article-title>A century of fungicide evolution</article-title>. <source>J. Agric. Sci.</source> <volume>143</volume>, <fpage>11</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>25</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1017/S0021859605004971</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B40">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Savary</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Willocquet</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pethybridge</surname> <given-names>S. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Esker</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>McRoberts</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Nelson</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>The global burden of pathogens and pests on major food crops</article-title>. <source>Nat. Ecol. Evolution.</source> <volume>3</volume>, <fpage>430</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>439</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41559-018-0793-y</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B41">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Sierotzki</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Scalliet</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>A review of current knowledge of resistance aspects for the next-generation succinate dehydrogenase inhibitor fungicides</article-title>. <source>Phytopathology</source> <volume>103</volume>, <fpage>880</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>887</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1094/PHYTO-01-13-0009-RVW</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B42">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Simko</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Piepho</surname> <given-names>H. P.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>The area under the disease progress stairs: calculation, advantage, and application</article-title>. <source>Phytopathology.</source> <volume>102</volume>, <fpage>381</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>389</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1094/PHYTO-07-11-0216</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B43">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Sykes</surname> <given-names>E. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sackett</surname> <given-names>K. E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Severns</surname> <given-names>P. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mundt</surname> <given-names>C.C.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Sensitivity variation and cross-resistance of zymoseptoria tritici to azole fungicides in north America</article-title>. <source>Eur. J. Plant Pathology.</source> <volume>151</volume>, <fpage>269</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>274</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10658-017-1370-y</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B44">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Torriani</surname> <given-names>S. F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Brunner</surname> <given-names>P. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>McDonald</surname> <given-names>B. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sierotzki</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>QoI resistance emerged independently at least 4 times in European populations of <italic>Mycosphaerella graminicola</italic>
</article-title>. <source>Pest Manage. Sci.</source> <volume>65</volume>, <fpage>155</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>162</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/ps.1662</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B45">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Torriani</surname> <given-names>S. F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Melichar</surname> <given-names>J. P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mills</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pain</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sierotzki</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Courbot</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>
<italic>Zymoseptoria tritici</italic>: A major threat to wheat production, integrated approaches to control</article-title>. <source>Fungal Genet. Biol.</source> <volume>79</volume>, <fpage>8</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>12</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.fgb.2015.04.010</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B46">
<citation citation-type="web">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<collab>VATZUM (2018) The state plant service Under the ministry of agriculture page. &#x12e;sakymas d&#x117;l fungicido Proline &#x12e;registravimo profesionaliajam naudojimui</collab>
</person-group>. Available at: <uri xlink:href="http://www.vatzum.lt/uploads/documents/a151_proline.pdf">http://www.vatzum.lt/uploads/documents/a151_proline.pdf</uri> (Accessed <access-date>01 August 2022</access-date>).</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B47">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Verikaite</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ramanauskiene</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Armoniene</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ronis</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Evaluation of fungicide application programmes for septoria tritici blotch control in winter wheat</article-title>. <source>Zemdirbyste-Agriculture.</source> <volume>109</volume> (<issue>2</issue>), <fpage>149</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>156</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.13080/z-a.2022.109.019</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B48">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wieczorek</surname> <given-names>T. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Berg</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sema&#x161;kien&#x117;</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mehl</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sierotzki</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Stammler</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Impact of DMI and SDHI fungicides on disease control and CYP51 mutations in populations of <italic>Zymoseptoria tritici</italic> from northern Europe</article-title>. <source>Eur. J. Plant Pathol.</source> <volume>143</volume>, <fpage>861</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>871</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10658-015-0737-1</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B49">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zadoks</surname> <given-names>J. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chang</surname> <given-names>T. T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Konzak</surname> <given-names>C. F.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1974</year>). <article-title>A decimal code for the growth stages of cereals</article-title>. <source>Weed Res.</source> <volume>14</volume>, <fpage>415</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>421</lpage>. <uri xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3180.1974.tb01084.x">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3180.1974.tb01084.x</uri>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B50">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ziogas</surname> <given-names>B. N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Malandrakis</surname> <given-names>A. A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2015</year>). &#x201c;<article-title>Sterol biosynthesis inhibitors: C14 demethylation (DMIs)</article-title>,&#x201d; in <source>Fungicide resistance in plant pathogens</source>. Eds. <person-group person-group-type="editor">
<name>
<surname>Ishii</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hollomon</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<publisher-loc>Tokyo</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Springer</publisher-name>). doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/978-4-431-55642-8_13</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>