<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing DTD v2.3 20070202//EN" "journalpublishing.dtd">
<article xml:lang="EN" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" article-type="research-article">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Front. Plant Sci.</journal-id>
<journal-title>Frontiers in Plant Science</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">Front. Plant Sci.</abbrev-journal-title>
<issn pub-type="epub">1664-462X</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Frontiers Media S.A.</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fpls.2021.780454</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Plant Science</subject>
<subj-group>
<subject>Original Research</subject>
</subj-group>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Breeding Practice Improves the Mycorrhizal Responsiveness of Cotton (<italic>Gossypium</italic> spp. L.)</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Letian</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/1485142/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>Xihe</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Maimaitiaili</surname> <given-names>Baidengsha</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"><sup>3</sup></xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Kafle</surname> <given-names>Arjun</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4"><sup>4</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/630129/overview"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<name><surname>Khan</surname> <given-names>Khuram Shehzad</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name><surname>Feng</surname> <given-names>Gu</given-names></name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
<xref ref-type="corresp" rid="c001"><sup>&#x002A;</sup></xref>
<uri xlink:href="http://loop.frontiersin.org/people/295327/overview"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="aff1"><sup>1</sup><institution>College of Resources and Environmental Sciences, National Academy of Agriculture Green Development, China Agricultural University</institution>, <addr-line>Beijing</addr-line>, <country>China</country></aff>
<aff id="aff2"><sup>2</sup><institution>Institute of Soil and Fertilizer and Agricultural Sparing Water, Xinjiang Academy of Agricultural Science</institution>, <addr-line>Urumqi</addr-line>, <country>China</country></aff>
<aff id="aff3"><sup>3</sup><institution>Institute of Nuclear Technology and Biotechnology, Xinjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences</institution>, <addr-line>Urumqi</addr-line>, <country>China</country></aff>
<aff id="aff4"><sup>4</sup><institution>Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, North Carolina State University</institution>, <addr-line>Raleigh, NC</addr-line>, <country>United States</country></aff>
<author-notes>
<fn fn-type="edited-by"><p>Edited by: Juan Manuel Ruiz-Lozano, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cient&#x00ED;ficas (CSIC), Spain</p></fn>
<fn fn-type="edited-by"><p>Reviewed by: Mahaveer P. Sharma, ICAR-Indian Institute of Soybean Research, India; Rupam Kapoor, University of Delhi, India; Paulo Emilio Lovato, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Brazil</p></fn>
<corresp id="c001">&#x002A;Correspondence: Gu Feng, <email>fenggu@cau.edu.cn</email></corresp>
<fn fn-type="other" id="fn004"><p>This article was submitted to Plant Symbiotic Interactions, a section of the journal Frontiers in Plant Science</p></fn>
</author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="epub">
<day>10</day>
<month>12</month>
<year>2021</year>
</pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="collection">
<year>2021</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>12</volume>
<elocation-id>780454</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received">
<day>23</day>
<month>09</month>
<year>2021</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted">
<day>08</day>
<month>11</month>
<year>2021</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>Copyright &#x00A9; 2021 Wang, Wang, Maimaitiaili, Kafle, Khan and Feng.</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2021</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Wang, Wang, Maimaitiaili, Kafle, Khan and Feng</copyright-holder>
<license xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/"><p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.</p></license>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<p>Maximizing the function of indigenous arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi by choosing specific crop genotypes offers one of the few untapped opportunities to improve the sustainability of agriculture. In this study, the differences in mycorrhizal responsiveness (MR) in plant growth and shoot phosphorus (P) content among cotton (<italic>Gossypium</italic> spp. L.) genotypes from different release dates were compared and then the relationships between MR and P uptake-related traits were determined. The experimental design in a greenhouse included 24 genotypes released from 1950 to present in Xinjiang Province, inoculation with or without AM fungi, and P levels (15 and 150 mg P kg<sup>&#x2013;1</sup> added as KH<sub>2</sub>PO<sub>4</sub>). Results showed that the modern cotton genotypes exhibited a higher degree of mycorrhizal colonization, the hyphal length density (HLD), and mycorrhizae-induced changes in shoot growth than the old genotypes when inoculated with indigenous AM fungi at both the P levels. Moreover, MR was highly correlated with the HLD at low P levels and the HLD may provide useful insights for future cotton breeding aimed at delivering crop genotypes that can benefit more from AM fungi.</p>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>cotton cultivars</kwd>
<kwd>breeding</kwd>
<kwd>mycorrhizal responsiveness</kwd>
<kwd>indigenous community</kwd>
<kwd>phosphorus uptake</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<counts>
<fig-count count="5"/>
<table-count count="0"/>
<equation-count count="2"/>
<ref-count count="67"/>
<page-count count="12"/>
<word-count count="8329"/>
</counts>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec id="S1" sec-type="intro">
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>Agricultural intensification has led to an increased yield of staple crops (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B55">Tilman, 1999</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">Godfray et al., 2010</xref>), but an intensive supply of chemical fertilizers has brought a series of adverse environmental impacts and sustainability issues (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Foley et al., 2005</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Bender et al., 2016</xref>). Arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi are widely distributed in natural and agricultural ecosystems and the most recognized benefit of AM fungi is enhanced plant uptake of immobile nutrients, especially phosphorus (P). Exploitation of the function of AM fungi to increase plant nutrient uptake offers one of the few untapped opportunities to reduce P fertilizer application and improve the sustainability of agriculture (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B56">Toju et al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B65">Zhang et al., 2019</xref>). Whether or not inoculated, AM fungi can successfully establish and enhance plant growth that depends on a series of factors such as native AM fungal communities, pesticides, and cultivars (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">Bethlenfalvay et al., 1996</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Busse et al., 2004</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B45">Muok et al., 2009</xref>). Hence, this approach is not always stable and may even have a neutral effect on crop production (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Jeffries et al., 2003</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Corkidi et al., 2004</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">Lekberg et al., 2008</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Cely et al., 2016</xref>). Besides inoculating nonindigenous AM fungi, using the indigenous AM fungal community to enhance plant growth could be an alternative. P availability is considered to be the major driving force of the mycorrhizal responsiveness (MR) of plants (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">Johnson et al., 2010</xref>). High soil P availability causes a decrease in AM fungal colonization and mycorrhizal benefits (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B42">Mader et al., 2000</xref>). However, a rich community of AM fungi in agricultural ecosystems has been observed with intensive crop management (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B47">Oehl et al., 2004</xref>), regardless of the application of fertilizers, pesticides, and even high soil available P (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B54">Thomson et al., 1992</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Kaeppler et al., 2000</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">Hao et al., 2008</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Gai et al., 2010</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B57">Vestberg et al., 2011</xref>). Moreover, the indigenous AM fungal communities can play a role in promoting growth of maize and cotton (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">Liu et al., 2016</xref>). According to breeding practices and release date, a recent study divided maize varieties into three varietal groups, including old landraces, modern hybrids, and inbred lines, and compared MR of these varietal groups (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B60">Wang et al., 2020b</xref>). The results showed that there were no significant differences among varietal groups for MR, confirming that the ability to associate with and benefit from AM fungi has been maintained in modern crops (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B60">Wang et al., 2020b</xref>). In addition, the varietal group of modern hybrids inoculated with indigenous AM fungi exhibited the higher P acquisition and higher P use efficiency under field conditions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B60">Wang et al., 2020b</xref>). Thus, maximizing the benefits of indigenous AM fungi could be a useful way to enhance crop growth, thereby reducing the dependence of crop production on the addition of P chemical fertilizers.</p>
<p>Mycorrhizal responsiveness reflects the degree of the response of plants to AM colonization and the capacity to benefit from the symbiosis (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Janos, 2007</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B50">Sawers et al., 2010</xref>). MR is determined by the complexity of combinations of plant-funga environmental conditions, and the magnitude of MR exhibites great variation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B61">Yao et al., 2001a</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B62">b</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">Hao et al., 2008</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Berger and Gutjahr, 2021</xref>). Specifically, MR depends on root morphological, physiological, and mycorrhizal traits that are P uptake-related features [e.g., root length (RL) and root diameter (RD)] and the degree of MR differs widely among plant species and even among plant genotypes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Chu et al., 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Comas et al., 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">Kramer-Walter et al., 2016</xref>). For mycorrhizal traits, mycorrhizal colonization might be a useful parameter for breeding maize varieties with high MR (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Chu et al., 2013</xref>). Root external fungal structures and the internal to external hyphae ratio (IEHR) exhibited great variation among different varieties and these two indicators may also contribute to MR (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Chu et al., 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B51">Sawers et al., 2016</xref>). For root traits, poorly adapted varieties with limited ability to explore the soil (e.g., large diameter roots and poorly branched roots) often show a large performance increase with AM symbiosis (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Hetrick et al., 1992</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B46">Newsham et al., 1995</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Comas et al., 2014</xref>). Thus, breeding higher MR crop genotypes could be an important way to enhance mycorrhizal benefits. To explore the variation pattern of MR, based on greenhouse experiments of 20 wheat cultivars, a previous study firstly proposed that the release date of the cultivar could be a decisive factor (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Hetrick et al., 1992</xref>) and some later studies also verified the findings of this study (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B67">Zhu et al., 2001</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Chu et al., 2013</xref>). However, for other crops, such as onion, modern breeding practices did not change mycorrhizal responses (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">Galvan et al., 2011</xref>). A meta-analysis of studies from 1981 to 2010 found no evidence that new crop plant genotypes lost their ability to respond to mycorrhizae due to agricultural and breeding practices (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">Lehmann et al., 2012</xref>). Therefore, it is clear that previous mainstream study cannot draw a general conclusion about the effect of modern breeding on MR and, thus, study on specific species at different P levels is needed to better predict the MR of crop genotypes.</p>
<p>Cotton (<italic>Gossypium</italic> spp.) is an economically important crop worldwide, both in providing a significant amount of natural fiber for the manufacture of textiles and as an oilseed (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">Bao et al., 2019</xref>). Upland cotton (<italic>Gossypium hirsutum</italic> L.), which belongs to one of the four cotton species, currently accounts for more than 90% of global cotton fiber production. Xinjiang Province tops China in cotton planting areas and its cotton is famous for its long pile, good quality, and high output. In the past few decades, many cotton varieties have been cultivated in Xinjiang. AM fungi can colonize up to 90% of cotton root length and enhance cotton plant P uptake or fiber yield (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Cely et al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Eskandari et al., 2016</xref>). Unlike other crops, such as maize, cotton plants have fewer root exudates and, thus, depend on root morphological characteristics to obtain nutrients (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B58">Wang et al., 2010</xref>). Therefore, a study was planned to identify cotton genotypes highly responsive to AM fungal inoculation. The primary objective of this study was to determine how MR on a set of cotton genotypes has been affected by their release date from 1950 to present (&#x201C;old&#x201D; vs. &#x201C;modern&#x201D; genotypes) at different P levels (low vs. high). The second objective was to identify the relationship between MR and functional traits that are related to P uptake efficiency. Such information will provide useful information for future cotton breeding aimed at delivering crop genotypes that are less dependent on the input of P fertilizers.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S2" sec-type="materials|methods">
<title>Materials and Methods</title>
<sec id="S2.SS1">
<title>Study Site, Soils, and Experimental Conditions</title>
<p>A pot experiment was conducted in a glasshouse at the Cotton Experimental Station (44&#x00B0;17&#x2032;57&#x2033;N, 86&#x00B0;22&#x2032;6&#x2033;E, 400 m.a.s.l.) of the Xinjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences in Manasi County, Xinjiang, Northwest China. Soil was collected from field plots at the Cotton Experimental Station. The basic soil properties were pH 6.4 (water:soil = 5:1), Olsen-P 13.6 mg kg<sup>&#x2013;1</sup>, 0.658 g total P kg<sup>&#x2013;1</sup>, organic matter 44.10 g kg<sup>&#x2013;1</sup>,104.5 available K mg kg<sup>&#x2013;1</sup>, and total N 2.35 g kg<sup>&#x2013;1</sup>. Before the experiment, the soil was air dried, passed through a 2-mm sieve, and sterilized by &#x03B3;-irradiation with 25 kGy <sup>60</sup>Co.</p>
<p>The following mineral nutrients were mixed uniformly (kg<sup>&#x2013;1</sup> soil) with the soil before the start of the pot experiment: 200 mg N (as NH<sub>4</sub>NO<sub>3</sub>), 200 mg K (as K<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub>), 50 mg Mg (as MgSO<sub>4</sub>&#x22C5;7H<sub>2</sub>O), 5 mg Zn (as ZnSO<sub>4</sub>&#x22C5;7H<sub>2</sub>O), 5 mg Mn (as MnSO<sub>4</sub>&#x22C5;H<sub>2</sub>O), and 2 mg Cu (as CuSO<sub>4</sub>&#x22C5;5H<sub>2</sub>O). Each pot was 23 cm in height and 18 cm in diameter and contained 3 kg of sterilized soil.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S2.SS2">
<title>Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungal Inoculation</title>
<p>The indigenous AM fungal community (including spores and hyphae) was sieved from the farmland soil. To obtain sufficient AM fungal inocula, the indigenous fungal community in the soil was propagated in a 5:1 mixture (w/w) of zeolite and river sand with maize for 4 months in a greenhouse and the inocula contained spores (15 spores g<sup>&#x2013;1</sup> of soil), mycelium, and fine root segments. A 40-g dry weight AM fungal inoculum and sterilized inoculum were added to mycorrhizal and nonmycorrhizal pots, respectively. In addition, to correct for differences in other soil bacterial communities between the mycorrhizal and nonmycorrhizal treatments, a 10-ml soil suspension filtered from AM general inocula in deionized water was added to each nonmycorrhizal pot (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">Hodge et al., 2001</xref>) and 10 ml of deionized water was added to each mycorrhizal pot.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S2.SS3">
<title>Test Plants</title>
<p>A total of 24 cotton varieties were used as host plants: C-3174 (C3), KK-1543 (KK), 108 Fu (108), C-4744 (C4), Che 61-72 (CHE), Nongkeng 5 (N5), and TM-1 (TM) were bred in the 1950s and were considered the old genotypes; Tashigan 2 (T2), Xinluzao1 (Z1), Junmian 1 (J1), Xinluzao 2 (Z2), SuK 202 (SK), and Xinluzhong 4 (Z4) were bred between 1970 and 1990; Xinlu 201 (X201), Xinluzao 13 (Z13), Xinluzao 19 (Z19), Xinluzhong 21 (ZH21), Xinluzao 31 (Z31), Xinluzhong 35 (ZH35), Xinluzhong 40 (ZH40), Xinluzao 48 (Z48), Xinluzao 50 (Z50), Xinluzhong 54 (ZH54), and Xinluzao 57 (Z57) were bred after 2000 and were considered the modern genotypes (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="DS1">Supplementary Table 1</xref>). TM-1 is genetic standard line and the other 23 cotton varieties are hybrids.</p>
<p>In each pot, three cotton seeds (surface sterilized for 10 min in 10% H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> and germinated in the dark) were sown on May 26, 2017; they were thinned to one plant per pot after germination. During the experiment, deionized water was supplied daily to adjust the soil moisture content to 18% (w/w). The pots were placed in random blocks and rearranged every week. The plants were harvested on July 26, 2017.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S2.SS4">
<title>Experimental Design</title>
<p>The pot experiment was conducted under a complete factorial design. There were 24 cotton genotypes (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="DS1">Supplementary Table 1</xref>), two P levels (15 and 150 mg P kg<sup>&#x2013;1</sup> soil as KH<sub>2</sub>PO<sub>4</sub>, hereafter referred to as P15 and P150, respectively), and two mycorrhizal treatments (inoculation with indigenous AM fungi or not). An appropriate P level (P15) was set to meet the demand for P in cotton growth and an extremely excessive P level (P150) was set to detect the MR of cotton genotypes at different P levels. Each of the 96 treatment combinations was replicated four times to give a total of 384 pots.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S2.SS5">
<title>Harvest and Sample Analysis</title>
<p>Plants were harvested after 8.5 weeks. At harvest, shoots, roots, and soil were separately collected. Shoots were oven dried at 70&#x00B0;C for 3 days and weighed. Dry shoots were ground into powder with a grinder, 0.2 g of each sample was digested in H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub> and H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> solutions, and the ammonium molybdate colorimetric method was used to quantify the P content in the shoots (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B53">Thomas et al., 1967</xref>).</p>
<p>Roots were carefully removed from the soil, gently washed with deionized water, and stored at &#x2212;20&#x00B0;C. A series of root-relevant indicators, such as root length and diameter, were scanned and measured using the WinRHIZO scanning and image-recording system (EPSON 1680, WinRHIZOPro2004b). The &#x201C;percentage root length&#x201D; (PRL) indicated the percentage of the root length with different RD to the total root length. The PRL was calculated to reflect the distribution of root length in fine roots and thick roots. From the stored root subsamples, DNA was extracted from 0.1 g fresh cotton roots with the Plant DNA Isolation Reagent following the instructions of the manufacturer (Tiangen Biotech, Beijing, China). The AM fungal gene copies in roots were detected to assess the AM fungal root colonization rate (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B66">Zhou et al., 2020</xref>). The preparation of standards was performed according to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">Kiers et al. (2011)</xref>. Then, standard and sample DNA was amplified using the 12.5 &#x03BC;l Biomed q-PCR SYBR Mix (Toyobo, Japan), 1.0 &#x03BC;l BSA, 7.5 &#x03BC;l ddH<sub>2</sub>O, 1.0 &#x03BC;l forward primer [AMV4.5NF, 5&#x2032;-CGCCCGCCGCGCGCGGCGGGCGGGGCG GGGGCACGGGGGG (GC clamp) AAGCTCGTAGTTGAATT TCG-3&#x2032;], and 1.0 &#x03BC;l reverse primer (AMDGR, 5&#x2032;-CCC AACTATCCCTATTAATCAT-3&#x2032;) in a 25-&#x03BC;l reaction (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B49">Sato et al., 2005</xref>). PCR amplification was performed under the following conditions with a Q-TOWER (Jena, Germany, United Kingdom): DNA was predenatured at 94&#x00B0;C for 5 min, followed by 40 cycles of denaturation at 94&#x00B0;C for 30 s, annealing at 60&#x00B0;C for 45 s, and extension at 72&#x00B0;C for 1 min. After each cycle, the fluorescence was detected and the dissolution curve was collected. The DNA copy number of each sample was calculated according to the standard curve.</p>
<p>The soil remaining in each pot was fully mixed. Subsamples were air dried and used to determine the hyphal length density (HLD) (meters of hyphae per gram of soil). A 2-g soil were blended at high speed in a Waring Blender with 250 ml of deionized water for 30 s. The blended suspension was rapidly transferred to wide-necked Erlenmeyer flasks; these were agitated vigorously by hand shaking and left on the bench for 60 s. Duplicate 5 ml aliquots were pipetted onto 25 mm Millipore filters in a filtration manifold holding 10 filters. The filters were covered with lactoglycerol-trypan blue for 5 min and transferred to microscope slides to dry (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">Johansen et al., 1993</xref>). The HLD was calculated by recording the number of stained hyphae crossing the grid.</p>
<p>Internal to external hyphae ratio was used to indicate the relative length of the intra- and extraradical cellular mycelia (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Chu et al., 2013</xref>). IEHR was calculated as follows:</p>
<disp-formula id="S2.Ex1"><mml:math display="block" id="M1"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>IEHR</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mtext> </mml:mtext><mml:mo>&#x2062;</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mpadded width="+2.8pt"><mml:mi>Root</mml:mi></mml:mpadded><mml:mo>&#x2062;</mml:mo><mml:mpadded width="+2.8pt"><mml:mi>length</mml:mi></mml:mpadded></mml:mrow><mml:mo rspace="5.3pt">&#x00D7;</mml:mo><mml:mpadded width="+2.8pt"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">M</mml:mi></mml:mpadded><mml:mo rspace="5.3pt">&#x00D7;</mml:mo><mml:mpadded width="+2.8pt"><mml:mi>Root</mml:mi></mml:mpadded></mml:mrow><mml:mo>&#x2062;</mml:mo><mml:mpadded width="+2.8pt"><mml:mi>diameter</mml:mi></mml:mpadded></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mpadded width="+2.8pt"><mml:mi>Hyphal</mml:mi></mml:mpadded><mml:mo>&#x2062;</mml:mo><mml:mpadded width="+2.8pt"><mml:mi>diameter</mml:mi></mml:mpadded></mml:mrow><mml:mo rspace="5.3pt">&#x00D7;</mml:mo><mml:mpadded width="+2.8pt"><mml:mi>Hyphal</mml:mi></mml:mpadded></mml:mrow><mml:mo>&#x2062;</mml:mo><mml:mi>length</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
<p>where M refers to mycorrhizal colonization, assessed by AM fungal gene copy number.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S2.SS6">
<title>Mycorrhizal Responsiveness</title>
<p>In this study, MR included mycorrhizal growth responsiveness (MGR) and mycorrhizal P responsiveness (MPR). MR was defined according to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Janos (2007)</xref>:</p>
<disp-formula id="S2.Ex2"><mml:math display="block" id="M2"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>MR</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>M</mml:mtext><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mtext>NC</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
<p>where M is the trait value for colonized plants and NC is the trait value for noncolonized plants.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S2.SS7">
<title>Data Analysis</title>
<p>All the statistical analysis data were checked for homogeneity of variances using Levene&#x2019;s tests (<italic>p</italic> &#x003E; 0.05). The specific copy numbers of AM fungi were log-transformed before statistical analysis. The main effects of treatments and their interactions were tested using the three-way ANOVA (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="DS1">Supplementary Table 2</xref>). The two-way ANOVAs were carried out to test for the effects of P levels and cotton genotypes on MGR and MPR. Significant differences between the old and modern cotton genotypes in the P levels were compared by the Wilcoxon signed-rank test at <italic>p</italic> &#x2264; 0.05. Differences were statistically significant at <italic>p</italic> &#x2264; 0.05. Principal component analysis (PCA) was performed with R statistics using dudi.pca in the ade4 package (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">Dray and Dufour, 2007</xref>) using centered and scaled data to determine the relationships among plant traits and mycorrhizal traits.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="S3" sec-type="results">
<title>Results</title>
<sec id="S3.SS1">
<title>Mycorrhizal Colonization and the Hyphal Length Density</title>
<p>The AM fungal gene copy number in roots was detected to indicate the colonization of AM fungi. Quantitative real-time PCR analysis indicated that cotton plants inoculated with indigenous AM fungi were successfully colonized, while plants without inoculation were free of mycorrhizal association (CT values were not detected). Compared with the low P condition, the copy number of colonization with AM fungi was lower (low P, mean = 5.56; high P, mean = 3.74; <italic>p</italic> &#x003C; 0.05) (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="DS1">Supplementary Figure 1</xref>) and showed higher variation (low P, CV = 0.13, high P, CV = 0.23; <italic>p</italic> &#x003C; 0.05) at high P. However, the ability of the plants to form AM symbiosis still existed despite the high P supply. At both the P levels, AM fungal gene copy number significantly differed among the genotypes, reflecting the genetic diversity of cotton plants in response to mycorrhizal fungi (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="DS1">Supplementary Figure 1A</xref>). To further distinguish the impact of the release date of mycorrhizal characteristics, 24 varieties were divided into three groups according to the date of breeding: 1950&#x2013;1960 (defined as the old genotypes), 1970&#x2013;1990, and 2000 to present (defined as the modern genotypes, <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="DS1">Supplementary Table 1</xref>). Based on release date, the root AM fungal gene copy number tended to gradually increase at high P, whereas at low P, the root AM fungal gene copy number did not show distinct variation with the release date of the cotton varieties (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figure 1A</xref>).</p>
<fig id="F1" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 1</label>
<caption><p><bold>(A)</bold> Arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungal gene copy number and <bold>(B)</bold> the hyphal length density (HLD) of cotton varieties inoculated with indigenous AM fungi under low or high phosphorus (P) supply. The groups (and bar patterns) are as follows: 1950&#x2013;1960 (red), 1970&#x2013;1990 (yellow), and 2000 to present (blue). We define those from &#x201C;1950&#x2013;1960&#x201D; and &#x201C;2000 to present&#x201D; as the old and modern varieties, respectively. Boxes show first quartile, median, and third quartile. Whiskers extend to the most extreme points within 1.5 &#x00D7; box lengths and the points are values that fall outside the whiskers. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test was carried out among different groups and the <italic>p</italic>-value is marked.</p></caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-12-780454-g001.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>The HLD reflected the successful extraradical mycelial growth of AM fungi outside the host root. The HLD of cotton without AM fungal inoculation was negligibly low. The growth of the HLD significantly decreased with the supply of P (low P, mean = 4.05 m g<sup>&#x2013;1</sup>; high P, mean = 2.85 m g<sup>&#x2013;1</sup>; <italic>p</italic> &#x003C; 0.05) (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="DS1">Supplementary Figure 1B</xref>). The HLD significantly differs among the genotypes within each P supply and the HLD of ZH35 and C3 was always relatively higher at low or high P levels (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="DS1">Supplementary Figure 1B</xref>). Notably, at both the low and high P, the modern genotypes had the higher HLD than the old genotypes, corresponding to the results of AM fungal gene copy number (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figure 1B</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S3.SS2">
<title>Root Architecture Characteristics</title>
<p>All the root traits were significantly affected by variety, AM fungal inoculation, and P supply level (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="DS1">Supplementary Table 2</xref>). Mycorrhizal inoculation had a significant positive effect on root development, remarkably enhancing RL, specific root length (RD &#x003C; 0.2 mm), and root surface area (RS) for all the genotypes (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="DS1">Supplementary Figure 2</xref>). Furthermore, at low P, the modern varieties without AM fungal inoculation exhibited greater RL, specific root length (RD &#x003C; 0.2 mm), and RS than the old varieties (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="DS1">Supplementary Figure 2</xref>). At high P, when inoculated with AM fungi, the old varieties exhibited greater RL, specific root length (RD &#x003C; 0.2 mm), and root surface area than the modern varieties (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="DS1">Supplementary Figure 2</xref>). Mycorrhizal plants had significantly more thin roots (RD &#x003C; 0.2 mm) and significantly fewer thicker roots (RD &#x003E; 0.4 mm) at both the low and high P (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figure 2</xref>). Interestingly, there was no significant difference in the PRL between the old and modern cotton genotypes when inoculated with AM fungi, suggesting that AM-mediated dynamics in the root traits remained the same despite the release date (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figure 2</xref>).</p>
<fig id="F2" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 2</label>
<caption><p>Box plots showing the percentage root lengths (PRLs) with different root diameters (RD) for the total root length of cotton genotypes grown under low <bold>(A)</bold> or high <bold>(B)</bold> P supply and with or without inoculation with indigenous AM fungi. The groups (and bar patterns) are as follows: 1950&#x2013;1960 (red), 1970&#x2013;1990 (yellow), and 2000 to present (blue). We define those from &#x201C;1950&#x2013;1960&#x201D; and &#x201C;2000 to present&#x201D; as the old and modern varieties, respectively. Boxes show first quartile, median, and third quartile. Whiskers extend to the most extreme points within 1.5 &#x00D7; box length. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test was carried out between the old and modern varieties or between with and without inoculation with indigenous AM fungi and the <italic>p</italic>-value is marked.</p></caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-12-780454-g002.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
<sec id="S3.SS3">
<title>Modern Cotton Genotypes Benefited More From Plant-Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi Association</title>
<p>A total of 24 cotton genotypes released in different dates, from the 1950s to the 2010s, were evaluated for MR with the inoculation of indigenous AM fungi (M) or without inoculation (NC) (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="DS1">Supplementary Table 1</xref>). Both the shoot dry weight (SDW) and shoot P (SP) content were significantly affected by genotypes, mycorrhizae, and P levels, but their interactions were not significant for SDW (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="DS1">Supplementary Table 2</xref>). For all the cotton genotypes, SDW increased with greater P addition without AM fungi, indicating that the plants were in P demand condition at low P supply (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="DS1">Supplementary Table 3</xref>). In the presence of mycorrhizae, all the varieties exhibited enhancement in SDW and SP, irrespective of P supply, suggesting that mycorrhizae were beneficial for plant growth (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="DS1">Supplementary Table 3</xref>).</p>
<p>Mycorrhizal growth responsiveness and MPR were significantly affected by P supply levels and varieties and by the interaction of genotypes &#x00D7; P levels (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="DS1">Supplementary Table 2</xref>). There was an obvious distinction between the old and modern genotypes for MGR (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">Figure 3A</xref>). At both the P levels, all the chosen cotton varieties inoculated with AM fungi showed a positive MGR (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="DS1">Supplementary Table 3</xref>). At low P levels, the modern varieties, with a panel-wide MGR of 0.57 &#x00B1; 0.06 g (mean &#x00B1; SE), had significantly greater MGR than the old varieties, with a panel-wide MGR of 0.42 &#x00B1; 0.07 g (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">Figure 3A</xref>). Similar scenarios appeared under high P supply, in which the MGR<sub>modern varieties</sub> was 0.49 &#x00B1; 0.04 g, which was still significantly higher than the MGR<sub>old varieties</sub> (0.38 &#x00B1; 0.04 g) (<italic>p</italic> &#x003C; 0.05, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">Figure 3A</xref>).</p>
<fig id="F3" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 3</label>
<caption><p>Mycorrhizae-induced changes in shoot growth [mycorrhizal growth responsiveness (MGR)] and shoot P content [mycorrhizal P responsiveness (MPR)] for cotton varieties with different release dates under low <bold>(A)</bold> or high <bold>(B)</bold> P supply. The groups (and bar patterns) are as follows: 1950&#x2013;1960 (red), 1970&#x2013;1990 (yellow), and 2000 to present (blue). We defined those from &#x201C;1950&#x2013;1960&#x201D; and &#x201C;2000 to present&#x201D; as the old and modern varieties, respectively. Boxes show the first quartile, median, and third quartile. Whiskers extend to the most extreme points within 1.5 &#x00D7; box length. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test was carried out between different groups and the <italic>p</italic>-value is marked.</p></caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-12-780454-g003.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>Mycorrhizae-induced changes in shoot P content (MPR) had high variation within the released group dates, but these genotypes demonstrated no obvious specific pattern (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">Figure 3B</xref>). Plants inoculated with AM fungi had a high plant growth response, but with no observed increase in shoot P content, whereas the P concentration in the mycorrhizal plants was reduced compared with that in nonmycorrhizal plants (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="DS1">Supplementary Table 4</xref>). The reduced P concentration may be an indication of a dilution effect of P in mycorrhizal plants.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S3.SS4">
<title>Mycorrhizal Responsiveness Was Positively Correlated With the Hyphal Length Density at Low P</title>
<p>There were substantial variations in MR among genotypes belonging to the modern or old groups for MGR and MPR under both the low and high P supply. Considering the P status in arable land in China at present (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">Li et al., 2011</xref>), the modern genotypes that showed better MR at low P levels (Olsen-P was 25 mg/kg) were paid more attention to identify the genotypes with the highest MR, thus far released that demonstrated a strong relation with AM fungi and facilitated plant growth. The top five genotypes by MGR included C3, ZH35, Z19, Z31, and Z57, which are in bold (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="DS1">Supplementary Table 3</xref>). Notably, among them, four are modern genotypes, which clearly demonstrate that the modern genotypes are more mycorrhizal dependent on plant growth than the old genotypes.</p>
<p>To examine different attributes of cotton genotypes in response to low P and AM fungi, root morphology and mycorrhizal traits among 24 cotton genotypes were further analyzed. A PCA was performed using data specifically for the mycorrhizal plants at low P by integrating these data with plant growth and mycorrhizal response (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">Figure 4</xref>). In addition, the pairwise correlations among all the measurements were calculated (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">Figure 5</xref>). The first two principal components (PCs) captured 60% of the trait variation (PC1: 35%; PC2: 24%) and separated the 24 genotypes based on the magnitude of MGR rather than release date (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">Figure 4</xref> and <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="DS1">Supplementary Table 5</xref>). The SDW was associated in the PC space with AM fungal gene copy number, the HLD, and shoot P content (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">Figure 4</xref>, right upper quadrant and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">Figure 5</xref>), but not related to the PRL (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">Figures 4</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">5</xref>). To characterize P absorption efficiency, we plotted &#x201C;specific P uptake&#x201D; (SPU), which reflects P uptake in shoots by unit of root length. SPU was positively related to shoot P content (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">Figure 5</xref>). In this study, the ratio of plant P content to shoot biomass was used to indicate P utilization efficiency (PUtE). When the plants were mycorrhizal, PUtE was decreased and remarked negatively related to shoot P content (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="DS1">Supplementary Figure 3</xref> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">Figure 5</xref>). Placing the genotypes on the PC space, genotypes with high MR (bigger dots), including most modern genotypes, were separated from those with low MR (smaller dots) on the basis of PC2 (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">Figure 4</xref>). The second principal component (PC2) was mainly explained by the RL, RS, PRL (RD &#x003C; 0.2 mm), and the HLD (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="DS1">Supplementary Table 5</xref>). Combined with the results of direct calculation of pairwise relationships (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">Figure 5</xref>), RL and RS had a greater contribution to PC2, but no significant correlation with MR (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="DS1">Supplementary Figure 2</xref>). Overall, MR was positively associated with the HLD at low P (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">Figure 4</xref>). These results explained the higher MR of the modern varieties described above: the modern varieties were highly responsive to inoculation with indigenous AM fungi compared to the old varieties with the higher HLD in the inoculated plants.</p>
<fig id="F4" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 4</label>
<caption><p>Principal component analysis of plant growth, morphological traits, and mycorrhizal traits of 24 cotton varieties grown under low P supply and inoculated with indigenous AM fungi. Biplot showing scores in the first two principal components (PC1, <italic>x</italic>-axis; PC2, <italic>y</italic>-axis) for traits [red arrows: shoot dry weight (SDW), shoot P concentration (P conc.), mycorrhizal colonization indicated by AM fungal gene copy number (M), HLD, root length of different diameters, root diameter (RD), root length (RL), root volume (RV), shoot P (SP) content, P utilization efficiency (PUtE), and specific P uptake (SPU) in shoots by unit of root length]. In addition, we calculated the PRL, the percentage of the root length with different root diameters. Points are colored by release date. The size of point indicates the mycorrhizal growth response (MGR, g), calculated as the difference in SDW in colonized and noncolonized plants.</p></caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-12-780454-g004.tif"/>
</fig>
<fig id="F5" position="float">
<label>FIGURE 5</label>
<caption><p>Correlation matrix (Pearson) of SDW (g), SP content (mg), mycorrhizal responsiveness (MGR and MPR), root morphological traits, and mycorrhizal traits at low P levels. Blue circles indicate a positive correlation, red circles indicate a negative correlation, and the size and intensity of shading indicate magnitude. Correlations significant at <italic>p</italic> &#x003C; 0.05 are marked with an asterisk. Corresponding measurements of each abbreviation: mycorrhizal colonization indicated by AM fungal gene copy number (M), HLD, RS, total RL, PUtE, SPU in shoots by unit of root length, mycorrhizal responsiveness (MGR and MPR), SDW, and SP content. In addition, we calculated the PRL, the percentage of the root length with different diameters.</p></caption>
<graphic mimetype="image" mime-subtype="tiff" xlink:href="fpls-12-780454-g005.tif"/>
</fig>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="S4" sec-type="discussion">
<title>Discussion</title>
<p>Extensive studies have revealed that MR and its trends based on release dates vary greatly among crop genotypes. For instance, the MR of old wheat cultivars was higher than that of modern wheat cultivars (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Hetrick et al., 1992</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">1996</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B67">Zhu et al., 2001</xref>). Nevertheless, MR for maize, tomato, and oats showed the opposite scenario (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">Koide et al., 1988</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">Bryla and Koide, 1998</xref>). Generally, the release date of a cultivar reflects the agricultural and breeding practices of its time (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">Lehmann et al., 2012</xref>). In the past few decades in Xinjiang, cotton breeding has mainly aimed to increase quality, fiber yield, and disease resistance, but has not considered how modern varieties interact with indigenous AM fungi. The data presented in this study showed that mycorrhizal colonization and the HLD of the modern cotton genotypes were relatively higher than those of the old genotypes at low and high P (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figure 1</xref> and <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="DS1">Supplementary Figure 1</xref>). The mycorrhizal colonization and the HLD of cotton genotypes developed between the 1980s and the 1990s exhibited an intermediate status between the old and modern genotypes (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">Figure 1</xref> and <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="DS1">Supplementary Figure 1</xref>). The 24 highly diverse cotton genotypes analyzed showed a positive response to AM fungi, irrespective of the initial soil P levels, indicating the ability of cotton to form a beneficial symbiosis with AM fungi (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figure 2</xref> and <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="DS1">Supplementary Table 3</xref>). The 24 cotton genotypes were divided into three groups according to release date, we noticed that MGR showed an increasing trend (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">Figure 3</xref>). Similar to maize, tomato, and oats (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">Koide et al., 1988</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">Bryla and Koide, 1998</xref>), the modern cotton genotypes benefitted more from plant growth in association with AM fungi than the old genotypes at both the P levels (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">Figure 3</xref>). Overall, the results indicated that release date had significant positive effects on the formation of AM symbiosis and on the MGR of modern cotton genotypes.</p>
<p>Enhancement of P uptake efficiency (PUpE) and PUtE is widely suggested as a target of crop breeding (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Hetrick et al., 1992</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B64">Zabinski et al., 2002</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">Lynch, 2011</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">Leiser et al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B48">Ros et al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B59">Wang et al., 2020a</xref>). Increase in shoot P concentrations and decrease in PUtE (defined as the inverse of P concentration) for wheat, maize, and <italic>Centaurea</italic> after AM fungal inoculation were common phenomena in previous study (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Hetrick et al., 1992</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B64">Zabinski et al., 2002</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B59">Wang et al., 2020a</xref>). This phenomenon has been described as luxury uptake in previous studies, but the term luxury uptake has no explanatory value (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Hetrick et al., 1994</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B64">Zabinski et al., 2002</xref>). A further explanation is that P uptake is not perfectly regulated over time and &#x201C;excess&#x201D; P can be used at later stages (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B59">Wang et al., 2020a</xref>). Compared with previous results above, the results in this study showed an opposite trend: decrease in shoot P concentrations and increase in PUtE in most cotton varieties after AM fungi inoculation (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="DS1">Supplementary Figure 3</xref> and <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="DS1">Supplementary Table 4</xref>). Mycorrhizal plants had higher biomass than nonmycorrhizal plants (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="DS1">Supplementary Table 3</xref>). AM fungi may provide other nutrients to plants and, thus, P is more dilute in the tissues. The reason for the increase in PUtE after inoculation remains to be explored.</p>
<p>Plant genotypes with different root structures and functions are crucial for understanding the large variation in MR from positive to negative (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Hetrick, 1991</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">Hao et al., 2008</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B63">Yucel et al., 2009</xref>). Traditionally, plant varieties with a confined and coarse root architecture, such as relatively low root hair density, large diameter roots, and short root hairs, obtain the greatest growth benefits from colonization by AM fungi (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">Brundrett, 2002</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">Ah, 2004</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B52">Smith and Read, 2008</xref>). Nonetheless, a meta-analysis combined previously published literatures indicated that the relationships between MGR and allocation to roots, RD, root hair length, and root hair density was statistically insignificant (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">Maherali, 2014</xref>). Similarly, a recent study indicated that magnitudes and directions of MR of 27 crops were diverse among crop species and were unrelated to the coordinated evolution with fine root traits (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B44">Martin-Robles et al., 2018</xref>). The particularity of the cotton root system is that it is mainly composed of fine roots: the abundance of fine roots (RD &#x003C; 0.4 mm) occupied more than 70% (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figure 2</xref>). But, for other crops, such as maize, the proportion of fine root length was 10&#x2013;20%, which was significantly lower than that of cotton (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B59">Wang et al., 2020a</xref>). When colonized with AM fungi, cotton plants had a notably higher abundance of roots with RD &#x003C; 0.2 mm, but a decreased abundance of roots with RD &#x003E; 0.4 mm, which was clear evidence that these root traits are functions of AM fungi (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figure 2</xref>). Plants need to invest more photosynthetically-fixed carbon to grow thick roots than thin roots (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">Kaschuk et al., 2009</xref>). When inoculated with AM fungi, the plants could then allocate more photosynthetically-fixed carbon to AM fungi and less photosynthetically-fixed carbon to roots (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B52">Smith and Read, 2008</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">Kaschuk et al., 2009</xref>). The reduction in carbon allocation to the root has led to the increased abundance of fine roots and the decreased abundance of thick roots in this study (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">Figure 2</xref>). Moreover, the MPR had a significant positive correlation with the abundance of root lengths with RD &#x003C; 0.2 mm. Altogether, cotton plants in association with AM fungi had a unique root morphological trait and a greater abundance of fine roots was a predictor of MPR. However, when combined with the nonsignificant relationship between fine roots and MGR (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">Figure 5</xref>), further experiments are needed to verify the stability of the relationship between the PRL and MR.</p>
<p>It has been suggested that the variation of plant genetic factors may influence the degree of AM fungal colonization and, thus, determine the variation in growth response to AM fungi. Much emphasis has been invested in study on the development of root-internal fungal structures, as more arbuscules may transfer more mineral nutrients, such as P, to the host plant (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">Lehmann et al., 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Chu et al., 2013</xref>). The length of root-external hyphae may reflect the ability to explore mineral nutrients from the root free soil. The recent study showed that the apparent benefits of AM fungi for plant growth and P uptake were correlated with the increased abundance of root-external hyphae rather than root colonization (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B51">Sawers et al., 2016</xref>). It was tempting to speculate that the extension of mycelium, coupled with the ability of AM fungi to absorb mineral nutrients, determined the response to AM fungi (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Jakobsen et al., 2001</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B51">Sawers et al., 2016</xref>). Considering that the relationship between MR and mycorrhizal colonization was nonsignificant, quantification of mycorrhizal colonization was not predictive of MR (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">Figure 5</xref>). Among all the 24 cotton varieties, the HLD was positively correlated with MGR and MPR in this study (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">Figure 5</xref>). The higher HLD of the modern cotton genotypes contributed to the increase in MR compared to the old genotypes. It is supposed that the variation of genetic factors between old and modern cotton genotypes may have a great impact on the supply of carbon to the AM fungi, which, in turn, affected the growth of root-external hyphae and even the magnitude of MR (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">Keymer and Gutjahr, 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Berger and Gutjahr, 2021</xref>). Overall, it could, thus, be suggested that the HLD is necessarily a good predictor of cotton growth response to AM fungal colonization.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S5" sec-type="conclusion">
<title>Conclusion</title>
<p>The results of this study show that modern cotton genotypes are more intensely colonized and more mycorrhizae responsive than the old genotypes. It can be concluded that modern breeding in Xinjiang Province has improved the association of cotton varieties with indigenous AM fungi. Thus, harnessing indigenous AM fungi as beneficial microbes presents a promising strategy to strengthen the functionality of AM symbiosis, thereby reducing the dependence of crop production on adding P chemical fertilizers and optimizing agricultural sustainability. Moreover, the HLD can be used as a proxy for the MR of cotton genotypes based on its correlation with MGR. These results provide useful information for future plant breeding programs aimed at developing crops that benefit from AM fungi.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S6" sec-type="data-availability">
<title>Data Availability Statement</title>
<p>The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="DS1">Supplementary Material</xref>, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S7">
<title>Author Contributions</title>
<p>GF, LW, and XW designed the experiment. LW, XW, and BM conducted experiments and completed the measurement of the experimental indicators. LW conducted all analyses, conceived figures, and wrote the manuscript. GF, LW, XW, AK, and KK contributed to revisions. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version of the manuscript.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="conf1" sec-type="COI-statement">
<title>Conflict of Interest</title>
<p>The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="pudiscl1" sec-type="disclaimer">
<title>Publisher&#x2019;s Note</title>
<p>All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<sec id="S8" sec-type="funding-information">
<title>Funding</title>
<p>This study was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (U1703232).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="S9" sec-type="supplementary-material">
<title>Supplementary Material</title>
<p>The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2021.780454/full#supplementary-material">https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpls.2021.780454/full#supplementary-material</ext-link></p>
<supplementary-material xlink:href="Data_Sheet_1.docx" id="DS1" mimetype="application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"/>
</sec>
<ref-list>
<title>References</title>
<ref id="B1"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ah</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2004</year>). <article-title>Magnolioid roots &#x2013; hairs, architecture and mycorrhizal dependency.</article-title> <source><italic>New Phytol.</italic></source> <volume>164</volume> <fpage>15</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>16</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1469-8137.2004.01193.x</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33873490</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B2"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bao</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hu</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Grover</surname> <given-names>C. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Conover</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yuan</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wendel</surname> <given-names>J. F.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Unraveling cis and trans regulatory evolution during cotton domestication.</article-title> <source><italic>Nat. Commun.</italic></source> <volume>10</volume>:<fpage>5399</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41467-019-13386-w</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31776348</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B3"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bender</surname> <given-names>S. F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wagg</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Van Der Heijden</surname> <given-names>M. G. A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>An underground revolution: biodiversity and soil ecological engineering for agricultural sustainability.</article-title> <source><italic>Trends Ecol. Evol.</italic></source> <volume>31</volume> <fpage>440</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>452</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.tree.2016.02.016</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26993667</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B4"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Berger</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gutjahr</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2021</year>). <article-title>Factors affecting plant responsiveness to arbuscular mycorrhiza.</article-title> <source><italic>Curr. Opin. Plant Biol.</italic></source> <volume>59</volume>:<fpage>101994</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.pbi.2020.101994</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33450718</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B5"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bethlenfalvay</surname> <given-names>G. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mihara</surname> <given-names>K. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Schreiner</surname> <given-names>R. P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mcdaniel</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1996</year>). <article-title>Mycorrhizae, biocides, and biocontrol, .1. Herbicide-mycorrhiza interactions in soybean and cocklebur treated with bentazon.</article-title> <source><italic>Appl. Soil Ecol.</italic></source> <volume>3</volume> <fpage>197</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>204</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/0929-1393(96)00092-3</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B6"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Brundrett</surname> <given-names>M. C.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2002</year>). <article-title>Coevolution of roots and mycorrhizas of land plants.</article-title> <source><italic>New Phytol.</italic></source> <volume>154</volume> <fpage>275</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>304</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1046/j.1469-8137.2002.00397.x</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33873429</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B7"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Bryla</surname> <given-names>D. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Koide</surname> <given-names>R. T.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1998</year>). <article-title>Mycorrhizal response of two tomato genotypes relates to their ability to acquire and utilize phosphorus.</article-title> <source><italic>Ann. Bot.</italic></source> <volume>82</volume> <fpage>849</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>857</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1006/anbo.1998.0768</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B8"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Busse</surname> <given-names>M. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fiddler</surname> <given-names>G. O.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ratcliff</surname> <given-names>A. W.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2004</year>). <article-title>Ectomycorrhizal formation in herbicide-treated soils of differing clay and organic matter content.</article-title> <source><italic>Water Air Soil Pollut.</italic></source> <volume>152</volume> <fpage>23</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>34</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1023/B:WATE.0000015335.32888.36</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B9"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Cely</surname> <given-names>M. V. T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>De Oliveira</surname> <given-names>A. G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>De Freitas</surname> <given-names>V. F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>De Luca</surname> <given-names>M. B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Barazetti</surname> <given-names>A. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dos Santos</surname> <given-names>I. M. O.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Inoculant of arbuscular mycorrhizal Fungi (<italic>Rhizophagus clarus</italic>) increase yield of soybean and cotton under field conditions.</article-title> <source><italic>Front. Microbiol</italic></source> <volume>7</volume>:<fpage>720</fpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3389/fmicb.2016.00720</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">27303367</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B10"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Chu</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yang</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Feng</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2013</year>). <article-title>Mycorrhizal responsiveness of maize (<italic>Zea mays L</italic>.) genotypes as related to releasing date and available P content in soil.</article-title> <source><italic>Mycorrhiza</italic></source> <volume>23</volume> <fpage>497</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>505</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00572-013-0492-0</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">23503868</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B11"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Comas</surname> <given-names>L. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Callahan</surname> <given-names>H. S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Midford</surname> <given-names>P. E.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Patterns in root traits of woody species hosting arbuscular and ectomycorrhizas: implications for the evolution of belowground strategies.</article-title> <source><italic>Ecol. Evol.</italic></source> <volume>4</volume> <fpage>2979</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2990</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/ece3.1147</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25247056</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B12"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Corkidi</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Allen</surname> <given-names>E. B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Merhaut</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Allen</surname> <given-names>M. F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Downer</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bohn</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2004</year>). <article-title>Assessing the infectivity of commercial mycorrhizal inoculants in plant nursery conditions.</article-title> <source><italic>J. Environ. Hortic.</italic></source> <volume>22</volume> <fpage>149</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>154</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.24266/0738-2898-22.3.149</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B13"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Dray</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dufour</surname> <given-names>A. B.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2007</year>). <article-title>The ade4 package: implementing the duality diagram for ecologists</article-title>. <source><italic>J. Inf. Sci</italic></source>. <volume>22</volume>, <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>20</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.18637/jss.v022.i04</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B14"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Eskandari</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Guppy</surname> <given-names>C. N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Knox</surname> <given-names>O. G. G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Backhouse</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Haling</surname> <given-names>R. E.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Improving mycorrhizal colonisation of cotton in sodic soils.</article-title> <source><italic>Rhizosphere</italic></source> <volume>2</volume> <fpage>48</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>50</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.rhisph.2016.08.003</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B15"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Foley</surname> <given-names>J. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Defries</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Asner</surname> <given-names>G. P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Barford</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bonan</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Carpenter</surname> <given-names>S. R.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2005</year>). <article-title>Global consequences of land use.</article-title> <source><italic>Science</italic></source> <volume>309</volume> <fpage>570</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>574</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1126/science.1111772</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">16040698</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B16"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Gai</surname> <given-names>J. P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>Z. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Feng</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>X. L.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi diversity and contribution to crop growth in agricultural fields.</article-title> <source><italic>J. Integr. Field Sci.</italic></source> <volume>7</volume> <fpage>41</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>45</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B17"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Galvan</surname> <given-names>G. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kuyper</surname> <given-names>T. W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Burger</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Keizer</surname> <given-names>L. C. P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hoekstra</surname> <given-names>R. F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kik</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Genetic analysis of the interaction between <italic>Allium</italic> species and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi.</article-title> <source><italic>Theor. Appl. Genet.</italic></source> <volume>122</volume> <fpage>947</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>960</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00122-010-1501-8</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21222096</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B18"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Godfray</surname> <given-names>H. C. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Beddington</surname> <given-names>J. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Crute</surname> <given-names>I. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Haddad</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lawrence</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Muir</surname> <given-names>J. F.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Food security: the challenge of feeding 9 billion people.</article-title> <source><italic>Science</italic></source> <volume>327</volume> <fpage>812</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>818</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1126/science.1185383</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20110467</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B19"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hao</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chen</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Christie</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>X.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>Response of two maize inbred lines with contrasting phosphorus efficiency and root morphology to mycorrhizal colonization at different soil phosphorus supply levels.</article-title> <source><italic>J. Plant Nutr.</italic></source> <volume>31</volume> <fpage>1059</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1073</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/01904160802115227</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B20"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hetrick</surname> <given-names>B. A. D.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1991</year>). <article-title>Mycorrhizas and root architecture.</article-title> <source><italic>Experientia</italic></source> <volume>47</volume> <fpage>355</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>362</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/BF01972077</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B21"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hetrick</surname> <given-names>B. A. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wilson</surname> <given-names>G. W. T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Cox</surname> <given-names>T. S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1992</year>). <article-title>Mycorrhizal defendence of modern wheat varieties, landraces, and ancestors.</article-title> <source><italic>Can. J. Bot.</italic></source> <volume>70</volume> <fpage>2032</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2040</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1139/b92-253</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B22"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hetrick</surname> <given-names>B. A. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wilson</surname> <given-names>G. W. T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Schwab</surname> <given-names>A. P.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1994</year>). <article-title>Mycorrhiza activity in warm-season and cool-season grasses &#x2013; variationin nutrient-uptake strategies</article-title>. <source><italic>Can. J. Bot.</italic></source> <volume>72</volume>, <fpage>1002</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1008</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1139/b94-126</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B23"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hetrick</surname> <given-names>B. A. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wilson</surname> <given-names>G. W. T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Todd</surname> <given-names>T. C.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1996</year>). <article-title>Mycorrhizal response in wheat cultivars: Relationship to phosphorus.</article-title> <source><italic>Can. J. Bot.</italic></source> <volume>74</volume> <fpage>19</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>25</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1139/b96-003</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B24"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Hodge</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Campbell</surname> <given-names>C. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fitter</surname> <given-names>A. H.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2001</year>). <article-title>An arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus accelerates decomposition and acquires nitrogen directly from organic material.</article-title> <source><italic>Nature</italic></source> <volume>413</volume> <fpage>297</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>299</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/35095041</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">11565029</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B25"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Jakobsen</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gazey</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Abbott</surname> <given-names>I. K.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2001</year>). <article-title>Phosphate transport by communities of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in intact soil cores.</article-title> <source><italic>New Phytol.</italic></source> <volume>149</volume> <fpage>95</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>103</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1046/j.1469-8137.2001.00006.x</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33853235</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B26"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Janos</surname> <given-names>D. P.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2007</year>). <article-title>Plant responsiveness to mycorrhizas differs from dependence upon mycorrhizas.</article-title> <source><italic>Mycorrhiza</italic></source> <volume>17</volume> <fpage>75</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>91</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00572-006-0094-1</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">17216499</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B27"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Jeffries</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gianinazzi</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Perotto</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Turnau</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Barea</surname> <given-names>J. M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2003</year>). <article-title>The contribution of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in sustainable maintenance of plant health and soil fertility.</article-title> <source><italic>Biol. Fert. Soils</italic></source> <volume>37</volume> <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>16</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00374-002-0546-5</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B28"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Johansen</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jakobsen</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Jensen</surname> <given-names>E. S.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1993</year>). <article-title>External hyphae of vesicular&#x2013;arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi associated with <italic>Trifolium subterraneum L</italic>.</article-title> <source><italic>New Phytol.</italic></source> <volume>124</volume> <fpage>61</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>68</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1469-8137.1993.tb03797.x</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B29"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Johnson</surname> <given-names>N. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wilson</surname> <given-names>G. W. T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bowker</surname> <given-names>M. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wilson</surname> <given-names>J. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Miller</surname> <given-names>R. M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Resource limitation is a driver of local adaptation in mycorrhizal symbioses.</article-title> <source><italic>Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.</italic></source> <volume>107</volume> <fpage>2093</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>2098</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1073/pnas.0906710107</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20133855</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B30"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kaeppler</surname> <given-names>S. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Parke</surname> <given-names>J. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mueller</surname> <given-names>S. M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Senior</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Stuber</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tracy</surname> <given-names>W. F.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2000</year>). <article-title>Variation among maize inbred lines and detection of quantitative trait loci for growth at low phosphorus and responsiveness to arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi.</article-title> <source><italic>Crop Sci.</italic></source> <volume>40</volume> <fpage>358</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>364</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2135/cropsci2000.402358x</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">34798789</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B31"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kaschuk</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kuyper</surname> <given-names>T. W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Leffelaar</surname> <given-names>P. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hungria</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Giller</surname> <given-names>K. E.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>Are the rates of photosynthesis stimulated by the carbon sink strength of rhizobial and arbuscular mycorrhizal symbioses?</article-title> <source><italic>Soil Biol. Biochem.</italic></source> <volume>41</volume> <fpage>1233</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1244</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.soilbio.2009.03.005</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B32"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Keymer</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gutjahr</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Cross-kingdom lipid transfer in arbuscular mycorrhiza symbiosis and beyond</article-title>. <source><italic>Curr. Opin. Plant Biol.</italic></source> <volume>44</volume>, <fpage>137</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>144</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.pbi.2018.04.005</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29729528</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B33"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kiers</surname> <given-names>E. T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Duhamel</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Beesetty</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mensah</surname> <given-names>J. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Franken</surname> <given-names>O.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Verbruggen</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Reciprocal rewards stabilize cooperation in the mycorrhizal symbiosis.</article-title> <source><italic>Science</italic></source> <volume>333</volume> <fpage>880</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>882</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1126/science.1208473</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21836016</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B34"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Koide</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lewis</surname> <given-names>J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Irby</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1988</year>). <article-title>Role of mycorrhizal infection in the growth and reproduction of wild vs cultivated plants.</article-title> <source><italic>Oecologia</italic></source> <volume>77</volume> <fpage>537</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>543</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/BF00377271</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28311275</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B35"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Kramer-Walter</surname> <given-names>K. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Bellingham</surname> <given-names>P. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Millar</surname> <given-names>T. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Smissen</surname> <given-names>R. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Richardson</surname> <given-names>S. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Laughlin</surname> <given-names>D. C.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Root traits are multidimensional: specific root length is independent from root tissue density and the plant economic spectrum.</article-title> <source><italic>J. Ecol.</italic></source> <volume>104</volume> <fpage>1299</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1310</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/1365-2745.12562</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B36"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lehmann</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Barto</surname> <given-names>E. K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Powell</surname> <given-names>J. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rillig</surname> <given-names>M. C.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2012</year>). <article-title>Mycorrhizal responsiveness trends in annual crop plants and their wild relatives-a meta-analysis on studies from 1981 to 2010.</article-title> <source><italic>Plant Soil</italic></source> <volume>355</volume> <fpage>231</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>250</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11104-011-1095-1</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B37"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Leiser</surname> <given-names>W. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Olatoye</surname> <given-names>M. O.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rattunde</surname> <given-names>H. F. W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Neumann</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Weltzien</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Haussmann</surname> <given-names>B. I. G.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>No need to breed for enhanced colonization by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi to improve low-P adaptation of West African sorghums.</article-title> <source><italic>Plant Soil</italic></source> <volume>401</volume> <fpage>51</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>64</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11104-015-2437-1</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B38"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lekberg</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Koide</surname> <given-names>R. T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Twomlow</surname> <given-names>S. J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <article-title>Effect of agricultural management practices on arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal abundance in low-input cropping systems of southern Africa: a case study from Zimbabwe.</article-title> <source><italic>Biol. Fert. Soils</italic></source> <volume>44</volume> <fpage>917</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>923</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00374-008-0274-6</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B39"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Huang</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Meng</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ma</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yuan</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Integrated soil and plant phosphorus management for crop and environment in China.</article-title> <source><italic>Rev. Plant Soil</italic></source> <volume>349</volume> <fpage>157</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>167</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11104-011-0909-5</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B40"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Liu</surname> <given-names>S. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Guo</surname> <given-names>X. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Feng</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Maimaitiaili</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fan</surname> <given-names>J. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>He</surname> <given-names>X. H.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Indigenous arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi can alleviate salt stress and promote growth of cotton and maize in saline fields.</article-title> <source><italic>Plant Soil</italic></source> <volume>398</volume> <fpage>195</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>206</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11104-015-2656-5</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B41"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Lynch</surname> <given-names>J. P.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Root phenes for enhanced soil exploration and phosphorus acquisition: tools for future crops.</article-title> <source><italic>Plant Physiol.</italic></source> <volume>156</volume> <fpage>1041</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1049</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1104/pp.111.175414</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21610180</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B42"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Mader</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Edenhofer</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Boller</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wiemken</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Niggli</surname> <given-names>U.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2000</year>). <article-title>Arbuscular mycorrhizae in a long-term field trial comparing low-input (organic, biological) and high-input (conventional) farming systems in a crop rotation.</article-title> <source><italic>Biol. Fert. Soils</italic></source> <volume>31</volume> <fpage>150</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>156</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s003740050638</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B43"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Maherali</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2014</year>). <article-title>Is there an association between root architecture and mycorrhizal growth response?</article-title> <source><italic>New Phytol.</italic></source> <volume>204</volume> <fpage>192</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>200</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/nph.12927</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">25041241</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B44"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Martin-Robles</surname> <given-names>N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lehmann</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Seco</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Aroca</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rillig</surname> <given-names>M. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Milla</surname> <given-names>R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Impacts of domestication on the arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis of 27 crop species.</article-title> <source><italic>New Phytol.</italic></source> <volume>218</volume> <fpage>322</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>334</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/nph.14962</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">29281758</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B45"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Muok</surname> <given-names>B. O.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Matsumura</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ishii</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Odee</surname> <given-names>D. W.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>The effect of intercropping <italic>Sclerocarya birrea</italic> (A. Rich.) Hochst., millet and corn in the presence of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi.</article-title> <source><italic>Afr. J. Biotechnol.</italic></source> <volume>8</volume> <fpage>807</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>812</lpage>.</citation></ref>
<ref id="B46"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Newsham</surname> <given-names>K. K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Fitter</surname> <given-names>A. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Watkinson</surname> <given-names>A. R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1995</year>). <article-title>Multi-functional and biodiversity in arbuscular mycorrhizas.</article-title> <source><italic>Trends Ecol. Evol.</italic></source> <volume>10</volume> <fpage>407</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>411</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S0169-5347(00)89157-0</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B47"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Oehl</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sieverding</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Mader</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Dubois</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ineichen</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Boller</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2004</year>). <article-title>Impact of long-term conventional and organic farming on the diversity of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi.</article-title> <source><italic>Oecologia</italic></source> <volume>138</volume> <fpage>574</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>583</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00442-003-1458-2</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">14714172</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B48"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Ros</surname> <given-names>M. B. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>De Deyn</surname> <given-names>G. B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Koopmans</surname> <given-names>G. F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Oenema</surname> <given-names>O.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Van Groenigen</surname> <given-names>J. W.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>What root traits determine grass resistance to phosphorus deficiency in production grassland?</article-title> <source><italic>J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci.</italic></source> <volume>181</volume> <fpage>323</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>335</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1002/jpln.201700093</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B49"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sato</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Suyama</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Saito</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sugawara</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2005</year>). <article-title>A new primer for discrimination of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi with polymerase chain reaction-denature gradient gel electrophoresis.</article-title> <source><italic>Grassl. Sci.</italic></source> <volume>51</volume> <fpage>179</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>181</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/j.1744-697X.2005.00023.x</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B50"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sawers</surname> <given-names>R. J. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gebreselassie</surname> <given-names>M. N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Janos</surname> <given-names>D. P.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Paszkowski</surname> <given-names>U.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Characterizing variation in mycorrhiza effect among diverse plant varieties.</article-title> <source><italic>Theor. Appl. Genet.</italic></source> <volume>120</volume> <fpage>1029</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1039</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00122-009-1231-y</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">20012933</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B51"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Sawers</surname> <given-names>R. J. H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Svane</surname> <given-names>S. F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Quan</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gronlund</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wozniak</surname> <given-names>B.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Gebreselassie</surname> <given-names>M. N.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2016</year>). <article-title>Phosphorus acquisition efficiency in arbuscular mycorrhizal maize is correlated with the abundance of root-external hyphae and the accumulation of transcripts encoding PHT1 phosphate transporters</article-title>. <source><italic>New Phytol</italic></source>. <volume>214</volume>, <fpage>632</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>643</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/nph.14403</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">28098948</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B52"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Smith</surname> <given-names>S. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Read</surname> <given-names>D. J.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2008</year>). <source><italic>Mycorrhizal Symbiosis</italic></source>, <edition>3rd Edn</edition>. <publisher-loc>New York, NY</publisher-loc>: <publisher-name>Academic Press</publisher-name>, <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>769</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/B978-012370526-6.50002-7</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B53"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Thomas</surname> <given-names>R. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sheard</surname> <given-names>R. W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Moyer</surname> <given-names>J. R.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1967</year>). <article-title>Comparison of conventional and autmated procedures for nitrogen phosphorus and potassium analysis of plant material using a single digestion.</article-title> <source><italic>Agron. J.</italic></source> <volume>59</volume> <fpage>240</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>243</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.2134/agronj1967.00021962005900030010x</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B54"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Thomson</surname> <given-names>B. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Robson</surname> <given-names>A. D.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Abbott</surname> <given-names>L. K.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1992</year>). <article-title>The effect of long-term applications of phosphorus-fertilizer on populations of vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in pastures.</article-title> <source><italic>Austr. J. Agric. Res.</italic></source> <volume>43</volume> <fpage>1131</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1142</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1071/AR9921131</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B55"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Tilman</surname> <given-names>D.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>1999</year>). <article-title>Global environmental impacts of agricultural expansion: the need for sustainable and efficient practices.</article-title> <source><italic>Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.</italic></source> <volume>96</volume> <fpage>5995</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>6000</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1073/pnas.96.11.5995</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">10339530</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B56"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Toju</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Peay</surname> <given-names>K. G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yamamichi</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Narisawa</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hiruma</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Naito</surname> <given-names>K.</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> (<year>2018</year>). <article-title>Core microbiomes for sustainable agroecosystems (vol 4, pg 247, 2018).</article-title> <source><italic>Nat. Plants</italic></source> <volume>4</volume> <fpage>733</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>733</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/s41477-018-0245-3</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30108297</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B57"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Vestberg</surname> <given-names>M.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kahiluoto</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wallius</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2011</year>). <article-title>Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal diversity and species dominance in a temperate soil with long-term conventional and low-input cropping systems.</article-title> <source><italic>Mycorrhiza</italic></source> <volume>21</volume> <fpage>351</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>361</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00572-010-0346-y</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">21085998</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B58"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>X. J.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Tang</surname> <given-names>C. X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Guppy</surname> <given-names>C. N.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Sale</surname> <given-names>P. W. G.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2010</year>). <article-title>Cotton, wheat and white lupin differ in phosphorus acquisition from sparingly soluble sources.</article-title> <source><italic>Environ Exp. Bot.</italic></source> <volume>69</volume> <fpage>267</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>272</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.envexpbot.2010.04.007</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B59"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>X. X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chu</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Feng</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kuyper</surname> <given-names>T. W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rengel</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2020a</year>). <article-title>Mycorrhizal impacts on root trait plasticity of six maize varieties along a phosphorus supply gradient.</article-title> <source><italic>Plant Soil</italic></source> <volume>448</volume> <fpage>71</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>86</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11104-019-04396-0</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B60"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>X. X.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Van Der Werf</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yu</surname> <given-names>Y.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Hoffland</surname> <given-names>E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Feng</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Kuyper</surname> <given-names>T. W.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2020b</year>). <article-title>Field performance of different maize varieties in growth cores at natural and reduced mycorrhizal colonization: yield gains and possible fertilizer savings in relation to phosphorus application.</article-title> <source><italic>Plant Soil</italic></source> <volume>450</volume> <fpage>613</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>624</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s11104-020-04524-1</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B61"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Yao</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>X. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Christie</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2001a</year>). <article-title>Factors affecting arbuscular mycorrhizal dependency of wheat genotypes with different phosphorus efficiencies.</article-title> <source><italic>J. Plant Nutr.</italic></source> <volume>24</volume> <fpage>1409</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>1419</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1081/PLN-100106991</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B62"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Yao</surname> <given-names>Q.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Li</surname> <given-names>X. L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Feng</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Christie</surname> <given-names>P.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2001b</year>). <article-title>Influence of extramatrical hyphae on mycorrhizal dependency of wheat genotypes.</article-title> <source><italic>Commun. Soil Sci. Plan.</italic></source> <volume>32</volume> <fpage>3307</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>3317</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1081/CSS-120001122</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B63"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Yucel</surname> <given-names>C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ozkan</surname> <given-names>H.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Ortas</surname> <given-names>I.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Yagbasanlar</surname> <given-names>T.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2009</year>). <article-title>Screening of wild emmer wheat accessions (Triticum turgidum subsp dicoccoides) for mycorrhizal dependency.</article-title> <source><italic>Turk. J. Agric.</italic></source> <volume>33</volume> <fpage>513</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>523</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3906/tar-0902-47</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">31411186</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B64"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zabinski</surname> <given-names>C. A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Quinn</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Callaway</surname> <given-names>R. M.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2002</year>). <article-title>Phosphorus uptake, not carbon transfer, explains arbuscular mycorrhizal enhancement of <italic>Centaurea maculosa</italic> in the presence of native grassland species.</article-title> <source><italic>Funct. Ecol.</italic></source> <volume>16</volume> <fpage>758</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>765</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1046/j.1365-2435.2002.00676.x</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B65"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>S.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Lehmann</surname> <given-names>A.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zheng</surname> <given-names>W.</given-names></name> <name><surname>You</surname> <given-names>Z.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Rillig</surname> <given-names>M. C.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2019</year>). <article-title>Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi increase grain yields: a meta-analysis.</article-title> <source><italic>New Phytol.</italic></source> <volume>222</volume> <fpage>543</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>555</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/nph.15570</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">30372522</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B66"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhou</surname> <given-names>J. C.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Chai</surname> <given-names>X. F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Zhang</surname> <given-names>L.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Timothy</surname> <given-names>S. G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Wang</surname> <given-names>F.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Feng</surname> <given-names>G.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2020</year>). <article-title>Different arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi cocolonizing on a single plant root system recruit distinct microbiomes.</article-title> <source><italic>mSystems</italic></source> <volume>5</volume> <fpage>e00929</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>e920</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1128/mSystems.00929-20</pub-id> <pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">33323417</pub-id></citation></ref>
<ref id="B67"><citation citation-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Zhu</surname> <given-names>Y. G.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Smith</surname> <given-names>S. E.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Barritt</surname> <given-names>A. R.</given-names></name> <name><surname>Smith</surname> <given-names>F. A.</given-names></name></person-group> (<year>2001</year>). <article-title>Phosphorus (P) efficiencies and mycorrhizal responsiveness of old and modern wheat cultivars.</article-title> <source><italic>Plant Soil</italic></source> <volume>237</volume> <fpage>249</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>255</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1023/A:1013343811110</pub-id></citation></ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>