<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.3 20070202//EN" "journalpublishing.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="2.3" xml:lang="EN">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Front. Plant Sci.</journal-id>
<journal-title>Frontiers in Plant Science</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">Front. Plant Sci.</abbrev-journal-title>
<issn pub-type="epub">1664-462X</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Frontiers Media S.A.</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpls.2022.1067618</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Plant Science</subject>
<subj-group>
<subject>Original Research</subject>
</subj-group>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Chitin amendments eliminate the negative impacts of continuous cropping obstacles on soil properties and microbial assemblage</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Fan</surname>
<given-names>Yanli</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname>
<given-names>Junjie</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="author-notes" rid="fn001">
<sup>*</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/522843"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname>
<given-names>Zhuxiu</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Hu</surname>
<given-names>Xiaojing</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1650271"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Yu</surname>
<given-names>Zhenhua</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1651947"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Li</surname>
<given-names>Yansheng</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/436961"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname>
<given-names>Xueli</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3">
<sup>3</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Li</surname>
<given-names>Lujun</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/624561"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Jin</surname>
<given-names>Jian</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname>
<given-names>Guanghua</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
</xref>
<uri xlink:href="https://loop.frontiersin.org/people/350746"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="aff1">
<sup>1</sup>
<institution>Key Laboratory of Mollisols Agroecology, Northeast Institute of Geography and Agroecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences</institution>, <addr-line>Harbin</addr-line>, <country>China</country>
</aff>
<aff id="aff2">
<sup>2</sup>
<institution>University of Chinese Academy of Sciences</institution>, <addr-line>Beijing</addr-line>, <country>China</country>
</aff>
<aff id="aff3">
<sup>3</sup>
<institution>Heilongjiang Academy of Black Soil Conservation and Utilization, Heilongjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences</institution>, <addr-line>Harbin</addr-line>, <country>China</country>
</aff>
<author-notes>
<fn fn-type="edited-by">
<p>Edited by: Jiangang Li, Institute of Soil Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), China</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="edited-by">
<p>Reviewed by: Yu Shi, Henan University, China; Xiaogang Li, Nanjing Forestry University, China</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="corresp" id="fn001">
<p>*Correspondence: Junjie Liu, <email xlink:href="mailto:liujunjie@iga.ac.cn">liujunjie@iga.ac.cn</email>
</p>
</fn>
<fn fn-type="other" id="fn002">
<p>This article was submitted to Plant Pathogen Interactions, a section of the journal Frontiers in Plant Science</p>
</fn>
</author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>24</day>
<month>11</month>
<year>2022</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="collection">
<year>2022</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>13</volume>
<elocation-id>1067618</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>12</day>
<month>10</month>
<year>2022</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>09</day>
<month>11</month>
<year>2022</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#xa9; 2022 Fan, Liu, Liu, Hu, Yu, Li, Chen, Li, Jin and Wang</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2022</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Fan, Liu, Liu, Hu, Yu, Li, Chen, Li, Jin and Wang</copyright-holder>
<license xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">
<p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.</p>
</license>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<p>Continuous cropping of soybean leads to soil environment deterioration and soil-borne disease exacerbation, which in turn limits the sustainability of agricultural production. Chitin amendments are considered promising methods for alleviating soybean continuous cropping obstacles; however, the underlying mechanisms of soil sickness reduction remain unclear. In this study, soil amendments with pure and crude chitin at different addition dosages were employed to treat diseased soil induced by continuous cropping of soybean for five years. Chitin amendments, especially crude chitin, remarkably increased soil pH, available phosphorus (AP), potassium (AK) and nitrate nitrogen ( <inline-formula>
<mml:math display="inline" id="im1">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msubsup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>NO</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>3</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
</mml:msubsup>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>-N) contents, and improved soybean plant growth and soil microbial activities (FDA). Additionally, chitin application significantly enriched the relative abundances of the potential biocontrol bacteria <italic>Sphingomonas</italic>, <italic>Streptomyces</italic>, and <italic>Bacillus</italic> and the fungi <italic>Mortierella</italic>, <italic>Purpureocillium</italic>, and <italic>Metarhizium</italic> while depleted those of the potential plant pathogens <italic>Fusarium</italic>, <italic>Cylindrocarpon</italic> and <italic>Paraphoma</italic>. Moreover, chitin amendments induced looser pathogenic subnetwork structures and less pathogenic cooperation with other connected microbial taxa in the rhizosphere soils. The structural equation model (SEM) revealed that pure and crude chitin amendments promoted soybean plant growth by indirectly regulating soil pH-mediated soil microbial activities and potentially beneficial microbes, respectively. Therefore, the reduction strategies for continuous cropping obstacles by adding pure and crude chitin were distinct; pure chitin amendments showed general disease suppression, while crude chitin exhibited specific disease suppression. Overall, chitin amendments could suppress potential plant pathogens and improve soil health, thereby promoting soybean growth, which provides new prospects for cultivation practices to control soybean continuous cropping obstacles.</p>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>continuous cropping</kwd>
<kwd>pure and crude chitin</kwd>
<kwd>soil pH</kwd>
<kwd>potential plant pathogens</kwd>
<kwd>specific disease suppression</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<counts>
<fig-count count="7"/>
<table-count count="1"/>
<equation-count count="0"/>
<ref-count count="112"/>
<page-count count="17"/>
<word-count count="8625"/>
</counts>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec id="s1" sec-type="intro">
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>Soybean (<italic>Glycine max</italic> L. Merill) is an important crop in China (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B62">Liu et&#xa0;al., 2008</xref>). The largest soybean production area in China is located in Heilongjiang Province, with the planting area increasing from 3.3 million ha in 2017 to nearly 6.8 million ha in 2022 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B105">Yin et&#xa0;al., 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B98">Wu, 2022</xref>). Given that soybean is highly susceptible to continuous cropping (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B66">Liu et&#xa0;al., 2019</xref>), an increasing frequency of soybean monoculture may result in extensive soil health deterioration and substantial losses of crop yield (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B63">Liu et&#xa0;al., 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B101">Xu et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>). Previous studies have documented that biotic factors, rather than abiotic factors, are the main reasons for the occurrence of continuous cropping obstacles of soybean (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Dias et&#xa0;al., 2015</xref>). In addition, studies have also reported that yield reduction of soybean continuous cropping is mainly attributed to the depletion of beneficial microbes and the enrichment of pathogenic microbes and soybean cyst nematodes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B64">Liu et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B87">Tian et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>). Consequently, it is of great significance to monitor the changes in microbial communities in response to continuous cropping for soil ecological restoration and sustainable agricultural development.</p>    <p>Soil microorganisms play a pivotal role in plant growth, soil health and agroecosystem sustainability (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Bonanomi et&#xa0;al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B56">Lehmann et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>) and participate in soil nutrient cycling and soil-borne disease development (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">Falkowski et&#xa0;al., 2008</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">Delgado-Baquerizo et&#xa0;al., 2016</xref>). The functional characteristics of soil microbial communities are key factors determining the emergence of crop soil-borne diseases (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B100">Xiong et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B102">Xun et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>) and/or the formation of disease-suppressive soils (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B66">Liu et&#xa0;al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B64">Liu et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>). For example, potential plant pathogens <italic>Fusarium</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">Bai et&#xa0;al., 2015</xref>), <italic>Clonostachys</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">Bienapfl et&#xa0;al., 2012</xref>), <italic>Lectera</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B66">Liu et&#xa0;al., 2019</xref>) and <italic>Pythium</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">Bai et&#xa0;al., 2015</xref>) have been widely reported to cause soybean root rot and impair soybean growth. In contrast, potentially beneficial microbes, such as <italic>Blastococcus</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B94">Wang et&#xa0;al., 2020b</xref>), <italic>Trichosporon</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B84">Sl&#xe1;vikov&#xe1; et&#xa0;al., 2002</xref>), <italic>Bradyrhizobium</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B49">Kalita and Malek, 2020</xref>) and <italic>Rhizobacter</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B52">Khan et&#xa0;al., 2015</xref>), can promote plant growth by participating in nitrogen fixation or organic matter degradation and increasing soil nutrient acquisition. Other species of potentially beneficial microbes, such as <italic>Trichoderma</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B107">Zhang et&#xa0;al., 2019</xref>), <italic>Pseudomonas</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B112">Zhou and Wu, 2018</xref>), <italic>Beauveria</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B89">Vega et&#xa0;al., 2008</xref>) and <italic>Hirsutella</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B70">Mwaheb et&#xa0;al., 2017</xref>), can protect plants from potential plant pathogens or soybean cyst nematode infestation by inducing systemic defense responses. Thus, monitoring these functional microbial groups associated with soil health and plant growth is crucial for revealing the mechanisms by which they are affected and the possible links between these effects and cropping systems.</p>
<p>Soil microorganisms live together to form a complex interaction system among species rather than living in isolation, and these interactions consequently influence microbial ecosystem functions and plant performance (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B88">Toju et&#xa0;al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B90">Wagg et&#xa0;al., 2019</xref>). Co-occurrence patterns of microbial taxa are extremely important in understanding microbial community function by offering new insights into potential interaction and revealing niche spaces (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B50">Kara et&#xa0;al., 2013</xref>). Microbial network analysis has been proved to be a powerful tool for revealing the mechanisms associated with patterns of community assembly and elucidating the interactions among different taxonomic groups (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">Faust and Raes, 2012</xref>). Many studies have documented that the occurrence or suppression of soil diseases depends on complex biotic interactions between potential plant pathogens and beneficial microbes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B79">Saleem et&#xa0;al., 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">Dur&#xe1;n et&#xa0;al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B58">Li et&#xa0;al., 2021b</xref>). A typical example of the complex interactions between plants and microbiomes is the effect of disease-suppressive soils or conducive soils induced by different agronomic practices (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B99">Xiong et&#xa0;al., 2017</xref>). It was reported that the application of amendments, such as organic fertilizer (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">Chen et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>), lime (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B59">Li et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>), biochar (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B104">Yao et&#xa0;al., 2017</xref>) and chitin (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B47">Inderbitzin et&#xa0;al., 2018</xref>), effectively ameliorated soil acidification by reshaping the microbial communities. However, understanding of if and how microbial communities support the beneficial effects of such amendments on the prevention of soil-borne diseases in continuous cropping systems remains unclear.</p>
<p>Given the adverse effects of soybean continuous cropping on soil quality and soybean growth, various strategies have been employed to overcome soybean continuous cropping obstacles. However, traditional control practices for continuous cropping obstacles, including the use of crop rotation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B57">Li et&#xa0;al., 2021a</xref>) and chemical agents (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B74">Pu et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>), still have potential drawbacks. Crop rotation requires long periods to reduce soil-borne pathogens and eliminate the negative effects of continuous cropping (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">Ding et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B57">Li et&#xa0;al., 2021a</xref>), and its effectiveness is limited once the disease breaks out (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B96">Wang et&#xa0;al., 2013</xref>). Chemical fumigants and fungicides have high efficiency in killing soil microorganisms (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">Fang et&#xa0;al., 2019</xref>), but the intensive use of chemicals not only causes severe environmental pollution (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B60">Liu et&#xa0;al., 2015</xref>) but also encourages the development of target pathogen resistance (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">Goldman et&#xa0;al., 1994</xref>). Organic amendments are known to be attractive alternatives to relieve continuous cropping obstacles (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B111">Zhou et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>). Chitin, as the most abundant polysaccharide in nature, possesses good biocompatibility, biodegradability, nontoxicity and various biological activities and poses no hazard to the environment (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B108">Zhan et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B51">Kemboi et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>). More importantly, chitin also has great potential for improving soil quality, inducing plant disease resistance and promoting plant growth (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">Fan et&#xa0;al., 2020b</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B81">Shamshina et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>). Chitin amendments have been reported to promote plant growth by activating chitinolytic microbes and releasing nitrogen and also to enhance plant disease resistance (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">De Tender et&#xa0;al., 2019</xref>). Consequently, chitin amendments could be a promising and environmentally friendly control strategy for eliminating soybean continuous cropping obstacles (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B53">Kielak et&#xa0;al., 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Debode et&#xa0;al., 2016</xref>). However, studies on how the microbial community regulated by chitin amendments influences both soil health and plant growth are still very limited.</p>
<p>In this study, we established a pot experiment by adding pure and crude chitin with different dosage gradients into a continuous cropping soil. We investigated the bidirectional effects of chitin amendments on bacterial and fungal communities and soil microbe&#x2013;plant interactions in both the bulk and rhizosphere soils using high-throughput sequencing technology. We mainly investigated (i) the variations in soil chemical properties and soil microbial activities in responses to chitin amendments; (ii) the relative abundances of potential beneficial microbes and plant pathogens and their interactions induced by chitin amendments; (iii) the impacts of soil properties resulting from chitin amendments on soil microbial activities, potential beneficial microbes and plant pathogens, finally on soybean growth. Three hypotheses were tested in the present study: (i) chitin amendments would increase soil pH and available nutrient contents; (ii) chitin amendments may induce looser pathogenic subnetwork structures and less pathogenic cooperation; (iii) the variations in soil chemical properties would induce higher soil microbial activities and lower relative abundances of potential plant pathogens, promoting soybean growth.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2" sec-type="materials|methods">
<title>Materials and methods</title>
<sec id="s2_1">
<title>Study site description and pot experimental design</title>
<p>The pot experiment was established on 10 May 2019 at the experimental garden of the Northeast Institute of Geography and Agroecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Harbin, Heilongjiang Province, China (45&#xb0;41&#x2032;48&#x2033;N, 126&#xb0;38&#x2032;12&#x2033;E). The soils used in the pot experiments were 0-20 cm topsoil collected from fields with continuous soybean cropping for five years in Glory Village, Hailun, Heilongjiang Province, China (47&#xb0;21&#x2032;N, 126&#xb0;50&#x2032;E). The exogenous chitin of pure chitin (PC) and crude chitin (CC) were purchased from Jinan Apollo Crustacean Fertilizer Co., Ltd. and Shanghai Haike Shengwu Biotech Co., Ltd., respectively, and were used to assess the effectiveness of exogenous chitin on continuous cropping obstacles. Crude chitin is a biopolymer (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Debode et&#xa0;al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B108">Zhan et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>) that is mainly sourced from the shells of marine organisms, such as shrimp, lobsters and crabs, while pure chitin is purified from crude chitin by removing calcium and protein with acid and alkali (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B47">Inderbitzin et&#xa0;al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B51">Kemboi et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>). The total carbon and nitrogen contents were 187.7 g/kg and 31.5 g/kg in pure chitin and 396.3 g/kg and 72.4 g/kg in crude chitin, respectively.</p>
<p>Seven treatments with different chitin addition ratios were designed in this study. The addition ratios of pure chitin were 0.05%, 0.1% and 0.2%, while those of crude chitin were 0.5%, 1% and 2%, which were calculated based on the soil mass ratios used in each pot. These treatments were marked as PC1, PC2, PC3, CC1, CC2, and CC3 for pure chitin and crude chitin, respectively. The no-addition treatment was designed as a control and marked as C0. Each treatment was set with eight replicates (pots), and 3 kg of soil was placed in each pot, whose height and diameter were 17.5 cm and 11.0 cm, respectively. The added chitin was thoroughly mixed with the soil before soybean planting. Six soybean seeds were sown in each pot, while four soybean seedlings were kept in each pot at the stage of cotyledon extension. Subsequently, soybean plants were watered with the same amount of water every two days to maintain a relatively consistent water retention capacity.</p>
<p>In total, 56 bulk and 56 rhizosphere soil samples were collected (seven treatments &#xd7; eight replicates) when soybeans reached the flowering stage in 2019. A single bulk soil sample (replicate) was collected from each pot and then sieved through a 2 mm mesh to fully homogenize and remove impurities. Bulk soils were placed into a sterile 50 mL centrifuge tube, and the remaining soil was put in a reclosable bag. Rhizosphere soil samples were collected by shaking methods to preserve&#xa0;soil firmly attached to the root surface (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">Fan et&#xa0;al., 2020a</xref>). A portion of each collected rhizosphere soil sample was placed in a sterilized 2 mL centrifuge tube. The centrifuge tubes were kept at -80&#xb0;C for subsequent molecular analysis, while the rest of the soils and soybean plants were temporarily kept in a 4&#xb0;C refrigerator prior to downstream determination for the determination of the physicochemical properties and soybean plant morphological characteristics.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_2">
<title>Measurement and analysis of soil chemical properties</title>
<p>Considering that the quantity of collected rhizosphere soils was too small to determine the chemical properties, soil chemical properties were measured only in bulk soils. Soil pH was determined using a pH meter (Thermo Electron, USA) from a soil water supernatant at a 1:5 (weight/volume) ratio of soil to 0.01 mol L<sup>-1</sup> CaCl<sub>2</sub> solution after shaking for 17 hours (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B95">Wang et&#xa0;al., 2015</xref>). The water used to prepare the CaCl<sub>2</sub> solution was carbon dioxide free to minimize the impact of carbon dioxide on soil pH. Soil total carbon (TC) and nitrogen (TN) were assayed by the combustion method (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">Fan et&#xa0;al., 2019</xref>) using a CNS Elemental analyzer (VarioEL III, Germany) after air-dried soils passed through 0.25 mm sieves. After the soil samples were melted by sodium hydroxide, the soil total phosphorus (TP) and potassium (TK) contents were determined with the molybdenum blue method and flame spectrophotometry method (FP640, INASA Instrument, China), respectively. Ammonium ( <inline-formula>
<mml:math display="inline" id="im2">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msubsup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>NH</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>4</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
</mml:msubsup>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>-N) and nitrate nitrogen ( <inline-formula>
<mml:math display="inline" id="im3">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msubsup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>NO</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>3</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
</mml:msubsup>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>-N) were extracted via 2 mol L<sup>-1</sup> KCl solution at a 1:10 (weight/volume) ratio of fresh soil to KCl solution. The soil ammonia nitrogen ( <inline-formula>
<mml:math display="inline" id="im4">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msubsup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>NH</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>4</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
</mml:msubsup>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>-N) and nitrate nitrogen ( <inline-formula>
<mml:math display="inline" id="im5">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msubsup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>NO</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>3</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
</mml:msubsup>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>-N) contents were analyzed from the supernatant using a continuous flow analytical system (SKALAR SAN++, Skalar, Netherlands). After extraction with 0.5 mol L<sup>-1</sup> NaHCO<sub>3</sub> and 1.0 mol L<sup>-1</sup> CH<sub>3</sub>COONH<sub>4</sub> solution, soil available phosphorus (AP) and potassium (AK) contents were quantified with molybdenum blue and flame photometry methods (FP640, INASA Instrument, China), respectively.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_3">
<title>Soybean plant morphological characteristics and soil total microbial activity measurement</title>
<p>Plant height was determined with a tapeline to measure the length from the soybean cotyledon scar to the top growth point of the main stem. We cut the plants from the cotyledon scar and weighed them to obtain the plant fresh weight. Root length, root surface area and root volume were measured using a root analyzer (WinRHIZO, Canada) after root nodules were completely removed with tweezers. The fresh soybean plants and roots were enwrapped into envelopes, desiccated at 105&#xb0;C for 30 minutes to degreen, switched to 80&#xb0;C for 48 hours, and finally weighted to measure plant and root dry weight.</p>
<p>The total microbial activity of bulk soil was determined by the fluorescein diacetate (FDA) hydrolysis method (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">Gillian and Harry, 2001</xref>). First, 15 mL potassium phosphate buffer (60 mmol L<sup>-1</sup>; pH=7.6) and 0.2 mL FDA stock solution (1000 &#x3bc;g mL<sup>-1</sup>) were added to 2.0 g fresh soil to initiate the hydrolysis reaction. Then, after incubation at 30 &#xb0;C for 20 minutes, 15 mL chloroform/methanol (2:1; v/v) was added to terminate the hydrolysis reaction. Finally, the absorbance of the supernatant was determined with a spectrophotometer (PERSEE T6-1650E) at a wavelength of 490 nm, and the fluorescein content was calculated according to the standard curve to obtain the soil total microbial activity.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_4">
<title>DNA extraction, PCR amplification and high-throughput sequencing</title>
<p>The soil microbial DNA for each sample was extracted from 0.5 g fresh soil (stored in a -80 &#xb0;C freezer) using the Fast DNA<sup>&#xae;</sup> Spin Kit for Soil (MP Biomedicals, Santa Ana, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer's manual. The extracted DNA was measured for concentration and purity with a NanoDrop 2000 spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific, Wilmington, DE, USA), and the quality of extracted DNA was examined using 1% agarose gel electrophoresis.</p>
<p>The V3-V4 region of the bacterial gene and the ITS region of the fungal gene were amplified by the primer pairs 515F (5&#x2019;-GTG CCA GCM GCC GCG GTA A-3&#x2019;)/907R (5&#x2019;-CCG TCA ATT CCT TTG AGT TT-3&#x2019;) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B91">Walters et&#xa0;al., 2016</xref>) and ITS1F (5&#x2019;-CTT GGT CAT TTA GAG GAA GTA A-3&#x2019;)/ITS2R (5&#x2019;-GCT GCG TTC TTC ATC GAT GC-3&#x2019;) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">Adams et&#xa0;al., 2013</xref>), respectively, with the forward primer labeled with a sample-specific barcode sequence (6 bp) at the 5&#x2019; end to differentiate the amplified products. PCR amplification was conducted in a 25 &#x3bc;L reaction system comprising 2.5 &#x3bc;L dNTPs (2.5 mM), 2.5 &#x3bc;L 5 &#xd7; FastPfu Buffer, 0.2 &#x3bc;L BSA, 0.5 &#x3bc;L FastPfu Polymerase, 0.25 &#x3bc;L forward and reverse primers (5 &#x3bc;M), 1.0 &#x3bc;L template DNA (10 ng) and 17.8 &#x3bc;L sterilized ultrapure water (ddH<sub>2</sub>O). The PCR amplification procedure was performed as reported in the literature (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">Adams et&#xa0;al., 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B91">Walters et&#xa0;al., 2016</xref>). Each sample was amplified in triplicate, and the PCR products were combined and purified using an agarose gel DNA purification kit (TaKaRa, Dalian, China), examined in a 2% agarose gel and quantitated by a QuantiFluor&#x2122;-ST Fluorometer (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) following the manufacturer&#x2019;s protocols. The equimolar amounts of purified PCR amplicons were combined as one sample and paired-end sequenced (2 &#xd7; 300 bp) using the Illumina MiSeq PE 300 platform at Majorbio Bio-Pharm Technology Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). The raw sequencing data of bacteria and fungi from this research were stored in the NCBI Sequence Read Archive (SRA), with accession numbers PRJNA869919 and PRJNA870067, respectively.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_5">
<title>Sequencing data analysis</title>
<p>The raw data from sequencing were analyzed using the QIIME-1.9.1 (Quantitative Insights Into Microbial Ecology) pipeline (<uri xlink:href="http://qiime.sourceforge.net/">http://qiime.sourceforge.net/</uri>) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Caporaso et&#xa0;al., 2010</xref>) and merged through FLASH-1.2.7 (fast length adjustment of short reads) (<uri xlink:href="http://ccb.jhu.edu/software/FLASH/">http://ccb.jhu.edu/software/FLASH/</uri>) software (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B68">Mago&#x10d; and Salzberg, 2011</xref>). First, we acquired 3,615,418 (from 18,302 to 46,619) and 7,120,035 (from 29,755 to 93,365) high-quality sequences of bacteria and fungi across soil samples after eliminating low-quality sequences (average base quality score&lt; 20 reads and/or length&lt; 200 bp) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Aronesty, 2011</xref>), mismatching the primers and barcodes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">Fan et&#xa0;al., 2019</xref>) and filtering the chimeras with the UCHIME algorithm (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Edgar, 2010</xref>). Then, the high-quality sequences were clustered into operational taxonomic units (OTUs) based on a 97% similarity threshold through UPARSE software (<uri xlink:href="http://drive5.com/uparse/">http://drive5.com/uparse/</uri>) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">Edgar, 2013</xref>). The taxonomic identity of OTUs was executed through the RDP (Ribosomal Database Project) classifier (version 11.5; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">Cole et&#xa0;al., 2014</xref>) at the 80% confidence threshold based on the SILVA (<uri xlink:href="http://www.arb-silva.de/">http://www.arb-silva.de/</uri>) (release 132; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B75">Quast et&#xa0;al., 2013</xref>) and UNITE (<uri xlink:href="https://unite.ut.ee/">https://unite.ut.ee/</uri>) (version 8.0; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">Abarenkov et&#xa0;al., 2010</xref>) databases for bacteria and fungi, respectively. The sequences that mismatched with bacteria and fungi were eliminated from the dataset after taxonomic identity. Furthermore, the potential plant pathogens were classified using FUNGuild (<uri xlink:href="https://github.com/UMNFuN/FUNGuild">https://github.com/UMNFuN/FUNGuild</uri>) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B71">Nguyen et&#xa0;al., 2016</xref>). All taxonomic information for the fungal nodes in each community network was uploaded to the online application in FUNGuild, and functional group (also referred to as guild) assignments of nodes that matched at a &#x2265; 93% were accepted (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B72">Nilsson et&#xa0;al., 2008</xref>). The fungal taxa were identified as plant pathogen with their confidence rankings of &#x201c;Highly Probable&#x201d; and &#x201c;Probable&#x201d; in current study (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B64">Liu et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B46">Hu et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>). In addition, potentially beneficial bacteria and fungi with various ecological functions were reconfirmed in the published literature (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM2">
<bold>Table S1</bold>
</xref>). Considering the impact of sequence number variation among samples, based on the minimum sequence, a subset of 18,302 and 29,755 sequences for each sample of bacteria and fungi were randomly selected for subsequent analysis.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_6">
<title>Ecological network construction and analysis</title>
<p>To uncover the interactions of bacterial and fungal taxa, co-occurrence network analysis, based on random matrix theory (RMT) methods, was performed using OTU relative abundance data through the Molecular Ecological Network Analysis Pipeline (MENAP) (<uri xlink:href="http://129.15.40.240/mena/">http://129.15.40.240/mena/</uri>) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B110">Zhou et&#xa0;al., 2011</xref>). We filtered out the rare OTUs with relative abundances&lt; 0.01% and merged the remaining bacterial and fungal OTUs of each treatment into an abundance table. Eight replicates of each treatment for bulk and rhizosphere soil samples were uploaded to the pipeline, and only OTUs observed in 6 out of 8 replicates were used to construct networks. The network construction procedures were performed as follows. First, after uploading the OTU file into the MENA pipeline, the proper similarity threshold (St) (<italic>p</italic>&lt;0.01) was automatically generated based on the RMT method. An edge or link between OTU pairs was assigned when the correlation exceeded <italic>St</italic> through Pearson&#x2019;s correlation analysis. Second, the calculations of &#x201c;global network properties&#x201d;, &#x201c;individual nodes&#x2019; centrality&#x201d; and &#x201c;module separation and modularity&#x201d; were conducted through the pipeline. Third, the network attribute files were generated by running the &#x201c;output for the Cytoscape software visualization&#x201d; based on the &#x201c;greedy modularity optimization&#x201d; algorithm (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Clauset et&#xa0;al., 2004</xref>), and then the co-occurrence networks were visualized with Cytoscape-3.7.2 (<uri xlink:href="https://cytoscape.org/">https://cytoscape.org/</uri>) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B82">Shannon et&#xa0;al., 2003</xref>). Finally, random networks, with identical nodes and edges as the empirical networks, were generated by running the &#x201c;randomize the network structure and then calculate network properties&#x201d;. Subsequently, the topological indices of the empirical and random networks were compared to identify if the network properties were error prone. In addition, pathogen-associated subnetworks were extracted from the global networks using the tool &#x2018;First Neighbors of Selected Nodes&#x2019; in Cytoscape to explore the effects of chitin amendments on the cooccurrence patterns of potential plant pathogens.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_7">
<title>Structural equation modeling construction and analysis</title>
<p>Structural equation modeling (SEM) was constructed to assess the direct and indirect influences of the prominent soil chemical properties on beneficial microbial taxa, potential plant pathogens, FDA (fluorescein diacetate) and plant growth performance (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">Grace, 2006</xref>). The SEM analyses were carried out using IBM SPSS Amos-21.0 software (Chicago, IL: Amos Development Corporation). The soil physicochemical variables included soil pH, TN, AP and TK, which were preselected by the Mantel test and autocorrelation test using R software (Version 3.6.2) and IBM SPSS-20.0 software, respectively. All variables used in SEM were mean standardized by Z transformation (mean=0, standard deviation=1) using the &#x201c;scale&#x201d; function in R-3.6.2 to improve normality of sample data (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B109">Zhao et&#xa0;al., 2019</xref>). The maximum likelihood estimation method was applied to fit the covariance matrix of these variables into the model. The path represented the standardized partial correlation coefficient, which illustrated the magnitude of the relationship between two factors. Latent variables, such as soybean plant morphological characteristics, were employed to integrate the effects of multiple conceptually related observed variables into a single composite effect, which could help to better interpret the model results (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">Delgado-Baquerizo et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s2_8">
<title>Statistical analyses</title>
<p>A subset of 18,302 and 29,755 sequences were randomly selected for each bacterial and fungal sample, respectively, to analyze the microbial alpha-diversity and beta-diversity, with a view to comparing the relative differences among soil samples. The number of OTUs and Faith&#x2019;s PD (phylogenetic distance) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">Faith, 1992</xref>) were used to compare soil bacterial and fungal alpha diversity using the QIIME platform (<uri xlink:href="http://qiime.org/index.html">http://qiime.org/index.html</uri>) with the alpha diversity.py function. Significance differences of bacterial and fungal alpha diversity between pure and crude chitin treatments was analysed by t-test. One-way ANOVA (analysis of variance), based on Duncan&#x2019;s post-hoc test, was employed to assess the differences in the soil physicochemical properties, bacterial and fungal relative abundance, alpha diversity indices and plant growth indices, which was implemented in SPSS-20.0 software. The variations in the bacterial and fungal community composition and relative abundance at the phylum level among different treatments were illustrated by stacked bar charts, which were generated using the &#x201c;ggplot2&#x201d; package in the R platform (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B77">R Development Core Team, 2016</xref>). A column chart was constructed to depict the significant differences in the relative abundance of potentially pathogenic and beneficial microbes with an average relative abundance &gt; 0.1% in each treatment at the OTU level. In addition, NMDS (nonmetric multidimensional scaling) and Adonis (nonparametric multivariate analysis of variance) analyses based on the Bray&#x2013;Curtis dissimilarity matrix were carried out using the &#x201c;vegan&#x201d; R package to explore the significant differences in bacterial and fungal community structure across different bulk and rhizosphere soil samples (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B73">Oksanen et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>). Permutational multivariate analysis of variance (PERMANOVA) was performed to assess the effects of the compartment and amendment type on the community composition of bacterial and fungal groups using the adonis function with 999 permutations in the &#x201c;vegan&#x201d; package in R (version 3.4.3) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B42">Guo et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>). Redundancy (RDA) analyses were performed to further identify the possible correlations between bacterial and fungal community structures and environmental variables. The environmental variables used in the RDA and SEM analysis were preselected by the Mantel test and variance inflation factor (VIF). The RDA, Mantel test and VIF analysis mentioned above were all conducted with the &#x201c;vegan&#x201d; package in R (version 3.6.2), and the significant differences were examined with the &#x201c;envfit&#x201d; function with 999 permutations (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">Guo et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>). Meanwhile, the random forest model was employed to evaluate the importance of environmental variables in predicting the changes in bacterial and fungal community structures using the &#x201c;rfPermute&#x201d; package in the R environment (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Archer, 2020</xref>).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s3" sec-type="results">
<title>Results</title>
<sec id="s3_1">
<title>Changes in soil chemical properties and plant morphological characteristics</title>
<p>Chitin amendments significantly improved soil chemical properties compared to that in the control. Briefly, soil pH, TK, AP and AK were markedly increased in PC and CC amendments, except for TK in PC1B and AK in PC2B and CC1B (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">
<bold>Table&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>). CC remarkably elevated the soil TN in CC2B and CC3B, but the soil TC, C/N ratio and <inline-formula>
<mml:math display="inline" id="im8">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msubsup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>NH</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>4</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
</mml:msubsup>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>-N content were significantly reduced by the PC and CC amendments, with the exception of TC in CC3B (<italic>P</italic>&lt; 0.05) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">
<bold>Table&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>). In addition, the chitin amendments sharply decreased the soil nitrate nitrogen (<inline-formula>
<mml:math display="inline" id="im9">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msubsup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>NO</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>3</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
</mml:msubsup>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>-N) (<italic>P</italic>&lt; 0.05), while it was highly increased in CC2B and CC3B (<italic>P</italic>&lt; 0.05) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">
<bold>Table&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>).</p>
<table-wrap id="T1" position="float">
<label>Table&#xa0;1</label>
<caption>
<p>Soil chemical properties under different pure and crude chitin addition dosages in the bulk soils.</p>
</caption>
<table frame="hsides">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="top" align="left">Treatment</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">pH</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">Total C(g/kg)</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">Total N(g/kg)</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">Total P(g/kg)</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">Total K(g/kg)</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">
<inline-formula>
<mml:math display="inline" id="im6">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msubsup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>NH</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>4</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
</mml:msubsup>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>-N (mg/kg)</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">
<inline-formula>
<mml:math display="inline" id="im7">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msubsup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>NO</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>3</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
</mml:msubsup>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>-N (mg/kg)</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">Available P(mg/kg)</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">Available K (mg/kg)</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">C0B</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5.10&#xb1;0.02e</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">18.77&#xb1;0.20a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.61&#xb1;0.04cd</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.53&#xb1;0.08ab</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">15.45&#xb1;0.11b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">63.70&#xb1;7.52a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">13.56&#xb1;1.02c</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">23.54&#xb1;2.50d</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">139.5&#xb1;2.7d</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">PC1B</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5.77&#xb1;0.03d</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">17.57&#xb1;0.27b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.62&#xb1;0.04cd</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.50&#xb1;0.08b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">15.83&#xb1;0.62b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">48.88&#xb1;2.83c</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.55&#xb1;0.34d</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">27.56&#xb1;3.77bc</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">162.3&#xb1;7.4b</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">PC2B</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5.71&#xb1;0.08d</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">17.26&#xb1;0.51b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.56&#xb1;0.06d</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.61&#xb1;0.05a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">17.06&#xb1;0.75a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">51.25&#xb1;3.27c</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.76&#xb1;0.61d</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">26.22&#xb1;1.40c</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">143.3&#xb1;4.7d</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">PC3B</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">5.78&#xb1;0.06d</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">17.54&#xb1;0.73b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.60&#xb1;0.10cd</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.56&#xb1;0.08ab</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">17.03&#xb1;0.22a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">51.49&#xb1;2.24c</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.99&#xb1;0.47d</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">28.74&#xb1;1.70abc</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">152.1&#xb1;6.8c</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">CC1B</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">6.34&#xb1;0.03c</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">17.42&#xb1;0.47b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.69&#xb1;0.06c</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.60&#xb1;0.12a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">16.82&#xb1;0.39a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">42.73&#xb1;2.30d</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.81&#xb1;0.38d</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">30.09&#xb1;2.55ab</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">144.1&#xb1;13.7d</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">CC2B</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">6.83&#xb1;0.05b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">17.81&#xb1;0.13b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">1.77&#xb1;0.06b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.48&#xb1;0.10b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">16.82&#xb1;0.35a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">44.18&#xb1;3.59d</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">23.20&#xb1;2.95b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">30.57&#xb1;1.76a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">153.2&#xb1;2.5c</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" align="left">CC2B</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">6.97&#xb1;0.13a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">18.69&#xb1;0.43a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">2.00&#xb1;0.12a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">0.51&#xb1;0.02b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">16.63&#xb1;0.73a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">57.73&#xb1;6.34b</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">47.07&#xb1;5.04a</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">27.60&#xb1;1.94bc</td>
<td valign="top" align="center">182.7&#xb1;9.7a</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn>
<p>C0, PC1, PC2, PC3 and CC1, CC2, CC3 represent the pure and crude chitin amendment rate at 0%, 0.05%, 0.1%, 0.2% and 0.5%, 1%, 2% of total soil mass, respectively. B: bulk soil. Means of 8 replicates are presented with standard deviations. Different letters within the same column show significant differences among treatments by one-way ANOVA (P&lt; 0.05).</p>
</fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<p>Compared with C0B, soybean plant morphological characteristics, such as plant height, root dry weight, and aboveground dry and fresh weight, were significantly increased under PC and CC amendments (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Figures S1A-G</bold>
</xref>). In addition, with the exception of PC2B and PC3B, soybean root volume was significantly (<italic>P</italic>&lt; 0.05) increased in both the PC and CC amendments (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Figure S1H</bold>
</xref>). However, there were no significant differences in such plant morphological characteristics among the different pure chitin addition dosages (<italic>P</italic>&lt; 0.05) (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Figures S1B, D-H</bold>
</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_2">
<title>Distribution patterns of bacterial and fungal communities</title>
<p>Compared with C0B, the bulk soil microbial activity was significantly increased under chitin amendments (<italic>P</italic>&lt; 0.05) (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Figure S1E</bold>
</xref>). In the bulk soils, except for PC1B, both PC and CC had a significantly (<italic>P</italic>&lt; 0.05) lower bacterial and fungal alpha diversity than C0B (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Figures S2A, B</bold>
</xref>). In contrast, the alpha diversity of the bacterial and fungal communities in the rhizosphere soils was hardly affected by PC (<italic>P</italic> &gt; 0.05), whereas it was markedly (<italic>P</italic>&lt; 0.05) decreased in the CC treatments, except for fungal alpha diversity in PC1B (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Figures S2C, D</bold>
</xref>). In addition, the alpha diversity of bacterial and fungal communities was dramatically lower in CC than in PC in both bulk and rhizosphere soils (<italic>P</italic>&lt; 0.05) (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Figure S2</bold>
</xref>, <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM2">
<bold>Table S2</bold>
</xref>).</p>
<p>The beta diversity of microbial communities illustrated by NMDS plots clearly showed that the bacterial and fungal communities were obviously divided into two major groups, that is, different kinds of chitin amendments (PERMANOVA, <italic>P&lt;</italic> 0.05) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;1A</bold>
</xref>, <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM2">
<bold>Table S3</bold>
</xref>), whereas the microbial communities in the bulk and rhizosphere soils were grouped closely (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;1A</bold>
</xref>). In addition, the separated NMDS plots showed a clear separation between the different dosages of pure and crude chitin additions, which also differed from the control (Adonis tests, <italic>P&lt;</italic> 0.05) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;1B</bold>
</xref>, <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Table S4</bold>
</xref>). Mantel test analysis implied that soil pH, TC, TN, C/N ratio, TK, AP, AK, <inline-formula>
<mml:math display="inline" id="im10">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msubsup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>NH</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>4</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>+</mml:mo>
</mml:msubsup>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>-N, and <inline-formula>
<mml:math display="inline" id="im11">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msubsup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>NO</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>3</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
</mml:msubsup>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>-N were significantly correlated with the bacterial and fungal community structures in the bulk soils (<italic>P</italic>&lt; 0.05) (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM2">
<bold>Table S5</bold>
</xref>). Based on Mantel test results and VIF screening, RDA revealed that soil pH, TN and <inline-formula>
<mml:math display="inline" id="im12">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msubsup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>NO</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>3</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
</mml:msubsup>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>-N made the greatest contributions to the variations in both bacterial and fungal community structures (<italic>P</italic> = 0.001) (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Figures S3A, C</bold>
</xref>, <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM2">
<bold>Table S6</bold>
</xref>). Moreover, these observations were supported by the results of random forest (RF) analysis (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Figure S3B, D</bold>
</xref>).</p>
<fig id="f1" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;1</label>
<caption>
<p>Nonmetric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) plot of all soil bacterial and fungal communities <bold>(A)</bold>. The separated NMDS plots showed the effects of pure and crude chitin amendments on the bacterial and fungal community structures in the bulk and rhizosphere soils, respectively <bold>(B)</bold>. C0, PC1, PC2, PC3 and CC1, CC2, CC3 represent the pure and crude chitin amendment rate at 0%, 0.05%, 0.1%, 0.2% and 0.5%, 1%, 2% of total soil mass, respectively. B, bulk soil; R, rhizosphere soil.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-13-1067618-g001.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_3">
<title>Changes in dominant bacterial and fungal taxa</title>
<p>In total, 6,012,813 good-quality bacterial sequences (32,046-74,775 per sample; mean = 53,658) and 7,256,335 good-quality fungal sequences (30,599-94,360 per sample; mean = 64,788) were obtained from 112 soil samples in this study. When grouped at the 97% similarity threshold, these sequences were clustered into 9,113 and 2,611 OTUs for bacteria and fungi, which were identified to 36 and 8 phyla, respectively. The bacterial and fungal community compositions in the bulk and rhizosphere soils under different PC and CC amendments are shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;2</bold>
</xref>.</p>
<fig id="f2" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;2</label>
<caption>
<p>Relative abundance of the dominant bacterial and fungal phyla/classes (at least one treatment &gt; 1%) <bold>(A, B)</bold>. The treatment description is same as <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-13-1067618-g002.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>At the bacterial phylum level, the PC markedly increased and decreased the relative abundances of Patescibacteria and Firmicutes in the bulk and rhizosphere soils, respectively, whereas it decreased the relative abundances of Deltaproteobacteria and Chloroflexi in the bulk soils and Gammaproteobacteria in the rhizosphere soils (one-way ANOVA, <italic>P</italic>&lt; 0.05) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;2A</bold>
</xref>, <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Table S7</bold>
</xref>). In contrast, CC markedly reduced the relative abundances of Deltaproteobacteria, Acidobacteria and Chloroflexi in both bulk and rhizosphere soils, while remarkably increased the relative abundances of Actinobacteria and Gemmatimonadetes in both bulk and rhizosphere soils, and increased Alphaproteobacteria in the bulk soils, except for CC1B (<italic>P</italic>&lt; 0.05) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;2A</bold>
</xref>, <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM2">
<bold>Table S8</bold>
</xref>). Meanwhile, the relative abundance of Actinobacteria was significantly increased by a high level of PC, and that of Bacteroidetes was promoted by a high level of CC in both bulk and rhizosphere soils (<italic>P</italic>&lt; 0.05) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;2A</bold>
</xref>, <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM2">
<bold>Tables S7</bold>
</xref>, <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM2">
<bold>S8</bold>
</xref>). At the bacterial OTU level, chitin amendments, especially CC, distinctly increased the relative abundance of OTUs in both bulk and rhizosphere soils, which belonged to <italic>Streptomyces</italic>, <italic>Sphingomonas</italic>, <italic>Bacillus</italic>, <italic>Mesorhizobium</italic> and <italic>Nitrospira</italic> (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3">
<bold>Figures&#xa0;3A, B</bold>
</xref>, <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM2">
<bold>Tables S9</bold>
</xref>, <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM2">
<bold>S10</bold>
</xref>).</p>
<fig id="f3" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;3</label>
<caption>
<p>Relative abundance of potentially beneficial bacteria under different pure <bold>(A)</bold> and crude <bold>(B)</bold> chitin addition dosages. The bars indicate the means of 8 replicates and the error bars represent the standard deviation. Different letters indicate significant differences among treatments (one-way ANOVA, <italic>P</italic>&lt; 0.05, Duncan&#x2019;s multiple-range test). The treatment description is same as <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-13-1067618-g003.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>At the fungal phylum level, the relative abundance of Basidiomycota was dramatically decreased by chitin amendments, but that of Zygomycota was markedly increased by CC in both bulk and rhizosphere soils (<italic>P</italic>&lt; 0.05) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;2B</bold>
</xref>, <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM2">
<bold>Tables S7</bold>
</xref>, <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM2">
<bold>S8</bold>
</xref>). The high level of PC markedly increased and reduced the relative abundances of Ascomycota and Zygomycota in the bulk soils, respectively, while the high level of CC significantly promoted the relative abundance of Ascomycota in both bulk and rhizosphere soils (<italic>P</italic>&lt; 0.05) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;2B</bold>
</xref>, <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM2">
<bold>Tables S7</bold>
</xref>, <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM2">
<bold>S8</bold>
</xref>). At the fungal OTU level, two high levels of PC and CC significantly increased the abundance of the biocontrol fungi <italic>Purpureocillium</italic> and <italic>Penicillium</italic> (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f4">
<bold>Figures&#xa0;4B, D</bold>
</xref>, <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM2">
<bold>Tables S9</bold>
</xref>, <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM2">
<bold>S10</bold>
</xref>). Additionally, PC amendments also remarkably increased the relative abundance of the fungal parasites FOTU2062 (<italic>Metarhizium frigidum</italic>) and FOTU843 (<italic>Pochonia chlamydosporia</italic>), while CC amendments increased the abundance of <italic>Mortierella</italic> (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM2">
<bold>Tables S9</bold>
</xref>, <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM2">
<bold>S10</bold>
</xref>). However, CC and high levels of PC dramatically reduced the relative abundance of potential pathogens affiliated with <italic>Fusarium</italic>, <italic>Paraphoma</italic>, <italic>Cylindrocarpon</italic> and <italic>Septoria</italic> (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f4">
<bold>Figures&#xa0;4A, C</bold>
</xref>, <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM2">
<bold>Tables S9</bold>
</xref>, <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM2">
<bold>S10</bold>
</xref>).</p>
<fig id="f4" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;4</label>
<caption>
<p>Relative abundance of potentially pathogenic <bold>(A, C)</bold> and beneficial <bold>(B, D)</bold> fungi under different pure and crude chitin addition dosages. The bars indicate the means of 8 replicates and the error bars represent the standard deviation. Different letters indicate significant differences among treatments (one-way ANOVA, <italic>P&lt;</italic> 0.05, Duncan&#x2019;s multiple-range test). The treatment description is same as <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-13-1067618-g004.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_4">
<title>Cooccurrence patterns of bacterial and fungal networks</title>
<p>To assess the effects of chitin amendments on soil microbial interactions, seven cooccurrence networks integrating bacterial and fungal OTUs were generated for different dosages of chitin in the bulk and rhizosphere soils, respectively (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Figures S4</bold>
</xref>, <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>S5</bold>
</xref>). The integrated network degrees for bacterial and fungal nodes followed a power-law distribution in both bulk and rhizosphere soils (<italic>R<sup>2</sup>
</italic> &gt; 0.6) (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM2">
<bold>Table S11</bold>
</xref>), indicating a nonrandom cooccurrence distribution pattern. The corresponding subnetworks of potential plant pathogens were further assessed from each integrated microbial community global network (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f5">
<bold>Figures&#xa0;5</bold>
</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f6">
<bold>6</bold>
</xref>). In the rhizosphere soils, we found that chitin amendments could cause simpler pathogenic-associated networks with apparently lower average node degrees in the PC and CC subnetworks than in C0B (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f6">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;6</bold>
</xref>). Furthermore, the direct interactions between potential plant pathogens and other microbial taxa are shown in <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM2">
<bold>Table S12</bold>
</xref>. Compared to the C0B subnetwork, negative interactions between <italic>Bacillus</italic> and the potential plant pathogens <italic>Cylindrocarpon</italic> and <italic>Fusarium</italic> were detected in subnetworks of CC treatment in the bulk and rhizosphere soils, respectively (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM2">
<bold>Table S12</bold>
</xref>). Additionally, a negative interaction between <italic>Fusarium</italic> and <italic>Sphingomonas</italic> was observed in the subnetwork of CC amendment (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM2">
<bold>Table S12</bold>
</xref>). The potential plant pathogen <italic>Cylindrocarpon</italic> negatively interacted with <italic>Nocardioides</italic> and <italic>Mycobacterium</italic> in the CC2R subnetwork (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM2">
<bold>Table S12</bold>
</xref>). Intriguingly, a negative interaction between <italic>Fusarium</italic> and <italic>Mortierella</italic> was observed in pure and crude chitin subnetworks in the bulk soils, but it showed different trends in the rhizosphere soils (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM2">
<bold>Table S12</bold>
</xref>).</p>
<fig id="f5" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;5</label>
<caption>
<p>Subnetworks of potential plant pathogens separated from the microbial network under different pure and crude chitin addition dosages in the bulk (B) soils. Circles and diamonds represent bacteria and fungi, respectively. The size of each node is proportional to degree. Node with blue, orange and grey indicate probiotic, pathogen and other, respectively. The microbial taxa are labeled in the blue and orange nodes. Blue and red lines show positive and negative interactions between two individual nodes, respectively. The treatment description is same as <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-13-1067618-g005.tif"/>
</fig>
<fig id="f6" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;6</label>
<caption>
<p>Subnetworks of potential plant pathogens separated from the microbial network under different pure and crude chitin addition dosages in the rhizosphere (R) soils. Circles and diamonds represent bacteria and fungi, respectively. The size of each node is proportional to degree. Node with blue, orange and grey indicate probiotic, pathogen and other, respectively. The microbial taxa are labeled in the blue and orange nodes. Blue and red lines show positive and negative interactions between two individual nodes, respectively. The treatment description is same as <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-13-1067618-g006.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="s3_5">
<title>Abiotic and biotic factors influencing soybean growth</title>
<p>SEM was used to evaluate whether the changes in soil properties induced by soil amendments directly and/or indirectly affected potential plant pathogens and beneficial species, which ultimately affected soybean growth. It was observed that soil variables and microbial parameters explained higher variations in soybean plant growth under crude chitin application (<italic>R<sup>2</sup>
</italic> = 0.84) than under pure chitin application (<italic>R<sup>2</sup>
</italic> = 0.75). With respect to pure chitin application, soil properties jointly explained 45% (<italic>R<sup>2</sup>
</italic> = 0.45) of the variation in potential plant pathogens, among which TN (<italic>&#x3b3;</italic> = 0.32, <italic>P</italic>&lt; 0.01) was directly positively associated with potential plant pathogens, while AP (<italic>&#x3b3;</italic> = -0.25, <italic>P</italic>&lt; 0.05) and TK (<italic>&#x3b3;</italic> = -0.35, <italic>P</italic>&lt; 0.01) were negatively associated with potential plant pathogens and thus indirectly and negatively affected soybean plant growth (<italic>&#x3b3;</italic> = -0.29, <italic>P</italic>&lt; 0.05) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f7">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;7A</bold>
</xref>). Importantly, soil pH (<italic>&#x3b3;</italic> = 0.96, <italic>P</italic>&lt; 0.001) was significantly and positively correlated with soil microbial activity (FDA) and then exhibited significant indirect and positive effects on soybean plant growth (<italic>&#x3b3;</italic> = 0.83, <italic>P</italic>&lt; 0.001) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f7">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;7A</bold>
</xref>). Regarding crude chitin application, soil TK (<italic>&#x3b3;</italic> = 0.61, <italic>P</italic>&lt; 0.001) had significant and direct positive correlations with soil microbial activity (FDA) but exerted no significant indirect positive effects on soybean plant growth (<italic>&#x3b3;</italic> = 0.17, <italic>P</italic> &gt; 0.05) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f7">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;7B</bold>
</xref>). However, the changes in the soil pH (<italic>&#x3b3;</italic> = 0.90, <italic>P</italic>&lt; 0.001) and TK (<italic>&#x3b3;</italic> = 0.12, <italic>P</italic>&lt; 0.05) under crude chitin addition indirectly promoted soybean plant growth mediated by the relative abundances of potentially beneficial microbial taxa (<italic>&#x3b3;</italic> = 0.79, <italic>P</italic>&lt; 0.001) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f7">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;7B</bold>
</xref>).</p>
<fig id="f7" position="float">
<label>Figure&#xa0;7</label>
<caption>
<p>Structural equation models (SEMs) describing the direct and indirect effects of soil properties, probiotic, potential plant pathogens and FDA on soybean growth under pure <bold>(A)</bold> and crude <bold>(B)</bold> chitin amendments. The probiotic represent potentially beneficial bacteria and fungi. The latent variable for soybean growth are indicated by plant height, aboveground dry weight (ADW), root dry weight (RDW) and root length. Solid and dashed lines indicate significant and insignificant relationships, respectively. Arrow width indicates the effect strength, with blue and red indicating positive and negative effects, respectively. <italic>R<sup>2</sup>
</italic> means the proportion of variance explained. ***<italic>P</italic>&lt; 0.001; **<italic>P</italic>&lt; 0.01; *<italic>P</italic>&lt; 0.05.</p>
</caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-13-1067618-g007.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s4" sec-type="discussion">
<title>Discussion</title>
<sec id="s4_1">
<title>Chitin amendments improved soil fertility and promoted soybean plant growth during continuous cropping</title>
<p>In this study, we observed that soybean growth was promoted with soil amendments of chitin (Figure S1), which was consistent with the findings reported by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Debode et&#xa0;al. (2016)</xref>. A number of studies have shown that chitin amendments imparted remarkable changes in soil physicochemical properties (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">Cretoiu et&#xa0;al., 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B78">Russell, 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">De Tender et&#xa0;al., 2019</xref>). The results of this study revealed that chitin amendments, especially for crude chitin, to acidic soil could significantly increase soil pH, indicating that chitin amendments are an effective method to mitigate soil acidification induced by continuous cropping of soybean (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B106">Yuan et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>). The increase in soil pH and TN content could be attributed to the direct effects of chitin, as chitin, an alkaline polysaccharide, is rich in carbon and nitrogen (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B103">Xu et&#xa0;al., 2005</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B81">Shamshina et&#xa0;al., 2020</xref>). The increase in available nutrients in this study, such as the soil AP and AK contents, may be largely associated with the increased abundance of phosphate- and potassium-solubilizing microbes under chitin amendments. This is substantiated by the increase of <italic>Streptomyces</italic>, <italic>Sphingomonas</italic> and <italic>Bacillus</italic> in this study (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM2">
<bold>Tables S9</bold>
</xref>, <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM2">
<bold>S10</bold>
</xref>), which have the ability to solubilize phosphorus and potassium (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Chen et&#xa0;al., 2006</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B101">Xu et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>). A surprising finding was that high dosages of crude chitin resulted in a substantial increase in soil <inline-formula>
<mml:math display="inline" id="im13">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msubsup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>NO</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>3</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
</mml:msubsup>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>-N content (<xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">
<bold>Table&#xa0;1</bold>
</xref>). We speculate that two reasons possibly contributed to this result. A possible interpretation of this finding could be that chitin is decomposed into plant available nitrogen (N) by increased chitin-degrading bacteria (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B69">Mendes et&#xa0;al., 2011</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">Cretoiu et&#xa0;al., 2013</xref>), which could further activate ammonia-oxidizing bacteria (AOB) in soils, thus resulting in the accumulation of soil <inline-formula>
<mml:math display="inline" id="im14">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msubsup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>NO</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>3</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
</mml:msubsup>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>-N content by nitrification mediated by AOB (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B55">Kowalchuk and Stephen, 2001</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">De Tender et&#xa0;al., 2019</xref>). This finding is supported by the results in our study that the relative abundance of ammonia-oxidizing bacteria of BOTU8616 (<italic>Nitrosospira multiformis</italic>) was significantly increased after high dosages of crude chitin addition (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM2">
<bold>Table S10</bold>
</xref>). An additional explanation may be that the decrease in the relative abundance of denitrifying bacteria in this study, such as BOTU9715 (<italic>Bradyrhizobium liaoningense</italic>), could also contribute to the increase in soil <inline-formula>
<mml:math display="inline" id="im15">
<mml:mrow>
<mml:msubsup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mtext>NO</mml:mtext>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mn>3</mml:mn>
<mml:mo>&#x2212;</mml:mo>
</mml:msubsup>
</mml:mrow>
</mml:math>
</inline-formula>-N content (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM2">
<bold>Table S10</bold>
</xref>), which was concordant with the view of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">De Tender et&#xa0;al. (2019)</xref>. In short, our results revealed that chitin amendments added to acidic soil improved soil chemical properties and further affected the soil microbial composition and diversity.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s4_2">
<title>Chitin amendments reduced the bacterial and fungal diversity and changed their community structure</title>
<p>It has been reported that the low C:N of chitin stimulates hydrolase production, which thus causes chitin added to soil to decompose rapidly and releases substantial nitrogen for microbial growth (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">Cretoiu et&#xa0;al., 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B54">Koivunen et&#xa0;al., 2018</xref>). This could account for the increase in soil microbial activity in PC and CC when nitrogen-rich chitin was added in this study (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Figure S1E</bold>
</xref>). <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Debode et&#xa0;al. (2016)</xref> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B47">Inderbitzin et&#xa0;al. (2018)</xref> found that microbial &#x3b1;-diversity presented no significant differences between chitin-amended and unamended soils. However, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">Cretoiu et&#xa0;al. (2014)</xref> observed that chitin amendments added to soils could promote soil microbial diversity. Conversely, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B53">Kielak et&#xa0;al. (2013)</xref> detected that bacterial diversities decreased after chitin addition, likely because of the particular selection of new habitat conditions created by chitin amendments to the microbial groups. In this study, we also observed that pure and crude chitin amendments decreased bacterial and fungal &#x3b1;-diversity in both bulk and rhizosphere soils (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Figure S2</bold>
</xref>). Therefore, we speculate that the lower diversity in PC and CC was mainly due to the larger copiotrophic bacteria (r-strategists) exhibiting higher growth rates than oligotrophic species (k-strategists) when the N resources increased under chitin amendments.</p>
<p>We found that the community structures of pure and crude chitin-amended treatments in both bulk and rhizosphere soils were clearly different from those of the unamended soils (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;1B</bold>
</xref>). It was generally reported that the bacterial and fungal communities in bulk soils were well differentiated from those in rhizosphere soils, which agrees with the concept that the enrichment of root exudates can influence rhizosphere microbial communities (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Chaparro et&#xa0;al., 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B65">Liu et&#xa0;al., 2018</xref>). However, this phenomenon was not detected in this study. We found that the impacts of chitin amendments on soil bacterial and fungal community structures were stronger than those of the rhizosphere effect, as the bacterial and fungal communities in pure and crude chitin-amended soils were obviously divided into two separate groups (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;1A</bold>
</xref>, <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM2">
<bold>Table S3</bold>
</xref>). In contrast, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Deng et&#xa0;al. (2021)</xref> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B65">Liu et&#xa0;al. (2018)</xref> observed that chemical and organic fertilizers or bio-organic fertilizer addition exerted weaker effects on microbial community structures than the rhizosphere effect. The stronger disturbances of chitin on microbial community structures compared to other organic fertilizers could be attributed to nitrogen stress and movement in soils of chitin as nitrogen-rich and slow-release fertilizer (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B103">Xu et&#xa0;al., 2005</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Deng et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s4_3">
<title>Chitin amendments increased the abundances of potentially beneficial microbes but decreased the abundances of potential plant pathogens</title>
<p>Mounting studies have documented that chitin amendments can activate specific microbial populations that are conducive to plant growth and antagonistic to potential plant pathogens (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">Bharathi et&#xa0;al., 2004</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B76">Rajkumar et&#xa0;al., 2008</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">De Tender et&#xa0;al., 2019</xref>). In this study, the relative abundances of BOTU6992 (<italic>S. limnosediminicola</italic>), BOTU8821 (<italic>S. lutea</italic>), and BOTU8988 (<italic>S. palustris</italic>), which are affiliated with the <italic>Sphingomonas</italic> genus, were markedly higher in pure and crude chitin treatments than in C0B in both bulk and rhizosphere soils (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;3</bold>
</xref>, <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM2">
<bold>Tables S9</bold>
</xref>, <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM2">
<bold>S10</bold>
</xref>). BOTU10033 (<italic>S. aureus</italic>), BOTU10262 (<italic>S. avermitilis</italic>), BOTU4104 (<italic>S</italic>. cyaneus), BOTU7747 (<italic>S</italic>. <italic>asenjonii</italic>) and BOTU8104 (<italic>S. rutgersensis</italic>) were identified as <italic>Streptomyces</italic> (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM2">
<bold>Table S10</bold>
</xref>), and BOTU10180 (<italic>Bacillus vireti</italic>), BOTU10233 (<italic>Bacillus aryabhattai</italic>), and BOTU10326 (<italic>Bacillus simplex</italic>) were affiliated with <italic>Bacillus</italic>, which were significantly increased in the crude chitin-treated soils (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM2">
<bold>Table S10</bold>
</xref>). <italic>Sphingomonas</italic>, <italic>Streptomyces</italic> and <italic>Bacillus</italic> were reported to have the capability to solubilize phosphorus and potassium (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Chen et&#xa0;al., 2006</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B101">Xu et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>) and inhibit soil-borne pathogens (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">Dur&#xe1;n et&#xa0;al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Cobo-D&#xed;az et&#xa0;al., 2019</xref>). Thus, the aforementioned increase in those bacterial taxa might be associated with antagonistic activity against potential plant pathogens and the improvement of soil nutrients. In addition, BOTU3878 and BOTU9424 were classified as <italic>Mesorhizobium huakuii</italic> and <italic>Nitrospira moscoviensis</italic>, which participate in nitrogen fixation and nitrification, respectively (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B46">Hu et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B61">Liu et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>). The relative abundances of these species were found to be significantly higher in the pure chitin treatment (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM2">
<bold>Table S9</bold>
</xref>), implying that chitin addition could enhance soil nitrogen nutrition.</p>
<p>The relative abundances of FOTU674 (<italic>Purpureocillium lilacinum</italic>), FOTU1202 (<italic>Penicillium infrabuccalum</italic>), FOTU1909 (<italic>Penicillium raperi</italic>) and FOTU676 (<italic>Penicillium janthinellum</italic>) were significantly increased in PC and CC (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f4">
<bold>Figures&#xa0;4B, D</bold>
</xref>, <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM2">
<bold>Tables S9</bold>
</xref>, <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM2">
<bold>S10</bold>
</xref>). Additionally, the relative abundances of FOTU2062 (<italic>Metarhizium frigidum</italic>) and FOTU843 (<italic>Pochonia chlamydosporia</italic>) were notably enriched in PC both in bulk and rhizosphere soils (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM2">
<bold>Table S9</bold>
</xref>). <italic>Purpureocillium</italic> and <italic>Penicillium</italic> are well-known beneficial fungi that control phytopathogenic fungi such as <italic>Fusarium oxysporum</italic>, which can cause soybean wilt disease and root rot disease (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B93">Wang et&#xa0;al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B45">Herrera et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>). <italic>Metarhizium</italic> can exert negative effects on soybean aphids (<italic>Aphis glycines</italic>), and <italic>Pochonia chlamydosporia</italic> is widely recognized as a promising biocontrol agent to suppress cyst and root knot nematodes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B44">Hamid et&#xa0;al., 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Clifton et&#xa0;al., 2018</xref>). Therefore, we speculate that the enrichment of potentially beneficial fungi in chitin amendments may largely lead to mitigation of the pathogenic risk of potential plant pathogens. Notably, we found that chitin amendments caused a larger decrease in the relative abundance of well-known potential plant pathogens, such as FOTU2225 (<italic>Fusarium equiseti</italic>) and FOTU26 (<italic>Fusarium solani</italic>), in the bulk and rhizosphere soils (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f4">
<bold>Figures&#xa0;4A, C</bold>
</xref>, <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM2">
<bold>Tables S9</bold>
</xref>, <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM2">
<bold>S10</bold>
</xref>). In addition, FOTU118 (<italic>Cylindrocarpon faginatum</italic>), FOTU501 (<italic>Paraphoma radicina</italic>) and FOTU616 (<italic>Septoria epilobii</italic>) were identified as key &#x2018;pathogen facilitators&#x2019; that aid in pathogen invasion (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B86">Tao et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>) and cause root rot and brown spot diseases of legumes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Cruz et&#xa0;al., 2010</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Dang et&#xa0;al., 2022</xref>). Thus, the increase in beneficial fungi and the decrease in potential plant pathogens provided evidence that chitin addition could contribute to the healthy development of the soil microbiota.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s4_4">
<title>Chitin amendments induced a simpler pathogen-associated subnetwork</title>
<p>The subnetworks were reconstructed from the global networks, which reflected the interactions between potential plant pathogens and their connected microbial taxa (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f5">
<bold>Figures&#xa0;5</bold>
</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f6">
<bold>6</bold>
</xref>). We found that chitin amendments formed simpler pathogen-associated subnetwork structures with lower average node degrees and less cooperation between pathogens and their connected microbial taxa, which indicated that chitin amendments could help mitigate the destructive effects of potential plant pathogens (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B80">Sato et&#xa0;al., 2010</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B53">Kielak et&#xa0;al., 2013</xref>). The interaction between <italic>Fusarium</italic> and <italic>Mortierella</italic> of crude chitin-added subnetworks was negative in bulk soils but positive in rhizosphere soils (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM2">
<bold>Table S12</bold>
</xref>). This negative relationship in bulk soil was most likely because <italic>Mortierella</italic>, as an opportunist, could respond rapidly to emerging ecological opportunities in the soils (increased carbon sources), which could compete with <italic>Fusarium</italic> for nutrients and living space (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Debode et&#xa0;al., 2016</xref>). However, this positive interaction between the bacterium <italic>Mortierella</italic> and the plant pathogen <italic>Fusarium</italic> in rhizosphere soils could be ascribed to the cooperation between <italic>Mortierella</italic> and pathogenic fungi in the decomposition of allelochemicals or the tight interactions facilitating fungal pathogenicity in rhizosphere soils (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B92">Wang et&#xa0;al., 2020a</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B46">Hu et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>). Interestingly, both in bulk and rhizosphere soils, negative interactions between <italic>Sphingomonas</italic> and <italic>Fusarium</italic> emerged in the subnetworks of CC. These antagonistic interactions may be explained by the concept that Sphingomonas utilized allelochemicals (e.g., salicylic acid) as the only carbon source (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B85">Story et&#xa0;al., 2004</xref>), which could degrade toxic substances in soils and thus suppress potential pathogens (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B67">Macchi et&#xa0;al., 2018</xref>). Thus, the simpler pathogen-associated subnetwork structures and antagonistic interactions against pathogens suggested that chitin amendments could mitigate the potential transmission of potential plant pathogens and inhibit their ecological function.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s4_5">
<title>Abiotic and biotic factors jointly promoted soybean plant growth under chitin amendments</title>
<p>Changes in soil physicochemical properties could directly affect potential plant pathogens to enhance the soil disease-suppressive ability (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Bongiorno et&#xa0;al., 2019</xref>). However, they mainly indirectly affected potential plant pathogens by influencing soil microbial assemblies and in turn improved soil disease suppression (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B83">Shen et&#xa0;al., 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B46">Hu et&#xa0;al., 2021</xref>). In this study, we observed that the increase in soil pH under chitin amendments mainly indirectly affected beneficial microbes and soil microbial activities and further suppressed potential plant pathogens to promote soybean growth (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f7">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;7</bold>
</xref>). The microbiological mechanisms of disease-suppressive soils were reported to be different and mainly included &#x2018;general suppression&#x2019; and &#x2018;specific suppression&#x2019; (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B97">Weller et&#xa0;al., 2002</xref>). &#x2018;General suppression&#x2019; is commonly associated with higher soil microbial activities, and &#x2018;specific suppression&#x2019; is mainly attributed to the dominance of specific microbial populations (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B48">Janvier et&#xa0;al., 2007</xref>). In our study, SEM showed that pure chitin amendments markedly increased soil microbial activity by increasing the soil pH, which thus promoted soybean plant growth (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f7">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;7A</bold>
</xref>). This is mainly because pure chitin addition increased the numbers and activities of chitin-degrading organisms, which could suppress potential plant pathogens by decomposing chitin-rich cell walls (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B69">Mendes et&#xa0;al., 2011</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">De Tender et&#xa0;al., 2019</xref>). This strategy belonged to &#x2018;general suppression&#x2019;, whose disease-suppressive ability was untransferable and dependent on soil organic matter content (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B48">Janvier et&#xa0;al., 2007</xref>). Interestingly, we found that the increase in soil pH mediated by crude chitin addition indirectly promoted soybean growth by increasing the populations of potentially beneficial microbes (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f7">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;7B</bold>
</xref>). This may because crude chitin addition recruited multiple specific beneficial microbial populations (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f7">
<bold>Figure&#xa0;7B</bold>
</xref>), which could suppress potential plant pathogens by competing for nutrients or colonization space (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B76">Rajkumar et&#xa0;al., 2008</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Debode et&#xa0;al., 2016</xref>). This strategy belonged to &#x2018;specific suppression&#x2019; with more stable and long-lasting disease-suppressive ability (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B97">Weller et&#xa0;al., 2002</xref>). These findings confirmed that chitin, particularly crude chitin, as a promising soil amendment could effectively alleviate soybean continuous cropping obstacles by developing disease-suppressive soils.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s5">
<title>Conclusions</title>
<p>We investigated the impacts of chitin amendments on soil proprieties, microbial communities and soybean growth in a soil with continuous cropping soybean for 5 years. We found that both PC and CC greatly increased soil pH and available nutrient contents and improved soybean plant growth and soil microbial activities (FDA). Chitin amendments remarkably enriched potentially beneficial bacterial and fungal taxa but reduced potential plant pathogens, implying that chitin addition may contribute to the development of healthy soil microbiota. In addition, chitin application caused looser pathogenic subnetwork structures, which demonstrated that chitin amendments may mitigate the spread and ecological risks of potential plant pathogens in soil&#x2013;plant systems. Interestingly, PC promoted soybean growth by increasing the numbers and activities of chitin-degrading organisms to decompose pathogenic cell walls, which belonged to general disease suppression. CC improved soybean growth by recruiting specific beneficial microbial taxa to compete for nutrients and colonization space with potential plant pathogens, which was identified as specific disease suppression. In conclusion, chitin amendments, especially CC, might be an essential approach to mitigate continuous soybean cropping obstacles by suppressing soil-borne diseases.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s6" sec-type="data-availability">
<title>Data availability statement</title>
<p>The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found in the article/<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SM1">
<bold>Supplementary Material</bold>
</xref>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s7" sec-type="author-contributions">
<title>Author contributions</title>
<p>YF: Investigation, visualization, formal analysis, writing &#x2013; original draft. JL: Supervision, fund acquisition, experiment design, writing &#x2013; reviewing &amp; editing. ZL: Visualization, formal analysis. XH: Formal analysis, data curation. ZY: Formal analysis, investigation. YL: Formal analysis, investigation. XC: Formal analysis, investigation. LL: Conceptualization, methodology. JJ: Conceptualization, methodology. GW: Conceptualization, methodology, writing &#x2013; review &amp; editing. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s8" sec-type="funding-information">
<title>Funding</title>
<p>This study was financially supported from National Natural Science Foundation of China (42177105), the Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (XDB28070302), the Key Research Program of Frontier Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences (ZDBS-LY-DQC017), Heilongjiang Province Scientific Research Fund of Provincial Scientific Research Institutes (CZKYF2022-1-B014) and Heilongjiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (ZD2022D001).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s9" sec-type="COI-statement">
<title>Conflict of interest</title>
<p>The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s10" sec-type="disclaimer">
<title>Publisher&#x2019;s note</title>
<p>All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<sec id="s11" sec-type="supplementary-material">
<title>Supplementary material</title>
<p>The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2022.1067618/full#supplementary-material">https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2022.1067618/full#supplementary-material</ext-link>
</p>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="DataSheet_1.docx" id="SM1" mimetype="application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document"/>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="DataSheet_2.xlsx" id="SM2" mimetype="application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet"/>
</sec>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="B1">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Abarenkov</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Nilsson</surname> <given-names>R. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Larsson</surname> <given-names>K. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Alexander</surname> <given-names>I. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Eberhardt</surname> <given-names>U.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Erland</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>The UNITE database for molecular identification of fungi - recent updates and future perspectives</article-title>. <source>N. Phytol.</source> <volume>186</volume>, <fpage>281</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>285</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.03160.x</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B2">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Adams</surname> <given-names>R. I.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Miletto</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Taylor</surname> <given-names>J. W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bruns</surname> <given-names>T. D.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Dispersal in microbes: Fungi in indoor air are dominated by outdoor air and show dispersal limitation at short distances</article-title>. <source>ISME J.</source> <volume>7</volume>, <fpage>1262</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1273</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/ismej.2013.28</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B3">
<citation citation-type="web">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Archer</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2020</year>) <source>rfPermute: Estimate permutation p-values for importance metrics</source>. Available at: <uri xlink:href="https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=rfPermute">https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=rfPermute</uri>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B4">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Aronesty</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <source>Ea-utils: &#x201c;Command-line tools for processing biological sequencing data&#x201d;</source> (<publisher-loc>Durham, NC</publisher-loc>). Available at: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://code.google.com/p/ea-utils">http://code.google.com/p/ea-utils</ext-link>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B5">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Bai</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cui</surname> <given-names>J. Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jie</surname> <given-names>W. G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cai</surname> <given-names>B. Y.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Analysis of the community compositions of rhizosphere fungi in soybeans continuous cropping fields</article-title>. <source>Microbiol. Res.</source> <volume>180</volume>, <fpage>49</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>56</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.micres.2015.07.007</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B6">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Bharathi</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Vivekananthan</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Harish</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ramanathan</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Samiyappan</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2004</year>). <article-title>Rhizobacteria-based bio-formulations for the management of fruit rot infection in chillies</article-title>. <source>Crop Prot.</source> <volume>23</volume>, <fpage>835</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>843</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.cropro.2004.01.007</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B7">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Bienapfl</surname> <given-names>J. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Floyd</surname> <given-names>C. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Percich</surname> <given-names>C. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Malvick</surname> <given-names>D. K.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>First report of clonostachys rosea causing root rot of soybean in the united states</article-title>. <source>Plant Dis.</source> <volume>96</volume>, <fpage>1700</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1700</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1094/PDIS-06-12-0550-PDN</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B8">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Bonanomi</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lorito</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Vinale</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Woo</surname> <given-names>S. L.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Organic amendments, beneficial microbes, and soil microbiota: Toward a unified framework for disease suppression</article-title>. <source>Annu. Rev. Phytopathol.</source> <volume>56</volume>, <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>20</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1146/annurev-phyto-080615-100046</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B9">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Bongiorno</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Postma</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>B&#xfc;nemann</surname> <given-names>E. K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Brussaard</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>de Goede</surname> <given-names>R. G. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>M&#xe4;der</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Soil suppressiveness to pythium ultimum in ten European long-term field experiments and its relation with soil parameters</article-title>. <source>Soil Biol. Biochem.</source> <volume>133</volume>, <fpage>174</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>187</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.soilbio.2019.03.012</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B10">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Caporaso</surname> <given-names>J. G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kuczynski</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Stombaugh</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bittinger</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bushman</surname> <given-names>F. D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Costello</surname> <given-names>E. K.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data</article-title>. <source>Nat. Methods</source> <volume>7</volume>, <fpage>335</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>336</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nmeth.f.303</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B11">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Chaparro</surname> <given-names>J. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Badri</surname> <given-names>D. V.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Vivanco</surname> <given-names>J. M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Rhizosphere microbiome assemblage is affected by plant development</article-title>. <source>ISME J.</source> <volume>8</volume>, <fpage>790</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>803</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/ismej.2013.196</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B12">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>Y. P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rekha</surname> <given-names>P. D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Arun</surname> <given-names>A. B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Shen</surname> <given-names>F. T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lai</surname> <given-names>W. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Young</surname> <given-names>C. C.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2006</year>). <article-title>Phosphate solubilizing bacteria from subtropical soil and their tricalcium phosphate solubilizing abilities</article-title>. <source>Appl. Soil Ecol.</source> <volume>34</volume>, <fpage>33</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>41</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.apsoil.2005.12.002</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B13">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>D. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>X. X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Carri&#xf3;n</surname> <given-names>V. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yin</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yue</surname> <given-names>Z. F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liao</surname> <given-names>Y. W. K.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Acidic amelioration of soil amendments improves soil health by impacting rhizosphere microbial assemblies</article-title>. <source>Soil Biol. Biochem.</source> <volume>167</volume>, <elocation-id>108599</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.soilbio.2022.108599</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B14">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Clauset</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Newman</surname> <given-names>M. E. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Moore</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2004</year>). <article-title>Finding community structure in very large networks</article-title>. <source>Phys. Rev. E.</source> <volume>70</volume>, <elocation-id>66111</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1103/PhysRevE.70.066111</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B15">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Clifton</surname> <given-names>E. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jaronski</surname> <given-names>S. T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Coates</surname> <given-names>B. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hodgson</surname> <given-names>E. W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gassmann</surname> <given-names>A. J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Effects of endophytic entomopathogenic fungi on soybean aphid and identification of metarhizium isolates from agricultural fields</article-title>. <source>PloS One</source> <volume>13</volume>, <elocation-id>e0194815</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0194815</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B16">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Cobo-D&#xed;az</surname> <given-names>J. F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Baroncelli</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Le Floch</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Picot</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Combined metabarcoding and co-occurrence network analysis to profile the bacterial, fungal and fusarium communities and their interactions in maize stalks</article-title>. <source>Front. Microbiol.</source> <volume>10</volume>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmicb.2019.00261</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B17">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Cole</surname> <given-names>J. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fish</surname> <given-names>J. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chai</surname> <given-names>B. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>McGarrell</surname> <given-names>D. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sun</surname> <given-names>Y. N.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Ribosomal database project: data and tools for high throughput rRNA analysis</article-title>. <source>Nucleic Acids Res.</source> <volume>42</volume>, <fpage>D633</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>D642</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/nar/gkt1244</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B18">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Cretoiu</surname> <given-names>M. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kielak</surname> <given-names>A. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Schluter</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>van Elsas</surname> <given-names>J. D.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Bacterial communities in chitin-amended soil as revealed by 16S rRNA gene based pyrosequencing</article-title>. <source>Soil Biol. Biochem.</source> <volume>76</volume>, <fpage>5</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>11</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.soilbio.2014.04.027</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B19">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Cretoiu</surname> <given-names>M. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Korthals</surname> <given-names>G. W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Visser</surname> <given-names>J. H. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>van Elsas</surname> <given-names>J. D.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Chitin amendment increases soil suppressiveness toward plant pathogens and modulates the actinobacterial and oxalobacteraceal communities in an experimental agricultural field</article-title>. <source>Appl. Environ. Microb.</source> <volume>79</volume>, <fpage>5291</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>5301</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/AEM.01361-13</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B20">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Cruz</surname> <given-names>C. D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mills</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Paul</surname> <given-names>P. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dorrance</surname> <given-names>A. E.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Impact of brown spot caused by septoria glycines on soybean in Ohio</article-title>. <source>Plant Dis.</source> <volume>94</volume>, <fpage>820</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>826</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1094/PDIS-94-7-0820</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B21">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Dang</surname> <given-names>S. Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cao</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hu</surname> <given-names>J. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>Y. Z.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Specific primers of paraphoma radicina which causes alfalfa paraphoma root rot</article-title>. <source>Eur. J. Plant Pathol.</source> <volume>162</volume>, <fpage>489</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>499</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10658-021-02399-1</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B22">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Debode</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>De Tender</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Soltaninejad</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Van Malderghem</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Haegeman</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>van der Linden</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Chitin mixed in potting soil alters lettuce growth, the survival of zoonotic bacteria on the leaves and associated rhizosphere microbiology</article-title>. <source>Front. Microbiol.</source> <volume>7</volume>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmicb.2016.00565</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B23">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Delgado-Baquerizo</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Maestre</surname> <given-names>F. T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Reich</surname> <given-names>P. B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jeffries</surname> <given-names>T. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gaitan</surname> <given-names>J. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Encinar</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Microbial diversity drives multifunctionality in terrestrial ecosystems</article-title>. <source>Nat. Commun.</source> <volume>7</volume>, <elocation-id>10541</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/ncomms10541</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B24">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Delgado-Baquerizo</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Reich</surname> <given-names>P. B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Trivedi</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Eldridge</surname> <given-names>D. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Abades</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Alfaro</surname> <given-names>F. D.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Multiple elements of soil biodiversity drive ecosystem functions across biomes</article-title>. <source>Nat. Ecol. Evol.</source> <volume>4</volume>, <fpage>210</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>220</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41559-019-1084-y</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B25">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Deng</surname> <given-names>X. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Shen</surname> <given-names>Z. Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhu</surname> <given-names>C. Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>H. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xu</surname> <given-names>Z. H.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Soil microbiome manipulation triggers direct and possible indirect suppression against <italic>Ralstonia solanacearum</italic> and <italic>Fusarium oxysporum</italic>
</article-title>. <source>NPJ Biofilms Microbi.</source> <volume>7</volume>, <fpage>33</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41522-021-00204-9</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B26">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>De Tender</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mesuere</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Van Der</surname> <given-names>J. F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Haegeman</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ruttink</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Vandecasteele</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Peat substrate amended with chitin modulates the n-cycle, siderophore and chitinase responses in the lettuce rhizobiome</article-title>. <source>Sci. Rep.</source> <volume>9</volume>, <fpage>9890</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41598-019-46106-x</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B27">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Dias</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dukes</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Antunes</surname> <given-names>P. M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Accounting for soil biotic effects on soil health and crop productivity in the design of crop rotations</article-title>. <source>J. Sci. Food Agr.</source> <volume>95</volume>, <fpage>447</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>454</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/jsfa.6565</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B28">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Ding</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>D. P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wei</surname> <given-names>H. W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>S. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xie</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Alleviating soil degradation caused by watermelon continuous cropping obstacle: Application of urban waste compost</article-title>. <source>Chemosphere</source> <volume>262</volume>, <elocation-id>128387</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.128387</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B29">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Dur&#xe1;n</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Thiergart</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Garrido-Oter</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Agler</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kemen</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Schulze-Lefert</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Microbial interkingdom interactions in roots promote arabidopsis survival</article-title>. <source>Cell</source> <volume>175</volume>, <fpage>973</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>983</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.cell.2018.10.020</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B30">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Edgar</surname> <given-names>R. C.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Search and clustering orders of magnitude faster than BLAST</article-title>. <source>Bioinformatics</source> <volume>26</volume>, <fpage>2460</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2461</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/bioinformatics/btq461</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B31">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Edgar</surname> <given-names>R. C.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>UPARSE: Highly accurate OTU sequences from microbial amplicon reads</article-title>. <source>Nat. Methods</source> <volume>10</volume>, <fpage>996</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>998</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/NMETH.2604</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B32">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Faith</surname> <given-names>D. P.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1992</year>). <article-title>Conservation evaluation and phylogenetic diversity</article-title>. <source>Biol. Conserv.</source> <volume>61</volume>, <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>10</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/0006-3207(92)91201-3</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B33">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Falkowski</surname> <given-names>P. G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fenchel</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Delong</surname> <given-names>E. F.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>The microbial engines that drive earth's biogeochemical cycles</article-title>. <source>Science</source> <volume>320</volume>, <fpage>1034</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1039</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1126/science.1153213</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B34">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Fang</surname> <given-names>W. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yan</surname> <given-names>D. D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Huang</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ren</surname> <given-names>Z. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>X. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>X. M.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Biochemical pathways used by microorganisms to produce nitrous oxide emissions from soils fumigated with dimethyl disulfide or allyl isothiocyanate</article-title>. <source>Soil Biol. Biochem.</source> <volume>132</volume>, <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>13</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.soilbio.2019.01.019</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B35">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Fan</surname> <given-names>K. K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Manuel</surname> <given-names>D. B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Guo</surname> <given-names>X. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>D. Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>Y. Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhu</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Suppressed n fixation and diazotrophs after four decades of fertilization</article-title>. <source>Microbiome</source> <volume>7</volume>, <fpage>143</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s40168-019-0757-8</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B36">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Fan</surname> <given-names>K. K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Manuel</surname> <given-names>D. B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Guo</surname> <given-names>X. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>D. Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhu</surname> <given-names>Y. G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chu</surname> <given-names>H. Y.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2020</year>a). <article-title>Biodiversity of key-stone phylotypes determines crop production in a 4-decade fertilization experiment</article-title>. <source>ISME J.</source> <volume>15</volume>, <fpage>550</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>561</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41396-020-00796-8</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B37">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Fan</surname> <given-names>Z. Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Qin</surname> <given-names>Y. K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xing</surname> <given-names>R. G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yu</surname> <given-names>H. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>P. C.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2020</year>b). <article-title>Chitosan oligosaccharide fluorinated derivative control root-knot nematode (Meloidogyne incognita) disease based on the multi-efficacy strategy</article-title>. <source>Mar. Drugs</source> <volume>18</volume>, <elocation-id>273</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/md18050273</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B38">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Faust</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Raes</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Microbial interactions: from networks to models</article-title>. <source>Nat. Rev. Microbiol.</source> <volume>10</volume>, <fpage>538</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>550</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nrmicro2832</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B39">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Gillian</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Harry</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2001</year>). <article-title>Development of a sensitive and rapid method for the measurement of total microbial activity using fluorescein diacetate (FDA) in a range of soils</article-title>. <source>Soil Biol. Biochem.</source> <volume>33</volume>, <fpage>943</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>951</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S0038-0717(00)00244-3</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B40">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Goldman</surname> <given-names>G. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hayes</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Harman</surname> <given-names>G. E.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>1994</year>). <article-title>Molecular and cellular biology of biocontrol trichoderma spp</article-title>. <source>Trends Biotechnol.</source> <volume>12</volume>, <fpage>478</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>482</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/0167-7799(94)90055-8</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B41">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Grace</surname> <given-names>J. B.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2006</year>). <source>Structural equation modeling and natural systems</source> (<publisher-loc>Cambridge</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Cambridge University Press</publisher-name>).</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B42">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Guo</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tao</surname> <given-names>C. Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jousset</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xiong</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Shen</surname> <given-names>Z. Z.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Trophic interactions between predatory protists and pathogen-suppressive bacteria impact plant health</article-title>. <source>ISME J</source>. <volume>16</volume>, <fpage>1932</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1943</lpage>. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41396-022-01244-5</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B43">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Guo</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xiong</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hang</surname> <given-names>X. N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gao</surname> <given-names>Z. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jiao</surname> <given-names>Z. X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>H. J.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Protists as main indicators and determinants of plant performance</article-title>. <source>Microbiome</source> <volume>9</volume>, <fpage>64</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s40168-021-01025-w</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B44">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Hamid</surname> <given-names>M. I.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hussain</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>Y. P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>X. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xiang</surname> <given-names>M. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>X. Z.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Successive soybean-monoculture cropping assembles rhizosphere microbial communities for the soil suppression of soybean cyst nematode</article-title>. <source>FEMS Microbiol. Ecol.</source> <volume>93</volume>, <elocation-id>fiw222</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/femsec/fiw222</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B45">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Herrera</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fuentes</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ortiz</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Soto</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Valadares</surname> <given-names>R. B. D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Salas-Eljatib</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Root-associated endophytes isolated from juvenile ulex europaeus l. (Fabaceae) plants colonizing rural areas in south-central Chile</article-title>. <source>Plant Soil.</source> <volume>474</volume>, <fpage>181</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>193</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11104-022-05324-5</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B46">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Hu</surname> <given-names>X. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>J. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liang</surname> <given-names>A. Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>L. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yao</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yu</surname> <given-names>Z. H.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Conventional and conservation tillage practices affect soil microbial co-occurrence patterns and are associated with crop yields</article-title>. <source>Agr. Ecosyst. Environ.</source> <volume>319</volume>, <elocation-id>107534</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.agee.2021.107534</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B47">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Inderbitzin</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ward</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Barbella</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Solares</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Izyumin</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Burman</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Soil microbiomes associated with verticillium wilt-suppressive broccoli and chitin amendments are enriched with potential biocontrol agents</article-title>. <source>Phytopathology</source> <volume>108</volume>, <fpage>31</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>43</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1094/PHYTO-07-17-0242-R</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B48">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Janvier</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Villeneuve</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Alabouvette</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Edel-Hermann</surname> <given-names>V.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mateille</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Steinberg</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2007</year>). <article-title>Soil health through soil disease suppression: Which strategy from descriptors to indicators</article-title>? <source>Soil Biol. Biochem.</source> <volume>39</volume>, <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>23</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.soilbio.2006.07.001</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B49">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kalita</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Malek</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Root nodules of genista germanica harbor bradyrhizobium and rhizobium bacteria exchanging nodC and nodZ genes</article-title>. <source>Syst. Appl. Microbiol.</source> <volume>43</volume>, <elocation-id>126026</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.syapm.2019.126026</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B50">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kara</surname> <given-names>E. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hanson</surname> <given-names>P. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hu</surname> <given-names>Y. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Winslow</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>McMahon</surname> <given-names>K. D.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>A decade of seasonal dynamics and co-occurrences within freshwater bacterioplankton communities from eutrophic lake mendota, WI, USA</article-title>. <source>ISME J.</source> <volume>7</volume>, <fpage>680</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>684</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/ismej.2012.118</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B51">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kemboi</surname> <given-names>V. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kipkoech</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Njire</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Were</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lagat</surname> <given-names>M. K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ndwiga</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Biocontrol potential of chitin and chitosan extracted from black soldier fly pupal exuviae against bacterial wilt of tomato</article-title>. <source>Microorganisms</source> <volume>10</volume>, <elocation-id>165</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/microorganisms10010165</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B52">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Khan</surname> <given-names>M. I.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yoo</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Park</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Improved RDX detoxification with starch addition using a novel nitrogen-fixing aerobic microbial consortium from soil contaminated with explosives</article-title>. <source>J. Hazard. Mater.</source> <volume>287</volume>, <fpage>243</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>251</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jhazmat.2015.01.058</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B53">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kielak</surname> <given-names>A. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cretoiu</surname> <given-names>M. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Semenov</surname> <given-names>A. V.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>S&#xf8;rensen</surname> <given-names>S. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>van Elsas</surname> <given-names>J. D.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Bacterial chitinolytic communities respond to chitin and pH alteration in soil</article-title>. <source>Appl. Environ. Microb.</source> <volume>79</volume>, <fpage>263</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>272</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/AEM.02546-12</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B54">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Koivunen</surname> <given-names>E. E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tully</surname> <given-names>K. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Swett</surname> <given-names>C. L.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Co-Managing soil and plant pathogens: effects of organic amendments on soil fertility and fungal pathogen survival</article-title>. <source>Plant Soil.</source> <volume>432</volume>, <fpage>171</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>189</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11104-018-3779-2</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B55">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kowalchuk</surname> <given-names>G. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Stephen</surname> <given-names>J. R.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2001</year>). <article-title>Ammonia-oxidizing bacteria: A model for molecular microbial ecology</article-title>. <source>Annu. Rev. Microbiol.</source> <volume>55</volume>, <fpage>485</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>529</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1146/annurev.micro.55.1.485</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B56">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Lehmann</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bossio</surname> <given-names>D. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>K&#xf6;gel-Knabner</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rillig</surname> <given-names>M. C.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>The concept and future prospects of soil health</article-title>. <source>Nat. Rev. Earth Env.</source> <volume>1</volume>, <fpage>544</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>553</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s43017-020-0080-8</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B57">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>C. W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>G. Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>J. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhu</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bai</surname> <given-names>X. F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hou</surname> <given-names>Y. P.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2021</year>a). <article-title>The comprehensive changes in soil properties are continuous cropping obstacles associated with American ginseng (Panax quinquefolius) cultivation</article-title>. <source>Sci. Rep.</source> <volume>11</volume>, <fpage>5068</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41598-021-84436-x</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B58">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>P. F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>G. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>T. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2021</year>b). <article-title>Phosphorus availability increases pathobiome abundance and invasion of rhizosphere microbial networks by ralstonia</article-title>. <source>Environ. Microbiol.</source> <volume>23</volume>, <fpage>5992</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>6003</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/1462-2920.15696</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B59">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>J. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yao</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yu</surname> <given-names>Z. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>Y. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jin</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Short-term lime application impacts microbial community composition and potential function in an acid black soil</article-title>. <source>Plant Soil.</source> <volume>470</volume>, <fpage>35</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>50</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11104-021-04913-0</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B60">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>X. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cheng</surname> <given-names>X. K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>H. Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>K. Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Qiao</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Effect of fumigation with 1, 3-dichloropropene on soil bacterial communities</article-title>. <source>Chemosphere</source> <volume>139</volume>, <fpage>379</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>385</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.chemosphere.2015.07.034</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B61">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>Z. X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gu</surname> <given-names>H. D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liang</surname> <given-names>A. Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>L. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yao</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xu</surname> <given-names>Y. X.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>Conservation tillage regulates the assembly, network structure and ecological function of the soil bacterial community in black soils</article-title>. <source>Plant Soil.</source> <volume>472</volume>, <fpage>207</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>223</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11104-021-05219-x</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B62">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>X. B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jin</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>G. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Herbert</surname> <given-names>S. J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>Soybean yield physiology and development of high-yielding practices in northeast China</article-title>. <source>Field Crop Res.</source> <volume>105</volume>, <fpage>157</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>171</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.fcr.2007.09.003</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B63">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>X. B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>Y. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Han</surname> <given-names>B. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Q. Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>K. Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>X. Y.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Yield response of continuous soybean to one-season crop disturbance in a previous continuous soybean field in northeast China</article-title>. <source>Field Crop Res.</source> <volume>138</volume>, <fpage>52</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>56</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.fcr.2012.09.012</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B64">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>Z. X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>J. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yu</surname> <given-names>Z. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yao</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>Y. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liang</surname> <given-names>A. Z.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Long-term continuous cropping of soybean is comparable to crop rotation in mediating microbial abundance, diversity and community composition</article-title>. <source>Soil Till. Res.</source> <volume>197</volume>, <elocation-id>104503</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.still.2019.104503</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B65">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>H. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xiong</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>R. F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hang</surname> <given-names>X. N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>D. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Continuous application of different organic additives can suppress tomato disease by inducing the healthy rhizospheric microbiota through alterations to the bulk soil microflora</article-title>. <source>Plant Soil.</source> <volume>423</volume>, <fpage>229</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>240</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11104-017-3504-6</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B66">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>J. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yao</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>Y. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mi</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>X. L.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Continuous cropping of soybean alters the bulk and rhizospheric soil fungal communities in a mollisol of northeast PR China</article-title>. <source>Land Degrad. Dev.</source> <volume>30</volume>, <fpage>1725</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1738</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/ldr.3378</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B67">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Macchi</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Martinez</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Neme Tauil</surname> <given-names>R. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Valacco</surname> <given-names>M. P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Morelli</surname> <given-names>I. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Coppotelli</surname> <given-names>B. M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Insights into the genome and proteome of sphingomonas paucimobilis strain 20006FA involved in the regulation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon degradation</article-title>. <source>World J. Microb. Biot.</source> <volume>34</volume>, <elocation-id>7</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11274-017-2391-6</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B68">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Mago&#x10d;</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Salzberg</surname> <given-names>S. L.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>FLASH: Fast length adjustment of short reads to improve genome assemblies</article-title>. <source>Bioinformatics</source> <volume>27</volume>, <fpage>2957</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2963</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/bioinformatics/btr507</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B69">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Mendes</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kruijt</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>de Bruijn</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dekkers</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>van der Voort</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Schneider</surname> <given-names>J. H. M.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Deciphering the rhizosphere microbiome for disease-suppressive bacteria</article-title>. <source>Science</source> <volume>332</volume>, <fpage>1097</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1100</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1126/science.1203980</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B70">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Mwaheb</surname> <given-names>M. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hussain</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tian</surname> <given-names>J. Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>X. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hamid</surname> <given-names>M. I.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>El-Kassim</surname> <given-names>N. A.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Synergetic suppression of soybean cyst nematodes by chitosan and hirsutella minnesotensis <italic>via</italic> the assembly of the soybean rhizosphere microbial communities</article-title>. <source>Biol. Control.</source> <volume>115</volume>, <fpage>85</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>94</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.biocontrol.2017.09.011</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B71">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Nguyen</surname> <given-names>N. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Song</surname> <given-names>Z. W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bates</surname> <given-names>S. T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Branco</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tedersoo</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Menke</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>FUNGuild: an open annotation tool for parsing fungal community datasets by ecological guild</article-title>. <source>Fungal Ecol.</source> <volume>20</volume>, <fpage>241</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>248</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.funeco.2015.06.006</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B72">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Nilsson</surname> <given-names>R. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kristiansson</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ryberg</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hallenberg</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Larsson</surname> <given-names>K. H.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>Intraspecific ITS variability in the kingdom fungi as expressed in the international sequence databases and its implications for molecular species identification</article-title>. <source>Evol. Bioinform.</source> <volume>4</volume>, <fpage>193</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>201</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4137/ebo.s653</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B73">
<citation citation-type="web">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Oksanen</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Simpson</surname> <given-names>G. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Blanchet</surname> <given-names>F. G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kindt</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Legendre</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Minchin</surname> <given-names>P. R.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2022</year>) <source>Vegan: Community ecology package</source>. Available at: <uri xlink:href="https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=vegan">https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=vegan</uri>.</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B74">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Pu</surname> <given-names>R. F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>P. P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Guo</surname> <given-names>L. P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>M. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cui</surname> <given-names>X. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>C. X.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>The remediation effects of microbial organic fertilizer on soil microorganisms after chloropicrin fumigation</article-title>. <source>Ecotox. Environ. Safe.</source> <volume>231</volume>, <elocation-id>113188</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ecoenv.2022.113188</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B75">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Quast</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pruesse</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yilmaz</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gerken</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Schweer</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yarza</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>The SILVA ribosomal RNA gene database project: improved data processing and web-based tools</article-title>. <source>Nucleic Acids Res.</source> <volume>41</volume>, <fpage>D590</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>D596</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/nar/gks1219</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B76">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Rajkumar</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lee</surname> <given-names>K. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Freitas</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>Effects of chitin and salicylic acid on biological control activity of pseudomonas spp. against damping off of pepper</article-title>. <source>S. Afr. J. Bot.</source> <volume>74</volume>, <fpage>268</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>273</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.sajb.2007.11.014</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B77">
<citation citation-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<collab>R Development Core Team</collab>
</person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <source>R: A language and environment for statistical computing</source> (<publisher-loc>Vienna, Austria URL</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>R Foundation for Statistical Computing</publisher-name>).</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B78">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Russell</surname> <given-names>A. E.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Unexpected effects of chitin, cellulose, and lignin addition on soil dynamics in a wet tropical forest</article-title>. <source>Ecosystems</source> <volume>17</volume>, <fpage>918</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>930</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10021-014-9769-1</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B79">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Saleem</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Meckes</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pervaiz</surname> <given-names>Z. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Traw</surname> <given-names>M. B.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Microbial interactions in the phyllosphere increase plant performance under herbivore biotic stress</article-title>. <source>Front. Microbiol.</source> <volume>8</volume>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmicb.2017.00041</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B80">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Sato</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Azama</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Nogawa</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Taguchi</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Shimosaka</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Analysis of a change in bacterial community in different environments with addition of chitin or chitosan</article-title>. <source>J. Biosci. Bioeng.</source> <volume>109</volume>, <fpage>472</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>478</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jbiosc.2009.10.021</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B81">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Shamshina</surname> <given-names>J. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kelly</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Oldham</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rogers</surname> <given-names>R. D.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Agricultural uses of chitin polymers</article-title>. <source>Environ. Chem. Lett.</source> <volume>18</volume>, <fpage>53</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>60</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10311-019-00934-5</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B82">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Shannon</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Markiel</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ozier</surname> <given-names>O.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Baliga</surname> <given-names>N. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>J. T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ramage</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2003</year>). <article-title>Cytoscape: A software environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks</article-title>. <source>Genome Res.</source> <volume>13</volume>, <fpage>2498</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2504</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1101/gr.1239303</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B83">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Shen</surname> <given-names>Z. Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xue</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Penton</surname> <given-names>C. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Thomashow</surname> <given-names>L. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>B. B.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Suppression of banana Panama disease induced by soil microbiome reconstruction through an integrated agricultural strategy</article-title>. <source>Soil Biol. Biochem.</source> <volume>128</volume>, <fpage>164</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>174</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.soilbio.2018.10.016</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B84">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Sl&#xe1;vikov&#xe1;</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ko&#x161;&#xed;kov&#xe1;</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mikul&#xe1;&#x161;ov&#xe1;</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2002</year>). <article-title>Biotransformation of waste lignin products by the soil-inhabiting yeast trichosporon pullulans</article-title>. <source>Can. J. Microbiol.</source> <volume>48</volume>, <fpage>200</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>203</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1139/W02-013</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B85">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Story</surname> <given-names>S. P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kline</surname> <given-names>E. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hughes</surname> <given-names>T. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Riley</surname> <given-names>M. B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hayasak</surname> <given-names>S. S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2004</year>). <article-title>Degradation of aromatic hydrocarbons by sphingomonas paucimobilis strain EPA505</article-title>. <source>Arch. Environ. Con. Tox.</source> <volume>47</volume>, <fpage>168</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>176</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00244-004-3069-2</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B86">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Tao</surname> <given-names>J. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cao</surname> <given-names>P. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xiao</surname> <given-names>Y. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Z. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Huang</surname> <given-names>Z. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jin</surname> <given-names>J. J.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Distribution of the potential pathogenic alternaria on plant leaves determines foliar fungal communities around the disease spot</article-title>. <source>Environ. Res.</source> <volume>200</volume>, <elocation-id>111715</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.envres.2021.111715</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B87">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Tian</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Shi</surname> <given-names>S. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ma</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tran</surname> <given-names>L. S. P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tian</surname> <given-names>C. J.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Community structures of the rhizomicrobiomes of cultivated and wild soybeans in their continuous cropping</article-title>. <source>Microbiol. Res.</source> <volume>232</volume>, <elocation-id>126390</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.micres.2019.126390</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B88">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Toju</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Peay</surname> <given-names>K. G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yamamichi</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Narisawa</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hiruma</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Naito</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Core microbiomes for sustainable agroecosystems</article-title>. <source>Nat. Plants.</source> <volume>4</volume>, <fpage>247</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>257</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41477-018-0139-4</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B89">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Vega</surname> <given-names>F. E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Posada</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Aime</surname> <given-names>M. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pava-Ripoll</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Infante</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rehner</surname> <given-names>S. A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>Entomopathogenic fungal endophytes</article-title>. <source>Biol. Control.</source> <volume>46</volume>, <fpage>72</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>82</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.biocontrol.2008.01.008</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B90">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wagg</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Schlaeppi</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Banerjee</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kuramae</surname> <given-names>E. E.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>van der Heijden</surname> <given-names>M. G. A.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Fungal-bacterial diversity and microbiome complexity predict ecosystem functioning</article-title>. <source>Nat. Commun.</source> <volume>10</volume>, <fpage>4841</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41467-019-12798-y</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B91">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Walters</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hyde</surname> <given-names>E. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Berg-Lyons</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ackermann</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Humphrey</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Parada</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Improved bacterial 16S rRNA gene (V4 and V4-5) and fungal internal transcribed spacer marker gene primers for microbial community surveys</article-title>. <source>mSystems</source> <volume>1</volume>, <elocation-id>e00009</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/mSystems.00009-15</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B92">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>H. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>X. Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Guo</surname> <given-names>Q. C.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2020</year>a). <article-title>Long-term no-tillage and different residue amounts alter soil microbial community composition and increase the risk of maize root rot in northeast China</article-title>. <source>Soil Till. Res.</source> <volume>196</volume>, <elocation-id>104452</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.still.2019.104452</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B93">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>Z. G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lin</surname> <given-names>R. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>E. F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mao</surname> <given-names>Z. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ling</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Biosynthesis of antibiotic leucinostatins in bio-control fungus purpureocillium lilacinum and their inhibition on phytophthora revealed by genome mining</article-title>. <source>PloS Pathog.</source> <volume>12</volume>, <elocation-id>e1005685</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1371/journal.ppat.1005685</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B94">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Y. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>J. F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Duan</surname> <given-names>Y. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Luo</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Taherzadeh</surname> <given-names>M. J.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2020</year>b). <article-title>The diversity of microbial community and function varied in response to different agricultural residues composting</article-title>. <source>Sci. Total Environ.</source> <volume>715</volume>, <elocation-id>136983</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.136983</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B95">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tang</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mahony</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Baldock</surname> <given-names>J. A.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Butterly</surname> <given-names>C. R.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2015</year>). <article-title>Factors affecting the measurement of soil pH buffer capacity: approaches to optimize the methods</article-title>. <source>Eur. J. Soil Sci.</source> <volume>66</volume>, <fpage>53</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>64</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/ejss.12195</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B96">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>B. B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yuan</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Shen</surname> <given-names>Z. Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>M. X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Effects of novel bioorganic fertilizer produced by bacillus amyloliquefaciens W19 on antagonism of fusarium wilt of banana</article-title>. <source>Biol. Fert. Soils.</source> <volume>49</volume>, <fpage>435</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>446</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00374-012-0739-5</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B97">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Weller</surname> <given-names>D. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Raaijmakers</surname> <given-names>J. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gardener</surname> <given-names>B. B. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Thomashow</surname> <given-names>L. S.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2002</year>). <article-title>Microbial populations responsible for specific soil suppressiveness to plant pathogens</article-title>. <source>Annu. Rev. Phytopathol.</source> <volume>40</volume>, <fpage>309</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>348</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1146/annurev.phyto.40.030402.110010</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B98">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2022</year>). <article-title>What does newly increased 10 million mu bring about</article-title>. <source>Econ. Daily</source> <fpage>009</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.28425/n.cnki.njjrb.2022.003861</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B99">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Xiong</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ren</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>Q. Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>H. S.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Distinct roles for soil fungal and bacterial communities associated with the suppression of vanilla fusarium wilt disease</article-title>. <source>Soil Biol. Biochem.</source> <volume>107</volume>, <fpage>198</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>207</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.soilbio.2017.01.010</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B100">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Xiong</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Song</surname> <given-names>Y. Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>K. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gu</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wei</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kowalchuk</surname> <given-names>G. A.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Rhizosphere protists are key determinants of plant health</article-title>. <source>Microbiome</source> <volume>8</volume>, <fpage>27</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s40168-020-00799-9</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B101">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Xu</surname> <given-names>Y. X.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>J. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>X. F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>H. B.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Continuous cropping of alfalfa (Medicago sativa l.) reduces bacterial diversity and simplifies cooccurrence networks in aeolian sandy soil</article-title>. <source>Soil Ecol. Lett.</source> <volume>4</volume>, <fpage>131</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>143</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s42832-021-0083-5</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B102">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Xun</surname> <given-names>W. B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>Y. P.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ren</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xiong</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xu</surname> <given-names>Z. H.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Specialized metabolic functions of keystone taxa sustain soil microbiome stability</article-title>. <source>Microbiome</source> <volume>9</volume>, <fpage>35</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s40168-020-00985-9</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B103">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Xu</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yong</surname> <given-names>L. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lim</surname> <given-names>Y. G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Obbard</surname> <given-names>J. P.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2005</year>). <article-title>Use of slow-release fertilizer and biopolymers for stimulating hydrocarbon biodegradation in oil-contaminated beach sediments</article-title>. <source>Mar. Pollut. Bull.</source> <volume>51</volume>, <fpage>1101</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1110</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.marpolbul.2005.02.037</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B104">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Yao</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>J. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yu</surname> <given-names>Z. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Li</surname> <given-names>Y. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jin</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>X. B.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Three years of biochar amendment alters soil physiochemical properties and fungal community composition in a black soil of northeast China</article-title>. <source>Soil Biol. Biochem.</source> <volume>110</volume>, <fpage>56</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>67</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.soilbio.2017.03.005</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B105">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Yin</surname> <given-names>R. F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Feng</surname> <given-names>X. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2017</year>). <article-title>Changes of soybean planting area in northeast China and the Huang-huai region in 2017 and its production outlook</article-title>. <source>Agric. Outlook</source> <volume>13</volume>, <fpage>42</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>47</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3969/j.issn.1673-3908.2017.07.009</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B106">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Yuan</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yu</surname> <given-names>T. B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Shi</surname> <given-names>Q. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Han</surname> <given-names>D. W.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yu</surname> <given-names>K. C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>S. R.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Rhizosphere soil bacterial communities of continuous cropping-tolerant and sensitive soybean genotypes respond differently to long-term continuous cropping in mollisols</article-title>. <source>Front. Microbiol.</source> <volume>12</volume>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmicb.2021.729047</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B107">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>F. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Y. H.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>F. J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ge</surname> <given-names>H. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tian</surname> <given-names>F. S.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Trichoderma harzianum mitigates salt stress in cucumber <italic>via</italic> multiple responses</article-title>. <source>Ecotox. Environ. Safe.</source> <volume>170</volume>, <fpage>436</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>445</lpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.ecoenv.2018.11.084</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B108">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zhan</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Qin</surname> <given-names>Y. K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gao</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fan</surname> <given-names>Z. Q.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>L. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Xing</surname> <given-names>R. G.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Efficacy of a chitin-based water-soluble derivative in inducing purpureocillium lilacinum against nematode disease (Meloidogyne incognita)</article-title>. <source>Int. J. Mol. Sci.</source> <volume>22</volume>, <elocation-id>6870</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3390/ijms22136870</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B109">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zhao</surname> <given-names>Z. B.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>He</surname> <given-names>J. Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Geisen</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Han</surname> <given-names>L. L.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>J. T.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Shen</surname> <given-names>J. P.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Protist communities are more sensitive to nitrogen fertilization than other microorganisms in diverse agricultural soils</article-title>. <source>Microbiome</source> <volume>7</volume>, <fpage>33</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s40168-019-0647-0</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B110">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Deng</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Luo</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>He</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Phylogenetic molecular ecological network of soil microbial communities in response to elevated CO2</article-title>. <source>mBio</source> <volume>2</volume>, <elocation-id>e00122-11</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/mBio.00122-11</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B111">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>R. R.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tian</surname> <given-names>M. M.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Jahan</surname> <given-names>M. S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Shu</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sun</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names>
</name>
<etal/>
</person-group>. (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Mixing of biochar, vinegar and mushroom residues regulates soil microbial community and increases cucumber yield under continuous cropping regime</article-title>. <source>Appl. Soil Ecol.</source> <volume>161</volume>, <elocation-id>103883</elocation-id>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.apsoil.2021.103883</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
<ref id="B112">
<citation citation-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>X. G.</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Wu</surname> <given-names>F. Z.</given-names>
</name>
</person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Vanillic acid changed cucumber (Cucumis sativus l.) seedling rhizosphere total bacterial, pseudomonas and bacillus spp. communities</article-title>. <source>Sci. Rep.</source> <volume>8</volume>, <fpage>4929</fpage>. doi:&#xa0;<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41598-018-23406-2</pub-id>
</citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>